Donna Brazile, former DNC chairwoman, tweeted out on Sunday, October 8th, that “the Weinstein Company has taken the lead against sexual harassment and assault.” This tweet came as a result of the Weinstein Company firing their namesake executive after it’s been revealed that he has a history of sexual predation.
Now, why exactly is she being mocked here? Because there’s no way that the Weinstein Company was oblivious to Harvey’s sexual predatory behavior and actions FOR 30 YEARS! The company was founded in 2005, but people within Harvey’s circle in the company must’ve known about him doing these things for a lot longer than 12 years. The only reason Harvey was fired is because he got caught.
Many Twitter users bashed the ignorant comment, with some saying: “The Weinstein Co. has been in cover-up mode for YEARS. The only reason they fired him (which means nothing) is because he got caught.” As well as: “If getting caught with your pants down is ‘taking the lead against sexual harassment,’ you’re on the wrong end of the donkey.” And my personal favorite: “’The Germans have taken the lead against Jew-hatred’ – You (Brazile), in 1945”
The point they’re all trying to make is that the Weinstein Company hasn’t taken the lead on anything. They were fine with his behavior for as long as he didn’t get caught. Now, he got caught, so the Company chose to save themselves and fire him, all the while earning the praise and respect of clearly ignorant people on social media.
Like that last tweet said, it’s basically the equivalent of praising Nazi Germany after WWII for no longer being a nation that will actively pursue the execution Jews. The Nazis were defeated, that’s why they stopped. Harvey got caught, that’s why he got fired.
For as long as this dirty old man managed to not make his sexual exploitations known to the public, the Weinstein Company had no problems with him. Like I informed you earlier, the Company has been around for 12 years now. If they had any sort of problem with his behavior, we would’ve known about this WHEN BUSH WAS PRESIDENT!
According to The Daily Caller, “Twitter mocked Brazile for her tweet, arguing that it’s unlikely the Weinstein Company was oblivious about the many accusations before the New York Times report. She finally deleted her tweet on Monday morning after being relentlessly ridiculed.”
While I love to see that common sense ruled over ignorance on Twitter, I have to ask this question: why even write that tweet in the first place?
Leftists tend to want to be on people’s good side, so it simply makes sense to be against Harvey on this issue (even if they don’t flat out tear into him). Her focus wasn’t on Harvey, but sexual predation as a whole. She wanted people to know that she was against sexual predation… or so it appears at the surface.
We all know that Leftists, particularly former DNC chairpersons, don’t tweet or say things without a deeper purpose: to get donations. She may have thought that the Weinstein Company was a donor to the Democrat Party, and, to an extent, it was. But only for as long as Harvey was in it. HE was the major donor to the Democrat Party in his company. HE is the one who was admired by Hollywood and Leftists everywhere (except the women he assaulted), because HE was the one who was the big-time donor of his company.
Now that HE’s the one in trouble and HE’s gone from the company he co-founded, there’s no advantage to being on the Weinstein Company’s good side. In fact, it’s a TERRIBLE idea to be on their good side. Because being on their good side means being on Harvey’s BAD side. If they condemn his actions, they’ll be turning away an important donor to their Party. And with the state the Democrats currently are in, they don’t want to turn away any sort of money.
Not that raising money will win them elections. If anything, I think people are less likely to vote Democrat now than they were in the 2016 Election, but money is still very much important. And if they hope to fight against the Trump agenda, they’ll need plenty of it, so turning away a major donor such as Harvey just to praise his company is not a good idea for them.
I believe that is also the reason she deleted her tweet in the first place. While I would love to believe it was because of the constant ridicule she gets (which she will receive no matter what she says), I think this is more than simply ego or hurt feelings. This is most likely about the potential money the Democrat Party could continue to receive from Harvey.
I’ve said in the past that the Left doesn’t care about women if a liberal man wants to do stuff to them. I’ve also said that the reason is because, if that liberal man is useful to the Party, they are okay with him being a rapist. In this case, Harvey’s use was largely monetary. Of course, he also makes sure to use social media to show that he’s a solid Leftist, but the Democrat Party likes him because he’s a donor too.
To the Democrats, if you’re either donating to them or are a strong part of the communist agenda, you are free to be as vile and repulsive a human being as you want, provided that you don’t get caught (or even after you get caught, really). Harvey managed to do that for THIRTY YEARS. For that long, this despicable human being was revered by Leftists, knowing just what kind of disgusting excuse for a man he was, and it was fine. It was fine because he is one of them. Even now, they refuse to strongly go after him because of the potential money he could donate if they kept their mouths shut.
In the same way he paid off women to not say anything about the things he did to them, he’s also paying off the Democrats to not say anything by the way of potential donations. The Democrat Party is the living embodiment of the phrase “for the right price”. They are the living embodiment of greed.
Beyond even that, they are the embodiment of SIN.
“The acts of the flesh are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the Kingdom of God.”
Saturday Night Live typically loves to poke fun at current events, particularly if they involve the President. In their latest show, they made sure to slam and mock the President as much as they could, talked about the horrible Vegas shooting, made a skit on O.J. being released from prison, and made a tribute to the late Tom Petty. But one thing they chose not to do anything about is Harvey Weinstein’s sexual harassment case.
Now, I don’t particularly care what SNL shows or doesn’t show. However, what they chose to say was the reason for not mentioning Weinstein is what raises eyebrows.
According to Fox News: “SNL creator Lorne Michaels said they decided not to go after Weinstein because he’s from New York.” Adding that “It’s a New York thing.”
What is? Rape? Rape is a ‘New York thing’? Sexual harassment? Sexual predatory? That’s not a New York thing, that’s a Leftist thing. It’s a Bill Clinton thing. It’s a Bill Cosby thing. It’s an Anthony Weiner thing. IT’S A LEFTIST THING!
But what a poor and gutless excuse to give. First of all, even if it was “a New York thing”, that doesn’t excuse Weinstein or any man from the egregious acts he committed to women. It’s just not right. Second of all, Trump is from New York and they mock him every single week! So it’s not the fact that Weinstein is from New York that is the reason they chose not to mention him.
They chose not to mention him or make fun of him because they’re on his side and he’s on theirs. He’s a Leftist through and through. He’s even trying his best not to be savaged by people on his side by being an ultra-liberal and constantly attacking gun owners and Trump. And he’s gonna get away with it too, at least with his Leftist buddies.
Whatever the court decides his punishment will be is largely irrelevant. He’s still going to be supported by the hypocritical Left no matter what. The media will make sure to bury this story as much as they can and as fast as they can, only slightly reporting the result of the case while at the same time trying to put a positive or at least VERY neutral spin on it.
The Left doesn’t honestly care about what Weinstein did. For their own reputations, celebrities like Meryl Streep will make sure to give him a slight tap on the wrist for it, and never bring it up again. The Left isn’t outraged at what Weinstein did because he’s on their side.
They’ve made up countless stories about Trump being sexist and a predator, saying that he wants to “grab women by the p***y” and that he wants to do it with his daughter. Meanwhile, they have an ACTUAL predator right in front of them and they slightly say “bad boy, bad!” and then move on like nothing happened!
SNL made sure not to do anything that would make things look worse for Weinstein, even though what he did is horrible and nothing they can do or say will make it seem less than horrible. In fact, their INACTION and their lack of speaking out against him makes things more horrible.
The Left is showing their true colors here. I remember Hillary Clinton tweeting: “To all the little girls watching… never doubt that you are valuable and powerful & deserving of every chance & opportunity in the world”. What was missing from that tweet was: “unless a liberal man wants to do stuff to you. Then, you have no value, no power, and are not deserving of any chance or any opportunity in the world.”
She’s gone after women who have come out against her predator husband, as has the Left back when it was a major story. Now, Weinstein has been exposed as having a 30 YEAR TRACK RECORD OF PREDATORY BEHAVIOR AND ACTIONS and they are doing much of the same! They are trying to, if not destroy the women he’s attacked, at least make it seem like it’s no big deal. Because to them, it really is no big deal.
For all their claims that women should have more power, they sure don’t really think so when a liberal man wants to do stuff to them. To them, women should have power only until a predator comes along and decides he wants to do stuff to them, as long as he says he’s a liberal and says he’s against Trump.
And for all the talk about Hillary Clinton being good for women, she sure hates the ones that didn’t vote for her. She has said that the women who voted for Trump were, in essence, “forced” to vote for him by their husbands. That they voted against their own voice. How insulting is that? How disrespectful is that? She thinks nothing of conservative women, and she assumed ALL women would vote for her. And when she lost, she blames the wives of Trump supporters because they “caved” in some way and they voted wrong. That is deeply insulting and offensive to conservative women, not that it matters to her.
I recently wrote an article about a college course asking why women became conservative. One of the reasons is that liberalism does nothing to protect women. In the womb, they are in danger. Out of the womb, they are in danger. In the Middle East, they are in danger, and the Left either ignores the danger or PUTS THEM in danger.
Now, we see exactly how the Left feels: If you’re a liberal man and are against Donald Trump, you are more than welcome to use women like dolls and sex objects. You’ll be slightly told you’re bad and not to do it again, but nothing more will come out of that from the Left. You can be as despicable as they claim Trump is, but for as long as you’re on their side, it’s ok.
The Left is loud and clear about how they feel about women. Everything they’ve said up to this point is absolute bull crap and everything they’ve DONE up to this point proves just how little they care about women.
Women are worth so much more than The Left makes them out to be.
“Charm is deceitful and beauty is vain, but a woman who fears the Lord, she shall be praised.”
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...