George Soros knows very well that, in order to OWN America, you have to OWN the DNC. And in order to OWN the DNC you must OWN the Clintons. Please don’t forget this premise as you read on…
The IG report that was made public last week reveals a huge number of interesting evidence about the swamp – it confirms Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were biased against Trump. It confirms that ‘we’ in the FBI ‘will stop Trump’ from becoming President – and ‘we’ has to be a group of people CONSPIRING at the FBI. It confirms that then FBI director James Comey broke protocol with one end in mind: to exonerate Hillary from any crime. In doing so, Comey himself may have broken the law by adding to the law something that it doesn’t require in the Hillary case: intent. I think we can all agree that Page, Strzok, Comey, Hillary and all the rest broke the law – and our trust. These were people in positions of power who used that power to benefit themselves and a particular presidential candidate. Hillary herself was way too senior in the Obama Administration not to know that she was breaking the law when she decided to keep an illegal, unprotected server for official business.
Let’s let lady Justice deal with these actors – I have a feeling that somebody will end up in jail over all of this.
But let’s focus on Obama for a moment. We know that Obama lied when he said he learnt about the illegal server when the media reported it and not before. We know it’s a lie because the IG report says that Obama himself was using an alias to write to Hillary when she was the Secretary of State on her numerous email addresses – he, too, was using unofficial Hillary email addresses to conduct official businesses and that’s a crime. So we know that a Hillary criminal investigation would have led to Obama himself and he could not afford it.
Now, let’s talk about the premise of the headline: Was Obama trying to OWN Hillary?
We all know that NOBODY in the Obama Administration back in 2016 thought Trump was going to win. Obama never in a million years thought he could be the target of an investigation – it’s the reason he let Hillary keep that illegal server. Nobody in the Obama Administration thought any of this would come to light.
So, with this in mind, let’s go back to the Comey press conference in October 2016 when he announced the FBI had found 30,000 new emails on the ‘Hillary matter’ that they would investigate, only to announce a couple of days later that there was no intent on the part of Hillary and therefore no ‘reasonable prosecutor’ would indict. Why would he do this, knowing that in May of that year the FBI had decided not to pursue Hillary? They knew all along Hillary was not to be touched. Why would he open and close the investigation like this in October of 2016? And why wouldn’t he just do his job and present the evidence to the DOJ? I’ve heard analysts say it was Comey’s ego that caused him to be on the spotlight, or Hillary may have threatened him and that’s why he closed the investigation and all sorts of reasons why he chose against prosecuting her, even when he didn’t have the power to do that as FBI director.
Well, I have another theory….let me explain.
Obama had already indicated in April 2016 that 'I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America's national security,' in an interview on 'Fox News Sunday.' He added 'What I've also said is that -- and she has acknowledged -- that there's a carelessness, in terms of managing emails, that she ... recognizes.' So Comey was just following orders: Hillary was just...'careless'.
Now, if you want to OWN America, you must OWN the DNC. And Obama doesn’t own the DNC…yet. He knows this perfectly well – if he’s going to put his own friends in office, he must NEUTRALIZE the Clintons sooner rather than later. Right now, the DNC is divided – and the Clintons have way too many friends for Obama’s liking. For a long time I thought Obama would throw Hillary under the bus on this email case just to get the Clintons out of the way and become the king of the DNC. But now I think he had a better plan…
I think Obama decided that neutralizing the Clintons doesn’t necessarily mean finishing them off politically – it means keeping their skeletons in the closet and owning them personally, like mobsters do. I think Comey was trying to convey the message that, once Hillary was inaugurated, she’d have to thank Obama for her freedom and presidency. And Obama holds the key to her future. She better continue with his legacy or else…
Let’s not forget that Obama is used to Chicago politics – these people are not like you and me. They’re mobsters. And speaking of mobsters, there’s one story in The Godfather Part II that explains what may have happened here (clip at the bottom).
You see, in The Godfather II, there’s this character, Senator Pat Geary, that opposes Michael Corleone, the head of the mobster family. The Senator knows Corleone is a criminal and he wants to find ways to bring him to justice. Corleone needs politicians, law enforcement agents and senior leaders on his payroll in order to conduct his illegal business freely. And this Senator is in his way. What was Corleone’s brilliant plan? To ambush the Senator: the Corleone gangsters find a prostitute for the Senator, who they then kill but making it look like the Senator did it. The Senator had been drugged somehow and he doesn’t even remember what happened to the girl – he thinks he must have killed her, given the evidence. But the Godfather’s saviors come to the rescue and protect the Senator from public shame and jail. The end objective was to OWN the Senator, which they managed to do by PROTECTING him from being INDICTED over a CRIME.
With Hillary it’s the same – except she did commit the crime. So Obama’s objective was to OWN the next President by sending Comey to close the email case to PROTECT Hillary from being INDICTED over a CRIME.
Perhaps that’s the reason the IG didn’t find documented evidence of political bias – Comey and Obama weren’t just rooting for Hillary out of love for her. This was about WHO was going to OWN the DNC…and the country.
'But the LORD abides forever; He has established His throne for judgment, And He will judge the world in righteousness; He will execute judgment for the peoples with equity.'
Author: Danielle Cross
On June 8th, 2017, former FBI Director James Comey testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee about his firing from the FBI, the Russian investigation, included the Michael Flynn investigation and the Clinton e-mail investigation. And while there’s plenty of things to talk about within each subject, today I want to point out the hypocrisy of the Left. Specifically Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch directing the then-FBI director to call Hillary Clinton’s e-mail scandal a “matter” not an “investigation.”
Oh, yes. While the Left is calling foul play on Trump supposedly asking Comey to “drop the Michael Flynn issue” and saying that it’s obstruction of justice, then-AG Loretta Lynch not only suggested that Comey called the e-mail probe a “matter” rather than an investigation, she actually asked and directed him to do that, according to Comey.
If you remember, Loretta Lynch met with former President Bill Clinton on June, 2016. According to Comey, this meeting made him feel rather uncomfortable. He also said that the meeting between Lynch and the former president “convinced him that the independence of the investigation was tainted with regard to the Justice Department and led him to go public with the bureau’s findings on Clinton”, according to Circa.com.
Well, of course that meeting made him uncomfortable and distrustful of the DOJ! If the Attorney General meets in private with the spouse of one of the people the FBI is investigating, red flags are going to fly! Particularly when that same AG also asks the FBI director to call one of the FBI’s investigations a “matter” and not an actual “investigation”! Loretta Lynch asking the FBI director to do that is CLEAR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE! Largely because it tries to diminish the importance of the e-mail scandal.
Now, don’t misunderstand, I still don’t really trust in many things Comey says. The official FBI statement on the Clinton e-mails made by Comey reads: “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent…”
In other words, since Comey couldn’t find any ill-intent in the way Hillary Clinton handled classified information, she gets a free pass. That’s precisely why I don’t trust Comey fully. He let Hillary off the hook because he doesn’t think she meant to mishandle classified information. This is a system that punishes people’s actions, not intentions. Unless you’re a big time Democrat, that is.
A murderer would never be let off the hook if he said “I didn’t mean to”. But Hillary Clinton IS let off the hook because Comey didn’t think she meant to mishandle classified info.
But here’s the reason why I choose to trust Comey on this instance: because he has no reason to mention that Loretta Lynch “directed” him to call the e-mail probe a “matter” rather than an “investigation”. Sen. Richard Burr had asked Comey “Was your decision (regarding Comey’s public statement on the e-mail investigation) influenced by the Attorney General’s tarmac meeting with the former President Bill Clinton?” That was the question Comey was asked. And yet, Comey CHOSE to mention Lynch’s order to call the probe a “matter”.
Comey essentially threw Lynch under the bus (even though the MSM will never focus on that part) by saying she directed him to refer to the investigation as a “matter”. The Left typically sticks up for its people unless it’s clear that they need to abandon one of their own. Comey, being part of the Left in this case, didn’t have a reason to throw Lynch under the bus, since he wasn’t directly asked if Lynch did what she did.
So that’s why I believe Comey when he said that, besides the fact that it definitely sounds like something Loretta Lynch would order to someone involved in the Clinton investigation. Which leads me - and likely many others - to believe that Lynch obstructed justice in the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton. Which leads me to call out the Left for what hypocrites they are.
To them, Trump allegedly asking Comey to drop the Flynn matter was obstruction of justice in the Russian investigation, but Lynch directing Comey to call the probe not an investigation is just fine. They think it’s ok for Lynch to tell the FBI director to call it a “matter” in order to reduce the negative effect it would have on Clinton’s campaign and in order to make the e-mail scandal not seem like such a big deal.
Now, I know that neither the FBI nor the DOJ nor the MSM will go after Lynch for this. But I know that this kind of thing (corruption) doesn’t get ignored by God. God knows what is in Lynch’s heart. He knows what was in her mind when she met with Bill Clinton. And He heard the things they discussed in that meeting. He also knows what Lynch’s, Bill’s, and Hillary’s intentions have been regarding the whole matter. And while they might not face punishment here on Earth, they will eventually have to meet their Creator. And they can’t bribe or blackmail the Lord.
“The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”
Author: Freddie M.
Danielle Cross and Freddie Marinelli will bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...