Have you ever found yourself in a situation in which you were hit on the head and felt like you might have lost brain cells as a result? Regardless of the way in which you hit your head, chances are, you still have more brain cells than the entire Democrat field and those who watched the Democrat debates after they were over.
 
That’s how embarrassingly stupid the first Democrat debate was, which is what we will mostly be focusing on. Although, I don’t know why I was expecting anything else from them.
 
Let’s begin with Señor Robert Francis O’Rourke when he somehow managed to avoid answering a question relating to taxes in two different languages.
 
Early on in the debate, moderator Savannah Guthrie asked O’Rourke: “Some Democrats want marginal, individual tax rate of 70% of the very highest earners, those making more than $10 million a year. Would you support that, and if not, what would be your top individual rate?”
 
To which Robert responded: “This economy has got to work for everyone, and right now, we know that it isn’t. And it’s gonna take all of us coming together to make sure that it does.” That was what he said in English, which 1) entirely avoided the question and 2) was a complete lie, considering we are in an economic boom and minorities are experiencing record-low unemployment rates that have been steady during Trump’s administration thus far.
 
Then, despite being limited on time, Robert said this in Spanish (and Spanish that wasn’t even entirely grammatically correct): “We need to include every person in the success of this economy. But if we want to do that, we have to include every person in our democracy. Every vote needs representation and every voice needs to be heard.”
 
Again, entirely avoiding the question, but in a uniquely dumb manner that even liberal late night hosts made fun of.
 
Let me remind you that the question asked had to do with taxing the rich extreme rates. What reason does Robert have to reply (without even answering the question at all) in both English and Spanish? It’s quite clear to anyone even half-way paying attention that the guy was simply pandering to the Hispanic vote by basically saying: “Hey, look, I can speak Spanish too!” The only thing that would’ve completed that hysterical moment was if he was holding Uno cards while he was saying that.
 
And while there may be others who disagree with me on this, I find this not only embarrassing for the guy but also kind of insulting. As a Hispanic person, I’m not going to be wooed by someone who happens to know some Spanish (again, he didn’t even speak it perfectly well either). I’m especially not going to be wooed by someone who manages to avoid answering a question in two different languages.
 
Granted, I never had any plans to vote for O’Rourke at any capacity and fully plan on voting for President Trump come the 2020 election, but this was outright asinine.
 
But perhaps not quite as asinine as Julian Castro saying that biological men who transition to (looking) female ought to have the right to an abortion.
 
For some context, NBC News’ Lester Holt had asked the actual Hispanic (and actual lunatic): “Secretary Castro, this one is for you. All of you on stage support a woman’s right to an abortion. You all support some version of a government health care option. Would your plan cover abortion Mr. Secretary?”
 
Castro replied: “Yes, it would. I don’t believe only in reproductive freedom, I believe in reproductive justice. And, you know, what that means is that just because a woman – or let’s not also forget someone in the trans community, a trans female, is poor, doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have the right to exercise that right to choose. And so I absolutely would cover the right to have an abortion.”
 
Another kind of pandering, particularly because he stopped to also include transgender people. And like O’Rourke’s pandering, this one also doesn’t make any sense (although it does make sense in the mind of a lunatic Leftist who is this out of touch with reality).
 
In case Secretary Castro has forgotten his 3rd grade science class, MEN CAN’T GET PREGNANT! It doesn’t matter if a man with gender dysphoria goes through the process of mutilating his body to look like a woman’s, he still cannot biologically get pregnant because he lacks the reproductive equipment to do so. A man may say he is a woman and may even transition into having the body of a woman, but that does not include the transfer of a womb into the new body and the removal of the previous reproductive system.
 
Men can’t get pregnant, and as a result, can also not get an abortion. It literally makes zero sense for Castro to even say this, or for anyone to say this for that matter. And these people think Trump isn’t fit to serve? This guy literally thinks men can get pregnant! Either that or he’s simply trying to pander to out-of-their-minds politically-correct morons in the audience who will say: “Yaaaas! Slay, queen!” entirely unironically. I honestly hope it’s the latter because I would hate for someone that mentally deranged to be within 10 feet of any position of power as grand as the Presidency.
 
Overall, the Democrat debates have proven that the entire field of Democrat candidates is filled with shameless panderers at best and outright deranged people at worst. None of them have proven to mainstream America that they are in any way sane, and that goes beyond the ridiculous (and dangerous) desire to confiscate every gun in America and allow for literally unrestricted abortions. While those two issues demonstrate how out of touch they are with America, it’s the shameless pandering and the open lunacy that tells us what they are all about.
 
Even if I had been a registered Democrat, voted for Hillary in 2016 and despised Trump, I would seriously doubt I would be willing to support any of these people. And I think there are plenty of people out there who think similarly. I mean, O’Rourke is polling at roughly 3%, Castro at less than 1 and everyone else is equally as stupid or deranged.
 
Sure, neither of the two will likely be the Democrat nominee to challenge Trump, but if this is what the Left has to offer, they really do need the tech giants to come in and rig the elections for them because otherwise, Trump would likely win all but one state ala Ronald Reagan.
 
Proverbs 18:2
“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

I’ve written extensively about matters pertaining to sex, sexual preference and sexual “identity” wherein one identifies as the opposite gender of what they are (and sometimes take it to such extremes as to identify as neither gender or even identify as an entirely different species). I’ve shared my two cents on the matter as well as what the Bible largely says about it (granted, it does not really talk much about transgenderism as that is a fairly new thing, for some reason).
 
But at the end of the day, whatever my own opinions on the matter are, it is entirely up to people to choose whether they are straight or gay (and yes, it’s a choice. A difficult one, but a choice nonetheless) and choose to identify as whatever they want to identify. I will still speak about how wrong it is, but it is entirely their choice to make. However, I absolutely draw the line at pedophilia.
 
A man wants to sleep with another man? Fine. I disapprove, as does God, but that’s their thing. A man wants to identify as a woman? Fine. I disapprove, as does God, but that’s their thing as long as they don’t use that to cheat at sports and don’t use women’s restrooms, given the high possibility of rape occurring in such an instance. But I will absolutely not tolerate anyone who is a pedophile. It is absolutely abhorrent behavior that causes suffering for children.
 
When two people of the same sex sleep together, they sin, but they both consent and are fully aware of their actions. When a man identifies as a woman, that is his choice, ditto for the opposite. But a child absolutely cannot be considered to be giving consent on sexual matters.
 
Part of the reason I absolutely hate the fact that the Left idolizes child drag queens is the fact that THESE ARE CHILDREN THAT HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND WILL LIKELY REGRET EVERYTHING THEY ARE DOING IN THE FUTURE! This sort of thing sticks with them forever and it’s simply not right. If an adult wants to be a drag queen, fine, but leave children out of it.
 
Now, after an unusually long introduction, allow me to give you the reason as to why I am writing about this.
 
Recently, a professor at the University of North Texas presented a lesson to students titled: “Sexual Pleasure and Response in Infants.”
 
If the title alone makes you sick to your stomach, brace yourself, because we’re just getting started.
 
That lesson plan is largely, though not entirely, taken from a textbook titled “Our Sexuality” which contains a section titled “Teaching Ideas”, which is essentially a guide for some teachers to follow as they teach their course.
 
The section suggests that “instructors take students on a ‘field trip’ to observe children possibly engaging in ‘sexual interactions’ during recess hours,” according to The College Fix.
 
The textbook reads: “Take the class to a local elementary school playground, or ask permission for a few of your students to attend various school playgrounds, preschools, or daycare centers during recess to observe behaviors of children. Ask students to note interactions between same-sex and mixed-sex groups. Which group was more frequent? Which behaviors were most frequent? What kind of touching did children engage in? What about teasing behaviors? Were there any overtly sexual interactions? What was the age range of the children being observed? Have students write a report comparing their observations with information in the text.”
 
Okay, I have a few things to say about this.
 
First, whose permission is being asked? The students in the course or the parents of the children potentially being observed? That remains unclear, but I’m willing to bet it’s not the latter.
 
Second, are they really encouraging people to observe kids in playgrounds? People have been mocking that sort of pedophilic behavior for ages (rightly so), but these people think it is 100% acceptable to do so?
 
Third, what do you mean “children possibly engaging in ‘sexual interactions’”? CHILDREN DON’T ENGAGE IN IT BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IT IS! A sexual interaction is an interaction where there is clear sexual intent behind it. Children have no idea what sex is so they don’t engage in sexual interaction by DEFAULT!
 
What interactions between two preschool boys could be considered same-sex sexual interaction? Playing with one another? Playing tag? Hugging one another occasionally? Hanging an arm around the shoulders of the other? The last time I went to church, I saw a young boy (no older than 8, maybe) with his arm around his buddy. Is that somehow a sexual interaction? Is any physical contact sexual interaction?
 
Of course not! It’s typical childhood behavior! Kids do what kids do! Even when they do “adult” things like kissing, it hardly means a thing at that age! They are just learning those things!
 
Children simply do not engage in sexual interaction unless they are FORCED by someone who knows what sex is.
 
Now, one of the textbook’s editors said that neither she nor another of the editors wrote the part about instructors going on bizarre “field trips” to preschools and the like. I suppose that makes sense seeing as that quote was taken from the book’s 13th edition, so it was likely edited by someone else entirely.
 
The editor notes that the “field trip” “seems rather odd, potentially problematic and fruitless… I’m not aware of any professors having assigned it – but I’d certainly be interested in students’ reactions to the proposal!”
 
Well, hopefully, the consensus reaction to the proposal is that of utter disgust and shock. Seeing as these are college students, who were just kids and minors themselves not that long ago, I would hope that they are fully aware of how creepy and messed up such a proposal is.
 
Granted, all adults should be painfully aware of how messed up such a proposal is, but there are still those who are eerily sexually attracted to young children.
 
And it certainly doesn’t help when an adult bus driver rapes a 14-year-old and the worst punishment he gets is a slap on the wrist as was the case recently in New York, where a judge gave no jail time, only 10 years probation, to a man who ADMITTED to raping a girl. Such a case only leaves these sycophants to think they can get away with it with only a minor punishment.
 
Pedophilia and the act of pedophilia should be a severely punished crime, as usually tends to be. Just possessing or distributing child pornography will send someone to jail for no less than 15 years with the addition of being put into supervised sex offender release programs, according to Justia.com.
 
That’s not to say these people should not be helped. Like with homosexuals and transgenders, these people lack Christ in their hearts. They need both spiritual and mental help. As far as homosexuals go, I think it’s entirely a choice, not that there is something inherently psychologically wrong with them, but that they choose to live in sin.
 
But they all need some sort of help. All need Christ. Granted, that also goes for people who are none of those things. It goes for pretty much everyone. But these people very specifically need Him.
 
Christians understand very well how much of a gift children are. Psalm 127:3 says: “Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward.”
 
Matthew 18:10 says: “See that you do not despise one of these little ones. For I tell you that in heaven their angels always see the face of my Father who is in heaven.”
 
Isaiah 54:13: “All your children shall be taught by the Lord, and great shall be the peace of your children.”
 
John 16:21: “When a woman is giving birth, she has sorrow because her hour has come, but when she has delivered the baby, she no longer remembers the anguish, for joy that a human being has been born into the world.”
 
Children are special and are fragile. It is very easy to mistreat them, abuse them and bring anguish to them. It is easy to take advantage of their naïve and trusting natures. It is easy to take advantage of their yet undeveloped bodies. But all of these things are absolutely abhorrent, and things that the Lord hates.
 
My heart broke when I read and wrote the story about a boy who was essentially forced to dress as a girl for his mother and his father was trying to save his son from such a horrible life. That was just dressing the boy as a girl and having him go by a girl’s name and say he was a girl. It was horrible abuse, but the one silver lining of the entire story is that he was not being forced into anything sexual with anyone.
 
Pedophiles do that and more. They take advantage of the children’s bodies and mind. They utterly corrupt them and scar them for the rest of their lives. The attempt by the Left to normalize this abhorrent behavior is utterly sickening and not something that I will stand for.
 
They want to say there’s absolutely nothing wrong with being gay? Fine. They’re wrong, but fine. They want to say there’s absolutely nothing wrong with being transgender? Fine. They’re wrong, but fine. But the minute they start saying there’s absolutely nothing wrong with being a pedophile is the minute I lose my own damn marbles.
 
For whatever reason, I have always pictured myself having a family. My mother sometimes reminds me of the fact that even when I was fairly little, maybe around 5 or so, I pictured myself having a family. Granted, I was also very childish at the time and named my children “Lightning Thunder” because I’ve always had a fascination with electricity and thought those names sounded cool, but I always pictured myself having kids even when I was a very young kid myself (not that I knew how to MAKE kids, but I always pictured a family of my own).
 
It is for this reason that I believe myself to have a very protective nature. When I used to attend Aikido classes with my father and would take the kids’ classes, I tended to be the oldest in the class and felt it was my responsibility to look after the other kids.
 
I have always felt protective and rather paternal of kids. So perhaps it is for this reason that I am so fired up and passionate about pushing back against the latest disgusting-as-sin attempt at normalizing evil… that or I’m just not a bat-crap insane Leftist lunatic and understand how naturally messed up pedophilia is. Because let’s be honest here: I highly doubt even Democrat VOTERS are fascinated with the idea of normalizing pedophilia. Some are just that insane and evil, but I highly doubt your run-of-the-mill Democrat, even a Millennial, would be okay with this.
 
Mark 10:13-16
“And they were bringing children to Him that He might touch them, and the disciples rebuked them. But when Jesus saw it, He was indignant and said to them, ‘Let the children come to me; do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of God. Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it.’ And He took them in his arms and blessed them, laying His hands on them.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

I often say that the Left is self-destructive. That the Left, at its core, is a way for society to self-destruct. You need only look at the Green New Deal to see the cyanide pill the Left wants to force down our throats (and their own, too).
 
I also often say that the ideologies they hold tend to lock horns with itself. For example, the Left supports both LGBT people and Muslims. Islam abhors homosexuality to the point where it is encouraged to eliminate anyone who is even suspected of being gay. The biggest shooting in American history, the Orlando gay night club shooting, really speaks more about Islam’s hatred of homosexuality than it does about gun laws in America (the terrorist shouldn’t have had a gun in the first place).
 
But we’re not even talking about that sort of infighting, though that will only continue in the future anyway.
 
No, today, I’m talking about a lesbian woman being kicked off of an LGBTQ Commission for following the biological and factual reasoning that a transwoman, regardless of what they identify as, is still a male and a transman, regardless of what they say, is still female. Science says as much.
 
Julia Beck is the lesbian woman we’re talking about here. She was kicked off the commission last October after “identifying a transgender rapist as male, his correct biological sex, though he ‘identifies’ as a woman,” according to The Daily Wire.
 
Beck recently was interviewed by Fox News’ Tucker Carlson about this. “I believe in truth”, she told Carson. “I believe that people should have these conversations and say things that matter without fear of punishment.”
 
Well, the unfortunate thing about this is that the Left largely does not want to have these conversations, because conversations about this alludes to people disagreeing with them and opposing them to any extent, and that cannot be allowed to occur.
 
Carlson replied to Beck by saying: “I couldn’t agree with you more, and I’m grateful that you have that attitude. But why do you think it was important to say this, specifically?”
 
Beck answered: “Well, when we get down to it, women and girls all share a biological reality. We are all female. But if any man, if any male person can call himself a woman, or be legally identified as female, then predatory men will do so in order to gain access to women’s single-sex spaces, and this puts every woman and girl at risk.”
 
THANK YOU! This is precisely the argument everyone on the Right was making regarding transgender bathroom laws (which the cowards in North Carolina caved on a long time ago). This sort of permission for biological males to use women’s restrooms just because they can make the claim that they identify as a woman and no one will bat an eye at that puts women and girls inside those restrooms in unnecessary peril.
 
Already, rape and other sexual assault acts are being called out as often as possible (see the entire #MeToo movement), so why would the Left be willing to put more women and girls in danger?
 
Actually, dumb question. These evil s.o.b.’s think the best option to dealing with gun crimes is taking away guns from those who obey the laws, further putting them in danger and in the lines of sight of those who do not care for any laws, much less gun laws.
 
If anything, both their desire to take away guns from law-abiding citizens and desire to allow men to enter women’s restrooms further shows the sort of self-destructive ideology I talked about in the beginning of the article. They claim to want to solve problems, but the only problems that arise come from the “solutions” the Left brings up.
 
But returning to Beck, she actually happens to be of sound and intelligent mind here. She recognizes the unnecessary dangers brought about by men in single-sex and typically female-only areas.
 
Carlson made sure to note in his show that it has always been his “instinct” that the transgender activists’ agenda “is not going to be good for girls in the long run.”
 
Beck replied by saying: “I absolutely agree. In many states, men can legally identify themselves as female and gain access to women’s single-sex spaces, and sports is just one institution where men are taking titles, scholarships, and this is a problem.”
 
Of course. Men are biologically stronger, on average, than women. Of course, there are some individual exceptions, but men tend to be stronger than women.
 
I remember watching Trump’s show “The Apprentice” some time ago and remember that, in the season opener, the very first task Trump gave to the teams, which were men vs. women, was running in one of his golf courses to his private helicopter in a race.
 
While these people were not necessarily athletes, and even though they were all wearing business suits that were definitely not made for running, unsurprisingly, the men won the race.
 
Why? Because men tend to be more physically fit, stronger, faster and athletic than women.
 
Watch an NBA game in comparison with a WNBA game and you’ll clearly see the differences between men and women, even among athletic men and women. Most men in the NBA can dunk, even if it’s not necessarily a flashy dunk, while most women in the WNBA can hardly reach the rim, if even that.
 
Biologically speaking, men tend to be physically superior to women. If anyone has a problem with that, don’t take it up with me, take it up to the One who made it this way. See if you can find some way of calling God a misogynist to His Face.
 
Returning to Beck, she then went on to say that women who even dare to speak out regarding the negatives and outright dangerous repercussions of radical transgender activism are pretty much “silenced”.
 
Carlson then asked if Beck “found it hard to advocate for biological truth and the protections of women and girls when she, an open lesbian, belongs to the LGBT acronym, which notably includes T for transgender,” according to The Daily Wire.
 
She answered: “The letters in the acronym share, um, not much. The L, G, and B, are based on sexuality, sex, biological reality, but the T is based on gender identity, which is not based in biological reality. In fact, I would argue it is opposed to biological reality. The LGB is very different from the T, and I don’t think it is fair to lump us all into the same acronym.”
 
Okay, a few things here. First, I completely agree with her on this. In fact, the B in LGBT stands for BISEXUAL. And bisexual insinuates a maximum of only two genders. Someone that is bisexual is someone who is attracted to both males and females, both men and women. Not transgender men or transgender women. Not Apache helicopter men and M1 Abrams tanks women. Not any of the 666 flavors of artificial gender. Just men and women. The only two options.
 
So the T in LGBT, at the end of the day, is in some ways an affront to the B in LGBT. Or, the other way around. In any case, it naturally creates infighting, much like we see in Beck’s case, though she is a lesbian woman trying to stand up for all women who are legitimately being left in the dust and led to the gallows by a self-righteous Left that further moves the needle towards Satan.
 
Second, her argument about transgenderism being opposed to biological reality is spot on and something we often say as well. No matter what you say, how you identify, you are what God made you to be. If you were born with the XX chromosomes, you are female. A biological female and that cannot be changed as your DNA is what dictates your gender among many other things.
 
If you have the XY chromosomes, you are male. And only a male. Nothing else will ever change that.
 
To make the claim that someone can be a female, even if they are a biological male, is to spit in the face of science (and God, really). It defies logic and facts.
 
And funny enough, this defiance of logic and facts also does what I talked about in the beginning: self-destruct society.
 
Logic and facts are necessary in a civilized society. When logic is ignored and facts are challenged (not in a scientific effort to advance the craft, but in a political effort to distort reality), you don’t make progress in humanity, you do the opposite of that. Regression is the only thing that results in ignoring and distorting reality.
 
Just take a look at the world around us, where you can be punched in the face or berated and verbally attacked for holding a differing opinion from someone else. And it doesn’t even have to relate to politics. Differences in opinion in terms of philosophy, art, even video games can result in such brutish violence.

This lack of self-control of emotions is almost no different from barbarians killing each other off or attacking each other for next to no reason. And this is the direction society is heading towards if the Left gets their way. There is no room for civilized discussion. Everyone needs their own safe spaces and if that cannot be accomplished, emotions flare and human life, which has lost all meaning after decades of abortion advocacy, is brutally ended.
 
And I’m not just talking about being unable to physically get to some sort of “safe space”. I’m talking about being so triggered by the mere existence of a differing opinion that severe action is taken. An extreme and rare scenario, yes, but a possible one nonetheless.
 
Even Julia Beck explains in an article about lesbianism and transgenderism how her views leave people to actively ostracize her, to the point where she explains that “people I trusted told me to die in a fire for naming male people men.”
 
A figure of speech, of course, but when does it stop being mere linguistics and begin being actual threats, or even actual attempts?
 
Granted, most people that wish that upon someone (as evil as they may be) won’t actually do it. But it only takes one madman or woman (notice that there’s only two options here) to actually attempt it.
 
In any case, despite our political and religious differences, Beck and I can at least agree to hold on to what is real, logical and factual. I’m not saying Beck is a conservative because of this (though I imagine many people will call her that, meant as an insult). But I am saying that she at least has common sense.
 
And common sense is a rare trait in Leftist advocacy groups.
 
1 Corinthians 15:33
“Do not be deceived: ‘Bad company ruins good morals.’”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

If you think that title is despicable enough, you better grab on to something because we’re just getting started. This train of messed up situations is only just beginning to leave the station.
 
Allow me to give you the context. In Texas, a father is fighting for custody of his son, particularly after his ex-wife’s claims that their 6-year-old son is actually a transgender girl.
 
According to court documents, the boy only dresses in girl’s clothing when he is with his mother, who has also enrolled him in first-grade under the name of “Luna”. The boy chooses to wear boy’s clothing when he’s with his father, identifies as a boy with his father, and “violently refuses to wear girl’s clothes at my home,” according to the boy’s father.
 
According to The Federalist, the mother is accusing the boy’s father of child abuse “for not affirming James (the name of the young boy) as transgender.” She is also looking to strip the father of his parental rights and “is also seeking to require him to pay for the child’s visit to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations, which may include hormonal sterilization starting at age eight,” according to The Federalist.
 
The father has also been legally barred from “speaking to his child about sexuality and gender from a scientific or religious perspective and from dressing his son in boys’ clothes; instead, he has to offer both girls’ and boys’ outfits,” according to the Daily Wire.
 
A gender transition therapist has diagnosed the boy with gender dysphoria (and I’ll get back to this topic momentarily). According to the therapist’s notes, James chooses to identify as a girl when he’s with his mom and identifies as a boy when he’s with his dad.
 
The Federalist reports: “[A] dossier filed with the Dallas court says that, under the skilled eyes of the therapist, the child was presented two pieces of paper, one with the word ‘James’ and one with the word ‘Luna,’ and asked to pick the name he preferred. When the appointment only included his mother, James selected Luna, the name and gender he uses at his mother’s home and in his first-grade classroom. When the appointment was only with his father, however, James pointed to the boy name James, not the girl name.”
 
Apart from that, according to the father, people around James such as the parents of the boy’s friends and a church leader all say that they “have only seen the six-year-old identify as a male,” according to the Daily Wire.
 
Now, this is a whole lot to cover, but you can just see the level of evil and sheer despicableness of the situation. The boy is only 6. He attends first-grade. He doesn’t know exactly what’s going on here, or why his mother has him identify as a girl, wearing girl’s clothes, when he feels he’s a boy, and overall is largely confused.
 
It doesn’t help either that the therapist has diagnosed him with gender dysphoria when that’s very clearly not what’s going on here.
 
Anyone with even a shred of common sense can tell that the mother is forcing the boy to wear girls’ clothes and call himself “Luna” and identify as a girl at school. And she has the audacity to claim the FATHER is the one ABUSING the boy?! I don’t think I’ve been this mad since I wrote the article talking about the sheer evil of pro-abortion people who are more than okay with killing babies with absolutely no regard for the babies’ life.
 
I cannot emphasize and put into words just how sickeningly evil this is. From the context given by both court documents and the Federalist report, it’s easy to see that the mother is the one putting pressure on the boy.
 
When alone with his mother, James will say to his therapist that he is a she; that his name is Luna and that he is a girl. What else is he supposed to do AT THE AGE OF SIX?! I don’t know exactly what’s going on inside the mother’s home, but it’s clear to me that she abuses him, at least psychologically. As a result, it would not be out of the realm of possibilities that she would potentially abuse him physically as well, should he answer “wrong” and say that he is a boy and his name is James.
 
The boy, at that age, is very clearly afraid of what his mother might say or do on the way home or inside the home when they are alone, so he goes along with his mother’s wishes. I can’t really blame him, either. If he ticks her off, who knows what she might do? I’ve been in a similar situation with my own father (though not about my gender identity because even he is not that stupid) where if I ticked him off, there was a decent chance of physical punishment (apart from corporal punishment). He never went too far, thankfully, but the fear was there sometimes. It wasn’t often that he would do that, but it has happened in the past, so I never dared take my chances.
 
So the boy, if he’s being abused psychologically, could likely also be victim of physical abuse apart from psychological abuse. Although, since the mother is fighting for custody over him, I doubt she would do anything to him until it’s all settled, lest she lose the case.
 
But still, it’s quite clear to anyone who has some sense of decency that this is not okay at any level. It’s definitely not okay for the mother to be psychologically abusing her own child, causing him to perhaps believe he is a girl (though it seems like he has some logic within him, if he is more comfortable around his father and tends to act more like the boy that he is when not pressured otherwise), and it’s definitely not okay for her to be planning a life-changing “treatment” (I’m putting that in quotation marks because anything that supposedly helps someone be something they definitely are not is not actually helping anyone. Treatment is supposed to make someone better, and this would make things worse).
 
Matter of fact, Walt Heyer, a former transgender female and author of “Trans Life Survivors” warns that the diagnosis of gender dysphoria for the child could ruin his life, in a similar manner to what he went through when his grandmother secretly cross-dressed him for almost three years when he was a young boy.
 
Heyer warns: “If we do not save [James] from a misdiagnosis, his next step is chemical castration at age eight, only two years away.”
 
And of course, that further speaks to the evil of this situation, that there are people out there who actually perform such life-changing procedures for such young children.
 
Now, I mentioned earlier that I would return to the whole diagnosis of gender dysphoria as a topic, and I will quickly mention it, but I’ve decided that it should not take much precedent in this article. All I was planning on saying about it, really, is the fact that I find it ironic that the boy is diagnosed with gender dysphoria when that has technically been ruled as not a mental disorder by the World Health Organization. You can’t be diagnosed with something that isn’t some sort of illness. A diagnosis’ purpose is to find what is wrong with you. So I find it interesting that in this conversation, we’re acknowledging the fact that gender dysphoria is a mental disorder, even acknowledged by the therapist, even if the therapist is misdiagnosing a kid being abused by his mother.
 
But such a point is largely tangential. It’s good to point out, but it’s not the main focus here. The main focus is the horrendous and messed up attitude this supposed mother has with her own son.
 
A mother is not supposed to confuse her own child, and certainly not force the kid into being something he doesn’t want to be. One argument the Left will always make regarding transgenderism is that “we should let people be who they are”. Well, where is the Left now? Why is this boy, who clearly wants to identify as a boy, being left in the dust? Where is the outrage from the Left of a woman not letting her child “just be who he is”?
 
It’s okay for a guy to identify as a girl, but not okay for a guy to identify as a guy? Is that the lesson to be learned here?
 
Again, I have not been this mad and annoyed at some people’s attitude since the articles discussing an abortionist wantonly aborting babies, not considering them human, and being so callous as to mention that she makes sure babies can’t scream by literally ripping out their throats.
 
I don’t think what this mother is doing is quite as evil as what that abortionist was doing, but it’s evil nonetheless. It’s despicable and that woman should not receive custody of her child. If anything SHE SHOULD GO TO JAIL FOR CHILD ABUSE!
 
Why is it child abuse for the father to let the boy be a boy but not child abuse for the mother to basically FORCE the boy to be a girl?
 
And where are those who supposedly stand up for “letting people be who they are”? This is even beyond the science of gender issues. This goes WAY beyond that. Never mind the fact that a boy can only be a boy and a girl can only be a girl. The boy ACTS LIKE A BOY and his mother is having none of that. Who in their right mind could say that this is okay in any shape, manner or form?
 
I pray for the father to win custody of the boy and pray that the mother find Christ, because she desperately needs Him, even if she hates Him (and I take it she does, given her behavior here).
 
This kind of evil cannot be allowed to continue growing and affecting more young children.
 
Romans 12:21
“Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
​
Author: Freddie Marinelli. 

Today’s Hollywood and media culture is chockfull of pandering, virtue-signaling and politically correct b.s. What with the recent trend of remaking every movie into a women’s only film to even having Batwoman, a canonically straight female, be turned into a lesbian superheroine.
 
So, it’s not surprising that unhinged Leftists attack other unhinged Leftists who are not “woke” enough. Gay rights groups GLAAD and 5050by2020, led by Jill Soloway, who created the show “Transparent” about a transgender woman, encouraged Hollywood to better represent the Transgender community in their films, saying that she got “four dozen production companies, talent agencies, film studios, and advocacy groups” to show “support for expanded LGBTQ representation”, according to Variety.
 
This comes relatively after Scarlett Johansson received backlash for being cast as a transgender man despite her being what these nut-jobs describe as “cisgender”, or someone who identifies with the gender they were born as aka a normal and mentally-stable person.
 
Soloway says that “cisgender actors portraying transgender individuals is harmful because of the message it sends to non-trans people who may believe transgender people are merely dressing in costume”, despite the fact that she herself has cast a “cisgender” man to play a transgender woman.
 
Now, while I typically never side with Hollywood on anything given that they themselves are out of their darn minds about everything to the point where at least one of their more prominent figures legitimately did not know there were people who were against abortion (*ahem* Mila Kunis *ahem*) and the fact that they go along with every socialist narrative out there, despite the fact that such policies would ruin the country and would eventually ruin the very people pushing for such policies, I always side with reasoned thought and logic.
 
Do you want to know why there is so little representation of transgender people in Hollywood? Why actors and actresses feel compelled to play transgender people even if they themselves are not transgender? BECAUSE TRANSGENDER PEOPLE COMPRISE ONLY 0.6% OF THE POPULATION!
 
And before any liberals reading this, if there even are any, try to challenge that number, know that that statistic comes from the Left’s version of the Gospel: the New York Times. Of course, this being the New York Times, I myself am fairly skeptical of what they tell me. However, considering the narrative that there are a lot of transgender people out there, seeing such an incredibly low number from a Leftist source who routinely lies and has employed an open bigot, I will trust that number for the time being.
 
This means that current Hollywood representation of transgender people might be on par or might even be over-representing them (can’t say for certain because I have not seen a Hollywood movie, in theaters or otherwise, in years, and simply refuse to watch anything new they release, knowing it will be filled with garbage).
 
But, of course, such a thing cannot be allowed to remain. The Left simply must push for more transgenders to be in movies, even if that creates an over-representation of transgenders. And this is all in the name of “equality”, even if it creates a glaring inequality.
 
The problem, of course, with what Soloway wants is that it is, as of now, relatively impossible. If 0.6% of the population in America is transgender, you will be hard-pressed to find that many transgender people to play a transgender person. Granted, this is Hollywood and it makes sense if many transgenders live in California, the land of insanity. And according to that same New York Times article, there are 1.4 million transgenders in the U.S., so you could, theoretically, find transgender people out there, but that does not necessarily mean they all want to be actors.
 
What I’m getting at is the fact that, if Hollywood really wants to represent transgender people in movies, they’ll have to “settle” with “cisgender” actors playing that role. It’s a bit of a stretch, considering those people would have to do something called “acting”, but I think they would be able to do it.
 
Of course, this all points to the larger problem: they are pretending transgenderism is a perfectly natural thing, at least for humans, and that there is nothing wrong with it. There is.
 
I’ve repeatedly quoted the World Health Organization having diagnosed transgenderism as “gender dysphoria”. Of course, since everything has to fit the Left’s agenda, the W.H.O. had to declassify gender dysphoria as a disorder in order to appease their fascistic overlords who wish to rip apart the fabric of humanity (all-the-while also classifying video game addiction as a mental disorder, which is ridiculous).
 
Hollywood, Soloway, and the entirety of the Left all promote the idea of being transgender and disregarding science itself. They all promote the idea of telling these people that there’s nothing wrong with them, even if the evidence is self-evident.
 
They also promote the idea that believing transgenderism is a disorder is wrong and that people like me, who call out the Left for this and call out the fact that this is, indeed, a mental disorder, should not be allowed to point it out.
 
Like I said in my previous article, they only want their ideas and their thoughts to be shared, not ours and no one who can realistically and honestly claim to be logical and sane.
 
What this all culminates to is a society that has long-abandoned not only the Creator, but even science and logic. A society that is 180 degrees backwards. A society that the Left dominates because it’s just as crazy as they are.
 
One can only pray that people recover their sanity and, thus, repent of this.
 
1 John 1:9
“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli. 

I’ll be entirely honest. I’m as stupefied by this as you are. This is some strange in-fighting within the LGBT community.
 
Let me give you some context. Free Pride Glasgow, a self-described “non-commercial” and more “open-minded” alternative to “traditional” Glasgow LGBT events, has decided to ban drag queens and shows from their event.
 
The Daily Wire reports: “After extensive consideration, the Free Pride Glasgow committee members decided that having men dressed as women giving stellar performances during the event would be offensive to transgender individuals, and that non-binary people within their ranks would be ‘uncomfortable' with having drag performances.’”
 
Let me tell you, transgender people aren’t the only ones who are uncomfortable with drag performances. No doubt, children who are forced to be there by their insane parents are also likely uncomfortable with the whole event, not just the drag queen parts of it.
 
In a statement, Free Pride Glasgow said: “It was felt that it [drag performance] would make some of those who were transgender or questioning their gender uncomfortable. It was felt by the group within the Trans/Non Binary Caucus (can’t believe they have a caucus) that some drag performance, particularly cis drag, hinges on the social view of gender and making it into a joke, however transgender individuals do not feel as though their gender identity is a joke.”
 
I’m sorry, you can’t tell from reading this, but I’m having trouble writing this. Not because of the issue itself, but because I can’t quite control my laughter here. There are no words to describe how ridiculous this sounds on all fronts.
 
Wouldn’t that statement about supposedly making a mockery of gender be offensive to drag queens? I don’t want to defend drag queens, but you would think, in their own crazy mentality, that they are serious about dressing up in drag and not trying to mock gender. So wouldn’t a statement like that offend drag queens?
 
Of course it does. And of course it did.
 
The Daily Wire reports: “The decision was, notably, unpopular with famous drag queens, many of whom took to social media to suggest Free Pride Glasgow was drawing unnecessary and offensive distinctions of its own.”
 
They even quote a tweet by a woman/man/whatever named Michelle Visage, who wrote: “WHO. THE HELL. BANS DRAG QUEENS FROM GAY PRIDE? THE VERY BACKBONE OF THE PRIDE CELEBRATION? Hello, ever hear of THE STONEWALL RIOTS?!!!”
 
The Stonewall Riots were a series of spontaneous, violent demonstrations by members of the gay community against a police raid that took place in 1969 at the Stonewall Inn in the Greenwich Village neighborhood of Manhattan.
 
Now, I don’t know why she references the Stonewall Riots here, but her/his/I don’t know frustration is evident. No doubt, many other drag queens feel much the same way.
 
This sort of in-fighting is… interesting, as I wouldn’t picture such in-fighting within the LGBT community. But in-fighting has been known to happen within the Left.
 
Throughout the “#MeToo” movement, many Leftists have had to abandon long-time Democrat donors and supporters just to advance their agenda and to eventually target Trump. They’ve had to turn on Harvey Weinstein, Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby and others whom they would otherwise defend or even ignore their actions.
 
And in-fighting comes naturally when discussing the gay community and Muslim community, as the two are natural enemies (though mostly because of the Muslim community, not the gay community).
 
Saying gay people are treated horrendously by Muslims is an understatement. Even the suspicion of homosexuality is enough to get someone into a deal of trouble.
 
Now, the in-fighting doesn’t come from either community, but rather from the Left as a whole. While it’s not as public an in-fight as this drag queen situation, the sort of in-fighting that happens is that the Left will be forced to choose one or the other – interestingly enough, seemingly always choosing the Muslim community.
 
The Left will support the gay community until Islam is somehow involved. Remember the Orlando night club shooting? The Left was more preoccupied with protecting Muslims than gay people. They tried to label the shooting as just another shooting and not a terrorist attack, despite the fact that the perpetrator was a Muslim who pledged allegiance to ISIS.
 
Have you ever wondered why the Left never really addresses gay people’s situation in the Middle East? Why the issue of “gay rights” is strictly focused on the United States? Why they never really focus on the lack of these “rights” gay people should have in the Middle East? Particularly in Muslim nations?
 
Therein lies the problem of pandering to particular groups of people, which is precisely what Free Pride Glasgow is doing here. While trying to “protect” one group of people (transgenders), they utterly ignore and even punish (to an extent) another group of people.
 
In their mission to protect the feelings of transgenders, they offend drag queens. And in a liberal world, to offend someone else (unless that person is a Christian, conservative, Republican or Trump supporter), is a crime… at least it is in England.
 
That’s the problem with choosing people over principles. The Left will be supportive of gay people until the conversation shifts to talking about their situation in the Middle East, which is a conversation no Leftist wants to have. They’d rather ignore the plights of one of their target demographics if it means the other one doesn’t get mad at them in some way and capacity.
 
The Left will “support” women’s rights while simultaneously destroying the very definition of a woman and allowing men to claim to be women and participate in women’s sports. And, of course, those men largely dominate women in physical competitions because men tend to be physically stronger and superior.
 
They will “support” women’s rights to be safe from predatory men while denying them the right to protect themselves with a gun.
 
The Left never supports what is right, just what is “trendy” and “popular” and “mainstream”. They claim being open about your sexuality is “cool” while being a follower and believer of Christ is “dumb”, “ridiculous”, or even “evil”.
 
In the case of the Free Pride Glasgow, there really is nothing right about it. But to flat out ban a particular group of people, particularly a group of people who have been a major part of these events, seems altogether stupid and unnecessary. If they want to be there, why shouldn’t they be allowed to be there? If they want to participate, why shouldn’t they be allowed to participate?
 
It’s their choice to live a life of sin and unrepentance. I would suggest against doing that, but it’s ultimately their decision. Why would they be denied by the very people they would think are their allies? That just doesn’t make much sense, particularly with the given reasons for it.
 
Like I said, there is nothing right about a parade that celebrates homosexuality and I would hope these people eventually accept Christ (though most of them likely won’t). But this whole ordeal seems… strange, if nothing else. I don’t know how else to describe it… other than perhaps “funny”.
 
1 Thessalonians 5:22
“Reject every kind of evil”.
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

I’ve previously written an entire article dedicated to telling you just how much the Left truly hates science. Well, here’s one more reason the Left has made a joke of science:
 
Ben Shapiro recently wrote an article on his website: The Daily Wire. The title of the article is: “SO MUCH SCIENCE: World Health Organization Says Playing Video Games Too Much Is A Mental Disorder, Transgenderism Isn’t”.
 
Yep, playing video games too much is a mental disorder, but believing you’re a member of the opposite gender is completely sane.
 
Now, I’ll be the first to say that while video games can be addictive, they don’t cause mental disorders. Playing video games too much is certainly not a good thing, but it doesn’t mean you have a mental disorder. An addiction? Perhaps. But not a disorder.
 
How do I know this? When I was younger, I could have essentially considered myself to have been addicted to video games. While I didn’t necessarily play video games every day, I would always think about video games (if I wasn’t thinking about girls) and simply couldn’t wait for the weekend to come so that I could play hours and hours of Call of Duty, Grand Theft Auto and what have you.
 
I would always prefer playing video games over sports or spending time with friends… well, spending time in real life with friends.
 
Video games used to be nearly my whole existence. But then I grew up. I had to realize that video games, unless I was going to become a game developer or something like that, weren’t going to help me out in the real world.
 
And while I had considered different job avenues in gaming, even in the realm of sports, I decided that none of those things mattered as much as getting the Truth out to the people and exposing the Left as much as humanly possible.
 
I used to be addicted to video games, but not anymore. I had an addiction, not a disorder. If I had a disorder, I’d be wasting my time playing video games all day instead of sitting here at my computer desk and writing these articles.
 
So it’s important to correctly define things as they are, not make everything political. The Washington Post reported that the World Health Organization (WHO) is expected to declassify transgenderism as a mental disorder.
 
“The proposals to declassify transgender identity as a mental disorder have been approved by each committee that has considered it so far… Transgender activist groups have been working toward this for years, said Mauro Cabral, one of the program directors of the Global Action for Trans Equality.”
 
The Left has politicized everything, including science. What was once considered an objective search for the truth of the universe and everything within it has been corrupted and turned into the exact opposite of what it is by definition.
 
Despite no evidence for man-made climate change, the Left preaches that like it’s gospel and will try to shut anyone down who disagrees with it – even fellow (or should I say, real) scientists.
 
Despite the fact that even the theory of evolution suggests the likelihood of a Creator, at least in the very beginning of life, they still adamantly refuse to believe the existence of God and mock those who believe in Him.
 
Despite the fact that discoveries that our very genetic makeup define just about everything about us including one’s gender, the Left has corrupted that in favor of actual insanity.
 
The Left hasn’t only made a mockery of science. They’ve made science THE OPPOSITE of science.
 
Theories are more valued than actual facts. Narratives have trumped previous discoveries. Corruption has disguised itself as science to fool people into believing humanity is responsible for the eventual demise of the world.
 
The fact that the WHO considers an addiction to be an actual mental disorder but believing to be a member of the opposite gender despite scientific and genetic evidence is not a mental disorder shows you just how corrupt these people are.
 
An organization created to help people identify possible disorders has been turned into yet another Leftist puppet.
 
Do you see one of the many reasons I believe the Left is evil? Science tells transgenders that they are who they are, so the Left utterly butchers science. They push for baseless political narratives that will only serve to further destroy society.
 
That may sound crazy today, but if left unchecked, who knows what the world will be like in 100 years? No, it likely won’t be completely flooded, but people might be so confused that no one knows what people are anymore.
 
Could you imagine if half the population of the world (not that I think it will ever necessarily come to that) was transgender? Males will still have male reproductive systems even with female reproductive parts. And females will still have female reproductive systems even with male reproductive parts.
 
Women can’t impregnate their partner and men can’t have babies. And if anyone thinks this is homophobic in any way, or against transgenders, then they themselves might just have a mental disorder.
 
Because let me tell you: science is adamantly against the idea of transgenders. It’s not some conservative “bigot” telling you a man can only be a man and a woman can only be a woman. It’s science that tells you that. And not only does science tell you that, but so does logic. So does the law of non-contradiction, the law that tells you contradictory statements can’t both be true in the same sense at the same time.
 
You can’t be a man if you’re a woman. You can’t be a woman if you’re a man. Such a premise defies science, logic and the law of non-contradiction.
 
But if you believe to be a member of the opposite gender, there’s no other explanation to that train of thought other than that you have a mental disorder or disease.
 
And if you believe being a member of the opposite gender is not a mental disorder but you believe playing video games too much is, you’re entirely illogical.
 
Proverbs 16:25
“There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death.”
 
Author: Freddie Drake Marinelli.

Well, this is something we (conservatives) have known for a while. OF COURSE IT’S A MENTAL DISORDER! For a man to truly believe he is a woman and get surgery done to “become a woman” is literally insane! And the same is true for women who want to be men!
 
But who am I to say it’s a mental disorder? After all, liberals trust what scientists say as though they were the Word of God. So here’s a scientist that very much disagrees with the Leftist narrative that it’s ok for a man to think he’s a woman and for a woman to think she’s a man: Dr. Paul R. McHugh.
 
Dr. McHugh is a distinguished psychiatrist in Johns Hopkins University and Johns Hopkins Hospital. He’s studied transgenderism and sex-reassignment surgery for 40 years. And according to CNSNews.com, “he said the condition is a ‘mental illness’ and to enable it is equal to ‘collaborating with madness.’”
 
Some pretty powerful words right there from a renowned psychiatrist. In his book titled “The Mind Has Mountains: Reflections on Society and Psychiatry”, he dedicates an entire chapter to “Surgical Sex”. In this chapter, he explains that transgenderism is a “mental illness” and to surgically alter a person’s genitalia is to enable a disorder.
 
“I have witnessed a great deal of damage from sex reassignment,” Dr. McHugh writes. “The children transformed from their male constitution into female roles suffered prolonged distress and misery as they sensed their natural attitudes” as these males develop. “As for the adults who came to us (at Johns Hopkins Hospital) claiming to have discovered their ‘true’ sexual identity and to have heard about sex-change operations, we psychiatrists have been distracted from studying the causes and natures of their mental misdirections by preparing them for surgery and for a life in the other sex.”
 
“We have wasted scientific and technical resources and damaged our professional credibility by collaborating with madness rather than trying to study, cure, and ultimately prevent it.”
 
Regarding the patients themselves, Dr. McHugh and his John Hopkins colleagues found that there were two types of men who were pushing for a sex change operation:
 
“One group consisted of conflicted and guilt-ridden homosexual men who saw sex change as a way to resolve their conflicts over homosexuality by allowing them to behave sexually as females with men.” And the other group, which consisted mostly of older men: “consisted of heterosexual (and some bisexual) males who found intense sexual arousal in cross-dressing as females.” So basically, most transgender men can be classified as either feeling guilty and conflicted with being gay and thought that if they were women, things would be better – and the others simply find it very kinky to dress like and be like a woman.
 
Let me tell you, when I first read the part about homosexual men feeling conflicted and guilty about being gay, I immediately thought about trying to find Christ in their lives. These men feel empty inside and the only way they think of filling that hole in their heart is to have sex with other people that they find attractive (in this case, other men). They are looking for value and worth and validation from other people. They want to be accepted by other people. But they don’t think to look for Christ as an answer.
 
If they had Christ in their lives and hearts, and I mean truly have Him there, none of these men would feel guilty or conflicted with who they are. They wouldn’t look for validation from some random person. They wouldn’t be sexually confused and wouldn’t be driven to change their natural gender.
 
Lastly, Dr. McHugh comes to the conclusion that: “to provide a sexual alteration to the body of these unfortunate people was to collaborate with a mental disorder rather than to treat it.” “We in the Johns Hopkins Psychiatry Department eventually concluded that human sexual identity is mostly built into our constitution by the genes we inherit and the embryogenesis we undergo. Quite clearly, then, we psychiatrists should work to discourage those adults who seek surgical reassignment.”
 
“The ‘transgender’ activists still argue that their members are entitled to whatever surgery they want, and they still claim that their sexual dysphoria represents a true conception of their sexual identity.” However, he argues that those activists have shown “little evidence” to refute the diagnosis that transgenderism is a mental illness.
 
“One might expect that those who claim that sexual identity has no biological or physical basis would bring forth more evidence to persuade others. But as I’ve learned, there is a deep prejudice in favor of the idea that nature is totally malleable.”, concluded the doctor.
 
So not only are some transgenders looking to fill the hole in their lives with gay sex rather than with Christ, but the whole idea of transgenderism goes against nature and science itself. Well, that last part I’ve briefly explained in a previous article titled “The Left Absolutely HATES Science!”. But it also makes sense that some of these transgender men feel empty and think they can feel better by changing their sex.
 
And the Left PROMOTES this! THEY ARE LITERALLY PROMOTING A MENTAL ILLNESS! But that’s to be expected from people as evil as those on the Left (at least those who hold government office and those in the MSM).
 
And just you wait. The Left will do what they can to refute the fact that transgenderism is a mental disorder in any way they can. But you know what happens when what’s in the dark comes out in the light.
 
John 3:19-20
“And this is the judgment: the Light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the Light because their works were evil. For everyone who does wicked things hates the Light and does not come to the Light, lest his works should be exposed.”
 
Author: Freddie Drake.