​I have said many times in the past, at least when talking about the Chinese concentration camps, that the excuse the world had for not being able to do anything about the Holocaust was ignorance. People, for the most part, didn't even know what was going on in various camps throughout Europe, and had little knowledge of their existence. However, ignorance is not a good enough excuse this time around. And ashamedly, I'm not even talking about Chinese concentration camps this time.

In Australia, a country which just two years ago would have considered itself free and democratic, the government has set up various camps to house the unvaccinated and those exposed to COVID.

Now, before getting to the meat and potatoes of it all, I just have to ask: If the Australian government believes the unvaccinated to be at risk of getting and dying from COVID, why would they put into these camps people who have been exposed to COVID? It sounds just as malicious as what Andrew Cuomo did in New York retirement and nursing homes. Are they hoping to kill these people? We know they harbor nothing but ill-will towards the unvaccinated because they refuse to comply with their tyrannical vaccination orders and dual-economy system, so are they actively trying to rid themselves of what they would consider as "political enemies"?

Whatever the case may be, it is undeniably evil to do something like this, knowing the facts surrounding not only the survivability of the Chinese coronavirus, but the lethality and adverse effects of the vaccines on otherwise healthy people.

A video (posted on Twitter, so it will likely be taken down at some point) of an Australian who was sent to one of these camps details roughly how their camp system works. In essence, the captives aren't allowed to leave their designated living quarters without a mask unless it is to do their laundry. They are not allowed to talk with other people outside their quarters or outside any nearby fences. Failure to comply will lead to a $5,000 AUS fine (no information surrounding repeated offenses, but given the Third Reich-ish nature of the Australian government as of late, it's not hard to imagine roughly what they might be willing to do).

And while I doubt they are actively performing experiments on their captives (apart from seeing roughly what will happen to them by mixing unvaccinated people with those exposed to the virus) or forcing them to work for them or outright killing them with gas chambers and furnaces, there is no doubt that they at least have the POTENTIAL to perform such atrocities.

After all, if they already see the unvaccinated as villains to society to the point where they must be separated not only from the economy but also from civilization at large, what's to stop them from going all the way and exterminating them through some irrational "justification" that they come up with? Their consciences? If they had that, they wouldn't be putting people in concentration camps. Of course, only God knows what will happen, and it's very possible that they won't go so far down Nazi Germany territory, but the fact that Australia is at this point to begin with gives reason for concern.

Perhaps rather ironically, a German EU member of parliament, named Christina Anderson, made a video, posted to Rumble, answering Australians' SOS call.

In the video, she said: "I will do whatever I can to make it known to the world that your once free and liberal democracy has been transformed into a totalitarian regime which tramples on human rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law. I am imploring all of you around the world who still think your governments are looking out for your best interests, at no point in history have the people forcing others into compliance been the good guys. The welfare of humanity has always been the alibi of tyrants. Do you not realize that this vaccine does not protect you from COVID? It does, however, protect you from governmental oppression. For now, that is. But don't think for even a second that this is not going to change tomorrow."

"I am a German, and we once asked our grandparents how they could have just stood by in silence, allowing a horrific totalitarian regime to come about. Anyone could have known; all they had to do was open their eyes and take a look. The vast majority chose not to. So what will you tell your grandchildren? Will you tell them you did not know? Will you tell them you were just following orders? You need to understand it is not about breaking the fourth wave. It is about breaking people. Australia does not need a no-COVID strategy. What Australia needs is a no-oppression strategy. So I stand in support with your fight for freedom and democracy. We need to stop our governments from transforming our free and democratic societies into totalitarian regimes. We need to do it now. We need to stand up now."

A powerful, short speech, I have to say. And she is 100% correct. Never, in the entire history of the world, have those who forced compliance of others into certain actions ever been the good guys. Nazis do that, fascists do that, socialists do that, communists do that. Tyrants do that. Always, their alibi is "the greater good", but it never actually is for the better of the people. The victim is always the people these tyrants claim are doing them a favor. For the Third Reich (given the actions of modern day Germany, I won't call Hitler's Germany "Nazi Germany" anymore, because now there is a second Nazi Germany, or an unofficial Fourth Reich), their targets were Jews, capitalists and non-Aryans. For the Soviet Union, it was the Cossacks, the Kulaks, the White Army, officers of the former Russian Empire, and generally anyone who disagreed with the regime. For the Chi-comms, it was anyone who even remotely liked the "old traditions" of China and didn't subscribe to the Color Revolution.

And it wasn't as if people were utterly ignorant of what was going on in Germany during Hitler's reign. The Holocaust was a big secret, sure, but their targeting of Jews wasn't, as they specifically made propaganda to demonize the Jews. The Holocaust wasn't well-known at the time, but the Nazis' oppression was. And so, like Christina said, they asked their grandparents how they could have stood by in silence as tyranny ran rampant on their country. Likewise, future generations will look at what is going on currently in more than one country and judge this time just as harshly as we judge the Third Reich.

And I love how Christina phrased it: "So what will you tell your grandchildren? Will you tell them you did not know? Will you tell them you were just following orders?" I love it because that last one calls back to the answer that Nazi guards and scientists would give during the Nuremberg Trial as to why they did what they did: "We were just following orders." It wasn't an acceptable answer then, and it's not an acceptable answer now.

To end things off, I want you to look back at the picture above. Look at what it shows. Look at the buildings, the sort of road, and the people in it. Now, look at the following pictures:

​Does it look like there is a whole lot of difference between the picture of the Australian camp and the pictures of the concentration camps with Nazis in them?

So why would anyone be willing to, rightly, demonize the four pictures but not the one at the top? Why would anyone justify the one at the top and judge the ones right above?

Tell whoever it is who sides with this atrocity that if they ever wondered if they would have supported the Nazis in Germany during WWII, they need not wonder anymore, for the answer is quite clear.

Proverbs 24:24-25
"Whoever says to the wicked, 'You are in the right,' will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations, but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them."

We all know that, at bare minimum, Anthony Fauci has been a flip-flopper and a serial liar, willingly misinforming the public regarding the Chinese coronavirus, its origins, and the effectiveness/safety of the vaccines. This is the best-case scenario regarding Fauci, but information recently coming to light paint a far grimmer picture of the guy.
 
Back in August, The Gateway Pundit broke the story that Fauci funded a study in Tunisia “where beagle dogs were eaten alive by parasite-infested flies.” Oh, and this was TAXPAYER FUNDED, so YOUR money went to the torture and cruel experimentation on dogs (not that that’s the worst use of taxpayer money I have seen, considering it’s used to fund abortion as well).
 
However, there are new developments surrounding just what other experiments Fauci and his NIH have funded.
 
Before I tell you what they are, let’s do an exercise I call “Nazis or NIH?” I will tell you of an experiment that was either conducted by the Nazis or the NIH and you will guess which organization performed them.
 
The purpose of this should be rather obvious: there is little moral difference between the two.
 
Without further ado, let’s begin.
 
First: This organization was involved with an experiment where the study’s researchers would cripple monkeys with toxic brain injections through devices implanted into the apes’ skulls. The research included (WARNING, IF YOU ARE UNCOMFORTABLE READING THE DETAILS, SKIP THIS PART):
 
Locking the monkeys alone in small cages, drilling holes into their skulls, implanting head restraining devices, implanting electrodes into the monkey’s brains, and finally, injecting toxins that destroy their brains, causing them to lose control of their limbs, mouths and other body parts.
 
(YOU CAN CONTINUE READING FROM THIS POINT)
 
So which is it? Nazi or NIH? There are some clues to tell you, but it’s the NIH. To the NIH’s credit, had this been the Nazis, they would have used humans as opposed to monkeys, but the experimentation is still messed up and I don’t see the purpose whatsoever to this study. Was it to test whatever was injected into the monkeys’ skulls to see what would happen? What a surprise, something bad happened to them.
 
Second: This organization tested immunization compounds and serums for the prevention and treatment of various contagious diseases, such as malaria, typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, yellow fever, hepatitis and epidemic jaundice.
 
I will give you some time to think about this one because, scarily enough, one could picture both organizations doing this kind of thing, particularly with me leaving out key information which would tell you immediately which one did this.
 
Okay, the answer is that this was the Nazis. They did this at various concentration camps.
 
Last one: This organization experimented on orphans with terminal diseases in order to perform drug trials on them, with a total of 201 children dying out of 532.
 
There is one thing here which ought to tell you the answer, and I bet you really wish this had been the Nazis.
 
According to TGP, Fauci’s NIH was caught funding experiments on hundreds of children with AIDS in a New York City hospital back in 2004.
 
“In 2005, the city of New York hired the VERA Institute to form a final report on the drug trials. VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008. They reported that twenty-five children died during the drug studies, that an additional fifty-five children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29% of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used).”
 
You know, I was originally going to compare Fauci to Joseph Mengele, the Nazi’s “Angel of Death” who would perform experiments on people, mainly twins, at Auschwitz, but then I realized that that would be a bit too mean to Mengele. At least he only did experiments at one concentration camp and they were largely focused on a single subject matter. A more fitting comparison for Fauci would be if Hitler had had a medical degree and was entirely focused on his egregious experiments as opposed to running Germany and trying to dominate the world.
 
Fauci is Hitler with a medical degree. That is perhaps the most accurate thing I can say about the guy right now. And this is WITHOUT counting the gain-of-function research at Wuhan and everything he has done regarding the Chinese coronavirus and the vaccines.
 
Counting those things makes him even worse and brings him closer to the comparison to Hitler with an MD. But even discounting all that, what the NIH has done (THAT WE KNOW OF) in these experiments can only be compared to the inhumane experimentation of the Nazis throughout their 12-year Thousand Year Reich.
 
The Nazis performed multiple other experiments, including: Experiments on twins (like I mentioned), experiments on bone, muscle and nerve transplantation and regeneration, experiments on head injuries, experiments on hypothermia and freezing temperatures, experiments with mustard gas, experiments with Sulfonamide drugs, experiments on the potability of sea water, experiments with sterilization and fertility, experiments with outright poison, experiments with incendiary bombs, experiments regarding high altitudes, experiments on blood coagulation, and electroshock experiments.
 
What is perhaps most frightening is that I could see the NIH performing most of these experiments themselves. Perhaps not the mustard gas ones, the Sulfonamide drug, the potability of sea water, incendiary bombs and high altitudes, but the others are plausible, at least with varying degrees.
 
We KNOW that they are experimenting with sterilization, for example, given that is one of the effects of the vaccine.
 
But given what we already know the NIH has done, I think a comparison to the Nazis’ inhumane experiments is warranted. They might not be quite that depraved (as far as we know), but excusing or forgiving these relatively mild experiments (mild compared to the Nazis) would invite pushing the boundaries more and more.
 
They want to know just what they can get away with before being subjected to a second Nuremberg Trial, which we all know will come sooner or later.
 
I often talk about the evil of the Left or the Washington Establishment or the elite ruling class (but I repeat myself), however, it’s not often that I talk about the evil of the medical industry. And there is PLENTY to talk about regarding that subject.
 
This shows just how evil they are willing to be now, and the history of the Nazi experiments shows us just how evil they could potentially be in the future.
 
There are those who call for Fauci’s firing. I call for his execution. His and everyone who was involved with these inhumane experiments, either physically or financially. And before you say anything, yes, I know these were taxpayer funded, sadly. But it’s the NIH which was responsible for how that money was used. THEY are the ones who ought to pay the price for their evil. So make no mistake about that.
 
Fire Fauci, try him, prosecute him and execute him. Preferably with either parasitic flies, whatever was injected into those monkeys, or injecting him with the vaccine the number of times he thinks other people ought to receive it.
 
Maybe then we would begin to approach justice.
 
Exodus 21:23-25:
“But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.”

In essence, there are two things that I will talk about in this article: First, the failed attempt Fake Doctor Jill Biden made at speaking Spanish during an event for farmworkers (few people showed up, unsurprisingly, as she and her husband are not popular figures in America) which drew mockery. Secondly, the suspicious-looking flag that was propped up behind her as she was making that speech.
 
Let’s begin with what I mentioned first.
 
Jill Biden made that failed attempt, like I said, during an event speaking to farmworkers on the birthday of Left-wing labor leader Cesar Chavez (who is rather well-known for making bigoted remarks towards illegal immigrants, whom he viewed as repressing American workers, a stance I am not disagreeing with, necessarily, but it’s notable that the Bidens seem to revere the guy). The Spanish phrase Jill Biden tried to say was “Si se puede”, which is Spanish for “Yes, it can be done,” likely meant as a call-back to Obama’s “Yes we can” slogan (that, in itself, is a bit of a botch, since the direct translation would be “Si podemos”, not “Si se puede”).
 
What the fake doctor and fake First Lady actually said was “Si se pwadueh,” which means nothing. If anything, that sounds closer to “Si se padre”, which means “yes is father”, which also means nothing, at least coherently.
 
Naturally, because of this botch and because it was particularly unnecessary since the audience was not necessarily a primarily Spanish-speaking one (even then, it’s just pandering to try and speak Spanish in such a circumstance when it’s not expected of one to speak the language), Jill Biden was mocked online.
 
RGA Deputy Communications Director Joanna Rodriguez tweeted: “It’s ‘Si se puede’ (Yes you/we can) not ‘Si se pwadueh.’ I can’t even imagine what word she was trying to say. Seriously why even try pandering if you’re going to butcher it and not practice before?!”
 
Journalist Dania Alexandrino tweeted: “Si se what???? I’m sure some one will surely tell Jill Biden ‘puadray’ is NOT a word in the Spanish dictionary. For those who are celebrating her effort, yeah NO! Very far from ‘Si se puede’ which means ‘Yes (we) can.’ We in parenthesis because it can also be yes you can!”
 
It’s not surprising that there would be those who simply applaud her efforts, as there is no doubt were any person on the Right to make this mistake, they would likewise be lampooned by the Left. But since it’s a Leftist making this mistake, all the excuses are brought up.
 
Another person mocked: “It’s wild that in the course of three months we went from a supermodel First Lady who spoke five languages, to fake Dr. Pwadway.”
 
Certainly, I miss First Lady Melania Trump and President Donald Trump. FLOTUS Melania was easily the best First Lady we had in a long time and had President Trump been a Democrat president, the fake news media would have gone out of their own way to highlight how classy she is and her life story, as well as her ability to speak five languages, which is roughly four and a half more than the current Occupier can muster.
 
At any rate, after the clip of Jill Biden’s failure to speak three Spanish words, people began to take notice of the strange flag that was propped up behind her because it resembles the Nazi flag so much.
 
That flag was the official flag of the United Farm Workers of America, which was created from the combination of two worker’s rights organizations, one of which was led by Cesar Chavez. Interestingly enough, it was Cesar Chavez who commissioned his brother, Richard, to design that flag.
 
Smithsonian Magazine gives more context to the reasoning behind the design:
 
“The story of the black eagle, the movement’s symbol, exemplifies Chavez’s skill as a tactician. He researched emblems, including cigarette boxes and Nazi flags, and concluded that the most potent color combination was red, black and white. He picked the eagle and directed his brother to draw the bird so simply that anyone could easily replicate the symbol.”
 
So it’s a United Farm Workers of America flag which was designed, in part, by Cesar Chavez himself and this was an event that took place on Cesar Chavez’s birthday. The flag, while strange to use given that it’s so close to the Nazi flag (the union was created in 1962, so there is no excuse for Chavez to not know what the Nazis did), makes sense for this event.
 
However, we have seen the fake news media searching for Nazi symbolism in everything Trump was associated with, from the stage on CPAC 2021 to an “America First” shirt which simply featured an eagle resting atop the American flag and claiming it was the Nazi’s Iron Eagle. The Left sought to push the narrative that Trump was Hitler or dog whistling to secret Nazis in America through these symbols, despite how utterly ridiculous those ideas are, so I have zero reason to be merciful to Jill Biden.
 
She stood in front of what looks like a Nazi flag and which was designed to resemble a Nazi flag. It was created by Leftists who at least had the courage to basically admit that Nazis were socialists (not only does their name mean “National Socialist German Workers’ Party” but their entire ideology and policies were centered around strong central government and government-controlled industries – a socialist/communist ideology) and a Leftist fake doctor and fake First Lady used it as a background during one of her speeches.
 
Jill Biden is a Nazi, confirmed, and has no issue with speaking in front of Nazi-looking paraphernalia. Even if she knew exactly what that flag was, and I believe she does know what it was, you would think someone who’s been on the side of “fighting Nazis” for the last four years would have a bit more common sense than to speak at an event in front of a flag that even remotely resembles the flag of the Nazis and was created with practically that intent.
 
Now, someone might argue that we don’t treat the Hindu swastika the same as the Nazi swastika, despite their obvious similarities, but the thing about that argument is that the Hindu swastika was used in ancient Hindu and Eurasian religions for FAR longer than how the Nazis used it. And while the Chavez flag doesn’t feature a swastika, the color scheme is clearly reminiscent of that ideology, which is very close to what Chavez’ own ideology was to begin with (again, “National Socialist German WORKERS’ Party”).
 
And like I said earlier, there is no excuse for Chavez to not have known what the Nazis had done by 1962. He very consciously and specifically implemented that color scheme and design for the flag.
 
Furthermore, even though it was an event that took place on Chavez’ birthday, there really was no need to have that flag in the background anyway. A background was not really needed, and if it was necessary for the (few) attendants to understand what this event was about, I imagine someone could have just put up a banner that said something akin to: “Celebrating farmworkers on Cesar Chavez’s birthday” or something that would indicate what the event was about and to whom it was tailored.
 
That they chose to have the flag there, in my mind, means that Jill Biden wants to be as close to a Nazi as she can be. Jill Biden, of course, being a socialist herself, follows the Nazi ideology anyway, but now she is practically showing to everyone that she is a Nazi almost outright.
 
And given the treatment the fake news media gave to Trump regarding any sort of shapes or designs that he was associated with, why would I give Jill Biden a pass for giving a speech in front of what looks like a Nazi flag?
 
Jill Biden is a Nazi. No one can dispute me on this, no matter how you slice it.
 
Proverbs 18:2
“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”

Jemele Hill is not exactly what people would call “smart.” This was very much clear when on Sunday, the former ESPN host suggested that the United States was just “as bad” as Nazi Germany, and that the Nazis “learned” from “watching America”.
 
Her initial tweet read as follows: “Been reading Isabel Wilkerson’s new book, ‘Caste,’ and if you were of the opinion that the United States wasn’t nearly as bad as Nazi Germany, how wrong you are. Can’t encourage you enough to read this masterpiece.”
 
Naturally, for comparing the U.S. to Nazi Germany, she was destroyed online for her sheer ignorance. Former Acting Director of National Intelligence and Ambassador to Germany Ric Grenell replied: “Read a book. The Nazis murdered 6.5 million Jews.”
 
Daily Wire writer Matt Walsh replied: “Been reading Jemele Hill’s tweets, and if you were of the opinion that she’s smarter than a cactus, how wrong you are.”
 
Tim Young replied: “Just the basic fact that you have a huge platform/make a solid living s****ing on the President and haven’t been locked in a labor camp says this is the complete opposite of nazi Germany. Grow up.”
 
To that particular tweet, Hill replied with the following: “Nowhere in my tweet did I say the current state of America is like Nazi Germany. I was referring to our racial history. The parallels have been pointed out by plenty of historians, not just Isabel Wilkerson. You tell me to grow up. I say, you need to read more.”
 
To be fair, the initial tweet did not specify that she was referring to Civil War-era America and not contemporary America. The wording was just ambiguous enough for people to reasonably believe she was referring to the current state of the country and not its history.
 
At any rate, she also replied to Arc Digital Editor-in-Chief Berny Belvedere, who originally told her: “This is breathtakingly irresponsible. How is anyone supposed to trust your judgment after this horror show of an opinion?”
 
To go on a bit of a tangent before quoting Hill’s reply to Belvedere, THIS particular opinion was only the latest one in a series of them which ought to demonstrate to people that her judgment is not to be trusted. She has REPEATEDLY compared Trump to some of the worst dictators in history and suggested he was on track to doing the same things that they did. This particular opinion was not particularly exceptional in comparison to the other atrocious takes she has uttered.
 
In any case, Hill’s reply to Belvedere was as follows: “What would you call it when a country that murdered millions of Jews learned their systems of genocide by watching America, and studying our history of racialized slavery, and great knack for racial terrorism?”
 
This is where I have to give up a point, but not a point she would want me to take note of: The Nazis DID learn from Americans – just not the country as a whole nor the kinds of Americans she would want them to have learned from.
 
What I mean is that Nazi Germany didn’t learn its practices from watching America. They learned their practices from watching THE DEMOCRAT SOUTH.
 
Hill, in her original tweet, was promoting a book that compared Nazi Germany with America, at least in its history as a country. Allow me, then, to promote a book that dispels the Leftist notions that America as a whole is to blame for the atrocities of the Nazis: Dinesh D’Souza’s “The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of The American Left.”
 
The subhead is, admittedly, a tad misleading. The modern American Left certainly has roots in the Nazis, but the Nazis also have roots in the old American Left – the one which fought for slavery, enacted Jim Crow laws and made it nearly impossible for former slaves to succeed and prosper, enacting laws and regulations that basically forced the freed slaves to return to the plantations while being paid peanuts and not living much differently free as they did when slaves.
 
Simply, to answer her question regarding what I would call it when a country that committed egregious crimes against humanity learned from watching politicians in America basically doing the same would be “learning from Democrats.”
 
Democrats were the ones who founded the domestic terrorist group known as the KKK. They were the ones who fought to keep their slaves. They were the ones who fought a war which led to the genocide of Native Americans.
 
Here’s an excerpt from D’Souza’s book, in a section aptly titled: “Learning from Hitler.”
 
“In this book I will show what the Left learned from the Nazis, and also what the Left taught the Nazis… Hitler… specifically said he intended to displace and exterminate the Russians, the Poles, and the Slavs in precisely the same way Americans in the Jacksonian era had displaced and exterminated the native Indians. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were directly modeled on the segregation and anti-miscegenation laws that had been implemented decades earlier in the Democratic South. Forced sterilization and euthanasia aimed at eliminating racial ‘defectives’ and producing a ‘superior’ Nordic race were two additional schemes the Nazis got from American progressives…
 
… Franklin D. Roosevelt was an avid admirer of Mussolini who sought to import Italian fascist schemes to America. FDR also collaborated with the worst racist elements in America, working with them to block anti-lynching laws and exclude blacks from New Deal programs and name a former Klansman to the Supreme Court. Mussolini, for his part, praised FDR’s book ‘Looking Forward’ and basically declared FDR to be a fellow fascist. Hitler too saw FDR as a kindred spirit and the New Deal was widely praised as an American form of fascism in the Nazi Party’s official newspaper ‘Volkischer Beobachter’ and other Nazi publications.”
 
“JFK toured Nazi Germany in the 1930s and came back effusive with praise of Hitler and his theory of Nordic superiority. ‘I have come to the conclusion, ‘JFK wrote in his diary, ‘that fascism is right for Germany and Italy.’… [JFK] described [Hitler] as ‘the stuff of legends… Hitler will emerge from the hate that now surrounds him and come to be regarded as one of the most significant figures to have lived.’”
 
D’Souza notes that the American Left learned from Nazi Germany, following World War II, as much as Nazi Germany learned from the American Left which was directly responsible for the darkest parts of America’s history.
 
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a massive advocate for eugenics (as evidenced by her founding of PLANNED PARENTHOOD) long before Hitler rose to power. She sought to eliminate black people, whom she considered “weeds” of society, and had black people fooled by a black eugenicist who would parrot Sanger’s eugenics propaganda as being beneficial to black people.
 
In a way, Hill is right in saying that Nazi Germany learned by watching America. However, they didn’t learn by watching Republicans or right-wingers. They didn’t learn by watching the people the Left now associates with them. They learned from THE LEFT and the things they had done. Like I pointed out, the Nuremberg Laws were modeled after the Left’s racist segregation laws.
 
The Nazis learned from the Left and the Left learns from Nazis. Take the following quote, as an example: “We are socialists. We are the enemies of today’s capitalist system of exploitation… and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.”
 
This sounds exactly like something someone would’ve said (or basically, someone did say) at last week’s Democratic National Convention. This quote, in fact, came from a 1927 speech made by Adolf Hitler.
 
D’Souza writes: “The Nazi Party at the outset offered a twenty-five point program that included the nationalization of large corporations and trusts, government control of banking and credit, the seizure of land without compensation for public use, the splitting of large landholdings into smaller units, confiscation of war profits, prosecution of bankers and other lenders on grounds of usury, abolition of incomes unearned by work, profit sharing for workers in all large companies, a broader pension system paying higher benefits, and universal free healthcare and education.”
 
With some slight alterations, this sounds exactly like the Leftist plan of today. Modern Leftists want, to some extent or another, each of these propositions, with some slight alterations to account for our modern era.
 
The American Left and the Nazis are inseparable, much as they might try to deny it. The American Left at least partly inspired Hitler and the Nazis in their quest to eradicate “inferior” races (I say partly because I believe Nietzsche’s theory of the “ubermench” or “superman” was also partly to blame). The American Left, past and present, has clear ties to Nazi Germany.
 
So, no, it’s not that Nazi Germany learned from watching America, because different states had different policies, as did different presidents in different times.
 
No, Nazi Germany specifically learned from watching American Leftists in how they enacted their racist and egregiously inhuman laws.
 
John 3:20
“For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed.”

The Chinese Communist Party is the modern-day version of Nazi Germany. Few would be willing to dispute that, apart from those who specifically profit from what the Chinese do, such as major American corporations and famous celebrities like LeBum James (not a typo).
 
The only difference between Communist China and Nazi Germany is that people weren’t aware of what Germany was doing until after the war. We had only really begun to learn and expose what the Nazis had been doing once the war was over and the concentration camps were made defunct.
 
The world didn’t know of the atrocities and crimes against humanity that the Nazis perpetrated. The world said “never again” would this be allowed to happen.
 
The world lied.
 
Nowadays, in real time, we see the atrocities that the Chinese Communist Party is inflicting not only on Uighur Muslims, but on Christians, on Jews, on black people and on its own citizens. I have said in the past how communism makes people slaves to the State. China is one of the examples of this being entirely and absolutely true.
 
And yet, because the CCP is in many corporations’ and politicians’ pockets, the atrocities that they do, which we are WITNESSING as they are happening, get either forgiven or totally ignored (usually the latter) because saying or doing anything that would risk companies’ or politicians’ ability to make money off of China is not something they’d be willing to do.
 
Instead, despite the fact that they make far more money in the States, many choose to openly display hatred towards America.
 
It’s absolutely appalling, but not exactly surprising, to see corporations and politicians like Joe Biden getting bought out by the CCP, even as the commies are committing heinous crimes against humanity and we are witnessing them doing exactly that.
 
For you see, this isn’t the first time that American corporations (or politicians) have chosen to do business with an international threat to individual lives and freedom. This isn’t the first time American corporations have profited from the crimes against humanity perpetrated by a foreign nation.
 
The Daily Caller has a fantastic piece on this very topic, and they share a wealth of information about the sorts of business deals and practices American corporations made with the Nazis.
 
IBM, for example, reportedly “established its Dehomag subsidiary in Germany after Adolf Hitler become [sic] Chancellor in 1933 and used its new factory and American capital to aid in the Holocaust.”
 
“Investigative journalist Edwin Black wrote in his book IBM and the Holocaust that the company’s technology was used to manage the ‘logistics of genocide’ by creating punch card machines that tracked Jews and other populations across Europe and in the concentration camps.”
 
American photography company Eastman Kodak established financial ties to Nazi Germany through subsidiaries, according to the National Archives. According to The Nation, the subsidiaries used slave labor in two factories, with 80 slave laborers being used in the Berlin-Kopenick factory and roughly 250 in the plant in Stuttgart.
 
Ford and GM also collaborated with Nazi Germany, according to a civil case in 1998. Attorney Bradford Snell said: “GM was an integral part of the German war effort,” and he alleged that the Nazis “could not have [invaded European nations] without GM.”
 
According to The Daily Caller, “Nazi Germany operated nearly 44,000 concentration camps during its existence and used them for purposes ranging from forced labor to mass sterilization to genocide.”
 
The CCP is doing much of the same exact thing, only largely to Uighur Muslims and Christians. For example, “re-education camps”, which is nothing short of concentration camps, in the Xinjiang region are set up with the objective of curbing Islamic extremism and ethnic separatism among the Uighur Muslims. While curbing Islamic extremism isn’t a bad thing at all, the way in which the Chinese do it is itself very extreme. Reportedly, the program involves very strict digital surveillance, bans Muslim public prayer, forces Muslim men to shave their beards and forces the Muslims to eat during Ramadan.
 
While I am not exactly a fan of Muslims or Islam, especially as they have historically and presently been responsible for mass murders of many people, particularly Christians and Jews, at the very least, I cannot approve of what the CCP is doing to Uighur Muslims.
 
The way in which they “curb” Muslim extremism is very reminiscent of how the French Jacobins or Argentinian government dealt with suspected enemies of the Revolution and with suspected communists, respectively. Anyone who was suspected to be an enemy of the French Revolution or suspected to have been a communist was subjected to being arrested/disappeared and being either publicly executed (guillotines) or privately executed (there are stories of suspected communists being thrown off of planes by Argentinian officials).
 
My point being that the CCP just suspecting someone of being a Muslim extremist gives them the green light to take them in when the Muslims they are taking in might not be extremist at all. I have met and seen Muslims who have actively been against the extremist and violent ways of Islam, such as the Imam of Peace on Twitter (and others), and thus know that not exactly all of them agree on absolutely everything Muslims do (which is why there are even different “denominations” of Muslims like the Shiites and the Sunnis).
 
What the CCP is doing to the Uighur Muslims, regardless of what one thinks about Muslims or Islam in general, is nothing short of the very kind of crimes against humanity that the Nazis did on the Jews and many other types of people.
 
Only this is even worse because the excuse the world had for not doing anything about the Holocaust was that the world simply didn’t know it was even happening. The technology was not available at the time to do things like satellite spying or someone leaking footage of security cameras loading Jews onto trains to head to the concentration camps.
 
The world could legitimately claim ignorance to the Holocaust that the Nazis perpetrated. The world has no excuse at all for doing nothing about the holocaust the CCP is perpetrating as we speak. We KNOW it’s happening. We can see the footage of Uighurs being lined up and prepared to be boarded onto trains. We have found Chinese contraband of Uighur Muslim’s hair.
 
And yet, despite this, corporations turn a blind eye (even as China opportunistically set the world on fire with their coronavirus) and continue doing business with China, building factories there, creating programs there, etc., etc.
 
Even as we know of the atrocities of the Chinese communists, Nike still willingly profits from the slave labor forced to create their shoes and other products.
 
Even as we know what the CCP is doing to fellow human beings, Disney still chooses to do business in China with their Shanghai Disneyland park.
 
Even as we know what the neo-Nazi CCP is currently responsible for, numerous Hollywood studios have worked with Chinese-owned companies like Tencent, and they censor their movies for Chinese audiences, even as they claim to be “super-woke.” They will talk about how big a deal it was to have a homosexual sex scene in a movie about Elton John, talking about how progressive they are, while they remove that scene completely for the viewings in China.
 
Even as the Chinese communists are instigating a systematic cultural genocide (or systematic racism, if you will) of Uighur minorities, the NBA will scrutinize Houston Rockets’ GM Daryl Morey for sharing a picture that was pro-Hong Kong (as China has now taken over Hong Kong and destroyed its autonomy), and do business with the Chinese to aid the CBA and have players participating in programs in China.
 
I can’t really blame Ford, GM, IBM and the companies that worked with Nazi Germany because no one knew of the atrocities that country was committing until after it was defeated and destroyed.
 
What excuse do the NBA, Nike, Apple, Hollywood, and reportedly, 83 well-known brands have for doing business with a China which is actively involved in a 21st century holocaust that we KNOW is happening?
 
No one has any excuse for supporting or collaborating with China.
 
Perhaps, it shouldn’t be so surprising that they would do this, given that corporations have collaborated with Nazi Germany, but again, one can’t seriously blame the corporations that collaborated with Nazi Germany (too much) because no one knew what it was doing. Of course, Nazis were still authoritarians, and there is little reason, if any, to work with such a government, but if we’re talking about human atrocities, one can forgive companies’ ignorance about the Holocaust.
 
The companies currently aiding and abetting China, however, cannot be forgiven for doing this, especially as we know what is happening in that God-forsaken country.
 
Isaiah 48:22
“’There is no peace,’ says the Lord, ‘for the wicked.’”

Over the weekend, the ever-so tolerant city of Portland, Oregon was marred by riots from angsty Antifa terrorists pretending to fight the “far-right” while employing similar tactics used by Nazi Brown Shirts in 1930s Germany.
 
In the riots, a number of people were assaulted by members of the hateful group, including journalist Andy Ngo (who is gay, but that doesn’t matter to the Left if he is a conservative) and other men who all had to go to the ER.
 
Ngo had to be treated for a brain hemorrhage and the other men (who were taking part of a Him Too demonstration, a demonstration to support men who are victims of sexual assault and falsely accused of sexual assault) were also left bleeding.
 
According to Portland Police, Ngo was beaten and milkshake laced with quick-dry cement was thrown at him. The other men were beaten with a crowbar, nun-chucks and other things apart from being outright punched.
 
Meanwhile, not one Democrat candidate has come out to condemn the violence of Antifa (likely because they approve of it) and hardly any MSM source has condemned it, with CNN hardly covering it at all.
 
This is far from the first time Antifa has gotten violent against anyone they perceived to be “Alt-Right” aka anyone they even somewhat disagree with. According to Breitbart News, Antifa has beaten 15 other journalists apart from Ngo in the past. This, of course, doesn’t include the people they generally disagreed with who are not journalists whom they chose to assault (just a few months ago, they beat up an elderly man after dragging him out of his vehicle).
 
And throughout all of it, despite their outright terroristic actions, the media stays quiet at best and outright PRAISES them at worst, with comments like “what they are doing is right” or “they are angels” or “they are just like the soldiers at Normandy” often being said by members of the fake news media.
 
These people are NOT doing what is right, are DEMONS and definitely are like the soldiers at Normandy – the Nazi soldiers, that is.
 
These people are downright terrorists. Now, I know what some disturbed individual might say: “how can you say they are terrorists? They haven’t killed anyone yet!” They were beating people up with weapons, hitting them upside the head and causing severe damage. If they haven’t killed anyone yet, it hasn’t come from lack of trying.
 
Besides, is that really the threshold necessary to designate a group as terrorists? We have to wait until someone loses their life over this before we can say these people are terrorists?
 
Think about what they are doing: gathering in massive groups, destroying property and generally terrorizing the populace, making threats and often coming through on those threats of violence. They may not be terrorists like ISIS, but they are terrorists like the KKK, who terrorized black people after slavery was abolished.
 
It’s also rather ironic to me that Antifa is also predominantly white, like the KKK before them. Antifa is the Left’s new military arm.
 
If there ever is to be another civil war in America, it’ll be because of these masked cowards pretending to fight what they actually are. Their actions, as I have said multiple times, are the same ones taken by actual fascists in the 20th century. These people are as much anti-fascist as Obama was a Republican. That is to say – not at all.
 
Being anti-fascist means being against big government. These people LOVE big government, particularly when it has the power to shut down those who oppose it. The only reason they say they are against fascism is because the education system has, for half a century, indoctrinated people into believing fascism was big government on the Right. Big government is very strictly a Left-wing pursuit. There is no real difference between fascism, socialism and communism. I would use the analogy of them being different sides of the same coin, but coins are only two-sided, so that doesn’t quite work as well, but the point remains: they are all basically the same.
 
One thing that has always puzzled me is how people can claim communism or socialism is in any way different or better than Nazism was. Nazis WERE SOCIALISTS! Not that you would know this from learning in school.
 
But something people would try and say to argue my point about communism, socialism and fascism being the same is that the Soviets fought the Nazis in World War II, so they obviously have to be different. Not true.
 
That conflict wasn’t a conflict of ideology but of interest. The Soviets were largely fine with the Nazis, even helping them get rid of Jews in Soviet territory, and only turned on each other once Hitler made the moronic decision of invading Russia. The two sides believed in the same, government-dominant ideologies but wanted their own countries to dominate the world. That is where the conflict lied.
 
So those who are supportive of big government, particularly to such extents, find themselves with more in common with Stalin and Hitler than they do with anyone else. This very much includes those who are delusional enough to consider their fascist actions to be in any way its antithesis.
 
And considering the way things are going right now, it’s only bound to get worse unless something gets done about this. Do we really have to wait until these people actually kill someone before designating them what we KNOW they are? Or are we just going to wait until an actual civil war begins? Are we going to wait until they’ve pushed people around long enough to actually being some sort of war?
 
These people may have the right to believe what they believe, but they most certainly do NOT have the right to partake in the actions that they are. And it sickens me that the mainstream media will hardly cover it, barely condemn it and sometimes even CHEER them on as they destroy people’s lives. It sickens me, though not necessarily surprises me, that not a single Democrat candidate looked at what happened in Portland (and it often happens in that God-forsaken city that I am definitely glad I left years ago) and not think of what happened as an absolutely reprehensible act.
 
Again, I do not see things getting better with these people. There may be a few people here and there who look at what they are doing, reflect on it, and decide to leave. That’s certainly possible, but this problem will not go away on its own. They are adamant about destroying an enemy that does not really exist. With their enemy so poorly defined as “Alt-Right”, literally anyone can be their enemy. Anyone who disagrees with them becomes their enemy and find that a justifiable enough reason to attack them. This includes even Democrats who disagree with them. And they won’t stop until their enemy is eliminated or they are.
 
This is, among many other reasons, why Antifa must be designated a domestic terrorist group and treated as such. They are not “fine Americans” and “angels” who are “fighting for good”. They are what Hitler and Stalin would’ve loved to see in the United States: fascist revolutionaries who will only escalate things as time goes on.
 
Isaiah 5:20
“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!

In recent time, the Supreme Court ruled (7-2, which was surprising), that Indiana had the right to require “medical facilities” like Planned Parenthood to provide dignified burials or cremation for aborted children. And while that is a nice little win for pro-lifers, the Court decided against ruling on a supposedly controversial part of the law that prohibited abortions on the basis of race, gender or disabilities.
 
Justice Clarence Thomas, after the ruling, said in a statement that while “further percolation may assist our review of this issue of first impression,” and that the Court was smart to not rule on this part of the Indiana law, the Court cannot avoid this issue forever.
 
“Given the potential for abortion to become a tool for eugenic manipulation, the court will soon need to confront the constitutionality of laws like Indiana’s. So long as the Supreme Court forces a policy of unfettered elective abortion on the entire country, it ought to at least allow for states to protect babies from unjust discrimination.”
 
He added: “Although the court declines to wade into these issues today, we cannot avoid them forever. Having created the constitutional right to an abortion, this court is dutybound to address its scope.”
 
The Indiana law in question largely focuses on the disabilities aspect, targeting abortions performed for the reasons of a baby having Down syndrome.
 
The law reads: “Indiana does not allow a fetus to be aborted solely because of the fetus’ race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, or diagnosis or potential diagnosis of the fetus having Down syndrome or any other disability.”
 
According to The Daily Wire, “Thomas referenced genetic screening in his concurrence, noting that a baby’s gender can be determined by an elective blood test given between 7 and 10 weeks, and that disabilities like Down syndrome can be detected before the end of the first trimester.” Thomas said that pairing these screenings with largely unrestricted abortion access leads us to “modern-day eugenics.”
 
Thomas ended by writing: “Enshrining a constitutional right to an abortion based solely on the race, sex, or disability of an unborn child, as Planned Parenthood advocates, would constitutionalize the views of the 20th-century eugenics movement. In other contexts, the Court has been zealous in vindicating the rights of people even potentially subjected to race, sex, and disability discrimination.”
 
All-in-all, I largely agree with what Justice Clarence Thomas is saying here except for two points. One, I do not think it was smart of the Court to pass up on not ruling on this part of the Indiana law. More time given to look things over when they ought to be clear as day allows for other states that do not have a similar law to perform the sort of ethnic cleansing Margaret Sanger often dreamed of.
 
If one discriminates against someone based on any of these factors at any level, whether that be in business, in school, in sports, or in any other area, that person is punished to some capacity. Not allowing a black person to eat at your restaurant for the reason of his or her race is not allowed under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
 
Nowhere can someone openly discriminate against someone for the reason of race, sex, etc. except in the womb. Let us not ignore the fact that Planned Parenthood disproportionally targets black and Hispanic neighborhoods, with almost 80% of their facilities located within walking distance of minorities. Let’s not ignore the fact that 52% of African American pregnancies end in abortion or that roughly 1,800 black babies are aborted every day.
 
Let’s not ignore the fact that babies who are diagnosed with Down syndrome are 60 to 80% likely to be aborted, according to the Guttmacher Institute. And that’s just in the U.S. In Europe, Down syndrome is basically non-existent, not because they found a cure, but because they systematically abort babies diagnosed with Down syndrome.
 
And in places like China and India, unborn girls face a high probability of being aborted. The UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund. Yes, the letters don’t match, but that’s because they used to be called the United Nations Fund for Population Activities) says that “126 million women and girls were missing in 2010 due to gender-biased sex selection, which can include, for example, excess female mortality and prenatal sex selection.”
 
That last reason they give, “prenatal sex selection” is simply their Leftist way of acknowledging abortion is the cause without actually blaming abortion. But you can plainly see that abortion is at least partly responsible for over 100 million women and girls “missing” (not sure what exactly that is supposed to mean here, but I may have a few ideas).
 
Countries like India show quite an imbalance in sex ratios, where there are 110 boys born for every 100 girls from 2011-2013. But that is nothing compared to China, which had 115.9 boys for every 100 girls born in 2014.
 
So throughout the world, abortion is already very much a tool of eugenics. Matter of fact, it always has been! And that’s the second point that I don’t entirely agree with Thomas. Abortion does not lead to eugenics. Abortion is already a tool of eugenics and always has been.
 
Let’s not forget that Margaret Sanger saw black people as a “weed” to be uprooted and frequently employed Nazi sympathizers like Clarence Gamble and Lothrop Stoddard. And let’s not forget that there have been a plethora of eugenics-based organizations, such as the Eugenics Record Office, the National Conference on Race Betterment, and the American Breeders Association.
 
These racist organizations were so vile that one particular man remarked: “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.” And that “The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective offspring is a demand of clearest reason. If systematically executed, it represents the most humane act of mankind.”
 
And just who was this man who viewed American eugenics and abortion as “the most humane act of mankind”?
 
None other than the leader of the Third Reich, Adolf Hitler. Yes, he absolutely adored American eugenics programs and sought to adopt them into his own German empire.
 
Margaret Sanger sought to utilize abortion as a eugenics tool long before there was even a Planned Parenthood. She sought to keep minorities, whom she considered “weeds” and “imbecilic” and overall “defective”, from reproducing as much as possible.
 
And given the statistics we see today, that sort of racial discrimination is not only alive and well, but outright THRIVING. We easily see the dreams of Margaret Sanger, Clarence Gamble, Lothrop Stoddard, and Adolf Hitler being carried out by Planned Parenthood and other abortionists throughout the world.
 
Already, 61 million babies have been aborted in the U.S. since 1973 and 1.5 billion in the world since 1980. Almost 20 million in the U.S. were black.
 
Justice Clarence Thomas is certainly right in drawing the links between abortion and eugenics, particularly in race-based, sex-based, etc. abortions. The problem is that abortion doesn’t lead to eugenics. Abortion IS eugenics. Now, not all eugenics are abortions, but all abortions are eugenics. The reasoning behind the abortions may not sound like eugenics, but at the end of the day, they are.
 
It’s not “women’s healthcare” or “liberation” for a black woman to kill off her own offspring (the literal definition of a fetus). It’s eugenics, through and through.
 
And Thomas is certainly right in saying that the Supreme Court can’t keep kicking this particular can down the road. Eventually, it will have to face the reality that this kind of abortion is outright discrimination and should be treated like any other kind of discrimination is today.
 
1 Samuel 16:7
“But the Lord said to Samuel, ‘Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature, because I have rejected him. For the Lord sees not as man sees: man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!

Back in March, I wrote an article talking about Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Al-Shabaab)’s anti-Semitic comments and how the Democrat Party initially planned to pass a resolution condemning all anti-Semitism (without singling out Omar) but then simply chose to pass a resolution condemning all forms of hatred, pretending as if no anti-Semitism actually was spewed.
 
Recently, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Hamas) tried her hand at a common tactic among anti-Semites: revisionist history of the Holocaust and Israel.
 
On a Yahoo podcast named, “Skullduggery”, Tlaib said the following words: “There’s kind of a calming feeling I always tell folks when I think of the Holocaust, and the tragedy of the Holocaust, and the fact that it was my ancestors, Palestinians, who lost their land and some lost their lives, their livelihood, their human dignity, their existence in many ways, have been wiped out, and some people’s passports… I mean, just all of it was in the name of trying to create a safe haven for Jews, post- the Holocaust, post- the tragedy and horrific persecution of Jews across the world at that time.”
 
Now, there are a number of things that are very, very wrong about this.
 
First, that initial portion is quite horrific. She gets a “calming feeling” when she thinks about the Holocaust and the tragedy of it? That is honestly some of the most vile, anti-Semitic rhetoric I have heard in my life. And before anyone tells me I’m taking it out of context, as pretty much all Democrats will claim here, in what context exactly is the phrase “calming feeling” when thinking of the Holocaust in any way not anti-Semitic?
 
Had she tried to say she got a “calming” or “pleasant” feeling of “knowing” her ancestors did nice things for the Jews (a complete lie, but we’ll get to that in a moment), then that would’ve been different. But she prefaced that with the actual Holocaust and its tragedy.
 
She could’ve said: “There’s kind of a calming feeling I always tell folks when I think of what my ancestors did for the persecuted Jews post- the Holocaust, about how they did their best to try to help them, even if it came at the cost of their very own lives and livelihoods.” THAT would’ve still been utterly wrong and Jewish revisionist history, but it at least would’ve been taken a little bit better, in my opinion. It at least would’ve hidden her hatred for Jews and appreciation for the Holocaust. But the Left is convinced they can get away with pretty much everything, so she can make clear her hatred of Jews and appreciation for the Holocaust and the Democrats + the media will come to her defense… exactly as they did.
 
The second, and perhaps most important thing that is wrong about what she said is the actual revisionist history. The Palestinians living in the area at the time were anything BUT welcoming of the Jewish people post- the Holocaust. Violence was often used against Jews returning to the Holy Land, which was occupied by Muslims at the time.
 
And matter of fact, it was the Palestinian Grand Mufti, Muhammad Amin al-Husayni, who was a big ally of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany, even being a big fan of Hitler’s “final solution” of the elimination of lesser races and people.
 
Now, a commonplace lie that is peddled by anti-Semites is that Israel only exists today because of the Holocaust. That is patently untrue.
 
Even ignoring the fact that Israel existed as a nation THOUSANDS of years before the Holocaust took place, what with Abraham essentially being considered every Jew’s ancestor (and every Christian, really), as well as Moses delivering the Jewish people out of bondage through God’s power, and God choosing Saul to anoint him as king of Israel, followed by David and Solomon, the Jewish people began to resettle in the land WELL before the Holocaust.
 
According to the New York Post: “Last Wednesday was Israel’s Memorial Day for fallen soldiers and victims of terror. Israeli television broadcast all the names – 23,741. The litany begins with Avraham Shlomo Zalman Tzoref, who was murdered by Arabs opposing his work for the Jewish community in Jerusalem. That was in 1851. The Holocaust took place nearly a century later.”
 
What’s more, Jewish people began to return to Jerusalem, or Zion, around the 1880s. “In 1917, British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour declared that his government ‘view[s] with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.’ The League of Nations, a precursor to the United Nations, gave the British a temporary mandate to govern Palestine, and under the mandate, the Jewish community formed its own self-governing body in 1922.”
 
So there was already quite the Jewish presence in the area well before Hitler came along. And returning to the Grand Mufti, according to a German transcript of a meeting between him and Hitler, when visiting German troops, the Mufti said: “An appeal by the Mufti to the Arab countries… would produce a great number of volunteers eager to fight.”
 
Hitler then made a promise to the Mufti that, after conquering the Southern Caucasus, “Germany’s objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere.”
 
The Arabs even pressured the British into limiting the number of Jews who would be granted access to the mandate established in 1917 in seek of refuge, leading many ships to be forced to turn around and many Jews to be sent to almost certain death in Europe.
 
What’s more, in 1947 when the U.N. voted to “partition mandatory Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state, five Arab armies invaded in an attempt to make it all Arab.”
 
So not only was there considerable Jewish presence in the region well before the Holocaust, enough to petition the British to allow for a sovereign Jewish state, and not only were the Arabs in cahoots with the Nazis, but once World War II had ended and the newly-formed U.N. voted to allow for a Jewish state to exist in the region, the Arabs (or Palestinians) outright invaded the region to keep it from becoming Israel’s.
 
The REAL history lesson here is the fact that Tlaib’s ancestors SOUGHT THE DESTRUCTION OF THE JEWS, EVEN SIDING WITH HITLER TO DO SO! And yet, she implies that the real victims here are the “Palestinians” post- the Holocaust. She implies that the Jews were greedy land-grabbers and thieves who took advantage of poor, little Palestinians who only wanted them to be safe and comfy.
 
What a load of crap! The Islamic Arabs have been mortal enemies to the Jews for centuries, ever since the “prophet” Mohammed’s first bloody crusade against infidels. They worked hand-in-hand with the NAZIS to eliminate the Jews. That is a FACT. What Tlaib is claiming here is entirely ahistorical crap.
 
But lo and behold, the self-righteous Democrat Party comes to Tlaib’s defense after getting called out for her horrific choice of words and her thinly-veiled attempt at rewriting history to make the Jews look like the bad guys.
 
Everyone from President Trump to Congressional Republicans to SANE PEOPLE WHO KNOW THEIR HISTORY AND CAN TELL TLAIB IS A HORRIBLE ANTI-SEMITE called Tlaib out on her bigotry and her hatred.
 
“Democrat Rep. Tlaib is being slammed for her horrible and highly insensitive statement on the Holocaust. She obviously has tremendous hatred of Israel and the Jewish people,” wrote the President.
 
This, in particular, has gotten the Democrats to, once again, defend anti-Semitism and show themselves to be far closer to the Nazi Party than they could ever claim Trump and Republicans to be.
 
Dem. Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD) tweeted: “If you read Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s comments, it is clear that President Trump and Congressional Republicans are taking them out of context. They must stop, and they owe her an apology.”
 
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Californistan) tweeted: “Republicans’ desperate attempts to smear Rep. Rashida Tlaib & misrepresent her comments are outrageous. President Donald Trump & House GOP should apologize to Rep. Tlaib & the American people for their gross misrepresentations.”
 
Yeah, Trump and Republicans should totally apologize to the horrible bigot for making her horrific comments that do not even attempt to hide her hatred for Jews and hardly attempt to hide that she is trying to rewrite history to make Jews look like the bad guys DURING THE WORST TRAGEDY TO EVER BEFALL THE JEWS!
 
Yeah, Tlaib was only making poorly-thought-out at best comments saying she got a calming feeling when thinking about the Holocaust and the tragedy and was only trying to insinuate the common anti-Semitic lie that Arabs in the region were welcoming of the Jews who totally were never there before.
 
Even Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-USSR) weighed in on this in defense of Tlaib. May I remind you he himself is Jewish?
 
Well, he’s a socialist, so I don’t know how one can be Jewish (or Christian) and socialist at the same time. If one were to say he is a socialist, he is not a Jew or a Christian. One cannot serve two masters (God and the government) for he will love one and hate the other and vice versa.
 
But in any case, we continue seeing the Left-ward trend from the modern Democrat Party to get closer and closer to the Nazi Party of Germany without actually calling themselves Nazis (and even having the nerve to call other people “Nazis”).
 
One does not have to think very hard about where we will go from here.
 
Psalm 109:2-5
“For wicked and deceitful mouths are opened against me, speaking against me with lying tongues. They encircle me with words of hate, and attack me without cause. In return for my love they accuse me, but I give myself to prayer. So they reward me evil for good, and hatred for my love.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!

One of the arguments the Left often makes about climate change, more specifically, man-made climate change, is that there is a consensus in the scientific field around the idea that man is causing harm to the planet and we need to take care of that.
 
Unsurprisingly, much like any other argument the Left ever makes, that is full of lies. Dr. Timothy Ball & Tom Harris, a climatologist and an Executive Director, respectively, at the International Climate Science Coalition in Ottowa, Canada, wrote a column on America Out Loud titled: “The Biggest Lie Ever Told – Man-made Global Warming”.
 
In this piece, they quickly establish some basic truths about our climate: it’s “well within the range of natural climate variability through Earth’s 4.5 billion-year history. In fact, it is within the range of the climate change of the last 10,000 years, a period known as the Holocene, 95% of which was warmer than today.”
 
They also establish the fact that CO2 does nothing to increase the global temperature, as there were substantial increases in the world’s temperature before CO2 became so known and used in things like airplanes, cars, etc. The only place where CO2 raises global temperatures is in the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s models.
 
They also quote Adolf Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels on what he said about lying to people (as a minister of propaganda naturally would do): “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the state can shield the people from the political, economic, and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the state to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the state.”
 
And one can’t help but to think of the countless times Leftists, be it elected Democrats or members of the media, have sought to silence those who would dare challenge the idea that man is causing global warming. I mean, Al Gore even suggested fairly recently to basically criminalize denying climate change hysteria. That tells you the sort of Nazi-like ideology that lives within the modern-day Left: the enemy of their reality is the truth, and those who speak the truth are, by extension, their enemies as well – enemies that cannot be allowed to speak the truth.
 
Dr. Ball and Mr. Harris also highlight a few of the lies perpetuated by a radical Left, which include: “It is warmer now than ever before; There is more severe weather now than before; CO2 levels are the highest ever; Arctic and Antarctic sea levels are the lowest ever; Extinction rates are the highest ever; Polar bear populations are in serious decline; Sea levels are rising at an increasing rate.”
 
They also mention the fact that Obama constantly perpetuated these lies, with the help of his EPA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
 
The biggest problem the Left faces in trying to sell this climate change hysteria is the fact that a state needs to constantly repeat the lie for people to believe it. Eight years of Obama helped the state lie to the people an awful lot, but elections are a thing in this country. Dictators have the advantage of either not having to run over and over or simply rigging elections to be constantly and eternally re-elected. However, the Electoral College affords Americans the opportunity to select their new President in a system that is, according to Obama, impossible to “hack” or “rig”.
 
We see this be the case considering that Trump is President and his EPA is not run by climate lunatics.
 
According to Dr. Ball and Mr. Harris: “The Trump Administration has proposed to establish a Presidential Commission on Climate Security, headed by former Princeton physicist Will Happer, to expose the climate lie by disclosing how the IPCC only examined human causes of climate change. They will show how natural climate change completely overwhelms any human effect. For example, human production of CO2 is less than the uncertainty in the measurement of the transfer of CO2 from two natural sources: the oceans, and the vegetation and land. In other words, if we removed all the people from the planet, a scientist left behind to measure the CO2 levels would not detect any difference.”
 
Which is really something to take into consideration in any climate change debate. HUMANS DO NOT HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO DESTROY THE PLANET WITHOUT NUKES! We simply do not output enough CO2 to make even a noticeable, much less significant, impact on the climate. Why else do you think we hear of stories of the Arctic or Antarctic seeing an increase in sheets of ice? Because whatever the Left claims we are doing to the climate is simply untrue.
 
We see this in the fact that they switched from saying “global warming” to simply calling it “climate change”, so as to cover the only two possible changes in the climate: warmth or cold. And somehow, people are alarmed by this? THIS IS HOW OUR PLANET WORKS! There are periods of extreme cold and extreme warmth and we are experiencing neither extreme. It makes as little sense to be worried about this as it would be to be worried about gravity.
 
This is NATURE. And guess what? Humanity has survived. Hot and cold, it’s survived.
 
And by the way, I find it absolutely hilarious that the “scientific community” as the Left calls them claims that the planet has never been warmer. Well, if my high school science class memory serves me right, there was a period of time before there was any life on Earth when the planet was literally a massive ball of magma and lava and fire after it was first formed (by something I don’t quite remember what the science class said, but definitely did not credit God) and went through a period of cooling down after that.
 
So it is an outright lie to say the planet’s never been warmer because we would all be swimming in lava right now if that were the case.
 
In any case, Dr. Ball and Mr. Harris return to Goebbels’ concept that a lie can be maintained as long as the state shields the people from political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. They note that in 1998, the Kyoto Protocol was established, which was essentially the same exact thing as the Paris Climate Agreement. The Kyoto Protocol, despite being a supposed “answer” for climate change (and Kyoto Protocol supporter Tom Wigley estimated that even if all the reduction targets were met, the temperature would lower only by 0.05° by 2050, so a completely unnoticeable change) would’ve done something similar to what the Paris Climate Agreement would’ve done: cripple the U.S. economy to fight an invisible enemy.
 
The U.S. Senate looked into the Kyoto Protocol but the Byrd/Hagel Resolution (the only thing I can give honest props to Robert Byrd for) stated that America should not be a signatory to “any agreement based on the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that would seriously damage the U.S. economy and didn’t include emissions reductions for developing countries that were similar to those imposed on the U.S.” That resolution passed unanimously, 95-0.
 
However, based on that, you can tell that Obama’s Democrat Party was considerably different. The Paris Climate Agreement was made to do exactly what the Kyoto Protocol was supposed to do: force the U.S. to comply to strict environmental regulations (which would cripple the economy) but other nations would not be forced to do much at all. And similarly to the Kyoto Protocol, someone estimated that even if all the requirements were met, the change would be entirely unnoticeable.
 
And as things stand today, the Stanford Energy Forum and the Asia Modelling Exercise estimate the Paris Climate Agreement to cost $1 – 2 trillion every YEAR.
 
But if you remember correctly, when Trump made the great choice of pulling the U.S. out of the deal, the Left cried as though it was the end of the world, with many actually claiming it would lead to the end of the world. No, it led to the end of the United States getting shafted by globalist organizations seeking to steal our money.
 
I can’t help but keep remembering that Goebbels quote and seeing the Left perfectly fitting the bill. They insist that “climate deniers” should not be given any platform to speak, essentially marking them as the enemy of the state, with some even actually wanting to criminalize and punish offering a different point of view.
 
Peter Buttigieg, the unholy hypocrite, said that to him, if people are faced with adversity, they are not free. In other words, he is not free if anyone were to offer a differing point of view from his own as he considers that to be adversity. And all of a sudden, that person is branded as an oppressor and someone who is taking away his freedom. That is the definition of irony right there: denying someone the freedom to speak while claiming he or she is denying someone else their freedom.
 
This is how a dictatorship starts. This is how an out of control government, led by a tyrant, starts. Insisting that someone will be free if they submit to slavery or servitude is a tale as old as time. A despot promising safety for the people in exchange for their freedom ultimately provides neither.
 
As Benjamin Franklin once said: “Those who would give up essential Liberty to purchase a little temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
 
And what the Left is offering is “safety” from man-made climate change in exchange for liberty. Of course, they don’t broadcast it, but that is what they are ultimately offering. The Green New Deal was going to get rid of planes, farting cows and ALL BUILDINGS AND VEHICLES THAT ARE NOT UP TO THEIR GREEN STANDARDS! If that is not forcing the people to give up their liberty, I don’t know what is.
 
But as far as these two guys go, that article is pretty great. It shows that (even though I already knew this) there is not absolute, unanimous consensus in the scientific field about climate change. Not everyone is willing to lie to the people of the world that we are killing our planet. We are making no noticeable contribution to it, one way or the other, so no need to fret about it.
 
God is the one in control of the world’s climate. Not us. The idea that we could wrestle control away from Him is ludicrous at best and outright blasphemous at worst.
 
1 Chronicles 29:11
“Yours, O Lord, is the greatness and the power and the glory and the victory and the majesty, for all that is in the heavens and in the earth is yours. Yours is the kingdom, O Lord, and you are exalted as head above all.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!

In the time that Donald Trump has run and taken office, he has been called a slew of ridiculous names, among which are things like “Hitler” and “Nazi” and such names have even been transferred over to those who support him. However, Trump has done something that both Bush and Obama could have done but didn’t care to do: deport a former Nazi labor camp guard.
 
According to the Daily Wire: “The Trump administration announced early on Tuesday morning that it had arrested 95-year-old Jakiw Palij – the last known Nazi collaborator living in the United States – at his home in Queens, New York, and deported him to Germany.”
 
The Office of the Press Secretary released a statement following the arrest and subsequent deportation: “President Trump commends his Administration’s comprehensive actions, especially ICE’s actions, in removing this war criminal from United States soil. Despite a court ordering his deportation in 2004, past administrations were unsuccessful in removing Palij.”
 
The statement continues: “To protect the promise of freedom for Holocaust survivors and their families, President Trump prioritized the removal of Palij. Through extensive negotiations, President Trump and his team secured Palij’s deportation to Germany and advanced the United States’ collaborative efforts with a key European ally.”
 
And ABC News reported: “Trump told U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell to make Palij’s deportation his number one priority when he got to Berlin.”
 
In the statement by the Office of the Press Secretary, there is one particular paragraph that is in larger font than the rest of the statement. This is what it reads: “Palij had lied about being a Nazi and remained in the United States for decades. Palij’s removal sends a strong message: The United States will not tolerate those who facilitated Nazi crimes and other human rights violations, and they will not find a safe haven on American soil.”
 
The statement also summarizes Palij’s life, having been born in what was at the time Poland but now is part of Ukraine, immigrated to the U.S. in 1949 and became a citizen in 1957. During the process of immigration and naturalization, Palij had hid the fact he was a Nazi SS labor camp guard, saying that he spent the duration of WWII “working on a farm and in a factory.”
 
The way the U.S. found out he was a Nazi labor camp guard is through a confession by Palij in 2001 to DOJ officials. He trained at the Nazi SS Training Camp in Trawniki, Poland. The same training camp that, according to court documents, trained SS soldiers who participated in “Operation Reinhard”, an op to kill Jews in Poland. The Trawniki camp is also famous for having incarcerated and executed around 6,000 Jewish children, women and men in a single day, November 3rd, 1943. It is known as one of the single largest massacres of the Holocaust.
 
According to the statement: “In August 2003, a federal judge revoked Palij’s United States citizenship based on his wartime activities, human rights abuses, and postwar immigration fraud. He was ordered deported in 2004, and his administrative appeal was denied in 2005.”
 
In other words, the request to be deported, despite it having been an order (the statement doesn’t clarify who gave the order in 2004), was denied by someone in the Bush administration for whatever reason.
 
No other order of deportation was issued by the Bush or Obama administrations and no action was taken to deport Palij, as evident by this week’s events.
 
Now, Ryan Saavedra of the Daily Wire, upon talking about this subject, opened his article by saying: “It will be interesting to see how CNN and MSNBC spin this.”
 
In my mind, there are a couple of things that could happen: either the MSM won’t cover it (to be fair, the Manafort trial is a big topic this week, so that will get the bulk of the screen time no matter what) or they will cover it and simply say it’s some form of virtue signaling, with Trump essentially saying to people “how can I be Hitler if I literally just deported a Nazi?” and spin it that way.
 
Of course, that still wouldn’t work because most people don’t believe the MSM anymore and we can have conversations about how the American Left and the Nazis are basically one and the same, only with different words and different targets for elimination.
 
The point is that they will either avoid covering it to avoid giving Trump or ICE, the agency that deported Palij, any sort of credit, even if inadvertently, or they will try to say it’s nothing more than virtue signaling. Kind of like whenever some sports star attacks Trump as being racist when 1) there is nothing you can point to that makes him a racist and 2) everyone else on the Left is doing it already and the attack has lost all its meaning and only serves to drive his supporters closer to him.
 
The difference between the actual virtue signaling of a sports star (or any other celebrity) calling Trump a racist and the “virtue signaling” of Trump deporting a Nazi is that Trump’s actions are more worthwhile than the manure that comes out of celebrities’ mouths.
 
Successfully extracting a former Nazi labor camp guard from U.S. soil, when both the Bush and Obama administrations had all the opportunity in the world to do, is a far stronger message to send to people than “Trump is a racist because reasons”.
 
We send the message that those who took part in or helped facilitate the egregious actions of an evil empire of the past are simply not welcome in the United States. If that is the message that the Left wants to own today, that ship has just sailed. Obama could easily have gotten some major props on both sides of the aisle in deporting the former Nazi guard, but was too busy running the country into the ground to do it.
 
Bush could have also done it but was too busy forging friendships with the establishment and promising to act like a scared kitten whenever Obama blamed anything he was doing wrong on him to do the job (granted, he had less time to do it, but still).
 
So if the MSM wants to spin it as virtue signaling, they will have to answer the question: “why didn’t Obama or Bush do it, then?” Or at least Obama, since they would then try to fully blame it on Bush and completely avoid the fact that Obama failed to act too.
 
James 4:17
“So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin.”