The golden rule regarding Democrats is that the fake news media will always cover for them, particularly if they are a prominent figure within the party. Almost nothing short of blatant groping of women (at least getting caught for it) or outright murder will get Democrats into trouble with the fake news media (and this one is dubious, seeing as Ted Kennedy probably got away with it). So one would have to be a major screw-up of catastrophic proportions in order to be bashed by the Leftist fake news media.
 
And for the first time since the botched Afghanistan withdrawal, that’s what Brandon has had to face, at least from one source.
 
With inflation reaching 8.5%, the highest in 40 years (this comparison is often used to bash Reagan, but people forget that those levels were part of his RECOVERY from the double-digit inflation numbers seen during the Carter years) and wages effectively shrinking in comparison to inflation growth, more and more people are being open about their distaste for Biden (there are, of course, those who always lie in polls to protect themselves from Leftist persecution) and it’s being reflected in polling. So much so, in fact, that CNN is beginning to notice it.
 
In the latest CNN poll, the ghost hand-shaker is seeing approval of just 39%. This wouldn’t usually be too bad, but seeing as this is an extremely friendly poll, that 39% (which is a low in this poll) is terrible. Almost as friendly Quinnipiac University had him at an abysmal 33% approval.
 
These results have led to a CNN panel consisting of Bloomberg White House correspondent Jordan Fabian, CNN Capitol Hill reporter Melanie Zanona, and Time Magazine national political correspondent Molly Ball, with host Abby Phillip weighing in on such numbers.
 
Phillip said: “It’s an environment of overall discontent,” in relation to Republicans disapproving due to (among other things) poor economic policies, and environmentalist wackos disapproving due to Biden resuming the sale of oil and gas leases on federal land (ironically, the only thing I have ever approved of this illegitimate regime).
 
She continued: “People correctly perceive that he’s not in control of the situation. And I think ever since that Afghanistan last summer, people have had – voters overall – have not had a sense of leadership from the White House, have not had a sense that there’s a president in control, who is strong and consistent and knows what he’s doing and can project a consistent message from one day or the next.”
 
A few things to comment on here. First, notice that she added “correct” when talking about a perception that Biden isn’t in control of the situation. This indicates that even she is in agreement with the statement. Even a CNN panelist believes that Brandon is completely fumbling the bag here and cannot get a hold of any situation, from inflation to even messaging on Ukraine (which we’ll get to momentarily).
 
The second thing is that the American people haven’t had a sense of leadership from the White House not since the Afghanistan disaster, but since January 20th, 2021, namely in the hours before Biden successfully stole the presidency. We haven’t had a leader in the White House since Trump. The only difference between then and now is that even the Left is beginning to agree that Biden is not a leader.
 
Finally, it’s indicative of how big a failure Brandon is that even people on his own side, in a panel from one of the most Democrat-friendly fake news sources out there, are not only reporting how unpopular he is, but also don’t try to make excuses too much about it.
 
During the height of the Afghanistan botch, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, BBC News and others called it how it was: a disaster. By-and-large, they didn’t pull many punches against Biden. Matter of fact, I saw more CNN headlines lambasting Biden over that than from other sources. And this is awfully reminiscent of that time. The Afghanistan disaster was a spectacular botch, so much so that even fake news sources had little choice but to call him out on it.
 
This time, however, it’s not one particularly noteworthy botch or screw-up. It’s the culmination of them which have led to poor numbers even by CNN standards.
 
Molly Ball went on to talk about the inconsistent and botched messaging surrounding the war on Ukraine, saying that Biden continues to “step on his own messaging”, such as the time that Brandon heavily suggested that American troops would be sent to Ukraine, and that Putin “cannot remain in power”, suggesting forceful regime change in a world superpower which the Obama administration had been trying to be extremely friendly with.
 
Phillip then went on to share multiple clips of vulnerable Democrats in Congress distancing themselves from Brandon, to which Ball said that this should ring “alarm bells” for the occupier.
 
“It is a sign that they sense that there is nothing to be gained by continuing to be allies of the president,” Ball said. This is a sentiment which could not be found with Trump, even after the 2020 steal.
 
Of course, early on, many (though not all) RINOs made sure to distance themselves from Trump, but pretty much all conservatives in Congress or running for a Congressional seat sought his endorsement and wanted to be close to him. As time went on, with the obvious popularity of the MAGA movement, wolves dressed as sheep also sought to be endorsed by him (only to turn around and vote to impeach him for b.s. reasons) and even today, any Republican running, regardless of what they think or said about Trump in the past, is seeking his endorsement (which unfortunately, he is way too loose in giving).
 
Whereas Republicans seek Trump’s endorsement and close ties (even the ones who hate him), some Democrats seek to distance themselves from the man who supposedly won the most votes in American electoral history.
 
To conclude, the panel discussed his plummeting support from younger generations, which typically are the most Democrat-friendly demographic. Fabian argued that Brandon is losing support among millennials and Gen Z because he “hasn’t delivered” on campaign promises like canceling student loan debt, which could be an accurate assessment (alongside the Obama-like crappy economy). According to a recent Gallup poll, Biden is down 21% with Gen Z and 19% with millennials.
 
Fabian said: “Those numbers are a tremendous failure for a Democratic president to have numbers like that among young voters.”
 
Indeed, seeing as the youngest voters (aside from the literal infants) are those most recently indoctrinated by the Marxist centers for diseducation that we call colleges. When a Democrat president (or in this case occupier of the Oval Office) is seeing massive drops in support from young voters, that is another major indication of how poor a job he is doing.
 
Be it because of not canceling student loan debt or the crappy economy, young people are getting fed up with Brandon, as is the rest of the country.
 
Of course, we didn’t vote to elect him, and his approval was always low (given how, again, we didn’t elect him), but people, by-and-large tend to not be as honest as they would be in these polls if they didn’t have to fear Leftist persecution. Even the numbers we are seeing, regardless of source, I believe to be unnaturally high, and that his real approval numbers are far closer to the teens.
 
But let us not simply be content with these numbers now. The midterms are half a year away and they will certainly try to pull some shenanigans to avoid total disaster come November.
 
1 Peter 5:8
“Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.”

I’ve mentioned in the past that ever since Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 Presidential election to President Trump, she’d become something of a ghost for the Democrat Party. She haunts them even in political death and is someone they wish they could just get rid of for good.
 
And since special counsel John Durham has been releasing bombshell after bombshell surrounding her schemes back in 2016, more and more people, surprisingly including Democrat voters, have come to the opinion that she should be investigated for her actions.
 
A poll taken last month, so before the most recent revelations from Durham that I will get to momentarily, from TechnoMetrica Institute of Policy found that 66% of Democrats surveyed want Durham to focus his investigation on Hillary Clinton, according to The Western Journal. TIPP often asks this same question, and even back in October, 44% of Democrats said they wanted Clinton investigated.
 
And again, this was before the most recent bombshell from Durham, so one can only imagine how much higher it might be now.
 
Back in September, Durham indicted Michael Sussman, a lawyer who represented the Clinton campaign, and was accused of lying to the FBI. And in December, Igor Dachenko, a contributor to the debunked Steele dossier, was charged with five counts of lying to the FBI.
 
On February 11th, Durham expanded on the claims surrounding Sussman’s activity in a filing which “alleged lawyers for the Clinton campaign hired a technology company to infiltrate computer servers and lay a false trail that would implicate the Trump campaign of having contacts with Russia.”
 
The charges also allege that Sussman, while he was doing this, was also working for the Clinton campaign, a claim which was unsurprisingly denied by Sussman.
 
Furthermore, Durham claims that Sussman “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign.”
 
In other words, Sussman brought up false evidence to the FBI not only for Hillary Clinton but also for a tech executive who likely has ties to the Clinton campaign and other Democrats, almost certainly including Clown-in-Chief Joe Biden. Naturally, I wish to learn just who this executive is (my money is on Mark Zuckerberg), and hope that Durham will also investigate that person.
 
The filing also claimed that Sussman’s “billing records reflect” that he “repeatedly billed the Clinton campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations,” which all but prove his ties to the Clinton campaign as he was trying to defame then-candidate Trump.
 
But we’re not even close to done with the new claims.
 
The filing also claimed that Sussman and the aforementioned tech executive had met with another law partner who served as general counsel to the Clinton campaign, with Fox News reporting that said individual was Marc Elias from the law firm Perkins Coie, although there are other reports which claim that Sussman retained Lathan & Watkins LLP as the legal counsel.
 
Why is this important? Because Liz Cheney’s husband is partner at Lathan & Watkins LLP, thus implicating their involvement, even if minimally, to the Clinton campaign’s crimes.

Why does Fox News say it was Perkins Coie and not Lathan & Watkins? Do you really think RINO Fox News is going to screw over RINO Liz Cheney?

In any case, the filing also said that in July of 2016, Sussman and his colleagues began to “assemble the purported data and white papers. In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data.” “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”
 
“Tech Executive-1,” continued the filing, “tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia. In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain ‘VIPs’, referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign.”
 
But this PALES in comparison to the final bombshell claim made by the filing.
 
Finally, the filing claims that Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited domain name system internet traffic regarding “(i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP),” with the firm Tech Executive-1 having “come to access and maintained dedicated servers” for the Executive Office of the President as “part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP,” said the filing, adding that “Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.”
 
In other words, Trump was 100% right once again, as his wires really were “tapped.” Not only were Trump Tower and other Trump buildings tapped, so was THE WHITE HOUSE WHILE TRUMP WAS PRESIDENT AND PRESIDENT-ELECT.
 
This is MAJOR and indicates a major security breach. This is a private company getting access to data from the highest office in the land, and basically getting the approval of Clinton and most certainly Obama as well to do this.
 
While not for the same purposes, I consider this no less criminally contemptible to what Julius and Ethel Rosenberg did during World War II, and should receive no lesser a punishment.
 
For context, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were spies who gave away American nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union, helping to facilitate their nuclear capabilities. They were charged with conspiracy to commit espionage for the Soviet Union and received the death sentence.
 
Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, Michael Sussman, Marc Elias (potentially), Liz Cheney’s husband, Tech Executive-1 and everyone who worked for the Clinton campaign (to the level of knowing about these schemes, obviously not those at the lower levels) ought to face similar charges.
 
Even just spying on Trump Tower and other Trump facilities is grossly criminal, but getting access to White House data is on a league of its own.
 
There are people who are basically being treated like terrorists at Guantanamo Bay simply for having walked into the Capitol on January 6th, after they were basically welcomed inside by Capitol Police. So clearly, these historical buildings hold much significance to these people, and so breaching and “defiling” them ought to bring about serious punishment, no?
 
What the Deep Staters did to Trump is more than a million times worse not only for Trump but the whole of the country than what peaceful protesters did on January 6th.
 
These people deserve the chair, nothing less.
 
And with these revelations being made, it’s not too surprising that even Democrats want to get rid of Hillary. Heck, they didn’t even want her in either 2007/08 or in 2016. She’s the most disliked, or even hated, woman in America and for good reason.
 
Now, even a large majority of Democrat voters want her investigated for her actions in 2016 (which, no doubt, could trigger other investigations, like the Uranium One deal). And no doubt, this ought to also lead to both Barack Obama and Brandon being investigated.
 
They deserve to be investigated, charged, tried, and found guilty of a lot more than just their involvement in spying on Donald Trump. But this, hopefully, would at least be a step in the right direction towards justice.
 
Proverbs 21:15
“When justice is done, it is a joy to the righteous but terror to evildoers.”

The infamously unpopular Brandon administration might be even more unpopular than we had previously thought. A myriad of (intentional) screw-ups have made the illegitimate and already unpopular fake president be even less popular as time has gone on.
 
And at this rate, barring any overt cheating from the Dems (which would be admittedly more difficult to pull off than in 2020), the midterm elections will likely see a red wave, particularly as more and more sitting Democrats announce they won’t be running for re-election next year (a mirror of 2018 for Republicans, and I have always said that it was at least one reason why they lost the House that year).
 
But allow me to give you the context of this article. See, a Rasmussen poll recently surveyed roughly 1,000 Americans, asking them if Brandon should be impeached for his failure in Afghanistan.
 
I think the results are particularly eye-opening, as this was an issue a few months ago and, while it is notoriously one of the worst foreign screw-ups for anyone sitting in the Oval Office, you’d think the negative views surrounding it would have at least somewhat subsided since then.
 
But I think that, because of everything else he’s messing up, in particular the economy, people are less willing to forgive and forget that international embarrassment which should have cost at least ONE person his or her job.
 
And so, we see results like these:
 
57% of Men said that Brandon should be impeached; 62% of Women said the same, which is rather interesting as women tend to lean more to the Left in these polls; 54% of people aged 18-34 said he should be impeached, and like with women, younger people tend to also lean Left; 63% of 40-64 agreed Brandon needs to be impeached; 61% of those 65 and older also agreed.
 
Amongst white people, 60% said Brandon deserves to be impeached for Afghanistan, with 56% of blacks and 61% of “Other non-white” people saying the same. And along party lines, 83% of Republicans think he should be impeached (a rather low number for this demographic), 58% of the politically unaffiliated said the same, and an astounding 40% of Democrats also believe he deserves to be impeached.
 
All in all, 60% of all voters say they believe Brandon ought to be impeached for his failure in Afghanistan.
 
And while Dems were the only demographic which didn’t have a majority agreeing with that statement, the fact that 1) all other demographics did have said majority and 2) it got as close as 40% of them agreeing on this shows you just how much of a failure this guy is, even in the eyes of those who (legitimately) voted for him.
 
Oh, and before you ask, they didn’t like the slave owner either, as 58% said that Kamala is unqualified to be President.
 
Like I said, Brandon is an infamously unpopular occupier of the Oval Office, but this poll shows things to be even worse than I imagined. And again, this is over the subject of Afghanistan. Were they to ask about the subject of inflation, or his inability to “end” the pandemic as he said he would do, how many more people would have said he should be impeached?
 
And if more people were to understand that Joe Biden and the Democrats did, indeed, steal the 2020 presidential election, just how much of the country would be in uproar demanding either his impeachment or resignation (alongside Kamala’s), or even that Trump be allowed to serve the term that he had actually won?
 
The only things keeping this regime afloat are the fake news media and the Deep State (which controls the fake news media, so really, just the Deep State). But even they are not invincible, not when enough of us fight against them in a peaceful manner.
 
It is said that it only takes 3.5% of a country’s population participating in peaceful protest to bring about great change. In 1986, according to The BBC, “millions of Filipinos took to the streets of Manila in peaceful protest and prayer in the People Power movement. The Marcos regime folded on the fourth day. In 2003, the people of Georgia ousted Eduard Shevardnadze through the bloodless Rose Revolution, in which protestors stormed the parliament building holding the flowers in their hands. While in 2019, the presidents of Sudan and Algeria both announced they would step aside after decades in office, thanks to peaceful campaigns of resistance.”
 
While the fake news media isn’t covering them, millions around the world are protesting the tyrannical vaccine mandates and lockdowns instituted in would-be communist countries, such as the UK, Australia, Austria, Germany, Italy, and even in actual communist countries like Cuba, there are protests which go uncovered by the media because they run against their narrative that most people approve of the mandates.
 
But they won’t be ignored forever, and they won’t be beaten at any point. Likewise, something similar could occur in this country. Not over the vaccine mandates, as it’s practically dead on arrival already and any further attempt to enforce it would be met by lawsuits and disobedience not only from companies but entire states as well. But Brandon keeps destroying the country as he is, and more people are made to suffer for it, they will arrive to the breaking point.
 
Of course, this is all hypothetical, but I do believe and declare that Biden will no longer occupy the Oval Office relatively soon (and won’t be replaced by the giggling prostitute). And all it takes is 3.5% of us in active protest. Surely, we have far more than that already.
 
Dismantling the Deep State is absolutely possible, and we will achieve that sooner than one might expect.
 
Hebrews 11:1
“Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.”

​Despite repeated demonstrations that the Brandon administration intends to enforce vaccine mandates (and they haven't actually managed to really do anything on this regard, at least officially), their already illegal activity is faced by a judge's decision to block the vaccine mandates on the grounds that "The COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission of the disease among the vaccinated or mixed vaccinated/unvaccinated populations."

Gotta say, that's the first time I've ever heard the term "mixed vaccinated." That concept just makes so little sense to me, I could hardly believe it exists. Of course, this is with the implication that one jab of the vaccine isn't enough to count one as "vaccinated", and in the near future, will likely also include anyone who has gotten two jabs but not the "booster" shot, because, as we know, Fascist Fauci gets to change the definition of things like "vaccine", "cases", "deaths", etc.

At any rate, Louisiana U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty blocked the federal vaccine mandate for health care workers last week, a stepping stone to what can easily lead to a broader ban on the mandate itself regardless of circumstance.

In his ruling, the judge made the obvious and logical assertion that the Left selectively either ignores or outright demonizes: "If boosters are needed six months after being 'fully vaccinated,' then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate them?"

This is a question that the Left hates being asked because it directly challenges, with sound logic, the reasoning behind getting not only one, but two or three or four jabs to "combat" a virus which is no worse than seasonal flu (and which conveniently and mysteriously has made seasonal flu all but disappear completely).

If you were to ask this question to a Leftist, they will either call you a conspiracy theorist, a racist, or a "science denier", or a combination of the three. All ad hominem attacks which are the very embodiment of a lost argument.

Yet, these are the kinds of questions people in important positions, such as federal judges, are asking and which the communists will have to answer, if they even can find a reasonable one. 

The complainant in this case provided evidence based on Dr. Peter McCullough's declaration that the vaccines don't prevent transmission amongst any population, and that "Mandatory COVID-19 vaccines for hospitals do not increase safety for employees or hospital patients. McCullough declared that additional treatment with other drugs and supplements has resulted in an 85% reduction in hospitalizations and death of high-risk individuals presenting with COVID-19."

This declaration, particularly regarding the lack of prevention of transmission of the virus, is also backed up by other research from Europe, specifically regarding the efficacy of vaccine passports. An investigation by experts in Spain concluded that "vaccine passports have no significant impact on reducing COVID-19 infection rates," according to Summit News. The study found that ordering people to show proof of vaccination in order to enter venues "is not reducing levels of transmission." Even worse, the investigation found that vaccine passport systems "contribute to a false impression that vaccinated people do not get infected," when in actuality, "around 40 per cent of those vaccinated are susceptible to infection and transmitting the infection."

The vaccine doesn't prevent transmission of the virus, something which has been known for a while now, the mandates are entirely illogical as a result of that, and vaccine passport systems don't work in any significant way and only mislead people into believing that getting the vaccine means they are immune to the virus (a fact which, were this any other vaccine for any other disease, would lead to federal regulators to scrap the production of the vaccines because they are, at best, doing absolutely nothing). As the judge said in his ruling: "In other words, even if you are fully vaccinated, you still may become infected with the COVID-19 virus."

The ruling continued with: "Although CMS spent pages and pages attempting to explain the need for mandatory COVID-19 vaccines, when infection and hospitalizations rates are dropping, millions of people have already been infected, developing some form of natural immunity, and when people who have been fully vaccinated still become infected, mandatory vaccines as the only method of prevention make no sense."

Thank the Lord for sound, rational judges like Doughty. Seeing as the vaccines don't prevent transmission, it makes no sense whatsoever to assert that they are not only a means of prevention, but are the ONLY VALID source of prevention. This is like saying that mechanics don't fix houses and someone comes along and says that ONLY mechanics can fix houses.

Furthermore, a CDC study found that, when there was an outbreak of the "Delta" variant in a federal hospital between July and August of 2021, there was no significant difference in transmission potential between vaccinated and unvaccinated people who had the virus. The Left may claim that the independent studies by researchers which don't support the narrative are a bunch of conspiracy theory hoopla, but they absolutely cannot say the same if it comes from a CDC study or other "reputable" sources which are like churches to them, at least if they want to keep asserting the "credibility" of such sources.

The vaccines don't work, the passport system doesn't work, and the vaccine mandates are not only illogical but outright tyrannical. Even if the vaccines did everything they were advertised of doing, namely protecting you from the virus, and didn't cause any sort of harm whatsoever, it'd still be immoral to issue a vaccine mandate. Matter of fact, it wouldn't even be seen as necessary because just about everyone would at least be open to getting it. But because we have seen that it does nothing at best and can outright kill people in horrible ways at worst, most people don't want to get them (and no, I have no reason to believe Brandon when he says we're at somewhere like 70% vaccinated). It's in large part because this is toxic poison that people don't want to get them and why tyrants like Brandon feel compelled to try and FORCE people into taking poison.

Thankfully, there are still plenty of people out there willing to fight back against this insanity and having the ability to actually do something about it materially.

Let the mandate die, and the vaccines along with it.

Psalm 106:3
"Blessed are they who observe justice, who do righteousness at all times!"

The fight for our Republic will always be a worthwhile one, and when it is in jeopardy, even if it appears as though the bad guys have won, it is imperative to fight until we are victorious. For if we give up the fight today, we will never get another chance in the future.

This is something that Mike Lindell understands perfectly well. He knows that if we don't fix 2020, there will be no 2022, 2024 or other future elections in which we could have a fair and free election, nevermind even the chance of winning whatsoever.

And so, roughly a year after the failed Texas lawsuit in which roughly 20 other states took part, Mike Lindell has sought to raise a complaint with the Supreme Court directly to challenge the election results on even better grounds than the Texas one, which already had a very solid ground to begin with.

The complaint is about 80 pages long (not counting the exhibits) and, naturally, is quite legally technical, bringing up a number of constitutional articles and clauses which can be very confusing for non-legal experts.

So to help with that regard, Attorney-at-Law Kurt Olsen appeared with Mike Lindell and Brannon Howse on Frank Speech to give as simple a summary as can realistically be given for such a subject matter.

Olsen begins by explaining that this complaint is largely a model for what state AGs ought to do to challenge the 2020 election results: "What we have presented is a model complaint for the state AGs that lays out the case as to why the November 2020 election should not stand. There are four significant differences in this complaint compared to the complaint that was filed by the State of Texas in December of last year. We have: New defendants and claims against those defendants. Those new defendants are the United States and then the officers of the United States: The President, the Vice President, Speaker of the House, the Attorney General and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate."

He continues: "We have brought claims under Article IV of the Constitution, the Guarantee clause, which provides that the United States shall provide for a Republican form of government, which as alleged in the complaint: a stolen election is not a Republican form of government. And we've also alleged violations of the Take Care clause, that's Article II, and that is simply that these officers have a duty to making sure that the laws of the United States are faithfully executed. And in this election, they were not."

"One point to talk about," Olsen adds, "the Article II claims, which is the same claim that was asserted last time. It's important to recognize that when you hear in the media that these are, you know, these complaints were baseless claims of election fraud, that's just simply ignoring the claims in the complaint and the actual facts. Because it is a fact that as of October of 2020, there were four Supreme Court Justices who wanted to take up a case involving Article II violations, in that particular situation was in Pennsylvania, when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, by fiat, ruled that ballots could be counted after the statutory deadline of November 3rd, 8 P.M. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said 'you can keep counting ballots even if they're not postmarked, they're not signed, you can do that through November 6th.'"

"At that time, Justice Ginsburg had passed away and the Court was at eight justices on it. There was a claim by the Republican Party of Pennsylvania to stay that decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Four Justices wanted to take that case up and for the Justices to rule on that, they had to believe that the plaintiffs... would likely succeed on the merit. So this is a long way of saying that the claims under Article II, there are four Supreme Court Justices who want to rule on whether these changes to election law by non-legislative actors, such as courts, such as officers, violate Article II of the constitution."

"In terms of the three remaining new issues, we have new arguments for standing. You may recall that in December of last year the Supreme Court dismissed the Texas case... saying that there was no standing on behalf of Texas. And we have two new arguments on that, which we think are very sound. One of which could not have been made before, and that is: Now that the Georgia runoff election resulted in the U.S. Senate being split 50/50, and Kamala Harris is the deciding vote, that all the states have standing to bring an action because of that. Because, as alleged in the complaint, now- Vice President Kamala Harris was not legitimately elected. And because she has the tie-breaking vote, all states now have an injury as a result of that."

Quickly commenting on that last bit, and to give a bit of a break between whole blocks of quotes, you really have to marvel at the way God works sometimes. God made it so that, following this sham election, the Left would try to do the same in Georgia's runoff election, and they got their wish there. And yet, that very result is part of the case as to why now EVERY state can claim injury to the fraudulent election results, due to Harris being the tie-breaking vote in a Senate which is split evenly. Last year, one argument made was that Texas could not have enough weight to sway an entire election based on injury (nevermind the fact it was stolen, I guess), because any state could therefore make a similar claim and we'd never have a sitting President.

Well, now, every single state can claim injury because of the result of the election in the form of whole federal laws being approved by an illegitimate tie-breaking vote. Of course, not every state is going to claim injury, but every state that could claim it now can, as opposed to simply joining Texas' case on the Lone Star State's behalf.

Their cheating in the Georgia runoff elections has seemingly come to bite them in the rear, and so will them cheating in 2020.

At any rate, getting back to Olsen:

"The other basis for standing that has been alleged is that the constitution is a compact amongst the peoples of the state. Everybody in each state agreed to play by the same rules. Because accepting the facts in the complaint [unintelligible] true, which the court must, the electoral count would be below 270. As a consequence, every state has a right under the 12th Amendment to demand an election pursuant to the 12th Amendment... for the President and the Vice President."

"The next distinction in this case is that we have a plethora of new evidence and facts since December. On September 24th, 2021, we had the results of the Maricopa audit. On October, you had the [unintelligible] county sheriff refer felony criminal charges against the Wisconsin election, saying that the election laws in Wisconsin were not just broken, they were, quote, 'shattered'. You have the Wisconsin legislative audit bureau issue a damning report, finding tens of thousands of ballots that were irregular or, I would argue, illegal. So, for example, there were over 50,000 new registered voters whose identification didn't even match what was on file at the Wisconsin election commission. Such things as 'the names weren't the same.' Obvious things that would raise questions of illegality. This is all new information."

"You have new court decisions. So, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled, after our Supreme Court dismissed the Texas case, that guidance given by the Wisconsin election commission [unintelligible], which involves potentially over 160,000 ineligible voters, that that guidance was unlawful. In Michigan, you have a Michigan court rule in March of 2021, that the Secretary of State guidance there, doing away with signature verification requirements, was unlawful. So you have a host of new facts, new developments, new findings, all that make this complaint materially different than the case that was filed in December 2020."

"The last thing that is materially different: The cover-up. There is evidence that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors destroyed election records, and they tried to block the audit every step of the way, and destroyed these election records, apparently, after the court in Arizona ruled that that audit must go forward... There is also evidence of destruction of election records in Georgia that Voter DA, a grassroots activist group, filed a Freedom of Information Act request, got emails when they requested ballot images that those ballots no longer existed. And Voter DA also produced emails which are cited in the complaint that the Director of Elections in Georgia gave guidance saying 'hey, it's okay to go destroy the ballot images that existed on the disks or the Dominion voting machines.'"

"We also have in Georgia recent developments were a renowned computer science professor  has raised the warnings that he can hack into these machines and steal votes. And the judge in that case sealed his 25,000 word report despite him begging the judge release it to the cyber infrastructure and information security agency to fix these problems. And these problems go beyond just Georgia, [the professor] says that these vulnerabilities go to 16 states, including Georgia. Now, what he doesn't say in that report, which is quite interesting, he is saying that this situation so dire and so urgent that [unintelligible] need to be notified so they can fix these problems before the 2022 election. But what he glosses over is: those same problems apparently existed during the 2020 election."

He finishes with: "These are bombshell developments that are just proving out that the case that Texas brought originally was only meritorious. The idea that these were baseless allegations, it never was, the allegations were incredibly strong back then, but they've only gotten stronger."

The only people who still claim that 2020 was not stolen are those who were involved in the theft, those who benefited from the theft, and those who want to pretend as though it's impossible to steal elections or simply don't want to look at the facts and will consider anyone who brings them up to be crazy conspiracy theorists.

But the facts of the 2020 election were clear from the very beginning: Joe Biden and the Democrats were stealing the election right before our eyes. We hoped they wouldn't succeed, and we hope that they won't get away with it now.

And with how more people are more likely to believe Biden stole the election now than last year (in part, likely, to how awful he has been as Occupier), it's only a matter of time until justice is served.

Isaiah 30:18
"Therefore the Lord waits to be gracious to you, and therefore He exalts Himself to show mercy to you. For the Lord is a God of justice; blessed are all those who wait for Him."

For the past few weeks or months (forget when it started), we have jubilantly heard chants of “F*** Joe Biden” at a number of places, ranging from sports events to rallies to even places where the illegitimate president makes speeches, as was recently the case.
 
Before I get to the downside to it, allow me to express just why I love the chants: it depicts the reality that the fake news media would rather ignore.
 
Joe Biden is not only an illegitimate president, he is a failed one as well. Everything he has done or has advocated for has been to the massive detriment to the American people. We see this at the gas stations, at grocery stores, and elsewhere. He wants to be Stalin so badly that he wishes to mandate vaccinations on almost every American, certainly any American who wishes to work for a company with more than 100 employees, which is most companies at this point.
 
He has screwed up Afghanistan so badly that even the traitorous General Milley threw him under the bus at a recent Congressional hearing. He is screwing up the southern border so badly that even college students, who are usually Leftists, take notice of how poorly he has handled that situation.
 
Everything he is and everything he does is a massive failure, and as much as the fake news media would want to sweep all of that under the rug, there is only so much they can actually do, particularly the more he messes things up.
 
Afghanistan was such a massive blunder that even the fake news media couldn’t outright defend him. For example, here are some headlines I read from the fake news media at the time of the Afghan screw-up:
 

• CNN: “Biden isn’t adequately explaining why he failed to predict Afghanistan’s fast fall.” With the subhead: “He no longer gets credit simply for not being Trump.”

 

• CNN: “Europe left exposed as Biden walks America away from the world stage.”

 

• NBC opinion piece: “Biden is delusional if he thinks the Afghanistan withdrawal doesn’t endanger Americans.”

 

• CNN: “Biden’s presidency of crises pushes White House to its limits.”

 

• CNN: “The worst of times for Democrats. The White House is at its lowest moment yet as the harsh reality of power puts Biden’s leadership under extreme examination.”

 

• MSNBC: “Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal is a masterclass in bad management.”

 
 
And there were others as well, but in many cases, they did still try to be soft with Biden. Still, that these headlines and others did appear, and surprisingly CNN was seemingly the harshest on him, was telling of how badly he messed up with Afghanistan.
 
There are, of course, far more crises thanks to Biden, as CNN noted in one of its headlines, which has dragged his approval numbers down significantly even in far-Left fake news polls (they were never that high to begin with as, again, he was NOT ELECTED).
 
Which is why we so often hear “F*** Joe Biden” chants, which the White House has hilariously tried to gaslight people into believing that they are actually “Let’s Go Brandon” chants, which is outright bizarre. Who the hell is Brandon and why would people be cheering him? Not that this matters, as again, this is just the WH trying to lie and say that’s what was being chanted one of the most recent times, when we all know Biden was being dragged.
 
And for the most part, I ADORE the fact that we are hearing these chants. Again, it shows that reality is far different from what the fake news media wants to report it. Joe Biden is extremely unpopular. No amount of spinning or gaslighting is going to change that fact. If anything, that’s just going to make things worse for the Occupier.
 
However, there is one discernible downside to these chants. You see, Biden traveled to Howell, Michigan recently to try and sell people on the socialist power-grab of an infrastructure bill which would add another $3.5 trillion to our already overly inflated debt. Expectedly, there were protesters at such an event, and said protesters were chanting “F*** Joe Biden.”
 
And that’s perfectly fine, and I love the fact that they were doing this. However, it wasn’t simply the adults who were chanting “F*** Joe Biden.”
 
A Gateway Pundit reader sent this video to the site, which depicts kids in a school bus also chanting “F*** Joe Biden” alongside the protesters.
 
Now, this might not necessarily seem like much of a big deal, and in the grand scheme of things, it might not be, but I do think it’s at least somewhat relevant and concerning that kids are going along with the chant.
 
Personally, I began to get a bit of a potty mouth when I was in middle school, around 12 or 13 years of age, in large part because I heard my peers so often and casually cursing. This cursing behavior has stuck with me ever since, not that you would be able to tell, as I often either avoid cursing on this site or censor the words, like I’m doing with the chant in this case. Of course, I’m an adult and can largely say whatever I want to say, but there is no denying that such behavior is present because of my experience in middle school, being around casual cursing, which became part of my own vocabulary in no time.
 
And in many cases, when a child is heard cursing, they get some amount of reprimand from their parent or teacher (depending on the setting) and are discouraged from such continued cursing. But here, because of the behavior of adults, the kids feel as though they have free reign over the use of the strongest curse word in the world, at least if used in the context of cursing out Joe Biden.
 
While I would like to believe that this is helping to create a generation which is rebellious towards the Washington establishment and the deep state, it’s far more likely that the kids are just using the occasion as an excuse to freely use the word. And as things tend to go, they will then go on to find other justified uses of the word. For example, they might figure that since it’s okay to chant “F*** Joe Biden”, it’s also okay to chant “F*** Kamala Harris” or “F*** Nancy Pelosi”. More realistically, since kids usually aren’t very privy to politics, they will use that word to chant similar things about authority figures.
 
For example: “F*** my dad” or “F*** my teacher” or “F*** the principal.” That last one I could particularly envision happening, for example, during a school assembly where the principal is trying to speak and the chant all of a sudden breaks out.
 
Whatever may be the case, the chant has the unfortunate downside of teaching children that it’s okay to curse people out so brazenly. And such a thing can help in the deterioration of civilized society. Not that there aren’t other things which are doing that already, such as the attempt by lunatics to get children to go to “Drag Queen Story Hour” or selling them on the idea that a man can be a woman and vice versa, or that a white person is a devil because of their skin color and a black person is a victim and oppressed for the same reason.
 
However, if we have concerns regarding those other things which deteriorate civilized society, we should have some amount of concern regarding the chant as well.
 
I’m not discouraging people from doing it, and in all likelihood, those kids, exposed to it or not in this context, will likely go on to curse anyway as they get older because that’s just how contemporary society acts. But it’s important to at least be mindful of the fact that what adults say and do will have an effect on kids. Often times, kids want to imitate the behavior of adults, so if they see adults act in a certain manner, they will imitate that behavior.
 
Granted, that’s usually for the younger kids, and the kids in that video looked to be at least in the 4th or 5th grade, or about 10 to 11 years old, but the point remains that they were seeing and hearing adults nearby using that curse word at their leisure, and thus felt that they had license to also use the word, particularly if they were simply going along with the chant.
 
This is rather conflicting for me as, again, I love the chants and want to continue hearing them since they show just how unpopular this faux-president is, but I’m also rather bothered by the fact that this gives kids the impression that it’s okay to curse so casually and so much.
 
Numerous verses in the Bible speak against cursing. For example: James 3:8-10: “But no human being can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison. With it we bless our Lord and Father, and with it we curse people who are made in the likeness of God. From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers, these things ought not be so.”
 
Colossians 3:8: “But now you must put them all away: anger, wrath, malice, slander, and obscene talk from your mouth.”
 
Matthew 15:11: “It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person.” Obviously, the context of that one is that it’s okay to eat food which isn’t kosher, or what Jews typically eat, but the point was that what defiles a person is that which comes out of the mouth. What comes out of the mouth are words, which can be destructive to the self or to others.
 
Now, forgive my French, but I don’t give a damn about Joe Biden and if he is destroyed by such cursing. Frankly, I would rather see him be destroyed, even if by cursing, because he is evil and of the devil.
 
But there is no denying, either way, that God does not want us cursing, even those who are evil. After all, both Luke 6:28 and Colossians 4:6 speak of blessing those who curse and persecute us, and praying for those who abuse us (this part specifically belonging to the Luke verse).
 
Does this mean that I pray that Biden will succeed in his evil acts and intentions? Of course not, since that would be praying for evil. I want to see Biden destroyed because of his evil, but would be ecstatic to see him rebuilt in righteousness. Joe Biden, the person, is not my enemy. Joe Biden, the piece of crap pedophile, baby-killer, tyrant, election thief and demon, is my enemy. Take those things away, make him a brother in Christ (as in an actual brother, not one who claims is Catholic but isn’t regenerate in any way), and he ought to be welcomed by Christians with open arms.
 
This, I think, is what those verses mean when talking about blessing these people and not cursing them. We bless them that they would turn away from their evil, not that their evil ways will succeed. After all, those who are unrepentant and unregenerate are punished by God and cursed to eternal damnation.
 
So while I do love the chants insofar as they depict Biden’s rising unpopularity which even the fake news media can’t bury, let’s keep in mind that it can lead to children joining in with the cursing, believing themselves to be free of liability for it, and that God doesn’t want us cursing either.
 
I can’t claim to be better than those who do the chants, as even I have gone along with it many times, and I do relatively often curse (at least when talking about Biden, the Left, the establishment, etc.) but that doesn’t mean that I should.
 
Again, I love the chants for what they signify, but we should be mindful of what effect they can have on children.
 
2 Timothy 2:16:
“But avoid irreverent babble, for it will lead people into more and more ungodliness.”

A couple of weeks ago, the Occupier of the Oval Office threatened hundreds of millions of Americans with a federal vaccine mandate and was visibly and audibly frustrated, not because he actually believed there were people keeping us from being able to move forward, but because his faux-presidency has been crumbling around him for the past couple of months, particularly after the Afghan disaster. When he made that threat, I said that I didn’t fear that what he wanted done would actually be done. And I was right, in more ways than I thought.
 
Back when I wrote the article, I was under the impression that his administration would actually try to make such a mandate and that freedom-loving governors, AG’s and companies would have to fight it in courts and likely even take the entire matter to the Supreme Court. I didn’t doubt that such massive civil disobedience would be effective. But as it turns out, it won’t even be necessary.
 
Allow me to explain. In the White House’s COVID plan section, they have a number of action items of what they intend to do or are currently doing. Such items include enforcing a federal worker mandate, whereby federal workers have to get the vaccine (conveniently excluding anyone who works in Biden’s administration and in Congress – you know, the elites); a federal contractor mandate, whereby people who work with the federal government, though not necessarily in it, have to get the vaccine (likely excludes whatever elites would be part of this group); and the infamous national worker mandate for companies with over 100 employees.
 
This is what’s written in that third plan:
 
“The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is developing a rule that will require all employers with 100 or more employees to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any workers who remain unvaccinated to produce a negative test result on at least a weekly basis before coming to work. OSHA will issue an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) to implement this requirement. This requirement will impact over 80 million workers in private sector businesses with 100+ employees.”
 
And that is all we have heard of the White House regarding this intention ever since. That paragraph was posted the day after Biden’s threat, on September 10th. Three weeks later and absolute silence on this front from the WH, or any federal agency at all.
 
The DoL’s website is utterly absent of any and all information regarding a national vaccine mandate, even from the days that the Occupier made the threat and that the aforementioned paragraph was written on the White House website. Even OSHA’s COVID information site says nothing about a vaccine mandate either being worked on or looking to be enforced. The most they say is that people “should” get the vaccine, not that they “must” or are “obligated”, or that they are working towards creating a mandate.
 
This is important because, again, it’s been three weeks. Nearly a month after this threat from the Occupier himself, and not a single word from the agencies which would work towards such a mandate whatsoever. There is no date for when they even want to begin discussing this matter, let alone when they think they will begin writing or enforcing the rule.
 
And according to The Conservative Treehouse, “if there was a federal intent to actually force American workers to get forcibly vaccinated as a condition of employment, there would be daily updates from a massive inter-agency network of compliance offices, regulatory agencies and private sector business interests giving updates and briefings.” And this is just regarding the anticipated guidance part aka Step 1, let alone the enforcing of any such actual rule or mandate.
 
Even if the guy is completely wrong about that assessment, you would think that, following Biden’s threat, either the Department of Labor or its OSHA agency would at least MENTION the intended national vaccine mandate for companies with over 100 employees, even if they haven’t actually begun to work on the rule. And yet, there is absolute silence on that end.
 
The only thing we have heard of this mandate from the administration at all is in a recent press conference with Jen Psaki, where she was ASKED about it by a reporter and gave the typical vague answer of “they’re looking into it” or “they’re working on it at OSHA”, etc. Nothing concrete or definitive.
 
Other than that, she said that many companies are already doing their own vaccine mandates “on their own”, and that’s certainly true. Companies like Delta, Apple, Google, and many hospitals throughout the country have executed their own vaccine mandates, and for many of these companies, they are losing workers quickly and having to backtrack on those mandates.

Apple and Google are mostly liberal, so there is little in the way of resistance to the mandate, but airlines have had to undo the mandate, or at least restructure them to be far less strict because of a large loss in employees which they couldn’t easily replace (namely, pilots). The same is happening to many hospitals, particularly in New York, where its lunatic Leftist governor has claimed that they would just replace the unvaccinated workers with either illegal immigrants or NATIONAL GUARD servicemen, as if either of those options were viable in a high-skill job.
 
But apart from those things, there is absolutely no news about a national vaccine mandate for employers with 100+ employees. Nearly a month without any updates whatsoever in what would be the single biggest restructuring of employment rules in U.S. history. That is proof positive that the DoL and OSHA know perfectly well that they have no legal means by which they can write and particularly enforce such a rule.
 
Similarly to how it would be impossible to enforce a complete and total confiscation of guns in America, it would be impossible to enforce a vaccine mandate for all companies with 100+ employees. What tools could they even use? What would be the necessary manpower and how would one go about enforcing the rule? Even with gun confiscation, theoretically, all that would be needed would be the police manpower to go house-to-house and confiscate guns (which is easier said than done). What would they be able to do with a vaccine mandate even theoretically? Particularly one which focuses on employees, not people in general?
 
They haven’t said a word about the mandate because they KNOW they can’t actually work on making such a mandate. Even outside of the legality of the issue (given that this is an illegitimate administration in the first place and Democrats don’t care for the law at all), it’s outright unenforceable. So they aren’t even trying to write rules.
 
Like I said, I was never afraid that what Biden wanted done would actually be done, but this works out even better than what I had expected. I expected the lawless administration to at least TRY to make unconstitutional rules, even if they knew they were unenforceable, just to show people that they tried to do something. This is even better than what I hoped for.
 
James 4:7
“Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.”

How you act under pressure can say a lot about you. If you can remain calm, cool and collected and deal with the situation in such a manner, it speaks well of your leadership skills. However, Biden, who largely has never faced much pressure at all because of a largely friendly fake news media, is lashing out as a result of waning popularity amongst even his supporters/voters and usually friendly media.
 
His approval ratings, following the disastrous Afghan crisis that he created, as well as his mishandling of the southern border and inflation, have gone down into the low 30s (as if they were ever actually higher, given that the country didn’t elect him), and are even noticeably low in fake news media polls which always show favoritism to Democrats.
 
Backed into a corner, and with his faux-presidency crumbling around him (I’m prophesying right now that he will be out in a few months, particularly if he keeps digging his own grave like this), Biden has chosen to lash out at dissenters regarding the toxic Chinese coronavirus vaccines in a speech which, had Trump given it, the media would have pointed out as “divisive” and “hateful.”
 
During this speech, the Occupier repeatedly demonized the tens (or hundreds, as I believe) of millions of Americans who have not taken the toxic vaccine, saying that “many” people in the country are “frustrated” with the unvaxxed, going so far as to claim that “this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.”
 
If he were right, which is no surprise that he isn’t, then Israel wouldn’t be seeing such massive influxes of COVID patients who have had the vaccine.
 
According to Vision Times, “The majority of [COVID-19] patients in an Israeli hospital are fully vaccinated, including those with severe disease… ‘95% of the severe patients are vaccinated’… ‘85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people.’”
 
There is also anecdotal evidence to suggest that the same is happening here, but reportedly, doctors aren’t allowed to disclose whether someone in the hospital suffering from the Chinese coronavirus is vaccinated.
 
Not to mention that, as I have written in a prior article, the fully vaccinated may be super spreaders of the Delta variant. And while I have questioned the existence of even the virus itself (and still do), the point is that if there is any pandemic at all, it’s a pandemic of the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated as the pressured pretend president claims.
 
Biden also claimed in his speech that “a distinct minority of Americans” are causing “a lot of damage” and are “keeping us from turning the corner.”
 
If it’s as distinct of a minority as you say, why is any of this necessary? More than that, if the vaccinated are as protected from the virus as YOU yourself claim in this very speech, Joe, then what does it matter whether someone else is protected? Couldn’t the vaccinated workers go back to work without any issues? And if so, why did the CDC backtrack on the vaccinated's need for wearing a mask?
 
You ask “What more is there to wait for? What more do you need to see?” First, and foremost, the answers to these questions that you keep avoiding. What we need to wait for is the results of the long-term effects of the vaccines, which are unknowable as of yet because not enough time has passed. What we’re waiting for is a RECENTLY LAUNCHED study into the effects of the vaccine on menstruating women. What more we need to see is that these things aren’t the toxic crap that they appear to be. What we need to wait for is the formula of what exactly is in these jabs.
 
“We’ve made vaccinations free, safe, and convenient.” Oh, you’ve made them free and “convenient” (as in, they are widely available, which is what I think he means here), but they are FAR from safe, as numerous articles on THIS VERY WEBSITE ALONE indicate, let alone the dozens or hundreds of other studies out there which I haven’t covered or haven’t even read yet.
 
“We’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. And your refusal has cost all of us.” Big talk coming from a guy who can barely string two sentences together. Your patience is wearing thin? Ours ran out a LONG time ago. Our refusal to be subjected to experimental vaccines has cost people? How many people has your administration killed, Joe?
 
Back during the campaign trail, when supposedly 230,000 Americans died under Trump, you said that “anyone responsible for that many deaths shouldn’t remain president.” According to mainstream figures (remember, only 6%, according to the CDC, have actually died from the virus, if it exists at all), 250,000 Americans have died since your administration took over.
 
If Trump killed 230,000 people by the time he left office, you’ve killed 250,000 since you’ve taken office. So I repeat, Joe, how many people have you killed? And we know that the vaccine itself has killed hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, if the VAERS system is any indication (and the fact that only 1% of all actual cases are reported), so how many people has this administration killed because of its insistence (now close to being illegal if he intends to enforce the b.s. he’s spewing in this speech) that people get vaccinated?
 
Your refusal to listen to real scientists and observe the data has cost this country infinitely more than you could possibly claim about the unvaccinated.
 
But it’s not just a medical or physical price you would have us pay, but also a social one. You insist that this mandate isn’t about people’s “freedom or personal choice.” In essence, you demand that we obey and that we have no choice on the matter.
 
To that, I say go f**k yourself. I have never said that word about anyone or to anyone in the past (at least on this site), but I believe it’s warranted here. You want us to ignore the data SCREAMING that the vaccines are dangerous and want to FORCE us, through our employers, to get a dangerous vaccine? This is the very tyranny the Left claimed Trump supported. Furthermore, this is a complete and utter violation of the Nuremberg Code, regarding the coercion of people to unwillingly undergo medical experimentation.
 
Keep in mind, Trump was impeached over a phone call. And here, we have the Occupier of the Oval Office violating INTERNATIONAL LAW through means of coercion, basically telling people that they won’t have a job anymore if they don’t get the vaccine.
 
Well and justly do I say to Biden to go f**k himself. Not because he can actually do any of this, but because he is OPEN about what he wants.
 
No, I don’t fear that what he says wants done will actually be done. Already, multiple Republican governors and companies have stated their purpose to not comply with such an illegitimate and unconstitutional order. And if he continues to press on with this crap, getting more tyrannical in his actions, I don’t see how his administration survives (politically). Push people far enough and they will eventually push back. And as we’ve seen in countries around the world trying their hand at full-on communism, the people push back.
 
Iran, the U.K., France, Italy and Australia, to name a few, have seen anti-lockdown and anti-vaccine passports/mandates protests. Australia being particularly significant, as there are a number of laws in that country which outright illegalize protesting and hundreds have been arrested for doing so in anti-lockdown protests.
 
Do not expect the American people, out of everyone, to simply take illegal, liberty-limiting actions from the government lying face down.
 
Biden’s faux-presidency is crumbling around him and I believe it will soon come undone, particularly as more evidence mounts and is shared of the rigged election.
 
Deuteronomy 28:7
“The Lord will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you. They shall come out against you one way and flee before you seven ways.” 

As we have known for a very long time now, Joe Biden isn’t exactly a master speaker nor does he command a strong knowledge of the English language when he speaks. This was very much demonstrated recently when talking about climate, as the Occupier of the Oval Office basically claimed that tornadoes don’t exist anymore, or at least, an unspecified “they” don’t call them that anymore.
 
“Uh, you know, the, looks like a tornado, they don’t call ‘em that anymore, that hit the crops and, and wetlands in the middle of the country, and, and Iowa, and Nevada, and, I mean it’s just across the board. And uh, you know um, uh, as I said we’re in this together.”
 
Hard to be “in this together” when most of us don’t know what the hell you’re talking about, Joe.
 
But, hey, this ought to be something to celebrate, right? Tornadoes don’t exist anymore, which is a success in the “fight” against climate change, right? Oh, wait, yeah, this is just because Old Man Biden is a senile coot unfit for the office he stole. Forgot.
 
Naturally, Pretend President Porky Pig had people attempt to defend his incoherence online, claiming that what Biden was talking about wasn’t tornadoes but derechos, a different kind of storm.
 
Of course, since this is a Leftist argument, there are a few holes in it.
 
First of all, Biden was referring, at least, to something that “looks like a tornado.”
 
Here’s a tornado:

And here’s a picture of a derecho:

The only people who could claim that a tornado and a derecho look similar are people who have never seen one or the other and people who are awfully dishonest like Leftists who still defend the ghost of the Democrat Party.
 
The only similarity between both storms is the color, and that’s just because they look LIKE DARK CLOUDS, as you would typically find in PRETTY MUCH ALL STORMS.
 
Furthermore, The National Weather Service defines a tornado as “a violently rotating column of air extending from the base of a thunderstorm down to the ground” which is “capable of completely destroying well-made structures, uprooting trees, and hurling objects through the air like deadly missiles.” Meanwhile, their definition of derecho is a “widespread, long-lived wind storm that is associated with a band of rapidly moving showers or thunderstorms.”
 
In essence, the two are nothing alike, again, apart from color and I already explained why that is the case.
 
Secondly, and lastly, it makes no sense for Biden to have been talking about derechos because people still call them that. Even if one were to argue that most people don’t know the term “derechos”, which is certainly possible, and would usually refer to a derecho as a weird storm, or a storm in general, that represents a lack of information on the particular storm, not a change in idiom regarding the name of the storm.
 
Whoever “they” is in Biden’s nonsensical speech, it’s definitely not meteorologists who can accurately recognize and name the particular storm. If “they” is the general public which might not know the name of the storm, again, that’s about a lack of information, not a conscious decision to start calling those storms something else.
 
So whether Biden actually meant to say tornadoes or was merely referring to derechos, what he said was both incoherent and inaccurate. Not that they had to be coherent or accurate for loyal Leftist dogs to defend Biden at the drop of a hat (even when no one would blame them if they stopped defending him considering his drop in ratings, even those which are rigged in his favor). Frankly, it’s pathetic that these people have to force themselves (even more pathetic if they don’t have to force themselves, to be honest) to defend the nonsense of a man who should be long retired by now and as far away as possible from the nuclear button.
 
And yet, we don’t really expect them to do anything else. This is the dog they chose in the primaries (even if the country at large didn’t choose him) and they have to stick by him, apparently. This, despite the increase in Biden voters regretting their decision in 2020.
 
But hey, at least tornadoes aren’t a thing anymore, right? Ah, wait, almost forgot again.
 
The Left really can’t have anything, huh?
 
Proverbs 18:2
“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”

Last Thursday, Occupier Joe Biden announced a mandate for millions of federal workers to either receive a “lifesaving vaccine” (which is nothing of the sort) or follow strict and stringent “safety” protocols such as wearing masks “no matter where they are”, get tested once or twice a week, social distance and “generally not be allowed to travel for work.”
 
The same standard seemingly applies to all federal contractors. Biden also seemingly based this decision on the DOJ’s prior “ruling” that Chinese coronavirus vaccination mandates were “legal,” which as I said in the last article, means absolute squat since it just means that the DOJ won’t prosecute states and businesses which mandate vaccinations but state AGs and private citizens can still sue and nothing at all changes following that “ruling.”
 
Funny enough, Biden, in that Thursday announcement, also iterated the need for even the VACCINATED to wear masks, following the CDC’s updated “guidance” on mask-wearing (thereby giving even LESS of a reason to get vaccinated, since they had been trying to give special rights to the vaccinated, including not having to wear masks, though both mandates are utterly unconstitutional).
 
What’s more, Biden, in a bid to encourage people to get vaccinated, insisted time and time again that “99%” of people falling ill of the virus and dying are unvaccinated. Small tangent, but if the vaccines are safe and effective, why isn’t that number 100%? We’ve only had the vaccine for half a year, let’s say, so it stands to reason that most people who have died of the virus are those who were not vaccinated (which is extremely misleading, and would be like saying that Rome existed more than 70 years ago, which is technically true but again, misleading. Of course most people who have died of the Chinese coronavirus are unvaccinated, we’ve only had the vaccine until recently. And again, why is the number not 100%?).
 
In any case, I, for one, couldn’t care less about whether or not federal workers are mandated to get the vaccine or have to follow strict “safety” protocols. They are the swamp, after all. So why would I care about their suffering?
 
Furthermore, this vaccine mandate (threat, really) from the Biden administration brings with it unintended consequences which are actually pretty advantageous for Americans: it inadvertently drains the swamp.
 
Think of it like this: We all know of the effects of the vaccines. I have, for the last half a year, written many articles which highlight the ineffectiveness of the vaccines in fighting the Chinese coronavirus and downright show the active HARM which they pose to those who get the vaccine. I’ve even used data from the CDC itself, through its VAERS system, to showcase the, at this point, tens of thousands of people who have died of the vaccines (and as a reminder, the VAERS system only reports less than 1% of cases, so it’s possible, at this point, that over a million have died from the vaccines).
 
And undoubtedly, many federal workers have taken the vaccines as well. While it’s almost certain that not everyone who takes the vaccine will die from it, it can still cause other severe side-effects which can sideline people. Let’s pretend, then, that at least 50% of federal workers have taken the vaccine and another 10% intend to take the vaccine but haven’t quite yet come around to doing so for one reason or another. So 60%, to be conservative, since many labor unions working with or for the federal government have protested against the mandate, and many will refuse to take the vaccine for religious or health reasons.
 
Anthony Fauci had said that 40 to 50% of the CDC had yet to take the vaccine (arguably, he didn’t say they refused, but it’s the CDC and I highly doubt they would have trouble getting vaccinated), so a 60% estimate of federal workers getting the vaccine isn’t out of line.
 
That means that a LOT of those people could see severe side-effects as a result of getting the vaccine. They might get seriously sick and have to quit/retire or might outright die, depending on the circumstances. But the other 40% who might refuse to get the vaccine would likely face extreme pressure from their peers (the Left’s authoritarian tendencies will backfire here) to get the vaccine and might choose to quit or retire as well from the extreme pressure that the Left tends to put on people to act in the manner which they wish.
 
Either way, this kind of pressure from the Biden administration to either get the vaccine (which could seriously harm or kill them) or be subjected to stringent protocols (and face further pressure from others) would inadvertently lead to some amount of swamp draining.
 
Either the workers get the vaccine and die/be forced into retirement or they don’t get the vaccine but face enough pressure from the administration and their peers to want to quit/retire (or get the vaccine, which brings us back to that first option). Such a mandate on federal workers will likely lead to inadvertently draining the swamp, and from one of the biggest swamp rats of all.
 
Certainly, God works in mysterious ways. Even when we think there is no possibility for something to happen, such as draining the swamp in this case because a swamp lifer stole the election, God makes a way for it to be possible.
 
I am reminded of the story of the widow’s oil, where a woman comes to Elisha in dire need, as her husband recently died and a creditor was coming to take the woman’s two sons to be his slaves. Elisha asked the woman what she had in her house and she replied “Your maidservant has nothing in the house but a jar of oil,” 2 Kings 4:2. Elisha then told her to go to all her neighbors and gather empty vessels and pour that oil into all those vessels. And that’s exactly what she did, with just one jar of oil, she managed to fill all the vessels she had with her with that oil by the power of God. Thanks to that, she was able to pay off her debt.
 
The story is rather short and doesn’t go into a whole lot of detail, but I’m certain the woman at least thought to herself “how can this lone jar of oil be enough to pay off my debt? If I thought it would be enough, I wouldn’t have had to come to Elisha to begin with.” In essence, I think she doubted there would have been a way for her to use that oil to pay for her debt (seeing as she said she "has nothing... but a jar of oil"), but God made a way for exactly that to happen.
 
Similarly, I believe that’s what God is doing with this situation as well. He is using a swamp rat to drain the swamp, likely without the rat’s knowledge.
 
Even if I overestimate what this will do to the swamp in terms of draining it, that this will definitely lead to some people in federal government to be forced out is more than I was expecting going into this illegitimate administration.
 
With Biden successfully stealing the election, I fully expected the swamp to recover from the four years of Trump, but frankly, this could do more damage to them than even Trump did. All under the “leadership” of one of their own.
 
God certainly is poetic with irony.
 
John 16:33
“I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world.”