As I have stated in the past, the Ukraine story is nothing more than a revamped version of the Russian collusion narrative, filled with nothing but lies and smears against Trump, accusing him of things he didn’t do, like trying to get “dirt” on Biden, which is a current Democrat talking point regarding the situation. Everything about it, from the whistleblower’s strange report to his connections to Democrats like Adam Schiff and Joe Biden, reeks of a not-so-silent coup attempt by the Democrats. But despite every negative thing under the sun that the Democrats can throw at Trump, regardless of the circumstance or the setting, the President enjoys pretty normal approval ratings. Looking at Rasmussen’s Daily Presidential Tracking Poll, we find that Donald Trump’s approval rating sits at 50%, which is rather normal for his administration. Compare that to even just a week ago, when his approval rating stood at 47%, also despite the negative coverage and the constant attacks from the press and from Democrats. The President had enjoyed a recent high of 53% approval, around the time the Ukraine call “scandal” was brought up by Democrats and shortly before Trump released the transcript to the call, showing that there was no actual quid pro quo, nor any other type of crime that can be pointed out, despite what Democrats and the media might try to convey (likely a part of the reason as to why Pelosi decided not to have a formal impeachment inquiry vote in the House). Following that, his approval rating dipped down a bit, falling to a recent low of 46%, but far from terrible, or even his record-low in the Rasmussen poll of 39%. Considering it is currently sitting at 50% and around that area, it’s pretty easy to tell that this latest attempt at destroying Donald Trump is yet another one of the Democrats’ many, many duds. Russian hacking didn’t work, Russian collusion didn’t work, Stormy Daniels didn’t work, campaign finance violations accusations didn’t work, calling him “Hitler” hasn’t worked, and now, the Ukraine call “scandal” isn’t working. And with the strategies that Democrats are incorporating in their campaigns, that of trashing Trump and promising to get rid of him, likely won’t work either. Moody’s Analytics has Trump winning in a landslide in all three of their models if things maintain course (with one showing Trump narrowly losing only if Democrat turnout is high and the economy is in the toilet, as in, if it crashes by 12% shortly before Election Day). There is still a little over a year before the 2020 election happens, and a lot can happen in that span of time. It’s still not entirely clear who the Democrat nominee will be, with Biden seemingly losing some ground to Elizabeth Warren. However, regardless of who the Democrat nominee will be, if things stay relatively as they are today, even if just a little bit worse (Moody’s predicts that even a 9% crash in the stock market would still give Trump the win, even if it’s a bit closer than the other models, which show Trump winning by a bigger landslide than he did in 2016), it’s more likely than not that Donald Trump will come out of the 2020 election having been re-elected as President of the United States, which will most definitely send the media into a frenzy. And it’s pretty clear, at this point, that if all the Democrats have is nothing but lies and accusations, that will definitely not be enough to destroy Trump, no matter what the Left might want. There’s a reason why even some Leftists believe that impeaching Trump will lead to his re-election in 2020. It’s not what Americans want, regardless of what the heavily-skewed Fox News poll might show. President Trump is popular, even more so than Obama at the same point in his own presidency, who only had 45% approval at the time. That is a fact that no Leftist wants to acknowledge, even if doing so is to their detriment. Deuteronomy 28:7 “The Lord will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you. They shall come out against you one way and flee before you seven ways.” Author: Freddie Marinelli.
0 Comments
The New York Times, ever-so full of integrity and without a shred of disgusting hypocrisy to be found, discovered a YouTube video made by pro-Trump meme-maker Carpe Donktum that depicts the character of a movie called Kingsman: The Secret Service with a superimposed picture of Trump on him killing various people inside a church who all have pictures of various news organizations, Left-wing organizations and even Leftist politicians superimposed on to them. The video, as it featured a superimposed Trump committing violent acts against the media and his typical critics, drew outrage from said media people. CNN released a statement that said: “Sadly, this is not the first time that supporters of the President have promoted violence against the media in a video they apparently find entertaining – but it is by far and away the worst. The images depicted are vile and horrific. The President and his family, the White House, and the Trump campaign need to denounce it immediately in the strongest possible terms. Anything less equates to a tacit endorsement of violence and should not be tolerated by anyone.” Well, the White House did issue a statement on it denouncing the violence depicted in the video, which they claim has not been seen by the President. But here are a few things to note about this whole ordeal: First of all, the video had been up for 16 MONTHS on YouTube before this. The only reason it’s being brought to anyone’s attention is because it was played at the American Priority Conference, a pro-Trump conference in Trump’s Doral resort. However, the video was not played to the public. It was played on a couple of screens inside a big, empty room and the video itself had less than 100,000 views on YouTube before the NYT brought attention to it. Second, what a load of crap CNN is. The past “promotions of violence against the media” they describe are, at worst, depicting Trump doing wrestling moves against the media. Back in July of 2017, CNN cried “foul” over a meme by Carpe Donktum that shows Trump wrestling someone with the CNN logo superimposed on them. It was pure entertainment and very obviously fake. Third, how is it that the video of Trump being depicted killing MSM and political opponents is considered a depiction of violence, but the actual movie that had a guy kill church-goers (who had been driven mad by a chemical released by an environmentalist super-villain) is not considered a depiction of violence against church-goers? Similarly, what about the countless times members of ANTIFA have physically assaulted Trump supporters, members of the media (if you want to talk about violence against the media), elderly people and all-around anyone they can possibly find to try and intimidate because they are terrorists? Is that not considered violence? Or what about the Trump rendition of “Julius Caesar” that was SPONSORED BY THE NEW YORK TIMES that shows a character whose likeness resembles Trump an awful lot being assassinated, Julius Caesar style, and calling that art? Is that not considered a depiction of violence? And what about Snoop Dogg making a music video where he “shoots” someone who is very clearly supposed to represent Donald Trump, with a suit, a red tie, blonde hair, an orange face and clown make-up? Doesn’t that depict an “act of violence” against Trump? All of these things either go unreported by the fake news media or are SUPPORTED by the fake news media as being “art” or “entertainment” or something else. I still remember MSNBC host Nicole Wallace saying that ANTIFA were “good people” on “the side of angels” for what they did at Charlottesville. Tell me what’s worse: a very obvious meme video of Trump “killing” fake news and political opponents, or actual acts of physical violence not only against Trump supporters but anyone the ANTIFA terrorists can try and get away with harming, possibly even killing if they could? What’s worse: a meme video of a scene in an action movie being repurposed for the sake of the meme, or plays, videos and pictures of a murdered President Donald Trump? And in case anyone’s forgotten, Kathy Griffin took a picture of herself holding a paper mache version of Trump’s bloodied and severed head, in a picture that honestly makes you think someone from ISIS could’ve taken. The meme video might be in poor taste, all things considered, but regardless of what one can say about it, it’s nowhere near as bad as the things THE LEFT CONSTANTLY DOES. And for the fake news media to feign outrage over this, or to have actual outrage over this, all-the-while ignoring what ANTIFA is doing to Trump supporters, ignoring what Leftist voters are doing to Trump supporters (how many people have had to leave a restaurant or other public place because of their support for Trump?), or even ENDORSING these things is outright disgusting. Do you want to know why I never had a problem with Trump calling the media the “enemy of the people”? Because he was exactly right and every day proves it even more. It’s not just the fake news stories that serve to misinform people (the Russian collusion story, despite having no weight to it, is still believed by most people who still watch their crap), but it’s their very actions and words too. Donny Deutsch calling Trump and his supporters “Hitler” and “Nazis” may be nothing new, but it’s still outrageous because of the sort of danger it puts us in. The idea of “punching Nazis in the face” is seen as perfectly acceptable because these people actually think we are Nazis when they are the ones far closer to that sort of ideology than we are. Let’s not forget that the Virginia baseball shooter only did what he did in trying to kill as many Republicans as he could because Bernie Sanders had him convinced Republicans were going to kill him and many others by “taking away their healthcare”. Let’s not forget that the ICE fire bomber only did what he did because of AOC’s stance against ICE. I’m not going to directly blame these politicians for the actions of their supporters, but they can’t claim that Trump uses inflammatory and dangerous language while calling him Hitler and us Nazis in the same sentence. They can’t say that Trump is hateful when they openly demonize law enforcement agencies who are only doing what they are SUPPOSED TO DO. For the New York Times, CNN and other news outlets to cry “victim” over the MEME VIDEO THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP’S CAMPAIGN is, itself, the actual outrage, considering their track record. How is a Donald Trump rendition of “Julius Caesar”, where Trump is brutally assassinated, considered “art” and “entertainment” and a silly video of a movie scene with Trump and his political opponents superimposed onto the actual characters of the movie is considered as “depicting violence” against the media? I’ll tell you how: these people are utterly narcissistic. Remember when the media lambasted a rodeo because someone had a Barack Obama mask that kind of mocked him even though they had also mocked George W. Bush? Compare and contrast the two presidents then: Obama? Can’t even make fun of him. Trump? Can show him brutally assassinated and it’s considered “art” and it’s sacred. The Left is full of hypocritical narcissists who wouldn’t know a joke if they had a debate stage full of them. John 3:20 “For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed.” Author: Freddie Marinelli. With the Democrat Party’s efforts to insist to the American people that President Trump committed impeachable offenses during his phone call with Ukraine (despite the fact the transcript is public and anyone with an internet connection can tell nothing of the sort occurred), Fox News, which always has Trump’s numbers in the gutter, released a recent poll that said 51% of Americans wanted President Trump impeached and removed from office. However, there are a number of problems with that poll. For starters, the sample size is rather small, with 1,003 registered voters. That’s not incredibly small, but smaller than others such as Rasmussen, who tend to have 1,500 registered voters. But the most important aspect is the sample of political affiliation. It’s not hard to get 51% saying Trump needs to be impeached and removed from office when you poll 48% Democrats, 40% Republicans and 12% Independents. There are far more Democrats than Republicans or Independents in this poll (likely on purpose) for this to really be an accurate belief for the majority of American people. Literally all you need is all Democrats and a couple Never Trump Republicans and Left-leaning Independents to achieve 51%. And the kicker? The margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points. In other words, it could easily still be 48% of Americans want Trump impeached and removed from office, which interestingly enough, is the same percentage of Democrats polled in this survey. Obviously, Fox News is trying to tell Republicans to abandon Trump, as “a majority of Americans favor impeachment and removal” of Trump. But when you get into the details of the survey, you find it to be nothing but a farce. Oversampling Democrats is what all fake news polls do every single time to make the numbers appear to be better or worse, depending on the narrative they want the poll to drive. It’s what multiple polls did throughout 2016, when some polls had Hillary ahead of Trump by DOUBLE DIGITS at the very least and running away with the election. Obviously, that didn’t happen. Rasmussen was the only one that accurately predicted the 2016 election and in their survey, while Trump’s numbers are down a tad, it’s nothing major. Trump’s approval currently stands at 47%. While that’s lower than the low-50s that Trump tends to enjoy, that is actually relatively normal for the President. It’s necessary to note that this is a daily tracking poll of Trump’s approval, which will naturally tend to be rather volatile from day to day. Just two days ago, it was at 45% and it’s been hovering in the high-40s since the beginning of the month a couple of weeks ago. And this is all coming off of the Democrats’ latest attempt at smearing Trump, with suggesting, without evidence, that Trump broke the law during his July 25th phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky. No doubt, the allegation has damaged Trump a little bit, but nowhere close to what the fake news media suggests or would want to be real. Again, the Fox News survey sampled far more Democrats than Republicans or Independents. And even then, they barely got a majority out of the total number. I know very well that the Democrats and their voters want to get rid of Donald Trump. Impeachment is something they’ve been wanting heavily since Trump won in the first place, before the Russian collusion narrative was even formed. They wanted him gone just for winning and that’s still the case, even if they fall back on Ukraine or Russia being the reason. But the rest of America doesn’t seem to be with them, considering that only 39% of Independents said Trump should be impeached and removed and 47% disagreed IN THIS VERY POLL. My guess would be that the real number of people who want Trump impeached and removed from office is somewhere in the mid-to-high-30s or low-40s, if all things are equal. The reason for this line of thinking, apart from the obvious oversampling and poll-manipulating tactics used by Fox News, is that Rasmussen poll. 47% is, again, pretty normal for Trump. Heck, despite everything being thrown at him, he still enjoys a better approval rating than Obama did at the same point in his own presidency. In October 2011, President Barack Obama’s approval rating stood at only 42%. And he didn’t have the media with over 90% negative news coverage of him spreading fake news stories about trying to dig up dirt on his political opponents and working with foreign governments to meddle in a presidential election (ironic that he did those things, at least for 2016). Trump has the radical Leftist fake news media trying to destroy him, Fox News hosts who hate his guts and will lie about him just as badly as the rest of the Left, Never Trump Republicans like Mitt Romney pushing for impeachment, and still, despite all of that, he is a more popular president than Barack Obama. Is it any wonder, at this point, why trust in the media is at such an all-time low? When the people whose job is to report reality are trying, instead, to shape it and convince people of a fantasy, what credibility do those people have? What reason does anyone have to trust what Chuck Todd or Jim Acosta or Rachel Maddow or Anderson Cooper or David Brooks or Shepherd Smith or Neil Cavuto or any of these bozos have to say when all they do is attempt to deceive their audience with poorly-researched pieces, opinion-laden “news” articles and minimal effort in verifying the credibility of the sources they use? Or when they oversample Democrats BY 8 PERCENTAGE POINTS MORE THAN REPUBLICANS IN A SURVEY ABOUT OVERALL AMERICAN VOTER SENTIMENT?! The hiring of Donna Brazile and Paul Ryan are quite symbolic of the kind of organization Fox News is: Never Trump, far-Leftist, Washington Establishment bullcrap. Without people like Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and Judge Jeanine Pirro, Fox News would sink to the ground. And they would completely deserve it. Psalm 52:2 “Your tongue plots destruction, like a sharp razor, you worker of deceit.” And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today! Author: Freddie Marinelli. Despite the fact that throughout the summer, with the Mueller report having found no Trump-Russia collusion and the narrative essentially having died, the fake news media switched tactics to try and intimidate people into believing that recession was right around the corner and it was the end of this economic boom in an effort to try and hurt Trump. The problem with that is, even though such reporting can hurt the stock market, the fake news media can’t report a recession into existence. Several factors have to contribute and none of them really showed signs of a recession. An economic cooldown, at most, but nothing close to a recession. And with September 2019’s jobs numbers, we can still see how good of an economy we have. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the U.S. economy created 136,000 jobs in September. A relatively low number, at least in comparison to others that we have seen in the Trump economy, but still good nonetheless. It’s also likely that the number would’ve been higher if General Motors workers hadn’t gone on strike, preventing that company from being able to hire many new people. What’s more, the jobs numbers were revised up for July and August, totaling 45,000 new jobs added to the numbers of both months (159,000 to 166,000 for July and 130,000 to 168,000 for August), meaning even more jobs created over that span, but slightly dipping for September. But in any case, that’s not all. The unemployment rate is now sitting at 3.5%, down from 3.7% the previous month. The last time it sat at 3.5% was on December of 1969. The only thing that was relatively negative in the report was wage growth, where average hourly earnings were down by 1 cent after having risen by 11 cents the previous month. But regardless, the unemployment rate is at the lowest level it has been since December 1969, matching that rate exactly, which is an impressive feat. But that’s not all. The African American unemployment rate held steady at 5.5%, but for African American men, it fell to 5.4%, which is the lowest level since December of 1973, when it was at 5.2%. The unemployment rate for African American women, on the other hand, went slightly up to 4.6%, up by 0.2 percentage points. And when it comes to Hispanic Americans, the unemployment rate is sitting at a new record-low of 3.9%, the first time in American history when the Hispanic unemployment rate fell below 4% (at least recorded history by the BLS since 1973). As a matter of fact, President Trump is the only president in history to see multiple months where Hispanic unemployment was below 5%. The only other time before Trump’s presidency that Hispanic unemployment was below 5% was in 2006, when Bush was President. However, that was short-lived, as that was the only month in recorded history up to that point when it was that low and it only proceeded to climb as the great recession followed. But ever since Trump took office, Hispanic unemployment never rose above 5.5%, which was the number it was sitting at when Trump was inaugurated. The following month, March of 2017, the unemployment rate for Hispanics dropped by 0.5 percentage points. Trump also saw 23 total months when Hispanic unemployment rate was below 5%, with 18 of those months being the last 18 months so far. But all of these figures really show the type of picture – the kind of reality – that the Left does not want people to see and know about. The Trump economy is strong. Very strong. The reason 2020 Democrats have stayed as far away as possible from discussing the economy is because there is nothing but good news for Trump there. No other President has achieved what Trump has achieved, Democrat or Republican, at least when it comes to Hispanic unemployment. And again, African American unemployment (at least for men) is the lowest since 1973 and general unemployment is the lowest since late 1969. Regardless of what the media might try and report, they do not report on reality. They only try and shape it. Similar to the polls that say that every Democrat candidate beats Trump (what a load), the fake news media’s reports regarding anything are total crap. They mistakenly believe that the strength of the economy is tied strictly to the stock market. And while it is a considerable part of it, short-term downtrends in the stock market do not mean downtrends in the economy as a whole. The unemployment rate has been going up and down throughout the Trump presidency, but the trend is largely down. The economy has been booming over the past couple of years thanks to Trump’s economic policies of deregulation and thanks to the tax cuts. These are things that, try as they might, the fake news media cannot control with fake news reports. Here’s hoping these trends continue to show throughout the rest of Trump’s presidency and beyond. Romans 8:28 “And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.” And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today! Author: Freddie Marinelli. With the Democrats jumping the shark with this latest attempt to smear President Trump as having committed a crime (none can be found and they have to make stuff up) and seeking to launch an impeachment inquiry before either the Ukraine phone call transcript or the whistleblower complaint were released, it’s quite obvious that Nancy Pelosi has completely lost control of the Democrat Party in the House of Representatives, which is the reason Trump tweeted that she was no longer the House Speaker (which the humorless Left considered to be an official declaration from him that he doesn’t have the power to do and not a joke at Pelosi’s expense). Along this decision to launch an impeachment inquiry that will ultimately backfire on the Left harder than the Russian collusion hoax (just as little evidence of wrongdoing and tons of made-up bullcrap made to smear the President won’t get rid of Trump, I can assure you), Pelosi told The Texas Tribune CEO and co-founder Evan Smith that it didn’t matter if the Democrats lost the House in 2020. Smith first said: “I want to ask you… heading into the next election cycle, do you have any anxiety at all about any of the stuff we’re talking about or anything that we’re not talking about impacting your ability to hold control of the House in 2020?” Pelosi replied: “Doesn’t matter… Our first responsibility is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Yeah, right. If that were what you were seeking to do, you wouldn’t be launching an impeachment inquiry based on a hearsay report… before that report was even made public. She continued: “People say you have to take a political risk doing that. That doesn’t matter. That doesn’t matter because we cannot have a President of the United States undermining his oath of office, his loyalty to his oath of office, undermining our national security, and undermining the integrity of our elections. Our elections are the fundamental point of our democracy.” Okay, two things. First, we are not a democracy. We are a republic. Unfortunately, those two terms are used so interchangeably, even by Pelosi later on in the interview, that most people have completely forgotten what the difference is and think they are the same thing. They are not. Second, where was this “patriotism” when Obama had the FBI spy on Trump? Where was it when Obama let 4 Americans die in Benghazi? Where was it when Obama’s IRS began to spy on conservatives? Where was it when Obama’s DOJ gave guns to the cartel? Where was it when Obama promised Medvedev that he would “have more flexibility” after the 2012 election? Every single charge the Democrats throw at Trump has been committed by Barack Obama. Every lie they spread about Trump is a truth about Obama. Democrats didn’t care as Obama superseded the Constitution when he used an EO to bring DACA into law or when he made a nuclear deal with Iran without having Congress ratify it. When a Democrat acts like a dictator, these people have no problem. When a Republican is in office, the Democrats will lie and say he is a dictator. But in any case, allow me to get to the main point of this article. To reiterate, Nancy Pelosi says that it doesn’t matter if the Democrats lose the House in 2020 if Trump gets impeached. I really only have one question: if impeachment of Trump is as popular as some polls would have us believe, such as a CBS poll which says that 55% of people approve of an impeachment inquiry into Trump, why would the Democrats be in trouble of losing the House in 2020? If impeaching Trump is as demanded as the Left claims it is, as the fake news polls claim it is, then how are the Democrats the ones at risk in 2020? You would think that if impeachment is as highly-desired by the vast majority of the American populace that the party moving forward with impeachment would be a lock-in to win the White House, the Senate, and keep the House, if not grow their majority. Pelosi, who only a week or so ago claimed there was no way a Democrat wouldn’t win the White House in 2020, is now accepting the fact that there is a possibility the Democrats would lose the House come 2020? These people aren’t as confident that Trump will be impeached and defeated as they might claim to be. In fact, if Al Green is anything to go by, the only reason they are looking to impeach Trump is because they KNOW he will win reelection. While it only takes a simple majority in the House to impeach Trump, which the Democrats have, impeachment does not mean removal from office. It also doesn’t mean that Trump can’t run for reelection. The removal of Trump would have to be the Senate’s job, where a two-thirds majority, or 67 votes, would be required. And given the composition of the current Senate, that would mean a third of Republicans would have to vote in favor of removal, which is unlikely, even with traitors like Romney, Mike Lee and the others who voted against Trump’s National Emergency declaration to build the wall. So even if the House does vote in favor of impeaching Trump, that doesn’t mean he’s defeated. It taints his presidency for sure, but it’s not the complete and utter defeat that the Democrats would want. And again, I highly doubt that the impeachment of Trump is what most people want, as people are reading into these polls. If it were as demanded by people as these polls might claim, the Democrats would not stand to lose anything in 2020. If you remember, I used to say that the reason Pelosi was trying to hold back against the radical Leftists in her party demanding for impeachment was because this would put Democrats in swing states at risk of losing their seats if they were forced to vote on impeachment. If you remember from an article last month where I discussed what would likely happen if Democrats were to seek to impeach Trump (granted, this was before the Russian-collusion 2.0 story came up), Democrat voters in purple states were at risk of losing voters regardless of what way they voted. Simply being forced to vote for it would mean risking their seats. But now, Pelosi has either succumbed to the pressure from the radical Leftists in her party or she has gone full-blown TDS (likely a bit of both). Now, launching an impeachment inquiry into Trump is not the same as holding the actual impeachment vote itself. It could also be that Pelosi is simply trying to buy some time by having an impeachment inquiry, that way they can attack Trump and she can give the radicals a little something to chew on for the time being. But I don’t know for sure why Pelosi has decided to do this, particularly given the timing of the entire thing. It’s one thing if there is an allegation against Trump and there is a whistleblower complaint (that is nothing but hearsay, but let’s pretend it’s relatively legit for the time being) that could then be made public. But launching an impeachment inquiry before people even know the reason for it apart from fake news reports is… surprisingly short-sighted from Pelosi. Although, the more you think about it, with what we know from the NYT, that AG Bill Barr is also trying to work with Australia (who also had a hand in the 2016 smear of Trump), it becomes clear that the purpose behind all of this the Democrats simply have no other choice. Barr might be inching closer and closer to finding the many skeletons in the Democrats' closet which could absolutely destroy them come 2020. They failed in destroying him and now, that failure might come back to bite them, if Barr finds and releases what I think he will find and release. At the end of the day, all this is is a cover up of 2016 and obstruction of justice. But regardless of what may be the purpose behind this impeachment inquiry, one thing is certain: they are not as confident as they pretend they are that this will get rid of Trump for good. To reiterate, if this is truly what the vast majority of the American people wanted, there would be no risk for the Democrats in the House in 2020, or any other public office. Pelosi could’ve just as easily replied by saying: “I won’t even entertain that thought as it’s not possible” or simply allude to the impossibility of Democrats coming up massive losers here. But she didn’t. She acknowledged the Democrats could lose and lose big. If this truly was the course the American people wanted to take, the Democrats would only stand to gain from launching an impeachment inquiry. I think Pelosi, and the rest of the Democrats, are seriously mischaracterizing what the will of the American people is. Not that I can blame them, with fake news polls showing what they are showing. The Democrats live and die by polls telling them they are winning and they are special. If a poll essentially gives them the green light to begin an impeachment inquiry or even formal proceedings, even if it’s nothing but fake news, these people will roll with it. They are that self-involved and narcissistic that they believe they can do no wrong and everything they do is seen as perfection by the majority of people. But reality has to set in at one point or another. Likely, that point will be November 4th, 2020, the day after the election when a winner will have been decided. Proverbs 6:12-15 “A worthless person, a wicked man, goes about with crooked speech, winks with his eyes, signals with his feet, points with his finger, with perverted heart devises evil, continually sowing discord; therefore calamity will come upon him suddenly; in a moment he will be broken beyond healing.” And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today! Author: Freddie Marinelli. The White House released the whistleblower’s complaint for the public to read recently, after having first released the transcript of the phone call President Donald Trump had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Having read both documents, it becomes clear that the whistleblower’s complaint was nothing more than hearsay and unproven allegations. The whistleblower (who is being reported as being a CIA officer, according to the NYT) begins his or her complaint by alleging that Donald Trump, in his call with Zelensky, was attempting to undermine the 2020 U.S. elections: “In the course of my official duties, I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election. This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals,” read part of the complaint. What we read here is a clear attempt to use the Russian collusion narrative’s talking points to make it look like Trump is at it again and will do it all once again to win in 2020. He/she cites “multiple U.S. Government officials”, which are all, of course, anonymous, so they could not exist for all we know, and he/she asserts that the investigation into Hunter Biden was at the top of Trump’s priorities during the phone call. But as I said in the article where I discussed the transcript of the phone call, the main thing Trump asked for as his “favor” (which has been twisted by the fake news media as being a mafia-style shakedown to look into the Bidens) is to look into the Crowdstrike thing, which has connections to Ukraine, as part of the investigation into the Russian collusion hoax. So right off the bat, the whistleblower, who him/herself later admits was not “a direct witness to most of the events described”, is alleging that Trump is trying to collude with a foreign power to influence the 2020 Presidential elections, citing what he/she heard from “multiple… government officials”. Allow me to share with you the definition of hearsay: “Information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.” What’s more, the law definition of hearsay is: “the report of another person’s words by a witness, which is usually disallowed as evidence in a court of law.” The whistleblower’s complaint wouldn’t even be held up as evidence in a court of law, and yet, the lunatic Leftists in the Democrat Party are running with it as though it is Gospel from Christ Himself. The complaint later on attempts to describe the talking points of the phone call, and while some topics were rather accurate, the way it was presented in the complaint is totally inaccurate: “Early in the morning of 25 July, the President spoke by telephone with Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky… Multiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call informed me that, after an initial exchange of pleasantries, the President used the remainder of the call to advance his personal interests. Namely, he sought to pressure the Ukrainian leader to take actions to help the President’s 2020 reelection bid. According to the White House officials who had direct knowledge of the call, the President pressured Mr. Zelensky to, inter alia: initiate or continue an investigation(2) into the activities of former Vice President Joseph Biden and his son, Hunter Biden; assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm Crowdstrike(3), which initially reported that Russian hackers had penetrated the DNC’s networks in 2016; and meet or speak with two people the President named explicitly as his personal envoys on these matter [sic], Mr. Giuliani and Attorney General Barr, to whom the President referred multiple times in tandem.” The only things accurate about this is the date on which the call took place and the pleasantries that were shared. The President DID NOT pressure Ukraine into doing anything. There was no threat made and no quid pro quo present in the transcript of the phone call. The 2020 U.S. Presidential election was not even DISCUSSED during the call. The DNC was not discussed either, only Crowdstrike due to its relation with Ukraine. What’s more, it was Zelensky, not Trump, who brought up investigations, discussing an ambassador whom he had recalled and assuring Trump that he would do what he could to ensure “all the investigations will be done openly and candidly.” This is what Trump used to segue and mention the particular prosecutor, whom had been shut down by Biden, as Biden himself admitted on camera. Zelensky himself then went on about how he had been intending to continue the investigation into Hunter Biden’s company, with Trump asking that he might also look into the shutting down of the prosecutor, as it does appear to be a very obvious case of corruption and abuse of power by the former Vice President. Trump asking Zelensky to look into seemingly criminal activity with relation to a top Ukrainian prosecutor and a cybersecurity firm with connections to the former Ukrainian government is what the Democrats want to hang Trump for. It’s not the criminals that should be punished, but the person asking for justice, in the mind of the Left. And again, it’s not like this was at the top of Trump’s priorities. They didn’t begin discussing these things until pages 3 and 4 of a 5-page transcript of a phone call (it’s that short because there’d be no point in putting in what the translators said, when they were just repeating the words said by the two world leaders in the other’s language). The point of the call seemingly was to congratulate Zelensky on more election victories and to discuss the relationship our two countries have. Later on, Trump asked if they could look into the Crowdstrike issue as the DOJ is currently looking into the source of the Russian collusion scandal and it might have begun in Ukraine, with former Ukrainian government officials. No pressure, no threat to withhold a billion dollars (unlike a certain corrupt former VP), no quid pro quo. Only justice. As far as the whistleblower complaint goes, it does not describe the events of the phone call very well. It tries to twist what occurred during the call into something Machiavellian when there was nothing there at all that was inappropriate or illegal. And the funny thing is that the complaint also included a complaint regarding the “locking down” and “restricting” of access to the records of the call. Part of the complaint was that government officials wanted the call to be restricted from most officials EVEN THOUGH THAT IS PERFECTLY NORMAL! “In the days following the phone call, I learned from multiple U.S. officials that senior White House officials had intervened to ‘lock down’ all records of the phone call, especially the word-for-word transcript of the call that was produced – as is customary – by the White House Situation Room. This set of actions underscored to me that White House officials understood the gravity of what had transpired in the call.” What a lying sad sack. Phone calls between foreign leaders ARE CLASSIFIED YOU LOON! Only a select few people are allowed to listen in on the conversation, otherwise it would be very easy to get access to the phone calls, which would pose a national security risk. Trump had to DECLASSIFY the transcript of the call BECAUSE IT WAS CLASSIFIED TO BEGIN WITH AS ARE ALL OTHER CALLS BETWEEN FOREIGN LEADERS! Obama had many phone calls with foreign leaders, all of which are classified and senior White House officials had to “lock down” and “restrict”. This is yet another attempt at making a mountain out of a molehill; to make the normal appear to be abnormal just because Trump does it. And the funniest part is that this part of the complaint, as useless as it was to begin with, is made utterly irrelevant by the fact that Trump has declassified the transcript of the phone call, so everyone with an internet connection has access to it. The whistleblower complaint is nothing more than hearsay and nonsense. The details described in the complaint do not match what was said during the phone call even a little and they try to pretend that what was said was an impeachable offense, down to even trying to restrict access to the records of the call. It fundamentally does nothing for the Democrats in trying to impeach Trump. The facts do not support the reality these lunatics are trying to create. No amount of editing from the fake news media or “parody” paraphrasing from Adam “full of” Schiff will change the fact that this “scandal” is the Russian-collusion hoax 2.0, which will end in the exact same cataclysmic failure that the first rendition did. Proverbs 19:9 “A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will perish.” And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today! Author: Freddie Marinelli. Another Nothingburger: Trump’s Call To Ukraine Was Perfectly Formal, Appropriate, And Legal9/26/2019 With the Russian collusion narrative all but six feet under, and with every other “scandal” pushed out by the fake news media flopping more than a fish out of water, the Left’s latest “scandal” has ironically focused on Russia’s rival: Ukraine. Like with the Russian collusion narrative, Trump was alleged to have tried to collude with Ukraine to interfere with the 2020 Presidential elections via the investigation of Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, thereby hurting Biden’s own candidacy. It is also being alleged that Trump threatened Ukraine with withholding foreign aid to the country if they didn’t investigate Hunter and the company he worked for. However, like with everything else these people spew, that was nothing more than fake news. With the way the media was talking about it, they made it look like investigating Biden was all that was in Trump’s mind and that he was out to influence in the elections. But the facts point in the other direction completely. You see, President Donald Trump recently released the full, unclassified transcript of his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. What we find in the transcript of the phone call are a couple of things: First, Trump congratulating Zelensky on his party’s success in a recent Parliamentary election in which they gained quite a bit of power. They talked quite a bit about what they hope to do in the future as far as U.S.-Ukraine relations go, with Zelensky crediting Trump as being an inspiration for Zelensky’s own election victory back in May of this year. Zelensky mentioned his desire to “drain the swamp” present in Ukrainian politics, and the two discussed the relationship Ukraine has with the European Union, which doesn’t seem to be a particularly good one. The transcript is five pages long and Trump doesn’t begin discussing other matters until the third page. In that page, he mentions the cybersecurity company Crowdstrike, which is connected to the DOJ’s investigation into election interference. President Trump said the following during the call: “I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.” So what is being said here? Trump is asking Ukraine to look into the whole ordeal surrounding Crowdstrike, which is under investigation by the DOJ as part of Barr's investigation into the origination of the Russian collusion hoax. As far as Biden goes, to give you some context as to why he is being talked about at all, back in 2016, a top Ukrainian prosecutor was investigating Burisma Holdings, a company which employed the former VP’s son as a board member, as well as a firm called Rosemont Seneca, which received monthly transfers of upwards of $166,000 from Burisma between 2014 and 2015. And Joe Biden himself had bragged about withholding $1 billion in U.S. loans to Ukraine if they didn’t fire the prosecutor investigating Hunter. Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations that he told then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko: “I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.” It’s truly ironic because one of the allegations the Left had been making about this call that Trump had with Zelensky was that he had a quid pro quo, or a favor granted in exchange for something in return, and that Trump had threatened to withhold money unless they investigate Biden, but in reality, we find that BIDEN himself had committed this type of quid pro quo threat. All Trump had asked Zelensky to do is to look into the entire ordeal surrounding Crowdstrike, if at all possible. Within the phone call, Trump wasn’t pressuring Zelensky to look into anything. He didn’t threaten Ukraine with withholding funds if they didn’t do something. It was BIDEN who did that back when he was Vice President (and Obama was likely in on it too). All that was in the phone call was Trump congratulating Zelensky on more election victories, discussing them meeting up in Poland, the U.S. or Ukraine, discussing the economic potential of Ukraine moving forward as an energy independent nation, and looking into Crowdstrike. It wasn't until later on that Trump mentioned the prosecutor who had been fired: "I just want to let you know that's the other thing... There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me," said the President to Zelensky. The main thing that Trump seemed to have sought was looking into Crowdstrike, with the Biden stuff appearing to be a complete afterthought. And, by the way, he didn’t have to threaten Ukraine like Biden did. That’s because Trump isn’t a corrupt crook like Joe Biden is or Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn) is. Why Sen. Chris Murphy? Because he did something relatively similar to Joe Biden. The Hill reports that earlier in September, Sen. Chris Murphy told Zelensky not to cooperate with Rudy Giuliani. To Murphy’s own words: “I told Zelensky that he should not insert himself or his government into American politics. I cautioned him that complying with the demands of the President’s campaign representatives to investigate a political rival of the President would gravely damage the U.S.-Ukraine relationship. There are few things that Republicans and Democrats agree on in Washington these days, and support for Ukraine is one of them.” Basically, he gave a thinly-veiled threat to President Zelensky not to investigate Hunter Biden in a rather similar manner as Joe did. He was essentially threatening that relations with the two countries could be jeopardized once a Democrat wins the White House if they investigate Hunter Biden and cooperate with Giuliani. Again, these two Democrats (and others like them) are extremely corrupt. If you would like to read the transcript yourself, here is the link: https://www.scribd.com/document/427411245/Trump-Zelensky-trancript#from_embed. Read it for yourself and see what a nothingburger this “scandal” which was used to launch an impeachment inquiry into the President is. Read it and discover just how utterly desperate the Left is to get rid of Trump. There is nothing in it that even points to criminal activity. And for this, the Democrats wish to impeach him (not that they need much. His very existence triggers them to wish to impeach him). For this absolute fake news nothingburger. The Democrats thought this would be what ended Trump. Like with everything else they tried, it utterly blew up in their faces. Let’s see just how crazier these people can get. I have the feeling we’ve just scratched the surface. Romans 16:18 “For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naïve.” And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today! Author: Freddie Marinelli. With the 2020 Presidential election still a year away, an awful lot of things can happen. However, if things remain about the same as today, there are quite a number of things that should scare any Democrat Presidential candidate when facing President Donald Trump. Here, I highlight five particular polls that should serve as a warning to Democrats not to continue down the road of rampant Marxism. Poll #1: support for the President sits at 53%, according to Rasmussen. On September 24th, 2019, Rasmussen Reports shared their daily presidential tracking poll and found that 53% of likely U.S. voters approve of the job Donald Trump is doing as President of the United States. This includes 37% who strongly approve of his job as POTUS. This is important to note because, while Rasmussen tends to show high numbers for Trump (not always, though), this is a sign of a very popular President in office. Rasmussen, back in September 16, found his approval numbers at 50% (so it fluctuates a lot, given the day) and is polling better than Obama did at the same time in his own presidency. Back in September 16, 2011, Barack Obama was polling at 46% approval, compared to Trump’s 50% at the same date 8 years later and even compared to now. Rasmussen also tends to be one of the most reliable polling firms and is one that accurately predicted the 2016 presidential election results. As it currently stands, Trump is considerably more popular of a President than Barack Obama was at the same point in time in his own term. Tell that to Leftists and they’re likely to not believe you, but it seems to be the truth. And it seems like a massive detriment to Democrats for 2020, if he can keep up these types of numbers (again, they do fluctuate). It is extremely difficult to defeat a popular President. Poll #2: Americans strongly believe and defend our rights to gun ownership. Rasmussen found that 75% of American adults believe the United States Constitution “guarantees the right of an average citizen to own a gun. Just 15% disagree. Ten percent (10%) are not sure. These findings are virtually unchanged in surveying since Rasmussen Reports first asked this question 10 years ago.” This is very important to know because of the kind of policies some people on the Left have been openly espousing as of late. While many Democrats are trying to push back against Beto O’Rourke’s desire to forcibly disarm the American people, the furry idiot continues to double and triple-down on this policy. After having “restarted” his campaign for the third or fourth time, Beto decided to have his campaign focus on a Soviet-style disarmament of the American populace via a “mandatory gun buyback” program that is nothing more than a complete and total disarmament of the people. With him continuing to assert a “need” to disarm Americans, he reflects on the rest of the Democrat Party, who at least inwardly share the same views. Over the past few decades, the Democrats have been looking for ways to slowly but surely make it harder and harder for people to get a gun and looking for ways to get rid of people’s guns. Proposed “red flag laws” (which have been foolishly, but unsurprisingly bipartisan) are one example of such a desire to get rid of people’s ability to own guns (and using a system that does not help in the slightest and only further endangers people, thereby working against the supposed purposes of the laws). And while Beto is nowhere close to being the nominee, his proposal, while being pushed back by people like Chuck Schumer and other Democrats, is something every Democrat would be willing to try out, even if they don’t publicly announce their support for it. But with 75% of Americans defending our constitutional right to bear arms, policies like the one Beto is espousing are not something other Democrats will want to attach themselves to. These people are deadliest when you don’t know their true intentions. Poll #3: consumer confidence is near a five-year high. Rasmussen Reports found in their Economic Index that consumer spending sits at 140.8, which is virtually unchanged from August and is among 2019’s highest. According to Rasmussen, “Enthusiasm about the economy started to grow immediately following Donald Trump’s election as president in November 2016 and spiked to 145.9 in February 2018.” Comparing Trump to Obama once again, Obama’s highest index number in the final years of his presidency was at 121.5 in January of 2015 and hovered around 108.1 his last month in the White House. This is also very important to note because it is a strong indication of just how wrong the Leftist media is about a “looming recession.” When consumer confidence is high, there is not much reason to fear a recession at all. People are comfortable spending their money (largely because of great unemployment rates and wage hikes) and that is always good news for any economy. This is also likely a good reason for Trump’s high approval numbers. It’s hard to disapprove of someone’s job when the economy is this good. Even if people have personal issues with Trump, the economy is on Trump’s side, which is why the Democrats avoid talking about it like the plague, unless the market has a bad day. The phrase “It’s the economy, stupid” is very much a true statement. Poll #4: fewest number of people support single-payer healthcare in five years. According to Rasmussen, 36% of likely U.S. voters favor a single-payer healthcare system where the government provides health coverage to everyone in the country. 47% are opposed with 17% undecided. “This is the highest level of opposition in nearly five years. A year ago, voters were evenly divided, with 43% in favor of a single-payer system and 43% opposed.” This likely has to do with the next poll. Poll #5: people dislike Medicare for All once they learn they have to pay higher taxes and there will be longer wait times for operations. Among Democrat voters, 70% support the socialized healthcare program supported by Warren and Sanders, with only 21% opposing. This is according to a polling firm working for the Biden campaign. However, when told that universal healthcare would cost taxpayers $3.2 trillion a year, 51% of people said they found that to be a good reason to oppose the proposal. Similarly, 53% said longer waiting periods for operations were a good reason to oppose the program. While the general trend has been seemingly a downward one for support for single-payer healthcare over the past couple of years, I firmly believe one of the biggest blunders Bernie Sanders committed was giving away the secret that middle-class families and income-earners will see a raise in taxes as a result of implementing Medicare for All. Knowing very well that taxing the ultra-wealthy into oblivion will not get him anywhere close to the amount of money needed to afford the program, he knew that middle-income people would have to pay up. He just made the mistake of admitting it to the people during a debate. It looks like people are beginning to wake up to the idea that “free healthcare” is not actually free. So with all of these polls, I really do not see much reason for Trump not to be able to beat these lunatics. Joe Biden might position himself as a moderate, but he’s no less radical than the other people he is currently sharing a stage with. And the other two candidates who are actually in this race to the nomination espouse extremely radical, fringe ideologies that as we can see are not particularly popular with most people. Again, a lot can change in the span of a single year. We still don’t even know for certain who will be the Democrat nominee (despite Biden having been considered the clear frontrunner and most likely nominee back when the campaign first began). But to reiterate my previous point: as long as these numbers are similar in a year, if not better, then Trump really should be able to win reelection. Deuteronomy 28:7 “’The Lord will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you. They shall come out against you one way and flee before you seven ways.’” And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today! Author: Freddie Marinelli. Yesterday, I talked about a poll that said a good amount of people thought America’s best days were ahead of us, and that a good majority of people thought that if any changes were to be made to the Constitution, that they should further limit the power of the federal government, as opposed to giving it more power. Though I did not strictly mention this in that article, that is a very conservative ideology that is still shared amongst the majority of American voters. Similarly, a recent Harvard/Harris poll showed that nearly three in four swing state voters, the kind that Democrats need to get in order to win elections, are against the idea of giving illegal immigrants driver’s licenses. But wait, there’s more. It’s not just a policy that is rejected by swing voters. Across the country, and even across the political spectrum, the idea is widely rejected. According to the poll, 72% of all U.S. voters said they opposed the idea of giving illegals driver’s licenses, which includes 74% of swing voters, as mentioned previously, 85% of Republican voters, 73% of moderate voters and even almost 60% of Democrats. Across racial lines, nearly 66% of African Americans oppose the idea of giving licenses to illegals, as well as 76% of whites, and 57% of Hispanics. And it’s not like this was a small survey. The sample size exceeded 2500 registered voters, which is a pretty big sample size for a survey. This just goes to show just how out-of-touch and divorced from reality the Democrat Party is in terms of the policies they espouse. Even in the state of New York, where they made it legal for illegal immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses, 61% of New York voters opposed the idea, according to a Siena College poll from March 2018. In that poll, 45% of Democrats opposed the idea of giving licenses to illegals, alongside 84% of GOP voters, 71% of swing voters, 73% of upstate residents, 60% of those in the working or middle class, 70% of Jewish New Yorkers, and 66% of Catholic New Yorkers. Virtually every demographic is hugely opposed to the dangerous idea of giving licenses to illegal immigrants, which basically allows them to go to polling places and vote, even if they are not registered (and, of course, ARE NOT SOVEREIGN CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY). Illegal immigration, and the fact that California has been giving illegals licenses since 2015, is what I think is a considerable part of the reason for the GOP to basically not exist in Commiefornia (as well as ballot harvesting and mysteriously finding more ballots with votes for the Democrat candidates after the polls closed). Not that the Democrat Party cares one wit. If their policies aren’t popular with Americans, they’ll just import voters from Latin America, who are begging to come to the States and be taken care of by the government, and the Democrat Party is all-too happy to oblige them. Like I have said multiple times in the past: their voting base is diminishing. They are pushing away longtime Democrat voters like union workers and working class white people in favor of illegal immigrants. They don’t care to get these people’s votes anymore because they can easily be replaced both in the job field and in the polls. As long as the Democrat Party has a permanent underclass that they can exploit and abuse, they don’t really care what most people think. Back in May of this year, I shared an article talking about a poll that said that 90% of Venezuelans wanted Maduro ousted and for socialism to be eradicated in their country. Nine out of ten Venezuelans want a complete overhaul of their political and economic system. Do you think Maduro cares? NOT AT ALL! He’s the guy in charge. So long as the military is on his side, he will be dictator in Venezuela until he dies, similar to Hugo Chavez. And after his death, an equally-socialist dictator will take his place. These people in power in Venezuela couldn’t give half a damn about what the people they rule over think. So long as their power is not at stake, they could not care less if almost 100% of Venezuelans hated their guts. The same thing applies to the Democrats. It doesn’t matter if American voters disagree with a particular policy of the Democrat Party. Any policy that gives them more power is a policy they will fully embrace. And any person who disagrees with them will be cast out of the Party and replaced by either a brainwashed millennial or a family of illegal immigrants (and even some legal immigrants) seeking a hand-out. The Democrat Party cares not for the environment, for women’s rights or freedom, for Latinos, for blacks, for minorities in general. They use all of these things to get as much power as they possibly can. Just look at the GND and the fact that AOC’s former chief of staff admitted that it wasn’t about climate change but economic change in America. All they care about is power and they will put on a face to fool people into following them and voting for them. They claim to care for the illegal immigrants coming into the country. They do not, as evidenced by Obama putting them in cages. They only care about their ability to get these uneducated people to buy into everything the Democrats are selling. In the meantime, they can be put into ghettos and be forgotten until the next election. These people thirst for power and are corrupted by it. Everywhere you see socialism, you see these people’s true colors. Maduro cares not for the people of Venezuela. Kim Jong-un cares not for the people of North Korea. Xi Jinping cares not for the people of China. The only difference between people like Maduro/Kim Jong-un/Xi Jinping and the Democrat Party in countries like the United States, or the ideological equivalents in Canada, the U.K., Germany, etc. is that Maduro, Kim Jong-un and Xi Jinping have enough power and stability in their power to not have to pretend to care about people. Left-wing politicians in the States, in Canada and in Europe have to pretend that what they are doing is for the “greater good.” Communist dictators do not have to do that because they have all the power they can have. This is the reality of the Left; this is who they are. They care only for themselves and their own power. They may say they care for other people, and they might actually believe they do, but at the end of the day, all that matters to them is how much power they have over the people they can rule over. Illegal immigrants do not care for the American culture or way of life. This is something they share in common with the American Left. It’s a match made in Hell and these people should not be in charge of a lemonade stand, let alone entire cities, counties, states and the country. Proverbs 29:2 “When the righteous increase, the people rejoice, but when the wicked rule, the people groan.” And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today! Author: Freddie Marinelli. I’ve said this multiple times before, but I will say it again because it’s particularly true: if you were to just watch the mainstream media, you would think we were on the brink of total collapse. From the MSM, we hear stories about climate change and how it’s all our fault; we hear stories about how Trump colluded with Russia (not anymore, really, but the attitude is still there); stories about how Kavanaugh sexually assaulted multiple women while in college (all of which are not corroborated by witnesses or evidence); and generally, that the world is getting worse and worse. However, a considerable majority of Americans believe that the country’s best days are ahead of us, not behind us. According to a recent Rasmussen poll, 59% of nationwide voters believe America’s best days are ahead of us, in contrast to 41% who believe they are behind us (thanks, Obama). This number includes 60% of conservatives AND liberals who say this, as well as 57% of moderates. 60% of Republicans and Democrats believe the future looks bright and so do 55% of Independents. Across racial demographics, 60% of Hispanics, 58% of whites and 53% of blacks agree with this optimistic idea. And it’s not like this is new. The trend has shown this to be around the average, with 58% of people saying the same back in June and 57% back in March. Interestingly enough, this comes in spite of the fact that only 35% of voters believe the federal government is doing a good job in terms of being a government of the people, by the people and for the people. What’s more, 71% believe the political system in America is broken, while only 16% disagree. This is good news, when you think about it. Yesterday, I wrote an article talking about why socialism was so attractive and came to the conclusion that our capitalist system of economics has been socialized to the point where young people are suffering and the blame is put on capitalism itself. Similarly, one could argue that the socialization of our political system has bastardized it. Yes, the Electoral College is still working wonders, but the fact that California is now an eternal shade of blue when only a few decades ago it at least had the capability of going red is quite the indication of political malpractice (as far as illegal immigration goes, let alone the other kinds of voter fraud present in states like Commiefornia). It also doesn’t help any that Congressmen on both sides of the aisle can be bought by lobbyists like Planned Parenthood and Wall Street, as well as other organizations. Now, one might also be able to assume that at least some of those people who say the system is broken are socialists who claim Capitalism itself is broken. One might be able to do that, but they actually would be wrong to do so. You see, Rasmussen also found that 81% of voters believe the reason for our system being broken is that our elected representatives AREN’T FOLLOWING THE CONSTITUTION. And while 30% believe the Constitution needs a major overhaul, a considerable majority (56%) believe that any changes that occur should FURTHER PLACE LIMITS ON THE POWER OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, which is the very thing the Constitution was written to do. The framers of the Constitution all knew what tyranny was like and knew that the best way for people to live free is for the federal government ruling over them to be as limited as possible without making it completely useless. The literal preamble of the Constitution reads as follows: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” The entire point of the Constitution is to insure the liberty and power of the PEOPLE of the United States, not the government.
In each of the first ten amendments, what is known as the Bill of Rights, we find rights and freedoms and powers that belong exclusively to We the People of the United States of America, if not to the state governments to protect the states from the possibility of a tyrannical President. This is why I say that no matter how socialist the Left wishes for us to be, the United States Constitution stands in the way. So long as there are people in power who are just, the Constitution will remain relevant to everyone. Of course, there are more amendments to the Constitution than the ones talked about in the Bill of Rights, but the general principle still applies: the federal government is necessarily limited in power. The Founding Fathers knew that it had to be limited in order to keep it from becoming tyrannical like the King of England they had fought and beaten. The Bill of Rights is there in order to limit the power the federal government can have on the individual states and on the people of the United States. And with 56% of people saying if any changes are to be made, they should be to FURTHER limit the government, as we think it has gotten too big, that only tells you the type of mentality we still have. So the overall climate in people’s minds, despite all the doom and gloom stuff shared by Democrat politicians and parroted by Left-wing media sources, seems to be that America’s best days are ahead of us, the government is cripplingly flawed and it should be limited in power. This only further tells me that the far-Left people you see so often on Twitter and other social media are extremely fringe groups that do not reflect the overall mindset and views of America. Romans 15:13 “May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, so that by the power of the Holy Spirit you may abound in hope.” And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today! Author: Freddie Marinelli. |
AuthorsFreddie Marinelli and Danielle Cross will bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free... Archives
December 2019
Categories
All
|