There is this saying that people often say during an election year: “the things that will determine the results of the election have not happened yet.” Well, we are close enough to the election for that to not really be the case anymore, to a certain extent.
With RBG’s death, filling her seat has become the Democrat’s biggest reason for voting for Biden.
The old man hiding in a basement has no draw to him whatsoever. While the polls show he is “ahead” of Trump, enthusiasm never goes his way. People aren’t excited to vote for Biden, and even if they think they kinda just have to in order to avoid four more years of Trump, that won’t be enough to get a sufficient amount of votes for Biden to defeat Trump.
NO ONE is enthused about voting for Biden. But for those who understand the significance of this vacancy in the Supreme Court, such people are definitely enthused to go out to vote for whichever one of the two are most likely to win.
No one cares about Biden enough to go out to win, but people, particularly on the Left, care enough about the Court being liberal and care enough about their supposed “right” to kill the unborn that they would go out to vote for whomever would ensure such a “right” remains in place.
Now, one can make the argument that such a situation of another SCOTUS vacancy should be expected in the next four years and as such, whomever was not going to vote for Biden anyway will not do so this time around. However, we cannot expect Democrat voters to be reasonable or think that far ahead. It’s one thing to worry about the next four years if RBG would be alive – it’s quite another to have her die 45 days before the election. The issue is now at the forefront of the Democrat voters’ minds.
This issue alone can drive Democrats to vote for Biden. That’s why it would make absolutely no sense for the Trump administration or the Senate GOP Majority to dilly-dally on this. Trump will announce RBG’s replacement later this week, but the GOP Senate should not delay much at all about holding a confirmation hearing and a vote.
Now, on average, since 1988, the Senate Judiciary Committee has held a confirmation hearing 45 days after a nomination and a confirmation vote occurred on average 26 days after that. However, there is obviously far less time to do these things now and there is nothing in the Constitution saying there needs to be a hearing, particularly as some Justices were confirmed the day they were nominated. The last time that happened was 1945, which, all things considered, wasn’t that long ago.
While these things usually take some time, time is a commodity Trump and Republicans do not really have. Thankfully, there is precedent even going back just 40 years, of relatively quick confirmations. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor was nominated by President Reagan on August 19th, 1981. Just 21 days later, on September 9th, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a confirmation hearing which lasted for three days and was ultimately confirmed by the Senate on September 21st – just 33 days after her nomination.
Justice John Paul Stevens, the last Justice the Senate had voted to confirm prior to O’Connor, was nominated by President Ford on November 28th, 1975, and was confirmed on December 17th of the same year. Just 19 days.
And with the gift of the nuclear option given to us by Harry Reid and the Democrats, all that is necessary for a Supreme Court Justice confirmation is a simple majority. Usually, as there are 100 total Senators, that means 51 votes. But there are only 45 Democrats and 2 Independents (let’s assume they all vote the same way, since they usually do). Republicans have 53 votes. Even if Romney, Collins and Murkowski all do not vote to confirm whomever Trump picks, that still gives Republicans 50 votes and Democrats 47 – a simple majority. Assuming those three vote against Trump’s pick and the vote is split 50-50, the deciding vote goes to the President of the Senate: Vice President Mike Pence.
We can lose 6 Republicans and still get the nominee through via a Pence tie breaker. What we can’t have is 4 Republicans voting against the nominee, but I doubt that would happen. Murkowski and Collins said they wouldn’t vote, not that they would vote against the nominee.
So the votes, or even a lack thereof, are not a problem. The problem is the amount of time we have to fill the SCOTUS vacancy and take away the only thing that might actually get Democrats to go out to vote.
Again, no one is excited about voting for Biden. The only reason Democrats give to vote for him is that he’s “not Trump.” That kind of attitude is not a winning one, neither would it naturally lead to a Biden victory, especially as Trump’s own voting base has grown (I don’t believe for a second that there is anyone out there who voted for Trump, even if hesitantly, and changed their mind about him after the past four years. If anything, I KNOW there are more people out there who either did not vote for him who will this time or who voted hesitantly and have been convinced he deserves a second term).
One reason I write this article is because I have seen some conservatives (actual conservatives, mind you, not RINOs) who have argued that it would be a good thing to fill the vacancy after the election is over so that Trump supporters and Republicans are even more enthused to vote for Trump. That is a bad idea because those who are willing to vote for Trump are already enthused to do so or have made up their minds to do so. Leaving that vacancy open throughout the election gives Democrats a fire in the belly which they did not have previously.
Trump voters were already going to turn out in droves. No sense in giving the opposition a reason to come out for Biden.
So, while I do not know how fast the GOP-led Senate can hold a hearing for Trump’s pick and follow that up with a fairly quick vote, I know that there is precedent for a quick process even going back 40 to 50 years ago. And while that is a long time for rules to have changed, the Democrats gave us the gift of the nuclear option. It used to be that a supermajority of two-thirds, and at some points, three-fourths of the Senate were needed to confirm a nominee, but with the nuclear option, all that’s required is a simple majority. As far as the process goes, a nomination (obviously) and a confirmation vote (obviously) are necessary. But I cannot find anywhere that there is a minimum amount of time that needs to go by before a nominee can be confirmed, nor that a confirmation hearing must take place.
What’s more, even while the last relatively quick confirmation was 39 years ago, I do not think we were ever in the situation we are today: a Republican President getting to fill a SCOTUS vacancy roughly 40 days before an election, and the Senate is held by the party belonging to the President.
Call Republicans “hypocrites” all you want with wanting to go forth with this vote, but we all know that:
1) They are not hypocrites because Republicans held the Senate when a Democrat President wanted to fill Scalia’s seat and the Senate has to give advice and consent to doing so according to Article II Section 2: “… and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate…” and
2) Elections have consequences and the party in power should be free to exercise said power.
Voters put Trump, a Republican, in the White House in 2016. The President gets to nominate judges and Supreme Court Justices wherever there is a vacancy. Voters expanded the Republicans’ hold over the Senate, giving them a 53-47 majority. The Senate gets to vote to confirm or deny any such nominees. It’s not a constitutional crisis for the President and Senate to do their constitutionally appointed jobs.
There is no point in delaying any confirmation hearings or votes. I do not know all of the rules pertaining such a process but I know there is precedent for quick confirmation processes. Senate Republicans should follow such a precedent in this time, when it is necessary.
“You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit and that your fruit should abide, so that whatever you ask the Father in my name, he may give it to you.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
I have, for a long time, said that the biggest way in which the Left has managed to make relatively mainstream economic and political ideologies like socialism and communism (one and the same, really), is through the indoctrination of children in public schools.
Children are very malleable and the things that they learn early on are things that they carry with them the rest of their lives, even subconsciously. While not all children who are subjected to this indoctrination end up as little Marxist puppets later on, it does negatively influence a lot of people and that has major implications for the future of this country.
One of the pillars of power I have talked about in the past is education. The side which controls the education system controls the future of the country and the Democrats have controlled it for more than half a century now.
And things are only getting worse and worse in that respect, with freedom of speech being stamped out in college campuses by both staff and fellow students. Holding a conservative point of view in a college campus is bound to get one heavily reprimanded or perhaps even outright expelled.
Which is why it’s so important to have patriotic education in our schools which undo the heavy damage the Left has caused over the past few decades. Kids today are taught that America is a hellish landscape born out of racism and bigotry, created by slave owners for the benefit of slave owners, when nothing could be further from the truth.
Great men in history like George Washington, Christopher Columbus and Thomas Jefferson are marred as bloodthirsty bigots looking out only for themselves, when history shows that to not be the case at all.
The Left is straight up lying about the history of this country (it took me doing research on my own to discover that Columbus didn’t genocide Natives or that the first Thanksgiving was held by the pilgrims celebrating a successful harvest after having tried and failed with a socialistic system) so that people believe it is not worth defending against the idea of globalism or against the idea of fundamentally changing it.
After all, if you’ve been taught all your life that this country is fundamentally and systematically racist, then naturally, you would come to the conclusion that it should not exist or that it should be fundamentally changed. This is the ignorance that many carry with them because the modern school system is not designed to teach them the truth of our history (or other subjects, as even math is becoming politicized). However, there is good news on this front.
A recent Rasmussen poll showed that a majority of likely voters agreed with President Trump on the idea of instilling patriotic education into our schools.
According to the poll, 57% of likely voters agree with the following statement issued by Trump: “The only path to unity is to rebuild shared national identity focused on common American values and virtues of which we have plenty. This includes restoring patriotic education in our nation’s schools, where they are trying to change everything that we have learned.”
Only 30% disagree and 14% are undecided on this issue.
Unsurprisingly, this issue is largely a partisan one, as 78% of Republicans agree with Trump compared to just 43% of Democrats and 49% of unaffiliated voters.
This sort of split is completely unsurprising, though it is rather interesting that that many Democrats agree with this. I can only imagine those are the types of Democrats seeing where their party is headed and cannot bear to go along with it.
Furthermore, 53% of Republicans and 49% of unaffiliated voters (a plurality) think most school textbooks are more preoccupied with being politically correct as opposed to teaching accurate information. 51% of Democrats think the books are more focused on providing accurate information.
What’s more, 73% of all voters (different from likely voters) agreed with President Trump when he made the following statement in his Independence Day speech last year: “[T]ogether we are part of one of the greatest stories ever told – the story of America. It is the epic tale of a great nation whose people have risked everything for what they know is right.”
So clearly, the Left hasn’t completely won in the fight regarding education, which is as I thought. There are still plenty of people out there who are patriotic and who love this country, even if they are drowned out by those with megaphones who scream obscenities about this country and those who support it.
When professional athletes are paid tens of millions of dollars under this capitalistic system of ours kneel in a sign of defiance against the country that afforded them such lives of leisure, many will boo those actions because they are worthy of being booed.
This is not a nation that deserves such hatred and scorn. And no, I don’t buy it for a second that they aren’t protesting against the country as a whole. I don’t buy it that they are kneeling for the “injustices” of the current justice system. They kneel only during the national anthem. Not at any other point. They do it to disrespect the flag and the country.
It also doesn’t help them when they stand in solidarity with a sexual assaulter (Jacob Blake) or people who were defiant against the police, in some cases, to the point of trying to harm them. It doesn’t help when they support a Marxist organization which does not actually care about black lives.
But even the examples that I have shared here are examples of a system of indoctrination. These athletes have been told that this country is racist from an early age and they believe it. They keep hearing it over and over again and assume it must be true. They see particular situations through the lenses that have been given to them by the evil Left.
This is among the many reasons why we need patriotic education in our schools. We need to teach our kids the TRUTH about this country: that it’s not racist, it was not built by racists or for racists, and that it is the single best nation in the world and can be even better if there were no Leftist communists here to try and ruin it.
I’m glad that so many likely voters (the people that actually have some amount of influence in elections) are in agreement with Trump’s statement. I just wish that the number was considerably higher, but I suppose that would come once such patriotic education is actually implemented and the anti-patriotic education is completely stamped out.
“Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord, the people whom he has chosen as his heritage!”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
Before the rabid, cultish Left begins accusing me of “denying science” or claiming that I know more than scientists and experts (which, all things considered, I might, in some areas), allow me to explain the context behind this kind of story and roughly why it is that I believe I can explain what scientists can’t.
Furthermore, I believe a lot of objective, rational people could explain what scientists can’t in this instance.
But before I get to that, like I said, let me give you the context.
A recent New York Post article is titled: “Scientists can’t explain puzzling lack of coronavirus outbreaks in Africa.”
“The novel coronavirus has infected more than 26.35 million people, with just four countries accounting for over 15 million cases… Some [scientists] expected the African continent to be affected most heavily by the virus, but that wasn’t the case. South Africa stands out when it comes to the number of total cases, with nearly 631,000 infections. But fewer than 15,000 people have died of COVID-19. These figures are puzzling scientists looking to understand how the virus behaves and how it can be beaten.”
Before I bring in my own two cents about why this is happening, let me tell you what the scientists theorize could be the case.
Despite the fact that Africa is a very poor and densely-populated continent, two factors which were expected to lead to a disaster in the continent, the most infected country, South Africa, has a death rate seven times lower than the U.K.
Trying to figure out this phenomenon, the NY Post says that “one hypothesis that can explain the disparity between Africa and other continents concerns the overall age of the population. In general, the population of Africa is younger than in regions hardest-hit by COVID-19.”
This hypothesis is fairly sound, all things considered. Africa is pretty underdeveloped and the life expectancy in all of Africa is 63.24 years. For comparison, life expectancy in the U.S. is 78.93 years. It also makes sense because the virus hits hardest for those who are older, as the death rate jumps from 6.5% for those between the ages of 65-74 to 14.3% for those 75 and older. If the average life expectancy is even less than 65 in Africa, there is good reason to assume lower age is a factor here.
Of course, that is just a hypothesis, so it is not outright proven nor are scientists fully confident that that would be the entire reason (which is why they acknowledge their being puzzled by this).
Another hypothesis is that “other human coronaviruses that cause common colds can elicit an immune response that could provide protection against COVID-19. South African researchers went to work on that idea, attempting to analyze five-year-old blood samples that were conserved from a flu vaccine trial in Soweto. The plan was to look for any evidence that would explain why the African continent is faring much better against the illness than others. Those samples were compromised by technical issues that put a stop to the research.”
“But the idea still stands. The same crowded neighborhoods that would lead to the quick spread of other coronaviruses may have protected the population from SARS-CoV-2.”
So basically, the idea is that some other strains of the coronavirus, particularly the ones that cause common colds, could have provided some protection for people in Africa. The only issue here is that Africa isn’t the only continent in the world where people get the common cold. Just about everyone everywhere could get it, even if not necessarily to the same degree.
Here in the States, for example, when it’s flu season, people tend to get a flu shot (which is very strange that one supposedly needs to get one every year, since vaccines are supposed to work for far longer). Such shots are easy to get, which is not necessarily the case in less developed nations.
However, tens of thousands of people die every year from the flu in the U.S. and obviously, far more people get it. And yet, the U.S. is the global leader in terms of cases and deaths to COVID-19 (at least according to official estimates, which as I have already mentioned time and time again, are not really trustworthy, particularly as seemingly only 6% of these deaths are actually to the virus).
What I’m getting at is that I don’t know if this hypothesis is all that good, though there is merit to the idea of immunity from getting the virus in the first place.
At any rate, those are a couple of the hypotheses that scientists have regarding this phenomenon, at least according to the New York Post.
However, I have a little theory of my own regarding this. Before I say it, however, keep in mind that I am not a doctor, a scientist or in any way an expert on this issue. I bring this theory up simply because it makes a good deal of logical sense, particularly knowing other stories that suggest the same.
My theory is that the numbers are particularly low in Africa because of malaria, or more specifically, the drug used to treat malaria: Hydroxychloroquine.
According to the World Health Organization (let’s spare our thoughts about this garbage organization for the time being), in 2018, there were an estimated 405,000 deaths from malaria worldwide, with Africa accounting for 94% of those deaths.
Simply put, Africa is a hotbed for malaria and Hydroxychloroquine has been used to both prevent and treat it since 1944.
Given its frequent use to prevent and treat malaria, and given that the drug has been used to treat the Chinese coronavirus in other places with good results (even leading some Democrats who got the virus and were cured by the drug to go so far as to THANK Trump for his promotion of the drug), it’s perfectly logical to assume that people in Africa were given the drug and have seen great numbers as a result.
While South Africa is the standout example given the number of cases but relatively low number of deaths, it still ranks at number 8 most infected in the world, according to worldometers. The next highest African country on that list is Egypt at number 31, with a little over 100,000 cases, but fewer than 6,000 deaths. After that comes Morocco at number 43, with over 75,000 cases but fewer than 2,000 deaths. After that comes Ethiopia at number 49, with over 60,000 cases but fewer than a thousand deaths.
While it was expected that the poor, dense populations of African nations would cause a massive disaster for the continent, reality has been the exact opposite so far: Africa is doing better than all other continents.
And while it could come down to the relatively lower average age and possible immunization from other similar viruses, there is no doubt that HCQ has at least somewhat of a hand to play here. It is widely used in that continent to prevent and treat malaria, as I just explained, and it has shown that it can also treat the Chinese coronavirus both in anecdotal stories and in some actual scientific studies, much as people like Fauci (who has a financial interest in not promoting that drug) might argue against it.
A big reason I suggest that this is a possibility is because the other scientists in the NY Post article seemingly didn’t even think to bring it up, despite the fact that the drug has been widely used for other purposes as well for nearly 80 years in that continent. It’s like the scientists didn’t even bother to try and connect the dots on this.
Now, am I saying that the drug is definitely the number 1 reason for these incredible numbers in Africa? No, and I cannot say that because I’m neither a scientist nor have I run a research study to find whether that is the case or not. However, there is no denying the, at the very least, massive coincidence that Africa is seeing great numbers in fighting the virus and it also has been using HCQ for decades in its population for fighting malaria.
I’m not saying that HCQ is definitely the reason for these numbers but I also cannot disregard the drug as having some impact here, especially knowing that it has worked in other places for other people.
I just wish that this whole thing weren’t so politicized (by the Left) that a plausible treatment that could save lives is largely disregarded just because a prominent politician hated by the Left and the media is the one who promoted it. Trust me, if, say, Bill Gates or Obama had brought up the idea that HCQ could help treat the virus, the media would have promoted the drug as if it had been sent by God Himself and they would have praised whomever brought it up as not only a genius but possibly as a savior of humanity.
But just because it was Trump that brought it up, it has to be avoided as though the drug itself were the CAUSE of the disease. The Left will literally let people die just out of disdain for Trump and to keep him from getting some sort of victory, political or not.
Again, I cannot possibly claim that the drug is definitely what is leading to the numbers Africa is seeing because I’m not a scientist, but it is ludicrous that some actual scientists are putting politics or money before lives and disregarding a drug which has clearly been at least fairly effective in dealing with this virus JUST because of who brought up its possible use (and again, people forget that Grandma-killer Cuomo also promoted the drug before the virus became a political war).
I hope that more and more scientists begin exploring the possibility of using this drug more frequently, because if they cared at all about people, this is what they would do: explore all possibilities for helping people and not disregarding such possibilities just because a politician Leftists don’t like is the one who brought it up.
“And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
Back in April, I talked about a story that indicated Osama bin Laden was confident that, if he and al-Qaeda were to be successful in assassinating Obama and making Biden the POTUS, the United States would go into a crisis because, according to the now-dead terrorist, Biden is ‘totally unprepared’ to be the president.
Well, now, we seem to have a relatively similar story. The New York Post has a recent story out regarding one interesting person’s thoughts surrounding the November election and the effects of the results.
Noor bin Ladin (whose side of the family has always spelled their last name differently from the terrorist), the niece of Osama bin Laden, warned that another 9/11-type attack could occur if Joe Biden becomes president.
Bin Ladin said: “ISIS proliferated under the Obama/Biden administration, leading them to coming to Europe. Trump has shown that he protects America and us by extension from foreign threats by obliterating terrorists at the root and before they get a chance to strike.”
Yes, as you can tell, Noor is not exactly on the side of radical Islamic terrorism. Matter of fact, it’s just the opposite. While she seemingly does not follow any particular religion, she is very right-wing conservative, a supporter of President Trump (as you can see her above wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat) and a fan of Fox News’ Tucker Carlson.
The NY Post reports that bin Ladin, though she lives in Switzerland, considers herself “an American at heart”, had a “full-size US flag hung in her childhood room at age 12 and her dream vacation is an RV trip across America.”
She also has conservative views regarding things like Spygate, big tech censorship of conservatives, mask mandates, the historically inaccurate garbage that is the NYT’s 1619 Project and Cuomo’s fatal executive order sending sick people to nursing and retirement homes.
So it’s pretty safe to say that she is a massive supporter of President Trump and while she lives in Switzerland, is extremely patriotic for the United States. It’s pretty sad that the niece of the most hated and notorious terrorist of all time is considerably far more patriotic than most people in D.C.
At any rate, bin Ladin also said to the NY Post: “I have been a supporter of President Trump’s since he announced he was running in the early days in 2015. I have watched from afar and I admire this man’s resolve. He must be re-elected… It’s vital for the future of not only America, but Western civilization as a whole.”
She continued: “You look at all the terrorist attacks that have happened in Europe over the past 19 years. They have completely shaken us to the core… [Radical Islam] has completely infiltrated our society. In the US it’s very worrying that the left has aligned itself completely with the people who share that ideology.”
Indeed, it is very worrying that the Left aligns itself with radical Islamic terrorists, but it’s not exactly surprising. Both share the same goal of destroying the U.S., even if by different means (though considering the past few months of social and civil unrest and violence, those means are becoming more and more similar).
Regarding radical Islamic terrorism as a whole, that is something that is often ignored or forgotten about the Trump administration. ISIS is functionally inoperative in the U.S. The last time we had a relatively major terrorist attack (in which more than 4 people died) on U.S soil was back in 2017, in that Halloween day attack by a radical Islamic terrorist who stole a U-Haul truck and ran people over in New York City. Eight people died in that attack. Since then, the deadliest attack we have had (at the hands of Islamic terrorists, not domestic ones) was in late 2019 when a Saudi national shot and killed three people and injured 8 others at a naval air station, according to thereligionofpeace.com
According to the site, only 18 people total have died in a radical Islamic terrorist attack on U.S. soil since Trump became president. Compare that to the 116 people who died in a radical Islamic terrorist attack on U.S. soil during Obama’s tenure and the difference is clear.
“But Freddie, you’re comparing four years of Trump to Obama’s eight years. How is that fair?” Very well. Let’s look at Obama’s first four years in office. Looking at the data on the website from February of 2009 to January 15th, 2012, roughly the first four years of Obama’s first term, we find that 29 people died in a terrorist attack in that time span. This is particularly impressive (not the good kind, obviously) and horrendous because it means that in Obama’s second four years, 87 people were killed in U.S. soil to a radical Islamic terrorist attack.
So which four years would we rather look at, the one where 29 people died or the one were 87 people died? Either way, that is still more than what Trump has seen so far in his own three and a half years (granted, that still could change, but he’s been kicking major terrorist butt this entire time, so ISIS knows not to mess with him, which is the biggest reason Noor is saying what she’s saying).
Trump has practically destroyed ISIS and is a major threat to any and all radical Islamic terrorists. Noor knows this and understands that a Biden victory would mean going back to rampant terrorism in the U.S., likely seeing numbers closer to Obama’s last four years than his first four.
While there is plenty more I could say about Noor and her views, particularly with things such as her criticism of The Squad and Ilhan Omar specifically, I believe the point of this article has been made. A Biden presidency would be utterly disastrous for this country in every possible sense.
The economy would be in shambles, our rights and freedoms would be eroded, our safety compromised by domestic and foreign terrorists and particularly the safety of Trump supporters and all conservatives (which, at this point, basically means everyone who even slightly disagrees with the Leftist hive mind) would be in jeopardy.
Radical Leftists are already calling for our heads, basically, and have made numerous threats against Trump, his supporters and other conservatives (not to mention Rand Paul has already been attacked and Congressional Republicans were shot up in a baseball game by a Bernie supporter whom none on the Left denounced). Could you imagine the state of this country if these demons were in power?
We already see some of it which is why it’s so important to defeat them in every place we can. This means, of course, politically, but also socially and other pillars of power. We must take back our country from these monsters and that means defeating them intellectually, morally and spiritually.
Morality has been eroding in this country for a long time due to secularism. We see, today, people supporting the idea of letting children “change their gender” and undergo life-altering chemical “treatment”. We see people defending the genocide that is abortion. We see people beginning to defend the idea of political violence as a means to an end for the sake of communism. Heck, communism in itself is highly immoral due to what it brings, even if it is advertised as this great thing that everyone can benefit from (except, of course, for its political enemies including opponents, landlords, etc.).
Beating these ideas back and bringing about a Christian revival (which is not something we alone can do, of course, as it depends entirely on God to allow it) are the way in which we can defeat the Left and its horrible, Satanic ideas.
This, of course, means beating them politically and means soundly defeating Joe Biden, who I hope suffers the greatest political defeat in the history of mankind.
Returning to Noor, however, it is interesting that she has turned out to be a great patriot, even if not actually American, and a supporter of the president. Her story is interesting and the NY Post itself writes a good deal about it and goes on to explain what she went through following the 9/11 attacks perpetrated by her uncle.
I wish her well and, returning again to Biden, like I said, I hope he loses badly.
“Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
I have long held the belief that one cannot be a Christian and a Democrat at the same time and for very long. Either one is a Christian and momentarily a Democrat, before recognizing that Democrats are fundamentally anti-Christian and will leave the party, or one is a Democrat and calls himself a Christian, but holds Left-wing beliefs and values such as abortion, open borders, homosexuality, etc. and is not a true Christian whatsoever.
Seemingly, though perhaps not totally surprisingly, California megachurch pastor John MacArthur believes the same thing: one cannot be a Christian and support Leftist beliefs and people.
Grace Community Church pastor John MacArthur has been a recent example of a wartime Christian, choosing to fight an authoritarian dictatorship in Los Angeles which stands in clear violation of the Constitution by trying to force MacArthur’s church to remain closed and holding him and the church in contempt and violation of such unconstitutional orders.
The Satanic local government is trying to destroy the church’s ability to spread the gospel and MacArthur has actually decided to stand up to them for such a clear violation of his First Amendment rights.
Recently, MacArthur told the Falkirk Center that President Trump has recently reached out to the pastor and the two held a conversation on the “pillars of faith and their importance with regard to the upcoming election”, according to Fox News.
MacArthur explained: “We love God, we desire to honor Him, and upholding righteousness in a society is what a church is supposed to do. So I said, any real, true believer is going to be on your side in this election because it’s not just an individual, it’s an entire set of policies that Christians cannot, in any way, affirm.”
“We talked a little bit about why – certainly from a Biblical standpoint – Christians could not vote Democratic. Because there’s no way that a Christian can affirm the slaughter of babies, homosexual marriage, or any gross immorality. No way we could stand behind a candidate who’s affirming transgender behavior… these things aren’t even political for us… these things are Biblical.”
I could not agree more with MacArthur here (which is ironic, considering there are plenty of things that I disagree with him about, particularly on matters of eschatology). No true Christian believer could bring themselves to vote for Biden or any other radical Left Democrat.
What the Left believes runs contrary to what God teaches us and commands us to believe and follow. The Left believes in a government which replaces God, basically. Of course, it cannot actually do that, but their allegiance is to government, not to God, and they worship government, not God.
The Left believes in a woman’s “right” to kill her own baby, and they are moving closer and closer to arguing in favor of this even AFTER the baby has been born. Every Christian worth their salt knows that abortion is murder and murder is explicitly PROHIBITED by God, going all the way back to Cain. Murder is explicitly prohibited by the sixth commandment. To be at any capacity in support of abortion, at ANY stage in the pregnancy, is an affront to God and in support of plain, clear murder.
No Christian can, therefore, support abortion because to do so would be the effectual rejecting of God. Man is created in God’s image. Murder is the illegitimate elimination of said image (keep in mind the reason I say “illegitimate” here is because the death penalty is a legitimate elimination of a person, reserved only for the worst kind of criminal).
Homosexuality, transgenderism, and other sexual sins (including straight sex when done outside of marriage) are an abomination to the Lord and are wrong. God created Man and Woman to be together. Man and Man together is an affront to God, as is Woman and Woman. And, of course, this means that there is no “third” option for one’s own gender, no matter what the Satanist heathens might try and argue.
When a political party stands in such direct contradiction to the teachings of the Bible, how can anyone who proclaims to follow the teachings of the Bible then go on to vote for such a party?
Now, one might try and argue that Trump isn’t much better, though they can only argue in terms of personality, not in terms of systems of belief or policy. The ONLY argument Never Trumpers have nowadays is that he is supposedly a “deeply” flawed individual and has severe personal problems.
They claim that Trump is not exactly a good representative of Christ due to his Twitter fights and other supposed character flaws. Okay, but then, are we Christians supposed to wait for someone with a perfect personality, no issues or flaws whatsoever, if we are to vote for someone? Doing so would require us to wait for Christ Himself to run for POTUS, a position FAR beneath Him.
What, then, shall we do without Christ literally running Himself? Abstain from voting and wait until Christ runs? Vote for a party which clearly does not represent our beliefs?
Which is another thing right there: what sense does it make to vote for a party which very clearly does not represent your beliefs over a party or candidate which does?
Some people might try and argue that the Bible doesn’t say that Christians are Republicans or Democrats, which is obvious considering the two parties were created roughly TWO MILLENNIA after Christ, but again, I ask, what sense does it make to vote for a party which does not represent your beliefs over a party which does?
That’s not to say that the GOP is a perfect representative or even that all or even most in the party are such representatives of Christian values (GOP establishment types come to mind as inherently non-representative of Christian values). However, no one can honestly tell me that the Democrat Party better represents Christian values than the Republican Party.
“Oh, well, they support and believe in charity!” the ignoramus will argue. No, they don’t. Their celebrities will virtue signal because being depicted as charitable is good for PR. Their politicians will often not donate a lot of their income to charity (and considering Trump donates 100% of his Presidential income to charity, he’s hard to beat on that front) and argue that charity is communism and vice versa, when it is not.
Charity is the willful giving of your things to another who needs it more. Communism is the state forcing you to give up your things (like land, other possessions, and rights) supposedly for “the greater, communal good”, which at the end of the day is simply the government.
So, if the Democrat Party stands in such clear contradiction to the values taught to us by Christ, what reason does any true believer have to vote for a Democrat over a Republican (provided the Republican is a better representative of Christian beliefs)?
“Oh, but God is loving and Trump is hateful, just look at the wall he’s trying to build to separate us with our fellow humans south of the border,” the ignoramus will continue. Yes, God is loving, but He is also just. When one breaks the law, that person must be punished. Illegal immigrants break the law; they must be punished and their actions deterred. God doesn’t let people get away with breaking the law, even Man’s law, provided Man’s laws do not contradict God’s Law.
Also, Trump is not hateful. That he wants to prioritize American citizens is not an act of hate. That he wants to see justice for people who have been negatively affected by illegals – people who shouldn’t even be here and have NO RIGHT to be here – is not a sign of hatred from Trump. Does Trump love people like God does? No, because God’s love is agape love, meaning “the highest form of love and charity”, which is a form of love inaccessible to mankind, at least for one another. We have philia love, brotherly love, and filikos love, or neighborly love, but not agape love because that is a love relationship between God and man.
So Trump fundamentally cannot love people like God does, but his actions, particularly in his decision to run for President of the United States when he is just about the last person who needed to do that, shows that he loves America and Americans.
He doesn’t hate the immigrants that obey the law (for crying out loud, HE’S MARRIED TO AN IMMIGRANT) and I doubt he outright hates the illegals who come here, just hates that they break the law to come here and hates the criminal actions that they typically commit.
For anyone to argue that Trump, even despite his personal flaws (which he obviously has, considering he’s human, but I believe they have been unfairly accentuated by the media), is in any way a worse representative for those with Christian beliefs than Joe Biden or anyone on the Left is ridiculous and a complete lie.
God doesn’t require that we be perfect, and that includes Trump. I’ve made this point in the past, but it bears repeating: No one in the Bible, apart from God and Jesus (who are the same essential being in different persons), is perfect.
I’ve heard people wishing that we had a leader like David, but they forget that David committed adultery and basically murder by sending his loyal soldier to die in battle so he could screw his wife.
God uses imperfect people for His plan. Abraham, the father of the Jewish faith, was impatient and committed adultery before he was given his promised son. Moses killed an Egyptian guard and was running from the law for forty years before his encounter with God. Jacob was a liar and a ritualistic sinner before he was given the name Israel by God Himself (and was given that name after he literally wrestled with God). Sampson succumbed to sexual immorality but he was still redeemed by God in the end.
Trump has flaws, of course, but for any Christian to believe such flaws disqualify him from being president or earning our vote is ludicrous. For a Christian to support Biden or abstain from voting (which only helps Biden and the Democrats) is to run contrary to his or her own professed belief.
Like John MacArthur said, any real, true believer and follower of Christ will see the two options presented to us this electoral season and come to the conclusion that, despite whatever flaws Trump has, Joe Biden represents and carries with him beliefs that not only run contrary to Christianity, but are outright damaging to it (and no, it doesn’t matter one bit that he is a self-professed Catholic. Profession of faith is not the same as possession of faith).
Keep in mind, MacArthur is currently fighting DEMOCRATS who say that he is not allowed to open his church and share the gospel with his congregation and are actively seeking to punish him for wanting to do so. Clearly, given the chance, Democrats will leap at the opportunity to destroy our constitutionally protected rights of freedom of religion.
Once last time, I ask: what sense does it make for any true Christian to vote for a party which does not represent his or her Christian values and actively works to undermine them?
“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
2020, as I have said in the past, has been a very rough year for everyone. For a time, tens of millions of people lost their jobs or they were furloughed and many small businesses went under, with few being likely to recover, while mega corporations have only grown as a result. However, the economy is making a comeback, and perhaps the biggest indicator of this, at least for the foreseeable future, is the stock market.
The markets usually work as a foretelling of the future, based on what people in the markets think will happen soon. It’s not an exact science, of course, but the big dips in the market in the earliest months of the year foretold the economic trouble we would face soon after, but now, the markets are back, with some hitting new record highs and mostly or completely wiping out the losses throughout the pandemic.
An economic recovery certainly helps Trump, much to the dismay of the Left who were salivating at the idea of a ruined economy for a chance to get Biden (or Harris) elected and finally bring America down. We are seeing an economic recovery right now, even as things still aren’t quite to how good they were pre-Chinese coronavirus, and this sort of recovery spells good news for a Trump re-election.
According to The Socioeconomics Institute, Trump has an 87% chance to win re-election if the market is above 28,052 on Election Day (Nov. 3rd). For the record, before the pandemic hit, the Dow Jones was at 29,500 and bottomed out at 18,591 on March 23rd.
Now, while a lot can happen in between now and November 3rd, as I have been saying all along, the current economic future looks bright, provided there are no major surprises that blindside us. Even the momentarily terrifying reality of two hurricanes hitting the states at the Gulf of Mexico has sort of dwindled as the two super storms have weakened over time.
But provided that nothing majorly bad occurs, Trump is in good position to win, according to the model. As it stands, the Dow Jones is hovering around 28,600, roughly a thousand points shy of the prior record which is fairly reachable at this point.
More specifically, the Institute notes that if the Dow Jones is anywhere over 23,377, Trump has at the very least a mild chance of winning re-election, while if the Dow is between 22,208 and 23,377, Biden has a mild chance of winning. Obviously, anything below 22,208 and Biden as a strong chance of winning.
The reasoning behind the Institute’s model is due to them studying all presidential races where an incumbent was running for re-election and in their research, they found that “the strongest correlation with incumbents’ margins of victory or defeat” was the net change in the market for the three years leading up to the election.
The last three years have been fairly strange, at least with this year in comparison to the last two. Ever since Trump became President, this country saw nothing but economic success. Following Trump’s election, the Dow Jones went up 2,000 points from election day to inauguration day. The market was excited for a Trump presidency. Time and time again, I noted how the economy was absolutely booming, with the unemployment rate hitting record low after record low, in general and for minorities.
We had such a roaring economy that during the Democrat primaries, NO ONE was talking about the economy. Despite it usually being at the top of people’s concerns heading into an election, not one Democrat dared to talk much about the economy because they KNEW they couldn’t fool everyone into believing it wasn’t real. Often times, their only, and flimsy, argument was that it was somehow “Obama’s” economy, even after three years of a Trump presidency.
It really speaks to their poor, phony character that the Left would blame Obama’s predecessor for all of his economic failures and steal the credit that rightfully belongs to his successor for a booming economy. The Obama economy was flat and stagnant, which is rather impressive for the fact that he inherited a recession and did NOTHING to make it better. And ever since Trump came along and made things better, they somehow got it into their minds that the credit belongs to the guy who had EIGHT YEARS to make it better and didn’t. That the guy who spent less than a year rebuilding the economy had nothing to do with it, even as it was happening under his watch, even as they had a guy in his same position for eight years who accomplished absolutely nothing.
Then, once the pandemic hit and local and state governments decided to completely shut things down, which naturally led to an economic downturn, only THEN did Democrats, specifically Joe Biden, start to talk about the economy and lie about how Obama and Biden rebuilt the economy after their 2008 win and Trump destroyed it.
Now that the economy is back strong, the Democrats are once again without a message, other than “Orange Man Bad”.
Now, all they have is “Trump is a racist” while citing no evidence and while having the most racist ticket in I don’t know how long. Seriously, for the first time in roughly a century, the Democrats are running a segregationist and a slave owner as their presidential and vice presidential candidates.
Now, all they have is “Trump is a sexist” while citing no evidence and while having a guy who is well-documented in sexually harassing women and who picked his VP largely because she is a woman.
Now, all they have is “Trump is evil” while citing no evidence and while running the most pro-death ticket in political history. And I’m not just talking about abortion here, though they are extreme proponents of it. I’m also talking about being anti-police (rather ironic, considering Harris’ former professional position) and supporting the violent riots (calling out the violence in general does not tell me Biden is against this. It’d be like watching a terrorist attack and denouncing the violence itself as opposed to those who perpetrated it, though they have done this plenty in the past, so I suppose there is precedence for this disgusting behavior).
The economy is making a great comeback following the closures, which is why the Left has turned back to reporting largely about the virus in an effort to scare people into locking things down again. They report “new cases” as though they are equal to “new deaths”, which isn’t at all the case (pun intended).
If nothing else, the economy would carry Trump into 2020. A damaged economy means a damaged Trump heading into the election while a strong economy means a strong Trump. We are still not quite where we were pre-pandemic in terms of economic strength, but we are getting there. This is a nightmare for Democrats and it showed throughout the DNC and the RNC.
I only pray to God that the economy will continue getting better and exceed where it was pre-pandemic and that Trump utterly trounces Joe Biden and the Democrats, giving them a defeat they haven’t seen since 1984.
“And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
A few days ago, I noted that President Trump’s job approval jumped up as the DNC went on last week, in large part due to the fact that the DNC was extremely boring at best and filled with deranged lunatics hellbent on destroying this nation and making little effort to hide that at worst. Now that the lunatic Leftists have had their convention of horror, it’s time for Republicans to have their convention and there are noticeable differences between the two conventions.
While the DNC focused on how Trump was a “threat” to Democracy and how everything is awful and it’s white capitalist men’s fault, the RNC is focusing on hope, redemption and American exceptionalism to carry us through a pandemic and any economic problems it has caused (and that we are likely past the worst of it).
The RNC featured a number of guest speakers, all of whom talked about overwhelmingly positive things, such as the historic pardoning of Jon Ponder, and the powerful speeches given by pro-life advocates speaking the truth about the horrors of abortion (FYI: I, personally, did not know that abortion has a smell. I just feel sorry for Abby Johnson, who gave us that fact, because the sense most connected to our memory is our sense of smell, so she likely remembers very well what an abortion smells like).
Overall, the RNC stands in stark contrast to the DNC, which even some in the fake news media had to acknowledge the fact that (at least the first night) was very good and effective. This has shown in the polls, as a recent Zogby poll shows Trump’s approval standing at 52%, the highest in the poll’s record.
What’s more, Trump enjoys pretty decent support from African Americans (36%), Hispanics (37%) and Asians (35%), all of whom usually vote for Democrats. Trump also enjoys pretty decent numbers with Independent voters, with 44%.
Perhaps what is most surprising, however, is that 23% of DEMOCRATS also approve of Donald Trump in the recent survey.
The Washington Examiner reports: “Pollsters have been somewhat at a loss to explain the rise of Trump’s approval ratings, considering that there has been little positive news to help his standings other than the peace deal he helped negotiate between Israel and the United Arab Emirates.”
Well, then, allow me to explain to the pollsters roughly what is likely driving Trump’s approval up: THE RIOTS, NUMBNUTS!
Even the dumbest man on cable news, Don Lemon, recently said: “The rioting has to stop… it’s showing up in the polling, it’s showing up in focus groups.”
To which I have a couple of things to say.
First, how interesting that Lemon decided to actually call them “riots” here when for the past few months, as they were happening, the media was insistent on calling them “peaceful protests”. Of course, there never was anything peaceful about them, as they all lead to violence, arson, vandalism, assault and a slew of murders, but the media ignored all of them, even as they were showing BURNING BUILDINGS and were simply calling them “peaceful protests”. Why? Because they somehow thought that the riots would HELP them beat Trump.
Their line of thinking probably went something like this: The people rioting shows Trump and Republicans to be weak leaders, so people will want to vote them out. The problem here is that the riots were EXCLUSIVELY happening in DEMOCRAT-RUN cities, counties and states. The Democrats in charge, because in their infinite wisdom they thought the riots were helping them against Trump, were doing nothing to quell the riots until they got a little too close to home, literally.
The Democrats that were not in charge of those places (namely, congresspeople) were either fully supporting and endorsing the violence or merely tolerating it at best. This included Joe Biden, who supports defunding the police (no, there is no difference between defunding and “redirecting” if the lack of funds render the police inoperable).
The media, like I pointed out, were running cover for the riots because they also thought they were helping the Democrats. They covered the riots as “peaceful protests” and omitted certain stories or facts which would undermine their agenda.
And Leftist celebrities, the people who are least qualified to talk about how Americans think, believe that America thinks like them, worships them, and believe that whatever they say is gospel, so they also support the riots, believing them to be for a good cause, even if they are violent. They will defend the actions of Jacob Blake, who did everything wrong in the video shown (not caring about being tased is an indication of being high on drugs and going to your car, opening the door and reaching in for something when you were not asked to do anything of the sort is BOUND to get you shot, so there is ZERO that the Left can say that makes Jacob Blake any sort of victim here).
The Left supports the riots, until they come to the oh, so shocking realization that it’s not exactly helping them. It’d perhaps be one thing if the riots were happening and they secretly supported (or even funded) them, but openly disagreed and called for law and order, but they are letting Trump be the law and order guy here and that’s what people want.
Now that the riots are not politically expedient, Lemon has no qualms about calling them riots and wants them to stop because they’re helping Trump.
Which brings me to the second thing I want to say about this: notice that the ONLY reason they want the riots to stop is because of politics.
The Left doesn’t care that businesses are being destroyed, that families are being brought to financial ruin, that people are being assaulted and, in many cases, killed. No, none of that ever mattered to the Left, else they would’ve demanded the riots stop the minute the first one occurred.
The ONLY reason they want the riots to end is because they are helping Trump in the polls. Remember this the next time a Democrat insists that they are the party of “love” and “tolerance” and that they are, in any way, the good guys.
I’ve made this point in the past, but it bears repeating: the Left is the physical manifestation of the kind of people described in Isaiah 5:20: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who turn darkness to light and light to darkness, who replace bitter with sweet and sweet with bitter.”
They call themselves good when they are, in fact, evil. Only evil people could look at the horrors of riots and think they are good if they help them and bad if they don’t. Only evil people could look at the genocide that is abortion, the holocaust that it is, and consider it a “woman’s right” and “freedom.” Only evil people could look at children being dragged to drag queen story hour and think that it’s a good thing. Only evil people could think that forcing children to take life-altering puberty blockers because the children momentarily feel like they are a different gender (or because one of their parents wants them to be a different gender) is a good thing.
This was all very much demonstrated in how they covered the death of George Floyd in contrast to the death of Secoriea Turner and Cannon Hinnant. The death of George Floyd was politically expedient to the Left, so it’s covered as a national tragedy. The deaths of Turner and Hinnant undermined their agenda, so they were largely ignored or restructured as an argument against gun ownership.
The American people see all of this bullcrap coming from the Left and, understandably, come to see Trump in a better light. Trump’s supporters aren’t the ones burning down businesses. Trump’s supporters aren’t the ones assaulting cops. Trump’s supporters aren’t the ones murdering people. Trump’s supporters aren’t the ones terrorizing those who do not raise their fists to show “solidarity” with the radical Left (btw, I’m beginning to see that raised fist as no different to the Nazi salute, and that’s how it should be treated).
It’s radical Leftists who are doing all of these things and the vast majority of people do not want this. Many who are life-long Democrat liberals are reportedly planning to vote for Trump because of all of this. They are pushing normal people to the right and making their camp smaller and smaller.
The only reason the Democrat base is as rabid and insane as it is is not because radical Leftist communism is now mainstream for many people, but because more moderate people have left the Democrat party because they felt the Democrat party has left them.
If you have a room of a hundred people and ten of them are communists, if the 90 other people leave that room, that doesn’t make communism the mainstream thought (at least, outside of that room).
Trump is enjoying bumps in approval because the Left is unwittingly handing him the election by making themselves far too crazy and dangerous to be allowed anywhere near the levels of power that they desire.
While there is still a good amount of time left before the election takes place, and plenty can happen in that time interval, if the economy recovers and the Left continues to show how insane they are, provided their mail-in voting scheme doesn’t work to the extent they want it to, I don’t see how Biden beats Trump at any capacity.
I wouldn’t even be surprised if states like Wisconsin, Minnesota and maybe even New York end up going to Trump.
“The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
A political party’s convention is supposed to be this big fest, essentially, in order to drum up support for the newly-nominated candidate, particularly if they really need it. It’s meant to get people excited and hyped to vote for them come November. This election’s DNC, however, seemed to have the opposite intended effect: Trump’s job approval went up AS THE CONVENTIONS WERE HAPPENING.
Matt Palumbo from Bongino.com points this out: “In the Rasmussen Poll, President Trump’s approval stood at 47% [before the convention] – but made an incredible four percentage point leap this morning to 51%. When I reached out to Rasmussen to confirm that the sampling for today’s poll wasn’t taken before the DNC began to air, they said the polling data was being accumulated as the DNC speeches were ongoing. In other words, it is likely that some people were being directly influenced by the DNC – albeit not in favor of any Democrats.”
Democrats, I’ll give you some good news and some bad news. First, the good news: hardly anyone was watching your commie-fest over the four days it was airing.
Yes, THAT is the good news. According to Joe Concha from The Hill, ABC, CBS and NBC’s combined viewership of the second night of the DNC was just 6.13 million viewers, a 48% drop from night 2 of the 2016 DNC. By comparison, CBS’s “Big Brother” received more than half of that alone, at nearly 4 million viewers, on the same night.
The first night didn’t fare much better either, with a 28% drop in viewership compared to the previous electoral season.
The reason this is good news is because plenty of people didn’t see the actual commie-fest that was going on, with all of the asinine and dangerous demands that people deeply involved in this party usually make.
The bad news is that all of this – Trump gaining in approval AS THE CONVENTION WAS GOING ON and viewership dropping like someone who had information that would lead to Hillary Clinton’s arrest – is a huge indicator that virtually no one is excited to vote for Biden.
This, of course, is nothing new to us who see things for how they are. We KNOW that Biden is a bore and hardly anyone is willing to vote for him for his own sake. The people that intend to vote for Biden aren’t voting for Biden, just against Trump. And in terms of likely voters, Trump is very much winning.
And, honestly, who can blame people who willingly sit through the snooze-fest that was the DNC for not exactly feeling excited to vote for Biden? What was shown in those four nights are boring, woke scold communists threatening to uproot this country’s very foundation.
It might not have helped the Democrats for them to have featured Elizabeth Warren on their Native American Caucus Meeting, either. It was already established LONG ago that Elizabeth Warren is less Native American than the average white person in this country, so to have her on that panel, particularly since everyone KNOWS she’s not Native American, even to her own admission, probably ruffled a few people’s feathers.
The Democrats also hilariously had a panel of Democrat Governors which included STACEY ABRAMS, which came off as more funny and pathetic than whatever point they were trying to prove with this stunt.
Other than that, though, apart from the usual morons demanding to defund the police (which doesn’t exactly help sell the idea that Biden is a moderate who doesn’t want to defund the police), abolishing ICE and prisons, defending and promoting the rioters in Portland, and other communist crap, hardly any part of the DNC was very memorable or interesting.
Obama gave a dark and depressing speech in which he focused far more on attacking Trump than propping up Biden, and Biden himself, upon giving his acceptance speech, gave a faux-hope and faith speech that REEKED with insincerity, considering Biden is a proponent of abortion, which does not demonstrate any kind of faith in Christ (the fact that they omitted “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance doesn’t exactly point to this being a campaign about faith and hope for the future).
The DNC not only didn’t accomplish its intended goal of getting people excited to vote for Biden (assuming that was the goal in the first place, considering how little time they actually spent promoting their very nominee), but the convention seemed to have the exact opposite intended effect, as people began to approve of Trump more as the convention was taking place!
Just about every aspect of the DNC Convention was a disaster for Democrats, particularly as they allowed for people to contribute in their chats with impunity. By which I mean that they had no real security system or method of authentication, so anyone who wanted to log into their streams and troll the crap out of them could easily do so by creating any random e-mail address on the spot, creating a random password and a random username. That was literally all that was necessary to interact with the chats, which were often bombarded by trolls with people going by usernames like “Creepy Uncle Joe”, “1/1024 Native American”, “Biden has Dementia”, “Hunter”, and “Kamala Invented the School to Prison Pipeline”, with all leaving funny messages to troll the DNC.
The issue was so bad, they often had to disable the chat in each of the individual panels that they were hosting.
So yeah, this season’s DNC Convention was not exactly what the Democrats were hoping to get out of it. Sure, they got to attack Trump with whatever b.s. lie they wanted, including perpetuating the “fine people” hoax, and got to display their communist and insane demands to defund the police, abolish ICE and destroying Capitalism, but it very clearly cost them, to some extent or another.
Not only was their viewership in the tank compared to even 2016’s convention, but the people who were brave or crazy enough to sit through it were getting turned off by the Democrats and began to support Trump just a little bit more, as evidenced by the fact that not only did he have 51% total approval, but he also had 38% strong approval and had a +3 net rating, with 48% disapproval, the first time he’s flipped it in a while.
People aren’t excited to vote for Biden and the people that made the decision to watch the convention were quickly turning towards Trump.
As I’ve said in the past, Trump isn’t running against Biden, but against voter fraud, but little enthusiasm for Biden won’t exactly help the Democrat either.
“But you, O God, will cast them down into the pit of destruction; men of blood and treachery shall not live out half their days. But I will trust in you.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
Coming from the political side of the aisle which for three and a half years has perpetuated the conspiracy theory that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election, for any Leftist to accuse someone else of being a kook conspiracy nut is absolutely rich (though projection is a popular Leftist tactic).
Still, Leftist reporters have tried to attack Trump for the section of his supporters who follow QAnon, which began with a supposed high-level anonymous government worker, referred to as “Q”, who supposedly has “access to classified information about what truly is going on behind the scenes in the nation’s capital,” according to Breitbart.
The Left, because they definitely are not guilty of doing the same thing, charge this group as being a bunch of conspiracy theorist wackos. One reporter in particular during a recent Trump presser asked the President repeatedly about them.
Trump initially responded with: “Well, I don’t know much about the movement, other than I understand they like me very much, which I appreciate.”
The reporter asked him again about Q, saying: “The crux of the theory is this belief that you are secretly saving the world from this satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibals. Does that sound like something you are behind?”
I will return to this question in a moment. First, let me share the fantastic answer that the President gave to this fake news reporter:
“I haven’t heard that, is that supposed to be a bad thing or a good thing? If I can help save the world from problems, I’m willing to do it. I’m willing to put myself out there… I don’t know really anything about it other than they do supposedly like me and they also would like to see problems in these [Democrat-run] areas go away. We’re saving the world from a radical left philosophy that will destroy this country and when this country is gone the rest of the world will follow.”
More specifically, the beginning part of the answer, I feel, was the best part of it. By asking whether that’s supposed to be a good or bad thing, he is basically asking: “what, are you supporting the Satanic, pedophilic cannibals? Are you siding with them? What’s so bad about wanting to save the world from such people?”
Which brings me back to the original question, as I said I would return.
While I do not associate myself with QAnon, in large part because the so-called high-level agent got it completely wrong about the impending arrests of Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and Huma Abedin following Trump’s electoral victory in 2016 and because the group still believes that indictments are coming for such people (I have zero faith that any such thing will happen, at this point, knowing how corrupt the Department of Injustice is), I believe they have a point about the Satanic, pedophilic cannibals.
Don’t laugh, I’m being serious. We all know precisely how satanic and evil the Left is.
The Left advocates and CELEBRATES the holocaust that is abortion. Planned Parenthood makes the crux of their income from abortions and SELLING BODY PARTS OF THE BABIES! They are so enamored with this sick and depraved practice that they are beginning to push for POST-birth abortion. Remember Gov. Northam, before the whole blackface scandal? He went on a radio show to push for such abortion and people blew a gasket over it.
They are calling for the defunding of the police while simultaneously demanding you give up your guns, which would only naturally lead to chaos and death on the streets. For crying out loud, THEY ARE DEFENDING THE CURRENT VIOLENCE THAT IS GOING ON WHILE BLAMING TRUMP FOR IT!
They defend the burning down of a church while attacking those who want to pray in it and listen to sermons in them. They talk at length about the supposed injustice of George Floyd’s death, while ignoring the factors that actually contributed to his death, and simultaneously can hardly pretend to give a damn about the execution of a five-year-old white boy!
They espouse the beliefs that have killed over 100 million people while claiming conservatives are Nazis and Trump is Hitler. They attack a 16-year-old kid who supports Trump, claim he has a “punchable face”, and then have to settle with the kid for hundreds of millions of dollars because they SLANDERED HIM JUST BECAUSE HE SUPPORTS TRUMP!
The Left also famously associated itself with Jeffrey Epstein, with Bill Clinton being among Epstein’s most notorious and frequent clients, if the flight logs and multiple photographs are any indication. According to multiple victims, Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell would traffic young girls for Leftists to rape and abuse, and in some cases, kill and possibly eat.
Considering this involves high-level political figures on the Left, there is no concrete evidence to show that this was happening, but I wouldn’t exactly put it past them to go that far. We KNOW these people are evil. We KNOW they are pedophiles. Cannibalism is not a massive leap in logic here.
Whether or not Trump is saving the world from it, I don’t know. I know he stands firmly against it, disassociated himself from Epstein likely as soon as he found out what was going on, and recognizes the evil that the Left is, considering they have FANTASIZED about his assassination on multiple occasions.
What I do know, ultimately, is that the Left is FILLED with Satanists, because no Christian can be a true Christian and a Leftist at the same time. It takes a purely evil heart and mind to be a Leftist in this day and age. And one does not exactly have to worship Satan in order to be a Satanist – they just have to do his bidding, and not follow God. Satan doesn’t care if people worship him or not or believe in him or not. He’s perfectly content with people who are not Christians, because those are the people he gets in Hell.
I know that Epstein, Maxwell, the Clintons, the Obamas, the Soros, and everyone who is a hardcore communist Leftist is EVIL for the things that they adamantly support.
Most people will hear about Leftists being “Satanic, pedophilic cannibals” and laugh it off, believing it to be utter nonsense, but I wouldn’t put it past them to be exactly that.
We KNOW they are Satanic. We KNOW they are pedophiles (that Netflix show about “twerking” pre-teens, which promotes pedophilia, is a massive indicator that they are, indeed, pedophiles, not to mention Hollywood has long been a cesspool of pedophilia, with the likes of Roman Polanski and Kevin Spacey being some of the most notorious ones). And there are reports from Epstein’s victims regarding cannibalism.
But even assuming they aren’t the last thing, they definitely are the former two things. The Left stands in direct opposition to God and everything they say and do reflects that.
Trump may not be secretly leading a group of loyal FBI investigators to spy on and arrest and indict multitudes of Satanic, pedophilic and cannibalistic Leftists, but the Left IS FULL of Satanists and pedophiles, at the very least.
They are sick, depraved, evil people. They laugh it off and call it a “conspiracy theory” (a term created by the CIA to undermine claims by people who might know just a little too much about what the government is doing) and attempt to hide what they are doing, not because they are ashamed of it, but because they know almost everyone would be repulsed and horrified about discovering their dirty little secrets.
Child sacrifice, murder and cannibalism all used to be pretty standard millennia ago and the only people in history who were explicitly appalled by it were the Israelites (when they were righteous and not doing it themselves in sick and depraved attempts to “please” God).
Christianity has made it so that evil has to hide itself in the darkness, lest their works should be exposed in the light. They have to hide what evils they do and laugh off the idea that they are doing it, calling those who would expose them “conspiracy theorists”, all-the-while grooming the rest of the world to substantially get used to the evils that they do.
Do you think the idea to “shout your abortion” would’ve been well-received in the 1970s? Only in a gradually secular society that is abandoning God would such a horrifying and disgusting phrase be seen as tame or even as EMPOWERING.
You may laugh off the idea that Leftists are Satanists, pedophiles and cannibals, but they routinely have shown their outright evil desires and have repeatedly been exposed as pedophiles, even if they don’t necessarily get legally punished for it.
The Left is full of evil people – an evil which knows no bounds. Do not put it past them to be totally depraved in a number of different ways which we can hardly conceive.
“Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desires, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
With the Democrat National Convention underway, the Left is trying its best to hype up Biden and prop him up as the clear answer to Republican President Donald Trump. However, despite this, former President Barack Obama is less than enthused about Biden’s run against Trump.
Now, while I have already talked about how Trump’s real opposition isn’t Biden but mail-in voter fraud, the fact remains that Biden still needs to campaign, to one extent or another, even if the farthest he goes is his front porch. He still has to give interviews and talk to people and do the things most regular presidential nominees have to do, even in this unique election.
In this campaigning, Obama points out that one shouldn’t “underestimate Joe’s ability to f**k things up,” reported a recent Politico article which was surprisingly harsh towards Joe Biden at points.
Throughout this Politico article, the general theme seems to be that Joe Biden felt he didn’t get much, if any, respect from Obama or those around him, not too dissimilar to Fredo Corleone, the aloof and clearly mentally-challenged older brother of Michael Corleone, the smart and tactful son of Vito who ended up succeeding him as the titular Godfather of his mafia family.
I imagine the following scene from The Godfather Part II is something Joe can relate to:
Fredo: “I’m your older brother, Mike, and I was stepped over!”
Michael: “That’s the way Pop wanted it.”
Fredo: “It ain’t the way I wanted it! I can handle things! I’m smart! Not like everybody says… like dumb… I’m smart and I want respect!”
Apart from the sentiment that Joe is not a very intelligent fellow, I think he can relate to Fredo in that he, too, was basically “stepped over.” Fredo was passed over as Don of the family, following the death of Sonny and Vito, making Michael the head of the Corleone family, despite being younger than Fredo. Similarly, Joe was passed over as the “heir” of the Obama administration’s legacy, with the Democrats choosing Hillary Clinton, who was at least relatively smarter and had the same Ivy League education and background that many Leftist elitists favor.
In fact, that sentiment of being passed over as Obama’s heir was a major topic in the Politico article as well:
“… behind all the BFF bonhomie is a much more complicated story – one fueled by the misgivings the 44th president had about the would-be 46th, the deep hurt still felt among Biden’s allies over how Obama embraced Hillary Clinton as his successor, and a powerful sense of pride that is driving Biden to prove that the former president and many of his aides underestimated the very real strengths of his partner,” according to Politico.
If this doesn’t scream “Fredo Corleone” to you, I don’t know what does.
Leon Panetta, Obama’s secretary of Defense, recalled: “[Biden] was loyal, I think, to Obama in every way in terms of defending and standing by him, even probably when he disagreed with what Obama was doing. To some extent, [Biden] oftentimes felt that that loyalty was not being rewarded.”
The Politico article then went on to point out the way in which “Young White House aides frequently mocked Biden’s gaffes and lack of discipline in comparison to the almost clerical Obama. They would chortle at how Biden, like an elderly uncle at Thanksgiving, would launch into extended monologues that everyone had heard before.”
Even the infamous Ben Rhodes, a key part of the Iran nuclear deal, wrote in his memoir that “in the Situation Room, Biden could be something of an unguided missile.”
A particularly bad quote came from Obama himself, apart from his “don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f**k things up” quote, where he reportedly told one 2020 Democrat candidate, speaking of the then-current Democrat electorate in Iowa, “And you know who really doesn’t have it? Joe Biden.”
Whether he meant the ability to win or to run things smoothly or what, I don’t know, but that hardly matters. He clearly doesn’t have much, if any, confidence in Joe Biden and has unenthusiastically supported Biden because he just kinda has to.
This was pointed out in the Politico article:
“But even in victory, Biden and his aides often act like they have something to prove to the Obama team that doubted them. Some Biden allies noted that Obama’s endorsement of Biden, when it finally arrived, lacked the effusiveness of his endorsement of Clinton. ‘I don’t think there’s ever been someone so qualified to hold this office,’ he said of Clinton in his video message in 2016. Four years later, in his endorsement video for Biden, he said: ‘I believe Joe has all of the qualities we need in a president right now… and I know he will surround himself with good people.’”
Obama and the Left have run with the narrative that Trump is dividing the country (completely ignoring that THEY are the ones who have been dividing the country with identity politics since HE was president), so it’s not surprising that he would say that Biden has “the qualities we need in a president right now.” Biden is known in the Swamp as being a bit more willing to cooperate with other people, even Republicans, which contrasted with Obama’s egotistical and narcissistic approach to things, believing he knew more than everyone else in whatever room he occupied combined.
That’s not to say Biden would make for a good president at all, of course – he’d be a train wreck and would not actually be in charge, which is why Obama mentioned that second part of Biden surrounding himself with “good people.”
Obama has no trust in Biden’s ability to do much of anything, especially doing things right, and knows perfectly well that if Joe were to “win” (if you read my previous article talking about cheat-by-mail, you know why I put that word in quotation marks), Joe would, at best, be the puppet with the official title of POTUS but someone else, like Kamala, would be the one actually running things and at worst, he would be forced to resign almost immediately to let Kamala be POTUS.
These are things we all knew, and even suspected that Obama saw it the same way, but it’s particularly interesting to see this from POLITICO of all sources. This, suffice to say, does not exactly hype people up to the idea of a Biden presidency. For Politico’s readers, this does not get them excited to vote for Biden, either by mail or by showing up to the polls.
While at some points the article tries to be more positive towards Biden, things like pointing out that Biden repeated the third grade, got all Cs and Ds in his first three semesters in college except for As in P.E., a course in which you would have to royally screw up to get anything less than a C, a B in “Great English Writers”, where he plagiarized in his paper, and an F in ROTC, as well as having graduated 76th out of 85 students at Syracuse Law School definitely do not help paint a pretty or excitable picture of Joe Biden, something he desperately needs.
I find it rather surprising that Politico would publish something like this, knowing full well that these people are largely Democrats. You would think they’d do whatever they could to help Biden win, especially as he is a candidate who NEEDS to be helped by those around him and those who support him.
Maybe they don’t exactly expect Biden to win, after all. Either that or they are so in bed with the Obama camp of the Democrat Party that they would rather try and avoid a disastrous campaign and Biden “presidency” which could tarnish whatever is left of the Obama legacy (which, granted, Biden or whomever controls his strings would get us back into the Paris climate deal and the Iran nuke deal and try to restore basically everything about Obama’s legacy, while trying to destroy Trump’s expansive legacy).
I don’t know the precise reason as to why the people at Politico chose to publish this, though I suppose we are still far enough away from the election that it would not really matter if this was published at all, and the sentiments expressed in the Politico article are sentiments found just about throughout the entirety of the Democrat Party anyway, and they aren’t doing a great job in hiding those sentiments.
At any rate, whatever the reason, I will enjoy the fact that they did and will call back to this whenever the opportunity strikes. Thanks for the ammo, Politico.
“Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
Freddie Marinelli and Danielle Cross will bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...