The Chinese coronavirus pandemic is pretty much over, but since the communists don’t want to face the consequences of their actions, they are trying to distract the world they decimated with the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Evidence of that is the fact that Pfizer, despite being persistent on sealing away the data they got on their toxic vaccines for 75 whole years, were forced to release their data now, practically in the shadows, as everyone else will be far more focused on Ukraine-Russia and the possibility for a larger conflict.
But I don’t intend to let these bastards get away with it, and neither should you. So, I will dedicate the rest of this article strictly to focusing on the adverse effects of the vaccine that they released in their data. Brace yourself, this might be a long one.
The PDF they released basically begins with explaining the timeline of them shipping their vaccines, which is from December 1st of 2020 to February 28th 2021.
In roughly those first 3 months of shipping their vaccines worldwide, there was a total of 42,086 case reports which contained 158,893 adverse events. Searching for times when the FDA recalled something medical, I found that in September of 2018, all ReGen Series products had to be recalled, “due to reported adverse reactions,” read the FDA’s website. It’s not specified what adverse reactions there were or their severity, but if ReGen products (not necessarily a vaccine, but still within the realm of medicine, so it’s applicable) had to be recalled due to reported adverse effects, why wouldn’t the Pfizer (and presumably the other vaccines also have similar issues) shot also be recalled?
Well, we all know why.
In any case, let’s get to the actual effects.
According to Pfizer’s data, in events reported in 2% or more cases, they found the following adverse effects:
And for those who might accuse me of trying to scare people with medical terms for relatively mild things, these are the terms that Pfizer used in their data. I literally had to look up these terms to define them.
Now, one might look at this list and say that it doesn’t look so bad. Sure, you don’t want any of these things to happen, but they are not exactly life-altering or life-ending things, by-and-large.
And that may, indeed, be the case. But we’re, unfortunately, just getting started. Those were the adverse effects listed by Pfizer. Now, here are the Adverse Effects of Special Interest (AESIs) listed by Pfizer:
Obviously, not all of these have the same chance of occurring within a vaccine-taker, but this is an extremely long list of adverse effects. For crying out loud, Pfizer even had to specify AEs of special interest, there were so many. And the bastards knew of this, likely for a very long time, and not only continued to ship these products, but still do so now.
More than 40,000 cases with nearly 160,000 adverse effects, many of which can either utterly change someone’s entire life, or END their entire life.
And this is JUST from Pfizer AND just from the first three months of data-gathering. What’s Moderna’s data looking like? Or Johnson & Johnson’s? Or any other vaccine manufacturer’s?
Pfizer alone recorded over 40,000 cases and nearly 160,000 adverse effects, and it’s generally considered (by pro-vaccine morons, at least) to be the most “effective” vaccine, and thus, is perhaps the most popular one. Are Moderna’s numbers fairly similar? Are, in actuality, over 100,000 cases and roughly 400,000 adverse effects across all the vaccines? What do the numbers look like today?
What’s the death toll of these butchers? How many lives have they ruined or ended as a result of their evil?
And for those who might try to argue that this is “just” from 2% or more of the reported cases, keep in mind that the world completely shut down and DEMANDED that it adhere to tyrannical dictatorships out of fear of a virus with a 0.007% mortality rate. Hell, even the originally thought 3.4% is around the percentage of events from the reported cases in Pfizer’s data.
The figures for the virus’s mortality rate are important and noteworthy to the point of subjugating entire countries, but the figures for the vaccine’s adverse effects (which are bigger than the virus’s mortality rate) are unimportant and should be ignored?
At the very least, by-and-large, you can recover from the virus far better than you could from what the vaccine will give you. Soccer players have either been forced into retirement or outright collapsed and died on the soccer field as a result of the vaccine. Athletes whom you’d think would have a better chance of fighting against the effects of the vaccine.
Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, everyone who was/is involved in the destruction of people should and will face the consequences of their actions.
“Evil men do not understand justice, but those who seek the Lord understand it completely.”
Two years ago, the world went mad. In a heartbeat, it did away with all forms of civil liberty and personal choice, demonizing those things as “dangerous” and “deadly”, and similarly doing so with anyone who advocated for such things. It went into an actually dangerous and ill-thought lockdown which wasn’t even effective and caused untold harm that, were anyone to point out, would warrant such a person being dehumanized and said to be “siding with the virus” or “putting the economy ahead of people’s lives.”
I’d even seen someone on the Right make that last assertion of people who rejected the lockdowns.
Now, two years later, with the boogeyman virus being shown to have been just that, lockdowns have largely been done away with, though we now must fight a different form of tyranny in the form of vaccine and mask mandates.
However, I won’t be focusing on that aspect right now, and I’ve already talked plenty about those things anyway. Right now, I want to focus on the lockdowns aspect, and particularly in a long-time lockdown advocate working with the UK government who recently admitted that he and basically everyone who advocated for said lockdowns got it completely wrong.
The lockdown advocate (or former, I guess) is Professor Mark Woolhouse, a member of the organization which advises the UK government on lockdown measures and made those extremely erratic models which depicted millions of Brits dying to the virus if absolutely nothing was done.
Even just last year, the organization made the prediction, through models, that the Omicron variant of the Chinese coronavirus would cause 6,000 deaths a day in the UK unless even harsher restrictions were put into place.
If you want exhibit #54564916 of models made by “experts” being utter crap, there you go.
In any case, in a new book titled “The Year the World Went Mad”, Woolhouse expressed regret at his organization’s involvement in pushing for lockdowns, which caused massive devastation to people and, at best, only managed to slightly delay the inevitable.
“We knew from February , never mind March, that the lockdown would not solve the problem. It would simply delay it,” said Woolhouse, adding that no one in British government seemed to have recognized the flaw in the lockdown strategy.
Right away, I have a few things to say.
First, it seems people have forgotten what the original “stated” purpose of the lockdowns were. They were not originally meant to “solve” the problem or outright stop the virus completely. It eventually was used for such a purpose because there were loud majorities opposing the lockdowns and they wanted to fool the people who were either already supporters or on the fence about it that the lockdowns were so essential that they would be able to stop the virus completely. That is particularly where they got things wrong. But originally, the lockdowns were supposed to slow the spread of the virus. And the purpose of that was to avoid overwhelming the hospital systems and avoiding catastrophe.
So it’s not surprising that he would admit that they knew from the beginning that the lockdown wouldn’t solve the problem, because in the beginning, no one was pretending that it would. But things really went off the rails when the liars in power began to say that this is what would happen. It went from “15 days to slow the spread” to “Two years to do the impossible”.
That’s not to say that the lockdowns were justified in the beginning with that original stated purpose, because I’ve never justified stripping people’s freedoms away in such a manner, but the original purpose of the lockdowns was, at least “officially”, to slow the spread so that hospitals can prepare to treat patients and not be overwhelmed.
The second thing I want to say about this is that, regardless of that original purpose, it still failed. Hospitals were never overwhelmed, to the point where Andrew Cuomo outright didn’t use a Navy hospital ship for non-Covid patients sent by President Trump, yet the fake news media kept insisting that they were. If the lockdowns were working, why was the fake news lying that the hospitals were overwhelmed? Those who dared to ask this question were demonized and deplatformed as sharing “misinformation”.
Now, one might argue that the hospitals weren’t overwhelmed precisely because of the lockdowns, but there’s no way to actually verify that because, again, the fake news media was claiming the hospitals were being overwhelmed. As we would discover over time, the Chinese coronavirus was far milder and less deadly than originally thought. It didn’t go from 3.4% fatality to 0.003 fatality, it was always this non-lethal. It’s just that the “experts” found that it wasn’t really 3.4% deadly, but instead, far less.
The world, courtesy of the “experts”, thought that the Chinese coronavirus could be something akin to the Plague. In reality, this virus was to the Plague as a Hot Wheels toy is to a racecar. It was nowhere near as bad as they were making it out to be, so in all likelihood, hospitals weren’t overwhelmed not because of the lockdowns but because of the mildness of the virus.
The last thing I want to say about this is that I doubt no one in the British government didn’t see the flaw in this plan. Much as I think politicians tend to be morons, I don’t think no one saw that the lockdowns would be a bad thing. It’s just that no one had the courage to speak out about it because they would be persecuted to Hell and back for it, particularly back then. The “experts” were, and somewhat still are, treated as prophets and missionaries delivering the gospel of doom, and to go against them or express any sort of doubt – even just asking questions – was considered an act of heresy.
So I doubt no one saw the foolishness of this plan in the UK government, but no one who did dared to speak out about it, which is a problem in itself.
In any case, let’s move on to the rest of Woolhouse’s confession of his political and ethical sins. He continued “The early global response to the pandemic was woefully inadequate”, adding that the WHO’s praising of China’s tyrannical “zero COVID” policy set the stage for other equally tyrannical policies around the world.
He asked why governments imposed such brutal restrictions seemingly without any regard or care for the consequences of such policies. “There was never at any stage, even by the following year, any form of analysis of the harms caused by lockdowns. Were they even considered? I haven’t seen any evidence that they were and that is very, very troubling.”
While I am glad this guy’s changed his tune surrounding lockdowns, I am still incredibly pissed off at him for having advocated for such a thing anyway. Furthermore, he asks these things as though HE HIMSELF NEVER CONSIDERED THE REPERCUSSIONS. He asks why the government officials didn’t question the lockdown policies or considered the consequences of enacting them, yet he’s the one who ADVISED the UK government to impose such policies to begin with!
Maybe at one point, he came to ask these questions and this is why he’s now admitting his wrongdoing, but he pretends as though he is a third-party individual who had no hand in what went on and was merely an observer.
Like historians who ponder on the context and reasoning behind some historical person’s actions, he ponders on the actions of people in power today AS THOUGH HE HAD NO HAND IN INFLUENCING SUCH PEOPLE.
You don’t get to ask “why did no one doubt the efficacies of this plan” when you yourself were selling this very plan to them. This would be like if Hitler had asked “why did no one tell me that killing 6 million Jews and 10 to 20 million total people was unethical?” You were pushing for it and, at the time, would’ve certainly repudiated any such doubt as “siding with the virus” and “being a danger to society.”
It’s good that he’s admitting he was wrong, but he’s acting as though he didn’t push for this crap and was one of the biggest influencers of policy-makers at the time.
And what comes next is even more infuriating. According to Summit News, as early as April of 2020, just ONE MONTH after the UK went into lockdown for the first time, Woolhouse’s organization was sent information which confirmed that the lockdowns would “cost three times more years than the disease itself” and that there was no consideration to the fact that “those over 70 had at least 10,000 times the risk of dying as those under 15 years old.”
This is HORRIBLE for a couple of reasons. First, they knew basically from the start that the lockdowns would be WORSE for the UK than the virus itself, and the damage done to the country by the lockdowns would take three times the amount of years than the damage done by the virus. And still, the UK continued with its lockdowns, and proceeded to lockdown three or four more times after that.
Either the organization held off on sharing this information with the government, which is horrendously unethical if not outright criminal, or the government was privy to this information and ignored it anyway, which is just as horrendously unethical if not outright criminal. Either way, the government and/or the organization advising on lockdowns completely and utterly failed the people of the United Kingdom and wittingly set them on the course towards suffering and diminishing freedoms for the ILLUSION of safety.
The other reason, regarding the part about over 70-year-olds being more at risk, is that the fake news media and the UK government were pretending as though the virus “doesn’t discriminate” and is just as likely to kill a young and otherwise healthy person as it is of killing an old and sickly person. This was patently untrue, as was clear from the very beginning.
Woolhouse said: “I heard [the official] argument caricatured as: everyone died, but at least no one was saved unfairly. BBC News backed up this misperception by regularly reporting rare tragedies involving low-risk individuals as if they were the norm.”
The government and their fake news puppets were acting as if everyone was equally likely to suffer as a result of the virus and deceiving people into believing that. Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, this is what they chose to do.
And everyone who tried to course-correct, show people who were either lying or were lied to that they were incorrect in their assertions, was utterly demonized, deplatformed and dehumanized for doing so. People were kicked off of social media, abandoned by friends, demonized by family and terminated from their jobs, if they hadn’t already been furloughed because of THE DAMN LOCKDOWNS.
People trying to do the right thing, helping their fellow countrymen and human beings were treated as less-than-human and as though they were agents of the virus, killers like COVID and deserving of derision at best and destruction at worst.
And now, two years after the fact, those who most strongly advocated for these lockdowns have seemingly come to recognize the damage they had done (even while seemingly pretending as though they had nothing to do with it, trying to absolve themselves of any well-deserved blame).
I could say that I’m simply happy that things turned out this way, but I won’t because I’m not. These people caused untold generational harm to the world. Because of the consequences they either ignored or didn’t take into consideration, families are without children, brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers. COVID didn’t take their lives, depression did. Depression from being deemed “unessential” and losing their jobs. Depression from being forced to wear masks at school (a demonic practice still present in many schools) and separate themselves from their friends while they watch as their teachers and other adults can ignore the very mandates themselves with zero punishment whatsoever so long as they push the agenda onto others.
And not just depression. How many abusive partners got a year and a half alone with their spouses and/or children? How many of them have had to suffer because an already unhinged individual is now being forced to spend all their time and energy with them? How many assaults went unreported? How many new scars were made? How much more trauma was inflicted?
How many have been driven to drugs as a “coping” mechanism? To alcohol? How many have suffered as a result of that? How many OD’d? How many families will now have an empty seat at their table, not because their loved one died from a fairly non-lethal virus, but because they took an obscene amount of drugs to cope with the fact that they were forced into isolation, out of a job, etc?
The damage done by these lockdowns is immeasurable and incalculable. Truly, only God knows the damage that was really done here. And these people just want to get away with “mea culpa”, if even that?
Woolhouse knew very early on that the lockdowns would be more costly than the virus. Did he speak out against the lockdowns as soon as he found out this information? If not, why not? Why contribute to crimes against humanity that you KNOW are crimes against humanity?
And make no mistake, that’s precisely what these things are. Not just the lockdowns, but every other mandate which was caused unknown suffering. People like Woolhouse should not be so easily forgiven. People like BoJo, Biden, Castro Jr., Merkel, Macron, everyone who pushed for these things are criminals deserving of the only justice appropriate for them.
Nuremberg 2.0 will have to be 100 times the size of the original Nuremberg Trials, as the number of illicit perpetrators is far bigger than the few Nazis which were tried (and ashamedly, fewer who were convicted).
“Whoever says to the wicked, ‘You are in the right,’ will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations, but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them.”
Exhibit #1519 of the vaccines doing absolutely jack at best and being utterly malignant at worst, we have a story about three BuzzFeed staffers having attended a Christmas party getting the “dreaded” Chinese coronavirus despite being triple vaxxed, wearing masks and showing proof of vaccination upon entering the party.
According to Business Insider, “The three positive employees told Insider they were vaccinated, had received their booster shots, and said they were experiencing mild symptoms.”
BuzzFeed, being a far-Left media company, requires its employees to be vaccinated, so not only does this mean that the people who got the virus were vaccinated themselves (as previously established) but so was the one who SPREAD the virus onto his or her colleagues.
As a reminder, the deceitful Left makes the following two claims regarding the vaccines: They help protect you from getting the virus and keep you from spreading the virus onto other people.
This story alone contradicts both those things, but as we have seen over this past year, it’s far from the only example.
Business Insider then said: “BuzzFeed requires vaccinations for staffers, and partygoers had to present their vaccination cards to get into the event. Two days before the party, BuzzFeed updated its rules to require masks ‘unless you are actively eating or drinking,’ according to the email, which was obtained by Insider.”
So, again, not only were the people who got infected vaccinated, and the person who infected them was vaccinated, but they all had to wear masks unless they were actively eating or drinking something.
That would be exhibit #3526 of the masks also being utterly garbage and not helping to either stop or slow down the spread of the virus, even amongst the “immunized”.
By-and-large, the tyrannical Left focused on four major policies for trying to “combat” the Chinese coronavirus: lockdowns, social distancing, mask-mandates, and vaccine-mandates. All four of them have failed or are in the process of being proven failures due to a lack of effectiveness in its main job of fighting the virus. At this point, it’s not an accident, neither is it sheer stupidity.
The lockdowns were a bad idea from the start, as anyone would be able to tell that you would basically be destroying people’s lives in the “hopes” of saving them. Of course, it wasn’t immediately apparent that the lockdowns weren’t helping, but even if they had, they still were a terrible idea because of all the OTHER negative side effects which never went reported by the fake news.
Things like drug overdoses, domestic abuse which went unreported to the police, child suicide rates skyrocketing, and this is without even talking about the almost irreparable financial damage done to individual families whose main sources of income were furloughed because they were considered “non-essential”.
They basically told people to their faces that their ability to provide for themselves and their families was “not essential.” That’s a moderately milder way of saying that their lives and the lives of their families don’t matter in the grand scheme of things and that they are entirely replaceable in the socialist cog.
How were more people not outraged by this?
And that’s just one of the mind-numbingly moronic proposals by the tyrants.
There were also the social distancing mandates and the mask mandates, both of which can be thrown together.
They forced not only healthy adults, but children who had long been PROVEN to have both low transmission and infection rates in comparison to older people, to social distance and wear masks.
We saw image after image and video after video of kids being forced to eat their lunch separately from their friends, having to study and work in very isolated manners, and generally being unnecessarily forced into social isolation and wearing uncomfortable, often suffocating masks for prolonged periods of time.
I mentioned this in a prior article, but I once saw a video of a mom telling her son that a group of parents who sued the school district over the mask mandates had won their case, and that the kids would no longer have to unnecessarily wear masks everyday to school. The kid, upon hearing the news, ran to hug his mother, who was recording his reaction, and began to bawl his eyes out in joy.
If this one kid, who, from what I remember, looked to be around the fourth or fifth grade, reacted like this at the news that he DIDN’T have to wear a mask in school anymore, how many other kids, particularly younger kids, are currently suffering because of the sheer depravity of school administrators who are unfit to run a computer program, let alone education?
They are actively, willingly and gleefully making kids suffer for either more money, the sick thrill of exercising power over others, or their evil agendas.
And neither the masks or social distancing did much of anything to protect them from a virus which they are THE MOST LIKELY to survive from out of all age ranges. And that’s without mentioning that more “vulnerable” adults still have a 99.97% chance of surviving.
Finally, there’s the vaccine mandates, and we are witnessing in real-time why they aren’t working. They, at best, don’t protect people from crap, and at worst literally acts like AIDS, with the added bonus of screwing people’s hearts up.
Remember in the previous article how I said that, with the Omicron variant, 80% of the cases found in the U.S. were from those who were “fully vaccinated”? And how I asked “How is it that, at any point in the new variant’s existence, those who got the shots are statistically more likely to be infected with this variant that those who didn’t get any shot whatsoever?”
In my mind, the only way that can actually happen is if the immune system of the vaccinated was weaker than that of the unvaccinated. And the only way that can happen is if the vaccine weakens the immune system of whoever takes it.
This isn’t just my random theory, it’s actually been shown that this is what happens.
So, then, no one ought to be surprised when a vaccine which basically acts like the AIDS virus ends up making people more likely to succumb to other illnesses.
And, of course, it’s making people suffer from increased heart risks and “sudden” deaths, among other health issues.
There is no reason whatsoever to trust the vaccines or the people coercing us into getting the vaccines. So the vaccine mandates will also end in failure, sooner rather than later.
Let the BuzzFeed staffers, as well as others, serve as examples of just why these tyrants are untrustworthy of anything they say or do.
“It is not good to be partial to the wicked or to deprive the righteous of justice.”
"Never Again", They Said: German EU Parliament Member Fights For Australians Held In COVID Concentration Camps
I have said many times in the past, at least when talking about the Chinese concentration camps, that the excuse the world had for not being able to do anything about the Holocaust was ignorance. People, for the most part, didn't even know what was going on in various camps throughout Europe, and had little knowledge of their existence. However, ignorance is not a good enough excuse this time around. And ashamedly, I'm not even talking about Chinese concentration camps this time.
In Australia, a country which just two years ago would have considered itself free and democratic, the government has set up various camps to house the unvaccinated and those exposed to COVID.
Now, before getting to the meat and potatoes of it all, I just have to ask: If the Australian government believes the unvaccinated to be at risk of getting and dying from COVID, why would they put into these camps people who have been exposed to COVID? It sounds just as malicious as what Andrew Cuomo did in New York retirement and nursing homes. Are they hoping to kill these people? We know they harbor nothing but ill-will towards the unvaccinated because they refuse to comply with their tyrannical vaccination orders and dual-economy system, so are they actively trying to rid themselves of what they would consider as "political enemies"?
Whatever the case may be, it is undeniably evil to do something like this, knowing the facts surrounding not only the survivability of the Chinese coronavirus, but the lethality and adverse effects of the vaccines on otherwise healthy people.
A video (posted on Twitter, so it will likely be taken down at some point) of an Australian who was sent to one of these camps details roughly how their camp system works. In essence, the captives aren't allowed to leave their designated living quarters without a mask unless it is to do their laundry. They are not allowed to talk with other people outside their quarters or outside any nearby fences. Failure to comply will lead to a $5,000 AUS fine (no information surrounding repeated offenses, but given the Third Reich-ish nature of the Australian government as of late, it's not hard to imagine roughly what they might be willing to do).
And while I doubt they are actively performing experiments on their captives (apart from seeing roughly what will happen to them by mixing unvaccinated people with those exposed to the virus) or forcing them to work for them or outright killing them with gas chambers and furnaces, there is no doubt that they at least have the POTENTIAL to perform such atrocities.
After all, if they already see the unvaccinated as villains to society to the point where they must be separated not only from the economy but also from civilization at large, what's to stop them from going all the way and exterminating them through some irrational "justification" that they come up with? Their consciences? If they had that, they wouldn't be putting people in concentration camps. Of course, only God knows what will happen, and it's very possible that they won't go so far down Nazi Germany territory, but the fact that Australia is at this point to begin with gives reason for concern.
Perhaps rather ironically, a German EU member of parliament, named Christina Anderson, made a video, posted to Rumble, answering Australians' SOS call.
In the video, she said: "I will do whatever I can to make it known to the world that your once free and liberal democracy has been transformed into a totalitarian regime which tramples on human rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law. I am imploring all of you around the world who still think your governments are looking out for your best interests, at no point in history have the people forcing others into compliance been the good guys. The welfare of humanity has always been the alibi of tyrants. Do you not realize that this vaccine does not protect you from COVID? It does, however, protect you from governmental oppression. For now, that is. But don't think for even a second that this is not going to change tomorrow."
"I am a German, and we once asked our grandparents how they could have just stood by in silence, allowing a horrific totalitarian regime to come about. Anyone could have known; all they had to do was open their eyes and take a look. The vast majority chose not to. So what will you tell your grandchildren? Will you tell them you did not know? Will you tell them you were just following orders? You need to understand it is not about breaking the fourth wave. It is about breaking people. Australia does not need a no-COVID strategy. What Australia needs is a no-oppression strategy. So I stand in support with your fight for freedom and democracy. We need to stop our governments from transforming our free and democratic societies into totalitarian regimes. We need to do it now. We need to stand up now."
A powerful, short speech, I have to say. And she is 100% correct. Never, in the entire history of the world, have those who forced compliance of others into certain actions ever been the good guys. Nazis do that, fascists do that, socialists do that, communists do that. Tyrants do that. Always, their alibi is "the greater good", but it never actually is for the better of the people. The victim is always the people these tyrants claim are doing them a favor. For the Third Reich (given the actions of modern day Germany, I won't call Hitler's Germany "Nazi Germany" anymore, because now there is a second Nazi Germany, or an unofficial Fourth Reich), their targets were Jews, capitalists and non-Aryans. For the Soviet Union, it was the Cossacks, the Kulaks, the White Army, officers of the former Russian Empire, and generally anyone who disagreed with the regime. For the Chi-comms, it was anyone who even remotely liked the "old traditions" of China and didn't subscribe to the Color Revolution.
And it wasn't as if people were utterly ignorant of what was going on in Germany during Hitler's reign. The Holocaust was a big secret, sure, but their targeting of Jews wasn't, as they specifically made propaganda to demonize the Jews. The Holocaust wasn't well-known at the time, but the Nazis' oppression was. And so, like Christina said, they asked their grandparents how they could have stood by in silence as tyranny ran rampant on their country. Likewise, future generations will look at what is going on currently in more than one country and judge this time just as harshly as we judge the Third Reich.
And I love how Christina phrased it: "So what will you tell your grandchildren? Will you tell them you did not know? Will you tell them you were just following orders?" I love it because that last one calls back to the answer that Nazi guards and scientists would give during the Nuremberg Trial as to why they did what they did: "We were just following orders." It wasn't an acceptable answer then, and it's not an acceptable answer now.
To end things off, I want you to look back at the picture above. Look at what it shows. Look at the buildings, the sort of road, and the people in it. Now, look at the following pictures:
Does it look like there is a whole lot of difference between the picture of the Australian camp and the pictures of the concentration camps with Nazis in them?
So why would anyone be willing to, rightly, demonize the four pictures but not the one at the top? Why would anyone justify the one at the top and judge the ones right above?
Tell whoever it is who sides with this atrocity that if they ever wondered if they would have supported the Nazis in Germany during WWII, they need not wonder anymore, for the answer is quite clear.
"Whoever says to the wicked, 'You are in the right,' will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations, but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them."
The Left not knowing how economics works is not exactly a big secret. By and large, they often prove that they don’t know anything of how it works and no amount of economics degrees or awards will disprove that. So it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise to see an MSNBC host making an exceedingly stupid comment regarding the economy.
During a segment on her show, Stephanie Ruhle made the following comment: “The dirty little secret here, Willie, while nobody likes to pay more, on average we have the money to do so. Household savings hit a record high over the pandemic. While the stock market isn’t the economy, you have over half of American households with some investment in the markets and the markets have hit record highs.”
In essence, she’s saying that it’s okay that you have to pay more for your food because you have the money to afford it… completely ignoring just what inflation does to money.
While we are FAR from Venezuela’s, The Weimar Republic’s, and other socialist countries’ inflation rates, the fact is that your dollar is worth less now than it was a year ago, which is why you see higher prices on store shelves (and other problems abound, such as a supply-chain problem).
So sure, people can usually afford to still pay for some things, but the “dirty little secret” about inflation, which really isn’t a secret at all, is that it leads people to be more conservative with their money. With their money being worth a bit less, they will want to save more, so they forego buying things which they don’t think are all too necessary for them at the moment.
Which can even make things worse because if fewer things are being bought, the retailers and producers need to make up the difference somewhere, so they either hike up prices even more or cut costs wherever they see fit, either in quality of product, quantity of product or lay-offs, of which there were plenty because of Leftist jackasses insisting that only SOME people’s jobs were “essential.”
Comments like the ones by Ruhle not only show the utter ignorance of the Left, but their unabashed bias. In essence, she is minimizing inflation because we all know on whom the responsibility lies. And with Brandon’s administration already well underwater because of recent events (including the inflation these deceivers are trying to minimize and even claim is a GOOD THING in some cases), the fake news media can’t afford to report on the bad things happening with any semblance of objectivity because the objective reality is that Biden is awful.
And the arguments made by Ruhle as to why the economy is *akshually* doing great are idiotic.
Household savings increased because EVERYTHING WAS SHUT DOWN. Not to mention that it’s odd she would argue that the economy is doing well with household savings from last year as a metric because Trump was still in the White House last year. If she’s trying to say that the economy during the pandemic has been good based on a metric from last year, she’s conveniently forgetting that she can’t credit the Brandon administration for that one in particular.
Secondly, the market was just about the only other place many Americans could receive income from, you know, because ghouls like YOU, Steph, insisted that people NEEDED to lose their jobs “for the common good” in keeping people “safe” from the virus. Oddly, more people have reportedly died from that same virus this year than last year, but your guy is in office, so there’s no need to talk about it anymore, apparently.
Lastly, markets hitting record highs has NOTHING to do with the Brandon administration. If anything, they are hitting record highs IN SPITE of him and his goons.
The market made a quick recovery in 2020. For it to continue to go up is due to a number of reasons (among which being multiple states and countries opening back up), absolutely NONE of which include the fact that the illegitimate child predator is occupying the Oval Office.
The idea that it’s okay that there are higher prices for things because “people can afford them” is emblematic of the following meme structure: Tell me you don’t know how inflation works without telling me you don’t know how inflation works.
Inflation means that your currency becomes less valuable. In a previous article, I talked about how cash was literally disappearing from Venezuela.
In that article, I mentioned that there were long lines being formed outside of banks in Caracas, hoping to withdraw the maximum limit of 400,000 bolivars. An idiot Leftist might think that that’s great and that means that just about everyone in Venezuela is a millionaire or billionaire (another thing which I have previously talked about), but in reality, 400,000 bolivars is worth around 20 cents (though maybe a bit more, with our inflation being worse now than back then).
With bolivars being as worthless as they are, people turned to using them to make handbags to sell outside the country. Bolivars are so worthless, they are worth more as the fabric that they are made from than as the currency it’s meant to represent.
This is with hyperinflation rates never before seen in the U.S., but that’s beside the point. The point is that with inflation, your money becomes less valuable. So the idea that “people can still afford to buy more expensive stuff” is not only asinine, it’s outright ironic. If it gets bad enough, you can get to the point where you’re spending a good bit of your money on basic things.
In the other article I brought up earlier, I mentioned that in order to purchase a little more than half a pound of the cheapest ham and cheese one could find, one would have to pay over 600,000 bolivars.
“But if 400,000 bolivars is roughly 20 cents, then 600,000 bolivars can hardly be much more, probably not even a dollar,” the Leftist might argue. Maybe, but that’s irrelevant because I also mentioned in that article that 600,000 bolivars is three-fourths of someone’s monthly salary at minimum wage.
With all the talk from the Left about how minimum wage isn’t a “livable wage” in the States, imagine how much less livable it is in a country where someone can barely afford the cheapest ham and cheese with a whole month’s worth of salary (and this is discounting all the other expenses they would have to make).
With such worthless currency, they would naturally have to seriously consider foregoing buying ham and cheese (and in most cases, actually do so). They might see it as luxury food.
And that’s why Ruhle’s comment is so idiotic. Anyone who is remotely knowledgeable of economics and inflation could tell you that it’s not good to have high inflation or hyperinflation. Again, we are far from the economic state that Venezuela is in, but there are people in the States who do have to adjust what they have to buy and how much of it. This impacts them negatively, and telling them that it’s not a very big deal or that they should just suck it up because “you can afford it” is ignorant, belligerent and short-sighted.
Not everyone is as rich as you, Steph. So it’s definitely not true that the “dirty little secret” is that people can afford higher prices. For many, they literally can’t. Not if they want to pay for other things which they might consider of higher importance.
And this is why so many people can’t stand the fake news media. It’s not just that they lie to people, they HATE the people they are lying to and see nothing wrong with them suffering economically. At least, not if they suffer economically during a Democrat administration. They destroyed Bush because of the recession (not that he had nothing to do with it) and tried to do the same with Trump during the pandemic mini-recession.
Now that their boy is in power, however, the economic trainwreck he’s causing will not only be minimized, it will be PROMOTED as something good in some cases. At best, they just decide to utterly ignore it or shift the blame.
They are annoying liars and a pest to this country.
“’There is no peace,’ says the Lord, ‘for the wicked.’”
We all know that, at bare minimum, Anthony Fauci has been a flip-flopper and a serial liar, willingly misinforming the public regarding the Chinese coronavirus, its origins, and the effectiveness/safety of the vaccines. This is the best-case scenario regarding Fauci, but information recently coming to light paint a far grimmer picture of the guy.
Back in August, The Gateway Pundit broke the story that Fauci funded a study in Tunisia “where beagle dogs were eaten alive by parasite-infested flies.” Oh, and this was TAXPAYER FUNDED, so YOUR money went to the torture and cruel experimentation on dogs (not that that’s the worst use of taxpayer money I have seen, considering it’s used to fund abortion as well).
However, there are new developments surrounding just what other experiments Fauci and his NIH have funded.
Before I tell you what they are, let’s do an exercise I call “Nazis or NIH?” I will tell you of an experiment that was either conducted by the Nazis or the NIH and you will guess which organization performed them.
The purpose of this should be rather obvious: there is little moral difference between the two.
Without further ado, let’s begin.
First: This organization was involved with an experiment where the study’s researchers would cripple monkeys with toxic brain injections through devices implanted into the apes’ skulls. The research included (WARNING, IF YOU ARE UNCOMFORTABLE READING THE DETAILS, SKIP THIS PART):
Locking the monkeys alone in small cages, drilling holes into their skulls, implanting head restraining devices, implanting electrodes into the monkey’s brains, and finally, injecting toxins that destroy their brains, causing them to lose control of their limbs, mouths and other body parts.
(YOU CAN CONTINUE READING FROM THIS POINT)
So which is it? Nazi or NIH? There are some clues to tell you, but it’s the NIH. To the NIH’s credit, had this been the Nazis, they would have used humans as opposed to monkeys, but the experimentation is still messed up and I don’t see the purpose whatsoever to this study. Was it to test whatever was injected into the monkeys’ skulls to see what would happen? What a surprise, something bad happened to them.
Second: This organization tested immunization compounds and serums for the prevention and treatment of various contagious diseases, such as malaria, typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, yellow fever, hepatitis and epidemic jaundice.
I will give you some time to think about this one because, scarily enough, one could picture both organizations doing this kind of thing, particularly with me leaving out key information which would tell you immediately which one did this.
Okay, the answer is that this was the Nazis. They did this at various concentration camps.
Last one: This organization experimented on orphans with terminal diseases in order to perform drug trials on them, with a total of 201 children dying out of 532.
There is one thing here which ought to tell you the answer, and I bet you really wish this had been the Nazis.
According to TGP, Fauci’s NIH was caught funding experiments on hundreds of children with AIDS in a New York City hospital back in 2004.
“In 2005, the city of New York hired the VERA Institute to form a final report on the drug trials. VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008. They reported that twenty-five children died during the drug studies, that an additional fifty-five children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29% of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used).”
You know, I was originally going to compare Fauci to Joseph Mengele, the Nazi’s “Angel of Death” who would perform experiments on people, mainly twins, at Auschwitz, but then I realized that that would be a bit too mean to Mengele. At least he only did experiments at one concentration camp and they were largely focused on a single subject matter. A more fitting comparison for Fauci would be if Hitler had had a medical degree and was entirely focused on his egregious experiments as opposed to running Germany and trying to dominate the world.
Fauci is Hitler with a medical degree. That is perhaps the most accurate thing I can say about the guy right now. And this is WITHOUT counting the gain-of-function research at Wuhan and everything he has done regarding the Chinese coronavirus and the vaccines.
Counting those things makes him even worse and brings him closer to the comparison to Hitler with an MD. But even discounting all that, what the NIH has done (THAT WE KNOW OF) in these experiments can only be compared to the inhumane experimentation of the Nazis throughout their 12-year Thousand Year Reich.
The Nazis performed multiple other experiments, including: Experiments on twins (like I mentioned), experiments on bone, muscle and nerve transplantation and regeneration, experiments on head injuries, experiments on hypothermia and freezing temperatures, experiments with mustard gas, experiments with Sulfonamide drugs, experiments on the potability of sea water, experiments with sterilization and fertility, experiments with outright poison, experiments with incendiary bombs, experiments regarding high altitudes, experiments on blood coagulation, and electroshock experiments.
What is perhaps most frightening is that I could see the NIH performing most of these experiments themselves. Perhaps not the mustard gas ones, the Sulfonamide drug, the potability of sea water, incendiary bombs and high altitudes, but the others are plausible, at least with varying degrees.
We KNOW that they are experimenting with sterilization, for example, given that is one of the effects of the vaccine.
But given what we already know the NIH has done, I think a comparison to the Nazis’ inhumane experiments is warranted. They might not be quite that depraved (as far as we know), but excusing or forgiving these relatively mild experiments (mild compared to the Nazis) would invite pushing the boundaries more and more.
They want to know just what they can get away with before being subjected to a second Nuremberg Trial, which we all know will come sooner or later.
I often talk about the evil of the Left or the Washington Establishment or the elite ruling class (but I repeat myself), however, it’s not often that I talk about the evil of the medical industry. And there is PLENTY to talk about regarding that subject.
This shows just how evil they are willing to be now, and the history of the Nazi experiments shows us just how evil they could potentially be in the future.
There are those who call for Fauci’s firing. I call for his execution. His and everyone who was involved with these inhumane experiments, either physically or financially. And before you say anything, yes, I know these were taxpayer funded, sadly. But it’s the NIH which was responsible for how that money was used. THEY are the ones who ought to pay the price for their evil. So make no mistake about that.
Fire Fauci, try him, prosecute him and execute him. Preferably with either parasitic flies, whatever was injected into those monkeys, or injecting him with the vaccine the number of times he thinks other people ought to receive it.
Maybe then we would begin to approach justice.
“But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.”
You know the Left is egregiously tyrannical when even Vladimir Putin thinks it proper to compare the woke “progress” they are attempting to do with what the Soviets did during the 1917 revolution and after.
For context, on Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin (whom I’ll remind all of you used to be in THE USSR’S KGB!) gave a speech during a plenary session of the 18th annual meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club in Sochi, where the topic of discussion was “Global Shake-up in the 21st Century.”
In this speech, Putin said the following (keep in mind this was translated from Russian, so it might sound grammatically off at times): “We see with bemusement the paralysis unfolding in countries that have grown accustomed to viewing themselves as the flagships of progress. Of course, it’s none of our business or what is happening, the social and cultural shocks that are happening in some countries in the Western countries, some believe that aggressive blotting out of whole pages of your own history, the affirmative action in the interest of minorities, and the requirement to renounce the traditional interpretation of such basic values as mother, father, family, and the distinction between sexes are a milestone… a renewal of society.”
He alluded to the fact that while Western nations have a right to do whatever they wanted to do, “the overwhelming majority of Russian society” rejected this wokeness altogether.
“The preparedness of the so called social progress believe that the bringing a new conscience, a new consciousness to humanity, something that is more correct. But there is one thing I would like to say: The recipes they come up with are nothing new. Paradoxical as it may seem, but this is something we saw in Russia. It happened in our country before after the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks followed the dogmas of Marx and Engels. And they also declared that they would go in to change the traditional lifestyle, the political, the economic lifestyle, as well as the very notion of morality, the basic principles for a healthy society. They were trying to destroy age and century long values, revisiting the relationship between the people, they were encouraging informing on one’s own beloved and families. It was hailed as the march of progress. And it was very popular across the world and it was supported by many, as we see, it is happening right now.”
“Incidentally,” he continued, “the Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of other opinions, different from their own. I think this should remind you of something that is happening. And we see what is happening in the Western countries, it is with puzzlement that we see the practices Russia used to have and that we left behind in distant path, the fight for equality and against discrimination turns into an aggressive dogmatism on the brink of absurdity, when great authors of the past as Shakespeare are no longer taught in schools and universities because they announced as backwards classics that did not understand the importance of gender or race.”
“In Hollywood there are leaflets reminding what you should do in the cinema, in the films, how many personalities and actors you’ve got, what kind of color, what sex, and sometimes it’s even tighter and stricter than what the Department of Propaganda of the Soviet Communist Party Central Committee did,” continued the surprisingly based Russian president. “And the fight against racism, which is a lofty goal, turns into a new culture, cancel culture, and into reverse discrimination, racism on the obverse. And it brings people apart, whereas the true fighters for civic rights, they were trying to eliminate those differences. I asked my colleagues to find this quote from Martin Luther King, and he said, ‘I have a dream, that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.’ That is a true value.”
“You know, the Bolsheviks were speaking about nationalizing not just the property, but also women. The proponents of new approaches go so far as they want to eliminate the whole notions of men and women, and those who dare say that men and women exist and this is a biological fact, they are all but banished. Parent number one, parent number two, or the parent that has given birth, or instead of breastmilk, you say human milk. And you say all of that, so the people who are not sure of their sexual agenda are not unhappy.”
“And I would like to say that this is not something new, and the 20s and the 1920s, the Soviet couture Tagore came up with the so called ‘Newspeak,’ and they thought that thereby they were building a new consciousness and coming up with new values, and they went so far that we feel the consequences up until now,” concluded Putin. “There are some monstrous things when from a very young age, you teach to children that the boy can easily become a girl and you impose on them this selection, this choice. You push the parents aside and make the child take this decisions that can destroy their lives. And if we call the spade a spade this is nigh to crime against humanity and all of that under the banner of progress, while some people just want to do that.”
I will remind you once again that this man used to WORK for the Soviet Union’s KGB, and in many ways runs Russia as though it was still the USSR. And yet, he understands just what the American Left is bringing to the table by trying to be “woke” and “progressive.”
Now, I’m not so naïve as to think he was saying all this to warn the West that what is happening is extremely reminiscent of the Soviet Revolutionary tactics of the early 20th century. He even started that speech by noting the bemusement they had in seeing what is happening. He made this speech not to warn the West, but to warn Russia against following the West’s woke direction of regressive “progress.”
The Russian people reject, as well they should, this idiotic “woke” thinking which is nothing new whatsoever, but Putin understands that positive sentiment for it is popular in the West and it could infect the Russian Federation. While, again, Putin runs Russia as it was the Soviet Union, both he and the Russian people at large have at least SOME amount of basic and traditional human values. They reject the militant gay agenda, the idea that the white race is naturally oppressive (probably because over 90% of the Russian population is white), and the idea that a man can be a woman or vice versa.
These are all tropes of the modern day Left in the Western world (even the Chinese communists aren’t fond of homosexuality, given that the CCP banned “sissy” men from being seen on television) but whose Godless values could spread to other countries with relative ease.
Putin wants to protect Russia from such heinous values because, as he said, such values destroy society. But despite the fact that he was clearly just trying to warn Russia, it does inadvertently serve as a warning to the West, which is currently undergoing such an asinine cultural revolution.
What the Left is doing and is trying to do is destroy not only the United States, but also the Western world in general. The foot-soldiers have a misguided idea that the West is responsible for the world’s woes such as slavery (as though this wasn’t a thing in Egypt thousands of years ago), racism (again, as though it wasn’t a thing elsewhere), genocide and imperialism (redundant to say it again), etc. Those at the top, to one extent or another, know it’s all bullcrap but gain tremendously from Western culture being battered and divided in such a way.
Take, for example, the Black Lives Matter (not the organization, but the belief/slogan) vs. All Lives Matter debate. This is a debate which, for the most part, I do not care to take part in any longer because I’ve come to the realization that most people, certainly the reasonable ones, are arguing over something that they agree on.
This is what I mean: Those who chant “Black Lives Matter”, at least the reasonable ones, don’t generally exclude other lives. While the slogan and chant seem exclusionary, no reasonable person who says that chant will also go on to say “I mean ONLY Black Lives Matter.” They believe that other people’s lives matter apart from black people’s, again, at least the reasonable ones. There are unreasonable people who say “no lives matter until Black Lives Matter”, which is preposterous and outright evil, and THAT is most certainly exclusionary and emphasizes that only black lives matter. But for the most part, I think that the foot-soldiers who side with “Black Lives Matter” don’t exclude other races.
As a result, they inadvertently admit that all lives matter. On the flipside, those who say “All Lives Matter” believe that, naturally, black lives are included. No reasonable person who says “All Lives Matter” will say “but not the black ones.” Frankly, I haven’t heard anyone on that side of the debate make such an assertion.
So what you have is one side, Black Lives Matter, believing that black lives matter and so do other people’s, and you have another side, All Lives Matter, believing that black lives matter and so do other people’s. THEY ARE ARGUING OVER SOMETHING THEY AGREE ON!
And this is what the elites and the establishment are gunning for: the division of the people so that we focus our efforts on each other as opposed to them. Somehow, the elite class has managed to make people argue over something that both “sides” agree on. Sure, like I said, there are those who are lunatics and exclusionary, but those are few and far between; the exception. Most people believe that all lives matter, even if they chant “Black Lives Matter.” So all we’re doing by engaging in this debate is wasting time and energy going at each other’s throats, when it’s the elite class which is pulling the strings in all this and causing such division and chaos.
This is what they do with pretty much everything. They do it with climate change, they do it with sexuality and the sexes in general, they do it with shootings, with terrorist attacks, and do it with homosexuality, all in the name of “progress”. They sow discord and chaos and division. This is what the Soviets did in the early 20th century, as Putin full-well understands, ironically.
The reason I say all this isn’t to try and back away from a debate, but to try and redirect it. It’s because I try to differentiate between the weak (those who say “BLM” but believe ALM) and the wicked (those who either say “no lives matter until BLM” or who attempt to further sow discord), knowing that at least the weak can be convinced to join our side. It’s hard to convince the weak that they are wrong when we treat them as wicked and just as culpable of the division and chaos as the elite ruling class.
The modern Left, the establishment elites, must not only be defeated but utterly DESTROYED AND CRUSHED everywhere, in basically every manner. Else, only the dissolution of society, Western and Eastern, will await us. Take heart, then, that God is with us and not with them.
“No weapon that is fashioned against you shall succeed, and you shall confute every tongue that rises against you in judgment. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord and their vindication from me, declares the Lord.”
Before I begin with explaining the idiotic reason that Leftists believe Halloween to be racist, allow me to preface this entire article by claiming that, out of all of the things that the Left generally cancels, I actually don’t mind this one too much.
Again, it’s still an idiotic reason, but ironically goes into a direction which I sort of approve of or like, at least in some ways.
I will further explain my reasoning after I give you the context for this article.
You see, a Seattle school has chosen to cancel a Halloween themed parade because it, according to school administrators, “marginalizes people of color.”
It’s not a reason any of us didn’t expect, given how utterly moronic many of these people are, and given how white savior-ish these white liberals think they have to be, supposedly for the benefit of minorities like myself. However, regardless of our expectations for such a “reason”, it’s still a darn stupid one. Further detail about just WHY it “marginalizes people of color” is hardly even present later on.
A spokesperson for the school told Jason Rantz, Seattle-based conservative radio host, that “historically, the Pumpkin Parade marginalizes students of color who do not celebrate the holiday. Specifically, these students have requested to be isolated on campus while the event took place.”
The spokesperson added: “In alliance with SPS’s unwavering commitment to students of color, specifically African American males, the staff is committed to supplanting the Pumpkin Parade with more inclusive and educational opportunities during the school day.”
Well, first of all, I seriously doubt that a vast majority of the students are in any way bothered by the parade, which I will talk about more later. So in essence, the school is canceling a parade for the whole school because a few (if even that many) students felt “marginalized.” Right, because people knowing that you canceled a fun school activity definitely isn’t something that would make you even more marginalized. Kids love snitches and buzz-kills, after all!
I should also probably explain that this was in an elementary school, and kids can be quite mean, even at this point.
The second thing I want to talk about is why the spokesperson felt the need to say “specifically African American males.” What, are African American females not as important? Are kids of other races apart from African American not as important? It seems particularly odd how one race and one gender is specified when talking about “commitment to students of color.”
At any rate, in lieu of the Pumpkin Parade, students at the school can opt to participate in what the school described as “autumnal work” (whatever that means), “thematic units of study about the fall,” (because kids surely want to study the season above having fun) and might also look at “sharing all the cozy feelings of the season.” All definitely seem like fun alternatives to dressing up in costumes at school, a once-a-year event. Congrats, kids who complained, I’m sure you won’t be given swirlies for this.
The school also further explained their ridiculous reasoning behind canceling this parade in a newsletter to the parents, which was obtained by Rantz. The newsletter read: “Halloween events create a situation where some students must be excluded for their beliefs, financial status, or life experience. Costume parties often become an uncomfortable event for many children, and they distract students and staff from learning.”
It continues, but allow me to pause here for a moment.
With regards to the first item, that being that some students feel like they are excluded because of their beliefs, I can actually understand that one, but it does bring up a problem which I will get to momentarily. As I alluded to earlier in the article, I am not a particular fan of Halloween and don’t really mind its cancelation outright. I believe it’s not a “holiday” because a holiday, by strict definition, means a “holy day.” In this day and age, it’s come to mean just a special day in general that basically everyone in the country either celebrates (like Christmas, an actual holiday) or take time off of school/work for (like Columbus day, which is a special occasion because of its significance, sure, but not a holy day), etc.
Halloween is a celebration of evil, darkness, and of the macabre (I mean, just look at the picture above, for crying out loud). It’s celebrating literally everything that is opposed to God. And while I know that All Hallow’s Eve and Day began as Christian holidays for the remembrance of the dead, namely saints, martyrs and faithful departed (and I have my concerns regarding even this, as it may have originated from pagan traditions), it has since utterly excluded the idea of remembering the dead, at least the ones who died in Christ or were martyred for Him, and is largely about evil and darkness now. The complete antithesis of Christ.
Sure, for kids, it’s mostly about candy and dressing up in costumes, which are fun, but the “holiday” is utterly commercialized (candy companies definitely love this day) and taken away from the Christian roots of it and towards more sinister ones.
So I can understand people’s objections to the celebration based on beliefs. The second item, about financial status, makes little sense to me, as one can make costumes basically out of anything. As a kid (long before I became a Christian), when Halloween came around, I would go to school in my regular clothes (in itself rather neat for me at the time, since that school required uniforms most days) and a simple cape on my back, and I would say that I was “Dracula” or a vampire in general. This happened for multiple years because I largely didn’t have other costumes.
And yet, I had no real issues with that at all and to the best of my memory, I wasn’t really teased for coming every year with just a cape. Even if your family didn’t have enough money to even buy a cape (granted, the cheapest I saw on Walmart’s online store was $5, and it wasn't even a good-looking cape), you can make a costume out of literally anything. You can make a cape out of a large towel. You can make costumes out of simple clothes. And I can ASSURE YOU that kids have shirts with stuff like the Superman or Batman logos.
So the “financial status” excuse doesn’t hold up. As far as “life experience” goes, it’s so vague that almost anything could seemingly justify it, and this article is already long enough as it is without getting to the main point, so I’ll leave it there.
In any case, the letter then read: “Large events create changes in schedules with loud noise levels and crowds. Some students experience over stimulation, while others must deal with complex feelings of exclusion. It’s uncomfortable and upsetting for kids.”
Yeah, that first sentence makes me think that the cancelation of the event has less to do with “marginalized people of color” and more with the fact that it can be annoying for staff to organize certain things and have to schedule certain things outside of the usual, and that it can be annoying to hear loud noises. This idea is supported by the fact that earlier in the letter, it talked about costume parties distracting students and staff from learning. It’s not about the minority kids at the school, it’s about the teachers having to give a damn about doing more than usual for the fun of the kids.
Of course, they couldn’t outright come out and say “the staff is tired of this parade, so we’re not doing it anymore” so they just use the excuse of some kids “feeling marginalized” and basically blaming them for the cancelation.
Like one parent told Rantz: this is an “exercise in affluent white vanity that is wokeism.”
But again, it’s a cancelation that I don’t mind too much. However, it does present a problem, like I mentioned earlier. That, of course, is the idea that if a Halloween themed parade (or Halloween in general) can be canceled for the reasons stated either by the spokesperson or the newsletter, other (actual) holidays could also be canceled for the same reasons, namely Christmas.
After all, not everyone celebrates Christmas, so based on that, schools feel as though it would be okay to cancel all school Christmas events. However, despite that, I’m not particularly incensed by the cancelation of that Halloween parade because miserable Leftists (both in and out of schools) have been trying to cancel Christmas for a long time now. Protecting Halloween in this particular school isn’t going to keep this school or others from trying to cancel Christmas, and they are currently setting their sights on what can easily be considered a Satanic “holiday,” at least as it currently is celebrated.
So, again, I don’t mind the cancelation of this particular event. The school presents moronic reasons, probably to try and hide the staff’s laziness and annoyance with the activities of the day, but it accomplishes a job I don’t mind them accomplishing.
So you won’t hear me complaining too much about this at all. After all, as Napoleon is attributed with saying: “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”
“Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil.”
Those who have experienced communism/socialism have, obviously, first-hand accounts as to what happens under such systems. And unless they belong to the establishment, or are outright mentally retarded, those who have experienced communism will tell you just how awful of a system it is and how much better capitalism (actual capitalism, not this crony crap we have currently) is by comparison.
Rapper Pitbull, whose real name is Armando Christian Perez, is one such person, as he is a first-generation Cuban-American and his family has suffered at the hands of communism and the Castro regime. So, in a recent performance, he seemingly felt compelled to express his pro-American and anti-communist beliefs.
“To whoever the f*** doesn’t like the United States of America, may God bless you, but f*** you at the same time. If you don’t like the United States of America, go back to the countries that we the f*** [are] from, and you’ll see how much you appreciate the United States of America.”
While this might be the first time I have talked about Pitbull, this is not the first time he has spoken out either in favor of this country or against the communist system that infects his home nation of Cuba.
During a recent interview, he expressed more anti-communist beliefs and his appreciation for this country, and even his disbelief that we have destroyed liberty over a virus:
“The reason I can have this conversation is because my family comes from communism, they fled communism, they had everything taken away from them, everybody got murdered, everybody got killed. That’s the reason me, being a first-generation Cuban-American… I look at freedom and I appreciate that s***. I appreciate opportunity. I appreciate anything that you give me… And, that comes from the fact that when Castro took over everything, and I’m looking at what’s going on right now – the only person here that’s hot… it’s Castro. He’s going, ‘Y’all did it with a virus? S***. Y’all took over the world with a virus? Y’all gotta be kidding me.’”
“In this day and age, I’m hoping that people see: as quick as you get it… come quick, leave quick,” the rapper continued. “When it comes to this technology, that’s exactly what it is. You got instant gratification and think you can touch many people, as quick as they [are] gonna pull it from you.”
Pitbull then went on to encourage politicians and people of great influence and wealth to get involved with the crisis in Cuba, where mass protests have been going on (not that it’s all that talked about, particularly after the regime cut the internet following the protests) for the past couple of months:
“This is a message to the world. We need to stand up, step up. But if you don’t understand what’s going on, then you need to wake the f*** up. Not only is this a Cuba event, a Cuba thing, this is a world event. This isn’t about politics. This is about saving lives. This is about unity, not division. And bottom line, it’s about taking action. Let me tell you something, why I’m frustrated and when I see everybody out there and doing what they’re doing, which I love what they’re doing. Okay, because not only do we live for freedom, we ride for freedom, we die for freedom but we mother***ing appreciate freedom.”
“And it gets me hot, it bothers me, and it frustrates me to a certain extent, being a Cuban American, and having a platform to speak to the world and not being able to help my own people, not being able to get them food, not being able to get them water, not being able to get them medicine,” Pitbull continued. “But most of all, not being able to help and really get them what they deserve, which is freedom. And this is my way of talking to the world. All world allies get together to help. Global businesses get together to help. People that we’re so proud of, people such as Jeff Bezos, a Cuban American, graduated from high school in Miami, built one of the biggest companies in the world, the richest man in the world. He’s somebody that can get involved and really help us and what we got. All we can do is create awareness, but politics are gonna be polititricks.”
“And while they figure out what they figure out, we need to figure out how to really help,” added the rapper. “We need to get creative, we need to figure out solutions while they’re losing their lives over there literally for something that we wake up every day and appreciate, which is freedom. So to everybody out there, stand up, step up. And if you don’t understand, get with the mother***ing program and wake up because this is about freedom and it’s about human rights. And to everybody in Cuba, keep the fight up.”
This is generally what a lot of people feel and understand, even if it’s a bit more expletive-filled. Hell, even I dropped an expletive when the illegitimate president expressed his desire to screw liberty and force a vaccine on people who neither want one nor need one. So the general feeling of “screw you if you want to take away my freedoms”, in a more expletive sense, is certainly there.
Like Pitbull suggested, people who don’t understand what communism is really about ought to spend some time in communist countries and then they would begin to appreciate the founding principles of this country. And I mean the ACTUAL founding principles, not the bullcrap Leftist woke dumbassery of “this country was founded on slavery.”
Anyone who is even relatively familiar with our founding principles understands what a load of crap that is, as every founding document makes the assertion that we are created free and equal, equal in the sense that no entity can force itself upon us and dominate and enslave us. It’s these founding documents and principles which served as the basis for the abolition of slavery, which would have naturally been phased out of our country were it not for the invention of the cotton gin, which made slave plantations extremely lucrative.
As I have said in prior articles, the U.S. government stopped the influx of slaves shortly after the founding of our country and believed slavery would eventually become too impractical to survive as an institution, and until the invention of the cotton gin, that’s the direction it was going.
This is part of our history and it’s what anyone with an internet connection can find, but which a Leftist indoctrination leads people to deny. The reality of our country is that it was founded based on the principles of liberty. Unfortunately, as time has gone on, that liberty became gradually more eroded, until today, we have people who actually and literally believe you shouldn’t have a say as to what you put into your body.
While Pitbull didn’t explicitly mention vaccine mandates, he did allude to the idea that the establishment “took over the world with a virus.” Despite everything we know about how mild the virus is, to the point where fewer people died in 2020 than did in years prior, we act as though it’s a practical death sentence to get the Chinese coronavirus and that we need to destroy all institutions of liberty to “protect” us from said virus.
And it’s typically those who hate this country who have gone along with the idea of destroying personal liberty, which is why Pitbull is as frustrated as he is and why he said what he said. While I have my problems with the way the country is run now and with how things currently are, there is no shortage of love for this country from me. In fact, it’s because of that love for this country that I wish to see the problems that we see resolved and the way things are to change.
I love capitalism, but hate this crony socialist-lite crap that we currently have and which has been exposed to be around in the last couple of years. I love the U.S. but hate the establishment that thinks is in charge of it.
When coming to this country, I was sold on the idea that this was the land of the free and the home of the brave. That this was the land of opportunity and that if you wanted to make something of yourself, you could. None of it was true, or at least, as true as I was led to believe. What country can claim to be the land of the free when your political, and now medical, beliefs can get you fired or generally castigated? What country can claim to be the home of the brave when you have soldiers being indoctrinated into Marxism and believing that it’s more important to accurately sexually identify people than defeating your enemies? What country can claim to be the land of opportunity when your beliefs can get you cancelled and stripped of all opportunities to live a better life?
I don’t know if this country ever achieved the aspirations of the founding principles (in large part because people are naturally evil), but those aspirations must still be there and definitely still are there in many people.
We wouldn’t be seeing the pushback that we are if we weren’t of the belief that, if this country isn’t as free and as great as it could be or has claimed to be, we can make it so. We just need to be able to defeat, politically, practically and ideologically, those who hate this country and want to see it come to ruin.
And I’m glad that someone like Pitbull is conscious enough to stand on the right side.
“The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”
Leftist Hypocrisy: Socialist Editor Reportedly Tried To Fire Staff For Trying To Organize Worker Co-Op
Evidence #481284 that socialists are utter hypocrites and only espouse beliefs they think others ought to follow but not themselves if said beliefs are in any way detrimental to those socialists.
For context, a group of employees of far-Left magazine Current Affairs have complained that Editor-in-Chief of the magazine, Nathan J. Robinson, has terminated their employment because they were attempting to organize a worker co-op at the company.
For those who don’t know, a worker co-op is basically the stated goal of communism, whereby companies are owned and controlled by the workers, not the people at the top.
What the workers were doing was practicing the very thing that Robinson espouses, and he tried to get them fired over it.
The employees who were reportedly fired wrote a statement giving out their grievances over the situation:
“Dear Comrades (yes, it does seriously start like that)
On August 8th, editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson (author of Why You Should Be A Socialist) unilaterally fired most of the workforce to avoid an organizational restructuring that would limit his personal power. Yes, we were fired by the editor-in-chief of a socialist magazine for trying to start a worker co-op.” (Emphasis original).
The statement then goes on to discuss a Zoom meeting during which Robinson was reportedly agitated over the workers’ desire to start a co-op. The statement also claims that Robinson wrote letters to five particular individuals where he expressed that he had “irreparably lost faith” in them and their ability to work together in the future.
Shortly after, Robinson reportedly retracted such statements, but claimed that “in his guts” he thought of the magazine as his and that, therefore, he ought to be the sole voice and leader atop any hierarchy in the organization.
“This organization has been heading slowly for some sort of reckoning where it was going to have to be made clear once and for all what kind of authority I wanted to have over it,” Robinson explained. “And I was in denial about the fact that the answer is I think I should be on top of the org chart, with everyone else selected by me and reporting to me. I let Current Affairs build up into a sort of egalitarian community of friends while knowing in my heart that I still thought of it as my project over which I should have control.”
Kind of sounds like a greedy capitalist pig! Or, more realistically, like a typical commie once he gets a taste of near absolute power.
Communism might sell itself as being about the benefit of workers and their control over corporations, but reality shows that to be the exact opposite. Corporations, if owned by anyone, are owned by either the government or people who are allied to the government by ideology or threat of death.
The Soviets routinely promised that the power belonged to “The People”, but by “The People” they meant themselves. They killed their people, arrested their people, kidnapped their people, starved their people, raped their people, robbed their people, abused their people and enslaved their people. Where they had originally promised the people the ability to own the companies and land they worked for, they instead forced them to own nothing at all, save for the clothes on their backs.
And this wasn’t a unique occurrence to the Soviets and the Russian people. This occurrence was the rule, not the exception, and I have yet to see the exception. In reality, everywhere there is communism, this is what happens: Promises of a better future where the people will own everything and the cold reality of a bitter future where the people will own nothing.
This, seemingly, is even the case in a socialist COMPANY. Their editor-in-chief is an avowed socialist and has written a book literally titled “Why you should be a socialist” and yet, acts seemingly in very anti-socialistic ways.
Supposedly, the socialist cause is what the workers are siding with: the workers being the owners of the company. That is the stated goal of communism, after all.
However, the real socialist cause is what the editor-in-chief is siding with: complete control over the entity and the people involved with it.
The reason it seems like such a juxtaposition is because the Left has long been capable of fooling people into believing that communism is for the little people and to the benefit of the little people, when it’s that precise demographic that most gets screwed.
Now, make no mistake, I am NOT siding with the socialist workers here. They deserve to see this crap happening to them because this is precisely what THEY HAVE BEEN ESPOUSING this whole time. They likely won’t realize it from this instance alone, if at all, but this is exactly the kind of result socialism brings.
Neither am I siding with the socialist editor-in-chief, as he also deserves the crap he is getting for seemingly acting “anti-socialistically” and in seeming opposition to his espoused beliefs.
I am merely pointing out that everyone involved with this mess is an idiot and a hypocrite. The editor-in-chief because he is acting seemingly contrary to his espoused beliefs and the workers because they are being treated exactly how all victims of socialism are treated, minus being unfairly sent to the gulags for complaining about their “Dear Leader”.
Not to mention that, were we to become a complete communist country, the editor-in-chief would quickly be victimized by the communist regime he would help establish. After all, it’s the useful idiots who are taken out first.
In any case, the magazine’s Board of Directors issued its own statement denying that anyone was “fired”, at least in a technical sense, but that seems to hardly matter, as the “fired” employees were left utterly disgruntled at the whole affair, claiming (with accuracy) that Robinson was unfit to run an organization. This is not merely an opinion from the employees, as Robinson himself reportedly wrote in one of those retracted statements that “I am not good at running an organization. I freely admit this.”
Not surprising, seeing as socialists hardly ever are, and if they seemingly are, it’s largely thanks to the financial help of far-Left billionaires like George Soros and the Rothschilds.
At any rate, whether the employees were ultimately fired or not is irrelevant. Robinson did TRY to fire them for attempting to organize a socialist workers’ co-op, showing how hypocritical he is and how much of an actual farse socialism and communism are in general.
Too bad there will be people who refuse to learn from this crap.
“No one who practices deceit shall dwell in my house; no one who utters lies shall continue before my eyes.”
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...