During the 2020 Antifa/BLM riots, I declared that the gun control debate was over and no argument could ever be made that would legitimize or justify the restrictions of gun ownership and purchase. Well, the Left has sure tried hard to combat this, and since people tend to have short-term memories (particularly those who were only seeing BLM “protests” and nothing of the burning, looting and murders), the recent school shooting in Uvalde, Texas has seemingly somewhat brought back this asinine debate.
Quite conveniently, I might add, knowing the details of this shooting.
School shootings are great for the Left, particularly with what happened in this one. In general, they love school shootings because they get to use a vulnerable population – children – to spread a message of fear and outrage (though people have to also conveniently forget the Left murders children by the thousands every day through abortions). As morally corrupt a society we might live in today, it’s still not so morally corrupt that we don’t feel anger and sadness at situations such as Uvalde.
Anyone with a heart is made to feel sadness, anger and outrage at the fact that children were needlessly and senselessly slaughtered at the hands of an evil bastard, which is why the Left can take particular advantage whenever such a thing happens.
It’s particularly beneficial to the Left if a shooting happens with an AR-15, the Left’s most hated weapon. Of course, they don’t give a damn if it’s with a shotgun or handgun (as most often is the case in shootings). And, of course, they don’t care when 40 or more people are killed with guns in Democrat-run, gun control-heavy Chicago, because those murders are counterproductive to their argument.
But when a shooting like Uvalde’s happens, they can hardly contain their excitement (though they still shed crocodile tears at the children they didn’t get to kill in abortions).
There are a lot of details surrounding Uvalde (though also a lot of confusion, which I will get to momentarily), but the major points are the fact that the shooter was 18-years-old (old enough to use actual weapons of war in the military, but apparently not old enough to use non-weapons of war to protect themselves in the U.S.), used an AR-15 (again, the Left’s most hated weapon), he targeted an elementary school (thus, “m’uh children” bs from the Left) and seemingly inexplicably, the Uvalde police department let him rampage for a full hour as he slaughtered the 19 kids and two teachers (while also reportedly going into the school to save their own kids without engaging the shooter, which makes the “Back-the-Blue” crowd angry towards them).
There are other facts that the Left conveniently forgets (such as the fact that the shooter was at the very least a crossdresser and he was stopped by Border Patrol agents, aka good guys with guns), but those aforementioned are an absolute dream for them.
It’s yet another shooting, particularly in a school, so they get to go after guns in general like always, AND they get to “justify” their anti-cop rhetoric by showing their uselessness in this situation.
Of course, you’d also have to conveniently forget that gun laws would have to be enforced by the very police that the Left is maligning and draining of force (5,300 NYPD officers quit or retired in 2020, a 75% increase from the previous year, and 2021 wasn’t much different), so even gun control laws passed now would hardly be enforceable (though I’ve covered previously that even with normal amounts of police manpower, this would be impossible).
But forgetting all that inconvenient stuff, you have the Left’s dream school shooting scenario.
Except, of course, that it looks a bit too much like a false flag operation.
Like I said earlier, there is a lot of confusion regarding the details. For example, the fake news media (seemingly in an attempt to further malign the “good guy with a gun” argument) claimed that the bastard had been confronted by an armed school resource officer outside the school and exchanged gunfire with him. But later on, DPS Regional Director Victor Escalon told reporters that the bastard crashed a pick-up truck near the school, climbed a four-foot-high chain link fence, fired at the school as he approached, fired at two eyewitnesses at a funeral home nearby, and “was not confronted by anybody” outside the school, armed or not.
Escalon also said that there was no school resource officer on campus.
Another example is that there were reports that the bastard entered the school through a door which had been left propped open with a rock, almost as if it were inviting in the bastard. But DPS Press Secretary Ericka Miller told ABC News that investigators determined the door had been closed by a teacher, though the door was not locked (supposedly, it’s a door that locks itself).
Because of the conflicting reports, it’s impossible to determine what actually happened without having physically been there. I don’t trust the fake news media when they say that the bastard was confronted by an armed resource officer, and I don’t trust the government officials when they say the opposite. I don’t trust the media that reported the door had been propped open with a rock and I don’t trust the government official who contradicts the reporting.
The reason for this is that the fake news media has great incentive to lie about the details, and the Uvalde government officials have good incentive to lie as well because of the at-best disgustingly negligent and shameful behavior of the officers who allowed the bastard to have a full hour of rampaging in a school (while making sure their own kids were safe).
I don’t trust the words of the DPS official who cowardly claimed the officers “could’ve been shot” if they went in to engage the shooter, as though that wasn’t their job and as though they didn’t risk their lives to save their own kids anyway.
The fact that the cops only saved their own kids could be indicative of a false flag operation. The fact that the cops kept extremely concerned parents from being able to do anything (going so far as to tazing and placing in cuffs some of them) while they themselves stood around doing nothing (once they saved their own kids) for a whole hour could indicate a false flag operation. The fact that an 18-year-old somehow purchased two $5,000 rifles to perpetrate this act (supposedly the day he turned 18) could indicate a false flag operation. The fact that the bastard was known by authorities for threatening to shoot up a school when he was 14 yet nothing happened until last week could indicate a false flag operation.
And the fact that the FBI is kind of known for doing this crap, as they often encourage and entrap mentally ill individuals (like the bastard) into committing acts of terror (which they call “right-wing terror” to malign conservatives) could indicate a false flag operation.
It, of course, could also have been extreme negligence and evil on the part of the Uvalde police officers to let the shooter do whatever he wanted in the school while they saved their own kids (after all, if they knew this would happen, why allow their kids to even go to the school they know will be the site of a shooting?), but the deep confusion and earned distrust that the media and government have amassed recently as a result of bullcrapping us throughout a scamdemic and the theft of a presidential election naturally leads people to start looking behind the curtain.
I can’t say for certain that Uvalde was a false flag operation, but at this point, I’m far more willing to believe that it was than that it wasn’t, simply because of how much this shooting benefits the Left. In a midterm election year when they had absolutely nothing going for them as a result of Brandon’s policies, they conveniently get something to talk about: supposed “gun violence”. Not to mention that just a week prior to Uvalde, a “white supremacist” shot up a supermarket in Brooklyn (which the Left also has to conveniently forget that he left behind a manifesto which shows he was a communist, hated Fox News (not that one needs to be a commie to do so) and loved Rachel Maddow).
All of that convenience for the Left makes it far too suspicious to me, and likely to many others who were red pilled as a result of the scamdemic. We see how the machine operates. They made it too obvious in recent time.
“For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naïve.”
The golden rule regarding Democrats is that the fake news media will always cover for them, particularly if they are a prominent figure within the party. Almost nothing short of blatant groping of women (at least getting caught for it) or outright murder will get Democrats into trouble with the fake news media (and this one is dubious, seeing as Ted Kennedy probably got away with it). So one would have to be a major screw-up of catastrophic proportions in order to be bashed by the Leftist fake news media.
And for the first time since the botched Afghanistan withdrawal, that’s what Brandon has had to face, at least from one source.
With inflation reaching 8.5%, the highest in 40 years (this comparison is often used to bash Reagan, but people forget that those levels were part of his RECOVERY from the double-digit inflation numbers seen during the Carter years) and wages effectively shrinking in comparison to inflation growth, more and more people are being open about their distaste for Biden (there are, of course, those who always lie in polls to protect themselves from Leftist persecution) and it’s being reflected in polling. So much so, in fact, that CNN is beginning to notice it.
In the latest CNN poll, the ghost hand-shaker is seeing approval of just 39%. This wouldn’t usually be too bad, but seeing as this is an extremely friendly poll, that 39% (which is a low in this poll) is terrible. Almost as friendly Quinnipiac University had him at an abysmal 33% approval.
These results have led to a CNN panel consisting of Bloomberg White House correspondent Jordan Fabian, CNN Capitol Hill reporter Melanie Zanona, and Time Magazine national political correspondent Molly Ball, with host Abby Phillip weighing in on such numbers.
Phillip said: “It’s an environment of overall discontent,” in relation to Republicans disapproving due to (among other things) poor economic policies, and environmentalist wackos disapproving due to Biden resuming the sale of oil and gas leases on federal land (ironically, the only thing I have ever approved of this illegitimate regime).
She continued: “People correctly perceive that he’s not in control of the situation. And I think ever since that Afghanistan last summer, people have had – voters overall – have not had a sense of leadership from the White House, have not had a sense that there’s a president in control, who is strong and consistent and knows what he’s doing and can project a consistent message from one day or the next.”
A few things to comment on here. First, notice that she added “correct” when talking about a perception that Biden isn’t in control of the situation. This indicates that even she is in agreement with the statement. Even a CNN panelist believes that Brandon is completely fumbling the bag here and cannot get a hold of any situation, from inflation to even messaging on Ukraine (which we’ll get to momentarily).
The second thing is that the American people haven’t had a sense of leadership from the White House not since the Afghanistan disaster, but since January 20th, 2021, namely in the hours before Biden successfully stole the presidency. We haven’t had a leader in the White House since Trump. The only difference between then and now is that even the Left is beginning to agree that Biden is not a leader.
Finally, it’s indicative of how big a failure Brandon is that even people on his own side, in a panel from one of the most Democrat-friendly fake news sources out there, are not only reporting how unpopular he is, but also don’t try to make excuses too much about it.
During the height of the Afghanistan botch, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, BBC News and others called it how it was: a disaster. By-and-large, they didn’t pull many punches against Biden. Matter of fact, I saw more CNN headlines lambasting Biden over that than from other sources. And this is awfully reminiscent of that time. The Afghanistan disaster was a spectacular botch, so much so that even fake news sources had little choice but to call him out on it.
This time, however, it’s not one particularly noteworthy botch or screw-up. It’s the culmination of them which have led to poor numbers even by CNN standards.
Molly Ball went on to talk about the inconsistent and botched messaging surrounding the war on Ukraine, saying that Biden continues to “step on his own messaging”, such as the time that Brandon heavily suggested that American troops would be sent to Ukraine, and that Putin “cannot remain in power”, suggesting forceful regime change in a world superpower which the Obama administration had been trying to be extremely friendly with.
Phillip then went on to share multiple clips of vulnerable Democrats in Congress distancing themselves from Brandon, to which Ball said that this should ring “alarm bells” for the occupier.
“It is a sign that they sense that there is nothing to be gained by continuing to be allies of the president,” Ball said. This is a sentiment which could not be found with Trump, even after the 2020 steal.
Of course, early on, many (though not all) RINOs made sure to distance themselves from Trump, but pretty much all conservatives in Congress or running for a Congressional seat sought his endorsement and wanted to be close to him. As time went on, with the obvious popularity of the MAGA movement, wolves dressed as sheep also sought to be endorsed by him (only to turn around and vote to impeach him for b.s. reasons) and even today, any Republican running, regardless of what they think or said about Trump in the past, is seeking his endorsement (which unfortunately, he is way too loose in giving).
Whereas Republicans seek Trump’s endorsement and close ties (even the ones who hate him), some Democrats seek to distance themselves from the man who supposedly won the most votes in American electoral history.
To conclude, the panel discussed his plummeting support from younger generations, which typically are the most Democrat-friendly demographic. Fabian argued that Brandon is losing support among millennials and Gen Z because he “hasn’t delivered” on campaign promises like canceling student loan debt, which could be an accurate assessment (alongside the Obama-like crappy economy). According to a recent Gallup poll, Biden is down 21% with Gen Z and 19% with millennials.
Fabian said: “Those numbers are a tremendous failure for a Democratic president to have numbers like that among young voters.”
Indeed, seeing as the youngest voters (aside from the literal infants) are those most recently indoctrinated by the Marxist centers for diseducation that we call colleges. When a Democrat president (or in this case occupier of the Oval Office) is seeing massive drops in support from young voters, that is another major indication of how poor a job he is doing.
Be it because of not canceling student loan debt or the crappy economy, young people are getting fed up with Brandon, as is the rest of the country.
Of course, we didn’t vote to elect him, and his approval was always low (given how, again, we didn’t elect him), but people, by-and-large tend to not be as honest as they would be in these polls if they didn’t have to fear Leftist persecution. Even the numbers we are seeing, regardless of source, I believe to be unnaturally high, and that his real approval numbers are far closer to the teens.
But let us not simply be content with these numbers now. The midterms are half a year away and they will certainly try to pull some shenanigans to avoid total disaster come November.
1 Peter 5:8
“Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.”
To provide a bit of context to the situation, recently, the crowdfunding platform GiveSendGo was hacked and revealed the names of nearly 100,000 donors who gave money to the Canadian Freedom Convoy truckers, about half of which were small-dollar donations.
The piece of crap responsible for that went on to brag about it on TikTok, calling himself a “famous f***ing cyber-terrorist” during an unhinged rant. His name is Aubrey Cottle and supposedly the founder of hacktivist group “Anonymous” and is a crazy communist bastard who lives in Canada. And for those asking if this is committing the same “doxing” that this piece of crap (so tempted to say the stronger word) has led to doing, I’ll have you know that he is already rather famous, even having his own Wikipedia page.
But I do hope that God will do something about this cancer of the world.
In any case, Cottle isn’t the only cancer on this topic, because following this hack and the revealing of donors’ names, the evil fake news media tracked a number of these donors down and wrote the following type of email to them: “***, my name is ***. I’m a reporter at The Washington Post and am writing about leaked data on GiveSendGo contributions to the trucker convoy in Canada. Your name and email address are associated with a $40 contribution. Could you please tell me if this matches your records, and either call or reply to this email to share what motivated you to contribute to the campaign?”
In essence, they are practically telling these people “we know who you are and can find out where you work, live, hang out and everything we want about you.” It’s a form of terrorism not unlike mafiosos showing up at your house and “having coffee.”
The Post also wrote what Fox News describes as “a lengthy thread singling out the biggest donor and a map showing where the donations came from in the U.S.”
The mainstream media is outright evil and unapologetic about it. They will track down anyone who voices a dissenting opinion and ruin their lives. And they will grossly claim they are doing a service either to the country or to their party. They are evil scum of the earth who deserve to lose their jobs and go to prison.
One of the tweets concerning the GiveSendGo hack came from an Ottawa Citizen editor named Alison Mah who shared an article written by reporter Blair Crawford about a café owner who “was forced to shut down her business after receiving threats after her name appeared on the donor list,” reported Fox News.
What’s worse is that Mah and the article ensured that the blame fell on the café owner, pointing out that she “regrets making her $250 donation to the trucker convoy.”
It seems this act was so vile and putrid that even normally equally-as-putrid Ilhan Omar felt compelled to tweet: “I fail to see why any journalist felt the need to report on a shop owner making such a[n] insignificant donation rather than to get them harassed. It’s unconscionable and journalists need to do better.”
Seems that Omar missed the memo and forgot she’s supposed to side with the evil communist scum Stalinizing Canada and the U.S.
But if she’s sincere about this (making this an exceptionally rare case of a far-Leftist goon showing a modicum of a conscience), that ought to show just how vile and evil an act this was.
The news media in the U.S. and Canada have sought to it that they would track down and RUIN people’s lives over donations as small as $40. Donations made for the sake of brave truckers who 1) are sick and tired of the tyrannical bullcrap of vax mandates and 2) inadvertently proved that the pandemic is over because it’s been weeks of people mass gathering without masks and vaccines and not one trucker was sent to the ICU.
But because they are in the way of the Left’s fever dream of complete domination over their own countries, the government and far-Left media have sought to demonize them as racist terrorists (because racism always has to be a part of it, even when it makes absolutely no sense) whose livelihoods and lives ought to be ruined until they get “re-educated”.
Aubrey Cottle, The Washington Post, The Ottawa Citizen, Justin Castro, the bitch councilwoman who keeps calling the truckers “terrorists”, Canadian Banks and everyone involved in the attempted destruction of freedom-loving, ACTUAL peaceful protesters not only should, but WILL burn in Hell for a whole lot more than just this.
These people are evil, and do whatever they can to showcase that evil. I pray to God that He will smite these demons sooner rather than later.
“Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.’”
Can someone check if pigs can fly and Hell has frozen over? Because, perhaps for the first time ever, a news source not only admits to having lied about something major, but went so far as to apologize to its audience for doing so.
Before we go around celebrating anything, I should explain that it’s not an American fake news source (as you can tell from the title), but a Danish one, which apologized for “hypnotically” following their government’s narrative surrounding the Chinese coronavirus. They even outright admitted that “we failed,” with that being the very headline they used.
The newspaper goes on to admit: “For ALMOST two years, we – the press and the population – have been almost hypnotically preoccupied with the authorities’ daily coronavirus figures.” They also admit that they didn’t do their due diligence with differentiating between someone who died WITH the virus and someone who died FROM the virus.
“WE HAVE NOT been vigilant enough at the garden gate when the authorities were required to answer what it actually meant that people are hospitalized with corona and not because of corona. Because it makes a difference. A big difference.”
They even go so far as to assert that their politicians and authorities have “lied” about many aspects of the pandemic and as a result, they have lost the trust of the people (something I will return to in a moment).
The paper also begins to question the efficacy of the vaccines, as the authorities said they were the key to ending the pandemic but roughly a year after having full access to vaccines, the pandemic is still a thing.
“The vaccines are consistently referred to as our ‘superweapon.’ And our hospitals are called ‘superhospitals.’ Nevertheless, these super-hospitals are apparently maximally pressured, even though almost the entire population is armed with a super-weapon. Even children have been vaccinated on a huge scale, which has not been done in our neighboring countries.”
Slowly, but surely, people are beginning to wake up. Even in the world of fake news, the insanity can only go on for so long. They can only reject reality for so long until it makes them mad, or until they face the truth.
I don’t doubt for one second that Danish people stopped trusting their government and the news as a result of this mass deception operation. A big part of this is because such distrust has been building everywhere for the past few years.
I first talked about the French beginning to lose trust in the scientific community. Not too long ago, I talked about the Germans distrusting government figures. And in the last article, I talked about how even CNN has admitted that the CDC has become a “punch line,” as Brian Stelter said.
Now, we have a Danish newspaper admitting to “hypnotically” passing along whatever narrative the government told them to push without having an iota of journalistic integrity or curiosity about the whole ordeal.
But that’s not all. Like I said, I’d get back to the whole “people losing trust” thing. And so, here we are. Again, the French and Germans lost trust, CNN and other fake news media (because remember, that started with MSNBC’s Savannah Guthrie) losing trust in the CDC (not to mention people losing trust in CNN, as their ratings are down 90% from last year), and now, we have a NewsNation/Decision Desk HQ poll which shows the following:
When asked what sources they trust to deliver information regarding the Chinese coronavirus, 30.8% of respondents said they trusted Anthony Fauci, 49.8% said they trusted the CDC, FDA and other health authorities, 63.2% said they trusted their doctor, 15.5% said they trusted Joe Biden, and 10.2% said they trusted the fake news media.
The surveyors were asked to select all that applied, so they didn’t simply choose one over the other. They consciously chose to avoid certain sources if they didn’t trust them, and said they trusted others more.
And before any Leftist tries to argue that this was biased or skewed to the Right, 73.9% of the respondents were vaccinated. By-and-large, Leftists are more often vaccinated than those who claim to be on the Right, so this showed little bias to speak of. If anything, it showed more left-leaning bias.
Pretty much all of those numbers are awful, but not undeserved. I could imagine that, when the pandemic began, all of these entities (except for Biden, obviously) were considerably more trusted than they are today.
To me, it’s not that nearly one-in-three people still trust Fauci. It’s that only less than one-in-three people will trust Fauci anymore. And the more time that passes, the more lies he tells, and the more he is exposed by the likes of Project Veritas and Sen. Rand Paul, the fewer the people will be that trust him moving forward.
That less than 50% trust the CDC, FDA, etc. is also quite telling, as there is no doubt it used to be considerably higher, both when the pandemic first began and even before the pandemic. There was little reason to distrust them then, after all, at least for most people.
And, of course, hardly anyone trusts Brandon or the fake news media. And those are especially deserved, given they are nothing but agenda-driven demons. At least for the so-called “scientists” and “experts”, one could argue that monetary or social gain could be a factor as to why they say and do what they do. But for the most part, Brandon and the fake news media know what they're doing and the lies they are telling.
Remember, even in the article where I talked about CNN’s distrust for the CDC, Brian Stelter still told lies surrounding the Chinese coronavirus, so it’s not like they turned over a new leaf and began to tell the truth henceforth.
We’ve known these people to be horrific liars, so those numbers aren’t at all surprising.
But returning to the Danish newspaper, more than an apology for their actions, I hope and expect they will change their ways and not peddle false information to the people just because the government asked them to. Begin questioning the narrative. Regain whatever journalistic curiosity and integrity we believed existed, if it ever did, and start looking into the information given by their government, and question whether or not they are benefited by falsifying that information.
I also hope that other fake news sources begin to change their ways as well. They don’t HAVE to be fake news. They only are it because they willingly spread disinformation for a political agenda which is utterly detrimental to civilized society.
Unfortunately, I fear we may actually have to wait to see pigs flying and Hell freezing over before that happens.
“Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no salvation.”
It’s been a while since I have talked about a Campus Reform video, but their latest one is quite intriguing.
Campus Reform’s Addison Smith went to Georgetown University in Washington D.C. to ask students their thoughts on higher prices due to inflation affecting Thanksgiving.
He began the video by talking about how “Last year, Americans enjoyed the least expensive Thanksgiving dinner in decades. Just one year later, and on the heels of sky-high inflation, reports warn that this time around could be the most costly Thanksgiving feast in American history.”
One year is all Brandon needed to take us from the cheapest Thanksgiving ever to the most expensive one. I’d be impressed if I weren’t so pissed.
At any rate, throughout the video, Smith asks the students their thoughts on the rising prices, inflation and the economy in general. And while many largely weren’t paying much attention to these things, everyone ultimately agreed not only that inflation is pretty bad right now (particularly after being told that the price for Turkey is up 22% and gas is up 50% since last year), but that the situation was better under President Trump than under Brandon. Even one who didn’t want to admit this to be true couldn’t deny that it was true.
This is particularly bad for Brandon given that college students tend to be Leftists, or at least rather liberal, and typically vote for Democrats. Not ONE of these students could deny that Brandon has made things worse in the months that he has illegitimately been in power. This is rather reflective of the awful poll numbers even Leftist polls show for the child predator.
But the fake news media, as I have said in a previous article, will either minimize the damage of the Bidenflation we are seeing or will outright gaslight you into believing that things are going well. MSNBC’s Joy Reid has somehow managed to do both.
In one of her latest segments, Lying Joy Reid made the claim that inflation was just a “buzzword bandwagon” by Republicans, adding that the GOP wants people “to believe the economy isn’t doing well, that’s terrible. But, in reality, unemployment is at its lowest point since before the pandemic began,” and absurdly claims that that it’s okay that “prices are higher” because “Americans are also spending a record amount of money that was pent up during the pandemic, which economics 101 will tell you drives prices up, aka inflation.”
This idiot is really out here trying to tell us that we have inflation because people are spending more money and that creates inflation. That we have inflation because we have inflation.
What, there is high inflation and Americans are spending a record amount of money? I wonder if those two things are related in any way. Hmm.
But it’s not just that bit of idiocy that made up her moronic segment. After claiming that it’s okay that we have inflation because Americans are spending more money and unemployment is the lowest since the pandemic began (tens of millions lost their jobs, so this is far from an accomplishment. Not to mention millions are not even looking for work anymore because they either adapted to a new/better source of income or are content with dependency on government stimulus, so the real unemployment rate is far higher than these people claim), she then went on to blame AMERICAN CONSUMERS for the lowest consumer confidence in a decade and for believing that we are in a bad economy.
“[T]hat conflict between how much we want to spend and what we can get into our hands quickly is contributing to how pessimistic many Americans feel about the economy. Consumer confidence is its lowest in a decade.”
So it’s people’s fault that they think we have a bad economy, not the fact we have a bad economy. People want to spend their money and are disillusioned by the fact prices are much higher than under Trump, and it’s THEIR fault?
Hilariously, she then goes on to say: “So – so, the economy isn’t bad. It’s just that people are mad because everything is late and things cost a little bit more.”
Yeah, things being late and costing more is a sign of a GREAT economy.
And if that wasn’t enough, she then goes on to claim that the only reason this is happening or that we’re even talking about it is because… get this… Republicans want to get back in power.
Right, because one couldn’t make the same claim that the ONLY reason Leftist hacks like Reid are making all these claims is because they want Democrats to remain in power.
Make no mistake, that really is the only reason they are saying all this. They see how much Brandon is fumbling the bag, how unpopular he and his borderline-prostitute of a VP are, and how screwed the Democrats are for 2022.
So they lie and lie and lie, as they always have, to get the result they want. The economy was doing fantastic throughout Trump’s tenure (so much so that Obama repeatedly tried and failed to take credit for it), and they largely couldn’t attack it until the pandemic began. But any rational person could tell that the economy started doing poorly because of the decisions by governors and local authorities to shut everything down.
Now, Brandon doesn’t get that as an excuse. States have been open/opening back up for months now, even the deep blue ones. There is still insanity surrounding the virus, but the reason this is such a bad economy is because of Brandon’s own disastrous policies and the Democrats wanting to spend trillions upon trillions of dollars.
Odd how last year, under rather similar circumstances regarding the virus, we weren’t seeing such awful inflation rates. So the college students are correct in their assessment that things were better under Trump.
The biggest difference between this year and last year is who is at the helm. And we have a senile child abuser who isn’t even allowed to take any questions from the press apart from pre-approved ones leading this country (illegitimately at that).
One of the students in that Campus Reform video said that she was planning to go to Miami over Thanksgiving. Assuming she’s going to drive there, that is over 1000 miles of travel taking the shortest route. And that’s just on the way there, nevermind on the trip back. That girl is going to be spending a LOT of money on this trip just on gas alone, not to mention the food and other basic travel necessities she has to buy which have also had their prices gone up because of the Brandon administration.
But since Lying Joy Reid is rich, she doesn’t have to worry about inflation at all and has the gall to tell other people that they shouldn’t either.
“Let them eat cake”, as the saying goes of the out-of-touch jackasses.
“For they will soon fade like the grass and wither like the green herb.”
The fake news media, as should be plenty clear for all to see, has been trying to spread the fake news narrative that the vaccines to the Chinese coronavirus are safe and effective and that those who refuse to get the vaccine are risking death.
Operating under the assumption that we’re all as stupid as they are, one ABC News affiliate station in Detroit asked people on Facebook about dead unvaxxed loved ones who died from the Chinese coronavirus. Reality showed them the exact opposite of what they were looking for.
ABC News affiliate WXYZ in Detroit, Michigan went to Facebook and posted the following:
“After the vaccines were available to everyone, did you lose an unvaccinated loved one to COVID-19? If you’re willing to share your family’s story, please DM us your contact information. We may reach out for a story we’re working on.”
The post received around 40,000 responses, with pretty much all of them sharing heartbreaking stories of vaccinated loved ones having suffered an adverse effect or two, or outright dying shortly after getting vaxxed.
Obviously, I can’t share all of them, but I will share a good few of them to really drive the point.
First, from a woman who lost her mom to the jab: “Lost my Mom 10 days after she got her 2nd Pfizer jab. She couldn’t swallow or talk correctly the very next day… was hospitalized and basically never ‘woke up’ again. Was sent home on hospice after 5 days in the hospital and died at home 2 days later…”
Well, I’m sure that the ABC affiliate will be thrilled to know that the CDC counts people who died within 14 days of getting vaccinated as UNVACCINATED, and thus could use that story as part of their “unvaccinated loved ones who died from COVID” even though it’s clear that the virus didn’t kill this woman’s mother. And I frankly wouldn’t put it past these bastards to actually do something so horrible.
Another post, this time from a parent:
“My daughter 33 years old died 10 days after getting the shot. She had an enlarged heart and she had a terminal lung disease pulmonary hypertension! She shouldn’t of (sic) gotten the shot! Pfizer only first shot Bath New York.”
Another story: “My son’s classmate lost her mother from heart complications due to the vaccine.”
And another: “No but I know a teenager hospitalized myocarditis the day after the second Pfizer shot.”
An even more heartbreaking story than others:
“My daughter got the first dose of Moderna then conceived a baby. My grandson was stillborn with heart and brain malformations that a Pfizer VP said could happen during the 20th and 22nd day of conception. But hey he is a crazy guy right. Hmm. Not. Also the FDA won’t have full test results in regards to teratology (the study of abnormalities of physiological development in organisms during a lifetime) until 2025.”
“I have a friend that dies (sic) after receiving the Pfizer. Went to the Er with unexplained tremors the day after. They got the tremors to stop and released him. He died the next day.”
A post with two harrowing stories:
“My parent’s neighbor woke up the next morning after the shot suddenly completely deaf. His doctor told him it’s from the vaccine and if his hearing didn’t return within a few weeks he will be permanently deaf. He is now permanently deaf.
Our rabbi’s mentor (a very prestigious rabbi) was recovering from covid in a rehab facility. He was doing well, walking and about to be discharged home. The facility forced him to take the vaccine because it became their policy, even though he refused. He immediately developed paralysis in one arm. They then forced the second shot on him, he refused again, but the facility insisted. After the 2nd shot he developed complete, progressive paralysis and died.
Why do we not see these stories in the news? Why are journalists silent on the thousands of vaccine injuries leading to permanent disability and death? What happened to honest journalism? Please report these stories in the news!”
I have a feeling this person knows the answer to each of those questions. We don’t see these stories in the news because these stories undermine the narrative that the establishment wants to drive. They are silent on these stories because either they themselves want to drive the establishment narrative or, at best, they fear repercussions for reporting on such stories. I mean, Nikki Minaj is getting attacked by people from her own side simply for sharing a story about her cousin’s adverse effect to the vaccine and asking challenging questions about the vaccine.
So if she could borderline be cancelled for her “defiance” to the establishment narrative, so could any journalist. As to what happened to honest journalism, it’s frankly a wonder if there ever was such a thing in the first place.
In any case, a few more stories before a rather important and interesting one:
“My Dad started having problems after his first shot. But was bound and determined to get second shot. He died 5 days after second shot of a massive heart attack. He had no known heart problems before!”
“My father in law had the covid vax then had a stroke and died. They ruled out all the normal stroke causes. It was the vaccine and my husband will be reporting it to VAERS. Do a report on that!”
“No stories on that (dying unvaxxed). But a guy I knew got double shot and 2 days later dropped dead of a heart attack. Why don’t you report on THAT.”
“My fully vaccinated husband and I just recovered from covid and gave it to our unvaccinated children who we were trying to protect by getting the shots in the first place!!! How about covering that story instead of producing more propaganda. So much journalisming!!”
As I have said many times in the past, the vaccine doesn’t even do what it’s marketed as being capable of doing. It doesn’t protect the people getting the shot and it doesn’t protect other people. When they tell you “you have to get it to protect your loved ones” tell them two things: first, that makes no sense as no other vaccine works that way, and two, it doesn’t even manage to do that.
But now, let’s get to what I think is the most interesting story:
“The vaccine has become so politicized that even if it is useful for preventing serious illness or death from covid, they pretend that adverse effects don’t exist and so they don’t warn people and don’t actually monitor people for them. My mother had a hypertensive crisis from the moderna booster which could have caused a stroke, and now she has to be on blood pressure medication. I also developed high blood pressure after one dose of Pfizer (I had covid already in November and just thought a booster would be a good idea, but I monitored my BP because of what happened with my mom). We know a 22 year old woman who also developed hypertension and tachycardia after the second Pfizer dose in March, and she is now on medication but her tachycardia is still uncontrolled. They are endangering people’s lives by pretending the adverse effects don’t exist. They know they exist which is why they don’t want to give boosters yet. They think it will cause even more adverse effects.”
This is particularly important and significant because it’s not some random person sharing their account, but a REGISTERED NURSE. You know, someone with “expertise” in the subject matter who we should blindly trust, according to the Left.
So we have not only the accounts of numerous people (literally with tens of thousands more stories that I can’t cover due to time) who have either lost a loved one due to the vaccine or have had a loved one’s life utterly and irretrievably changed due to the vaccine, which monsters like the ABC News affiliate in Detroit continue to support unilaterally.
Now, one might make the assertion that these are merely anecdotes and not real data, and they could be lying. First, there is real data covering this, as I have written in the past. Second, consider that this is a local affiliate in deep-blue Detroit. While I doubt every single person commenting lives in Detroit, they are at least from that area if they follow that particular news affiliate, so by and large, many of these people are from deep-blue Detroit. Finally, even if they aren’t, are we really going to ignore the literal tens of thousands of stories from people and just assume that they are lying? Well, the Left will do what they can to ignore people’s plight, that’s for sure.
But would other, relatively honest people choose to ignore that? Would they comment on one of these people’s posts and charge “you’re lying” without any evidence? I doubt they would, and that’s why the Left would rather bury these kinds of stories.
The Nikki Minaj situation shows a lot of people, for the first time, what the establishment does to those who just ASK QUESTIONS regarding the vaccine: they get attacked, libeled, and have their character assassinated. And if that can happen to someone like Minaj, it can, and does, happen to a lot of other people who, in some cases, have had things happen to THEM.
Here's hoping that a lot more people’s eyes are opened to the reality of the toxic nature of the vaccine and that these stories come out more often in the mainstream.
“Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, but those who act faithfully are his delight.”
The fake news media is altogether biased and only operates within the bounds of their established Leftist agenda. I don’t think I really need to repeat that, but the MSM continues proving this day after day with report after report, regardless of subject.
Recently, with many states having made the logical decision to reopen (after having made the originally illogical decision to lock down) and seeing Chinese coronavirus cases dropping, NBC News has tried to cast doubt on how good reopening states is as an idea, attempting to credit anything apart from the basic reopening to why the number of cases dropping in such states (and also trying to explain away why states that continue lockdowns are seeing rising cases).
Nothing but dishonesty abounds, but this is the fake news media, so it’s to be expected, unfortunately. We do not have an honest, unbiased media in this country, so we have to discern the truth of reality from what quackery these deceivers try to sell us.
NBC News reporter Sam Brock began by declaring, “Call it a COVID conundrum. In states with the strictest measures in the country, like Michigan, Pennsylvania, and much of New England, cases are on the rise, while in the South, states like Arkansas and Texas that have reopened businesses and ripped away mask mandates are seeing their numbers drop.”
“So what might explain the apparent contradiction? One theory: differences in testing rates. Alabama has experienced one of the biggest dips in infections, more than 52% in two weeks. But it’s also dead last in the U.S. for COVID testing.”
“How much does the lack of adequate testing have to do with the numbers we’re seeing right now?” Brock eventually asked an NBC guest, who is a doctor at Florida International University, whom replied: “When you don’t test you’re blind, and when you’re not testing you have a false sense of what the real problem is in your community.”
There is plenty of information now available about the Chinese coronavirus that it makes no sense for people to make these kinds of assertions or theories, especially as we have seen that over-testing can result in false positives. For example, we know that the virus has a higher rate of infection when indoors. That was actually one excuse given when states were locking down and unconstitutionally and illegally shutting down businesses. However, we also now know that the virus has an extremely high rate of survivability for most people.
Back early in the pandemic, we heard of survival rates around 97%. Still decently high, but considerably lower than things like the flu. There was at least some reason to be wary of this virus back then because we knew so little about it. But now we know a lot more, such as the fact that the survival rate is 99.9%+ for most people. What’s more, one idiotic thing this country did (and all countries which went with lockdowns, really) was that we decided to lock down people who were HEALTHY as opposed to quarantining those who were sick.
Remember phrases like “flatten the curve” and “slow the spread”? The original purpose of those things was to allow hospitals to not be overwhelmed by cases, since that would lead to catastrophe. Well, we flattened the curve and we slowed the spread as much as we could, with almost everyone in the country routinely wearing masks where they needed to, but bad-faith actors with PhD’s, as well as members of the fake news media, moved the goal posts.
The original purpose of taking a lot of these safety measures was to not overwhelm the hospital systems with virus cases and with normal, daily problems hospitals have to deal with. But at no point did the hospitals even come close to being overwhelmed, so much so that when Trump sent a Navy hospital ship to house patients in New York (back then, the epicenter of the pandemic in the U.S.), it was hardly used.
And now, we have states like Florida, one of the most populous states in the country with a notoriously old population (being a retirement spot and all), which reopened back in the late summer of last year and NOTHING catastrophic has happened since. Cases varied, but at this point, like NBC reported, they are going down, as are cases in Texas.
Speaking of Texas, Brock persisted with another theory: COVID fatigue. “Michigan, where people are just coming out of lockdown for the first time in months, cases are up more than 100% as demographics shift. Texas, on the other hand, began opening its doors months ago and just jammed 40,000 people into the (Texas) Rangers’ ballpark, many without masks.”
Dr. Neil Gandhi of Houston Medical Hospital posited that “A lot of individuals in the southern U.S. and especially here in Texas have already been exposed to the coronavirus, so many individuals already have coronavirus antibodies.”
While that is a sound and reasonable argument from Gandhi, he then proceeded to negate that with a very stupid argument, which I will get to in a second.
First, some context for that stupid argument. Brock eventually stated: “That leads us to the risky behavior that we’ve seen in places like Miami Beach, Florida, where numbers have only increased slightly. Theory number three: where young people are acting as carriers, as doctors are saying they’re returning to other states carrying the virus with them.” A dumb argument in itself, seeing as they’d be infecting other people in Florida along the way to their home states, yet Florida is not seeing cases skyrocketing.
In any case, he eventually said: “Bottom line: health experts say the falling figures in the South might be giving a false sense of security. Do medical experts worry this is emboldening those leaders who said this is a good idea to loosen restrictions?”
Which is when Gandhi gave his stupid argument: “We worry about if there’s a perfect storm brewing. If we remember, this virus always takes 10 to 14 to 21 days to develop. We might just be seeing the early effects of that right now.”
This is a stupid argument because Texas lifted its mask mandate and began to reopen more than 40 days ago, well past the point where one would see this virus act up and develop.
Not to mention that, again, FLORIDA HAS BEEN OPEN FOR MORE THAN HALF A YEAR! And, of course, this is completely ignoring the fact that there are states which NEVER closed, like South Dakota, and there are COUNTRIES which also never closed, like Sweden. And none of them are on the verge of collapse at any capacity – if anything, reopening/never closing ended up HELPING those places.
In any case, it was clear that the people at NBC News were throwing whatever they could at the wall to see what sticks, offering no less than three theories as to why locked down states are seeing surges in cases and why reopening states are seeing drops in cases. Anything to not give credit to the idea that reopening is the best option for ALL states.
Even if one wants to argue that reopening isn’t what’s leading to drops in cases, the fact of the matter is that locked down states have seen surges in cases. The prevailing reasoning behind lockdowns is that they help to slow the spread, flatten the curve, and prevent more and more people from getting sick. And that clearly hasn’t worked.
All lockdowns have achieved is financial and economic strain, mental health issues, surges in child suicide and depression, and a myriad of other problems that wouldn’t be there without lockdowns. And the ONE thing lockdowns are put into place to do – slow the spread of the Chinese coronavirus – they haven’t been able to do. It is evidently clear that lockdowns offer a false sense of security at best (not surprising that commies are trying to say that reopening states are the ones offering a false sense of security, since projection is a commie trait) and crippling, devastating, and often utterly fatal problems at worst, including potentially making the spread of the virus even worse.
Immunity is what people are hoping for, and locking things down only prolongs the issues. Not to mention that I have zero trust that the vaccine is in any way effective in fighting the Chinese coronavirus. That people say you have to get MULTIPLE vaccines is already a red flag. That Fauci has insisted that people who get BOTH vaccines still have to wear masks and social distance is another red flag.
If the vaccines actually worked, surely only one dose would be enough, and we wouldn’t have to continue wearing masks and social distancing since we would be immune.
“Oh, but the vaccine and the masks/social distancing is to protect other people, not ourselves,” liberals might argue. Bull. A vaccine is meant to protect the person GETTING IT. A mask is supposed to protect the person WEARING IT. The idea that they are supposed to protect other people is communist bullcrap meant to coerce people into submission. After all, “you’re doing something good for other people.” That is the appeal that these Leftists use to get people to wear masks and get vaccinated. At no point since the beginning of modern medicine have masks and vaccines been created and used for the purposes of protecting people apart from the person wearing/getting them, apart from surgeons performing surgery on someone with an open wound.
When one gets a tetanus shot, it’s to prevent one getting tetanus and being sick by it. When one gets a hepatitis shot, it’s to prevent one from getting any variant of hepatitis. When one gets ANY shot, it’s for the sake of the person getting it. Seemingly, except for the Chinese coronavirus vaccine, conveniently enough.
And even accepting the premise that those things are, indeed, meant to protect other people, how does it make sense for those WITHOUT THE VIRUS to adhere to this? Someone without the virus can’t spread the virus, and you can tell when someone has it because they will show symptoms. It has been shown that there is no asymptomatic spread of the virus, so why would PERFECTLY HEALTHY PEOPLE have to either wear a mask or get the vaccine if the purposes of those things are for protecting OTHER people from getting sick and not themselves?
If masks are meant to protect others, wouldn’t it make more sense for those who have the virus in their system to have to wear them? But no, it’s the healthy people as well as the sick people that have to wear them.
It’s this contradictory bullcrap that infuriates me about this entire situation, particularly as many insist that what doesn’t make sense actually does make sense and that the measures put into place which clearly haven’t worked are argued to have worked and to continue to work, or at least that getting rid of them would only make things worse when the evidence points to the contrary.
We are told to defer to the “health experts” who hide behind their degrees and pretend as though they are nearly infallible and any challenge to their illogic is nothing but a conspiracy theory created by someone who doesn’t have a prestigious medical degree (though that excuse doesn’t hold up when people with such prestigious medical degrees make similar challenges).
We are told to “follow the science”, as though science was Jesus, by people who, themselves, do not follow scientific reasoning or data. We can EVIDENTLY SEE that lockdowns don’t work, and this has been clear for nearly a YEAR. And yet, these people insist that what “science” tells us is the opposite of what reality and empirical evidence tells us.
Either these people are utterly incompetent morons or have a malicious and nefarious agenda to push, and we can only hope that it’s the former.
“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”
Years from now, I would hope, people will be able to take a look back at how numerous countries handled the Chinese coronavirus pandemic and come to the understanding that we allowed fear and panic to set in and drive our decisions in the best case, and allowed closeted tyrants to be free to rein in as much power as they could at worst. Hopefully, understanding this, they will come to know that they should not repeat the mistakes of the past and erode their own rights and liberties in exchange for a little bit of false safety.
Likewise, I would hope that they would allow for actual science to be the main driver of their decisions, not bad-faith “experts” who have plenty to gain from the stripping of people’s freedoms.
Because the people of today have largely been led to be as fearful of the Chinese coronavirus as they are about things like cancer, AIDS, etc., and treat it as though it were in any way similar to those diseases.
A recent Gallup survey showcased just how misinformed Americans are about the dangers of the Chinese coronavirus, and how many people who have the virus require hospitalization.
“Less than one in five U.S. adults (18%) give a correct answer of between 1 and 5%,” the authors of the study said. “Many adults (35%) say that at least half of infected people need hospitalization. If that were true, the millions of resulting patients would have overwhelmed hospitals throughout the pandemic.”
By political demographics, we see completely unsurprising results.
10% of Democrats, 26% of Republicans and 20% of Independents were correct when they said between 1 and 5% of COVID patients needed to be hospitalized. But the majority of all, including even Republicans, vastly overestimated the number. 41% of Democrats, 28% of Republicans and 35% of Independents all answered that 50% or more of Chinese coronavirus patients must be hospitalized.
Like the authors of the study said, were that to be the case, the hospitals would have long been overwhelmed with Chinese coronavirus patients. However, we never even came close to that in any state, even the ones that were worst off.
If you remember, President Trump sent a Navy hospital ship to New York back when that was the epicenter of the pandemic, and it was hardly even used. Cuomo whined and moaned about the “lack” of support Trump gave them, but he never even used the hospital ship to treat people in it. That wouldn’t have been the case if hospitals had been overwhelmed.
The reason for this overestimation of how bad the Chinese coronavirus is is quite easy to pinpoint: the fake news media created an environment of fear and panic.
According to an Ivy League-led study (so not exactly a right-leaning one), 91% of U.S. stories in 2020 were negative, compared to just 54% in non-U.S. media, even when there were positive developments surrounding the virus, such as fewer positive cases, deaths, and hospitalizations.
“The negativity of the U.S. major media is notable even in areas with positive scientific developments including school re-openings and vaccine trials,” said the study. “Stories of increasing COVID-19 cases outnumber stories of decreasing cases by a factor of 5.5 even during periods when new cases are declining.”
And while one can’t exactly expect the fake news media to be cheerful during a pandemic, there is a clear disconnect between the percentage of negative stories shared by the American media (91% negative) and the media outside the U.S. (54%). It’s not like things were just that much worse in America than in other places. Italy was very rattled early on, and many European countries “had” to go through multiple lockdowns (I put quotations around “had” because they absolutely did not need to do that. If one lockdown didn’t work, multiple ones logically wouldn’t either).
Even though the U.S. has the most reported cases of the Chinese coronavirus (remember, China stopped counting back in March of last year), the virus was never bad enough that it would warrant constantly negative news stories, even while there were positive developments.
The reason as to why the news were so consistently negative is clear: the fake news media had an agenda to get rid of President Trump. They took the opportunity a pandemic gave them and ran with it, claiming negative thing after negative thing and how Trump was just handling it so, so poorly, blah, blah, blah.
The reality is that he was ahead of everyone in handling the virus. Even while he was in the midst of the illegitimate and unconstitutional impeachment trial (the first one, that is), he was looking to get ahead in handling the virus by taking early action. Action, by the way, which was even praised by one of the Left’s emperor gods, Dr. Anthony Fauci, as having saved countless lives.
But none of that would matter to a fake news media which abhorred President Trump and had no qualms about showing their feelings. Constantly delivering negative news during the pandemic, particularly as it pertained to Trump’s handling of the virus, during a time when people were afraid and easily abused to the point where they would abandon their freedoms in exchange for a little temporary (and as it would turn out, fake) safety and would trust the word of even the most notorious of liars, would be a big help to the Left in defeating President Trump.
Of course, as we know, it wasn’t the negative news stories that allowed for the Left to get rid of Trump. It was the mail-in ballots and general election rigging that allowed them to do it, but such an opportunity was at least helped by the fear and panic the fake news media was setting with their negative coverage. It got a lot of people who would otherwise have voted in person to vote by mail, and if you remember, Trump was far ahead of Biden until they started counting the easily falsifiable mail-in ballots.
But regardless of what actually got the Left to get rid of Trump, there is no denying the reason the news was so constantly negative was to make Trump as unpopular as they possibly could make him. It didn’t work, of course, but the attempt was still made.
And so, they did their best to instill within the American people a great fear and panic which would, among other things like hopefully having gotten rid of Trump, also allow for the communist tyrants to play Stalin for as long as they could, imprisoning anyone who would dare to stand against them and their blatant unconstitutional power-grab.
It is entirely unsurprising that 41% of Democrats, who are most easily fooled by the fake news media, believe that 50% of those with the Chinese coronavirus require hospitalization. Republicans and Independents were, also unsurprisingly, a bit more educated on the facts, though still a surprisingly decent number of them still believed that 50% required hospitalization.
In any case, let future generations judge the actions of those who went along with the fear and panic harshly, learning from the mistakes of their ancestors to never, EVER, allow for tyrants and liars-for-profit to deceive us into giving up our rights and freedoms in exchange for the promise of safety that never even comes.
I’ve shared this quote before in the past, but I believe it is adequate to repeat it here: Benjamin Franklin once said, “Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Allow for me to add on to that quote with the reality of what happens to those who do:
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety and will be deprived of both.
2 Corinthians 3:17
“Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.”
This is the third “Meet X” article I have written which demonstrates the utter hypocrisy of the fake news media, the Left, and BLM Inc. (but I repeat myself) when discussing unjust killings of people.
First, there was Ryan Whitaker, who was killed by police officers back in May of 2020, but whose story was not widely reported because Ryan was a white man and the narrative surrounding police is that they only kill black people.
Then, there was Cannon Hinnant, who was a five-year-old white kid executed by his black neighbor while riding his bicycle. His story was not widely reported because 1) the kid was white and 2) the killer is black. CNN, by the way, now has three stories where they mention Cannon Hinnant, and egregiously, they dare include the following paragraph in the last story where they mentioned him: “And in the midst of the same racial unrest experienced throughout the rest of the country, our collective hearts were broken over the senseless killing of 5-year-old Cannon Hinnant, who was White. Though the suspect, a Black man, was apprehended… many people in Wilson and throughout the country politicized this tragedy to counter the legitimacy of those protesting generations of institutionalized and overt racism…”
First of all, their hearts did not break over the killing of Cannon, because they took their sweet freaking time talking about Cannon, their first story was the length of 222 words, and have now mentioned George Floyd over 2,200 times in their own articles. And, by the way, this latest article wasn’t about Hinnant himself, but about elections in North Carolina.
Second of all, a bit rich to accuse others of politicizing that tragedy considering JUST WHO THE HELL THESE PEOPLE ARE. The media narrative is that white people are racist and black people are oppressed by them and their racism. That story ran contrary to that narrative, so they swept it under the rug as much as possible in order to focus on things which help their own agenda. Invert the races in that story and you would watch a nation cry for justice, as it should. But because Hinnant was white and his killer is black, that story is not only buried, but ATTACKED as being a political tool for countering “the legitimacy of protesting generations of… racism.” What a load of utter bullcrap, but what can you expect from the demons at CNN?
At any rate, now that that’s out of the way, let’s talk about Robert Howard, who himself was killed by a cop for no apparent reason whatsoever.
Robert Howard was a 30-year-old black man, who was killed by a Memphis police officer on January 5th, with the officer reportedly having forced Howard into his squad car and executing him while on duty.
According to WREG Memphis, “Patrick Ferguson, 29, is charged with first-degree murder, including aggravated kidnapping, tampering with evidence and abuse of a corpse in the death of 30-year-old Robert Howard.”
Memphis police released a statement on Sunday outlining the allegations. “On Jan. 6, Howard’s girlfriend called police to report him missing. He had last been seen around 5 p.m. the day before in the 3500 block of Mark Twain Street in Frayser.”
“Police said an investigation revealed that Ferguson, armed with a handgun, encountered Howard outside his residence and forced him into his squad car. The two knew each other, police said.”
“Ferguson then drove to Frayser Boulevard and Denver Street, where he shot and killed Howard, according to MPD.”
“Another man, 28-year-old Joshua Rogers, also is charged with tampering with evidence and abuse of a corpse in this case. Police say he was an acquaintance of Ferguson and helped him relocate the body.”
Assuming we have just about the full story here, what we have is a pretty gruesome and awful situation. A man was seemingly minding his own business when a police officer, whom Howard knew, used force to get him into the back of his squad car and, at some point, killed him and abused his corpse, with the help of an “acquaintance” of the officer who helped the officer move the body.
Howard does not seem to have committed a crime here and was seemingly just kidnapped. The only thing I really question here is that “acquaintance” status for Rogers, seeing as no acquaintance would just help someone with getting rid of a body. I imagine, if Ferguson didn’t really know Rogers all that well, that Ferguson paid Rogers to help him with that.
But at any rate, why do you think the fake news media didn’t cover this or that BLM hasn’t made this a massive spectacle? Now, you might guess that the date of these events had something to do with it. Howard was kidnapped and, likely, killed on January 5th, when the biggest subject was the Georgia run-off elections. He was reported as missing on the 6th, when the biggest subject was the pro-Trump protest which eventually led to some people rioting and storming Capitol Hill (while some also seemingly were just allowed to go in).
However, stories like these usually don’t get reported until a good deal later, so the vast majority of people were not even aware that this had happened. WREG initially posted the story on January 10th, so not that long ago. One could argue that a couple of days is not enough for BLM and the fake news media to make a big deal out of this, but here’s the thing: they won’t make a big deal out of this no matter how much time passes.
The reason for this is simple: both the officer who kidnapped and killed Howard, Patrick Ferguson, and the officer’s “acquaintance” accomplice, Joshua Rogers, are black themselves.
Without that fact, the story of a black man killed by a cop, particularly when it was almost certainly an illegitimate execution, would make national news and BLM would demand you to “say his name” and sports athletes would take a knee supposedly in his honor. But that narrative doesn’t really work very well if the police officer who carries on such an illegal execution is black himself.
The narrative only works if the following parameters are met: the “victim” (sometimes, they actually are the victim, such as in Howard's case, but not most of the time) is black and the officer(s) is/are white.
As with the case of Ryan Whitaker, the cops that undoubtedly extrajudicially killed him hardly matter because the first parameter was not met. Whitaker was shot and killed by a white police officer, but because he was, himself, white, his story was not told.
And with Cannon Hinnant, though it wasn’t a police-involved killing, it does involve race in a way. The killer was black and the victim was white. The narrative of black people being oppressed and white people being the oppressors doesn’t work here, so it’s largely ignored, and when people point out that fact and the hypocrisy that goes alongside it, the fake news media acts as though those people are just playing political games.
It’s really quite disgusting the way in which the “free” press acts in this country. Only *certain* groups of people get a story about them made into a big deal. Even then, only if *certain* conditions are met. If a white man is killed by a white cop, the story doesn’t get covered a whole lot. If a white man is killed by a black cop, the story definitely doesn’t get covered. If a black man is killed by a black cop, the story doesn’t get covered a whole lot. Only if a black man is killed by a white cop does the story get plenty of coverage.
And the reason for the killing doesn’t really matter. They made Rayshard Brooks into a big story, despite the fact that he had stolen a cop’s taser and tried to use it against him. They made Michael Brown a big story despite the fact that he quite literally tried to beat a cop with his own squad car’s door. They made George Floyd into a big story because, despite the fact he was not really a threat to the officers, he died in their custody (and despite the fact that he was later discovered to have been under the influence of drugs and he overdosed).
But if a black man is brutally and extrajudicially executed by a black cop, that story doesn’t get much outrage and outcry and coverage despite how absolutely awful that is.
Now, I can suspect the motive for the killing in the first place. Ferguson and Howard, as WREG reported, knew one another, so this clearly wasn’t a random kidnapping and execution. If I had to guess, it might have had to do with some unpaid debt or some sort of strife between the two men. But the fact of the matter remains that a cop kidnapped and killed a person for any given reason. That idea ought to frighten people, regardless of motive. And the officer should well face serious charges and, if found guilty, face serious consequences.
But despite the fact that such an astoundingly disgusting thing happened, the incident doesn’t help the narrative of the Left. Granted, they are currently trying to just orchestrate a not-so silent coup against the President of the United States, so I think that even if the cop had been white in this scenario, this story likely would not have been talked about much, but the point remains that they will not cover even extrajudicial executions of people by police if a narrative cannot be drawn from it to advance their agenda.
The fake news media disgusts me to my core.
“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people’s bones and all uncleanness.”
I have often said, just about anytime I talk about the fake news media that they, at the end of the day, are a bunch of propagandists for the Democrat Party. The fact that 92% of the media coverage of Donald Trump is negative is a testament to that fact.
But it’s one thing for me, a conservative kid who has never worked in the media, to tell you, and it’s an entirely different thing for someone who actually used to work in the media to tell you the same thing.
Enter Lara Logan, former CBS journalist, in an interview with retired Navy SEAL Mike Ritland on his show “Mike Drop”.
In what she later admits is “professional suicide” for her, she rails against the media not simply for being left-wing biased, but for dropping all pretense of objectivity.
“The media everywhere is mostly liberal, not just in the U.S. But in this country, 85% of journalists are registered Democrats – that’s just a fact. No one is registering Democrat when they’re really a Republican. So, the facts are on the side that you just stated: most journalists are Left, or liberal, or Democrat, or whatever word you wanna give it,” said Logan.
That statistic, alongside the 92% negative coverage of Trump, further goes to show the bias that exists in the media, that has been there long before Trump even arrived in the political scene. The fake news media has been fake news long before Trump branded them as such.
She continues: “How do you know you’re being lied to? How do you know you’re being manipulated? How do you know there’s something not right with the coverage? When they simplify it all and there’s no gray. There’s no gray. It’s all one way. Well, life isn’t like that. If it doesn’t match real life, it’s probably not – there’s something wrong.”
Indeed, there are a lot of things that can be said about the Trump administration, both positive and negative. The media chooses to stick with the negatives (I admit I also tend to stick with the positives, but then again, I’m not 24/7 news coverage so there’s only so much I can talk about and I try to push back against that constant negativity against him when I talk about him at all. I tend to be objective).
While the media chooses to stick with hoax stories of Russian election interference, or Stormy Daniels, or campaign finance issues, etc., they ignore the millions of jobs created, the booming economy, the attempts at peace with North Korea, the near complete defeat of ISIS, etc.
I’ve often said that the media does not report on reality but attempts to alter it for those who watch or read what they have to say. Glad to see a former CBS journalist (don’t quite know if she herself is a Republican or a conservative, but she definitely is smarter than most people in the media) acknowledging the fact that the media is so left-wing biased that they are basically propagandists.
In any case, she continued: “So, for example, all the coverage on Trump all the time is negative… That’s distortion of the way things go in real life, because although the media has historically always been left-leaning, we’ve abandoned our pretense, or at least the effort, to be objective today.”
“We’ve become political activists, and some could argue propagandists, and there’s some merit to that.”
She also mentioned that it is pretty much impossible to get the Right’s side of the story unless you yourself search Breitbart to find the other side of the story.
All in all, I am glad to see Ms. Lara Logan saying all of these things. And I do certainly think this is professional suicide for her. Being a journalist, she just exposed the media for what they are. When someone exposes you for what you truly are, if what you are is a bad thing, chances are you are not going to like that person, and definitely wouldn’t consider hiring them for anything.
Truth be told, she has more bravery for this than Dr. Christine Blasey Ford did for lying about Brett Kavanaugh. Ford got something out of her deceit: tons of money and fame. Logan will probably find it hard to land a job anywhere in the mainstream media now.
Of course, her chances of landing a gig with a conservative news network went up, but there’s almost no chance of landing a job with CNN or NBC, etc. if she were to look for employment there.
But I am glad she had the bravery to say this. It’s 100% true, everything she said.
The media are a bunch of political activists. She didn’t want to go as far as to call them propagandists, simply saying that the argument could be made for that, but I have no qualms about calling them out for it: they ARE propagandists.
Consider the way they covered Obama. They thought everything that came out of his mouth was gold and everything he did was perfect. They were so enamored with him that they didn’t mind, or notice, when he fooled them regarding the Iran nuclear deal. He could lie to them all day and the media would pass it all off as the inarguable and absolute truth.
Regarding Hillary, it was much the same (for the time that she was relevant, at least). They adored everything she did, even when she was blatantly racist (“I don’t feel no ways tired” or Hillary “always” keeping hot sauce in her purse because that apparently will draw in black people).
Contrast that with everything they have to say about Trump: that he’s a racist, sexist, bigot, etc. That he’s a national security threat, that he’s unfit for office, that he’s a lunatic, blah blah blah.
So Ms. Logan is completely right when it comes to the media coverage of Trump and when it comes to what the mainstream media is. They are propagandists who don’t even care to pretend to be objective, just claiming that they are every now and then.
What Ms. Logan did here is important. She is exposing the evil of the Left, at least the Left-wing media. This, at the cost of her own career, is unique.
Like I said earlier, I do not know if she herself is a conservative or a Republican at any capacity. However, with this knowledge in her mind, I hope she will continue down the right path towards conservatism (if she’s not already there) and will come to find Christ as well (again, if she’s not already there).
Here’s hoping she will be able to find Christ and that we’ll be able to fight back against a news media that is hell-bent on distorting reality and making lies into truths.
“When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come.”
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...