The simple answer is “yes, there is a deliberate plan to destroy the U.S.” But that a politician from an entirely different country is wondering about this goes to show just how obvious it is for us here, at least those of us who are paying attention.
 
For a bit of context, the new president responded to a tweet from The New York Post about commiedian Michael Rapaport’s Instagram video showcasing a local Rite Aid with empty shelves because of shoplifters which is closing down as a result.
 
The NYP’s tweet said: “Michael Rapaport says UES Rite Aid now closing because of shoplifters.”
 
To which El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele responded: “Is there a deliberate plan to destroy the United States from within? Why are the authorities and some of the media not even commenting on this (sic) things? Why are they letting their beautiful cities rot?”
 
I already answered the first question, so I will move on to the second. The reason some authorities and media aren’t even commenting on this is because they are okay with what’s happening but know it wouldn’t be good to address it in a positive manner.
 
The authorities were ordered to stand down or generally were handicapped in attempting to root out actual crime and have been told to arrest parents in parks and anyone not complying with the mayor or governor’s tyrannical orders. And if they do try to stop any of this, they will receive hatred from Antifa and BLM, if not outright threats, and potential punishment from the NYPD itself.
 
And the media have an agenda to destroy American cities, are glad that these things are happening, but know better than to say anything about it. Even just reporting on it would be a bad idea because they know no one outside of their commie bubble would be happy to hear of this.
 
Rampant crime in New York, Detroit, Chicago, Philly or any other Democrat-run city reflects poorly on the Democrats, so they sweep things under the rug regardless of the real damage their policies are causing.
 
In New York, transit crimes are up 65.5% and all crimes are up by over a third in the first two weeks of 2022 compared to the same time in 2021.
 
In Philadelphia, last month, a Democrat congresswoman was held up at gun point while in broad daylight at a park in South Philly, and had all her belongings stolen, alongside her car.
 
And in Chicago, there were 797 homicides in 2021, the most of any city in the nation, and the highest number in nearly 25 years. Democrats have held the mayorship for nearly 100 years. Chicago also saw 3,561 shootings in 2021.
 
These things, by and large, have to be ignored in some way. Obviously, it’s a lot harder to ignore a sitting congresswoman being held up at gun point, mugged, and carjacked in broad daylight, but they can keep pretending everything is fine anyway. Or just blame the guns, because these people are morons.
 
Addressing the obvious faults of the Democrat policies hurts Democrats in one way or another. Even in deep blue cities where they are guaranteed to win elections anyway as a result of stealing, they can only get away with so much before they are Jacobin’d out of power.
 
And as far as the president’s last question goes, they are letting their beautiful cities rot for their political agendas. They HATE the United States and wish to see it collapse. Even if they end up hurting those who moronically keep voting for them (legitimately), they will do whatever they can to hurt this country.
 
They will deliberately damage this country and blame it on nationalism and capitalism, and claim that this wouldn’t have happened if we were under a globalist power. It’d be like smashing your iPhone to pieces with a hammer and blaming Apple for not making their products hammer-proof.
 
But again, that a foreign politician can look at what’s happening in these cities and wonder if there is a deliberate plan to destroy America from within is a testament to just how obvious the Left has made it at this point.
 
Their disdain for America is painfully obvious not only from their actions, but their words, as they constantly claim this to be a “racist” nation and it was founded based on racist principles roughly 150 years before its actual founding, as though this is the only country that ever had slavery.
 
But this is why people like President Trump are as popular as they are. Americans love America, and we love anyone who loves America. We vote for anyone who loves America and particularly if they go on to show that both in words and in action once elected (which is unfortunately a rarity, but it’s getting better).
 
The Left has been trying to destroy America for decades now, and thanks to God, they are very far from reaching their goals, even in this present situation.
 
Biden is unpopular (50% want him impeached, including 34% of Democrats), the Democrats are screwed in November unless they can figure out a way to do this year what they did in 2020 (though with so many Democrats either retiring or announcing they won’t run again, I don’t think they’re very confident they can do that), and we will soon take our country back from the Deep State. Sooner than a lot of people, particularly them, would expect.
 
Deuteronomy 20:4
“For the Lord your God is he who goes with you to fight for you against your enemies, to give you the victory.”

The infamously unpopular Brandon administration might be even more unpopular than we had previously thought. A myriad of (intentional) screw-ups have made the illegitimate and already unpopular fake president be even less popular as time has gone on.
 
And at this rate, barring any overt cheating from the Dems (which would be admittedly more difficult to pull off than in 2020), the midterm elections will likely see a red wave, particularly as more and more sitting Democrats announce they won’t be running for re-election next year (a mirror of 2018 for Republicans, and I have always said that it was at least one reason why they lost the House that year).
 
But allow me to give you the context of this article. See, a Rasmussen poll recently surveyed roughly 1,000 Americans, asking them if Brandon should be impeached for his failure in Afghanistan.
 
I think the results are particularly eye-opening, as this was an issue a few months ago and, while it is notoriously one of the worst foreign screw-ups for anyone sitting in the Oval Office, you’d think the negative views surrounding it would have at least somewhat subsided since then.
 
But I think that, because of everything else he’s messing up, in particular the economy, people are less willing to forgive and forget that international embarrassment which should have cost at least ONE person his or her job.
 
And so, we see results like these:
 
57% of Men said that Brandon should be impeached; 62% of Women said the same, which is rather interesting as women tend to lean more to the Left in these polls; 54% of people aged 18-34 said he should be impeached, and like with women, younger people tend to also lean Left; 63% of 40-64 agreed Brandon needs to be impeached; 61% of those 65 and older also agreed.
 
Amongst white people, 60% said Brandon deserves to be impeached for Afghanistan, with 56% of blacks and 61% of “Other non-white” people saying the same. And along party lines, 83% of Republicans think he should be impeached (a rather low number for this demographic), 58% of the politically unaffiliated said the same, and an astounding 40% of Democrats also believe he deserves to be impeached.
 
All in all, 60% of all voters say they believe Brandon ought to be impeached for his failure in Afghanistan.
 
And while Dems were the only demographic which didn’t have a majority agreeing with that statement, the fact that 1) all other demographics did have said majority and 2) it got as close as 40% of them agreeing on this shows you just how much of a failure this guy is, even in the eyes of those who (legitimately) voted for him.
 
Oh, and before you ask, they didn’t like the slave owner either, as 58% said that Kamala is unqualified to be President.
 
Like I said, Brandon is an infamously unpopular occupier of the Oval Office, but this poll shows things to be even worse than I imagined. And again, this is over the subject of Afghanistan. Were they to ask about the subject of inflation, or his inability to “end” the pandemic as he said he would do, how many more people would have said he should be impeached?
 
And if more people were to understand that Joe Biden and the Democrats did, indeed, steal the 2020 presidential election, just how much of the country would be in uproar demanding either his impeachment or resignation (alongside Kamala’s), or even that Trump be allowed to serve the term that he had actually won?
 
The only things keeping this regime afloat are the fake news media and the Deep State (which controls the fake news media, so really, just the Deep State). But even they are not invincible, not when enough of us fight against them in a peaceful manner.
 
It is said that it only takes 3.5% of a country’s population participating in peaceful protest to bring about great change. In 1986, according to The BBC, “millions of Filipinos took to the streets of Manila in peaceful protest and prayer in the People Power movement. The Marcos regime folded on the fourth day. In 2003, the people of Georgia ousted Eduard Shevardnadze through the bloodless Rose Revolution, in which protestors stormed the parliament building holding the flowers in their hands. While in 2019, the presidents of Sudan and Algeria both announced they would step aside after decades in office, thanks to peaceful campaigns of resistance.”
 
While the fake news media isn’t covering them, millions around the world are protesting the tyrannical vaccine mandates and lockdowns instituted in would-be communist countries, such as the UK, Australia, Austria, Germany, Italy, and even in actual communist countries like Cuba, there are protests which go uncovered by the media because they run against their narrative that most people approve of the mandates.
 
But they won’t be ignored forever, and they won’t be beaten at any point. Likewise, something similar could occur in this country. Not over the vaccine mandates, as it’s practically dead on arrival already and any further attempt to enforce it would be met by lawsuits and disobedience not only from companies but entire states as well. But Brandon keeps destroying the country as he is, and more people are made to suffer for it, they will arrive to the breaking point.
 
Of course, this is all hypothetical, but I do believe and declare that Biden will no longer occupy the Oval Office relatively soon (and won’t be replaced by the giggling prostitute). And all it takes is 3.5% of us in active protest. Surely, we have far more than that already.
 
Dismantling the Deep State is absolutely possible, and we will achieve that sooner than one might expect.
 
Hebrews 11:1
“Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.”

​Despite repeated demonstrations that the Brandon administration intends to enforce vaccine mandates (and they haven't actually managed to really do anything on this regard, at least officially), their already illegal activity is faced by a judge's decision to block the vaccine mandates on the grounds that "The COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission of the disease among the vaccinated or mixed vaccinated/unvaccinated populations."

Gotta say, that's the first time I've ever heard the term "mixed vaccinated." That concept just makes so little sense to me, I could hardly believe it exists. Of course, this is with the implication that one jab of the vaccine isn't enough to count one as "vaccinated", and in the near future, will likely also include anyone who has gotten two jabs but not the "booster" shot, because, as we know, Fascist Fauci gets to change the definition of things like "vaccine", "cases", "deaths", etc.

At any rate, Louisiana U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty blocked the federal vaccine mandate for health care workers last week, a stepping stone to what can easily lead to a broader ban on the mandate itself regardless of circumstance.

In his ruling, the judge made the obvious and logical assertion that the Left selectively either ignores or outright demonizes: "If boosters are needed six months after being 'fully vaccinated,' then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate them?"

This is a question that the Left hates being asked because it directly challenges, with sound logic, the reasoning behind getting not only one, but two or three or four jabs to "combat" a virus which is no worse than seasonal flu (and which conveniently and mysteriously has made seasonal flu all but disappear completely).

If you were to ask this question to a Leftist, they will either call you a conspiracy theorist, a racist, or a "science denier", or a combination of the three. All ad hominem attacks which are the very embodiment of a lost argument.

Yet, these are the kinds of questions people in important positions, such as federal judges, are asking and which the communists will have to answer, if they even can find a reasonable one. 

The complainant in this case provided evidence based on Dr. Peter McCullough's declaration that the vaccines don't prevent transmission amongst any population, and that "Mandatory COVID-19 vaccines for hospitals do not increase safety for employees or hospital patients. McCullough declared that additional treatment with other drugs and supplements has resulted in an 85% reduction in hospitalizations and death of high-risk individuals presenting with COVID-19."

This declaration, particularly regarding the lack of prevention of transmission of the virus, is also backed up by other research from Europe, specifically regarding the efficacy of vaccine passports. An investigation by experts in Spain concluded that "vaccine passports have no significant impact on reducing COVID-19 infection rates," according to Summit News. The study found that ordering people to show proof of vaccination in order to enter venues "is not reducing levels of transmission." Even worse, the investigation found that vaccine passport systems "contribute to a false impression that vaccinated people do not get infected," when in actuality, "around 40 per cent of those vaccinated are susceptible to infection and transmitting the infection."

The vaccine doesn't prevent transmission of the virus, something which has been known for a while now, the mandates are entirely illogical as a result of that, and vaccine passport systems don't work in any significant way and only mislead people into believing that getting the vaccine means they are immune to the virus (a fact which, were this any other vaccine for any other disease, would lead to federal regulators to scrap the production of the vaccines because they are, at best, doing absolutely nothing). As the judge said in his ruling: "In other words, even if you are fully vaccinated, you still may become infected with the COVID-19 virus."

The ruling continued with: "Although CMS spent pages and pages attempting to explain the need for mandatory COVID-19 vaccines, when infection and hospitalizations rates are dropping, millions of people have already been infected, developing some form of natural immunity, and when people who have been fully vaccinated still become infected, mandatory vaccines as the only method of prevention make no sense."

Thank the Lord for sound, rational judges like Doughty. Seeing as the vaccines don't prevent transmission, it makes no sense whatsoever to assert that they are not only a means of prevention, but are the ONLY VALID source of prevention. This is like saying that mechanics don't fix houses and someone comes along and says that ONLY mechanics can fix houses.

Furthermore, a CDC study found that, when there was an outbreak of the "Delta" variant in a federal hospital between July and August of 2021, there was no significant difference in transmission potential between vaccinated and unvaccinated people who had the virus. The Left may claim that the independent studies by researchers which don't support the narrative are a bunch of conspiracy theory hoopla, but they absolutely cannot say the same if it comes from a CDC study or other "reputable" sources which are like churches to them, at least if they want to keep asserting the "credibility" of such sources.

The vaccines don't work, the passport system doesn't work, and the vaccine mandates are not only illogical but outright tyrannical. Even if the vaccines did everything they were advertised of doing, namely protecting you from the virus, and didn't cause any sort of harm whatsoever, it'd still be immoral to issue a vaccine mandate. Matter of fact, it wouldn't even be seen as necessary because just about everyone would at least be open to getting it. But because we have seen that it does nothing at best and can outright kill people in horrible ways at worst, most people don't want to get them (and no, I have no reason to believe Brandon when he says we're at somewhere like 70% vaccinated). It's in large part because this is toxic poison that people don't want to get them and why tyrants like Brandon feel compelled to try and FORCE people into taking poison.

Thankfully, there are still plenty of people out there willing to fight back against this insanity and having the ability to actually do something about it materially.

Let the mandate die, and the vaccines along with it.

Psalm 106:3
"Blessed are they who observe justice, who do righteousness at all times!"

The fight for our Republic will always be a worthwhile one, and when it is in jeopardy, even if it appears as though the bad guys have won, it is imperative to fight until we are victorious. For if we give up the fight today, we will never get another chance in the future.

This is something that Mike Lindell understands perfectly well. He knows that if we don't fix 2020, there will be no 2022, 2024 or other future elections in which we could have a fair and free election, nevermind even the chance of winning whatsoever.

And so, roughly a year after the failed Texas lawsuit in which roughly 20 other states took part, Mike Lindell has sought to raise a complaint with the Supreme Court directly to challenge the election results on even better grounds than the Texas one, which already had a very solid ground to begin with.

The complaint is about 80 pages long (not counting the exhibits) and, naturally, is quite legally technical, bringing up a number of constitutional articles and clauses which can be very confusing for non-legal experts.

So to help with that regard, Attorney-at-Law Kurt Olsen appeared with Mike Lindell and Brannon Howse on Frank Speech to give as simple a summary as can realistically be given for such a subject matter.

Olsen begins by explaining that this complaint is largely a model for what state AGs ought to do to challenge the 2020 election results: "What we have presented is a model complaint for the state AGs that lays out the case as to why the November 2020 election should not stand. There are four significant differences in this complaint compared to the complaint that was filed by the State of Texas in December of last year. We have: New defendants and claims against those defendants. Those new defendants are the United States and then the officers of the United States: The President, the Vice President, Speaker of the House, the Attorney General and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate."

He continues: "We have brought claims under Article IV of the Constitution, the Guarantee clause, which provides that the United States shall provide for a Republican form of government, which as alleged in the complaint: a stolen election is not a Republican form of government. And we've also alleged violations of the Take Care clause, that's Article II, and that is simply that these officers have a duty to making sure that the laws of the United States are faithfully executed. And in this election, they were not."

"One point to talk about," Olsen adds, "the Article II claims, which is the same claim that was asserted last time. It's important to recognize that when you hear in the media that these are, you know, these complaints were baseless claims of election fraud, that's just simply ignoring the claims in the complaint and the actual facts. Because it is a fact that as of October of 2020, there were four Supreme Court Justices who wanted to take up a case involving Article II violations, in that particular situation was in Pennsylvania, when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, by fiat, ruled that ballots could be counted after the statutory deadline of November 3rd, 8 P.M. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said 'you can keep counting ballots even if they're not postmarked, they're not signed, you can do that through November 6th.'"

"At that time, Justice Ginsburg had passed away and the Court was at eight justices on it. There was a claim by the Republican Party of Pennsylvania to stay that decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Four Justices wanted to take that case up and for the Justices to rule on that, they had to believe that the plaintiffs... would likely succeed on the merit. So this is a long way of saying that the claims under Article II, there are four Supreme Court Justices who want to rule on whether these changes to election law by non-legislative actors, such as courts, such as officers, violate Article II of the constitution."

"In terms of the three remaining new issues, we have new arguments for standing. You may recall that in December of last year the Supreme Court dismissed the Texas case... saying that there was no standing on behalf of Texas. And we have two new arguments on that, which we think are very sound. One of which could not have been made before, and that is: Now that the Georgia runoff election resulted in the U.S. Senate being split 50/50, and Kamala Harris is the deciding vote, that all the states have standing to bring an action because of that. Because, as alleged in the complaint, now- Vice President Kamala Harris was not legitimately elected. And because she has the tie-breaking vote, all states now have an injury as a result of that."

Quickly commenting on that last bit, and to give a bit of a break between whole blocks of quotes, you really have to marvel at the way God works sometimes. God made it so that, following this sham election, the Left would try to do the same in Georgia's runoff election, and they got their wish there. And yet, that very result is part of the case as to why now EVERY state can claim injury to the fraudulent election results, due to Harris being the tie-breaking vote in a Senate which is split evenly. Last year, one argument made was that Texas could not have enough weight to sway an entire election based on injury (nevermind the fact it was stolen, I guess), because any state could therefore make a similar claim and we'd never have a sitting President.

Well, now, every single state can claim injury because of the result of the election in the form of whole federal laws being approved by an illegitimate tie-breaking vote. Of course, not every state is going to claim injury, but every state that could claim it now can, as opposed to simply joining Texas' case on the Lone Star State's behalf.

Their cheating in the Georgia runoff elections has seemingly come to bite them in the rear, and so will them cheating in 2020.

At any rate, getting back to Olsen:

"The other basis for standing that has been alleged is that the constitution is a compact amongst the peoples of the state. Everybody in each state agreed to play by the same rules. Because accepting the facts in the complaint [unintelligible] true, which the court must, the electoral count would be below 270. As a consequence, every state has a right under the 12th Amendment to demand an election pursuant to the 12th Amendment... for the President and the Vice President."

"The next distinction in this case is that we have a plethora of new evidence and facts since December. On September 24th, 2021, we had the results of the Maricopa audit. On October, you had the [unintelligible] county sheriff refer felony criminal charges against the Wisconsin election, saying that the election laws in Wisconsin were not just broken, they were, quote, 'shattered'. You have the Wisconsin legislative audit bureau issue a damning report, finding tens of thousands of ballots that were irregular or, I would argue, illegal. So, for example, there were over 50,000 new registered voters whose identification didn't even match what was on file at the Wisconsin election commission. Such things as 'the names weren't the same.' Obvious things that would raise questions of illegality. This is all new information."

"You have new court decisions. So, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled, after our Supreme Court dismissed the Texas case, that guidance given by the Wisconsin election commission [unintelligible], which involves potentially over 160,000 ineligible voters, that that guidance was unlawful. In Michigan, you have a Michigan court rule in March of 2021, that the Secretary of State guidance there, doing away with signature verification requirements, was unlawful. So you have a host of new facts, new developments, new findings, all that make this complaint materially different than the case that was filed in December 2020."

"The last thing that is materially different: The cover-up. There is evidence that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors destroyed election records, and they tried to block the audit every step of the way, and destroyed these election records, apparently, after the court in Arizona ruled that that audit must go forward... There is also evidence of destruction of election records in Georgia that Voter DA, a grassroots activist group, filed a Freedom of Information Act request, got emails when they requested ballot images that those ballots no longer existed. And Voter DA also produced emails which are cited in the complaint that the Director of Elections in Georgia gave guidance saying 'hey, it's okay to go destroy the ballot images that existed on the disks or the Dominion voting machines.'"

"We also have in Georgia recent developments were a renowned computer science professor  has raised the warnings that he can hack into these machines and steal votes. And the judge in that case sealed his 25,000 word report despite him begging the judge release it to the cyber infrastructure and information security agency to fix these problems. And these problems go beyond just Georgia, [the professor] says that these vulnerabilities go to 16 states, including Georgia. Now, what he doesn't say in that report, which is quite interesting, he is saying that this situation so dire and so urgent that [unintelligible] need to be notified so they can fix these problems before the 2022 election. But what he glosses over is: those same problems apparently existed during the 2020 election."

He finishes with: "These are bombshell developments that are just proving out that the case that Texas brought originally was only meritorious. The idea that these were baseless allegations, it never was, the allegations were incredibly strong back then, but they've only gotten stronger."

The only people who still claim that 2020 was not stolen are those who were involved in the theft, those who benefited from the theft, and those who want to pretend as though it's impossible to steal elections or simply don't want to look at the facts and will consider anyone who brings them up to be crazy conspiracy theorists.

But the facts of the 2020 election were clear from the very beginning: Joe Biden and the Democrats were stealing the election right before our eyes. We hoped they wouldn't succeed, and we hope that they won't get away with it now.

And with how more people are more likely to believe Biden stole the election now than last year (in part, likely, to how awful he has been as Occupier), it's only a matter of time until justice is served.

Isaiah 30:18
"Therefore the Lord waits to be gracious to you, and therefore He exalts Himself to show mercy to you. For the Lord is a God of justice; blessed are all those who wait for Him."

One of the biggest stories currently is of Kyle Rittenhouse and of the absolute clownshow of a trial because of the egregious (yet common) behavior of the Leftist prosecutor. As such, most people are talking about it already and I wouldn’t really have much else to add.
 
If you want my two cents, here you go: Kyle is innocent, the judge is awesome, the prosecutor should be disbarred and the Left is full of demons who praise a child rapist and woman abuser who tried to harm/kill a 17-year-old kid.
 
Moving on, we have a video of a 2nd grader in Florida who is far more brave than almost any adult and has far more intelligence than the collective Left (not that that’s a very high bar to overcome).
 
Eight-year-old Fiona Lashells was recorded at a school board meeting in Florida, giving a short speech about the unfairness and illogic of forcing children to constantly wear masks in schools, which in Florida is a direct violation of not only the Constitution, but of the governor’s orders.
 
She began her speech talking about how she has been to other school board meetings, seemingly also having spoken there, and then talks about how she is “going to get suspended if I don’t wear a mask for three more days.”
 
For a bit of context, this girl has already been suspended before, not once, not twice, but close to FORTY times, to the point where her teacher tells her she missed too many school days and would have to repeat the second grade.
 
Despite these threats from the tyrannical teachers at her tyrannical school, she tells us of how she is undeterred in her fight. “Just because I get suspended for not wearing a mask isn’t going to change my mind. You can keep suspending me, I still have the right not to wear a mask. It is not fair that I’m getting punished because you guys [at] the school board are not following the law. That is not fair, it just isn’t right, I’m still going to stand up for what I believe and nothing’s gonna change my mind.”
 
That last part was received by thunderous applause from the crowd.
 
She then presents the argument that masks don’t just not work, but can actively infect others: “Do you know how dirty masks are? ‘Cuz you touch the mask, you put it on your face, you breathe all those germs… ‘cuz you have lots of bacteria on your hand.”
 
And she finishes her speech by saying: “And, okay, I hope you all go f- to jail for doing this to me. And my family is proud of me and my Uncle Murphy that is in Heaven is really proud of me, and I wanna say… your rules suck.”
 
While I am not exactly gleeful about her almost dropping the f-bomb, or what sounds like she was about to say (which was met with some surprised laughter from the audience), I too am proud of this girl for having the courage, at the age of EIGHT, to stand up to those who other kids would see as the “authority figures.”
 
Much like the devil, the Left will use whatever tools they have to coerce people into doing their will. They threaten adults with their livelihoods and kids with suspension/expulsion. The former is obviously a bit more threatening, since schools are such utter garbage and unnecessary at this point that being suspended or expelled from one of them might be a BLESSING which can lead to proper education from homeschooling or other private, pro-parent and pro-freedom schooling.
 
But despite the threats made to her, and the actual suspensions delivered, Fiona refuses to back down. She knows her rights and won’t be terrorized into giving them up. No matter how many times they suspend her and no matter if she has to repeat the second grade, she will not give up her freedoms.
 
This girl is a model American citizen, who shows far more courage than any Leftist ever would (no, it’s not “brave” to say you’re gay or transgender at this point, given how glorified such people are in pop culture) and tons more intelligence than many adults, let alone Leftists.
 
This girl is right about everything she is saying. The people forcing kids to wear masks in schools should go to jail not for disobeying the governor’s orders, but because it is outright against the LAW to force people, including kids, to wear anything at any point. They aren’t educators, they are dictators, abusing the easiest group of people to abuse: children.
 
It’s extremely rare to have kids who are as well-raised, logical and confident as Fiona, so they are typically very easy to coerce and abuse. “Don’t want to get suspended or expelled, thereby ‘ruining’ your academic and actual future? Wear a dirty, uncomfortable and suffocating mask during all school-hours and never defy us again.”
 
It’s cowardly beyond compare, because just about no kid will be brave enough to stand up for themselves.
 
I saw a video some time ago of a woman crying tears of joy, telling her son who just got home from school that parents who sued the school or school board won their case and they no longer can mandate that the students wear masks. The kid, upon hearing the news, bellowed as well and ran to hug his mother in jubilation.
 
The people who run these schools are nothing short of power-hungry monsters who will lord whatever puny power they may have on the easiest target of them all. They are criminals and demons who care not for the students they are teaching, but for the Marxist agenda they are ramming down kids’ throats.
 
Glenn Youngkin won his race because he exposed what Virginia schools were doing to their kids, but one would be foolish to believe that to be isolated to the Old Dominion. Schools all around the country are teaching Marxist garbage and have been for a very long time, really ever since intolerant militant Atheists got God kicked out of schools.
 
These monsters are present in almost every single government school, to one extent or another. What is a wonder to me is why Fiona is still attending that tyrannical government school anyway. Homeschools and pro-parent/pro-freedom private schools are far better options, both morally and academically. If it’s worth it to stick in those schools to fight for freedom, it’s also worth it to leave those schools and search for better options.
 
Now, one might argue that it’s good that Fiona is still attending the government school because that way, she can fight for her fellow classmates in these school board meetings. My counter-argument is “why are we having an eight-year-old fight this battle”?
 
It’s amazing and commendable, to be sure, but far from ideal. I’m not saying her parents are less brave than she is, but it’s the parents of these children who should be fighting for the freedom of the kids. And while I don’t doubt that, for the most part, they are, it is utterly unnecessary for this girl to have to stick her neck out along the way.
 
She definitely should still stand up for herself at school, brazing those suspensions with a determined attitude, but only for as long as she is even in that school, which really shouldn’t be for very long at all.
 
Especially if they are threatening her with having to repeat the second grade, I’d be looking for other schooling options so that she doesn’t “fall behind” (she has done and turned in all the assignments she had, so she shouldn’t fall behind whatsoever) and getting her out of that Schoolingrad they call an education center, if I were her dad.
 
The free market is more applicable to education than ever before, so use it to your advantage. Force the schools to be better by harming them financially. Of course, they’re government funded so they will never truly be out of business, but the worse they get, the fewer students they will get and the more students better schools which stand with parents and freedom will receive.
 
They lose not by being utterly defunded, but by being outfunded by competition. Particularly, competition which is more influential on the future of this country than they are.
 
At any rate, Fiona is definitely braver than most adults and smarter too for doing what she is doing. I just wish she didn’t have to be the one fighting this battle. Heck, if I’m wishing for anything, I wish there wasn’t such a battle to begin with. It’s only present because the people instituting these ridiculous mandates are pure evil. Ideally, they wouldn’t be anywhere close to power, or at least wouldn’t be so evil as to abuse children.
 
I pray that this brave little girl is successful in her fight and that there doesn’t even have to be a fight for reason soon.
 
1 Corinthians 16:13
“Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong.”

Following the 2020 election steal, I largely wrote off most elections theretofore as likely to be stolen by the Left. Some areas are far more protected in terms of voter integrity than others, so I expected SOME Republican victories to still occur, but by-and-large believed most big, important races in either blue or battleground states to be ultimately stolen, regardless of the size of the Republican’s lead.
 
This might be the end result in the New Jersey election (though even this, I would consider a victory and will explain why momentarily), but just about everywhere else, at least where it counted, the Republican (hopefully MAGA conservative) candidates were the ones to come out on top.
 
First, of course, the biggest news of the night: Glenn Youngkin defeating former Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe, turning the state red for the first time since Obama’s 2008 election.
 
Of course, the Left tried to steal it from Youngkin, as votes seemed to have been stolen from Youngkin and given to McAuliffe around 10:56 pm on the night of the election:

Despite those stolen votes, it clearly was not enough as even the fake news media, which hadn’t called anything in Virginia until roughly 100% of the votes were counted (Fox News infamously called Arizona within two seconds for Biden but were the last ones to call this one for Virginia. Fox News is the enemy), ultimately had to face reality and call it for Youngkin.
 
One note I would like to make is that, while I think Trump’s endorsement helped Youngkin, in a way, this was sort of a post-Donald Trump GOP election. The GOP is, of course, Trump’s party and it will be for long after he leaves politics, but it will one day be post-Donald Trump and this election ought to be the strategy in the future. McAuliffe lost in large part because he doubled-down on Virginia’s schools showing gay pornography to school children and teaching CRT in classrooms (the latter part which the fake news media now claims NEVER existed, hilariously enough). Oh, and he also called the concerned parents “domestic terrorists.” Surprising that didn’t work.
 
Meanwhile, Youngkin ran on “No gay porn in schools, no CRT in classrooms and most importantly, I’m not Terry fricking McAuliffe, good Lord.” Things that parents, particularly suburban moms (who “went” to Biden in 2020), care about and were being dismissed by the Left.
 
Youngkin focused on the issues and McAuliffe focused on being a tyrant and a liar. That it was as close as it was can only be because of the concerted effort to steal it, but they ultimately failed at that too.
 
This election didn’t focus on President Trump, which is a good thing long-term, and is rooted in conservative beliefs. For those who might think I’m turning my back on Trump with these comments, perish the thought. It’s BECAUSE of Trump and his success that candidates like Youngkin can appear and win in what was previously a foregone conclusion that the Democrat would win. Thankfully, while Trump’s election was stolen, Youngkin’s ultimately wasn’t, and Virginia will be better off for it.
 
Another side note, I really do hope that the Democrats don’t learn a thing from this election. They cite “white supremacy” as the root cause for Youngkin’s election, which is of course ludicrous, but them doubling down on this will be helpful for other conservatives in the future. Keep calling parents “domestic terrorists” and “white supremacists.” It’s working wonders, Democrats.
 
But Youngkin wasn’t the only winner of note. Virginia Republicans swept the election, for the most part, and elected Winsome Sears to be Virginia’s first black female Lt. Governor (something the fake news media is avoiding like COVID because it goes against their narrative that Republicans are racist and sexist). Virginia also elected Republican Jason Miyares to be the state’s Attorney General, the first Hispanic man to serve in that position in the state’s history. Guess what the fake news media is also avoiding talking about?
 
And as if it couldn’t get worse for Virginia Democrats, the House of Delegates flipped Republican, with the GOP having a one-seat majority.
 
But the bad news doesn’t end there for Democrats. In a Texas district which is largely blue and roughly 75% Hispanic, GOP House candidate John Lujan also won his race there, flipping that seat red.
 
Furthermore, the measure to abolish the police in Minneapolis was soundly defeated 56.17% to 43.83%. While it’s ridiculous that it wasn’t 100% to 0%, or the slightly more realistic 99% to 1%, it still shows that most people in Minneapolis aren’t so utterly moronic as to want to abolish the police, giving up their safety in favor of some other agency which would largely handle police jobs with safety blankets and warm milk.
 
What’s more, a Republican picked up a seat on the Pennsylvania supreme court, which is also an important upset.
 
One major piece of bad news is, of course, the New Jersey gubernatorial race. The Democrats might end up stealing it anyway, which is definitely bad and unjust and they should not get away with it, but the victory here comes in the fact that they would HAVE to steal an election most people would assume the Democrat would have won handily.
 
That race was NOT supposed to be anywhere as close as it is, and the Republican candidate led by four or five points for a good bit of that race. Steal or no steal, this spells disaster for Democrats in future elections, particularly if they double down on their b.s.
 
If even NEW JERSEY can be seen as a battleground state in a legitimate election, the Democrats are losing a lot of ground and very quickly.
 
Oh, and perhaps most embarrassingly for a New Jersey politician, the Democrat State Senate President Steve Sweeney is also in a close race with a Republican candidate. What makes this one particularly embarrassing for the Democrats is that the Republican, Edward Durr, is a truck driver who reportedly only spent $153 on his campaign and doesn’t even have a campaign website, only Facebook and Twitter pages (which I doubt will last all that long).
 
Now, they did win other races, such as the Boston and New York mayoral elections (guess both cities will have to continue to suffer until they learn their lesson, assuming those were legitimate Democrat wins, which they very well might not have been) but both were races where the Democrats were expected to win, even legitimately. The big news, and devastating losses, come in the races where they were also expected to win and either didn’t (Virginia) or had to steal because the Republican was winning or was close near the end (New Jersey, assuming that that’s what’s going to happen, hope it doesn’t).
 
Americans have seen what life is like under the illegitimate president and soundly reject his b.s. (in this case, the “B” stands for “Biden”). We never wanted it in the first place, and everywhere there is someone with his party’s letter next to their name, people will vote in droves against them, even if the Democrats have to try and steal those elections.
 
We are winning. Of this, there is no doubt.
 
Deuteronomy 20:4
“For the Lord your God is he who goes with you to fight for you against your enemies, to give you the victory.”

It’s not very often that we see blue-on-blue attacks (I’m willing to believe they happen far more often than being reported, and this is without counting Manchin’s resistance to Schumer and Sinema being harassed by Leftists), so it’s always quite a joyous sight to see when they do happen.
 
This time, it’s for a far less significant matter: the race for the next governor of New York in 2022. In all certainty, whoever ends up being the Democrat candidate will end up stealing the election, and NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio wants to be the Democrat’s thief (insert New York crime rate joke here).
 
However, it looks as though he will have trouble getting that spot, as people in his own Democrat Party are not only unconvinced that he would be in any way a good option, but even go so far as to mock the prospect.
 
Rich Schaffer, chairman of Suffolk County’s Democrat committee told the NYT that “Osama bin Laden is probably more popular in Suffolk County than Bill de Blasio. De Blasio, I would say, would have zero support if not negative out here.”
 
Would be a bit more impactful had it been from a committee chairman from New York county, the county that Manhattan is from, but still quite the scolding comment to make that the guy officially responsible for the deaths of 3,000 people and destruction of what used to be the city’s most iconic structures would be more popular anywhere in New York than the mayor of NYC. Hyperbole, of course, but it's quite the statement to make. Perhaps a rather offensive one, all things considered, but still.
 
However, he’s not the only Democrat to be opposed to de Blasio. Most notably, former representative and tax-evader Charles Rangel told the NYT that he didn’t want to “get involved in anything that would be negative” but admitted that he couldn’t think of “anything positive” to say about a potential de Blasio gubernatorial bid.
 
When even the guy found guilty of 11 ethics charges doesn’t think you’d be a good governor, that says something.
 
The Times also reported that de Blasio is privately telling people that he plans to run for NY governor, likely to try and see how much such a prospect would garner support:
 
“Mr. de Blasio, who has been a polarizing figure during his two terms in office, has also sounded our trusted former aides about their interests in working on a potential campaign, according to two people who are familiar with those contacts, and has made other overtures to labor leaders about a possible bid. His longtime pollster conducted a private survey to assess Mr. de Blasio’s appeal beyond New York City.”
 
And back in September, Politico reported that de Blasio had “phoned several labor leaders in recent days to gauge support.”
 
But, again, he isn’t exactly getting a whole lot of support from New York Democrats. Even NYC’s DOI recently released a report accusing the mayor of using NYPD security detail like personal servants for himself and his family.
 
The DOI commissioner Margaret Garnett said in a statement following the report: “Protecting the mayor and his family is a serious and significant job that should be guided by best practices, formalized procedures, and an understanding that security details are not personal assistants in a dignitary’s daily life but provide essential protection.”
 
De Blasio responded to this, claiming that there were “inconsistencies and inaccuracies” throughout the report, and just made the excuse that his “first responsibility was as a father and as a husband.” Is that what the guy was thinking when his own daughter participated in the George Floyd riots in NYC and got arrested for it?
 
In any case, it’s really quite telling when even members of his own Democrat Party in NEW YORK are at best not saying anything about it, like Rangel, and at worst are making jokes at his expense, like claiming that Osama bin Laden would be a more popular figure in New York politics than the mayor.
 
Whether he ends up running and winning the nomination is a different matter entirely (though I’d be willing to bet the NY Democrat Party would Bernie him out of the nomination). But his prospects so far do not appear good, suffice to say.
 
Either way, I just hope that the corruption, theft and lies in New York will be utterly uncovered and made known to every American so that the Democrats can’t steal further elections.
 
Ephesians 6:11
“Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil.”

For the past few weeks or months (forget when it started), we have jubilantly heard chants of “F*** Joe Biden” at a number of places, ranging from sports events to rallies to even places where the illegitimate president makes speeches, as was recently the case.
 
Before I get to the downside to it, allow me to express just why I love the chants: it depicts the reality that the fake news media would rather ignore.
 
Joe Biden is not only an illegitimate president, he is a failed one as well. Everything he has done or has advocated for has been to the massive detriment to the American people. We see this at the gas stations, at grocery stores, and elsewhere. He wants to be Stalin so badly that he wishes to mandate vaccinations on almost every American, certainly any American who wishes to work for a company with more than 100 employees, which is most companies at this point.
 
He has screwed up Afghanistan so badly that even the traitorous General Milley threw him under the bus at a recent Congressional hearing. He is screwing up the southern border so badly that even college students, who are usually Leftists, take notice of how poorly he has handled that situation.
 
Everything he is and everything he does is a massive failure, and as much as the fake news media would want to sweep all of that under the rug, there is only so much they can actually do, particularly the more he messes things up.
 
Afghanistan was such a massive blunder that even the fake news media couldn’t outright defend him. For example, here are some headlines I read from the fake news media at the time of the Afghan screw-up:
 

• CNN: “Biden isn’t adequately explaining why he failed to predict Afghanistan’s fast fall.” With the subhead: “He no longer gets credit simply for not being Trump.”

 

• CNN: “Europe left exposed as Biden walks America away from the world stage.”

 

• NBC opinion piece: “Biden is delusional if he thinks the Afghanistan withdrawal doesn’t endanger Americans.”

 

• CNN: “Biden’s presidency of crises pushes White House to its limits.”

 

• CNN: “The worst of times for Democrats. The White House is at its lowest moment yet as the harsh reality of power puts Biden’s leadership under extreme examination.”

 

• MSNBC: “Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal is a masterclass in bad management.”

 
 
And there were others as well, but in many cases, they did still try to be soft with Biden. Still, that these headlines and others did appear, and surprisingly CNN was seemingly the harshest on him, was telling of how badly he messed up with Afghanistan.
 
There are, of course, far more crises thanks to Biden, as CNN noted in one of its headlines, which has dragged his approval numbers down significantly even in far-Left fake news polls (they were never that high to begin with as, again, he was NOT ELECTED).
 
Which is why we so often hear “F*** Joe Biden” chants, which the White House has hilariously tried to gaslight people into believing that they are actually “Let’s Go Brandon” chants, which is outright bizarre. Who the hell is Brandon and why would people be cheering him? Not that this matters, as again, this is just the WH trying to lie and say that’s what was being chanted one of the most recent times, when we all know Biden was being dragged.
 
And for the most part, I ADORE the fact that we are hearing these chants. Again, it shows that reality is far different from what the fake news media wants to report it. Joe Biden is extremely unpopular. No amount of spinning or gaslighting is going to change that fact. If anything, that’s just going to make things worse for the Occupier.
 
However, there is one discernible downside to these chants. You see, Biden traveled to Howell, Michigan recently to try and sell people on the socialist power-grab of an infrastructure bill which would add another $3.5 trillion to our already overly inflated debt. Expectedly, there were protesters at such an event, and said protesters were chanting “F*** Joe Biden.”
 
And that’s perfectly fine, and I love the fact that they were doing this. However, it wasn’t simply the adults who were chanting “F*** Joe Biden.”
 
A Gateway Pundit reader sent this video to the site, which depicts kids in a school bus also chanting “F*** Joe Biden” alongside the protesters.
 
Now, this might not necessarily seem like much of a big deal, and in the grand scheme of things, it might not be, but I do think it’s at least somewhat relevant and concerning that kids are going along with the chant.
 
Personally, I began to get a bit of a potty mouth when I was in middle school, around 12 or 13 years of age, in large part because I heard my peers so often and casually cursing. This cursing behavior has stuck with me ever since, not that you would be able to tell, as I often either avoid cursing on this site or censor the words, like I’m doing with the chant in this case. Of course, I’m an adult and can largely say whatever I want to say, but there is no denying that such behavior is present because of my experience in middle school, being around casual cursing, which became part of my own vocabulary in no time.
 
And in many cases, when a child is heard cursing, they get some amount of reprimand from their parent or teacher (depending on the setting) and are discouraged from such continued cursing. But here, because of the behavior of adults, the kids feel as though they have free reign over the use of the strongest curse word in the world, at least if used in the context of cursing out Joe Biden.
 
While I would like to believe that this is helping to create a generation which is rebellious towards the Washington establishment and the deep state, it’s far more likely that the kids are just using the occasion as an excuse to freely use the word. And as things tend to go, they will then go on to find other justified uses of the word. For example, they might figure that since it’s okay to chant “F*** Joe Biden”, it’s also okay to chant “F*** Kamala Harris” or “F*** Nancy Pelosi”. More realistically, since kids usually aren’t very privy to politics, they will use that word to chant similar things about authority figures.
 
For example: “F*** my dad” or “F*** my teacher” or “F*** the principal.” That last one I could particularly envision happening, for example, during a school assembly where the principal is trying to speak and the chant all of a sudden breaks out.
 
Whatever may be the case, the chant has the unfortunate downside of teaching children that it’s okay to curse people out so brazenly. And such a thing can help in the deterioration of civilized society. Not that there aren’t other things which are doing that already, such as the attempt by lunatics to get children to go to “Drag Queen Story Hour” or selling them on the idea that a man can be a woman and vice versa, or that a white person is a devil because of their skin color and a black person is a victim and oppressed for the same reason.
 
However, if we have concerns regarding those other things which deteriorate civilized society, we should have some amount of concern regarding the chant as well.
 
I’m not discouraging people from doing it, and in all likelihood, those kids, exposed to it or not in this context, will likely go on to curse anyway as they get older because that’s just how contemporary society acts. But it’s important to at least be mindful of the fact that what adults say and do will have an effect on kids. Often times, kids want to imitate the behavior of adults, so if they see adults act in a certain manner, they will imitate that behavior.
 
Granted, that’s usually for the younger kids, and the kids in that video looked to be at least in the 4th or 5th grade, or about 10 to 11 years old, but the point remains that they were seeing and hearing adults nearby using that curse word at their leisure, and thus felt that they had license to also use the word, particularly if they were simply going along with the chant.
 
This is rather conflicting for me as, again, I love the chants and want to continue hearing them since they show just how unpopular this faux-president is, but I’m also rather bothered by the fact that this gives kids the impression that it’s okay to curse so casually and so much.
 
Numerous verses in the Bible speak against cursing. For example: James 3:8-10: “But no human being can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison. With it we bless our Lord and Father, and with it we curse people who are made in the likeness of God. From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers, these things ought not be so.”
 
Colossians 3:8: “But now you must put them all away: anger, wrath, malice, slander, and obscene talk from your mouth.”
 
Matthew 15:11: “It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person.” Obviously, the context of that one is that it’s okay to eat food which isn’t kosher, or what Jews typically eat, but the point was that what defiles a person is that which comes out of the mouth. What comes out of the mouth are words, which can be destructive to the self or to others.
 
Now, forgive my French, but I don’t give a damn about Joe Biden and if he is destroyed by such cursing. Frankly, I would rather see him be destroyed, even if by cursing, because he is evil and of the devil.
 
But there is no denying, either way, that God does not want us cursing, even those who are evil. After all, both Luke 6:28 and Colossians 4:6 speak of blessing those who curse and persecute us, and praying for those who abuse us (this part specifically belonging to the Luke verse).
 
Does this mean that I pray that Biden will succeed in his evil acts and intentions? Of course not, since that would be praying for evil. I want to see Biden destroyed because of his evil, but would be ecstatic to see him rebuilt in righteousness. Joe Biden, the person, is not my enemy. Joe Biden, the piece of crap pedophile, baby-killer, tyrant, election thief and demon, is my enemy. Take those things away, make him a brother in Christ (as in an actual brother, not one who claims is Catholic but isn’t regenerate in any way), and he ought to be welcomed by Christians with open arms.
 
This, I think, is what those verses mean when talking about blessing these people and not cursing them. We bless them that they would turn away from their evil, not that their evil ways will succeed. After all, those who are unrepentant and unregenerate are punished by God and cursed to eternal damnation.
 
So while I do love the chants insofar as they depict Biden’s rising unpopularity which even the fake news media can’t bury, let’s keep in mind that it can lead to children joining in with the cursing, believing themselves to be free of liability for it, and that God doesn’t want us cursing either.
 
I can’t claim to be better than those who do the chants, as even I have gone along with it many times, and I do relatively often curse (at least when talking about Biden, the Left, the establishment, etc.) but that doesn’t mean that I should.
 
Again, I love the chants for what they signify, but we should be mindful of what effect they can have on children.
 
2 Timothy 2:16:
“But avoid irreverent babble, for it will lead people into more and more ungodliness.”

For anyone who doesn’t pay attention to the fake news media, or at least doesn’t think they are in any way truthful, objective journalists, it was immediately clear that the allegation that President Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election was a load of crap, fabricated by an embittered loser Hillary Clinton and her Leftist associates in and outside the media.
 
However, if you’re like Russell Brand and you watch the fake news media because you think they are at least somewhat truthful in their “reporting”, you’re bound to believe the crap that they spew until, surprise, surprise, you begin to question certain things and discover the lies they have been telling.
 
This is precisely what Brand has apparently been going through recently, as in a recent video which he posted to Rumble (something I will talk about in a moment, as it’s relevant to my overall argument), he expressed his epiphany that Trump was actually correct about Russian collusion being a hoax and that the Clintons and Democrats in general are corrupt and liars.
 
Brand said: “Well, now there’s serious evidence that it was the Clinton campaign and Hillary Clinton acolytes that were directly involved in the generation of what has proven to be conspiracy – untrue! Think about how much media you watched. Me, a person who I think, broadly speaking, is from the left – a liberal, certainly not a Trump-supporting Republican, with respect to those of you who are – I find myself in awe, gobsmacked, flabbergasted and startled by these revelations.”
 
This might be the first time I’ve heard a Leftist say “with respect to those of you who are” Trump supporters.
 
He continued: “What my concern is becoming is that these are totemic issues pushed to the forefront to mask ordinary, regular corruption like the Russiagate thing, the Hunter Biden laptop, all of that stuff. And it was like, being sort of in a way discussed as if it was just an absolute fact. To discover that this was propaganda, a construct, a confection by the Democratic Party – who, of course, are now in government – is kind of beyond disappointing, because you begin to question and query what other things may not be true. Once you recognize that people create certain truths in order to meet certain ends and aims, the idea you might be able to trust their integrity obviously dissolves.”
 
That is kind of major, all things considered, but perhaps not quite as much as one might originally think. You see, at least ever since the Chinese coronavirus pandemic began, Russell Brand has been surprisingly based and not following the narrative other Leftists follow. It seems his Rumble account (which it’s telling that he has one as well, as that indicates his separation from mainstream outlets, to an extent) is relatively new, with his first video having been published only on September 15th. However, I have seen at least snippets of him on some sort of podcast in which he stands against the COVID tyranny that we have been seeing.
 
Not to mention he is also rather based on other matters as well. For example, that aforementioned first video was titled: “Did Liberals Use Feminism to Justify Afghan Cluster F*ck?”, basically pointing at liberals and feminism and saying that it was they who messed things up in Afghanistan.
 
Other video titles include: “Are You DISGUSTED By This?! Marine’s Viral Video Gets Him Sacked,” obviously referring to Lt. Col. Stuart Scheller, who posted a video critical of the military leadership messing up Afghanistan and being basically imprisoned for it; “Facebook Are MANIPULATING Our Stupid Governments & LYING TO US”, which is pretty self-explanatory, and could frankly include all of big tech; “How Everyday People Were SCREWED By Liberal Politics,” which is also pretty self-explanatory and rather telling, seeing as he tends to hold liberal beliefs; “The Mainstream Media Are Trying To Start A CIVIL WAR!!,” “Vaccine Mandates: An ASSAULT On Your Bodily Freedom?”, “SHOCKING Wuhan Evidence. Did Fauci LIE?”, “Is This HYPOCRISY?!,” referring to, among other things, AOC wearing a very expensive dress which had the words “Tax the rich” on it to the highly-exclusive Met Gala, which to answer the question: Yes, it’s very hypocritical; “Thought Biden Couldn’t Sink Any Lower?? THINK AGAIN!!”, and others relating to not trusting Big Pharma, and bashing the establishment.
 
To summarize, Brand, as liberal as he was and in some ways still is, has been rather critical and questioning of the crap that those he considered/s to be on his side have been pushing for, at least as of late.
 
Which is certainly a rather hopeful sight to see, regardless of context. The guy who has been a raging liberal all this time and he would still classify himself as such has begun to see things in a more clear light, as they are, rather than as the Left claims they are. Inundating yourself in fake news means you can’t see reality as well as those who wisely avoid it, which is why it’s taken Brand only until NOW to come to the realization that Trump DIDN’T collude with Russia and that Hillary and Democrats in general are massively corrupt and evil, which has been general knowledge to most of us since this whole nonsense began.
 
Brand even said that he wanted to believe that the Democrat Party is the party of “inclusivity, and diversity and truth and social justice and all great, positive ideas,” but he is seemingly not too sure about that anymore, and with good reason. The only inclusivity the Democrat Party approves of is of Leftists and Leftist thinking. If you’re a conservative, you are less than human and don’t belong even in the job you might hold. The only diversity the Democrat Party approves of is diversity of outward appearance, but only as far as those people are Leftists, as conservative blacks, Hispanics, Asians, women, etc. are considered traitors to their race and gender, as though the Left still owns people.
 
The only “truth” the Democrat Party approves of is the relative truth crap that they pass off, while any evidence which contradicts them must be eliminated, as well as those who bring up such evidence. The only social justice the Democrat Party approves of is of disabling police officers from being able to take care of criminals, while people are being illegally held in prison for January 6th, just for being in the Capitol building doing nothing in particular because the FBI agents did their job in setting them up.
 
And anyone who doesn't inject fake news poison into their streams on the regular recognizes that the Democrat Party has no great, positive ideas, certainly none which are of any benefit to anyone other than themselves (this includes Republicans in the establishment, by the way, not just Democrats).
 
In any case, that Russell Brand has been discovering all these things about the side he once supported, or to some extent still supports, is hopeful in that if he, of all people, is figuring this stuff out, so can anyone who does even a bit of research which doesn’t include going back to the fake news well. It certainly means that the Left is nowhere near as popular, particularly with their most recent actions, as they believe themselves to be or even claim to be, even with some of their most recognized celebrities like Brand and, surprisingly, Nikki Minaj, who has done more to fight for freedom in a couple of weeks than the GOP has in decades.
 
Their downfall is a matter of when, not if.
 
Ephesians 6:12
“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.”

How you act under pressure can say a lot about you. If you can remain calm, cool and collected and deal with the situation in such a manner, it speaks well of your leadership skills. However, Biden, who largely has never faced much pressure at all because of a largely friendly fake news media, is lashing out as a result of waning popularity amongst even his supporters/voters and usually friendly media.
 
His approval ratings, following the disastrous Afghan crisis that he created, as well as his mishandling of the southern border and inflation, have gone down into the low 30s (as if they were ever actually higher, given that the country didn’t elect him), and are even noticeably low in fake news media polls which always show favoritism to Democrats.
 
Backed into a corner, and with his faux-presidency crumbling around him (I’m prophesying right now that he will be out in a few months, particularly if he keeps digging his own grave like this), Biden has chosen to lash out at dissenters regarding the toxic Chinese coronavirus vaccines in a speech which, had Trump given it, the media would have pointed out as “divisive” and “hateful.”
 
During this speech, the Occupier repeatedly demonized the tens (or hundreds, as I believe) of millions of Americans who have not taken the toxic vaccine, saying that “many” people in the country are “frustrated” with the unvaxxed, going so far as to claim that “this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.”
 
If he were right, which is no surprise that he isn’t, then Israel wouldn’t be seeing such massive influxes of COVID patients who have had the vaccine.
 
According to Vision Times, “The majority of [COVID-19] patients in an Israeli hospital are fully vaccinated, including those with severe disease… ‘95% of the severe patients are vaccinated’… ‘85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people.’”
 
There is also anecdotal evidence to suggest that the same is happening here, but reportedly, doctors aren’t allowed to disclose whether someone in the hospital suffering from the Chinese coronavirus is vaccinated.
 
Not to mention that, as I have written in a prior article, the fully vaccinated may be super spreaders of the Delta variant. And while I have questioned the existence of even the virus itself (and still do), the point is that if there is any pandemic at all, it’s a pandemic of the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated as the pressured pretend president claims.
 
Biden also claimed in his speech that “a distinct minority of Americans” are causing “a lot of damage” and are “keeping us from turning the corner.”
 
If it’s as distinct of a minority as you say, why is any of this necessary? More than that, if the vaccinated are as protected from the virus as YOU yourself claim in this very speech, Joe, then what does it matter whether someone else is protected? Couldn’t the vaccinated workers go back to work without any issues? And if so, why did the CDC backtrack on the vaccinated's need for wearing a mask?
 
You ask “What more is there to wait for? What more do you need to see?” First, and foremost, the answers to these questions that you keep avoiding. What we need to wait for is the results of the long-term effects of the vaccines, which are unknowable as of yet because not enough time has passed. What we’re waiting for is a RECENTLY LAUNCHED study into the effects of the vaccine on menstruating women. What more we need to see is that these things aren’t the toxic crap that they appear to be. What we need to wait for is the formula of what exactly is in these jabs.
 
“We’ve made vaccinations free, safe, and convenient.” Oh, you’ve made them free and “convenient” (as in, they are widely available, which is what I think he means here), but they are FAR from safe, as numerous articles on THIS VERY WEBSITE ALONE indicate, let alone the dozens or hundreds of other studies out there which I haven’t covered or haven’t even read yet.
 
“We’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. And your refusal has cost all of us.” Big talk coming from a guy who can barely string two sentences together. Your patience is wearing thin? Ours ran out a LONG time ago. Our refusal to be subjected to experimental vaccines has cost people? How many people has your administration killed, Joe?
 
Back during the campaign trail, when supposedly 230,000 Americans died under Trump, you said that “anyone responsible for that many deaths shouldn’t remain president.” According to mainstream figures (remember, only 6%, according to the CDC, have actually died from the virus, if it exists at all), 250,000 Americans have died since your administration took over.
 
If Trump killed 230,000 people by the time he left office, you’ve killed 250,000 since you’ve taken office. So I repeat, Joe, how many people have you killed? And we know that the vaccine itself has killed hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, if the VAERS system is any indication (and the fact that only 1% of all actual cases are reported), so how many people has this administration killed because of its insistence (now close to being illegal if he intends to enforce the b.s. he’s spewing in this speech) that people get vaccinated?
 
Your refusal to listen to real scientists and observe the data has cost this country infinitely more than you could possibly claim about the unvaccinated.
 
But it’s not just a medical or physical price you would have us pay, but also a social one. You insist that this mandate isn’t about people’s “freedom or personal choice.” In essence, you demand that we obey and that we have no choice on the matter.
 
To that, I say go f**k yourself. I have never said that word about anyone or to anyone in the past (at least on this site), but I believe it’s warranted here. You want us to ignore the data SCREAMING that the vaccines are dangerous and want to FORCE us, through our employers, to get a dangerous vaccine? This is the very tyranny the Left claimed Trump supported. Furthermore, this is a complete and utter violation of the Nuremberg Code, regarding the coercion of people to unwillingly undergo medical experimentation.
 
Keep in mind, Trump was impeached over a phone call. And here, we have the Occupier of the Oval Office violating INTERNATIONAL LAW through means of coercion, basically telling people that they won’t have a job anymore if they don’t get the vaccine.
 
Well and justly do I say to Biden to go f**k himself. Not because he can actually do any of this, but because he is OPEN about what he wants.
 
No, I don’t fear that what he says wants done will actually be done. Already, multiple Republican governors and companies have stated their purpose to not comply with such an illegitimate and unconstitutional order. And if he continues to press on with this crap, getting more tyrannical in his actions, I don’t see how his administration survives (politically). Push people far enough and they will eventually push back. And as we’ve seen in countries around the world trying their hand at full-on communism, the people push back.
 
Iran, the U.K., France, Italy and Australia, to name a few, have seen anti-lockdown and anti-vaccine passports/mandates protests. Australia being particularly significant, as there are a number of laws in that country which outright illegalize protesting and hundreds have been arrested for doing so in anti-lockdown protests.
 
Do not expect the American people, out of everyone, to simply take illegal, liberty-limiting actions from the government lying face down.
 
Biden’s faux-presidency is crumbling around him and I believe it will soon come undone, particularly as more evidence mounts and is shared of the rigged election.
 
Deuteronomy 28:7
“The Lord will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you. They shall come out against you one way and flee before you seven ways.”