Because the Left is as dumb as a bag of bricks and as corrupt and evil as can be, they have taken it upon themselves to keep parents away from children’s education, making outrageous claims like “parents have no place in the classroom”.
 
Naturally, that would tick off any parent who is moderately concerned with their kids, and would prompt looking into just what kind of education these kids are receiving that the “educators” don’t want parents to find out about. Which is why the Florida legislation infamously (and incorrectly) called “Don’t Say Gay” bill exist, in order to protect children as young as THREE OR FOUR from having their minds corrupted by the subject of sex, a subject they are far too young to understand.
 
And this idea of parents being able to oversee their children’s education, which has been turned into a political matter because everything is political in this day and age, is extremely popular and favorable by pretty much everyone, even Democrat voters (though, unsurprisingly, that demographic is closer than the others in terms of favorable vs. unfavorable).
 
You see, according to a poll conducted by the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School, 46% of Americans aged 18-29 agree with the statement that “parents should have more control over their children’s education than they do now,” while only 23% disagreed.
 
That is a 2-1 margin in favor of parental control in education, and this is coming from the youngest demographic, the type that would more often side with the Left on political issues.
 
Unsurprisingly, Republicans showed the most support for this, with 64% agreeing with that statement and only 14% disagreeing. And like I said, even Democrats saw more people supporting that statement than opposing it, with 35% agreeing and 31% disagreeing, though like I said, this is unsurprisingly close in this demographic.
 
I will give credit where it’s due, as a still majority of Democrats seem to be somewhat reasonable with this, but it’s clear that they are very quickly becoming a party of groomers and child abusers. If teachers don’t want the parents of the kids they are teaching to know what is being taught, that should be a massive red flag that something terrible is going on. Because what adult will tell a kid “don’t mention this to your parents” and have anything other than evil planned for that kid?
 
At any rate, as far as Independents go, they also showed a great deal of support for that statement, with 44% agreeing and 20% disagreeing.
 
And just to reiterate, this is ALL young Americans. Young Republicans, young Democrats, young Independents, all had a majority, in most cases a strong majority, agreeing that parents should have more control over kids’ education. One can only imagine how much more support older Americans have for parental rights in education. Actually, it’s not that hard to imagine, seeing as Gov. Youngkin pretty much ran on this one issue and won handily against someone who was vehemently opposed to parental rights in education.

The poll, of course, showed other matters, such as young Americans’ approval of Brandon dropping 18% over the last year, a similar number to what I mentioned in the previous article. The poll also showed 85% of young Americans supporting government measures to addressing student debt, though with varying solutions for it. For example, 38% said they approved of the government fully cancelling student loan debt, while 27% said they agreed with the government assisting with repaying the debt without fully cancelling, 21% said they preferred debt be cancelled only for those who are in most need, and 13% said they believed the government shouldn’t alter its policy aka no student loan debt cancellation.
 
But it’s not really much of a surprise that the demographic which is most burdened by student loan debt would want to see it be cancelled or at least be assisted with repayment. The matter of fact is that student debt is as much of a scam as college itself, rips people off substantially and leads them to financial misery. The idea that people go into debt so they can get an “education” and then get a crappy job (some people don't even accomplish that) just to try and repay that debt which is easily in the six figures is absolutely insane. And this is without even going into the fact that colleges, for the most part, are just Marxist indoctrination centers.
 
Getting back to parental rights, quite unsurprisingly, there are those who are opposed to parents having any say in their kids’ education.
 
For example, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten claimed that “Instead of everybody joining together in America to get us out of the effects of the pandemic, these right-wing ideologues are just trying to create fear and anxiety and anger exploiting the fear that parents already have in order to win elections and end public education as we know it.”
 
A few things to say about this. First, I’m not surprised she’s trying to get people to focus on the scamdemic instead of what evils they are doing in classrooms. These people are sick, and not with COVID.
 
Second, what do you mean “fear that parents already have”? If they are already fearful, then these “right-wing ideologues” aren’t creating fear, anxiety and anger. You yourself are admitting it’s already there.
 
Third, why is it already there? Why are parents already fearful? Is it because this indoctrination and corruption of minds isn’t anything new and parents have been growing more and more concerned with what their kids are being taught? Is it because one of the silver linings of the lockdowns was that parents got to basically sit in on classes and got to see what their kids were being taught in online classrooms and didn’t like it? Why does that fear already exist if we are to believe that what teachers are doing is merely educating kids and not doing other awful, immoral and illegal things? No parent who is confident his or her child is receiving a solid education will have any fears about it, so the fact that there IS fear in parents is a damning statement of this education system.
 
Fourth and finally, she isn’t entirely wrong, at least with that last bit. Us “right-wing ideologues” certainly are trying to end public education as we know it, because public education as we know it is teaching kids to be immoral, Marxist wokemobs as young as Kindergarten and they are being taught about sexuality at that young of an age. The fact that they include gay sex makes it a lot worse, but the teaching of sexuality at any level is what is abhorrent to those of us who have a heart and a conscience. That’s why there is such massive support in favor of the so-called “Don’t Say Gay” bill, because it protects young kids from teachers trying to corrupt their minds and groom them into being sexual objects.
 
It’s because of the current state of public education that homeschooling has grown between 5.4% and 11% from March 2020 to September 2020, and 5 million American children, by the summer of 2021, were being homeschooled. Government schools are so putrid that concerned parents (who have been wrongfully labeled as “terrorists” simply for inquiring about their children’s education at PTA meetings, which definitely doesn’t help the Left here) are looking everywhere, even within their own homes, to give their kids a better education.
 
So yes, we are definitely trying to end public education as we know it, because public education as we know it is resolutely evil and corrupt. And we will never apologize for trying to protect our kids.
 
Matthew 19:14
“But Jesus said, ‘Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.’”

We once again are faced with a horrific judge who ought to be in prison, not be sending people to prison, and interestingly enough, it is someone we have previously talked about.
 
If you’ve been a long-time reader of ours, that picture above might look familiar. Back in April of 2017, the Left was looking for any and all kinds of ways to stop President Trump and his legal executive orders which would harm the Left’s causes. Among such EO’s was an order to stop the funding of sanctuary cities which illegally protected illegal immigrants from deportation.
 
The judge in the picture above is Judge William H. Orrick, the judge who, back in April, blocked President Trump’s sanctuary city executive order.
 
Well, we now have another story about him, though completely unrelated from that April 2017 article.
 
In July of 2015, Judge Orrick reportedly “issued a restraining order blocking the release of undercover videos at the National Abortion Federation (NAF) convention showing Planned Parenthood employees negotiating the sale of aborted fetus body parts,” according to The Federalist.
 
Nearly six years later and those videos, making up over 200 hours of footage, have still not been released to the public, though that may not be the case for long.
 
Ever since the first undercover footage was released back in 2015 (remember the PP executive who said “I want a Lamborghini” in exchange for baby body parts? That footage), The Center for Medical Progress and its founder, David Daleiden, have been entrenched in legal battles with both the NAF and Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA). But to the luck of the killers-for-profit, the presiding judge was none other than William Orrick.
 
Orrick, by the way, is an Obama-appointed judge who was a big donor to Obama’s presidential campaign and he and his wife are big pro-abortion advocates, with both of them being longtime donors to San Francisco’s Good Samaritan Family Resource Center (GSFRC), which ought to be called anything other than something related to Christianity as Orrick was a board member of this organization and helped fund and open a Planned Parenthood clinic on its site. According to The Federalist, that clinic “sold fetal tissue to StemExpress, a for-profit wholesaler exposed by CMP’s videos and reporting.”
 
Orrick’s wife is also a major abortion advocate, who reportedly has “liked” pro-abortion groups on Facebook and posts which called CMP and Daleiden’s videos “domestic terrorism.”
 
So the legal serial killer organizations have the judge in their back-pocket, which is why there has been so little justice surrounding the release of the hundreds of hours of footage depicting people in those organizations illegally profiting off of the tissue of their child victims.
 
However, there is good news: There are two cases involved here which put Orrick in a lose-lose position.
 
The first case is actually a $16 million lawsuit by Planned Parenthood against Daleiden and CMP, which recently was appealed and filed to the Ninth Circuit court of appeals by Daleiden to be reversed on the grounds that his First Amendment rights are being infringed. Orrick was the one who ruled that Daleiden’s 1A rights were not being infringed, so he decided to appeal it to the Ninth. At any rate, this case filed by PP against Daleiden is a suit alleging Daleiden of having committed fraud, trespassing, unlawful recording and breach of contract. However, and this is key, they did not sue him for defamation.
 
The reason for having not sued Daleiden for defamation is so that the content of the video did not have to be the focus of the case. So any testimony about what they did wrong would be deemed irrelevant by the judge, which ended up happening. They can’t fight against an expert testimony about their wrongdoing even if Orrick himself argues nothing criminal or wrong occurred, so they would rather sue Daleiden for technical stuff to avoid trouble for themselves. It was actually fairly strategic.
 
The NAF, however, was not quite as strategic, having agreed to drop most of their claims against Daleiden, also having sued him for those videos, “asking only for a summary judgment on its breach of contract claim and seeking a permanent ban on the videos solely because of the way it will harm their reputation,” according to The Federalist. The NAF is still arguing in their suit that the content of the videos is false and would be harmful, or defamatory, to their organization and reputation.
 
This was the major mistake made by the baby killers, as this is what helps put Orrick in a lose-lose situation.
 
I will get to why in just a moment, I just have to provide one more piece of context.
 
You see, back in 2016, when Orrick ruled that Daleiden’s 1A rights were not being infringed, or at least that releasing the videos would jeopardize the safety of the abortion workers (NAF’s members specifically) so that was more important than Daleiden’s 1A rights, he had reviewed both transcripts and recordings of the videos and determined that he had found “no evidence of actual criminal wrongdoing.”
 
According to his own non-expert analysis of the videos, he does not believe there was criminal wrongdoing in those videos. However, one of CMP’s witnesses claims differently.
 
Dr. Forrest Smith is said CMP witness. Smith is an OB-GYN in California who horrifically has said that he has performed over 50,000 abortions. While the guy has the blood of 50,000 people on his hands and he should be arrested and executed for genocide, he is actually a helpful witness for CMP and Daleiden, as he is an expert on the field, disgusting as that reality is.
 
In 2019, Smith took the witness stand at the trial of PPFA’s case against Daleiden and testified that “there’s no question” that some of the induced abortions on the videos “were live births.” He also testified that the PP employees violated other medical standards of practice.
 
As this was in the PPFA case which did not sue on defamation, Orrick didn’t allow Smith’s testimony, deeming it unnecessary, though his expert report was submitted but never used.
 
However, Daleiden and CMP submitted another extensive report from Smith in the NAF case, meaning that Orrick can’t block Smith’s testimony at least on the same grounds as the PPFA case because Smith’s testimony is necessary for the case of defamation.
 
This is why the NAF made a mistake in suing for defamation: The expert testimony alleges wrongdoing even if the judge, a non-expert, claims otherwise. And this is why that puts Orrick in a lose-lose situation: Either Orrick claims that he knows better than the expert on this matter, thereby further showing he is on the side of Planned Parenthood and making it easier to get him removed from the case, or he rules justly and accordingly, which pits him against Planned Parenthood and the Left.
 
In all likelihood, he will choose the former, as that seems to be his best option for not angering his Leftist masters, but it would potentially ruin PP’s case against Daleiden, who could then release the footage unrestrained.
 
And if Orrick rules justly, it will possibly also lead to the release of the footage anyway, as Peter Breen, Daleiden’s defense attorney, argued during a Zoom hearing in February that the videos should be made available to police or lawmakers investigating PP as well as to the public, arguing that it’s a matter of “public interest,” which it certainly is.
 
Breen said: “There’s nothing inconsistent with the court saying ‘I don’t see it but others do’ and certainly the court would not want to stand in the posture of a censor over something that has First Amendment value and public interest value.”
 
Unfortunately, while this would normally be quite the trap for a corrupt judge, the reality is that the justice system is broken in this country and the judge could, ultimately, simply disregard the consequences of being blatantly on Planned Parenthood’s side. He’s an Obama-appointed judge and has previously been a hero to the Left regarding that block of Trump’s executive order. Who knows what his ultimate decision will be and who knows how legal or illegal it ultimately will be?
 
Furthermore, even if he is forcibly removed from this case, who’s to say that he would be replaced by someone who will actually rule fairly and impartially? This is Commiefornia, after all. Hardly any judge in that state is against abortion or Planned Parenthood and hardly any judge would rule against them.
 
Serious actual justice reform is necessary so as to keep these baby killers not only from being able to legally operate but, at the very least, from being able to financially or ideologically bribe the judges presiding over their cases.
 
If even an expert in the field of abortion whom has himself taken the lives of over 50,000 innocents is testifying, under oath, that Planned Parenthood broke all sorts of laws, let alone ethics, I see little reason to not believe his testimony. These people should go to prison for a long time and it is an abortion of justice for the judge to be on their side so blatantly.
 
I hope and pray that these evil bastards will face the justice that they deserve.
 
Proverbs 17:15
“He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous are both alike an abomination to the Lord.”

Back in late September, I talked about the bombshell Senate report that spared no detail about the business dealings of the Bidens and the overall corruption of the Obama/Biden administration with regard to Ukraine and Burisma Holdings.

Well, a recent New York Post article drops another bombshell in the form of recovered emails between Hunter Biden and a top Burisma executive named Vadym Pozharskyi.
 
The details of this one are pretty juicy and Twitter thought them so damaging that they outright have been banning people that simply TALK about it, which only serves to bring more attention to a story which otherwise might not have led very many people to care about it (particularly as some people will vote for Biden no matter what).
 
According to the NY Post: “Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company, according to emails obtained by The Post.”
 
This goes against something that Joe Biden had been claiming for a long time now, that he has “never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” We all knew for a long time now that that was an utter lie, but this only goes to further prove it, particularly as according to Politico, “Biden’s campaign would not rule out the possibility that the former VP had some kind of informal interaction with Pozharskyi, which wouldn’t appear on Biden’s official schedule.”
 
For context, the Biden campaign had responded to the NY Post’s piece, obviously lambasting it, but only claiming that the former VP never officially met with the Burisma executive, meaning that the two had met in secret in an informal setting. This, suffice to say, does not look good for Biden at all, and I think this can somewhat be considered an October Surprise, but aimed at the Democrats as opposed to the Republicans.
 
At any rate, returning to the uncovered emails (which were not hacked, as some on the Left might claim. They were in a computer taken to a repair shop which was never claimed and the shop owner tried contacting the owner multiple times before looking through the contents of the hard drive, as the computer could now be claimed as his own, and found these emails. He then made a copy of the hard drive and set it to various places such as the FBI and Rudy Giuliani’s lawyers), we find some truly juicy stuff.
 
An April 17, 2015 email from the Burisma executive reads: “Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together. It’s realty [sic] an honor and pleasure. As we spoke yesterday evening, would be great to meet today for a quick coffee. What do you think? I could come to you [sic] office somewhere around noon or so, before or on my way to airport. Best, V.”
 
Like I said, that email points to Joe Biden having met with an executive from Burisma, which Joe had been lying to people about for years.
 
Less than a year after that particular email, Joe Biden coerced the Ukrainian president and Prime Minister into firing the country’s top prosecutor who had been investigating Burisma Holdings’ executives, which naturally included Hunter Biden. This is something else that Joe is now lying about, despite the fact that there is video proof that he has outright BRAGGED about what he did, saying to the Council on Foreign Relations in 2018: “I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’”
 
“Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.”
 
Another email from Pozharskyi, which is a lengthy one so I will share the most important details, reads as follows: “Dear Hunter and Devon,… As previously pointed out on a number of occasions, the representatives of new authorities in power tend to quite aggressively approach N. Z. unofficially with the aim to obtain cash from him… After unsuccessful attempts to receive funds from our side, they proceeded with concrete actions… We urgently need your advice on how you could use your influence to convey a message/signal etc. to stop what we consider to be politically motivated actions…”
 
A few things need to be made clear about this. First of all, this was an email sent to Hunter and his business partner Devon Archer (whom I’ve talked about at length in that other article) on May 12th, 2014… the same day that Hunter Biden, at least officially, joined the Burisma board.
 
I see Burisma didn’t take too much time to use their newly acquired influence.
 
Secondly, this was a bit of a murky period in Ukraine. The Revolution was still ongoing and President Viktor Yanukovych had fairly recently been removed from office in February. The country wouldn’t have elections until May 25th, in which Poroshenko succeeded the former president. So it’s a bit of a strange period and I do not know exactly who was in charge of the country in between the time Yanukovych was removed and Poroshenko was installed (which was in June). However, someone obviously was in charge and their short-lived administration clearly wanted some money from this “N. Z.” fellow, who is most likely Burisma’s owner Mykola Zlochevsky, as he is an oligarch with plenty of money and his name “Mykola” is a Ukrainian version of “Nicholas.”
 
It is a bit strange that Pozharskyi would refer to Zlochevsky as “N. Z.” instead of “M. Z.” since they are both Ukrainians, but given the context of those initials in Pozharskyi’s email, I can’t think of whom else he could possibly be referring to, as he talks about “the gaz [sic] production business of N. Z. …”
 
At any rate, the New York Post also noted that this email was sent on the same day that Burisma announced (and has since redacted) Hunter Biden’s addition to the board of directors, though they also say that “Hunter Biden actually joined the board in April 2014, according to multiple reports.”
 
So that is another possible lie from the Bidens in general, as Hunter was reportedly a part of the board of directors of the gas company a good bit before his official announcement. I wonder what else happened in between the time that he actually joined the board and the time that the announcement was made official.
 
There is more to this story in the New York Post, though I do not think many other details are all that relevant for me to share here, other than an email written by Pozharskyi and forwarded to Hunter by Archer about a proposed tax law which would have been detrimental to Burisma, but I did not get too much out of that exchange.
 
Like I said in my previous article regarding the dealings of Hunter Biden and his father, I want you to imagine the outrage from the Left if any person on the Right, such as Don Jr. or Eric Trump, or anyone from the Pence family, had been caught doing the things that Hunter was doing.
 
Hunter has taken millions of dollars from Burisma simply in exchange for his family name and the position of his father, has taken millions of dollars from other foreign sources such as the wife of the former mayor of Moscow, and has a detailed record of corruption. If a right-winger had done even one of the things Hunter has done, that would be all we’d be talking about for weeks, and all the way to the election.
 
But because it’s a story which damages the Democrat nominee, it has to be pushed back against and censored on social media, which like I said, only serves to draw more attention to the story. Some people might not care about the actual story involving Hunter Biden and the implications of Joe’s lying butt, but they will care about social media censorship and will want to look into exactly why it is that big tech giants are trying to suppress this story so badly.
 
Despite the fact that I imagine a decent number of Biden voters have already voted for the guy, I hope some people who were considering voting for Biden but have yet to do so change their minds about it after this. Stories which display the Bidens’ corruption would be shut down every single time if Biden were to win. Even now, we see that happening in large part because big tech bribes Republican congresspeople so that they can get away with this crap.
 
Here’s hoping this story will help a good amount of people recognize how utterly awful Joe Biden is and how important it is to keep him as far away from the Oval Office as possible.
 
2 Peter 2:15
“Forsaking the right way, they have gone astray. They have followed the way of Balaam, the son of Beor, who loved gain from wrongdoing…”

Despite the details I will share with you today which show just a fraction of how utterly corrupt Hunter Biden, Joe Biden and the Obama administration are/were, this is not a story that will at all be covered by the likes of the mainstream media.
 
No, they will instead choose to cover things related to either RBG or Roe v. Wade, or literally anything at all that could pass as news in order to avoid reporting on the things that I will share with you.
 
As I share these things, I ask you to perform a bit of a mental exercise. For every line item I share from the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC) and the Committee on Finance’s report regarding the various business dealings of Hunter Biden, as well as in relation to the Obama/Biden administration, please picture the fake news media’s reaction had any member of the Trump family, even up to Donald himself, done any one of the things detailed on the report.
 
Picture the headlines, the fake horror and dismay, if anyone on the Right had done any of the following things:
 
Two months after massive protests in Ukraine regarding people’s desire to integrate into western economies and get rid of systematic corruption in the country, which led to the killing of 82 people during the protests, a number of significant events regarding the Bidens unfolded in the span of less than a month.
 
According to the report: “On April 16, 2014, Vice President Biden met with his son’s business partner, Devon Archer, at the White House. Five days later, Vice President Biden visited Ukraine, and he soon after was described in the press as the ‘public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.’ The day after his visit, on April 22, Archer joined the board of Burisma. Six days later, on April 28, British officials seized $23 million from the London bank accounts of Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky. Fourteen days later, on May 12, Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma, and over the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.”
 
Later, in early 2015, former Acting Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, George Kent, reported concerns to officials in then-VP Joe Biden’s office about what he considered to be a conflict of interest regarding the anti-corruption mission the U.S. was reportedly pushing in the former Soviet state and the fact that Hunter Biden, the VP’s son, had a role on Burisma’s board. According to the report, “Kent’s concerns went unaddressed.” In an email Kent sent to his colleagues in September of 2016, he wrote: “Furthermore, the presence of Hunter Biden on the Burisma board was very awkward for all U.S. officials pushing an anticorruption agenda in Ukraine.”
 
In October of 2015, another state official, Amos Hochstein, raised concerns regarding Hunter’s role with Burisma to Joe Biden himself as well as Hunter Biden. He argued that Hunter’s position with the Ukrainian company enabled “Russian disinformation efforts and risked undermining U.S. policy in Ukraine,” according to the report.
 
Those two individuals, George Kent and Amos Hochstein, raised concerns regarding Hunter Biden’s role with Burisma, at least as far as the Committees are aware of.
 
Hunter’s role with Burisma was very well known to state department officials, including then-Secretary of State John Kerry, though he falsely claimed in a town hall event on December 8th, 2019, that he “had no knowledge about any of that. None. No.” Section V of the report shows that to have been a lie.
 
Without going into too much detail for one particular section in a lengthy report, there is plenty of evidence that shows John Kerry was lying in that town hall. He did, in fact, have knowledge, and plenty of it, about Hunter Biden’s role with Burisma.
 
According to the report: “On May 13, 2014, the day after Hunter Biden joined Burisma’s board, Secretary Kerry’s stepson, Christopher Heinz – who was also Hunter Biden’s business partner – emailed to inform Kerry’s chief of staff, and to distance himself, from that decision. Moreover, in May 2014, Secretary Kerry’s chief of staff, David Wade, briefed him about press inquiries specifically relating to Heinz, Hunter Biden, and Burisma. Separately, State Department officials wrote that they sent the secretary articles with the headlines, ‘Biden’s son joins Ukrainian gas company’s board,’ ‘Biden’s son joins Ukrainian gas producer board,’ and ‘White House says no issue with Biden’s son, Ukraine gas company.’”
 
John Kerry knew possibly as early as THE DAY AFTER Hunter joined Burisma’s board and definitely no later than whenever that particular briefing occurred in May of 2014. Kerry was lying about this as late as December of last year.
 
Going further with the report, the key findings also show that George Kent had told the Committees that Zlochevsky, Burisma’s owner, was an “odious oligarch.” However, in December of 2015, well after British officials had seized over $20 million dollars from Zlochevsky’s bank accounts in London, Vice President Biden’s staff had advised him to not comment anything regarding Zlochevsky, instead, recommending he simply say: “I’m not going to get into naming names or accusing individuals.”
 
To remind you, the “mission” of the U.S. in Ukraine was to weed out corruption. It’s not surprising, really, how poorly such a “mission” went with regards to achieving that goal when you have an equally corrupt administration running that “mission.” Clearly, the Bidens used that as an excuse to enrich themselves in a country which was already fraught with corruption.
 
Moving on, another key finding is so incredible that I will directly quote it to you in full: “Hunter Biden was serving on Burisma’s board (supposedly consulting on corporate governance and transparency) when Zlochevsky allegedly paid a $7 million bribe to officials serving under Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Vitaly Yarema, to ‘shut the case against Zlochevsky.’ Kent testified that this bribe occurred in December 2014 (seven months after Hunter joined Burisma’s board), and, after learning about it, he and the Resident Legal Advisor reported this allegation to the FBI.”
 
Unsurprisingly, the insane levels of corruption don’t end there. According to the report, Hunter Biden was a U.S. Secret Service protectee while he was on Burisma’s board. Also, Obama administration officials repeatedly met with former Ukrainian official Andrii Telizhenko, described in the report as “the Democrats’ personification of Russian disinformation,” and Telizhenko was often contracted by a Democrat lobbying group as recently as summer of 2019.
 
Furthermore, apart from the over $4 million that Burisma paid to both Hunter Biden and Devon Archer, Archer “received $142,300 from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan, purportedly for a car, the same day Vice President Joe Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsemy Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia’s actions in Crimea.”
 
Hunter Biden got an even nicer payout from Elena Baturina, wife of a former Moscow mayor, in the form of $3.5 million. Hunter also opened a bank account with Gongwen Dong in order to fund a $100,000 global spending spree with James and Sara Biden, so now, the Chinese are also involved (not that it’s surprising that the Bidens are in bed with China).
 
Hunter also had business dealings with Ye Jianming, the aforementioned Gongwen Dong, and other Chinese nationals who are obviously linked to the CCP and the People’s Liberation Army. According to the report, “those associations resulted in millions of dollars in cash flow.”
 
And the cherry on top of the disgusting cake of lies, deceit and malignant corruption is that Hunter Biden, according to the report, also “paid nonresident women who were nationals of Russia or other Eastern European countries and who appear to be linked to an ‘Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.’”
 
Remember how ballistic the Left and fake news media got when it was discovered that Don Jr. met with a Russian lawyer with no actual ties to the Kremlin? Or how the media would not stop talking about the debunked Steele dossier claiming that Trump had hired Russian hookers to urinate on the Obama’s hotel bed?
 
Remember how the deep state tried to cover up their attempt at cheating in the 2016 election by alleging that Trump had colluded with Russia to become President of the United States?
 
Again, imagine for a moment the kinds of headlines we would be reading, the unending news coverage from the fake news media, if any member of the Trump or Pence family, or just anyone on the Right, had reportedly done any one of the things that Hunter and Joe Biden are accused of having done.
 
The Left will allege that Trump is a corrupt dictator when their literal last choice of a nominee is DEEPLY embedded in corruption schemes that would make Al Capone look like a chump.
 
This, obviously, won’t be covered by the fake news media. If at all, they will allege that these are “old” or “debunked” “lies” in order to cover for a presidential candidate who is comparable to the Clintons in his level of corruption and greed.
 
But it’s out there for anyone to find and read. And unlike the Mueller report, which was chockfull of allegations made by the fake news media with no real substance (and which ultimately had to admit they found NOTHING that even remotely suggested that Trump had colluded with Russia), this Senate Committee report brings plenty of evidence for all of the things they are alleging.
 
The Bidens (and by extension, the Obamas) are corrupt. In other news, the sky is blue.
 
2 Peter 2:19
“They promise them freedom, but they themselves are slaves of corruption. For whatever overcomes a person, to that he is enslaved.”

Whenever there is an election season, people on both sides of the aisle accuse people on the other side of committing some sort of voter fraud. Despite the fact that such a clear violation of election standards is most often committed by the Left simply by their desire to count illegal immigrants as “citizens” to give them voting rights (even then, they still get to vote because sometimes, the people in charge in voting polls don’t care if you bring ID with you or not) and their desire to switch to an electoral system that very obviously can lead to voter fraud, that being mail-in ballots, they have the gall to accuse Republicans of committing such fraud through “voter suppression” and other things.
 
It’s b.s. and they know it, but they have to fight fire with fire and the media would never report on the voter fraud that the Left commits.
 
But in any case, one way in which states can commit voter fraud is through extremely lazily sending people absentee ballots, as it happened for a prominent writer for TownHall, Jazz Shaw, in a piece he titled: “So New York Just Basically Invited Me To Commit Voter Fraud.”
 
Shaw explains that he and his wife received a pair of letters that seemed identical, which came from the Board of Elections for the State of New York. The letters were absentee ballots for the two of them to vote in the New York primary election on June 23rd, which the state is going forward with, but with precautions as a result of the Chinese coronavirus that is ravaging the state (and we all know why).
 
This, in and of itself, is not particularly unusual or troublesome. However, the devil is in the details, as Shaw goes on to explain. He actually transcribed the introduction of the letter for us to read:
 
“Dear Voter, Our records indicate that you are registered in a party which is having a Primary Election on Tuesday, June 23, 2020. All voters are allowed to vote by absentee ballot for this Primary Election. Enclosed is an absentee ballot request form which is being sent pursuant to Executive Order 202.23 on April 24, 2020.”
 
Sounds fairly standard, doesn’t it? The problem, as Shaw explains, is that he is NOT registered in a party having a primary election. Shaw explained: “I’m not a member of the Republican Party and I haven’t been for more than fifteen years. Nor am I a Democrat. I’m a member of the Conservative Party of New York State (CPNYS).”
 
The Conservative Party of New York State does not hold primary elections. “Candidates for the Conservative Party line on the ballot are selected at a convention by committee members with input from party members,” as Shaw explained.
 
In other words, the records the Board of Elections are either wrong or they are right and they still “mistakenly” (in all fairness, it really could have been an honest mistake, but considering this is New York, I’m not giving them the benefit of the doubt) sent him and his wife absentee ballots for a primary election in which it is outright illegal for them to participate since they are not members of the parties holding primaries and the state has closed primaries, meaning that only people within a political party are allowed to participate in that party’s primary process.
 
But wait, it actually gets worse than that. One could chalk it up to being a simple mistake by the BoE, and it very well could have, but what follows is something that raises a red flag for me. Shaw explains that the first field that needs to be filled on the application requires the voter to give a reason “in good faith” as to why they need the absentee ballot. So you have to provide a reason as to why you cannot physically go to the voting booth and personally show up to vote.
 
The application gives people a number of options, such as being out of town for the election, having a temporary illness, having a permanent disability, being a caregiver of a disabled person, being a resident of a Veterans’ Affairs hospital or being in prison (yes, they allow prisoners to vote, which is insane on its own, but let’s move on).
 
This all seems fairly normal, right? After all, you ought to have a decent reason for not being able to vote in person at voting booths. And the reasons they give, apart from the “being in prison” one, are fair and logical. But that’s not the part that raises the red flag for me. This is:
 
“For concerns regarding COVID-19 and Social Distancing, please select the ‘Temporary Illness’ option on the application as the reason for requesting an absentee ballot.”
 
In essence, using the virus as an excuse, the Board of Elections is INSTRUCTING people on what to select, even if it’s not true, which I should remind you, IS A FEDERAL CRIME.
 
This is why Shaw said in his title that New York is inviting him to commit voter fraud. It was bad enough that he wasn’t registered to a party having a primary election and was sent this form anyway, but the BoE is INSTRUCTING him on what to fill in for the reason behind needing the absentee ballot, even though neither he nor his wife ever contracted the virus nor do they currently have it.
 
Ironically, on the back of the form, the BoE reminds voters that “It is a felony to make a false statement in an application for an absentee ballot, to attempt to cast an illegal ballot, or to help anyone to cast an illegal ballot.”
 
So who goes to jail if the BoE itself is trying to help anyone cast an illegal ballot? Because that is basically what they are doing here.
 
Again, the BoE sent Shaw and his wife absentee ballots because they had it on “record” that they were registered to a party that was having a primary election, even though they were not registered. What’s more, they were COACHING people on what to put as the “reason” for needing the ballot, even if it’s not the truth whatsoever.
 
And this at least one way in which states commit voter fraud. They lazily (or on purpose) send absentee ballots to people that should not be sent absentee ballots, potentially influencing the primary for the Republican Party and then instructing the people on what to say as for the reason that they “need” an absentee ballot for.
 
As Shaw so eloquently put it: “These letters were obviously mailed out to pretty much everyone, dead or alive, whose name shows up somewhere on the voter rolls. And they clearly don’t have it broken down by party. The idea that nobody who isn’t enrolled would try to obtain a ballot and sent it in seems ludicrous. And it’s pretty obvious that they don’t have a way to quickly or efficiently check all of the returned forms to ensure that everyone is enrolled as a member of the party holding the primary and following the rules.”
 
If absentee ballots were “mistakenly” mailed to someone who is not affiliated with either party, then it’s not a Herculean leap in logic to assume that someone who is registered in one party received a ballot for the other party’s primary. It’s also not a particularly large leap in logic either to assume someone who isn’t registered for either party and never was still received an absentee ballot.
 
Someone like, say, an illegal immigrant, could receive this ballot because “the records” show that he or she is registered to one of the political parties. I mean, if “the records” show Shaw to be registered as a Republican, even though he hasn’t been a registered Republican for FIFTEEN YEARS, then it’s not outrageous to assume that just about anyone could receive these ballots because of faulty records.
 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how you get voter and election fraud to occur. It’s how you could potentially get the wrong candidate to win when they should have lost. It’s how you rob the People of their right to select their representatives in fair and free elections.
 
And let’s not pretend like they couldn’t do this in more important elections than just primary races either. There were many stories of election fraud in the 2018 midterms and videos of people running the voting booths just letting someone vote without proper identification or without even having registered before the deadline.
 
This is how states commit voter fraud and how the Left often operates to undermine our democratic process. They complain about “voter suppression” from Republicans when Republicans do no such thing, while faking votes for their own guys in the process.
 
Keep in mind that many of the districts that flipped from red to blue in California were still red by the time the elections should have been called, but Democrats “mysteriously found” more ballots that voted for the Democrats, leading to the flipping of the districts.
 
We must keep our eyes peeled to this voter fraud that the Left often is a fan of committing. They cannot be allowed to get away with rigging the elections (and let’s not forget they tried to rig the 2016 elections for Hillary and still lost, so there is a pattern for this egregious behavior).
 
Proverbs 10:9
“Whoever walks in integrity walks securely, but he who makes his ways crooked will be found out.”

In what Gen Michael Flynn’s attorney, Sydney Powell, called a “travesty of justice”, Judge Emmitt Sullivan tabled a motion by the DOJ to dismiss the case against Flynn. After evidence was released that the FBI set a perjury trap for Flynn, rather than totally toss this case into the garbage, the activist judge invited interested parties to file friend-of-the-court briefs, called amicus briefs, to weigh in on the case.

Who are these friends of the court? No other than 16 dinosaur Watergate prosecutors from the 1970s! Do they have any personal interest in this case? Nope. Their interest is solely the fact that they want to run Trump out of office just like they did Nixon. They’re engulfed in their past glory! But more than anything, they’re the Deep State!

Now, the timing of activist Judge Sullivan couldn’t be more suspicious…

As you probably know, there was a phone call with Obama and his former aides last week in which the former president said “There is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who was charged with perjury just getting off scot-free”. Now we know that none of this is true. But since it’s Obama saying this, his faithful worshipers wouldn’t dare correct him. But isn’t it strange that Clinton appointed activist Judge Sullivan now decides to delay resolution of the Flynn case after his spiritual leader demands that Flynn be punished?

Let me be clear: there IS no case. The most this activist judge can do is delay, delay, delay such that he may feed the media with the narrative as if there was a case to hurt Donald Trump as we get closer to the November election. But there is no case. You see, Sullivan cannot try a case that the DOJ doesn’t bring to court. And AG Barr cannot bring anything to court because he has no evidence of any wrong-doing on the part of Gen Flynn. Therefore, ultimately Sullivan will have to toss the case as well.

But that doesn’t stop the activist judge to help his activist friends in the Media such that the Democrats may have a better shot in the November election. It’s all political. Sullivan is complicit in generating a phony news cycle to keep the story going to help the Democrats. He’s a Leftist political hack.

But that doesn’t explain why they fear Flynn. I get the fact that Flynn is the ticket to Trump. And they hate Trump. But why this obsession with Flynn?

And it is an obsession indeed: let’s not forget that when he was President, Obama fired Flynn, started an investigation on Flynn and made sure to recommend Trump during the transition not to hire Flynn. Why Flynn? Why this obsession with Flynn?

One could speculate that Flynn knows something about Obama that the former President doesn’t want the public to know. But that’s pure speculation on my part.

Or it could be that Obama simply hates Flynn’s guts for no reason. That would make Obama insane – nobody hates anybody for no reason.

Whatever the case, we know that there has to be a reason for Obama’s obsession with Flynn and his strong desire to ensure Flynn is convicted.

Sure, ultimately a Flynn conviction makes Trump look bad and this alone, in the Deep State’s opinion, would pave the way to them winning the White House. And that’s why Sullivan is being such a good servant doing what his Master, the former President, demands.

But I have to tell you, Obama’s beef with Flynn goes way back to 2014, when Obama fired the General. So whatever feelings the former President has for Flynn today are not new. And the question becomes, why?

We know there is no case against Flynn. We know that all this delay does is feed the Leftists in the Media with the narrative they need to help their friend Joe Biden or whoever ends up getting the Democrat presidential nomination.

Hopefully people will see the truth. Hopefully they will see that if they go after Flynn like this, they can go against anyone and for no reason. We’re already seeing the Left’s true colors during this lockdown, with 77 year-olds or moms being arrested for wanting to reopen their businesses and feed their families. Rights are being violated. What makes anyone think that what’s happening to Flynn won’t happen to the rest of us? If they made up a case against Flynn, what makes us think they won’t do the same against anyone?

The deep state prosecutes innocent people with the help of activist judges like Emmitt Sullivan. Their trials take years to be resolved. They go broke in the process. It’s hard not to conclude that our freedoms are lost.

If we’re to remain a free country, we need to ensure to really drain the swamp. It won’t be easy, but we need to fight.

Ephesians 6:12
“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.”

Imagine that you have a neighbor that lives all alone and is so sick that they can’t take care for themselves and you volunteer to take care of them until they get better. In order to do so, you leave your family behind for a few days and you have to spend night after night in your neighbor’s home, making sure he or she takes their medicine, and that their temperature doesn’t go up too much. In the process, you’ve consumed electricity and some food that your neighbor had in his/her house.

Now your neighbor is doing much better and you’re ready to go back home to continue taking care of your family. Before you leave your neighbor’s home, he/she hands a bill over to you with all that you consumed during the time you spent there, that they expect you to pay: electricity, cereal, milk, bread, etc plus rent. You are shocked, because you left your own family and didn’t take care of them just to take care of your neighbor, and THIS is the thanks you get?

That’s what’s happening to the hundreds of volunteer health care workers who left their families to go to New York to help the State and its COVID-19 patients during this pandemic.

You see, Governor Andrew Cuomo has said that volunteer health care workers who traveled to NY to help his people out will have to pay State Income Tax there for as long as they were in the State doing their jobs. Here’s what he said during his Tuesday news conference:

"We're not in a position to provide any subsidies right now because we have a $13 billion deficit […] If we don't get more money from Washington, we can't fund schools, right, so at the rate we want to fund them. We are in dire financial need".

The issue first came up when the temporary hospital in Central Park was being erected by Samaritan’s Purse, a humanitarian aid organization led by Franklin Graham:

"Our financial comptroller called me, and he said, 'Do you know that all of you are going to be liable for New York state income tax?'" said Ken Isaacs, a Vice President for Samaritan's Purse. "I said, 'What?' [The comptroller] said, 'Yeah, there's a law. If you work in New York State for more than 14 days, you have to pay state income tax.' I didn't know that."

Isaacs said he’s actually more concerned by the paperwork that will go into paying those taxes:

"I think that once that's unleashed...once you start filing that, you have to do that for like a whole year or something," he said.

According to a partner at accounting firm Spielman, Koenigsberg & Parker, LLP, entities from "these other states will have to register in New York and do withholding here in New York."

Any out-of-state resident who's come to New York to work on Coronavirus relief is subject to the tax after 14 days, just like any other worker in New York who goes to the State to work on anything else. The tragedy here is that all these people were moved by compassion and did what they felt was right to help their fellow Americans…and THIS is the thanks they get?

Not only that, it was Cuomo himself who ASKED for help from all of these people. So did New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio. They both asked for help. Imagine that! Many of these health care workers are collecting paychecks from companies back in their home states, which allowed them to go to New York to volunteer, and now they're obligated to pay State Income Tax...

The insanity of this is unbelievable. Who in their right mind would go to New York to help the next time something like this happens? The people of New York are mostly liberals who elect people like Cuomo, who has the highest Coronavirus mortality rate IN THE NATION. The governor has caused more deaths than needed, and now he wants to collect income tax from the very people he BEGGED for help? Why would anyone want to do this again in the future? Particularly if New York INSISTS on electing corrupt and incompetent people like De Blasio or Cuomo? The 13 Billion Deficit was NOT created by COVID-19 – this deficit was built up by years of incompetent management by Cuomo himself.

I won’t EVER go to New York for as long as this insanity continues. After all, Cuomo himself said conservatives are not welcome in New York a few years ago. Why pay them to be insulted like this?

Proverbs 29:4
“By justice a king builds up the land, but he who exacts gifts tears it down.”

I’ve already said in article after article that the climate change movement is utterly unscientific and relies on unfounded beliefs, as well as fearmongering and indoctrination of younger generations. But here, I would like to visit some of the predictions that were made by “experts” on climate change that did not come true. This is rather similar in nature to another article I made about how long the media had been talking about climate change, but this is a tad different and explores the particular predictions that have been made over the past 50 years.
 
Let’s begin with a not-so subtle article from a November 1967 issue of the Salt Lake Tribune titled: “Dire Famine Forecast by ’75.”
 
The article quotes Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich, who said the “time of famines” was upon us and it’d be at its absolute worst by 1975. He argued that “the population of the United States is already too big, that birth control may have to be accomplished by making it involuntary and by putting sterilizing agents into staple foods and drinking water, and that the Roman Catholic Church should be pressured into going along with routine measures of population control,” according to the Salt Lake Tribune.
 
It’s funny, because even with this early rendition of climate alarmism, we see the overall point of the movement: control the masses. There’s no doubt in my mind that if anyone had taken this guy seriously and implemented his proposals, the world would face a far bigger catastrophe than the one these people believe it’s in.
 
Abortion must be made mandatory… for the climate. Population control, government control over everything, must be implemented… for the climate. Does anyone else see the similarities to a mugging here? Being threatened with death if we don’t hand over everything to the people with guns? If we don’t hand control of our lives to the government, everyone will die. That is the message being sent out and it’s nothing but diplomatic thuggery.
 
But regardless, it’s quite clear that Ehrlich was 100% wrong about his prediction (largely because he bases it on the heavily-flawed Malthusian theorem). Let’s move on to another prediction. From The New York Times: “Foe Of Pollution Sees Lack Of Time,” from August of 1969. Interestingly enough, they also quote Ehrlich. “We must realize that unless we are extremely lucky, everybody will disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years,” said Ehrlich. The cause? Once again, too big a population and “contamination of the planet by man,” according to the NYT.
 
Another example: “Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century,” from a 1970 issue of The Boston Globe. “Air pollution may obliterate the sun and cause a new ice age in the first third of the next century.”
 
Notice how it used to be about Global COOLING back then?
 
Broke: Air pollution will cause global cooling.
 
Woke: Air pollution will cause global warming.
 
No wonder they switched to “climate change” because they just couldn’t make up their darned minds about how we were all going to die.
 
Next, from an October 1970 issue of the Redlands Daily Facts (playing fast and loose with the word “facts”, I see): “America will be subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980.”
 
And once again, they quote Dr. Ehrlich. Though I suppose I can’t blame them. Not enough time had passed yet for his predictions to not have come true, so he maintains credibility (not that that stops any of these people. Al Gore has been wrong for decades and people still believe his garbage).
 
But in December of 1972, we find something interesting: predicting things that will happen far enough away for anyone to remember the predictions and discovering they were wrong. From a Brown University geologist in a letter addressed to President Richard Nixon: “The present rate of the cooling seems fast enough to bring glacial temperatures in about a century, if continuing at the present pace.”
 
Another ice age prediction, but this time 100 years out into the future when next to no one will remember this prediction and when next to no one alive at that time will be alive by then.
 
But that was in the 1970s, and there are a lot of other articles that discussed another ice age occurring sometime in the future. Switching decades, however, in the 1980s, it was all about “acid rain” and droughts. “Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes,” read an April 1980 edition of the Noblesville Ledger. It’s also when the switch to global warming began. From The Miami News: “More droughts likely, expert tells senators.” Subhead: “’88 on way to be hottest ever as world temperatures up sharply.”
 
So they began saying that a particular year was “the hottest ever” in 1988. Interesting but obviously very stupid. The technology used to measure this type of stuff was very new by that point, so any particular temperature in it has to be considered within the timespan of recorded history. No one can credibly claim a particular year is “the hottest ever” without knowing how hot or cold it used to be before we had the means by which to measure it.
 
And yet, people are still ignorant enough to believe it when Obama says a particular year was “the hottest year to date” or when another Leftist who stands to gain a lot by spreading this type of misinformation says the same.
 
In any case, we move on to another example, this time with global warming threatening a particular spot: the Maldives. “A gradual rise in average sea level is threatening to completely cover this Indian Ocean nation of 1196 small islands within the next 30 years, according to authorities… But the end of the Maldives and its 200,000 people could come sooner if drinking water supplies dry up by 1992, as predicted,” read a September 1988 issue of The Canberra Times.
 
Well, let’s see how the Maldives are doing, shall we? Hmm, a quick Google search tells me that the island nation is very much still there, with a population of nearly 450,000 in 2017. I can fly there and stay at a resort, though it’s not cheap. All in all, it looks like that prediction was wrong (can’t say I’m surprised).
 
But the prediction must’ve fooled and panicked enough people, because other areas were then predicted to be flooded unless “action” was taken to “reverse” it. Such as the inundation of NYC’s West Side Highway by the year 2019.
 
And who could forget the March 2000 The Independent article that boldly declared: “Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past,” and that “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is”? Fast-forward 17 years and you find a USA Today article titled: “Snow is on the ground in 49 of 50 states.”
 
These are only ten of FORTY-ONE predictions that John Nolte from Breitbart gathered. They all include predictions of either a “new ice age” or places being flooded or famines and droughts happening or absolutely no ice anywhere in the world.
 
None of which came to pass, all of which entirely based on nothing substantial, and yet, the list continues to grow with ridiculous predictions like AOC’s “12 years” or Prince Charles’ “18 months”.
 
But regardless of the predictions or the accuracy of the predictions, they all have one thing in common: scare the populace into giving up rights and freedoms to the government out of fear of Armageddon. It’s a disgusting ploy to attain as much power as possible for the already-powerful elites.
 
I look at all these predictions and see nothing but liars and con-artists, all of whom stand something to gain.
 
And at the same time, I look at the current Democrat candidates, who buy into all of this nonsense, and then proceed to have a massive steak cookoff in Iowa, where they cook over 10,000 steaks and other meats; the same kind of food they told us TO STOP CONSUMING FOR THE SAKE OF THE PLANET!
 
It’s for this reason that every time I look at Democrat candidates today, I see nothing but crappy people peddling bull crap proposals that they know very well will not benefit anyone but themselves.
 
41 times, so-called “experts” warned people about a coming climate catastrophe (that Nolte gathered. I’m certain there are FAR MORE than just that). Over 40 times, they said something was going to happen and nothing of the sort happened. They hold no credibility and we know exactly why they are saying what they are saying.
 
Unfortunately, you have a lot of people who buy into this nonsense. Last weekend’s “Climate Strike” was evidence of that, as well as the “Shut Down DC” event that occurred the following Monday.
 
People have been brainwashed into thinking we are killing our own planet and that the ONLY solution is to turn our rights and freedoms over to socialists who will do absolutely nothing to “solve climate change” because NOTHING CAN BE DONE ABOUT SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
 
Again, in history, there have been two other Warming Periods that we know of apart from the Modern one. The reasons these lunatics give for temperatures rising today can’t be used to explain previous periods of warming and cooling (and therefore, can’t be used to explain the current one). It’s all a cycle, but not many people know this.
 
The climate change movement is nothing more than a cult, based on nothing but pure, raw emotion and fabricated data that gives them ammo. This is the religion of seculars. The good news, however, is that they can come to receive Christ as well. Not all of them will, of course, but I certainly believe there is a chance that there are people who believe this nonsense now who are part of the elect and can be taught the Truth of the Gospel.
 
I can only hope that enough people will be taught the Truth before this country turns over its freedoms to the Devil.
 
Acts 4:12
“And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!

There are a number of reasons as to why I had not written about Jussie Smollett at all in the months that the entire scandal broke out, first with the belief that Trump supporters really did beat him up and then when it was made pretty clear the scumbag staged the whole thing, taking advantage of racial tensions in America to advance his own career.
 
Among the reasons are 1) I did not care one wit about it and had every reason to not believe Smollett’s story in the first place, 2) when the hoax was revealed, everyone was saying the same exact things and were shocked about them and 3), perhaps most importantly, I seriously did not care one wit about this story and had better things to write about.
 
However, I feel the need to say a little something here after Chicago State's Attorney dropped all the charges made against Jussie and he continued to play the victim in all of this. The amount of corruption going on in this case and really the country as a whole is visceral. It disgusts me to my core.
 
What do I mean? Well, if you’ve been following the details of this story, you would understand why, but in the case that you previously did not really care about this whole case at all, like me, allow me to explain just why I am certain this is a case of utter corruption.
 
As if faking a hate crime wasn’t enough, the s.o.b. “Empire” actor Jussie Smollett, thanks to his and his family’s ties with the OBAMAS, gets a get-out-of-jail-free card. Like Matt Walsh from the Daily Wire says about this: this shows what privilege in America really looks like.
 
And there’s almost no privilege that equals the privilege of knowing and being friends with powerful people, particularly with a former First Family.
 
Last week, a series of texts and emails from a woman named Tina Tchen were revealed, wherein Tina was acting on behalf of Smollett’s family to try and get Chicago SA Kim Foxx to intervene in the investigation of Smollett and have the case turned over to the FBI. Who’s Tina Tchen, you might ask? Michelle Obama’s former Chief of Staff.
 
Beyond that, Kim Foxx is known for having taken hundreds of thousands of dollars from one major Democrat donor. A donor who goes by the name of George Soros. In her 2016 race, Foxx reportedly received more than $300,000 from George Soros and an extra $75,000 after the race ended. Of course, Foxx is not the only person to be in Soros’ pocket, but that goes to show the level of corruption we’re dealing with.
 
And if that wasn’t bad enough, Foxx dropped the charges without first alerting Chicago P.D. Superintendent Eddie Johnson and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emmanuel (who are both livid over it, and for the first time in my life, I agree with something Emmanuel says) and while the police department was preoccupied with a graduation ceremony.
 
The SA did what Michelle Obama’s Chief of Staff asked her to do and intervened in the investigation. The SA dropped all the charges against Jussie Smollett, releasing the following statement:
 
“After reviewing all of the facts and circumstances of the case, including Mr. Smollett’s volunteer service in the community and agreement to forfeit his bond to the City of Chicago, we believe this outcome is just a disposition and appropriate resolution to the case.”
 
What kind of a half-assed explanation is that? Did they actually review the facts? I’m guessing they did, because they don’t even try and challenge the facts. They make no mention of them. The only reason they give as to why they are dropping the charges is “Smollett was a good boy to the community”. What a load of garbage! How does exploiting racial tensions and reporting a false hate crime doing good community service? Rahm Emmanuel thought that was an EMBARRASSMENT to the city of Chicago! And I agree! These people have me agreeing with Rahm Emmanuel it’s that bad.
 
“Oh, but it’s not just his community service! No, he also paid a bond! That counts for something, right?” Oh, yeah, because paying a $10,000 bond is going to make a dent in the guy’s wallet.
 
Perhaps what makes all of this so disgusting is the fact that, after having his charges dropped, the shameless bastard Jussie Smollett continued to play victim and not apologizing at all for his actions. He even says he will “continue to fight for the justice, equality, and betterment of marginalized people everywhere.”
 
What a load of garbage! He orchestrated a poorly-executed hate crime against himself to advance his career, tried to blame white Trump supporters for it, further dividing the country for his own benefit and was stupid enough to leave a paper trail behind. How exactly does FAKING a hate crime help? How is that fighting for justice? How is that fighting for equality? How does this improve marginalized people’s standing in the world?
 
And if you have to MAKE UP a hate crime, what does that tell you about the frequency of hate crimes in the first place? What does that tell you about how often people are marginalized?
 
I think it’s for that reason that Rahm is so furious over this whole thing. He claims that this makes it so others who go through an actual hate crime will be less likely to be believed. And that might be true, but how often do such hate crimes happen nowadays?
 
The Left pretends we still live in a pre-Civil Rights America and would like for others to think this is the case, but it’s really not. If Jussie had to PAY people to attack him in order to blame racism and homophobia, etc., that tells you that America is not quite as hateful as they think it is.
 
But it’s clear as day just how corrupt the Left makes America. Being friends with the Obamas carries weight. Being in a city where the people in charge are in the pocket of one of the most corrupt and twisted billionaires in the history of the world carries weight.
 
This is the opposite of justice. This is visceral corruption of the justice system. I honestly feel sorry for Superintendent Johnson. His officers gathered evidence to expose the guy and apply justice to him, but a corrupt lawyer stepped in to stop that.
 
Justice is blind. But corrupt people aren’t.
 
Romans 1:21
“For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!

Recently, the DOJ’s Office of Inspector General report on the FBI’s handling of the Clinton e-mails investigation revealed a text message conversation between two FBI employees the day after Trump won the 2016 election.
 
Here is the exchange:
 
FBI Employee: “I’m very upset.”
FBI Employee: “haha”.
FBI Attorney 2: “I am so stressed about what I could have done differently.”
FBI Employee: “Don’t stress. None of that mattered.”
FBI Employee: “The FBI’s influence.”
FBI Attorney 2: “I don’t know. We broke the momentum.”
FBI Employee: “That is not so.”
FBI Employee: “All the people who were initially voting for her would not, and were not, swayed by any decision the FBI put out. Trump’s supporters are all poor to middle class, uneducated, lazy POS that think he will magically grant them jobs for doing nothing. They probably didn’t watch the debates, aren’t fully educated on his policies, and are stupidly wrapped up in his unmerited enthusiasm.”
 
Love you too, bud.
 
But seriously, you might be thinking “this is just what the Left in general thinks of us, what’s the big deal? They’ve called us worse.” True, but those were all people on social media or in the MSM. These people are FBI AGENTS who are supposed to REMAIN UNBIASED!
 
Take a look back at these texts. I’ll also remind you that Peter Strzok also texted Lisa Page that “they” would stop Trump from becoming President. I don’t know who these two employees are, but clearly there was a larger conspiracy to rig the election.
 
Of course, this is nothing new to us. We knew that Hillary conspired to cheat and we also knew that Obama did as well, but this really puts things into perspective. This is evidence that the FBI was politically biased throughout the campaign. Meaning, there is reason to believe there was bias in the handling of the e-mail investigation as well.
 
The FBI attorney was wondering what they could have done differently. Regarding what? It’s unclear. The conversation seems to focus on the Hillary investigation. But the larger context is regarding the election. What could they, as FBI agents, have done to keep Trump from becoming President? Clearly, not very much. But what gives them license to believe they even could have done anything? Was their handling of the investigation meant to help out Hillary?
 
Of course, we know that it was. Comey usurped the authority of the Attorney General by exonerating Hillary and not seeking charges against her. He didn’t have the power to do that as FBI director. The FBI director can make recommendations to the AG, but he/she does not have the authority to decide the fate of the person being investigated.
 
But again, as we already knew all of this and the corruption within the FBI, this further puts things into perspective.
 
Now the conversation didn’t just end there. Of course, the attorney continued his or her upset tirade by saying: “I just can’t imagine the systematic disassembly of the progress we made over the last 8 years. ACA is gone.”
 
And the employee made further known just what he thinks of us: “Who knows if the rhetoric about deporting people, walls, and crap is true. I honestly feel like there is going to be a lot more gun issues, too, the crazies won finally. This is the tea party on steroids. And the GOP is going to be lost, they have to deal with an incumbent in 4 years…” And then he says something pretty interesting: “We have to fight this again.”
 
Who is “we”? Who is the “we” that Strzok talks about when saying they would stop Trump? Of course, I have no doubt that it’s the Deep State, the swamp, the Obama people who can’t stand to lose and must not allow people their right to vote for people they disagree with.
 
To this elitist jackhole, we are too stupid to know what is right. We are too uneducated and must be helped in choosing who to vote for. And if we vote for the wrong person, they will do whatever they can to destroy said person, undermine that person and rule his or her election null and void.
 
This is corruption at its finest. Thankfully, the American electorate system seems to have been solid enough that no matter what these holier-than-thou elitists tried to do, they wouldn’t get away with it.
 
And since it’s in my nature, I will obliterate this man’s claims here.
 
First, the only ones who are crazy here are the people who believe themselves big enough and bad enough that they could influence and alter the results of an election to benefit themselves every time out. The only ones crazy here are the ones who fight for a political side that would ultimately see the United States destroyed from within, that would see American citizens at the mercy of the government… or Sharia Law, honestly. The only ones who are crazy here are the ones who believe a fetus is nothing more than a random assortment of cells, Islamic terrorists can be appeased by giving them jobs, Antifa terrorists are peaceful angels sent from Heaven, a man can be a woman and vice versa, and that MS-13 are innocent souls.
 
Second, what gun violence? You mean the one that ravaged the nation during Obama’s 8 years when he did absolutely nothing about it, even with a Democrat majority in his first 2 years as POTUS? You mean the one where we saw record numbers of shootings perpetrated by Democrats or Muslims? I won’t deny there isn’t gun violence in Trump’s America, but Obama had the best opportunity to actually do something about it and did nothing. Not to mention that some of the most dangerous places in the country in terms of gun violence are places where Democrats have power, such as Chicago, Oakland and Detroit.
 
Third, I simply love how he blasts poor and middle class people. Aren’t the Democrats supposed to be the ones who cared about the low and middle class people? Aren’t they the ones who do great things for the downtrodden? How are Trump’s supporters the poor and middle class?
 
This is just another example of how the Left has utterly abandoned the low and middle class. Particularly, the white, blue collar class. They make fun of you, they attack you, and then, somehow expect you to vote for them? What a joke.
 
Finally, the FBI employee makes fun of Trump’s promise of bringing back jobs and of your expectations that jobs will “magically” come back. Well, abracadabra, jerk. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (from March 2018), Donald Trump has created nearly 2.5 million jobs since becoming President. This goes along with record-setting unemployment rates in the last few months as well.
 
Reading what these people think of us, I feel mixed emotions. For one, I feel indifferent, as this is something I would expect out of mind-numbed Leftists who believe Obama is God. The problem is that, as I mentioned earlier, these are FBI employees. They’re law enforcement. They’re SUPPOSED to remain unbiased in how they handle investigations and their overall work. THAT is what makes me angry. Although, it’s also something to be expected. This is the swamp, after all. The Deep State. These are corrupt, biased and evil people we are talking about.
 
People who have seemingly worked to alter the results of an election. People who have sought to undermine the people they are supposed to serve. People who have taken Democracy into their own hands and tried to taint it.
 
We really have to thank the Lord for Donald Trump’s election victory. It’s not just Hillary that he had to beat. It was also government corruption. And by some miracle, he managed to do it. All thanks to the Lord.
 
Because here’s the thing: it really doesn’t matter what these FBI employees tried to do or will try to do. It doesn’t matter the extent Hillary and Obama and his administration went to cheat. It doesn’t matter what they think they are capable of. Ultimately, it is God who decides what happens.
 
He gets to decide who wins an election. He gets to decide what policy an authority figure enacts. None of it is a surprise to Him. He gets to decide who goes where and what they end up doing. For as powerful as the FBI might think they are, or might actually be, they are absolutely nothing compared to the Lord.
 
Usually, I would use an analogy here to compare a situation, but no analogy could honestly be properly used. Because there is nothing that can compare to God’s power. Nothing that can compare to the power gap that exists between God and Man. Man, ultimately, has no power. We only have as much power as the Lord gives us.
 
These fools may think they can play God. Ultimately, they are nothing.
 
We must also be thankful that these things are coming to light. It might be scary to believe our government can be so corrupt as to try and steal an election away from the American people, but it’s worse to not be aware of the danger.
 
Make no mistake, this is war. A war that we cannot afford to lose and cannot afford to not participate in. This isn’t Democrat vs. Republican anymore. It’s not conservative vs. liberal. It’s the Left vs. We the People. It’s Evil vs. Good. It’s government corruption vs. the American people. The Deep State vs. the rest of us.
 
The swamp may be big, but it’s not unbeatable. As I said before, it is the Lord who gets to decide who wins and who loses. If He is with us, who in the world are they to be against us?
 
Proverbs 19:21
“Many are the plans in the mind of a man, but it is the purpose of the Lord that will stand.”