In another great video (below) from Campus Reform, Cabot Phillips traveled to Georgia, specifically to Savannah College of Art and Design, where there exists a building named after conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
 
At this college, a number of students have signed a petition to rename the building and remove Clarence Thomas from any association with the building and/or the school.
 
Cabot Phillips wanted to understand just why the students were signing the petition and just why they felt compelled to rename the building to something that is not associated with Justice Clarence Thomas. And if you think any one of them came up with even a remotely decent explanation, you’d be horribly wrong.
 
You see, none of them could really come up with a solid answer. Many simply shrugged their shoulders, saying “I don’t know” or “I haven’t done enough research.” So they can’t even clumsily point to Thomas’ sexual assault allegations that came up very similarly to Kavanaugh’s allegations back when Thomas was a nominee to the Supreme Court.
 
Of course, even pointing that out brings with it a share of problems, but not even one of them even thought of it. They literally would say or signify that they simply don’t know why they are against him, they just are.
 
Cabot went further, asking them if there was anything the students could point to as the biggest reason for wanting to remove Thomas’ name from the building. Once again, they could not come up with anything… except for one particular student who gave perhaps the single stupidest answer I’ve heard in a long time.
 
A student wearing a New Orleans Saints beanie said the following: “[Thomas] is a historical figure… so is Hitler.”
 
No, there was nothing in between the things I quoted. There was nothing else that he said. That ellipsis was not to cut out unimportant bits and focus on the important ones, that ellipsis was to signify the time spent from one part of the quote to the other, similar to dialogue.
 
The kid’s literal argument was that Clarence Thomas is a historical figure, and because Hitler was also a historical figure, Thomas should have his name removed.
 
Now, I will cut the kid some slack. He does appear to be smiling when he said that, as if to know he just said some seriously dumb crap, but still. That is hardly an argument.
 
I’ve heard some ludicrous comparisons to Hitler before. Comparisons between, say, Trump and Hitler. And the reasons given are wrong and ignorant. People will say “they are both white supremacists” or other ridiculous things. But those kinds of comparisons, though erroneous, are pretty subjectively understandable. People consider the concept of a wall to be racist, even though it’s only meant to protect the border and the rule of law, without interjecting race. However, this comparison, though not directed at Trump, has to be the dumbest one I’ve ever heard.
 
People can say Trump is a Nazi all they want; they’d be wrong. But that gives them some subjective reason to not like him. This answer does not even touch on similarities of ideology (of which there are none because Hitler was a socialist and Thomas is a conservative). It does not even touch on similarities of policy (again, of which there are none). The argument is: Thomas is a historical figure. So is Hitler. Therefore, Thomas bad man.
 
There is literally no logical steps taken to go from not liking Thomas to comparing him to Hitler in this instance.
 
There is this little analogy I use sometimes: A farmer has to wake up very early every day, and he’s tired of it. He notices that whenever his rooster starts clucking in the morning, the sun would rise. As a result, he kills the rooster so that the sun will stop rising. Of course, the sun still rises anyway.
 
You see, there was no direct relationship between the rooster clucking and the sun rising. It’s just that the rooster clucks to signify the sun is about to rise, but the rooster does not make the sun rise.
 
But the farmer in that analogy at least noticed some sort of pattern, even if he was ultimately wrong. No cause-effect relationship. The student here draws no pattern. His line of thinking is: Thomas is a historical figure, as was Hitler, so that CLEARLY means Thomas must be like Hitler.
 
Never mind the fact that OBAMA is also a historical figure. Never mind that Bill and Hillary Clinton are historical figures (Bill more than Hillary, I’d say). Don’t pay attention to any of that.
 
Now, again, the kid was smiling, almost laughing, when he said that. I take that as he knows what he just said is super dumb, so I will try to cut him some slack, but I hope he at least learns the meaning of constructing an argument.
 
Of course, we could also argue about Thomas being a historical figure, but that’s not the point of my rebuking of the Saints fan.
 
That argument can hardly be called an argument. And that is where I will leave that since that is mostly a tangent for the main purpose of this article.
 
Returning to the overall video, there wasn’t a single person who could come up with a reason at all to remove Thomas’ name. One of the students tried to make it about politics, saying that the campus is liberal and that Thomas “degrades” that, which can also hardly be considered an argument. Cabot makes sure to point out the hypocrisy of liberalism, saying that liberals are supposed to be “open-minded and tolerant”. The student replies: “I guess, but I think that’s just a way to twist the concept of liberalism.”
 
Sweetheart (the student is a girl), what does the Left tend to do to appeal to people? Aside from trying to be hipster and cool to appeal to millennials, they point to the “racism” of the Republicans and the “inclusive” nature of the Left. The Left is the ones who say they are “open-minded and tolerant”. Cabot isn’t twisting it, the Left is.
 
We know very well that the Left is not tolerant and open-minded (as evidenced by the fact that this student herself essentially argues against Thomas’ name for the building because the college is liberal and he is conservative), so if anyone is twisting the concept of liberalism, it’s the Left.
 
Now, thankfully, not every single student interviewed by Cabot said they should rename it. One of the students brought up that just because you disagree with someone, that doesn’t necessarily disqualify their accomplishments. So not every student there is being completely indoctrinated, but there are a good number of them who are.
 
And make no mistake, this is prototypical indoctrination. Those students believe the things they believe not because they arrived at those conclusions by themselves, but because other people have taught them to believe those things.
 
This much is clear when they sign a petition to remove Clarence Thomas’ name from a school building but cannot come up with any particular reason as to why, apart from that’s just the way they feel.
 
This is what comes out of indoctrination. Mindless pawns useful to the Left. Clarence Thomas, to these kids, is bad. Not because they know anything about him, but because other people told them he’s bad and they have no sense for wishing to learn more about him to verify the claims made against him.
 
Then, these kids grow up to “believe all women” whenever a Leftist woman accuses a conservative man of something, whether or not it’s proven he did it.
 
But in this case, I arrive at a dilemma. What is better? Being uninformed or being misinformed? I, for one, believe it’s better to be uninformed. These kids, given their answers, are largely uninformed about Clarence Thomas. Again, they didn’t point to the sexual assault allegations, and the one kid that compared him to Hitler made a very stupid comparison that is not even up for debate as to why it’s wrong.
 
So I think these kids are in a better situation than someone who would bring up the aforementioned things or would make a more common comparison to Hitler (which is largely becoming stale, regardless of who you direct the comparison to), because such a person would be largely misinformed and remain grounded in their beliefs, whereas someone who is uninformed can be properly informed and could perhaps be persuaded to our side.
 
However much this may be the case here, I don’t know. But there is at least some level of hope for these kids to be properly informed and help them understand why it makes no sense to wish to rename the building currently named after Justice Thomas.
 
Here’s hoping that is the case, because it could just as easily go the other way, unfortunately. This is academia, after all. It’s long ceased to be a place of higher education. It’s now a place for higher indoctrination.
 
Proverbs 18:15
“An intelligent heart acquires knowledge, and the ear of the wise seeks knowledge.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Valerie Jarrett recently said that Donald Trump’s win was a ‘soul crushing’ ‘punch to the stomach’ event. For someone who considers herself brilliant, you have to wonder – where has she been the last eight years? How come she did not see this coming?

The fact of the matter is liberals live in fantasyland. They promote socialism as the only possible system to guarantee ‘fairness’. They want to redistribute wealth, but they have no clue how to create it. How can you distribute wealth if you don't know how to create it?

Their surprise at Trump's win, and the subsequent hysterical reaction on their part, are only but a couple of pieces of evidence of the fact democrats live in their own imaginary world.

You see, Valerie Jarrett and the rest of the democrat elites actually believe that you want the same things that they want: gay marriage, teen pregnancies, abortion, redistribution of wealth, hatred for the police, hatred for the rich (unless they’re democrat donors), etc.

Liberals ATTACK your faith, your wallet, your gun rights, and force women to share their bathrooms with predators and they think you’ll just accept all of these things.
Like a woman who’s beat up by her husband on a regular basis, they think you’ll just take it. But what they don't understand is, like in any abusive relationship, either your abuser kills you, or you abandon him. There’s really no other possible outcome. Sooner or later either one of these two events will happen. But abusers rarely see either of these things coming – they’re always taken by surprise when you abandon them. How can you not see how wonderful they are? You see, they just think you’ll always submit and take their beating.

… is what liberals expect from you.

• They FORCE you to buy health insurance, even if you don’t want to.
• They FORCE you to use fluorescent lightbulbs to ‘protect the environment’, God knows from what, even if you don't want to.
• They FORCE women to see themselves as nothing but a sex toy, to be used and disposed of at men’s will.
• They FORCE little girls to share their bathrooms with boys – let’s face it, after all they’re being trained to be nothing but sex toys when they grow up.

Total submission is what they want. Are liberals sociopaths?

While the democrat elites know exactly what they’re doing and why, sadly the democrat base doesn’t. The base is losing their rights, money, joy and opportunities every time the Democrats are in charge - just like the rest of us. After all they are these sex-toy-low-self-esteem kind of women, the millions of men and women forced to buy health insurance or the many more millions of men and women without a job – living on handouts. Nobody really wants to live this way. Nobody.

Socioeconomic and crime statistics point to failed democrat policies. I don’t need to list them all here. But if you’re wondering where liberal policies can take you all you need to do is turn around and look at Latin America.

Latin America has been ruled by all sorts of big governments, from the left AND the right. Big governments taking more of people’s money and liberties. It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to know where Democrat policies can take our country – and yet, the liberal base refuses to see the truth.

Now, indoctrination is mostly responsible for the democrat base living in a fantasy world. But how about the democrat elites?

Think about it: Hillary’s votes recounting effort was pointless. There was NO WAY she was going to win this battle. Why was she pursuing this? Where was she during the campaign trail that she couldn’t see the massive crowds in Trump rallies? Where was she on election night, that wouldn’t allow her to concede until the following day?

The democrat elites, like all abusers, live in their own bubble as well, but they’re not stupid - they’re slowly waking up. For now, some of them, like Hillary, are probably in denial. Some like Obama are blaming the 11/8 loss on racism (which is another form of denial), some like Jarrett are slowly but surely waking up to the fact Democrats are NOT the majority and their mindset is FAR from being mainstream.

It’s going to take a while until they regroup, but they will at some point. When they do, brace yourself because these people do NOT TAKE REJECTION WELL. They’re going to escalate their anger and their violence – it’s going to get ugly. They’re sociopaths who will MAKE YOU PAY for rejecting them.

What can we do?

Preach, my friend. Preach.

To the extent that we can bring some of the democrat base over to this side, liberals will become less and less relevant. We have to PREACH to the democrat base, and DEFEAT its leadership.

​We have to defeat big government elites.

Luke 10:19 ‘Behold, I give you the authority to trample on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall by any means hurt you’.

​Author: Daniela R.
​

The reaction to the November 8th presidential election that our ‘brightest’ students demonstrated is both sad and concerning. From 'safe' spaces, to play-doh 'therapy' to coloring books - these are all warning signs of an immature generation that won't be able to face difficulties in their lives.

We know that democrats' relentless pursuit to diminish individuals so that they feel so bad about themselves that their only hope is the government has turned individuals into helpless human beings.

We know that the liberal base wants freebies that we, the producers, pay for and this fact alone is evidence of their own hopelessness – they cannot imagine succeeding in anything anymore. You could argue that, in some instances like older, unemployed people, perhaps they have cause for concern. If you’re in your 40s or 50s and you’ve been unemployed for some time, I can only imagine how horrible and helpless you must feel. Most of us, however, know better and get up and fight.

But how about our youth? These college students have access to what some consider the best education in the world, and they’re only beginning to live their lives as adults – a bright future is ahead of them. Why all the whining?

To answer that question, you have to take a look at the somber statistics from a recent study published by a non partisan scholarship group.  

According to this study, in America’s top 40 universities, the Democrat Professor-to-Republican Professor ratio is 12-1. In other words, there are 12 democrat professors for each republican professor on America’s top 40 college campuses.

These democrat professors are in the business of making sure your college student remains as immature and vulnerable as he was at the age of 5 - hence the coloring books.

And it’s not surprising to those of us who know liberals better than they know themselves.

When you look at the details of the study, among the fields analyzed, the results are astounding:

1. In History: 33.5-1 ratio. That is, there are 33.5 democrat professors per each republican professor. This is a big deal. You see, it’s in History that you should learn about our Christian founding, or the fact that the KKK was (and is) the terror arm of the Democrat party. Obviously these democrats are not teaching any of this as it makes them look bad. And, let's not forget, Michelle Obama herself once said, they’re re-writing history. So History is a field that's CRITICAL for indoctrination.
2. In Journalism: there’s a 20-1 ratio. There are 20 democrats per each republican professor in this field. And then you wonder why the mainstream media is so mediocre! Much like democrat historians re-write history, democrat journalists re-write current events. That's why all the bias...
3. In Psychology: the ratio is 17.4-1. Democrat professors will teach their students to dig into the psyche of their future patients, without teaching them anything about Jesus and how we can overcome everything through Jesus Christ. Shrinks are in the business of exploiting people’s vulnerabilities, and if the solution is as simple as coming to Jesus, then the business is over.
4. In Law: the ratio is 8.6:1. Any wonder why we have now more Judge-activists than ever before? The law doesn’t matter. What matters is how these judges feel about the plaintiff and the defendant - and that's the basis for their rulings.
5. In Economics: the ratio is 4.5-1, which would explain why there are so many Bernie Sanders supporters on college campuses. When you don’t teach the negative consequences of socialism, as evidenced by every single country where it’s been implemented from Latin America to Asia to Europe, how do you expect these students to know?

You may find this hard to believe, but the most prestigious universities in the U.S had a Christian founding. America’s oldest universities were founded in New England in the 17th and 18th centuries with an emphasis on training ministers of the Gospel. They have Christian mottos, which they now betray:

• Harvard: ‘Truth’ (‘Veritas’ in Latin)
• Princeton: ‘Under the Protection of God Power She Flourishes!’ (‘Dei Sub Numine Viget’ in Latin)
• Yale: ‘Light and Truth’ (‘Lux et Veritas’ in Latin)
• Columbia: ‘In Thy Light Shall We See Light’ (Psalm 36:9. ‘In Lumine Tuo Videbimus Lumen’ in Latin)
• Brown: ‘In God We Hope’ (‘In Deo Speramus’ in Latin)

As you can see, these Universities were founded with God in mind. As a result, graduates would have CHARACTER which they’d bring into their fields after their college years. There was a sense of right and wrong, and there was a sense of responsibility. The kind of responsibility that anyone who’s matured can bring to their professions.

Now, after decades of indoctrination, the democrat sissification of the American youth brings hysteria, immaturity, a sense of despair and the reluctance to grow up. These are the leaders of tomorrow, my friend.

We must teach our children that the democrats are far from being the source of truth. They’re being indoctrinated in our schools – so we need to teach them the truth at home.

Deuteronomy 6:5-9: You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength. And these words which I command you today shall be in your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up.  You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes.  You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.

It's our responsibility as parents to teach our kids the truth if we want them to succeed.

​Author: Daniela R.

Whenever the left fights to remove the Ten Commandments or a Christmas tree from a public building, or your children’s right to read their Bible in school, they usually refer to the separation of State and Church as the reason behind their fight.

Never mind that, instead, they’re polluting our minds with their own version of religion – atheism. Atheism, after all, is the BELIEF that there IS no God. Atheists, in other words, are BELIEVERS - they believe in SOMETHING, they just don’t believe in the same thing Christians do. They can't prove God doesn't exist any more than Christians can prove He does.
Atheists are religious people too...

The decades-long war on God Atheists have been pursuing has had terrible consequences on our society: in public schools or buildings, Evolution is in and the Bible is out; promiscuity is in and the Ten Commandments are out.

What am I saying?

I’m saying that while atheists devote their lives to condemning righteousness and everything that’s good for you, they’re also committed to promoting everything that’s wrong for you.

Evolution is just a theory, as even scientists agree – and, worst of all, it’s a theory that's never been proven and can never be proven. Nobody's ever seen a monkey evolve into a person. It’s not just a theory, it’s a ridiculous theory based on the IMAGINATION of an atheist who found it hard to believe that God had anything to do with the creation of this world.
Charles Darwin was ready to accept the evidence of creation while denying the existence of a CREATOR. As if, for example, I saw the evidence of this computer I’m using to type this blog, without recognizing the fact that someone, somewhere in Asia built it. Somebody I’ve never met built this computer whether I want to accept it or not. Similarly, somebody we’ve never met created this awesome universe…

And don’t get me started with promiscuity. Promiscuity leads to disease, depression and poverty. Women feel used, men can't find anybody to spend the rest of their lives with, gays feel awkward and rejected, and they get sick so they spend money on doctors and shrinks. There’s nothing good about promiscuity.

But, behold! Bring the Bible into the class and just wait to see how quickly they label you a bigot, a lunatic, a cross worshiper. You bet I’m a cross worshiper – what else would you worship? Miley Cyrus? Obama? Money?
But do they teach you any of this in school?

Of course not.

If they taught you anything of value in school you would know that the separation of State and Church was determined so that the government would not adopt any one particular religion. The founding of this country was based on religious liberty, so the government per se has never adopted a religion.
​
But did the Framers intend to forget about GOD altogether?

No. On the contrary.

The separation of State and Church does not mean the separation of State and God. It’s not what our Founding Fathers intended.

James Madison, the architect of our Constitution said this:

‘We have staked the whole future of American Civilization NOT upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to sustain ourselves, ACCORDING TO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS’

George Washington said:

'We ought to be no less persuaded that the perpetual smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that DISREGARDS ETERNAL RULE of order and Right which HEAVEN ITSELF HAS ORDAINED'.

Abraham Lincoln said:

'In regards to this great book, the Bible, I have this but to say: it is the best gift God has given to men. But for it, we would not know right from wrong’

Not only is there RIGHT and WRONG – it’s the BIBLE that tells you what’s right and what’s wrong.

And I could go on and on - but you get the picture.

Friend, our Founding Fathers never intended for the state to be separated from God. In fact, God has been the light, the inspiration and the guidance to our leaders ever since the Pilgrims landed on our shores. Given the experience of persecution that Jews and Christians have been subjected to for thousands and thousands of years, the Framers didn’t want the state to adopt any specific religion and potentally one day justify persecution. But make no mistake – God has always been a key source of guidance to our BEST leaders. Those wonderful leaders who have promoted righteousness and what is good for us have always sought God before making crucial decisions.

Separation of State and Church is another lie propagated by democrats – good governments and God are supposed to walk together.

1 Peter 2:13-17:  Be subject for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme, or to governors as sent by him to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good. For this is the will of God, that by doing good you should put to silence the ignorance of foolish people. Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil, but living as servants of God. Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor.

There’s a cold war out there – a battle for your mind that you won’t believe. In ancient times, when you had opposing groups of people like the Egyptians and the Jews, or the Romans and the Jews or the Aztecs and their neighbors, the solution to their disputes was open war.

Today, and 100 years after the soviet revolution of 1917, battles are won and lost in our minds.

Like in every good movie, reality has two opposing sides: Good and Evil. Believe me, these are the sides, whether you’re talking about ISIS or Mother Theresa or Obama or Trump. This old battle is still going on, but what’s different today is that evil has figured out there’s no better way to win you over but to lie to you.

And that’s why evil needs indoctrination, because if you were free to think and choose which side to support, there’s no way you’d ever be a liberal.

You see, liberalism is evil. No, it’s not another viewpoint or a different way of thinking. It’s truly evil. Why?

• Because liberalism does not allow critical thinking – they want you to accept their viewpoints as truths and will crush anybody who challenges them. It’s truly their way or the highway.
• Because liberalism produces anxiety and depression. Have you ever noticed how liberals are always angry? Whatever happens in the world is the Christian’s fault, or Republican’s fault or somebody else’s fault. They’re in a constant state of anger because they find fault everywhere but in their own leadership.
• Because liberalism produces LACK – and its inevitable poverty. There is no such thing as a prosperous communist country.

But somebody benefits from liberalism, right? I mean, not everybody gets hurt, correct?

That’s right. Not everybody gets hurt.

The only winners in a liberal society are the ruling elites:

1. Wall Street
2. Career politicians
3. The mainstream media
4. Hollywood

They are the ONLY ones growing their wealth and influence.

In order to get you to accept liberalism they have no choice but to make you think liberalism is good – they have to lie to you. They have to indoctrinate you.

There is indoctrination in America and it’s orchestrated by the four main suspects above – the only beneficiaries: Wall Street, career politicians, the mainstream media and Hollywood.

How is indoctrination in America happening?

Through our schools – the same schools that removed the 10 commandments and distributes condoms to students. The same schools that tossed the Bible into the garbage and teaches evolution as if it was science. The same schools that removed paintings of Jesus Christ and replaced them with a drawing that depicts evolution (the 'March of Progress') created by some artist (Rudolph Zallinger) decades ago – and they pass this drawing for science. It's just a drawing, for God's sake. The result of Zallinger's imagination! He was an artist!

Indoctrination also takes place in College campuses, where free thinkers are no longer allowed. In order to graduate you have to subscribe to the one liberal line of thought, which they expect you to carry throughout your life.

Indoctrination also takes place through the Mainstream media, which is constantly battling to convince you that abortion is good and being pro-life is wrong. They want to convince you that transgender bathrooms are a civil right (!?) and protecting your child from a predator is wrong. They want to convince you that gay marriage is OK, but ignore the hundreds of thousands of gays and lesbians who are being thrown out of buildings to their deaths in Muslim countries.

Indoctrination takes place through Hollywood, when they create their own version of history, or their own version of 'modern family'.

The left wants to convince you that you’re a victim, while ignoring you when you’re actually victimized... by them!

The question becomes, what are you going to do about it?

Your children are being indoctrinated in schools every single day. What are you going to do about it?

You’re being spoon-fed liberal lies through the mainstream media and Hollywood – whenever you turn on the news or whenever you watch a movie. Every detail is designed to shape YOUR MIND. And that's how you go from a normal family 50 years ago with mom and dad and a couple of kids, to today's debate of transgender bathrooms. You don't get to this place without the media indoctrinating you that transgenders bathrooms must be somebody's civil right. Fifty years ago the whole concept would have been laughable. Today, we're taking it seriously!

Why do they want to indoctrinate you?

Power. They just want power.

Why?

Money. Ultimately they just want money. They worship money and they make you pay for it. And they need power to grab a bigger slice of the pie.

Ephesians 6:12: For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.

'Principalities' refers to government, to the ruling elites. In our case, it refers to liberals in power, including Wall Street, the mainstream media and Hollywood. These are the principalities we’re fighting against, and the only ones benefiting from liberalism.

And the battle is for you mind.

Please don’t let them win over your mind – you’ve got much to lose!

Turn off the mainstream media. Refuse to watch Hollywood movies. Teach your children and home school them if you can. Don’t be a victim of the left!
​
Teach your children the Bible. Teach yourself the Bible – please go to a good Bible church to learn the TRUTH. You’ve got nothing to lose and much to gain!