This is not the first instance of actual hate speech to be seen, and it certainly won’t be the last.
Actress and producer Ellen Barkin tweeted out (and later deleted those tweets) that she hopes comedian Louis C.K. “gets raped” and “shot at”.
This is in apparent response to the comedian’s leaked audio of a recent comedy routine in which he ripped “gender neutral” millennials and Parkland school shooting survivors for their insane gun control activism.
While C.K.’s routine is certainly out there and not for everyone, it’s simply comedy. But in a day and age when speech is limited and policed heavily, comedy is among the most notorious and saddest victims. For any comedian to make fun of anyone apart from Trump, conservatives and Christ or Christians, that comedian must be rebuked, put to shame, and wished literal rape and death upon.
Any comedian that dares even make fun of a Leftist is someone that ought to be arrested and overall destroyed in the minds of the Left, even if that person tends to be more progressive in general and not a conservative themselves.
But it’s not simply the destruction and enchaining of comedy that destroys a civilized society. It’s both the unending desire to limit speech for anyone that even seemingly disagrees with the collective think-tank of the Left and the casual response to such disagreement coming in the form of the very hate speech these people supposedly fight against.
And while Barkin wound up deleting those tweets, she first made sure to defend them by attacking those who would rebuke her and by lying about the comedian.
“For all of you ready to jump on my back, think for a minute about how Louis C.K. must talk about the women who outed him? What do you think he wishes on them? Do you think he will assault a woman again? Read up on serial sexual assault.”
Louis C.K. did not assault anyone. He was accused of sexual misconduct (and C.K. admitted to it) about masturbating in front of female comedians after he would ask permission to do so. Still not a good thing whatsoever for anyone to do, and C.K. has apologized for it. That’s definitely a bad thing to do, but it’s a far cry from the sexual assault the actress is claiming.
Now, the most interesting part of this thing, in my opinion, comes in what was essentially the actress blowing a lid. I mentioned earlier that she would push back against those who would try to call her out on her poor choice of words. This is what she had to say to them:
“Interesting that most of the aggressive responders to my tweet are anti-choice, anti-science, anti-immigrant, anti-poc (people of color) Christians. I’m a Jew, an eye for an eye has its place for me. This sociopath & serial predator will continue harming. Stay safe while you clap.”
She’s not done: “If all you racist, anti-semitic, woman-hating muthaf**ckers are so distraught over my tweets, why the f**k are you following me? Cuz you’re dumb af. (that means *as f**k).”
I say this is the most interesting part in my opinion because it’s basically a goldmine for me. There’s so much that I can talk about here, even within the larger point of the destruction of civilized society.
First, I find it hilarious that her go-to response to people that are rightfully calling her out for her hate speech is calling people racist, sexist, xenophobes. We on the Right like to make fun of the Left for using this sort of response, but we usually exaggerate how much the Left does this. She’s literally giving the list of things that we make fun of the Left over.
Second, I highly doubt that “an eye for an eye” has its place in this woman. If that were the case, she would not have said what she said and she would not have tried to defend it. If she truly believes in the concept of an eye for an eye, then what exactly does she expect from wishing that someone gets raped and shot at?
Lastly, the reason this also has its part in the destruction of a civilized society is that these very tweets highlight our inability to have a civilized conversation anymore and that the words “gets raped” and “shot at” are being hurled in a serious conversation highlight the fact that we are normalizing this sort of hate speech.
I’m not going to say we never had hate speech in the past, but it’s certainly not progressive to hurl such hateful speech at someone just because you don’t like someone’s comedy routine.
I’ve heard C.K.’s latest comedy routine. Again, it’s definitely out there and I would not recommend audiences younger than 18 to listen to it, but it’s still just comedy.
To react in such a manner is not an indication as to how terrible and offensive C.K.’s routine was, but of how poorly people can take a joke in this day and age, and there is no sign of things getting better in that area.
It’s also an indication that the Left can hurl any sort of hateful speech they want at anyone they want so long as the collective Left is in agreement. Although, this is nothing new either.
People can literally wish death upon the Trump family, upon Christians, Republicans, conservatives all they want with minimal, next to nonexistent, repercussions. So long as the collective Left is in agreement about who can be targeted, hate speech is more than acceptable.
I say this because I remember a story some time ago about a feminist being suspended by Facebook for her stance against transgender women being counted as women. Transgenders are not someone people can negatively talk about in any way, so the feminist, one of the Left’s own people, was punished.
But in this instance, the hateful woman is hateful towards a seemingly acceptable target (seemingly because many other Leftists went bananas over the leaked comedy routine), so her hatred is allowed to carry on.
The reason I say this is all an indication of the destruction of civilized society is because this is the precise language people in the Middle East would use against someone they didn’t like. For example, when Asia Bibi was imprisoned and released years later (oversimplifying things here), people called for her head because she was considered a blasphemer.
Whenever someone does something the Muslims deem unacceptable, the people demand bloodshed, and often enough, they get it.
I draw this comparison between the Muslim world and Barkin’s hateful rhetoric because the Muslim world is not a civilized society (as evidenced by far more things than I have even shared here).
The fact that Barkin spreads hateful words that are so similar to what Muslims would say is an indication of the destruction of a civilized society in America. More-so when taking into account she tweeted those things so casually, went as far as to defend them and call those who would rebuke her as “racists”, etc., and that she ultimately decided to delete those tweets but never apologized for them.
Inwardly, and often outwardly, the Left is no more civilized than the Muslim world. They demand that others obey them and those who refuse are to be targeted and destroyed by any means necessary.
With that last sentence alone, you honestly could not even tell whether I was talking about the Left or Islam.
1 John 2:9
“Whoever says he is in the light and hates his brother is still in darkness.”
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
If you want to find the perfect instance of a Leftist showing their true colors and showing a damn-near demonic side to them, look no further than Illinois’ House of Representatives, where Democrat Representative Stephanie Kifowit detailed exactly what she wishes she could do to GOP Representative Peter Breen and his family.
You better hold on to your gut, because what she says is sickening, depraved and horrifying.
Here’s what the she-demon said: “I would like to make him a broth of Legionella and pump it into the water system of his loved ones so that they can be infected, they can be mistreated, they can sit and suffer by getting aspirin instead of being properly treated and ultimately die.”
For further context, Rep. Breen has a wife and two adopted kids aged 2 years old and 2 months old. And the Legionella bacteria is a bacteria that causes a pneumonia-type disease called Legionnaires’ disease and a mild flu-like illness called Pontiac fever.
GOP Representative Jeanne Ives, in response, blasted the witch: “How dare you concoct up some sort of story about brewing up some batch of Legionella and having him feed it to his family… How dare you… wish death on my colleague Peter Breen, his wife, and his 2 adopted kids.”
Breen also said that her attacks came “out of left field” and if the monster “made those statements in the parking lot, or left a message on an answering machine in my office, she would be in custody.”
The House also voted unanimously to “expunge Kifowit’s statement from the record,” according to the Daily Herald.
And do you want to know the worst part? Oh, yes, it’s even worse than what I’ve already mentioned. The worst part is she’s not apologetic – she’s defensive.
The she-devil said: “And so to misinterpret my words, and of course these are all transcribed, and my words will be clear… So for the fact that it being misinterpreted, I’m going to say that what was said earlier is a mischaracterization of what my words were.”
WOMAN, YOU LITERALLY WISHED DEATH AND SUFFERING UPON A COLLEAGUE! THERE IS NO MISINTERPRETATION OF THAT!
Does she not even realize what she actually said?! She says that it’s all transcribed and the words are clear. Does she not even realize what she said? Did she undergo some sort of demon possession when she said those words and has no clear recollection of what she said?
Doubtful, since if that were the case, she would be apologizing for her words, rather than trying to say that she did not say those things or those things were “mischaracterized and misinterpreted”. What a lying, hateful scumbag she must be.
And I hate calling people names, as I believe that to be the lowest form of argument, apart from repeating what someone said in a mocking tone or mockingly laughing at someone’s argument. I don’t tend to call people names, but I just can’t help it here.
This woman is a she-devil. Look closely at the words she used. Does that sound like something someone just comes up with out of the blue? To specifically say that she would want to batch up a broth of a specific kind of bacteria, “pump it” into Breen’s family’s water supply so that they may be infected, mistreated, suffer and ultimately die? That was way too specific and way too detailed for that to have come up out of nowhere. She must’ve thought about this previously. Not to say she might actually do it, but it’s pretty clear these are the words of someone who has thought about this sort of thing in the past.
There’s something copywriters do when writing advertisements for a restaurant or a particular food. They will sometimes paint a picture of what it might be like to taste and eat the food. For example, one could say: “The sweet aroma of Restaurant X’s special steak will cause you to wish to dig in right away, but the sweet, succulent and voluminous taste of the steak, marinated in thick, rich barbeque sauce, will cause you to take a step back and relish in the overall richness of the dish.”
For a copywriter to come up with a sort of story like that to paint the picture of a delicious $20 steak, careful thought and consideration must take place. The same can be said for someone who uses this specific sort of language. Of course, this example is a bit more detailed than what Fem-Satan said, but it’s just as specific. The way she phrased that takes you down specific roads and alleyways of thought and paints a clear, but grim, picture of the suffering and ultimate demise of a family.
I’m not accusing the monster of actually killing or planning to kill anyone, but these are disturbing thoughts that don’t appear to have been random, but carefully thought out.
But regardless of whether or not this was thought out, it still signifies a deeply-rooted hatred within her heart, that is shared by others in the Democrat Party and even the media.
I don’t know what the previous conversation was about, but no context could possibly justify the very specific words that she seemingly denies saying.
And actually, the aforementioned GOP Representative who stood up for Breen, Rep. Jeanne Ives, went to the jugular, bringing up something that seemingly occurred during the 2018 midterm election cycle, where Breen and another GOP colleague were painted as supporters of child predators. She said: “That’s what you guys (Democrats) think. That’s the kind of garbage you spew into people’s minds.” She also said that fellow Democrats clapped and agreed with Kifowit’s statements, which if true, further proves my previous statement that such hatred is shared by the Democrat Party.
The wish to infect, make suffer, and ultimately kill with what is basically a biological weapon at that point, is something that can only come from someone who harbors Satan in their heart. The same could be said for anyone who agrees with the sentiment. And that is the reason I call the Democrat Party the Party of Satan. It’s his. His ideology reigns supreme in the Democrat Party. His unending hatred is shared among Party members (not necessarily all of them, but far too many for me to believe otherwise).
I mean, just last week, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) said he would nuke gun owners who would defy the government if the government were to take away people’s guns (paraphrasing). Bernie Sanders, before a socialist madman shot up a baseball field full of Republican congressmen, said that Republicans wanted to kill people by “taking away their healthcare”. David Brooks said, following Trump’s election victory, that Trump had to choose between being impeached, resigning, or being assassinated. Madonna, in the first “Women’s March” against Trump, said that she “thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.”
The Left HATES people. They particularly hate anyone that is not like them, in a very similar fashion to Adolf Hitler. And since anti-Semitism seems to be on the rise on the Left, day by day, they appear to embody the Nazi Party of Germany more and more, minus the nationalism part.
Historically speaking, it’s only been those on the Left who have wanted, or gone as far as to actually kill, opposition. The communists (no matter what country you talk about) do it, the socialists (no matter what country you talk about) do it, the fascists do it. Generally speaking, the wish of death upon anyone who dares defy the Left is par for the course regarding this witch. But just because it’s par for the course definitely does not make it right.
The fact that this is just who the Left is is downright terrifying. They have no respect or regard for human life. They don’t even have respect for themselves, at the end of the day, so why would they respect anyone else?
As often as I get the chance (which is very often), I expose the fact that the Left is evil. And this is why. Their hearts are full of evil, so they naturally gravitate towards the ideologies of Satan. They may not necessarily believe in Satan, but they do not have to. Satan doesn’t care if people believe in him or not. Matter of fact, he’d rather people not believe in him, so that people don’t feel the need to seek God for salvation.
I sincerely hope this woman finds Christ. I don’t say that in spite of what she said, I say that precisely BECAUSE of what she said. She needs Christ. Granted, so does everyone else, but she desperately needs Him.
But as it stands, her heart belongs to Satan and it will remain that way, barring God’s desire to save her.
“The face of the Lord is against those who do evil, to cut off the memory of them from the earth.”
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
Over this weekend, the White House Correspondents’ Dinner took place. Now, I will admit, I didn’t watch it. Choosing to watch an hour and a half-long event showcasing Leftists praising each other and attacking conservatives and the President all night long is about as enjoyable to me as watching the grass grow.
Actually, I’d rather watch grass grow because I’m more likely to have a meaningful, intelligent conversation with my lawn than these Leftists.
And at the end of the day, though I’m still going to end up mowing my lawn, it’s less likely to hate me than the Left will.
And hatred is all I could see coming from Michelle Wolf, a supposed “comedian” with the mouth of a sailor and the comedic skills of a sailboat.
Seriously, if you have to constantly use expletives and vulgarity to even somewhat get people to laugh, that’s not comedy, that’s pathetic.
Throughout Michelle Wolf’s monologue, hatred is all that was coming out of her mouth. From making horrible jokes about abortion (that actually got a room full of mostly liberals to groan) to insulting Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ appearance and weight (which, if that had been targeted at, say, Michelle Obama, those jokes would’ve cost Wolf her career) to even “joking” about hoping Kellyanne Conway gets stuck under a tree.
That, and much more, was what Michelle Wolf “contributed” to the night. And while she is receiving some backlash, just about everyone will forget about it in less than a week. Michelle Wolf will not be reprimanded, but rather praised for the hate that she spewed that night.
But this is the reality of the Left. They can offend and insult all they want, provided they are offending and insulting Christians, conservatives and/or Trump supporters, and nary a bad rep will they get from it.
If you, as a conservative, make a gay joke, the Left will try their best to utterly annihilate you for being “offensive”. But they are more than allowed to do the same, even with gay jokes. Why? Because in their minds, they are supportive of gay people and thus are allowed to make a gay joke. That’s not being supportive, that’s being abusive. It’s the same as making a joke about your spouse and thinking it’s ok because you support them and are on their side. That’s not love, nor support, but abuse.
If a conservative makes a Muslim joke, they are attacked. If a liberal makes a Christian joke, they are revered and praised as though it’s a massive accomplishment, and as though it’s actually funny.
Leftists are allowed to be as offensive as they possibly want, even towards gay people, and all they have to do is offer an apology for it that doesn’t even have to sound sincere. Just look at Joy Reid. She made horrible homophobic comments against Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and even Barack Obama’s “Tranny Nanny” as she puts it. What has come of her? Not much.
Oh sure, she’s gotten slammed by conservatives, but that’s really nothing new. If she were worth my time, I’d be slamming her more too. Really, the biggest thing that happened is that a gay rights group rescinded an award they gave to her over those old comments.
That oughta show her!
And homophobia isn’t the only thing that she has been charged with (at least by conservatives). She has also “insulted” Islam (though through concepts that actually make a lot of sense, but would be berated by today’s Left).
Back in 2006, a Danish paper published several cartoons of the prophet Mohammed. Naturally, that caused anger from the Muslim population. Joy Reid, upon weighing in on this, surprisingly said: “Uh… Ok… I’m not sure what we’re learning here (referencing an American Muslim group calling this a ‘learning experience’), except that the current iterations of Islam are largely incompatible with Western notions of free speech and expression, and thus, I’d say, with the Bushian dream of Western style democracy for all.” She also said that it would be naïve to believe Muslims would embrace free speech.
Today, that comment, while still truthful and makes sense, would be met with gasps of shock by people. Not one person on the Left would dare say something along the lines of Islam being incompatible with Western civilization. And if they do, it’d be in the context of slamming Western civilization for not being compatible with Islam.
Again, what has come of Reid? Nothing of significance.
Need another example? How about that Fresno State professor who gloated over the death of Barbara Bush? Now, I chose to avoid that topic since I’m not a fan of the Bush’s whatsoever and I believe the professor was expressing her right to free speech (though it was still uncalled for and horrible). If it had been a conservative professor gloating over the death of, say, Obama’s wife or any Democrats’ wife, that professor would be sent packing immediately.
Free speech, in the Left’s view, does not extend to those they disagree with politically. No conservative voice is allowed to speak or utter a word of defiance against Leftism. The minute Kanye West diverged from the group-think of the Left, he was attacked. The minute Trump separated himself from the Left, he was attacked.
The minute a woman describes herself as a conservative, out the window go her rights and dignity. The minute a black person describes him or herself as a conservative, that person is not thinking for themselves and has been brainwashed by the vast right-wing conspiracy. The minute a Hispanic voices his or her support for Trump, they are made to look like a massive moron.
The Left HATES everyone and everything that isn’t like them. They hate black people (historically, they always have and always will, if through different means), they hate women, they hate Christians. They hate anyone who isn’t like them, in a truly Hitlerian fashion.
The only thing that is keeping them from flat-out imprisoning people they don’t agree with is the Constitution of the United States.
Just look at the U.K. if you want to know what I’m talking about. They have arrested and convicted a YouTuber for uploading a video they didn’t like, arrested and convicted a man who was pranking Muslims and Mosques, and have arrested a man for flipping off a traffic camera.
That is what authoritarianism looks like. If you do anything that even slightly angers the people in power, or if you do something that they don’t like, there is nothing stopping them from destroying you.
And that is precisely what the Left hopes to accomplish one day. Wolf’s monologue perfectly embodies that desire. She very clearly hates Trump and everyone who supports him and works for him. She truly hates conservatives, Christians and pro-Lifers. She wishes the Left had the power to utterly silence and destroy any and all opposition.
That sentiment expands to every hardcore Leftist. Every action they undertake, from barring conservatives from speaking at college campuses to mass-mob attacking conservatives for speaking their minds, to even having judges perverting the Constitution (remember the judge that basically ordered Trump to reinstate the unconstitutional DACA act?) is all in the hopes of one day ridding this country of its basic founding principles and documents and turning this country into what every other country in the world is: a s**thole.
And what is driving that desire? Hatred.
The Left’s version of love is hate. The Left’s version of good is evil. The Left’s version of right is wrong.
The Left lives in a world of perpetual hatred for anything that isn’t like them. All they need is a swastika band on their arms and they embody the 21st century version of Nazis.
“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil; who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.”
February is widely known as Black History Month. A month when people honor African-Americans who have sought and/or achieved to make great strides towards making all people equal under the law regardless of race. But today’s Leftists miss that point entirely.
Recently, the Boston Police Department tweeted this: “In honor of #BlackHistoryMonth we pay tribute to @celtics legend #RedAuerbach for being the 1st @NBA coach to draft a black player in 1950, field an all African-American starting five in 1964 and hire the league’s 1st African-American head coach (Bill Russell) in 1966.”
Of course, Leftists on social media were outraged that the BPD would honor a white man during Black History Month. Now do you see how they entirely miss the point people like Dr. King strived to make?
They are prioritizing Auerbach’s skin color over the content of his character and his actions. Red Auerbach drafted Bill Russell in 1956, being the first coach to do so. However, Russell was not the first African-American man to play in the NBA. That honor belongs to three other people: Earl Lloyd (who was the first African-American to play in an actual NBA game), Chuck Cooper and Nathaniel Clifton who were all drafted in 1950.
And funny enough, Chuck Cooper was drafted by the Boston Celtics thanks to Celtics owner Walter A. Brown, another white man.
From the tweet, we can see the great help Red Auerbach was to African-Americans in the NBA. As early as the 2015-16 NBA season, The Institute for Diversity and Ethnics in Sport (TIDES) of the University of Central Florida recorded that the NBA was 18.3% white, with this number including non-American whites such as Dirk Nowitzki and Kristaps Porzingis.
The NBA being mostly black is not surprising but a large reason it’s the way it is at this point in time is because of people like Red Auerbach and Walter A. Brown, who saw potential in players like Cooper and Russell, not skin color.
And remember, this is in the 1950’s and early 60’s. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was still a ways away from this and I remember reading that Bill Russell told stories about being discriminated against by hotel owners and restaurants whenever the team was travelling to away games.
So despite the great importance Red Auerbach was to African-Americans in the NBA, Leftists are more concerned with the fact that he was white and he’s being honored during Black History Month.
Not to equate him to Lincoln, but would it also be outrageous to honor Abraham Lincoln during Black History Month despite the GREAT things he did for African-Americans in the country? Would the fact that he was white diminish his actions or made them worthless?
Of course not, yet Leftists miss the point entirely. Eventually, the BPD was forced to apologize after comments made by idiots, including Boston City Counselor Tito Jackson, who said: “Only in Boston do the Boston Police honor Red Auerbach for Black History Month. So we already have the shortest month and now this.” “Please file this under Hell Nah aka Not Having it aka Not Ok…”
The BPD apologized by saying: “BPD realizes that an earlier tweet may have offended some and we apologize for that. Our intentions were never to offend. It has been taken down.”
And even the apology gets attacked: “This is a bad apology. You should say why black history is important and why a police department should be hyper-cognizant of that,” wrote one user.
Typical Leftist telling people what they “should” do. What the BPD “should” do is not give a damn what these sensitive little wusses think and honor someone WHO HAS HELPED AFRICAN-AMERICANS A GREAT DEAL DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE IS WHITE!
Another lunatic wrote: “This wasn’t an honest mistake, it was an idiotic move by a group clearly unconcerned and unfamiliar with anyone who’s not white.” You can’t see it, but his profile picture is that of a white guy. By his logic, isn’t he also unfamiliar with anyone who’s not white? By his logic, he doesn’t “understand the constant struggle non-whites go through.”
The BPD is literally honoring someone who helped black people in his sport. Only in Leftist America could that possibly be offensive and wrong.
And the funny thing is that it’s not really surprising. The Left has always hated anyone who’s not white and attacked those who helped black people. In a sense, these Leftists are doing on Twitter what the KKK did in their time. They’re harassing and (at least verbally) assaulting those helpful and supportive of black people.
By attacking the BPD for honoring a white man, these lunatics show themselves to be the racists that they truly are. They don’t care what Red did. They care that he was white and they care that he’s being honored during Black History Month.
Frankly, the BPD is more progressive (as in actually forward-thinking, not communist) than those who attack them. They see what Red did for African-Americans in the NBA and honor his actions, ignoring the fact that he was white because that fact is entirely irrelevant. It’s these “progressive” social justice warriors who should apologize and be ashamed of themselves.
They’re the ones who are being insensitive here. So we shouldn’t honor white people who helped black people? We should only honor black people who helped black people? That’s what I mean when I say they miss Dr. King’s message.
His message was that of hope for the future. That his children would live in a world where they wouldn’t be judged by the color of their skin, but be judged by the content of their characters. And yet, these lunatic social justice warriors decide to focus on Red’s skin color rather than what he did for African-Americans. And they choose to attack the BPD for doing something that’s right.
Hatred simply lives and thrives in the Left’s heart. Whether it’s hatred for black people, white people, it doesn’t matter. Ironically, their hatred is less racist than they are.
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”
It’s expected to find a good amount of Trump supporters in the United States. After all, over 60 million people voted for him in 2016. What isn’t expected, however, is to find support for Trump outside of the U.S. Even less expected is to find support for Trump in the leader of an African country.
In fact, President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni sounded like any other Trump supporter you’d meet here in the States. Speaking to lawmakers at the East African Legislative Assembly, Museveni said: “America has got one of the best presidents ever. Mr. Trump. I love Trump. I love Trump because he talks to Africans frankly. I don’t know if he’s misquoted or whatever, but when he speaks, I like him because he speaks frankly.”
How is it that in a couple of sentences, the president of Uganda has spoken far better of Trump than AMERICAN MEDIA?!
Regardless, we return to President Museveni. He continues with: “The Africans need to solve their problems. They need to be strong.” And that’s not the only instance of him showing support for the POTUS.
Museveni has even written an article titled: “The Confusion, Ingratitude as well as danger of Western Liberals & the Trump Therapy.”
He writes: “I have been closely following… World and African political events for the last 56 years. In those 56 years, I have noticed many happenings, behaviours, etc. One of the groups that I have observed with interest are the Western “Liberals”, “Leftists”, etc. In particular, I have noticed the confusion, ingratitude and, therefore, danger of these groups.” Starting off strong, I see.
“Liberals are supposed to be people who are not conservative and hardliners in economic, political and social issues. Leftists are supposed to be progressive as far as the same issues are concerned… Suffice it to say that the freedom fighters from Africa, who have been fighting colonialism, neo-colonialism, slave trade and marginalization for the last 500 years, would have counted the Western Liberals and Leftists among our automatic allies because these should be people that should be fighting for freedom and justice for all peoples, including the formerly Colonized Peoples.”
“Instead, we notice confusion, ingratitude and, therefore, danger from these liberals and leftists… During the US campaign, I noticed President Trump using the words: ‘convergence rather than divergence,’ while handling international affairs. That is exactly what the Western Liberals and Leftists should have been looking for. Instead, we would spend endless hours arguing with the Western Liberals on matters on which we cannot have convergence bearing in mind that our societies were still pre-capitalist and traditional while theirs have been industrial for centuries now.”
“These are issues to do with family, forms of democracy, homosexuals, central planning versus economic liberalization, etc. One had to control irritation to politely get through these meetings. Yet matters of convergence were there and uncontested: fighting extremism and terrorism… modern education in natural sciences and social sciences; the emancipation of women; trade; democracy; etc. This is what, in brief, I regard as the confusion of the Western Liberals and Leftists… By the Western Liberals trying to impose all their views and values on everybody in the World, they generate not convergence but divergence and even conflict.”
It’s a rather lengthy article, but the best part comes in the final paragraph. When talking about powerful nations coming together to solve the world’s problems, Museveni writes: “This is where Mr. Trump comes in. He says: ‘Why do we not examine the possibility of working with Russia against common threats, such as terrorism?’ The liberals then shout that Mr. Trump must be having a secret agenda with Mr. Putin etc.”
Museveni has also praised President Trump multiple times on Twitter and, according to the Daily Wire: “A further review of Museveni’s Twitter account reveals no such praise or adoration for former President Barack Obama.”
Overall, I think it’s incredible to find such an ardent Trump supporter leading an African nation. Clearly, he’s not at all offended over the reported remarks made about countries such as Haiti and African nations. On contraire, he supports these remarks. He thinks that Africans should be stronger and look to solve their own problems. THAT is the mark of a leader. While accepting and even asking for help is ok, looking to make your nation stronger and your people stronger and solve your own problems is even better.
A strong leader wants to make his nation and people strong and does whatever he can to do that. That’s what Trump wants to do and is working very hard to do. That’s what Museveni wants to do and seemingly is working to do as well.
I’m also glad to see Museveni calling out the Left in this manner. While the Left claims that Trump is a divider, Museveni can see that Trump is trying to unite people and the world. He’s already helped out Russia with a potentially serious terrorist threat in St. Petersburg, which Russian President Vladimir Putin thanked the POTUS for his help. And last weekend, while the Women’s March was happening, Trump tweeted: “Beautiful weather all over our great country, a perfect day for all Women to March. Get out there now to celebrate the historic milestones and unprecedented economic success and wealth creation that has taken place over the last 12 months. Lowest female unemployment in 18 years!”
Of course, if you read my previous article, the Women’s March was nothing more than a massive hate-fest centered around attacks on Trump. Funny enough, this is where the ingratitude part of Museveni’s article comes in. Trump is doing wonders for the country, and these people were marching to reverse all of that.
So regardless of Trump’s call to support the women marching that day, the Left still spewed nothing but hatred and insults at him. Regardless of Trump’s effort to unite people in this march, the Left made sure to keep people divided.
It’s so obvious that even the president of an African nation was able to call out the Left’s b.s.
Regardless, I appreciate President Museveni’s words about our president.
1 Peter 3:8
“Finally, all of you, have unity of mind, sympathy, brotherly love, a tender heart, and a humble mind.”
Over this past weekend, two separate and very different marches occurred. One was the March for Life and the other was the Women’s March. And these two events highlight the characters of the opposing sides.
According to the Daily Wire, at the March for Life event: “Families proudly pushed their babies with Down syndrome – an abnormality we, as a society, are urgently told to dispose of – in their strollers with smiles on their faces; former abortion clinic workers held signs proclaiming that life matters; teens chanted about their love for babies and held clever and playful signs; single mothers boasted of their children they chose to keep thanks to pro-life pregnancy centers and religious organizations; a Congresswoman told the masses of the miracle birth of her daughter who was supposed to die upon delivery; and the faithful said prayers aloud in unison and sang church hymns.”
Overall, love was the main message of the March for Life.
In stark contrast, we see the hatred of the “Women’s March”, which in all reality is the “Hatred March”. Because that’s exactly what that march showcased.
Info Wars released a video of one of their team members attending the event. The video is over 20 minutes long, so I won’t talk about absolutely everything in it, but that’s fine. Most of the video is simply the same thing: angry, hateful protesters calling for the impeachment of our duly elected president, calling for supposed “women’s rights” that they already have or that they shouldn’t have - aka the “right” to kill their own children as though they were some sort of disease - and lots and lots of swearing.
Throughout the video, you would see those captured by the camera either flipping off the camera or the reporter himself (or both), you would see the protesters calling Info Wars fake news (which is hilarious), you would see the protesters voicing the same liberal talking points that Trump is a racist and a sexist despite having no proof of those claims and even going so far as to deny the fact that Trump has appointed more women to significant positions than any previous President.
They would often call Trump a rapist but ignore the fact that Bill Clinton, Harvey Weinstein and multiple other Democrats are rapists themselves. One of them even berated the Info Wars guys and twice spat on them.
Many of them were constantly cursing despite the fact that children were present. One of them even called the Info Wars guys “a**holes” right in front of his son who looked to be no older than 13. I saw a lot of children marching with their insane parents and some even holding signs such as “Justice = Equality”, despite the fact that that’s entirely untruthful given that Bill and Hillary Clinton are just two of many Democrats who should be in jail at the moment.
But the overall message was clear: these people hate everyone and everything that isn't like them. I saw far more hateful signs attacking Trump than loving signs calling for unity and peace. In fact, I don’t remember having seen a single sign that didn’t either bash Trump or recite a liberal talking point such as “we’re all immigrants”, which funny enough, has nothing to do with women and thus proves the point that this was not a “women’s march” but a “hatred march”.
On the other hand, all I saw from the March for Life signs was love. That unborn children should be protected no matter what. One in particular makes the great point that “True feminists protect human life”. And that’s true. A true feminist would protect unborn girls. Someone who’s truly against racism would protect unborn minorities. Someone who’s for gay rights would protect the right of a potential future gay person.
And yet, all these people support abortion. They support the idea of euthanasia for minorities. Oh, did that come out of nowhere? Yeah, that’s what Margaret Sanger’s mission was. She founded Planned Parenthood for the benefit of eugenics. In other words, she founded Planned Parenthood so that “undesirables” wouldn’t get a chance at life.
In a 1934 article titled: “America Needs a Code for Babies”, Sanger said that the government should establish a code “for the better distribution of babies… to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit… No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for fatherhood… No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.”
I recall a liberal talking point being that the government should “stay out of women’s vaginas”. Well, the very founder of Planned Parenthood suggested that the government should control women’s vaginas through the same means they control someone’s right to drive. And funny enough, this is very similar to China’s “one child” policy, yet we don’t see these Leftists calling out China’s oppressive regime.
And this might even be a tough pill to swallow for liberals, but Sanger even accepted an invitation to speak to the women’s chapter of one of the biggest racist organizations in history: the Ku Klux Klan. In a letter to one of her associates, Clarence Gamble, she wrote: “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” This was a letter explaining why she hired black ministers to be her ambassadors to the black community.
And that’s not all. In 1938, she urged Americans to follow Nazi Germany’s path of eugenics. “In animal industry, the poor stock is not allowed to breed,” she wrote. “In gardens, the weeds are kept down.”
And that’s not her only affiliation with Nazis. Ernst Rudin, chief architect of the Nazi sterilization program, wrote an article on Sanger’s magazine “Birth Control Review” titled: “Eugenic Sterilization, an Urgent Need.”
Knowing this, I’m not really surprised that the protesters at the “Women’s March” were so hateful and angry. The very founder of Planned Parenthood was a hateful, angry Nazi-sympathizer who sought to eradicate the African-American population and allow the government to have control of people’s reproductive endeavors.
The evidence is clear: the Left is full of hateful bigots and the Right is full of loving and compassionate people who love life.
“Hatred stirs up strife, but love covers all offenses.”
It’s pretty much a fact of life that no matter what you do, there will always be people who hate you. If you’re a Trump, this is very much the case.
During Christmas time, the Trump family was spending the holiday together in Palm Beach, Florida. Aside from spending time together, they also enjoyed some activities that only places like Florida can offer during winter. One of which was a day fishing.
Ivanka’s young son, Joseph Frederick Kushner, managed to catch a fish. So, like any proud mother would do in the digital age, Ivanka took some pictures of it and shared it on her social media.
She took four pictures, one of which showed a confederate flag… on a different boat… several hundreds of feet from their own fishing boat. Yep, that’s what the Left is outraged about. And not only are they outraged, they also theorize that the flag was planted there on purpose to “show that the Trumps are racists”.
While none of the comments (at least the ones I’ve seen) are really nasty or offensive, some of them do show that the commenter believes she meant for the flag to be in the background of the picture.
“Hey, Ivanka Trump, what’s up with the confederate flag in the background up the upper picture?”, asks one Twitter user using rather incorrect grammar. “… you should probably delete the second photo, hun,” suggested another.
But it’s not just random liberals on Twitter commenting on the photo. Steve Silberman, writer for Wired magazine, commented: “It’s karma. They can’t escape it. From Ivanka Trump’s tweet this morning.”
And Amy DuBois Barnett said: “Nice confederate flag in the background… #complicit #resist”.
The Left just loves to look for things that offends them. For anything that will get them angry. They can’t be happy and must always look to be negative about something.
You can see the picture at the top. Does that look like Ivanka was looking to send a message to black people that she is in any way racist? Does it look like she’s trying to tell people that her entire family is racist? No sane person would believe so. Still, the insane Left tries to attack Ivanka for that little detail in the photo.
Meanwhile, none of them mention how prominent Democrat Robert Byrd was a member of the Klan and was photographed holding the Klan hood while wearing the Klan robes. Robes which, might I add, feature the confederate flag.
None of them mention how Bill and Hillary Clinton viewed Robert Byrd as their mentor.
None of them mention how it was the Democrat South that wanted to keep slaves and opposed Republican Party founder Abraham Lincoln to the point of civil war.
None of them mention how African-American unemployment rates have hit a 17-year-low under Trump.
But sure, the Trumps are the racists. Give me a break.
Most people would’ve looked at the pictures and not thought much of it other than “huh. Ok.”
And, as you know, I try to look at things from multiple perspectives sometimes. But even looking at it from a liberal’s point of view, I still wouldn’t have thought much of it, much less have made a comment. Maybe I would’ve thought something bad about it, but not really paid it too much attention.
But Leftists love to hate people when given the chance. Hate lives rent-free in their hearts. The Left’s entire history has been nothing but hatred. Hatred of Native Americans (looking at you, Andrew Jackson). Hatred of black people. Hatred of Jews. Hatred of Christians. Hatred of freedom. Hatred of the concept of family. Hatred of Jesus Christ Himself.
The Left requires nearly no reason to hate someone. In time, I wouldn’t be surprised if they come to hate Barron Trump or any of Trump’s grandchildren. Just being related to the current President will garner hatred unless you denounce him.
I have no doubt that, given the chance, the Left would harass Barron into politically betraying his father.
And in this particular case, they really have no half-way decent excuse for their behavior.
If you remember back during the summer, Hurricane Harvey hit Texas. Amid the storm, a terrified hawk sought refuge in a good Samaritan’s cab and was given care by said Samaritan. During one of the update videos, the Samaritan briefly showed a couple of confederate flags hung on his wall. Despite them not being anywhere near the topic of the video, YouTube commenters still attacked him for having that flag in his home.
And while I would still defend his decision to hang that flag in his own property, I know that he had it there on purpose. But the flag shown in Ivanka’s picture was shown by accident, with no malignant intentions behind it (frankly, the good Samaritan had no malignant intentions showing his own flags).
But this is Christmas time and I’m filled with the spirit of giving. And what I’m giving is a taste of the Left’s own medicine.
May I remind you that Kathy Griffin showed a grotesque and very mature picture of a beheaded Donald Trump being held by the “hair” by said “celebrity” in the style of an ISIS picture? How come there’s more Leftist outrage over Ivanka’s picture than there was over that clearly malignantly-intended photo?
Why are they ok with the brutalized and beheaded sculpture of the current POTUS? Why are they ok with Snoop Dogg releasing a music video showing a clown dressed as Trump being shot by a fake gun by the high-as-a-kite rapper?
Why are they ok with showing these ill-intended and grotesque things but flip the heck out whenever they see a confederate flag?
The answer to those questions is what I’ve been talking about in this article: hatred.
They hate Trump to the point where they have dreams of killing him. They hate Trump for a myriad of reasons and all wish to see him dealt with. Either by impeachment, resignation or assassination, they want Trump gone.
This is just how hateful they are. How insane they are. How evil they are.
An innocent picture of a toddler filled with pride over catching a fish is turned into rage fuel for the Left simply because there’s a confederate flag in the background far away from the focus of the photo.
Have I mentioned that the Left disgusts me?
“O you who love the Lord, hate evil! He preserves the lives of his saints; he delivers them from the hand of the wicked.”
On Thursday August 17th, 2017, a van rammed into a crowd of people in Barcelona which has killed 13 people and injured 50 others. This attack was merely one of two attacks happening within two days with the same device: a vehicle, in Spain. The other was a similar attack in Cambrils, though this one was perpetrated by 5 people who have been killed by the local law enforcement.
And even though this is a clear terrorist attack, which ISIS has already claimed responsibility for, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer attempted to make a comparison to the Charlottesville driver that killed one and injured a dozen others with his vehicle, saying that it might be a ‘copycat’ attack of what happened in Charlottesville.
CNN national security correspondent Jim Sciutto began with: “In light of the uproar of the last several days, five days apart you have a white supremacist in Charlottesville use a vehicle to kill, and here you have attackers at least following the modus operandi of terrorists using vehicles apparently to kill as well, and those shared tactics that should be alarming.”
To which Blitzer responded with: “There will be questions about copycats. There will be questions if what happened in Barcelona was at all a copycat version of what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia. Even though there may be different characters, different political ambitions, they used the same killing device: a vehicle going at high speed into a group, a large group of pedestrians.”
Oh, sure, ignore the fact that terrorists have been using vehicles to run into crowds of people for years now. No, “THIS is nothing but a copycat attack, influenced by the white supremacist in Charlottesville, and therefore, influenced by Donald Trump!” Give me a break. Let’s not forget that a terrorist in Nice, France killed 84 people with a truck.
This attack has absolutely nothing to do with Charlottesville, but the media wants to draw comparisons to keep the story fresh in people’s minds. The media wants to remind everyone of what happened that last Saturday and the wave of emotions they felt over that weekend at the beginning of the week. They want to keep that story going, because that’s a story that they think will help them win in 2018 and 2020.
Charlottesville has reignited the fire within Antifa and BLM. For a long time now, there hasn’t been a white police officer killing an “innocent” black kid. And BLM has had little to do. But this Charlottesville protest was just what the Left needed to reignite the flame within those Leftist groups to fight Donald Trump, whom has nothing to do with white supremacists or the KKK.
Over the past few days, we’ve seen statue after statue being vandalized and illegally torn down. Even LINCOLN’s statues in Chicago and D.C. have been vandalized. The statue of the very man that FREED THE SLAVES has been vandalized by people who clearly don’t know their history.
These kinds of things are great for the Left. They see riots and incivility and they will quickly blame Trump for it, even though they are initiated by the Left. From Ferguson, to Berkeley to Charlottesville, the violence of these riots are all on the Left. Let’s not forget that the police in Charlottesville were ORDERED to stand down. The violence at Charlottesville is entirely on the Left.
And they are proud of it. They incited the violence there and are trying to put the blame on Trump. And the worst part it is: it’s succeeding… to an extent. I know what the Left is about and I place the blame on them for what happened in Charlottesville. After all, THERE WAS ONLY ONE SIDE THERE! So I won’t be convinced by anyone that Trump is racist or incites racists. But there are a lot of people out there that let others tell them what to think and believe.
Let me remind you of something Mika Brzezinski said: “[Trump] is trying to undermine the media… he could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think. And that is our job.” She publicly admitted that the media’s job is to control what people think. And they are capable of doing just that. Not with everyone, but with a lot of people for sure.
They are able to place the blame of Charlottesville on Trump and their mindless followers gladly eat up what they say. And so, when they see Wolf Blitzer trying to draw comparisons between Barcelona and Charlottesville, many in his audience will believe what he’s saying. That the terrorists in Barcelona were influenced by the events in Charlottesville.
Even though terrorists have been using vehicles FOR YEARS, the media will attempt to ignore that fact and try to bring people’s attention back into Charlottesville. Because they don’t frankly care about what happens in the world. About what ISIS carries out. No - their main objective is to destroy Trump. And in a story where the main focus should be the atrocities that happened in Barcelona over the past couple of days, Wolf Blitzer made it known that he couldn’t care less about it and simply wanted to return the focus to Charlottesville to further blame Trump.
It’s completely ridiculous to draw a comparison between what happened in Charlottesville and Barcelona. The only thing they have in common is that both events had something to do with a vehicle. But the Left just wants people to still be angry with Trump.
George Washington had it right when he said: “If the freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” Every day, the Left wants to take away freedom of speech from conservatives. It’s their objective to control people’s thoughts and beliefs. Mika thinks that the media is, or at least it should be, in control of people’s thoughts. And people like Trump stand clear in the way of the Left’s objectives.
They want to destroy Trump so that they can get one step closer to their true goal: complete destruction of the United States of America as founded and rebuild it as an authoritarian socialist state. But for as long as there are people like you and me, people who are willing to fight for our country and defeat the Left at every turn, they won't succeed. The Left foolishly believes they are in the majority. That most people think the way they do. But for the last half a year, with the 2016 presidential election and the following special elections in key states, we’ve shown them that support for the President is not at 34%, as they report.
And the more the Left attacks the President; the bigger their efforts become to illegally take him out of office, the stronger our support for him gets. The riot in Charlottesville was nothing but a showcase of the Left’s hateful history (with the KKK and neo-Nazis) and their hateful present (with BLM and Antifa). And for as long as we can recognize and expose the Left for the evil and hateful people that they truly are, I doubt they will have much luck in future elections.
“Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed.”
The biggest story of this past weekend was the Charlottesville, VA protest of white nationalists and neo-Nazis, which turned largely violent once Antifa and BLM showed up. Don’t misunderstand, I’m not defending white nationalists here. Why would I? THEY’RE LEFTISTS TOO!
The social media world blew up this past weekend due to that protest by the neo-Nazis. Even more so when Antifa and BLM showed up and when a car plowed into Antifa counter-protesters, killing one and injuring a dozen others. The driver of that vehicle has been identified as James Alex Fields Jr. Someone who is a Nazi. But regardless, both sides have one common root: THEY'RE ALL LEFTISTS!
The media wants you to believe that the riot at Charlottesville is because of Trump. It’s not just the media, leftist celebrities and even Charlottesville’s mayor blamed Trump for this. Well, I would like to blame the centuries of Leftist hatred for anyone that is or thinks differently from them. And I’m not just talking about the American Left. Hitler’s Nazi party literally stood for National Socialism. HITLER WAS ON THE SAME SIDE AS THE LEFT! But of course, that’s no surprise to me.
Do you know who Robert Carlyle Byrd was? He was a longtime member of the Ku Klux Klan, recruited 150 people to his local chapter, and even got elected as the highest rank in his local chapter: Exalted Cyclops. (I know, the Klan is crazy). He also happened to be a longtime Democrat Senator for West Virginia since 1959 until the time of his death on June 28th, 2010. Not to mention he was also Bill and Hillary Clinton’s mentor.
He was also opposed to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He did say, later in life, that he regretted doing that and having been a member of the Klan, but I wouldn’t be so quick to believe him. Largely because he was a liberal and they often lie to ensure they are seen by the media as good people. Both Bill and Hillary were opposed to gay marriage, until the media decided that it was cool to be gay and they should be allowed to marry.
But getting back on topic, Robert Byrd was the Clintons’ mentor for the longest time, as well as a noted racist and Ku Klux Klaner who also happened to have a “D” next to his name in Congress. None of this is a coincidence. THE KKK IS DEMOCRAT! We’ve already said that before, but it’s important that we restate it here with the latest events. White nationalists don’t belong with the Republican Party or with conservatives. White nationalists are SOCIALISTS AND LEFTISTS THEMSELVES!
Which is why when Trump said “We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence, on many sides.”, I would have to respectfully disagree. There weren’t multiple sides in Charlottesville. THERE WAS ONLY ONE: THE LEFT! I understand where the President is coming from. Every side has extremists. BUT NAZIS ARE LEFTISTS! And even that comment is getting the Left to condemn him for his “failure” to condemn the white nationalists. In the Left’s eyes, he will never do anything right.
But Trump is not responsible in any way, shape or form for the events in Charlottesville. Hatred is deeply rooted in the Democrat Party. THEY were the ones that FOUGHT AND KILLED to keep slaves. Not that liberals know that, apparently. There are people that think the Democrat Party of the Civil War is today’s Republican party… seriously. I've recently debated a leftist over that and he’s convinced those Democrats are today’s Republicans and that Lincoln didn’t found the Republican Party and even thought Lincoln would be a Democrat if he were alive today!
But back to history, after the Confederacy fell, the Democrats created the Ku Klux Klan and targeted black people because they would vote Republican at the time (of course black people would vote Republican - Democrats wanted TO KEEP THEM ENSLAVED!).
And Nazism isn’t very different. Like the American Left, Hitler sought to confiscate civilians’ guns because he knew that people would be able to rise against him if they had weapons. The difference is that Hitler succeeded and it led to the most famous (or rather, infamous) genocide in world history. Communist countries are very much the same, and they too have killed northwards of 100 million people across all communist states. The Democrat Party, for the longest time, has been the near equivalent to Hitler’s Nazi party, or Lenin’s Communist Party. In fact, Nazi Germany was INSPIRED by the American Democrat party - all they did was replace the term 'black' with 'Jew' in all of their oppressive policies. The KKK killed black people, the Nazis killed Jews.
The only difference amongst all three is that the Democrat Party is limited by the U.S. Constitution (which only CONSERVATIVES are trying to preserve), and so they can’t just mass kill everyone that differs in opinion from them. Granted, that didn’t stop them when it came to assassinating Lincoln and JFK (who was too right-wing and too Christian for the Democrats’ liking). But the reason they are not able to do the same thing Hitler, Lenin and Stalin did (not to mention the other communist dictators) is because Christians impeded the government from having too much power at the time of the founding of the country.
The Constitution has impeded the Left from doing precisely what they want, and so, they organize riots like the ones in Charlottesville to attack the 1st Amendment. Like I said, the only side there was the Left. So I wouldn’t put it past Soros to fund those white nationalist and neo-Nazis. He is, after all, ONE OF THEM! So it’s erroneous to say that what happened in Charlottesville is Trump’s or any Republican’s fault.
Hatred in America is born in the Democrat Party. THEY are the ones responsible for this.
“I hate the assembly of evildoers, and I will not sit with the wicked.”
YES!!! Absolutely yes! Let me be crystal clear here: THE LEFT HATES ITS OPPOSITION WITH EVERY FIBER OF THEIR BEING! The last article that I wrote lists a few cases in which the Left deals with its opposition using deadly methods. But today, I want to narrow down one of the roots for shootings such as the one in Virginia. I want to talk about the influence celebrities have on people.
Many people view celebrities as idols. They want to be just like them. Act and look just like them. And they will follow every little thing these celebrities say. Sadly, this also means that, when a celebrity HATES someone, that celebrity’s fans will also hate that person. And Donald Trump, while loved by a large majority of the country, is also hated by many people, including many celebrities.
Breitbart recently wrote a story listing the “15 Times Celebrities Envisioned Violence Against Trump And The GOP”. Many of these celebrities are big stars on the world stage. Celebrities such as Madonna, Kathy Griffin, Snoop Dogg, Robert De Niro, Marilyn Manson and others (article doesn’t include Jim Carrey dreaming of beating up the president with a golf club). These celebrities have ALL incited violence against Trump and Republicans in general.
Kathy Griffin showed a bloody and severed head of Trump, Snoop Dogg made a music video of him shooting the president (who looks like a clown) with a fake gun, and Marilyn Manson made a music video showing a ‘dead’ Trump with Manson ripping pages out of the Bible. The rest have either tweeted or said on national television that they would love to inflict harm upon the president or Republicans.
And since there are people that love these celebrities (for some reason), they will agree with the sentiment these celebrities have against Trump. They will hate Trump themselves. And this isn’t something new, either. Remember John Hinckley? The guy that tried to kill Reagan? He tried to kill him so that he would get the attention of a celebrity that was in a movie about a guy who wanted to kill a presidential candidate. Hinckley thought that if he could successfully assassinate a sitting president, he would get the attention of Jodie Foster, with whom he was obsessed.
Celebrities, sadly, tend to have some sort of influence on people. And when celebrities hate someone, their fans will as well. And because they are so distant from God (both the celebrities and their fans), they are ok with someone’s life being taken, as long as that someone is someone they truly hate.
Kathy Griffin showed a horrible picture to the world of what she wishes she could do to the president. All the celebrities listed in Breitbart’s article expressed either in words or pictures exactly what they wish to do to the president or other Republicans. THEY SPREAD HATE! It’s rich, really, that they claim they are doing it all for love. That what they are fighting for is love. Well, let me tell you, that’s some seriously messed up love right there.
Madonna, in the Women’s March speech, said that she has “thought a lot about blowing up the White House.” And in the same speech she said that the Women’s March signified a “… revolution of love…” I’m sorry, but you can’t say one minute that you have thought about blowing up the White House, hoping to kill the President and other people in it as a result, and the next minute say that you’re fighting for love.
That’s the same logic as saying ISIS fights for peace in the world. By inciting violence, killing people that think differently from you, or making them submit to your will, you don’t create peace. You create OPPRESSION! The very kind of oppression the Founding Fathers fought against!
I’m not afraid to say that these nut-job celebrities are almost on-par with members of ISIS. Both wish to destroy Christianity. Both wish to kill the president. Both wish to inflict harm upon people who think differently from them. The only difference is that ISIS often actually KILLS THE PEOPLE THEY SAY THEY WISH TO KILL!
THAT is the biggest difference between the two. But that difference makes no difference (no pun intended) when one of these celebrity’s fans goes out and tries to, or actually successfully kills people. Hodgkinson, the criminal who tried to kill Republicans in the Virginia shooting, was a HUGE Bernie supporter and life-long socialist. He’s someone who’s bought into every narrative the Left drives against Trump. And he’s no doubt seen all these celebrities say they wish to harm the president and/or other Republicans. So, in his mind, he thought it would be a terrific idea to actually go out and try to kill Republicans.
No doubt, he thought he would do far more damage than he achieved. No doubt he wanted to go after Trump too, but figured he’d find easier targets who are still the people he hates. And, in case you haven’t noticed, there is much silence coming from the Left on the shooting in Virginia.
I checked multiple celebrities’s twitter accounts. From Kathy Griffin’s, to Robert De Niro’s, to even the former President Barack Obama’s. NONE OF THEM EVEN TALKED ABOUT THE SHOOTING! The only person I saw talking about it was Hillary Clinton, if you can believe that. And all she said was the standard “My thoughts are with the victims” response. No condemnation of the shooter in the least. None of them care.
This is the result of being distant from God. Being distant from His righteousness. This is the result of being A LIBERAL. You grow up to not care about other people who think differently from you. And when someone tries to kill “the other people”, you either don’t care or flat out support the shooter for his actions. When you are raised to not want to follow God, and live your life hating those who do, these kinds of things tend to happen. Socialist sociopaths attempt mass murder against Republicans, Muslim Jihadists behead Christians and Jews, and the whole world becomes Hell for those who love God and Christ.
The Left fills people’s hearts with hatred. Hatred for Republicans. Hatred for Christians. And most of all, hatred for God. But do not be dismayed. You might be sad for this world. You might worry about the future of this country, of the President, and of your children. It’s natural to worry about those things. But there’s good news. None of this is permanent. This world as a whole is not permanent. The time will come when the Lord will take His children with Him to Paradise. And after that, He will destroy all that is Evil in this world, including the world itself.
If you’ve read the Book of Revelation, you know how the story of the world ends. The devil is ultimately defeated and those who follow Christ are saved from the evils of this world. There will be no pain, no sorrow, and certainly no evil in Heaven.
John 14:2-4, 6
“’My Father’s house has many rooms; if that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to prepare a place for you? And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am. You know the way to the place where I am going… I am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’”
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...