In yet another example of the utter destruction that people have allowed to befall them, a recent study from the Royal Society Open Science journal found that lockdowns in the United Kingdom drove roughly 60,000 children to clinical depression.
Researchers found that there was a 27.1% prevalence of depression in their sample, a number far higher than would have occurred without lockdowns. This percentage, according to the UK Telegraph, equates to roughly 60,000 extra children who suffered as a result of the Chinese coronavirus lockdowns than otherwise would have under normal circumstances.
The study says: “After controlling for baseline scores and several school and pupil-level characteristics, depressive symptoms were higher in the COVID-19 group. These findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 pandemic increased adolescent depressive symptoms beyond what would have likely occurred under non-pandemic circumstances.”
One could argue that the study is saying that the pandemic itself is what drove children to depression, but one would have to be awfully disingenuous to pretend as though being practically locked in your home without the ability to see your friends and/or extended family wouldn’t have any sort of negative psychological effects.
We saw images of children being forced to wear masks and sitting by themselves in cafeterias, and they were absolutely miserable. They were literally banned from being able to socialize with their friends, despite the fact that children are the safest demographic regarding the virus.
And this isn’t the only negative side-effect found in the study.
According to the research, 400,000 UK children were referred to mental health specialists for things such as eating disorders and self-harm. How do you see this and not think that the measures taken during the pandemic were not only not beneficial towards “slowing” the spread of the virus (it seems to be a seasonal thing, kind of like, oh, well, what do you know, THE FLU!) but were actively harmful towards society.
Even in China, we are currently seeing whole cities being forced to stay indoors, not being able to even leave to get food, just because ONE person in that entire city tests positive for the virus they created. The CCP is currently performing psychological terrorism on their own populace, not because the virus is just that terrible or even because they think it’s just that terrible, but because this is the best opportunity to screw their own people over since Mao’s “Great Leap Forward”.
And clinical depression is far from the only problem kids have had to face as a result of evil people’s mandates and cowardly people’s submission. According to Summit News, there has been a shocking outbreak of hepatitis in children as a result of lockdowns and social distancing weakening their immune systems, with most of the 169 cases discovered having occurred in children under the age of 5. 17 of those little kids have had to get liver transplants and one of them ended up dying.
Again, this comes as a result of a weakened immune system caused by lockdowns and social distancing. You know how sometimes, when a kid gets chicken pox, friends of that kid’s parents who are parents themselves will throw “chicken pox parties” so that their kids develop immunity towards it? Whatever you might think of such a ritual, its benefit is that it does precisely that: helps develop the kids’ immune systems. Lockdowns and social distancing accomplish the opposite of that,and weaken the immune system.
Another negative side-effect, which will likely be a generational one unless we can figure out a way to reverse it, is that many infants have struggled in cognitive development and developed speech disorders as a result of adults around them wearing masks. According to speech therapists, adults wearing masks has caused a 364% increase in patient referrals of toddlers and other very young children.
Little kids learn behavior from their parents, so not being able to see their faces has seemingly caused cognitive development issues in those kids. Which would be strange if not for the fact that I would 100% believe many of those parents were wearing masks inside their own homes like psychopaths.
The damage done to society is far greater than perhaps any of us realize. In an effort to protect ourselves from the biggest mountain-out-of-a-molehill virus with very little lethality, we have destroyed civil liberties, the idea of bodily autonomy, and skewed the very development of the future leaders of this country. And still, there are people out there who want to inject poison into LITTLE CHILDREN and cause even more, perhaps irreparable, damage to them. Oh, and in the meantime, teachers have sought for a way to have sex with those kids too, and call you bigot and terrorist for trying to stop them.
A country which does not protect its children is a country which does not deserve a future and most certainly will not have one.
“For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.”
The Chinese coronavirus pandemic is pretty much over, but since the communists don’t want to face the consequences of their actions, they are trying to distract the world they decimated with the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Evidence of that is the fact that Pfizer, despite being persistent on sealing away the data they got on their toxic vaccines for 75 whole years, were forced to release their data now, practically in the shadows, as everyone else will be far more focused on Ukraine-Russia and the possibility for a larger conflict.
But I don’t intend to let these bastards get away with it, and neither should you. So, I will dedicate the rest of this article strictly to focusing on the adverse effects of the vaccine that they released in their data. Brace yourself, this might be a long one.
The PDF they released basically begins with explaining the timeline of them shipping their vaccines, which is from December 1st of 2020 to February 28th 2021.
In roughly those first 3 months of shipping their vaccines worldwide, there was a total of 42,086 case reports which contained 158,893 adverse events. Searching for times when the FDA recalled something medical, I found that in September of 2018, all ReGen Series products had to be recalled, “due to reported adverse reactions,” read the FDA’s website. It’s not specified what adverse reactions there were or their severity, but if ReGen products (not necessarily a vaccine, but still within the realm of medicine, so it’s applicable) had to be recalled due to reported adverse effects, why wouldn’t the Pfizer (and presumably the other vaccines also have similar issues) shot also be recalled?
Well, we all know why.
In any case, let’s get to the actual effects.
According to Pfizer’s data, in events reported in 2% or more cases, they found the following adverse effects:
And for those who might accuse me of trying to scare people with medical terms for relatively mild things, these are the terms that Pfizer used in their data. I literally had to look up these terms to define them.
Now, one might look at this list and say that it doesn’t look so bad. Sure, you don’t want any of these things to happen, but they are not exactly life-altering or life-ending things, by-and-large.
And that may, indeed, be the case. But we’re, unfortunately, just getting started. Those were the adverse effects listed by Pfizer. Now, here are the Adverse Effects of Special Interest (AESIs) listed by Pfizer:
Obviously, not all of these have the same chance of occurring within a vaccine-taker, but this is an extremely long list of adverse effects. For crying out loud, Pfizer even had to specify AEs of special interest, there were so many. And the bastards knew of this, likely for a very long time, and not only continued to ship these products, but still do so now.
More than 40,000 cases with nearly 160,000 adverse effects, many of which can either utterly change someone’s entire life, or END their entire life.
And this is JUST from Pfizer AND just from the first three months of data-gathering. What’s Moderna’s data looking like? Or Johnson & Johnson’s? Or any other vaccine manufacturer’s?
Pfizer alone recorded over 40,000 cases and nearly 160,000 adverse effects, and it’s generally considered (by pro-vaccine morons, at least) to be the most “effective” vaccine, and thus, is perhaps the most popular one. Are Moderna’s numbers fairly similar? Are, in actuality, over 100,000 cases and roughly 400,000 adverse effects across all the vaccines? What do the numbers look like today?
What’s the death toll of these butchers? How many lives have they ruined or ended as a result of their evil?
And for those who might try to argue that this is “just” from 2% or more of the reported cases, keep in mind that the world completely shut down and DEMANDED that it adhere to tyrannical dictatorships out of fear of a virus with a 0.007% mortality rate. Hell, even the originally thought 3.4% is around the percentage of events from the reported cases in Pfizer’s data.
The figures for the virus’s mortality rate are important and noteworthy to the point of subjugating entire countries, but the figures for the vaccine’s adverse effects (which are bigger than the virus’s mortality rate) are unimportant and should be ignored?
At the very least, by-and-large, you can recover from the virus far better than you could from what the vaccine will give you. Soccer players have either been forced into retirement or outright collapsed and died on the soccer field as a result of the vaccine. Athletes whom you’d think would have a better chance of fighting against the effects of the vaccine.
Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, everyone who was/is involved in the destruction of people should and will face the consequences of their actions.
“Evil men do not understand justice, but those who seek the Lord understand it completely.”
Two years ago, the world went mad. In a heartbeat, it did away with all forms of civil liberty and personal choice, demonizing those things as “dangerous” and “deadly”, and similarly doing so with anyone who advocated for such things. It went into an actually dangerous and ill-thought lockdown which wasn’t even effective and caused untold harm that, were anyone to point out, would warrant such a person being dehumanized and said to be “siding with the virus” or “putting the economy ahead of people’s lives.”
I’d even seen someone on the Right make that last assertion of people who rejected the lockdowns.
Now, two years later, with the boogeyman virus being shown to have been just that, lockdowns have largely been done away with, though we now must fight a different form of tyranny in the form of vaccine and mask mandates.
However, I won’t be focusing on that aspect right now, and I’ve already talked plenty about those things anyway. Right now, I want to focus on the lockdowns aspect, and particularly in a long-time lockdown advocate working with the UK government who recently admitted that he and basically everyone who advocated for said lockdowns got it completely wrong.
The lockdown advocate (or former, I guess) is Professor Mark Woolhouse, a member of the organization which advises the UK government on lockdown measures and made those extremely erratic models which depicted millions of Brits dying to the virus if absolutely nothing was done.
Even just last year, the organization made the prediction, through models, that the Omicron variant of the Chinese coronavirus would cause 6,000 deaths a day in the UK unless even harsher restrictions were put into place.
If you want exhibit #54564916 of models made by “experts” being utter crap, there you go.
In any case, in a new book titled “The Year the World Went Mad”, Woolhouse expressed regret at his organization’s involvement in pushing for lockdowns, which caused massive devastation to people and, at best, only managed to slightly delay the inevitable.
“We knew from February , never mind March, that the lockdown would not solve the problem. It would simply delay it,” said Woolhouse, adding that no one in British government seemed to have recognized the flaw in the lockdown strategy.
Right away, I have a few things to say.
First, it seems people have forgotten what the original “stated” purpose of the lockdowns were. They were not originally meant to “solve” the problem or outright stop the virus completely. It eventually was used for such a purpose because there were loud majorities opposing the lockdowns and they wanted to fool the people who were either already supporters or on the fence about it that the lockdowns were so essential that they would be able to stop the virus completely. That is particularly where they got things wrong. But originally, the lockdowns were supposed to slow the spread of the virus. And the purpose of that was to avoid overwhelming the hospital systems and avoiding catastrophe.
So it’s not surprising that he would admit that they knew from the beginning that the lockdown wouldn’t solve the problem, because in the beginning, no one was pretending that it would. But things really went off the rails when the liars in power began to say that this is what would happen. It went from “15 days to slow the spread” to “Two years to do the impossible”.
That’s not to say that the lockdowns were justified in the beginning with that original stated purpose, because I’ve never justified stripping people’s freedoms away in such a manner, but the original purpose of the lockdowns was, at least “officially”, to slow the spread so that hospitals can prepare to treat patients and not be overwhelmed.
The second thing I want to say about this is that, regardless of that original purpose, it still failed. Hospitals were never overwhelmed, to the point where Andrew Cuomo outright didn’t use a Navy hospital ship for non-Covid patients sent by President Trump, yet the fake news media kept insisting that they were. If the lockdowns were working, why was the fake news lying that the hospitals were overwhelmed? Those who dared to ask this question were demonized and deplatformed as sharing “misinformation”.
Now, one might argue that the hospitals weren’t overwhelmed precisely because of the lockdowns, but there’s no way to actually verify that because, again, the fake news media was claiming the hospitals were being overwhelmed. As we would discover over time, the Chinese coronavirus was far milder and less deadly than originally thought. It didn’t go from 3.4% fatality to 0.003 fatality, it was always this non-lethal. It’s just that the “experts” found that it wasn’t really 3.4% deadly, but instead, far less.
The world, courtesy of the “experts”, thought that the Chinese coronavirus could be something akin to the Plague. In reality, this virus was to the Plague as a Hot Wheels toy is to a racecar. It was nowhere near as bad as they were making it out to be, so in all likelihood, hospitals weren’t overwhelmed not because of the lockdowns but because of the mildness of the virus.
The last thing I want to say about this is that I doubt no one in the British government didn’t see the flaw in this plan. Much as I think politicians tend to be morons, I don’t think no one saw that the lockdowns would be a bad thing. It’s just that no one had the courage to speak out about it because they would be persecuted to Hell and back for it, particularly back then. The “experts” were, and somewhat still are, treated as prophets and missionaries delivering the gospel of doom, and to go against them or express any sort of doubt – even just asking questions – was considered an act of heresy.
So I doubt no one saw the foolishness of this plan in the UK government, but no one who did dared to speak out about it, which is a problem in itself.
In any case, let’s move on to the rest of Woolhouse’s confession of his political and ethical sins. He continued “The early global response to the pandemic was woefully inadequate”, adding that the WHO’s praising of China’s tyrannical “zero COVID” policy set the stage for other equally tyrannical policies around the world.
He asked why governments imposed such brutal restrictions seemingly without any regard or care for the consequences of such policies. “There was never at any stage, even by the following year, any form of analysis of the harms caused by lockdowns. Were they even considered? I haven’t seen any evidence that they were and that is very, very troubling.”
While I am glad this guy’s changed his tune surrounding lockdowns, I am still incredibly pissed off at him for having advocated for such a thing anyway. Furthermore, he asks these things as though HE HIMSELF NEVER CONSIDERED THE REPERCUSSIONS. He asks why the government officials didn’t question the lockdown policies or considered the consequences of enacting them, yet he’s the one who ADVISED the UK government to impose such policies to begin with!
Maybe at one point, he came to ask these questions and this is why he’s now admitting his wrongdoing, but he pretends as though he is a third-party individual who had no hand in what went on and was merely an observer.
Like historians who ponder on the context and reasoning behind some historical person’s actions, he ponders on the actions of people in power today AS THOUGH HE HAD NO HAND IN INFLUENCING SUCH PEOPLE.
You don’t get to ask “why did no one doubt the efficacies of this plan” when you yourself were selling this very plan to them. This would be like if Hitler had asked “why did no one tell me that killing 6 million Jews and 10 to 20 million total people was unethical?” You were pushing for it and, at the time, would’ve certainly repudiated any such doubt as “siding with the virus” and “being a danger to society.”
It’s good that he’s admitting he was wrong, but he’s acting as though he didn’t push for this crap and was one of the biggest influencers of policy-makers at the time.
And what comes next is even more infuriating. According to Summit News, as early as April of 2020, just ONE MONTH after the UK went into lockdown for the first time, Woolhouse’s organization was sent information which confirmed that the lockdowns would “cost three times more years than the disease itself” and that there was no consideration to the fact that “those over 70 had at least 10,000 times the risk of dying as those under 15 years old.”
This is HORRIBLE for a couple of reasons. First, they knew basically from the start that the lockdowns would be WORSE for the UK than the virus itself, and the damage done to the country by the lockdowns would take three times the amount of years than the damage done by the virus. And still, the UK continued with its lockdowns, and proceeded to lockdown three or four more times after that.
Either the organization held off on sharing this information with the government, which is horrendously unethical if not outright criminal, or the government was privy to this information and ignored it anyway, which is just as horrendously unethical if not outright criminal. Either way, the government and/or the organization advising on lockdowns completely and utterly failed the people of the United Kingdom and wittingly set them on the course towards suffering and diminishing freedoms for the ILLUSION of safety.
The other reason, regarding the part about over 70-year-olds being more at risk, is that the fake news media and the UK government were pretending as though the virus “doesn’t discriminate” and is just as likely to kill a young and otherwise healthy person as it is of killing an old and sickly person. This was patently untrue, as was clear from the very beginning.
Woolhouse said: “I heard [the official] argument caricatured as: everyone died, but at least no one was saved unfairly. BBC News backed up this misperception by regularly reporting rare tragedies involving low-risk individuals as if they were the norm.”
The government and their fake news puppets were acting as if everyone was equally likely to suffer as a result of the virus and deceiving people into believing that. Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, this is what they chose to do.
And everyone who tried to course-correct, show people who were either lying or were lied to that they were incorrect in their assertions, was utterly demonized, deplatformed and dehumanized for doing so. People were kicked off of social media, abandoned by friends, demonized by family and terminated from their jobs, if they hadn’t already been furloughed because of THE DAMN LOCKDOWNS.
People trying to do the right thing, helping their fellow countrymen and human beings were treated as less-than-human and as though they were agents of the virus, killers like COVID and deserving of derision at best and destruction at worst.
And now, two years after the fact, those who most strongly advocated for these lockdowns have seemingly come to recognize the damage they had done (even while seemingly pretending as though they had nothing to do with it, trying to absolve themselves of any well-deserved blame).
I could say that I’m simply happy that things turned out this way, but I won’t because I’m not. These people caused untold generational harm to the world. Because of the consequences they either ignored or didn’t take into consideration, families are without children, brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers. COVID didn’t take their lives, depression did. Depression from being deemed “unessential” and losing their jobs. Depression from being forced to wear masks at school (a demonic practice still present in many schools) and separate themselves from their friends while they watch as their teachers and other adults can ignore the very mandates themselves with zero punishment whatsoever so long as they push the agenda onto others.
And not just depression. How many abusive partners got a year and a half alone with their spouses and/or children? How many of them have had to suffer because an already unhinged individual is now being forced to spend all their time and energy with them? How many assaults went unreported? How many new scars were made? How much more trauma was inflicted?
How many have been driven to drugs as a “coping” mechanism? To alcohol? How many have suffered as a result of that? How many OD’d? How many families will now have an empty seat at their table, not because their loved one died from a fairly non-lethal virus, but because they took an obscene amount of drugs to cope with the fact that they were forced into isolation, out of a job, etc?
The damage done by these lockdowns is immeasurable and incalculable. Truly, only God knows the damage that was really done here. And these people just want to get away with “mea culpa”, if even that?
Woolhouse knew very early on that the lockdowns would be more costly than the virus. Did he speak out against the lockdowns as soon as he found out this information? If not, why not? Why contribute to crimes against humanity that you KNOW are crimes against humanity?
And make no mistake, that’s precisely what these things are. Not just the lockdowns, but every other mandate which was caused unknown suffering. People like Woolhouse should not be so easily forgiven. People like BoJo, Biden, Castro Jr., Merkel, Macron, everyone who pushed for these things are criminals deserving of the only justice appropriate for them.
Nuremberg 2.0 will have to be 100 times the size of the original Nuremberg Trials, as the number of illicit perpetrators is far bigger than the few Nazis which were tried (and ashamedly, fewer who were convicted).
“Whoever says to the wicked, ‘You are in the right,’ will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations, but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them.”
To provide a bit of context to the situation, recently, the crowdfunding platform GiveSendGo was hacked and revealed the names of nearly 100,000 donors who gave money to the Canadian Freedom Convoy truckers, about half of which were small-dollar donations.
The piece of crap responsible for that went on to brag about it on TikTok, calling himself a “famous f***ing cyber-terrorist” during an unhinged rant. His name is Aubrey Cottle and supposedly the founder of hacktivist group “Anonymous” and is a crazy communist bastard who lives in Canada. And for those asking if this is committing the same “doxing” that this piece of crap (so tempted to say the stronger word) has led to doing, I’ll have you know that he is already rather famous, even having his own Wikipedia page.
But I do hope that God will do something about this cancer of the world.
In any case, Cottle isn’t the only cancer on this topic, because following this hack and the revealing of donors’ names, the evil fake news media tracked a number of these donors down and wrote the following type of email to them: “***, my name is ***. I’m a reporter at The Washington Post and am writing about leaked data on GiveSendGo contributions to the trucker convoy in Canada. Your name and email address are associated with a $40 contribution. Could you please tell me if this matches your records, and either call or reply to this email to share what motivated you to contribute to the campaign?”
In essence, they are practically telling these people “we know who you are and can find out where you work, live, hang out and everything we want about you.” It’s a form of terrorism not unlike mafiosos showing up at your house and “having coffee.”
The Post also wrote what Fox News describes as “a lengthy thread singling out the biggest donor and a map showing where the donations came from in the U.S.”
The mainstream media is outright evil and unapologetic about it. They will track down anyone who voices a dissenting opinion and ruin their lives. And they will grossly claim they are doing a service either to the country or to their party. They are evil scum of the earth who deserve to lose their jobs and go to prison.
One of the tweets concerning the GiveSendGo hack came from an Ottawa Citizen editor named Alison Mah who shared an article written by reporter Blair Crawford about a café owner who “was forced to shut down her business after receiving threats after her name appeared on the donor list,” reported Fox News.
What’s worse is that Mah and the article ensured that the blame fell on the café owner, pointing out that she “regrets making her $250 donation to the trucker convoy.”
It seems this act was so vile and putrid that even normally equally-as-putrid Ilhan Omar felt compelled to tweet: “I fail to see why any journalist felt the need to report on a shop owner making such a[n] insignificant donation rather than to get them harassed. It’s unconscionable and journalists need to do better.”
Seems that Omar missed the memo and forgot she’s supposed to side with the evil communist scum Stalinizing Canada and the U.S.
But if she’s sincere about this (making this an exceptionally rare case of a far-Leftist goon showing a modicum of a conscience), that ought to show just how vile and evil an act this was.
The news media in the U.S. and Canada have sought to it that they would track down and RUIN people’s lives over donations as small as $40. Donations made for the sake of brave truckers who 1) are sick and tired of the tyrannical bullcrap of vax mandates and 2) inadvertently proved that the pandemic is over because it’s been weeks of people mass gathering without masks and vaccines and not one trucker was sent to the ICU.
But because they are in the way of the Left’s fever dream of complete domination over their own countries, the government and far-Left media have sought to demonize them as racist terrorists (because racism always has to be a part of it, even when it makes absolutely no sense) whose livelihoods and lives ought to be ruined until they get “re-educated”.
Aubrey Cottle, The Washington Post, The Ottawa Citizen, Justin Castro, the bitch councilwoman who keeps calling the truckers “terrorists”, Canadian Banks and everyone involved in the attempted destruction of freedom-loving, ACTUAL peaceful protesters not only should, but WILL burn in Hell for a whole lot more than just this.
These people are evil, and do whatever they can to showcase that evil. I pray to God that He will smite these demons sooner rather than later.
“Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.’”
The Book of Genesis covers a great deal of people throughout a great deal of time. From the creation of the universe to Adam and Eve in and out of the Garden, Cain killing Abel, Seth being born to Adam and Eve, Noah’s Ark, Abraham being the forefather of the faith, his son Isaac’s long-awaited birth, Jacob and Esau’s rivalry, ending with Joseph’s story of betrayal and hardship until reaching the second highest position in the land of Egypt and helping his family move there.
The Book of Exodus, in turn, covers the story of Moses, for the most part. And in the beginning of Exodus, starting from verse 6, we read the following:
“Then Joseph died, and all his brothers and all that generation. But the people of Israel were fruitful and increased greatly; they multiplied and grew exceedingly strong, so that the land was filled with them.”
“Now there arose a new king over Egypt, who did not know Joseph. And he said to his people, ‘Behold, the people of Israel are too many and too mighty for us. Come, let us deal shrewdly with them, lest they multiply, and, if war breaks out, they join our enemies and fight against us and escape from the land.’ Therefore they set taskmasters over them to afflict them with heavy burdens. They built for Pharaoh store cities, Pithom and Raamses. But the more they were oppressed, the more they multiplied and the more they spread abroad. And the Egyptians were in dread of the people of Israel. So they ruthlessly made the people of Israel work as slaves and made their lives bitter with hard service, in mortar and brick, and in all kinds of work in the field. In all their work they ruthlessly made them work as slaves.”
“Then the king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was named Shiphrah and the other Puah, ‘When you serve as midwife to the Hebrew women and see them on the birthstool, if it is a son, you shall kill him, but if it is a daughter, she shall live.’ But the midwives feared God and did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but let the male children live. So the king of Egypt called the midwives and said to them, ‘Why have you done this, and let the male children live?’ The midwives said to Pharaoh, ‘Because the Hebrew women are not like the Egyptian women, for they are vigorous and give birth before the midwife comes to them.’ So God dealt well with the midwives. And the people multiplied and grew very strong. And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families. Then Pharaoh commanded all his people, ‘Every son that is born to the Hebrews you shall cast into the Nile, but you shall let every daughter live.’”
The reason I bring this story up, at least up to this point, is because much like Pharaoh, it seems as though Chinese President Xi Jinping is afraid of the surge in numbers of people of faith.
According to The UK Express, who quote Director of Strategic Research at Christian charity, Open Doors, Dr Ron Boyd-MacMillan, “China’s premier is becoming increasingly concerned by the size of the Church – currently estimated at 97 million people.”
Dr. Boyd-MacMillan claimed that the size of the church in China is expected to increase rapidly in the next couple of decades, reaching 300 million people by 2030 at the rate it’s currently growing (roughly 7-8%), thus “creating a group big enough to challenge Xi’s government.”
He said: “We think the evidence as to why the Chinese Church is so targeted, is that the leaders are scared of the size of the Church, and the growth of the Church. And if it grows, at the rate that it has done since 1980, and that’s about between seven and eight percent a year, then you’re looking at a group of people that will be 300 million strong, nearly by 2030. And, you know, the Chinese leadership, they really do long term planning, I mean, their economic plan goes to 2049, so this bothers them. Because I think if the Church continues to grow like that, then they’ll have to share power.”
The UK Express also shared an infographic depicting China’s military power (which they claim is accurate as of November 2020, so the numbers are probably a bit higher at this point, assuming that the CCP would even share these numbers to begin with), as you can see below.
As you can see, it depicts a few notable things. First, the population, which currently stands at 1,384,688,986. The fact that, already, the Chinese Church stands at 97 million is rather bad for Xi, as they make up 7% of the total population, and as I have already mentioned in prior articles, it only takes 3.5% of the population actively protesting peacefully to drive meaningful change. With the Chinese population growing at approximately 0.3% per year, the 300 million Christians would be roughly 20% of the Chinese population by the year 2030.
These are not insignificant numbers, whatsoever. Second, they show China’s military power in terms of military personnel and vehicles.
2.7 million total personnel is not insignificant, unfortunately, as the U.S.’s total military personnel is roughly 2.4 million. Those numbers may not be too far apart, but during times of war, the personnel tend to go up (following 9/11, the military saw a surge in enlistment, and that was just to hunt down illiterate savages sleeping in sand), and there are roughly a billion Chinese compared to 330 million Americans. Not that every single resident of the countries would be fighting, of course, but I’m largely talking about total possible manpower.
We do, however, have an advantage in terms of vehicles, most likely. I don’t know the estimated number of military vehicles we have available, but I know for sure that we have more than just two aircraft carriers unlike China.
But these numbers are only interesting to know in the event of war against China, which isn’t the main point of this article. Like I mentioned before, the Chinese Church makes up roughly 7% of the Chinese population and that number is increasing year-over-year at a rate of seven or eight percent.
With Christians being the natural enemy of communism and communists, it’s no surprise, really, that Xi would feel threatened by such a massive surge in faith every year. Particularly as he has tried his darndest to oppress and Chinafy the Church, trying to turn people’s faith away from God and towards himself.
But as Exodus 1:12 says, “But the more they were oppressed, the more they multiplied and the more they spread abroad.”
My comparison to the Book of Exodus isn’t to say that we might one day see a Christian exodus from China. What I’m trying to do is draw comparisons between Xi and Pharaoh, the conditions of their targets in their own times, and what faith in God will do for the believers. God delivered the Jews out of Egypt. He might do the same for Christians in China, or He might even lead Christians in China to rule the future former-communist country.
Can you imagine how delightful it would be for China to become a Christian nation, run as a Republic, and faithful to God? Instead of an economic and political rival, we would have an economic and political friend (assuming Christianity further grows in the U.S. as well and defeats the Satanic Left).
I don’t know the plans that God has for His people in China, but knowing His goodness, I know that He will deliver good things to them, even if there is hardship along the way.
I pray that the latter option happens, and Christians begin ruling China, dealing a deathblow to communism worldwide.
“For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.”
Exhibit #1519 of the vaccines doing absolutely jack at best and being utterly malignant at worst, we have a story about three BuzzFeed staffers having attended a Christmas party getting the “dreaded” Chinese coronavirus despite being triple vaxxed, wearing masks and showing proof of vaccination upon entering the party.
According to Business Insider, “The three positive employees told Insider they were vaccinated, had received their booster shots, and said they were experiencing mild symptoms.”
BuzzFeed, being a far-Left media company, requires its employees to be vaccinated, so not only does this mean that the people who got the virus were vaccinated themselves (as previously established) but so was the one who SPREAD the virus onto his or her colleagues.
As a reminder, the deceitful Left makes the following two claims regarding the vaccines: They help protect you from getting the virus and keep you from spreading the virus onto other people.
This story alone contradicts both those things, but as we have seen over this past year, it’s far from the only example.
Business Insider then said: “BuzzFeed requires vaccinations for staffers, and partygoers had to present their vaccination cards to get into the event. Two days before the party, BuzzFeed updated its rules to require masks ‘unless you are actively eating or drinking,’ according to the email, which was obtained by Insider.”
So, again, not only were the people who got infected vaccinated, and the person who infected them was vaccinated, but they all had to wear masks unless they were actively eating or drinking something.
That would be exhibit #3526 of the masks also being utterly garbage and not helping to either stop or slow down the spread of the virus, even amongst the “immunized”.
By-and-large, the tyrannical Left focused on four major policies for trying to “combat” the Chinese coronavirus: lockdowns, social distancing, mask-mandates, and vaccine-mandates. All four of them have failed or are in the process of being proven failures due to a lack of effectiveness in its main job of fighting the virus. At this point, it’s not an accident, neither is it sheer stupidity.
The lockdowns were a bad idea from the start, as anyone would be able to tell that you would basically be destroying people’s lives in the “hopes” of saving them. Of course, it wasn’t immediately apparent that the lockdowns weren’t helping, but even if they had, they still were a terrible idea because of all the OTHER negative side effects which never went reported by the fake news.
Things like drug overdoses, domestic abuse which went unreported to the police, child suicide rates skyrocketing, and this is without even talking about the almost irreparable financial damage done to individual families whose main sources of income were furloughed because they were considered “non-essential”.
They basically told people to their faces that their ability to provide for themselves and their families was “not essential.” That’s a moderately milder way of saying that their lives and the lives of their families don’t matter in the grand scheme of things and that they are entirely replaceable in the socialist cog.
How were more people not outraged by this?
And that’s just one of the mind-numbingly moronic proposals by the tyrants.
There were also the social distancing mandates and the mask mandates, both of which can be thrown together.
They forced not only healthy adults, but children who had long been PROVEN to have both low transmission and infection rates in comparison to older people, to social distance and wear masks.
We saw image after image and video after video of kids being forced to eat their lunch separately from their friends, having to study and work in very isolated manners, and generally being unnecessarily forced into social isolation and wearing uncomfortable, often suffocating masks for prolonged periods of time.
I mentioned this in a prior article, but I once saw a video of a mom telling her son that a group of parents who sued the school district over the mask mandates had won their case, and that the kids would no longer have to unnecessarily wear masks everyday to school. The kid, upon hearing the news, ran to hug his mother, who was recording his reaction, and began to bawl his eyes out in joy.
If this one kid, who, from what I remember, looked to be around the fourth or fifth grade, reacted like this at the news that he DIDN’T have to wear a mask in school anymore, how many other kids, particularly younger kids, are currently suffering because of the sheer depravity of school administrators who are unfit to run a computer program, let alone education?
They are actively, willingly and gleefully making kids suffer for either more money, the sick thrill of exercising power over others, or their evil agendas.
And neither the masks or social distancing did much of anything to protect them from a virus which they are THE MOST LIKELY to survive from out of all age ranges. And that’s without mentioning that more “vulnerable” adults still have a 99.97% chance of surviving.
Finally, there’s the vaccine mandates, and we are witnessing in real-time why they aren’t working. They, at best, don’t protect people from crap, and at worst literally acts like AIDS, with the added bonus of screwing people’s hearts up.
Remember in the previous article how I said that, with the Omicron variant, 80% of the cases found in the U.S. were from those who were “fully vaccinated”? And how I asked “How is it that, at any point in the new variant’s existence, those who got the shots are statistically more likely to be infected with this variant that those who didn’t get any shot whatsoever?”
In my mind, the only way that can actually happen is if the immune system of the vaccinated was weaker than that of the unvaccinated. And the only way that can happen is if the vaccine weakens the immune system of whoever takes it.
This isn’t just my random theory, it’s actually been shown that this is what happens.
So, then, no one ought to be surprised when a vaccine which basically acts like the AIDS virus ends up making people more likely to succumb to other illnesses.
And, of course, it’s making people suffer from increased heart risks and “sudden” deaths, among other health issues.
There is no reason whatsoever to trust the vaccines or the people coercing us into getting the vaccines. So the vaccine mandates will also end in failure, sooner rather than later.
Let the BuzzFeed staffers, as well as others, serve as examples of just why these tyrants are untrustworthy of anything they say or do.
“It is not good to be partial to the wicked or to deprive the righteous of justice.”
"Never Again", They Said: German EU Parliament Member Fights For Australians Held In COVID Concentration Camps
I have said many times in the past, at least when talking about the Chinese concentration camps, that the excuse the world had for not being able to do anything about the Holocaust was ignorance. People, for the most part, didn't even know what was going on in various camps throughout Europe, and had little knowledge of their existence. However, ignorance is not a good enough excuse this time around. And ashamedly, I'm not even talking about Chinese concentration camps this time.
In Australia, a country which just two years ago would have considered itself free and democratic, the government has set up various camps to house the unvaccinated and those exposed to COVID.
Now, before getting to the meat and potatoes of it all, I just have to ask: If the Australian government believes the unvaccinated to be at risk of getting and dying from COVID, why would they put into these camps people who have been exposed to COVID? It sounds just as malicious as what Andrew Cuomo did in New York retirement and nursing homes. Are they hoping to kill these people? We know they harbor nothing but ill-will towards the unvaccinated because they refuse to comply with their tyrannical vaccination orders and dual-economy system, so are they actively trying to rid themselves of what they would consider as "political enemies"?
Whatever the case may be, it is undeniably evil to do something like this, knowing the facts surrounding not only the survivability of the Chinese coronavirus, but the lethality and adverse effects of the vaccines on otherwise healthy people.
A video (posted on Twitter, so it will likely be taken down at some point) of an Australian who was sent to one of these camps details roughly how their camp system works. In essence, the captives aren't allowed to leave their designated living quarters without a mask unless it is to do their laundry. They are not allowed to talk with other people outside their quarters or outside any nearby fences. Failure to comply will lead to a $5,000 AUS fine (no information surrounding repeated offenses, but given the Third Reich-ish nature of the Australian government as of late, it's not hard to imagine roughly what they might be willing to do).
And while I doubt they are actively performing experiments on their captives (apart from seeing roughly what will happen to them by mixing unvaccinated people with those exposed to the virus) or forcing them to work for them or outright killing them with gas chambers and furnaces, there is no doubt that they at least have the POTENTIAL to perform such atrocities.
After all, if they already see the unvaccinated as villains to society to the point where they must be separated not only from the economy but also from civilization at large, what's to stop them from going all the way and exterminating them through some irrational "justification" that they come up with? Their consciences? If they had that, they wouldn't be putting people in concentration camps. Of course, only God knows what will happen, and it's very possible that they won't go so far down Nazi Germany territory, but the fact that Australia is at this point to begin with gives reason for concern.
Perhaps rather ironically, a German EU member of parliament, named Christina Anderson, made a video, posted to Rumble, answering Australians' SOS call.
In the video, she said: "I will do whatever I can to make it known to the world that your once free and liberal democracy has been transformed into a totalitarian regime which tramples on human rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law. I am imploring all of you around the world who still think your governments are looking out for your best interests, at no point in history have the people forcing others into compliance been the good guys. The welfare of humanity has always been the alibi of tyrants. Do you not realize that this vaccine does not protect you from COVID? It does, however, protect you from governmental oppression. For now, that is. But don't think for even a second that this is not going to change tomorrow."
"I am a German, and we once asked our grandparents how they could have just stood by in silence, allowing a horrific totalitarian regime to come about. Anyone could have known; all they had to do was open their eyes and take a look. The vast majority chose not to. So what will you tell your grandchildren? Will you tell them you did not know? Will you tell them you were just following orders? You need to understand it is not about breaking the fourth wave. It is about breaking people. Australia does not need a no-COVID strategy. What Australia needs is a no-oppression strategy. So I stand in support with your fight for freedom and democracy. We need to stop our governments from transforming our free and democratic societies into totalitarian regimes. We need to do it now. We need to stand up now."
A powerful, short speech, I have to say. And she is 100% correct. Never, in the entire history of the world, have those who forced compliance of others into certain actions ever been the good guys. Nazis do that, fascists do that, socialists do that, communists do that. Tyrants do that. Always, their alibi is "the greater good", but it never actually is for the better of the people. The victim is always the people these tyrants claim are doing them a favor. For the Third Reich (given the actions of modern day Germany, I won't call Hitler's Germany "Nazi Germany" anymore, because now there is a second Nazi Germany, or an unofficial Fourth Reich), their targets were Jews, capitalists and non-Aryans. For the Soviet Union, it was the Cossacks, the Kulaks, the White Army, officers of the former Russian Empire, and generally anyone who disagreed with the regime. For the Chi-comms, it was anyone who even remotely liked the "old traditions" of China and didn't subscribe to the Color Revolution.
And it wasn't as if people were utterly ignorant of what was going on in Germany during Hitler's reign. The Holocaust was a big secret, sure, but their targeting of Jews wasn't, as they specifically made propaganda to demonize the Jews. The Holocaust wasn't well-known at the time, but the Nazis' oppression was. And so, like Christina said, they asked their grandparents how they could have stood by in silence as tyranny ran rampant on their country. Likewise, future generations will look at what is going on currently in more than one country and judge this time just as harshly as we judge the Third Reich.
And I love how Christina phrased it: "So what will you tell your grandchildren? Will you tell them you did not know? Will you tell them you were just following orders?" I love it because that last one calls back to the answer that Nazi guards and scientists would give during the Nuremberg Trial as to why they did what they did: "We were just following orders." It wasn't an acceptable answer then, and it's not an acceptable answer now.
To end things off, I want you to look back at the picture above. Look at what it shows. Look at the buildings, the sort of road, and the people in it. Now, look at the following pictures:
Does it look like there is a whole lot of difference between the picture of the Australian camp and the pictures of the concentration camps with Nazis in them?
So why would anyone be willing to, rightly, demonize the four pictures but not the one at the top? Why would anyone justify the one at the top and judge the ones right above?
Tell whoever it is who sides with this atrocity that if they ever wondered if they would have supported the Nazis in Germany during WWII, they need not wonder anymore, for the answer is quite clear.
"Whoever says to the wicked, 'You are in the right,' will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations, but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them."
Despite repeated demonstrations that the Brandon administration intends to enforce vaccine mandates (and they haven't actually managed to really do anything on this regard, at least officially), their already illegal activity is faced by a judge's decision to block the vaccine mandates on the grounds that "The COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission of the disease among the vaccinated or mixed vaccinated/unvaccinated populations."
Gotta say, that's the first time I've ever heard the term "mixed vaccinated." That concept just makes so little sense to me, I could hardly believe it exists. Of course, this is with the implication that one jab of the vaccine isn't enough to count one as "vaccinated", and in the near future, will likely also include anyone who has gotten two jabs but not the "booster" shot, because, as we know, Fascist Fauci gets to change the definition of things like "vaccine", "cases", "deaths", etc.
At any rate, Louisiana U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty blocked the federal vaccine mandate for health care workers last week, a stepping stone to what can easily lead to a broader ban on the mandate itself regardless of circumstance.
In his ruling, the judge made the obvious and logical assertion that the Left selectively either ignores or outright demonizes: "If boosters are needed six months after being 'fully vaccinated,' then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate them?"
This is a question that the Left hates being asked because it directly challenges, with sound logic, the reasoning behind getting not only one, but two or three or four jabs to "combat" a virus which is no worse than seasonal flu (and which conveniently and mysteriously has made seasonal flu all but disappear completely).
If you were to ask this question to a Leftist, they will either call you a conspiracy theorist, a racist, or a "science denier", or a combination of the three. All ad hominem attacks which are the very embodiment of a lost argument.
Yet, these are the kinds of questions people in important positions, such as federal judges, are asking and which the communists will have to answer, if they even can find a reasonable one.
The complainant in this case provided evidence based on Dr. Peter McCullough's declaration that the vaccines don't prevent transmission amongst any population, and that "Mandatory COVID-19 vaccines for hospitals do not increase safety for employees or hospital patients. McCullough declared that additional treatment with other drugs and supplements has resulted in an 85% reduction in hospitalizations and death of high-risk individuals presenting with COVID-19."
This declaration, particularly regarding the lack of prevention of transmission of the virus, is also backed up by other research from Europe, specifically regarding the efficacy of vaccine passports. An investigation by experts in Spain concluded that "vaccine passports have no significant impact on reducing COVID-19 infection rates," according to Summit News. The study found that ordering people to show proof of vaccination in order to enter venues "is not reducing levels of transmission." Even worse, the investigation found that vaccine passport systems "contribute to a false impression that vaccinated people do not get infected," when in actuality, "around 40 per cent of those vaccinated are susceptible to infection and transmitting the infection."
The vaccine doesn't prevent transmission of the virus, something which has been known for a while now, the mandates are entirely illogical as a result of that, and vaccine passport systems don't work in any significant way and only mislead people into believing that getting the vaccine means they are immune to the virus (a fact which, were this any other vaccine for any other disease, would lead to federal regulators to scrap the production of the vaccines because they are, at best, doing absolutely nothing). As the judge said in his ruling: "In other words, even if you are fully vaccinated, you still may become infected with the COVID-19 virus."
The ruling continued with: "Although CMS spent pages and pages attempting to explain the need for mandatory COVID-19 vaccines, when infection and hospitalizations rates are dropping, millions of people have already been infected, developing some form of natural immunity, and when people who have been fully vaccinated still become infected, mandatory vaccines as the only method of prevention make no sense."
Thank the Lord for sound, rational judges like Doughty. Seeing as the vaccines don't prevent transmission, it makes no sense whatsoever to assert that they are not only a means of prevention, but are the ONLY VALID source of prevention. This is like saying that mechanics don't fix houses and someone comes along and says that ONLY mechanics can fix houses.
Furthermore, a CDC study found that, when there was an outbreak of the "Delta" variant in a federal hospital between July and August of 2021, there was no significant difference in transmission potential between vaccinated and unvaccinated people who had the virus. The Left may claim that the independent studies by researchers which don't support the narrative are a bunch of conspiracy theory hoopla, but they absolutely cannot say the same if it comes from a CDC study or other "reputable" sources which are like churches to them, at least if they want to keep asserting the "credibility" of such sources.
The vaccines don't work, the passport system doesn't work, and the vaccine mandates are not only illogical but outright tyrannical. Even if the vaccines did everything they were advertised of doing, namely protecting you from the virus, and didn't cause any sort of harm whatsoever, it'd still be immoral to issue a vaccine mandate. Matter of fact, it wouldn't even be seen as necessary because just about everyone would at least be open to getting it. But because we have seen that it does nothing at best and can outright kill people in horrible ways at worst, most people don't want to get them (and no, I have no reason to believe Brandon when he says we're at somewhere like 70% vaccinated). It's in large part because this is toxic poison that people don't want to get them and why tyrants like Brandon feel compelled to try and FORCE people into taking poison.
Thankfully, there are still plenty of people out there willing to fight back against this insanity and having the ability to actually do something about it materially.
Let the mandate die, and the vaccines along with it.
"Blessed are they who observe justice, who do righteousness at all times!"
The Left not knowing how economics works is not exactly a big secret. By and large, they often prove that they don’t know anything of how it works and no amount of economics degrees or awards will disprove that. So it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise to see an MSNBC host making an exceedingly stupid comment regarding the economy.
During a segment on her show, Stephanie Ruhle made the following comment: “The dirty little secret here, Willie, while nobody likes to pay more, on average we have the money to do so. Household savings hit a record high over the pandemic. While the stock market isn’t the economy, you have over half of American households with some investment in the markets and the markets have hit record highs.”
In essence, she’s saying that it’s okay that you have to pay more for your food because you have the money to afford it… completely ignoring just what inflation does to money.
While we are FAR from Venezuela’s, The Weimar Republic’s, and other socialist countries’ inflation rates, the fact is that your dollar is worth less now than it was a year ago, which is why you see higher prices on store shelves (and other problems abound, such as a supply-chain problem).
So sure, people can usually afford to still pay for some things, but the “dirty little secret” about inflation, which really isn’t a secret at all, is that it leads people to be more conservative with their money. With their money being worth a bit less, they will want to save more, so they forego buying things which they don’t think are all too necessary for them at the moment.
Which can even make things worse because if fewer things are being bought, the retailers and producers need to make up the difference somewhere, so they either hike up prices even more or cut costs wherever they see fit, either in quality of product, quantity of product or lay-offs, of which there were plenty because of Leftist jackasses insisting that only SOME people’s jobs were “essential.”
Comments like the ones by Ruhle not only show the utter ignorance of the Left, but their unabashed bias. In essence, she is minimizing inflation because we all know on whom the responsibility lies. And with Brandon’s administration already well underwater because of recent events (including the inflation these deceivers are trying to minimize and even claim is a GOOD THING in some cases), the fake news media can’t afford to report on the bad things happening with any semblance of objectivity because the objective reality is that Biden is awful.
And the arguments made by Ruhle as to why the economy is *akshually* doing great are idiotic.
Household savings increased because EVERYTHING WAS SHUT DOWN. Not to mention that it’s odd she would argue that the economy is doing well with household savings from last year as a metric because Trump was still in the White House last year. If she’s trying to say that the economy during the pandemic has been good based on a metric from last year, she’s conveniently forgetting that she can’t credit the Brandon administration for that one in particular.
Secondly, the market was just about the only other place many Americans could receive income from, you know, because ghouls like YOU, Steph, insisted that people NEEDED to lose their jobs “for the common good” in keeping people “safe” from the virus. Oddly, more people have reportedly died from that same virus this year than last year, but your guy is in office, so there’s no need to talk about it anymore, apparently.
Lastly, markets hitting record highs has NOTHING to do with the Brandon administration. If anything, they are hitting record highs IN SPITE of him and his goons.
The market made a quick recovery in 2020. For it to continue to go up is due to a number of reasons (among which being multiple states and countries opening back up), absolutely NONE of which include the fact that the illegitimate child predator is occupying the Oval Office.
The idea that it’s okay that there are higher prices for things because “people can afford them” is emblematic of the following meme structure: Tell me you don’t know how inflation works without telling me you don’t know how inflation works.
Inflation means that your currency becomes less valuable. In a previous article, I talked about how cash was literally disappearing from Venezuela.
In that article, I mentioned that there were long lines being formed outside of banks in Caracas, hoping to withdraw the maximum limit of 400,000 bolivars. An idiot Leftist might think that that’s great and that means that just about everyone in Venezuela is a millionaire or billionaire (another thing which I have previously talked about), but in reality, 400,000 bolivars is worth around 20 cents (though maybe a bit more, with our inflation being worse now than back then).
With bolivars being as worthless as they are, people turned to using them to make handbags to sell outside the country. Bolivars are so worthless, they are worth more as the fabric that they are made from than as the currency it’s meant to represent.
This is with hyperinflation rates never before seen in the U.S., but that’s beside the point. The point is that with inflation, your money becomes less valuable. So the idea that “people can still afford to buy more expensive stuff” is not only asinine, it’s outright ironic. If it gets bad enough, you can get to the point where you’re spending a good bit of your money on basic things.
In the other article I brought up earlier, I mentioned that in order to purchase a little more than half a pound of the cheapest ham and cheese one could find, one would have to pay over 600,000 bolivars.
“But if 400,000 bolivars is roughly 20 cents, then 600,000 bolivars can hardly be much more, probably not even a dollar,” the Leftist might argue. Maybe, but that’s irrelevant because I also mentioned in that article that 600,000 bolivars is three-fourths of someone’s monthly salary at minimum wage.
With all the talk from the Left about how minimum wage isn’t a “livable wage” in the States, imagine how much less livable it is in a country where someone can barely afford the cheapest ham and cheese with a whole month’s worth of salary (and this is discounting all the other expenses they would have to make).
With such worthless currency, they would naturally have to seriously consider foregoing buying ham and cheese (and in most cases, actually do so). They might see it as luxury food.
And that’s why Ruhle’s comment is so idiotic. Anyone who is remotely knowledgeable of economics and inflation could tell you that it’s not good to have high inflation or hyperinflation. Again, we are far from the economic state that Venezuela is in, but there are people in the States who do have to adjust what they have to buy and how much of it. This impacts them negatively, and telling them that it’s not a very big deal or that they should just suck it up because “you can afford it” is ignorant, belligerent and short-sighted.
Not everyone is as rich as you, Steph. So it’s definitely not true that the “dirty little secret” is that people can afford higher prices. For many, they literally can’t. Not if they want to pay for other things which they might consider of higher importance.
And this is why so many people can’t stand the fake news media. It’s not just that they lie to people, they HATE the people they are lying to and see nothing wrong with them suffering economically. At least, not if they suffer economically during a Democrat administration. They destroyed Bush because of the recession (not that he had nothing to do with it) and tried to do the same with Trump during the pandemic mini-recession.
Now that their boy is in power, however, the economic trainwreck he’s causing will not only be minimized, it will be PROMOTED as something good in some cases. At best, they just decide to utterly ignore it or shift the blame.
They are annoying liars and a pest to this country.
“’There is no peace,’ says the Lord, ‘for the wicked.’”
One of the biggest stories currently is of Kyle Rittenhouse and of the absolute clownshow of a trial because of the egregious (yet common) behavior of the Leftist prosecutor. As such, most people are talking about it already and I wouldn’t really have much else to add.
If you want my two cents, here you go: Kyle is innocent, the judge is awesome, the prosecutor should be disbarred and the Left is full of demons who praise a child rapist and woman abuser who tried to harm/kill a 17-year-old kid.
Moving on, we have a video of a 2nd grader in Florida who is far more brave than almost any adult and has far more intelligence than the collective Left (not that that’s a very high bar to overcome).
Eight-year-old Fiona Lashells was recorded at a school board meeting in Florida, giving a short speech about the unfairness and illogic of forcing children to constantly wear masks in schools, which in Florida is a direct violation of not only the Constitution, but of the governor’s orders.
She began her speech talking about how she has been to other school board meetings, seemingly also having spoken there, and then talks about how she is “going to get suspended if I don’t wear a mask for three more days.”
For a bit of context, this girl has already been suspended before, not once, not twice, but close to FORTY times, to the point where her teacher tells her she missed too many school days and would have to repeat the second grade.
Despite these threats from the tyrannical teachers at her tyrannical school, she tells us of how she is undeterred in her fight. “Just because I get suspended for not wearing a mask isn’t going to change my mind. You can keep suspending me, I still have the right not to wear a mask. It is not fair that I’m getting punished because you guys [at] the school board are not following the law. That is not fair, it just isn’t right, I’m still going to stand up for what I believe and nothing’s gonna change my mind.”
That last part was received by thunderous applause from the crowd.
She then presents the argument that masks don’t just not work, but can actively infect others: “Do you know how dirty masks are? ‘Cuz you touch the mask, you put it on your face, you breathe all those germs… ‘cuz you have lots of bacteria on your hand.”
And she finishes her speech by saying: “And, okay, I hope you all go f- to jail for doing this to me. And my family is proud of me and my Uncle Murphy that is in Heaven is really proud of me, and I wanna say… your rules suck.”
While I am not exactly gleeful about her almost dropping the f-bomb, or what sounds like she was about to say (which was met with some surprised laughter from the audience), I too am proud of this girl for having the courage, at the age of EIGHT, to stand up to those who other kids would see as the “authority figures.”
Much like the devil, the Left will use whatever tools they have to coerce people into doing their will. They threaten adults with their livelihoods and kids with suspension/expulsion. The former is obviously a bit more threatening, since schools are such utter garbage and unnecessary at this point that being suspended or expelled from one of them might be a BLESSING which can lead to proper education from homeschooling or other private, pro-parent and pro-freedom schooling.
But despite the threats made to her, and the actual suspensions delivered, Fiona refuses to back down. She knows her rights and won’t be terrorized into giving them up. No matter how many times they suspend her and no matter if she has to repeat the second grade, she will not give up her freedoms.
This girl is a model American citizen, who shows far more courage than any Leftist ever would (no, it’s not “brave” to say you’re gay or transgender at this point, given how glorified such people are in pop culture) and tons more intelligence than many adults, let alone Leftists.
This girl is right about everything she is saying. The people forcing kids to wear masks in schools should go to jail not for disobeying the governor’s orders, but because it is outright against the LAW to force people, including kids, to wear anything at any point. They aren’t educators, they are dictators, abusing the easiest group of people to abuse: children.
It’s extremely rare to have kids who are as well-raised, logical and confident as Fiona, so they are typically very easy to coerce and abuse. “Don’t want to get suspended or expelled, thereby ‘ruining’ your academic and actual future? Wear a dirty, uncomfortable and suffocating mask during all school-hours and never defy us again.”
It’s cowardly beyond compare, because just about no kid will be brave enough to stand up for themselves.
I saw a video some time ago of a woman crying tears of joy, telling her son who just got home from school that parents who sued the school or school board won their case and they no longer can mandate that the students wear masks. The kid, upon hearing the news, bellowed as well and ran to hug his mother in jubilation.
The people who run these schools are nothing short of power-hungry monsters who will lord whatever puny power they may have on the easiest target of them all. They are criminals and demons who care not for the students they are teaching, but for the Marxist agenda they are ramming down kids’ throats.
Glenn Youngkin won his race because he exposed what Virginia schools were doing to their kids, but one would be foolish to believe that to be isolated to the Old Dominion. Schools all around the country are teaching Marxist garbage and have been for a very long time, really ever since intolerant militant Atheists got God kicked out of schools.
These monsters are present in almost every single government school, to one extent or another. What is a wonder to me is why Fiona is still attending that tyrannical government school anyway. Homeschools and pro-parent/pro-freedom private schools are far better options, both morally and academically. If it’s worth it to stick in those schools to fight for freedom, it’s also worth it to leave those schools and search for better options.
Now, one might argue that it’s good that Fiona is still attending the government school because that way, she can fight for her fellow classmates in these school board meetings. My counter-argument is “why are we having an eight-year-old fight this battle”?
It’s amazing and commendable, to be sure, but far from ideal. I’m not saying her parents are less brave than she is, but it’s the parents of these children who should be fighting for the freedom of the kids. And while I don’t doubt that, for the most part, they are, it is utterly unnecessary for this girl to have to stick her neck out along the way.
She definitely should still stand up for herself at school, brazing those suspensions with a determined attitude, but only for as long as she is even in that school, which really shouldn’t be for very long at all.
Especially if they are threatening her with having to repeat the second grade, I’d be looking for other schooling options so that she doesn’t “fall behind” (she has done and turned in all the assignments she had, so she shouldn’t fall behind whatsoever) and getting her out of that Schoolingrad they call an education center, if I were her dad.
The free market is more applicable to education than ever before, so use it to your advantage. Force the schools to be better by harming them financially. Of course, they’re government funded so they will never truly be out of business, but the worse they get, the fewer students they will get and the more students better schools which stand with parents and freedom will receive.
They lose not by being utterly defunded, but by being outfunded by competition. Particularly, competition which is more influential on the future of this country than they are.
At any rate, Fiona is definitely braver than most adults and smarter too for doing what she is doing. I just wish she didn’t have to be the one fighting this battle. Heck, if I’m wishing for anything, I wish there wasn’t such a battle to begin with. It’s only present because the people instituting these ridiculous mandates are pure evil. Ideally, they wouldn’t be anywhere close to power, or at least wouldn’t be so evil as to abuse children.
I pray that this brave little girl is successful in her fight and that there doesn’t even have to be a fight for reason soon.
1 Corinthians 16:13
“Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong.”
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...