As I have explained many times in the past, Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a racist theory calling itself “anti-racist” because it supposedly “empowers” blacks while “destroying” white supremacy or whatever else. Basically, it makes white people out to be devils because of their race and black people to be victims for the same reason. Anyone with a positive IQ can tell that CRT fits the definition of racism to a T.
One black father from Colorado, named Derrick Wilburn, has such a positive IQ and in a school board meeting, demanded that the board ban the racist teaching from Colorado Springs School District 49’s classrooms.
Wilburn began by saying the following: “I am a direct descendant of the North American slave trade. Both my parents are black. All four of my grandparents are black, all eight of my great grandparents, all 16 of my great greats. On my mother’s side, my ancestors were enslaved in Alabama. On my father’s side, we were enslaved in Texas.”
The reason for mentioning this is that, by the Left’s own logic, if anyone can claim to be a victim of the legacy of slavery in this nation, it would be Wilburn and his family. Yet, he says the following: “I’m not oppressed, and I’m not a victim.”
The Left, mostly white knight liberals, make the claim that black people are oppressed and victimized because of crap that happened centuries ago. That a black person today is a victim of the slavery that was abolished over 150 years ago. By sharing the fact about his ancestry, and that his family used to be slaves, and proceeding to say that he is not oppressed or a victim is to shatter this delusional argument.
He then went on to explain that he travels the country extensively, and that no matter where he goes, he is “treated with kindness, dignity, and respect.”
“I have three children. They are not oppressed, either – although they are victims. I’ve taught my children they are victims of three things: their own ignorance, their own laziness, and their own poor decision-making.”
“Putting Critical Race Theory into our classrooms has taken our nation in the wrong direction. Racism in America would by and large be dead today if it were not for certain people and institutions keeping it on life support,” among which being the education system in this country.
“I can think of nothing more damaging to society,” he continued, “than to tell a baby today that she has grievances against another baby born today simply because of what their ancestors may have done two centuries ago.”
And he’s certainly correct. It is outright ghoulish to teach a child that he or she is naturally made enemies with another person simply because of what happened LONG before either of them were born or simply because of the immutable aspects of their skin color.
Critical Race Theory teaches white kids that they are, by nature, oppressors and black kids that they are, also by nature, oppressed. It gives rise to victimizing black people and, in some of those white kids, to make them think that they might be superior, thereby increasing, not diminishing, white supremacy. And if they teach that the white kids should feel inferior, that creates black supremacy instead, which is equally terrible.
CRT is simply the newest model of outright blatant racism that the Left wishes to create in this country.
And there are people like Wilburn who recognize this as well. He continued, “Putting Critical Race Theory into our classrooms is not combating racism. It’s fanning the flames of what little embers are left. Let racism die the death it deserves.”
Later on, the school board, thankfully, voted to pass the resolution to ban CRT from its schools, but by a narrow 3-2 vote.
The board provided their rationale for this vote, explaining that the school district “partners with parents to assist in their responsibility to educate their children in accordance with the principle that America is a nation founded on the principle that all men and women are created equal per the Declaration of Independence, Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”
They also argued that CRT “excludes individuals who merely advocate for neutral principles of the Constitution, or who deny or question the extent to which white supremacy shapes our institutions.” And that while schools ought to teach unvarnished American history, “such exposure should not purport to deliberately undermine student/family values, religious beliefs, or principles.”
The resolution also bans schools from being able to separate students by their race or assigning them work based on such criteria. It also further prohibits teaching the idea “that race is the most important identity,” “that group identity is more important than individual identity,” and that one is automatically an “oppressor or oppressed according to their race.”
While that is a good statement, it bothers me to no end that this wasn’t a 5-0 vote and even more so that it was as slim a margin as 3-2, which leads me to encourage parents, if they are able, to take their kids out of these crappy government schools.
That it was as slim a margin as that leaves it vulnerable to go the other direction some time in the future. While the people of that school district should take measures to ensure that that doesn’t happen, there is no guarantee that the district won’t ever go back on this decision and start teaching the racist CRT in their classrooms.
To save their children from such indoctrination (and, frankly, the indoctrination that is already allowed to occur in such classrooms), parents should take their kids out of these government schools and find alternatives, such as private school (a good one, as there can still be Leftist ones, if New York is anything to go by), schools tied with a church, or homeschooling which can be organized by parents in a neighborhood.
Whatever it takes to save these children from the toxic nonsense that the Left teaches and ruins any child that is subjected to it.
We have already seen, for the last few decades, what Leftist education does to children. It destroys them physically (obesity rates are sky-high because kids aren’t taught that sugar leads to obesity, not to mention the unhealthy crap they serve in cafeterias), spiritually (not having God in the classroom for 60 years will do that), mentally (an astounding coincidence that we have so many mental health issues when people who are mentally ill teach in schools) and emotionally (youth suicide, ages 10 to 24, jumped 57% between 2007 and 2018, and this was, as you can see, BEFORE the COVID-related suicides).
You wanna know how to Make America Great Again? Take Leftists and Leftism, not God, out of schools. Put God back in schools and His Teachings. Don’t tell kids that they are worthless crap descended from dumbass monkeys and fish who don’t know how to be fish (seriously, I’m to believe life on land happened because a fish somehow “evolved” to live somewhere it never lived on before? That’s not adaptation, that’s retardation) and are, therefore, here for no reason at all. Tell them that they were created in the image of the Almighty God who has a plan for their lives and that their lives matter (wanna ensure people believe that black lives matter? Teach them that lives matter, period).
That this decision was 3-2 when it should be clear as day that CRT is racist bullcrap tells me one of two things about the two people who voted to teach that crap: They are racist themselves, or they have a negative IQ. Either option is intolerable and inexcusable.
Parents shouldn’t wait for the district to, one day, reverse course on this, given how close of a vote this was. That it was this close ought to infuriate parents on the winning side and demand the resignation of the two dissenters.
Pull your kids out of government schools, for their sake.
“See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.”
Liberals are hypocritical. This much has consistently been observed for decades, as they will claim to be in support of one thing and then proceed to do the exact opposite to what they “believe.” One such example is of Obama’s birthday bash which I talked about last week, as well as the fact that Leftists will claim to care for the environment and proceed to own massive homes and private jets which leave massive carbon footprints.
Similarly, the Left will claim to be in support of the abolition of slavery, and of the people who fought slavery in the 19th century, but will take similar stances as pro-slavery people with regards to the modern-day evil of abortion.
This is the general point that Christian group Free The States recently tried to make at a rally.
The group distributed over 500,000 fake $20 bills with Harriet Tubman’s face on the front and a burning Pennsylvania Hall (the HQ of the Philadelphia slavery abolition movement which was torched by an angry mob just four days after its opening in May 1838) on the back. The tactic was to basically fool people into attending a “put Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill” rally, where they would be told certain truths about both Tubman and the fight against our modern culture’s evil: abortion.
Furthermore, the group set up a website called “Tubman20.com” and announced an in-person and livestreamed rally for August 1st at the former site of the Pennsylvania Hall.
At the rally, T. Russell Hunter, a 19th century historian and founder of Free The States, explained to the attendees “that though the abolitionists who opposed slavery are lauded in the modern era, they were loathed by the vast majority of Americans in the decades leading to the Civil War,” according to The Daily Wire.
Hunter explained: “Harriet Tubman is popular today. Her abolitionist friends are popular today. You can watch PBS documentaries about the abolitionists William Lloyd Garrison, Frederick Douglass… But when Harriet Tubman was living in this city, she was an outlaw. People tried to chase her down.”
“Harriet Tubman – and these men and women in the abolitionist movement – rejected all compromise with slavery. They demanded its total and immediate abolition. These abolitionists not only argued that slavery was evil, but they argued that gradual abolition was evil. They spent as much time arguing with moderate anti-slavery gradualists as they did arguing against slavery itself.”
“Here’s the point. Does our culture truly support Harriet Tubman? Do we appreciate people like Harriet Tubman, or do we treat abolitionists of today in the way we treated abolitionists of the past?”
“We find ourselves in a similar situation today among a similar people,” he continued to explain. “Chattel slavery is no longer legal; it has been abolished. The Supreme Court no longer prohibits individuals or states from helping those in bondage. However, the federal government, every state government, and the majority of the population totally, emphatically, and unquestionably protects the Supreme Court-sanctioned evil of our own age… I am talking about the evil of human abortion and the movement to abolish it.”
Unsurprisingly, as soon as Hunter revealed the true purpose of the rally, several attendees began to leave in anger. Hunter used those leaving as a good example of his point.
“Some of these folks that leave, that don’t want to hear us out – they don’t realize that they are treating us just the same way as they treated the abolitionists of an earlier age. They were willing to celebrate abolitionists like Harriet Tubman until someone said, ‘You agree with her then, but you would not agree with her now.’”
“We believe that these children ought to be rescued from being taken away to death. Like her, we believe that we should not live for ourselves, but we should live for others. Like her, we believe in and follow Christ. We believe that He leads the abolitionist cause, and that His gospel is the answer to abortion.”
In an interview with The Daily Wire, he noted that “it was very interesting to note who left and who stayed.”
“Almost all the white liberals stormed off in anger when the rally switched gears. But not a single black person left. Many of them stayed for more than thirty minutes after the rally was over to talk about abolitionism and have me sign their bills. Our message resonated strongly with them.”
“Our culture thinks they like Harriet Tubman, but that’s only because they have created a false, secularized version of her. She was a Bible-quoting, gun-toting, evangelical Christian abolitionist who trusted in God’s providence above all else. Tubman was the furthest thing from a modern leftist.”
“Tubman demanded slavery’s total and immediate abolition. She told Lincoln, ‘Never wound a snake. Kill it.’ She supported nullifying tyrannical fugitive slave laws. She supported immediatism, nullification, and many more of the principles pro-life leaders argue against when they oppose abolition bills.”
“Because of this, we set out to teach the culture about immediatism, nullification, and – most importantly – the gospel of Jesus Christ that animated Harriet Tubman.”
There isn’t a single thing here I could possibly, as a Christian, argue against, not that I would want to anyway.
I don’t know of any pro-life leaders who oppose abolition bills, and certainly, one could not consider themselves pro-life, let alone a leader, if they do. But if Hunter is going so far as to mention that, he probably has someone or some people in mind who fit the bill. Certainly, RINO Republicans who say what they need to say to gain support and then betray the principles they claim to espouse.
But what this rally demonstrated was the great point of the similarities of both abolitionist movements of the 19th century and of today.
While polls show that abortion is nowhere near as popular as the Left might have us believe, it is still more popular than I would want, and I’m willing to bet that many people would rather keep than overturn Roe v. Wade, as Hunter was trying to point out.
So with regards to the evil of abortion, abolitionists are much in the same position today as they were in the 19th century with regards to slavery.
Federal and state governments support abortion about as much as they supported slavery, and the reason laws changed was because more and more people recognized the evil of slavery, as I believe more and more people will recognize the evil of abortion. Those who argued against slavery were treated with contempt by many people, and attempts at changing the culture were met with violence (as evidenced by the burning of Pennsylvania Hall just four days after its opening).
Similarly, those who argue against abortion are treated with contempt, ironically even called “evil” and “anti-woman” and attempts at changing the culture are met with similar contempt (as evidenced by angry white liberals leaving the rally) and often times violence.
The same people, Democrats, who supported slavery in the past also support abortion today. Only abortion is even more ghoulish than slavery was, as abortion is the specific targeting of human babies for termination. Slaves at least got to live, for the most part. Not great lives, but lives nonetheless. Slaves were not sought out for destruction. Slavery was profitable mostly by the maintenance of the slaves and their numbers. Abortion is profitable exclusively by the elimination of human life.
It might be surprising for some to hear, but there is no doubt in my mind that abortion is a way worse evil than slavery ever was.
In 1860, five years before the abolition of slavery, the U.S. population was a little over 31 million. 3.9 million of them were slaves. So in 1860, 12% of the US population were slaves.
In 2020, the U.S. population was a little over 330 million. There have been over 63 million abortions in the U.S. since Roe v. Wade. Comparatively speaking, that’s nearly 20% of the current population. More people, numerically and statistically, have been killed by abortion than were slaves at the HEIGHT of slavery in 1860.
Abortion is a holocaust unlike any other. It supersedes Germany’s, Russia’s and China’s. It dwarfs slavery in the U.S., but one would be scorned for even thinking that, let alone saying it.
Even slavery’s purpose wasn’t outright genocide. Abortion is, even if there are those who argue against that.
They will say that babies “aren’t alive”, dehumanizing them like they did black people. They will say “it’s a woman’s choice”, also dehumanizing the babies as though they were property to be kept or tossed. When they inevitably run out of excuses to try and justify the unjustifiable, they switch to personal attacks of “you’re a sexist” or “you’re anti-woman” when abortion leaves many women emotionally scarred and regretting their decisions (not to mention we are at the point where they will argue that MEN can get an abortion, so how is that pro-woman?).
Any possible defense they have for abortion can be used for defending slavery. “What if a rape happens?” “What if it’s incest?” “What if it’s deformed or won’t have a normal life?” “It’s not a baby, it’s just a fetus!”
“What if the slave rapes someone in his freedom?” “What if they decide to have disgusting incestual relationships in their freedom?” “What if they are deformed and couldn’t have a normal life outside of slavery?” “It’s not a human, it’s property!”
The slavers of yesterday are the abortionists of today. They take up similar defensive strategies in opposing abolition in both centuries.
And like Hunter pointed out, it’s largely the white liberals who stormed off. The white liberals, who like to white knight for minorities, are the ones who got offended. The white liberals, who used to own slaves back in the day, are the ones who opposed abolition. Meanwhile, black people, the people most targeted by both institutions, decided to stay and hear the abolitionists out.
Funny how it works, that white liberals make ignorant, bigoted assumptions about what minorities think and want because those are the things the white liberals want them to think and want.
Like their incredulity at how a Latino could support Trump (after all, he was building a “racist wall” and wants to “deport people like me”), they are incredulous at the idea that there are black people who stand against the institution which seeks them out for termination.
They live in their own little bubble with their own little presuppositions about how the world works and how other people think and feel. And yet, they also have enough narcissism and self-righteousness to claim that black people who are conservatives “aren’t real black people” (and will make similar charges of conservatives of other minorities).
At any rate, what Free The States did here is spectacular and their points are well-made. Abortion ought to be immediately abolished and there can be no room for moderation or debate on that front. Slowly getting rid of abortion is as evil as not getting rid of it at all, so the solution ought to be quick and immediate.
“What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?”
I may sound like a broken record, but the Left has always used the tactic of projection. Whatever they themselves do and believe, they project that onto their political opponents. They themselves are massive racists, often openly, yet project onto their opponents that racism via accusations that holding such opposing beliefs makes them inherently racist.
It used to be that calling a Republican racist was all the Democrats needed to do because most Republicans would usually become rather timid and gutlessly apologize for holding such “racist” beliefs or for saying things which align with such “racism.”
Thankfully, apart from a few RINOs here and there, that has largely stopped. However, that doesn’t mean that the Left has stopped accusing everyone who stands against them of being racist at whatever interval they could. They, for five years, accused President Trump of being a racist with absolutely zero evidence to back that up.
Meanwhile, they themselves have routinely been shown to be unapologetic racists in one way or another, be it in being openly against white people or, through their actions, being against non-whites. The latter is what we are talking about today, as I mentioned in the title: Leftist senator Sheldon Whitehouse is a member (alongside his wife who is a major stakeholder) of an all-white club in Rhode Island.
According to GoLocalProv, “Both Whitehouse and his wife Sandra as well as their families have been members of [the all-white private Bailey’s Beach Club in Newport, RI] for decades. Whitehouse did transfer his shares in the club to his wife years ago, and she is now one of the largest shareholders in the all-white club. The club’s membership is a who’s who [of] Newport, Palm Beach, and New York wealth.”
In a feeble and futile attempt at damage control, a spokesperson for Whitehouse told The Washington Post that the club isn’t, actually, racist and all-white, and that it “has had and has members of color.”
I say this is feeble and futile because one doesn’t even have to do any research to find that the spokesperson is lying. Whitehouse himself basically proves that they were.
In an interaction with a reporter last Friday, Whitehouse defended his membership in the all-white club and the interaction went as follows:
Reporter: “Back in 2017, you had expressed concerns about the membership of the all-white Bally’s (sic) Beach Club, you said that you hoped it would become more diverse. Now your family’s been members, your wife is one of the largest shareholders. Has there been any traction in that? Are there any minority members of the club now?”
Whitehouse: “I think the people who are running the place are still working on that. And I’m sorry, it hasn’t happened yet.”
That right there proves his own SPOKESPERSON wrong about their claim that it has had and currently has members who are not white. From Whitehouse’s lips himself, he refutes the spokesperson’s b.s.
The reporter then asks the hypocritical racist piece of crap: “Do you have concerns in 2021? I mean, obviously, it’s been four years, you had remarks on the floor following the death of Brianna Taylor and George Floyd saying, you know, hoping to root out systemic racism in the country. Your thoughts on an elite all-white wealthy club again in this day and age, you know, should these clubs continue to exist?”
To which Whitehouse gave the tired old argument that proponents of slavery and segregation have always given: “It’s a long tradition in Rhode Island and there are many of them. And I think we just need to work our way through the issues. Thank you.”
The guy defends the club’s all-white exclusivity on it being a “long tradition.” Like any good Old South Democrat, he says that such racism is simply “tradition” as though that is in any way an excuse. It probably is to one who projects racism onto others and yet is an even bigger racist themselves.
Not only does he excuse it as a “long tradition”, he also excuses it as there being a lot of clubs (presumably in Rhode Island, specifically) which are all-white clubs. That is another tired argument – that it’s too widespread for any challenge to that system to be worth it.
Whitehouse’s arguments are logical fallacies of argumentum ad antiquitatem, or the argument to antiquity or tradition, that it should be considered acceptable because of its persistence in tradition throughout generations. Such a logical fallacy could be taken to its logical conclusion whereby anything could be permitted if enough time passes and it becomes “tradition.”
For example, one could make the argument that it’s okay for cannibalistic tribes to be cannibals because “it’s a tradition” in their tribe. That they are simply different from us and that we must accept such immoral atrocities because it’s simply part of their culture and has been for generations. Of course, no rational person would simply accept that and would be revolted at such an immoral act.
Then, if we wouldn’t rationally accept cannibalism just on the merits that “it’s tradition” in those tribes, why would anyone turn around and say that it’s okay that the club is all-white just on those same merits? It makes no rational sense and this decision to be part of such a club from Whitehouse isn’t a rational one, but an emotional/financial one.
He’s been part of that club for decades, as we just saw, and thus, has developed sentimentality for the club, at least to some extent or another. Such a thing tends to happen to people and get emotionally attached. But like we also saw, it’s a who’s who of rich socialites from Newport, Palm Beach and New York. The elite of the elite are members of this club (would love to see who else is part of this retched thing) and that brings with it not only a sense of prestige but also the ability to network and financially benefit oneself.
Whatever the reason Whitehouse has for being a part of such a club, the matter of fact is that he is still a massive hypocrite, as is much of the Left. Whitehouse himself pointed out that “there are many of them.” Even assuming that he’s just referring to all-white clubs in Rhode Island, that highlights the hypocritical racism of the Left. Rhode Island is HEAVILY Democrat. Joe Biden “won” over 300,000 votes compared to Trump’s just under 200,000, with Biden “winning” the state by over 20 percentage points. A Democrat state senator running in 2020 won 66.5% of the vote compared to the Republican’s 33.4%.
And in both district races that happened in 2020, the Democrat candidate won well into the double digits. In other words, Rhode Island is a blue state, through and through. So why are there seemingly so many of these all-white clubs that Whitehouse claimed there were?
Well, if you know the Left, this isn’t exactly a tough question. Like I said in the beginning, the Democrats always use projection. They project onto their political opponents the racism that actually lives and thrives within them. They claim that Republicans are racist while they themselves have or are part of all-white clubs. They claim horrible things of Republicans while they themselves are everything they claim their opponents to be.
This is simply how they operate and it has worked on many people for a long time.
I just hope that enough people are waking up to the reality of the rottenness of the Left that we might be able to utterly defeat them and their evil ideology once and for all.
“And the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.”
For five years now, we have been told that President Trump is a massive racist, hates non-whites, wants to ban Muslims from travel, thinks white supremacists are “very fine people” and every other b.s. lie they could manufacture to paint him as a huge racist devil.
Surely, then, if they are so much against racism, they would be shocked, appalled and infuriated at Joe and Hunter Biden’s repeated use of the single most racist term a white man can utter: the N-word. But, of course, since these are Leftists we’re talking about, they of course don’t care that the Bidens casually throw such a word around. They don’t care to challenge racism because they are the ones who propagate it and give it life.
It has recently come to light that Joe and Hunter Biden have, collectively, used that word 16 times, at least (undoubtedly, they’ve used it far more than that, if they so casually throw this word around).
Joe, himself, has used the word a number of 13 times, while in Senate hearings, no less, and Hunter has been shown to have used the word three times when speaking with his white attorney.
Then-Senator Joe Biden used the word during a 1985 Senate hearing when he was questioning William Reynolds, President Reagan’s assistant attorney general for civil rights, as Reynolds was looking to get a promotion to associate AG. Biden used the term when quoting a memo sent to Reynolds which included a quote from a “key legislator” regarding a case of a redistricting plan in Louisiana. The quote, which Biden didn’t care to censor, was: “We already have a n***** mayor (in New Orleans), and we don’t need another n***** bigshot.”
Throughout the hearings, Biden kept bringing up that quote and kept using the term a total of 13 times.
Now, there are two things I want to say about this. First, it’s important to note that Biden was just quoting what someone else was saying, and an argument could be made that if it’s simply a quote, then it might be permissible. I, myself, believe some amount of self-censorship should be at least considered when using such a quote, but free speech demands that one ought to be able to make the choice for themselves.
You might be asking why it is that I’m defending Biden. Well, I’m not, which brings me to the second thing I want to say: whoever would make such arguments about the use of that word in such a context is NOT on the same side that Biden generally is. Leftists have long fought against even the idea of using that word when quoting someone, arguing that if one wishes to include a quote which includes the word, the word ought to be censored if the person using the quote is not black themselves.
For example, a professor at St. John’s University was fired earlier this year because she used the term when quoting a line from Mark Twain’s “Pudd’nhead Wilson,” a story about a light-skinned slave switching her newborn baby with her master’s so that he might grow up to have a better life (though Twain, having been against racism and slavery before it was cool, satirized the entire institution by making the “free” baby grow up to be a monster and a killer and the “slave” baby grew up to be a man of character).
The professor was first reported by a student, who initially sent an email to the professor saying how “It was unnecessary and very painful to hear,” because college students are, of course, snowflakes who get hurt by words. Eventually, the professor, who is the daughter of Holocaust survivors, was contacted by the school’s HR, with her receiving a suspension pending investigation, claiming she had “violated the university’s policy against bias”, according to the NY Post, and was then fired on April 29.
So we have two very similar cases here, but with wildly different results. The professor was shown to have used the n-word only ONCE when QUOTING Mark Twain, who is pretty famous for his use of such words, and she was ultimately fired for her “offense.” Meanwhile, you have a then-sitting Senator REPEATEDLY using the same quote which uses the word more than once, and the media is utterly silent about it and absolutely no repercussions came from it. Again, that was in 1985. Biden would go on to become the VICE PRESIDENT to the country’s first (half) black POTUS and would go on to illegitimately occupy the Oval Office.
Why the double standard? Because that’s the only standard the Left lives by. If there is issue with the professor saying the n-word in a quote, there should be issue with a SITTING SENATOR uttering the word NUMEROUS TIMES throughout a Senate hearing, even if that was also because of a quote. But because Biden is the Left’s golden man-child, they will protect him from the very things which they would ravage anyone else for.
Speaking of golden children, let’s talk about Joe’s. Like I said, the crack addict was recently shown to have used the n-word in text messages to his white attorney. The Daily Mail reports:
“The [occupier’s] son joked in a January 2019 text to corporate attorney George Mesires about a ‘big penis,’ and said to the lawyer: ‘I only love you because you’re black’ and ‘true dat n***a.’”
“In another text a month earlier he wrote to the Chicago lawyer saying: ‘how much money do I owe you. Becaause (sic) n***a you better not be charging me Hennessy rates.’ Mesires replied: ‘That made me snarf my coffee.’ Hunter added: ‘That’s what I’m saying ni…’, cutting off the racial slur mid-word, then texted a picture to Mesires.”
So not only does Hunter casually throw the word around, he even talks in a “gansta” way. If he so comfortably says the word, and even speaks (or texts) in this manner, he must have picked it up from somewhere, and I doubt that somewhere wasn’t his segregationist father who has no issue with saying the n-word 13 times during a SENATE HEARING.
But despite all these things, the media is utterly silent about it. They spent five years making fake story after fake story of how “racist” President Trump was, claiming he said things he never actually said or claiming he didn’t say things he repeatedly said (namely, the idea that he has “never denounced white supremacy” despite having done it at least 38 times), but the Bidens use the n-word like it’s part of their everyday vocabulary and all of them have no issue whatsoever with that.
Don’t misunderstand, I’m not surprised one iota by this. The Left has a history of blatant racism, as it courses through their veins, so it’s not surprising whatsoever that they would have no issue with the racism of the Bidens.
Racism is a tool, a weapon, to them. Why would they want to get rid of it? Why would they want to “fight” it? They use it all the time against their opponents. So it’s not exactly mesmerizing to see the Bidens use the n-word, and it’s equally as un-mesmerizing to see the media completely ignore this. They have a certain narrative to uphold and that’s that Trump supporters and Republicans are the blatant racists, not them.
But much to their dismay, they can’t keep such things hidden forever. Eventually, the truth comes out, particularly as there exists alternative media to them (and particularly as they continuously suffer ratings hits). People are tuning them out, and the time will come when they have little power over the American people. Possibly, sooner than one might think.
To sum up, the Bidens are unsurprisingly racists, both in regards to their anti-white racism and their anti-minority racism, and the fake news media refuses to cover it because they have no morals or standards, just an agenda to drive down people’s throats.
Their demise will have been of their own making.
“’There is no peace,’ says the Lord, ‘for the wicked.’”
For a very long time, anyone with a relatively unbiased and analytical eye could tell that the organization commonly referred to as “Black Lives Matter” does not actually believe that black lives matter. It takes whatever opportunities it can to cause destruction to public and private property, and to induce terror into the hearts of citizens and political opponents alike.
It is little more than a terrorist organization, alongside Antifa, and has already claimed a number of lives in the past year. However, it is seen in a favorable light by the fake news media, entirely because both BLM and the media are Leftists fighting for Leftist causes.
BLM’s “About Us” page included items which were explicitly Leftist LGBT crap that had absolutely NOTHING to do with the improvement of black lives or the protection of black lives, thereby pointing out how little black lives actually mattered to BLM (and is among the reasons I have been calling them “BLM” for the past year).
It is simply a Marxist, communist organization meant to drive Marxism and make us more into a Soviet Union.
They fool plenty of people into believing that their cause is genuine and noble, and even some of its chapter founders believe that the organization cares about black lives and black people.
However, there are some times when even a founding member of a chapter recognizes the putrid nature of the organization and sees that it works towards things which would be counterintuitive to its official mission of helping black people.
Rashad Turner is one such person, as he founded a Minnesota BLM chapter in 2015 and resigned some time later (unknown exactly when). The reason I am pointing this out now is because, regardless of when he actually resigned, he recently released a video (below) on YouTube in which he “reveals the truth about BLM”.
It’s a short, two-minute video in which he details some of his early life:
“My mother wasn’t able to take care of me, so I was raised by my grandparents. They told me that if I was going to change my life for the better, education was the answer. So, I worked hard in school. I got into Hamline University, and earned a college degree, the first in my family. Then I went on to earn a master’s in education from St. Mary’s University of Minnesota. I am living proof that no matter your start in life, quality education is a pathway to success.”
He then goes on to talk about founding the St. Paul chapter of BLM in 2015, believing “the organization stood for exactly what the name implies, black lives do matter. However, after a year on the inside, I learned they have little concern for rebuilding black families, and they cared even less about improving the quality of education for students in Minneapolis.”
“That was made clear when they publicly denounced charter schools, alongside the teachers’ union. I was an insider in Black Lives Matter, and I learned the ugly truth: the moratorium on charter schools does not support rebuilding the black family, but it does create barriers to a better education for black children.”
And it goes a lot further than that. The fact that their “About Us” page included LGBT propaganda and that one of their main missions was to disrupt the nuclear family is exemplary of their ill-will towards black people. The black family unit is racked by absent parents, with Turner himself mentioning how his mother couldn’t take care of him and was instead raised by his grandparents (notice the sheer absence of a father here, a common story for many black families).
The current social and welfare system in the U.S. encourages poor women (often, black women) to have as many kids as they can so they get bigger welfare checks from the government (which the Left is happy to provide, since it means they get to financially own such people, basically reliving their “glory days” of being slave owners).
While overt racism (towards minorities) is rather scarce, the Left enacts systematic racism (which they claim to fight against, though they are the ones implementing it) through their welfare systems which financially enslave poor people, whom are most often minorities. Of course, there are plenty of people who can get out of it, such as Turner or Ben Carson, among others. But it is undeniable that the Left does what it can to enslave as many people in as legal a way as they can.
And organizations like BLM are created, not for the purposes of improving the lives of black people and families, but keeping them in check. Similar to how Margaret Sanger used black people to convince other black people of the “goodness” of the genocide she wanted to commit against them, the Left uses black people to convince other black people of the “goodness” of the enslavement that they want to place on them.
And clearly, it works with many, as Turner sort of points out. He used to believe that black lives mattered to Black Lives Matter. After all, it’s in the name (an argument which somehow is ignored when you point out that there is “socialist” in “National Socialist” or “Nazi”, but whatever). However, there are those who can see, immediately or eventually, how disingenuous the organization is to its namesake.
This should have been made perfectly clear to all last year, when BLM burned down black-owned businesses and harassed black neighborhoods. BLM actively worked against the benefit of black lives, and many took notice of this.
Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if Turner is one of those people.
At any rate, it is good that Turner is speaking out against the evil of BLM, and how it is an organization which only cares about black lives in name. In action, they do things which are actively against the progress of black people and their Marxist leaders are intent on pushing not a pro-equality agenda, but a pro-LGBT, Marxist agenda, which as mentioned previously, work against black people.
I hope and pray many others whom are still within the organization come to the realization that BLM is nothing but a Marxist communist organization which only serves to make matters worse for black people in the short and long-run.
“And you will know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.”
I have, for a long time, noted that the biggest enemy of black America is the Democrat Party, what with their insistence on committing genocide on the black race via abortions and seeking to eradicate the “weeds”. And one former NBA player, former No. 1 overall pick Kwame Brown, seemingly agrees with me.
In a video he took while driving in his car (I won't link to it since it's on Twitter), Brown sounded off on the Democrat party which was supposed to do things like “end racism” but has absolutely nothing to show for it, and calls out black people in the Democrat party for being hypocrites and attacking other black people if said black people express an opinion which does not align with the Democrat party’s.
“Motherf***ers crazy. Can’t talk one policy, can’t say one thing,” began the former No. 1 pick. “Look here, I said a long time ago. I got people calling my phone all the time. I got, I don’t know how the hell all these people get my number, the Democratic registry and all this s**t. ‘Are you voting for Joe Biden?’ I say, ‘well what is his policies?’ ‘He gon’ let you know. You can go online.’ I went online, I saw tax [inaudible] and I saw this and I saw that. I don’t [video and audio briefly cut out] for black America. What’s going on? ‘Oh, we going to talk about-‘ Oh, no, I ain’t, I’m not here to debate, I’ll call you back. Like s**t, I don’t want to hear that s**t. I’m not one of them scared n*groes. I’m me.”
“You get on the [phone] line and try to talk all smart, ‘well, ya know. I went to school and I-‘ oh yeah, you did, you went to school and all that, ok yeah,” Brown continued. “You been voting for the Democrats this whole time, well so have I and everybody else and what do we have to show for it? ‘Well, you know, they try to combat racism.’ Well why the f**k they ain’t do it in 60 years then?”
A very good question to ask for those who have not come to fully understand the aims and goals of the Democrat Party.
For one, the Democrat Party feeds off of the “racism” crap to get people to vote for them. They call their opponents racist, and the fake news media will back them up on this, so they get to confuse a bunch of people who still watch them and get them to think that if someone is a Republican or a conservative, they are automatically a racist.
But the other thing is that the Democrats are the ones PROPAGATING racism, while claiming to be fighting against it. Critical Race Theory, “Anti-racism”, etc. are all ploys which make them appear to be fighting against racism, but using racism and just directing it towards white people (and as I have explained before, it still hurts non-whites as well).
They make b.s. claims after b.s. claims of racism where none is to be found because they WANT to pretend as though we are still in the era of the Civil Rights Movement.
Fellow NBA player LeBron James, back in August of 2020, did another round of pretending to be sophisticated and educated by reading the first few pages of Malcolm X’s autobiography, and when asked about it, he said: “[Malcolm X was] a very smart man. His words & what was going on in the 1960s is what’s going on today, still…”
Whether he said that because he believes it or because it would advance his Leftist cause is irrelevant. That anyone would claim that we are in a similar situation, racially, today as we were back in the 1960s is utterly preposterous. Today, one can barely find examples of actual, real-life racism. It’s why so many minorities, for some reason, create racism hoaxes, such as sending themselves racist, threatening letters or messages.
There is so little racism in today’s age that people have to INVENT instances of overt racism. Now, that being said, it’s not like there aren’t actual racists and white supremacists out there – there are. I have seen some in some social media platforms and have actually debated with one who repeatedly claimed that Hitler did what was right, that the white race is superior to all others, and that the reason for majority-black cities like Chicago and Detroit being crapholes is because they are majority black, not because they keep voting for Democrats and implementing Democrat policies. So it’s not like racism doesn’t exist, but it is so infrequent as to be practically, for all intents and purposes, nonexistent.
To claim that America in 2021 is as racist (towards black people, because that is the context LeBron is using) as it was in the 1960s and prior is utterly ridiculous. And yet, that’s the claim he makes. They make themselves and others believe that racism is utterly rampant in the country, and bafflingly, that the best solution to anti-minority racism is anti-white racism (which, again, still negatively affects minorities in practice).
Racism flows through the Democrat party’s veins. They can’t live without it, but are aware enough that there are extremely negative connotations with that word, so they attempt to make themselves look like they are the opposite of racists and that they will combat racism, despite having both propagated anti-black racism and anti-white racism (and attempting to genuinely make the case that the latter is justified).
They haven’t done a damn thing about racism in 60 years because they 1) are the ones propagating that racism and 2) can benefit politically by the perceived existence of rampant racism.
In any case, Brown continued: “’Well, you know, it’s still work-‘ Man, I don’t want to hear that s**t. I don’t want to hear it. I’m up to here with all these excuses that people make… I’m just so tired. You fake woke n*gros man, y’all, y’all are the worst thing to the black community. You fake woke n****s won’t allow independent thought, because I don’t care who you vote for. I ain’t never cuss nobody out for voting for the Democratic party, I ain’t ever called anyone a coon or a disrespectful name, none of that. You mother***** are, you guys do that… y’all are the new version of the KKK. White folks don’t got to do nothing. You all are the new version of the KKK because you try to intimidate. You try to exile black folks and you try to cancel them because they don’t agree with you and that’s sad.”
“You act like you doing something righteous for doing that, ‘the Democratic Party is our people!’ So, you going to hurt another black man for the white people that you like? You a fool.”
And he’s absolutely right. When Republican Senator Tim Scott, who is black, gave a rebuttal to Occupier Biden’s address to Congress, a Democrat from Texas called him an “Oreo”, referring to how he was black on the outside, but supposedly “white” on the inside. Basically, accusing Scott of being a racist white man wearing black skin.
And that is FAR from the only example of a black Republican being called a coon, an Uncle Tom (despite the fact that Uncle Tom is the hero of that story) or generally a race traitor for simply holding a differing thought to the Democrat Party.
The Left still believes that black people are theirs to own, politically if not physically. Like I have said for a long time, the Left still has a slave-owner’s mentality when it comes to black people. Following their shameful defeat in the Civil War, where they attempted to keep their slaves and failed to do so, they sought to oppress the newly-freed blacks with the implementation of Jim Crow laws, segregation and “three-fifths” principles. Having lost their ability to continue openly treating black people like crap, they continued to implement Jim Crow-like policies to get black people into ghettos and make them financially dependent on the government, and particularly, the Democrat Party.
Oh, and let’s not forget the intimidation tactics of the KKK against blacks to get them to stop supporting Republicans and begin supporting Democrats.
They have gone from physically owning black people to financially owning them.
I’m glad that Kwame Brown is beginning to recognize this and speaking out about it. Too bad that those still in the NBA either are too afraid to speak out or have their pockets too deeply tied with Leftist causes to speak out against their masters.
“Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness.”
As I have said for a long time now, the key to ensuring the future of the country is in the kind of curricula that schools implement, and if we want to raise patriots, patriotic curricula must be implemented in said schools. This is something the Left has understood for even longer than the Right has, and currently has a monopoly on what children are taught. One school district in Upstate New York demonstrates this perfectly well, though they are far from the only example.
Fairport Central School District in Monroe County, Rochester, New York partnered with a “social justice” consulting firm in order to implement a new race-based curriculum which indoctrinates children into being massive racists and patting themselves on the back for believing they are “anti-racists.”
According to the curriculum, fourth-grade students must be able to “understand, discuss, and identify examples of racism, segregation, and anti-racism.” Students were also shown images of children protesting as an example of “anti-racism.”
What is perhaps most interesting to me, however, is their insistence that New York schools are the “most segregated schools in the country,” and they proceed to show slides of housing segregation maps of Monroe County, and the students were asked to explain how such “redlining” has affected where they live.
There are a few things I want to say about this. First of all, according to The Daily Wire, the redlining maps shown to students were from 1935, well before the Civil Rights Act eliminated segregation. So these people are, expectedly, outright lying and gaslighting their students, teaching them things which are demonstrably false.
Secondly, let’s pretend for a moment that they aren’t lying here and that Monroe County is a segregationist, racist county which separates whites from minorities both in housing and schooling. Do you want to know which political party largely rules in this county, let alone the entire state? No points for guessing right, as it should be as clear as the sky: the Democrat Party.
So assuming that these “teachers” are correct and that Monroe County still segregates students in school and people in houses, wouldn’t that be the fault of the Democrats whom have run that county for years?
Monroe County has voted for every Democrat presidential candidate since Bill Clinton in 1992, with Joe Biden having “won” (even in a largely blue county, I’m compelled to still put quotation marks around that word, even if I’m more willing to believe he legitimately won that county) the county with 60% of the vote (more than Obama by a percentage point, another reason I’m putting quotations around “won”).
If Monroe County is particularly racist when it comes to forced segregation of housing and schooling (again, a demonstrable lie due to the fact that the Civil Rights Act is a thing, though it’s easier to trick kids than adults), then that would mean it’s the fault of racist and segregationist Democrats who hold power there, no?
For the past nearly 14 years, a Democrat has been the governor of the state of New York, and since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, there have been 5 Democrat governors to 2 Republicans (technically 3, since a Republican was governor for a few years before and about a decade after the passage of this bill), with those Democrats amassing roughly 34 years (give or take some days) in power, compared to 22 years of Republican governorship in New York since the passage of the Civil Rights Act.
If in 34 total years, more than 10 of which are because of the current governor, Andrew Cuomo, the state of New York still has the “most segregated schools in the country,” exactly whose fault is that? Which party has been ruling that state for over a decade now and has had PLENTY of opportunity to “desegregate” the schools in New York?
Following this fictitious, asinine logic of these Leftist teachers, should the state of New York be sued for violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and segregating the schools? And if so, why aren’t lawyers going through with such lawsuits? Are lawyers in New York also racists and segregationists?
This is what I don’t get about these Leftists: they accuse THEIR OWN STATE of being racist and segregationist, yet completely ignore the fact that THEY ARE THE ONES who have been in control of the state for over a decade, and for a total of roughly 34 years since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. If what they are claiming about their state is true, logic would DEMAND that the people in charge bear responsibility for it, and thus, the Democrats ought to pay for their continued implementation of “systemic racism.”
This is what logic demands, yet this is not where they go at all. And worse still, they manage to trick a whole lot of people that those who have been in power whilst all this “injustice” has been going on should REMAIN in power and obtain even MORE of it as opposed to bearing any sort of blame or responsibility for the “injustice” which they claim.
This is generally how the Democrats operate: create a crisis and claim that they will be the ones to solve it. It doesn’t matter if that crisis is real, like the gas crisis, border crisis, etc. (both of which have come in the past few months, impressing even me at how fast Biden has screwed everything up) or if it is entirely fictional, such as a “segregation” crisis in schooling and housing or a “climate” crisis. They create this crap and pose themselves as the only ones with the ability to solve them, real or not.
It’s nothing but fearmongering in the best circumstance and abusive, Mafia-style coercion in the worst circumstance.
In any case, the Left understands perfectly well that the future of the country will be dictated by whomever is able to affect the hearts and minds of children. If the Left can hold a monopoly on “education”, they will raise entire generations of Marxist communists. The proof is in the fact that they have been doing this for the last 60 years and we have young people actually believing communism is in any way a good thing.
You have young people believing that gender is fluid and not grounded on biological sexual fact, and with curricula like this one, you will have young people believing that some people ought to be treated differently or worse because of their skin color. Used to be that that would be considered “racism” and it would be if the target of such discrimination is not white, but if the target is white, it’s not only not discouraged, but outright encouraged as “anti-racism”.
Let us pray to God that we will be able to undo the deep and serious damage that the Left has created which has driven this country into the arms of the devil.
2 Timothy 3:5
“Having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people.”
It is always delightful to see the Left going after people on their own side for one asinine reason or another.
In a piece titled “Justin Fields And The Double Standard Of Black Quarterback Prospects”, ESPN’s Martenzie Johnson alleges that the main reason as to why Justin Fields’ draft stock is falling is because of his race.
“When it comes to black quarterbacks in particular,” Johnson writes, “the NFL has long gone out of its way to keep the position as white as the painted yard lines on the field.”
Now, this might be the point where one would expect me to defend the NFL from this nonsensical “racism” attack, but I won’t do that.
The simple reason is that I have no reason or intention to defend the NFL, which invests heavily in the woke kneeling crap and the blatant disrespecting of the United States. It does everything it can to appeal to the Left, submitting to people who either couldn’t care less about football or only want to see the league be destroyed because it’s “barbaric” or because, at one point at least, it appealed to conservatives. That is the reason I even titled this article the way that I did: ESPN, a blue, Leftist sports “news” organization is attacking the NFL, a now-blue, Leftist sports league that cares more about “social justice” that never pans out over delivering a good on-the-field product.
At any rate, Johnson continued with his racism allegations, writing: “We can leave the draft evaluating to the experts, but with zero explanation, two white quarterbacks with comparable or lesser resumes than Fields were suddenly can’t-miss picks. Whether that is true is irrelevant; it’s more about what happened to Fields since he declared for the draft that exposes the draft process – and the entire football-industrial complex – for the, let’s say, racial institution that it is.”
“Quarterbacks are expected to be smart, rational decision-makers who command a team and act as the de facto coach on the field. Accuracy and strong arms are a plus, but it mostly comes down to what’s between your ears rather than any other physical attribute. As the authors of The Bell Curve would have you believe, few Black men possess those attributes.”
While I have zero intention of defending the NFL, I will at least point out why the racism allegation is baseless in this case and give a possible explanation as to why Fields’ draft stock is dropping (not that it’s all that relevant for the purposes of this article, but I feel like I should cover this).
First of all, there are plenty of black quarterbacks in the NFL who are superstars. The highest paid QB in league history is Patrick Mahomes, a black quarterback for the Kansas City Chiefs. The second-highest paid QB in league history is Dak Prescott, a black quarterback for the Dallas Cowboys. Apart from them, a number of black quarterbacks are starters in the NFL: Cam Newton, Teddy Bridgewater, Russel Wilson, Lamar Jackson, Deshaun Watson, Kyler Murray, and others.
A lot of those QBs were taken later in the draft, but for a number of reasons.
Mahomes and Deshaun Watson were taken with the 10th and 12th picks respectively, not because people thought they were bad (people generally don’t think a first-round pick is bad), but because there were few relative QBs of this caliber in this draft. The only other QB taken ahead of them, at the second spot, was Mitch Trubisky, who is white but also pretty good (not as good as Mahomes, but still good, outside of injuries).
Furthermore, the NFL draft has 7 rounds, naturally with a lot of players being taken in those rounds. Sometimes, good QBs, like Russell Wilson, fly under the radar and get drafted in later rounds, and then turn out to be great prospects. This is the case not just for black QBs but also for white QBs, as is the case for one of the best QBs of all time, Tom Brady, who was drafted in the 6th round at the 199th spot. 198 people were taken ahead of Brady, though only six were QBs, which brings me to another reason for talented QBs to be taken later:
Teams often draft based on need, as opposed to talent. If a team has a good or great QB, they have less reason to draft one, even a great one (unless they believe the young QB would be better for them) and would look to fill a different position.
As far as Fields goes, one reason for his stock to fall is that teams are looking deeper at what he does on the field, and they notice that he tends to hold the ball for a little too long because his offensive line is very good and allows him time and room to breathe, which not all NFL teams are capable of doing. The bad teams tend to be the ones who draft higher, and they tend to have turnstile offensive lines, incapable of protecting their QB. Andrew Luck was a prime example of what can happen to a great QB who is left unprotected by their line.
But outside of the on-the-field reasons as to why Fields might be taken lower or why other, white QBs might be taken higher, my overall concern here is not to defend the NFL or even the teams in and of themselves. I delight in the fact that ESPN is attacking people on its own side, or at least, people who submit to the Leftist, woke mob rule.
It demonstrates that there is absolutely zero reason to capitulate to such people, because in their eyes, one can never be woke enough. Like the devil, they point to mistakes and stains in people’s past, and accentuate them and pretend as though that is still the case in the present.
Much like their insistence that this country is “racist” because of its tainted past regarding segregation and slavery (as if this is the only country in the world which practiced that vile thing and as though their Leftist ancestors weren’t the ones DEFENDING those very things), they insist that the NFL itself is racist because it has few black quarterbacks overall. Further, they insist that the reason for that is the league attempting some sort of miniature slave-owning practice, whereby the leader of a team, the QB, is the white master of the mostly black people that make up the rest of the team.
The Left is so fixated on the slave plantations they were forced to give up that they attack the NFL as having a slave owners’ mentality because that is the very mentality they still possess.
They project their own desires onto other people and claim them to be putrid, but it is precisely what they want for themselves.
They accuse others of racism to masquerade their own racist behaviors, both past and present, and to exculpate any future racist behaviors. For example, that very ESPN article. By claiming that the only reason Justin Fields’ draft stock is going down is because of his skin color, the author alludes to the idea that white QBs slated to go ahead of Fields are only up there because of their own skin color and not because of their skill and talent. Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if Johnson were to admit this himself, as they tend to not care about anti-white racism at best and seek to perpetrate it at worst.
In the 2021 draft, there are three QBs who are slated to go ahead of Fields: Trevor Lawrence, one of the best prospects in the draft and shown to likely go 1st overall, Zach Wilson, and Trey Lance. Of these, only Lawrence and Wilson are white, with Lance being black, and apart from Lawrence, Fields is close to the other QB prospects.
Where he actually goes will be up to the team that drafts him, of course, but to allude to the idea that Fields’ stock is going down because of nothing other than his race, when there is ANOTHER BLACK QB SHOWN TO BE AHEAD OF HIM, is utter nonsense.
Again, don’t really care as far as the NFL is concerned because I refuse to defend them. Sure, they are racist, what does it matter to me whether or not that’s true? They have been trying, for years, to capitulate to a woke Leftist mob that seeks to destroy them no matter what they do. A smart league would recognize that it shouldn’t be trying to submit to a mob that seeks to devour them whole and would begin to fight back against it, but I can’t expect the NFL, at this point, to be all that intelligent.
ESPN can write all the allegations and accusations that they want, baseless or not, against the league and I wouldn’t really care one wit, not just because I never really cared for football to begin with, either. The NFL is bleeding when it comes to audience, both in TV ratings and in stadium attendance (the latter having been a big problem even BEFORE the lockdowns).
If the Left wants the NFL to crash and burn, so be it. A league unwilling to defend itself against its aggressors hardly deserves to be afloat to begin with.
2 Corinthians 2:11
“So that we would not be outwitted by Satan; for we are not ignorant of his designs.”
Ironically, on the day of Derek Chauvin’s “trial” (it was not a fair trial given all the intervention and threats by Maxine Waters, Joe Biden, etc.), a black 16-year-old was killed by a police officer because she was visibly trying to stab another black girl following a police call.
Released body-cam footage depicted what happened, and clearly shows Ma’Khia Bryant wielding a knife and in the process of beginning to stab another girl on the scene. However, before she was able to do so, she was shot by a police officer at the scene and later pronounced dead.
Because the officer was white and the girl was black, initially, Leftists around the country raised the same bullcrap hell they tend to do with these situations, assuming that this was the result of racism (the officer visibly saved the life of one or more black people at the scene) and just “another” example of police brutality in America.
NBA star LeBron James even tweeted “YOU’RE NEXT #ACCOUNTABILITY” with a picture of the officer of this case, before he received serious backlash and took it down (he has yet to apologize and has tried to play the victim, like the little b-word that he is).
And with the release of the body-cam footage, ABC’s “60 Minutes”, which is infamous for editing and distorting videos to fit their narrative, did exactly that and tried to edit out the knife from Bryant’s hand, attempting to make it look like a totally unjustified police killing.
However, others were less quick to judge the situation. CNN’s Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo surprisingly admitted that the killing, while tragic (which it is), was justified.
“We have to be fair about what happens when police arrive at scenes. It is tragic that it’s a 16-year-old girl. Just as it is tragic that it’s a 13-year-old in Chicago (referencing Adam Toledo, who was an armed individual shot by police). When police are chasing people, they don’t know how old they are. And they don’t run and say, ‘How old are you?’ ‘Oh, I’m 13.’ You don’t know that. Or, ‘I’m 16’.”
“When they roll up on the scene, they see people tussling around. Someone has a knife. And their job is to protect and serve. Every life on that scene. And if they see someone who is in the process of taking a life, what is that decision, what decision do they have to make?”
They even went so far as to defend the use of a lethal weapon as opposed to a taser: “Tasers, they don’t always connect. So, you’ve got to get two prongs or what have you, and it has to connect to whatever. I see it, if the woman in the pink (the potential victim of stabbing) was my sister, niece, wife, whatever, you have to make a decision. Is one life on that scene more valuable than another? And if someone is trying to take a life, on that scene, do you protect the life of the person trying to take the life, or do you protect the life of the person whose life is in imminent danger at that point?”
Cuomo said: “I feel for the officer. You can hear it in his voice. When he said – the man on the side was saying, ‘You shot my baby, you shot my baby.’ And he said, ‘She had a knife. She went right at her.’ You know, this is something that he’s going to have to live with also… The analysis is only of the instant circumstances. I’m saying, if you want to have this contextual conversation that people seem to want to have about ‘what else we can do, people fight with knives all the time, do we really need cops? The answer is no, learn how to control your kids, and don’t be so violent and we won’t need cops.’ But that’s not our reality. And cops get called to our lives all the time for the worst situations.”
When the guy who said that “God doesn’t judge gay people” and the guy that pretended to have the Chinese coronavirus for sympathy while he went out partying in New York come to the agreement that the officer did the RIGHT thing, you know that there is really little reason for Leftists to be attacking the officer.
Because, as one can see from the footage, Bryant tried to stab someone. She tried to stab, and in all likelihood kill, another person.
It is a bit more understandable to be irritated before the facts come out about what happened in this case, but it is an absolute moron and degenerate who would still defend the girl knowing what we know about this case.
Bryant was a would-be murderer. Everyone trying to defend her, which at this point is LeBron James and the Biden administration, is trying to defend Bryant’s attempt to kill another person.
Which, unfortunately, is not all that surprising, to be honest. These people, who pretend to care so, so much about black lives, NEVER bring up black-on-black crime. When talking about someone like Secoriea Turner, who was killed by BLM terrorists who took over a burned down Wendy’s, she is only talked about in reference to gun crime as a whole to attempt to disarm Americans, not as a victim of THE LEFT’S OWN CHAOS AND DISCORD.
And this is without even mentioning someone like Robert Howard, who was kidnapped and executed by a police officer, but his story was not told and his name was not encouraged to be remembered because the cop that killed him was black himself.
And even recently, a 7-year-old black girl was killed in a McDonald’s drive-thru in Chicago, and her father was in critical condition as well. Jaslyn Adams was killed in gun-control heavy Chicago, likely by black shooters (admittedly, the identities of the shooters are unknown, but a 7-year-old girl killed in Chicago ought to spark the same sort of outrage from people like LeBron as the justified shooting of a would-be killer, at least. It’s still a black life that was lost). Yet, her name is largely unknown and no one is attempting to make it known, at least on the Left.
The only kind of situation that gives way for a Leftist narrative is when a white police officer is involved with the death of a black person. It doesn’t matter if that person is visibly and clearly a threat to the life of either the officer or another person (even if that other person was black themselves). Apparently, if it’s a white officer pulling the trigger against a white would-be killer, it’s unjust and a sign of racism.
To their credit, Lemon and Cuomo recognized that this was a justified shooting and that the officer did the right thing in prioritizing the life of the would-be victim over the life of Bryant, so I have nothing bad to say about them in this instance (a rare occurrence), but other Leftists like ABC News’ “60 Minutes” and celebrities like LeBron James are being stupid at best and degenerates at worst.
Because, like I said earlier, they are attempting to defend and justify the stabbing of one black person by another black person. “Let the teenager stab the other one” is what they are basically saying.
I have asked this before in prior articles, but it bears repeating: Does it sound like these people think that black lives actually matter? Or does it sound like they only matter when they are taken, justifiably or not, by a white officer? And if that’s the case, one can hardly say that they believe their life mattered.
George Floyd’s life didn’t matter to BLM. His death did. Ma’Khia Bryant’s life didn’t matter to BLM. Her death did. Michael Brown’s life didn’t matter to the Left. His death did. Freddy Gray’s life didn’t matter to the Left. His death did.
And by contrast, Robert Howard’s life, which was taken by a ghoulish cop, didn’t matter to BLM and even his death didn’t matter because his life was taken by a black cop. The wrong kind of cop, in their minds. Secoriea Turner’s life didn’t matter to BLM (evidenced by the fact it was taken by BLM), and her death didn’t matter to them either, only insofar as the Left could try and use it to attack legal gun ownership. Jaslyn Adams’ life didn’t matter to BLM and her death doesn’t matter to them either because it’s not a white cop that took her life, but likely, fellow black people. Even if it was white people who killed her, it won’t matter as much as if it had been white officers.
But in any case, this episode goes to show why waiting on the facts of a case is crucial. Facts matter, and the facts of this case are clear enough for even DON LEMON AND CHRIS CUOMO to agree that the officer did the right thing. For those who jump the gun and make assumptions, or even stupefyingly double-down, they get egg on their face about the assumptions they had made. Even if LeBron is acting like a b-word, the facts of the matter still got him to take down the original tweet which, frankly, painted a target on the officer’s back.
He won’t apologize because entitled people believe they are infallible or are above apologizing when they genuinely messed up (he demands accountability for this case, but makes no similar demand to the CCP which is keeping millions of Uyghurs and Christians in concentration camps), but he at least had enough wherewithal to recognize that he should at least take that original post down (after suffering enough backlash, at least).
Waiting for the facts is infinitely more important than initial emotional reactions to things.
“A hot-tempered man stirs up strife, but he who is slow to anger quiets contention.”
The only thing I would add to that idea in the title is that BLM, apart from being a fraud organization that doesn’t care even a little bit about black people, is also a terrorist organization, given how often they incite riots which often lead to someone’s death. Blacks lives do not matter to the organization which calls itself “Black Lives Matter”. This has been obvious for a long time, but now, even a victim’s mother is acknowledging this in no unclear terms.
Breonna Taylor is a relatively well-known name, as she was the victim of her ex-boyfriend’s idiotic firefight with Louisville Police, and was made a martyr for opportunistic Leftists who wish to exploit her death for political gain.
BLM was seemingly supposed to have raised money for Taylor’s family, but Taylor’s mother, Tamika Palmer, has called them out for having “never done a damn thing for us,” calling the organization a fraud and money-grabbers.
“I have never personally dealt with BLM Louisville and personally have found them to be fraud, Attica Scott another fraud,” Palmer wrote in a now-removed Facebook post. “I could walk in a room full of people who claim to be here for Breonna’s family who don’t even know who I am, I’ve watched y’all raise money on behalf of Breonna’s family who has never done a damn thing for us nor have we needed it or asked so talk about fraud.” She also continued, claiming that BLM has “lost focus” of what they are trying to accomplish.
I personally have to disagree with that last sentiment, as BLM has not “lost focus” of what they are trying to accomplish. What they are trying to accomplish is simply something different than what they advertise. Supposedly, they want to end police brutality, help black people, etc., etc., but that’s just a front. As I have pointed out multiple times in the past, their “About Us” page used to contain nothing but far-Left Marxist garbage that had NOTHING to do with keeping black people safe or creating a more equal and just culture. It was just pushing LGBT crap down people’s throats, particularly transgender crap, which the VAST majority of black people are generally against, and overall pushing Marxist class-warfare crap as well.
BLM is a self-admittedly (given many of its leaders) Marxist organization which seeks to profit off of discourse.
One example of this is Patrisse Khan-Cullors, one of BLM’s co-founders, who recently bought four luxurious homes for $3.2 million, which are in predominantly white neighborhoods.
This, rightly, leads people to question the validity of the entire movement, as the actions of its leaders often reflect the attitude and culture of the entire organization. Cullors bought FOUR luxury homes, likely from the money she has raised through her organization. She is a self-described Marxist and it shows: Marxists tend to demand others make sacrifices that they themselves would be unwilling to make.
As I have said many times in the past, under communism, the 1% FLOURISHES. It is under communism that the gap between the rich and the poor is the widest. Those who are either in the government (specifically, high places in the government) or in high places in companies under the government or allied with the government are the ONLY ones who get to enjoy comfort and wealth.
There are only two kinds of communists out there: Those who are in it to profit (which is considerably ironic), such as Cullors, Kaepernick, etc., and those who are too stupid to profit from it and genuinely believe in the edicts, teachings, beliefs, etc.
The former are always the ones who take advantage of the latter, because the latter are so easy to take advantage of. They are the “useful idiots” of the Lenin, Mao, Hitler, Mussolini, Obama, Cullors-types, who go out and create chaos, pushing for the crap that is nothing but fake and idiotic, and help raise funds for those who are controlling them.
They are little more than those trained monkeys who dance on the street, and even that is arguable, as the dancing monkeys don’t go around causing billions of dollars-worth of damage to private and public property.
So for Palmer to be calling them out as frauds is entirely correct. They ARE frauds. At least, if you believe they are trying to do what they claim they are trying to do. If you believe BLM cares about black lives and is doing whatever it can to help black people, then yes, you would believe they are frauds, because they do not accomplish what you believe they set out to do.
The charge that they are a money-grabbing organization is true, no matter how you look at it. If you believe BLM is genuinely trying to improve black lives and protect black lives, you still see them being money-grabbers and the leaders profiting off of the anguish and anger of people who believe(d) in them. If you understand that BLM is nothing but a Marxist terrorist organization that seeks to exploit situations and outright lie about them (much like the rest of the Left does), you still see them as a money-grabbing organization exploiting the people who support them for their own personal gain.
Now, I feel it’s necessary to point out that not everyone in BLM-related organizations is seeking to make a profit from this. Those would, of course, be the latter kind of communists – those who are too stupid to profit from the grift that is communism and actually believe in what it claims.
One such person is Hawk Newsome, whom I have previously talked about when he went on Martha MacCallum’s show and presented himself as a faux-Christian, arguing that Jesus was a “black radical revolutionary”, and who recently called for an internal investigation of Cullors for her real estate purchases.
He said: “If you go around calling yourself a socialist, you have to ask how much of her own personal money is going to charitable causes. It’s really sad because it makes people doubt the validity of the movement and overlook the fact that it’s the people that carry this movement.”
First, socialists aren’t charitable. Like, at all. They claim they do this and that to help this person or these people, but they always give a MINISCULE amount of their income to charity. For example, there is Bernie Sanders, who, as I wrote in a 2019 article, only gave LESS THAN ONE PERCENT of his income to charity. He had made over a million dollars in 2018, and reportedly gave just a little over $10k to charity, or less than one percent of his income. For a self-avowed socialist, he sure cares pathetically little about charity, so no one tell me that socialists and charity go hand-in-hand.
Second, this is not the only thing that leads people to doubt the validity of the movement. The fact that BLM terrorists (alongside ANTIFA, another Marxist terrorist organization) destroyed largely black-owned businesses in black neighborhoods throughout last year’s riots showcases how little they care about the lives of black people.
Black business owners saw their businesses, which were already struggling mightily because of the idiotic lockdowns, being physically looted, burned, or generally destroyed. How, exactly, does this demonstrate that black lives matter to BLM?
Matter of fact, it’s precisely BECAUSE OF THIS CRAP that I began to call them simply by their initials “BLM” because they don’t even deserve to call themselves “Black Lives Matter”. They don’t care about black lives, so to call them that only spreads falsehoods and lies.
Third, and finally, it might be “the people” who carry the movement, but those people are the useful idiots I talked about earlier, and the second type of communist: those who are too stupid to profit from the grift and who genuinely believe in what they are calling for. That doesn’t make the movement any better, because it’s simply the exploitation of the ignorant and misinformed. It’s what all communist organizations have done since the ideology was created.
Tamika Palmer is 100% correct in her assessment that BLM is fraudulent. Again, they certainly are to those who believe or have believed that they in any way cared about black people. They are profiteers and exploiters. They are everything they claim capitalist companies and organizations are: for-profit, selfish, and oppressors of the lower classes.
“Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.’”
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...