Over the weekend, President Trump made a series of tweets regarding Baltimore and Rep. Elijah Cummings' (D-MD) work there that many on the Left have called out as "racist". However from what we will see in just a moment, they're far from racist - they're actually ACCURATE. Let's look at a couple of his tweets and then I'll share some reactions - and LIES - coming from so-called "journalists" such as Fox News' Chris Wallace. Here are the tweets: Now let's take a look at what our "friend" on Fox News said - according to Breitbart: "This goes back to what happens with the four members of 'The Squad'. Nobody objects to the president defending his border policy, but this seems to be the worst kind of racial stereotyping. [...] Black congressman, majority-black district, I mean, no human being would want to live there? Is he saying people who live in Baltimore are not human beings?" No, Chris...that's not what President Trump said. Trump never mentioned race in his tweets, so where is he saying that no human being would want to live in a majority-black district? That's what YOU say, Chris - that no human being would live in a majority-black district, thus indicating that it's YOU who doesn't think black people are human beings. Again, Trump never said ANYTHING about race. He said no human being would want to live in the "worst run and most dangerous" district in America. It's YOU, Chris, who deducts that because it's the most dangerous district it can only be the home of a majority-black population. You, Chris, are the only one ASSUMING that because the district is dangerous, black people must live there and must be the criminals. And check out what Wallace said next: "[T]here is a clear pattern here. The fact is before his inauguration the president tweeted about John Lewis, a black congressman. This is before his inauguration. 'He should spend time in his crime-infested district'. Then, two weeks ago he goes after these four members of 'The Squad', all women of color, and says they should go back to the crime-infested countries from which they come. Then he talks about Elijah Cummings, and he says his district is rat and rodent-infested. Infested, it sounds like vermin. It sounds subhuman, and these are all six members of Congress for people of color". Yes, there is a pattern here - a pattern in which Trump criticizes the Left (Cummings, Pelosi, De Blasio, AOC) and what they're doing to this country and the districts they represent and the Left uses the race card as a defense mechanism. But in doing so, they're the ones showing their racism. "Rodent-infested" means what it says - there are a lot of rodents, rats and the like, in that town. And it's true. The same is true for San Francisco where they even have feces maps so people can avoid those areas. What do you think human feces bring? RATS...rodents of all types. Do you think Chris Wallace doesn't know that? He's being entirely disingenuous here. Trump was referring to LITERAL RODENTS littering the streets of Baltimore, not the citizens of Baltimore. Chris was reaching for something that wasn't even there. I think Chris Wallace is, quite honestly, simply auditioning for a job at NBC or CNN...we all know how that went for Megyn Kelly. At any rate, there are two aspects to this discussion: first, the fact that Democrat-run districts/cities are a mess (much like Leftist-run countries), and Baltimore is just one example. Take a look at Los Angeles. Take a look at San Francisco. The second aspect is how the extreme Left (which now comprises all of the Democrat Party and the Never Trumpers like Chris Wallace who have joined forces with them) is trying to portray Trump, and by extension Trump supporters, as white supremacists. As if Trump and his supporters were just a bunch of racists when it's the LEFT that has historically supported Segregation, the mass-killing of black children through Planned Parenthood and so on. They are the white supremacists who need a permanent underclass to survive. You can tell they're the racists by the fact that they make everything about race. Heck, didn't Congresswoman Ayana Pressley a few days ago say "we don't need any more brown faces that don't want to be a brown voice"? What does that even mean?? It means that Ayana herself is a slave driver driving slaves to the Democrat plantation. She doesn't want black or brown people to have a mind of their own - she wants obedient slaves... The good news is that we, Trump supporters, know who we are and we know we're not racists or bigots. The Left, now led by "The Squad", is indeed a group run by a bunch of racist communists who want to destroy the freedoms that we enjoy in America. So calling them racists, murderers for their support of the genocide that is abortion and communists are all accurate expressions of who they are, based on what they say, on what they do and who leads them. The Left trying to call us white supremacists doesn't stick because we know who we are and we know we are not who the Left says we are. Now some facts about Baltimore: Look at the murder rate as compared to the rest of the country, according to statistics from The Baltimore Sun: As you can see, not only are crime stats worsening but they're also 10 times higher than the national average. And how about the poverty rate? Well, it stands at 22.1%, according to The Baltimore Sun in an article from earlier this year, whereas the State Average is 9.4%. So next time you hear anyone talk about Maryland's fabulous living standards, make sure to ask about "how about Baltimore?", because that particular district is far worse than the State Average. The devil's in the details, as they say. So always double check whether they're talking about the State or the District that Elijah Cummings represents...which is in a terrible state, just like anything Democrats touch. Proverbs 19:9 "A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will perish." And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
0 Comments
As we draw closer and closer to the 2020 election cycle, with all 200 Democrats getting ready for their first debates later on this month, pollsters are running their numbers again and pitting Trump against potential 2020 Democrat matchups and, surprise surprise, he’s “trailing” all of them by a significant deficit. Quinnipiac University released their first 2020 matchup poll on Tuesday which has current Democrat frontrunner former VP Joe Biden leading the President by 13 points. Biden also leads Trump 60-34 among women and 47-46 among men. White voters are also split among them, but Trump leads Biden 47-46 here. Biden also leads Trump among African-American and Hispanic voters, with Biden leading Trump 85-12 among African-Americans and 58-33 among Hispanics. When it comes to the other Democrats, Trump supposedly doesn’t do much better. Crazy Bernie leads Trump 51-42, Kamala Harris leads Trump 49-41, Fauxcahontas leads Trump 49-42 and the Pence-obsessed South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Cory “Not So Smarticus” Booker lead Trump 47-42. Non-college educated white voters are the only demographic where Trump seems to have a very solid lead against every Democrat candidate. But looking at this poll as a whole, one might think that it’s over for Trump, right? That he’s going to get trounced. He’s finished. Done. Caput. Well, there is a very good reason as to why I am so skeptical about polls that show these kinds of numbers, especially from Quinnipiac University. Well, reasons, not just one, but one major one. Despite the fact it seems like Trump’s campaign will be swiftly defeated come November of 2020, there is one big factor at play here: this very same poll had Hillary Clinton winning by EVEN BIGGER MARGINS THAN THEY SHOW FOR BIDEN! In this recent poll, Quinnipiac shows Biden leading Trump by 13 points. A good lead for Biden if that were to be the truth whatsoever. But the problem here comes in the fact that back in May of 2015, so basically the same time four years ago, Quinnipiac had Clinton leading Trump by 18 points (50-32). What’s more, even among demographics like African-Americans and Hispanics, Hillary held more of the support than Biden does. Again, Biden supposedly has 85% of the African-American support. But Hillary had 88%. And when it comes to Hispanics, Trump’s numbers today (33%) are higher than they were in 2016 (28%). So considering how astronomically wrong Quinnipiac wound up being in 2016, this current poll shouldn’t really elicit confidence for Trump haters. I imagine there will at least be some fairly rational Democrat voters who will remember how much of a “lead” Hillary had over Trump in 2016 and will be at least relatively skeptical about polls that show such wide margins between the two candidates. And yes, a decent portion of the Democrats will still likely be blaming the Russians for 2016 and will likely claim they helped Trump win re-election if he were to do so, but I am giving these Democrat voters some benefit of the doubt here. I don’t think they are all quite so stupid as to take these polls at face value, especially considering they’re even lower than Hillary’s were. Now, that was only one of the components that leads me to be skeptical about these numbers. Not only was Quinnipiac SUPER wrong about the 2016 matchup, but these numbers are way too distant (in terms of time) from the actual election for them to hold any sort of meaning. You can run hypothetical matchups for any race even beyond the next one and that will matter very little. And while we knew fairly well that Hillary was going to be the nominee in 2016, the answer is not quite so clear this time around. Sure, Biden is leading the other Democrats by a good bit but you never really know. Like I’ve said before in other articles, Hillary was in Joe’s place in 2007, leading the Democrat field, before she was beaten by Obama. So just because Biden is leading right now doesn’t mean he is a lock for the nomination in the first place. This far out from the election, what these types of polls say don’t really matter all that much. I’ve even said the same of polls that show Trump winning. Like I always say, we’re still less than two years away from the election. A lot of things can happen between then and now and the vast majority of the things that will most heavily influence the election will not occur until a few weeks before the election takes place. If the economy is roaring just as well, if not better, by November of next year, and if Trump can make the focus of the election about the economy as well, then he’ll almost certainly win. If you recall an article I wrote from March, I said that economists calculated Trump’s chances of victory and how many electoral and popular votes he is likely to garner (at least a percentage for the popular vote) and had him winning with a margin of 294 electoral votes, meaning he is likely to receive 416 electoral votes total (if the economists are correct, of course). In the history of the United States, there have been 14 elections where the total number of electoral votes was 538. 416 would be the sixth highest number in the 538 system, with only George H. W. Bush (who was riding on Reagan’s coattails), Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan twice getting more electoral votes. So as far as the Quinnipiac poll (or any other poll) goes this early in the election cycle, to claim that Biden will likely beat Trump is mostly a pipe-dream. Again, Hillary’s numbers were far better than Biden is showing, had supposedly strong numbers all the way to the morning of election day where she was supposed to have like a 99% chance of winning and then wound up getting stomped. What exactly will happen on election day only God knows. Of course, I pray to Him that He will allow Trump to be reelected, but as of right now, no one on Earth knows what will happen for certain. With the way things are going, particularly considering Trump’s approval rating (which even Quinnipiac is showing a decent number at 42%, one point shy of his record in that poll) and given the current state of the economy, where even CNN’s polls show roughly 70% say it’s good, then there really is no reason for Trump to come out of the election a loser, especially considering he’s running on a strong economy and every Democrat is running on “we hate Trump”, which is hardly a unifying or beneficial message for the country. Philippians 4:6 “Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God.” And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today! Ever since Trump became president, the Left have whined and moaned that he somehow cheated to get elected and that he collaborated with Russia to beat Hillary in the election. We’ve known it was utter b.s. for a long time now, but now we’re starting to see the real scandal surrounding the election. No, Russia didn’t do anything to alter the election results, but that hasn’t stopped the DNC from accusing Trump of collusion with a dossier. You know the one, right? The Russian dossier that says Russia and Trump were working together for 5 years (a ridiculous claim), that Russia had been giving Trump information on Hillary for 5 years (an even more ridiculous claim, considering we didn’t know who was going to be the nominees of the parties back then), oh, and that Trump hired prostitutes to pee on a bed in a presidential suite that the Obamas used once. The ridiculous dossier, as it turns out, was FUNDED BY THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN AND DNC! And what’s the media doing? What they always do whenever the Democrats do something terrible: ignore it and try to redirect the blame on Republicans. The Daily Caller talks about how many people in the media are trying to falsely claim the GOP funded the dossier first and, with one person in particular saying to the POTUS in a tweet: “… your son, son-in-law, and campaign manager met with Russians claiming to have dirt on Clinton.” So Clinton trying to spread b.s. dirt on Trump is fine but meeting with Russians (who didn’t have anything and never did) is treason? Do you know what that b.s. dossier led to? THE ENTIRE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION BY THE FBI! Comey said that the dossier was the basis for the investigation. Now, knowing that the DNC funded the dossier, we know FOR SURE that the investigation will lead nowhere. Granted, we’ve known that for a long time now. But knowing the DNC funded the basis for the investigation completely kills the efforts made by the FBI, MSM and special counsel for the past 10 MONTHS! So now it’s clear to everyone who has an ear to hear that the Russian investigation is based on nothing of substance. However, that doesn’t mean there wasn’t some sort of collusion between a former candidate and Russia. No, there was no collusion in the election. There was no hack or anything of the sort. There was, however, collusion between Hillary Clinton, her husband Bill, as well as the then-president Obama and Russia: in a little deal called THE URANIUM ONE DEAL! Unsurprisingly, this is not something being talked about by the media. But The Hill wrote a story on it. The title: “FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved controversial nuclear deal with Moscow.” The article is very detailed, but Breitbart made sure to highlight key factors about the Uranium One deal. According to Breitbart: “The Hill reported last week that ahead of the deal, the FBI had uncovered ‘substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering’ to expand Russia’s nuclear footprint in the U.S. as early as 2009. The agency also found that Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. to benefit the Clinton Foundation…” Later on, they focus a bit more on the Clinton Foundation: “The Clinton Foundation took big bucks from Uranium investors. According to the Times, the Clinton Foundation received $2.35 million in donations from Ian Telfer, a mining investor who was also the chairman of Uranium One when Rosatom (a Russian company) acquired it. It also received $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more from Frank Giustra, the Canadian mining financier whose company merged with Uranium One.” It’s clear to me and to anyone who reads this that there is more collusion between the Clintons and Russia than between Trump and Russia. That there’s more collusion between Obama and Russia than Trump and Russia. Friends, THIS is the real Russian collusion story. This just helps put the Clintons in a far darker light than they ever were before. That, alongside the fact that they, along with the DNC, helped fund that b.s. dossier that accuses Trump of collusion with Russia. If there was an award for “biggest crook”, that award would have to be shared amongst Obama, the Clintons and the DNC. Do you see why Trump won? Ignore the fact that millions of people felt as though they were losing the country and Trump offered them hope for a better future and is thus far delivering on it. It’s not just that Trump was heavily favored by many Americans, it’s also that Hillary was INSANELY CROOKED! The Clintons live and breathe corruption. Everything that they’ve done up to this point has been corrupted. Hillary was a corrupt Secretary of State, why else would she try so diligently to get rid of tens of thousands of emails and wipe the server that contained them clean? She was also a crooked candidate, screwing over Bernie Sanders by making it utterly impossible for him to be the Democrat nominee. She is a crooked politician who takes money from foreign governments in exchange for favors. The Democrat Party is probably the most corrupt political party the world’s ever seen. And like the propagandists they are, the Mainstream Media chooses to ignore the Left’s corruption and instead tries to accuse their opponents of being corrupt. Knowing all of this, I hope AG Jeff Sessions is useful at least one more time for Trump as opposed to just kinda being there and launches an investigation on the Clinton Foundation, the Obamas and the Democrat Party. Those people deserve to go to jail. James 3:16 “For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every vile practice.” The reason I add “surprisingly” to the title is simply because I didn’t think Hillary Clinton could sink to a new low following the 2016 election. While she’s still blaming Russia for her election loss, the way she’s blaming Russia is incredibly astonishing and offensive. In a speech at the Southbank Centre’s London Literature Festival, Hillary made sure to remind the audience what she thinks was the reason for her loss: Russian interference. “I think there are a lot more connections that have yet to come to light”, Clinton said in her speech. She also mentioned that if she had been elected President, she “would have called for an independent commission to get to the bottom of it.” Well, there are a few things wrong with that: First, THERE WAS NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION! This is a point we’ve been making ever since this excuse began to float about in the Democrat Party and MSM. Nearly a year after the election and not a single piece of evidence of collusion. Second, the only reason this excuse was given is because SHE LOST! If she had won, NO MENTION OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION WOULD’VE BEEN MADE BY THE LEFT! Even Trump was worried, before the election, that there could be Russian collusion against him. And do you know what happened? Obama assured the country that Russia couldn’t possibly hack into our elections and the media made fun of Trump for even suggesting such a ridiculous notion. Third, we do have a sort of “independent commission” who are “trying to get to the bottom of it”. They’re called the MSM. They’ve been independently investigating Trump and Russia for nearly a year now. Not to mention that aside from the MSM, there’s Robert Mueller’s special counsel who are also investigating this. Though, mostly, they’ve been investigating Trump’s personal and business life than anything else, because they literally have nothing that ties him to Russia during the time of the election. And frankly, they also won’t find anything on Trump the way they’re doing it. If anything, there’s been more collusion between the Obama administration and Russia than Trump and Russia. The Hill wrote a story on how the FBI has uncovered business dealings between the Obama administration and Russia about American uranium. I won’t go into much detail about it, considering this is a story about something else entirely, but this just goes to show how much more corrupt the Left is than they even claim Trump to be. If you want to read that Hill article, the title is: “FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved controversial nuclear deal with Moscow.” Returning to the topic of conversation, at this point, you might be wondering “what did Hillary say that was ‘offensive’ as you put it, Freddie?” Well, here it is: “We had really well-respected security, intelligence veterans saying this was a ‘cyber 9/11’ in the sense it was a direct attack on our institutions.”, Hillary said in her speech. Yep, Hillary’s comparing her election loss to the 9/11 attacks that killed 3000 people and brought down two iconic towers in Manhattan. If you have lost a loved one on 9/11, Hillary is saying that her election loss was just as bad. That the made up Russian attack was just as significant and tragic as the very real Islamic terrorist attack on our nation. This, I believe, might be a new low for Hillary Clinton. Again, I did not think she could sink any lower than she already has. Maybe I gave her too much credit. Maybe I’ve yet to learn just how offensive, ignorant and insensitive the Left is about our country and just how self-absorbed they are. You must be a massive narcissist to believe a national tragedy such as 9/11 could even compare to you losing an election. On September 11th, 2001, the whole world stood still as we witnessed evil taking down the twin towers. We lost 3000 souls that day. We vowed that justice would be served. And promised to never forget. On November 8th, 2016, the whole world stood still as we witnessed God’s glory in making Trump President of the United States. We witnessed America looking to become stronger. We lifted the spirits of true American patriots that otherwise would’ve lost all hope for our country with the election of a crook. We vowed that we would do everything we could to Make America Great Again. And we promised to once again become the world’s hyper power. To become a beacon of light for the world to see. To become leaders of the world, as opposed to followers. Hillary, your election loss wasn’t a “cyber 9/11”. It was one of the best days of my young life. I wasn’t around to see Reagan be elected and make the country great. And this is the first time I’m seeing a true leader in the White House, after 8 terrible years if ineptitude, incompetence and evil coming from Obama and 8 years of Bush kinda just being there (I was too young to pay attention at the time, and I wouldn’t understand anyway). On 9/11, we lost 3000 innocent people. On November 8th, THE LEFT lost the America they envisioned. One that was just as impotent and fragile as Obama sought to make it. Matthew 5:16 “In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in Heaven.” The President had recently endorsed Sen. Luther Strange for election to the U.S. Senate later this year. Strange had replaced Jeff Sessions when he was appointed by the President to be Attorney General. But even though Luther Strange lost his Party’s nomination for Congress (now, the race is between (R) Roy Moore and (D) Doug Jones) and was endorsed by the President, this is not really a loss for the POTUS. Luther Strange was the Establishment candidate for Congress between him and Moore. And Strange is the sitting senator, who will stay there until a new candidate is elected in December. So, for as long as Strange is there, Trump wants to be on his good side. For as long as Strange is in Congress, he will count as one vote to help Trump pass legislation. And Trump wants Congress to pass the Graham-Cassidy bill which will do a little bit to repeal and replace Obamacare (though not too much). That’s really the BIGGEST and likely ONLY reason he chose to endorse Strange as opposed to Moore. And even though Moore is against the bill for not being conservative enough (and I agree), his primary election victory is actually very good for Trump. No, Trump didn’t endorse him, but he knows what Moore wants. And he, too, wants to Make America Great Again. Moore was called the “more conservative” candidate and for good reason. According to the Washington Post, “In three books, Moore has described his legal opinion that the United States was founded a Christian nation that ultimately answered to the ‘laws of nature and nature’s God.’… As a judge, Moore refused to obey a federal court order to remove from his courthouse a monument to the Ten Commandments he had installed to underscore his belief. He was removed from his job as a result.” So he agrees with us that this country was founded A CHRISTIAN NATION and that our laws are based off of God’s laws. And when he was removed from his job for defying the court order to remove the Ten Commandments, he followed one of God’s rules! Acts 5:29: “But Peter and the apostles answered: ‘we must obey God rather than men.’” So he knows that God’s law is far more important to follow than any country’s law. Which brings us to another time that he was removed from his post. According to the Washington Post: “In a 2002 legal opinion, he described homosexual conduct as ‘an inherent evil’, and he has argued that the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage should not be considered the rule of law.” So he’s AGAINST the Supreme Court’s decision to legalize gay marriage and believes that homosexual conduct is inherently evil. So, he’s very clearly a conservative and someone I can get behind. He’s very clearly a Christian and someone who wants our nation to go back to our Christian roots. In his victory speech after the primary election, he said: “We have to return the knowledge of God and the Constitution of the United States to the United States Congress. We have become a nation that has distanced ourselves from the very foundation.” Do you know what that sounds like to me? He seems like he wants to Make America Great Again. And part of Making America Great Again includes Making America Christian Again. Making America God’s Again. So that we can truly say “God bless America”. So then why would people think that Moore’s election victory is a loss to Trump? According to CNN, Trump was infuriated that he backed the loser of the election. “Returning from a high-dollar fundraiser in Manhattan on Tuesday evening, an infuriated President Donald Trump watched aboard Air Force One as Fox News called the Alabama Senate primary for Roy Moore against Trump’s favored candidate, Luther Strange.” Really, “infuriated”? Then how do you explain that he said that he “might have made a mistake” at a STRANGE rally the Friday before the election? According to the Washington Post: “If Moore won the primary, Trump said to applause, ‘I’m going to be here campaigning like hell for him.’” That doesn’t sound like someone who would be too heartbroken about his endorsed candidate losing. Trump knows that Moore is one of the good guys. He’s anti-establishment, Christian and very conservative. And he KNOWS that that’s the kind of person he wants in Congress. The Republican Establishment has been completely USELESS in passing any significant legislation in Trump’s first year as POTUS. He doesn’t want to deal with and appease Establishment candidates and Congressmen. He doesn’t want to deal with the Democrats either, as I’ve said in a previous article. He wants people who will be on his side on MANY issues. Trump wants to repeal and replace Obamacare. Moore wants much of the same, so he will vote for a VERY conservative repeal bill. He won’t vote for a “let’s get rid of this one tiny thing so that the media isn’t too mad at us” bill. Moore is as close to Trump’s perfect candidate as you can get. He’s certainly as close to a grass-roots Christian conservative as you can get. And if the people of Alabama can get him into office (which I believe will happen), then I certainly think that we’ll be dealing a serious blow to the Establishment and will be getting closer to Making America Great Again. Strange’s loss isn’t a loss for Trump. It’s a loss for the Establishment, and potentially a MASSIVE loss for the Democrats. Alabama is very conservative. Liberal policies and candidates are VERY difficult to sell there. But even more so if that liberal candidate is going up against a very CONSERVATIVE candidate. I can’t wait for the December special election in Alabama. It will mark another step forward to Making America Great Again and Making America WE THE PEOPLE’S Again. Colossians 3:23 “Whatever you do, work heartily, as for the Lord and not for men.” Day in and day out our President is fighting the deep state – John McCain opposing the Obamacare repeal which he himself ran on, judges blocking Trump’s travel ban, Special counsel Muller ‘investigating’ the Russia hoax. The GOP establishment and the democrats are all embarked on a massive effort to destroy Trump, his voters, his agenda and to make sure no other outsider in the future even dreams about messing with the swamp. What a wonderful and different story this would be if Republicans in Congress sided with the people who voted Trump into office. They don’t seem to understand their base is no longer their base – it’s Trumps base. My colleague Freddie Drake pointed this out in his article ‘Turns Out That Dems Are Divided On Immigration Too’. The GOP refused to embrace the Tea Party – the very first attempt to get the party back on the path of conservatism. And the GOP now refuses to embrace Trump. We, conservatives, have seen enough. We know better now – we now that the swamp is so deep that it’s almost an impossibility to influence on it to course correct to preserve our Constitution and freedoms. Abraham Lincoln said it correctly: ‘America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves’. And President Lincoln was right – we’re witnessing the destruction of America as we know it. Not just by the Left, which most people will recognize as the enemy of freedom. This kind of evil is easy to identify. But America is a target for the GOP establishment as well – the only GOP that matters. Perhaps it’s time to just call it the swamp? There is no other GOP than the establishment. But this kind of evil is much more difficult to identify – behind Paul Ryan’s goofy smile is the devil himself guiding Ryan’s steps to stop Trump. Behind Jeff Sessions’ angel face is the devil himself guiding his steps in recusing himself from enforcing the law on Hillary, Comey, Susan Rice and all the rest. This kind of evil is much more difficult to identify because they’re wolves in sheep’s clothing. The Bible warns us about them in Matthew 7:15: ‘Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves’. How can we, the people, take our country back among these wolves who control the government? It’s widely known that Trump’s base is not just conservatives (the old Republican base) but also Democrats. The white working class in America, once the Democrat Party’s darling, has been neglected by the democrats for too long. The dems stand for nothing nowadays – other than transgender rights. They jumped on the ‘Sex Life Matters’ wagon in the hopes that they would turn the discussion of this private matter into a civil rights discussion – something very few everyday Americans would agree with. So Trump’s base is, in fact, larger than just Republicans. Trump is a practical person who cares about RESULTS. He’s not an ideologue – he gave up his business and his peace to try to do something good for the American people. And the white working class democrats have noticed. The vast majority of the people are concerned about jobs, security and general well-being. They’re not too worried about transgender rights – there is no such thing as a transgender right issue. Transgenders have the same rights as the rest of us. But my main point is: Trump’s not an ideologue and neither is his base. We just want jobs, security and general well-being. If Trump forms his own party, smart GOP and democrat leaders will follow him – and the rest of us would as well. After all, we’re Trump’s first supporters. It wouldn’t be too crazy and it would succeed. There’s an example in Argentina – the current President of Argentina, Mauricio Macri, is, like Trump, a businessman who formed his own party. Much like with the Democrat and Republican parties today, the two main parties in Argentina were also struggling to define themselves – and to hold on to their power. But, much like the DNC and GOP in America today, neither party cared in the least about the Argentine people. So Argentines grew tired and when Mauricio Macri ran for office, they supported him. Granted, it took him several iterations before he became president – but he is the first independent Argentine President to beat the two dominant parties since 1916! Government exists for one reason only: to protect the life and property of its people. When government moves away from those reasons and engages in self-preservation and power expansion, it becomes a tyranny – like the one we’re witnessing. A place where the Clintons can do whatever they want without facing legal consequences and the FBI can spy on you and drag you from your bedroom like they did Manafort. They don’t need a crime to investigate you – they can investigate you and then find or, better yet, make up a crime. Like with the phony Russian dossier, which the deep state created to start the Russia hoax. Like in a banana republic... Trump owns the ENTIRE Republican base, and SOME of the Democrat base. I don’t know if he’s thinking about forming his own party. If he does, the American people will have one last chance to take our country back. Exodus 18-21 ‘Moreover, look for able men from all the people, men who fear God, who are trustworthy and hate a bribe, and place such men over the people as chiefs of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens.’ If you're following the news about Trump's approval rating of 39% you would think the entire country hates Trump. In the last couple of days, even after Hurricane Harvey, the Fake News media has continued on its relentless efforts to destroy Trump. In an article published on Saturday 8/26 CNBC says: 'Donald Trump started as the most unpopular new president in the history of modern polling. After seven months, things have only gotten worse.Plunging into undesirably uncharted territory, Trump is setting records with his dismally low approval ratings, including the lowest mark ever for a president in his first year. In fact, with four months left in the year, Trump has already spent more time under 40 percent than any other first-year president. At 34 percent, his current approval rating is worse than former President Barack Obama's ever was.' And CNBC is not alone. Here's LA Times: 'Trump is shedding supporters like no other president in modern history'. Naturally, the Fake News media is doing what it's always done: produce FAKE NEWS. For example, they fail to tell you that in less than two months, French President Macron went from 64% approval rating in June to 34% today - apparently, the beloved anti-Trump, globalist French president isn't doing so well after all. And to be perfectly honest, even Ronald Reagan's approval rating fell to 35% in his first term...and as we all know, he was re-elected nevertheless... In other words, assuming these polls are correct - something extremely difficult to do based on the recent history of polling that had Hillary winning the presidency - what the media isn't telling you is that by no means these polls are reflective of a President's actual performance on the job. In fact, when it comes to performance, Trump has:
But this list is exactly the kind of news the mainstream media doesn't want you to know. So...should we be concerned about Trump's approval rating? Nope. What we should be concerned about is the GOP's LACK OF SUPPORT of our president. Where's the Obamacare repeal and replace? Where's Tax Reform? If anybody should care about approval ratings is the GOP establishment - the Mitch McConnells of the world. Here we have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to pass a truly conservative agenda - Republicans own the WH, the House and the Senate - and yet their weakness and lack of COURAGE at this very crucial moment in our history is astonishing. What can we, regular folks, do? Pray, my friend - pray that God continues guiding and protecting our president and that He opens the GOP leadership's eyes and hearts to act...and do what they were elected to do. 1 Chronicles 28:20 'Then David said to Solomon his son, “Be strong and courageous and do it. Do not be afraid and do not be dismayed, for the Lord God, even my God, is with you. He will not leave you or forsake you, until all the work for the service of the house of the Lord is finished' New York is home to many theatrical venues that show plays, such as Broadway and Shakespeare In The Park. The latter of the two has caught fire with its rendition of Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’ depicting a ‘Caesar’ that looks eerily similar to the president. And, if you know your history, you know how it ends. ‘Caesar’ is brutally murdered. It’s truly unbelievable the amount of insane hatred the Left harbors for their opponents. This hatred doesn’t end with Trump. It certainly didn’t start with him. Let’s not forget that a British filmmaker made a movie titled ‘Death of a President’ that came out in 2006 depicting the assassination of George W. Bush. Let’s not forget that Kathy Griffin posed with a sculpture of Donald Trump’s severed and bloodied head. And let’s not forget that THE LEFT HAVE ACTUALLY SUCCESSFULLY ASSASSINATED THEIR OPPOSITION BEFORE! John Wilkes Booth, a Democrat, assassinated President Lincoln. Lee Harvey Oswald, a communist, killed JFK. Loyd Jowers, according to Wikipedia, ‘as well as others, including governmental agencies’ have taken part in a conspiracy to kill Martin Luther King Jr. And yesterday, Bernie Sanders supporter James T Hodgkinson attempted to assassinate Republican members of Congress, in what could have been a massacre had it not been for God's intervention to place Republican Congressman Steve Scalise and his security guards on the scene. Lincoln freed the slaves, so he was killed by a confederate Democrat. JFK was a Democrat that didn’t like communism, and so a communist killed him (and maybe the U.S. government took part of that, but that’s mostly a theory popularized by the LEFT). And Martin Luther King Jr. helped to end segregation of black people, and so he was killed. The Left never sees a problem with eliminating opposition with bloodshed. But this kind of insane hatred can be explained: MAN IS BASICALLY EVIL! And what do I mean by “basically evil”? I mean that, without God, man will choose the option that either harms another person, or brings him some sort of selfish profit or gain. When we put God in our minds, we tend to feel guilty about something bad we’ve done or joyous over something good we’ve done. The Left, because they don’t follow God, often see doing something bad as doing something good. The proof? THEY DEPICTED TRUMP BEING KILLED IN A PLAY! Its director, Oskar Eustis, a Marxist, likely didn’t stop to think that maybe, just maybe, the production he’s directing might be in bad taste. That it might be a bad thing to do. Kathy Griffin also likely didn’t stop to think that maybe posing with a bloody and severed head of Trump was a bad thing. What these two have in common, other than their individual depictions of a dead President Trump, is that they both lack a sense of guilt. A sense of guilt that is placed in us by God. With Eustis being a Marxist communist and Griffin being a liberal, neither of them had the capability of believing what they were doing was wrong. Their hearts are so full of hatred that they are unapologetic for what they’ve done and shown. This is the devil’s work right here. He is the very definition of evil and he has a hold of these two people, along with most of the Left (and, arguably, the Washington Establishment as a whole). It’s because these two people are so distant from God that they see the things they’re doing as good, rather than evil. The Left thinks showing the death of a very popular president as being more than ok. They thought that with Bush too (though he’s not nearly as popular). And went even further with Lincoln, JFK and MLK Jr. Not to mention that an insane man attempted to kill Reagan because of a Robert De Niro movie ‘Taxi Driver’. Eustis, Griffin, Booth, Oswald, Loyd Jowers, John Hinckley (the man that tried to kill Reagan) and James T Hodgkinson are/were all distant from God. Throughout 8 years of Obama, I can’t recall any time a conservative icon made a movie depicting his death, or made a sculpture of his severed and bloodied head, or went as far as to attempt to kill him. That’s because conservatives are largely Christian. And Christians know that killing people is JUST SOMETHING YOU SHOULD NEVER DO! At least unless it’s in self-defense. But if you go out and kill someone for whatever reason, I’ll sugarcoat this and say that God isn’t going to be happy with you. Christians know what is right and wrong. The Left often blurs the line between right and wrong. Beyond that, they often call what’s wrong (abortion, gay marriage, etc.) good while calling what’s right (Christ, God, the church) bad and often insult Him (remember the jar full of pee with Christ in it?). The Left are the very people Isaiah 5:20 speaks about. Isaiah 5:20 “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.” New York Times Contributor Compares Comey’s Testimony To That Of A Sexual Harassment Victim’s6/14/2017 Oh, the Left and their insane tactics to bring down Trump. This one is particularly funny, if I may say so myself. New York Times contributor Nicole Serratore wrote an opinion piece comparing former FBI director James Comey’s testimony to one that a sexual harassment victim would issue. Yes, the 6’8” James Comey was basically sexually harassed by the president, according to Serratore. James Comey is the same height as LeBron James, and yet, Serratore says that he is comparable to a victim of sexual assault and harassment. You’ve gotta be KIDDING ME! Forget the fact that she is making light of a real issue women go through sometimes in the workplace. But the overall idea of a guy as tall as one of the best basketball players ever being compared to a sexual harassment victim is laughable. Even more so when you realize Trump is 6’2”. Comey is as tall as a Small Forward in the NBA and Trump is as tall as typical Point Guards in the NBA. For those of you who don’t know much about basketball, Point Guards are the shortest players on the court (usually) while Small Forwards are usually the 3rd tallest players on the court (out of five people). The article writes: “As I listened to (Comey) tell the Senate Intelligence Committee about his personal meetings and phone calls with President Trump, I was reminded of something: the experience of a woman being harassed by her powerful, predatory boss.” I know that Serratore was siding with Comey and trying to defend him, but calling him a harassed woman isn’t going to help him. In school, if you’re a guy but are sometimes called a girl by some mean kids or bullies, you’re not typically going to take that well. It’s the same in the real world. Most guys definitely don’t want to be called girls, so calling Comey one isn’t going to help him, or his narrative, in the least. The article continues: “On Jan 27, Mr. Comey received a last-minute dinner invitation from the president and then learned it would be ‘just the two of us.’ On Thursday (during the hearing), Mr. Comey revealed that he had to break a date with his wife in order to dine with Mr. Trump. Already, something about this ‘setup’ made him ‘uneasy’. The central business of this intimate dinner was Mr. Trump’s insistence: ‘I need loyalty, I expect loyalty.’ Mr. Comey immediately recognized that this was a press for something he didn’t want to give. He froze: ‘I didn’t move, speak, or change my facial expression…’ That reaction… is so relatable for any woman.” Let’s point out some things that seem strange about this quote, shall we? First, why would the president expecting loyalty from YOUR FBI DIRECTOR be a bad thing? If you’re serving as the boss of the whole FBI, why wouldn’t it be expected to SHOW LOYALTY TO YOUR PRESIDENT? Secondly, I find it interesting that Serratore writes that Comey “immediately recognized that this was a press for something he didn’t want to give.” That doesn’t seem to be a direct quote from Comey, does it? This seems like it comes from Serratore’s own mouth. Those are HER words. SHE is trying to make Comey look like a terrified woman on the verge of being harassed by a predator. Meanwhile, all the president asked for is something any boss asks for, and that should be a guarantee: loyalty. But finally, to make my larger point in this article: isn’t the Left’s hypocrisy unbelievable? Let’s not forget that A REAL SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM WAS SHUNNED BY THE LEFT! Did the Left just forget about MONICA LEWINSKY? She was ACTUALLY ASSAULTED by President Clinton. And the Left tried to SHUT HER DOWN! So while the Left tries to make bogus comparisons of Trump to a sexual harasser (because that’s really what they’re trying to achieve with that article), we’ll just continue to point out that a Democrat president did far more to damage women than the Left could ever say Trump has. (And let’s not forget that we’re talking about Comey, a 6'8" MAN!) It’s truly unbelievable how far the Left will go to destroy Trump. But all they’re doing here is throwing stuff at the wall to see what sticks. The Russian collusion story has fallen apart after 6 months of 0 evidence and Comey’s testimony. And now, they’re borderline saying Trump is a sexual predator (which they said he was 3 weeks before the election) by saying Comey’s testimony is similar to that of a sexual harassment victim’s testimony. But this is simply who the Left is. Like the devil, they will lie, cheat and steal to get their way. Every day, they attempt to deceive the masses into believing that Trump is a reprobate, bigoted human being. Problem for them is, most people don’t believe what the Left (MSM and otherwise) says about him. The Left is so insanely filled with rage and hatred for Donald Trump that they will write any kind of story, regardless of how little sense it makes. Proverbs 10:18 “Whoever conceals hatred with lying lips and spreads slander is a fool.” The Huffington Post published a story last week stating that Trump’s decision to pull the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Agreement is a High Crime worthy of impeachment… Ok, I’m gonna give everyone a couple of seconds to let that sink in… are we good? Great. DON’T MAKE ME LAUGH! I mean, c’mon! The Left is hilariously reaching for anything to remove Trump from office. AND I DO MEAN ANYTHING! According to the Huffington Post, “the Constitution provides impeachment of the president when he commits ‘High Crimes’ and misdemeanors… Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist No. 65 that offenses are impeachable if they ‘proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.” And the Huffington Post believes that there was a ‘violation of public trust’ when he pulled out of the Agreement. Ok, real quick. How many liberals do you know thought at any point that Trump was GOING TO STAY in the Agreement? How many people were caught off guard by it? Literally no one was surprised by his decision, conservative or liberal. So he didn’t violate public trust. In fact, MOST PEOPLE TRUST IN TRUMP! This sham of an article by the Huffington Post was written with the assumption that most people hate Trump, when we know that’s not the case! The article then talks about how, by the U.S. withdrawing from the accord, Trump committed a crime against humanity. That’s right. Apparently, if the president walks away from a bad deal that would rob the U.S. blind and the deal has something to do with the Leftist narrative of climate change, that’s a crime against humanity. Of course it is. Anyone who disagrees with the Left is committing a crime against humanity, apparently. Give me a break. If we’re talking about crimes against humanity, how about the Obama administration funding the single largest killer of black people in the country: Planned Parenthood? PP performs millions of abortions every year. And even if you don’t think that a fetus is alive (which is ridiculous), it’s STILL HUMAN. If you end a pregnancy, YOU’RE COMMITTING A CRIME AGAINST A HUMAN BEING; AGAINST A HUMAN FETUS! But not only was Obama not impeached for it. Not only was PP penalized for it. THEY WERE PRAISED FOR IT! The Left claims to care about future generations but they don’t care about human babies in the least! So don’t go about telling me that Trump committed a crime against humanity by pulling out of a deal that would hurt the U.S. economically and wouldn’t do a darn thing to ‘fight’ a non-issue such as climate change. I’ve already talked about how man-made climate change is a ridiculous idea, so I don’t think I need to continue talking about that. But really, it’s laughable that the Left is so insanely desperate to throw Trump out of the office he won legitimately with any little thing they possibly can. They would call for impeachment for any little thing he did short of breathing. But this is the insane desperation the Left has found itself in. And I couldn’t be happier about it. Don’t get me wrong, when the MSM writes a ridiculous article such as the Huffington Post one, I will still do what I can to call out the Left for their hypocrisy. But as God as my witness, I will also laugh out loud while reading those articles and writing these sorts of counter-articles. The Left MAY HAVE ACTUALLY LOST THEIR MINDS after the 2016 election. And seeing that Trump is not only largely unaffected by their efforts to destroy him, but actually succeeding in many things he wants to do while at the same time making fun of the Left (such as in last Friday’s article) only drives the Left further down into the pits of insanity. And this Huffington Post article only helps my point. They think Trump violated the Constitution (a crime that Obama did constantly in his 8 years) by withdrawing the U.S. from a terrible deal. Every time I see an article such as this one, I picture children throwing a tantrum. They are insanely enraged that their precious criminal Hillary didn’t win the election. And they are just as enraged that Trump is as successful as he has been in his first 5 months of being POTUS. This kind of rage and ignorance won’t do anything to help them in 2018. The country will only see leftist children demanding to be brought back into power, but we, as the responsible adults we are, won’t let them get what they want, particularly with that kind of attitude. And God, as the ultimate Father, won’t reward them for the kind of evil they are showing themselves to be filled with. James 1:19-20 “… Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry, because human anger does not produce the righteousness that God desires.” |
AuthorsWe bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free... Archives
February 2021
Categories
All
|