Unfortunately, today is the inauguration of this country’s first known occupier of the oval office, coming as a result of the Establishment working really hard to defeat Trump. Republicans always hated their most popular leader since Reagan and wanted revenge against the people who elected him and re-elected him.
 
However, there are a plethora of reasons to believe (and very well know) that Joe Biden is not the rightful winner of the 2020 election, neither is he deserving of the title of President of the United States. One of the reasons is the fact that President Trump’s approval rating remains just about the same in recent time as it was during the days, weeks and months leading up to the election.
 
On his way out, President Trump enjoys FAR better approval ratings than the last Republican president, George W. Bush, who saw historically low ratings of 22% as he was leaving office in 2009. Even Pew’s obviously biased poll showing Trump at 29% approval is still considerably higher than Bush’s, but like I just said, that one was obviously biased and an outlier.
 
Even NBC’s poll showed that he was around the same (40%) over the last few weeks and days as he was throughout most of his presidency.
 
And Rasmussen shows that, at least for the last full day of Trump’s presidency, the last real president enjoyed an approval rating of 51%.
 
Further, despite how undeserving the Republican Party is, Trump is leaving the GOP stronger than Bush did, with Democrats holding a very slim majority in the House (plenty of people assume there will be a red wave in 2022, but one can assume that Democrats will look to cheat in that election as well, so I don’t know how certain it is that Republicans will flip Congress, nor am I certain that that would in any way be a better outcome than what we have now if RINOs will replace Democrats) and only holding a majority in the Senate because of Kamala Harris’ tie-breaking vote (no, Manchin isn’t going to be a savior for conservatives. He’s going to be a good little boy for the Democrats).
 
And no, I won’t call Kamala Harris the Vice President because she was not elected to such a position, just like Biden was not elected to be president.
 
By contrast, the Democrats held a 79-vote majority in the House after the 2008 elections and a 59-41 majority which turned into a 60-40 supermajority with then-Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Arlen Specter switching parties (guy was obviously a RINO but at least was honest enough to switch to the party which most closely aligned with his beliefs).
 
Of course, what is far more important to me is the fact that Trump’s approval ratings remain about the same as for most of his presidency, even after the Capitol Hill riot. Everyone on the Left was, obviously, blaming Trump for it (something which would have had more of an impact if they hadn’t spent the last four years blaming Trump for literally everything bad) and some establishment Republicans were doing the same thing, but the American people, whom elected Trump to a second term, did not blame him for it at any capacity.
 
Whether or not they believe the riot was acceptable is irrelevant. Those who believe it was a bad thing do not blame Trump for it and rightly point to his speech calling for a peaceful and patriotic protest as proof of his innocence (as well as the fact that Antifa demonstrably had a hand in inciting the riot in the beginning). Those who believe it was a good thing (or at least an acceptable thing) obviously do not blame Trump for it for some of the same reasons as the other people and because you wouldn’t blame someone for something that you consider to be a good or ok thing.
 
This much is reflected in the polls: the American people LOVE Trump and we re-elected him. It doesn’t help the Left that they jumped the gun, again, and chose to illegally and unconstitutionally impeach Trump (without witnesses, evidence or the ability for him to defend himself) as well as withholding the delivering of the impeachment articles to the Senate, not to mention the clear instruction to social media to pull the trigger and ban the president and many of his supporters from their platforms.
 
Even if people wanted to blame Trump for the riot, the Left pulling all this crap and targeting all political dissenters as obviously as they are does not help them gain any favorability from the people. Not that they care at any rate anyway. They have proven to themselves (perhaps not for the first time) that they don’t actually need the support of the American people, just the power in certain places.
 
But it means a lot to me that the American people are on Trump’s side. We just have to figure out a way to turn that to action against the Establishment. May God curse the Washington Establishment and foil their wicked schemes.
 
1 John 2:18
“Children, it is the last hour, and as you have heard that antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come. Therefore we know that this is the last hour.”

I want to begin this article by making a couple of disclaimers. First, and perhaps most importantly, I am not a lawyer. I cannot give legal advice or counsel, nor can I give expert opinion on the procedures and logistics of possibilities for the Trump legal team to seek legal action against a clearly rigged election result. However, I will be largely quoting actual lawyers, who themselves have already written plenty about the legal options of the Trump team, both back in late November and more recently on Christmas Eve.
 
So whatever legal opinions are shared here, they will largely either be quotes or paraphrases of these lawyers, or at least backed up by what these lawyers are sharing.
 
The second disclaimer I want to make is that I am not saying that Trump only has this option for resolving the issue of a stolen election. This one is a little less important, since I don’t think too many people would interpret that title as whittling down Trump’s options for victory, but I still want to make this perfectly clear simply due to my not trusting the Supreme Court at this point (for good reason) and not believing that they are willing to actually do anything to save the Republic or even themselves, not to mention that I also don’t trust the current Acting AG.
 
But regardless of those things, allow me to share with you the thoughts of a couple of prominent conservative legal scholars who are giving their opinions about the SCOTUS having rejected the Texas suit against four “swing” states (generally titled Texas v. Pennsylvania), and who make a suggestion (which they have gone so far as to formally submit to President Trump himself) about what legal steps the president can take to right the many wrongs committed during this election that have resulted in a fake president-elect.
 
First, they give their opinions of the ghastly decision by the SCOTUS to reject the Texas suit:
 
“In refusing to hear Texas v. Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court abdicated its constitutional duty to resolve a real and substantial controversy among states that was properly brought as an original action in that Court. As a result, the Court has come under intense criticism for having evaded the most important inter-state constitutional case brought to it in many decades, if not ever.”
 
“However, even in its Order dismissing the case, the Supreme Court identified how another challenge could be brought successfully – by a different plaintiff…”
 
The lawyers, named William J. Olson and Patrick M. McSweeney, note that the SCOTUS made a massive mistake which could have huge ramifications if not corrected. In rejecting the suit, the Court committed wrongs against Texas and the roughly 20 states which supported its suit (which includes Arizona, for some reason), the United States itself, the President, and We the People.
 
You see, Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist No. 78, wrote that courts have “neither force nor will, but merely judgment.” Courts have the obligation to explain their decisions satisfactorily to the People, else the reasoning behind the decisions can easily be seen as partisan or corrupted. In its refusal to take up the case, the Court (all nine justices, though it was a 7-2 decision, technically) only issued the reason of “lacking standing”, explaining that reason with one sentence: “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its election.”
 
That is simply not enough to issue reasoned judgment. It arbitrarily says “yeah, we’re not taking it up because I don’t really think you care about how other states do their elections.” I don’t know the exact wording of every page of Texas’ suit, but I can hardly imagine they went so far as to sue those four states (and be joined by around 20 other states) without providing much of a reason. Texas is most certainly interested in how another state conducts its election because the results of that election affect Texas, or at least, the process of that election’s result.
 
The winner of that election can institute policy which could harm Texas (Biden’s “green” policies would hurt the Lone Star State), but even more important than that, it would affect Texas illegally. No, a state cannot sue another state for having voted one way or another, as that would pretty much destroy the entire system of the Republic. Texas can’t sue Pennsylvania for having gone to Biden instead of Trump like California can’t sue Texas for having gone to Trump instead of Biden. However, Texas can sue Pennsylvania for having clearly and overtly (to the admission of Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court) gone against both its state constitution and the U.S. Constitution by implementing and executing rules that are not legal or constitutional.
 
Because those rules were unconstitutional, and they helped Biden “win” that state, that is an illegal result, and so Texas has standing based on that, since they would be illegally and unconstitutionally affected by the result of the election. Furthermore, by doing what Pennsylvania and those other states did, they are utterly corrupting the electoral process by which we select our president. If those states are allowed to do what they did with impunity, then Texas’ voice, as well as all other states, don’t matter in this election. Their electoral power and voice are eliminated entirely because of an illegal and fake result in those states.
 
Like the lawyers said: “If the process by which Presidential Electors are chosen is corrupted in a few key states, like Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin by rigging the system in favor of one candidate, it becomes wholly irrelevant who the People of Texas support.” Again, if it were all legal, Texas, Trump and his voters would all have to suck it up and admit defeat. But because it was blatantly illegal, we cannot simply accept the result because we know it is not legitimate.
 
So it’s not only absolutely unacceptable for the SCOTUS to have issued a one-sentence explanation for their decision regarding what is perhaps the biggest suit in the history of the country, but the explanation itself is illogical and constitutionally unsound.
 
The lawyers put it pretty well: “In the vernacular, the Supreme Court blew it, threatening the bonds that hold the union together.”
 
If a state cannot be allowed to sue another state which has clearly broken not only its own constitution but also the constitution of the United States, what exactly is the reason for the union to remain? The Constitution is a contract which all states sign on to. If one of them breaks that contract and gets away with it, what reason is there for the others to keep honoring it? What reason is there for the states to remain unified under a broken contract?
 
It’s why I am not against secession if Biden ends up being the occupier of the oval office. Secession, ironically, would be the only way to preserve the union. We’re not quite there yet, and I pray to God we never get there, because secession would definitely lead to another civil war at one point or another. War is sometimes necessary, but it’s never ideal, and I would much rather avoid it if it can be avoided. But if it’s the only way to preserve the union, it cannot be taken off the table, due to its alternative: full-on communism.
 
At any rate, after disparaging the Supreme Court for its cowardly actions to defend the constitution at a crucial moment, the lawyers went on to note a way in which this legal case can still be made and be heard by the Supreme Court:
 
“A strategy exists to re-submit the Texas challenge under the Electors Clause to the Supreme Court in a way that even that Court could not dare refuse to consider. Just because Texas did not persuade the Justices that what happens in Pennsylvania hurts Texas does not mean that the United States of America could not persuade the justices that when Pennsylvania violates the U.S. Constitution, it harms the nation… Thus, the United States can and should file suit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin.”
 
That strategy could theoretically work because the majority of the Supreme Court (two of which are solidly conservative and the others less so but appointed by Trump) could hardly argue that the United States of America does not have a standing or interest in defending the United States constitution.
 
My only worry is in the fact that it would be up to Acting AG Rosen to file such a suit, which I am not sure he would be willing to do. And at this point, having had great hopes for both Jeff Sessions and William Barr to seek justice wherever they can, without politics being involved in the decision-making process, and being completely disappointed by both of them when they were of great need, I cannot say I have much hope in Acting AG Rosen to seek this option, even under direct order from President Trump.
 
Trump’s legal team can’t issue this suit since that would have to make it a private suit as opposed to a federal one, and there would be almost zero chance that the SCOTUS would take it up.
 
Olson and McSweeney’s suggestion could be plausible, and if actually performed (that is, Rosen actually files that suit), would pretty much be guaranteed to have its day in court, but there is reason to be cautiously optimistic about it, at best. I do not trust anyone in the swamp, and while I don’t know a lot about Rosen, do not outright trust him to be willing to go through with this.
 
Of course, as I mentioned towards the beginning, this legal challenge is not all Trump has to right the wrongs of this election. One Republican representative and Senator objecting to the results of the election on January 6th are all that’s needed to send Congress (presided by Pence) into deliberation and activation of the 12th amendment, leading state legislatures in those states to having one representative voting for the party they have to vote for, leading to Trump’s victory.
 
But I write this to remind people that there are still a number of options out there, both politically and legally (Martial Law and the use of the military should be last resorts, but not off the table options), to ensure that the rightful winner of this election actually ends up winning this election.
 
The SCOTUS should absolutely be ashamed of itself for potentially destroying the Republic with that heinous decision, and the people involved in attempting to steal this election should face extreme consequences for their treason.
 
Psalm 106:3
“Blessed are they who observe justice, who do righteousness at all times!”

Recently, Trump adviser Peter Navarro issued a report which he titled: “The Immaculate Deception: Six Key Dimensions of Election Irregularities.” In this report, Navarro outlines the various ways in which Democrats, in some cases at the behest of Republicans, conspired and coordinated to, if not outright steal the election, at least stack the deck against President Trump.
 
It’s a lengthy report – far too long for me to cover everything with great detail here – so I will try my best to summarize every important point and keep my explanations/opinions fairly short and succinct, because just about everything here is important and I do not want to make this article unbearably long.
 
Navarro begins by summarizing the findings that he would later go into further detail: how each of the six states which questionably swung for Biden used very different and egregious tactics to ensure the outcome that we all saw.
 
He notes six key dimensions of irregularities which occurred, to one capacity or another, in most if not all of the six states, which are in the following table:

As you can see, there is some or wide-spread evidence of each of these dimensions in all the states, though varying in how they show up. There is wide-spread evidence of ballot mishandling in every swing state except for Arizona, and there is wide-spread evidence of significant statistical anomalies in every state except Pennsylvania.
 
Now, for a very brief opinion portion, I wonder why Pennsylvania does not show even some statistical anomaly, considering that Trump’s lead was the biggest in this state out of the six, and it somehow and improbably utterly vanished by the end of it. That was the kind of lead that was statistically impossible to overcome, a point which is even admitted to by those in the fake news media, at least back on election night when Trump was still ahead by over half a million votes.
 
It was statistically impossible for Joe Biden to erase that lead to the point of winning, but Navarro is likely talking about things apart from the statistical likelihood of overcoming massive deficits.
 
At any rate, the second table that Navarro shows is this one:

As you can see, by midnight on election day, Trump held quite sizable leads in four states: Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. The only two swing states that are not here are Arizona and Nevada, because Biden held a lead in those states by midnight of election night, with 30,000 in Nevada and less than 150,000 in Arizona (though there is plenty of reason to doubt that Biden should have “won” those two states either).
 
Perhaps what is most important to note is the third table Navarro shares, which takes the first one about the six dimensions of election irregularities and adds the figures of Biden’s “victory” margin and the possible illegal ballots:

As you can see, in just about every state (except Michigan because the state government illegally wiped the voting machines a couple of days after the election was “completed”), Biden’s margin of “victory” is considerably smaller than the amount of possible illegal ballots in each state. Which is why Navarro belabors the following point: “The ballots that have come into question because of the identified election irregularities are more than sufficient to swing the outcome in favor of President Trump should even a relatively small portion of these ballots be ruled illegal.”
 
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has already said that those 200,000 votes are illegal and should not be counted, so in theory, that SHOULD lead to Trump taking Wisconsin, though for that to happen, the state’s Legislature (which is controlled by Republicans), has to step in and give the state’s electoral votes to Trump (and they are within their constitutional authority to do so, as I have already outlined in a previous article).
 
The other states should all do the same (it’s already egregious that this much was allowed to occur) and throw away those illegal ballots.
 
At any rate, Navarro then goes into further detail regarding each dimension that he describes, beginning with outright voter fraud, which constitutes: bribery, fake ballot manufacturing & destruction of legally cast real ballots, indefinitely confined voter abuses (as in, people who said they could not physically show up to vote and thus requested absentee ballots, but were later proven to have been able to physically show up to vote in states where indefinite confinement is the only excuse for not showing up to vote), ineligible voters & voters who voted in multiple states, dead voters & ghost voters, counting ballots multiple times, and illegal out-of-state voters.
 
Navarro shows that there is evidence of every state doing at least two of those things. There is wide-spread evidence of bribery in Arizona and Nevada; wide-spread evidence of fake ballot manufacturing, etc. in Arizona and Georgia and at least some evidence of it in Nevada and Pennsylvania; wide-spread evidence of indefinitely confined voter abuses in Wisconsin and some evidence of it in Georgia and Pennsylvania; wide-spread evidence of ineligible voters in Arizona, Georgia and Nevada; wide-spread evidence of dead voters in Arizona, Georgia and Nevada, with some evidence of it in Michigan and Pennsylvania; wide-spread evidence of repeated counting of individual ballots in Wisconsin, with some evidence of it in Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania; and finally, wide-spread evidence of illegal out-of-state voters casting ballots in Arizona, Georgia and Nevada, with some evidence of it in Pennsylvania, as you can see in this table:

​This is just ONE dimension of election irregularities out of six, and I am already sick with the corruption and blatant attempt of theft of this presidential election.
 
And I know that Leftists will conveniently say “there is no evidence of voter fraud”, which is frankly an absolute laugh after hearing for the last four years about how “Trump colluded with Russia” and that there’s “mountains of evidence” of it, but unlike those blatant liars, there actually IS mountains of evidence of voter fraud here.
 
Navarro’s report says: “Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage.”
 
All the Left ever had regarding Russian collusion was the debunked Steele dossier (which was oppo research by the Clinton campaign), the Trump Tower meeting between Don Jr. and a Russian lawyer who was not connected with the Kremlin at all and basically lobbied Don Jr. about a man wrongfully imprisoned in Russia, and a slew of promises by pundits and politicians about how “Mueller had the goods” without any substantial evidence to back up those claims.
 
So no, these are not the actions by a sore loser; they are the actions by a clear and rightful winner who KNOWS has been cheated and backstabbed by a number of people who wish to see him gone for the sake of their elitist establishment.
 
At any rate, Navarro then goes into more detail about each of the items in the dimensions, such as the bribery of Native Americans by the Biden campaign to trade their ballots for “Visa gift cards, jewelry, and other ‘swag,'” as well as the fake ballot manufacturing/destruction of legally cast real ballots, citing a sworn affidavit by a truck driver who alleged to have “picked up large crates of ballots in New York and delivered them to a polling location in Pennsylvania.” This same point could be made regarding out-of-state voting.
 
He also points to the most flagrant example of fake ballot manufacturing happening in Georgia, where poll watchers and observers were asked to leave after a suspicious water leak, and that once the room was cleared, several election officials went on to pull out large boxes and suitcases filled with ballots from underneath their tables. The fake news media, after video of this came out, went on to say “nothing to see here, move along, this is routine and normal,” which is nothing but b.s.
 
I could go on and on with plenty of examples for each item in each subsequent dimension, but Navarro’s report is better for giving you knowledge about that than this article. His report is rather lengthy, as well it should be since he is detailing a lot of election irregularities that helped sway the election for Biden, but it’s definitely worth a read. There are some elements in this report that even I did not fully know about and served to only further make my blood boil at how disgusting the Left is, and how enraging some Republicans in these states have been.
 
But at any rate, no one should be considering Biden to be President-elect because he is neither legitimate nor actually President-elect. The rightful winner of this election, by a country mile, is President Trump and he is the one we should be seeing in the White House for the next four years. Anything apart from that is a complete abortion of justice and the death of this Republic.
 
Shame on Mitch McConnell for being so eager to get rid of Trump and shame on the Republicans who have fooled us into thinking they were worthy of wielding the power that they do. The Democrats, I frankly expected this sort of behavior, but that does not mean that they should benefit from clear rigging and thievery of this election – they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and thrown into prison, if not made to suffer the penalty of treason.
 
I pray to God that we will see the rightful president be inaugurated January 20th and that we purge the establishment far more aggressively from now on. I refuse to allow this country to fall to cheating tyrants.
 
James 4:17
“So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin.”

This week has been rather chockful of news. Let’s begin with what I think are the most important pieces of news: first, that Dominion Voting Systems, the system used in various states to try and steal the election for Joe Biden, uses a system by SolarWinds Orion, which the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued an emergency directive in response to what they say is a known compromise.
 
This is worth noting because it’s been a little over 40 days since the November 3rd election, and it takes a while (between <30 to >55 days, according to IT Governance USA) for these kinds of breaches to be 1) detected and 2) reported to the general public. The November 3rd election is well within the timeframe for usual hack detections from this point, and again, Dominion Voting Systems uses SolarWinds systems to operate, meaning that they could have been subject to a breach.
 
From the CISA Twitter account: “JUST RELEASED: Emergency Directive 21-01 calls on all federal civilian agencies to review their networks for indicators of compromise and disconnect or power down SolarWinds Orion products immediately…”
 
From the CISA website: “The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) tonight issued Emergency Directive 21-01, in response to a known compromise involving SolarWinds Orion products that are currently being exploited by malicious actors. This Emergency Directive calls on all federal civilian agencies to review their networks for indicators of compromise and disconnect or power down SolarWinds Orion products immediately.”
 
CISA Acting Director Brandon Wales said: “The compromise of SolarWinds’ Orion Network Management Products poses unacceptable risks to the security of federal networks. Tonight’s directive is intended to mitigate potential compromises within federal civilian networks, and we urge all our partners – in the public and private sectors – to assess their exposure to this compromise and to secure their networks against any exploitation.”
 
It’s also worth noting that Dominion Voting Systems has still not powered down, so they are in violation of the CISA’s orders.
 
Since Dominion uses SolarWinds, and the election is within the timeframe for the discovery of hacks/security breaches, does that mean that Dominion itself was hacked? I cannot say for certain, but given what we know about the election, and given these news, it is within the realm of possibility.
 
What is also worth noting is that the US Treasury was also victim of a hack. Reuters reports: “A sophisticated hacking group backed by a foreign government stole information from the U.S. Treasury Department and a U.S. agency responsible for deciding policy around the internet and telecommunications, according to people familiar with the matter.”
 
Why is this important? Because if the two occurrences are related and a foreign government is involved in this, it triggers an executive order signed by Trump in 2018 regarding foreign interference in our elections. This EO requires the DNI to report to the president 45 days after an election if he or she found evidence of foreign interference in that election. If so, the DNI and other members of the president’s cabinet who have to do with national security can offer the president recommendations for punishment.
 
The EO itself, of course, has no bearing on the election, just punishes the identified criminals with asset forfeiture and things alike (both the foreign interferers and those who may have given them access domestically, for example, Gov. Kemp, if he is found to be a part of this). But if because of this EO the DNI finds foreign interference, that allows legislators and judges/SCOTUS justices to have concrete evidence of a national security threat and can take steps to ensure that the election is resolved in a better way. This is particularly the case if it’s found that Joe Biden is connected to the foreign interferers (and given we know he is tied with Russia, China and Iran, the three biggest suspects regarding foreign interference in US elections, it should mean bad things for “The Big Guy”).
 
Of course, that US Treasury hack does not have to be the only thing that would trigger the EO. If other aspects of the election are shown to have been interfered with by foreign actors, that would also trigger it. The reason I mention it is because foreign actors, according to Reuters (so not exactly a conservative source), hacked into the Treasury most likely around the time of the election, and a security breach was also recently discovered in a system which is connected to the voting system used in many states, particularly the ones which we find problems, such as Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, etc.
 
In other words, Trump has PLENTY of avenues for victory because of what we are finding here.
 
What’s more, according to a forensic review of the Dominions systems in Antrim County, Michigan, the Dominion Voting machines “were assigned a 68.05% error rate.” That means that 68.05% of the ballots cast in that county’s election were sent for adjudication, meaning that they are sent off somewhere “where people in another location can change the vote,” according to Michigan lawyer Matthew DePerno, who is involved in this case.
 
The report also shows changes in vote totals on November 3rd, 5th and the 21st. That 68.05% error rate is particularly staggering considering that the Federal Election Commission allows for just 0.0008% error rate. That staggeringly high error rate demonstrates systematic design, not human error. In other words, it’s done on purpose.
 
The Gateway Pundit has a great article about it that talks about this in far more detail and with other things which are of great importance that I can’t talk about here without making this article excessively long.
 
My overall point here is that there is PLENTY of evidence of voter fraud and now even hacking to lead to this election either being overturned or tossed (thus leading to one vote per state), both of which lead to a Donald Trump victory. There is still some time before the election is absolutely over and plenty can happen and develop in such a time frame.
 
I just hope that justice will be done in the end and that Biden, who himself has admitted to being involved in election fraud, does not end up near the White House, but instead, is headed towards prison at the lightest sentence (if evidence of treason is found, as I believe there is, it should lead to considerably worse punishments for a whole lot of people).
 
I pray, at the end of the day, that God will deliver us from the evils of the Left and will lead us towards victory against them.
 
2 Corinthians 2:14
“But thanks be to God, who always leads us in triumph in Christ, and manifests through us the sweet aroma of the knowledge of Him in every place.”

I want to make my thoughts surrounding election fraud perfectly clear: we do not have a Republic if fraud is allowed to take place and be used successfully and effectively. If Republicans in the State Legislatures do not fight for this country, it is over for them and for us.
 
This is not even about fighting for Trump himself. This is about fighting for the constitutional Republic in which we live. It’s about fighting for the rule of law. If they fail in doing this, it’s gone. The Republic would be dead.
 
There have been points over the past month, since election day, in which I have wanted corrupt, traitorous Republicans like Brian Kemp and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger tried and punished severely for their actions against America. I am convinced that those two (and many others) have betrayed this country in refusing to even look into election fraud in their state and pretending as though they haven’t been presented with MOUNTAINS of evidence of it all.
 
We literally have video of poll workers PULLING SUITCASES FILLED WITH BALLOTS FROM UNDER TABLES and yet, we are told “there is no evidence of fraud.” We have seen, live on even the fake news sources, Trump votes be taken away. We have seen votes be switched from Trump to Biden by the MILLIONS. We have seen more mail-in ballots be returned than originally sent out. We have seen enough evidence to, at the very least, toss this election into the garbage and have State Legislators decide the election, as the Constitution provides.
 
Publius Huldah wrote an article not long ago for RenewAmerica, detailing “A constitutional roadmap for conquering election fraud.”
 
Huldah, for some background context, is a retired litigation attorney, got a degree in philosophy before law, specialized in political philosophy and epistemology (that is, the theories of knowledge) and now writes about the Constitution, using the Federalist Papers in order to prove the original intent and meaning of the document.
 
In this piece, like I said, she details a constitutional roadmap for defeating election fraud and securing our Republic.
 
She writes: “The following shows what the State Legislatures and each Branch of the federal government have the authority to do to address the monstrous crime which has been committed against our Country.”
 
First, there is Article IV, §4 of the U.S. Constitution, which reads: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…”
 
In Federalist No. 10, James Madison wrote: “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place… The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest…”
 
A Republic, Madison says, is a form of government whose power is exercised by representatives elected, directly or indirectly, by We the People. In a democracy, the electoral college would not exist. It would be strictly down to the popular vote to determine who wins the presidency, which would leave plenty of people in plenty of states disenfranchised from the electoral process, seeing as only the biggest states would be relevant in such an election. There would be no point in addressing the needs or desires of those living in smaller states.
 
For example, in Argentina, the elections are strictly democratic. Popular vote reigns supreme. But this means that only the biggest and most populous provinces matter. Argentina has a population of a little over 45 million people. Easily, more than half live in only three provinces, out of a total 23, so only those three are where politicians spend most of their time campaigning and trying to get people’s votes.
 
For perspective, the three most populous states are California, Texas and Florida. In a pure democracy, that would mean that politicians would have to campaign pretty much exclusively in those three states. Obviously, other states participate in the electoral process, and those three don’t amount to more than half the country’s population, but winning those three states would be very important for any presidential candidate. And even then, again, those three states don’t amount to half the country’s population, so they would still need to campaign in states like New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, and all the other big ones.
 
Smaller states like Wyoming, Idaho, West Virginia, New Mexico, Nevada, Iowa, etc. would hardly be of any interest to presidential candidates, and as such, their needs and desires are entirely ignored in favor of the states with the biggest populations.
 
Because of this, the Founders had enough foresight to understand that this would leave too much power in the hands of only the biggest and most populous states, and those living in smaller states would get shafted, with zero incentive for anyone to move to those places in favor of the bigger states.
 
So, the Founders opted for a republican form of government, in which electors would represent the will of the people in their states. This is why the Constitution demands that the country provide each state a Republican form of government: without such a government, those states lose power, economic relevance, and the ability to even be relevant in the selection of this country’s leaders.
 
And as Publius writes, “Congress, the federal courts, and the Executive Branch… have the duty, imposed by Article IV, §4, to preserve our Republican form of government” and protect it from anything which would tarnish it, including electoral fraud.
 
Publius then went on to write the Constitutional framework regarding federal elections.
 
There is Article I, §4, which Publius notes disallows Federal and State judges, as well as Federal and State executive agencies from tinkering with election laws made by State Legislatures or Congress.
 
Examples of such a violation of that clause exist in Pennsylvania, where the governor infamously instituted election rules (or laws) which the State Legislature did not vote on and which the Pennsylvania Constitution prohibit. The Pennsylvania Governor is in clear and direct violation of Article I, §4, which is an act of usurpation of power (literally doing the job of the State Legislature).
 
There is also Article II, §1, clause 2, “The President & Vice President are to be elected by Electors appointed, in such manner as the State Legislature shall direct…,” according to Publius.
 
This gives the State Legislatures the power to elect the President and Vice President, which is important as you will later read.
 
The same article and section, clause 4 indicates that Congress “may determine the Time of chusing [sic] the Electors and the Day on which they Vote,” wrote Publius.
 
There is also the 12th Amendment, which directs how the Electors are to cast their votes for the POTUS and VP.
 
The 20th amendment, specifically §1, which says that the terms for POTUS and VP end on January 20 and the terms of Senators and Representatives end on January 3rd.
 
And finally, §2 of the 20th amendment, which directs Congress to meet on January 3rd, “unless they make a law setting a different date”, which they did, and established it as January 6th.
 
Publius also noted how the constitution provides for inevitable fights in Congress over the selection of Electors, so the Founders provided rules for such fights. Title 3, §1 sets November 3rd as the date for appointing Electors, but the two following sections provide for what happens when Electors are not appointed by such a date:
 
§2 says that Electors may be appointed on a different day “in such a manner as the Legislature of each State may direct.” And §3 says that Electors are chosen once any controversy surrounding their appointment has been determined. The purpose of litigations and hearings, such as the ones we have been seeing, is to determine such controversy.
 
Next, there is the determination of when those Electors are supposed to vote. Title 3, §7 sets the date for December 14th, but §§12 and 13 “provide for what happens when Congress hasn’t received the Electors’ votes by December 23rd,” according to Publius.
 
Keep in mind that Joe Biden hasn’t officially won or been elected yet, and has yet to actually cross the 270 threshold. If he doesn’t by those dates, the Constitution demands that one Elector from each state be chosen to be the state’s representative and must vote for their party candidate (so a Republican chosen to be State Representative has no other choice apart from voting for the Republican candidate).
 
Publius then writes the following:
 
“Now we get to the counting of the Electors’ Votes in Congress: 3 USC §15 says Congress is to meet on January 6 to count the votes. The President of the Senate [Mike Pence] presides. He is to call for objections to the votes. The rest of §15 and §§16-18 deal with handling the objections in Congress respecting the Electors’ votes.”
 
So if the Constitution is followed and enforced (as it should be), just about every piece of evidence and every situation indicates that Trump is the rightful winner of the election.
 
Publius then went on to note that Congress has the power and duty to determine whether or not the President-elect and VP-elect are even qualified for office, such as in the case that one of them is not a natural born citizen. This is, of course, largely irrelevant because if Biden and Harris do become (illegitimately) “elected”, there is absolutely no way that Congress would dare question their qualifications for office, not because they shouldn’t but because Democrats sure as hell won’t and Republicans would be too cowardly/traitorous to do anything like that. This part of the Constitution gets trampled on, easily.
 
Publius then briefly notes how election fraud is a crime and the DOJ should be investigating this and prosecuting it, and that they aren’t is an absolute disgrace.
 
After that, she notes that the Supreme Court, while it cannot enforce its own rulings, has a duty to guarantee a Republican form of government and issue an Opinion which is consistent with Article IV, §4.
 
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, Publius gets to the part about State Legislatures appointing replacement Electors.
 
“It is clear that State Legislatures have the power to ignore the fraudulent election and appoint a new set of Presidential Electors. Such is consistent with the Constitution and the statutory scheme laid out in 3 USC §§1-21. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has already acknowledged that State Legislatures may do this.”
 
“Originally, Electors were generally chosen by the State Legislatures. In McPherson v. Blacker, decided 1892, the Supreme Court gave the history of how each State Legislature chose their Electors since the first presidential election. It was only later that State Legislatures began to provide for the popular election of the Presidential Electors.”
 
“Congress expressly recognizes that State Legislatures may resume at any time the power to select the Electors.”
 
“Additionally, in Bush v. Gore, decided 2000, the Supreme Court said that the State Legislature’s power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it chooses, select the Electors itself; and even after granting the franchise to the People to select the Electors, State Legislatures can resume the power at any time.”
 
In other words, State Legislatures are Constitutionally allowed to resume their power for selecting Electors, and in such a time as this, they must.
 
Every single person elected to public office is sworn to protect the Constitution of the United States. We don’t expect Democrats to do this, of course, given their communistic and anti-American ideology, but Republicans definitely should and it would be an abortion of justice for them to cower in the face of danger when the very Republic is at stake.
 
Again, the Republic is dead if the GOP in the State Legislatures don’t do the right thing. This means our votes don’t matter and their tenures would soon expire. For those Republicans who think this is no big deal, they are ignorant to the fact that their own jobs are at peril. Give the Democrats an opening, and they will take over every seat they can, if they want.
 
Georgia has given the Democrats that kind of opening, and I do not expect Loeffler or Perdue to win their races, not because they are unappealing or don’t deserve Georgians’ vote (arguably, Loeffler somewhat deserves their votes, but Perdue surely doesn’t), but because the same systems which have stolen the election in favor of Biden are still in place.
 
Wanna know why this election went into run-off instead of outright victory for the Democrats? Because getting rid of Trump was the biggest priority. Republicans everywhere down-ballot enjoyed a Red Wave election, with numerous seats gained and “toss-ups” won. Just about everywhere, Republicans made major advancements… but Trump lost? It’s not because there was no cheating – it’s because the cheating was focused on the biggest priority. In Georgia, the biggest priority is now the Senate seats, so the cheaters have to adjust for that one.
 
If there is only one reason I would vote there if I were a Georgian voter, it’s to make it harder for the Democrats to cheat, as they would have to change or steal one extra vote, and that would make the operation bigger and more difficult to hide. When the GOP Senate candidates lose, they could make the excuse that “people didn’t turn out to vote for them,” which undercuts the point we have been trying to make regarding the election: that there is widespread election fraud by the Democrats.
 
Those Senate losses will be replicated everywhere else, at least over time. It’s not because Democrats are increasingly popular (Trump gaining 10M votes from last time and R’s making gains everywhere else is an indication of the opposite being the case), but because Democrats are increasingly more powerful, in many cases, at the behest of Establishment Republicans who are virtually no different from Democrats, other than how open they are about tyranny.
 
And make no mistake, I consider Kemp to be every bit the tyrant other Democrats are. Just because he doesn’t speak overtly about his intentions and desire, it doesn’t mean he isn’t like them.
 
If this election can be stolen, all other elections can be stolen as well, at every level of government. All you need to do is give these commies a single opening, and they have been given plenty by those we once trusted.
 
Pray that the State Legislatures everywhere we need them will grow wise enough to recognize the threat of a dead Republic and courageous enough to go against the Deep State to ensure that doesn’t happen.
 
Isaiah 9:16
“For those who guide this people have been leading them astray, and those who are guided by them are swallowed up.”

The Never Trumper and liberal would look at that headline and believe that I have given up on Trump or the fight to ensure Biden and the Democrats do not steal this election. They will think I am a pro-Trumper who is looking at the situation and thinks it is so bleak that I have no other choice but to pray to God for a miracle. Make no mistake: praying to God is our FIRST choice, not our last.
 
It is not rare for soldiers to pray to God before they set off to battle. They do so, not because they are at their wits end and can only pray for a miracle. They do so because they believe God will deliver them from the present darkness of war. They do so because they believe God will protect them from the enemy. They do so because they are believers first and soldiers second. They do so because they know the awesome power of the Lord.
 
Read the following written prayer from a Russian soldier during World War II:
 
“O God, hear me! Not once in my life have I ever spoken to you, but today I feel the urge to make you an act of worship. You know that even from my infancy they always told me that you didn’t exist… I, stupid, believed them. I had never marveled at your great works. But tonight I looked up from out of a shell hole at the heaven of stars above me! And fascinated by their brilliant magnificence. All at once I understood how terrible the deception…”
 
“I don’t know, O God, if you will give me your hand. But I say this to you, and you understand. Isn’t it strange, that in the midst of a terrible inferno, the light should appear to me and I should have discovered you? Beyond this I have nothing to say to you. I am happy just because I have known you. At midnight we must attack, but I have no fear, you are looking out for us.”
 
“It is the signal. I have to go. It was wonderful to be with you. I want also to tell you, and you know it, that the battle will be hard: it could be that, in this very night, I’ll come to knock at your door. And even though up to now I haven’t been your friend, when I come, will you let me come in? But what’s this? Am I crying? My Lord God, you see what has happened: only now I’ve begun to see clearly… Farewell, my God, I am going. It’s scarcely possible that I’ll return. Strange; Death now has no fear for me.”
 
Realize the magnitude of such a prayer. Children in the Soviet Union were taught not to believe in God. Teachers would often, under order of the Soviet school systems, organize an exercise where children would be given two potted plants: one which they would water themselves and take care of themselves, and another which “would be left up to God to take care of”. The point of the exercise was to “prove” that God didn’t exist because the plant that would not get watered or put under the sun or overall taken care of would die, and the one that the children took care of would live.

So, it is not surprising that a Russian soldier in the midst of the Second World War would have spent much of his young life not having known God at all. And even still, it is clear to me, through reading that prayer, that the Holy Spirit came down upon him and his eyes were opened to the Lord. That soldier, as he had predicted, would die in that battle. But he did not despair at the thought. He felt tranquil, as he expressed in the end of the prayer.
 
Prayer to God may have been among his last actions, but it was not out of desperation for hope of making it out of there. Again, he demonstrated he was not afraid of meeting his end there. Similarly, those who support and have voted for Trump, whether twice now or for the first time this election, we do not hope in God because He is our last hope or choice; He is our ONLY hope and choice.
 
Shall we have hope in an imperfect system (which is still pretty good, all things considered) created by imperfect men? Shall we have hope in even Trump himself or his legal team? I’m not saying that because I think they will fail; I say that because I believe God will let them succeed and has the power to do so. I say that because, at the end of the day, whether we are talking about war, a rigged election, or whatever else, we can truly do nothing more than to put all our trust, faith and hope in the One who is Master of All.
 
We see what we have to face. Many of us saw much of that during the recent State Senate hearing in Philadelphia.
 
The State of Pennsylvania sent out 1.8 million mail-in ballots and received 2.5 million. A clear sign of a rigged election. Republican poll watchers were not allowed to watch the polls, and even Philadelphia sheriffs didn’t allow them to go in, despite them having a judge’s order to be allowed to watch the polls. Another clear sign of a rigged election. At one point, the vote count received 570k votes going to Biden and only 3,200 going to Trump. Yet another sign of a rigged election.
 
There is plenty more, but also keep in mind that this was JUST in the State of Pennsylvania. There are other states like Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia and Michigan to consider, and even then, I doubt those are the only states where massive irregularities occurred.
 
Did you know that Biden severely underperformed Hillary Clinton everywhere in the country, with just about every demographic, except in four key cities? The only places where Biden did “better” were Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia, all of which are in states where some of the worst irregularities occurred and which are being challenged (Arizona is another state where such irregularities occurred, but no particular city “carried the day” for Biden there).
 
So we know what we are faced with. On the natural level, there are plenty of reasons to be worried. However, we do not serve a natural god, we serve a supernatural God. Absolutely none of this is a surprise to Him. He knows the exact number of votes stolen, illegally thrown away, illegally counted, etc.
 
We likely will never know the extent to which Democrats have been trying to steal this election (and I suspect this is far from the only election they have tried to steal, given Biden’s comments about his “voter fraud operation” and how “you guys did it for President Obama’s administration before this”, pointing to the possibility of Obama having stolen at least one of his elections, most likely 2012). However, what is important is to keep them from stealing this one, because if we are successful in doing that, I believe it will serve as a wake-up call to many Republicans (not the establishment ones) about election security.
 
I’ve said this before but I will repeat it here: it’s possible that this is all a blessing in disguise. Had Trump won in a massive landslide like I originally hoped he would, the topic of election security and fraud would not have been a priority. Sure, a Trump landslide would have been evidence that it clearly didn’t work, but consider that Trump is very much unlike other Republicans in many regards. He has the kind of pull many other Republicans do not. He is the most popular Republican president and candidate since Ronald Reagan. Had he won in a massive landslide and nothing was done about election security and defeating the Democrat fraud operations, they would have taken over in 2024 very easily, and the fears and worries we have today would become guaranteed realities four years from now.
 
If Trump succeeds, as I believe God will lead him to do, this close brush with fraud victimization will lead him to do something about the election. Keep in mind, also, that he sought to secure this election from foreign influence JUST because of the allegations made against him that he colluded with Russia.
 
If he is willing to implement policies which secure the elections from foreign influences just because of what people say about him, don’t you think he will be more willing to implement policies which secure the elections from domestic influences because of how close he was to being cheated out of re-election?
 
Election security and fighting fraud are now unmistakably a part of the Make America Great Again agenda, because without it, Democrats will have a much easier time stealing all future elections wherever they need them, with varying degrees of success in some places, at least.
 
There will be no Red Wave in 2022 if we don’t keep this election from being stolen by the Democrats. But again, despite all our earthly trials and tribulations, we must place our faith and trust, first and only, in the Lord.
 
Just as He hardened Pharaoh’s heart, He can also soften the hearts of our enemies. He can guide even wicked people to righteousness. Consider that before the Apostle Paul was an apostle or a Christian, he was the biggest helper of the Roman Empire in persecuting and hunting down those who walked with Christ.
 
If Christ can cause Saul of Tarsus to have a change of heart and become His follower, and further to writing about half of the New Testament and being one of the most influential apostles of the 12, God can make even people like Justice Roberts to do the right thing (and yes, I am aware of how he voted in a recent SCOTUS case regarding Cuomo’s unconstitutional shuttering of religious services, but that case does not go against the truth that God can guide Roberts’ steps away from wickedness and evil).
 
So do not put your hope in Trump, or his legal team, or the justice system of the United States. Rather, put your hope in the One who is above all things, who created all things, and who is Master over all things. Put your faith and trust and hope in the One who cannot be cheated, who cannot be victimized, and who knows the plans of the wicked and laughs at them.
 
Put your hope in God first and only.
 
Romans 12:12
“Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer.”

I would like to thank all of my voters, friends and family for getting me to where I am today. As President-elect, I will ensure we have a peaceful transition of power and once inaugurated, I will lead this nation away from the communist hellhole the Democrats and the Left wish to take us to and towards a future where God is back in our schools, the Constitution is actually taught, our history is taught, and where no Marxist shall ever find refuge.
 
Why am I saying all of this? Because I currently have about as much claim as Joe Biden does to call myself President-elect. Despite the fake news media calling state after state for Joe Biden and even pretending as though he has passed the 270 electoral vote threshold, he, in fact, has not won jack. The following are states which are heavily contested (due to rampant voter fraud) and have not officially been called or certified in anyone’s favor:

• Nevada
• Arizona
• Wisconsin
• Michigan
• Pennsylvania
• And Georgia

 
Both Alaska and North Carolina have recently been called for Trump, giving him 232 electoral votes so far in comparison to Joe Biden’s 226. As it currently stands, President Trump is ahead in the electoral college vote and has multiple paths for victory against Biden.
 
Matter of fact, The Gateway Pundit pointed this very thing out.
 
In Nevada, as well as in pretty much every other state they mention, they point out the blatant voter fraud that threatens to steal the election away from Trump. “Signatures were not verified on hundreds of thousands of votes. It is likely that President Trump will win this state if any of the ineligible votes are eliminated here…”
 
In Arizona, TGP points to delays in counting. In Wisconsin, TGP points to Biden’s 20,000 vote lead over Trump but notes that “in the morning after the election more than 100,000 votes magically appeared in Milwaukee… If these votes or the exception in the numbers in Rock County are addressed, Trump will likely win this state by a large margin.”
 
In Michigan, 100,000 ballots were dropped overnight in Detroit, and if eliminated from the total vote tally (there are lawsuits taking place here and other states), it will likely go to Trump. If all of these aforementioned states go Trump’s way (as they should), that would give Trump 278 electoral votes.
 
There is also Pennsylvania, where some of the most blatant and obvious rigging and fraud is happening. Biden currently leads the vote count here, but it is very obviously through fraud, given that Trump was ahead by 700,000 votes on election night before the Leftist jackals stopped counting to harvest ballots for Biden. This, I think, is one of the biggest focuses for Trump’s legal team, since I think it is where the easiest case can be made for widespread massive voter fraud.
 
Finally, there is Georgia, which unfortunately, despite it being largely a red state, is seeing a lot of election fraud (and hardly any fight in the state GOP, it seems). Like in other states, Trump was winning this one handily on election night, with a 100,000 vote lead, but ballot harvesting operations have allowed for Biden to take the lead here as well, though they are beginning a hand recount there, so it could end up going for Trump.
 
If the Trump legal team can get those illegal votes thrown out, as they should, Trump will win here as well, for a total of 311 electoral votes. Of course, this is all assuming that the courts rule in Trump’s favor (which, given the rampant voter fraud, they should).
 
Jon Miller wrote a great Twitter thread about the two ways in which the Supreme Court could go here:
 
One way is roughly what I just talked about: SCOTUS orders the states in dispute to remove all illegal ballots and do recount (likely by hand), which would lead to the situation I described above where Trump wins 311 electoral votes.
 
The other way is the SCOTUS rules the entire election as invalid due to the mass voter fraud, which, as Miller writes: “At that point it will be sent to Congress and Senate for a vote.”
 
Now, I know what you might be thinking: “So it’s sent to Congress? Meaning it has to go through the Democrat-led House? Doesn’t that mean that we already lost?” And, no, it doesn’t, as Miller points out: “Congress votes but it has nothing to do with what party has power. Every state gets one vote and 30 states are held by Republicans. 19 by Dems. They have to vote down party lines,” because of the 12th amendment.
 
The Constitution provides for a situation in which an election is either too close for any winner to be declared or where the Supreme Court has to intervene because of rampant and proven fraud. Trump’s legal team doesn’t even have to prove that every single illegal ballot is illegal, just that there is enough that those illegal ballots could intervene in the election and change the results. If that is proven, the SCOTUS can go down different roads, and many of those roads lead to Trump’s second term.
 
This is why the Democrats are rushing with “President-elect Joe Biden.” It’s nothing but posturing. They are well aware of the fact that they could and likely will lose this election through a number of ways, so for the purposes of fighting Trump’s legitimacy, they have to pretend as though HE is the one that “stole” the election as opposed to them.
 
This is why even I (and many others) have begun to call myself “President-elect”, because I have as much legal claim to be that as Joe Biden does. Neither of us have gotten the sufficient amount of legal votes in the electoral college to be President-elect. My “office” of the President-elect includes a desk that’s been battered through a couple of moves, a two-year-old computer, a nearly-decade old monitor, another computer which is years old and never use but always keep on my desk just in case, some books, a couch/bed behind my desk, a white board and a flat-screen television. All of this is just an official part of my office of President-elect as whatever is on Biden’s desk at home or in his basement.
 
I have half a mind to try and contact President Trump about my transition of power for my administration, seeing as I have as much legal claim to it as Biden does.
 
So don’t let any fake news source make the claim that Joe Biden is “President-elect” because he flat-out isn’t. The fake news media doesn’t get to decide the elections, else Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Michael Dukakis, Walter Mondale, Jimmy Carter, and every other Democrat who came before would have won (and out of all of these, only Carter actually was POTUS at some point).
 
What gets to decide the election is the United States Constitution, and it says that the electoral college decides the election. When it cannot or when it’s this heavily contested, the Supreme Court makes a decision as to the avenue for deciding the president.
 
And by the way, every single news outlet that today is lambasting Trump for “refusing to accept the results of the election” is also every single news outlet which for four years refused to accept the results of the 2016 election, and perhaps even more importantly, PRAISED Al Gore for doing pretty much the same thing that Trump is now doing back in the 2000 election.
 
Gore put this country through 30+ days of litigation, and every step of the way, he was praised by the fake news media as “fighting for democracy.” Now, Trump is doing pretty much the same thing only because of rampant voter fraud which anyone halfway paying attention can notice, and they call him a “sore loser” or other crap.
 
Not that it’s in any way surprising, of course. I would have to be insane to be at all surprised at this kind of reaction from the media. But it’s worth it to point out the great hypocrisy of these people and their outright subjectivity throughout it.
 
Now, something that is fairly ironic about this situation is that it could be a blessing in disguise. One silver lining of the current election fiasco we are witnessing is that it paves the way for Trump to prioritize election security once he enters his second term. Had he won in a landslide like I was originally hoping he would, election security would not have been much of a priority because the fraud, despite its size, would not have been effective enough to sway the election.
 
Trump has so far won more than 72 million votes, which is nearly 10 million more votes than he got four years ago. That is MASSIVE and if it weren’t for the election fraud and its relative success (thus far), it’s what a lot of people would be talking about for a long while. This is more than what Obama got in 2008, and this is WITH THE TOSSED-OUT TRUMP VOTES. In reality, he has even more votes than the official count.
 
But as great as that is for Trump, do you really think that any other Republican could get these kinds of numbers? If the fraud scheme had not been exposed as it had been because it was clearly not effective enough to sway the election, the Democrats would have come back in two years and in four years and every future election cycle with some of the same schemes that would, in the future, actually help them steal the elections.
 
Even despite the annoyance of this current process, and the anger at the Democrats trying to steal an election away from the American people, if Trump is ultimately successful, he can (and should) prioritize election integrity for the future, because I can just about guarantee no Republican in the future will ever win the presidency again if these kind of shenanigans are allowed to continue.
 
At any rate, no one should be calling Joe Biden “President-elect”, seeing as he has not actually won the election. But for as long as Democrats and Leftists do actually call him that, might as well start calling myself that too.
 
This isn’t over folks, not by a long-shot.
 
Amos 5:24
“But let justice flow down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.”

The fake news media will lie about anything and everything if they think it would even slightly help the Democrats out, no matter how utterly ludicrous and divorced from reality that lie may be. This is seemingly what they have chosen to do recently regarding yet another Joe Biden gaffe.
 
During a campaign “rally”, Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden once again showed his senility and his early stages of possible dementia when talking about the election. This is what Joe said at one point in that “rally”:
 
“This is the most [consequential election], not because I’m running, but because [of] who I’m running against, this is the most consequential election in a long, long, long time. And the character of the country, in my view, is literally on the ballot, what kind of country we’re going to be.”
 
“Four more years of George, uh, George, uh, he, uh… gonna find ourselves in a position where if Trump gets elected we’re gonna be, we’re gonna be in a different world.”
 
It is clear where the guy made the mistake. Joe Biden mistakenly believed that George W. Bush was still president, not Donald Trump. At least, he did this for a brief moment but caught himself quickly enough and remembered that he was running against Trump, not Bush.
 
However, that is far too logical for the fake news media, who are seemingly willing to die on the hill that Biden was not talking about Bush, but about actor and “comedian” George Lopez, who has never even run for president.
 
Dave Weigel from The Washington Post said: “1.1 million views and a Fox story based on the premise that Biden was confusing Trump with George Bush. He was talking to George Lopez.”
 
While George Lopez was a part of the livestream, the context does not make any sort of sense for Biden to have been referencing George Lopez.
 
“Four more years of George…” Lopez? How is that better than Biden confusing Trump with Bush? At least if he was confusing Trump with Bush, he was confusing presidents, not a guy who never even has run!
 
And yet, this is what the idiots on the fake news media are running with. CNN’s Brian Stelter tweeted: “NBC has added an editor’s note to this morning’s ‘Today’ show segment that played a clip of Biden saying ‘four more years of George, uh…’ without noting that he was talking to George Lopez.”
 
Jake Tapper tweeted: “Lie after lie after lie,” siding with Weigel and attacking conservatives on this.
 
“No, you silly conservatives, Joe Biden wasn’t confusing Trump with George Bush, he was confusing Trump with George Lopez!”
 
Ah, ok, much better, then.
 
But seriously, how is that a better argument than just admitting the guy briefly confused Trump with Bush? It’s not like this is the first time Biden has confused people or gotten their names wrong.
 
During an Illinois campaign rally in 2008, after having been tapped to be Obama’s running mate, Biden said: “A man who will be the next president of the United States – Barack America!”
 
During an interview with CBS Evening News, Biden criticized Bush’s handling of the financial crisis, saying: “When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed.”
 
Herbert Hoover was president during the stock market crash of 1929, not FDR, and there was no television back then.
 
Earlier this month, Joe Biden forgot he was running for president, not the Senate, and forgot Mitt Romney’s name, calling him “the senator who was a Mormon, the governor, ok?”
 
Following his Super Tuesday victories, Biden confused his wife for his sister and vice versa.
 
He has, repeatedly, forgotten where he is and outright confused states. He claimed to have gone to an exclusively black college in Delaware. And he has, repeatedly, forgotten who was president at any given time.
 
This is a pattern for Joe Biden and it’s all public, even though the fake news media never covers it. This close to an election, given how utterly biased the fake news media is, I expected them to try and cover for Biden’s gaffes to try and minimize them, but this is an utterly strange hill to die on.
 
How does it make more sense to claim that Biden meant George LOPEZ when talking about getting “four more years” of a person named George?
 
If the media is wrong (which of course they are), that just makes Biden look senile. If the media is right and Biden meant George Lopez, it makes him look like a moron. How is that a better alternative?
 
It’s not like Joe didn’t recognize his momentary gaffe. He immediately tried correcting himself and rather promptly got it right. This gaffe, had it been left alone, would have largely been swept under the rug. He has confused people many times before, as I have just shared. Yeah, it still makes him look senile, but claiming he was talking about George Lopez in the context of getting four more years, a context of presidential terms, would actually make the guy look even worse if true.
 
How is it better for Biden to have meant that George LOPEZ was president than for him to have meant that George Bush was president?
 
Not that I want these idiots to correct themselves, this kind of gaslighting and obvious attempt at protecting one candidate over another further proves to everyone how much of a partisan hack these people are, particularly this close to the election.
 
Instead, I shall relentlessly mock these fools for their horrid miscalculation which they will be far too proud and stubborn to correct.
 
Proverbs 18:2
“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”

With a little over a week to go before the election, the last presidential debate certainly did no favors for Joe Biden, even as the debate topics and liberal moderators were favorable to the corrupt Democrat (admittedly, the moderator still did far better than Chris Wallace did, by a mile, even if she interrupted Trump far more than Biden and began to debate Trump later on in the night a bit).
 
There are a number of things that I could point to which likely could lead to Joe Biden’s landslide defeat being even grander, such as his slip up in noting that he would move away from fossil fuels (a remark which will cost him dearly in Pennsylvania), or his outright lie (of which there were plenty) regarding how “not one single person” lost their private health insurance once Obamacare was enacted, but his overall debate performance was outright awful and has led to some eye-opening post-election poll numbers, which I will get to in a moment.
 
Despite the fact that the Democrats have basically owned the black vote for the last 50 years (pun intended), that little safety net of theirs is beginning to not be so safe anymore.
 
For 50 years, the Democrats have promised black people economic prosperity, safety, justice reform, healthcare reform, and generally have promised black people that their lives would improve if only they would consistently vote for Democrats everywhere they could. They have been promising this for half a century and things have only gotten worse in places run by Democrats.
 
Let’s not forget that Joe Biden himself was the author of the 1994 Crime Bill, and his running mate is responsible for the incarceration of over 44,000 black people and almost 2,000 incarcerations were for marijuana-related offenses when she was California’s AG.
 
Now, if people commit crimes, they have to do the time. That is not my issue here, even with the marijuana stuff since I do not believe for a second that it should be made legal. However, the Democrats go around pretending like they’re doing this massive favor for black people and that they are making reforms and new laws that help black people when that has not shown to be the case whatsoever.
 
They claim that this country’s laws overincarcerate people and that the system is rigged against blacks and other minorities, when they are the ones writing and enforcing those laws. California has been a deep-blue state for a long time now and Harris was its Attorney General from 2011-2016. Democrats own California and yet, it’s not the socialist paradise that they claim we would have as a nation if we were to consistently elect them.
 
California is quickly becoming (if it isn’t one already) a socialist dystopia because that is all socialism can bring to anybody. So even if a Leftist were to make the excuse that “the reason things aren’t great for black people is because Republicans still get elected to the presidency and Congress,” it is nothing more than that: an excuse. This is because California has been very solid blue for decades now, their last Republican governor was not truly a Republican, and we can see what the Leftist ideology brings to all people, let alone black people: misery.
 
In Minneapolis, where George Floyd died during a police-involved event, Democrats have been in total control for ages. Same in Baltimore, where Freddie Gray died in police custody.
 
Wherever Democrats rule, people suffer, particularly black people. Perhaps that’s why it really shouldn’t be so surprising that Trump has such high likely voter approval numbers from black people. You see, according to Rasmussen Reports, National Daily Black Likely Voter Job Approval for Trump from October 19 to 23 has seen a fantastic rise.
 
On the 19th (a Monday), Trump’s black LV approval was at 25%, which is still pretty good, but could be better. It went down by one point the following day, but on Wednesday the 21st, it ticked up a good bit to 31%. The day of the debate, it went up to 37% and on Friday, following Thursday night’s debate, it was at 46%.
 
A good reason for this, in my opinion, is Trump’s Platinum Plan to economically assist black people who were heavily affected during the pandemic (a plan which was brought forth by Ice Cube who is not likely to vote for Biden after Sleepy Joe refused to work with Mr. Cube on this plan). That was fairly big news throughout the week last week, so the tick up to 31 and 37% made sense, as well as the 46% following the debate in which Biden began to slowly fall apart once he began to be pressed on Hunter’s emails.
 
These numbers ought to terrify Democrats, who have, like I said, enjoyed a safety net with black voters for half a century. LBJ himself once said that he’ll “have those n*****s voting Democratic for the next 200 years,” in discussions with fellow Democrat governors talking about the Great Society plan. As it turns out, he might have been right for the first 50 or so years, but the Democrats are beginning to lose this demographic.
 
Will a majority of black people be voting for Trump? Doubtful. But considering these are likely voters, if these numbers remain steady for the next week and a half (or at least they don’t drop well below 30%), that will give Trump a huge advantage over Biden and the Democrats.
 
And while I cannot possibly claim to be able to predict the future, I can say that this trend is not a good one whatsoever for the Democrats. It’s unlikely the GOP will ever see another Trump-like candidate, but if they can embrace Trumpism following Trump’s tenure as POTUS, this sort of trend will continue their way, maybe even to the point where a majority of black people will begin to vote for Republicans again like they did following the passages of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution.
 
You know, when the KKK began to form and was terrorizing black people because they largely were targeting Republicans and black people were largely Republican back then?
 
I have long believed that Joe Biden was headed towards an embarrassing landslide defeat (again, no one get complacent here, there is still a job to be done) but if these numbers continue, Joe will lose by an even bigger margin than even I thought he would.
 
He easily sealed his defeat in Pennsylvania following his fossil fuel comments, but he might lose even worse in many other places.
 
Here’s hoping Trump will utterly CRUSH the communist Trojan horse and deliver a defeat that will bring Democrats flashbacks of 1984.
 
Ephesians 6:12
“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.”

Back in late September, I talked about the bombshell Senate report that spared no detail about the business dealings of the Bidens and the overall corruption of the Obama/Biden administration with regard to Ukraine and Burisma Holdings.

Well, a recent New York Post article drops another bombshell in the form of recovered emails between Hunter Biden and a top Burisma executive named Vadym Pozharskyi.
 
The details of this one are pretty juicy and Twitter thought them so damaging that they outright have been banning people that simply TALK about it, which only serves to bring more attention to a story which otherwise might not have led very many people to care about it (particularly as some people will vote for Biden no matter what).
 
According to the NY Post: “Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company, according to emails obtained by The Post.”
 
This goes against something that Joe Biden had been claiming for a long time now, that he has “never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” We all knew for a long time now that that was an utter lie, but this only goes to further prove it, particularly as according to Politico, “Biden’s campaign would not rule out the possibility that the former VP had some kind of informal interaction with Pozharskyi, which wouldn’t appear on Biden’s official schedule.”
 
For context, the Biden campaign had responded to the NY Post’s piece, obviously lambasting it, but only claiming that the former VP never officially met with the Burisma executive, meaning that the two had met in secret in an informal setting. This, suffice to say, does not look good for Biden at all, and I think this can somewhat be considered an October Surprise, but aimed at the Democrats as opposed to the Republicans.
 
At any rate, returning to the uncovered emails (which were not hacked, as some on the Left might claim. They were in a computer taken to a repair shop which was never claimed and the shop owner tried contacting the owner multiple times before looking through the contents of the hard drive, as the computer could now be claimed as his own, and found these emails. He then made a copy of the hard drive and set it to various places such as the FBI and Rudy Giuliani’s lawyers), we find some truly juicy stuff.
 
An April 17, 2015 email from the Burisma executive reads: “Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together. It’s realty [sic] an honor and pleasure. As we spoke yesterday evening, would be great to meet today for a quick coffee. What do you think? I could come to you [sic] office somewhere around noon or so, before or on my way to airport. Best, V.”
 
Like I said, that email points to Joe Biden having met with an executive from Burisma, which Joe had been lying to people about for years.
 
Less than a year after that particular email, Joe Biden coerced the Ukrainian president and Prime Minister into firing the country’s top prosecutor who had been investigating Burisma Holdings’ executives, which naturally included Hunter Biden. This is something else that Joe is now lying about, despite the fact that there is video proof that he has outright BRAGGED about what he did, saying to the Council on Foreign Relations in 2018: “I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’”
 
“Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.”
 
Another email from Pozharskyi, which is a lengthy one so I will share the most important details, reads as follows: “Dear Hunter and Devon,… As previously pointed out on a number of occasions, the representatives of new authorities in power tend to quite aggressively approach N. Z. unofficially with the aim to obtain cash from him… After unsuccessful attempts to receive funds from our side, they proceeded with concrete actions… We urgently need your advice on how you could use your influence to convey a message/signal etc. to stop what we consider to be politically motivated actions…”
 
A few things need to be made clear about this. First of all, this was an email sent to Hunter and his business partner Devon Archer (whom I’ve talked about at length in that other article) on May 12th, 2014… the same day that Hunter Biden, at least officially, joined the Burisma board.
 
I see Burisma didn’t take too much time to use their newly acquired influence.
 
Secondly, this was a bit of a murky period in Ukraine. The Revolution was still ongoing and President Viktor Yanukovych had fairly recently been removed from office in February. The country wouldn’t have elections until May 25th, in which Poroshenko succeeded the former president. So it’s a bit of a strange period and I do not know exactly who was in charge of the country in between the time Yanukovych was removed and Poroshenko was installed (which was in June). However, someone obviously was in charge and their short-lived administration clearly wanted some money from this “N. Z.” fellow, who is most likely Burisma’s owner Mykola Zlochevsky, as he is an oligarch with plenty of money and his name “Mykola” is a Ukrainian version of “Nicholas.”
 
It is a bit strange that Pozharskyi would refer to Zlochevsky as “N. Z.” instead of “M. Z.” since they are both Ukrainians, but given the context of those initials in Pozharskyi’s email, I can’t think of whom else he could possibly be referring to, as he talks about “the gaz [sic] production business of N. Z. …”
 
At any rate, the New York Post also noted that this email was sent on the same day that Burisma announced (and has since redacted) Hunter Biden’s addition to the board of directors, though they also say that “Hunter Biden actually joined the board in April 2014, according to multiple reports.”
 
So that is another possible lie from the Bidens in general, as Hunter was reportedly a part of the board of directors of the gas company a good bit before his official announcement. I wonder what else happened in between the time that he actually joined the board and the time that the announcement was made official.
 
There is more to this story in the New York Post, though I do not think many other details are all that relevant for me to share here, other than an email written by Pozharskyi and forwarded to Hunter by Archer about a proposed tax law which would have been detrimental to Burisma, but I did not get too much out of that exchange.
 
Like I said in my previous article regarding the dealings of Hunter Biden and his father, I want you to imagine the outrage from the Left if any person on the Right, such as Don Jr. or Eric Trump, or anyone from the Pence family, had been caught doing the things that Hunter was doing.
 
Hunter has taken millions of dollars from Burisma simply in exchange for his family name and the position of his father, has taken millions of dollars from other foreign sources such as the wife of the former mayor of Moscow, and has a detailed record of corruption. If a right-winger had done even one of the things Hunter has done, that would be all we’d be talking about for weeks, and all the way to the election.
 
But because it’s a story which damages the Democrat nominee, it has to be pushed back against and censored on social media, which like I said, only serves to draw more attention to the story. Some people might not care about the actual story involving Hunter Biden and the implications of Joe’s lying butt, but they will care about social media censorship and will want to look into exactly why it is that big tech giants are trying to suppress this story so badly.
 
Despite the fact that I imagine a decent number of Biden voters have already voted for the guy, I hope some people who were considering voting for Biden but have yet to do so change their minds about it after this. Stories which display the Bidens’ corruption would be shut down every single time if Biden were to win. Even now, we see that happening in large part because big tech bribes Republican congresspeople so that they can get away with this crap.
 
Here’s hoping this story will help a good amount of people recognize how utterly awful Joe Biden is and how important it is to keep him as far away from the Oval Office as possible.
 
2 Peter 2:15
“Forsaking the right way, they have gone astray. They have followed the way of Balaam, the son of Beor, who loved gain from wrongdoing…”