The most recent breaking story circulating out there is that new text messages between FBI agents Lisa Page and Peter Strzok reveal that then-President Barack Obama wanted to “know everything we’re doing.”
 
According to the Daily Wire: “The Senate suggests that this text was not about the Trump-Russia collusion investigation, but rather about the Hillary Clinton probe, which had not yet been closed.”
 
This makes sense, since this text was sent on September 2nd, 2016. Well before the election.
 
Another text, written on September 28th, 2016 by Strzok, says: “Got called up to Andy’s [McCabe] earlier… hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s atty to sdny [Southern District of New York], includes a ton of material from spouse [Abedin]. Sending team up tomorrow to review… this will never end.”
 
And the Daily Wire tells us that “the FBI didn’t inform Congress until a month later that they were re-opening their email investigation into Clinton.”
 
Another text depicts Strzok calling Virginians “ignorant hillbillies” for not electing McCabe’s wife to the Senate.
 
And another text written by Page on November 13th, 2016, 5 days after Trump’s election victory, says: “I bought all the president’s men. Figure I need to brush up on Watergate.”
 
Without much context, it looks like Page was looking to find a way to impeach Trump, if she mentioned Watergate. I can’t be too sure, since by this time, Obama was still President and she could simply be talking about defending him or at least Hillary since her situation is closer to a Watergate situation (in reality, it’s 33,000 times worse).
 
The Daily Wire notes that the most “shocking material here is obviously the news that President Obama wanted to be updated on the Clinton investigation – particularly when Obama stated on national television in April 2016 that he did ‘not talk to the Attorney General [Lynch] about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line and always have maintained it. I guarantee it. I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department or the FBI, not just in this case but in any case. Period'.”
 
Those words will become Obama’s version of “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” He’s blatantly lying on air and his words give us reason to doubt him. This being Obama, we always had reason to doubt him, but now it’s clear that he was lying through his teeth. It’s all about language.
 
His insistence on making that point is what draws us to suspect his words (aside from the fact that it’s Obama who is speaking the words).
 
Now, lying to the media is not unlawful by any means. Democrats do it all the time. But while it’s not unlawful for him to lie to the media or even to ask to be updated about any case (the POTUS has every right to do as much), it does point out the corruption of his administration.
 
He said he wasn’t involved in the Hillary investigation but he certainly was. Comey said he wasn’t investigating Trump but he certainly was. These people are being exposed for their corruption left and right and I’m savoring this moment so much.
 
Of course, that’s not gonna matter whatsoever to the media and the Left. But it doesn’t matter what they think. THEY ARE PART OF IT!
 
Now, let’s return to the main topic of this article.
 
It’s clear that Obama was involved in the Hillary investigation and worked with the FBI to determine an end to it without justice.
 
So we’ve answered the first part of the title question. He most certainly helped Hillary to avoid serving time for her crimes. But now comes the second question. Why did he help her?
 
Did he honestly think she was going to become President? Was he afraid of her? Did he fear what she would do to him if he didn’t help her? We already know that Obama isn’t exactly Hillary’s favorite person in the world. After all, he’s the one that essentially robbed her of the Democratic nomination in 2008. That election was supposed to be hers. She was supposed to become the first female President. And, frankly, that was the election she had the best chance to do it. She was a rock star in the Democrat Party and the Republicans offered very weak competition.
 
After the economic collapse of the late 2000s under George W. Bush, adding that to the fact that Bush was a heavily hated President and the GOP offered peanuts in terms of good candidates, 2008 was the Democrats’ for the taking and Hillary thought herself to be the woman for the job.
 
But then came a charming African-American 2-year Senator rookie by the name of Barack Hussein Obama. For all that Hillary had going for herself back then, Obama easily overshadowed her. Obama was charming. He was very Leftist. And most of all, he was black. So, the Democrat Party abandoned Hillary and backed Obama all the way to his election and beyond.
 
No doubt, Hillary felt robbed of something she felt was rightly hers. So robbed, she felt, that the next time she would run, she had to make sure she would win and not give someone else any sort of chance to do so.
 
But 2008 wasn’t the only time Obama essentially destroyed her. The other time came when he named her to be his Secretary of State. He knew Hillary wasn’t very bright so he knowingly (not that he’d admit it) set her up for failure.
 
No doubt he let out a good chuckle when Hillary presented the Russian PM at the time with a red button that was supposed to say “reset” in Russian, but instead said “overcharged.”
 
It’s not the typo that I want to talk about here. It’s the ridiculous gesture by Clinton that should be the main focus. I mean, c’mon. An actual “reset” button? Lame… Sorry, that’s the millennial in me.
 
But it’s not just the ridiculous button that further damaged her image. Mostly, it was the tens of thousands of e-mails that almost entirely destroyed her. Without that, there wouldn’t have been any investigation.
 
Heck, without her being Secretary of State, there wouldn’t have been an investigation.
 
So Obama has somehow managed to destroy her chances of becoming President in two separate elections – inadvertently or not.
 
But of course, at the time, none of us knew for an absolute fact that she would end up losing an election that has been so clearly rigged in her favor. So he tried to help her avoid being the first President to be sworn into office behind bars (a joke, of course. Prison would’ve meant she would be replaced as the Democrat candidate).
 
But the question remains unanswered. Why did he help her? Was he actually afraid she would win and she would destroy him? If he was afraid she would win, why not finish the job and destroy her? Why not obliterate the Clintons in the Democrat hierarchy and replace it with his own family?
 
Am I simply overestimating the power that he had? Or am I overestimating the amount of balls that he had? Did he actually believe she would maintain his legacy? That she would effectively be his third-term in office, just as H.W. Bush was supposed to be Reagan’s? Am I overestimating his level of intelligence, then?
 
Because the reality of the situation comes down to three choices. Either he didn’t have the power we thought he had (which is not likely the case, given the amount of corruption in the FBI, DOJ and other federal agencies), he didn’t have the spine we thought he had or he didn’t have the intelligence we thought he had.
 
I can’t say for certain which is the right option. There may even be another option that I’m missing. All I know, and all we now know, is that Obama saved Hillary from going to jail for the massive threat to national security she posed due to the e-mails.
 
Of course, we’re likely to be finding more things out as we go along. If it’s possible to have learned all the corruption going on within the FBI and DOJ, it’s certainly possible to discover the answers to these questions. Whether or not we will depends strictly on God. He has let us know all we know and without Him, we know nothing. And if anyone truly knows the answers to these questions, it’s the Lord God Almighty.
 
Proverbs 2:6
“For the Lord gives wisdom; from His mouth come knowledge and understanding.”
 
Author: Freddie Drake Marinelli.

Remember when you were a kid and would be in trouble for something and you just lied and lied about it? Remember how you would feel about being caught in your own lies? Well, that’s exactly how Nancy Pelosi felt during an interview with CNN’s Chris Cuomo.
 
The House voted to release a four-page memo outlining Obama’s DOJ and FBI minions abusing a surveillance program so that they could spy on Donald Trump during his transition to becoming President.
 
This memo presents a MASSIVE threat to the Democrats and Obama himself, so I’m not surprised to see Nancy Pelosi being nervous and stuttering at every sentence while talking with Chris Cuomo about it. Now, if she was this nervous when talking with Democrat-friendly Chris Cuomo, imagine how she would’ve felt talking with someone who might actually put some pressure on her.
 
To Chris’ credit, he did ask some proper questions about the memo when he needed to (and ignored the lying and b.s. Pelosi would spew, but that’s to be expected of him). But even with questions that make sense, Pelosi still felt nervous merely discussing it.
 
She would often say that releasing this memo would be a matter of national security even though Obama himself declassified top secret info about Bush’s fight with terrorism. When he did that, the New York Times reported that “exhaustive details about interrogation methods used by the Central Intelligence Agency could lead to a flood of new disclosures about secret Bush administration operations against Al Qaeda.”
 
THAT actually put U.S. officials at risk and THAT was a matter of national security that the Democrats simply didn’t care about. THIS release of the memo is not a matter of national security, it’s a matter of Democrat security. This memo will largely serve to further destroy Obama’s legacy and standing (with independents, perhaps, but it likely won’t do much with brainwashed liberals). This could lead to a lot of arrests in the future, perhaps including Obama himself.
 
So you can see why the Democrats don’t want the American people to see this memo. Pelosi claims it’s a matter of national security, even though it’s not. She also claims that people simply won’t understand what the memo means and says. That’s how little she thinks of regular citizens.
 
No, it’s likely that most people won’t understand all the legalistic aspects of the memo, but we’re smart enough to recognize a general theme: abuse of power and illegal espionage on an American citizen and President-elect.
 
Besides, it’s only four pages long. Even if it’s filled with all sorts of lawyer talk, I will still likely figure out what the memo is saying.
 
Back when Paul Manafort was indicted, I read the charges that Robert Mueller presented. I’ll be the first to admit I didn’t understand absolutely everything. I’m not a lawyer, after all. But I could understand what the charges were and that they had nothing to do with Russian collusion.
 
Once I read the memo, I might not understand absolutely everything it says, but I’ll be able to recognize what it’s talking about and what illegal deeds Obama and his Justice Department did during Trump’s transition to the White House.
 
And once I read it, myself, alongside a lot of other conservative news outlets, will be able to simplify things if needed. Though, I don’t think the people who will read the memo will be dumb enough to not see what it’s talking about (again, perhaps except brainwashed liberals who will keep their minds closed when reading it and believe it all to be lies).
 
Regardless, returning to Pelosi, it’s clear as day that she’s very nervous about this memo being released to the public. Just as Ephesians 5:13 says: “But everything exposed by the light becomes visible, for everything that is illuminated becomes a light itself.”
 
What happens in the dark will come to the light. The secrets of the Obama DOJ will be revealed for all who have eyes to see; for all who have ears to hear.
 
Now, I should clarify something. It’s not the fact that the American people will see the memo that might lead to consequences for Obama and those involved in the illegal activities detailed in the memo. Punishment would likely occur despite the American people knowing about it.
 
That’s not what Pelosi is nervous about here. It’s not the fact that Obama and his Justice Department broke the law that worries her. She’s a career politician with a $30 million net worth. Like President Truman once said: “You can’t get rich in politics unless you’re a crook.”
 
So it’s not the illegality of Obama’s actions that worries her. It’s the fact that people will KNOW that he did it that worries her. It’s the fact that it will be exposed to the general public.
 
It’s the fact that this memo will severely hurt the Democrats’ chances at retaking Congress in 2018. If it becomes general knowledge that Obama broke the law to spy on a political opponent, it will reflect badly upon Democrats in the future.
 
This memo can easily become a weapon for Republican candidates to expose the corruption of the Democrats (granted, they have a lot of other examples of this, but this becomes yet another one, and a big one, at that).
 
The reason Pelosi is so nervous about it is because this will only further destroy the Democrat Party. If used right, no Democrat should even retain a seat in 2018 (except in loony California, perhaps), let alone gain any.
 
Public opinion about them will likely diminish, even within their own base (Bernie supporters already thought Hillary was crooked, so this certainly doesn’t help anyone in the Establishment).
 
This memo will largely serve to further rip the Democrat Party to shreds.
 
Ephesians 5:13
“But everything exposed by the light becomes visible, for everything that is illuminated becomes a light itself.”
 
Author: Freddie Drake Marinelli.
​

As you know, once Presidents leave the White House, Presidential library plans begin and new buildings flourish in the location desired by the respective President. George W. Bush’s Presidential library is located in Dallas, Texas. Bill Clinton’s is in Little Rock, Arkansas. Ronald Reagan’s is in Simi Valley, California. It’s really no surprise that Barack Obama’s will be in Chicago, Illinois. Specifically, on the University of Chicago’s campus.
 
The funny thing is that, according to Campus Reform: “more than 150 University of Chicago professors and lecturers are protesting a ‘socially regressive’ plan to build an ‘Obama Center’ next to the school’s campus.”
 
I don’t think I’ve ever heard such harsh words spoken by college professors about anything related to Barack Obama. Don’t misunderstand, they still want the Obama Center in Chicago, but they do have concerns about where exactly the former President intends to have it built.
 
In a letter signed by faculty members, the professors write: “First, there are concerns that the Obama Center as currently planned will not provide the promised development or economic benefits to the neighborhood.”
 
Gee, Obama failing to deliver on a promise? That’s new.
 
The letter continues: “Because the current plans place the Center next to the Museum of Science and Industry and across the street from the University of Chicago campus, there is no available adjacent land in which to start a new business, set up a new café or restaurant, [or] bring another cultural center to the neighborhood.”
 
Putting aside the fact that I’m surprised these college professors care at all about the possibility of a new business starting there, it really seems like the Obama Center will really inconvenience the community in multiple ways. After 8 years of heavily inconveniencing the country (and that’s putting it lightly), he seemingly is looking for smaller ways in which he can inconvenience people he couldn’t care less about.
 
But the letter is not done. “At a time of increasing complexity and pressure in urban life, Chicago should be dedicated to preserving our public parks as open areas for relaxation and play for all its citizens.” This in particular criticizes the intrusion the Center will have on the neighboring public parks: the Midway Plaisance and Jackson Park.
 
The professors also criticize plans to construct an above-ground parking garage which takes up some of the space of the parks, protesting that although "public lands are being given away, all the profits from this parking lot will go to the Obama Foundation. None of the funds will go back to the City to improve train lines and public transportation infrastructure. Overall, this is a socially regressive plan.”
 
According to the Associated Press, the Foundation has opted to drop the plans for the above-ground garage. Instead, it will be underground. And, of course, there will be a parking fee.
 
The letter makes one final criticism of the Obama Center by saying: “Finally, it is the taxpayers of Chicago who are going to be forced to pay hundreds of millions of dollars for this project… The required widening of Lake Shore Drive alone is estimated to be over $100 million.” The entire project is estimated to cost half a billion dollars.
 
The letter ends by saying: “We are concerned that rather than becoming a bold vision for urban living in the future it will soon become an object-lesson in the mistakes of the past… We would be pleased to support the Obama Center if the plan genuinely promoted economic development in our neighborhoods and respected our precious public urban parks.”
 
When did any Obama plan genuinely promote any sort of economic development anywhere in the country? We had 8 years of a terrible economy that was on life support. Obama didn’t help the national economy, how could you expect him to help a local economy? How can you expect him to care whatsoever about it?
 
Of course, these college professors are liberals themselves, so they have certain expectations that Obama isn’t the incarnation of Satan.
 
Regardless, it fascinates me that even after leaving the White House, Obama can still find ways to screw people, albeit in a far smaller scale. He no longer has Presidential power. He does have power, but not nearly as much as he did before. No doubt that’s a fact that irks him.
 
Now, the letter only addresses the fact that it will be a massive economic and urban inconvenience. And it is important to establish that. But you also have to look at the very design of the building. Ben Shapiro said that it looks like a Chinese takeout container. To me, it looks like a poorly-designed and borderline-useless candle. It also sort of looks like an ancient Mayan structure.
 
I’m no architect, but I do have functioning eyes. The Obama Center is an eye-sore. Not only is it economically inconvenient, but it’s honestly rather ugly to look at.
 
Just another way Obama looks to mess with people he doesn’t care about. And even though the population of Chicago is largely liberal, especially the University of Chicago, I can’t help but feel sorry for them. They made very good points on why it shouldn’t be where it is, but I also feel sorry that it’s something these people will have to look at every time they’re in the area.
 
Unfortunately, it’s unlikely that the Obama Foundation will care enough to move the site somewhere more economically advantageous for the city.
 
1 Thessalonians 5:22
“Reject every kind of evil.”
 
Author: Freddie Drake Marinelli.

If you’re a long-time reader of these articles, you know quite well how I’m not very fond of just about any poll. Often times, polls are inaccurate or misleading and don’t offer a real perspective of the political views of the country. But some polls tend to be more reliable than others and will often show a little (or a lot) less bias than others. While they may still not be insanely accurate, they are at least a bit more trustworthy than many others.
 
Rasmussen reports that on December 29th, 2009, 46% of the voters approved of the job Obama was doing, while 53% disapproved. They compare these numbers to Trump’s, saying that Trump has a 45% approval rating among likely voters and 53% disapproval rating.
 
Looking at these numbers alone, you might not think much of them. They’re not very high for either, but not very low. What you do have to look at, however, is their significance.
 
I’ve mentioned before that I didn’t really pay much attention to the world around me until roughly 2011-2012. But even I, a child who didn’t pay much attention to the world back in 2008-2009, could tell that Obama was very popular. He was arguably at the peak of his popularity in the beginning, when the country was excited to have their very first African-American President.
 
Obama, particularly back then, was considered a demigod by much of the country, considering he had won by a massive landslide against his opponent John McCain (though who knows how he would’ve fared against an actually conservative opponent. He might’ve still won, but maybe not by a landslide).
 
So to see that, at least in this poll, Trump’s numbers resemble that of Obama’s after his first year in office is very significant.
 
Of course, the Left is doing their best to make this insignificant, saying that Rasmussen’s reports include “only likely voters in its polling, a group that tends to skew more heavily Republican, since Republicans tend to vote more regularly.”, according to the Washington Post.
 
Right, a couple of things. First, it’s not our fault Democrats tend to have the charm of a rotting corpse (and sometimes have the looks of a rotting corpse *ahem* Hillary *ahem*). If Democrats can’t draw very many people to enthusiastically vote for them, that’s their problem.
 
Polling likely voters doesn’t take away from the value of the poll. It shows you what people who will likely vote in the next significant election think of a candidate.
 
Second, other polls, particularly those run by the Left, tend to oversample Democrats. Look back at the polls run by the Left during the 2016 presidential election. All of them had Hillary winning the election either by a landslide or by a few points. In the end, Trump beat Hillary by a landslide.
 
Polls run by Democrats tend to be very biased. They’re not always wrong, as in the case of the Alabama Special election or the 2012 presidential election, but they’ve been very wrong plenty of times.
 
For any poll that surveys likely voters to view Trump as favorably as Obama in his first year in office is truly significant. Like I said, Obama was a very popular President, particularly in the beginning. And despite all of the negative press (seriously, only 5% of news about Trump is positive) and despite the baseless claims of Russian collusion, likely voters still have a rather positive outlook on Trump. At least as positive as they did 8 years ago with Obama.
 
A President’s first year in office tends to not be great. An incoming President inherits the rules and regulations put into place by his predecessor and works to either continue working with those rules and regulations or seeks to change them. Even the Left understands this concept (to an extent).
 
Even they know and freely admit that Obama inherited a very poor economy which was only made to look better through the Dow Jones Industrial Average by the end of his presidency. Aside from that, high rates of unemployment were prominent during the Obama years, the national debt skyrocketed, and businesses were taxed and regulated heavily enough to keep those unemployment rates from coming down.
 
The American economy merely survived 8 years of Obama. After 1 year of Trump, it’s very much THRIVING. Not that the Left wants you to know that. They certainly don’t need to tell you that the economy is doing the greatest it has in a very long time. You can see it for yourself. You can experience it for yourself.
 
Even the Left has had to mention that the economy is doing well under Trump, which for one reason or the other, they say credit should go to Obama. Despite the fact that many Leftist entrepreneurs and investors expected the economy to collapse with the mere ELECTION of Trump, the economy is quickly coming off life support. It’s growing at unprecedented rates and can only get better from here.
 
Remember, the tax cuts have yet to even be implemented. Once they come about, things will be a lot better for middle-class families and businesses.
 
It’s this thriving economy, alongside seeing the rather quick defeat of ISIS, that is keeping Trump supporters more than happy with Trump. It’s even bringing in people who were previously Never Trump!
 
He’s having a fantastic first year in office. So far, he’s 100x better than Obama was in all of his 8 years! For Rasmussen to show favorability numbers like these is very impressive. If the media treated Trump the way they treated Obama, who knows what his approval rating would be! Maybe the highest for any President in recent time!
 
Obama was a terrible President that was popular thanks only to the media, not because of his so-called “accomplishments”, a list that would be easier to fill than a grocery list. Trump is a fantastic President that, among likely voters, is as popular as Obama was in his first year in office largely due to his accomplishments.
 
I’ve said multiple times that the Left lives in their own little bubble. In an alternate reality where the majority of the country absolutely hates Trump and everything he’s doing. Meanwhile, on planet Earth, Trump is a very popular President and a very successful President so far.
 
While I am very much aware that he’s highly despised by many in the country, I believe there are more people who support him (at least internally) than who hate him. Otherwise, he wouldn’t have become President.
 
Jeremiah 29:11
“For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.”

​Author: Freddie Drake Marinelli

On July 26th, 2017, President Trump announced that transgender individuals will no longer be allowed to be a part of the United States military in any way. And while liberals everywhere are going haywire and saying that Trump is a bigot, let me tell you why this decision can help Make America Great Again in a more direct way than you may think.
 
Think about what comes along with allowing transgenders into the military. It surely costs the military a lot of money to accommodate those few people - after all, living quarters would have to be adjusted, medical treatment including surgeries for people in “transition” would be implemented just for them, and new training methods would also have to be implemented just for the few that are crazy enough to think they’re a different gender from what God created them to be and from what science determines.
 
Trump banning transgenders from being in the military could SAVE THE MILITARY A LOT OF MONEY long-term! Even Trump brings up the economic side of this issue. In a series of tweets announcing this ban, the president said: “After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you.”
 
So apart from transgender individuals costing the military more money, they also provide some disruptions. That is, in terms of training methods, sleeping arrangements, and healthcare. And that makes a lot of sense. Today, we don’t allow people whose eye sight could pose a serious problem in military training and missions if it’s bad enough. People have to be within a certain height and weight in order to be allowed in the military. And they have to be physically fit.
 
A transgender person by definition would look to be of a different gender and would get surgery to do that. Any sort of surgery means that, for a period of time, you aren’t allowed to serve in the military, so it’s truly head-scratching how the military allows for people to get sex change operations, knowing it will put those people out of service for a good amount of time after an unnecessary surgery.
 
Not to mention the fact that, if someone thinks they are a different gender and wants to be a different gender, there is a clear mental issue with that person. It’s literally called “Gender Dysphoria”! According to psychiatry.org, “Gender dysphoria involves a conflict between a person’s psychical or assigned gender and the gender with which he/she/they identify. People with gender dysphoria may be very uncomfortable with the gender they were assigned, sometimes described as being uncomfortable with their body (particularly developments during puberty) or being uncomfortable with the expected roles of their assigned gender.”
 
It’s literally a psychological issue for anyone to want to be the opposite sex from what they were born with! And for a year (thanks to Obama), they were allowed in the military! For the most part, the military holds the right to turn away anyone with psychological issues that will clearly make it impossible for either that person or the military to benefit from that person’s service. And transgender people fall into that category by definition! The military was forced to make adjustments for very few people simply because Obama wanted it!
 
And now, Trump has restored logic to the military. Now, the military won’t have to make adjustments for the less than 1% of the population that literally has a psychological issue with their sex just to appease the “progressive” movement and the Left. And now, the military can go back to focusing on its primary task: Making America Safe Again.
 
That’s why this decision by Trump isn’t a political decision, as the Left would want you to believe. This is a decision that will save the military a lot of money in unnecessary surgeries and healthcare bills. And this is a decision that will make things easier for the people who assign dorms and training procedures to the men and women who serve this country.
 
With one less thing to worry about, the military can go back to ensuring the safety of this country, as was their original mission until the likes of Barack Obama came along, whose ideas were meant to appease Man and not God. Whose ideology and mission was to destroy what is logical and what is good about this country. A mission to tear this country down and apart. But now, that man is gone and is replaced by a man who wishes to work for God rather than against Him.
 
Now, America can be made safe again. America can be made great again. And America can be blessed by God again.
 
Proverbs 14:12
“There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death.”
 
Author: Freddie Drake.

This problem isn’t new – after all it was the ELITES who killed Jesus as well. Pontius Pilate, the Roman prefect, allowed the Jewish leaders to conduct a mock trial in which an innocent man, Jesus Christ, was sentenced to death. Evil will always HATE righteousness. Evil doesn’t want you to be free. Evil doesn’t want you to be creative. Evil doesn’t want you to run your own life. Evil wants to reserve the right to keep you poor, take your liberties away and even kill you if so is beneficial for Evil’s objectives.

This cultural war is real - and this Donald Trump Jr. business is just one front. On the one hand, you have the good guys – those of us conservatives who want to live in the land of the free and home of the brave. And on the opposite side we have the bad guys – liberals who just want your soul and to control you.

But this war has to be fought on many fronts – and ideas is one of those fronts. Keep on educating yourself and those around you. Keep on alerting your friends of the evil that’s just around the corner. We’re very close to losing this battle and we cannot let that happen. Our western civilization is a CHRISTIAN civilization – make no mistake about it.

Without the gospel there would not be any freedoms or artistic creativity or scientific progress. It’s the Christian theology that enables man to fly high and pursue his dreams. There’s no other civilization in the world like it. The western civilization is, in fact, a SUPERIOR civilization – all you have to do to confirm this truth is look at North Korea. Has North Korea produced anything good? Of course not. Or look at Cuba. Has it produced anything good? Of course not. Or look at those areas in the Middle East dominated by ISIS. What have they created? Nothing but DEATH.

There’s no better civilization than our western civilization – it’s worth fighting for.

Romans 1:28-32
​
'And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Though they know God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.'

Author: Danielle Cross

Let’s never forget that it’s Obama and his footmen in the democrat party who put us in this position. Without Obamacare there would be no Ryancare. So before you get too upset or happy (depending on which side you’re on) about last Friday’s ‘defeat’, let’s not lose sight of who put America’s health insurance industry in the terrible state that it is today: the democrats.

The good news is we have a president who’s very much interested in making your life better. Republicans may not agree now on what the best solution is for our health insurance industry, but sooner or later they’ll have to, if they want to renew their seats in Congress. At this point, they have everything they need to come up with a piece of legislation in which all viewpoints are considered.

This piece of legislation, it's clear, wasn’t meant to be. But not to worry. There’s a reason for everything and I believe there is a reason for this too.

In my experience when something doesn’t turn out the way I expected, somehow something better came afterwards.

Paul Ryan has demonstrated time and time again he's no effective leader – the fact that he put this piece of legislation without generating consensus beforehand is a good example of that. Good leaders don’t risk bringing up a new idea unless he or she has been able to sell it to key people first. The good news for Ryan is it’s not too late to learn. 

Let’s put it this way: it’s a time for GROWTH for speaker Ryan. If he’s smart, he’ll learn from this setback. If he’s not…well, we might need another Speaker soon…

My fellow Americans, something better is likely in store for us. It doesn’t mean we just sit down and wait for things to happen – we must voice our concerns. At this point the best we can do is encourage Ryan and the rest of the Republicans in congress to IGNORE THE HEADLINES and WORK TOGETHER for a piece of legislation that’s going to bury Obamacare once and for all.

The next thing we have to do is be APPRECIATIVE. Yes, be appreciative of our freedom and prosperity.

Friends, if you thought Trump’s presidency was going to be easy you were deceived. We have to thank God for Trump.

Nothing that’s worth fighting for is easy. Nothing that’s worth fighting for is cheap.

​When we have a good health insurance legislation, we’re going to protect it even more.

We tend to take our prosperity and freedoms for granted. All of us who voted for Trump know that freedom isn’t free, and that we were on a horrible path to tyranny.

But now is not the time to give up.

If you’ve ever done anything meaningful or difficult in your life, you know it takes many tries to get it right. And you also know you shouldn’t give up at the first sign of complication. Successful people overcome complications and don’t let the enemy deter them.

Think of the time when Moses went to speak with Pharaoh to ask him to free the Hebrew slaves. Pharaoh wanted nothing to do with it – he would not just let his slaves go. In the natural, there was nothing Moses could do, but important things usually don’t depend on people – they depend on God.

As the story goes, God sent plague after plague to Egypt until one day Pharaoh decided it was better to just free the Hebrews – after all, he could see that the Hebrew God was really working behind the scenes to free His people.

And then what happened?

Pharaoh regretted freeing the slaves and sent his men to chase the Hebrews…but God had a better plan. He parted the Red Sea to let the Hebrews through, but the waters closed on Pharaoh’s army killing them all.

I think it’s safe to say that passing a health insurance legislation is simpler than freeing the Hebrew slaves in Egypt.

So, don’t be discouraged – but don’t get distracted either. Forget the noise in the media. Forget the joy the democrats are feeling and focus on the goal: to make America great again.

Exodus 14:13-14
But Moses said to the people, "Do not fear! Stand by and see the salvation of the LORD which He will accomplish for you today; for the Egyptians whom you have seen today, you will never see them again forever. "The LORD will fight for you while you keep silent."

​Author: DR

You see, in Latin America, you have the ROMAN Catholic Church, which in that region is nothing but a ‘spiritual’ arm of the left. It is the dominant denomination and it's the reason why socialism is also dominant in the region.

Just to give you one example, the most famous Bible verse there is not John 3:16, as it’s here, ‘For God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life’. Nope. That’s not the best known Bible verse at all in Latin America. The very verse that spells out the love of God for us is not the most famous Bible verse in that region.

Do you know which one is?

This is very important – and think of the implications of growing up in Latin America believing this fallacy. The best know Bible verse in Latin America is the ROMAN Catholic Spanish version of Matthew 5:3 ‘Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven’.

The English version says ‘poor in spirit’, which is another way of saying ‘those who know are sinners in the eyes of God’. In other words, those of us believers who understand we’re sinners and repent will go to heaven. That's, in a nutshell, what the verse means.

But the Roman Catholic version in Latin America removes the term ‘in spirit’, leaving you with just 'the poor'.  The Roman Catholic Church in Latin America teaches that only ‘the poor’ go to heaven. Matthew 5:3 has a parallel in Luke 6:20, which indeed removes the term ‘in spirit’. But Jesus’ point here wasn’t economic – it was a spiritual point he was trying to make. But the Roman Catholic Church doesn’t teach you that - it teaches conformism. 

Is it any wonder why Latin Americans are vastly POOR?

They think they'll go to Heaven just by being poor! 

They’re bombarded with Socialist propaganda:

• From the government and every single political party
• In school
• In College
• From the Media
• From local celebrities
• In Union gatherings…and most importantly
• From the PULPIT.

The lower classes in Latin America are convinced they’ll go to heaven, regardless of their beliefs. After all their priests are telling them that theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Communists infiltrated the Church DECADES ago and have convinced generations of Latin Americans that the surest way to heaven is through economic poverty.

But God’s kingdom is granted by GRACE through FAITH. That’s all it takes – that’s what the PROTESTANT Church teaches us. God isn’t opposed to money: Abraham was wealthy. Job was wealthy. David was wealthy. God wants you to prosper, even financially.

In the US the Protestant Church hasn’t been infiltrated by communists just yet – though it’s true that some denominations have been. For example, the Presbyterian Church USA (PCUSA) supports ABORTION and GAY MARRIAGE. I never thought I’d find something worse than the ROMAN Catholic Church, but I have. The more conservative denomination of the Presbyterian Church is the PCA, or Presbyterian Church in America, which teaches the Word of God as it's written in the Bible. It's my Church.

The bottomline is this: while Americans, much like Latin Americans, are bombarded with socialist propaganda from the Media, Hollywood, Democrats, etc, the fact of the matter is the Church hasn’t turned into a propaganda tool just yet. They’re trying – some denominations like the PCUSA are definitely going in the wrong direction, but they’re losing members as a result.

The Protestant Church in America is virtually untouched by communism. And to the extent that they continue driving their message of TRUTH, chances are that coup attempts like Obama’s are not going to work - most of us know right from wrong.

​While Church attendance has been going down, there are still people who have the courage to go and stand for the Truth. You don’t get that in Latin America – whether they attend Church service or not, they’re getting the same consistent message of how wonderful big government is.

It’s our job to continue telling the TRUTH. It’s the reason we created this website. If you’re reading this, please share it with your friends. Talk about the Gospel. Talk about the dangers of communism. Spread the Word of God. Go to Church. Make new friends there. It's the best you can do to understand what's right and what's wrong and educate others. Let's keep our Church safe from Communism.

2 Timothy 3:16-17

All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.

Author: Daniela R.

Are you or have you been a parent of a small child? Or at least have taken care of one for a friend or family member, or even as a job as a babysitter? Take a look at that child and then take a look at former President Barack Obama, or just about any Democrat in Congress or that holds public office. You’ll see that there isn’t much difference between them other than that your child is far cuter and that the Democrat holds POWER. Because that is what a Democrat in office really is: a child with authoritative power.
 
That last statement should be painfully obvious with the way the Democrats and even the news media have been acting since Trump won the election. Democrats blaming Russia for Trump’s win is exactly like a child crying and blaming someone else for their loss. Representative John Lewis claiming that Trump’s election win is illegitimate is like a child throwing a tantrum for his favorite sports team losing a championship game after a last-second score by the other team. ‘It’s not fair!’ is all I hear when one of these children say Trump won illegitimately.
 
And it’s not just elected Democrats who are children. It’s also anyone in Hollywood who wanted to stop Trump from becoming president, Rosie O’Donnell being the biggest child of them all, calling on Trump to be arrested. With her saying: ‘I fully support imposing martial law delaying the inauguration until Trump is “cleared” of all charges’. The funny thing is that she probably doesn’t even know what martial law means. By the way, it means ‘the law temporarily imposed upon an area by state or national military forces when civil authority has broken down or during wartime military operations.’ So unless she could’ve convinced the U.S. military to attempt a coup d’état, martial law just wasn’t going to be imposed.
 
And let’s not forget the people that are actually the closest to being children in age: university student millennials. Now, it’s not all of the college students that are being childish. But there are some very strange cases of childishness going on in colleges. I mean, soon after Trump was elected president, college campuses actually offered COLORING BOOKS and safe spaces for students that were ‘traumatized’ by the election results. They have even offered COUNSELING for people that are upset that Trump won. Some students have even pledged to CUT OFF their private parts if Trump actually builds the wall! They won’t go through with it, being the sissies that they are, but to proclaim to eliminate a part of your body because a president actually wants to do something about our illegal immigration problem? Seriously?
 
If you are a college student that attends classes with one of these morons, I suggest you do the following: 1) Go to any store that sells pacifiers. 2) Go back to the campus, find said student and offer the binky. 3) When they start crying and yelling at you, calling you a bigot bully and they start getting visibly flustered, offer the binky again. 4) Repeat step three until they storm off to one of their ‘safe spaces’. (Just in case it's not painfully obvious, I'm joking. That's bordering on or actual harassment. Don't actually do that.) Honestly, I’ve had the urge to go to my local college campus with boxes full of pacifiers and stuffed toys and a sign that read: “Upset Trump is president? Have a complementary binky and teddy bear.”
 
But all of this, the celebrities, elected officials and college students acting like oversized children, is the direct result of decades of Democrat rule. It’s not just for the last 8 years, though it’s been running amok because of that, but it’s for however long Democrats have had power over the schools that breed these Peter Pan-like children, over the news organizations and over Hollywood that has resulted in these people throwing temper tantrums for not getting their way for the first time in their lives.
 
This is what happens when God isn’t present in schools. Children grow up to be materialistic, selfish and greedy. Actually, grow up is the wrong term. How about ‘get bigger and taller’? Because we know, from reading this and from seeing what’s happening on social media, that these people don’t grow up. But back to my previous point. This is what happens when God isn’t in the schools. None of these people know God on a personal level. None of them believe in Him as the Creator and Master of the universe. They don’t have God in their lives and as a result have fallen deeper into their sins. And they’re PROUD of it! I could go on and on, but I don’t wish to waste your time on a useless rant.
 
They live without the Father and fail to grow up.
 
1 Peter 2:2:
‘Like newborn infants, long for the spiritual milk, that by it you may grow up into salvation…’
 
Author: Freddie M.

On the night of November 8th, 2016, Donald J. Trump reached the vital number of delegates to become president of the United States: 270. This was the night that the Clinton camp and supporters cried. And their weeps were heard ‘round the world.
 
Every single (or double, depending on where voter fraud was found) Clinton voter and supporter was stunned, but none more so than the news media. The news media had been running polls and surveys and “concluding” that Hillary would be elected president, either in a landslide or after a tough fight. They ran the polls showing that most people wanted Hillary, but when the actual votes came in, WHEN EVERYONE HAD A VOICE, Hillary was absolutely trounced. But how? How could that possibly have happened? The media and the Left in general blame Russia. But you and I know why she lost.
 
She lost because people had grown SICK AND TIRED of the elite class ruling and wanted an outsider.
 
She lost because people were afraid of what it could mean for ANOTHER LIBERAL to run the White House after all the DAMAGE Obama had caused in his 8 years.
 
She lost because she thought half of her opponent’s supporters were “deplorable”, and that is insulting at least a quarter of the population. She made herself DISLIKABLE.
 
But I think most importantly, she lost because she was a Democrat. And people are tired of the Democrats’ policies. They had been tired since 2010. In the mid-term election of 2010, Republicans took control of Congress. It had happened again in 2014. The only reason Obama won twice, let alone once, is that he was considered a pretty cool guy. He was hip. He was cool. He smoked dope in college and has a pretty nice voice. But he didn’t win because of his policies, at least in 2012. In 2008, he ran on hope and change for America. In 2012, he ran on “I’m not the white dude over on that side”. Both of Obama’s opponents were Republican establishment hacks that DIDN’T CARE about winning the White House. They wouldn’t impeach Obama no matter what he did, because they didn’t want to impeach the first African American president. They didn’t want to make the Democrats angry, all the while they were making their base angry, and it showed.
 
In 2010 and ’14, the American people showed they didn’t want Obama’s policies. In 2016, they showed up again and this time, it was to back someone who would ACTUALLY FIGHT THE LEFT, and if need be, the Right. They elected a fighter. Someone who wouldn’t stand down to any attack, no matter the source. If a leftist attacks him, he fights back. If a Republican establishment traitor attacks him, he fights back, provided the fight is worth fighting, *ahem* Lindsey Graham *ahem*.
 
The American people voted someone into office that would reverse the effects of the Obama administration as much as possible and return the country to shape. With Obama, people were out of jobs (94 million of them), the VA was absolute garbage, illegal aliens were coming in mass, Syrian refugees that look like the posterchildren for ISIS were essentially being paid to come here and spread Sharia Law, and no country respected us anymore.
 
Clinton lost because she was the white and female version of Obama, only she cared more about money and power than liberalism. But she would’ve implemented the policies Obama and Soros would’ve asked (or payed) her to do. And the American people would have none of it.
 
The Left blames Russia for hacking the elections, instead of themselves. They believe everyone likes them. They can’t stand rejection and won’t accept it for what it is. They think them losing was a fluke, a major theft. They can’t believe they would be rejected and we can’t believe their arrogance… well, some of us can.
 
They’ve even gone so far as to try to come up with ways to get Trump out of the White House and somehow get Hillary in, short of a smuggle run.
 
Michael “I-can’t-believe-is-still-allowed-to-make-movies-with-the-single-digit-IQ- point-he-has” Moore has even suggested to have Trump arrested and Hillary installed as president… I’ll just let that sink in.
 
Wolf Blitzer has said if Trump would prefer to ‘resign, be impeached, or be assassinated.’
 
And Rosie O’Donnell said that, prior to the inauguration, we should impose martial law.
 
They just can’t believe Trump trumped them all and believe Russia had interfered in the election. My friend, someone did interfere in the election, but it wasn’t Russia. It was God.
 
God REFUSED to allow Hillary to win. He didn’t want Israel to be alone in the world. He wanted the U.S., the land that He’s blessed for nearly 250 years to be His nation’s strongest ally and to show it. He refused to let evil dressed in women’s clothing to enter the White House and run the show. God Himself ordained that America be Made Great Again.
 
I won’t give you just one Bible quote today. I will give you two… mostly since they’re both pretty good and relevant.
 
Jeremiah 29:11
‘For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.’
 
Psalm 22:28
‘For kingship belongs to the Lord, and He rules over the nations.’
 
Author: Freddie M.