 On April 12, 1961, the Soviet Union made history by sending the first man into space, a cosmonaut named Yuri Gagarin. For a long time after that, particularly after the space race ended, the Left made the joke that the Soviets won the space race but the U.S. “moved the goal-posts” by claiming reaching the moon was the true end-goal of the space race. Well, now, it seems cancel culture might ironically and inadvertently make the U.S. the retroactive winners of the space race. You see, a U.S. space industry conference, The Space Foundation, renamed a fundraising party from “Yuri’s Night” to “A Celebration of Space: Discover What’s Next,” citing recent events as the reasoning for it. Essentially, these people are trying to cancel Yuri Gagarin for no other reason than that he was Russian as a sort of political statement against the actions of the Russian government. Obviously, for anyone with a positive IQ, this is utterly ridiculous and achieves nothing but the very erasure of history that (ironically, in this case) the Soviet Union and the CCP were/are known for. So it’s no surprise to see Russian Cosmonaut Andrey Borisenko taking issue with this, warning that “A fight with history has started.” Arguably, this fight started long ago, and this is merely another battle in that overall fight, but there is no doubt that he is generally right. This is definitely a fight with history for no other reason apart from worthless virtue-signaling. Borisenko went on to explain, “Yuri Gagarin is not only our history, [he] is global history. They are trying to erase world history from the memory of everyone on Earth.” He added, “Such actions are indefensible… I suspect that in other events that will be held in the near future, related to the coverage of space exploration, space flights, the mention of our country will also be erased.” His suspicions are not unfounded, given cancel culture’s track history and the Left’s clear stance in opposition to Russia, which has only served as a scapegoat for them over the last couple of decades, and in particular in the last few years (Russian collusion hoax, anyone?). If other space conferences were to cancel Gagarin, again, they would ironically make the U.S. the retroactive winners of the space race, since they’d be completely erasing the history of our then-enemies in said race. And I doubt it would simply end with Gagarin, just as Borisenko suspects. This whole shebang is just another in a series of moronic moves by the Left with relation to Russia and Ukraine. For example, the fake news media made the false suggestion that Russia cosmonauts boarded the ISS “wearing Ukraine’s colors” of yellow and blue. The BBC, Bloomberg, The Times, and NPR all made the suggestion that these Russians were “taking a stand against Putin and his war”. As with all other things, this was b.s. from the fake news media, as mission commander Oleg Artemyev explained that the suits had been made six months prior to the mission (so LONG before this invasion), and noted that “Color is just color… It has nothing to do with Ukraine.” Furthermore, to outright push back against the narrative the fake news media was trying to present with this (the narrative being that Putin and his actions are extremely unpopular even amongst Russians), Artemyev went on to say: “In these days, even though we are in space, we are together with our president and people!” Such sentiment was seemingly shared by many Russians, who attended a huge Trump-like rally last Friday to express their support both for their president and country altogether (though the fake news media tries to claim this was a Soviet-style rally where people were forced to attend and cheer, once again signaling their utter hypocrisy, as well as just spewing opinions without facts as they could not verify if that was the case). In any case, I find it rather amusing, if still annoying, that cancel culture would target the first man in space just because of his nationality, thereby erasing his and his country’s history and making the U.S., the country they generally hate the most, the de facto winners of the space race retroactively. Hopefully, this will be undone some time soon, cancel culture be put to bed, and globalism utterly defeated and destroyed. Ecclesiastes 3:17 “I said in my heart, God will judge the righteous and the wicked, for there is a time for every matter and for every work.”
0 Comments
Pfizer Finally Released Data They Intended To Seal For 75 Years As Commies Distract With Ukraine3/3/2022  The Chinese coronavirus pandemic is pretty much over, but since the communists don’t want to face the consequences of their actions, they are trying to distract the world they decimated with the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Evidence of that is the fact that Pfizer, despite being persistent on sealing away the data they got on their toxic vaccines for 75 whole years, were forced to release their data now, practically in the shadows, as everyone else will be far more focused on Ukraine-Russia and the possibility for a larger conflict. But I don’t intend to let these bastards get away with it, and neither should you. So, I will dedicate the rest of this article strictly to focusing on the adverse effects of the vaccine that they released in their data. Brace yourself, this might be a long one. The PDF they released basically begins with explaining the timeline of them shipping their vaccines, which is from December 1st of 2020 to February 28th 2021. In roughly those first 3 months of shipping their vaccines worldwide, there was a total of 42,086 case reports which contained 158,893 adverse events. Searching for times when the FDA recalled something medical, I found that in September of 2018, all ReGen Series products had to be recalled, “due to reported adverse reactions,” read the FDA’s website. It’s not specified what adverse reactions there were or their severity, but if ReGen products (not necessarily a vaccine, but still within the realm of medicine, so it’s applicable) had to be recalled due to reported adverse effects, why wouldn’t the Pfizer (and presumably the other vaccines also have similar issues) shot also be recalled? Well, we all know why. In any case, let’s get to the actual effects. According to Pfizer’s data, in events reported in 2% or more cases, they found the following adverse effects:
And for those who might accuse me of trying to scare people with medical terms for relatively mild things, these are the terms that Pfizer used in their data. I literally had to look up these terms to define them. Now, one might look at this list and say that it doesn’t look so bad. Sure, you don’t want any of these things to happen, but they are not exactly life-altering or life-ending things, by-and-large. And that may, indeed, be the case. But we’re, unfortunately, just getting started. Those were the adverse effects listed by Pfizer. Now, here are the Adverse Effects of Special Interest (AESIs) listed by Pfizer:
Obviously, not all of these have the same chance of occurring within a vaccine-taker, but this is an extremely long list of adverse effects. For crying out loud, Pfizer even had to specify AEs of special interest, there were so many. And the bastards knew of this, likely for a very long time, and not only continued to ship these products, but still do so now. More than 40,000 cases with nearly 160,000 adverse effects, many of which can either utterly change someone’s entire life, or END their entire life. And this is JUST from Pfizer AND just from the first three months of data-gathering. What’s Moderna’s data looking like? Or Johnson & Johnson’s? Or any other vaccine manufacturer’s? Pfizer alone recorded over 40,000 cases and nearly 160,000 adverse effects, and it’s generally considered (by pro-vaccine morons, at least) to be the most “effective” vaccine, and thus, is perhaps the most popular one. Are Moderna’s numbers fairly similar? Are, in actuality, over 100,000 cases and roughly 400,000 adverse effects across all the vaccines? What do the numbers look like today? What’s the death toll of these butchers? How many lives have they ruined or ended as a result of their evil? And for those who might try to argue that this is “just” from 2% or more of the reported cases, keep in mind that the world completely shut down and DEMANDED that it adhere to tyrannical dictatorships out of fear of a virus with a 0.007% mortality rate. Hell, even the originally thought 3.4% is around the percentage of events from the reported cases in Pfizer’s data. The figures for the virus’s mortality rate are important and noteworthy to the point of subjugating entire countries, but the figures for the vaccine’s adverse effects (which are bigger than the virus’s mortality rate) are unimportant and should be ignored? At the very least, by-and-large, you can recover from the virus far better than you could from what the vaccine will give you. Soccer players have either been forced into retirement or outright collapsed and died on the soccer field as a result of the vaccine. Athletes whom you’d think would have a better chance of fighting against the effects of the vaccine. Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, everyone who was/is involved in the destruction of people should and will face the consequences of their actions. Proverbs 28:5 “Evil men do not understand justice, but those who seek the Lord understand it completely.” If There’s Nuclear War, U.S. Government Advises Wearing Masks And Social Distancing In Bomb Shelters3/2/2022  I am NOT making this up. In the event that nuclear catastrophe occurs, billions die and the world is actually destroyed by the hands of man, those who are lucky enough to find themselves inside nuclear shelters must remember to wear a mask and social distance if sharing such shelter with non-family members. This is the unsurprising-for-this-regime’s priority in the case that Brandon screws up so badly that world leaders arbitrarily decide to call it a day for the human race. COVID is always the priority. Now, to be fair, this isn’t utterly new advice. This has actually been on the website Ready.gov since November 11th, 2020, three days after our election began to be openly stolen. For context, the website has advice on getting inside shelters and staying inside of them: “Get inside the nearest building to avoid radiation. Brick or concrete are best.” This is, of course, assuming you’ve survived the initial detonation to begin with. “Remove contaminated clothing and wipe off or wash unprotected skin if you were outside after the fallout arrived. Hand sanitizer does not protect against fall out. Avoid touching your eyes, nose, and mouth, if possible. Do not use disinfectant wipes on your skin.” “Go to the basement or middle of the building. Stay away from the outer walls and roof.” So far, relatively sound advice, I’d presume. Don’t know how applicable this would be to most people, and I don’t doubt that radiation could eventually make its way to people even inside brick or concrete buildings, but in such a devastating event, there is little that really matters anymore. Either you’re dead or you’re screwed in a post-apocalyptic wasteland with irradiated water, crops, and animals, as it applies. But as sound as advice that may be, here comes the sadly embarrassing part: “Try to maintain a distance of at least six feet between yourself and people who are not part of your household. If possible, wear a mask if you’re sheltering with people who are not a part of your household.” Now, I don’t know for sure, and searching “can viruses survive nuclear fallout” didn’t yield me any results, but I’m not so sure that the Chinese coronavirus would be able to survive nuclear war any more than humanity would. Even if it does, it’s far from a priority in such an event, for crying out loud. Aside from the already well-known facts of its non-lethality and the uselessness of masks, whoever manages to survive a nuclear explosion isn’t going to be worried about catching this or any virus. Well, maybe idiots in the Left coast would, but not anyone remotely sane. The virus isn’t an end-of-the-world event, nuclear war is. There are about a million other things you’d have to worry about before the darned Chinese coronavirus. Things pertaining to survival such as finding and staying inside a bomb shelter that could actually withstand modern nuclear arsenal and fallout. Things like having a large enough food supply and stable water supply that is separate from other water which could become contaminated. Things like having weaponry and ammo to protect yourself against those who will inevitably revert to raiding. Things like being able to adapt to the new state of the planet and trying to rebuild humanity. Only a stable society has the luxury to worry about pandemics. This advice, of course, was picked apart and mocked online for its sheer stupidity. One political commentator wrote: “’Wear a mask in the event of a nuclear fallout’… from the same government who told kids to hide under a desk in case of a nuclear bomb.” Which does bring up something interesting. Even back in the day, when we thought America was America, the U.S. government was pushing bullcrap on people. Everyone and their grandmother likely knew that a wooden desk in a school classroom would do absolutely nothing to protect the students in case of a nuclear detonation. “Oh, but it was probably done to keep the kids calm and not worry”. First, it was called the “Red Scare” for a reason; it was scary. Kids were undoubtedly scared either way. Second, do you know how you can achieve that without lying to kids and looking like utter morons? Telling the kids to pray. Supposedly, this was a more Christian country back in the day, so why not make that the number one advice for children? Why not be upfront with them and say that if there is a nuclear explosion outside of our school, the desks won’t do anything to protect you, but God certainly will. Not necessarily on Earth, but most definitely in Heaven. What/who would you rather trust? A shoddy wooden desk that has “Billy rulez and Stevie droolz” written on it with a pencil, or the Almighty God, Master of the Universe, Creator of Heaven and Earth? If kids see a nuclear explosion outside their schools, they’re going to be deathly afraid anyway, so that advice is less than worthless. At that point, they might as well trust in the safety and warmth of God than in the insecure confines of their cold desks. God should have always been the number one priority for this country, and the state it finds itself in is the result of failure to do so. Now, we have morons in elected and unelected offices who dictate that people should wear masks and MAINTAIN SIX FEET APART INSIDE NUCLEAR SHELTERS in the event of nuclear war. Let us turn to Him once again that we may undo the societal damage that has been created by the unbelievers. Psalm 91:1-2 “He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will abide in the shadow of the Almighty. I will say to the Lord, ‘My refuge and my fortress, my God, in whom I trust.’”  Two years ago, the world went mad. In a heartbeat, it did away with all forms of civil liberty and personal choice, demonizing those things as “dangerous” and “deadly”, and similarly doing so with anyone who advocated for such things. It went into an actually dangerous and ill-thought lockdown which wasn’t even effective and caused untold harm that, were anyone to point out, would warrant such a person being dehumanized and said to be “siding with the virus” or “putting the economy ahead of people’s lives.” I’d even seen someone on the Right make that last assertion of people who rejected the lockdowns. Now, two years later, with the boogeyman virus being shown to have been just that, lockdowns have largely been done away with, though we now must fight a different form of tyranny in the form of vaccine and mask mandates. However, I won’t be focusing on that aspect right now, and I’ve already talked plenty about those things anyway. Right now, I want to focus on the lockdowns aspect, and particularly in a long-time lockdown advocate working with the UK government who recently admitted that he and basically everyone who advocated for said lockdowns got it completely wrong. The lockdown advocate (or former, I guess) is Professor Mark Woolhouse, a member of the organization which advises the UK government on lockdown measures and made those extremely erratic models which depicted millions of Brits dying to the virus if absolutely nothing was done. Even just last year, the organization made the prediction, through models, that the Omicron variant of the Chinese coronavirus would cause 6,000 deaths a day in the UK unless even harsher restrictions were put into place. If you want exhibit #54564916 of models made by “experts” being utter crap, there you go. In any case, in a new book titled “The Year the World Went Mad”, Woolhouse expressed regret at his organization’s involvement in pushing for lockdowns, which caused massive devastation to people and, at best, only managed to slightly delay the inevitable. “We knew from February [2020], never mind March, that the lockdown would not solve the problem. It would simply delay it,” said Woolhouse, adding that no one in British government seemed to have recognized the flaw in the lockdown strategy. Right away, I have a few things to say. First, it seems people have forgotten what the original “stated” purpose of the lockdowns were. They were not originally meant to “solve” the problem or outright stop the virus completely. It eventually was used for such a purpose because there were loud majorities opposing the lockdowns and they wanted to fool the people who were either already supporters or on the fence about it that the lockdowns were so essential that they would be able to stop the virus completely. That is particularly where they got things wrong. But originally, the lockdowns were supposed to slow the spread of the virus. And the purpose of that was to avoid overwhelming the hospital systems and avoiding catastrophe. So it’s not surprising that he would admit that they knew from the beginning that the lockdown wouldn’t solve the problem, because in the beginning, no one was pretending that it would. But things really went off the rails when the liars in power began to say that this is what would happen. It went from “15 days to slow the spread” to “Two years to do the impossible”. That’s not to say that the lockdowns were justified in the beginning with that original stated purpose, because I’ve never justified stripping people’s freedoms away in such a manner, but the original purpose of the lockdowns was, at least “officially”, to slow the spread so that hospitals can prepare to treat patients and not be overwhelmed. The second thing I want to say about this is that, regardless of that original purpose, it still failed. Hospitals were never overwhelmed, to the point where Andrew Cuomo outright didn’t use a Navy hospital ship for non-Covid patients sent by President Trump, yet the fake news media kept insisting that they were. If the lockdowns were working, why was the fake news lying that the hospitals were overwhelmed? Those who dared to ask this question were demonized and deplatformed as sharing “misinformation”. Now, one might argue that the hospitals weren’t overwhelmed precisely because of the lockdowns, but there’s no way to actually verify that because, again, the fake news media was claiming the hospitals were being overwhelmed. As we would discover over time, the Chinese coronavirus was far milder and less deadly than originally thought. It didn’t go from 3.4% fatality to 0.003 fatality, it was always this non-lethal. It’s just that the “experts” found that it wasn’t really 3.4% deadly, but instead, far less. The world, courtesy of the “experts”, thought that the Chinese coronavirus could be something akin to the Plague. In reality, this virus was to the Plague as a Hot Wheels toy is to a racecar. It was nowhere near as bad as they were making it out to be, so in all likelihood, hospitals weren’t overwhelmed not because of the lockdowns but because of the mildness of the virus. The last thing I want to say about this is that I doubt no one in the British government didn’t see the flaw in this plan. Much as I think politicians tend to be morons, I don’t think no one saw that the lockdowns would be a bad thing. It’s just that no one had the courage to speak out about it because they would be persecuted to Hell and back for it, particularly back then. The “experts” were, and somewhat still are, treated as prophets and missionaries delivering the gospel of doom, and to go against them or express any sort of doubt – even just asking questions – was considered an act of heresy. So I doubt no one saw the foolishness of this plan in the UK government, but no one who did dared to speak out about it, which is a problem in itself. In any case, let’s move on to the rest of Woolhouse’s confession of his political and ethical sins. He continued “The early global response to the pandemic was woefully inadequate”, adding that the WHO’s praising of China’s tyrannical “zero COVID” policy set the stage for other equally tyrannical policies around the world. He asked why governments imposed such brutal restrictions seemingly without any regard or care for the consequences of such policies. “There was never at any stage, even by the following year, any form of analysis of the harms caused by lockdowns. Were they even considered? I haven’t seen any evidence that they were and that is very, very troubling.” While I am glad this guy’s changed his tune surrounding lockdowns, I am still incredibly pissed off at him for having advocated for such a thing anyway. Furthermore, he asks these things as though HE HIMSELF NEVER CONSIDERED THE REPERCUSSIONS. He asks why the government officials didn’t question the lockdown policies or considered the consequences of enacting them, yet he’s the one who ADVISED the UK government to impose such policies to begin with! Maybe at one point, he came to ask these questions and this is why he’s now admitting his wrongdoing, but he pretends as though he is a third-party individual who had no hand in what went on and was merely an observer. Like historians who ponder on the context and reasoning behind some historical person’s actions, he ponders on the actions of people in power today AS THOUGH HE HAD NO HAND IN INFLUENCING SUCH PEOPLE. You don’t get to ask “why did no one doubt the efficacies of this plan” when you yourself were selling this very plan to them. This would be like if Hitler had asked “why did no one tell me that killing 6 million Jews and 10 to 20 million total people was unethical?” You were pushing for it and, at the time, would’ve certainly repudiated any such doubt as “siding with the virus” and “being a danger to society.” It’s good that he’s admitting he was wrong, but he’s acting as though he didn’t push for this crap and was one of the biggest influencers of policy-makers at the time. And what comes next is even more infuriating. According to Summit News, as early as April of 2020, just ONE MONTH after the UK went into lockdown for the first time, Woolhouse’s organization was sent information which confirmed that the lockdowns would “cost three times more years than the disease itself” and that there was no consideration to the fact that “those over 70 had at least 10,000 times the risk of dying as those under 15 years old.” This is HORRIBLE for a couple of reasons. First, they knew basically from the start that the lockdowns would be WORSE for the UK than the virus itself, and the damage done to the country by the lockdowns would take three times the amount of years than the damage done by the virus. And still, the UK continued with its lockdowns, and proceeded to lockdown three or four more times after that. Either the organization held off on sharing this information with the government, which is horrendously unethical if not outright criminal, or the government was privy to this information and ignored it anyway, which is just as horrendously unethical if not outright criminal. Either way, the government and/or the organization advising on lockdowns completely and utterly failed the people of the United Kingdom and wittingly set them on the course towards suffering and diminishing freedoms for the ILLUSION of safety. The other reason, regarding the part about over 70-year-olds being more at risk, is that the fake news media and the UK government were pretending as though the virus “doesn’t discriminate” and is just as likely to kill a young and otherwise healthy person as it is of killing an old and sickly person. This was patently untrue, as was clear from the very beginning. Woolhouse said: “I heard [the official] argument caricatured as: everyone died, but at least no one was saved unfairly. BBC News backed up this misperception by regularly reporting rare tragedies involving low-risk individuals as if they were the norm.” The government and their fake news puppets were acting as if everyone was equally likely to suffer as a result of the virus and deceiving people into believing that. Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, this is what they chose to do. And everyone who tried to course-correct, show people who were either lying or were lied to that they were incorrect in their assertions, was utterly demonized, deplatformed and dehumanized for doing so. People were kicked off of social media, abandoned by friends, demonized by family and terminated from their jobs, if they hadn’t already been furloughed because of THE DAMN LOCKDOWNS. People trying to do the right thing, helping their fellow countrymen and human beings were treated as less-than-human and as though they were agents of the virus, killers like COVID and deserving of derision at best and destruction at worst. And now, two years after the fact, those who most strongly advocated for these lockdowns have seemingly come to recognize the damage they had done (even while seemingly pretending as though they had nothing to do with it, trying to absolve themselves of any well-deserved blame). I could say that I’m simply happy that things turned out this way, but I won’t because I’m not. These people caused untold generational harm to the world. Because of the consequences they either ignored or didn’t take into consideration, families are without children, brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers. COVID didn’t take their lives, depression did. Depression from being deemed “unessential” and losing their jobs. Depression from being forced to wear masks at school (a demonic practice still present in many schools) and separate themselves from their friends while they watch as their teachers and other adults can ignore the very mandates themselves with zero punishment whatsoever so long as they push the agenda onto others. And not just depression. How many abusive partners got a year and a half alone with their spouses and/or children? How many of them have had to suffer because an already unhinged individual is now being forced to spend all their time and energy with them? How many assaults went unreported? How many new scars were made? How much more trauma was inflicted? How many have been driven to drugs as a “coping” mechanism? To alcohol? How many have suffered as a result of that? How many OD’d? How many families will now have an empty seat at their table, not because their loved one died from a fairly non-lethal virus, but because they took an obscene amount of drugs to cope with the fact that they were forced into isolation, out of a job, etc? The damage done by these lockdowns is immeasurable and incalculable. Truly, only God knows the damage that was really done here. And these people just want to get away with “mea culpa”, if even that? Woolhouse knew very early on that the lockdowns would be more costly than the virus. Did he speak out against the lockdowns as soon as he found out this information? If not, why not? Why contribute to crimes against humanity that you KNOW are crimes against humanity? And make no mistake, that’s precisely what these things are. Not just the lockdowns, but every other mandate which was caused unknown suffering. People like Woolhouse should not be so easily forgiven. People like BoJo, Biden, Castro Jr., Merkel, Macron, everyone who pushed for these things are criminals deserving of the only justice appropriate for them. Nuremberg 2.0 will have to be 100 times the size of the original Nuremberg Trials, as the number of illicit perpetrators is far bigger than the few Nazis which were tried (and ashamedly, fewer who were convicted). Proverbs 24:24-25 “Whoever says to the wicked, ‘You are in the right,’ will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations, but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them.”  To provide a bit of context to the situation, recently, the crowdfunding platform GiveSendGo was hacked and revealed the names of nearly 100,000 donors who gave money to the Canadian Freedom Convoy truckers, about half of which were small-dollar donations. The piece of crap responsible for that went on to brag about it on TikTok, calling himself a “famous f***ing cyber-terrorist” during an unhinged rant. His name is Aubrey Cottle and supposedly the founder of hacktivist group “Anonymous” and is a crazy communist bastard who lives in Canada. And for those asking if this is committing the same “doxing” that this piece of crap (so tempted to say the stronger word) has led to doing, I’ll have you know that he is already rather famous, even having his own Wikipedia page. But I do hope that God will do something about this cancer of the world. In any case, Cottle isn’t the only cancer on this topic, because following this hack and the revealing of donors’ names, the evil fake news media tracked a number of these donors down and wrote the following type of email to them: “***, my name is ***. I’m a reporter at The Washington Post and am writing about leaked data on GiveSendGo contributions to the trucker convoy in Canada. Your name and email address are associated with a $40 contribution. Could you please tell me if this matches your records, and either call or reply to this email to share what motivated you to contribute to the campaign?” In essence, they are practically telling these people “we know who you are and can find out where you work, live, hang out and everything we want about you.” It’s a form of terrorism not unlike mafiosos showing up at your house and “having coffee.” The Post also wrote what Fox News describes as “a lengthy thread singling out the biggest donor and a map showing where the donations came from in the U.S.” The mainstream media is outright evil and unapologetic about it. They will track down anyone who voices a dissenting opinion and ruin their lives. And they will grossly claim they are doing a service either to the country or to their party. They are evil scum of the earth who deserve to lose their jobs and go to prison. One of the tweets concerning the GiveSendGo hack came from an Ottawa Citizen editor named Alison Mah who shared an article written by reporter Blair Crawford about a café owner who “was forced to shut down her business after receiving threats after her name appeared on the donor list,” reported Fox News. What’s worse is that Mah and the article ensured that the blame fell on the café owner, pointing out that she “regrets making her $250 donation to the trucker convoy.” It seems this act was so vile and putrid that even normally equally-as-putrid Ilhan Omar felt compelled to tweet: “I fail to see why any journalist felt the need to report on a shop owner making such a[n] insignificant donation rather than to get them harassed. It’s unconscionable and journalists need to do better.” Seems that Omar missed the memo and forgot she’s supposed to side with the evil communist scum Stalinizing Canada and the U.S. But if she’s sincere about this (making this an exceptionally rare case of a far-Leftist goon showing a modicum of a conscience), that ought to show just how vile and evil an act this was. The news media in the U.S. and Canada have sought to it that they would track down and RUIN people’s lives over donations as small as $40. Donations made for the sake of brave truckers who 1) are sick and tired of the tyrannical bullcrap of vax mandates and 2) inadvertently proved that the pandemic is over because it’s been weeks of people mass gathering without masks and vaccines and not one trucker was sent to the ICU. But because they are in the way of the Left’s fever dream of complete domination over their own countries, the government and far-Left media have sought to demonize them as racist terrorists (because racism always has to be a part of it, even when it makes absolutely no sense) whose livelihoods and lives ought to be ruined until they get “re-educated”. Aubrey Cottle, The Washington Post, The Ottawa Citizen, Justin Castro, the bitch councilwoman who keeps calling the truckers “terrorists”, Canadian Banks and everyone involved in the attempted destruction of freedom-loving, ACTUAL peaceful protesters not only should, but WILL burn in Hell for a whole lot more than just this. These people are evil, and do whatever they can to showcase that evil. I pray to God that He will smite these demons sooner rather than later. Romans 12:19 “Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.’” Hillary Clinton’s Schemes In 2016 Are So Obvious, Even Large Majority Of DEMS Want Her Investigated2/16/2022  I’ve mentioned in the past that ever since Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 Presidential election to President Trump, she’d become something of a ghost for the Democrat Party. She haunts them even in political death and is someone they wish they could just get rid of for good. And since special counsel John Durham has been releasing bombshell after bombshell surrounding her schemes back in 2016, more and more people, surprisingly including Democrat voters, have come to the opinion that she should be investigated for her actions. A poll taken last month, so before the most recent revelations from Durham that I will get to momentarily, from TechnoMetrica Institute of Policy found that 66% of Democrats surveyed want Durham to focus his investigation on Hillary Clinton, according to The Western Journal. TIPP often asks this same question, and even back in October, 44% of Democrats said they wanted Clinton investigated. And again, this was before the most recent bombshell from Durham, so one can only imagine how much higher it might be now. Back in September, Durham indicted Michael Sussman, a lawyer who represented the Clinton campaign, and was accused of lying to the FBI. And in December, Igor Dachenko, a contributor to the debunked Steele dossier, was charged with five counts of lying to the FBI. On February 11th, Durham expanded on the claims surrounding Sussman’s activity in a filing which “alleged lawyers for the Clinton campaign hired a technology company to infiltrate computer servers and lay a false trail that would implicate the Trump campaign of having contacts with Russia.” The charges also allege that Sussman, while he was doing this, was also working for the Clinton campaign, a claim which was unsurprisingly denied by Sussman. Furthermore, Durham claims that Sussman “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign.” In other words, Sussman brought up false evidence to the FBI not only for Hillary Clinton but also for a tech executive who likely has ties to the Clinton campaign and other Democrats, almost certainly including Clown-in-Chief Joe Biden. Naturally, I wish to learn just who this executive is (my money is on Mark Zuckerberg), and hope that Durham will also investigate that person. The filing also claimed that Sussman’s “billing records reflect” that he “repeatedly billed the Clinton campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations,” which all but prove his ties to the Clinton campaign as he was trying to defame then-candidate Trump. But we’re not even close to done with the new claims. The filing also claimed that Sussman and the aforementioned tech executive had met with another law partner who served as general counsel to the Clinton campaign, with Fox News reporting that said individual was Marc Elias from the law firm Perkins Coie, although there are other reports which claim that Sussman retained Lathan & Watkins LLP as the legal counsel. Why is this important? Because Liz Cheney’s husband is partner at Lathan & Watkins LLP, thus implicating their involvement, even if minimally, to the Clinton campaign’s crimes. Why does Fox News say it was Perkins Coie and not Lathan & Watkins? Do you really think RINO Fox News is going to screw over RINO Liz Cheney? In any case, the filing also said that in July of 2016, Sussman and his colleagues began to “assemble the purported data and white papers. In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data.” “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.” “Tech Executive-1,” continued the filing, “tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia. In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain ‘VIPs’, referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign.” But this PALES in comparison to the final bombshell claim made by the filing. Finally, the filing claims that Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited domain name system internet traffic regarding “(i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP),” with the firm Tech Executive-1 having “come to access and maintained dedicated servers” for the Executive Office of the President as “part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP,” said the filing, adding that “Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.” In other words, Trump was 100% right once again, as his wires really were “tapped.” Not only were Trump Tower and other Trump buildings tapped, so was THE WHITE HOUSE WHILE TRUMP WAS PRESIDENT AND PRESIDENT-ELECT. This is MAJOR and indicates a major security breach. This is a private company getting access to data from the highest office in the land, and basically getting the approval of Clinton and most certainly Obama as well to do this. While not for the same purposes, I consider this no less criminally contemptible to what Julius and Ethel Rosenberg did during World War II, and should receive no lesser a punishment. For context, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were spies who gave away American nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union, helping to facilitate their nuclear capabilities. They were charged with conspiracy to commit espionage for the Soviet Union and received the death sentence. Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, Michael Sussman, Marc Elias (potentially), Liz Cheney’s husband, Tech Executive-1 and everyone who worked for the Clinton campaign (to the level of knowing about these schemes, obviously not those at the lower levels) ought to face similar charges. Even just spying on Trump Tower and other Trump facilities is grossly criminal, but getting access to White House data is on a league of its own. There are people who are basically being treated like terrorists at Guantanamo Bay simply for having walked into the Capitol on January 6th, after they were basically welcomed inside by Capitol Police. So clearly, these historical buildings hold much significance to these people, and so breaching and “defiling” them ought to bring about serious punishment, no? What the Deep Staters did to Trump is more than a million times worse not only for Trump but the whole of the country than what peaceful protesters did on January 6th. These people deserve the chair, nothing less. And with these revelations being made, it’s not too surprising that even Democrats want to get rid of Hillary. Heck, they didn’t even want her in either 2007/08 or in 2016. She’s the most disliked, or even hated, woman in America and for good reason. Now, even a large majority of Democrat voters want her investigated for her actions in 2016 (which, no doubt, could trigger other investigations, like the Uranium One deal). And no doubt, this ought to also lead to both Barack Obama and Brandon being investigated. They deserve to be investigated, charged, tried, and found guilty of a lot more than just their involvement in spying on Donald Trump. But this, hopefully, would at least be a step in the right direction towards justice. Proverbs 21:15 “When justice is done, it is a joy to the righteous but terror to evildoers.”  As evil people insist on injecting poison into the streams of everyday citizens, we can see and, in unfortunate cases, experience the effects of that poison happen. One such instance occurred recently during a comedy show in Tempe, Arizona where comedienne Heather McDonald was the main attraction. During just her second joke of the night, she began to say the following: “I’m vaxxed, double vaxxed, boosted… and flu shot and shingle shot and haven’t gotten COVID and Jesus loves me most,” before collapsing on the stage immediately after. Because of the nature of the joke, and because of the known side-effects of it that the evil people wish to insist isn’t actually a side-effect, people thought her collapsing was part of the bit and she was making some sort of social commentary on how one might believe the shots are good for you but can cause such terrible things to happen. However, it was not part of the bit. According to TMZ, an EMT and a nurse “happened to be in the audience… they rushed up on stage to provide first aid.” A spokesperson for McDonald, knowing very well that her collapsing would obviously be because of the vaccines which she was proudly claiming she got, said that she “may have lost consciousness because of dehydration.” A dubious claim, at best, as again this was just the second joke of the night and whenever someone on stage is thirsty, they can ask a showrunner to give them some water. Often times, they will have water on stage anyway. Not to mention that, again, collapsing is a known side-effect of the jabs. According to National File, at least EIGHT soccer players experienced heart scares or collapses in 2021, with three of those eight having died as a result. And just last week, Greek soccer player Alexandros Lampis died from cardiac arrest just five minutes into a game. He was just 21 years old. People are getting seriously sick or outright dying while people ignore, and in some cases sickeningly joke, about the very cause of it. Dr. Peter McCullough, during a podcast with Joe Rogan, warned that myocarditis “has become at least 50% more common than predicted by” US health “experts”, according to Summit News. A 50% increase in anything related to heart issues is not just “coincidence” as evil people might try and claim. Numerous soccer players have collapsed during games, with too many of them dying as a result. All of them athletes, of course, meaning they are all in their physical peaks. 21-year-olds like Lampis don’t just suddenly die from cardiac arrests, especially if they are athletes. And with regards to McDonald, in a subsequent video recorded in the ER, she claimed that she’s “never, ever fainted in my life.” Likewise, many other people who have never, ever suffered the side-effects of the vaccine all of a sudden are, and we’re not allowed to talk about it seriously? I say that, but I really shouldn’t be surprised. The Left, the evil people I kept talking about, don’t care one wit about what happens to people. The vaccines, particularly the mandates, give them a sort of power they didn’t really have before. Not to mention that “scientists”, whom should really be referred to as “zealots”, are getting stinking rich off of telling people to inject poison into their streams. The reason I call them “zealots”, I will add, is because we are not allowed to question their “science”, lest we be regarded as “deniers.” It’s no different to religious zealots of the last millennia who would label you similarly for daring to question their misguided beliefs. Science that can’t be questioned isn’t science, it’s dogma. By definition, science has to be questioned in order to discover the truths of this world. Asking questions is science. Daring to challenge the status quo or the common belief about something is science. Keeping people from questioning things, therefore, is the antithesis of science. This is why I so often refer to Fauci as a sort of “bishop” for his own “faith.” That’s basically what he is. In essence, he is the “Pope” of idiots who clamor to their own erroneous definition of science. But reality is reality, and they can’t cancel reality. Soccer players and now a comedian have collapsed, some resulting in death, following getting a vaccine or a booster shot. Many other people who are less famous have also either gotten seriously sick or passed away, to the tune of tens or hundreds of thousands (unsurprisingly, the CDC stopped updating the VAERS count on this). And as a result, more and more people are pushing back against the Left’s b.s. In Canada, for example, you outright have thousands or more truckers protesting the communistic mandates. CANADIANS, who are stereotypically the nicest, softest people ever, are conducting a mass protest and winning, given that Trudeau is hiding like a little b and Ottawa city officials are trying to label them as “terrorists.” These people will lose, and lose badly. What happened to McDonald is unfortunate, but of her own accord. She CHOSE to get the shots and even brag about them (not to mention that whole “Jesus loves me most” part, which was insulting, to say the least, particularly since she’s an atheist) and suffered MILD consequences for it, compared to what others have gone through. For the sake of humanity’s very survival, these evil people must be defeated. Philippians 4:13 “I can do all things through him who strengthens me.”  The simple answer is “yes, there is a deliberate plan to destroy the U.S.” But that a politician from an entirely different country is wondering about this goes to show just how obvious it is for us here, at least those of us who are paying attention. For a bit of context, the new president responded to a tweet from The New York Post about commiedian Michael Rapaport’s Instagram video showcasing a local Rite Aid with empty shelves because of shoplifters which is closing down as a result. The NYP’s tweet said: “Michael Rapaport says UES Rite Aid now closing because of shoplifters.” To which El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele responded: “Is there a deliberate plan to destroy the United States from within? Why are the authorities and some of the media not even commenting on this (sic) things? Why are they letting their beautiful cities rot?” I already answered the first question, so I will move on to the second. The reason some authorities and media aren’t even commenting on this is because they are okay with what’s happening but know it wouldn’t be good to address it in a positive manner. The authorities were ordered to stand down or generally were handicapped in attempting to root out actual crime and have been told to arrest parents in parks and anyone not complying with the mayor or governor’s tyrannical orders. And if they do try to stop any of this, they will receive hatred from Antifa and BLM, if not outright threats, and potential punishment from the NYPD itself. And the media have an agenda to destroy American cities, are glad that these things are happening, but know better than to say anything about it. Even just reporting on it would be a bad idea because they know no one outside of their commie bubble would be happy to hear of this. Rampant crime in New York, Detroit, Chicago, Philly or any other Democrat-run city reflects poorly on the Democrats, so they sweep things under the rug regardless of the real damage their policies are causing. In New York, transit crimes are up 65.5% and all crimes are up by over a third in the first two weeks of 2022 compared to the same time in 2021. In Philadelphia, last month, a Democrat congresswoman was held up at gun point while in broad daylight at a park in South Philly, and had all her belongings stolen, alongside her car. And in Chicago, there were 797 homicides in 2021, the most of any city in the nation, and the highest number in nearly 25 years. Democrats have held the mayorship for nearly 100 years. Chicago also saw 3,561 shootings in 2021. These things, by and large, have to be ignored in some way. Obviously, it’s a lot harder to ignore a sitting congresswoman being held up at gun point, mugged, and carjacked in broad daylight, but they can keep pretending everything is fine anyway. Or just blame the guns, because these people are morons. Addressing the obvious faults of the Democrat policies hurts Democrats in one way or another. Even in deep blue cities where they are guaranteed to win elections anyway as a result of stealing, they can only get away with so much before they are Jacobin’d out of power. And as far as the president’s last question goes, they are letting their beautiful cities rot for their political agendas. They HATE the United States and wish to see it collapse. Even if they end up hurting those who moronically keep voting for them (legitimately), they will do whatever they can to hurt this country. They will deliberately damage this country and blame it on nationalism and capitalism, and claim that this wouldn’t have happened if we were under a globalist power. It’d be like smashing your iPhone to pieces with a hammer and blaming Apple for not making their products hammer-proof. But again, that a foreign politician can look at what’s happening in these cities and wonder if there is a deliberate plan to destroy America from within is a testament to just how obvious the Left has made it at this point. Their disdain for America is painfully obvious not only from their actions, but their words, as they constantly claim this to be a “racist” nation and it was founded based on racist principles roughly 150 years before its actual founding, as though this is the only country that ever had slavery. But this is why people like President Trump are as popular as they are. Americans love America, and we love anyone who loves America. We vote for anyone who loves America and particularly if they go on to show that both in words and in action once elected (which is unfortunately a rarity, but it’s getting better). The Left has been trying to destroy America for decades now, and thanks to God, they are very far from reaching their goals, even in this present situation. Biden is unpopular (50% want him impeached, including 34% of Democrats), the Democrats are screwed in November unless they can figure out a way to do this year what they did in 2020 (though with so many Democrats either retiring or announcing they won’t run again, I don’t think they’re very confident they can do that), and we will soon take our country back from the Deep State. Sooner than a lot of people, particularly them, would expect. Deuteronomy 20:4 “For the Lord your God is he who goes with you to fight for you against your enemies, to give you the victory.”  The Bible is the Word of God. The Word of God is inerrant, unmalleable and eternal. It begins with the established truth that God exists, necessarily, as Genesis 1:1 says: “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” It predetermines God’s existence in a universe devoid of anything, and depicts Him as the Creator of everything. Without God, there can be nothing, as something can’t come from nothing. Ex nihilo, nihil fit, or “out of nothing, nothing comes.” Us Christians understand this, at least when we put our minds to it, and trust in the Word of God as Truth. And this is not a blind trust either, as the Bible, if nothing else, is a basically reliable historical document, depicting stories and events throughout history which are backed by archaeological discoveries. The Word of God is Truth, and seemingly, this is what psychologist Jordan Peterson has come to realize very recently. Peterson appeared on a recent episode of Joe Rogan’s podcast, in which they discussed culture, society and the Bible, with Peterson saying that the Bible serves as the bedrock of culture. “If categories just dissolve, especially fundamental ones, the culture is dissolving, because the culture is a structure of category,” began Peterson. “That’s what it is. So and in fact, culture is a structure of category that we all share. So we see things the same way. But that’s why we can talk, I mean, not exactly the same way, because then we have nothing to talk about. But, roughly speaking, we have a bedrock of agreement. That’s the Bible, by the way. So, I just walked through the Museum of the Bible in Washington. That was very cool. It’s [a] very cool museum.” Joe Rogan then asked Peterson: “So the structure, that’s what the Bible provides?” To which Peterson gets into the meat of his argument and revelation: “Yeah, that’s what I figured out. I just figured this out this week. So it was a cool, it was cool thing to walk through, because it’s, it’s chronological, they have one floor, which is the history of the Bible… it’s really what it is, is the history of the book. Now, in many ways, the first book was the Bible. I mean, literally, because at one point, there was only one book, like, as far as our western cultures concerned, there’s one book. And for a while, literally, there was only one book. And that book was the Bible. And then before it was the Bible, it was, you know, scrolls, and it was writings on papyrus.” “And… we were starting to aggregate written texts together. And it went through all sorts of technological transformations. And then it became books that everybody could buy, the book everybody could buy, and the first one of those was the Bible, and then it became all sorts of books that everybody could buy. But all those books, in some sense, emerged out of that underlying book. And that book itself, the Bible, isn’t a book, it’s a library. It’s a collection of books.” “And so what I figured out was, partly because I was talking to my brother in law, Jim Keller… we were talking about meaning and text, because we were talking about translation and the problem of understanding text. And Jim said, the meaning of words is coded in the relationship of the words to one another, and the postmodernist make that case that all meaning is derived from the relationship between words. That’s wrong, because, well, what about rage? That’s not words. And what about moving your hand? That’s not words. So it’s wrong, but part of it is right, because the meaning we derive from the verbal domain is encoded in the relationship between words. So now, then you think, well, let’s think about the relationship between words while some words are dependent on other words, some ideas are dependent on other ideas, the more ideas are dependent on a given idea, the more fundamental that idea is… that’s a definition of fundamental.” Peterson then brings up the idea that, whatever texts exist in a civilization, there must be a fundamental text on which all the other texts depend, and that the Bible is said fundamental text. He brought up authors like Shakespeare, Milton and Dante for being part of the “Western canon”, as he put it, as they influenced other texts in the West. But even those books have the Bible at its base, as Peterson said. Peterson concludes his lengthy and rather round-about explanation by saying: “And so it isn’t that the Bible is true. It’s that the Bible is the precondition for the manifestation of truth, which makes it way more true than just true. It’s a whole different kind of true, and I think this is… not only literally the case, factually, I think it can’t be any other way.” What I believe Peterson to be arguing is that, in order for anything else to be true, the Bible must be the first and fundamental Truth. Whatever truth other books and texts provide must first be true according to God. For example, the truth of binary genders. There is only male and female, as Genesis 1:27 says: “So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” God never created “transgenders”, because there is no such thing as “transgender.” If you are male, you cannot become female, no matter what body deformations you put yourself through. The same is true of females. Any book which acknowledges the truth of binary genders, namely biology textbooks which haven’t been corrupted by their woke publishers, is thus speaking a truth which first relies on the Truth of Scripture. Another example is anything pertaining to other things which are uncontestably true, such as gravity, the sky being blue, the way human or animal bodies work, cellular biology, etc. Scientists may not all have everything figured out, at least when it comes to the scientific studies of the universe, but what they do say as truth is first dependent on the Higher Truth, or Ultimate Truth. For example, we don’t really know how black holes work, but we know they are there because God created black holes. As a result of that lack of knowledge, we can’t presently tell people whatever truth pertains to black holes apart from the fact that they exist and that they usually are formed when massive stars reach the end of their lifespans and implode, collapsing in on themselves and forming a small but massive black hole. Funny enough, in researching this very matter, I came across an article which talks about how black holes form, and it talks about two twists regarding what we know about black holes, only one of which is really important. It reads: “[I]t would take longer than the universe’s current age for black holes that started as dead stars to grow to galaxy-center-sized black holes. So astronomers also think the universe may have jumpstarted the process by creating giant primordial black holes in the moment just after the Big Bang – though this is just as weird and problematic as you might think.” One doesn’t really think it’s all that weird, let alone problematic, if one understands the Truth of God. The theory here is that black holes take longer than the universe’s current age to form into the massive black holes that we see at the center of galaxies, such as the one in the middle of the Milky Way, or the closest galaxy to us, Andromeda. As a result, the fact that such massive black holes not only currently exist but have existed for a very long time has godless scientists scratching their heads in confusion. How can it be that they exist if black holes take longer than the age of the universe to form? Assuming that their calculations are correct, both regarding the age of the universe and how long it takes for black holes to become that big or massive, the only logical explanation is close to what the article provides, though with a different source. God, not the universe, created giant primordial black holes after the Big Bang (or when God created the universe) to situate planets and solar systems, thus creating galaxies. Though regarding the age of the universe, God created Adam and Eve to be adults rather than mankind's usual starting age of infancy, so He could have created the universe to appear aged as well (either that, or age is an effect of sin, but that's a different discussion entirely). Regardless, God designed and created a universe that makes sense and isn’t random (for such a universe would be contradictory to the idea of intelligent design), and made things work in particular ways. He created the Earth to be habitable, created the animals which roam it, and created man and woman to live on it. He designed the other planets to not be habitable, as they were unnecessary for the purpose of creating life. Though, if He desired to, obviously, He could change that either gradually or immediately. Regardless, God created the heavens and the earth, and this is knowledge we derive both from the world we inhabit and the Word of God, which directly tells us so. The Word of God is Truth, and without it, nothing else can be. I am glad that Jordan Peterson is beginning to see the Truth of God and I hope this means that he is saved. Hebrews 4:12 “For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart.”  The press conference some people saw just a couple of days ago is precisely why Brandon is not allowed outside the basement for prolonged periods of time. In his first press conference in months, to mark the one-year anniversary of his successful heist of the 2020 election (or to do something about his pathetic approval numbers in even friendly polls), Brandon decided it would be appropriate to give a lengthy press conference and prove to the world why he is utterly unfit to be in the role that he is, whether they think he got it legit or not. There are two particular topics which were introduced in the press conference (with questions being pre-approved, making this even worse) which highlighted how much the Left and Deep State messed up in putting this guy in the White House: Russia’s imminent invasion of Ukraine and the 2022 midterm elections. Let’s begin with the first one. When asked what the U.S. and NATO response would be to a Russian invasion of Ukraine, Brandon said that it would depend on whether or not it was just a “minor incursion”. In other words, Putin is allowed to invade and take Ukraine little by little, but not all at once. Apparently, Brandon thinks real life is a video game and Russia can just immediately annex all of Ukraine and wouldn’t have to take it little by little. He was pressed multiple times on this issue to try and give a better answer, but he kept screwing it up. He even tried to speculate Putin’s motives and moves, but admitted that he’s “not so sure he is certain what he’s going to do. My guess is he will move in, he has to do something.” While it makes sense to try and make guesses and assumptions of what an opponent might do, this is saying the quiet part out loud. It’s like if Chamberlain had said “My guess is Hitler will move in on Poland to try and retake Danzig. He has to do something.” Even if you think this, there is no reason to say it to the public, particularly framing it with “he has to do something.” If you are intent on “protecting your allies” and “putting America back in its leading place in the world stage” as promised, you don’t say that your opponent “has to do something.” By doing this, he has allowed Putin to take charge of this issue. In any negotiations heretofore, Putin knows that the U.S. won’t do much of anything to protect Ukraine, allowing him to take as much as he wants diplomatically, or if need be, militarily. Regardless of how things go from here, this is just another major foreign policy blunder by the Brandon regime. He surrendered Afghanistan to the Taliban, trapping thousands of Americans inside and killing 13 of them while trying to get terrorists. Now, he’s basically doing the same thing to Ukraine and broadcasting it to the world in no uncertain terms. And make no mistake, China watched that press conference. Now that they know Brandon won’t bother to protect Ukraine, they’ll feel more emboldened to take Taiwan, possibly as soon as the Winter Olympics are over. But that’s just one of the major screw-ups of the day for Brandon. The second one even had pedo news network CNN bashing him. That being that Brandon questioned the legitimacy of the upcoming 2022 midterm elections. A reporter asked Brandon about supposed “voting rights legislation” in the Senate, asking “if this isn’t passed, do you still believe the upcoming election will be fairly conducted and its result will be legitimate?” The incoherent mess of a thief responded with: “It all depends on whether or not we’re able to make the case to the American people that some of this is being set up to try to alter the outcome of the election.” Since that obviously wasn’t a very good, or even clear, answer, another reporter brought this up again: “I just wanted to clarify: A moment ago, you were asked whether or not you believed that we would have free and fair elections in 2022 if some of these state legislatures reformed their voting protocols. (Sidenote, that’s not what the first reporter asked. The first one asked about the reform in the Senate, not the reforms from states like Georgia, so this one is trying to give Biden an out, which he doesn’t take). You said that it depends. Do you – do you think that they would in any way be illegitimate?” “Oh, yeah, I think it easily could be – be illegitimate… I’m not going to say it’s going to be legit. It’s – the increase and the prospect of being illegitimate is in direct proportion to us not being able to get these – these reforms passed.” In other words, he’s saying that if the Senate doesn’t pass his codifying of the cheating he did in 2020, the 2022 election won’t be legit. Of course, it’s utter bullcrap, as 1) he himself is guilty of rigging an election and 2) he gives way to the questioning of all other prior elections in the United States… including 2020. Think about it, he’s saying that if the Senate doesn’t pass these illegitimate election reforms, the 2022 election results might be illegitimate (likely because he knows he’s going to lose badly and is trying to get ahead of that). But that also means that, because these reforms haven’t been present in any prior election, all said prior elections might be illegitimate. This would be quite the claim to make, that all elections prior were illegitimate. Of course, he’s not directly saying this, but that’s what this all implies, that without those election reforms in the Senate, the midterms won’t be legit. And since they weren’t present for any prior election, that would therefore render all prior elections illegitimate. This blunder was so bad that, again, even CNN rebuked him for saying it. John King said: “It is striking to hear an American president not named Donald Trump raise questions about the legitimacy and sanctity of our democracy.” Jake Tapper said: “And quite strikingly, the President said that the upcoming midterm elections might not be legitimate if the election reform bills before the Senate are not passed… President Biden just said, with Donald Trump’s history when it comes to the big lie on the elections, but he refused to say that the election results this midterm – in these midterms in November would be legitimate. He refused it.” Dana Bash said: “Well, particularly the first part, Anderson, what he said, was – actually the entire thing, but the first part was probably the most jarring to hear a President of the United States who is not Donald Trump, even suggest ahead of time that an election isn’t legitimate.” You know it’s bad when CNN compares Biden to Trump. Now, of course, they are fake news, and the reasons for Trump’s questioning of the 2020 election were legitimate, unlike Biden’s. We saw, in real-time, Biden get boosted up in votes in some states, defying laws of logic and mathematics. We saw fraud happening in Georgia during the “water pipe” fiasco, with the suitcases filled with votes, with people being told they had already voted when they hadn’t, with people as young as 0 years old and as old as 150 appearing to have voted, with the Dominion voting machines being wiped of their data the day after the elections, with some states outright taking days and WEEKS to count their votes which was utterly unprecedented. Meanwhile, Brandon is complaining about the potential election results of 2022 because he’s doing a piss-poor job, is aware of it despite his apparent residence in Lalaland, and knows his Democrat allies are going to get rolled over in 2022, with him potentially being next in 2024, assuming he will even last that long, so he’s claiming that it won’t be legit unless his election-stealing “reforms” are passed. Like I said, this is why Brandon isn’t allowed outside the basement for prolonged periods of time. He’s even worse at screwing things up for himself than Hillary was. The more he talks, the worse things get for him. Though, to be fair, it’s not like maintaining radio silence was doing him any good. People can see and feel the awful job he’s been doing in his stolen position. Inflation reaching record-highs can be avoided in the fake news media, but not in people’s wallets. They can’t be lied to anymore by the fake news media about “how great a job” he’s been doing because they FEEL he’s doing a terrible job. Which is why his approval numbers are particularly awful in even friendly polls like Quinnipiac. And keep in mind, the people didn’t elect him and never really liked him to begin with. I don’t believe he’s even as popular as these polls show, particularly as a growing number of people (now at 58%) say they believe Biden cheated in 2020, which is up from 54%, with 57% supporting audits of the 2020 election. Brandon built his so-called “presidency” on a foundation of lies. As it turns out, he also built himself a house of cards. His end will come sooner rather than later, particularly if he’s managing to anger the people who put him in this position in the first place. Proverbs 3:35 “The wise will inherit honor, but fools get disgrace.” |
AuthorsWe bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free... Archives
May 2022
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed