One slogan Leftists have repeated following the death of George Floyd while in police custody is that “All Cops Are Bastards” or “ACAB” for short. That is, obviously, ridiculous, but there is no denying that there are some bad apples in many places. This includes even school resource officers, seemingly.
 
According to reports, an Ohio woman was tased and arrested on Wednesday for not wearing a mask during an outdoor eighth-grade football game.
 
Local news station WTAP-TV reported that the school resource officer “appears to use a taser on the parent, before placing her in handcuffs.”
 
Another woman, named Tiffany Lynn Kennedy, had recorded the incident on her phone. The parent was screaming at the officer who was trying to grab her, telling him “don’t touch me!” and “get off of me!” as the officer was attempting to place cuffs on her.
 
The woman taking the video comments, saying: “This is over a mask… I don’t think you can arrest her for not wearing a mask.” Well, seemingly, in backwards Ohio, under the idiot governor’s orders (first time Republican Governor Mike DeWine has honestly pissed me off so much), you can, indeed, face consequences for not wearing a mask, even when you are away from other people and outside.
 
No wonder the crowd booed the Lt. Governor of Ohio when he told a Trump rally crowd about the mask mandate. Mask mandates are unconstitutional, but even idiotic Republican governors, fearing the scorn of the fake news media, I suppose, will cave and take away people’s rights at the drop of a hat.
 
It is ridiculous and absolutely outrageous and both the governor and Lt. governor deserve to be either recalled or primaried the next time they are up for reelection over this disgraceful and unAmerican, not to mention ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL, mask mandate.
 
As far as the officers who follow these illegal orders go, they deserve all the scorn in the world. In a time like today, when the Left is shouting that “all cops are bastards” and have no qualms whatsoever about them being shot and killed, officers across the country cannot afford to do things that would lose them support from people who most fervently support them.
 
Conservatives, freedom-loving Americans back the blue. We support law enforcement officers and believe they are the most unjustifiably maligned group in this country, where they have to sacrifice life and limb to protect communities who will shout and criticize them regardless of what they do. Even if they do every single thing right, and are justified in doing unsightly things (like firing back at Breonna Taylor’s boyfriend, which tragically ended in the woman’s death and no one denies that it was tragic), they will be scorned and demanded that their heads be served up on a silver platter.
 
We believe this because we know that the job of a police officer is to protect and serve his or her community. But when an officer does something like this (and yes, the officer in question is a school resource officer, but I have seen actual police officers act like mini-gestapo against law-abiding citizens who don’t follow the governor’s “guidelines” which are unconstitutional), such an officer deserves every bit of the scorn that they receive.
 
When officers do the wrong thing, they ought to be criticized for it. Last month, I wrote about how police officers executed a man named Ryan Whitaker. I did not hold back in my scorn and criticism of the officer who killed him because that was nothing short of an execution. When SWAT officers shot and killed Daniel Shaver, that was an execution by a man (and I hesitate to call him that) mad with power. Those officers deserve all the scorn they received and more.
 
Likewise, officers who follow these illegal orders and arrest and even TASE law-abiding citizens who are made outlaws by communistic “health and safety guidelines” also deserve plenty of scorn.
 
Back in April, I wrote about the bravery of Michigan sheriffs who openly went against the governor’s executive orders regarding the arrest and fining of those who go against “stay-at-home” orders. If you remember, in that very article, I gave some examples of officers arresting joggers and Christians attending Easter services.
 
I noted that those sheriffs, rightly, did not turn their backs on the constitution. But when officers do turn their backs on the constitution and oblige with illegal orders given to them by the governor, that’s a massive problem and such officers deserve fierce criticism.
 
This is particularly asinine and outrageous following the months of “protests” where people very clearly have disregarded many of the same guidelines those very governors dictate other people must follow. Maybe the parent at that football game should have just said she was “peacefully protesting” and the officer (whose own mask eventually slipped down as he was making contact with the woman, defeating the purpose of the mask and the mandate) might have just let her be.
 
I don’t know, in this crazy world of ours where one group of people get to live by one set of rules and laws and another group of people have to abide by draconic orders and regulations, lest they be arrested, any such argumentation might seem valid.
 
Some officers will arrest you for attending church, but not for setting fire to one. They will arrest you for jogging alone in the street, but not for marching with a mob to call police “bastards” and inciting the death of “fascists”. They will arrest parents attending football games for not wearing a mask, but won’t arrest the people that assaulted Kyle Rittenhouse (and I know that that was in Wisconsin, not Ohio, but the point remains: there is a very clear double standard in how the law is being enforced).
 
As long as you are “protesting” police brutality, you can borderline literally spit in a police officer’s face and not much will happen to you. As long as you were a prominent Leftist politician, you can have a massive funeral gathering with few guidelines.
 
If you want to attend a religious gathering, go to the gym, eat at a restaurant, or simply go out for a walk, some officers will ensure that you have no ability to do any one of those things.
 
No, not all cops are bastards, but some cops are bastards when they do crap like this. They are supposed to protect and serve their communities, not criminalize people’s existence. We are law-abiding citizens until the government outlaws our lives, at which point, we are at the mercy of law enforcement. Yes, that is hyperbole, before someone accuses me of being a drama queen, but you understand my point. Attending a high school football game without a mask has been made illegal and some officers have no qualms about arresting such people.
 
If a cop follows such illegal orders, going so far as to even TASE someone who was not a threat to the officer’s life, I cannot think that that cop is anything other than a bastard. And in this day and age, cops need as many friends as they can get.
 
Now, does this mean I am condemning all cops? Absolutely not and that would be utterly ridiculous. It’s not an either/or situation where either all cops are bastards or none of them are, or where either all cops are good or all of them are bad. There is a very obvious middle road here where most cops are good, will do what they need to do to protect their communities and won’t violate someone’s rights without reason (criminals forfeit such rights upon committing crimes), but some cops are not exactly good ones and will either abuse their power or nonchalantly do the bidding of tyrants (and given that b.s. mandate, I have no problem calling DeWine a tyrant).
 
I have already shared examples of police officers clearly doing the wrong thing, with Ryan Whitaker, with Daniel Shaver, and with those who have arrested joggers and churchgoers. Such officers, though I believe they are in the fringe minority, are not good officers.
 
And don’t tell me “they’re just following orders” as though that justifies their actions. By that logic, one can also excuse Nazi soldiers and officers, who were “just following” Hitler’s orders. The Nazi officer rounding up Jews to be put in the gas chamber is not excused just because “he was following orders.” The SS officer searching for Jews hiding in people’s basements is not excused because “he was just following orders.”
 
We all have a choice when it comes to matters of right and wrong. We can choose to do the right thing or the wrong thing. Putting the responsibility on someone else’s shoulders, saying that “it was their orders” does not excuse the action performed by the person who was “just following orders.”
 
The Stanley Milgram Experiment aimed to see whether the Nazi soldiers’ defense of “we were just following orders” was a logical one. The experiment, to be brief, involved some participants being separated between “teacher” and “student”. The participants who were “teachers” were real while the participants playing “students” were actually confederates of the experiment (as in, they were in on it and were not being experimented on).
 
The “teachers” were then taken to a room adjacent to where the “students” were and were told to ask “students” a series of questions. The “students” were “hooked up” to “shock generators” and if they got any questions wrong, they would “receive” some shock which would become worse the more questions they got wrong.
 
The shock generators were not real, but the participants, the ones playing the “teachers”, didn’t know that. The people running the experiment told the “teachers” to give some questions and every time the “students” got it wrong, the “teachers” were supposed to administer ever-growing shock charges. The “students” often purposely gave the wrong answers to see whether the “teachers” would actually give them those “shocks.”
 
Those “shocks” ranged from 15V of electricity to 300V, which was marked as the danger line, and even 450V, which was marked as “XXX” and left up to one’s interpretation as to what that could mean.
 
The study found that every participant delivered the 300V shock and 65% delivered the “fatal” 450V shock.
 
At the end of the day, they were “just following orders” and they likely felt that it would be okay to do so because someone else was ordering them to administer the “fatal” shocks. However, those people are still responsible for their actions. Had they actually killed someone, it would have weighed on their minds (as well it should).
 
Just because the officers are told to arrest people with masks, that doesn’t mean that the officers have to obey. In order to keep their jobs, maybe they have to, but they would still be doing the wrong thing and should still be held accountable for their actions (and the people giving those orders should also be held accountable, don’t misunderstand).
 
Another example that comes to mind is a common one you would hear in childhood when your friend wanted to do something regarded as dangerous or unsafe by your parents: “if your friend jumped off a bridge, would you do it too?” Similarly, one can rephrase that as “if your friend told you to jump off a bridge, would you do it?”
 
If someone’s commanding officer orders them to do something that is objectively wrong, be it routinely killing people through poison gas or putting them in a furnace or putting them up against the wall and executing them, that does not mean that such a person is absolved of their actions.
 
The school resource officer is not absolved of his actions just because he gets orders from his school’s principal or from the governor himself regarding what to do with someone who is at an outdoor event without a mask.
 
In an age when the Left says that all cops are bastards, officers cannot afford to give even the remotest of credence to such an absurd claim. These are the kinds of stories that make community support for the police drop like a man claiming to have information which would lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton.
 
No, not all cops are bastards, obviously. But there are bad apples in the bunch in some places which must be resolved. We can’t have officers acting like the gestapo against law-abiding citizens and we can’t have state and local politicians making outlaws out of such citizens. This is the sort of thing I expect from Newsom, Cuomo and Whitler, not from a REPUBLICAN governor and Lt. Governor.
 
What a disgrace.
 
James 4:17
“So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

To the Left, lying is as natural as breathing. They are pathological liars and often times cannot help but lie in order to save their own behinds. They will lie about big things and small things. They will lie about everything so long as they get their way. Regarding the virus alone, they have already lied about the death numbers in a number of ways, from counting gunshot wounds as COVID deaths to lying about the total number of deaths, with the real number being around 6% of the reported death toll (roughly 10,000).
 
They are little dictators and this much has been shown for the past few months in particular. However, in Nashville, Tennessee, the mayor of that city is in deep trouble because of the possibility that the city knew, for some time, that bars and restaurants hardly contribute to Chinese coronavirus cases, but they maintained the tyrannical shutdown orders and even intended to keep such knowledge away from the public.
 
According to The Daily Wire: “A Nashville city council member is accusing Nashville Democrat Mayor John Cooper’s office of concealing low coronavirus outbreak numbers tied to restaurants and bars in the area, claiming that they are ‘fabricating information.’”
 
Fox 17 News also reported on Wednesday: “The coronavirus cases on lower Broadway may have been so low that the mayor’s office and the metro health department decided to keep it secret.”
 
The way in which this has been found out is through a series of emails between a senior advisor to the mayor and a health department official. Fox 17 reported: “The discussion involves the low number of coronavirus cases emerging from bars and restaurants and how to handle that and most disturbingly how to keep it from the public. On June 30th, contact tracing was giving a small view of coronavirus clusters. Construction and nursing homes were found to be causing problems with more than a thousand cases traced to each category, but bars and restaurants reported just 22 cases.”
 
In an email, health department official Leslie Waller asked senior advisor Benjamin Eagles: “This isn’t going to be publicly released, right? Just info for Mayor’s Office?”
 
Eagle responded with: “Correct, not for public consumption.”
 
One month after the fact, Tennessean reporter Nate Rau asked the following question to the health department in an email: “The figure you gave of ‘more than 80’ does lead to a natural question: If there have been over 20,000 positive cases of COVID-19 in Davidson and only 80 or so are traced to restaurants and bars, doesn’t that mean restaurants and bars aren’t a big problem?”
 
Health department official Brian Todd reportedly forwarded the email to five other officials asking how to answer the question. One official responded: “My two cents: We have certainly refused to give counts per bar because those numbers are low per site… We could still release the total though, and then a response to the over 80 could be ‘because that number is increasing all the time and we don’t want to say a specific number.’”
 
Isn’t this just rich? Seemingly, bars and restaurants reported just 22 cases of the Chinese coronavirus in that particular area of Nashville, but instead of being truthful and showing the right numbers, the local government decided to inflate the numbers a bit (though that “80 cases” is still extremely low and would naturally lead to the kind of question that Rau asked because there would still be no reason to shut down those businesses with those numbers) and lie to everyone about the true number of cases and how little risk there seemingly is from going to bars and restaurants.
 
What benefit is there to lying to people and shutting down those types of businesses when there is seemingly such a low risk? And don’t tell me: “Well, they said that the numbers were increasing all the time and things could be getting worse, so that’s why they did it.” Really? They prioritized an area that yielded low cases over areas where there was more risk? That would be like sitting in a car in front of a minefield, looking at alternative paths, finding one that is fairly rocky, and deciding that the rocky road is anywhere close to as dangerous as the minefield.
 
That is, of course, if we assume these people to be acting in good faith, which I do not trust that they are. The Left loves dictatorships and will attempt to become one at every given chance. This was proven by Cuomo, Newsom, Whitler, and now, by the government in Nashville.
 
They didn’t shut down the businesses because they yielded a lot of Chinese coronavirus cases or because they were at great risk of doing so. And even if they did it for these reasons at one point, the data came back that it was largely safe to open them back up, and still chose not to do it and chose to keep this a secret from the public.
 
They shut the whole thing down because THEY COULD. More importantly, because they know that a heavily-dampened economy would be bad news for Trump come November. With a rebounding economy, Trump’s chances of reelection also rebound. The Left doesn’t want that to happen, so certain sacrifices (yours) must be made. Your business must be shut down, unless a local government official with a “D” next to their name wants to use your services. You must risk being furloughed or your job being lost entirely or your business shutting down permanently (60% of them so far will) for the benefit of the Communist, I mean, Democrat Party.
 
And the people cannot be made aware of this because that would, obviously, cause an uproar in the local area, which they would rather avoid. The Left in Nashville would rather quietly put a pillow over the head of small businesses and suffocate them quietly, rather than let people know how much of a monumental failure (at best) they are.
 
Now, you could be thinking: “Well, how do we know if these emails are legit? They could have been faked by some right-winger trying to get Democrats in trouble.” Fair question. They could be fake. But they have been verified as real by a city council member.
 
City Councilmember Steve Glover reportedly asked a government attorney to verify if the emails were real and the attorney responded: “I was able to get verification from the Mayor’s Office and the Department of Health that these emails are real.”
 
Glover, upon discovering this, accused the Mayor’s Office and the Department of Health of “fabricating information. They’ve blown their entire credibility. It’s gone, I don’t trust a thing they say going forward… nothing.”
 
He added: “We raised taxes 34 percent and put hundreds, literally thousands of people out of work that are now worried about losing their homes, their apartments, etc., and we did it on bogus data. That should be illegal!”
 
Fox 17 News concluded in their report: “Again, we weren’t told by the mayor’s office this wasn’t true. We were told to file a Freedom of Information Act request. Which allows us now to ask the question: why are you keeping this from us? Why would you even want to? It’s just the real numbers and what could possibly be an honorable motive?”
 
Any government official who acts in good faith would want to let the public know whether some activity would be safe, particularly if it helps alleviate some economic stress and allows jobs to return and businesses to open. If the data says that something is relatively safe, a good faith government official will act accordingly and allow it. At the very least, he would tell the people this bit of good news in a time when there seems to hardly be any.
 
What conclusion, then, can we draw from the fact that the government officials in Nashville did not tell anyone this, did not deliver those numbers, that data, or the good news, and did not act according to the data presented, opening things back up? Naturally, the conclusion reached is that these are not government workers acting in good faith. They are not public officials who are interested in serving the public.
 
These are mini-dictators, holding on to whatever power they can keep for however long they can keep it. Seemingly, the idea is that if Biden wins, “the virus will just go away.” This could mean easing (some) restrictions, but no communist ever gives up power so easily. They have it. They will keep it until they no longer can.
 
They look upon China, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela with both adoration and envy, wishing they could wield the power those in government in those countries can. That is as close to absolute power as people can reach and these American dictators want as much of that kind of power as they can get, U.S. Constitution and civil liberties and rights be damned.
 
The worst part is that they deceive themselves into believing they are doing something “for the greater good”. They believe themselves to be the good guys when they suffocate small businesses into permanently closing. “There is a dangerous virus out there!” they repeat to themselves to justify the injustices they commit against the people that elected them.
 
This is why it’s so important to kick Democrats and Leftists out of whatever office they hold. I don’t think there has ever been another time in American history when the Left has more deserved to be utterly defeated and humiliated, to the point where they would be thrown into the ash heap of history. And I’m not just talking about their response to the virus. I’m talking about their hatred for the very institutions which keep us safe and free. I’m talking about the corruption they have shown in the past decade alone, trying to undermine and sabotage an administration they vehemently disagree with. I’m talking about their promotion of ABSOLUTE FILTH in the form of a film that is borderline child pornography.
 
The modern Left is so comically perverse you would think they came straight out of a fiction book where the bad guys are clearly evil and there is no depth to their character. They have demonstrated, time and time again, how utterly unfit, AT BEST, they are to run a lemonade stand, let alone an entire world superpower.
 
If it weren’t for the Left’s clear attempts at cheating this election, I honestly would not be surprised if Trump ended up winning all 50 states, the Left is that detestable and hated.
 
I do hope, however, that whatever cheating they try to pull off will so backfire as to make the 1984 election appear to be a fairly close contest.
 
God knows the Left deserves such a catastrophic fate.
 
Proverbs 19:9
“A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will perish.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

As you may know, Vice Presidential candidate Kamala Harris this week during a virtual roundtable discussion referred to the “Harris Administration” and its plans for America. This is very concerning for two reasons, but before I get to that point let me share with you what she said:

“A Harris administration, together with Joe Biden as the president of the United States – the Biden-Harris administration will provide access to $100 billion in low-interest loans and investments for minority business owners.”

Some analysts think that this was a slip of the tongue and having a “Biden moment” (in reference to Biden’s declining cognitive abilities), while others think this is a message to the Democrat base and donors who are worried about Biden’s inability to lead the country due to the fact that he’s clearly not fit for office.

Regardless of the reasons why Harris mentioned a “Harris Administration” at all, the fact of the matter is that we know that a Harris Administration is what we're going to get if Democrats win in November. We know Biden’s not fit for office, clearly showing signs of dementia. And some speculate Harris will be sworn into office within the first month into the new Administration.

It's not just what some analysts think, it's also what Trump himself thinks as well. Let’s not forget that Trump himself has called Biden a “Trojan Horse” for the ultra-left to illegitimately gain power without really earning it through running for office, like the Constitution demands. Socialism or communism will never win elections fair and square, so they figure this is the way they’re going to steal it from American citizens.

There are two things that puzzle me about this.

The first one is this: why does the Democrat base even want to vote for the Biden-Harris ticket when they themselves rejected Kamala Harris during the primaries? She was utterly rejected by the base and was forced to drop out of the race quite early, really. If you remember, it was Tulsi Gabbard that finished her off in about 40 seconds during a debate. Remember what Tulsi said?

"Senator Harris says she's proud of her record as a prosecutor and that she'll be a prosecutor president. But I'm deeply concerned about this record. There are too many examples to cite but she put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana. She blocked evidence -- she blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California."

So there you have it – in just those few seconds Kamala Harris was toast. She dropped out soon after that.

In other words, Tulsi Gabbard took Kamala Harris out as she EXPOSED the now VP candidate for the racist and corrupt piece of garbage she truly is. As a result, the Democrat base responded the only way they could respond: by withdrawing their support for Harris.

And now what? They rejected Harris earlier this year and now they’re about to vote for her as VP so that she can become the President they didn’t want in the first place? How do you reconcile that if you’re a Democrat? And I mean a regular Democrat, not a privileged Democrat like Hunter or Obama. I mean the base. How do you swallow this pill? You don’t want her but nevertheless the DNC imposes her onto you as the President you never really wanted? And you’re still going to vote her in? Why?

And the second thing that puzzles me about this is this: Do regular people realize that if we do indeed get a “Harris Administration” the level of violence in this country will go up? And pushed by the Harris Administration itself? I know a lot of people are talking about how violent democrats are going to become if they lose – they’re PROMISING to be more violent. So that’s a given. But if Biden-Harris win in November, history tells us that the violence will come from the Administration itself – there is no Communist or Socialist government in the world today or in history that hasn’t ruled and oppressed its people by force.

Kamala will remember very well that it was first the DEMOCRAT BASE that rejected her – she will make sure THAT doesn’t happen again and oppression will begin exactly there. The useful idiots that were supposed to make her the Democrat nominee will suffer the wrath of a rejected woman who won’t forgive or forget.
​
And, of course, then it’s the Republicans who will be targeted – it wouldn’t be the first time, as you know. The KKK was the terrorist army of the DNC back in the day with a mission to kill Republicans. Since black people were 100% Republican back then, you can imagine it was easy for the Dems to identify and massacre the enemy.

The Democrats MUST be utterly defeated this November. Our freedoms depend on it. Go vote in person!

Psalm 10:7
“His mouth is filled with cursing and deceit and oppression; under his tongue are mischief and iniquity.”
 
Author: Danielle Cross

Considering how deep-blue San Francisco is, I am not even a little bit surprised to find that the people who run that city are massive hypocrites. As it turns out, even as local and state politicians have argued and mandated that public gyms (as in regular people, as opposed to the politicians, use them) as well as other “non-essential” businesses must be closed, that seemingly did not apply to the amenities that affect the ruling class, only the peasant class.
 
According to The Washington Examiner, “Gyms within government buildings in San Francisco have been open for months, despite privately owned establishments being ordered to close due to the coronavirus.”
 
So, in San Francisco alone, we have a salon who had been ordered to be closed for months and was hemorrhaging money only to be told to reopen for one person in particular, that being her highness Nancy Pelosi (who hilariously tried to blame the salon owner, showing just how insufferable she is), and now, we come to find that gyms for government workers have been open this entire time, even despite the warnings those very people were giving public gyms about how “unsafe” it was for people to work out in indoor gyms.
 
What a sick joke it is to live in Commiefornia. Understandably, one gym owner told a local NBC News station: “It’s shocking, it’s infuriating. Even though they’re getting exposed, there are no repercussions, no ramifications? It’s shocking.”
 
Well, of course there are no repercussions and ramifications even while they are being exposed. YOU ARE DEALING WITH DEMOCRATS! Hypocrisy doesn’t stick to them. They do not get punished for blatant corruption.
 
For crying out loud, the current Democrat nominee has deep business ties with CHINA AND UKRAINE! He is essentially a puppet for Xi Jinping, but the media will never bring it up and they would even pretend that it doesn’t matter at all and play it off as a non-issue.
 
Sen. Diane Feinstein was caught employing a Chinese national for DECADES and literally NOTHING came of it, other than the Chinese national getting fired. No repercussions for Feinstein or anything. She was exposing national-security secrets and NOTHING came of it. Not to mention she was part of that whole pre-COVID stock market fraud, but the media focused largely on Sen. Loeffler.
 
The last Democrat nominee literally had a foundation that would take money from the Saudis and the Chinese (and whomever else, really) in exchange for “favors”. What do you think “pay-for-play” was all about?
 
Hypocrisy is a charge that does not stick to the Democrats because the media sides with the Democrats. The only standards the Left has are double standards, where we, the peasants, are supposed to listen and obey them even as they do something entirely contrary to what they tell us.
 
People are not allowed to go to salons, but Nancy Pelosi can (funny enough, in order to save some amount of face, the city began to ease on restrictions for salon owners following Pelosi being exposed). People are not allowed to go to the gym, but government workers can.
 
According to the Washington Examiner, the “gyms that have been open for government employees include those for police officers, judges, lawyers, bailiffs, and paralegals, according to the report. One such gym, the Hall of Justice gym, has been open since July 1.”
 
Now, I can understand gyms for police officers being open. Police precincts usually have gyms within them and it makes sense that out of everyone, they should still be allowed to work out in gyms (especially given the current social climate). They have to uphold the law and do many of the same tasks they usually do outside of a pandemic, so it makes sense for their gyms to still be open.
 
But what is a judge going to do with an open gym? Why does his or her gym get to be open for them? What need do government lawyers have to continue working out?
 
It makes sense for cops’ gyms to be open, given their line of work, but judges don’t go out hitting criminals with their gavel. Lawyers don’t go out hitting criminals with a case. Bailiffs, I suppose, could make sense given that they are supposed to maintain safety in the courtroom and they need to be physically fit to do so. But the others, apart from cops, don’t need their gyms to remain open, particularly as the rest of us plebs (I don’t live in San Francisco, but I doubt this double standard is exclusive to this city) are told we cannot go certain places or do certain activities.
 
Another gym owner put it how I just described it: “It just demonstrates that there seems to be some kind of a double standard between what city employees are allowed to do and what the residents of San Francisco are allowed to do.”
 
Yep, you, the peasant, have to obey and eat bread, if you can get some, while the ruling class gets to do basically whatever they want (see: Nancy Pelosi, again) and get to eat cake (and then burn all those calories in government gyms).
 
“But Freddie, COVID can spread quickly if all gyms are open,” the ignoramus will argue. Okay, what sense does it make to claim that public gyms are dangerous but government gyms are not? If the argument is that the virus can spread quickly in an indoor area with plenty of people, who are naturally not going to be wearing masks as to avoid getting a lack of oxygen, then why is a public gym at all different from a gym in a government building?
 
Not that I expect the liberal ignoramus to be able to answer, let alone honestly. The Left will actually argue that, even as people are not allowed to go to the beach, people are allowed to protest and riot for a Leftist political cause. No masks or social distancing or other health and safety guidelines are required at such protests, but other people not participating must still abide by those rules.
 
You can’t go to church to pray but you can to set it on fire. You can’t go to a park with your family but you can with your communist revolutionary friends to tear down statues and deface public property.
 
These double standards are BLATANT and the Left does not get punished for it, apart perhaps from the polls. And even then, the polls didn’t show that they were suffering until the media began to cover and justify obvious criminal acts of destruction as being “mostly peaceful”, all with even a garbage study that says that 93% of the protests were peaceful, while ignoring that that means that there were nearly 600 RIOTS IN 220 LOCATIONS because there were THOUSANDS of protests all across the country in the last three months.
 
The Left is filled with hypocrites but that hardly seems to matter to some people or event to many. I hope that, given this, things will begin to change a little.
 
I cannot imagine that the local business owners in places like San Francisco, which have suffered some of the strictest lockdown measures in the country (alongside other deep-blue cities and states), will be too keen on continuing to vote for the Democrats that ruin their businesses and live like royalty, borderline literally.
 
Do I expect California to turn red this year? Not really. But I do expect some people to recognize just how the Left has been running things and see the results of such governance. San Francisco was literally a “s**thole” before this pandemic began, let alone during it. If there is any hope of cities getting out of the craphole that they are in and return to prosperity, they have to stop voting for those who blatantly hate them and enact policies that are meant to hurt them in every way possible.
 
The Left must be defeated at all costs and everywhere possible.
 
Colossians 2:15
“He disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

​If you were to ask a Leftist which country he or she believes is the most oppressive, regressive and tyrannical nation in the world, 9 times out of 10, they will say it’s the U.S. and the tenth time will be a non-answer because they are groggy from nap time. However, we all know very well that the U.S., while not perfect, is still FAR from the dictatorial and oppressive nation that the Left claims it is.
 
You don’t have to look very far to recognize this – the fact that the Left can attack Donald Trump without fear of imprisonment is enough evidence. However, let’s ignore such facts for now and focus on an actually dictatorial and oppressive regime which, unsurprisingly, the Left is all buddy-buddy with: the Islamic “Republic” of Iran.
 
According to the Jerusalem Post, the Iranian Supreme Court “confirmed the death sentence of national wrestling champion Navid Afkari for his 2018 protest against the regime in Tehran. The news website Iran International reported on Saturday that Iran’s clerical regime imposed two death sentences, six years and six months in prison, and 74 lashes on Afkari. His brother, Vahid Afkari, received a prison sentence of 54 years and six months in prison and 74 lashes. The third brother, Habib, was slapped with a prison term of 27 years and three months and 74 lashes.”
 
A national wrestling champion is being executed and his two brothers are being given lengthy prison sentences for the “high crime” of protesting the regime in Tehran two years ago.
 
This would just about be the equivalent to LeBron James being arrested, tried and sentenced to TWO death sentences (which really goes to show just how ridiculous the “justice” system works in that third-world craphole) for the “crime” of having protested against Donald Trump’s administration.
 
It would be very hard to imagine such a situation happening here, let alone the absolute outrage that would come as a result of such an injustice. And yet, this is what’s happening in Iran and somehow, someway, the Left is still convinced that America is anywhere close to that level of oppression.
 
Let me tell you what oppression is. Oppression is Facebook deleting posts that support Kyle Rittenhouse. Oppression is Twitter “accidentally” banning people who defend Rittenhouse, including the kid’s LAWYERS. Oppression is the fake news media attacking a teenager, lambasting him and smearing him, maliciously changing his life forever JUST because he is a political opponent. Oppression is being sentenced TO DEATH for protesting the government.
 
Notice that each instance of oppression I talked about that exists in this country is NOT coming from the federal government itself, but rather, from Left-wing businesses and organizations. This is because Leftism is oppression itself. This doesn’t mean that the government itself hasn’t been oppressive to some extent. Dinesh D’Souza, for example, was given five years probation and 8 months in prison for campaign finance violations (giving more than $20,000 to a GOP candidate in her race) back during the Obama administration. Yet, the Clintons are allowed to receive millions from foreign agents with total impunity JUST because they technically did not donate to her campaign directly, but rather, to the highly corrupt Clinton Foundation.
 
So the government definitely is capable of being rather oppressive, but to allege that it is on par with some of the most oppressive and tyrannical dictatorships to have ever existed is utter madness.
 
Leftists will claim that particular sets of people are “oppressed” because in many instances, they see a white cop JUSTIFIABLY shooting at a suspect who happens to be black. Despite the fact that there is NO defense of Jacob Blake, the Left will defend him to no end. Despite the fact that Rayshard Brooks was justifiably killed, the Left has insisted that “yet another white cop hunted down and executed a black man”.
 
They have convinced a lot of black people that they are practically hunted down by police just because of their skin color. They have convinced a lot of people in general that police are the bad guys and that defunding them completely will bring about a utopia where nothing bad ever happens and unicorns fart rainbows. They haven’t convinced a majority, thank God, but have convinced far more people than they should have been able to.
 
There is no rhyme or reason to believe ANYTHING that the Left says about any given topic, be it climate change, abortion, homosexuality and transgenderism, race relations, etc. And yet, many do, not because it is a logical attachment, but because it is an emotional one.
 
We can PLAINLY see that America is nowhere close to the level of oppression that regimes like Iran, North Korea, China, etc. are, and yet, many are convinced that they are all practically the same (and some will even argue that those countries are better, again, indicating that this is not an intelligent or logical attachment).
 
Returning to the situation with Iran, another aspect of it is that, allegedly, two of the Afkari brothers were tortured into giving confessions. The reason this is highly credible is because it comes from Iran International itself, and considering how “journalism” usually works in these dictatorships, I wouldn’t be surprised if this is a government-run website.
 
Iran International reported: “Navid and Vahid Afkari were severely tortured to give confessions, and the testimony of witnesses about their beatings and torture are even referenced in the case, but the court has ignored it.”
 
Now, one could ask: “Why would an Iran-owned website admit this?” To which I say: do you really think Iran cares how it is viewed by someone who gives enough of a damn to read through their news sites?
 
They are openly hostile to their own people when they protest against the regime (as evidenced by this very case). Remember when a bunch of women were protesting against wearing the hijab? Yeah, the regime would routinely make arrests and even open fire on demonstrators.
 
Compare that to what we are seeing in Democrat-run cities across the country today. We have rioters being DEFENDED by the fake news media (when the polls don’t show people being opposed to riots, at least) and many on the Left pretending that everything is fine and there is nothing to see. That some peaceful part of Portland is “obviously” an indication that there is nothing wrong anywhere else in the city, an argument which is the equivalent of December 7th, 1941 being rather peaceful because not ALL of Pearl Harbor was attacked.
 
Rioters assault cops and destroy property, both private and public, with much impunity because the fake news media (which, as the days go by, more and more, they prove that they EARNED the moniker of “enemy of the people”) runs cover for them by saying they are “peaceful protesters” or by sticking their heads in the sand and ignoring all the violence that proves they are b.s.-ing everybody. And while arrests are made, the Leftist DA’s of the various cities release the rioters without bail so the destruction and chaos may continue largely unimpeded.
 
Compare and contrast the two situations in Iran and the U.S. In America, rioters get to destroy buildings, assault people and cops, and get released a few hours after their arrest. In Iran, a guy gets two death sentences for having actually peacefully protested the dictatorial regime, and his two brothers also get lengthy prison sentences. Oh, and reportedly, all of this comes after having been tortured into confessing to the “crimes” levied against them.
 
According to the Jerusalem Post, “Iran’s judiciary charged the brothers with 20 different crimes including ‘attending illegal gatherings, assembly and conspiracy to commit crimes against national security, and insulting the supreme leader.’”
 
Meanwhile, in America, that first charge is levied not against the rioters but against people who attend funerals. Not against those who illegally gather during a pandemic to “protest” and cause chaos, but against those who want to visit family next door (which also goes to show the government’s ability to be oppressive, particularly when it is a Leftist government that is in charge).
 
Anyone still wanna tell me that America is at all on the same level of oppression as the Iranian regime is? Just look at that last charge of “insulting the supreme leader” to find that the two nations are entirely incomparable. If it were a crime to “insult the President of the United States”, every single person working in the fake news media, every single Washington establishment politician and roughly half the country would be in prison.
 
The American Left doesn’t know real oppression, but they are all too excited to try and oppress the rest of us.
 
Isaiah 10:1-2
“Woe to those who decree iniquitous decrees, and the writers who keep writing oppression, to turn aside the needy from justice and to rob the poor of my people of their right, that widows may be their spoil, and that they may make the fatherless their prey!”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Around three months ago, I wrote an article about how the State of Washington was knowingly counting gun shot wounds as Chinese coronavirus deaths, as well as many other things that should not be counted as COVID deaths being counted as COVID deaths.
 
In that article, I expressed how utterly angered I was at Dr. Birx saying in one of the press briefings that the CDC was counting deaths “with” the virus the same as deaths “from” the virus, even though there is a very clear difference and doing this makes little to no sense whatsoever.
 
Lo and behold, I was right in my assessment, because the CDC has recently announced that only 6% of the deaths associated to the COVID-19 death toll were strictly from the virus. That is to say, for only 6% of the deaths in the total, the virus was the only cause mentioned.
 
“For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.”
 
This means that, according to the CDC, less than TEN THOUSAND people in the U.S. have died directly to the virus. 94% of the deaths came from people who had the virus but had other pre-existing conditions or co-morbidities that the virus likely just contributed to making matters worse.
 
This, for all intents and purposes, would be like having a group of students doing a project, but the popular kid in the group, even if he does the least amount of work, gets ALL the credit for the project. The Chinese coronavirus is the “popular” disease out there right now (in as far as it is well-known and there are some people who stand to gain from hearing worse and worse news relating to it) and even if it is a minimally-contributing factor to the death of someone who had respiratory or immune-system problems, it gets all the blame for the death of a person.
 
Now, like I pointed out in the aforementioned previous article, one can argue that we count AIDS deaths by people who died with it but, say, got sick with something else and died. And like I also pointed out in that article, this is fine when people are truthful.
 
The big problem is that doctors are not being truthful about the virus. People are attributing COVID deaths to things that should not be COVID, like gun shot wounds. And even when it comes to general other diseases, there is enough of a difference between the Chinese coronavirus and AIDS for the two to not be counted similarly. AIDS specifically targets the immune system and causes a deficiency in its ability to fight off infections (also, it’s an STD, not an airborne disease). It’s essentially the battering ram of diseases, which breaks down one’s defenses and allows for other things to get in with impunity.
 
The Chinese coronavirus is a respiratory disease much like the flu. So it would make far more sense to count COVID deaths more similarly to flu deaths as opposed to AIDS deaths. People die with AIDS; people die TO the flu. Similarly, people have died TO the Chinese coronavirus directly.
 
And the number of people who have died TO the Chinese virus are roughly 10,000. Still bad, but nowhere close to the 180,000 that we often hear from the fake news media in trying to blame it all on Trump. Now, those people are still dead, of course, but 94% of them had co-morbidities and in general other issues that COVID might have exacerbated (or maybe not, considering we have seen gunshot wounds be counted towards the death toll in a single state, so who’s to say this hasn’t happened far more often throughout the country?)
 
What’s more, as I shared in that quote, out of the 94% who died with COVID and another underlying issue, on average, “there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death”. So 94% of those who died with COVID but not directly from it also had at least TWO other health issues.
 
Here are the top underlying medical issues linked with Chinese virus deaths:

• Influenza and pneumonia
• Respiratory failure
• Hypertensive disease
• Diabetes
• Vascular and unspecified dementia
• Cardiac arrest
• Heart failure
• Renal failure
• Intentional and unintentional injury, poisoning and other adverse events

 
And other medical conditions as well, according to NBC News. People often had at least TWO other medical issues, any of the ones listed above or something else, as well as the Chinese virus. This goes in line with the survivability rate for the virus being around 99.9%. IT IS DIFFICULT TO DIE TO THIS VIRUS, PERHAPS EVEN MORE-SO THAN THE SEASONAL FLU.
 
That less than 10,000 people have died from COVID-19 is particularly bad, in relation to everything we did as a result of the virus, considering that, according to Health.com, the average flu season claims tens of thousands of lives and that the CDC estimates between 29,000 and 59,000 people died from influenza illnesses THIS YEAR.
 
And yet, no one’s panicking about that, despite it being a considerably bigger number, even on the low-end, to the total COVID-19 deaths from those who died to the virus. We upended our entire society for a virus that is less deadly than the flu.
 
At the time, this wasn’t known, of course. Hindsight is 20/20, for certain. However, at no point did the lockdown measures actually make sense, particularly to the extent that they were applied, and we saw the results of that insanity, both economically and in terms of physical well-being.
 
So, then, how can anyone argue in favor of not fully, or at least almost fully (because this virus is still clearly deadly for those who have medical issues and those who are of a more mature age), or even in favor of locking things down again?
 
A rhetorical question, of course, considering health facts are not what is driving people’s and politicians’ actions. Many Americans are gripped with fear to the point where a majority believe a MASK MANDATE would be perfectly acceptable. Many politicians also have to do certain things, not because they are good for the health and safety of their citizens and residents (and often times, they are not good for that) but because there is a certain narrative surrounding the virus and deviation from that narrative, driven by the Left and the media, will make someone appear like they are intentionally killing people’s grandmas (even as Cuomo practically did that and yet he is hailed as a hero of the age).
 
At this point, it is more imperative to fight against the narrative surrounding the virus rather than the virus itself. We can see that the virus is not as deadly as we once thought it was, not even close. It still is for the elderly and for those with underlying conditions, of course, and certain measures must be taken to try and limit the damage to such people. But everyone is acting like the Chinese virus is a death sentence when there are FAR deadlier viruses out there including the common cold. Everyone is acting like someone not wearing a mask it basically committing murder in broad daylight (even as we ignore or justify actual murder by BLM and ANTIFA terrorists).
 
Everyone is acting like going to a bar or a restaurant or CHURCH at anywhere over 50% capacity would lead to the black death.
 
The narrative surrounding the virus is deadlier than the virus itself.
 
Here’s hoping that people regain their senses and start fighting for their freedoms once again, wherever that issue applies.
 
Psalm 120:2
“Deliver me, O Lord, from lying lips, from a deceitful tongue.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

I have previously made mention that I like basketball and there are times when that world meets the world of politics, whether it’s a stupid comment uttered by a player or the overall business dealings that the NBA at large has with the CCP (which has a little something to do with this article). But I don’t think I’ve ever talked about the two worlds of gaming and politics coming together, so this will be a fairly new experience for me.
 
At any rate, allow me to give you the important context of this article. According to Gaming news website Kotaku (which is Leftist, so it’s largely garbage, but useful here), the people at Activision, which is the publisher of the annual video game giant “Call of Duty”, decided to edit the trailer for their newest installment in the franchise: “Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War” because the trailer featured footage from the Tiananmen Square massacre.
 
But they didn’t just edit it for Chinese audiences. They edited the trailer for ALL audiences and only IGN and Gamespot still carry the original trailer (video below).
 
So not only are they censoring a massacre perpetrated by the CCP to Chinese audiences, they are also doing it for all audiences so that they might not know about it unless they specifically set out to research it. Perhaps I shouldn’t be so surprised at this, considering that Activision is partly owned by Tencent, a Chinese gaming corporation. I suppose Tencent doesn’t want anyone to know about the massacre perpetrated by the CCP, which makes sense considering they are a Chinese company.
 
However, it is still extremely shameful for Activision to go down this path of Chinese appeasement, especially considering the theme of the trailer.
 
For a little background context, the Call of Duty series has always been about simulating war. The first few iterations of the franchise focused on World War II and numerous sequels have either gone to a more modern setting, returned to World War II, delved into the Vietnam War and some have even gone to futuristic wars like World War III and other things. The Black Ops series in particular started out with a Vietnam War setting and seemingly, the producers are returning to that setting.
 
One important aspect of the setting was, of course, the conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union in their arms and space races, with plenty of stories of foreign interference such as Soviet spies infiltrating United States intelligentsia and other places, as well as the attempts to radicalize Americans towards accepting and embracing communism (which has been rather successful as of late).
 
And seemingly, the newest iteration in the franchise will explore this aspect a bit more. The trailer itself focused on an interview by a KGB defector named Yuri Bezmenov, who detailed in four stages how a free society collapses. The first stage is demoralization, specifically in indoctrinating students into believing foreign values and beliefs that stand apart from American tradition, which would be taught by radical students from the 1960s and 70s once they controlled educational institutions. This is currently happening.
 
The second step is destabilization of the structure of society – the economy, the military and international relations. This is currently happening as well, with the Left insistent on bringing down the American economy and destroy its superpower status so that a global government can be established and dominate completely. They are also destroying the military not simply by cutting its funding but also by having soldiers indoctrinated, forced to read pseudo-scientific garbage like “White Fragility”, and overall making it so that the U.S. military has no real desire to protect the U.S. As far as the international relations go, I chuck that up mostly to other countries which are more secular and socialistic and do not like people like Donald Trump, instead preferring people like Obama and Biden.
 
The third stage is crisis, an event which builds upon the first two stages to bring about a revolution. This is also happening with the Chinese coronavirus panic and the Left attempting to drive us towards a constitutional crisis following the 2020 election in their mail-in voting scheme, as well as the race riots going on bringing about a racial crisis to this country.
 
The fourth stage is normalization, as in establishing a “new normal”. Sound familiar?
 
At any rate, the actions by Activision are extremely ironic given all of this. One theme they outright display in the game’s trailer is “know your history or be doomed to repeat it.” And yet, they are destroying history by censoring the Tiananmen Square massacre in order to appease their Chinese owners.
 
You couldn’t write better satire than that, but unfortunately and sadly, this is reality. I don’t know how many recognize the irony in the trailer showing “know your history or be doomed to repeat it” and editing the trailer so it gets rid of an important part in world history which perfectly encapsulates the evil that is the CCP and communism as a whole in order to appease the people who perpetrated that crime against humanity.
 
The Chinese government killed hundreds, if not thousands of student protesters. This is a fact not known by most of the people in China, at least those not involved in the government, and at the behest of a Chinese company which partially owns them (5%), Activision is trying to ensure that this fact is also not known to other people outside of China.
 
Now, one might think “but it is very well known outside of China. How does one game trailer editing that part out make it so that people outside of China not know about it?” To this, I say: “wait a couple of decades.”
 
Communism used to be abhorred by the overwhelming majority of the country just 40 years ago. The memories of the Cold War are fading from this country and many are forgetting just what communism is and how horrible it is.
 
Just 30 years ago, West German band “The Scorpions” released the worldwide hit “Winds of Change” which celebrated the toppling of the Berlin Wall and freedom from communism, optimistic towards a future “where the children of tomorrow dream away in the wind of change.”
 
The tragedy is that the following verses say: “Distant memories are buried in the past forever.” THIS is the problem, because the children of tomorrow dream dreams of communist revolutions, and the memories are being buried too deep into the past, that they do not know how horrible communism is.
 
In time, the memory of the Tiananmen Square massacre will fade in the minds of the countries which know about it if not regularly taught. That Activision would edit out footage from its trailer in appeasement of the Chinese is an indication of this looming threat.
 
Of course, the massacre is but one aspect of communism which many will forget in the future. Matter of fact, even as many know about it today, how many even connect it with the horrors and injustices of communism? In America, we know very well about Tiananmen Square, and yet, plenty seem to want communism anyway.
 
That warning in the trailer that if we fail to learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it, may be cliched, but it’s definitely true. For crying out loud, New York University is now trying to implement RACIAL SEGREGATION in student dorms and this is being celebrated as an achievement by Leftists (not that that should be much of a surprise, considering they were fighting for segregation in the 60s, but still).
 
The memories of the Civil Rights movement, and the teachings that came about it, are being hijacked by the Left so that they might be forgotten forever, to the point where they rewrite history and say that MLK would support the anti-white, racist domestic terrorists in BLM.
 
Again, it’s disgustingly ironic that Activision would focus this year’s installment of Call of Duty on “remembering your history” while also attempting to rewrite it and lead people to forget it because actually remembering your history and reminding people of it would hurt their bottom line.
 
Shame on Activision for doing this and shame on all U.S. companies which work for or with the 21st century version of Nazi Germany.
 
Remember your history.
 
Ephesians 5:11
“Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Jemele Hill is not exactly what people would call “smart.” This was very much clear when on Sunday, the former ESPN host suggested that the United States was just “as bad” as Nazi Germany, and that the Nazis “learned” from “watching America”.
 
Her initial tweet read as follows: “Been reading Isabel Wilkerson’s new book, ‘Caste,’ and if you were of the opinion that the United States wasn’t nearly as bad as Nazi Germany, how wrong you are. Can’t encourage you enough to read this masterpiece.”
 
Naturally, for comparing the U.S. to Nazi Germany, she was destroyed online for her sheer ignorance. Former Acting Director of National Intelligence and Ambassador to Germany Ric Grenell replied: “Read a book. The Nazis murdered 6.5 million Jews.”
 
Daily Wire writer Matt Walsh replied: “Been reading Jemele Hill’s tweets, and if you were of the opinion that she’s smarter than a cactus, how wrong you are.”
 
Tim Young replied: “Just the basic fact that you have a huge platform/make a solid living s****ing on the President and haven’t been locked in a labor camp says this is the complete opposite of nazi Germany. Grow up.”
 
To that particular tweet, Hill replied with the following: “Nowhere in my tweet did I say the current state of America is like Nazi Germany. I was referring to our racial history. The parallels have been pointed out by plenty of historians, not just Isabel Wilkerson. You tell me to grow up. I say, you need to read more.”
 
To be fair, the initial tweet did not specify that she was referring to Civil War-era America and not contemporary America. The wording was just ambiguous enough for people to reasonably believe she was referring to the current state of the country and not its history.
 
At any rate, she also replied to Arc Digital Editor-in-Chief Berny Belvedere, who originally told her: “This is breathtakingly irresponsible. How is anyone supposed to trust your judgment after this horror show of an opinion?”
 
To go on a bit of a tangent before quoting Hill’s reply to Belvedere, THIS particular opinion was only the latest one in a series of them which ought to demonstrate to people that her judgment is not to be trusted. She has REPEATEDLY compared Trump to some of the worst dictators in history and suggested he was on track to doing the same things that they did. This particular opinion was not particularly exceptional in comparison to the other atrocious takes she has uttered.
 
In any case, Hill’s reply to Belvedere was as follows: “What would you call it when a country that murdered millions of Jews learned their systems of genocide by watching America, and studying our history of racialized slavery, and great knack for racial terrorism?”
 
This is where I have to give up a point, but not a point she would want me to take note of: The Nazis DID learn from Americans – just not the country as a whole nor the kinds of Americans she would want them to have learned from.
 
What I mean is that Nazi Germany didn’t learn its practices from watching America. They learned their practices from watching THE DEMOCRAT SOUTH.
 
Hill, in her original tweet, was promoting a book that compared Nazi Germany with America, at least in its history as a country. Allow me, then, to promote a book that dispels the Leftist notions that America as a whole is to blame for the atrocities of the Nazis: Dinesh D’Souza’s “The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of The American Left.”
 
The subhead is, admittedly, a tad misleading. The modern American Left certainly has roots in the Nazis, but the Nazis also have roots in the old American Left – the one which fought for slavery, enacted Jim Crow laws and made it nearly impossible for former slaves to succeed and prosper, enacting laws and regulations that basically forced the freed slaves to return to the plantations while being paid peanuts and not living much differently free as they did when slaves.
 
Simply, to answer her question regarding what I would call it when a country that committed egregious crimes against humanity learned from watching politicians in America basically doing the same would be “learning from Democrats.”
 
Democrats were the ones who founded the domestic terrorist group known as the KKK. They were the ones who fought to keep their slaves. They were the ones who fought a war which led to the genocide of Native Americans.
 
Here’s an excerpt from D’Souza’s book, in a section aptly titled: “Learning from Hitler.”
 
“In this book I will show what the Left learned from the Nazis, and also what the Left taught the Nazis… Hitler… specifically said he intended to displace and exterminate the Russians, the Poles, and the Slavs in precisely the same way Americans in the Jacksonian era had displaced and exterminated the native Indians. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were directly modeled on the segregation and anti-miscegenation laws that had been implemented decades earlier in the Democratic South. Forced sterilization and euthanasia aimed at eliminating racial ‘defectives’ and producing a ‘superior’ Nordic race were two additional schemes the Nazis got from American progressives…
 
… Franklin D. Roosevelt was an avid admirer of Mussolini who sought to import Italian fascist schemes to America. FDR also collaborated with the worst racist elements in America, working with them to block anti-lynching laws and exclude blacks from New Deal programs and name a former Klansman to the Supreme Court. Mussolini, for his part, praised FDR’s book ‘Looking Forward’ and basically declared FDR to be a fellow fascist. Hitler too saw FDR as a kindred spirit and the New Deal was widely praised as an American form of fascism in the Nazi Party’s official newspaper ‘Volkischer Beobachter’ and other Nazi publications.”
 
“JFK toured Nazi Germany in the 1930s and came back effusive with praise of Hitler and his theory of Nordic superiority. ‘I have come to the conclusion, ‘JFK wrote in his diary, ‘that fascism is right for Germany and Italy.’… [JFK] described [Hitler] as ‘the stuff of legends… Hitler will emerge from the hate that now surrounds him and come to be regarded as one of the most significant figures to have lived.’”
 
D’Souza notes that the American Left learned from Nazi Germany, following World War II, as much as Nazi Germany learned from the American Left which was directly responsible for the darkest parts of America’s history.
 
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a massive advocate for eugenics (as evidenced by her founding of PLANNED PARENTHOOD) long before Hitler rose to power. She sought to eliminate black people, whom she considered “weeds” of society, and had black people fooled by a black eugenicist who would parrot Sanger’s eugenics propaganda as being beneficial to black people.
 
In a way, Hill is right in saying that Nazi Germany learned by watching America. However, they didn’t learn by watching Republicans or right-wingers. They didn’t learn by watching the people the Left now associates with them. They learned from THE LEFT and the things they had done. Like I pointed out, the Nuremberg Laws were modeled after the Left’s racist segregation laws.
 
The Nazis learned from the Left and the Left learns from Nazis. Take the following quote, as an example: “We are socialists. We are the enemies of today’s capitalist system of exploitation… and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.”
 
This sounds exactly like something someone would’ve said (or basically, someone did say) at last week’s Democratic National Convention. This quote, in fact, came from a 1927 speech made by Adolf Hitler.
 
D’Souza writes: “The Nazi Party at the outset offered a twenty-five point program that included the nationalization of large corporations and trusts, government control of banking and credit, the seizure of land without compensation for public use, the splitting of large landholdings into smaller units, confiscation of war profits, prosecution of bankers and other lenders on grounds of usury, abolition of incomes unearned by work, profit sharing for workers in all large companies, a broader pension system paying higher benefits, and universal free healthcare and education.”
 
With some slight alterations, this sounds exactly like the Leftist plan of today. Modern Leftists want, to some extent or another, each of these propositions, with some slight alterations to account for our modern era.
 
The American Left and the Nazis are inseparable, much as they might try to deny it. The American Left at least partly inspired Hitler and the Nazis in their quest to eradicate “inferior” races (I say partly because I believe Nietzsche’s theory of the “ubermench” or “superman” was also partly to blame). The American Left, past and present, has clear ties to Nazi Germany.
 
So, no, it’s not that Nazi Germany learned from watching America, because different states had different policies, as did different presidents in different times.
 
No, Nazi Germany specifically learned from watching American Leftists in how they enacted their racist and egregiously inhuman laws.
 
John 3:20
“For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Plenty has been going on this past week. Perhaps the biggest story, of course, is the ongoing DNC, featuring liars, cheaters, deceivers, rapists, a young socialist who hilariously endorsed the guy who was not made the nominee that same night, and, of course, the Democrat nominee and Joe Biden’s husband: Joe Biden.
 
However, a story that has not really been reported on a whole lot, largely because it completely craps all over the Green New Deal and heavily exposes its many flaws, is the story of the California blackouts happening as a result of the state’s insistence on using “renewable energy” to power itself up but with those sources failing to meet the demand of Californian residents.
 
Over the last week, California had been experiencing a series of blackouts that make the state look like Venezuela, likely because socialists run both places, as a result of renewable energy sources failing to meet demand. Officials said that the blackouts came due to the “unexpected loss of a 470-megawatt power plant Saturday evening, as well as the loss of nearly 1,000 megawatts of wind power.”
 
The state’s overreliance on wind and solar has led to these blackouts, because there is little wind currently blowing and solar panels have a hard time collecting power from the sun when there are clouds in the sky or when it’s nighttime.
 
According to Breitbart: “On Friday, Newsom said, the state had fallen about 1,000 megawatts short; on Saturday, it fell 450 megawatts short. Sunday saw only ‘modest or minor’ interruptions. But on Monday, he said, the state would be 4,400 megawatts short of ‘where we believe we needed to be.’”
 
It doesn’t help California’s residents either that they are currently experiencing a massive heat wave, record-breaking temperatures, and wildfires in their forests.
 
Now, even despite this, Newsom still insists on continuing the “transition” to “100% renewable” energy, clearly not having learned the lesson that these other energy sources cannot, as currently constructed, meet the demand of the entire state. If they could, we wouldn’t even be talking about blackouts NOW.
 
Still, he did admit that “we cannot sacrifice reliability as we move forward in this transition” and that they need to be “more sober” about renewable energy, which is extremely rare for any Leftist to do.
 
I don’t imagine the Left would be all too happy to hear this (provided anyone does hear it, considering this story exposes the flaws of green energy as being insufficient and leading to a series of blackouts and no proponent of these communist policies would dare share a story which would expose these things).
 
The reason I say this is because any semblance of a thought that green energy is in any way flawed or with drawbacks must be shut down. Michael Moore was lambasted for releasing a film which EXPOSED the inefficiencies of “green” energy, being extremely dependent on the very fossil-fuels they claim to be trying to replace.
 
I’ve already written a little about this movie, more specifically, in a rebuke by another Leftist environmentalist wacko who was among the people who lambasted Moore for the movie, so there is not much point in me going too far into it. But the point remains that even MICHAEL MOORE, who was, for a long time, a Leftist sweetheart who was always reliable for attacking and “exposing” Republicans with documentaries, was attacked for straying from the hive mind surrounding green energy.
 
Moore was essentially tried as a traitor to the Left for that documentary, even as in that very movie, he still espoused the same Leftist beliefs about climate change he always did and ultimately argued in favor of population control to keep the amount of people who are “able” to “affect” the climate to a minimum.
 
So for Gavin Newsom to even slightly suggest that there are flaws the Left has overlooked in terms of the reliability of green energy, I can’t imagine many people would be too happy with him over this. Though, I have hardly heard anything about it, once again, because the entire story hurts the Leftist narrative surrounding green energy, so I doubt Newsom will experience much falling out with other Leftists over this admission.
 
Not that he’s wrong, of course. There definitely are PLENTY of flaws regarding so-called green energy, not only in terms of economic price but also in terms of practicality. It is IMPOSSIBLE for green energy to produce the amount of energy required to power up the entire state of California. And California is among the best-suited to try this sort of green energy tactic anyway!
 
They have a lot of natural advantages for using renewable energy. They get plenty of sun and nice weather, they get good wind flow, which is why they even have those wind farms in the first place, they are next to the biggest ocean in the world to try hydro and the state is very rich in natural resources.
 
California has all the advantages it could possibly need to try using so-called green energy sources, but the fact remains that the technology is not available for these sources to completely replace fossil fuels. Not only can they not produce the same output of energy as fossil fuels, but as Michael Moore’s documentary pointed out, they REQUIRE fossil fuels to even be used at all.
 
Solar panels require the mining of quartz and coal and fusing them together. This process requires the use of fossil fuels. Wind turbines have to be constructed with tools that require the use of fossil fuels. The two also require the mining of rare earth metals, again, a process which requires fossil fuels. Even ethanol requires fossil-fuel-based agricultural systems to produce corn, which fuels ethanol.
 
This is without even mentioning that wind and solar power plants take up a lot of arable land and often require terraforming, which also requires machinery which uses fossil fuels.
 
Green energy cannot output the same amount of power as fossil fuel can, and it requires fossil fuels to even be constructed and functional. There is ZERO logical reason to use solar, wind or whatever else in the stead of fossil fuels. The ONLY environmentally-friendly alternative to fossil fuels which can produce a good amount of power is nuclear, but the Left sees it as just as evil as coal and gas.
 
For Gavin Newsom to admit that there are shortcomings to green energy sources is quite surprising, all things considered. Even when faced with blackouts, I wouldn’t put it past Leftists to pretend nothing is wrong, or at least, ignore the actual reason for the blackouts. I mean, he’s even routinely blamed the California wildfires on CLIMATE CHANGE despite the many other actual reasons such wildfires start, such as lightning striking a tree and catching it on fire, or the heatwaves drying the leaves, making them easily-flammable, etc.
 
For him to make this admission is honestly surprising, though, again, as few people are talking about it, I doubt he would be tried as a heretic by the cult of climate change for saying what he said.
 
Still, to try and continue the transition to “100% renewable”, which is an outright myth as renewable energy requires fossil fuels to be created and operated, will only lead California to face more blackouts and power problems.
 
I just hope the people of California come to the realization, at some point or another, that Leftist policies lead not to prosperity but struggle, and will begin voting these communists out of office forever.
 
Exodus 14:14
“The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Do you know what the definition of colonialism is? It is the policy or practice of a wealthy or powerful nation’s maintaining or extending its control over other countries. And despite how supposedly anti-colonialist the Left claims to be, they effectively do this by demanding that other nations and cultures adhere to their own beliefs and practices, even as doing so would destroy centuries of tradition.
 
This is what the white liberal of today is trying to do with the honestly disgusting term “Latinx” to try and make the Spanish language more “gender-inclusive”, or “gender-neutral.”
 
The Spanish language is gendered and offers two possible genders for words. A Hispanic male, if you don’t use the term “Hispanic,” can also be referred to as “Latino.” A Hispanic female can also be referred to as “Latina.” The “o” and “a” endings on those words, as well as on many others, indicates the gender of the things being referred to (even if they are inanimate objects like “la banana”, which is not female in itself, but the female “la” is being used to refer to the banana).
 
This is how Spanish words work and we Latinos (referring to Hispanics in general, and this includes Latinas in the same way that “Man” would include both men and women) like it this way.
 
At least, that is what a recent Pew Research Survey showed. According to Pew, despite the common use of the term “Latinx” by news and entertainment outlets, as well as corporations, local governments and universities, a considerable majority of Hispanics have actually never even heard of the term and a very miniscule amount of those who have prefer to use it.
 
According to the survey, 76% of Hispanic respondents have not heard of the term “Latinx,” despite its frequent use amongst the entities that I just described.
 
The funniest part, however, is that of the 23% of Hispanics who have heard of the term, only 3% actually use it.
 
And while this was not part of the survey, I am willing to bet that the 3% of Hispanics who use the term “Latinx” to describe themselves are both liberals and 1/1024th Hispanic. I’m only half joking here, as I really don’t doubt that the idiotas who prefer to use the white liberal term “Latinx” are liberals themselves who are sinverguenzas (shameless, for my non-Spanish-speaking audience, though even that translation takes away the harshness of the word).
 
At any rate, returning to Pew, interestingly enough, they say the following: “The emergence of Latinx coincides with a global movement to introduce gender-neutral nouns and pronouns into many languages whose grammar has traditionally used male or female constructions.”
 
So, basically, Pew is admitting, though without using the words, that the people who use and prefer that term to describe Hispanics (white liberals) are conducting the textbook definition of colonialism, trying to impose their beliefs on the culture and language of an entirely different set of people, who have had this sort of culture and language for centuries.
 
The white liberal is conducting a global effort to change the Spanish language into something that THEY deem acceptable and right. And then they go and attack colonialism, despite doing the exact same thing to others. Sinverguenzas, white liberals are.
 
Returning to the poll, Pew also reports that Google searches for the term “Latinx” have increased since 2016, but are far behind other terms like “Latina,” “Latino,” and “Hispanic.”
 
This really should come as no surprise to anyone, considering it’s a pretty new term. The terms “Latino” and “Hispanic” have been around for decades.
 
What is also unsurprising is the fact that there are notable critics of the term, with “some critics point[ing] to its origins among U.S. English speakers, saying it ignores the Spanish language and its gendered form,” and “others see Latinx as a gender- and LGBTQ-inclusive term, reflecting a broader movement within the U.S. around gender identity.”
 
Yep, that is the biggest reason for the term, and perhaps the only reason. Despite the fact that you would think “Hispanic” was an inclusive term anyway, the white liberals, ever their thirst for control and dominion over other people going unsatiated, have now been attempting to normalize another “gender-inclusive” term in order to neutralize gendered language and eliminate any semblance of an idea of there only being two genders.
 
The Spanish language, as it is currently constructed, is problematic to the woke white liberal, so it must be reworked entirely to “accommodate” for those who suffer from gender dysphoria and claim to not be either male or female. One would normally ask “what right do these sanctimonious, self-serving and self-righteous white liberals have to dictate what people of a different culture ought to refer to themselves as or what a different language ought to be like?”, but you know that the Left does not care for other people’s rights.
 
They didn’t care for black people’s rights and only pretend to do so now. They never cared for Hispanic people’s rights, only insofar as to giving illegal immigrants the right to vote so that they can remain in power forever. They never cared for women’s rights, only insofar as they can hide behind that idea to push for abortion and free contraception so that generations of women will strictly think about themselves as sexual objects and stray further and further from God and morality altogether. They never cared for gay people’s rights, only insofar as aligning themselves with them can get them a political voting bloc that was not previously there, and also so that the sin of homosexuality can be considered “moral” and “right”, again, to get people to stray further from God.
 
What reason should any of us have to expect the Left to respect the Spanish language?
 
Not that it appears to even be working. While the vast majority of Hispanics have never heard of the term, that is bound to change eventually. The biggest number of Hispanics who have heard of the term tend to be young Hispanics who go to college (which makes sense, since I have already stated that colleges use the term frequently). Eventually, almost all of Hispanics will have heard of the term.
 
What is most encouraging, however, is that of those who have heard of the term, a miniscule amount of them actually would use it to refer to themselves.
 
The self-righteous, hypocritical white liberal will refer to me as “Latinx”, but I never will refer to myself as that, that’s for sure, and neither will the vast majority of fellow Latinos.
 
While I hardly ever (if at all) have displayed much pride in my Hispanic heritage (only because the Latin American countries I come from are socialistic and I hate that aspect of them) and while I focus far more on my Christianity and find that to be my primary identity – as a citizen of Heaven as opposed to a citizen of the United States or, at one time, a citizen of Argentina – I can’t help but get ticked off at the Left’s shameless colonialist pursuit of changing the Spanish language because it has aspects that are politically incorrect to their Satanic ideology.
 
The Spanish language is gendered, in part, BECAUSE THERE ARE ONLY TWO GENDERS. This is a scientific truth that has gone by the wayside in Leftist circles, so any aspect of the modern world which still alludes to the idea of binary gender must be culled and reworked. Their sense of entitlement knows no bounds if they go so far as to demand an entire culture change the way IT SPEAKS to accommodate for a miniscule, but politically-important-for-the-Left, portion of society.
 
Hispanics tend to value culture and tradition, so I doubt this will really catch on with most Hispanics, at least provided that most Hispanics are not indoctrinated in colleges and universities.
 
This is yet another reason as to why the current educational system in this country must be completely reformed, with colleges and universities that teach and endorse communism being stripped of their endowments and no longer publicly funded.
 
The Left infects everything it touches, no exceptions.
 
Proverbs 25:26
“Like a muddied spring or a polluted fountain is a righteous man who gives way before the wicked.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.