Continuing down the list of things people find strangely racist, we find Jack-O’-Lanterns that are painted black, because 2019 is stupid and we continue to stray farther from God.
 
A New York law firm recently came under fire due to placing black Jack-O’-Lanterns in their front porch in Nyack, New York, which some people decried was “racist” and “insensitive.”
 
Mary Marzolla, a partner at Feerick, Nugent, MacCartney Law Offices, said that “we understand that someone complained about [the black Jack-O’-Lanterns] and so once we got word of that, we immediately took them down.” Marzolla also explains that the pumpkins were personalized with the names of each of the firm’s partners and were not intended to offend anyone. “We represent people of all colors and faiths, and we would never do anything to exclude anyone from any community.”
 
A local NAACP director, Wilbur Aldridge, says that the display shows an “extreme lack of sensitivity.”
 
I’m not exactly surprised that an NAACP director would complain about something like this. These people find just about everything offensive, except for the systemic genocide of black people in the womb.
 
But regardless, the law firm subsequently queried why it was that they came under fire for displaying the pumpkins when they bought them from Bed Bath & Beyond, putting the spotlight on that company.
 
As a result of that, Bed Bath & Beyond apologized for having sold the “racist” Jack-O’-Lanterns and pulled them from store shelves, adding that any offense was unintentional.
 
Director Wilbur Aldridge also decided to attack Bed Bath & Beyond, decrying that it was “equally as offensive” that the retail store would sell the product as the firm was for displaying it.
 
Now, I don’t ever tend to put up decorations outside my home during Halloween, only during Christmas and even then, only the wreath on my front door, but nothing more than that. But if I wanted to put a black Jack-O’-Lantern on my front porch, why would anyone take offense to it? The lanterns that the firm used were not all too different from other ones. The lanterns had faces painted on them that gave them a white mouth, white teeth, white eyes and a white nose. What’s so offensive about that? How is this equal to blackface?
 
In my opinion, this is just bullying the law firm. Of course they meant no offense! NO ONE INTENDS OFFENSE WHEN PUTTING UP DECORATIONS! It’d be like saying a display of the birth of Jesus was racist because the characters have brown skin and Muslims could be offended (although there are other “arguments” people make about taking down such decorations). It’s utterly ridiculous and the only person here that is in any way offensive is the NAACP director.
 
The fact that he can only see things through the lens of skin color tells me race is all that is in his mind. And the fact that he would push the law firm and the retail giant to pull the “racist” lanterns off their porch and shelves respectively tells me the guy is just a bully. How exactly is this necessary? Who does it offend? Why does it offend? Because it’s black? PLENTY OF THINGS ARE BLACK TOO!
 
The very computer monitor I’m typing on is black. Is that racist? My phone is black. Does that make it racist and make me racist for having it? Or is it only racist if I put a face on it? If I put a face on my phone, does that make me racist? Is a black cat racist? Because it’s both black and has a face on it.
 
So then why would A BLACK JACK-O’-LANTERN BE CONSIDERED RACIST?!
 
That’s really a rhetorical question. We know precisely why it’s considered racist. Not because it fundamentally is racist but because people want to flex some social muscle and bully others into submission.
 
The NAACP is, unsurprisingly, full of Leftists. Leftists, in case one can’t tell, are massive bullies. I don’t think I have to make much of a case as to why they are. My entire website highlights time after time after time and case after case after case of Leftists being bullies in some way or another. Whether it’s bullying Trump, bullying celebrities, bullying regular people, bullying libraries, bullying businesses, bullying the law-abiding citizens, just about their entire ethos surrounds the tactic of bullying.
 
It’s a means to an end and it’s disgusting. And it’s totally insincere too. Let’s not forget that Virginia Governor Ralph Northam GOT CAUGHT WEARING BLACK FACE IN A COLLEGE PICTURE and is still governor of Virginia. Let’s not forget that Canadian PM Justin Trudeau got caught in black face THREE DIFFERENT TIMES and he recently won re-election as PM.
 
What this tells us is that it’s okay to be racist, to wear blackface, to offend people, so long as you are 1) a Democrat/liberal/Leftist and 2) apologize, even if you do not mean it in the least.
 
No one can sincerely argue that the law firm or the retail giant intended any offense when putting up or selling the black-O’-lanterns. But still, they catch fire for it. And yet, Northam and Trudeau have both worn blackface, which I would argue is FAR more offensive than a black Jack-O’-Lantern, and they do not get punished whatsoever, in fact, only get rewarded for it, as is the case for Trudeau.
 
Racism means nothing if consequences aren’t equally shared. If the law firm and Bed Bath & Beyond are punished for the black lanterns, why aren’t actual people who intentionally wore blackface? If it’s okay for the racist liberals to do it, it’s okay for EVERYONE to do it (and let’s not even get into the whole “lynching” fiasco, which is another example of Leftist hypocrisy, given even they have used the word which they claim is offensive, but actually is not).
 
Every time someone is accused of racism, while at one time was a heavy charge, it means absolutely nothing anymore. When someone is accused of being a Nazi, while that was a serious charge against someone in the past, it means absolutely nothing any more (unless they actually are a Nazi, of course).
 
These words have lost all meaning due to overuse. Of course, for businesses who risk profits, they will bend the knee to these Leftist bullies and do whatever they want so as to avoid unnecessary conflict. But for me, when someone is accused of being a racist, that means absolutely nothing to me (again, unless they actually were being racist).
 
Trump has been called a racist since the beginning of his campaign and there isn’t a single time when he has proven or even slightly suggested that he was racist. The charge itself holds no value anymore, which is why some Democrat candidates have insisted on saying something “stronger” than just calling people racist.
 
The fact that that is even being discussed is proof that what I say is true. They wouldn’t need to come up with a stronger charge than “racist” if the charge of “racism” was in any way as effective as it once was.
 
But to reiterate my original point, the black Jack-O’-Lanterns are NOT ACTUALLY RACIST! Certainly, not to anyone who has any sense of reason or logic or even a remotely thick skin.
 
Deuteronomy 31:6
“Be strong and courageous. Do not fear or be in dread of them, for it is the Lord your God who goes with you. He will not leave you or forsake you.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Following the two shootings that occurred over the weekend, President Donald Trump issued a televised statement from the White House condemning white supremacy, racism and hatred that likely fueled the shootings to take place, something the Left had been demanding Trump do following the tragedies. However, having done so, the Left is ticked off that he did, insists he is insincere and continues to spread the lie that Donald Trump is a racist white supremacist who enables people like the shooters (who both held Leftist beliefs) to commit those kinds of heinous acts.
 
But for a brief period of time, the New York Times actually acted like a news organization and planned to deliver a story surrounding the event in a relatively unbiased manner. Their original headline was: “Trump Urges Unity Vs. Racism.”
 
I will share a few of the statements the President made shortly, but I would have to say that that is an apt summation of what was said. President Trump fully condemned the shooters, as well as the white supremacy ideology that likely fueled at least one of them. However, this unbiased headline was too “far-right” and too unbiased for the ever-so tolerant and not-at-all full of crap Leftists who are still subscribed to the paper.
 
Nate Silver from FiveThirtyEight, a notable far-Left source, tweeted: “Tomorrow’s NYT print edition. Not sure ‘TRUMP URGES UNITY VS. RACISM’ is how I would have framed the story.”
 
Him being a Leftist, that doesn’t surprise me. Neither does it surprise me that 2020 Dem hopefuls also announced their frustrations over the truthful headline.
 
Cory Booker tweeted: “Lives literally depend on you doing better, NYT. Please do.”
 
Kirsten Gillibrand tweeted: “That’s not what happened.”
 
Allow me to briefly address the two failures. First, let’s start with what Not So Smarticus said, “Lives literally depend on you doing better, NYT. Please do.”
 
Am I the only one getting 1984 vibes here? Cause to me, it sounds like a politician is shaming the publication for reporting the truth and insists that people’s lives are in danger as a result of it. Because, you see, the truth is dangerous. When people find the truth, they stop believing the lies. The lies that Donald Trump is a racist and a white supremacist. The lies that Donald Trump colluded with Russia. The lies that Republicans have blood on their hands when tragedies like these happen. And to me, it looks like Cory Booker is attempting to channel his inner Joseph Goebbels: “Let me control the media and I will turn any nation into a herd of pigs.”
 
He doesn’t want the media to report on the truth because that has consequences dire to his agenda – to the Leftist agenda. Lives are not put into danger because the New York Times’ original headline featured objectivity and truth. Lives are not put into danger because the headline, for once, featured a Trump who offers unity (which he had been for years, but the MSM never reported on it, likely because of crap like this). But in the mind of a Leftist, Trump is Hitler (who was also an extreme Leftist, but no one will care to admit that on the Left) and as a result, to give him any sort of objectivity is the same as allowing him to start a Holocaust.
 
This is why they say ICE detention centers are “concentration camps”. Having lived their lives in the constant toxic bullcrap they spew, they started to believe it. They truly believe that Donald Trump is in any way comparable to Hitler, so to portray him objectively in any way would be the equivalent of giving Hitler a pass, in their minds.
 
This is how utterly corrupt these people are, and the reason I say that there is truly no longer freedom of the press. Constitutionally, and officially, there is freedom of the press as it is detailed in the First Amendment. But when news organizations are hit with so much blowback not only from other “journalists” but also politicians and people threatening to unsubscribe, the organizations under fire for reporting the truth no longer have the right to report freely.
 
So, they changed the headline to: “Assailing Hate But Not Guns.” Because of course the focus has to be on the guns. The two shooters held Left-wing ideologies. That can’t be mentioned whatsoever. The Left is lucky one of them was a white supremacist, because otherwise, they would have to avoid talking about motive, for the most part. They certainly avoid the Dayton shooter, who had very openly-Leftist social media activity before the shooting.
 
Now, let’s discuss what Kirsten Gillibrand thought of the original headline. To repeat, she tweeted: “That’s not what happened.”
 
Oh, isn’t it? I understand Leftists tend to live in their own world, but please at least try to provide evidence to back up your claims. You claim that Trump didn’t call for unity against racism? Well, what’s this then?:
 
“Together, we lock arms to shoulder the grief. We ask God in Heaven to ease the anguish of those who suffer. And we vow to act with urgent resolve… The shooter in El Paso posted a manifesto online, consumed by racist hate. In one voice, our nation must condemn racism, bigotry and white supremacy. These sinister ideologies must be defeated. Hate has no place in America. Hatred warps the mind, ravages the heart and devours the soul… In the two decades since Columbine, our nation has watched with rising horror and dread as one mass shooting has followed another, over and over again, decade after decade. We cannot allow ourselves to feel powerless. We can and will stop this evil contagion. In that task, we must honor the sacred memory of those we have lost, by acting as one people. Open wounds cannot heal if we are divided. We must seek real bipartisan solutions – we have to do that, in a bipartisan manner – that will truly make America safer and better for all.”
 
This is only a portion of what the President said recently, followed by similar remarks on social media. Exactly which part of this is him not trying to unite our country against racism? The part where we “lock arms to shoulder the grief”? The part where we “vow to act with urgent resolve”? The part where “our nation must condemn racism, bigotry and white supremacy”? The part where we must act “as one people”? The part where our “wounds cannot heal if we are divided”? Or the part where “we must seek real bipartisan solutions… in a bipartisan manner… that will truly make America safer and better for all”?
 
Exactly how is the headline: “Trump Urges Unity vs. Racism” not a factual and accurate summation of what the President said? No, the President didn’t assail against guns because, as I said in my previous article covering these tragedies, that wouldn’t solve anything because guns are not the root cause of shootings. But in what way is the original headline in any way dangerous or fictitious? In the Left’s mind, any story that does not portray Trump as the literal devil is dangerous to their narratives and rhetoric and their opportunity to defeat him at any capacity. That’s the Left’s current goal: defeat Donald Trump at any cost.
 
Evidently, that comes even at the cost of a free press, but we already knew journalism was long dead. This just further proves that to be true.
 
John 8:44
“You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Back in late 2018, a story came out about a Portland State University professor and his two colleagues (above) writing “hoax” research papers, about 20 of them, sending them to be peer-reviewed, edited and published, and successfully published 7 of those hoax papers.
 
The hoax papers discussed insane topics such as rape culture in dog parks, fat bodybuilding, and toxic masculinity in “breastaurants” like Hooters, as well as others, and were ultimately reviewed and published by esteemed academic journals despite a distinct lack of facts to support the arguments being made.
 
The three professors, Peter Boghossian, Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay referred to their little hoax project as an analysis of “grievance studies”, suspecting that some fields in academia have focused more on “ideologically-motivated scholarship” rather than the pursuit of scientific fact or truth.
 
In an essay in which the trio announced this project, they wrote: “Scholarship based less upon finding truth and more upon attending to social grievances has become firmly established, if not fully dominant, within these fields, and their scholars increasingly bully students, administrators, and other departments into adhering to their worldview. This worldview is not scientific, and it is not rigorous. For many, this problem has been growing increasingly obvious, but strong evidence has been lacking. For this reason, the three of us just spent a year working inside the scholarship we see as an intrinsic part of this problem.”
 
The three professors received worldwide support for their work to expose the problems of academic research. Campus Reform sent Mark McLellan, PSU’s vice president for research and graduate studies, a public records request for his e-mails that had to do with what Boghossian did. Campus Reform gathered thousands of e-mails from all over the world addressed to McLellan in support of Boghossian.
 
One notable e-mail came from Alan Sokal, a physicist teaching at New York University who had actually done something similar to Boghossian back in 1996 with an article titled: “Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.” To the normal person, what Sokal wrote might seem confusing but might be taken as the truth, given it’s an academic paper. But to any scientist or mathematician that knows his stuff, they’d be able to tell that what is in the paper is utter garbage. Sokal himself said: “Throughout the article, I employ scientific and mathematical concepts in ways that few scientists or mathematicians could possibly take seriously… In sum, I intentionally wrote the article so that any competent physicist or mathematician (or undergraduate physics or math major) would realize that it is a spoof. Evidently, the editors of Social Text felt comfortable publishing an article on quantum physics without bothering to consult anyone knowledgeable in the subject.”
 
But despite the honestly good work the three professors did, at the very least Professor Boghossian is likely to be punished, as he was placed under investigation and was found guilty of research misconduct by the Internal Review Board. Boghossian was accused, and later found guilty of, fabricating data and studying human subjects, specifically the journal editors, without their consent. While technically that is what he did, the guilty verdict is ridiculous. The fabrication of data served entirely to prove a point, a point that was further proven not only by the actual publishing of this data, but by the response from the IRB and PSU, that academic journals hold the responsibility of sticking faithfully to data and to the facts, despite of the topic being discussed, but many do not actually do that.
 
The fact that Boghossian will be punished for EXPOSING the fact that academic journals don’t do their due diligence in verifying the claims being made in the articles shows us just how truly rotten the system is. If the article says something supposedly “woke”, such as perpetuating a “rape culture” in DOGS VISITING DOG PARKS IN PORTLAND, then whatever is used to “prove” the thesis is irrelevant. Much in the same way as a paper that claims illegal immigrants commit less crimes than American citizens, if the thesis is “woke” and SJW-friendly, then facts be damned. This is the point professors were trying to prove, that ideologically-motivated papers, even if entirely fictitious, will be approved and spread as “truth”, goes entirely against what scientists, real scientists, are trying to do: find and discuss what is actually TRUE.
 
For example, let’s take a look at an article from Breitbart about a high school kid in Scotland being suspended for saying that there are only two genders. Despite the fact that science is behind the kid, the 17-year-old was suspended for saying something that is not “inclusive” aka something that is not part of the “right-think” of the British school system. The teacher and the entire school board do a disservice to society not only by banning a dissenting thought, but also perpetuating the idea that there are more than two genders when the truth and facts completely disagree with that.
 
Whether someone says they are a different gender from what they are is entirely up to them. If a man wants to claim he is a woman, fine. But let’s not distort what science says about genders. Let’s not throw away the fact that our chromosomes dictate what gender we are. For the thousandth time, an XY set of chromosomes makes someone a male and an XX set of chromosomes makes someone a female. There is no third option, there is no destroying this fact. To challenge this proven scientific concept is to challenge reality and truth itself, all in the vein effort to be more “inclusive”. No one benefits from destroying science.
 
The three professors wanted to stick to the idea that science is the pursuit of truth about different things in our universe (which is why I so often say that science and faith are not mutually exclusive but often work together, as we study the creation) and challenged the unscientific views some, if not most people within academic journals hold with regard to what is truth.
 
In essence, those in academic journals take a Pontius Pilate sort of stance of: “what is truth?” They believe truth is subjective when it is, in fact, objective and as such, see actual science as an enemy while pretending to be in favor of “science” that “shows” them to be right about things like climate change (of course, they are entirely wrong there too) and the theory of evolution (which they dropped the “theory” part and pass it off as fact, an entirely unscientific thing to do).
 
While the professors ought to be commended for their work to IMPROVE the academic journals’ research and publishing standards to not pass off what is essentially SJW-feeding crap as truth, they are more likely to be punished for it than anything else.
 
The reason for which is likely not simply the ones being given to us: that they gave false data, conducted research on people who did not consent to it (which is the point of a project to expose something like this). The reason is likely so that academic research papers can continue to be useful for Leftists who use it as “arguments” against people who actually have science and reason behind them. It’s no secret that academia belongs to the Left. As such, they get to control what kind of “information” is published in academia, to certain extents. Rogue professors that expose the heavily-biased nature of at least some people within the academic journals are counterintuitive to the purpose of academic journals. So those professors must be punished for exposing the truth in an effort to keep these things in the dark in the future.
 
Luke 8:17
“For nothing is hidden that will not be made manifest, nor is anything secret that will not be known and come to light.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

This is the second time in a week that I write about something like this, but it is always important to make note when it happens.
 
Recently, former tennis player and openly gay activist Martina Navratilova wrote an op-ed for the Sunday Times of London where she voiced her concern regarding transgender women (men who turn female) playing against biological women and having a natural advantage as a result.
 
“To put the argument at its most basic: a man can decide to be female, take hormones if required by whatever sporting organization is concerned, win everything in sight and perhaps earn a small fortune, and then reverse his decision and go back to making babies if he so desires… It’s insane and it’s cheating. I am happy to address a transgender woman in whatever form she prefers, but I would not be happy to compete against her. It would not be fair.”
 
Seems fairly reasonable, wouldn’t you think? She’s not outright dropping any support for transgenders, but she is voicing her concern regarding physically superior transwomen competing against biological women and having a natural advantage every time out.
 
But instead of being willing to have a conversation with her, who very much is still adamant about supporting LGBT “rights”, the LGBT-friendly sports group Athlete Ally completely dropped her as an ambassador and from the group altogether.
 
Athlete Ally released a statement regarding Navralitova’s piece:
 
“Athlete Ally unequivocally stands on the side of trans athletes and their right to access and compete in sport free from discrimination. Martina Navratilova’s recent comments on trans athletes are transphobic, based on a false understanding of science and data, and perpetuate dangerous myths that lead to the ongoing targeting of trans people through discriminatory laws, hateful stereotypes and disproportionate violence… As an organization dedicated to addressing root causes of homophobia and transphobia in and through sport, we will only affiliate with those committed to the same goal, and not those who further misinformation or discrimination in any way.”
 
Boy, can I have a lot of fun with this one.

First of all, I find it hilarious that they try and call Navralitova “transphobic” for voicing her opinion regarding this issue. It’s a darn cliché at this point. Everyone who disagrees with me in this day and age can only be a Nazi, or a fascist, or a racist, or a homophobe or a transphobe or a veganphobe (just watch, that will be a thing soon enough) or whatever negative accusation one can come up with.
 
Anyone who disagrees with me is literally Hitler and there’s no room for discussion, so such opinion existing must be eliminated and all affiliations with that person must be ended and that person be made to suffer as a consequence of their reasonable actions or thoughts.
 
Second, don’t b.s. me about what science and data says. Grab any 5th grade biology book, look into DNA and chromosomes and you will see what science has to say about gender “stereotypes”. The fact of the matter is, as I stated in my previous article surrounding a similar topic, men are physically superior to women on average.
 
On an individual case, yes, sometimes a woman beats a man in a contest of physicality. Which is why, whenever anyone says “well, if trans people playing against women is cheating, why aren’t they winning all the time?” I will say just that: sometimes, a woman can best a man in a physical event.
 
For example, I myself used to sort of play tennis when I was younger. The very first somewhat legitimate game I ever had (in which I was neither playing against my parents or against my coach) was against a girl that was maybe a couple of years younger than me. I was maybe ten while she was likely no older than 9 herself, around 7 or 8.
 
I lost… badly. That doesn’t mean she was physically superior to me in any way. While I was a young kid, I undoubtedly was still physically stronger than her. However, multiple factors can contribute to such a loss.
 
Primarily, that was my first “real” game against someone while she herself had been playing for longer (at least that’s what my coach told me after I lost and I legit started to cry because I was 10 and just lost to a younger girl, which hurt my pride). The girl was more experienced than me and that helped her out.
 
So there most certainly can be cases of women beating men in a physical competition. But the fact remains that men are physically superior to women on average.
 
Going back to my NBA/WNBA comparison, most halfway decent players in the NBA would likely dominate in the WNBA, while not one WNBA player would likely do that well against NBA players.
 
One of the biggest challenges for college players joining the NBA is getting their bodies “NBA ready”. There’s a major difference between college basketball and NBA basketball that goes beyond the distance of the three-point line. NBA players are older, bigger, stronger and more physically dominant than college players. Look at pictures of a rookie LeBron James, Kevin Durant or Giannis Antetokounmpo compared to today and you will see they did not have NBA ready bodies back then, but most certainly do now.
 
So that’s a problem MEN face. How much more likely would a female athlete be able to compete against NBA players in anything regarding physicality?
 
Whatever “science” and “data” these people are using are anything but scientific. It’s propaganda made to fit their erroneous narrative that totally betrays science while pretending to be science. Like the media claiming to be objective, no one with a brain buys that men are not physically superior to women on average.
 
The third and final thing I want to talk about regarding these idiots’ decision to drop one of their best allies in the world of sports for the heinous crime of disagreeing about something is that I want to highlight the sort of self-destructive behavior that must accompany their self-destructive ideology.
 
It’s no secret that I think the Leftist ideology, socialist ideology, is self-destructive. Not only does it not work anywhere it’s tried, but it fails miserably, creating tons of human suffering, and for the literally idiotic belief from Karl Marx that you can go from 100% government control of pretty much everything to zero need for any government at all and a people fully capable of ruling themselves without a government and laws to protect them as Marx believed the last phase of communist evolution would be.
 
It’s ludicrous and self-destructive. But not only is the ideology self-destructive, so are the people that push for it.
 
Martina Navratilova has been an advocate for LGBT rights for ages, particularly in the age of Reagan and AIDS when people thought the disease was a gay-only disease. In many ways, she was a pioneer for gay people, both within and without the world of sports. And all it takes to eliminate her work for these people is one differing opinion regarding transgenderism and sports.
 
All it took was not being “woke” enough for this group to drop her completely. Anything to the right of Marx, even within lifelong Democrats and Leftist allies, simply cannot be allowed to remain and they cannot allow themselves to associate with such people.
 
Today, being a feminist can cause ire on the Left if you don’t count transwomen as actual women.
 
They eliminate their own in an effort to keep moving farther and farther to the left if their own aren’t “woke” enough.
 
I imagine Martina must feel pretty jaded for the current treatment she’s receiving. I doubt she ever thought the same people she helped throughout her life and career would betray her like this.
 
But this further goes to show the kind of mentality of the Left: agree with us all the time or be made to suffer.
 
No room for independent thought whatsoever. And definitely no room for independent thought that is backed up by reason, logic and outright facts.
 
Here’s hoping Martina Navratilova opens her eyes to the sort of monster that the Left is and opens her eyes to Christ as well that she might believe in Him and be saved.
 
John 8:31-32
“So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed in him, ‘If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.’”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

I have no idea just how this actually started, but the Left seemingly is beginning to be convinced that making the “OK” sign is somehow a new symbol equal to the Nazi salute.
 
I think it may have started around the Kavanaugh hearings, but it’s really stupid and, if I’m honest, will probably be legitimately seen as a hate symbol in the very near future, but not before it is made fun of for a long while.

Now, allow me to give you some context for the reason for me to be writing about this at all.
 
Recently, soulless human being and c-list comedienne Kathy Griffin posted a picture on Twitter (picture above) which she later deleted for reasons that will soon be made clear, doubling down on her attacks on Covington Catholic high school students.
 
Instead of admitting fault and apologizing for demanding people dox these kids, she chooses to double down and tries to continue smearing these kids, or at least anyone who attends that school, as racists.
 
The picture she showed is the one above, where a bunch of Covington Catholic basketball players are seemingly making the “ok” sign.
 
Kathy Griffin, in all her glorious ignorance, took that to be an actual “ok” sign, which the Left is trying to make into a hate symbol, as I stated previously.
 
Now, there are two major points I want to make regarding this symbol.
 
Point number one: it’s not an “ok” symbol in the context of basketball. It’s a symbol for a successful three-pointer. Just about everyone who plays basketball makes this symbol.

​Look at anyone from the Golden State Warriors, who time and time again refuse to visit the White House because they are convinced in the Leftist narrative that Trump’s racist. The Warriors are among the best three-point shooting teams in the league and have Stephen Curry (picture below), who is more-than-likely going to be remembered as the best three-point shooter in NBA history by the end of his career.
 
Whenever someone makes a three, that player or his teammates will make that same exact symbol. Does that mean that the Warriors are Nazis? Or how about when LeBron James, one of the most notorious Trump-haters in basketball makes that symbol? Is he a Nazi? How about Dwyane Wade, James Harden, Anthony Davis, Allen Iverson, Carmelo Anthony, Michael Jordan?

​LITERALLY ALL OF THEM MAKE OR HAVE MADE THAT SIGN!
 
But since Kathy Griffin is just that ignorant, she sees this symbol that her friends in Hellywood are trying to equate to a Nazi salute and assumes these kids are racists for no other reason than they are white and are from a Catholic school. And once she realizes the colossally dumb mistake she made, she opted to delete the tweet, but without apologizing for making assertions that these kids are racists.
 
And it’s not just Kathy Griffin that is showing that level of ignorance. Other people on Twitter looked at that picture and thought the exact same thing.
 
Point number two: even if that wasn’t the symbol for a three-pointer, WHY IS THE “OK” SYMBOL CONSIDERED THE SAME AS A NAZI SALUTE BY THESE NUT-JOBS!?
 
It literally makes no sense how making that hand gesture is beginning to be considered a racial affront to people.
 
Again, I don’t quite know how it got started. All I know is that this is a relatively new thing and it’s insanely ridiculous. Ten years ago, if you said that the “ok” symbol would be considered racist, people would probably laugh at you. I was going to say the same for five years ago, but with how much else is considered racist and it’s been this way for some time, I think people could’ve legitimately believed that symbol could eventually be considered racist. Soon enough, white people simply existing will be considered racist by these nut-bags.
 
In any case, something else I want to focus on is just how heartless and actually deranged these people are.
 
Take Kathy Griffin as our prime example here. Aside from picturing herself holding a makeshift decapitated head of Donald Trump, for which she has apologized and doubled down multiple times on and off, she is now doubling down on her hatred for kids who were maligned by a bloodthirsty media.
 
And do you want to know what else is kind of sad about her? She isn’t this crazy only against conservatives.
 
She might actually be a deranged person. According to The Wrap, Griffin and her 18-year-younger boyfriend named Randy Bick were sued by their neighbors last summer for invasion of privacy.
 
The Wrap reported last July: “According to the suit, Griffin and Bick ‘undertook a campaign of secret electronic surveillance and recording almost immediately after taking up residence,’ first with their iPhones, then with an audio-video surveillance system that was pointed directly into the Mezgers’ (their neighbors) backyard ‘in order to spy on and record them.’ The suit says that Griffin and Bick ‘illegally captured hundreds of hours of audio and video from the Mezgers’ back yard’ and that the Mezgers only learned about it in September 2017, months after the secret recordings began, when Griffin and Bick leaked one of the recordings to the media.”
 
This, combined with the fact that she literally asked for these kids’ names, indicates that you can hardly tell me this woman is of any sound mind.
 
Another prime example of outright deranged behavior is actor Jim Carrey.
 
We all know and maybe have even seen at least some of his outright vomit-inducing paintings depicting Trump and other conservatives as demons and other things. Regarding the Catholic Covington kids, the guy, once again showing his sick artistic skill (not a good “sick”), showed Nick Sandmann as a cocky kid with a mocking smug on his face wearing a red hat that says “hate again” and the other kids appearing malicious when nothing of the sort was shown to be the case in the full story of the event.
 
In debuting his painting, the guy called the kids “baby snakes”, yet again showing his deranged nature.
 
By the way, that painting and subsequent tweet was released on January 22nd, so the full story had already been made available at that point in time.
 
Jim Carrey, being an outright psychopath, doesn’t care and continues with the now-debunked narrative that these kids are the bad guys.
 
But that’s just these sickos following a trend. Even after the kids were shown to have been victimized by the Black Hebrew Israelites and Nathan Phillips, who outright slandered them, they are still seen as the bad guys by a sick and twisted Left.
 
Some have apologized, or at least semi-apologized, but many refuse to apologize and choose to double down on this hatred against the kids, even going so far as to signify that anyone making the “ok” symbol is a Nazi.
 
This is how sick and twisted many on the Left are. It’s reprehensible what the media did to these kids, but the fact that we know the full and actual story, have the evidence to see that the kids are the victims, and still some people choose to villainize them and their school shows the height of their stupidity, hatred and maybe even evil.
 
These kids, by virtue of being white, Christians and Trump-supporters, even when proven to be the victims of hate, are seen by a hateful political group of people as the aggressors and bad guys.
 
Kathy Griffin, Jim Carrey, and anyone who continues to spread the bullcrap that these kids are the villains are truly disgusting people.
 
And that pains me to say for multiple reasons: 1) that there are people this evil and depraved in general and 2) that Jim Carrey, an actor whom I used to really like in the past, is part of this depraved action.
 
These people truly need more help than any psychiatrist could possibly provide them. Their problem isn’t simply a twisted mind, but an evil heart.
 
How else can you explain Kathy Griffin posing with a paper-mache figure of what is supposed to be Donald Trump’s decapitated head? How else can you explain Jim Carrey spending tons of time and money painting portraits that are as disgusting as they are?
 
 
How else can you explain the effort by the Left to try and brand the “ok” sign as a Nazi symbol? It’s almost Orwellian what these people are trying to depict as “wrong”. Even the simple act of smiling in an uncomfortable situation is seen as a sign of aggression by the Left.
 
These depraved people, I am beginning to think, are honestly demon-possessed. Not like in the horror movies where little girls are possessed by a demon that causes them to float, turn their heads 180 degrees, spit vomit bile, etc. but actual depraved actions that one cannot believe a human being could be capable of doing and can only believe a demon would be capable of doing.
 
We all need Jesus, but if there are any people I can point to as truly and unequivocally needing Jesus, it’s these people.
 
People like Kathy Griffin, Jim Carrey, (and the evil s.o.b.’s that passed a bill in New York allowing for abortion to happen even up to birth and celebrate that as some sort of achievement and not a moment of shame) all truly need Jesus in their lives.
 
Of course, whether they receive Him or not is an entirely different matter, but the need still exists.
 
I am someone who believes in predestination (and there is plenty in the Bible that backs up that belief), so I am fully aware that there will be people who are simply not meant to be saved. However, that need for Jesus, for God, exists within every single one of us. We all need Him, whether or not we receive Him or are predestined to receive Him.
 
That is why I so often say that people on the Left need Jesus. That need is always there, no matter what.
 
I can only hope that at least some of these people come to Christ.
 
Proverbs 3:5-6
“Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge Him, and He will make straight your paths.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

This past Saturday, very many people from both sides of the aisle took aim and lambasted a group of kids from Covington Catholic High School.
 
In a short and edited video, kids from the school are seen wearing MAGA hats surrounding a group of Native American protesters and chanting things.
 
From that video, and one Native American protester named Nathan Phillips who was banging the drums in one of the kid’s faces (picture above), the situation looks as though the kids were the bad guys, were harassing minorities and overall being threatening because they are white and are wearing MAGA hats.
 
The Mainstream Media drove this story because they saw the perfect narrative: white, Christian, Trump supporters, albeit underage, were seemingly being threatening towards a group of minorities. There were claims that the children were also chanting “build that wall”.
 
And conservatives who are seemingly in a rush to appear to be the good guys in the Left’s eyes (why attempt to please man instead of pleasing God?) were rebuking the kids as not actually being conservatives or Christians, etc., making sure to distance themselves as far from the raging fire as humanly possible.
 
Threats were made against the kids and their families, with people on the media and celebrities like Kathy Griffin (oh, look, there is the soulless monster again), asking that the kids get doxed (their private information be made public) so that they can be even more threatening to the kids in retaliation.
 
Rep. John Yarmuth (D-KY) even “joked” that he is “calling for a total and complete shutdown of teenagers wearing MAGA hats until we can figure out what is going on. They seem to be poisoning young minds.” He said that in a thread where he went on to say that the incident represents a deeply-rooted problem of racism in our country, so I’m not buying that he was “joking” about this.
 
The media, because they had the perfect anti-Trump narrative - white kids appearing threatening to minorities while wearing MAGA hats - did not care to do further investigative journalism to discover the full story because there wasn’t any more that they wanted or needed to hear.
 
They had their story and they ran with it. “Who cares if the kids’ lives are destroyed by this blatant smear and outright libel? Getting Trump is our main goal regardless of the bodies we leave behind.”
 
That was basically the mindset of all of this.
 
Fast-forward 24 hours and we see more information made available. The kids were not surrounding minority groups. They were being called derogatory terms such as “f**gots” and other things by a black radical cult called Black Hebrew Israelites.
 
The Native American group was not surrounded by the kids – they made their way towards the kids. Their exits were not blocked by the kids. The kids weren’t chanting “build that wall” (which is not offensive even if they did chant it). They were chanting pep-rally cheers to drown out the hateful comments by the Black Hebrew Israelites.
 
The kid that was shown smiling at Nathan Phillips, the man banging the drum in his face, was not being cocky. He was trying to remain calm and diffuse the situation and, according to his own account on the events that unfolded, said a silent prayer that he would be able to diffuse the situation with inaction.
 
Eventually, the kids’ bus arrived and they left.
 
That is what happened, not what the media claimed happened and not what everyone from Hellywood to D.C. to MSM propagandists to supposedly conservative journalists believed happened.
 
And do you want to know what is one of the saddest things about this? Apart from the fact that these kids probably have been scarred to some extent by the level of hatred they received just because they are Christians, mostly white, and Trump supporters, this is the second time in 48 hours that a major news story broke by the MSM that turned out to be a complete hoax.
 
Earlier in the week, everyone on the Left and the Right was raving about a Buzzfeed story that said they had proof Trump instructed Cohen to lie to Congress. Buzzfeed, aka the site where you can take a quiz of what Harry Potter character you should marry and what your favorite snack says about your personality, broke this story.
 
Then, after a day of talking about it, it was discovered that that story, among the countless others that insisted this was finally the end of Trump, was yet another hoax and nothing but fake news.
 
Earlier last week, people had egg on their faces for talking about a hoax as though it was real and over the weekend, they did it again.
 
The difference between the Buzzfeed story and the MAGA Kid story is that the only threat that was made against Trump was impeachment (which has been made pretty much every day for the past 2 years). Not to mention that the target was Trump, who is the target of the fake news media every single day.
 
But the MAGA kid story included CHILDREN. Children who were not doing anything but were lied about as having been racist demons that harassed minorities. Children whose lives have likely been changed by this. Children whose futures were in jeopardy because the media was anxious about painting a story about white Trump supporters being racist, even if those supporters are kids.
 
No one is safe from the media, not even children. You can literally be a high school kid visiting the Lincoln Memorial, happen to be white, which is not something you have control over, and the fact that you are 1) a Christian and 2) a Trump supporter will set you up as a target of the Left.
 
The kids weren’t bothering anyone. The Black Hebrew Israelites were protesting something else entirely, according to Nick Sandmann (the smiling kid pictured above), when they noticed the group of white kids with MAGA hats and began to insult them.
 
Through the magic of editing and one Native American protester having a history of provoking and lying about white people, these innocent kids were made out to be demons of white supremacy and a symbol of Trump’s racism infecting young people’s minds.
 
The media, and many other people, wanted blood. They wanted universities not to accept these kids, their current school to expel them, and the kids to never be able to show their faces in public again.
 
And if any of them wound up committing suicide as a result of this, it would be seen not as a tragedy but as a great thing and that kid doing the right thing in some form of reparation for his own racism.
 
The narrative was the only important thing to them. And others, not wanting to appear racist in their silence, piled on and rebuked these kids as being racist when nothing could be further from the truth.
 
The fake news media has been trying to destroy Trump’s life for years now. But I have never seen them be this despicable.
 
It’s not like these Trump supporters were adults. They were kids with their whole futures jeopardized by an uncaring media that is more focused in driving a narrative than discovering the truth.
 
And this sort of thing happens ALL THE TIME. When a huge story breaks, that story gets a lot of attention. When that story is discovered to not have been true, the discovery garners less attention than the original fake story.
 
But again, these are kids we’re talking about. The media was more than glad to go after kids if the narrative demanded it.
 
And that’s exactly what happened.
 
Some people think that Donald Trump calling the media “the enemy of the people” is a bit excessive. Well, what else can we possibly call them at this point?
 
The enemy wishes to destroy you. The media wished to destroy these kids. The enemy uses any lie they can to hurt you. The media used any lie they could find to hurt these kids. The enemy will ignore the truth. The media ignores the truth. The enemy does not care who gets hurt if you ultimately fall. The media does not care who gets hurt if it can ultimately make Trump fall.
 
There is a very good reason I so often compare the Left to Germany’s Nazi Party. The Nazis sought the destruction of their enemies through any means necessary, regardless of who was hurt in the process.
 
The Left, given the chance, would undoubtedly do the same thing Hitler did to Jews, Gypsies, gay people, and anyone not considered optimal in their eyes. In other words, anyone that disagrees with them is made to suffer even if they did nothing wrong.
 
I find it sadly ironic that they seem to be going down the road of anti-Semitism, further emulating the Nazis.
 
But as it stands right now, the media is the enemy of truth. They did not care about the full story of the kids and the protesters. They only cared about the narrative the situation afforded them.
 
They were excited when the story broke out and undoubtedly were highly disappointed that it turned out to be fake news.
 
They were ready to shed some young, Christian, Trump-supporter blood, but were left with black protesters being hateful towards the white kids and the Native American protesters looking to escalate things.
 
Instead of the minorities being the victims, like the Left wants them to be, they were found to be the aggressors while the supposedly racist white kids who happen to support Trump and also be Catholics were found not to be the aggressors but the victims. The complete opposite of what the Left wanted.
 
The media, the Democrat Party, Hellywood, and overall Left are the enemy of the people. That much is clear.
 
1 Peter 5:8
“Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Over the weekend, former NFL kicker Jay Feely shared a picture of him with his daughter and her prom date, holding a handgun (that isn’t pointing at anyone) and with the caption: “Wishing my beautiful daughter and her date a great time at prom. #BadBoys”
 
And it’s precisely because he was holding a gun that the Left went absolutely insane and attacked him.
 
Here are just some of the crude tweets from enraged liberals:
 
“Let’s see… Daddy poses for a photo by standing between daughter and her date, while holding a hand gun?! The clear message is what? That you own a gun? You make a strong case that MANY GUN OWNERS SHOULD NOT OWN A GUN!! Totally irresponsible.”
 
You kiddin’ me? The stereotypical overprotective father with a gun is as old as fatherhood itself, and you think he’s being irresponsible? First, he’s not aiming the gun at the boy. Second, his finger is off the trigger. And third, the safety is on. That’s fantastic gun responsibility and safety, but I couldn’t expect a liberal to understand what that means.
 
Here’s another tweet, which is actually in response to the previous one: “He is also apparently sending a message that he owns his daughter, and this kid better not trespass on his ‘property’.”
 
Aren’t liberals the same people that tell us that we should teach our boys to respect women and not abuse them? Such an intimidating image (whether intentional or not) will teach the young man that if he messes with his daughter, he will take away what supposedly makes him a man… at best.
 
So because he’s teaching that lesson with a gun, all of a sudden that’s the wrong message to send? He’s not sending a message saying that he’s got a gun or that his daughter is his property. He’s sending a message that his daughter is very important to him and if he hurts her in any way, he should know that he’s perfectly capable of dealing with him.
 
I truly hope not one of the people attacking Feely have a daughter, because you’re a pretty terrible father if you’re not willing to go to any extreme lengths to protect your daughter.
 
Thankfully, there are also some sensible people that see the joke for what it is and don’t blow it out of proportion just because there is a gun in the picture.
 
“Ok honestly, why the hell is this news? 5 years ago this would’ve just been posted on iFunny and Reddit for 2 days and we would move on. What happened to this country that we can’t take jokes anymore? What harm does this cause exactly?”
 
As well as: “Thank you this is a joke and people don’t have anything better to do than try to make this bigger than it is.”
 
But even the sensible people, expectedly, were bashed and brought into a gun debate.
 
“I have nothing better to do since my son was shot by someone jokingly pointing a gun at him. There’s nothing funny about guns to me anymore.”
 
Which prompted this response: “Good thing this guy isn’t pointing the gun at him, the gun’s safety is on, and his finger isn’t on the trigger. Your tragedy doesn’t take away from the fact that is a HARMLESS joke. Cars kill more people every year than guns, but we don’t care when people pose in front of them.”
 
And so, another liberal replied: “I don’t get backlash over an unfunny played-out joke, but this stupid comparison of cars and guns has to stop, they are nothing alike. Cars serve a vast array of purposes and benefits and were not designed to kill, guns are manufactured for being good at tearing through flesh.”
 
Thankfully, the sensible person proved just why she was sensible: “Their intended purpose doesn’t matter. People can repurpose anything into a weapon, which is how London’s murder rate surpassed NYC’s bc of their stabbings. Knives, cars, hammers, etc are all deadlier than guns. Saying ‘but they weren’t made for that!’ doesn’t change that.”
 
And that’s precisely correct, but I don’t intend to go too far into the gun debate.
 
What I will get into is the Left’s hypersensitivity to seeing things they don’t like and their hypocrisy on the values they hold.
 
Like one of the tweets said earlier, this joke 5 years ago would’ve been online and strictly be seen as a joke and people would move on. Today, it sparks a debate because snowflakes can’t even stand the sight of a gun.
 
Not only that, they go as far as to essentially accuse the guy of “owning” his daughter. No, he doesn’t own her, but he is her father. As such, he has a certain level of authority over her. And because he clearly loves his daughter, he shows he’s willing to protect her at any cost, even if he did it in a half-jokingly manner.
 
Again, it’s these same people that are supposedly telling us that we should teach our boys to respect girls and not abuse them. But that lesson goes out the window if a gun is being used as the teaching tool? Would they have preferred he pose in his car about to run over the guy? Because apparently, cars are better than guns because their intended purpose isn’t to neutralize or destroy someone else.
 
Would they rather he have held a kitchen knife because the purpose of a kitchen knife is to slice food?
 
It’s ridiculous to attack the guy for doing what ANY GOOD PARENT WOULD DO AND THAT IS TO PROTECT THEIR YOUNG!
 
Such a concept is so basic that ANIMALS DO IT TOO! A mama bear will protect her cubs at the risk of even her own life. A father will protect his young at the cost of going to prison. Jay Feely, even if he meant this as a joke, shows the lengths at which he’s willing to protect his daughter. Who would attack him for that? How can anyone say this is wrong?
 
I’ll tell you who and how: liberals. Liberals would attack him, and clearly have, entirely missing the point. They say he’s sending a message that he has a gun or that his daughter is his property. TO HELL WITH THAT! He’s sending the message that his daughter is the most precious thing in his life and if anyone in this world is willing to bring harm to her, physical or otherwise, he’s willing to utterly DESTROY that person no matter the consequences.
 
That’s not insanity nor irresponsibility. It’s love. A concept that clearly escapes these people. The people who attack him and say he “owns” his daughter and that it’s wrong clearly have never experienced the kind of love a parent has for their child. Either they don’t have children of their own or they do have children but are not willing to go to any length to protect them, which is sad.
 
Now, this being the age of liberals bullying people into submission, Feely felt as though he needed to apologize for the picture, saying: “The prom picture I posted was obviously intended to be a joke. My daughter has dated her boyfriend for over a year and they knew I was joking. I take gun safety seriously (the gun was not loaded and had no clip in it) and I did not intend to be insensitive to that important issue.”
 
Absolutely no apology necessary. Frankly, I would much prefer he stick it to the ignorant jerks attacking him. He easily could’ve just told them to chill because his gun was entirely harmless and he only meant it as a joke.
 
Unfortunately, the Left is full of people who will stop at nothing to make sure the people they attack utterly submit to their will.
 
When I have a daughter who is going to prom, I will take a picture just like that, but holding a shotgun. And it too will be just a joke... well, half-joke. If any liberal wants to attack me for that, they are more than welcome to do so, given the right to do so by the 1st Amendment. That being said, they should also expect me to go full force at them and offer no apology for doing the right thing and that is to protect my little girl no matter how old she is.
 
And if anyone wants to say that I’m displaying “toxic masculinity”, I’ll simply guide them to the nearest CVS or Walgreens for their daily dose of “ouch, my feewings!” medication.
 
Proverbs 31:8-9
“Open your mouth for the mute, for the rights of all who are destitute. Open your mouth, judge righteously, defend the rights of the poor and needy.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

On Monday, the FBI raided the home, office and hotel room of Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen, who’s now being investigated for “possible bank fraud, wire fraud, and campaign finance violations,” according to The Washington Post.
 
This is all in relation with the Stormy Daniels “scandal” and is nothing more than justice being held hostage by Leftists who got ticked off that their favorite candidate didn’t win. I say this because it’s true and because those possible charges are really reaching for lawlessness.
 
What do I mean? Well, with the bank and wire fraud, that rests solely on Cohen. Supposedly, he had taken a loan of $130,000 to pay Stormy Daniels to make sure she remained quiet about her supposed affair with Trump.
 
Now, I don’t have all the information with me, but I really don’t see any way how Cohen committed fraud against a bank by using the loan to pay someone off. In general, it’s a bad idea to take out a bank loan to pay off, say, a debt, but I never knew it to be illegal (it’s not. Generally speaking, unless the loan agreement specifies otherwise, you can do whatever you want with a bank loan, even investing the money).
 
Again, I don’t have every important bit of information in front of me, but I doubt Cohen committed fraud here, not to mention that Cohen said he paid Daniels with his own money. Even if what he said is untrue, claiming it’s your money doesn’t constitute a bank fraud.
 
The last part, the “campaign finance violations” is also a bit of a reach. Cohen paid Daniels (either with a loan or his own money) “in a private transaction in 2016,” according to Cohen. This could be considered a violation of campaign finance laws, but you also have to ask this: "what about the money Congressmen set aside to pay off women?" If the issue here is that Cohen had to disclose that amount and didn't, why don't horny Congressmen have to do the same?

Why is this a bigger deal for Trump than it would be for, say, Al Franken?
 
Once again, I will admit I don’t have all the information in front of me. I could be completely wrong about this, but generally and logically speaking, with the information I do have, this should be a nothing-burger. This is something that shouldn’t land Cohen in prison or remotely threaten Trump’s presidency.
 
Now, that being said, I don’t doubt the Left will further destroy justice and take into their own hands to destroy Trump. Supposedly, the kind of warrant used to raid Cohen’s home and office is very difficult to get and not used for anything other than something major. Then again, the same could be said for FISA warrants, and you know full well how easy it is for the Left to get those.
 
These warrants aren’t being used to investigate a crime. Mueller was never given a crime to pursue in his investigation and the only reason Cohen is being investigated is because of his ties with Trump. The only reason we’re even hearing about these things is because the Left is full of children who are still throwing tantrums that they lost a Presidential election, particularly against someone they deem a massive buffoon at best.
 
Had Trump lost, there wouldn’t have been a Russia investigation despite the fact that Hillary very clearly and evidentially colluded with Russia in the elections. Had Trump lost, this whole Stormy Daniels eye-roller of a “scandal” would never have even come up. The only reason they are brought up is because he beat the Left, which in their eyes is a crime almost punishable by death (or actually punishable by death if they feel they need to go that far).
 
For as bad as the Left wants to make this appear to be, it’s their own people that do much of the same and even worse. Let’s not forget former Democratic presidential candidate and senator, John Edwards, was tried on those exact charges before eventually being acquitted and the Obama DOJ dropped the charges (because of course they did). It wasn’t a big deal when he did the things they claim Cohen, and by extension, Trump, did so why is it a big deal now? The same could be said about the “Cambridge Analytica scandal”. Obama did the exact same thing, using Facebook’s data to determine voting patterns and likely voters among other things, during the 2012 election in order to influence people into voting for him.
 
It’s entirely likely that Hillary did (or at least tried to do) the same thing in 2016.
 
The reason it’s as big a deal as they make it out to be is because it involves Trump and gives them some hope that they’ll be able to impeach him come next year.
 
Now, let’s address the title of this article. What does this mean moving forward? It means that I’ll be even more fired up to defeat the Left come November. It means that justice is being held hostage by a bunch of angry children in places of relative power. There was no need to raid Cohen’s home and office. Cohen has been cooperative about everything. The only reason a raid was conducted was purely for political reasons. They want to make you, a Trump supporter, angry and afraid that it will all be over soon. And they want to give their base a false sense of hope that Trump’s administration is on the verge of destruction.
 
Legally, much of the same things will happen moving forward as they would have without a raid. Make no mistake, this raid was nothing more than an exhibition of force in order to intimidate you and anyone who supports Trump. It’s nothing but terrorism tactics in its most literal sense.
 
This, on its own, likely won’t lead to Trump’s impeachment, much less his prosecution. Trump was hardly involved in this and has even claimed that he had no knowledge of the payment. Even if he’s lying and he did know about the payment, the Daily Wire tells us: “if Trump knew about it, that could constitute criminal conspiracy to violate campaign finance law”. Not if it really wasn’t a violation of campaign finance law (and there's a chance it won't be seen as one).
 
So there’s a lot of “ifs” in this scenario. If Trump really didn’t know about the payments, that’s the end of this particular criminal charge the Left would want to put on him. But even if he did know about it, they would have to prove that it really was a violation of campaign finance law (which, in all fairness, could be the case).
 
All this really will do is fire up Trump supporters to go out and vote and make sure that Democrats don’t take back either the House of Representatives or the Senate. We’ll take useless Republicans who likely won’t impeach the President based on nothing over blood-thirsty Democrats who will impeach Trump based on the grounds that he simply defeated Hillary and that’s good enough to impeach him.
 
Even then, Democrats would still need a super-majority to supersede the certain veto Mike Pence would issue regarding the impeachment of Trump. And with their agenda of repealing the tax cuts that have helped most of America, taking away people’s guns, and giving amnesty to criminal aliens, prioritizing them over the American people, I don’t see them coming close to a super-majority. If Republicans really wanted to, they could have a super-majority of their own and be in power for decades.
 
The unlikelihood of Democrats winning a super-majority combined with the multiple variables and questions in the Stormy Daniels “scandal” indicates the likelihood of Trump being impeached is not very high.
 
Now, what could this mean for the Left? I don’t know what Trump is thinking, but I don’t think he’ll fire Robert Mueller over this. Mueller doesn’t really have much of a hand in this because his only tie to it is that he gave a referral to the Southern District of New York about this. It was the SDNY and the Department of Justice that had a bigger hand in this ordeal.
 
Does this mean Trump will fire Sessions or Rosenstein? Again, I don’t know what Trump is thinking here. I can’t say with certainty whether he will or not. We'll just have to wait and see. He certainly has the authority to do so and will not be actually charged of "obstruction of justice". Accused? Likely. But not charged.
 
Yes, he could fight it and yes, it could also fire up Trump’s supporters, but it could also fire up Democrat voters as well, smelling likely victory over the horizon. If Democrat voters think they’re very close to actually impeaching Trump and for a seemingly legitimate (it wouldn’t be) reason, they will be fired up to vote.
 
Granted, that could be the general case regardless of what happens, but this alone should fire up Trump supporters even more. At this point, it’s about ensuring the survival of this administration.
 
Proverbs 21:15
“When justice is done, it is a joy to the righteous but terror to evildoers.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

On June 29th, President Trump tweeted the following couple of tweets: “I heard poorly rated @Morning_Joe speaks badly of me (don’t watch anymore). Then how come low I.Q. Crazy Mika (Brzezinski), along with Psycho Joe, came…” “… to Mar-a-Lago 3 nights in a row around New Year’s Eve, and insisted on joining me. She was bleeding badly from a face-lift. I said no!”
 
As you might expect, the Left’s panties were in a bunch because of these tweets. They are deeply offended that the POTUS said Mika had a low I.Q. and that Joe Scarborough was a psycho! Even Republican Sellouts were condemning the president for his tweets. What, with “<1% Of The Vote” Lindsey Graham saying: “Mr. President, your tweet was beneath the office and represents what is wrong with American politics, not the greatness of America.”
 
Really, now? THAT represents what is wrong with American politics. Not the Clintons taking money from foreign nations during the campaign trail? Not Obama spying on conservative organizations through the IRS? Not Bernie Sanders defrauding a bank? No, THIS is what is wrong with American politics. A president firing back at a media that has been attacking him non-stop since the campaign trail started.
 
The Left can dish out hits, but can’t take any, is what I understand from this. They can attack you, but you can’t fight back. Is that what they truly expect? Maybe from any other Republican. Most Republicans (at least in the Establishment) are completely spineless, after all. What they fail to understand is that Trump IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT! He’s not a spineless coward like the rest of them. He fights back. IT’S ONE OF THE REASONS WE ELECTED HIM. The American voter was getting tired of spineless Republicans and evil Democrats running things. They wanted a fighter. And a fighter, they got.
 
And the Left is simply left stunned and offended and hurt when they see Trump firing back at them. In their minds, he’s supposed to just sit there and take it. He’s not supposed to fight back. In their minds, they can do and say whatever they want about Trump without any consequence. It’s why liberal loons like Kathy Griffin are more than happy to pose with a sculpture of Trump's severed head. She truly didn’t think there would be much, if any, backlash about it.
 
The Left is filled with evil BULLIES! What I described above – that mentality – is precisely the kind of mentality bullies have. Bullies will pick on someone they think won’t have the guts or ability to fight back. And for DECADES, the Left has been able to bully Republicans in the same way. For DECADES, the Republicans didn’t have the guts to fight back. For DECADES, Republicans just sat where they were and took every hit the Left delivered. If something in the government didn’t work, it was because of the Republicans.
 
But now, the Left faces an opponent that ACTUALLY FIGHTS BACK! And they are completely stunned. No tactic they’ve used has worked on Trump. They’ve tried labeling him as an evil reprobate with no soul. They’ve tried separating him from his supporters. They’ve tried pinning outrageous scandals on him. And NONE OF THEM HAVE WORKED!
 
But when Trump fights back, using one of the Left’s very own tactics (labeling), the Left cries “foul” and can’t take it. They think a Republican president fighting back is inconceivable. To them, the phrase “Republican pushback” is an oxymoron. It just doesn’t happen. And for the longest time, IT DIDN’T. When a Republican would say something the Left deems “offensive”, aka anything at all, said Republican would immediately apologize and try to stay out of the spotlight. They were like Comey trying to hide from Trump during dinner by hiding behind a curtain.
 
Don’t get me wrong. Even though I’m using the term “were”, I mean they largely still are. How else can you explain Republican Establishment Sellouts like Graham trying to distance themselves from Trump? The thing is that, now, there’s a Republican that doesn’t immediately apologize for opening his mouth and tries to hide from the media.
 
For the longest time, Republicans had been victims to constant verbal abuse and bullying from Democrats. And they simply took it. The Left is like an abusive husband. They will insult your intelligence and everything about you, and when something bad happens, it’s your fault. After all, it was Scalise’s fault that a mad leftist tried to shoot and kill as many Republicans as he could, right? It wasn’t because the Left often incites violence against Trump and Republicans, right? No, it was the Republicans’ fault for voting on a bill that would “kill hundreds of thousands of people”, right?
 
What the Left and an abusive husband have in common is that they are both EVIL! When things don’t go their way, they quickly point their finger elsewhere. Most likely to you. And when that happens, they will do whatever they can to HURT you. Either by verbally abusing you with insults or by physical abuse, as in the case of the would-be Republican killer.
 
Nothing but evil exists in their hearts. And nothing short of God can change that.
 
Psalm 11:5
“The Lord tests the righteous and the wicked, And the one who loves violence, His soul hates.”
 
Author: Freddie M.