The fated day we all hoped would come has finally arrived. The writing was on the wall for Roe v. Wade ever since it was leaked (by a Leftist clerk, no doubt, since we still don’t know who it was) that the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was all but ruled on already, as it’s the case which effectively overturns Roe v. Wade and sends the issue of abortion back to the states.
In a 6-3 ruling, meaning that even Deep Stater John Roberts was in favor, the Supreme Court of the United States has overturned the worst SCOTUS decision in history, the 1973 case of Roe v. Wade which killed (so glad to put it in past-tense now) over 63,000,000 children in the 49 years this atrocity plagued America.
Interesting to note that the SCOTUS’ official Twitter page tweeted the news: “THE SUPREME COURT HAS OVERTURNED ROE V. WADE, ELIMINATING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ABORTION.” There never was such a constitutional right. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that a woman has the right to kill her child in her womb. If it did, this decision wouldn’t have been made today.
But alas, much as the Left will undoubtedly make a ruckus that could, potentially, mimic the 2020 Antifa/BLM riots (not that I care anymore, since they’d target deep-blue cities), the fact of the matter remains that abortions will be severely hampered from this day forward.
Unfortunately, of course, the issue is far from resolved. Really, I’d say this is just the beginning. It’s a good beginning and a great step forward, but the evil institution of abortion is still alive. States such as California, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Colorado had expressed that in the event that Roe were to be overturned (which it now has and I’m not sorry for continually bringing that up in this article), they would become “sanctuary states” for abortion, with states like Oregon already allowing abortion up to the third trimester.
And it’s entirely possible, even likely, that other Leftist states will follow suit, or at the very least continue to not restrict abortion in their own states.
So we’re still far from destroying this evil institution, but not as far as we were before this decision, or as far as perhaps one might think. I mean, how many of us really expected to see Roe overturned within our lifetimes? We all certainly prayed that would be the case, and sooner rather than later, but there was definitely a concern that it would never be overturned (particularly since RINOs could often run on fighting abortion and overturning Roe, and actually doing it would mean one less item to run on).
But that concern is out the window now, as is Roe v. Wade. So what’s left ahead of us is the work that still needs to be done. Again, Leftist states have sought to become “sanctuaries” for baby murder, so there is still plenty of injustice left to fight in this country.
In all likelihood, we will need to end abortion the same way we ended slavery (minus a civil war, hopefully): make a constitutional amendment protecting the right to life. This is, of course, an inherent, inalienable right of mankind, as the Founders knew perfectly well, but since we just came off of 49 years of butchering children, it’s clear that we need such an amendment.
So long as abortion is still practiced and the institution lives, the fight is not over. We just took down an important pillar of it, but they’re not out of it yet. We have to proverbially crush the head of the snake and end it for good.
Thankfully, states like Texas, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Florida have or will restrict abortion entirely, freeing those states of the plague of abortion, so we can definitely celebrate the achievement that this is.
We truly must thank the Lord for a number of things, primarily for setting things up in a way that Roe would be overturned today. God gave us Trump and three Justices in four years (a rare, if not unique event) for precisely this landmark decision. I still have issues with the SCOTUS and Trump’s picks particularly (Thomas and Alito are the two greatest Justices ever), but I do have to commend them for not caving to the mob, particularly after the decision was leaked last month.
The attempts at terrorizing the justices thankfully were failures, as they should’ve been, and I can’t help but recall the Kavanaugh confirmation process and roughly what I said back then. I don’t remember exactly where it was, but I basically said that the treatment of Kavanaugh was going to bite the Left in the rear. Them accusing him of awful bullcrap with absolutely zero evidence was not going to help their case in trying to moderate the Justice. If anything, it was going to lead to Kavanaugh being ticked off enough at the people who tried to destroy him that he would be, if presented with the opportunity, crucial in the overturning of Roe.
Now, there were other cases which could’ve overturned Roe sooner (I recall one such case which the SCOTUS, fresh off of picking up Kavanaugh, refused to take which Kavanaugh agreed in not taking, thus delaying this decision), and that ticked me off pretty badly, but God is always in control. It just wasn’t the time, back then, to overturn Roe; now is, for whatever reason God knows.
Maybe it was important that the New York conceal carry law was stricken first. Maybe it was important that states set up the immediate banning of abortion upon Roe’s overturning first (after all, Texas and other states didn’t have such laws until after Biden stole the election).
Whatever the case may be, it’s all in God’s timing, and this will hopefully turn the tide against the child killers and their movement of death. Again, we cannot rest until the evil institution of abortion is destroyed like slavery was.
Overturning Roe was step 1. More will be to come, necessarily.
“And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to His purpose.”
We know from experience that lockdowns were a terrible idea, and we’ve seen many studies leading anyone with half a brain to recognize that they were a bad idea, and this is just one of said many studies.
Conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the study found that through 2020 and 2021, there were at least 170,000 non-Chinese coronavirus excess deaths in the U.S. It’s important to note that this is a conservative estimate, as the real number is likely closer to 200,000, since they also counted 72,000 “unmeasured Covid deaths”, which is people who died with the virus, not necessarily from it.
In other words, roughly 200,000 more people died in the U.S. as a result of the lockdowns than would have if there hadn’t been any lockdowns at all. All over a “virus” with a less than 0.01% mortality rate.
A liberal might argue that that is a relatively small figure compared to the total COVID death count (which I will remind you is really 6% of the actual number), but two things ought to be taken into consideration: First, and foremost, the lockdowns were sold as a measure to save lives. This shows it did the exact opposite of that. Second, the number would definitely be far higher (as will soon be demonstrated) if states like Florida hadn’t lifted restrictions as early as they did, and if states like Montana hadn’t avoided locking down to begin with.
No matter what one can say about it, lockdowns were abysmal.
From the study: “Summing our estimates across causes and age groups, we estimate 171,000 excess non-Covid deaths through the end of 2021 plus 72,000 unmeasured Covid deaths. The Economist has assembled national-level mortality data from around the world and obtains a similar U.S. estimate, which is 199,000 (including any unmeasured Covid) or about 60 persons per 100,000 population (Global Change Data Lab 2022).”
In addition: “While Covid deaths overwhelmingly afflict senior citizens, absolute numbers of non-Covid excess deaths are similar for each of the 18-44, 45-64, and over-65 age groups, with essentially no aggregate excess deaths of children. Mortality from all causes during the pandemic was elevated 26 percent for working-age adults (18-64), as compared to 18 percent for the elderly.”
The study didn’t just look into the U.S., however. It also took a look at the European Union, and they found a similar 64 non-Covid excess deaths per 100,000. However, one country in that Union stands apart from the rest, which is Sweden. The researchers write: “In contrast, the estimate for Sweden is -33, meaning that non-Covid causes of death were somewhat low during the pandemic. We suspect that some of the international differences are due to the standard used to designate a death as Covid, but perhaps also Sweden’s result is related to minimizing disruption of its citizen’s normal lifestyles.”
In essence, since Sweden didn’t lock down at any point, they did not see an increase in non-COVID mortality rates.
Another study released by the WHO found Sweden’s average excess death rate was 56 per 100,000, but stands in stark contrast to the UK’s 109, Spain’s 111, Germany’s 116 and Italy’s 133. Essentially, the WHO found that Sweden avoiding locking down (which went against the WHO’s guidance) led to fewer excess deaths than the European countries which followed WHO guidance and locked down.
And yet another study from Johns Hopkins University concluded that global lockdowns “are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument. While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted.”
Although I do have to disagree on that last bit from this study, regarding the “lockdowns have had little to no public health effects”. That is abjectly false, as we saw in my previous article discussing lockdowns, where we found that 60,000 children in the United Kingdom were driven to clinical depression as a result of lockdowns. Clinical depression is a public health effect.
To summarize, we have found, somewhat retrospectively, that lockdowns not only were destructive of whole economies (less destructive than the Brandon regime, but destructive nonetheless) but also brought about non-COVID-related problems that people couldn’t report on social media without getting punished for “wrongthink”, but failed in their very purpose, which was to save lives.
Now, I’m old enough to remember that the lockdowns were only supposed to last for 15 days and were originally for the purposes of not overcrowding hospitals, but the reasoning behind extending the lockdowns went from “slowing” the spread of the virus to “stopping” it and “saving lives.”
Remember how you were accused of “putting the economy over lives” for suggesting we shouldn’t be locked down back in the beginning of this mess? That was indicative that people saw the lockdowns as life-saving measures. As such, the fact that they CAUSED excess deaths is proof positive of what massive failures they were for their supposed objectives.
Much like the vaccines, they did the opposite of what they were supposed to do… well, if you believe they were supposed to protect and save lives, as opposed to ruining and ending them.
One might be able to chalk up every pandemic policy from the globalists as failures and the advocates themselves as incompetent buffoons, but that would be assuming they really intended to help people out.
We are a bit more privy than even before the pandemic that what these globalists want isn’t to help people. Far from it. Some may be in it for the money, but others are in it for domination.
The ratio of greedy bastards and Brains from Pinky and The Brain (in other words, people who want to “take over the world”, for those who didn’t watch that cartoon) may not be all that certain, but what is certain is that their efforts and actions have led to untold numbers of deaths and unimaginable numbers of lives utterly ruined.
Actions and efforts outside of the pandemic policies, mind you.
“A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will perish.”
During the 2020 Antifa/BLM riots, I declared that the gun control debate was over and no argument could ever be made that would legitimize or justify the restrictions of gun ownership and purchase. Well, the Left has sure tried hard to combat this, and since people tend to have short-term memories (particularly those who were only seeing BLM “protests” and nothing of the burning, looting and murders), the recent school shooting in Uvalde, Texas has seemingly somewhat brought back this asinine debate.
Quite conveniently, I might add, knowing the details of this shooting.
School shootings are great for the Left, particularly with what happened in this one. In general, they love school shootings because they get to use a vulnerable population – children – to spread a message of fear and outrage (though people have to also conveniently forget the Left murders children by the thousands every day through abortions). As morally corrupt a society we might live in today, it’s still not so morally corrupt that we don’t feel anger and sadness at situations such as Uvalde.
Anyone with a heart is made to feel sadness, anger and outrage at the fact that children were needlessly and senselessly slaughtered at the hands of an evil bastard, which is why the Left can take particular advantage whenever such a thing happens.
It’s particularly beneficial to the Left if a shooting happens with an AR-15, the Left’s most hated weapon. Of course, they don’t give a damn if it’s with a shotgun or handgun (as most often is the case in shootings). And, of course, they don’t care when 40 or more people are killed with guns in Democrat-run, gun control-heavy Chicago, because those murders are counterproductive to their argument.
But when a shooting like Uvalde’s happens, they can hardly contain their excitement (though they still shed crocodile tears at the children they didn’t get to kill in abortions).
There are a lot of details surrounding Uvalde (though also a lot of confusion, which I will get to momentarily), but the major points are the fact that the shooter was 18-years-old (old enough to use actual weapons of war in the military, but apparently not old enough to use non-weapons of war to protect themselves in the U.S.), used an AR-15 (again, the Left’s most hated weapon), he targeted an elementary school (thus, “m’uh children” bs from the Left) and seemingly inexplicably, the Uvalde police department let him rampage for a full hour as he slaughtered the 19 kids and two teachers (while also reportedly going into the school to save their own kids without engaging the shooter, which makes the “Back-the-Blue” crowd angry towards them).
There are other facts that the Left conveniently forgets (such as the fact that the shooter was at the very least a crossdresser and he was stopped by Border Patrol agents, aka good guys with guns), but those aforementioned are an absolute dream for them.
It’s yet another shooting, particularly in a school, so they get to go after guns in general like always, AND they get to “justify” their anti-cop rhetoric by showing their uselessness in this situation.
Of course, you’d also have to conveniently forget that gun laws would have to be enforced by the very police that the Left is maligning and draining of force (5,300 NYPD officers quit or retired in 2020, a 75% increase from the previous year, and 2021 wasn’t much different), so even gun control laws passed now would hardly be enforceable (though I’ve covered previously that even with normal amounts of police manpower, this would be impossible).
But forgetting all that inconvenient stuff, you have the Left’s dream school shooting scenario.
Except, of course, that it looks a bit too much like a false flag operation.
Like I said earlier, there is a lot of confusion regarding the details. For example, the fake news media (seemingly in an attempt to further malign the “good guy with a gun” argument) claimed that the bastard had been confronted by an armed school resource officer outside the school and exchanged gunfire with him. But later on, DPS Regional Director Victor Escalon told reporters that the bastard crashed a pick-up truck near the school, climbed a four-foot-high chain link fence, fired at the school as he approached, fired at two eyewitnesses at a funeral home nearby, and “was not confronted by anybody” outside the school, armed or not.
Escalon also said that there was no school resource officer on campus.
Another example is that there were reports that the bastard entered the school through a door which had been left propped open with a rock, almost as if it were inviting in the bastard. But DPS Press Secretary Ericka Miller told ABC News that investigators determined the door had been closed by a teacher, though the door was not locked (supposedly, it’s a door that locks itself).
Because of the conflicting reports, it’s impossible to determine what actually happened without having physically been there. I don’t trust the fake news media when they say that the bastard was confronted by an armed resource officer, and I don’t trust the government officials when they say the opposite. I don’t trust the media that reported the door had been propped open with a rock and I don’t trust the government official who contradicts the reporting.
The reason for this is that the fake news media has great incentive to lie about the details, and the Uvalde government officials have good incentive to lie as well because of the at-best disgustingly negligent and shameful behavior of the officers who allowed the bastard to have a full hour of rampaging in a school (while making sure their own kids were safe).
I don’t trust the words of the DPS official who cowardly claimed the officers “could’ve been shot” if they went in to engage the shooter, as though that wasn’t their job and as though they didn’t risk their lives to save their own kids anyway.
The fact that the cops only saved their own kids could be indicative of a false flag operation. The fact that the cops kept extremely concerned parents from being able to do anything (going so far as to tazing and placing in cuffs some of them) while they themselves stood around doing nothing (once they saved their own kids) for a whole hour could indicate a false flag operation. The fact that an 18-year-old somehow purchased two $5,000 rifles to perpetrate this act (supposedly the day he turned 18) could indicate a false flag operation. The fact that the bastard was known by authorities for threatening to shoot up a school when he was 14 yet nothing happened until last week could indicate a false flag operation.
And the fact that the FBI is kind of known for doing this crap, as they often encourage and entrap mentally ill individuals (like the bastard) into committing acts of terror (which they call “right-wing terror” to malign conservatives) could indicate a false flag operation.
It, of course, could also have been extreme negligence and evil on the part of the Uvalde police officers to let the shooter do whatever he wanted in the school while they saved their own kids (after all, if they knew this would happen, why allow their kids to even go to the school they know will be the site of a shooting?), but the deep confusion and earned distrust that the media and government have amassed recently as a result of bullcrapping us throughout a scamdemic and the theft of a presidential election naturally leads people to start looking behind the curtain.
I can’t say for certain that Uvalde was a false flag operation, but at this point, I’m far more willing to believe that it was than that it wasn’t, simply because of how much this shooting benefits the Left. In a midterm election year when they had absolutely nothing going for them as a result of Brandon’s policies, they conveniently get something to talk about: supposed “gun violence”. Not to mention that just a week prior to Uvalde, a “white supremacist” shot up a supermarket in Brooklyn (which the Left also has to conveniently forget that he left behind a manifesto which shows he was a communist, hated Fox News (not that one needs to be a commie to do so) and loved Rachel Maddow).
All of that convenience for the Left makes it far too suspicious to me, and likely to many others who were red pilled as a result of the scamdemic. We see how the machine operates. They made it too obvious in recent time.
“For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naïve.”
It’s sometimes difficult to discern whether someone is merely ignorant on a political issue or if they are generally stupid and no amount of information given to them will actually get them to learn. Those on the Left will usually be ignorant no matter what, but stupidity reigns supreme because they continue to believe what they do despite the information provided to them by conservatives.
And seemingly, Bill Maher is among those who were merely ignorant on the issue of abortion, as he explained in a recent segment of his show that he was unaware both that Europe was more restrictive on abortion than the U.S. is and that most people who call themselves pro-life are actually women, rather than men.
I say “seemingly” because he’s had his “Real Time” show for nearly 20 years and, as a 66-year-old man, has been involved in media since the early 1980s, when he appeared on Johnny Carson’s and David Letterman’s shows (not to mention he definitely had political opinions from before that time as well).
My point being that I really doubt he’s only come to learn this recently. You’re this involved in the political world (albeit through commentary) for this long and only now you are beginning to hear things from the other side? Either he always did and would always ignore them, or he really was living in a Leftist bubble all his life.
At any rate, Maher said “I learned things this week… that are pretty basic things that I did not know about abortion. Like in Europe, the modern countries of Europe are way more restrictive than we are or what they’re even proposing! If you are pro-choice, you would like it a lot less in Germany, and Italy, and France, and Spain, and Switzerland. Did you know that? I didn’t know that.”
What he’s referring to is that Germany, France and Spain all have abortion limits set at 14 weeks into the pregnancy, while Italy and Switzerland have their limits at 12 weeks. Here in the U.S., Democrats shriek about even the mildest of restrictions to abortion and argue that it would be “unfair” to have limits at 20 weeks of pregnancy.
Maher continued: “I learned most people who are pro-life are women. I did not know that. Most abortions are from… mothers, people who have a kid… And I thought this was interesting, most abortions now – even when you go to a clinic are done with the pill. The pill. And pills are easy to get in America. So, you know, for the people who say we’re going back to 1973, we’re not. That’s just factually inaccurate.”
A couple things to say here. First, don’t think I didn’t catch that “most abortions are from… mothers, people who have a kid” bit that was clearly trying to be woke and claim men can get pregnant too. It’s not “most” of the abortions being from mothers. It’s ALL of them. Only mothers can get pregnant because only women can get pregnant and mothers are all women.
Second, regarding the “going back to 1973” thing, that’s just fearmongering from the Left to scare dumb women into thinking they will be forced to get risky, unsafe, life-threatening (for the mother, not just the child) abortions and that Roe allows them to get “safe” abortions. It’s a load of crap, all of it. For starters, overturning Roe doesn’t even get rid of abortion nationwide. The matter goes back to the states. Red states, hopefully, would eliminate abortion altogether, but blue states will continue to have it. And if an evil woman from a red state wants to kill her baby because she’s a selfish whore, she can go to a blue state to kill the child.
Of course, overturning Roe would only be step 1 in eliminating abortion nationwide, as we should be a country (and world, but country comes first and is easier) which not only disallows abortion but outright shuns it as it should be. Girls should be taught to not wantonly have sex with whatever is drunk enough to screw them and subsequently getting pregnant. They should be taught that life begins at conception because that’s the moment where two different DNA codes merge to create a unique one. Boys (at the appropriate age) should be taught not to act on their sexual impulses and temptations. Boys should be taught to be men of honor who will abstain from sex until he marries a woman who is also willing to abstain from sex until marriage.
Notice that I didn’t mention that girls should be taught to love their children, because such a thing comes naturally. The women who are pro-abortion are unnatural. They were taught to hate children and see them as nothing but a burden in their lives, and for the unborn, as nothing more than parasites.
And beyond coming to hate their children, they come to hate themselves. Not sure if you’ve seen the following image, but it depicts a person who either deeply hates herself or is being extremely overdramatic:
That sign indicates a deep level of self-hatred. Of course, the message falls a bit flat given that she’s wearing a mask because she fears dying of the largely non-lethal Chinese coronavirus, but the point remains. Only someone who hates him or herself to a notable degree would be willing to have that kind of sign at a Roe protest.
If they hate themselves, how can we expect them to not hate their children? And the thing about hate is that it has to be taught. The Leftist has to be taught that white people are evil, black people are blameless and victims, men are oppressors, etc. That’s why they want crap like CRT in classrooms, which only creates more and more Leftists who hate other people and most importantly themselves.
In any case, there’s more to that segment, as he had guests, one who was seemingly more pro-life and the other who was staunchly pro-abortion and was fuming the entire time (not to mention spreading disinformation like “interracial marriage” is next to try and make as many of their favored demographics fearful and ticked off enough to incite violence against pro-lifers), but this article is long enough as it is.
Again, I’m not believing for one second that Maher only became privy to this information recently. People had to have been telling him, in some form or fashion, about stuff like that and he had to have either ignored them altogether or countered that it was just “right-wing talking points.”
The fact is that only SEVEN countries in the entire world allow for elective (no reason) abortion after 20 weeks: The U.S., Canada, Netherlands, Singapore, China, North Korea and Vietnam.
Not exactly the best crowd to surround yourself with.
That abortion exists altogether is a nightmarish thing. Make no mistake, Roe v. Wade is the single worst decision the Supreme Court ever made. Dredd Scott may have led to the Civil War and Plessy led to the need for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but neither led to the genocide of nearly 64 million babies in 49 years, neither led to the death of nearly 20 million black babies in 49 years, and neither led to over 1000 babies being aborted every day in the U.S.
And yes, just because Roe has been around for nearly 50 years doesn’t mean crap. Roe is not “settled law” like conservative justices were cowardly made to acknowledge in their confirmation hearings. First of all, it’s not law. Only the Legislature can write and pass laws. Supreme Court cases are merely decisions as to what the SCOTUS of that time believes to be constitutional. But the Constitution does not say abortion was fine or legal anywhere. Furthermore, Plessy v. Ferguson, the decision which led to the “separate but equal” doctrine, was around for 58 years before it was overturned.
If Dredd Scott and Plessy were overturned, as they should’ve been, so can and should Roe v. Wade, Casey v. Planned Parenthood, Obergefell v. Hodges (the gay marriage case), etc. Evil should not be the law of the land and no Supreme Court case is ever “settled.”
If America wishes to see God’s favor and be able to sincerely say “God bless America” it must destroy evil wherever it is found. One such evil is in Roe v. Wade.
“Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”
In yet another example of the utter destruction that people have allowed to befall them, a recent study from the Royal Society Open Science journal found that lockdowns in the United Kingdom drove roughly 60,000 children to clinical depression.
Researchers found that there was a 27.1% prevalence of depression in their sample, a number far higher than would have occurred without lockdowns. This percentage, according to the UK Telegraph, equates to roughly 60,000 extra children who suffered as a result of the Chinese coronavirus lockdowns than otherwise would have under normal circumstances.
The study says: “After controlling for baseline scores and several school and pupil-level characteristics, depressive symptoms were higher in the COVID-19 group. These findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 pandemic increased adolescent depressive symptoms beyond what would have likely occurred under non-pandemic circumstances.”
One could argue that the study is saying that the pandemic itself is what drove children to depression, but one would have to be awfully disingenuous to pretend as though being practically locked in your home without the ability to see your friends and/or extended family wouldn’t have any sort of negative psychological effects.
We saw images of children being forced to wear masks and sitting by themselves in cafeterias, and they were absolutely miserable. They were literally banned from being able to socialize with their friends, despite the fact that children are the safest demographic regarding the virus.
And this isn’t the only negative side-effect found in the study.
According to the research, 400,000 UK children were referred to mental health specialists for things such as eating disorders and self-harm. How do you see this and not think that the measures taken during the pandemic were not only not beneficial towards “slowing” the spread of the virus (it seems to be a seasonal thing, kind of like, oh, well, what do you know, THE FLU!) but were actively harmful towards society.
Even in China, we are currently seeing whole cities being forced to stay indoors, not being able to even leave to get food, just because ONE person in that entire city tests positive for the virus they created. The CCP is currently performing psychological terrorism on their own populace, not because the virus is just that terrible or even because they think it’s just that terrible, but because this is the best opportunity to screw their own people over since Mao’s “Great Leap Forward”.
And clinical depression is far from the only problem kids have had to face as a result of evil people’s mandates and cowardly people’s submission. According to Summit News, there has been a shocking outbreak of hepatitis in children as a result of lockdowns and social distancing weakening their immune systems, with most of the 169 cases discovered having occurred in children under the age of 5. 17 of those little kids have had to get liver transplants and one of them ended up dying.
Again, this comes as a result of a weakened immune system caused by lockdowns and social distancing. You know how sometimes, when a kid gets chicken pox, friends of that kid’s parents who are parents themselves will throw “chicken pox parties” so that their kids develop immunity towards it? Whatever you might think of such a ritual, its benefit is that it does precisely that: helps develop the kids’ immune systems. Lockdowns and social distancing accomplish the opposite of that,and weaken the immune system.
Another negative side-effect, which will likely be a generational one unless we can figure out a way to reverse it, is that many infants have struggled in cognitive development and developed speech disorders as a result of adults around them wearing masks. According to speech therapists, adults wearing masks has caused a 364% increase in patient referrals of toddlers and other very young children.
Little kids learn behavior from their parents, so not being able to see their faces has seemingly caused cognitive development issues in those kids. Which would be strange if not for the fact that I would 100% believe many of those parents were wearing masks inside their own homes like psychopaths.
The damage done to society is far greater than perhaps any of us realize. In an effort to protect ourselves from the biggest mountain-out-of-a-molehill virus with very little lethality, we have destroyed civil liberties, the idea of bodily autonomy, and skewed the very development of the future leaders of this country. And still, there are people out there who want to inject poison into LITTLE CHILDREN and cause even more, perhaps irreparable, damage to them. Oh, and in the meantime, teachers have sought for a way to have sex with those kids too, and call you bigot and terrorist for trying to stop them.
A country which does not protect its children is a country which does not deserve a future and most certainly will not have one.
“For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.”
Because the Left is as dumb as a bag of bricks and as corrupt and evil as can be, they have taken it upon themselves to keep parents away from children’s education, making outrageous claims like “parents have no place in the classroom”.
Naturally, that would tick off any parent who is moderately concerned with their kids, and would prompt looking into just what kind of education these kids are receiving that the “educators” don’t want parents to find out about. Which is why the Florida legislation infamously (and incorrectly) called “Don’t Say Gay” bill exist, in order to protect children as young as THREE OR FOUR from having their minds corrupted by the subject of sex, a subject they are far too young to understand.
And this idea of parents being able to oversee their children’s education, which has been turned into a political matter because everything is political in this day and age, is extremely popular and favorable by pretty much everyone, even Democrat voters (though, unsurprisingly, that demographic is closer than the others in terms of favorable vs. unfavorable).
You see, according to a poll conducted by the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School, 46% of Americans aged 18-29 agree with the statement that “parents should have more control over their children’s education than they do now,” while only 23% disagreed.
That is a 2-1 margin in favor of parental control in education, and this is coming from the youngest demographic, the type that would more often side with the Left on political issues.
Unsurprisingly, Republicans showed the most support for this, with 64% agreeing with that statement and only 14% disagreeing. And like I said, even Democrats saw more people supporting that statement than opposing it, with 35% agreeing and 31% disagreeing, though like I said, this is unsurprisingly close in this demographic.
I will give credit where it’s due, as a still majority of Democrats seem to be somewhat reasonable with this, but it’s clear that they are very quickly becoming a party of groomers and child abusers. If teachers don’t want the parents of the kids they are teaching to know what is being taught, that should be a massive red flag that something terrible is going on. Because what adult will tell a kid “don’t mention this to your parents” and have anything other than evil planned for that kid?
At any rate, as far as Independents go, they also showed a great deal of support for that statement, with 44% agreeing and 20% disagreeing.
And just to reiterate, this is ALL young Americans. Young Republicans, young Democrats, young Independents, all had a majority, in most cases a strong majority, agreeing that parents should have more control over kids’ education. One can only imagine how much more support older Americans have for parental rights in education. Actually, it’s not that hard to imagine, seeing as Gov. Youngkin pretty much ran on this one issue and won handily against someone who was vehemently opposed to parental rights in education.
The poll, of course, showed other matters, such as young Americans’ approval of Brandon dropping 18% over the last year, a similar number to what I mentioned in the previous article. The poll also showed 85% of young Americans supporting government measures to addressing student debt, though with varying solutions for it. For example, 38% said they approved of the government fully cancelling student loan debt, while 27% said they agreed with the government assisting with repaying the debt without fully cancelling, 21% said they preferred debt be cancelled only for those who are in most need, and 13% said they believed the government shouldn’t alter its policy aka no student loan debt cancellation.
But it’s not really much of a surprise that the demographic which is most burdened by student loan debt would want to see it be cancelled or at least be assisted with repayment. The matter of fact is that student debt is as much of a scam as college itself, rips people off substantially and leads them to financial misery. The idea that people go into debt so they can get an “education” and then get a crappy job (some people don't even accomplish that) just to try and repay that debt which is easily in the six figures is absolutely insane. And this is without even going into the fact that colleges, for the most part, are just Marxist indoctrination centers.
Getting back to parental rights, quite unsurprisingly, there are those who are opposed to parents having any say in their kids’ education.
For example, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten claimed that “Instead of everybody joining together in America to get us out of the effects of the pandemic, these right-wing ideologues are just trying to create fear and anxiety and anger exploiting the fear that parents already have in order to win elections and end public education as we know it.”
A few things to say about this. First, I’m not surprised she’s trying to get people to focus on the scamdemic instead of what evils they are doing in classrooms. These people are sick, and not with COVID.
Second, what do you mean “fear that parents already have”? If they are already fearful, then these “right-wing ideologues” aren’t creating fear, anxiety and anger. You yourself are admitting it’s already there.
Third, why is it already there? Why are parents already fearful? Is it because this indoctrination and corruption of minds isn’t anything new and parents have been growing more and more concerned with what their kids are being taught? Is it because one of the silver linings of the lockdowns was that parents got to basically sit in on classes and got to see what their kids were being taught in online classrooms and didn’t like it? Why does that fear already exist if we are to believe that what teachers are doing is merely educating kids and not doing other awful, immoral and illegal things? No parent who is confident his or her child is receiving a solid education will have any fears about it, so the fact that there IS fear in parents is a damning statement of this education system.
Fourth and finally, she isn’t entirely wrong, at least with that last bit. Us “right-wing ideologues” certainly are trying to end public education as we know it, because public education as we know it is teaching kids to be immoral, Marxist wokemobs as young as Kindergarten and they are being taught about sexuality at that young of an age. The fact that they include gay sex makes it a lot worse, but the teaching of sexuality at any level is what is abhorrent to those of us who have a heart and a conscience. That’s why there is such massive support in favor of the so-called “Don’t Say Gay” bill, because it protects young kids from teachers trying to corrupt their minds and groom them into being sexual objects.
It’s because of the current state of public education that homeschooling has grown between 5.4% and 11% from March 2020 to September 2020, and 5 million American children, by the summer of 2021, were being homeschooled. Government schools are so putrid that concerned parents (who have been wrongfully labeled as “terrorists” simply for inquiring about their children’s education at PTA meetings, which definitely doesn’t help the Left here) are looking everywhere, even within their own homes, to give their kids a better education.
So yes, we are definitely trying to end public education as we know it, because public education as we know it is resolutely evil and corrupt. And we will never apologize for trying to protect our kids.
“But Jesus said, ‘Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.’”
The golden rule regarding Democrats is that the fake news media will always cover for them, particularly if they are a prominent figure within the party. Almost nothing short of blatant groping of women (at least getting caught for it) or outright murder will get Democrats into trouble with the fake news media (and this one is dubious, seeing as Ted Kennedy probably got away with it). So one would have to be a major screw-up of catastrophic proportions in order to be bashed by the Leftist fake news media.
And for the first time since the botched Afghanistan withdrawal, that’s what Brandon has had to face, at least from one source.
With inflation reaching 8.5%, the highest in 40 years (this comparison is often used to bash Reagan, but people forget that those levels were part of his RECOVERY from the double-digit inflation numbers seen during the Carter years) and wages effectively shrinking in comparison to inflation growth, more and more people are being open about their distaste for Biden (there are, of course, those who always lie in polls to protect themselves from Leftist persecution) and it’s being reflected in polling. So much so, in fact, that CNN is beginning to notice it.
In the latest CNN poll, the ghost hand-shaker is seeing approval of just 39%. This wouldn’t usually be too bad, but seeing as this is an extremely friendly poll, that 39% (which is a low in this poll) is terrible. Almost as friendly Quinnipiac University had him at an abysmal 33% approval.
These results have led to a CNN panel consisting of Bloomberg White House correspondent Jordan Fabian, CNN Capitol Hill reporter Melanie Zanona, and Time Magazine national political correspondent Molly Ball, with host Abby Phillip weighing in on such numbers.
Phillip said: “It’s an environment of overall discontent,” in relation to Republicans disapproving due to (among other things) poor economic policies, and environmentalist wackos disapproving due to Biden resuming the sale of oil and gas leases on federal land (ironically, the only thing I have ever approved of this illegitimate regime).
She continued: “People correctly perceive that he’s not in control of the situation. And I think ever since that Afghanistan last summer, people have had – voters overall – have not had a sense of leadership from the White House, have not had a sense that there’s a president in control, who is strong and consistent and knows what he’s doing and can project a consistent message from one day or the next.”
A few things to comment on here. First, notice that she added “correct” when talking about a perception that Biden isn’t in control of the situation. This indicates that even she is in agreement with the statement. Even a CNN panelist believes that Brandon is completely fumbling the bag here and cannot get a hold of any situation, from inflation to even messaging on Ukraine (which we’ll get to momentarily).
The second thing is that the American people haven’t had a sense of leadership from the White House not since the Afghanistan disaster, but since January 20th, 2021, namely in the hours before Biden successfully stole the presidency. We haven’t had a leader in the White House since Trump. The only difference between then and now is that even the Left is beginning to agree that Biden is not a leader.
Finally, it’s indicative of how big a failure Brandon is that even people on his own side, in a panel from one of the most Democrat-friendly fake news sources out there, are not only reporting how unpopular he is, but also don’t try to make excuses too much about it.
During the height of the Afghanistan botch, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, BBC News and others called it how it was: a disaster. By-and-large, they didn’t pull many punches against Biden. Matter of fact, I saw more CNN headlines lambasting Biden over that than from other sources. And this is awfully reminiscent of that time. The Afghanistan disaster was a spectacular botch, so much so that even fake news sources had little choice but to call him out on it.
This time, however, it’s not one particularly noteworthy botch or screw-up. It’s the culmination of them which have led to poor numbers even by CNN standards.
Molly Ball went on to talk about the inconsistent and botched messaging surrounding the war on Ukraine, saying that Biden continues to “step on his own messaging”, such as the time that Brandon heavily suggested that American troops would be sent to Ukraine, and that Putin “cannot remain in power”, suggesting forceful regime change in a world superpower which the Obama administration had been trying to be extremely friendly with.
Phillip then went on to share multiple clips of vulnerable Democrats in Congress distancing themselves from Brandon, to which Ball said that this should ring “alarm bells” for the occupier.
“It is a sign that they sense that there is nothing to be gained by continuing to be allies of the president,” Ball said. This is a sentiment which could not be found with Trump, even after the 2020 steal.
Of course, early on, many (though not all) RINOs made sure to distance themselves from Trump, but pretty much all conservatives in Congress or running for a Congressional seat sought his endorsement and wanted to be close to him. As time went on, with the obvious popularity of the MAGA movement, wolves dressed as sheep also sought to be endorsed by him (only to turn around and vote to impeach him for b.s. reasons) and even today, any Republican running, regardless of what they think or said about Trump in the past, is seeking his endorsement (which unfortunately, he is way too loose in giving).
Whereas Republicans seek Trump’s endorsement and close ties (even the ones who hate him), some Democrats seek to distance themselves from the man who supposedly won the most votes in American electoral history.
To conclude, the panel discussed his plummeting support from younger generations, which typically are the most Democrat-friendly demographic. Fabian argued that Brandon is losing support among millennials and Gen Z because he “hasn’t delivered” on campaign promises like canceling student loan debt, which could be an accurate assessment (alongside the Obama-like crappy economy). According to a recent Gallup poll, Biden is down 21% with Gen Z and 19% with millennials.
Fabian said: “Those numbers are a tremendous failure for a Democratic president to have numbers like that among young voters.”
Indeed, seeing as the youngest voters (aside from the literal infants) are those most recently indoctrinated by the Marxist centers for diseducation that we call colleges. When a Democrat president (or in this case occupier of the Oval Office) is seeing massive drops in support from young voters, that is another major indication of how poor a job he is doing.
Be it because of not canceling student loan debt or the crappy economy, young people are getting fed up with Brandon, as is the rest of the country.
Of course, we didn’t vote to elect him, and his approval was always low (given how, again, we didn’t elect him), but people, by-and-large tend to not be as honest as they would be in these polls if they didn’t have to fear Leftist persecution. Even the numbers we are seeing, regardless of source, I believe to be unnaturally high, and that his real approval numbers are far closer to the teens.
But let us not simply be content with these numbers now. The midterms are half a year away and they will certainly try to pull some shenanigans to avoid total disaster come November.
1 Peter 5:8
“Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.”
Disgusting: Macron Says He Is “Opposed To Self-Defense” After Farmer Defends Himself Against Burglars
Pardon my French, but I believe France could nowadays be classified as a s**thole country, like the ones President Trump had talked about some years ago. The reason I say this is because of the following irrational, irritating and infuriating situation:
Last week, a farmer had to defend himself, his THREE-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER, and his home from FOUR burglars between the hours of 10 p.m. and 11 p.m., with the farmer taking his gun and killing one of the burglars. While any reasonable person would obviously classify this as a case of self-defense, and therefore a legal shooting and killing, it’s obvious that France is looneyville in this day and age, and the farmer was charged with MURDER for shooting one of the men who broke HIS rights by illegally entering his home and attempting to ransack it AT BEST.
But that’s not the worst part, because seemingly, the country’s PRESIDENT is siding with the court in charging the man with murder and, effectively, siding with criminals altogether.
More specifically, he said the following about the event: “Everyone must be safe, and the public authorities have to ensure it. But I am opposed to self-defense. It’s very clear and undisputable because otherwise the country becomes the Wild West. And I don’t want a country where weapons proliferate and where we consider that it’s up to the citizens to defend themselves.”
You know who else doesn’t believe in the right to self-defense? Those who wish to violate other people’s rights. And it’s not like you can only make the inference that that’s what he means. He’s telling you, straight up, that you don’t have a right to defend yourself, at least in France.
It’s maddening and I simply have no words to describe how enraging this is. He’s saying that the farmer, who is the VICTIM in this circumstance, should’ve just ALLOWED the burglars to ransack his home, frighten his daughter, and perhaps do even worse things to them. All because France “shouldn’t be the Wild West.”
France’s police force is already having to tangle with not only radical Islamic terrorists that Macron keeps allowing in and allowing to form insurgency zones, but also enforcing whatever illegal and inhumane COVID mandates he still has imposed on the French populace. Macron says that the farmer should’ve simply called the police, which I’ve previously discussed could be detrimental as response time, particularly in bad areas, can be pretty bad. Not to mention that, if the burglars had still been there by the time the cops showed up, you immediately have a hostage situation, making things even worse.
In such scenarios, there are a million possible outcomes. That there were FOUR of them means that it really could’ve gone unimaginably worse than it actually did, especially as they chose to do that at night, meaning they were prepared to meet opposition and having to subdue the residents (most burglaries happen in daylight, when people are away from their homes). Allowing four men free reign over your home, when you have a three-year-old child with you would be to fail as a parent and would invite the worst of situations imaginable. But going so far as to charging the man who defended his family and his home with murder and then claiming, with no uncertain words, that you’re opposed to the concept of people defending themselves and those they care about, is to fail as a civilized society, as a country, and as an officeholder.
I already really didn’t like Fascist Macron because of the mandates and everything else, but this makes me outright DESPISE the man. Yes, not simply as a Leftist politician, but as a man.
Just what could be going on in his head that he thinks that way of thinking is in any way okay, let alone that he would feel comfortable SAYING IT OUT LOUD (though with the first round of the French elections just days away, I’m certain someone in his camp will tell him to backtrack those comments, but we all know how putridly he feels about his fellow man, let alone Frenchmen)?
I guess he’s never had to contend with the traumatic experience and severe violation of one’s home that is burglary. But perhaps even worse, he himself could be considered a criminal, as he views people defending themselves as erroneous and morally deplorable. What plans does he have for his countrymen that he thinks they shouldn’t be able to defend themselves?
The bit about the Wild West was nothing but an excuse and an attempt at demonizing the time and to fearmonger based on that demonization. The Wild West is considered a “lawless” time, but people conflate that with is being “justiceless.” The federal government had a much tougher time imposing federal law in those days, to the point it was practically nonexistent in the “Wild West.” But the Wild West still had towns and designated lawmen. Not to mention people had guns to defend themselves against injustice that may fall upon them.
The concept of a Wild West is not the anarchic hellhole that the Left wishes to make of it. People were a lot freer and could trust, at least, in themselves and their weapons. Take away those weapons and all you’d be left with is Detroit, Chicago, or France in 2022.
Again, with the French police being held up doing other things, they likely wouldn’t have shown up to the scene until it was far too late. Is that a better outcome than the legal and justified killing of a BURGLAR READY TO SUBDUE THE FARMER? Is it better for crime to succeed so long as France doesn’t become “the Wild West”? Because guess what, whatever idea you have of the Wild West, Mr. Macron, it’s what your country has become. A lawless and, truly, justiceless land if the farmer was charged with murder at any capacity for DEFENDING HIS FAMILY AND HOME.
Thankfully, the farmer was released from jail, but is still under judicial supervision. Whether this means the murder charge was lifted or not, I don’t know, but that the French justice system would find it appropriate to “keep an eye” on the VICTIM of burglary is damning for Baguetteland.
Wanna know who else believed French people shouldn’t be able to defend themselves? Literally Hitler when he took over half the country and installed a Fascist puppet to run Vichy France.
Who would’ve thought France in 2022 would become Vichy France once more?
I hope these fascists and indisputably evil people in office are soundly defeated now and forevermore.
1 Timothy 5:8
“But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”
Watch out, Zorro, your iconic symbol is being attacked and cancelled by a virtue-signaling mob pretending they are doing anything at all effective against Russia.
I’d like to pretend we live in a remotely sane world, which is why I do my absolute best to stay off of Twitter, but on occasion I am pulled back in like Michael Corleone to see the collective idiocy of the Left.
Following the cancellation of Yuri Gagarin and Russia as a whole in a “World’s Prettiest Tree” competition, the Left around the world is seeking to cancel the letter “Z”, because, apparently, it’s being linked with support for Russia’s actions against Ukraine.
This makes about as much sense as the claim that the number “88” is a secret code for white supremacists that means “heil Hitler” or something like that. But it’s not as though logic is a requirement for Leftist actions. If anything, it’d be a deterrent.
The letter is apparently so egregious that Germany will outright make it a CRIME to use the letter, and Ukraine called for the global “criminalization” of the letter, at least in the context of it being used to voice support for Russia (those claims that Ukraine was Nazified don’t seem so ridiculous after this and the dismantling of 12 whole political parties, only half of which could be said to be pro-Russia).
However, even with this supposed context, the letter is being entirely dropped by companies like Zurich Insurance Group (henceforth known as “Urich” Insurance Group. I joke, they really just dropped it from their logo, but the name is the same) and Samsung, who dropped the “Z” from their Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Galaxy Z Flip 3 foldable smartphones.
And Lithuania would even go so far as to punish individuals and businesses with 500 euro fines ($554.35) just for DISPLAYING the letter “Z”, utterly ignoring the context and simply punishing the use of the letter as a whole, even if those displaying the letter are against Russia as well.
Which is not only extremely moronic, but outright ironic, seeing as the last name of the Ukrainian president starts with a “Z”.
But this is just how low IQ these individuals and businesses are. They are willing to outright cancel a whole LETTER IN THE ALPHABET, if it’s for the purposes of virtue signaling and appearing as woke as possible.
Never mind the fact that the letter itself has millions of different uses, and that someone could display the letter Z without being supportive of Russia (like how the Russian cosmonauts weren’t supporting Ukraine just because of the color of their space suits), apparently, any and all uses of the letter must be forbidden.
“The Suite Life of Zack & Cody”? More like “The Suite Life of Ack & Cody.” New York Jets QB Zach Wilson, you’re gonna have to change your name, bud. Actress Zendaya, might wanna permanently make yourself Mary Jane.
What, are they also gonna change the name of Mt. Zion back to Mt. Moriah? Actually, they very well might do that.
Regardless, anyone with half a functioning brain would recognize how stupid it is to cancel a whole letter of the alphabet just for the purposes of standing in “solidarity with the Ukrainian people.” In reality, they are, of course, standing in solidarity with their bank accounts, as I’ve noted in a prior article.
I have no idea how this concept of the letter “Z” being used by pro-Russia people was fabricated, but as I’ve previously mentioned, it doesn’t have to make a lick of sense. They will go forth with what they think is best (for them) regardless of logic and evidence at any capacity.
This much has been proven over the last couple of years in particular, given their insistence of mandating things like lockdowns, masks, social distancing and vaccination, despite the fact that none of those things work and could, in fact, be outright detrimental to people (and have proven to be so).
At this point, nothing the Left does should really be surprising to me, and nothing they cancel ought to stun me at all, but it somehow does. They continue to outdo themselves in their stupidity and attempts to virtue signal.
Lord, let this madness end sooner rather than later.
“A worthless witness mocks at justice, and the mouth of the wicked devours iniquity.”
In the toughest and most gut-wrenching strike from the international community against mean ol’ Putin, organizers of the International European Tree Contest have banned Russia from participating in their Tree of the Year contest.
Take that, Vlad!
To add on to this joke of an attempt at literally useless virtue signaling, the event officials awarded the “prestigious” award to Poland, because Poland is helping Ukrainians flee their country.
Furthermore, they released a statement saying: “This move is not directed against ordinary Russian women and men. We appreciate all active citizens of the Russian Federation who strive for a free civil society and the protection of nature. However, we cannot stand idly by and watch the unprecedented aggression of the Russian leadership against a neighboring country. The exclusion of Russia from the competition is a step that must be understood in the context of international efforts to isolate Russia in order to stop the war.”
Boy, do I have a lot to say about this hilarious cancelation.
First, note that they mentioned women ahead of men towards the beginning. It’s not at all surprising that an environmentalist, Leftist wacko organization that literally just awards countries with “Tree of the Year” (in all likelihood as a front for some money laundering or other bribery actions, kind of like how Ukraine is known for laundering money and being massive Clinton, Biden and other Democrat donors) would be so “woke” as to say “women and men” when “men and women” is the far more common phrase.
Second, I find it hilarious that they call whatever they don’t like “unprecedented.” Just what’s unprecedented about one country invading another? Russia invaded Georgia and Armenia, and took Crimea in 2014, albeit without having to fight.
Before that, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Croatia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Albania, Romania, Iran, Finland, the Baltic states, Ukraine (1919), the Ottoman Empire, Galicia, Germany, etc. in reverse order. And that’s JUST in the case of Russia. Of course, many other countries have conducted invasions. In the 2000s alone, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, Ethiopia invaded Somalia, Comoros invaded Anjouan, Kenya invaded Somalia, Turkey invaded Syria; Senegal, Nigeria and Ghana invaded Gambia and the UAE invaded Yemen.
After World War II, China invaded Tibet (twice), France invaded Vietnam, Pakistan invaded India; Egypt, Jordan, Iraq and Syria invaded Israel, North Korea invaded South Korea, North Vietnam invaded South Vietnam, Iraq invaded Iran, Argentina invaded the Falkland Islands, Iran invaded Iraq, etc.
Before then, over literal millennia, countries have invaded other countries and particularly neighboring ones. Countries invading other countries is the most precedented thing in world history.
Lastly, I find it the most hilarious that they actually take themselves so seriously as to believe this is an effort to isolate Russia from the international community and would do even the most miniscule of things to stop war in Ukraine.
Either they could take lessons in humility from Narcissus or they are massive morons.
Do you really think Putin received news of this and thought “Man, this is getting out of hand. We’ve now been cancelled by hippy tree people from competing to see who has the prettiest tree! Clearly, this is a sign that what I’m doing is not very well received by people I already didn’t like nor respect. I shall put an end to this now, before we miss out on the ‘World’s Fanciest Hat’ award”?
What, exactly, would something like this practically achieve? Nothing, of course, but it’s not meant to achieve anything practical. Like I said, this is just useless virtue signaling to express support for the “current thing” the Left supports: Ukraine.
Granted, the Left only supports Ukraine because it’s a cash cow for them and they may or may not have very incriminating evidence of crimes against humanity in some of the biolabs in that country, but they’re still generally pushing for Russia to not be inside Ukraine anyway.
And the only reason people like the organizers of the “world’s prettiest tree” event do this isn’t to actually show support for a country under siege. They don’t care one wit about the plight of the Ukrainian people. They only do this to show support for their Leftist buddies to keep events like these going. If they didn’t do something this worthless and idiotic, they themselves would be on the other end of the ban hammer. They themselves would be the ones being canceled.
So, they do stupid crap like this to “stop the war” as if anyone would believe this does anything to achieve that.
With the way things are going, the next major war America and the West participate in will be a massive defeat (particularly since the American military will now be accepting those who weigh the same as a Bradley into their ranks) and very deservedly so.
I’d feel no sadness over the loss of a West which long abandoned God and worships the self, kills babies in cold blood and parades around the sexually abominable, and sends out ridiculous and useless virtue signals in fake shows of “support” that amount to literally nothing, all for the sake of a paycheck.
What a worthless culture this one is.
“Turn away from evil and do good; so shall you dwell forever. For the Lord loves justice; he will not forsake his saints. They are preserved forever, but the children of the wicked shall be cut off. The righteous shall inherit the land and dwell upon it forever.”
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...