Certain things are self-evident. We are created in the image of God, and the Lord created the heavens and the Earth. Anyone with the ability to sense the world at any capacity should be able to recognize that nothing could be possible without the hand of God. Similarly, it is self-evident that the sky is blue, as anyone with eyes can tell you. Gravity has an effect on everything on this planet, as everything is subject to having -9.8m/s2 weighing down on them.
And no matter what any Twitter scientist might try to tell you, male is male and female is female. Someone might FEEL that they are the opposite gender, but they biologically cannot be the opposite gender. No matter how hard a man tries, he cannot get pregnant, even if he undergoes surgery to possess a vagina. No matter how hard a woman might try, she cannot get a woman pregnant, even if she undergoes surgery to possess a penis. This is because, despite such surgeries, they lack the necessary reproductive parts to do either thing.
In a similar fashion, due to the way in which male and female bodies develop, men tend to have a physical advantage over women, on average. However, it seems as though this obvious fact was dubious enough that a study was necessary.
You see, a recent study published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine suggests that, even after a year of hormone “therapy”, transgender “women” (men who claim to be women) still retain an athletic physical advantage over real women.
The study examined transgender men and women serving in the Air Force between 2013 and 2018. According to NBC News, who are reporting on this study, “The Air Force’s fitness assessment includes the number of pushups and situps performed in a minute, and the time required to run 1.5 miles. For the first two years after starting hormones, the trans women in their review were able to do 10 percent more pushups and 6 percent more situps than their cisgender female counterparts.”
The study found that, even after two years of “hormone therapy”, transgender “women” were still 12% faster on the 1.5 mile run than the real women they were competing against.
The way in which the male body develops is different from that of women. Men possess higher muscle mass and stronger bone development, so “hormone therapy” would still not be enough to make those transgender “women” equally as athletic as real women.
Women are at higher risk of developing osteoporosis than men are for precisely the reason that women develop weaker bones than men. So of course the transgender “women” are going to still have an athletic advantage over the women: it’s NATURE!
Must I revisit the topic of the Williams sisters, at the height of their careers, losing to a man outside the top 200 who might have been holding back?
I’ve already shared that one plenty of times because it is a prime example of the differences between men and women. The Williams sisters were undoubtedly more talented than that man, but his physical superiority is what won him those games, somewhat to the admission of the famous sisters, who noted that the guy got to balls which would “be winners” against female competitors.
The guy’s physical superiority won him those games, and a man’s physical superiority, even despite years of “hormone therapy” will still show against women, at least usually.
I say “usually” because if I, an untrained man, were to play against the Williams sisters (even now), I would probably get creamed. I may currently be more physically superior to them, but they are athletes and I am not. I would certainly get destroyed if I played against them in their primes. In an arm-wrestling competition, I would most likely win (at least against Venus, seeing as Serena has a very mannish body structure), because of my very genetic and physical composition.
But regardless of whether or not I would be able to win against literal athletes, the fact remains that the average man is physically stronger than the average woman. On a level playing field, just about any man playing tennis today could beat any woman playing tennis today 99 times out of 100, or somewhere around that. Men being physically superior to women is the norm, not the exception.
So I ask, again, did we really need a study to confirm what anyone with a brain already knows? Do we need to run tests to prove again and again that gravity is a thing that exists? Do we need to perform examinations and studies which showcase that, yes, the sky is blue?
Do we need to perform tests to see that men and women really are different? It’s extremely observable throughout the history of mankind that men are physically superior to women, on average. There exist women, for example, who are professional weightlifters such as the following women:
I don’t think I have to tell you that I am almost certainly not physically superior to those women, particularly the ones which are obviously using steroids. So, for the feminists out there, yes, there are women who are/can be physically superior to most men. Though, again, on a level playing field, weightlifting men are usually going to be physically superior to the weightlifting women.
The world record holder for heaviest weightlifting for men is a Georgian (country) man named Lasha Talakhadze, with a 220kg Snatch record and a 264kg Clean & Jerk record, totaling 484kg. For women’s weightlifting, the record is owned by a Chinese woman named Li Wenwen, who owns the Snatch record at 147kg, Clean & Jerk record at 186kg, for a total record of 332kg.
By the way, those are the records for men who weigh more than 109kg and women who weigh more than 87kg respectively. But even comparing the record-owning woman with men in a similar range of weight, she is still outclassed.
The record for an 81kg man is 378kg total, shattering both of Li’s records. Only 67kg men (147.71 lbs.) are near where she set her record… and still beat her by a few pounds.
So even significantly lighter men can still beat the strongest woman’s record.
It’s for that reason that common sense activists (both conservatives and real feminists whom would usually not side with conservatives on anything) are opposed to men and transgender “women” participating in girls’ sports, because men are PHYSICALLY AND ATHLETICALLY SUPERIOR.
Once again, I ask: did we really need a study for this? I’m not trying to bash the researchers for doing their jobs and exploring some scientific curiosity, but why does this kind of scientific curiosity exist? Like I said in the beginning, certain things are self-evident. That means you don’t need studies to verify their veracity. Like you don’t need studies to show that the sky is blue or that gravity is a thing that exists, you don’t need studies that show that men are physically superior to women, even men who have gone bananas and inject themselves with estrogen.
I can only hope that common sense and reason return soon to Western society, else the rest of the world will easily destroy us (well, we’ll have destroyed ourselves, really).
“There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death.”
Some good news for a change, still sticking with stories that have little or nothing to do with the Wuhan Virus, the Idaho Senate has approved of HB 500a, the Fairness in Women’s Sports act, banning biological males who “identify” as females from competing in girls’ and women’s sports.
According to Breitbart: “The bill passed the State Senate, 24-11, after being approved by the House in February, 52-17. The House must approve a Senate amendment to the bill prior to sending it to the desk of Gov. Brad Little (R) for his signature.”
If approved by the House and signed into law by the governor (which is to be expected), Idaho would become the first state in the country to protect girls’ and women’s sports from biological males seeking to cheat by competing against women.
Utterly unsurprisingly, Leftists were outraged at this, with some trying to outright shame and intimidate members of the State Senate on Twitter.
GLSEN, an LGBT organization, tweeted: “This is downright shameful: In the face of a global pandemic, the Idaho Senate spent yesterday passing a dangerous bill that singles out transgender students for discrimination.”
I just love it when Leftist hacks jam all of their preferred adjectives into their tweets. In that one, we find “dangerous” and “discrimination”, despite the fact that this bill protects girls from CHEATING MALE ATHLETES competing against them in an unfair manner. It does not “discriminate” against anyone. It protects girls’ and women’s sports from being destroyed by shameless cheaters who have a natural advantage in physical competition and therefore have a much higher chance to win (and just because they don’t always win, that doesn’t take away their natural advantages that should not be present in this category of sports).
Idaho Sen. Mary Souza (R), a sponsor of this bill, told the Idaho Press: “We are not trying to do anything except save women’s sports for girls and women.” Apparently, trying to protect women’s sports is not “progressive”.
Leftists also call one of the provisions of the bill “retrogressive” because it demands that athletes prove their gender via some sort of DNA testing. This is a problem for Leftists because their entire narrative centers around gender being a “social construct” and being entirely “fluid” and up to an individual’s interpretation for their own gender, when biology teaches us otherwise.
Men have XY chromosomes whereas women have XX chromosomes. This isn’t up to interpretation, neither is it up for debate. Biology, science, tells us what men are and what women are. You would think that “the party of science” would believe science, but no, they just believe the “science” that benefits them.
“The glaciers aren’t actually melting and there is no threat of major cities being flooded? Bah! That’s not REAL science!”
“Logic demands that there be an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent God, and the theory of evolution is so full of holes it may as well pass off as Swiss cheese? Then I deny logic itself!”
“Biology has proven that there is a very discernible difference between men and women, even though such a difference should already be plain as day with just a simple glance? Bah humbug! I reject such an obvious result!”
This is why I have written articles that PROVE the Left hates actual science. It’s because it’s true. The idea that men and women are different is, somehow, retrogressive even though it’s a natural fact.
But these people simply can’t help themselves and their side must always win, even when their side would be catastrophic for everyone at every level, and so, they attempt to shame the Idaho legislature for having COMMON SENSE.
And while I know that Leftists and transgender activists (but I repeat myself) will claim that there is no scientific evidence to suggest biological males “identifying” as females have an advantage over biological females, that’s simply not the case.
According to Breitbart News, “a recent study conducted by the Karolinska Institute and Linkoping University in Sweden found biological males – who claim to be transgender women – who were administered a full year of hormone therapy, still maintained muscle mass and strength advantages over biological women.”
“Despite the robust increases in muscle mass and strength in TM (Transgender Men, or women “identifying” as men), the TW (Transgender Women) were still stronger and had more muscle mass following 12 months of treatment. These findings add new knowledge that could be relevant when evaluating transwomen’s eligibility to compete in the women’s category of athletic competitions,” the researchers noted.
They concluded: “Our results indicate that after 12 months of hormonal therapy, a transwoman will still likely have performance benefits over a cis-woman [biological woman].”
Another study released in July of last year concluded that “male athletes who claim to be female hold an ‘intolerable’ advantage over biological female athletes,” according to Breitbart.
This study was conducted following the International Olympic Committee (IOC) announcing that it would allow transgender athletes to compete in the Olympics if the “transgender women” have testosterone levels below 10 nmol/L, which is still significantly higher than testosterone levels of biological females.
The researchers noted that “indirect effects of testosterone will not be altered by hormone therapy. For example, hormone therapy will not alter bone structure, lung volume or heart size of the transwoman athlete, especially if she transitions post-puberty, so natural advantages including joint articulation, stroke volume and maximal oxygen uptake will be maintained.”
And for those who might try and argue that the researchers are “transphobic” or “anti-trans”, note that they said “she” when referring to a transgender woman, when the ACTUAL pronoun for such a person is still masculine because such a person is STILL A MAN NO MATTER WHAT! They adhered to the politically correct pronoun for such a situation, so these people are not “transphobic” or some such nonsense (not that they would’ve been had they used the actual pronoun).
Men, as has been the case for literally all of human existence, have physical advantages over women. We are stronger than women, have higher muscle mass, denser bone structure, higher lung capacity and a bigger heart. All of these things give us an advantage over women in sports and any sort of physical competition. To deny these things is to deny the women competing any semblance of fairness in their sports.
Could you imagine a girl’s football team competing against boys? Or a girl wrestling against a boy? Well, you don’t have to think too hard to imagine this because the Left is trying to push for it and the second example has already happened (as you can see from the picture above). It doesn’t matter what one’s “preferred pronouns” may be, or even how low their testosterone levels are. Men have a physical advantage over women and it is unfair for all women if a man competes against them. That’s not transphobic, it’s reality.
So kudos to the Idaho legislature for doing the right thing and protecting girls and women in their sports competitions from shameless cheaters.
“Whoever walks in integrity walks securely, but he who makes his ways crooked will be found out.”
Back in the 1980s and 90s, the idea of female independence was something that many people, particularly Leftists, wanted and pushed for. They demanded that women have “the same rights” as men do (even though they do have the same rights) and even still do that to this day, when trying to argue in favor of abortion (which is odd, considering men cannot have abortions). They demanded that girls stick with each other, have each other’s backs and fight against “the patriarchy” (again, something they still largely do). Any sort of sexual, physical, emotional or psychological abuse of a woman would be considered reprehensible behavior and evidence of how “all” men are sexist, misogynistic, dangerous pigs who cannot be trusted.
But with the arrival of transgenderism, particularly with men “identifying” as women, the Left has come full circle and now celebrates when a biological male enters an MMA octagon, fights a biological woman, and FRACTURES HER SKULL. THAT is not considered physical abuse in the least. It is not considered wrong. Matter of fact, it is considered morally right and a wonderful thing; so much so that a sportswriter for a gay sports organization dubbed the abuser the “bravest athlete in history”.
The writer of that article says that the professional abuser “is an indelible part of LGBTQ sports history” who has “opened possibilities for trans athletes in women’s sports that will be felt for generations.”
The reason as to exactly why we should consider the abuser so brave is never actually given, probably because the writer fully expected just about everyone who read his piece to be in full agreement with him. “Well, of course he’s brave, he’s the first transgender athlete in women’s mixed martial arts!” Why does that make the guy brave? The guy is physically stronger, has greater muscle mass and has denser bone structure that makes him more durable. This is the equivalent of someone beating a Mortal Kombat game on the easiest difficulty with cheat codes and calling that an impressive feat worthy of awe.
The guy (and no, I am not going to address this abuser by his preferred pronoun or “identification” because he does not deserve it for making a mockery of science and for working towards the legitimization of his torment of women) is very obviously cheating because he knows that he can’t beat many other men in the world of MMA, so he has to go after women like a complete coward (kind of want to use the stronger “P-word” here, but I will hold myself back).
He excuses his beating up of women with “I’m not the first female MMA fighter who’s broken another fighters’ bones.” Well, considering he isn’t female at all, I’d say he’s right, but the argument of “female MMA fighters break other female fighters’ bones” doesn’t work here because of the aforementioned point that he is not female and because NO ONE ELSE IN THE WOMEN’S DIVISION IS LIKE THIS GUY BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE IS A GUY! Again, he is physically stronger than the women. He is far more capable of breaking the women’s bones, breaking more of them and breaking them with far greater ease, than the other combatants are. When you have such a physical advantage, you do not belong in a particular division or class.
Wrestling and MMA fighting is supposed to be split by weight-class. Why? Because a 280-pound behemoth of a man fighting or wrestling a 190-pound man would be pretty unfair to the lighter fellow. How can a woman be expected to fight a MAN and have that fight be seen as in any way fair?
Now, I do understand that the guy actually (surprisingly) weighs only 143 lbs. and that is heavy enough to contend in the Featherweight class of fighters, which is the heaviest for the women’s division. But again, he has denser bone structure and bigger muscle mass. He is still physically stronger than the other women in the octagon purely by virtue of higher testosterone and GENERALLY BEING A GUY!
Now, of course, I am not saying that women cannot ever beat men in a physical fight. I am certain that if I were to fight (most) of the women in the women’s MMA tournaments, I would get my behind kicked for a variety of reasons (form, technique and general combat skill that I overall am lacking in). But if I were to diligently train as fighters tend to do and gain some muscle, I would become even heavier (most likely), learn to fight and would be able to hold my own in a fight, and in all likelihood, I would dominate in said fight against a woman.
I’ve used this argument before, but it’s always worth mentioning: most female tennis players who have played against men have lost to the male tennis players. Venus and Serena Williams have both lost, one after the other, to a man who was outside the top 200 in the men’s division and who claims to have played like someone outside the top 500 (though hard to tell the weight of that statement, so let’s just stick with the fact that he was, indeed, outside the top 200 and destroyed both Williams sisters, who both were at the top of women’s tennis at the time).
They lost because he was a guy, so he was physically superior to the Williams sisters and the competition they usually have. To their own admission, the guy got to balls that would usually “be winners” against women.
The two best female tennis players in the world (at the time) lost to a guy outside the top 200 purely because of his physical superiority. Now replace the Williams sisters with female MMA fighters who routinely take physical punches and hits as a job and replace the male tennis player with a male MMA fighter. That is considerably worse because at least the tennis match was not a physical event centered around fighting. The Williams sisters lost a match to him, each. Female combatants who go up against the male fighter stand to lose far more than just the match. Again, the guy fractured a woman’s skull. He can inflict fatal damage to female combatants (thankfully, he is retired now, but if he is the supposed trailblazer for transgenders in women’s MMA fighting, it could only be a matter of time before some guy straight up kills or permanently injures a woman, all for the sake of woke culture).
But despite the very deadly risks of having biologically male combatants fighting female combatants in women’s MMA, the Left celebrates the prospect as some sort of moral victory for progress. They have gone full circle from saying “men hitting women is bad” to “men hitting women is brave and courageous”. Of course, they don’t say that they are men, but that is precisely what they are and what God and science say they are.
There is no denying that transgender “women” are actually men. And there is no denying that the Left is now celebrating the prospect of men beating the crap out of women, for the sake of “progress”. These people are evil.
“For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed.”
When the Left isn’t excusing itself for the horrendous act of killing the unborn, they attempt to do the second closest thing they can: completely pervert and destroy young children’s minds with lies, deceit, and utter perversion.
While they already do plenty of the first two when they indoctrinate kids into believing we are killing the planet, Democrats in Washington State want to do the third thing with young children starting from kindergarten.
Democrats in Washington State are pushing House Bill 2184, which states: “In accordance with the requirements in this section and any recommendations of the sexual health education work group… that are enacted by the legislature, every public school shall provide comprehensive sexual health education to each student by the 2022-23 school year.”
Radio host Jason Rantz of KTTH points out about the bill: “One section of the curriculum for teachers to use as a guide suggests talking to students about the penis as not having ‘any bones in it, but when people talk about an erection as a “boner”, they’re mistaken.’ Girls are taught about a ‘very sensitive little area at the top called the clitoris.’”
I don’t know about girls, but I learned about these sexual things, for the most part, in middle school, not necessarily because we had classes specifically dedicated to teach these things (I wouldn’t have payed much attention anyway) but because that is roughly the age when puberty hits us and we begin to ask questions about ourselves and our bodies.
A FIVE-YEAR-OLD does not wonder about a “boner”. A FIVE-YEAR-OLD does not wonder about the clitoris. When I was around that age, I once went to a beach and saw a girl who was younger who, for some reason, did not have her bottom on. Embarrassing as it is to say this, I saw what she had and briefly made a mental note about how she didn’t have what I have. Then I promptly went about my business because I WAS AROUND FIVE YEARS OLD AND I DIDN’T CARE ABOUT THAT STUFF!
Wanna know what I cared about at that age? Watching cartoons while eating a sandwich and drinking orange juice. I cared about playing with my toys; playing with my Max Steel action figure; playing with my toy cars (I really liked cars back then, so I had a lot of them); going to friends’ houses to play with them and their toys. I cared about watching old Nickelodeon, Cartoon Network or Disney Channel shows (that were not old at the time) and generally watching and enjoying TV. I DID NOT CARE OR KNOW ABOUT SEXUALITY BACK THEN BECAUSE THAT’S NORMAL FOR SOMEONE THAT AGE!
But the Left cares not for the normal. They care not for what is right. They want to mold and manipulate young people’s minds, as evidenced by the fright they give them about climate change. They want to teach young kids about sexual things and, what’s worse, about how “some” boys don’t have penises and about how “some” girls don’t have a vagina aka about transgenderism, in an attempt to normalize it.
According to The Daily Wire, the curriculum has statements such as the following: “This lesson does, however, acknowledge that ‘there are some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.’”
Rantz also noted how the curriculum suggests for 1st grade students, “teachers should have their students read ‘My Princess Boy’ before teaching the six and seven-year-olds about reproduction.”
That revolting book is about exactly what you think it is about: a gender-confused boy. On Amazon, the description says: “Dyson loves pink, sparkly things. Sometimes he wears dresses. Sometimes he wears jeans. He likes to wear his princess tiara, even when climbing trees. He’s a Princess Boy.”
This is the sort of filth Washington State Democrats want young kids to read and I doubt this sentiment is contained within the borders of that particular state. The Left is EXTREMELY disturbed and this is one of the MANY reasons I say that they are evil. There’s just no other way to explain this sort of disturbing behavior. Wanting young kids to learn about sex and transgenderism is SICK and DEPRAVED and anyone who defends this perversion is just as twisted as the people pushing for it at the State’s capital.
This, by the way, goes against the will of the people, who 54% say that “sex education for children in grades K-5 should not be required,” according to The Daily Wire. But public opinion be damned, these perverts want to destroy young people’s minds and they will do everything within their power to do it.
And unfortunately, they will likely get their way, barring some miracle, as both legislative chambers in the State of Washington are controlled by Democrats, with the House having 57 Democrats to 41 Republicans and the Senate having 28 Democrats to 21 Republicans, so the disgusting bill will, in all likelihood, be eventually passed (if before the 2020 election) in both chambers of State Congress.
Despite the fact that most people do not want young kids to be taught about sexual education (though 54% is about 46 percentage points too low for my liking) and despite how clearly evil and disgusting it is, the Democrats in this State will push to teach young kids about things they couldn’t care less about and things that will only end up either confusing them further about a subject they couldn’t care less about or end up messing them up profusely, which is likely the desired outcome for the Democrats, though they would never admit it.
But beyond everything else, these sons and daughters of Satan will seek to cause these young children to sin against the Lord, because that is their desire, even if they don’t know it or believe in a God to sin against in the first place.
In Matthew chapter 18, the disciples asked Jesus “Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” Jesus called a child to him, put him in the midst of them and said: “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me, but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea. Woe to the world for temptations of sin! For it is necessary that temptations come, but woe to the one by whom the temptation comes!”
Now, before anyone says it, yes, I know that this is not about a literal child, but about a Christian being humbled, like a child, but being led astray by someone who is evil and forcing the Christian to sin against God. That teaching from Jesus was about “the greatest in the kingdom of heaven” being those who humble themselves before the Lord, similar to how a child humbles himself and is ready to be taught, not necessarily about actual children being led astray. However, there is no doubt in my mind that there are children in the State of Washington who go to public school and are believers of the Lord Jesus. And with this sort of curriculum, they are being led astray so as to sin against the Lord.
In this case, the Bible passage’s meaning takes a bit more of a literal meaning than it was originally intended, but the point remains: the evil Left is causing believers in Christ, who humble themselves in His name, to sin against the Lord. This is the great evil that the Left is doing, following their father the devil in his evil deeds.
The Left, in all their evil, believes God has no place in school, but that it is perfectly acceptable to teach young kids about sexuality and about transgenderism as being perfectly normal and moral. Unsurprising to me, but revolting nonetheless.
“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who turn darkness to light and light to darkness, who replace bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.”
In this day and age, if you dare tell the truth about biological gender, you stand the risk of being lambasted, cancelled or both. Any semblance of scientific truth regarding the issue of transgenderism must be culled in favor of science fiction so that a miniscule sector of society will not feel offended and so that Leftists can politicize and attack people for some sort of bigotry as though it’s a sport. But what happens when America’s first legal “non-binary” person discovers the truth about so-called gender identity and returns to his original gender of male?
This is what James Shupe is attempting to do, fighting legal fights in multiple states (namely Florida and Oregon) to get back his original gender of male and put it back on all legal documents which currently legally state that he is “non-binary”.
PJ Media had an extensive piece regarding this issue that I recommend you check out yourself, as I will likely not be able to cover everything here.
Shupe told PJ Media: “The charade of not being male, the legal fiction, it’s over. The lies behind my fictitious sex changes, something I shamefully participated in, first to female, and then to non-binary, have been forever exposed. A truthful accounting of events has replaced the deceit that allowed me to become America’s first legally non-binary person.”
He added: “The legal record has now been corrected and LGBT advocates are no longer able to use my historic non-binary court order to advance their toxic agenda. I am and have always been male. That is my biological truth, the only thing capable of grounding me to reality.”
He also said: “I hope that [a woman who is fighting to legally change her legal designation to non-binary] and all the others are denied the right to change their sex to non-binary because it’s fraud and legal fiction based on pseudoscience. I was indoctrinated to believe that I had this thing called a gender identity and that suppressing it was causing my mental health problems. It was all a lie.”
Obviously, this is a complete 180 from what he used to believe. Though he has mental health problems, he was led to believe that these problems were a result of suppressing a gender identity that was different from his biological sex. He was easy prey for anyone with an agenda to destroy as many lives as possible. As I said in the title, he used to be a hero in the LGBT community because of not only his transition into a woman, but particularly for becoming the first legally “non-binary” person in America. His own case has been and currently is being used by other people to legally transition their own legal gender status to “non-binary” as well, which he sincerely hopes to fight against.
Shupe later told PJ Media about the sort of physical and psychological harm his transitions have caused him:
“I ended up in the psych ward three times because of hormones. I had blood clots in my eyes because my estrogen levels were 2,585 instead of 200 (normal estrogen levels for women ranges from 15-350 picograms/milliliter, while for men, it ranges from 10-82 pg/mL. A man receiving roughly THIRTEEN times the normal amount for a woman is bound to lead to terrible health problems), low bone density, problems controlling my bladder, and emotional instability. Blood tests indicated I was dropping into kidney disease territory (eGFR below 60%) for about 18 months, I had chronic dermatology issues and skin reactions to estrogen patches, I passed out on the kitchen floor from Spironolactone (a drug meant to treat heart failure, high blood pressure or hypokalemia (low potassium levels in blood)).”
In all, while James was led to believe that transitioning into a different gender from what he is would be helpful, it only ended up hurting him more than anything. He had mental health issues before and these issues were only exacerbated by the sort of hormone treatment he was receiving, on top of the various drugs he was taking. The high-strength marijuana he was taking also made him hallucinate:
“The gender transitions were supposed to fix my mental health problems, but I kept getting worse instead. The high-powered marijuana made me psychotic. I started hearing booming noises and having visions of being some Indian woman. I started believing I was some kind of chosen one who was picked to restore the third gender to North America, that’s what I thought the visions were telling me.”
It’s not surprising at all that the Left, who are like the devil, would try and convince James to destroy his own life using lies and deceit. NO ONE gets better by exacerbating mental health issues and no one who claims to be “loving and tolerant” could come off as such when they suggest that people physically and psychologically harm themselves by lying to them about what would happen.
The serpent lied to Eve about her dying if she were to eat the fruit from the forbidden tree and lied to her about being “like God”. He convinced her that she would be “like God, knowing good and evil” to get her and Adam to destroy their very own lives and get them kicked out of literal paradise. The Left is exactly the same way, telling people lies so that they will willingly destroy their own lives. “No, socialism doesn’t lead to death and starvation. It leads to prosperity!” “Yes, your mental health issues will all go away if you make the transition into a different gender entirely.” “No, your unborn child is not a human; it’s nothing more than the equivalent of Jell-O.” “Yes, you should give up your rights and freedoms to the government. It’s for the environment!” “Yes, little Timmy, anyone who has guns is a bad person and will only seek to hurt you.”
All destructive lies that can alter, ruin or outright end people’s lives. And the Left repeats them with zero remorse regardless of the consequences.
Despite what this ideology has gotten James, any attempt to fight back against it has been met with scorn from the very people that considered him a sort of “hero”. Once he began to disagree with the transgender ideology, the various media sources that would love to hear what he had to say all of a sudden were uninterested in his opinion. They didn’t care that he agreed with Trump’s transgender military ban. They didn’t care that he was worried about the effect of this ideology on young children and their growing bodies. They didn’t care about the harmful effects this lifestyle has had on his life and on his health.
“Not a single Oregon media outlet has been willing to talk to me, let alone report that I’ve reclaimed my birth sex and have denounced gender ideology. They dropped me after I supported Trump’s ban on gender dysphoria in the military. That got me canceled.”
The Left doesn’t care for the truth. James finding out this truth is harmful to their twisted and sick ideology that seeks to destroy as many lives as possible. His landmark case allows for people to transition into legal non-binary status and they definitely are not going to let it be known that the very person that sought and attained the first legal non-binary status in this country has come forth with his testimony about the entire process and that he is now seeking to regain his male status (which he says is legally challenging, as the Social Security Administration reportedly refused to accept a doctor’s letter stating he was a biological male and that they forced him to claim that he had undergone a transition to male, despite the fact that that’s not the case at all, but the ideology is more important than the individual to these people).
Shupe also called out the doctors and judges who facilitated the transitions because they were aware of his mental health problems and ignored them in favor of being “woke”: “Why didn’t they (the doctors) force me to go to mental health for an evaluation about why I felt the sex change (to female) was a failure instead of giving me yet another one (to non-binary)?” And regarding the judge that allowed him to transition to “non-binary”: “The Oregon judge physically and mentally harmed me by silently rubber-stamping the non-binary court order to advance a transgender agenda, to which she has ties.” According to PJ Media, before the proceeding had begun, “Shupe’s lawyer told him not to worry because the judge herself had a transgender kid.”
The entire thing is very messed up from top to bottom. He was lied to about the reason he had mental health issues and pushed him down a slope of further psychological but also physical and emotional issues and pain.
Do you wonder why I so often call the Left “evil” and “of the devil”? Because of this kind of stuff. And while no actual political party was mentioned here, we all know what side of the political aisle supports this kind of stuff. Only the Left would be willing to lie to someone about the reasons for their problems and put them down a road of self-destruction all for the sake of a political agenda meant to divide and destroy the American culture and the nuclear family, not to mention any sense of reason and the definition of truth.
The Left are the ones to destroy people’s lives. The Left are the ones to say “my truth” or “his truth” or “her truth” as though truth were entirely subjective. The Left are the only ones who would be heartless enough to destroy people’s lives all for the sake of political dominance and the advancement of their agenda.
I sincerely hope and pray that James wins his legal cases and, following this, he will turn his life to Christ, who is the only one who can actually help him with his mental health issues, let alone his other life issues.
“And the prayer of faith will save the one who is sick, and the Lord will raise him up. And if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven.”
The Mainstream Media believes it holds a monopoly on public opinion, being able to shape it in whatever way they wish. They couldn’t be more wrong, as example after example shows, such as public sentiment regarding President Trump (they wish America hated him as much as they do). But within their highly-biased reporting is the desire to be as “woke” as humanly possible, despite how much of a detriment to civilized society that may be.
So when they come out in favor of “woke” things such as allowing for biological males who identify as females to compete against biological women who actually are women, they expect most people to fall in line with that thought and those who do not ought to be publicly shamed as being “transphobic” and “bigoted”.
However, according to a recent Rasmussen poll, public sentiment is not with the media on this matter.
According to the poll, 51% of U.S. adults opposed “allowing athletes compete on the basis of their gender identity, including biological males who participate in women’s and girls’ sports.” Only 29% supported the idea of transgenders competing in sports teams of the gender they identify with and 20% said they were undecided.
This is fairly similar to a poll back in June that showed 28% supported the idea of transgenders competing in sports teams of their “identified” gender and 54% were opposed.
I do have a problem with the fact that it’s not quite as big a margin as I think it should be, but it’s still nowhere close to what the Left would want it to be.
Simply put, it gives men an unfair advantage to compete against girls simply by pretending to be women. Men are, on average, physically superior to women and develop stronger bodies as they grow up.
Most people recognize this biological fact, including former tennis player and openly gay activist Maria Navratilova. I’ve already written more extensively about where she stands on the issue of transgender sports players, but she acknowledges the inarguable fact that men are physically stronger than women and have an athletic advantage.
It’s not “transphobic” to think this way. It’s pure science. Watch any NBA game versus any WNBA game. Watch any men’s soccer game versus any women’s soccer game. You will find that the men tend to be faster than the women, are capable for more athletic feats than women (most male basketball players can dunk to some degree or another while I can count on one hand the amount of female basketball players that can dunk to any degree) and are overall physically superior to women.
For NBA rookies, one of their biggest challenges is to put on enough muscle to be able to finish at the rim against NBA-level competition, aka against strong and fully-grown men. Players have to be able to put on some muscle and strength in order to compete. Look at the following pictures of current NBA MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo:
One picture shows Giannis when he was a rookie. Pretty skinny, right? The guy is pretty athletically-gifted, pretty tall and lengthy. But he needed to bulk up a little to be able to compete at the NBA level against other giants. So, he hit up the gym and is now the reigning MVP and a top-3 player in the NBA.
Do you sincerely think that there is any woman in the WNBA who would be able to beat Giannis 1-on-1 if Giannis is actually trying? I even remember one of the WNBA’s biggest stars, Brittney Griner, who while she is 6’9” but only weighs 205 lbs., claimed that she could beat NBA star Demarcus Cousins, who is 6’11” and 269 lbs. on a 1-on-1 game.
When that news circulated, fellow NBA stars laughed at the idea, not believing Griner to be able to beat Cousins whatsoever. They laughed not because they are “transphobic” or “bigoted” but because they knew that the WNBA star couldn’t hold a candle to the NBA star. He is bigger, stronger and one of the best centers in the NBA (when healthy).
And even in actual cases in which men competed against women, we find tennis matches where men won most of the matches rather handily, as I have noted many times in the past.
But we don’t have to look at professional competitions to know how much of an athletic advantage men have over women. There are many examples in school sports of guys pretending to be girls, competing against girls, and obviously beating said girls.
There is good reason that girls have their own division of sports. There is a reason there is a WNBA, because female basketball players would get destroyed by male basketball players 99 times out of 100. There is a reason there is a Women’s soccer team, because female soccer players would get destroyed by male soccer players 99 times out of 100.
Girls have to have their own divisions to compete against other girls because they have next to no prayer to be able to beat guys in athletic competitions. That’s not to say it doesn’t happen, of course. Even when discussing men vs. women tennis matches, there was one instance in which the woman won. But in every other instance, the male competitor won and pretty easily.
Again, Serena and Venus Williams, some of the best female tennis players of all time, lost to a guy who was ranked outside the top-200 one after the other. That’s not because the guy was more talented than the Williams sisters. I don’t think anyone would argue that that was the case. It was because he was physically superior. Serena Williams herself acknowledged that she hit the ball in ways that would usually be winners against other women but that he got to with rather ease.
Men can kick soccer balls farther and harder than women can. Men can finish at the rim better than women can (this is something even I have done when playing against girls, even though I have zero talent for basketball). Men are physically superior to women. So when a guy competes against a girl, it’s no surprise that he would win. It becomes utterly unfair to the girls in the competition to work so hard and yet fall to someone who is naturally more athletic and physically superior.
Men who compete against women are complete and utter failures and cowards who are too afraid to compete against other men because they know they would fail against other men. I don’t care what they “identify” as, they aren’t women and they shouldn’t be allowed to compete against women.
“If favor is shown to the wicked, he does not learn righteousness; in the land of uprightness he deals corruptly and does not see the majesty of the Lord.”
Back in late November of last year, I wrote an article discussing the harrowing situation a family, or more specifically, a father and his young son were in because of the son’s monster of a mother, wherein she forced him to dress and act like a girl around him and in the school he would attend.
As a reminder, court documents said that James Younger, the young boy in question who is only 7 years of age at this point, would only dress as a girl when he is with his mother and was enrolled into school under the name of “Luna”. He would have to use the girls’ restroom and he would be addressed as “Luna” by his teachers, principal, librarian, and most other authoritative figures in his life… except his father, who is trying to save the young boy.
But unfortunately, evil reigns supreme in this case, as a Texas jury has decided that Jeffrey Younger, the father of James, will not be the Sole Managing Conservator over his “two twin boys” (Yes, there are two, but it appears James is the only one that is being forced to be transgender by his mother, though it’s uncertain that his twin brother will not be forced as well).
James’ mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, according to LifeSiteNews, has been granted authority to “transition” James from a boy to a girl, meaning chemical castration when he turns 8, putting him on puberty blockers and eventually, put him on a hormone treatment in his mid-teens.
LifeSiteNews also says that “the jury’s decision likely means that Mr. Younger will be required to ‘affirm’ James as a girl, despite his religious and moral objections, and will also be forced to take a class on transgenderism.”
Jeffrey Younger recently was a guest on The Luke Macias Show and shared with the host:
“I want you to imagine having electronic communication with your son on FaceTime, and imagine that your ex-wife has dressed him as a drag queen to talk to you. He has false eyelashes and makeup. His hair has got glitter in it. He’s wearing a dress. Now imagine how you would feel seeing what I believe is actual sexual abuse – I believe this is not just emotional abuse but is the very, most fundamental form of sexual abuse, tampering with the sexual identity of a vulnerable boy… [James] wears a dress at her (Georgulas’) home; he has a new made-up name, Luna – it appears in the court filings. He goes to school; the teachers call him ‘Luna’. He uses the girl’s bathroom at school. All of his authority figures – his mother, his teacher, the librarian at school, the police officer at school, the principal at school – tell him he’s a girl. I’m the only authority figure in his life that tells him the truth; that he’s actually a boy.”
Furthermore, Jeffrey notes that, in his opinion, he has witnessed his then-wife “was only giving [James] love and affection when he was acting like a girl,” adding that she used to lock the young boy in his room and tell him that monsters only eat boys.
He continued: “Every. Single. Day. You have to see your son sexually abused, and you have to maintain your calm, because the courts are not going to be fair to you. And the only way you can survive this and get your son through this alive is to calmly allow your son to be tortured right before your eyes and outlast the opposition. That’s what it’s like. They’re asking me to affirm a delusion.”
It is utterly despicable what this mother is doing to her own son. I believe Jeffrey’s account regarding withholding affection unless James acts like a girl and locking him in his room and telling him monsters only eat boys, but even if they aren’t true, the situation as a whole is very much true and is horrifying.
The mother is a vindictive (I really want to use a bad word here, that’s how mad I am, but you can use your imagination) and is sexually and emotionally abusing her OWN SON. And now, because of course it’s this way, a jury, the people who decide the boy’s future, have sided with his mom likely because of “political correctness.”
If I were Jeffrey, I would go to my ex-wife’s house, barge in, take my kids and go to a non-extradition country, safe from that monster’s predatorial hands.
I would honestly not give one single flipping crap (I really wish I could say something stronger) about what the legal consequences of this are. I would much rather obey God’s Law over Man’s law if Man’s law contradicts with God’s.
What happened in that courtroom was an abortion of justice. Even by the Left’s own standards, this should be considered extremely evil because it’s FORCING A CHILD TO BE A GENDER HE DOESN’T WANT TO BE!
Court documents show that he very aggressively does not want to act or dress like a girl when he is with his father. He KNOWS he’s a boy, but is being FORCED to act like a girl when with his “mom” (I wouldn’t even call her that, as calling her that is an insult to all mothers) or when in school.
One of the Left’s arguments in favor of transgenderism is “letting people choose who or what they want to be.” Dumb as it is to deny biological and scientific FACT, adults can do whatever they damn well please, so if one wishes to be a different gender from what they are, then fine. They are definitely wrong to do so and if they go through the transition procedure, will permanently alter their bodies and will likely come to regret it, but it’s their decision to make.
But here? The only decision being made is by the “mother” and by the courts, siding with the “mother”. The young boy doesn’t have a choice in the matter. His mother wants him to be a girl, so he has to be a girl. And not one Leftist will care because “woke”, even though if the roles were reversed, and it was the boy who wanted to be a girl and the mother who didn’t want that, the Left would accuse her of bigotry and transphobia and say it’s “the kid’s choice”.
Apparently, the kid only has a choice when it’s a choice the Left agrees with. Why am I not even surprised at this in the least?
It’s pure evil what is happening and the judge preceding over the case should lose her job and her law degree. This is the very perversion of justice, the state allowing a woman to sexually, emotionally, biologically and physically abuse her child just because she’s on the “right side of history.”
Injustice is never on “the right side of history.” History, but most especially the Lord God, who is the creator of the universe, will utterly condemn this action by the woman and by the court.
The Mayo Clinic says that possible side-effects of cross-sex hormone therapy include: blood clots in a deep vein (deep vein thrombosis) or in a lung (pulmonary embolism), high triglycerides which are a type of fat in the blood, gallstones, weight gain, elevated liver function tests, decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, infertility, hyperkalemia or high potassium, hypertension, Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and hyperprolactinemia, where a noncancerous tumor in the brain causes the pituitary gland to overproduce the hormone prolactin and have it rush through the veins.
In other words, there are a LOT of health hazards when it comes to the hormone treatment of transgenders itself, let alone the chemical castration and things like gender transition surgery.
The young boy will be forced to live a life, perhaps a short one, full of chemical and biological, let alone social, misery all because his mother FORCED HIM TO BE A TRANSGENDER GIRL!
Now, I don’t usually do this, but I highly recommend visiting the website: savejames.com. In this site, you can find more information regarding the case, including multiple court documents detailing the situation, such as documents showing Georgulas accusing Jeffrey of domestic violence (thankfully, he was acquitted) and everything else regarding the actual case. They also allow for people to donate to the site to help Jeffrey keep his son, though it’s not likely that this story will have a happy ending. If you wish to donate, that is your decision. I will not ask that you do, as I am not certain it would help any at this point, but do as you wish.
As far as Jeffrey and James go, I pray to the Lord that He will watch over them and keep them safe. From what I understand, Jeffrey is religious and the site says that he has volunteered to serve on the board of a private Christian school that his step-daughters attended, so it’s likely that he already is a Christian, which is good. Regarding James, it’s unclear. With limited contact with his father, he will likely have limited contact with his father’s faith as well and more contact with his devilish “mother”.
The entire situation is horrible, but I pray that James will be able to go through this as safely as one possibly can when being hurled into permanent harm’s way, and I pray that things do get better for James, his father and his twin brother, who might be subjected to the same things as James in the future (if he isn’t already).
One can only hope that the young boy is as safe as possible, the father will be as strong as possible and will eventually be justified and given custody of the boys and that the Lord will appear strongly in everyone’s hearts, especially Georgulas’, who absolutely needs Him the most. Don’t misunderstand, they all need Him badly and need His comfort and love badly, but it’s her evil heart that needs the most purging and cleansing with the Holy Spirit.
I hate what this woman is doing and even slightly hate her for doing it, but if there ever was a case of demons plaguing someone, this is it (you particularly think this if you read the “James’ Story” section of the aforementioned website that says “Ms. Georgulas [believes] she is called by God to do these terrible things,” which really only makes me think Satan is behind this, using his demons on her). This woman is being utterly plagued by demons and only the power of the Lord can save her.
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I will end by saying this one more time: I pray that everything will turn out well for everyone in question, with everyone finding comfort, love and security in the Lord.
“And whenever the unclean spirits saw him, they fell down before him and cried out, ‘You are the Son of God.’”
Much as that might sound like the beginning to a punchline of a joke, this is what happened earlier this week as the Supreme Court of the United States began to hear oral arguments regarding whether or not the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to transgenders in the workplace.
On one side are the progressive uber-Leftists who are trying to force the transgender agenda down Americans’ throats and on the other, we find conservatives, lesbian feminists and former transgenders fighting back against it.
You know an issue is particularly important and major if conservatives and lesbian feminists are fighting ON THE SAME SIDE.
While the Supreme Court Justices were hearing oral arguments inside the High Court, on the steps of the building were demonstrators and protesters on both sides of the issue, each trying to make their case in public.
Walt Heyer is one of these people, making his case against the transgender agenda. And while nutcase Leftists might try and pin him as a transphobe or a sexist or what-have-you, there is particular reason to hear his testimony: he, himself, used to be a transgender woman (biological male to female).
Heyer recounted: “It all started when I was four-years-old and my grandmother started crossdressing me and I enjoyed it very much. But that crossdressing started a confusion within me about who I was. And it was in 1944, before we had any words like gender dysphoria. I was just a confused kid that was being affirmed by my grandmother who actually caused me to have this tremendous confusion, which started this journey to transgenderism.”
Heyer said that he uncovered the truth about his life when he began studying to become a counselor: “I wanted to be a therapist. So I studied at U.C. Santa Cruz and realized in studying the books in the stacks that people who identified with gender identity disorder had mental disorders. And I thought we’re not approaching this from the right direction. We need to be addressing the co-morbid problems that are causing people to believe they’re a different gender. It seems to be compassionate to me to reach out to those people and actually guide them in the right direction and not fill their bodies with hormones and cut body parts off and rearrange everything in their lives so their lives are totally destroyed.”
Heyer also has a website called sexchangeregret.com and he says that hundreds of thousands of people have visited it. “Today, we have a worldwide ministry that reaches over 300 million people a year and people now are de-transitioning by the hundreds,” said Heyer
In the site, Heyer also recounts what he went through, having had gender reassignment surgery in 1983 but being left unsatisfied and then de-transitioning back to male 25 years ago. He is now happily married for 20 years to a woman, but he recognizes the permanent damage that surgery caused to his body, having to take hormones now to “try to regulate a system that is permanently altered,” according to Heyer.
The site also notes the fact that males have XY chromosomes, even those who are transgender women, and that the genes responsible for the determination of sex, SRY, and the genes that determine possible male infertility, AZF a, b, and c, are not found to be abnormal in transsexual people, meaning there is no biological reason for people to be transgender.
If you want to read more of Heyer’s testimony, go to this Breitbart News link: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/08/former-transgender-woman-on-sex-change-regret-people-are-de-transitioning-in-the-hundreds/.
Moving on to lesbian feminists, however, we also find another great speech.
The speech was given by Natasha Chart, a feminist writer at FeministCurrent.org, and while her speech was relatively long and I can’t share everything she said, here are the main points:
If you wish to read her full speech, here is the link: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/08/watch-feminist-speaks-against-transgender-ideology-i-will-not-submit/.
But what she says is completely right and insanely powerful. I’ve already noted how feminists get banned from Twitter if they speak out against men in women’s sports and other transgender issues. And the risk of transgender bathroom laws, as I have always maintained, is that women are put into the precarious situation where they might be raped or sexually assaulted.
Chart herself noted in her speech: “If a woman complains that a man has dropped his trousers in front of her at a job, the left will shout ‘Me Too!’ in solidarity, and he’ll be cancelled. If a woman complains because he dropped his trousers in front of her at a gym locker, but he says he’s a woman, they’ll cancel her. Is that kind?”
Basically, transgender bathroom laws, despite their supposed intentions, leave women at risk of being raped or sexually assaulted and without the ability to hold the man accountable because of identity politics (and yes, Chart railed on the hypocrisy of the Left more than in just this instance).
The transgender agenda gives license to rapist and sexually-deviant men to get away with whatever they want and have the Left side with them. Only look at someone like “Jessica Yaniv”, the transgender “woman” who is all-too happy to sue a wax parlor because the female worker would not touch his male genitals.
Because of cases like Yaniv, is it really so surprising to see conservatives, lesbian feminists and former transgenders – who discovered the grim reality of what gender reassignment and transgenderism bring someone – fighting on the same side against a highly-dangerous and morally-evil agenda?
I’m not sure if I have stated this previously, as I have said a lot of things at this point in my career, but I have felt for a while that the transgender movement would have to be completely divorced from the rest of the gay movement. It totally goes against gays, lesbians and bisexuals, who by definition affirm the reality of two genders.
If Hegelian dialectics are anything to go by, this antithesis of transgenderism to the thesis of the rest of the gay movement will have to bring about a synthesis, where the two theses collide with one another. I think that’s what’s happening here, with lesbians and other gay people fighting against the transgender movement. This also is the case for feminism against transgenderism.
Put simply: transgenderism and feminism cannot peaceably coexist. One must abandon key beliefs in order to appease the other and live with it to some extent. If more men enter women’s sports because they are wimps and can’t win against other men, women’s sports will disappear because the women, most of the time, cannot compete against physically-superior men.
There is a reason there is an NBA and a WNBA – a reason there is a men’s and women’s tennis (though there are mixed teams too, but still).
One of the reasons Serena Williams was so successful is because she has a uniquely man-like physique that makes her bigger, stronger and generally physically superior to many women. And even then, when facing against a man ranked 203rd in 1998, the man destroyed her and then her sister, beating Serena 6-1 and Venus 6-2. Despite her physical advantages against women, she is still, herself, a woman and physically inferior to most athletic men. The mere fact that she even said that no man outside the top 200 could beat the Williams sisters is an indication that she didn’t think she could beat Carlos Moya, who was the same rank as Serena (no. 5) in 1998, and an indication that she did not believe she could beat a man of her skill range. Despite the similarities in rank at the time, the Williams sisters didn’t think they could beat men in their same rank range, such as Carlos Moya, Andre Agassi, Pete Sampras, or even number 199, Lorenzo Manta.
If men and women are not physically different, why wouldn’t Serena and Venus Williams have challenged men who were in a similar rank to them at the time?
But regardless, my point is that the transgender movement is very dangerous for society as a whole, not to mention people the Left already victimizes, like women and homosexuals.
It’s very dangerous to children, as hormone treatment can permanently destroy children’s lives, and it makes absolutely no sense to be in favor of this.
But the hate-filled Left will see none of this logic and change their minds. They think transgenderism is something they must back in order to attain power, even though Obama himself admitted on NPR that his support for transgenderism might’ve made Trump’s election easier.
This is far too dangerous and destructive to be allowed and I hope and pray that God will guide the SCOTUS to the right decision. Otherwise, may God help us.
“Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make straight your paths.”
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
Have you ever found yourself in a situation in which you were hit on the head and felt like you might have lost brain cells as a result? Regardless of the way in which you hit your head, chances are, you still have more brain cells than the entire Democrat field and those who watched the Democrat debates after they were over.
That’s how embarrassingly stupid the first Democrat debate was, which is what we will mostly be focusing on. Although, I don’t know why I was expecting anything else from them.
Let’s begin with Señor Robert Francis O’Rourke when he somehow managed to avoid answering a question relating to taxes in two different languages.
Early on in the debate, moderator Savannah Guthrie asked O’Rourke: “Some Democrats want marginal, individual tax rate of 70% of the very highest earners, those making more than $10 million a year. Would you support that, and if not, what would be your top individual rate?”
To which Robert responded: “This economy has got to work for everyone, and right now, we know that it isn’t. And it’s gonna take all of us coming together to make sure that it does.” That was what he said in English, which 1) entirely avoided the question and 2) was a complete lie, considering we are in an economic boom and minorities are experiencing record-low unemployment rates that have been steady during Trump’s administration thus far.
Then, despite being limited on time, Robert said this in Spanish (and Spanish that wasn’t even entirely grammatically correct): “We need to include every person in the success of this economy. But if we want to do that, we have to include every person in our democracy. Every vote needs representation and every voice needs to be heard.”
Again, entirely avoiding the question, but in a uniquely dumb manner that even liberal late night hosts made fun of.
Let me remind you that the question asked had to do with taxing the rich extreme rates. What reason does Robert have to reply (without even answering the question at all) in both English and Spanish? It’s quite clear to anyone even half-way paying attention that the guy was simply pandering to the Hispanic vote by basically saying: “Hey, look, I can speak Spanish too!” The only thing that would’ve completed that hysterical moment was if he was holding Uno cards while he was saying that.
And while there may be others who disagree with me on this, I find this not only embarrassing for the guy but also kind of insulting. As a Hispanic person, I’m not going to be wooed by someone who happens to know some Spanish (again, he didn’t even speak it perfectly well either). I’m especially not going to be wooed by someone who manages to avoid answering a question in two different languages.
Granted, I never had any plans to vote for O’Rourke at any capacity and fully plan on voting for President Trump come the 2020 election, but this was outright asinine.
But perhaps not quite as asinine as Julian Castro saying that biological men who transition to (looking) female ought to have the right to an abortion.
For some context, NBC News’ Lester Holt had asked the actual Hispanic (and actual lunatic): “Secretary Castro, this one is for you. All of you on stage support a woman’s right to an abortion. You all support some version of a government health care option. Would your plan cover abortion Mr. Secretary?”
Castro replied: “Yes, it would. I don’t believe only in reproductive freedom, I believe in reproductive justice. And, you know, what that means is that just because a woman – or let’s not also forget someone in the trans community, a trans female, is poor, doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have the right to exercise that right to choose. And so I absolutely would cover the right to have an abortion.”
Another kind of pandering, particularly because he stopped to also include transgender people. And like O’Rourke’s pandering, this one also doesn’t make any sense (although it does make sense in the mind of a lunatic Leftist who is this out of touch with reality).
In case Secretary Castro has forgotten his 3rd grade science class, MEN CAN’T GET PREGNANT! It doesn’t matter if a man with gender dysphoria goes through the process of mutilating his body to look like a woman’s, he still cannot biologically get pregnant because he lacks the reproductive equipment to do so. A man may say he is a woman and may even transition into having the body of a woman, but that does not include the transfer of a womb into the new body and the removal of the previous reproductive system.
Men can’t get pregnant, and as a result, can also not get an abortion. It literally makes zero sense for Castro to even say this, or for anyone to say this for that matter. And these people think Trump isn’t fit to serve? This guy literally thinks men can get pregnant! Either that or he’s simply trying to pander to out-of-their-minds politically-correct morons in the audience who will say: “Yaaaas! Slay, queen!” entirely unironically. I honestly hope it’s the latter because I would hate for someone that mentally deranged to be within 10 feet of any position of power as grand as the Presidency.
Overall, the Democrat debates have proven that the entire field of Democrat candidates is filled with shameless panderers at best and outright deranged people at worst. None of them have proven to mainstream America that they are in any way sane, and that goes beyond the ridiculous (and dangerous) desire to confiscate every gun in America and allow for literally unrestricted abortions. While those two issues demonstrate how out of touch they are with America, it’s the shameless pandering and the open lunacy that tells us what they are all about.
Even if I had been a registered Democrat, voted for Hillary in 2016 and despised Trump, I would seriously doubt I would be willing to support any of these people. And I think there are plenty of people out there who think similarly. I mean, O’Rourke is polling at roughly 3%, Castro at less than 1 and everyone else is equally as stupid or deranged.
Sure, neither of the two will likely be the Democrat nominee to challenge Trump, but if this is what the Left has to offer, they really do need the tech giants to come in and rig the elections for them because otherwise, Trump would likely win all but one state ala Ronald Reagan.
“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
I’ve written extensively about matters pertaining to sex, sexual preference and sexual “identity” wherein one identifies as the opposite gender of what they are (and sometimes take it to such extremes as to identify as neither gender or even identify as an entirely different species). I’ve shared my two cents on the matter as well as what the Bible largely says about it (granted, it does not really talk much about transgenderism as that is a fairly new thing, for some reason).
But at the end of the day, whatever my own opinions on the matter are, it is entirely up to people to choose whether they are straight or gay (and yes, it’s a choice. A difficult one, but a choice nonetheless) and choose to identify as whatever they want to identify. I will still speak about how wrong it is, but it is entirely their choice to make. However, I absolutely draw the line at pedophilia.
A man wants to sleep with another man? Fine. I disapprove, as does God, but that’s their thing. A man wants to identify as a woman? Fine. I disapprove, as does God, but that’s their thing as long as they don’t use that to cheat at sports and don’t use women’s restrooms, given the high possibility of rape occurring in such an instance. But I will absolutely not tolerate anyone who is a pedophile. It is absolutely abhorrent behavior that causes suffering for children.
When two people of the same sex sleep together, they sin, but they both consent and are fully aware of their actions. When a man identifies as a woman, that is his choice, ditto for the opposite. But a child absolutely cannot be considered to be giving consent on sexual matters.
Part of the reason I absolutely hate the fact that the Left idolizes child drag queens is the fact that THESE ARE CHILDREN THAT HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND WILL LIKELY REGRET EVERYTHING THEY ARE DOING IN THE FUTURE! This sort of thing sticks with them forever and it’s simply not right. If an adult wants to be a drag queen, fine, but leave children out of it.
Now, after an unusually long introduction, allow me to give you the reason as to why I am writing about this.
Recently, a professor at the University of North Texas presented a lesson to students titled: “Sexual Pleasure and Response in Infants.”
If the title alone makes you sick to your stomach, brace yourself, because we’re just getting started.
That lesson plan is largely, though not entirely, taken from a textbook titled “Our Sexuality” which contains a section titled “Teaching Ideas”, which is essentially a guide for some teachers to follow as they teach their course.
The section suggests that “instructors take students on a ‘field trip’ to observe children possibly engaging in ‘sexual interactions’ during recess hours,” according to The College Fix.
The textbook reads: “Take the class to a local elementary school playground, or ask permission for a few of your students to attend various school playgrounds, preschools, or daycare centers during recess to observe behaviors of children. Ask students to note interactions between same-sex and mixed-sex groups. Which group was more frequent? Which behaviors were most frequent? What kind of touching did children engage in? What about teasing behaviors? Were there any overtly sexual interactions? What was the age range of the children being observed? Have students write a report comparing their observations with information in the text.”
Okay, I have a few things to say about this.
First, whose permission is being asked? The students in the course or the parents of the children potentially being observed? That remains unclear, but I’m willing to bet it’s not the latter.
Second, are they really encouraging people to observe kids in playgrounds? People have been mocking that sort of pedophilic behavior for ages (rightly so), but these people think it is 100% acceptable to do so?
Third, what do you mean “children possibly engaging in ‘sexual interactions’”? CHILDREN DON’T ENGAGE IN IT BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IT IS! A sexual interaction is an interaction where there is clear sexual intent behind it. Children have no idea what sex is so they don’t engage in sexual interaction by DEFAULT!
What interactions between two preschool boys could be considered same-sex sexual interaction? Playing with one another? Playing tag? Hugging one another occasionally? Hanging an arm around the shoulders of the other? The last time I went to church, I saw a young boy (no older than 8, maybe) with his arm around his buddy. Is that somehow a sexual interaction? Is any physical contact sexual interaction?
Of course not! It’s typical childhood behavior! Kids do what kids do! Even when they do “adult” things like kissing, it hardly means a thing at that age! They are just learning those things!
Children simply do not engage in sexual interaction unless they are FORCED by someone who knows what sex is.
Now, one of the textbook’s editors said that neither she nor another of the editors wrote the part about instructors going on bizarre “field trips” to preschools and the like. I suppose that makes sense seeing as that quote was taken from the book’s 13th edition, so it was likely edited by someone else entirely.
The editor notes that the “field trip” “seems rather odd, potentially problematic and fruitless… I’m not aware of any professors having assigned it – but I’d certainly be interested in students’ reactions to the proposal!”
Well, hopefully, the consensus reaction to the proposal is that of utter disgust and shock. Seeing as these are college students, who were just kids and minors themselves not that long ago, I would hope that they are fully aware of how creepy and messed up such a proposal is.
Granted, all adults should be painfully aware of how messed up such a proposal is, but there are still those who are eerily sexually attracted to young children.
And it certainly doesn’t help when an adult bus driver rapes a 14-year-old and the worst punishment he gets is a slap on the wrist as was the case recently in New York, where a judge gave no jail time, only 10 years probation, to a man who ADMITTED to raping a girl. Such a case only leaves these sycophants to think they can get away with it with only a minor punishment.
Pedophilia and the act of pedophilia should be a severely punished crime, as usually tends to be. Just possessing or distributing child pornography will send someone to jail for no less than 15 years with the addition of being put into supervised sex offender release programs, according to Justia.com.
That’s not to say these people should not be helped. Like with homosexuals and transgenders, these people lack Christ in their hearts. They need both spiritual and mental help. As far as homosexuals go, I think it’s entirely a choice, not that there is something inherently psychologically wrong with them, but that they choose to live in sin.
But they all need some sort of help. All need Christ. Granted, that also goes for people who are none of those things. It goes for pretty much everyone. But these people very specifically need Him.
Christians understand very well how much of a gift children are. Psalm 127:3 says: “Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward.”
Matthew 18:10 says: “See that you do not despise one of these little ones. For I tell you that in heaven their angels always see the face of my Father who is in heaven.”
Isaiah 54:13: “All your children shall be taught by the Lord, and great shall be the peace of your children.”
John 16:21: “When a woman is giving birth, she has sorrow because her hour has come, but when she has delivered the baby, she no longer remembers the anguish, for joy that a human being has been born into the world.”
Children are special and are fragile. It is very easy to mistreat them, abuse them and bring anguish to them. It is easy to take advantage of their naïve and trusting natures. It is easy to take advantage of their yet undeveloped bodies. But all of these things are absolutely abhorrent, and things that the Lord hates.
My heart broke when I read and wrote the story about a boy who was essentially forced to dress as a girl for his mother and his father was trying to save his son from such a horrible life. That was just dressing the boy as a girl and having him go by a girl’s name and say he was a girl. It was horrible abuse, but the one silver lining of the entire story is that he was not being forced into anything sexual with anyone.
Pedophiles do that and more. They take advantage of the children’s bodies and mind. They utterly corrupt them and scar them for the rest of their lives. The attempt by the Left to normalize this abhorrent behavior is utterly sickening and not something that I will stand for.
They want to say there’s absolutely nothing wrong with being gay? Fine. They’re wrong, but fine. They want to say there’s absolutely nothing wrong with being transgender? Fine. They’re wrong, but fine. But the minute they start saying there’s absolutely nothing wrong with being a pedophile is the minute I lose my own damn marbles.
For whatever reason, I have always pictured myself having a family. My mother sometimes reminds me of the fact that even when I was fairly little, maybe around 5 or so, I pictured myself having a family. Granted, I was also very childish at the time and named my children “Lightning Thunder” because I’ve always had a fascination with electricity and thought those names sounded cool, but I always pictured myself having kids even when I was a very young kid myself (not that I knew how to MAKE kids, but I always pictured a family of my own).
It is for this reason that I believe myself to have a very protective nature. When I used to attend Aikido classes with my father and would take the kids’ classes, I tended to be the oldest in the class and felt it was my responsibility to look after the other kids.
I have always felt protective and rather paternal of kids. So perhaps it is for this reason that I am so fired up and passionate about pushing back against the latest disgusting-as-sin attempt at normalizing evil… that or I’m just not a bat-crap insane Leftist lunatic and understand how naturally messed up pedophilia is. Because let’s be honest here: I highly doubt even Democrat VOTERS are fascinated with the idea of normalizing pedophilia. Some are just that insane and evil, but I highly doubt your run-of-the-mill Democrat, even a Millennial, would be okay with this.
“And they were bringing children to Him that He might touch them, and the disciples rebuked them. But when Jesus saw it, He was indignant and said to them, ‘Let the children come to me; do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of God. Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it.’ And He took them in his arms and blessed them, laying His hands on them.”
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...