Before I begin with this rather lengthy article, allow me to clearly express the fact that I AM NOT A DOCTOR, and thus what I say should not be considered medical advice whatsoever. All this is is a protocol which a woman used to save her husband who had gone to the hospital because of pneumonia which the doctors wanted to treat as a severe case of the Chinese coronavirus, and had they gotten their way, the woman’s husband likely would have been another of their victims.
 
With that out of the way, let’s begin. As I stated previously, this is a protocol which a woman used to save her husband as he was going through a case of pneumonia for which he had to be hospitalized. This is what the woman said on The Kate Dalley Show that she did to save her husband:
 
“Here is the actual protocol that we used to save my husband from the hospital protocol. He had pneumonia. They tried to claim it was ‘Covid-pneumonia.’ X-rays are the same as regular pneumonia, by the way. But here is our protocol that some wonderful America’s Frontline Doctors helped me with.”
 
“Keep in mind my husband is 56, not in the greatest shape (right? He’s supposed to [be] a HUGE risk, right?) and diabetic. He should not be a success story of epic proportion, right? But he was. Here’s the thing – pneumonia is pneumonia is pneumonia. Bacterial needs an antibiotic and viral – you get the oxygen up and TLC at home. They have made a three-ring circus out of the label Covid. They are over-treating it and we under-treated it. We treated it like regular good ole pneumonia.”
 
“The X-ray pics are exactly the same. No difference, I checked. What was pneumonia in 2015 is the same as today. Docs will even admit no one has regular pneumonia anymore. Why is that? What they are doing is the equivalent of you having a hangnail and their protocol is chopping off the hand while watching you bleed out and blaming the hangnail as being a new fierce kind of hangnail. Honestly – that’s what’s going on with the ‘Covid’ diagnosis.”
 
“What they label Covid is just respiratory illness. Some people have pneumonia, some bacterial, some viral, some a cold, some the flu – when I asked the docs if they could identify what Covid was or what it actually looked like – none of them could. And they were embarrassed when I asked. One said, ‘Well I’m sure it’s out there somewhere.’ I’m not kidding.”
 
Taking a brief moment to comment on just a couple of things, I will point out that the reason that they couldn’t identify the Chinese coronavirus nor say what it looked like is because no one has been able to isolate the virus, as I have stated in prior articles. Despite all the time, energy, and focus in dealing with the pandemic, not a single scientist, Western or Chinese, has been able to isolate the virus and thus prove its existence. And that whole “Covid-pneumonia” is ridiculous and pathetic all in one, an indication of how delusional or outright evil some of these doctors are.
 
In any case, let’s move on.
 
“When pressed, they had no idea how to identify it – other than the fraudulent test dialed up to 40 magnifications that really just says you have illness, not did [specify] Covid. Why do I say that? The ‘Covid’ test is like magnifying a typeset letter ‘A’ 40 times – until you just see black ink – and it could be any letter – that’s what the Covid test is. It’s magnified so many times that it could be any illness. People don’t know that. That is very telling. And something everyone should be aware of.”
 
“Labeling all illness Covid gives them the ability to do dangerous protocols for the elusive mystery thing that no one has seen or can describe. The CDC said they have no samples of Covid. China admitted the same. No sample after 19 months? Hmm.”
 
Now, for the ACTUAL PROTOCOL used to save the woman’s husband's life. Keep in mind that neither she nor I are doctors and that everyone’s case can vary because not everyone is going through the same. As the lady said earlier, the hubby is 56 with diabetes, so a comorbidity. For better information regarding other cases, it’s best to go to America’s Frontline Doctors’ treatment protocols, as they also have far more detail on what to do and how to treat the Chinese coronavirus (or whatever someone has).
 
The woman suggested that you tell the doctors that you want (demand it):
 
“10,000 mg – 20,000 mg of high-dose INTRAVENOUS Vitamin C daily. Not just oral. They will try to reduce to oral. They may try to give you the equivalent of a chewable. You need at least 10,000 a day. 20,000 is better.”
 
“Vitamin C has many properties to help in many, many ways that people don’t realize. It’s been known to fight inflammation in respiratory for decades. It strengthens your immune system. Pneumonia is inflammation. (Their protocol in most hospitals is only up to 6,000 max a day ONLY if they have severe sepsis so you have to demand use for this), so you have to push them. Don’t stop pushing. If you aren’t firm – if you don’t get a backbone (because their arrogance and control is off the charts) then ignore this entire post. They love pushovers. They cling to their protocol.”
 
“If you use the words ‘it won’t do any harm,’ that’s their buzz words to get them to act. They like those words.”
 
In essence, you have to be firm. In my opinion, the reason for “it won’t do any harm” being buzz words for them is that they shift the responsibility of something happening to the patient away from the doctors and onto you. Doctors have emergency protection from deaths or injury if they stick to their protocol, so they risk being sued if they do things outside protocol and they result in the death of the patient. They want the security that they won’t be sued for doing as you want them to do, so it’s important to make it clear, even sign anything that makes you responsible instead of them, that you will take responsibility and won’t sue them if they go outside protocol and the patient still dies.
 
“He also had 260mg Zinc a day oral but you can/should push for intravenous (IV). They said ‘they were out of it’ but I guess never use it? That was confusing. But at least get an oral dosage.”
 
“10,000 intravenous (IV) Vitamin D a day.”
 
“Slipped in 3 NAC (immune support) capsules a day. (N-Acetylcysteine).”
 
“They kept coming and telling my husband that any moment he could crash and have to go on a vent. Even when his oxygen was at 91 on the high flow. Their scare tactics were relentless. Within 30 hours my hubby was doing great.”
 
It’s important to do everything you can to keep yourself or loved ones OFF of ventilators, as roughly 80% of people who go on ventilators end up dying. With such a high mortality rate (surprised THAT isn’t considered an epidemic of sorts, but not entirely seeing as the elites want people to die), it’d practically be a death sentence to go on ventilators. Do not let yourself or your loved ones be scared into capitulating to the doctor’s demands to go on ventilators. The reason they still push for it, despite the high mortality rate, is because doctors and hospitals are paid nearly $40k per PATIENT who goes on a ventilator (they also get paid $13k per positive COVID diagnosis, which partly explains why they say everything from pneumonia to freaking gunshot wounds are COVID), according to State Sen. Scott Jensen, who is also a medical doctor.
 
It’s part greed and part ideological delusion that’s driving this crap.
 
In any case, back to the protocol:
 
“Forced them to cut back their DEX (steroid) to half to make way for Budesonide inhaled steroid. Instead of just regular dose, once a day, we upped to once every six hours.”

“’Early administration of inhaled budesonide reduced the likelihood of needing urgent medical care and reduced time to recovery after early COVID-19.’ (Lancet article).”
 
“That was key. (Their typical Dex steroid causes psych issues – read up on it. Makes them agitated and angry and all kinds of stuff, besides blood sugar going through the roof.)”
 
“Don’t let them do Remdesivir. It can cause organ failure. Try to ask for Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine but I’m letting you know that they will say they won’t work. Yes, there are plenty of studies [that show they do]. But they will shame you for bringing them up. You can fight for them. They will act like you are asking for voodoo remedies. This is how pathetic it is. What works is not part of the 341 pages given to the hospitals by the NIH/CDC.”
 
“Page 205 of their NIH handbook of their horrifying protocol, they even list all the benefits of Budesonide and claim it keeps them from even going to the hospital in the first place, but claimed there were not enough people in the trial – so whoops – can’t recommend. But results are a glowing recommendation? Yep. This is the silver bullet. Ask for it – demand it. Lancet medical journal just published on it a month ago, calling it the miracle in the UK three months ago. I found that most doctors do not read up or study what is going on. I found they don’t know much about what they are doing because they keep saying it’s a mystery? No mystery. They are OVER-treating it. Scary.”
 
“REFUSE THE VENT. Over and over and over and over. Be firm. Be nice. Be firm.”
 
“Go to the Frontline Doctor page on [the] internet. Do a televisit. They help anyone. They overnight certain drugs mentioned above. What they overnight is based on body weight dose. So make sure to take enough for first few days. In my husband’s case it should have been 30mg the first few days and then down to 6mg a day.”
 
“Go to an IV clinic – they are everywhere and no script or doctor needed for intravenous amounts – you can just get over there ASAP. They help anyone. That website I mentioned is key because no one else will give those drugs at the bought and sold hospitals.”
 
A piece of advice, look up “IV clinic (insert name of my city and state)” instead of “IV clinic near me” because the latter just showed me one in a state completely different from mine and I was momentarily under the impression that they aren’t actually everywhere, but upon looking up IV clinics specifically in my city and state, I was able to find a couple, so make sure to do diligent research.
 
Back to the protocol:
 
“Getting Budesonide was key. Had it in a nebulizer at the hospital.”
 
“[W]e walked out of that place no one hardly walks out of in 3 and a ½ days. Miracle? Or giving someone a chance to fight it, and so never needing things with extremely high death rates – like vent. Say you’ll claim hospice and remove them if they don’t listen to you. Pray for them to listen to you. Prayer works. Blessings work. Be firm but nice.”
 
“The entire key to our success was that Vitamin C high load when we got in there. My husband was at a 79 blood oxygen level.”
 
“Why did we give 3 capsules of NAC in the hospital a day to my husband? NAC – N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a precursor of the antioxidant glutathione, has been used to loosen thick mucus in the lungs and treat acetaminophen overdose for decades. However, NAC can also boost the immune system, suppress viral replication, and reduce inflammation. I would have this around in bulk!”
 
“And Dr. Mikovitz recommended Glutathione supplements. There are websites for televisits to good doctors like www.myfreedoctor.com. There are Mobile IV vitamin clinics also! They come to your house. The ‘Right to Try’ Act is hugely important to tell your doctors what you want your loved one to be given.”
 
So thank you, President Trump, for that resource.
 
One more thing I want to share real quick, which I guess wasn’t part of the protocol of this lady (don’t remember where else I got it, but it’s a good resource), is the Patient Bill of Rights.
 
I’m willing to bet most of you didn’t even know this existed, and even fewer of you know what those rights are. Which is fair, as I didn’t know this existed either until just recently.
 
Not all of the parts of the Patient Bill of Rights are entirely necessary for you to constantly know, so I will share some here (of course, you can check out the entire Patient Bill of Rights here).
 
As a patient, you have the right:
 

• To safe, considerate and respectful care, provided in a manner consistent with your beliefs;

 

• To expect that all communications and records pertaining to your care will be treated as confidential to the extent permitted by law;

 

• To know the physician responsible for coordinating your care at the Clinical Center;

 

• To receive complete information about diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis from the physician, in terms that are easily understood. If it is medically inadvisable to give such information to you, it will be given to a legally authorized representative;

 

• To receive information necessary for you to give informed consent prior to any procedure or treatment, including a description of the procedure or treatment, any potential risks or benefits, the probable duration of any incapacitation, and any alternatives. Exceptions will be made in case of emergency;

 

• To receive routine services when hospitalized at the Clinical Center in connection with your protocol. Complicating chronic conditions will be noted, reported to you, and treated as necessary without the assumption of long-term responsibility for their management;

 

• To receive appropriate assessment of, and treatment for, pain;

 

• To refuse to participate in research, to refuse treatment to the extent permitted by law, and to be informed of the medical consequences of these actions, including possible dismissal from the study and discharge from the Clinical Center. If discharge would jeopardize your health, you have the right to remain under Clinical Center care until discharge or transfer is medically advisable;

 

• To expect that a medical summary from the Clinical Center will be sent to your referring physician;

 

• To designate additional physicians or organizations at any time to receive medical updates.

 
 
As I said, these are only some (actually, most) of the rights under the Patient Bill of Rights. I highlighted these ones because I believe these would be most applicable to most people at most times, and are the most important ones to know, particularly the ones regarding safe care and not being forced to participate in research (as most people currently are).
 
Anyway, to make a very long article short, please ensure that you or your loved one are being taken care of properly. If you have the misfortune of having to go to the hospital, you have to be the one in charge of the health of yourself or your loved one, as most doctors in most hospitals only care about the money they are paid and the legal security of their protocol over the health and safety of their patients. I would advise (not medical advice) to try telemedicine and IV clinics before going to the hospital, as most cases should not even really lead to hospitalization at all.
 
But if you do end up having to go, for one reason or another, follow either this lady’s protocol or that of the Frontline Doctors. Supposedly, the average recovery time for people is 7 to 14 days, and a relatively old, diabetic man managed to recover in less than four days. That’s no fluke, and even Joe Rogan, when he had Covid, said he used Ivermectin and recovered in about as long. Also don’t forget that President Trump had the Chinese coronavirus and recovered in just three days because of HCQ.
 
These things work and work for the healthy and less healthy, the low-risk and high-risk patients. So you have to be the one in control of your or your loved one’s health, because most doctors won’t give a semblance of a damn about that.
 
Jeremiah 17:14
“Heal me, O Lord, and I shall be healed; save me, and I shall be saved, for you are my praise.”

According to a recent study by the Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published in The Lancet, fully vaccinated people (that is, those who have taken the ridiculous two shots) carry 251 times the viral load of the Chinese coronavirus compared to those who are unvaccinated.
 
The study reads: “Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020.”
 
And in what is a particularly bad blow to the vaccine narrative, the study shows that the vaccinated can spread to both the vaxxed and unvaxxed. According to the Daily Veracity:
 
“The study focused on healthcare workers who were unable to leave the hospital for two weeks. The study showed that fully vaccinated workers, about two months after injection, carried and transmitted the virus to their vaccinated colleagues after infection. They also passed the virus to unvaccinated people, including their patients. The vaccine used in the study was the Oxford/AstraZeneca (AZD1222) vaccine.”
 
While this isn’t particularly new, it’s just more evidence against the vaccine and particularly the vax mandates.
 
One of the biggest reasons the Left claims for getting the vaccine is that one wouldn’t be able to transmit the virus onto other people. Even though a vaccine is meant to protect the person GETTING IT and this narrative goes completely against what is generally understood about vaccines, that is what the Left had been arguing for a long time. However, even that isn’t true (shocker), as the vaccinated, if they get the virus (or something, seeing as we’ve previously discussed the potential inexistence of COVID-19), can spread it onto other people, even those who are also vaccinated.
 
So what is the point of getting the vaccine? There is no medical or scientific reason for it, you’re just supposed to do as you’re told and if possible, they will force you to get it through social and financial coercion, violating the Nuremberg Code.
 
Every supposed “benefit” of getting the vaccine has utterly backfired after even some amount of review. It used to be that those who were vaccinated had the “privilege” to not wear a mask (as if that actually stopped the rest of us from doing the same), but recently, the CDC went back on that, urging vaccinated people to continue to wear masks because they were still catching and spreading the virus (or whatever else, but let’s, for the sake of the argument, say it’s really the Chinese coronavirus).
 
Even the vaccine passports will likely backfire on them, given that they already are in the UK.
 
According to Breitbart, “Britain’s socialized healthcare system reportedly falsified up to 700,000 vaccine passport records… resulting in many Britons being barred from leaving the country.”
 
In other words, the British healthcare system messed up the healthcare records of 700,000 Brits, keeping them from enjoying the “benefits” of the vaccine passport system, such as going to clubs or pubs, large public events like sports games, etc.
 
So not only is it a draconian system which divides and discriminates against people because they don’t want to be part of an experimental vaccine trial and fall victim to violations of the Nuremberg Code, but it’s a draconian system which doesn’t even work (again, shocker).
 
So the vaccinated still have to wear masks and social distance (according to the fascists, that is. They don’t actually have to do any such thing), they can still catch and spread the virus thereby negating any medical benefit to the vaccine, and the fascistic vax passport system, at least in the UK, is not only authoritarian but also incompetent and broken.
 
I repeat, what reason is there to get a vaccine? We’ve already seen that it doesn’t protect you from catching the virus, which at this point, with the Delta variant (assuming it exists) being the dominant one, isn’t much of a big deal since the variant is 20 times less lethal than the original strain (again, assuming these things exist).
 
The study from Oxford found the less lethal Delta strain in all of those vaccinated workers, which is probably the reason as to why they survived, but again, seeing as the Delta strain is less lethal than the already pretty mild 99.98% non-lethal Chinese coronavirus, what reason is there for someone without the vax to get jabbed?
 
Not to mention the VAERS system which shows tens of thousands of reported deaths from the vaccines (which, I will remind you, is a system which reports less than 1% of all actual cases in the U.S., so the real number is likely much, much higher) and other adverse effects from the vaccine, such as thrombosis (blood clots), anaphylaxis (allergic reactions), neurologic injury and, in pregnant women, particularly those in the first and second trimesters, spontaneous abortion.
 
All these risks just to get a vaccine which doesn’t work, to “protect” you from something you have a greater than 99.98% chance of surviving if you are relatively young and healthy, since, again, the Delta variant is the dominant one and it’s far less lethal.
 
Oh, and you may even become a super spreader due to the 251 times greater viral load, therefore putting your loved ones at risk (according to the Left’s argument).
 
This entire charade has been one massive pile of bullcrap after another. A virus which people were too afraid to accurately say came from China, which has a survival rate equal to or greater than the flu, which apparently only targets rallying Republicans and Trump supporters but not BLM and Antifa rioters and Democrat politicians.
 
We were repeatedly told we only had to wait 15 days to slow the spread. This was over 530 days ago. In the meantime, almost all states went into lockdown, causing a mini-recession, millions of jobs lost from which we are still recovering, and untold pain and deaths caused by said lockdowns which will go ignored because people were too damn afraid of the virus (in large part because the Establishment kept insisting this was practically the Plague).
 
We were told we could reopen once cases went down. They went down and many states didn’t reopen. We were told we could reopen once vaccines were available. Vaccines are available and many states have RE-ENTERED lockdown. The goalposts keep being moved and b.s. reason after b.s. reason keeps being thrown out.
 
And on top of all that, we are being driven insane by the illogic of the insistence of getting a vaccine which even a VENTRILOQUIST COMEDIAN IN JEFF DUNHAM can see is utter stupidity (in a video where he had one of his puppets asks questions to a puppet “Joe Biden” during a press conference, which included the vaccines among other topics).
 
And now, along with everything else, a study shows that those who were gullible enough to get a vaccine might be super spreaders due to the viral load? I repeat, for the final time (in this article), why would anyone ever get one of these vaccines?
 
Proverbs 18:7
“A fool’s mouth is his ruin, and his lips are a snare to his soul.” 

The Left repeatedly has demanded that “we listen to doctors” and “experts” and that we “follow the science” surrounding the Chinese coronavirus. They, of course, are liars and hypocrites, as they utterly ignore any scientific data which shows this whole pandemic to be a farce and their supposedly “effective” measures to be nothing but pipe dreams at best and heavily damaging to society at worst.
 
They often try to cite Anthony Fauci as the be-all and end-all of scientific credentials, and that what he says is basically the Gospel. Well, here we have a doctor with even BETTER credentials than Fauci, Dr. Thomas T. Siler.
 
Dr. Siler is an internist with 37 years of experience, the same credentials as Fauci, and actually treats patients, so he gets to see the actual effects of the pandemic first-hand, making him a far more credible source than Fauci.
 
Dr. Siler wrote two articles, one in which he details the good news about the Chinese coronavirus and another which talks about “the bad and the ugly” surrounding the virus.
 
Let’s begin with the good news, shall we?
 
Siler details 10 points, or pieces of good news, for us to know:

    1. “Globally, the survival rate for COVID-19 is 99.8%. Under the age of 70, the survival rate for COVID-19 is 99.97%. This is on par with many influenza seasons. Americans younger than 70 do not have to fear COVID-19 any more than influenza and we know how to protect the elderly.”

   2. “Herd immunity for the alpha strain is here.” Dr. Siler says that antibody studies show that the percentage of those with natural immunity is 4-6 times higher than the number of cases in the U.S. And according to another doctor, from Johns Hopkins University, 80-85% of the population is immune. “Those who deny this,” Siler writes, “must explain how cases and deaths started to decline in January way before there was a significant vaccine effort. Instead, we are transitioning now from a pandemic to endemic status and, indeed, some eminent virologists say vaccinating in the middle of a pandemic is making herd immunity more difficult to obtain through the creation of variants.” 

    3. “The average age of death from COVID is 78. The average life expectancy in America is 78… Children and those under age 70 are at much lower risk.”  

    4. “Hydroxychloroquine works. Ivermectin works. It has been estimated 85% of COVID-19 deaths could have been prevented were these medicines used early.” 

    5. “Children are safe from COVID-19 and don’t spread the virus either. A study in the UK showed that the survival rate in children is 99.995%. In the U.S. 335 children have died since the start of the pandemic. A study done by Johns Hopkins and FAIR Health showed that all of the children that died from April 2020 to August 2020 had immune problems or were chronically ill. In that period, not one healthy child died. Children have more chance of dying in a car wreck, unintentional drug overdose, or influenza than from COVID-19. Vaccination for healthy children is not needed.” 

    6.  “Sweden did not have a lockdown or mask mandate and did better with cases and deaths than many countries. Lockdown did not work and had serious cultural and economic side effects. There is ample literature now to show that masks, as we are using them, do not work.” 
   
   7. “Persons who have had COVID-19 infection have a robust and long-lasting immunity. This immunity also is likely to protect against variants. As evidence continues to accumulate that the new mRNA vaccines are neither as effective nor safe as advertised, I would advise not getting the vaccine on top of your natural immunity if you had the COVID-19 infection.” 
 
   8. “There is very little, if any, spread of COVID-19 from asymptomatic persons. This lie was spread early to maximize fear of this new virus. COVID-19 is like other respiratory viral infections – you catch it from being around someone who has symptoms.” 

    9. “The death rate nationally for COVID-19 has been going down since January.” 

   10. “The Delta variant is acting like a typical historical virus variant. Typically, variants happen all the time and are more contagious but less deadly… A UK report states the Delta variant is likely 20 times less deadly than the alpha strain, but that more data needs to be collected.”  

Basically, Siler said, we needn’t be afraid of the Chinese coronavirus.
 
Unfortunately, there are entities who wish to only further increase the fear, rather than remain rational about it. For a variety of reasons, the lies and hysteria will only continue, and unfortunately, those who try and tell the truth will be de-platformed or generally censored, as Siler notes in his second article.
 
Now, we move on to the bad things about the pandemic:

     1. The death count “has been artificially elevated to maximize fear.” “California’s fifth-most populous county revised its COVID-19 death count down by 22% after reviewing the cases for the last 18 months.” Washington and Minnesota also lowered their counts and it’s likely that “overcounting happened across our country.” 

    2. “The PCR test for COVID-19 is flawed in many ways and led to overcounting cases. Two weeks ago, the CDC and FDA quietly said they would abandon the PCR test for COVID-19 in December 2021, acknowledging it did not work. They also alluded to the fact that the PCR test could not distinguish between COVID and the flu. Did the flu go away last year? No, many cases were counted as COVID-19. The CDC and FDA also now admit that they did not have any physical samples of the COVID-19 virus (I’ll get to why in a moment) so they used common cold Coronaviruses and human cells to make a less accurate test.” 

     3. “The new mRNA vaccines are far from safe. While the VAERS reporting system now has over 10,000 deaths (EU 20,000 deaths) after the vaccine, a whistleblower with the CDC says the actual count is closer to 50,000 and not being reported. Adverse reactions, including… blood clots, neurologic injury, and spontaneous abortion have approached 650,000 patients in the USA.” 

    4. “The mRNA vaccine is not safe in pregnant women. An article in the New England Medical Journal showed a rate of spontaneous abortion of 12% which is close to what is normally expected and the conclusion was the vaccine was safe to give. However, the study was skewed to include mostly women in the third trimester (84%). The remaining women in the 1st and 2nd trimesters had a 75% spontaneous abortion rate (96 out of 127).” 

    5. Supposedly prestigious medical journals have spread disinformation. “The Lancet, the top medical journal in Europe, had to retract a study saying Hydroxychloroquine was not working on COVID-19 when it was proved that there was no data for the study… The Lancet also published a statement signed by several scientists saying the COVID-19 virus could not have possibly come from the Wuhan lab. With evidence mounting now that this is exactly what happened the Lancet cannot admit it was wrong. Faith in our medical leaders is waning.” 

    6. “Antibody Dependent Enhancement (“ADE”) may be happening. [R]eports are beginning to come in from countries that are heavily vaccinated, such as Israel, that vaccinated people are getting sick and may have more serious illnesses than those not vaccinated.” 

     7. “The mRNA vaccines are not 95% effective as touted. Efficacy is likely closer to 40-70% but more data is needed. Reports coming in from Israel and states like Massachusetts show high numbers of vaccinated people (over 50%) in the hospital with COVID-19.”  

In that article, Siler also points to “the ugly” of the pandemic, such as the shady bullcrap that we have seen from “scientists” and the government. For example, Siler points to the faulty PCR testing being used to inflate case numbers and maximizing fear; or the fact that some protests and riots are ok and not superspreaders, such as BLM and Antifa riots, or things like a massive birthday bash for Obama, but other protests and gatherings, like any Trump rally or the Jan. 6th rally, being supposed superspreader events.
 
Read the article yourself for more such examples from Siler, because I want to get to the one thing the doc never got to which, as I mentioned previously, is related to why neither the CDC nor FDA don’t have samples of the Chinese coronavirus and had to use other coronaviruses: COVID-19 has yet to be proven to actually exist.
 
See, the way in which viruses are effectively proven to exist is through a process of isolation. You take a cell you believe is infected with the virus and attempt to isolate the virus from the rest of the cell. There is a pretty good article on Algora that goes into more technical detail about the process for finding new viruses, far too detailed for me to be able to simplify more than I already have. It also says that “none” of the steps necessary for isolating and discovering a new virus have “even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus.”
 
“But how can that be?” one might be compelled to ask. “We have seen the picture of the virus, with the cell and the things sticking out of it looking kind of like a crown, like the picture above.” Well, if that were evidence of the existence of the virus, the evolutionary “road-map” from ape to human would count as evidence of evolution. They likely made that graphic out of other coronaviruses and how they look. For example, the following:

MERS also looks rather similar to coronaviruses.
 
So just because we have all seen the graphic of what COVID-19 “looks like” that doesn’t necessarily mean that it exists. That it hasn’t been isolated means that it hasn’t been proven to exist.
 
Remember, also, that Siler mentioned that the death rate is on par with many influenza seasons and that the flu didn’t simply go away last year but many flu cases were counted as Chinese coronavirus cases. In a pandemic, it would be expected for MORE people than usual to die in a given year, yet we have seen that the number of people dying over the last few years has been about the same. Fewer were reported to die from things like the flu or influenza, etc., not because humanity somehow evolved into being capable of surviving those things within a year or two (any evolutionary biologist, even the most ardent and Leftist one, would tell you that’s not how evolution works) but because we have attributed non-COVD deaths to COVID, literally including gunshot wounds.
 
People have gotten sick, yes, but people always get sick with many things. The only difference is that, this time, those illnesses have been in the spotlight but been called COVID-19.
 
In Alberta, Canada, a man was fined $1,200 CAN for being in a “large gathering” of more than 10 people. In court, he demanded to see evidence of the virus isolated to justify a pandemic and the measures for which he was being fined. He specifically subpoenaed the Chief Medical Officer of Health for Alberta that she might isolate the virus and show proof of its existence. They tried dirty tricks like subpoenaing the man back within 24 hours of a court appearance, which was a “procedural violation” and which the man got the judge to agree was a violation. Eventually, the CMO’s lawyer said: “Well, your honor, [the defendant] is requesting evidence we cannot get.”
 
The health office of Alberta could not get evidence that the Chinese coronavirus was isolated and, therefore, real, something which, if anyone had isolated the virus, ought to be easy for them to have acquired such evidence.
 
Now, I have said previously that the CCP likely developed this virus in a lab and released it on accident but took advantage of the chaos to set the world on fire. It can’t be that both are true, since either it’s not real and therefore the CCP developed nothing or it’s real and the CCP developed something but there should be isolation and proof of the virus of which there isn’t any.
 
The CCP definitely is developing things in their virology institutes, since they are commie crap. We know for certain that, if the virus is real, that it’s artificial. But do we know that it definitely exists even artificially? The evidence points to the idea that no, it doesn’t exist. It would certainly make sense, since, again, you’d expect far more deaths in pandemic years than we would have in other years, even if the virus is artificial, yet the number of deaths has been about the same.
 
My gut instinct here is to go with the idea that it doesn’t exist (isolation is a key component) but that if it ever is isolated and proven to exist, we at least also know for sure that it is manufactured and not natural, as evidence shows.
 
At any rate, to close on this rather long article, what Dr. Siler wrote in his articles is great and certainly truthful. And all this from someone who has FAR more credibility than the Left’s St. Fauci.
 
Proverbs 15:14
“The heart of him who has understanding seeks knowledge, but the mouths of fools feed on folly.”

Allow me to preface this by explaining roughly what I mean when I say that this is at all “surprising.” What I find surprising isn’t that the CCP has control over the WHO or that it uses pressuring tactics to force such organizations to lie on their behalf. What I find surprising is that anyone from the WHO, particularly a lead investigator into the origins of the Chinese coronavirus, would reverse course on the narrative and expose the CCP for its deceitful tactics.
 
What is also rather surprising is that the news organization to break this story is Jeff Bezos’ The Washington Post. They report that Peter Ben Embarek, a top scientist leading the WHO’s investigation into the origins of the Chinese coronavirus, “said Chinese researchers on the team had pushed back against linking the origins of the pandemic to a research laboratory in Wuhan in a report about the investigation.”
 
“In further comments during the interview that were not included in the documentary but were incorporated in an account by the Danish channel TV2 on its website, Ben Embarek suggested that there could have been ‘human error’ but that the Chinese political system does not allow authorities to acknowledge that,” continued the report.
 
What he’s saying is that the virus likely originated in the lab and was released as a result of some sort of accident, or “human error” as he puts it. Since the CCP is built on nothing but lies, it insists that anyone working in the government be seen as infallible and perfect, incapable of making mistakes such as these. They try to maintain an aura of perfection and effectiveness, so the idea that the virus came not only from a lab but was an accident goes against the narrative they wish to drive.
 
Embarek also said that the CCP pressed the investigating team to not look into the lab and only allowed them to report that it was “very unlikely” that the Chinese coronavirus escaped from a lab and demanded that the team “didn’t recommend any specific studies to further that hypothesis.”
 
In a TV interview, Embarek said that “it’s interesting that the lab relocated on the 2nd of December 2019: That’s the period where it all started. We know that when you move a lab, it disturbs everything… That entire procedure is always a disruptive element in the daily work routine of a lab.”
 
Embarek wasn’t completely betraying CCP narratives, however, and while he said that the virus likely came from the lab, he also said that it was likely a researcher at the lab could have become infected collecting bat samples, arguing that such a case would be one where “the virus jumps directly from a bat to a human.”
 
Essentially, he is revealing that it likely came from a lab, but not that it was necessarily altered or artificially created, just that it was originally in a bat and it was transmitted to a human, sort of like the original reported “origin” of the virus being from a Wuhan market.
 
However, New York magazine reported earlier this year that when six field workers got sick in a Chinese cave back in 2012 with a virus which is most closely related to the Chinese coronavirus, they were taken to a hospital and none of the hospital workers got sick, so the virus was not transmissible.
 
This is relevant because Dr. Steven Quay and UC Berkeley physics professor Richard Muller explained to The WSJ back in June that the genomic structure of the Chinese coronavirus was not found in any other virus in nature. That is the strongest evidence that the Chinese coronavirus was MANUFACTURED.
 
So no, it wasn’t transmitted from a bat to a human even in a lab. That the genomic sequence was unnatural indicates artificial creation through gain-of-function research.
 
In gain-of-function research, a spike protein is altered for the purposes of making a virus more transmissible and lethal. The specific genome sequence of CGG-CGG (known as “double CGG)” has “never been found naturally,” according to Quay and Muller, “in the entire class of coronaviruses that includes CoV-2.” They further explained that natural processes could not create a sequence combination if it “isn’t present in any other virus.”
 
“Although the double CGG is suppressed naturally, the opposite is true in laboratory work. The insertion sequence of choice is the double CGG. That’s because it is readily available and convenient, and scientists have a great deal of experience inserting it… Now the damning fact. It was this exact sequence that appears in CoV-2. Proponents of zoonotic origin must explain why the novel coronavirus, when it mutated or recombined, happened to pick its least favorite combination, the double CGG. Why did it replicate the choice the lab’s gain-of-function researchers would have made?”
 
The fact that there was no serious viral “improvement” which took place until a small variation was found many months after the pandemic began in England is also indicative that it was optimized in a lab. Compare it to SARS and MERS, both of which were confirmed to have had a natural origin – rapidly evolved as they spread through the population – until the most contagious forms of the viruses were dominant. The CCP virus, according to Quay and Muller, “didn’t work that way. It appeared in humans already adapted into an extremely contagious version… Such early optimization is unprecedented, and it suggests a long period of adaptation that predated its public spread. Science knows of only one way that could be achieved: simulated natural evolution, growing the virus on human cells until the optimum is achieved. That is precisely what is done in gain-of-function research.”
 
All evidence suggests to artificial creation of this virus. It makes no sense that Embarek would still be willing to share the nonsensical “bat-to-human transmission” theory when, by this point, he has angered the CCP by revealing what they do. It’s not at all unsurprising that the CCP does this crap, but they still don’t want their dirty laundry aired, and that is what Embarek did, to an extent.
 
Still, that someone this high up in the WHO would do this at all is a surprise anyway, and something for which I can be appreciative.
 
I just hope more of the corruption and deception of the CCP gets to be released and shown by even some of their closest allies.
 
Deuteronomy 28:7
“’The Lord will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you. They shall come out against you one way and flee before you seven ways.’”

One thing has been made perfectly clear in the last year and a half of this pandemic: The people who claim that it’s a big deal never act as though it’s a big deal. It’s a similar phenomenon to what they do regarding climate change. They claim man-made climate change will destroy the planet one of these days and then go on to do things which run contrary to the message they generally give.
 
One such example is Obama having bought a house on Martha’s Vineyard, which the Left constantly claims will be underwater in a decade or so. So if it’s going to be underwater because of climate change, why buy the property which Obama’s OWN SIDE claims is doomed? It’s because they don’t actually believe the bullcrap they sell, neither when it comes to climate change nor the Chinese coronavirus.
 
This is once again exemplified with the planned 60th birthday party that the Obamas are planning to hold for the former criminal-in-chief; a birthday party which seeks to have over 700 people in it.
 
Even Axios kind of called them out on this, reporting: “Obama is hosting a 60th birthday bash for himself and hundreds of guests on Martha’s Vineyard this coming weekend amid heightened public health concerns – locally and nationally – about the COVID-19 Delta variant.”
 
If even Axios, of all sites, is calling them out on this even to this extent, you know these people are utter hypocrites.
 
And this news comes as the illegitimate Biden administration and other top Democrats are trying to fearmonger people about the “danger” of the Delta variant of the Chinese coronavirus, scaring people about the increased number of cases despite the fact that deaths have not gone up alongside that increase.
 
Still, Leftists are making the claim that the Delta variant is something to fear and for which we ought to re-implement the failed policies which did nothing to slow down the original Chinese coronavirus over the last year and a half, and that includes Barack Obama.
 
Fake news CNN tried to downplay this party, claiming that the attendees would be “fully vaccinated” so there would be no issues at all with holding such a super-spreader event (a term they would never use to describe their own parties). But if the Delta variant is as bad as they themselves claim, why do fully vaccinated people now have to wear masks indoors again?
 
If these people believe that the Delta variant and the Chinese coronavirus in general are so bad, why do they CONSTANTLY break the rules that they themselves either set up or have openly supported?
 
The Heritage Foundation has a neat little list of incidents where policymakers have supported restrictions and regulations for Americans and then went on to break those very rules, often the very day they were imposed.
 
The first example The Heritage Foundation shares was of Mayor Bill de Blasio going to the gym after advising New Yorkers not to go to the gym themselves (a case which we ourselves have noted multiple times). Another example they give is of Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot getting a haircut at a salon despite such places being shut down. And of course, they also include Nancy Pelosi’s similar little scandal.
 
Most recently, as in the last two days of July, there were five incidents of COVID hypocrisy to be noted.
 
The first one was of D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (she appears multiple times here, unsurprisingly) being seen maskless with Dave Chappelle hours before new mask mandate goes into effect.
 
Now, the liberal might argue “she’s technically not breaking the rules because the mandate hadn’t gone into effect yet.” Oh, yes, I’m sure the virus was well aware that it couldn’t begin trying to affect people again until after the mandate went into effect. Seriously, that’s just a technicality and she was no safer from the virus, either the original or Delta variant, hours after the mandate went into effect than she was before.
 
But even if the virus somehow, someway did act like that and Bowser was technically “safe” from it or at least was not being hypocritical about the mandate and being maskless, like I said earlier, she appears multiple times here.
 
Later that same day, she held her birthday party maskless despite the mandate, by that point, having gone into effect. And for those who might argue that maybe the party was outside, and she didn’t break the INDOOR mask mandate, here’s a picture of the event:

Not only is Bowser not wearing a mask indoors, but there isn’t a SINGLE person in that picture, whom I could tell, who was wearing a mask at all or properly. There is one dude on the right who has a mask but has it all the way down, and that’s the only one I can see with a mask at all.

So technicality or not regarding that first incident I mentioned, she is definitely a massive hypocrite with this second one.
 
The third one I will mention, the last one with Bowser, was an incident the following day, on July 31st, where she attended a wedding party, again indoors, and again without wearing a mask despite the indoors mask mandate she had implemented just the day before.
 
So three incidents in two days of sheer hypocrisy from just ONE of these deceivers.
 
The other two recent incidents were of Nancy Pelosi, where she swore in a new congressman without wearing a mask despite the new mask mandate in the House and New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell, who was seen maskless at an event on the same day that she implemented new mask mandates.
 
And this is FAR from the complete list of incidents of utter hypocrisy from these people. Check out the site for yourself to see the many times these politicians and policymakers were caught violating their own rules and mandates (and who knows how many other incidents there are where they weren’t caught?).
 
The point is that NONE of the people who are telling you to be wary of the virus are acting wary of the virus. None of the people who say that this is a big deal are acting like it’s a big deal. None of the people who claim that these mandates are safe and effective are acting like they do a damn thing. None of the people who ORDER you to do this and that are doing it themselves.
 
That’s because NONE of them believe the crap that they spew. They will say it over and over again, of course, because they want YOU to believe it and be afraid enough to be submissive to them, but they know better than to believe their own crap and sure as hell are acting like it.
 
There are people who condescendingly ask you why you refuse to follow these unconstitutional mandates, and while there are plenty of good answers, perhaps none is more effective than the fact that none of the people who demand we do these things do them themselves.
 
According to the CDC’s most recent guidance, even those fully vaccinated need to be wearing masks, so it’s not an issue of “oh, you conservatives are just unvaccinated while these liberals are vaccinated, so they get to enjoy these extra freedoms.” 1) That’s discrimination, as there shouldn’t be any reason one group of people ought to enjoy more rights and liberties based on this criterion and 2) again, the CDC recommends fully vaccinated people (that is, those who have gotten two shots, which I will continue to argue why it’s necessary to get two if they are as safe and effective as they claim they are) to wear masks.
 
I assume that Bowser, Obama, Pelosi and all these other people have been fully vaccinated and yet, they continue to disregard even the rules that THEY have established.
 
If they have no worries about the consequences of their rule-breaking, there should be no one else who ought to have such worries. Even ignoring the scientific data surrounding the mildness of the virus (both versions) and the inefficacy of the vaccines, masks and lockdowns, you can just look at the behavior of the elites to see how little worry anyone ought to have here.
 
Sure, they all SAY that these things are necessary and safe and effective, but none of them are acting like what they say has any sort of truth in it. None of them are acting the least bit worried about the pandemic, certainly, not like they generally act when they speak with the press on this matter.
 
So then, why would any of us have to worry about what they themselves are not worried? Why do any of us have to follow these mandates when they themselves refuse to do so?
 
Simply, they have law enforcement on their side. The corrupt bureaucrats get to make the rules others have to follow, but they don’t have to follow themselves if only because the cops will be on their side, at least for the most part. It’s a “do as I say, not as I do” kind of corrupt system.
 
But it’s not like it can’t be fought. I don’t go to businesses which require me to wear masks indoors, unless it’s absolutely necessary. And lawsuits can be filed because these mandates are illegal and unconstitutional.
 
But generally speaking, if anyone wants to argue with me about why I don’t follow these guidelines, I present them with these very hypocrites who are rule-breakers as well but who are utterly self-righteous and grandstanding about their positions. They urge others to do what they themselves refuse to do.
 
I have NO intention of following any such people or listening to what they tell me to do and any politician supposedly on our side ought to be primaried or generally challenged if they insist on these insane mandates.
 
Frankly speaking, there is no reason for ANYONE to believe the crap that these people spew.
 
2 Timothy 3:5
“Having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people.”

For decades, the Left has made the argument that abortion was “safe” and meant to be “rare” and that those who perform the abortion were “kind and understanding” people who cared about the patients. It is no surprise, really, that the Left lies about this as much as anything else, and horror stories from a Texas PP abortion clinic will show that.
 
As with other businesses (which begs the question as to why PP is tax-funded, since they get paid by their customers like any other business), Planned Parenthood abortion facilities get reviewed online by customers who had some sort of comment to make about their experience. Today, we will read the stories of four customers who have had horrible experiences at this particular slaughterhouse, and will check out how this facility stacked up when reviewed by health inspectors.
 
First, the horror stories.
 
One woman, who will of course remain nameless, posted the following lengthy review (which I will cut a bit to save time):
 
“I had a pregnancy that I knew I couldn’t go through for financial reasons… and if I [could afford it] I would not have had an abortion… The decision I made was hard for me and I needed someone who understood. When I got there I waited for hours alone. They brought me in to give me packets on adoption agencies, took my money and sent me back out. Then a few hours later I was herded into waiting room #2 which was smaller for a couple more hours. When I got in to visit the doctor he described the abortion process so fast it was difficult to understand, because, for him it was obviously just a script. Very little heart went into what was being said. I was so confused and had a difficult time processing the information that was being said because of the speed and lack of emotional connection… When I came in for the abortion I became emotional, yet, I had to wait for hours in a packed waiting room, 8 to be exact. I was herded from place to place and everyone who spoke to me recited a script as fast as they could so they could get the next person in. I was just a number. When I finally went in, there was a large bio waste bucket overflowing with the materials used to perform abortions which was not comforting. The procedure itself was incredibly painful and I was on the strongest medication they had. I weighed only 92 lbs. during this procedure and had a very hard time staying awake after it was finished. They seemed frustrated with me for being out of it. I started throwing up as soon as the medicine wore off and after THAT whole experience, the hours of waiting, knowing if I could have my baby I would have… I broke down, and they WOULDN’T let me leave until I stopped crying. I understand that emotions in the waiting room are delicate but they didn’t seem to care through the rest of the procedure.”


This woman then goes on to say that she is, unsurprisingly, pro-abortion and even pro-PP, but an experience like this really ought to get someone to rethink some stuff. Like I said in the beginning of the article, for decades, we have been told that abortion was “safe” and “rare” and that those who “take care” of the women going through such procedures are “kind and compassionate” individuals who understand the women’s situation. All a load of bullcrap, of course. There is nothing safe or rare about abortion, as one can see from just this review alone.
 
That the murderers were speaking as fast as they could was an indication of two things, one of which the woman writing this review kind of hints at: 1) they WANT it to be confusing so that the women leave the ultimate choice up to the abortionists themselves because they wouldn’t be able to make the best decision themselves (going against the whole “pro-choice” idea) and 2) they herd women through so they can perform as many abortions as they can. It’s that second thing which demonstrates the bullcrap nature of that whole “rare” argument.
 
No Leftist wants abortion to be rare. To the contrary, they want it to be COMMON and PREVALENT. After all, they make PLENTY of money off of it, with the b.s. lobbying in Congress and other donations made by PP to Leftist politicians. All at the tax-payers’ expense, of course.
 
The idea that these people are “kind and considerate” is, frankly, a bit oxymoronic (and generally moronic). A murderer isn’t “kind and considerate”. At best, they only pretend to be. They are evil and, like the devil, entice people to commit horrid actions against their benefit.
 
The woman leaving a review did NOT have to get an abortion. She said she did it for financial reasons, but that’s not a good enough reason (and there is no good enough reason for abortion, ever). If she was worried she couldn’t raise her child, why not give them up for adoption or leave them in the hands of trusted family and/or friends? Why is murder the go-to option here? For anyone? Even for someone who is pro-abortion?
 
In any case, let’s move on to the other stories, which for the sake of time, I will further edit down and offer less commentary until I feel the need to speak.
 
“A nurse was making insensitive remarks and yelling at my ear saying I have no reason to be crying while I was on the table getting my procedure done… I was under pressure while this woman aggressively asking why am I crying and saying that they know it doesn’t hurt me that bad… In recovery she also stated that they should close the curtain because no one wants to see me crying…. I was so frustrated at that difficult moment I just feel like some sort of action should be taken… Meanwhile in recovery I was still crying and a diff nurse said that if I didn’t stop crying they would remove me and take me to the hospital… they were yelling at me and it made me cry harder… I paid money so they could do their job this is one experience I would never forget those two women or this experience bad enough I was forced on this abortion but to have those women speak to me the way they did was very unprofessional…”
 
Not the best grammar, but from what I can tell, it seems this woman was FORCED to get an abortion in some form or fashion, likely pressure from someone she knows. Again, what’s pro-choice about this? Where is the choice? And again, she had to pay money for people to do this. Why does PP, a for-profit business, get funds from tax payers?
 
Next woman: “Dr. Jordan and his staff are entirely incompetent. My counselor I was supposed to talk to barely said two words to me and when I began to cry… his staff kept telling me that I needed to just grow up and that it wouldn’t be that bad. Two months ago I was raped and they offered no compassion or understanding… When I entered the room for the sonogram, Dr. Jordan told me I was not being compliant because I was crying, mind you he hadn’t given me any instruction or said anything to me before that. When the sonogram was over, I wasn’t offered anything to clean the medical lubricant off of myself with nor was I given a panty liner… I was made to wait more than 15 minutes in a tiny… waiting room by myself, no counselor at all, and when I had an anxiety attack in that small room, they took me back to the lobby and told me that I needed to take my business elsewhere.”
 
Thankfully, this woman wound up not getting an abortion (at least at this facility) but still.
 
And lastly, the fourth woman: “The surgery here hurt like hell, the medicine they give you does not soften your cervix in time for surgery so he will literally crack it open… After having my surgery here I went home for 4 nights I bled tremendously to the point I slept with 2 large towels to protect my bed.”
 
But it’s not just customer experiences that indicate how awful of a place this PP facility is.
 
According to a report by Check My Clinic, which makes health inspections for abortion facilities, they failed in a number of aspects:
 

• The facility failed to document that women were examined before their abortions.
  
  
• Patients were dismissed from the facility after their abortions without being examined by a doctor or advance practice registered nurse.

 

• The facility was unsanitary. The sink in the waiting room had “a large circle of a dark brown dried substance.” Patients’ bags were stored in front of the toilet or on the floor of the bathroom. There were “large brown water stains” on the floor. Snack foods being offered to patients were kept in cardboard boxes on the floor.

 

• Sterile instruments were kept in cracked, peeling cabinets, and wrapped in a way that would cause “likely contamination and infection.” Biohazardous waste was stored in cardboard boxes next to open patient supplies.

 
As well as 13 other health violations including clean linens being stored on the floor and other things which created risk for infection.
 
So not only is the staff at the PP facility filled with blatantly uncaring and uncompassionate individuals (I imagine at least other facilities have people who pretend to care) but the place itself is practically a pigsty and an utterly unsafe environment for anything which could be insultingly called “healthcare.”
 
Again, the whole “safe” and “compassionate” argument is a complete farce. The Left doesn’t care about women or their health and safety. PP is a piggy bank for them and something which works towards their desired ends of destroying all sense of morality in the world.
 
May God severely punish this and all PP facilities which are houses of murder, all Leftists who support this immoral crap, and that He guide all the women who are scared and confused and easily manipulated into potentially doing something so egregious away from choosing this ultimate evil.
 
Romans 12:19
“Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.’”

I can probably come up with a million and one reasons not to get the Chinese coronavirus vaccine, but seemingly, even those who are in favor of it are willing to give me more and more reasons.
 
From the fact that the Chinese coronavirus doesn’t have a mortality rate which would justify getting a vaccine to the fact that these are entirely experimental vaccines and inexplicably require more than one dose to properly function (something unique to the world of vaccination), it isn’t difficult to find reasons not to get the vaccine.
 
And yet, we keep on finding more as more time passes and we can begin to see the relatively long-term effects of the vaccines.
 
Last Wednesday, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) held an open meeting about the link between the Chinese coronavirus shots and the serious heart problems that we are finding in teenagers and young adults. The problem is so bad that the CDC was practically FORCED to take a look at it, something that they haven’t really done for all other questions and problems that have arisen regarding the vaccines.
 
Naturally, the CDC used their VAERS system, which I have previously noted only shows less than 1% of reported vaccine adverse events, so you should probably know roughly what to expect here.
 
According to former NYT reporter Alex Berenson, who attended the meeting, the CDC “showed that even without accounting for underreporting, a second dose of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines could increase the risk of problems up to 200-fold in young men.”
 
“The CDC’s focus [at the meeting] was on two illnesses, myocarditis and pericarditis, forms of heart inflammation that can occasionally progress to heart failure and even death. The CDC and many reporters insist on calling the cases mild. In fact 95 percent of the 300+ post-vaccination cases the CDC has reviewed have led to hospitalization.”
 
To be more specific, the CDC looked at 323 reported cases of myocarditis/pericarditis post-vaccination in people aged 29 and younger. 309 of those 323 (95.66%) were hospitalized (thankfully, 295 have been discharged but these are diseases which can alter people’s lives depending on the severity of the condition. Some of these kids might not be able to live very active lifestyles anymore). 9 of these 309 are still hospitalized with 2 being in ICU, and 5 have no outcome data available for the report. Only 14 of those 323 teens were not hospitalized.
 
This is what the CDC calls “mild” and “rare” cases, by the way. If 309 hospitalizations are “mild” and 95% of cases leading to hospitalization is “rare”, I don’t know what “severe” and “common” are by comparison.
 
But we’re not done with the horrendous data that the CDC shared at that meeting. You see, cases are continuing to be reported to their system, which in itself was a funky enough system as it was. This means that their crappy system is being overwhelmed by side effect reports on the vaccines.
 
Berenson gives us a good way to look at this in perspective: “In all of 2019, the CDC’s voluntary vaccine side effect reporting system received about 48,000 reports for ALL vaccines. So far in 2021 it has received at least seven times that many for Covid vaccines alone.”
 
So for all of the year 2019, there were 48,000 reports in the VAERS system for all vaccines. And yet, in only half that time in 2021, there are at least 336,000 reports of side effects from the Chinese coronavirus vaccine ALONE. And keep in mind that less than 1% figure, so the actual number is likely FAR higher than we see here. But even ignoring the underreporting tendencies of the system, this is a MASSIVE number and a huge problem.
 
Continuing down the rabbit hole of horrendous CDC data, we find the rate of hospitalization to the Chinese coronavirus vaccine compared to the virus in and of itself. According to the CDC, for every 100,000 vaccines given to young people, over 25,000 will showcase seemingly temporary side effects which will keep them from “normal activities”, 700 will require medical attention and 200 will be hospitalized.
 
None of those numbers give anyone any reason to trust the effectiveness and safety of the vaccines, but even looking at the smallest number given, that 200 hospitalizations per 100,000, that’s still higher than the 50 per 100,000 hospitalizations for the virus itself.
 
So according to the CDC’s own numbers, a teenager/young adult is four times more likely to have to go to the hospital following vaccination than from contracting the virus for which they are getting vaccinated in the first place. Oh yeah, that just SCREAMS safety and effectiveness. Hell, even if it did actually effectively get rid of the virus (there are PLENTY of reports that one can still get the virus after getting vaccinated, yet another reason not to get the vaccine and showcases its ineffectiveness), one must still weigh the risks versus the rewards of such actions.
 
If one is four times as likely to have to go to the hospital because of the vaccine than the disease, what sense does it make to get the vaccine even if it gets rid of the disease? On top of the fact that the VAST majority of Chinese coronavirus cases are actually mild (as in, no hospitalization or medical attention required) and the survival rate for most people (and in particular for teenagers and young adults) is over 99.9%, there is simply no logical reason why anyone would want to get the Chinese coronavirus vaccine.

Not to mention that most people seemingly have only gotten it or plan to get it not because they think the virus is just that bad, but because their JOBS demand that they do (highly unconstitutional, of course, but most people won’t make such legal challenges).
 
Returning to the CDC’s data, we find something that is outright insane and even contradictory to data the CDC has previously used. And not “previously” as in data which they had months ago which has since changed. I mean “previously” as in they used that data IN THIS VERY MEETING and which I JUST talked about.
 
In the meeting, the CDC claimed that "the rate of hospitalization in adolescents was roughly 400 out of 14,000 cases, or close to 2,900 per 100,000” that is “almost 20 times what its own data shows,” according to Berenson.
 
So then, which is it? Is it 200 per 100,000 or 2,900 per 100,000? Because that is a MASSIVE difference and I don’t know how the CDC arrived at such conclusions. And, once again, I ask that you keep in mind that VAERS shows less than 1% of all reported cases, so these numbers are such best-case scenarios as to practically be pipe dreams.
 
What is perhaps the most bizarre part of it all is that they used these numbers to ENCOURAGE vaccination for teenagers and young adults, even for those with previous cases of myocarditis or pericarditis, arguing that the vaccines have a “positive balance for all age and sex groups.”
 
This is like looking at a basketball team’s horrendous statistics like being dead-last in offense and defense, allowing massive point differentials in favor of their opponents, and then unironically claiming that this is a championship-contending team. And these are the “experts” we’re supposed to blindly trust to make the right decisions? Doctors and scientists looking at data which PROVE how unsafe the vaccines are and go on to argue that EVEN THOSE MOST AT-RISK LIKE KIDS WITH MYOCARDITIS AND PERICARDITIS ought to get the vaccines?
 
I once said that future generations will look at how we handled the pandemic and understand that, for the next pandemic, they should do the EXACT opposite as what we did. Similarly, in the present, I’ve arrived at the conclusion that whatever the CDC recommends people do, they should actually do the exact opposite.
 
But this has all gotten me to think far more critically. I never expected the CDC to be infallible, and can excuse being wrong because humans err. However, being this wrong about this many things, and even making the EXACT opposite arguments than they should with the data which proves the unsafety of the vaccines, makes me think it can’t just be one massive oopsie. Even a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in a while, and yet, the blind CDC has not found even one nut in the last year and a half. And it’s not just the CDC either, but the WHO, NIH, NHS, etc.
 
Either these people are the single most incompetent batch of scientists the world has ever known, or they’re doing this crap on purpose. At this point, it’s far more likely to be the latter. Again, one can excuse the occasional error. What I can’t excuse is being dead wrong about everything up to this point.
 
Bottomline is that no one, young or old, healthy or sick, should get the Chinese coronavirus vaccines. Frankly, it’s BETTER to just have the virus than to get the vaccine, according to the CDC’s own underreported data.
 
So add to the already long list of reasons not to get the vaccine: It is literally worse than the virus for most people.
 
2 Timothy 3:13
“While evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived.”

There are a number of measures that the government and the fake scientists have suggested people and businesses take in order to slow down the spread of the Chinese coronavirus. From wearing masks to social distancing, avoiding travel, gatherings of numerous people, switching from shaking people’s hands to giving them an awkward “elbow bump”, etc.
 
One such measure taken by businesses and government facilities was the installation of Perspex screens, those clear screens put into place in locations such as grocery stores, schools, etc. Matter of fact, when it came to schools, the installation of such screens was a condition for allowing the schools to reopen following the lockdown. However, a report from Politico EU (so not exactly a conservative source, but in this case, it serves to lend it a bit more credence as opposed to taking away from it) indicates that the Perspex screens not only likely haven’t prevented transmission of the virus, but might have actually increased the risk of transmission.
 
According to the report: “Ministers are also being advised that those Perspex screens that have appeared in some offices and restaurants are unlikely to have any benefit in terms of preventing transmission. Problems include them not being positioned correctly, with the possibility that they actually increase the risk of transmission by blocking airflow. Therefore there is clear guidance to ministers that these Perspex screens should be scrapped.”
 
So not only have masks shown to be useless at best, and lockdowns to be actively detrimental to the physical and financial health of people and entire countries, but even something as simple as a screen might be ineffective against the transmission of the virus.
 
And not only is it reportedly ineffective, it might even work AGAINST its intended objective by increasing the risk of transmission as opposed to lowering it.
 
I don’t know if this will happen, but I really hope someone someday documents all the steps countries, most states, and businesses took to lower the transmission of the Chinese coronavirus so that in the future, were another pandemic to strike the world, we will know to do the EXACT OPPOSITE.
 
Seriously, how many measures have government officials and fake scientists suggested or, in many cases, ordered onto people that have turned out to be useless at best and actively harmful at worst? Because at this point, I’ve lost count.
 
And the more we discover about this pandemic, the more those of us who are paying attention become absolutely livid at all the lies and deception. We were told “15 days to slow the spread” back on March 16th. That was 458 days ago. And while most of the country is no longer under lockdown, the fact remains that FAR more days than just 15 were spent under lockdown for most people in most states.
 
California has only recently “fully re-opened” back on June 15th, and even then, many restrictions are still in place that make it “less open”, shall we say? Throughout this time, entire businesses went under, people lost their jobs for good, and countless people have died from things APART from the virus (and still, were counted as deaths to the virus, because in case it was hard to notice, we are ruled by morons).
 
And among the laundry list of failed measures which have only served to make things worse for not only hundreds of millions of Americans but also for billions of people around the globe, there is the simple clear Perspex screen?
 
At least that one was considerably less intrusive of people’s rights, unlike the mask mandate crap and the unconstitutional lockdowns. But regardless of how much or little of a bother those screens were for people, it’s just one more piece of evidence that whatever the government tells you that you should do in a pandemic, the exact opposite measure might actually be better.
 
And this is assuming that these people weren’t acting with malicious intent. At best, the people who have been giving this kind of advice are utterly incompetent and unfit to lead a potted plant through a pandemic, let alone entire nations. At worst, these are people who have ulterior motives, be they ideological or financial, or some combination of the two, and have suggested these awful things knowing full well what they would lead to and DESIRING those results, at least in secret.
 
And at this point, I have little reason to give them the benefit of the doubt on anything. They have been caught lying, deceiving and manipulating time and time again, all the while they utterly shut down anyone who raised protestations at their actions, including actual scientists. Such actions of censorship and deceit are hardly the actions taken by those who are simply incompetent. Incompetent people at least sometimes get things right and might be willing to listen to advise.
 
Malevolent people, on the other hand, act very much in the manner that people like Fauci and other big government types have. I’m not saying that Fauci is an evil person, but I am saying that if he were to be an evil person, there is nothing different that he would have done throughout the last year.
 
Proverbs 18:2
“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”

As we all know, the CDC itself has admitted that only 6% of all “COVID-related deaths” had the Chinese coronavirus as the cause of death, meaning that the actual number of people in the country who are dead because of the virus is 6% of the official death toll.
 
However, a county in California has needed to do at least SOME revision of their death toll, not necessarily acknowledging that 6% figure, but enough to revise down their death toll by 25%.
 
Alameda County has had to change their total death count from 1,634 to 1,223 because the state and county tally deaths rather differently. Interestingly, the state has the more logical way of counting deaths out of the two of them, and so, the county has to adjust to the way the state counts Chinese coronavirus deaths.
 
According to Fox News: “The county previously included deaths of anyone infected with the virus, regardless of whether COVID-19 was a direct or contributing cause of death.”
 
As I have said time and time again, that method is utterly asinine and bound to artificially raise the death toll and leave people more afraid than necessary (an intentional “mistake”). Using that line of logic, one could argue that if someone is run over by a truck but they had gotten a splinter on their finger, then we would count that as death to a splinter, instead of the obvious cause that killed them. It makes absolutely no sense to do things this way and no doctor ever would, say, diagnose someone with cancer and then claim that cancer killed them if they ended up in a car accident or if they ended up falling off a ladder and dying.
 
So the county had to change the way in which they count deaths, not because that method is inherently stupid, but because the state, for once, actually had a better method of counting deaths to the Chinese coronavirus.
 
Alameda County Public Health Department spokeswoman Neetu Balram said that “There are definitely people who died from reasons that were clearly not caused by COVID,” according to The Oaklandside. Barlam seemingly couldn’t give any examples of cases that were clearly not deaths to Chinese coronavirus, but if they are anything like the state of Washington, one can assume that at least some of those 411 deaths were actually from gunshot wounds and not from the Chinese coronavirus.
 
Interestingly enough, infectious disease “expert” Dr. Amesh Adalja was rather critical of the 25% drop, saying that such a revision “seems high,” according to The Daily Wire. Well, considering that the actual number is 6%, so there ought to be a 94% revision, 25% seems rather generous (though still fairly disingenuous).
 
Axios argued that “While the cause of death listed as solely from the coronavirus occurred in 6% of cases in the U.S.,… this doesn’t mean that the virus was not a contributing factor or, indeed, the leading cause in the other 94%. The U.S. virus death toll would be much lower if this were the case.”
 
Here’s the thing, Axios: it is lower. Lower than the official number, that is. How do I know that? Well, you see, in the year 2019, 2,854,838 people died in the United States, according to the CDC. In the year 2020, 2,861,000 Americans died. That’s a difference of a little over 6,000 people. Yet, we are told that roughly 500,000 Americans died of the Chinese coronavirus in 2020. Doesn’t that seem a little strange? That the death toll would see such a miniscule increase between years when the latter year was faced with a global pandemic?
 
If 500,000 Americans died, assuming that they wouldn’t have died otherwise (as this is the standard hospitals used to count actual Chinese coronavirus deaths, not just the “if they had it, they died from it” insanity), wouldn’t that mean that we would have seen a 500,000 people increase in that death toll from 2019 to 2020? So why was it so minimal?
 
Stranger still, that is the lowest increase in deaths year-to-year in some time. From 2018 to 2019, the U.S. saw a death increase of 15,633, while from 2017 to 2018, the increase was 25,702. And from 2015 to 2016, the increase was of 31,618 more deaths.
 
In essence, roughly the same amount of people died in 2020 as did in 2019, and the increase between the two years is LOWER than in previous years, and by a lot. Isn’t that just a little bit strange for a pandemic year? Even if you assumed a good chunk of that 500,000 number would have died anyway, you would expect a considerably higher number than just a 6,000 people increase.
 
So, yes, Axios, the actual U.S. virus death toll is much lower. It’s just that the powers that be wanted to scare as many people as they could into submission and a higher number would accomplish that. Either that or doctors and experts are utter morons and don’t know how to logically count something with its actual death toll, which is entirely possible but not something which the Left would be willing to admit.
 
So they are forced to admit that either they made stuff up or their “experts” are dumbasses. Well, I say “forced”, but in reality, they won’t admit a damn thing, of course. They’ll just spin things like what Axios was trying to do here. But still, reality is what it is, not as the Left claims it to be.
 
And the reality is that this virus has a survivability rate of 99.97% for most people and the actual death count ought to be 94% lower (and no, I don’t buy that whole “they might have died partly because of it” because no one claims that someone who had cancer and diabetes would say that both are the causes of death, so why would we count “died partly because of the virus” as “they died because of the virus”?)
 
It certainly is good that Alameda County has revised its death count to be at least a little more accurate, but I can’t help but be rather frustrated at the fact that it was because of a discrepancy with the way they were doing it and the way the state was doing it, as opposed to the fact that their method was UTTERLY MORONIC and anyone with a functioning brain could tell.
 
Here’s hoping they further revise their count to be more accurate with the CDC’s 6% count and that other counties and states begin revising their asinine death tolls.
 
Proverbs 29:12
“If a ruler listens to falsehood, all his officials will be wicked.”

A plethora of narratives have spawned since the start of the Chinese coronavirus pandemic, from the narrative that it originated from a guy eating a bat in a Wuhan market (more and more evidence points to the Virology institute in Wuhan being the most likely source) to the narrative that it disproportionately affects minorities (because to the Left, everything, including an unconscious virus, is racist).
 
From the narrative that getting the Chinese coronavirus is a borderline death sentence to the narrative that wearing 27 masks will keep you safe (to be fair, the virus can’t get in if oxygen can’t either). Fake narrative after fake narrative has spawned and been propagated by the Left and the fake news media to scare the population into being submissive little puppies who will obey daddy government’s every order.
 
However, two studies showcase how fake a couple of these narratives are with the very thing that these Leftists supposedly clamor for: science and evidence-based data.
 
First, let’s begin with the study relating to mask mandates and usage as they relate to the spread of the Chinese coronavirus.
 
The lead of this study, Damian D. Guerra, assistant professor of biology at the University of Louisville, “hypothesized that statewide mask mandates and mask use are associated with lower COVID-19 case growth rates.”
 
In essence, the researchers hypothesized that the running assumption made by the Left and many other people that mask mandates and usage lead to lower transmission rates was true. However, unlike fake Twitter scientists, the researchers sought out to do what actual researchers and scientists usually seek: evidence that their hypothesis is wrong.
 
If scientists just look for evidence that their hypothesis is right, they run the risk of ignoring evidence that it is wrong, which brings bias into their hypothesis and makes for bad science. But if they search for evidence that their hypothesis is wrong and can’t find any, they lead people to understand that their hypothesis, by virtue that there is no evidence to show it’s wrong, is correct.
 
This is what the researchers did for mask mandates and usage, and lo and behold, they found evidence that their hypothesis that mask mandates and usage lead to lower transmission rates is incorrect.
 
“Contrary to our hypothesis,” the authors found, “early mandates were not associated with lower minimum case growth. Maximum case growth was the same among states with early, late, and no mandates. This indicates that mask mandates were not predictive of slower COVID-19 spread when community transmission rates were low or high.”
 
They continued: “We wondered if mask mandates were associated with smaller or slower surges in case growth. Differences between minimum and maximum case growth were similar among early, late, and no mandate states, and surges from minimum to maximum growth occurred at similar rates. These findings suggest that mask mandates are not predictive of smaller or slower shifts from low to high case growth.”
 
In simple terms, the mask mandates, as we have known for quite some time, did nothing to prevent the spread of the virus. People were forced to accept (and ashamedly, some willingly accepted) a severe reduction in their personal freedoms in exchange for the IDEA of safety, not even actual safety.
 
It didn’t matter if your state forced upon you (unconstitutionally) the wearing of masks or not, because both methods led to the same results, as we have known for some time thanks to other studies.
 
“Case growth,” the study continues, “was not significantly different between mandate and non-mandate states at low or high transmission rates, and surges were equivocal. Mask use predicted lower case growth at low, but not high transmission rates. Growth rates were comparable between states in the first and last mask use quintiles adjusted for normalized total cases early in the pandemic and unadjusted after peak Fall-Winter infections. Mask use did not predict Summer 2020 case growth for non-Northeastern states or Fall-Winter 2020 growth for all continental states.”
 
In other words, actual mask usage did little in the way of slowing the spread of the virus, only being somewhat useful with low transmission rates. Ultimately, this is what the authors found: “Mask mandates and use are not associated with slower state-level COVID-19 spread during COVID-19 growth surges.”
 
So, as we have known for quite some time, the narrative that masks “save lives” or whatever else is utterly fictitious and they provide seemingly little to no protection from the virus.
 
However, there are good news for those who do actually get the virus (particularly seeing as 99.9% of people tend to survive it).
 
A different study, this time from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis found that “months after recovering from mild cases of COVID-19, people still have immune cells in their body pumping out antibodies against the virus that causes COVID-19. Such cells could persist for a lifetime, churning out antibodies for a while.”
 
One narrative among the many that came about from this pandemic is that those who get the virus do not get permanent immunity from it. This was a narrative spawned to argue that even those who have had the virus still need to get vaccinated. However, much like the other narratives, this one is also false.
 
Matter of fact, the study sort of acknowledges this false narrative:
 
“Last fall, there were reports that antibodies wane quickly after infection with the virus that causes COVID-19, and mainstream media interpreted that to mean that immunity was not long-lived. But that’s a misinterpretation of the data. It’s normal for antibody levels to go down after acute infection, but they don’t go down to zero; they plateau. Here, we found antibody-producing cells in people 11 months after first symptoms. These cells will live and produce antibodies for the rest of people’s lives. That’s strong evidence for long-lasting immunity.”
 
The study also goes into a more in-depth analysis of how our body fights the virus once we have had it, talking about cells which patrol the bloodstreams for the virus and cells which work in the bone marrow to trickle out antibodies for decades.
 
This is generally how the body works and why sane people talk about herd immunization outside of vaccinations. Prior to a vaccine being available for public consumption, herd immunization is the best defense against such viruses. Usually, that plan is no longer necessary if there is a vaccine which treats the virus, but we have no such vaccines. We have Chinese coronavirus vaccines, but as we have known for a while, they do not actually treat the virus and, as we have learned from the previous article, have an 11x higher likelihood of killing someone than the virus itself.
 
So those are two studies which, in a sane world, would put to rest the narratives and ideas that mask mandates/usage are beneficial and that natural immunization is not long-lasting. We see evidence to the contrary for both cases with both of these studies. But as we live in an insane world and those involved in this pandemic are ideologically and/or financially tied to it, there will be those who call these studies “conspiracy theories” as they usually do.
 
Ephesians 4:25
“Therefore, having put away falsehood, let each one of you speak the truth with his neighbor, for we are members one of another.”