The single biggest debate over this past year has been about the Chinese coronavirus vaccine and whether or not it is safe and effective. Over the course of multiple articles, I have shown that it is neither of those things (and this article will only further show that), and the recent death of Colin Powell (using his title as “General” would give him respect that he doesn’t deserve) ought to prove just how ineffective these vaccines are, at the very least.
 
On Monday, the family of the Deep State rat announced that Powell had died “due to complications from Covid 19.” The family stated on Facebook, “General Colin L. Powell, former U.S. Secretary of State and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff passed away this morning due to complications from Covid 19. He was fully vaccinated. We want to thank the medical staff at Walter Reed National Medical Center for their caring treatment. We have lost a remarkable and loving husband, father, grandfather, and a great American.”
 
I don’t know about the first three things, but he definitely wasn’t the last one.
 
At any rate, the fact that the guy was fully vaccinated and still died of the Chinese coronavirus (according to the family, at least, who knows if that actually was the cause?) ought to be a huge indication of how the vaccines aren’t nearly as efficacious as fraudsters like Fauci claim that it is.
 
Speaking of whom, there is a great video (unfortunately on Twitter, but what can you do?) going viral showing Anthony Fauci repeatedly talking about the “efficacy” of the vaccine, with a number of articles which show studies surrounding the efficacy of the vaccine.
 
Article after article claiming that the vaccines are “highly effective” alongside claims of “low chance of adverse reactions” or some other claim. Well, that’s what the articles say at first. One article’s headline, in the beginning, reads: “AstraZeneca COVID vaccine is 100% Effective at Preventing Severe Disease.”
 
Another: “Novavax Vaccine 100% Effective Against Both Moderate and Severe COVID-19.”
 
Another one: “Moderna says its Covid vaccine is 100% effective in teens, plans to seek FDA OK in early June.”
 
And another one: “The Pfizer Vaccine Is 100 Percent Effective for People This Age, Study Says.” And above that article there is a little tag that says it’s “fact-checked.” Not sure by whom, but most likely by liars.
 
At any rate, the video shows article after article claiming the vaccine’s effectiveness being 100%. Interestingly, that being the case for all of the vaccines. But then, a slight decline.
 
“Real-world vaccine study shows 99% effective rate.”
 
“Israeli Health Minister: Pfizer vaccine close to 99 percent effective.”
 
Ok, not necessarily great, but a decline of 1% is nothing. 99% is great!
 
“Pfizer coronavirus vaccine is 98% effective – expert.”
 
Alright, 2%. So what?
 
“Pfizer vaccine 97% effective against symptomatic COVID-19, study shows.”
 
3%? Call me when it’s something real.
 
“Pfizer vaccine 96.7% effective at preventing COVID deaths, Israeli data shows.”
 
Ha! This time, it only dropped by 0.3%! I told you it was nothing to worry about.
 
“Moderna vaccine is more effective against COVID-19 infection at 96% compared to Pfizer shot at 89%, another study finds.”
 
Okay, a bit more troubling regarding Pfizer, but Moderna’s is still very high at 96%. Worrying, but not a big deal.
 
“One Covid vaccine jab 96.6% effective in averting deaths, to 97.5%.”
 
Ah, you see? It’s starting to go back up, slightly. No real need to worry whatsoever.
 
“Updated Pfizer Data Shows Vaccine Is 95% Effective.”
 
Might be lower than usual, but it’s higher than that 89% the other article claimed. Still going up! To the moon!
 
“The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are 94 percent effective at preventing hospitalization in older adults, a study finds.”
 
A slight set-back, it will go back up in no time.
 
“Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine Still 93% Effective After 6 Months, Company Says.”
 
“Vaccine 92% effective against Delta variant: AstraZeneca.”
 
“CDC Reports Two Vaccines 91% Effective.”
 
Okay, what?
 
“CDC: Pfizer, Moderna vaccines are 90% effective in real-world conditions.”
 
Wait.
 
“Novavax Covid vaccine is 89% effective and could be approved in UK in weeks.”
 
Hold on.
 
“Study: Pfizer vaccine 88 percent effective against delta variant.”
 
“Getting both COVID-19 vaccine shots has 87% efficacy: Japanese university study.”
 
“Pfizer COVID vaccine 86% effective after third shot – Maccabi.”
 
STOP!
 
For the sake of this article’s brevity and not running a joke into the ground, I will stop quoting every single article which shows a slight drop in efficacy for the vaccine. But more and more articles came out showing smaller and smaller numbers for the efficacy of the vaccine. In the 80’s, 70’s, 60’s, on and on it went. I will only quote one more article’s headline just to show what the lowest number seems to be so far.
 
The vaccine went from being “100% effective” to this: “Pfizer Covid vaccine efficacy against infection plunges to just 20% after six months – but protection against severe illness barely dips, study concludes.”
 
From 100% efficacy to a pathetic 20%. After that, the articles all talk about people “needing booster shots” because, though they would never admit it, the vaccines ARE NOT EFFECTIVE ON THEIR OWN!
 
And after the articles on the booster shots, there are articles about countries outright halting or banning certain vaccines, such as the U.S. halting Johnson & Johnson vaccine shipments, Hong Kong halting the Pfizer vaccine, India halting AstraZeneca, Sweden halting Moderna, Japan also halting Moderna, UK halting AstraZeneca, Sweden and Denmark halting Moderna particularly for young people, South Africa halting what seems to be all vaccines, etc.
 
And at the very end, the video shows article after article depicting just for who the vaccines are highly-effective: the CEO’s and founders of the Big Pharma industries which created the vaccines. One article even claimed that Moderna posted profits for the first time, likely since it was founded. The vaccines made billionaires out of Big Pharma CEO’s and other executives.
 
The very last article’s headline is quite the stunner: “Stunning Study Reveals How Ineffective Pfizer Vaccine Actually Is,” with the following even more stunning sub-head: “Biden official: ‘If that’s not a wakeup call, I don’t know what is.’”
 
And as a last good measure, there is, of course, my own headline: “Colin Powell Dies Of China Virus, Despite Being ‘Fully Vaccinated’”.
 
Colin Powell was a Leftist, a Deep Stater and a rat. As a result, he fully believed the bullcrap the “scientists” and the fake news media were selling regarding the vaccine, apparently. Frankly, I was under the impression that these people knew better than to use the drugs they were selling, but I guess some of them did anyway.
 
Powell was fully vaccinated and died of the Chinese coronavirus. Whether that’s actually the case, I don’t know, but that’s the official story. So how does one who believes that the vaccine is effective and protects you from the virus reconcile the fact that Powell was “fully vaccinated” and still died of the virus?
 
The typical Leftist hardly has to do that, since doing mental gymnastics is second nature to them, but what about other people who aren’t necessarily uber-Leftist? How about people who were simply deceived by the fake news? And it’s not like Powell is the only person who was “fully vaccinated” and still died of the China virus. He’s just the most well-known so far. Many, many families have gone through something similar, having lost a loved one due to the virus, despite them having been fully vaccinated. Or, alternatively, losing a loved one to the vaccine because the adverse effects aren’t reported by the agenda-driven fake news media.
 
Now, Powell’s family is one such family. I don’t feel sorry for them, to be frank. Guy was garbage. But this and all the other cases ought to drive more and more people to stand against the vaccine, because at the very least, it’s not nearly as effective as people have been led to believe. Whether they come to believe the vaccines are outright killing people (they are) or not is another matter entirely. But the efficacy of the vaccines is being heavily questioned and this should further that along. At the very least, if the vaccine isn’t outright killing people (again, it is), it’s not protecting people as advertised.
 
If nothing else, that ought to be what drives more people to reject and oppose the vaccine, whether or not they have already taken it and whether or not they previously had misplaced faith in it.
 
2 Corinthians 2:11
“So that we would not be outwitted by Satan; for we are not ignorant of his designs.”

Before I begin with explaining the idiotic reason that Leftists believe Halloween to be racist, allow me to preface this entire article by claiming that, out of all of the things that the Left generally cancels, I actually don’t mind this one too much.
 
Again, it’s still an idiotic reason, but ironically goes into a direction which I sort of approve of or like, at least in some ways.
 
I will further explain my reasoning after I give you the context for this article.
 
You see, a Seattle school has chosen to cancel a Halloween themed parade because it, according to school administrators, “marginalizes people of color.”
 
It’s not a reason any of us didn’t expect, given how utterly moronic many of these people are, and given how white savior-ish these white liberals think they have to be, supposedly for the benefit of minorities like myself. However, regardless of our expectations for such a “reason”, it’s still a darn stupid one. Further detail about just WHY it “marginalizes people of color” is hardly even present later on.
 
A spokesperson for the school told Jason Rantz, Seattle-based conservative radio host, that “historically, the Pumpkin Parade marginalizes students of color who do not celebrate the holiday. Specifically, these students have requested to be isolated on campus while the event took place.”
 
The spokesperson added: “In alliance with SPS’s unwavering commitment to students of color, specifically African American males, the staff is committed to supplanting the Pumpkin Parade with more inclusive and educational opportunities during the school day.”
 
Well, first of all, I seriously doubt that a vast majority of the students are in any way bothered by the parade, which I will talk about more later. So in essence, the school is canceling a parade for the whole school because a few (if even that many) students felt “marginalized.” Right, because people knowing that you canceled a fun school activity definitely isn’t something that would make you even more marginalized. Kids love snitches and buzz-kills, after all!
 
I should also probably explain that this was in an elementary school, and kids can be quite mean, even at this point.
 
The second thing I want to talk about is why the spokesperson felt the need to say “specifically African American males.” What, are African American females not as important? Are kids of other races apart from African American not as important? It seems particularly odd how one race and one gender is specified when talking about “commitment to students of color.”
 
At any rate, in lieu of the Pumpkin Parade, students at the school can opt to participate in what the school described as “autumnal work” (whatever that means), “thematic units of study about the fall,” (because kids surely want to study the season above having fun) and might also look at “sharing all the cozy feelings of the season.” All definitely seem like fun alternatives to dressing up in costumes at school, a once-a-year event. Congrats, kids who complained, I’m sure you won’t be given swirlies for this.
 
The school also further explained their ridiculous reasoning behind canceling this parade in a newsletter to the parents, which was obtained by Rantz. The newsletter read: “Halloween events create a situation where some students must be excluded for their beliefs, financial status, or life experience. Costume parties often become an uncomfortable event for many children, and they distract students and staff from learning.”
 
It continues, but allow me to pause here for a moment.
 
With regards to the first item, that being that some students feel like they are excluded because of their beliefs, I can actually understand that one, but it does bring up a problem which I will get to momentarily. As I alluded to earlier in the article, I am not a particular fan of Halloween and don’t really mind its cancelation outright. I believe it’s not a “holiday” because a holiday, by strict definition, means a “holy day.” In this day and age, it’s come to mean just a special day in general that basically everyone in the country either celebrates (like Christmas, an actual holiday) or take time off of school/work for (like Columbus day, which is a special occasion because of its significance, sure, but not a holy day), etc.
 
Halloween is a celebration of evil, darkness, and of the macabre (I mean, just look at the picture above, for crying out loud). It’s celebrating literally everything that is opposed to God. And while I know that All Hallow’s Eve and Day began as Christian holidays for the remembrance of the dead, namely saints, martyrs and faithful departed (and I have my concerns regarding even this, as it may have originated from pagan traditions), it has since utterly excluded the idea of remembering the dead, at least the ones who died in Christ or were martyred for Him, and is largely about evil and darkness now. The complete antithesis of Christ.
 
Sure, for kids, it’s mostly about candy and dressing up in costumes, which are fun, but the “holiday” is utterly commercialized (candy companies definitely love this day) and taken away from the Christian roots of it and towards more sinister ones.
 
So I can understand people’s objections to the celebration based on beliefs. The second item, about financial status, makes little sense to me, as one can make costumes basically out of anything. As a kid (long before I became a Christian), when Halloween came around, I would go to school in my regular clothes (in itself rather neat for me at the time, since that school required uniforms most days) and a simple cape on my back, and I would say that I was “Dracula” or a vampire in general. This happened for multiple years because I largely didn’t have other costumes.
 
And yet, I had no real issues with that at all and to the best of my memory, I wasn’t really teased for coming every year with just a cape. Even if your family didn’t have enough money to even buy a cape (granted, the cheapest I saw on Walmart’s online store was $5, and it wasn't even a good-looking cape), you can make a costume out of literally anything. You can make a cape out of a large towel. You can make costumes out of simple clothes. And I can ASSURE YOU that kids have shirts with stuff like the Superman or Batman logos.
 
So the “financial status” excuse doesn’t hold up. As far as “life experience” goes, it’s so vague that almost anything could seemingly justify it, and this article is already long enough as it is without getting to the main point, so I’ll leave it there.
 
In any case, the letter then read: “Large events create changes in schedules with loud noise levels and crowds. Some students experience over stimulation, while others must deal with complex feelings of exclusion. It’s uncomfortable and upsetting for kids.”
 
Yeah, that first sentence makes me think that the cancelation of the event has less to do with “marginalized people of color” and more with the fact that it can be annoying for staff to organize certain things and have to schedule certain things outside of the usual, and that it can be annoying to hear loud noises. This idea is supported by the fact that earlier in the letter, it talked about costume parties distracting students and staff from learning. It’s not about the minority kids at the school, it’s about the teachers having to give a damn about doing more than usual for the fun of the kids.
 
Of course, they couldn’t outright come out and say “the staff is tired of this parade, so we’re not doing it anymore” so they just use the excuse of some kids “feeling marginalized” and basically blaming them for the cancelation.
 
Like one parent told Rantz: this is an “exercise in affluent white vanity that is wokeism.”
 
But again, it’s a cancelation that I don’t mind too much. However, it does present a problem, like I mentioned earlier. That, of course, is the idea that if a Halloween themed parade (or Halloween in general) can be canceled for the reasons stated either by the spokesperson or the newsletter, other (actual) holidays could also be canceled for the same reasons, namely Christmas.
 
After all, not everyone celebrates Christmas, so based on that, schools feel as though it would be okay to cancel all school Christmas events. However, despite that, I’m not particularly incensed by the cancelation of that Halloween parade because miserable Leftists (both in and out of schools) have been trying to cancel Christmas for a long time now. Protecting Halloween in this particular school isn’t going to keep this school or others from trying to cancel Christmas, and they are currently setting their sights on what can easily be considered a Satanic “holiday,” at least as it currently is celebrated.
 
So, again, I don’t mind the cancelation of this particular event. The school presents moronic reasons, probably to try and hide the staff’s laziness and annoyance with the activities of the day, but it accomplishes a job I don’t mind them accomplishing.
 
So you won’t hear me complaining too much about this at all. After all, as Napoleon is attributed with saying: “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”
 
Ephesians 6:11
“Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil.”

Those who have experienced communism/socialism have, obviously, first-hand accounts as to what happens under such systems. And unless they belong to the establishment, or are outright mentally retarded, those who have experienced communism will tell you just how awful of a system it is and how much better capitalism (actual capitalism, not this crony crap we have currently) is by comparison.
 
Rapper Pitbull, whose real name is Armando Christian Perez, is one such person, as he is a first-generation Cuban-American and his family has suffered at the hands of communism and the Castro regime. So, in a recent performance, he seemingly felt compelled to express his pro-American and anti-communist beliefs.
 
“To whoever the f*** doesn’t like the United States of America, may God bless you, but f*** you at the same time. If you don’t like the United States of America, go back to the countries that we the f*** [are] from, and you’ll see how much you appreciate the United States of America.”
 
While this might be the first time I have talked about Pitbull, this is not the first time he has spoken out either in favor of this country or against the communist system that infects his home nation of Cuba.
 
During a recent interview, he expressed more anti-communist beliefs and his appreciation for this country, and even his disbelief that we have destroyed liberty over a virus:
 
“The reason I can have this conversation is because my family comes from communism, they fled communism, they had everything taken away from them, everybody got murdered, everybody got killed. That’s the reason me, being a first-generation Cuban-American… I look at freedom and I appreciate that s***. I appreciate opportunity. I appreciate anything that you give me… And, that comes from the fact that when Castro took over everything, and I’m looking at what’s going on right now – the only person here that’s hot… it’s Castro. He’s going, ‘Y’all did it with a virus? S***. Y’all took over the world with a virus? Y’all gotta be kidding me.’”
 
“In this day and age, I’m hoping that people see: as quick as you get it… come quick, leave quick,” the rapper continued. “When it comes to this technology, that’s exactly what it is. You got instant gratification and think you can touch many people, as quick as they [are] gonna pull it from you.”
 
Pitbull then went on to encourage politicians and people of great influence and wealth to get involved with the crisis in Cuba, where mass protests have been going on (not that it’s all that talked about, particularly after the regime cut the internet following the protests) for the past couple of months:
 
“This is a message to the world. We need to stand up, step up. But if you don’t understand what’s going on, then you need to wake the f*** up. Not only is this a Cuba event, a Cuba thing, this is a world event. This isn’t about politics. This is about saving lives. This is about unity, not division. And bottom line, it’s about taking action. Let me tell you something, why I’m frustrated and when I see everybody out there and doing what they’re doing, which I love what they’re doing. Okay, because not only do we live for freedom, we ride for freedom, we die for freedom but we mother***ing appreciate freedom.”
 
“And it gets me hot, it bothers me, and it frustrates me to a certain extent, being a Cuban American, and having a platform to speak to the world and not being able to help my own people, not being able to get them food, not being able to get them water, not being able to get them medicine,” Pitbull continued. “But most of all, not being able to help and really get them what they deserve, which is freedom. And this is my way of talking to the world. All world allies get together to help. Global businesses get together to help. People that we’re so proud of, people such as Jeff Bezos, a Cuban American, graduated from high school in Miami, built one of the biggest companies in the world, the richest man in the world. He’s somebody that can get involved and really help us and what we got. All we can do is create awareness, but politics are gonna be polititricks.”
 
“And while they figure out what they figure out, we need to figure out how to really help,” added the rapper. “We need to get creative, we need to figure out solutions while they’re losing their lives over there literally for something that we wake up every day and appreciate, which is freedom. So to everybody out there, stand up, step up. And if you don’t understand, get with the mother***ing program and wake up because this is about freedom and it’s about human rights. And to everybody in Cuba, keep the fight up.”
 
This is generally what a lot of people feel and understand, even if it’s a bit more expletive-filled. Hell, even I dropped an expletive when the illegitimate president expressed his desire to screw liberty and force a vaccine on people who neither want one nor need one. So the general feeling of “screw you if you want to take away my freedoms”, in a more expletive sense, is certainly there.
 
Like Pitbull suggested, people who don’t understand what communism is really about ought to spend some time in communist countries and then they would begin to appreciate the founding principles of this country. And I mean the ACTUAL founding principles, not the bullcrap Leftist woke dumbassery of “this country was founded on slavery.”
 
Anyone who is even relatively familiar with our founding principles understands what a load of crap that is, as every founding document makes the assertion that we are created free and equal, equal in the sense that no entity can force itself upon us and dominate and enslave us. It’s these founding documents and principles which served as the basis for the abolition of slavery, which would have naturally been phased out of our country were it not for the invention of the cotton gin, which made slave plantations extremely lucrative.
 
As I have said in prior articles, the U.S. government stopped the influx of slaves shortly after the founding of our country and believed slavery would eventually become too impractical to survive as an institution, and until the invention of the cotton gin, that’s the direction it was going.
 
This is part of our history and it’s what anyone with an internet connection can find, but which a Leftist indoctrination leads people to deny. The reality of our country is that it was founded based on the principles of liberty. Unfortunately, as time has gone on, that liberty became gradually more eroded, until today, we have people who actually and literally believe you shouldn’t have a say as to what you put into your body.
 
While Pitbull didn’t explicitly mention vaccine mandates, he did allude to the idea that the establishment “took over the world with a virus.” Despite everything we know about how mild the virus is, to the point where fewer people died in 2020 than did in years prior, we act as though it’s a practical death sentence to get the Chinese coronavirus and that we need to destroy all institutions of liberty to “protect” us from said virus.
 
And it’s typically those who hate this country who have gone along with the idea of destroying personal liberty, which is why Pitbull is as frustrated as he is and why he said what he said. While I have my problems with the way the country is run now and with how things currently are, there is no shortage of love for this country from me. In fact, it’s because of that love for this country that I wish to see the problems that we see resolved and the way things are to change.
 
I love capitalism, but hate this crony socialist-lite crap that we currently have and which has been exposed to be around in the last couple of years. I love the U.S. but hate the establishment that thinks is in charge of it.
 
When coming to this country, I was sold on the idea that this was the land of the free and the home of the brave. That this was the land of opportunity and that if you wanted to make something of yourself, you could. None of it was true, or at least, as true as I was led to believe. What country can claim to be the land of the free when your political, and now medical, beliefs can get you fired or generally castigated? What country can claim to be the home of the brave when you have soldiers being indoctrinated into Marxism and believing that it’s more important to accurately sexually identify people than defeating your enemies? What country can claim to be the land of opportunity when your beliefs can get you cancelled and stripped of all opportunities to live a better life?
 
I don’t know if this country ever achieved the aspirations of the founding principles (in large part because people are naturally evil), but those aspirations must still be there and definitely still are there in many people.
 
We wouldn’t be seeing the pushback that we are if we weren’t of the belief that, if this country isn’t as free and as great as it could be or has claimed to be, we can make it so. We just need to be able to defeat, politically, practically and ideologically, those who hate this country and want to see it come to ruin.
 
And I’m glad that someone like Pitbull is conscious enough to stand on the right side.
 
Exodus 14:14
“The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”

A couple of weeks ago, the Occupier of the Oval Office threatened hundreds of millions of Americans with a federal vaccine mandate and was visibly and audibly frustrated, not because he actually believed there were people keeping us from being able to move forward, but because his faux-presidency has been crumbling around him for the past couple of months, particularly after the Afghan disaster. When he made that threat, I said that I didn’t fear that what he wanted done would actually be done. And I was right, in more ways than I thought.
 
Back when I wrote the article, I was under the impression that his administration would actually try to make such a mandate and that freedom-loving governors, AG’s and companies would have to fight it in courts and likely even take the entire matter to the Supreme Court. I didn’t doubt that such massive civil disobedience would be effective. But as it turns out, it won’t even be necessary.
 
Allow me to explain. In the White House’s COVID plan section, they have a number of action items of what they intend to do or are currently doing. Such items include enforcing a federal worker mandate, whereby federal workers have to get the vaccine (conveniently excluding anyone who works in Biden’s administration and in Congress – you know, the elites); a federal contractor mandate, whereby people who work with the federal government, though not necessarily in it, have to get the vaccine (likely excludes whatever elites would be part of this group); and the infamous national worker mandate for companies with over 100 employees.
 
This is what’s written in that third plan:
 
“The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is developing a rule that will require all employers with 100 or more employees to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any workers who remain unvaccinated to produce a negative test result on at least a weekly basis before coming to work. OSHA will issue an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) to implement this requirement. This requirement will impact over 80 million workers in private sector businesses with 100+ employees.”
 
And that is all we have heard of the White House regarding this intention ever since. That paragraph was posted the day after Biden’s threat, on September 10th. Three weeks later and absolute silence on this front from the WH, or any federal agency at all.
 
The DoL’s website is utterly absent of any and all information regarding a national vaccine mandate, even from the days that the Occupier made the threat and that the aforementioned paragraph was written on the White House website. Even OSHA’s COVID information site says nothing about a vaccine mandate either being worked on or looking to be enforced. The most they say is that people “should” get the vaccine, not that they “must” or are “obligated”, or that they are working towards creating a mandate.
 
This is important because, again, it’s been three weeks. Nearly a month after this threat from the Occupier himself, and not a single word from the agencies which would work towards such a mandate whatsoever. There is no date for when they even want to begin discussing this matter, let alone when they think they will begin writing or enforcing the rule.
 
And according to The Conservative Treehouse, “if there was a federal intent to actually force American workers to get forcibly vaccinated as a condition of employment, there would be daily updates from a massive inter-agency network of compliance offices, regulatory agencies and private sector business interests giving updates and briefings.” And this is just regarding the anticipated guidance part aka Step 1, let alone the enforcing of any such actual rule or mandate.
 
Even if the guy is completely wrong about that assessment, you would think that, following Biden’s threat, either the Department of Labor or its OSHA agency would at least MENTION the intended national vaccine mandate for companies with over 100 employees, even if they haven’t actually begun to work on the rule. And yet, there is absolute silence on that end.
 
The only thing we have heard of this mandate from the administration at all is in a recent press conference with Jen Psaki, where she was ASKED about it by a reporter and gave the typical vague answer of “they’re looking into it” or “they’re working on it at OSHA”, etc. Nothing concrete or definitive.
 
Other than that, she said that many companies are already doing their own vaccine mandates “on their own”, and that’s certainly true. Companies like Delta, Apple, Google, and many hospitals throughout the country have executed their own vaccine mandates, and for many of these companies, they are losing workers quickly and having to backtrack on those mandates.

Apple and Google are mostly liberal, so there is little in the way of resistance to the mandate, but airlines have had to undo the mandate, or at least restructure them to be far less strict because of a large loss in employees which they couldn’t easily replace (namely, pilots). The same is happening to many hospitals, particularly in New York, where its lunatic Leftist governor has claimed that they would just replace the unvaccinated workers with either illegal immigrants or NATIONAL GUARD servicemen, as if either of those options were viable in a high-skill job.
 
But apart from those things, there is absolutely no news about a national vaccine mandate for employers with 100+ employees. Nearly a month without any updates whatsoever in what would be the single biggest restructuring of employment rules in U.S. history. That is proof positive that the DoL and OSHA know perfectly well that they have no legal means by which they can write and particularly enforce such a rule.
 
Similarly to how it would be impossible to enforce a complete and total confiscation of guns in America, it would be impossible to enforce a vaccine mandate for all companies with 100+ employees. What tools could they even use? What would be the necessary manpower and how would one go about enforcing the rule? Even with gun confiscation, theoretically, all that would be needed would be the police manpower to go house-to-house and confiscate guns (which is easier said than done). What would they be able to do with a vaccine mandate even theoretically? Particularly one which focuses on employees, not people in general?
 
They haven’t said a word about the mandate because they KNOW they can’t actually work on making such a mandate. Even outside of the legality of the issue (given that this is an illegitimate administration in the first place and Democrats don’t care for the law at all), it’s outright unenforceable. So they aren’t even trying to write rules.
 
Like I said, I was never afraid that what Biden wanted done would actually be done, but this works out even better than what I had expected. I expected the lawless administration to at least TRY to make unconstitutional rules, even if they knew they were unenforceable, just to show people that they tried to do something. This is even better than what I hoped for.
 
James 4:7
“Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.”

Protesting works. It might take time and making plenty of noise, but it gets results. And in England, following weeks of protests from common sensical people, the government has decided to shelve the fascistic Chinese coronavirus vaccine passport system which would have forced citizens to show proof of vaccination just to enter businesses and venues, much in a “mark of the beast” manner.
 
According to the U.K.’s Health Secretary Sajid Javid, “[W]e’ve looked at it properly and whilst we should keep it in reserve as a potential option, I’m pleased to say that we will not be going ahead with plans for vaccine passports.”
 
Frankly, they should scrap it altogether, since such a system will be utterly detrimental to the country and would only lead to further protests like the ones they had been seeing for a while now.
 
Regardless, Javid also said that Great Britain may also soon be looking to drop other Chinese coronavirus restrictions, including mandatory testing for returning travelers, which is more good news.
 
According to Javid, “I’ve never liked the idea of saying to people, ‘You must show your papers’ or something to do what is just an everyday activity.”
 
Then why keep the passports as a “potential option”, presumably in the case that the pandemic gets worse? I don’t know Javid’s political ideologies, and I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt on this and say that I think he’s sincere, but if you have some sort of moral distaste for such a system, then you should be against it from the moment it is conceived, without leaving it as a “potential option” for the future.
 
Javid also explained that England didn’t simply want to submit to international peer pressure regarding vaccine passports, as many Western “allies” like much of continental Europe, Japan, Israel, and some American states were implementing them to one extent or another. “So many countries, at the time they implemented it, was to try and boost their vaccination rates and you can understand why they might have done that.”
 
And certainly, no country ought to be bullied into doing something it doesn’t want to do (the same applies to people individually), but there are globalist fascists out there who care little for national or personal freedom, and will do what they can to ensure others will do as they want them to do.
 
That’s the whole point of the vaccine passports in the first place. Don’t wanna get vaccinated? Then you can’t enter these venues. Soon, it will be “Don’t wanna get vaccinated? You’re fired.” Matter of fact, forget the idea that it would be “soon.” It’s already happening, albeit at a smaller scale. For example, a Navy assistant coach was reportedly fired for refusing to take the vaccine. Whether this technically is because the military has a vaccine mandate is irrelevant. This is the result that commies want for those who refuse to do as they want: job termination.
 
It’s not merely a complete violation of the Nuremberg Code, it’s objectively morally evil. So it’s good that at least some sense has returned to England regarding the insanity of the Chinese coronavirus.
 
What’s rather interesting about this whole ordeal, at least in England, is that the vaccine passports were seemingly opposed by people on both sides of the aisle.
 
Liberal Democrat MP Alistair Carmichael said that vaccine passports would open “the door to a major change in the relationship between the citizen and the state. The introduction of vaccine passports will have enormous practical implications for the literally thousands of businesses across the country who will be required to gather and to hold our data.”
 
Labour Party’s top deputy Angela Rayner said that her party “cannot support any potential COVID pass scheme for access to everyday services.”
 
Conservative MP William Wragg called the vaccine passport plan “a load of rubbish,” and fellow Conservative MP Mark Harper said it was a “pointless policy with damaging effects.”
 
Naturally, I’m inclined to believe the only reason this is bipartisan is because politicians often say what they believe people want to hear. But even with that, it does still show bipartisan opposition to the vaccine passport system, which exemplifies just how unpopular such a policy proposal is.
 
The people don’t want it, political opponents to the PM lampoon it, and political allies criticize it just as harshly, if not more so. With so much pressure, it makes sense that the government would backtrack on such a fascistic idea.
 
Unfortunately, it’s not all good news, as not all of the U.K. will drop such tyrannical measures. Last week, Scotland’s Parliament voted 68-55 to implement a vaccine passport system for entry into nightclubs and other crowded venues and negative COVID tests will not be accepted. And Northern Ireland has created a vaccine passport, but thus far, it’s only with regards to international travel. No word on whether Wales intends to implement a vaccine passport system.
 
The good news is that I highly doubt the people of those countries in the U.K. will simply take it lying down. If even the people of IRAN and CUBA are protesting their corrupt and tyrannical governments, it would be easy to imagine that the people of Scotland, Northern Ireland, etc. would be willing to protest such authoritarian measures.
 
I just hope and pray that more of these tyrannical idiots recognize that they only have as much power as we allow them to have and that the real power belongs, as President Trump said in his first inauguration address, to the people.
 
Luke 10:19
“Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you.”

How you act under pressure can say a lot about you. If you can remain calm, cool and collected and deal with the situation in such a manner, it speaks well of your leadership skills. However, Biden, who largely has never faced much pressure at all because of a largely friendly fake news media, is lashing out as a result of waning popularity amongst even his supporters/voters and usually friendly media.
 
His approval ratings, following the disastrous Afghan crisis that he created, as well as his mishandling of the southern border and inflation, have gone down into the low 30s (as if they were ever actually higher, given that the country didn’t elect him), and are even noticeably low in fake news media polls which always show favoritism to Democrats.
 
Backed into a corner, and with his faux-presidency crumbling around him (I’m prophesying right now that he will be out in a few months, particularly if he keeps digging his own grave like this), Biden has chosen to lash out at dissenters regarding the toxic Chinese coronavirus vaccines in a speech which, had Trump given it, the media would have pointed out as “divisive” and “hateful.”
 
During this speech, the Occupier repeatedly demonized the tens (or hundreds, as I believe) of millions of Americans who have not taken the toxic vaccine, saying that “many” people in the country are “frustrated” with the unvaxxed, going so far as to claim that “this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.”
 
If he were right, which is no surprise that he isn’t, then Israel wouldn’t be seeing such massive influxes of COVID patients who have had the vaccine.
 
According to Vision Times, “The majority of [COVID-19] patients in an Israeli hospital are fully vaccinated, including those with severe disease… ‘95% of the severe patients are vaccinated’… ‘85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people.’”
 
There is also anecdotal evidence to suggest that the same is happening here, but reportedly, doctors aren’t allowed to disclose whether someone in the hospital suffering from the Chinese coronavirus is vaccinated.
 
Not to mention that, as I have written in a prior article, the fully vaccinated may be super spreaders of the Delta variant. And while I have questioned the existence of even the virus itself (and still do), the point is that if there is any pandemic at all, it’s a pandemic of the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated as the pressured pretend president claims.
 
Biden also claimed in his speech that “a distinct minority of Americans” are causing “a lot of damage” and are “keeping us from turning the corner.”
 
If it’s as distinct of a minority as you say, why is any of this necessary? More than that, if the vaccinated are as protected from the virus as YOU yourself claim in this very speech, Joe, then what does it matter whether someone else is protected? Couldn’t the vaccinated workers go back to work without any issues? And if so, why did the CDC backtrack on the vaccinated's need for wearing a mask?
 
You ask “What more is there to wait for? What more do you need to see?” First, and foremost, the answers to these questions that you keep avoiding. What we need to wait for is the results of the long-term effects of the vaccines, which are unknowable as of yet because not enough time has passed. What we’re waiting for is a RECENTLY LAUNCHED study into the effects of the vaccine on menstruating women. What more we need to see is that these things aren’t the toxic crap that they appear to be. What we need to wait for is the formula of what exactly is in these jabs.
 
“We’ve made vaccinations free, safe, and convenient.” Oh, you’ve made them free and “convenient” (as in, they are widely available, which is what I think he means here), but they are FAR from safe, as numerous articles on THIS VERY WEBSITE ALONE indicate, let alone the dozens or hundreds of other studies out there which I haven’t covered or haven’t even read yet.
 
“We’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. And your refusal has cost all of us.” Big talk coming from a guy who can barely string two sentences together. Your patience is wearing thin? Ours ran out a LONG time ago. Our refusal to be subjected to experimental vaccines has cost people? How many people has your administration killed, Joe?
 
Back during the campaign trail, when supposedly 230,000 Americans died under Trump, you said that “anyone responsible for that many deaths shouldn’t remain president.” According to mainstream figures (remember, only 6%, according to the CDC, have actually died from the virus, if it exists at all), 250,000 Americans have died since your administration took over.
 
If Trump killed 230,000 people by the time he left office, you’ve killed 250,000 since you’ve taken office. So I repeat, Joe, how many people have you killed? And we know that the vaccine itself has killed hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, if the VAERS system is any indication (and the fact that only 1% of all actual cases are reported), so how many people has this administration killed because of its insistence (now close to being illegal if he intends to enforce the b.s. he’s spewing in this speech) that people get vaccinated?
 
Your refusal to listen to real scientists and observe the data has cost this country infinitely more than you could possibly claim about the unvaccinated.
 
But it’s not just a medical or physical price you would have us pay, but also a social one. You insist that this mandate isn’t about people’s “freedom or personal choice.” In essence, you demand that we obey and that we have no choice on the matter.
 
To that, I say go f**k yourself. I have never said that word about anyone or to anyone in the past (at least on this site), but I believe it’s warranted here. You want us to ignore the data SCREAMING that the vaccines are dangerous and want to FORCE us, through our employers, to get a dangerous vaccine? This is the very tyranny the Left claimed Trump supported. Furthermore, this is a complete and utter violation of the Nuremberg Code, regarding the coercion of people to unwillingly undergo medical experimentation.
 
Keep in mind, Trump was impeached over a phone call. And here, we have the Occupier of the Oval Office violating INTERNATIONAL LAW through means of coercion, basically telling people that they won’t have a job anymore if they don’t get the vaccine.
 
Well and justly do I say to Biden to go f**k himself. Not because he can actually do any of this, but because he is OPEN about what he wants.
 
No, I don’t fear that what he says wants done will actually be done. Already, multiple Republican governors and companies have stated their purpose to not comply with such an illegitimate and unconstitutional order. And if he continues to press on with this crap, getting more tyrannical in his actions, I don’t see how his administration survives (politically). Push people far enough and they will eventually push back. And as we’ve seen in countries around the world trying their hand at full-on communism, the people push back.
 
Iran, the U.K., France, Italy and Australia, to name a few, have seen anti-lockdown and anti-vaccine passports/mandates protests. Australia being particularly significant, as there are a number of laws in that country which outright illegalize protesting and hundreds have been arrested for doing so in anti-lockdown protests.
 
Do not expect the American people, out of everyone, to simply take illegal, liberty-limiting actions from the government lying face down.
 
Biden’s faux-presidency is crumbling around him and I believe it will soon come undone, particularly as more evidence mounts and is shared of the rigged election.
 
Deuteronomy 28:7
“The Lord will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you. They shall come out against you one way and flee before you seven ways.” 

According to a recent study by the Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published in The Lancet, fully vaccinated people (that is, those who have taken the ridiculous two shots) carry 251 times the viral load of the Chinese coronavirus compared to those who are unvaccinated.
 
The study reads: “Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020.”
 
And in what is a particularly bad blow to the vaccine narrative, the study shows that the vaccinated can spread to both the vaxxed and unvaxxed. According to the Daily Veracity:
 
“The study focused on healthcare workers who were unable to leave the hospital for two weeks. The study showed that fully vaccinated workers, about two months after injection, carried and transmitted the virus to their vaccinated colleagues after infection. They also passed the virus to unvaccinated people, including their patients. The vaccine used in the study was the Oxford/AstraZeneca (AZD1222) vaccine.”
 
While this isn’t particularly new, it’s just more evidence against the vaccine and particularly the vax mandates.
 
One of the biggest reasons the Left claims for getting the vaccine is that one wouldn’t be able to transmit the virus onto other people. Even though a vaccine is meant to protect the person GETTING IT and this narrative goes completely against what is generally understood about vaccines, that is what the Left had been arguing for a long time. However, even that isn’t true (shocker), as the vaccinated, if they get the virus (or something, seeing as we’ve previously discussed the potential inexistence of COVID-19), can spread it onto other people, even those who are also vaccinated.
 
So what is the point of getting the vaccine? There is no medical or scientific reason for it, you’re just supposed to do as you’re told and if possible, they will force you to get it through social and financial coercion, violating the Nuremberg Code.
 
Every supposed “benefit” of getting the vaccine has utterly backfired after even some amount of review. It used to be that those who were vaccinated had the “privilege” to not wear a mask (as if that actually stopped the rest of us from doing the same), but recently, the CDC went back on that, urging vaccinated people to continue to wear masks because they were still catching and spreading the virus (or whatever else, but let’s, for the sake of the argument, say it’s really the Chinese coronavirus).
 
Even the vaccine passports will likely backfire on them, given that they already are in the UK.
 
According to Breitbart, “Britain’s socialized healthcare system reportedly falsified up to 700,000 vaccine passport records… resulting in many Britons being barred from leaving the country.”
 
In other words, the British healthcare system messed up the healthcare records of 700,000 Brits, keeping them from enjoying the “benefits” of the vaccine passport system, such as going to clubs or pubs, large public events like sports games, etc.
 
So not only is it a draconian system which divides and discriminates against people because they don’t want to be part of an experimental vaccine trial and fall victim to violations of the Nuremberg Code, but it’s a draconian system which doesn’t even work (again, shocker).
 
So the vaccinated still have to wear masks and social distance (according to the fascists, that is. They don’t actually have to do any such thing), they can still catch and spread the virus thereby negating any medical benefit to the vaccine, and the fascistic vax passport system, at least in the UK, is not only authoritarian but also incompetent and broken.
 
I repeat, what reason is there to get a vaccine? We’ve already seen that it doesn’t protect you from catching the virus, which at this point, with the Delta variant (assuming it exists) being the dominant one, isn’t much of a big deal since the variant is 20 times less lethal than the original strain (again, assuming these things exist).
 
The study from Oxford found the less lethal Delta strain in all of those vaccinated workers, which is probably the reason as to why they survived, but again, seeing as the Delta strain is less lethal than the already pretty mild 99.98% non-lethal Chinese coronavirus, what reason is there for someone without the vax to get jabbed?
 
Not to mention the VAERS system which shows tens of thousands of reported deaths from the vaccines (which, I will remind you, is a system which reports less than 1% of all actual cases in the U.S., so the real number is likely much, much higher) and other adverse effects from the vaccine, such as thrombosis (blood clots), anaphylaxis (allergic reactions), neurologic injury and, in pregnant women, particularly those in the first and second trimesters, spontaneous abortion.
 
All these risks just to get a vaccine which doesn’t work, to “protect” you from something you have a greater than 99.98% chance of surviving if you are relatively young and healthy, since, again, the Delta variant is the dominant one and it’s far less lethal.
 
Oh, and you may even become a super spreader due to the 251 times greater viral load, therefore putting your loved ones at risk (according to the Left’s argument).
 
This entire charade has been one massive pile of bullcrap after another. A virus which people were too afraid to accurately say came from China, which has a survival rate equal to or greater than the flu, which apparently only targets rallying Republicans and Trump supporters but not BLM and Antifa rioters and Democrat politicians.
 
We were repeatedly told we only had to wait 15 days to slow the spread. This was over 530 days ago. In the meantime, almost all states went into lockdown, causing a mini-recession, millions of jobs lost from which we are still recovering, and untold pain and deaths caused by said lockdowns which will go ignored because people were too damn afraid of the virus (in large part because the Establishment kept insisting this was practically the Plague).
 
We were told we could reopen once cases went down. They went down and many states didn’t reopen. We were told we could reopen once vaccines were available. Vaccines are available and many states have RE-ENTERED lockdown. The goalposts keep being moved and b.s. reason after b.s. reason keeps being thrown out.
 
And on top of all that, we are being driven insane by the illogic of the insistence of getting a vaccine which even a VENTRILOQUIST COMEDIAN IN JEFF DUNHAM can see is utter stupidity (in a video where he had one of his puppets asks questions to a puppet “Joe Biden” during a press conference, which included the vaccines among other topics).
 
And now, along with everything else, a study shows that those who were gullible enough to get a vaccine might be super spreaders due to the viral load? I repeat, for the final time (in this article), why would anyone ever get one of these vaccines?
 
Proverbs 18:7
“A fool’s mouth is his ruin, and his lips are a snare to his soul.” 

Evidence #481284 that socialists are utter hypocrites and only espouse beliefs they think others ought to follow but not themselves if said beliefs are in any way detrimental to those socialists.
 
For context, a group of employees of far-Left magazine Current Affairs have complained that Editor-in-Chief of the magazine, Nathan J. Robinson, has terminated their employment because they were attempting to organize a worker co-op at the company.
 
For those who don’t know, a worker co-op is basically the stated goal of communism, whereby companies are owned and controlled by the workers, not the people at the top.
 
What the workers were doing was practicing the very thing that Robinson espouses, and he tried to get them fired over it.
 
The employees who were reportedly fired wrote a statement giving out their grievances over the situation:
 
“Dear Comrades (yes, it does seriously start like that)
 
On August 8th, editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson (author of Why You Should Be A Socialist) unilaterally fired most of the workforce to avoid an organizational restructuring that would limit his personal power. Yes, we were fired by the editor-in-chief of a socialist magazine for trying to start a worker co-op.” (Emphasis original).
 
The statement then goes on to discuss a Zoom meeting during which Robinson was reportedly agitated over the workers’ desire to start a co-op. The statement also claims that Robinson wrote letters to five particular individuals where he expressed that he had “irreparably lost faith” in them and their ability to work together in the future.
 
Shortly after, Robinson reportedly retracted such statements, but claimed that “in his guts” he thought of the magazine as his and that, therefore, he ought to be the sole voice and leader atop any hierarchy in the organization.
 
“This organization has been heading slowly for some sort of reckoning where it was going to have to be made clear once and for all what kind of authority I wanted to have over it,” Robinson explained. “And I was in denial about the fact that the answer is I think I should be on top of the org chart, with everyone else selected by me and reporting to me. I let Current Affairs build up into a sort of egalitarian community of friends while knowing in my heart that I still thought of it as my project over which I should have control.”
 
Kind of sounds like a greedy capitalist pig! Or, more realistically, like a typical commie once he gets a taste of near absolute power.
 
Communism might sell itself as being about the benefit of workers and their control over corporations, but reality shows that to be the exact opposite. Corporations, if owned by anyone, are owned by either the government or people who are allied to the government by ideology or threat of death.
 
The Soviets routinely promised that the power belonged to “The People”, but by “The People” they meant themselves. They killed their people, arrested their people, kidnapped their people, starved their people, raped their people, robbed their people, abused their people and enslaved their people. Where they had originally promised the people the ability to own the companies and land they worked for, they instead forced them to own nothing at all, save for the clothes on their backs.
 
And this wasn’t a unique occurrence to the Soviets and the Russian people. This occurrence was the rule, not the exception, and I have yet to see the exception. In reality, everywhere there is communism, this is what happens: Promises of a better future where the people will own everything and the cold reality of a bitter future where the people will own nothing.
 
This, seemingly, is even the case in a socialist COMPANY. Their editor-in-chief is an avowed socialist and has written a book literally titled “Why you should be a socialist” and yet, acts seemingly in very anti-socialistic ways.
 
Supposedly, the socialist cause is what the workers are siding with: the workers being the owners of the company. That is the stated goal of communism, after all.
 
However, the real socialist cause is what the editor-in-chief is siding with: complete control over the entity and the people involved with it.
 
The reason it seems like such a juxtaposition is because the Left has long been capable of fooling people into believing that communism is for the little people and to the benefit of the little people, when it’s that precise demographic that most gets screwed.
 
Now, make no mistake, I am NOT siding with the socialist workers here. They deserve to see this crap happening to them because this is precisely what THEY HAVE BEEN ESPOUSING this whole time. They likely won’t realize it from this instance alone, if at all, but this is exactly the kind of result socialism brings.
 
Neither am I siding with the socialist editor-in-chief, as he also deserves the crap he is getting for seemingly acting “anti-socialistically” and in seeming opposition to his espoused beliefs.
 
I am merely pointing out that everyone involved with this mess is an idiot and a hypocrite. The editor-in-chief because he is acting seemingly contrary to his espoused beliefs and the workers because they are being treated exactly how all victims of socialism are treated, minus being unfairly sent to the gulags for complaining about their “Dear Leader”.
 
Not to mention that, were we to become a complete communist country, the editor-in-chief would quickly be victimized by the communist regime he would help establish. After all, it’s the useful idiots who are taken out first.
 
In any case, the magazine’s Board of Directors issued its own statement denying that anyone was “fired”, at least in a technical sense, but that seems to hardly matter, as the “fired” employees were left utterly disgruntled at the whole affair, claiming (with accuracy) that Robinson was unfit to run an organization. This is not merely an opinion from the employees, as Robinson himself reportedly wrote in one of those retracted statements that “I am not good at running an organization. I freely admit this.”
 
Not surprising, seeing as socialists hardly ever are, and if they seemingly are, it’s largely thanks to the financial help of far-Left billionaires like George Soros and the Rothschilds.
 
At any rate, whether the employees were ultimately fired or not is irrelevant. Robinson did TRY to fire them for attempting to organize a socialist workers’ co-op, showing how hypocritical he is and how much of an actual farse socialism and communism are in general.
 
Too bad there will be people who refuse to learn from this crap.
 
Psalm 101:7
“No one who practices deceit shall dwell in my house; no one who utters lies shall continue before my eyes.”

Allow me to preface this by explaining roughly what I mean when I say that this is at all “surprising.” What I find surprising isn’t that the CCP has control over the WHO or that it uses pressuring tactics to force such organizations to lie on their behalf. What I find surprising is that anyone from the WHO, particularly a lead investigator into the origins of the Chinese coronavirus, would reverse course on the narrative and expose the CCP for its deceitful tactics.
 
What is also rather surprising is that the news organization to break this story is Jeff Bezos’ The Washington Post. They report that Peter Ben Embarek, a top scientist leading the WHO’s investigation into the origins of the Chinese coronavirus, “said Chinese researchers on the team had pushed back against linking the origins of the pandemic to a research laboratory in Wuhan in a report about the investigation.”
 
“In further comments during the interview that were not included in the documentary but were incorporated in an account by the Danish channel TV2 on its website, Ben Embarek suggested that there could have been ‘human error’ but that the Chinese political system does not allow authorities to acknowledge that,” continued the report.
 
What he’s saying is that the virus likely originated in the lab and was released as a result of some sort of accident, or “human error” as he puts it. Since the CCP is built on nothing but lies, it insists that anyone working in the government be seen as infallible and perfect, incapable of making mistakes such as these. They try to maintain an aura of perfection and effectiveness, so the idea that the virus came not only from a lab but was an accident goes against the narrative they wish to drive.
 
Embarek also said that the CCP pressed the investigating team to not look into the lab and only allowed them to report that it was “very unlikely” that the Chinese coronavirus escaped from a lab and demanded that the team “didn’t recommend any specific studies to further that hypothesis.”
 
In a TV interview, Embarek said that “it’s interesting that the lab relocated on the 2nd of December 2019: That’s the period where it all started. We know that when you move a lab, it disturbs everything… That entire procedure is always a disruptive element in the daily work routine of a lab.”
 
Embarek wasn’t completely betraying CCP narratives, however, and while he said that the virus likely came from the lab, he also said that it was likely a researcher at the lab could have become infected collecting bat samples, arguing that such a case would be one where “the virus jumps directly from a bat to a human.”
 
Essentially, he is revealing that it likely came from a lab, but not that it was necessarily altered or artificially created, just that it was originally in a bat and it was transmitted to a human, sort of like the original reported “origin” of the virus being from a Wuhan market.
 
However, New York magazine reported earlier this year that when six field workers got sick in a Chinese cave back in 2012 with a virus which is most closely related to the Chinese coronavirus, they were taken to a hospital and none of the hospital workers got sick, so the virus was not transmissible.
 
This is relevant because Dr. Steven Quay and UC Berkeley physics professor Richard Muller explained to The WSJ back in June that the genomic structure of the Chinese coronavirus was not found in any other virus in nature. That is the strongest evidence that the Chinese coronavirus was MANUFACTURED.
 
So no, it wasn’t transmitted from a bat to a human even in a lab. That the genomic sequence was unnatural indicates artificial creation through gain-of-function research.
 
In gain-of-function research, a spike protein is altered for the purposes of making a virus more transmissible and lethal. The specific genome sequence of CGG-CGG (known as “double CGG)” has “never been found naturally,” according to Quay and Muller, “in the entire class of coronaviruses that includes CoV-2.” They further explained that natural processes could not create a sequence combination if it “isn’t present in any other virus.”
 
“Although the double CGG is suppressed naturally, the opposite is true in laboratory work. The insertion sequence of choice is the double CGG. That’s because it is readily available and convenient, and scientists have a great deal of experience inserting it… Now the damning fact. It was this exact sequence that appears in CoV-2. Proponents of zoonotic origin must explain why the novel coronavirus, when it mutated or recombined, happened to pick its least favorite combination, the double CGG. Why did it replicate the choice the lab’s gain-of-function researchers would have made?”
 
The fact that there was no serious viral “improvement” which took place until a small variation was found many months after the pandemic began in England is also indicative that it was optimized in a lab. Compare it to SARS and MERS, both of which were confirmed to have had a natural origin – rapidly evolved as they spread through the population – until the most contagious forms of the viruses were dominant. The CCP virus, according to Quay and Muller, “didn’t work that way. It appeared in humans already adapted into an extremely contagious version… Such early optimization is unprecedented, and it suggests a long period of adaptation that predated its public spread. Science knows of only one way that could be achieved: simulated natural evolution, growing the virus on human cells until the optimum is achieved. That is precisely what is done in gain-of-function research.”
 
All evidence suggests to artificial creation of this virus. It makes no sense that Embarek would still be willing to share the nonsensical “bat-to-human transmission” theory when, by this point, he has angered the CCP by revealing what they do. It’s not at all unsurprising that the CCP does this crap, but they still don’t want their dirty laundry aired, and that is what Embarek did, to an extent.
 
Still, that someone this high up in the WHO would do this at all is a surprise anyway, and something for which I can be appreciative.
 
I just hope more of the corruption and deception of the CCP gets to be released and shown by even some of their closest allies.
 
Deuteronomy 28:7
“’The Lord will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you. They shall come out against you one way and flee before you seven ways.’”

It really says something when in a secular and fairly Leftist society like the one found in the United Kingdom, the demographic most likely to be in support of Leftist crap refuses to allow for a totalitarian scheme to be successful.
 
According to a poll recently published by YouGov, 52% of young British people have downloaded the NHS’s Chinese coronavirus tracing app and then either deleted it, turned it off, or just avoided checking in with it. And that’s just of the ones who chose to download the app in the first place.
 
For a bit of context, the NHS’s Chinese coronavirus tracing app uses Bluetooth technology “to log whether you have come in contact with someone else with the same app who has been diagnosed with coronavirus and sends alerts that can include recommendations to self-isolate. The app can also be used to check into venues, which was a mandatory requirement for service in restaurants and pubs before July 19th’s ‘Freedom Day,’” according to Breitbart News.
 
How it can know when someone has been diagnosed with the virus, I don’t quite know (probably the app asks someone, but if that’s the case, I imagine a decent amount of people would lie about it), but generally speaking, it’s an app meant to be able to track people who have COVID and encourages people to try and maintain their distance from them.
 
However, as I mentioned earlier, even young Brits aren’t exactly too keen on its use and purpose. According to that same YouGov poll, a full 40% of Brits never even downloaded the app to begin with, despite it basically having been a “requirement” from the government.
 
And of those who did download it, only 22% said they were using it correctly, with 24% saying they either switched off the contact tracing and/or avoided checking in at venues, while another 10% deleted it completely.
 
Keep in mind, also, that this is a poll and not an official statistic, so that 22% of people saying they use it correctly might not even be all that accurate. After all, if someone asks you if you use the NHS app correctly, you might fear some amount of persecution or judgment if you were to say “no”, even if that were the truth, so you’d be more inclined to lie and say “yes.” So it’s entirely possible that there are more people who actually misuse it than correctly use it than the poll would suggest.
 
Furthermore, according to the poll, the highest proportion of those who have outright deleted the app are those aged 18 to 24, with that same age bracket being the likeliest to intentionally misuse the app in some form or fashion, such as turning off contact tracing (15%), avoiding checking in at venues even though it was required (10%) or have done both (10%). That demographic is also the least likely to use the app correctly.
 
Again, it’s just a poll and not official figures, but according to Breitbart, “it matches recent reporting of a ‘rising number’ of people deleting the app, including NHS staff.”
 
So not only are young Brits deleting the app in droves, but even people working at the NHS itself have reportedly been deleting the app as well.
 
That, to me, sounds like one hell of a totalitarian fail. They hoped that they’d be able to keep tabs on people with such a tracing app, but they could hardly enforce its use. For one, it’s not an outright legal requirement to follow the app’s instructions, as government officials have recently noted, but even if it were, it’d still be rather difficult to enforce it.
 
Much like enforcing a complete gun confiscation law would be impossible to do in the United States, enforcing the use of an app is also pretty impossible pretty much anywhere. Law enforcement would have to check in with every single person in the country to see if they are using the app correctly, and that is a logistical impossibility due to the limited personnel and resources of the police, not to mention the fact that they have to tend to other crimes, such as a mean guy on the internet calling a homosexual man a “f*ggot”, apparently.
 
But the fact that the demographic which one would think would be most likely to follow along the “let’s work together to end this pandemic” nonsense is the MOST likely to either misuse the app or outright delete it is a great indication of how far from their goals communists are, even in an already fairly far-Left country like the U.K.
 
Even NHS staff have come to delete the app, for crying out loud.
 
Despite things like these, PM Boris Johnson has threatened to introduce mandatory COVID passports for entry into large venues like nightclubs, “in a bid to pressure younger people into getting vaccinated,” according to Breitbart.
 
Apart from the fact that that is utterly disappointing to see BoZo do, it also would not really work. Why? Because even Germany isn’t mandating vaccines. According to the DW (not Daily Wire), Angela Merkel says they have no plans to mandate vaccinations, saying that such a thing would “endanger public trust.”
 
Now, one might think that COVID passports and vaccinations are different things, but not really. If your country is mandating COVID passports, it is essentially mandating vaccination, albeit in a bit of a roundabout way. It’s not offering a choice, but an ultimatum: “You can not vaccinate, if you want, but then you’ll be barred from going to all these places which require you to have it. And such places could eventually become your place of work or even your home if you don’t own it yourself.”
 
So if Germany, which is the leading economic power in Europe, isn’t mandating vaccinations, then no other country really can either, including the U.K. So enforcing COVID passports would be just as much, if not more, of a failure as the tracing app.
 
And again, we are talking about the demographic most likely to support such totalitarian measures, at least vocally.
 
The U.K. and much of Europe might never have had as terrible conditions as places like Cuba, South Africa and Iran during this pandemic, but everywhere in the world, there is only so much people will take of authoritarians and their rule. This may not be an outright and loud protest like in the aforementioned countries, but it is a more silent form of protest. The young Brits are seemingly fed up with the nonsense their idiotic government has spewed.
 
They may not necessarily come right out and say it, but their actions are such an indication.
 
Proverbs 28:16
“A ruler who lacks understanding is a cruel oppressor, but he who hates unjust gain will prolong his days.”