As I was reading financial and technology news I came across this article from Fox Business News. I have to admit that I felt a little sick to my stomach when I read this report of Hollywood bringing James Dean back to life….to give him a role and a career! Can you believe it?

Here’s what Fox Business recently reported:

“The men bringing James Dean back to life for a forthcoming film are aiming not just to give his digital likeness a role, but a whole new career.

Dean’s planned appearance in the Vietnam War movie ‘Finding Jack,’ and the possibility of future parts, comes as digital de-aging and duplication of real actors has tipped from cinematic trick into common practice. And it's giving new life to old arguments about the immortality and dignity of the dead.

‘Our intentions are to create the virtual being of James Dean. That's not only for one movie, but going to be used for many movies and also gaming and virtual reality,’ said Travis Cloyd, CEO of Worldwide XR, who is leading the design on the Dean project. ‘Our focus is on building the ultimate James Dean so he can live across any medium.’”

If you’re feeling uneasy about what these people are trying to do, it’s because God put in you His morality so that you can discern right from wrong.

You see, these people are justifying their actions by what some of their predecessors in other movies did:

“’This is disruptive technology,’ Cloyd said. ‘Some people hear it for the first time and they get shaken by it. But this is where the market is going.’

The revival of the dead, often done clumsily, has been happening for much of Hollywood's existence.

Footage of Bela Lugosi, combined with a double holding a cape over his face, was used in 1959’s ‘Plan 9 From Outer Space,’ released after the horror star's death. Bruce Lee’s film ‘Game of Death,’ left unfinished before his 1973 death, was completed using doubles and voice overdubs and released five years later. ‘The Fast and the Furious’ star Paul Walker died in 2013 before shooting was done on ‘Furious 7.’ His two younger brothers and others acted as stand-ins so his scenes could be finished.

Even Lennon, and many other dead historical figures, were digitally revived in 1994 in ‘Forrest Gump.’

But the technology of recreation and resurrection has taken a major leap forward in quality and prestige, with the extensive de-aging and re-aging used in Martin Scorsese’s ‘The Irishman’; a young Will Smith digitally returning to play opposite the current version in last summer's ‘Gemini Man’; and Carrie Fisher, whose younger self briefly returned digitally in 2016's ‘Star Wars: Rogue One’ and appeared again after her death, in ‘Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker.’

Let me decode this for you. What they mean to say is they’re going to push for this “new normal” in technology until you accept it as normal as if normal meant “right”.

So what if Bela Lugosi was brought to “life” by a double in 1959 to finish a project? So what if Bruce Lee’s “Game of Death” film was completed by doubles after his death? So what if Lennon appeared next to Forrest Gump? In the first two cases, doubles were used for one particular purpose: to finish a film, and the practice stopped there. Nobody else brought Bela Lugosi or Bruce Lee back to life to give them careers. Even Lennon appearing with Forrest Gump (or any other doctored video of actual people, such as JFK, for that matter) is not really a moral problem when it’s done this way.

Doctoring a video to place yourself in the swearing in of, say, JFK or Donald Trump as President, can be artistic, but not morally wrong. Even making yourself look younger or older in a photo or video can be artistic but not morally wrong (unless you’re using it to fool people into thinking you’re younger or older than you are for a larger purpose, such as fraud). The key is: what’s your motive? Vanity? Just trying to look better? Or fraud where you’re actually trying to steal something from someone?

But let’s face it, bringing a dead man to life for PROFIT is EVIL. They’re doing this for MONEY. Not to mention the idea that they’re going to CREATE a digital image of James Dean, not use old footage as was the case with John Lennon in Forrest Gump, is morally wrong.

Morality cannot be based on what's normal at the moment! Slavery was normal, but it was wrong. Abortion is somewhat normal, but it’s still wrong. Transgenderism is also somewhat normal (or they’re trying to normalize it), and it’s still wrong. Having males compete against women in sports is being pushed as normal, but it’s still wrong. And bringing people back from the dead, pretending they’re alive and giving them a role in a movie is as wrong as talking to dead people, or the Ouija board game, which attempts to contact dead people and having them talk to you!

What I find fascinating is what Pablo Helman said:

“Pablo Helman, the visual effects supervisor behind the de-aging of Robert De Niro and others in ‘The Irishman,’ said he considers that moral dilemma in his work.

‘The main question that you need to ask yourself is why do it?’ Helman said. ‘You know, just because you can do it doesn't mean you should, you know? That would be one thing that I'm always questioning: Is it in service of the story?’”

Why you do it, is the question. “Is it in service of the story?” HA! So now morality is based upon a certain action being in service of the story? Slavery was definitely in service of the Southern economy. Was it right? So what if a few make hundreds of millions of dollars, in service of the story out of this?

The question of morality is not decided by the majority and it’s not decided by economics or arts – it’s decided by God Himself.

In Deuteronomy 18:10-12 we read: “anyone who practices divination or tells fortunes or interprets omens or a sorcerer or a charmer or a medium or a necromancer or one who inquires of the dead, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD”.

By doing these things – creating digital beings of people who have died so that these images assume a role in a movie (not even acting as self!) is an abomination to the Lord. There’s a reason people have a negative reaction to these things, as Cloyd confessed. It’s occultism. It’s Satanism. They don't need to do any of this - they can just hire a real, living actor. So why do this unless you're working knowingly or unknowingly for Satan himself!

God has written His law in our souls. It’s wrong what Hollywood is doing. People know it. The authors of this evil know it. You know it and I know it. It’s simply wrong. And it’s always wrong to do wrong.

1 Chronicles 10:13-14:
“So Saul died for his breach of faith. He broke faith with the LORD in that he did not keep the command of the LORD and also consulted a medium, seeking guidance. He did not seek guidance from the LORD. Therefore the LORD put him to death and turned the kingdom over to David the son of Jesse.“

​Author: Danielle Cross

We have, for a long time, discussed just what were Margaret Sanger’s intentions in funding pro-abortion organizations: the control and elimination of other races, who are deemed “inferior” and “weaker”. This has been Planned Parenthood’s, and Leftists’, objective, though they do not really tend to be open about this. In a recent climate change townhall, however, Bernie Sanders essentially admitted that that’s what he wants to do as President of the United States.
 
During the townhall, a woman whom CNN identified as a teacher (and this terrifies but doesn’t surprise me at the same time) said the following: “Human population growth has more than doubled in the last 50 years; the planet cannot sustain this growth. Empowering women, and educating everyone on the need to curb population growth seems a reasonable campaign to enact. Would you (speaking to Sanders) be courageous enough to discuss this issue and make it a key feature of a plan to address climate catastrophe?”
 
Okay, before we get to Sanders’ answer (no points for those who can guess it), allow me to address this horrible woman’s question. First, while the Earth’s population did double in the last 50 years, we have only seen a DECREASE in poverty and NEXT TO NO FAMINES outside of socialist hellholes like Soviet Russia.
 
We are not overpopulated in the least. As I said in an article from early January of this year, the overpopulation argument stems from the heavily-flawed Malthusian theorem, wherein the theorem suggests that populations increase exponentially while food grows arithmetically, which is far from the truth, even for Malthus’ own time.
 
Ignoring the fact that technology has made it so that a lot more food can be grown by a lot less people (farmers make up less than 2% of the U.S. employment numbers and can still grow enough food to send out not only to the rest of the country, but also other countries that buy our products), the theorem itself is based on pretty much nothing. More people means more food that can be grown.
 
What’s better, having one person growing as much food as he can, or having 100 people grow as much food as they can? If populations increase exponentially, so does food (and we’re only talking vegetables here, not even farm animals).
 
So the idea that we are overpopulated is entirely erroneous. What’s worse, however, is the insistence that we must be able to “control” (in other words, eliminate) populations so as to not run out of food. This is what this teacher (and I can’t believe she is one, but again, also not entirely surprised) is asking for and this is what Bernie Sanders answered:
 
“The answer’s ‘yes’. Women in the United States of America, by the way, have a right to control their own bodies and make reproductive decisions. And the Mexico City agreement – which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control – to me is totally absurd. So I think, especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, it’s something I very strongly support.”
 
Now, I have a lot to say about this. First, I find funny how he just feels the need to pander as much as possible. “Women… have the right to control their own bodies and make reproductive decisions.” Who exactly gives them that right? It’s nowhere in the Constitution, and it’s most definitely not in the Bible. Someone doesn’t have the right to something just because you say they do (and no, I’m not forgetting about the unconstitutional Roe v. Wade).
 
Second, notice the emphasis on controlling poor people’s populations. HE is the one saying women in poor countries don’t “necessarily want to have large numbers of babies”. How exactly does he know that? But what’s more, why specifically target poor people? Well, to be fair, that one is very much a rhetorical question. Planned Parenthood targets minority neighborhoods, those who are statistically more likely to be poor, regarding where they set up locations and are already controlling their populations. Since 1973, nearly 20 million black babies have been killed in the U.S. That’s a little less than half of the current black population in America (at least according to the 2010 census). Planned Parenthood is already systemically controlling the black population of America and now, these Leftists are demanding that we use OUR TAXPAYER MONEY to fund EUGENICS around the world, particularly in poor countries?
 
Finally, I would simply like to point out a particular word that Bernie used here. Let me write what he said once again: “women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies…” Notice that last word there? This guy fully recognizes that the kind of people he intends to target are babies. When the shooting in Odessa, Texas happened earlier this past week, the Left had been trying to point out how a 17-month-old baby had been injured in the shooting. Tragic as that is, let’s not beat around the bush: they do not care about that baby. 17 months earlier, they would argue that it didn’t have the right to life and that it wasn’t even human. So when is a baby a baby? These people don’t answer that because they have no answer. There are those who argue in favor of killing the baby even AFTER it is born, such as current Virginia Governor Ralph “Coonman” Northam.
 
These people realize very much that what they are killing are human babies. Argue as they might against it, they know these are babies for a FACT. And yet, they argue that it’s “women’s rights” or “women’s liberation” or even that it’s “necessary to fight climate change” to kill babies.
 
My friends, these are not sane people. These are not good people. These people are pagans, sacrificing children to appease a god of their own creation: mother nature. And they think it’s perfectly reasonable to do all this, not because it actually is reasonable, but because they have no heart – no soul – to tell them right from wrong.
 
They support this because they see it as right in their own eyes and not because they believe it is right in God’s eyes (and it definitely isn’t).
 
Killing children isn’t going to “solve” climate change any more than banning meat or gas-powered cars or whatever communist plan these people shared in that townhall because WE DO NOT CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE AND CANNOT AFFECT IT SIGNIFICANTLY! Everything these people say is going to happen is utter bullcrap. Wanna know why? BECAUSE THEY’VE BEEN SAYING THIS SAME CRAP FOR DECADES AND NOTHING OF THE SORT HAS HAPPENED!
 
The glaciers aren’t melting, there isn’t a hole in the ozone layer, coastal cities aren’t going to get flooded, massive droughts and famines aren’t happening and we are not CAUSING CLIMATE CHANGE! In fact, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the U.S. hasn’t even seen any warming since 2005. And yet, Obama has gone on record pretty much year after year saying how that particular year was the “hottest year to date” as though he had the data of THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE PLANET to back up that claim.
 
Nothing the Democrats have suggested will do a darn thing to affect climate change because we can’t do anything to it. The funny thing, though, is that even if we did have the power to do that, Democrats’ plans wouldn’t do anything anyway. AOC’s former chief of staff said that the GND wasn’t about climate change but about changing the economic system of the U.S. Makes sense, considering it costs $93 TRILLION according to some estimates and it would bankrupt us almost immediately, all-the-while giving the government all the power in the world.
 
But as bad as trying to ban meat might be, to me, an even worse idea is to suggest we start killing people, particularly poor people, to combat climate change. And if you think abortion is as far as they would go, think again. The teacher brought up the question on the basis that THERE ARE ALREADY TOO MANY PEOPLE ON THE PLANET. Abortion would only be the first step, followed by genocide.
 
This is the sort of thing that has led to people like Hitler to commit massive atrocities like the Holocaust. Only, instead of suggesting to kill all Jews and all non-Aryan people, they are suggesting killing minorities and poor people. First, those who have some sort of disability (as is the case in Europe, where they abort babies who are diagnosed with Down Syndrome), then some sort of illness (illnesses as defined by the state) and then on to poor people and other “undesirables”.
 
Of course, the only people that get to not be killed are the rich, white liberals who think themselves gods. These people are demons in the flesh and they’re just getting started laying out the policies of Satan.
 
Shame on that teacher, shame on the audience who clapped after Bernie gave his answer, shame on Bernie Sanders, shame on the Democrats who agree with him (wouldn’t be surprised if that’s all of them), and shame on anyone who tries to argue that we, Christians and conservatives, are the evil and intolerant ones.
 
James 1:21
“Therefore put away all filthiness and rampant wickedness and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

A rather interesting, but not exactly unheard of, phenomenon of supposedly “Christian” people denouncing their faith has made some news recently, with a former pastor and a songwriter of a popular Christian band both having made public announcements declaring they are no longer Christians. This has led John Cooper, songwriter and lead singer of the Christian rock band “Skillet” (which I was not aware they were Christians, but have downloaded some of their songs in the past) to write a rather lengthy Facebook post calling out the supposed “Christians” for publicly denouncing their faiths.
 
Cooper began his post: “What is happening in Christianity? More and more of our outspoken leaders or influencers who were once ‘faces’ of the faith are falling away. And at the same time they are being very vocal and bold about it. Shockingly they still want to influence others (for what purpose?) as they announce that they are leaving the faith.”
 
“I am stunned that the seemingly most important thing for these leaders who have lost their faith is to make such a bold new stance. Basically saying, ‘I’ve been living and preaching boldly something for 20 years and led generations of people with my teachings and now I no longer believe it. Therefore, I’m going to boldly and loudly tell people it was all wrong while I boldly and loudly lead people in to my next truth.’ I’m perplexed why they aren’t embarrassed? Humbled? Ashamed, fearful, confused? Why be so eager to continue leading people when you clearly don’t know where you are headed?”
 
Skipping a little bit, he continued: “As if someone is courageous simply for sharing virally every thought or dark place. That’s not courageous. It’s cavalier. Have they considered the ramifications? As if they are the harbingers of truth, saying, ‘I used to think one way and practice it and preach it, but now I’ve learned all the new truth and will start practicing it and preaching it.’ So the influencers become the voice for truth in whatever stage of life and whatever evolution takes place in their thinking.”
 
“[A]s these influencers disavow their faith, they always end their statements with their ‘new insight/new truth’ that is basically a regurgitation of Jesus’ words?! It’s truly bizarre and ironic. They’ll say ‘I’m disavowing my faith but remember, love people, be generous, forgive others.’ Ummm, why? That is not human nature. No child is ever born and says, ‘I just want to love others before loving myself. I want to turn the other cheek. I want to give my money away to others in need.’ Those are bible principles taught by a prophet/Priest/King of kings who wants us to live by a higher standard which is not an earthly standard, but rather the ‘Kingdom of God’ standard. Therefore, if Jesus is not the truth and if the Word of God is not absolute, then by preaching Jesus’ teachings you are endorsing the words of a madman. A lunatic who said ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the father except through me.’ He also said that he was alive before Abraham, and to see him was to see God because he was one with God. So why then would a disavowed Christian leader promote that ‘generosity is good’? How would you know ‘what is good’ without Jesus’ teachings? And will your ideas of what is ‘good’ be different from year to year based on your experience, culture trends, [popular] opinion etc. and furthermore will you continue year by year to lead others into your idea of goodness even though it is not absolute? I’m amazed that so many Christians want the benefits of the kingdom of God, but with the caveat that they themselves will be the King.”
 
There was more to this post, but I think you get the idea. John Cooper is, rightly, calling out the former “Christians” who have “fallen away” from the faith.
 
The only thing I have to disagree with him on is that these people haven’t “fallen away” from the faith; they never truly had it to begin with.
 
Hebrews 6:4-6 says: “For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt.”
 
Those who have come to the faith do not leave the faith, and if they proclaim to be Christians one day and proclaim to no longer be Christians the next, they never were one to begin with.
 
Similarly, 2 Peter 2:20-22 says the following: “For if, after they have escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the last state has become worse for them than the first. For it would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment delivered to them. What the true proverb says has happened to them: ‘The dog returns to its own vomit, and the sow, after washing herself, returns to wallow in the mire.’”
 
There is a significant difference between being ignorant and being wicked. Someone who is ignorant knows nothing of the Lord, not His blessings, nor His character, nor His love, nor His authority. But it is better for someone to be ignorant to the truth than for someone to be knowledgeable to the truth and still deny it. Those are the wicked ones, those who have made proclamations of faith but then make a proclamation to effectively return to sin.
 
Specifically, the two “Christian” people that are being talked about here are former pastor Josh Harris, who said he was leaving the Christian faith and divorcing his wife, having felt guilty with the way gay people were treated and feeling guilty over what the Bible teaches on homosexuality; and Marty Sampson, who is a songwriter for Hillson United, a Christian band, and who recently said: “I’m genuinely losing my faith… and it doesn’t bother me… like, what bothers me now is nothing… I am so happy now, so at peace with the world… It’s crazy.”
 
These two were never Christians in the first place. They are of the world and gladly remain with it until the end. The fact that the songwriter said he wasn’t bothered over losing his faith doesn’t surprise or shock me because I would have to believe he had any faith whatsoever in the first place for this to affect me like that. He was never in Christ to begin with. He is clearly comfortable in the world’s sin, has no problem with it, and finds a peculiar delight in it. That isn’t ignorance; it’s wickedness.
 
These two former “Christians” were never Christians in the first place. But in doing this, they are effectively doing what Christ warned people not to do: be ashamed of Him, particularly in the presence of Man.
 
Mark 8:38 and Luke 9:26 basically teach the same thing: Mark 8:38: “For whoever is ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him will the Son of Man also be ashamed when he comes in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.” Luke 9:26: “For whoever is ashamed of me and my words, of him will the Son of Man be ashamed when he comes in his glory and the glory of the Father and of the holy angels.”
 
But Matthew 10:32-33 makes the most damning statement for these two former “Christians”: “So everyone who acknowledges me before men, I will also acknowledge before my Father who is in heaven, but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven.”
 
These two are the types of people Christ often talks about, who say “Lord, Lord” but whom Christ never knew. They are comfortable in their sin and even feel a sort of liberation, but what they have done is publicly announce their enslavement to sin and to the devil.
 
These two former “Christians” are the worst type of sinners: they know perfectly well who is the Lord and who is the Savior, but they deny Him. They know perfectly well and have no excuse not to know who Jesus Christ is, but Christ is not their Lord. Satan lords over them, it’s just taken them this long to essentially admit that.
 
All Christians know what Christ said: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” To understand this and still deny it, following another way, accepting another “truth” and living another life is utter wickedness that does not deserve to exist in the Kingdom of God.
 
In this, the former “Christians” have signed away their souls to the devil, and upon their deaths, will suffer under him in Hell.
 
We are saved by grace through faith alone. If one lacks that faith, he or she is not saved. He or she who lacks faith is not saved but will die the first and also the second death, perishing in the lake of fire and sulfur.
 
Not to mince my words here, but unless Christ really goes into these two’s hearts, the only place they will go is straight to Hell. But as that is Christ’s decision to make, I don’t quite know what will happen to them. One thing is for sure, though: those who embrace the world will perish alongside it.
 
1 John 2:15-17
“Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world – the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride in possessions -is not from the Father but is from the world. And the world is passing away along with its desires, but whoever does the will of God abides forever.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Recently, Alabama State House voted overwhelmingly (74-3) in favor of a bill that would outright ban all abortions in the state (unless it is necessary for the health of the mother) in an effort to have the issue reach the Supreme Court so that they might look over the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion and possibly overturn it.
 
However, in a move that is shocking but not really surprising, Alabama State Rep. John Rogers (D-Birmingham) made the following comments regarding babies and abortion: “Some kids are unwanted, so you kill them now or you kill them later. You bring them in the world unwanted, unloved, you send them to the electric chair. So, you kill them now or you kill them later.”
 
He continued by saying: “Some parents can’t handle a child with problems. It could be retarded. It might have no arms and no legs.”
 
Again, shocking comments to make, but not really surprising, at least to me. The Left is the party of Satan, after all.
 
Notice how Rogers does not even pretend like the children are not actually children. He is fully aware and accepting of the fact that we are talking about the death of children here, and is totally okay with killing them if they are “unwanted” or “retarded”. That these children do not deserve life if the mother does not wish for them to have life.
 
What else are we to call this apart from full-blown infanticide? And what’s the limit? Using this sort of logic, and fully understanding that we are talking about children, aren’t parents then justified to kill their children if they bring them problems regardless of the age?
 
If a teenager is doing drugs and the parents find that problematic, are the parents justified in killing their child? Because that’s what this logic brings about. He understands that we are talking about kids, which is honestly more than I can say about much of the rest of the Left. But that honestly sort of makes things worse.
 
We conservatives insist that babies in the womb are children, a fact that the Left often denies. Here, we have a Leftist who accepts the fact that these children are, in fact, children, and he’s STILL okay with killing them.
 
And his arguments, again, lead to the notion that it is okay to off someone who is problematic to you. If your child is being a pain in the rear end – is being problematic –  you apparently have every right to kill them. If you did not want your child, even if you acknowledge that it’s a human being, you have the right to kill them.
 
Rep. Rogers accepts that we are talking about children, so his comments show him to be truly despicable and vile. Either the Left keeps getting worse or they’ve always been this despicable, only now the mask is coming off more and more.
 
And he’s yet another example of the Left using an African-American in their favor. Abortion is the number one killer of black people, with PP clinics being present mostly in minority neighborhoods. Rogers is ideologically a descendant of the black minister who helped notorious racist Margaret Sanger to sell the idea of abortion to the black community as some sort of good, likely not understanding that abortion was created to exterminate black people, whom Sanger considered to be like “weeds”.
 
Of course, that’s not to say that Rogers is not speaking his own mind or he’s not doing this of his own accord. He is. And that’s what’s sad about it. He’s been brainwashed into believing abortion – killing children – is a force for good.
 
Those words heavily represent the modern-day Left. They are quickly dropping all pretense of decency. If you remember, a few months ago, Virginia Governor Ralph Northam (who is still Governor, by the way), also made shocking but unsurprising remarks:
 
“This is why decisions such as this should be made by providers, physicians, and the mothers and fathers that are involved. When we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of the mother, with the consent of physicians, more than one physician by the way, and it’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus which is non-viable. So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen, the infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if this is what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physician and the mother.”
 
Like Rogers, Northam accepts the fact that we are talking about children. Children whom the mother apparently does not want and children who have absolutely no rights if the mother wishes them not to.
 
Trump recently held a rally where he mentioned that Democrats want to execute babies. He also said something to that extent in his 2019 SOTU address. Unsurprisingly, the Democrats and the media called him a liar. But when comments like Northam and Rogers’ are made by these Democrats, we get to see their true colors. They DO want to execute babies. They WANT to have the ability to end life on a mere whim in a mere second. Why? Because they want POWER. That constitutes the power over life and death, a power that God has, a power that Man has wanted ever since Cain killed Abel.
 
And as far as Rogers’ comments go, the media made somewhat of an effort in defending him. When Rogers made those comments, people on social media were livid. Said people usually are conservative. So what do fake news sites like The Hill do? They say “Conservatives pounce on Alabama state Dem’s abortion comments” as though what he said was perfectly reasonable and we are the lunatics who jump at every word we disagree with.
 
What he said was EVIL. What he said shows us that the Left is evil. Not that I needed this to know that, but it’s a good refresher for what we are up against: pure vile.
 
Saying that some children are unwanted and would eventually be killed anyway is outrageous and moronic. What exactly does he mean by those words? Because electric chair is a death-penalty punishment for people, with only 30 states having the death penalty. And the death penalty is usually a punishment reserved for murderers and the like. So what, he expects unwanted children to grow up to be killers? That’s awfully pessimistic and very wrong.
 
I can imagine a woman not wanting a child, having one anyway and not loving that child. That happens plenty of times, unfortunately. But what leap of logic must you take to say that it is okay to then go ahead and kill that child? How is the child the one at fault here? Why must the child be punished?
 
You see, it’s not simply the idea of abortion that we conservatives wish to fight against and defeat. That’s only part of the battle. The idea that people should go ahead and have all the sex they want without repercussions is something we also often fight against, even if we do not always bring it up when we discuss the issue of abortion.
 
If a woman does not want a child, SHE SHOULDN’T HAVE SEX! Part of the abortion argument is that it’s “women’s liberation”. I’ve made this point before, but it is always a good one: liberation from what? From responsibilities for your actions; from that little voice in your head that tells you maybe you shouldn’t have sex; from feeling any guilt over committing sin and being used and tossed into the garbage over and over again.
 
That is not liberation, but bondage to the flesh and to sin. The fact is that we wouldn’t have anywhere close to an abortion problem if people weren’t so enslaved to sexual sin. Of course, that’s a pretty difficult battle to fight, but a necessary one.
 
Joe Biden and other hypocritical Democrats say that 2020 will be about “restoring the soul of the country”. How is abortion good for the soul? How is rampant sexual sin good for the soul? Both are a poison to the soul. And the only being in existence who can properly restore the soul of anyone is Jesus Christ. We need a Christian revival in America to truly restore our country’s soul.
 
Because being willing to kill children for any half-assed excuse and being willing to execute them outside the womb, despite knowing that these are human beings themselves is not how you restore a soul, but utterly decimate and rot it.
 
The Left does not have a soul that they can restore. Individual people within the Left might come to Christ and be redeemed, but the overall Left is doomed to the depths of Hell because the ideas and policies they propose are uniquely and exclusively anti-Christian. And the anti-Christ has only one place to go.
 
James 4:7
“Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

This past Sabbath, while Jews around the world were celebrating Passover, the Jewish holiday celebrating God freeing His Chosen People from the bonds of slavery in Egypt, an antisemitic, white supremacist (and I mean an actual white supremacist, not people who simply disagree with the Left) opened fire in a Poway synagogue, killing one and wounding three others.
 
And while this is a tragedy, as any loss of life is a tragedy, we can see the power of the Lord at work to defeat someone who is working for Satan through the actions of two brave men.
 
According to reports, a U.S. Border Patrol agent named Jonathan Morales and a former combat veteran who served in the Navy and the Army, named Oscar Stewart, kept the shooter (whose name I will omit as to not give him recognition for his heinous crime) from making that a much bloodier day than it already was.
 
The shooter reportedly went into the synagogue, shot at the Rabbi, Rabbi Yisroel Goldstein, blowing off two of his fingers, shot at an elderly woman who was trying to protect the Rabbi, killing her in the process, shot at an 8-year-old girl and her uncle, both of whom were injured, but have thus far survived.
 
In the midst of this, Stewart, the combat veteran, made the decision to run towards the gunman, knowing that the shooter’s AR-style rifle would not be effective within five feet.
 
He recalled: “I heard gunshots. And everybody got up and started trying to get out of the back door, so I – for whatever reason – I didn’t do that. I ran the other way. I ran towards the gun shots. When I came around the corner into the lobby area, I saw the individual with a gun, and he fired two rounds. I knew I had to be within five feet of this guy so his rifle couldn’t get to me. So I ran immediately towards him, and I yelled as loud as I could. And he was scared. I scared the hell out of him. And I yelled at him and I must have yelled very loud, and he looked at me, and I must have had a really mean look on my face or something, because he immediately dropped his weapon and turned and ran. And then I gave chase.”
 
There were reports that the gun had jammed before the shooter ran to his car, but Stewart noted that it was unlikely. “Full automatic weapons will jam. Semi-automatic weapons do not jam.” Stewart figured that the gunman’s magazine simply ran out of ammo, so he dropped the gun and ran to his car.
 
Stewart then reportedly ran towards the gunman’s car, started pounding on it before he saw the gunman reach for another rifle. However, Border Patrol agent Morales came running and “yelled for Stewart to get down because Morales had a gun.” According to reports, Morales shot at the car multiple times in the hopes of disabling it, but the shooter drove away. The two brave men then called the police to report the guy’s license plate, but the shooter turned himself in soon after, interestingly enough.
 
The entire situation, however, demonstrates the power of God over Satan. The shooter intended to cause great harm and damage to Jews. According to posts he made on 8-chan, a reportedly “far-right” message board site, the guy hates Jews and Israel, blaming them for supposedly “sealing the doom” of the “European race”, spoken much like Adolf Hitler, whom the shooter mentions as being his inspiration, alongside the Tree of Life Synagogue shooter and the Christchurch, New Zealand mosque shooter.
 
The shooter also reportedly blames the Jews for “persecution of Christians” for their role in the deaths of Jesus, as well as prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah… all of whom were Jewish, so I’m not so sure about that.
 
According to the Jerusalem Post, the shooter claimed he was carrying out the attack in order to be a “good Christian”, saying “My God understands why I did what I did.”
 
Suffice it to say, he was not being a good Christian. God certainly understands why he did what he did, seeing as He’s omniscient, but that does not mean He sees it as a good or righteous thing. Far from it. If the shooter were really a “good Christian”, he would understand NOT TO KILL OTHER PEOPLE among many, many other things.
 
Plenty of people use God in terrible, sinful ways. One argument the Left often makes regarding religion is that it was used to justify slavery. But it was also used to justify ending it. Slavery is not a Christian thing. It’s not what God wants. And before you point out the multiple times in the Bible where the word is used and it’s not taken as a bad thing, please understand that there’s a difference between indentured servitude and paying off a debt through labor.
 
It is nothing new to see Satan use the scripture to perform evil deeds. Satan used scripture to tempt Jesus, after all. So it’s not exactly new for someone who claims to be a Christian to use scripture to try to justify committing an evil act. However, it is important to note that such a thing is inherently anti-Christian. Just as any “Christian” trying to justify abortion, any “Christian” trying to justify the killing and persecution of Jews is not a real Christian.
 
The shooter blamed the Jews for what they did to Jesus, but what happened to Jesus was NECESSARY FOR OUR ATONEMENT! We are evil by nature and nothing we can do on our own accord justifies us or makes us righteous. What we need is a perfect being to be our substitute, to be punished in our stead and make us justified in the Eyes of the Lord. Jesus is that perfect substitute. What happened to Him is heart-wrenching and gruesome, but the ultimate blessing for those whom He calls.
 
To blame Jews, particularly today’s Jews for what the Pharisees and Romans did to Jesus is like blaming white people today for what white Democrats did in the past regarding slavery and segregation. Christians have no better ally in the world than the Jews and vice versa.
 
The power of God is clearly seen in the fact that the shooter likely ran out of ammo and was scared off by brave men, one of whom had a gun with him. Satan led the supposed “Christian” to commit this detestable crime against God’s Chosen People, but God kept the shooter from doing more damage than he could have.
 
Satan already knows he is finished, that he will not win. At this point, he just doesn’t want to be lonely by the time he burns in the lake of fire and sulfur, so he entraps people like this shooter. He loves nothing more than to bring people away from God, away from Christ. But his defeat was made concrete from the very beginning.
 
2 Thessalonians 3:3
“But the Lord is faithful. He will establish you and guard you against the evil one.”

And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

If you thought the bill in New York allowing women to get an abortion at any point in the pregnancy was evil, you’ve seen nothing yet. Democrat Virginia Governor Ralph Northam recently went on a radio show and he was asked whether or not he supported a Virginia bill that would do much of the same thing the New York bill did: allowing a woman to abort her baby even within seconds of birth.
 
The Governor said the following:
 
“This is why decisions such as this should be made by providers, physicians, and the mothers and fathers that are involved. When we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of the mother, with the consent of physicians, more than one physician by the way, and it’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus which is non-viable. So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen, the infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if this is what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physician and the mother.”
 
This goes WAY beyond anything else the Left has argued regarding this issue.
 
This is more than just “it’s just a clump of cells”. More than just “yeah, it has a heartbeat, but it’s not really alive.” This is “literally everyone considers this child to be alive but you can kill it anyway.”
 
I CANNOT EXPRESS JUST HOW PISSED OFF I AM AT THAT STATEMENT!
 
But I shall try and calm down and break down just what it is he said here.
 
First, he talked about this as being a decision. It should NEVER be considered a decision, but that will likely fall on deaf ears were I to debate a Leftist on this.
 
Second, notice how he mentioned deformities as a viable reason for murdering the child. I have often brought this up because it’s a very accurate argument, but this is EXACTLY what the Nazi eugenics program sought to do.
 
The first people that were rounded up and killed by the Nazis were those who were crippled or otherwise were simply not of any use. They could not fight in the war, they could not support the War Machine in any way, so they were disposed of.
 
Third, and easily the most important thing, the Governor CASUALLY talked about the parents choosing to RESUSCITATE a child that is STRUGGLING TO BREATHE in the outside world. If it struggles but the parents choose not to help it, that’s all hunky-dory for this guy.
 
And even if the parents mercifully choose to resuscitate the child, the Governor says they can STILL choose to kill it ANYWAY if they so desire.
 
I often say that there is not an argument anyone can make that will make me think abortion is not murder. By the same token, there is not an argument ANYONE can make that will make me think this is not UNDENIABLE INFANTICIDE!
 
Again, this is more than just the flimsy and dangerous excuse of “it’s just a clump of cells.” Pretty much everyone, Left or Right, agrees that a baby that is outside the womb is alive. That is why pro-choice/pro-abortion people argue that life begins at birth and not at conception. We can argue all we want about whether or not it’s alive inside the womb (it is), but pretty much everyone I’ve ever seen talk about this issue would agree that a child is ALIVE outside the womb.
 
Is this where we’re headed now? Arguing and debating the fact that a baby is alive ONCE IT’S BORN!?
 
Again, this goes beyond every other argument ever made regarding abortion. This is not even an abortion at this point. This is flat-out, unadulterated infanticide that this MONSTER is promoting.
 
WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD SUPPORT KILLING A CHILD ONCE IT’S BORN?!
 
Just when I think the Left could not get any more visceral, any more disgusting, they pull crap like this. Just when I thought the New York bill allowing abortion up to any point was evil and madness, the Left manages to show the very DEVIL that lives inside their hearts.
 
You know, I’m reminded of what Sen. Diane Feinstein said to Amy Coney Barrett. That Catholic dogma “lives loudly within you.”
 
I’ll take Catholic dogma living loudly within someone over the work of Satan living loudly within someone and that’s what I see from the Left.
 
No wonder their candidates support Medicare-for-all and eliminating everyone’s existing health insurance. These people HAVE NO SOUL! While most may have no brain, NOT ONE OF THEM HAS A SOUL.
 
Actually, let me rephrase. Not one of them has a soul that is still alive. They’ve killed or sold theirs. Their soul belongs to the devil, who is smiling at the Governor’s words.
 
And do you want to know what may just be the worst part? He was saying these things as though he were saying “interesting weather we’re having.” It was that casual as though he often talks about this and everyone around him agrees.
 
As though it makes complete sense for parents to have the ability to kill their NEW BORN CHILD.
 
It’s complete and total apathy for children. FOR HUMAN LIFE!
 
I remember Nancy Pelosi having a lot of children on the House floor when she was sworn into office as House Speaker. Many conservatives made the half-joking argument that Pelosi thinks those kids would all be considered available for slaughter while in the womb. Now, they’re seemingly moving in a worse direction. Now, those kids are available for slaughter within seconds, minutes, or however long AFTER birth.
 
And their slaughter wouldn’t even cause the Left to bat an eye. Killing children is as natural to them as breathing.
 
Believe me when I tell you I am really trying to hold back my anger here. I have so many things to say to the Governor that I simply cannot permit myself to say on this website. Just know that they are not exactly kind words.
 
This is the full-embrace of the Devil. And it’s only going to get worse.
 
There is not much else I can say that will be original. I’ve already called them degenerates, evil, etc. multiple times. The fact they keep embracing evil and keep going further down that path enrages me and saddens me. Not because I care for the state of their souls. They’re screwed. But because these people are elected into power. Gov. Northam has power to shape policy in his state.
 
And also because they have the power to influence others. It used to be the Left would at least PRETEND to be decent and reasonable people. That’s no longer the case. But instead of being punished for their indecency and their hatred, they get the House of Representatives. Now, you can call into question the legitimacy of many elections last November, considering how much voter fraud happened throughout, but that doesn’t change the fact that MANY people still support and fully embrace the Left PRECISELY BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE NOW.
 
Millennials, being the uninformed sad-sacks that they are, tend to support socialism more than capitalism according to many polls. Well, this kind of insane and inhuman rhetoric regarding born children is what accompanies socialism. People are not people under socialism, so how could we expect socialists to think that a baby that is BORN is an alive human being?
 
Remember Obama’s 2012 Democratic Convention slogan? “We belong to the government.” I’ve often talked about this being similar to what fascists, socialists, communists and everyone who wants big government all think.
 
Well, part of “people belonging to the government” means the government gets to decide just who qualifies as “people”. For the Nazis, the lame, the Jews, and anyone not of the Aryan race were considered less than people. For the Old Southern Democrats, black people were property, not people. For the Soviets, those who would oppose the regime were less than people. For much of the Middle East, the Jews, Christians, women and children are less than people.
 
For Governor Northam, a new born baby is less than a person. It does not have the right to live and the parents get to decide its fate.
 
It’s the same evil dogma we’ve seen from some of history’s most evil empires. And it seems to be festering as mainstream ideology on the Left if the Governor is talking about this so casually (and the radio host did not even question what the Governor said).
 
It’s truly sickening what evil the Left is capable of concocting. This is not human. This is Satanic.
 
Genesis 6:5
“The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

​May God have mercy on the State of New York, because I won’t.
 
On the anniversary of the biggest mistake in the Supreme Court’s history – Roe v. Wade – the State of New York voted 38-24 to legalize abortion through the third trimester, remove abortion from the definition of homicide, and overall made it a New York Constitutional right for people to get an abortion, with Gov. Andrew Cuomo signing it into law.
 
The bill is bullcraply (not an actual word but I don’t know how else to describe it) titled “Reproductive Health Act” and, like previously stated, removes a whole lot of limitations on abortion.
 
As I said, it allows for abortion in the third trimester, when an unborn baby has developed a nervous system and is more than capable of living in the outside world with little to no outside help.
 
The bill says that an abortion is perfectly fine if an abortion “is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.”
 
Yeah, don’t give me that crap. First, the term “health” is not defined, so it can really mean anything. The mother’s physical health doesn’t have to be at risk. Her mental health, emotional health, or even financial health can be legitimately pointed at for a legitimate reason for an abortion.
 
Second, there is never a case when an abortion is “necessary” for the life or health of a woman in the third trimester. As I said, an unborn baby can survive outside the womb during that stage with little help. If the pregnancy, for whatever reason, is causing the mother’s health to deteriorate and her life to be at risk, at that point in the pregnancy, labor would be induced.
 
In other words, no baby needs to die in such a circumstance.
 
Third, even in such a circumstance where the mother chooses to abort in the third trimester, she will still have to deliver a baby. Abortion during the third trimester is done differently from other periods of pregnancy. During a second trimester abortion, the baby’s torso and/or limbs are crushed, cut off, etc. It’s utterly gruesome. But during the third trimester, a lethal injection is given to the baby.
 
According to the Daily Wire, during a third trimester abortion, “the baby is injected with a poison directly into his skull or torso. He then suffers a hideously painful death, which he will certainly feel because of his developed nervous system. The mother carries the corpse around in her womb for a day. The next day, there is an ultrasound to check if the baby is dead. If he isn’t – if he has been writhing and suffering in agony for the past 24 hours, clinging onto life – then he will be injected again. The following day, the mother delivers her dead child. Sometimes she delivers him at the clinic, but if she can’t make it on time, the clinic is perfectly happy to recommend that she give birth into her toilet.”
 
So a delivery must happen either way, whether or not a woman delivers a living baby or a dead one. So the question must be asked: why go through with an abortion in this circumstance? For all the b.s. reasons for a woman to have an abortion that the Left will spew out of their mouths, there seems to be no even remotely legitimately-sounding reason for an abortion to be a viable option in this circumstance. (For the record, I don’t think there is any legitimate or legitimate-sounding reason for an abortion at any point, but there are arguments made by pro-abortion people that try to legitimize them.)
 
If the mother does not want the baby or does not think she can afford to have the baby, why not give it up for adoption? The baby will still have to be delivered, so how is delivering a dead baby a better option than delivering a live one?
 
Overall, in case you couldn’t tell, I am really pissed off right now. I usually would not write that word, and usually would say “ticked” off, but I think this situation at least justifies some swearing.
 
This is not okay.
 
And do you want to know what is perhaps the most messed up part? Never mind that the New York Senate voted on it, passed it and Cuomo signed it into law. The people that were there to witness this were CELEBRATING this and Cuomo ordered the One World Trade Center, a symbol of freedom and American prosperity, be lit pink in “honor” of this shameful event.
 
They were THRILLED at the fact that this bill will only cause more and more death.
 
I am so ticked off I can hardly think straight. There are a lot of things I want to say about this and to the people who both passed this death bill and celebrated it as some sort of achievement, but I have to restrain myself.
 
Let me be 100% honest with you here. I would FAR rather live in Sodom or Gomorrah than even set FOOT on New York.
 
New York has now become the new Sodom on steroids.

In Luke chapter 10, Jesus sends out 72 people to go to different towns and proclaim the Word of God, living off of what good people will give them in their homes in those towns. But as for the ones who do not receive the ones sent by Jesus, in verses 10-12, Jesus says to them: “But whenever you enter a town and they do not receive you, go into its streets and say, ‘Even the dust of your town that clings to our feet we wipe off against you. Nevertheless know this, that the kingdom of God has come near.’ I tell you, it will be more bearable on that day for Sodom than for that town.”
 
And later on in verse 16, Jesus says: “The one who hears you hears me, and the one who rejects you rejects me, and the one who rejects me rejects him who sent me.”
 
Now, how does this relate to the subject at hand?
 
New York is a state that outright rejects Christ. This bill proves as much. Not only the allowing, but the cheering, of passing a piece of legislation that legalizes the death of children in the womb who can absolutely live outside it with little help is an outright full embrace of evil.
 
Now, this is not something new by any means. New York has been a cesspool of liberalism and anti-Christianity for a while now, but this is only a step farther away from God and closer towards Satan.
 
The towns that rejected those sent by Christ were doomed and outright cursed by Jesus in verses 13 through 15: “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. But it will be more bearable in the judgment for Tyre and Sidon than for you. And you, Capernaum, will you be exalted in heaven? You shall be brought down to Hades.”
 
Cities, towns, even nations that reject Christ are utterly doomed. New York is quickly going down the path of eternal damnation and they continue voting into power those who would doom the people.
 
Never mind high taxes that straight up rob you more often than any mugger in a dark alley. This piece of legislation marks New York as the leading state in “reproductive rights”, which is simply another word for legal, and celebrated, murder.
 
This is infanticide and no one can convince me otherwise.
 
May God have mercy on everyone who celebrated death on that day, because I am just about out of it.
 
1 John 5:4
“For everyone who has been born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world – our faith.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

If you want to find the perfect instance of a Leftist showing their true colors and showing a damn-near demonic side to them, look no further than Illinois’ House of Representatives, where Democrat Representative Stephanie Kifowit detailed exactly what she wishes she could do to GOP Representative Peter Breen and his family.
 
You better hold on to your gut, because what she says is sickening, depraved and horrifying.
 
Here’s what the she-demon said: “I would like to make him a broth of Legionella and pump it into the water system of his loved ones so that they can be infected, they can be mistreated, they can sit and suffer by getting aspirin instead of being properly treated and ultimately die.”
 
For further context, Rep. Breen has a wife and two adopted kids aged 2 years old and 2 months old. And the Legionella bacteria is a bacteria that causes a pneumonia-type disease called Legionnaires’ disease and a mild flu-like illness called Pontiac fever.
 
GOP Representative Jeanne Ives, in response, blasted the witch: “How dare you concoct up some sort of story about brewing up some batch of Legionella and having him feed it to his family… How dare you… wish death on my colleague Peter Breen, his wife, and his 2 adopted kids.”
 
Breen also said that her attacks came “out of left field” and if the monster “made those statements in the parking lot, or left a message on an answering machine in my office, she would be in custody.”
 
The House also voted unanimously to “expunge Kifowit’s statement from the record,” according to the Daily Herald.
 
And do you want to know the worst part? Oh, yes, it’s even worse than what I’ve already mentioned. The worst part is she’s not apologetic – she’s defensive.
 
The she-devil said: “And so to misinterpret my words, and of course these are all transcribed, and my words will be clear… So for the fact that it being misinterpreted, I’m going to say that what was said earlier is a mischaracterization of what my words were.”
 
WOMAN, YOU LITERALLY WISHED DEATH AND SUFFERING UPON A COLLEAGUE! THERE IS NO MISINTERPRETATION OF THAT!
 
Does she not even realize what she actually said?! She says that it’s all transcribed and the words are clear. Does she not even realize what she said? Did she undergo some sort of demon possession when she said those words and has no clear recollection of what she said?
 
Doubtful, since if that were the case, she would be apologizing for her words, rather than trying to say that she did not say those things or those things were “mischaracterized and misinterpreted”. What a lying, hateful scumbag she must be.
 
And I hate calling people names, as I believe that to be the lowest form of argument, apart from repeating what someone said in a mocking tone or mockingly laughing at someone’s argument. I don’t tend to call people names, but I just can’t help it here.
 
This woman is a she-devil. Look closely at the words she used. Does that sound like something someone just comes up with out of the blue? To specifically say that she would want to batch up a broth of a specific kind of bacteria, “pump it” into Breen’s family’s water supply so that they may be infected, mistreated, suffer and ultimately die? That was way too specific and way too detailed for that to have come up out of nowhere. She must’ve thought about this previously. Not to say she might actually do it, but it’s pretty clear these are the words of someone who has thought about this sort of thing in the past.
 
There’s something copywriters do when writing advertisements for a restaurant or a particular food. They will sometimes paint a picture of what it might be like to taste and eat the food. For example, one could say: “The sweet aroma of Restaurant X’s special steak will cause you to wish to dig in right away, but the sweet, succulent and voluminous taste of the steak, marinated in thick, rich barbeque sauce, will cause you to take a step back and relish in the overall richness of the dish.”
 
For a copywriter to come up with a sort of story like that to paint the picture of a delicious $20 steak, careful thought and consideration must take place. The same can be said for someone who uses this specific sort of language. Of course, this example is a bit more detailed than what Fem-Satan said, but it’s just as specific. The way she phrased that takes you down specific roads and alleyways of thought and paints a clear, but grim, picture of the suffering and ultimate demise of a family.
 
I’m not accusing the monster of actually killing or planning to kill anyone, but these are disturbing thoughts that don’t appear to have been random, but carefully thought out.
 
But regardless of whether or not this was thought out, it still signifies a deeply-rooted hatred within her heart, that is shared by others in the Democrat Party and even the media.
 
I don’t know what the previous conversation was about, but no context could possibly justify the very specific words that she seemingly denies saying.
 
And actually, the aforementioned GOP Representative who stood up for Breen, Rep. Jeanne Ives, went to the jugular, bringing up something that seemingly occurred during the 2018 midterm election cycle, where Breen and another GOP colleague were painted as supporters of child predators. She said: “That’s what you guys (Democrats) think. That’s the kind of garbage you spew into people’s minds.” She also said that fellow Democrats clapped and agreed with Kifowit’s statements, which if true, further proves my previous statement that such hatred is shared by the Democrat Party.
 
The wish to infect, make suffer, and ultimately kill with what is basically a biological weapon at that point, is something that can only come from someone who harbors Satan in their heart. The same could be said for anyone who agrees with the sentiment. And that is the reason I call the Democrat Party the Party of Satan. It’s his. His ideology reigns supreme in the Democrat Party. His unending hatred is shared among Party members (not necessarily all of them, but far too many for me to believe otherwise).
 
I mean, just last week, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) said he would nuke gun owners who would defy the government if the government were to take away people’s guns (paraphrasing). Bernie Sanders, before a socialist madman shot up a baseball field full of Republican congressmen, said that Republicans wanted to kill people by “taking away their healthcare”. David Brooks said, following Trump’s election victory, that Trump had to choose between being impeached, resigning, or being assassinated. Madonna, in the first “Women’s March” against Trump, said that she “thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.”
 
The Left HATES people. They particularly hate anyone that is not like them, in a very similar fashion to Adolf Hitler. And since anti-Semitism seems to be on the rise on the Left, day by day, they appear to embody the Nazi Party of Germany more and more, minus the nationalism part.
 
Historically speaking, it’s only been those on the Left who have wanted, or gone as far as to actually kill, opposition. The communists (no matter what country you talk about) do it, the socialists (no matter what country you talk about) do it, the fascists do it. Generally speaking, the wish of death upon anyone who dares defy the Left is par for the course regarding this witch. But just because it’s par for the course definitely does not make it right.
 
The fact that this is just who the Left is is downright terrifying. They have no respect or regard for human life. They don’t even have respect for themselves, at the end of the day, so why would they respect anyone else?
 
As often as I get the chance (which is very often), I expose the fact that the Left is evil. And this is why. Their hearts are full of evil, so they naturally gravitate towards the ideologies of Satan. They may not necessarily believe in Satan, but they do not have to. Satan doesn’t care if people believe in him or not. Matter of fact, he’d rather people not believe in him, so that people don’t feel the need to seek God for salvation.
 
I sincerely hope this woman finds Christ. I don’t say that in spite of what she said, I say that precisely BECAUSE of what she said. She needs Christ. Granted, so does everyone else, but she desperately needs Him.
 
But as it stands, her heart belongs to Satan and it will remain that way, barring God’s desire to save her.
 
Psalm 34:16
“The face of the Lord is against those who do evil, to cut off the memory of them from the earth.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

​Ok, I won’t go so far as to actually say that he is the devil himself. But why do I ask that question? Most, if not all, of you readers probably believe in God. As such, you also probably believe in Satan. The Bible often speaks of Satan, calling him the great dragon and snake and deceiver of the world. But when you think of Satan, what do you picture? Probably a 6’ tall red guy with horns and legs like a goat, wielding a trident.
 
By that description, he seems rather silly. Who would believe that such a being could exist? That’s part of the reason why so many people today don’t believe that Satan exists. The Bible doesn’t describe him that way, though. In fact, aside from being described as a snake and a great dragon, he is never really described physically. All the Bible says of him in terms of physical attributes is that he was “perfect in beauty”, according to Ezekiel 28:12.
 
Satan was created as the perfect creation. Not the perfect BEING, mind you. That title belongs to God and only God. But Satan was God’s masterpiece. His perfect creation. He was given the most wisdom, talent and beauty out of all the angels. On top of that, he was given the highest honor and greatest job an angel could have: guarding and protecting God’s throne. His job was to protect the very holiness of God! That’s the best and most honorable job anyone could hope to have, but Satan wanted more.
 
He wanted to be ABOVE God. And so, he rebelled against Him. That’s how Satan became a fallen angel.
 
So you see, Satan was created not as the ruler of Hell and a disgusting creature in terms of physical looks. He was created to be God’s GREATEST ANGEL! He doesn’t look like a half-goat half-man mix with a fancy pitchfork and some serious skin problems. He was created to be PERFECT! But even the most perfect of creations is still just that, a CREATION. Satan wanted to be a CREATOR. To be ABOVE GOD.
 
So we know that Satan doesn’t look the way people usually picture him looking like. In fact, Satan started to be described this way during the Middle Ages. Back then, the Church was very aware of the presence of Satan. They were deathly afraid of him. So they decided to ease their worries by attacking Satan. How, you may ask? Well, it wasn’t going to be a battle with weapons. It was going to be a psychological battle. Knowing what they knew about Satan, they knew that he is a proud being. So, they decided to make fun of him. After all, someone who is prideful can’t stand public ridicule and humiliation.
 
And so, they had artists draw Satan as an ugly, inhuman-looking creature that represents the evils of the world. But that’s not what he looks like. That’s the thing about it.
 
And that’s why I ask the title question, is the pope the Anti-Christ? Well, first, I have to explain my reasoning as to why I’m picking on the pope as opposed to, say, Obama or Hitler or Stalin. All were evil in their own right. All wanted to, like Satan, be kings of this world. All thought they could be higher than God. But they were all too obviously evil. Their evil could easily be recognized. Yes, they all had followers that loved them and those followers didn’t think they were evil. But we, who follow Christ, all know that the three are evil (though, with varying résumé’s of evil actions).
 
Satan, however, will not be seen as evil by a large majority of the world. And he will appear as though he is God Himself. In fact, the Bible speaks of this. Revelation 13:4 “And they (the world) worshipped the dragon, for he had given his authority to the beast, saying ‘Who is like the beast? And who can fight against it?’”
 
He will perform miracles and signs and the world will worship him. The point I’m trying to make here is that Satan won’t one day emerge and kill millions upon millions of people. He won’t destroy anything in this world. He’s not like a comic book villain that appears out of nowhere, laughs evilly and makes buildings explode. He will appear to be the world’s SAVIOR. It’s one of the ways he intends to BECOME LIKE GOD!
 
So he won’t be someone that is clearly evil and will kill and destroy people and civilizations. He will appear like an angel of light, ready to lead his followers to greatness. He will say the right things at the right times. People will love him, all throughout the world. He’s basically a politician. But in all seriousness, his evil won’t be painfully obvious to the world. People will actually believe he is God. And so, I ask: is the pope the Anti-Christ?
 
The pope is the head of the Catholic Church. He is, in many people’s eyes, the representative of God and light and goodness. He is, after all, called “His Holiness”. And we all know he's just a man like you and me. The title "His Holiness" can only be attributed to GOD. 
 
Pope Francis is a notorious climate change believer, so he doesn’t trust that God is in control, but rather believes Man is in control of the climate. He is also rather lenient when it comes to gay or lesbian Christians (which is rather oxymoronic) - the Bible is very clear on this. Practicing gays or lesbians by definition cannot be Christians, while former gays or lesbians can be if they repent.
 
And now, to answer the title question: no, he’s not the Anti-Christ. He doesn’t fit the physical description of the devil nor is he a clear God-like figure that the majority of the world follows. That doesn’t mean, however, that this pope is not a tool for the devil to use. This pope is as far from God as I’ve seen a pope be. He doesn’t trust God. He trusts Man. He may not be the Anti-Christ, but he certainly is no Christian.
 
Sorry to any Catholic readers on here, but that’s the truth.
 
2 Corinthians 11:3
“But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent’s cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ.”
 
Author: Freddie Drake