It is not often that I talk about how proud I am of my state of Alabama (usually because either I don’t talk much about it or it decides to elect a Democrat to the Senate for the first time in decades), but I am very proud of my state today.
 
In a landmark decision, the Madison County Probate Court recently became the first state to rule that an aborted baby is a person with the same rights as everyone else.
 
The court took the case of a father whose baby was aborted by his girlfriend against his wishes six weeks into the pregnancy.
 
On February 10th, 2017, the girlfriend of Ryan Magers aborted their baby when she went to the Alabama Women’s Center, where she received an abortion pill.
 
According to Magers, he “just tried to plead with her and plead with her and just talk to her about it and see what I could do, but in the end, there was nothing I could do to change her mind.”
 
On January 25th, 2019, Magers filed a petition with the Madison Probate Court to serve as the personal representative of the baby’s estate (hereby called “Baby Roe”).
 
In February 2019, Magers said: “It was just like my whole world fell apart,” insisting that the reason for filing the suit in the first place is “I’m here for the men who actually want to have their baby. Even though there’s nothing I can do for the situation I was in, there is something I can do for the future situations for other people… I believe every child from conception is a baby and deserves to live.”
 
Regarding the suit, Mager’s lawyer Brent Helms said: “The only thing that estate has is the right to sue and so that is what Ryan is doing, is suing on behalf of Baby Roe’s estate.”
 
Upon the court ruling that the aborted baby is a person, thus leading Magers to be able to legally represent the baby’s estate, Helms said: “We have already had a victory, and it was the first one of its kind, ever… This is the first estate that I’m aware of that has ever been opened for an aborted baby.”
 
Helms also noted that Alabama’s law states that life begins at conception, so this case could also make its way to the state supreme court.
 
Overall, this is pretty good news. Unfortunately, Ryan’s baby is long gone. He or she has already been eliminated by a mother who did not want him or her and by a clinic that insists they are a women’s healthcare center when in reality are nothing but a legal human slaughterhouse.
 
However, this is a landmark decision. The fact that the Alabama law states that life begins at conception and their recent decision that an aborted baby is, indeed, a human being with rights, whose rights have been violated, should not be understated. It’s outright incredible!
 
And it could lead other states to follow suit. In a similar way that the Satanists that call themselves the New York legislature set the precedent for trying to normalize and promote third-trimester abortions, leading other liberal states to look to do the same, other conservative states could look to implement similar pro-life policies and laws as Alabama’s.
 
In this way, we continue the fight for life – the insistence that all babies in the womb are human beings, are alive and deserve the same rights everyone else: a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
 
While the evil Left insists that even babies who are already BORN are not human beings if the mother decides that it is not a human, the righteous Right insists that all babies, inside and out of the womb are a gift from God, with life and potential, created in His Holy image.
 
And that’s another thing I want to discuss: the fact that it’s just the mother who gets to decide what to do with the baby. Why is it that way? It takes two to make a baby, so why does only one get to make the decisions for it?
 
In every relationship, or at least the good ones, the two participants make decisions together. They talk things over, they have discussions and come to a resolution. But when it comes to abortion, the father of the baby has zero rights in the subject matter, zero say in what he wants, zero right to state his opinion and have it matter.
 
When it comes to abortion, the primary decision makers are the mother of the baby and the MURDERER of the baby.
 
And what exactly do you think the murderer is going to want to do? It’s his very BUSINESS to eliminate life. He makes MONEY off of doing that. It’s not like he’s going to talk to the mother and say “you know, you could at least TRY to love your baby. I mean, it may not have been planned, but you are growing a human being inside you and being a mother is one of the best and most rewarding things that you can do.” OF COURSE NOT!
 
A murderer is not going to pass up an opportunity to murder someone, particularly if they are not going to be prosecuted for it and can actually make MONEY off of it.
 
And don’t try and tell me abortionists aren’t murderers. Do you know how old I was when the subject of abortion was brought up at all? 8, maybe 9 at most. My father explained to me what it was and I was really surprised that it was legal. Why? BECAUSE EVEN AS AN EIGHT OR NINE YEAR OLD, I UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS MURDER!
 
I also knew what murder was and was under the assumption that murder was illegal. On that day, I discovered that there is one legal way to kill someone: in the womb.
 
Even at that young of an age, I knew perfectly well that abortion was murder. It only stands to reason to follow that up by saying that an abortionist, who is legally murdering someone, is a murderer, not really any different from Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer except for the fact that they can legally do it.
 
I am so incredibly proud of my state of Alabama for having recognized an aborted baby as being a person with rights. It’s outright DEMENTED that it takes A LOWER COURT to recognize the FACT that a baby inside the womb is, in fact, a human baby and should be afforded the same rights as anyone else, but this is the society we live in.
 
I feel terrible for Ryan for what his girlfriend did. However, I can consider this a teachable moment as well.
 
What do I mean by that? Well, consider what the situation was: Ryan’s GIRLFRIEND, not wife, aborted their baby.
 
This is precisely why I would advise everyone, not just Ryan, to not have pre-marital or extra-marital sex.
 
We would not have anywhere near as many problems in this world, especially when it comes to abortion, if people understood the importance of strictly marital sex and the sinfulness of pre-marital or extra-marital sex.
 
Had Ryan and his girlfriend been married, they very well might have kept the baby because they would’ve been ecstatic to start their own family (I say "might" because there of course is always the chance that the girl did not want a family at all and still would’ve gone through with it, but for the most part, married women would rather keep their babies, especially if it’s their first).
 
I’m not saying this to castigate or place blame on Ryan at all. I’m saying this to reaffirm the importance of marital sex.
 
Most people don’t see what makes sex special. No doubt, it’s enjoyable, but it’s supposed to be enjoyed by a husband and his wife only. Not a man with his girlfriend, not a man with another man, not a woman with her boyfriend, not a woman and another woman, etc.
 
Sex is supposed to be an enjoyable activity for child-rearing and marriage-consummation. It’s not supposed to leave people with strictly carnal desires for one another. It’s not supposed to be between two (or more) people outside of marriage. It’s certainly not supposed to lead people to regularly sin against God with lustful desires of the flesh.
 
The biggest reason I often say that abortion is linked to bondage of sin, bondage of the flesh, is because it is only ever a result of having been in a sexual relationship, usually outside of marriage.
 
Do you think anywhere near as many babies would be aborted if people understood and respected the importance of marital sex? Abortions are an evil result of an evil act of immorality and one of the seven deadly sins: lust.
 
Take that out of the equation, and so many more people come to realize just why we used to say that life is a miracle. Take that out of the equation and so many more people are happier and feel more fulfilled.
 
If society is to truly progress, we need to reaffirm the major tenets of the Bible, including what it says about marriage and sexual intercourse.
 
And for the few lefties that think that’s being regressive, let me tell you something: take a look around and see what your “progress” has gotten you. Depression rising, violence increasing, shootings on a regular basis especially in areas where guns are heavily restricted to the public, suicide rates on the rise, drug abuse worsening and a people so damn sensitive to anything different that they think Will Smith isn’t BLACK ENOUGH to play Venus and Serena Williams’ father in a biopic.
 
To me, none of that is progress. To me, all of that is the saddening and ever-worsening state of the human soul and psyche. It’s not progress to have a society so divided by race. It’s not progress to have a society where your gender can be left up to the individual to discern.
 
It’s lunacy and it’s human regression. I believe in evolution in as far as I believe a species can progress and regress. Humanity is doing the latter. Life is as meaningless now to many members of mankind as it is to animals, except animals aren’t animalistic enough to eliminate their young before they are even born.
 
Truly, truly, I say to you, the only way for humanity to be saved from this sin is to believe in and follow the Lord Jesus Christ.
 
How many Christians do you think abort their children? Or have pre-marital or extra-marital sex (and I’m talking about real Christians not the fake ones like the Catholic priests that molest young children)?
 
I can tell you: not very many.
 
Acts 4:12
“And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

It is no secret to anyone at this point that the Democrat Party has effectively become the Party of infanticide. This is something they’ve been for a long time, don’t misunderstand, but I think more and more people are beginning to feel uncomfortable with the Party’s policies regarding abortion.

This has been especially true since the passing of the New York legislation legalizing late-term abortion, with Governor Coonman in Virginia essentially endorsing infanticide, and other states going farther towards accepting the execution of babies born alive after a botched abortion, which is especially noted in Congress, with all but three Democrat Senators voting against a bill that would protect such babies.
 
I’ve often said that the Democrats and the Left in general have let the mask slip off their face ever since Trump became President. Their opposition to Sen. Ben Sasse’s (R-NE) Born-Alive bill is a testament to their fervent opposition for anything Trump would happily support.
 
However, their radical extremism on this issue has seemingly turned off even a good portion of Democrat voters who would previously have identified as pro-choice.
 
But that’s getting a bit ahead of myself. Let’s take a step back and discuss the incredible new Marist poll’s showing from a survey taken in mid-February.
 
The recent poll found that 47% of respondents identified as pro-life and 47% identified as pro-choice. This is the first time in a decade that the poll finds as many people identify as pro-life as they do pro-choice.
 
But the results of this poll are made even more impressive by the simple fact that just a month prior, only 38% identified as pro-life and 55% identified as pro-choice. That’s a difference of 17 whole points in the span of a single month!
 
This, I think, is the biggest thing to look at. Of course, I’ll also be looking at other numbers which are also pretty great, but this number and contrast with the January poll is something that I will focus on for the most part later on.
 
In any case, what is seen as the biggest boost in numbers for pro-life people seems to come, surprisingly, from Democrats and respondents who were under the age of 45.
 
Previously, only 20% of Democrats identified as pro-life, which was still surprisingly high, all things considered. The Democrat Party certainly has no room for pro-life people, so it is surprising to see so many registered Democrats saying they are pro-life. In any case, that number was before the most recent poll. According to the Marist poll, that number has surged 14 points to 34%. Still not as many as one would hope, but a significant gain altogether, let alone in the span of a single month.
 
And as far as young Americans go, with those under the age of 45, back in January, the gap between pro-choice and pro-life was massive, with 65% saying they were pro-choice and 28% identifying as pro-life. Now, only 48% identify as pro-choice and 47% identify as pro-life, a single point deficit.
 
Dividing down party lines, as previously mentioned, 34% of Democrats now identify as pro-life, 46% of Independents identify as pro-life (with 48% being pro-choice) and 67% of Republicans identify as pro-life, which honestly comes as a pretty big surprise to me. Most conservatives tend to be pro-life, so 67% is a worryingly low number, all things considered.
 
The poll also noted that 71% of Americans disapprove of third-trimester abortions, with that number including 60% of Democrats, 72% of Independents and 85% of Republicans. So the Democrat Party’s push for supporting late-term abortions are not popular even among their own supposed constituents.
 
71% also disapprove of abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy, or roughly 4 months.
 
Almost all of these numbers, especially in such a short amount of time, is music to my ears.
 
Over the past couple of months, the Democrat Party has deluded themselves into thinking that socialism is widely popular in America and that most people do not think of a baby in the womb, or having recently been born, as a human being. They think the majority of Americans agree with them wholeheartedly that a fetus is really nothing more than a disease or a virus, equating it to a cancerous tumor that must be rid of.
 
They think they do themselves a massive favor by supporting late-term abortion bills, endorsing infanticide (even if they don’t want to call it that) and overall believing that the vast majority of the population agrees with them.
 
We the People do not agree. This much is plainly seen not just in this poll but in other polls taken around the same time as well. Even those who vote for Democrats and have previously identified as pro-choice, or at least not been entirely sure about the whole issue and remained neutral have come to oppose the Democrat Party on this.
 
So much so that in the span of a single month, people have gone from pro-choice to pro-life so much that the numbers are tied for the first time since 2009.
 
And you know the Democrat Party isn’t going to learn a darn thing from this. They are dead-set in believing the lie that just about everyone agrees with them and loves them and hates Trump with a passion. They are dead-set in believing an ultra-radical approach to abortion is a winning ticket for them.
 
America has not yet completely sold its soul to the devil. And America is, I think, beginning to realize that the Democrat Party is the party of Satan.
 
I mean, to outright reject a bill that allows for the protection of BABIES BORN ALIVE after a failed abortion is outright satanic. It’s denying that that baby is a human being. How is that any different from Hitler denying Jews their humanity, or Southern Democrats denying black people their humanity?
 
It becomes painfully obvious just how satanic the Democrat Party and the Left altogether are. They offer babies as a sacrifice to their gods of money and power. I am running out of adjectives to call these people. I know that I tend to throw the word “evil” out there an awful lot to describe the Left, but that’s because that is precisely what they are.
 
No one can make the argument that denying a BABY BORN ALIVE their humanity and right to life is not evil in the least bit. No one can make the argument that a baby inside the womb is not a human and terminating it is not an act of sheer evil akin to murdering anyone already born.
 
The Left can dress things up however they want, using whatever deceitful words they want. Abortion is not healthcare, not for the mother and especially not for the child. To call this a healthcare issue is to equate pregnancy to a disease. Yes, it’s something the Left often does, but that doesn’t make it any less evil.
 
It’s not a woman’s liberation effort because no one is liberated by being slave to sin and to the flesh.
 
You can take a piece of crap, put colorful sprinkles on it, spray it with a nice perfume to make it smell better, wrap a bow on it and call it chocolate ice cream, but at the end of the day, it’s still just a piece of crap. That’s what the abortion issue is.
 
It’s death made to look like a healthcare service that strengthens a woman’s power and serves to free her from a fictitious patriarchy, but at the end of the day, it’s the advocacy of death for the most innocent among us.
 
Abortion is not a healthcare service. It’s not a tool for liberation. It’s not a right. It’s bloody murder.
 
It’s what sycophants like Jack the Ripper, Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer could only dream of doing. It’s what genocidal maniacs like Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong would smile about.
 
It’s what the very embodiment of evil, Lucifer, finds delight in every day of the week.
 
It’s what the Democrat Party fights tooth and nail for. And I think people have had enough.
 
Thank you God that there are people out there with enough reason to see what evil the Democrat Party has been advocating for recently.
 
Isaiah 58:8
“Then shall your light break forth like the dawn, and your healing shall spring up speedily; your righteousness shall go before you; the glory of the Lord shall be your rear guard.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

It’s no secret at this point that the State of New York has become one of the least child-friendly states in the entire country with their recent legislation that allows for late-term abortions to be legal (among other things).
 
As a response to this, a pro-life group called Focus on the Family has decided to show a 4D ultrasound image (like a 3D ultrasound but with moving images showing the baby three-dimensionally in real-time) of an unborn child in Times Square.
 
Focus on the Family president Jim Daly told LifeSiteNews: “Over 40 years ago, our founder, Dr. James Dobson, recognized that the family was in trouble. Prompted by the Lord, he left a very comfortable position in academia to start Focus on the Family. Our mission then – and now – is to help families thrive in Christ. We do this by providing help and resources for couples to build healthy marriages that reflect God’s design, and for parents to raise spiritually and emotionally healthy kids.”
 
All of that is fantastic. Quite fascinating that Dr. Dobson had the foresight to understand the Left’s war against the family. Of course, 40 years ago was just 1979, so Roe v. Wade had been the law of the land for some years at that point, but it is quite interesting to see someone back then be able to at least somewhat foretell what lied ahead in the road the country was taking.
 
And the message of focusing the family around the image of God, His plan for us and what He commands out of a marriage and family is also fantastic. It is rare to see that sort of message, in large part because the Left owns the news media which is adamant about taking away an unborn, or even newborn child’s very humanity.
 
In any case, Daly continued: “Times Square is known as ‘The Crossroads of the World’ and we’re at a crossroad as a nation regarding life. Do we really want to be part of the Abortion Axis of Evil – like China, North Korea and Vietnam that allows abortion for any reason after 20 weeks? We’re hearing from people all over the country who are disgusted by the blatant disregard for life. Enough is enough!”
 
I really like that name: “Abortion Axis of Evil”. It really encapsulates precisely what these countries are. They are akin to the Axis of World War II with Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and imperialist Japan. But beyond even that, it is absolutely, unequivocally evil. So that name fits the shoe just right.
 
Daly also noted that “most people have never seen a 4-D ultrasound. It’s our hope that after seeing these videos in Times Square, people will have no doubt that every life is made in the image of God. It’s our prayer that ALIVE FROM NEW YORK will be an event used to help change hearts and minds regarding life. We hope you’ll join us!”
 
Before writing this article, I did not know that 4D ultrasounds were even a thing. I knew very well about the standard 2D ultrasound, where there is a flat, 2D image of a baby living inside the womb. I also knew about 3D ultrasounds, where the image is three-dimensional but completely still. However, I did not know about 4D ultrasounds before this (in large part because I am not about to become a parent any time soon).
 
But this 4D ultrasound I think can be a very effective tool both for expecting parents to see their baby and for pro-life advocates who insist that the being growing inside a woman’s womb is a live human virtually no different from a baby that has already been born (as the image above suggests).
 
Daly went on to talk about what Focus on the Family has already managed to achieve, saying that over 15 years, they have saved “an estimated 425,000 babies by placing ultrasound machines in high-abortion areas… When abortion-minded women see an image of their baby on a screen, research suggests that 54% of them will choose not to abort. Just last month at the March for Life, we announced a goal of saving a million lives by 2025. In the aftermath of the egregious NY legislation legalizing late-term abortion and the Virginia governor endorsing infanticide, we’re prayerfully hoping this will call greater attention to the plight of the preborn.”
 
Everything about this is fantastic, though I am concerned with what the pro-abortion crowd will do regarding this. The 4D ultrasound showing is set to take place sometime in May. Given that this is New York, especially New York City, I don’t doubt that pro-abortion people will look to somehow prevent this event from happening, either petitioning Bill de Blasio to not allow this showing of an ultrasound to occur or something else entirely, including even sabotaging the event somehow.
 
Pro-abortion people know very well that an ultrasound shows a baby’s humanity. It shows that what the woman is seeing right then and there is the growing of her very own child, who is very much alive. A 4D ultrasound, basically taking the more realistic images of a 3D ultrasound and combining that with 2D’s ability to show a live-feed of a baby further shows the humanity of an unborn child. It shatters the idea that what is growing inside a uterus is not a baby, a human or alive. It shatters the idea that what is being shown on screen can be equated to a cancerous tumor ready to be removed. It shatters the idea that it’s just a clump of cells randomly thrown together.
 
4D ultrasound shows a real baby, an alive baby, in real time. Anyone who sees an ultrasound, particularly a 4D ultrasound and still denies the viability or humanity of the baby on their screen is either evil or outright demented (or both). I would say moronic but I think even stupid people would recognize a human when they see one. This is not a matter of intelligence, but a matter of morality.
 
To deny that a human baby is alive inside the womb is evil, regardless of what someone might try and argue. It’s virtually no different from denying Jews their humanity during the Holocaust (and I tend to be careful about comparing things with the Holocaust, but with the fact that there have been over 60 million abortions since 1973 in the U.S. ALONE, I don’t think it’s too far-fetched to compare the issue of abortion with a sort of modern-day Holocaust that is actually worse than the original Holocaust).
 
That’s over 60 million lives ended by the evil belief that a human baby inside the womb is not a baby at all.
 
God willing, this showing of a 4D ultrasound will go off without a hitch and will actually get a lot of people in Manhattan thinking about what it is they are even discussing. It’s not an issue of women’s rights or women’s healthcare or women’s liberation from the “patriarchy”.
 
It’s no woman’s (or man’s) right to kill their own child at any stage of his or her life. It’s definitely not healthcare when you’re talking about the literal ending of a life. That’s the antithesis of healthcare. And it’s not women’s liberation from the “patriarchy” because this allows women to have as much sex as possible, leaving them with a feeling of emptiness and allowing themselves to essentially be used by men as much as possible.
 
What part of a woman feeling sad and sorry for herself after her 100th round of sex with some random guy is women’s liberation?
 
Let me tell you: that’s not liberation from anything. It’s the very opposite. It’s bondage to sin.
 
It’s bondage to the flesh. No human ever is liberated by something that ensnares them and puts them in bondage.
 
Hopefully, that idea runs through many people’s minds upon seeing a 4D ultrasound of what can only be described as a living human being.
 
Jeremiah 1:5
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

If there is any silver-lining for Democrat Governor of Virginia Ralph “Coonman” Northam this past week facing some backlash over his support and promotion of infanticide and the surfacing of a photo of him wearing blackface standing next to someone in a KKK robe and hood is that according to a Morning Consult Poll taken after these scandals, 50% of Virginia Democrats still support the racist baby-killer.
                                        
Granted, that number dropped by 20 points from 70, so good for the 20% of Virginia Democrats who have a conscience, but a full 50% of Virginia Democrats see the news regarding his support for killing babies, see the news regarding his racist picture, and find absolutely nothing wrong with that.
 
And no, it’s not the same as Kavanaugh or Trump. What people might say regarding the photo is that Kavanaugh did stuff in college too and we, conservatives, forgave him for it. That is completely wrong.
 
The difference between Northam and Kavanaugh is that there is EVIDENCE that Northam was a racist. It’s certainly backed up by the fact that he ADMITTED to being the one in the photo. With Kavanaugh, there was zero evidence (and still there is zero evidence) that he did the things that were alleged about him.
 
And it’s different from Trump because, despite what the Left says about him, he’s not racist. They claim the Wall is racist, or the “Muslim” ban is racist (it only applies to terror-related Middle East countries, and not even all of them), or that just about anything he says ever is racist. But like I mentioned previously, there is actual evidence to Northam being racist. And again, he admitted to it.
 
If someone did not do what they are accused of having done, they deny it, not admit it immediately and then deny it.
 
Not that it matters much to Virginia Democrats. 50% still support him, only 25% disapprove of him and only 24% are unsure about him. So 24% of Virginia Democrats are mulling over just how wrong it is for him to promote infanticide and being in a photo featuring him wearing blackface.
 
Contrast that with Independents going from 42% approval to only 20% and Republicans going from 31% (fascinating that he had so much support from Republicans before) to only 15%.
 
And this is not even mentioning that, upon Northam denying that he was in the photo after already having admitted to it, his defense was not simply that that wasn’t him. It was that it couldn’t have been him because he was wearing blackface at a different time and place.
 
This is what he said: “My belief that I did not wear that costume or attend that party stems, in part, by my clear memory of other mistakes I made in the same period of my life. That same year, I did participate in a dance contest in San Antonio in which I darkened my face as part of a Michael Jackson costume”.
 
That’s like saying: “You see, your honor, I couldn’t have possibly killed the victim at the time in question because I remember perfectly well that I was killing someone else at that time.”
 
But even with this pouring-gasoline-on-a-fire of a defense, half of Virginia Democrats still support him.
 
I may sound surprised, but I really shouldn’t be. If Democrats don’t abandon their own when someone sleeps with an intern, keeps tens of thousands of classified government emails in a server in a bathroom, drives into a lake and kills a woman, takes a photo with Louis Farrakhan, puts Japanese Americans in an internment camp during WWII, allows for the nuclearization of North Korea, allows for the nuclearization of Iran, insists to the Soviets that Reagan will not be in power forever and they should wait on Democrats to retake power for negotiations, leaves Americans to die in Benghazi, allows for the running of guns through the southern border and weaponizes government agencies to target and destroy an opposing candidate, then they aren’t likely to abandon a racist baby-killer.
 
The biggest of the scandals about Northam for Democrats is not the baby-killing scandal, but the racist one. Elected Democrats could not give one single damn about what he said regarding killing a born-alive baby. They only cared when he admitted to wearing blackface in a photo.
 
And not even because they think it’s bad to do that, but because they have to be able to keep one of their most used weapons: calling Republicans racist.
 
That’s the only reason they want him gone. They ignored the baby-killing comment because they secretly liked what he said and support it (not really all that secretly, but still) and are likely saddened over the fact that they have to try and insist he steps down from office over the photo.
 
The funny thing is that the longer he stays as governor, the worse it will be for Democrats because any conservative, especially Trump, can point to him and say “you guys call us racist, but you still have ‘Coonman’ running Virginia, killing babies left and right”.
 
I would normally say that, regardless of party, I would want such a horrible person to step down from office, but I don’t in this instance. I want him to remain. It’s not like Virginia’s next governor would be any better for the state or for babies. Democrats are moving towards normalizing and supporting full-on infanticide if it’s in the name of women’s “health” or “liberation” or some other crap.
 
So it’s best if he is stubborn enough to remain, so that he gives us another arrow in our quiver.
 
But regardless of what happens, it speaks volumes that half of Virginia Democrats still support and approve of Coonman. Again, not so surprising when knowing that there is next to no scandal that will make most Democrats abandon the person in question.
 
Bill Clinton did not become an inconvenience to the Democrats until around and just before the #MeToo movement. Obama is still revered as one of the greatest presidents they’ve ever had, despite all the evil and obvious things he did. FDR is considered a Democrat legend despite putting Japanese Americans in internment camps.
 
The reason they don’t abandon them over these things is because they are a brotherhood of evil. Now, I usually don’t lump in Democrat voters with these people, since most are either uninformed or altogether misinformed about things, but this is a national story, many other elected Democrats are calling for his resignation and there is plenty of information out there regarding this. There isn’t much of a chance of being uninformed or misinformed about this.
 
So being ignorant about this is not an option, which leaves us with two options: either these people are outrageously stupid or evil.
 
But again, what makes things worse is the fact that it’s the racist photo, not the advocating of infanticide, that is ruining his career. Quite frankly, had that photo not surfaced, he would probably be considered a Democrat hero in their circles. Openly, they still feel as though supporting this or advocating for this might be a step too far, but give them time and this will become mainstream.
 
These people fight to ensure everything that is evil is considered good so that it may become mainstream. They are rotten to the core.
 
And as far as the Democrat voters go, kudos to the ones that no longer support Coonman, but shame on the ones that still do for any given reason.
 
Isaiah 5:20
“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

If you thought the bill in New York allowing women to get an abortion at any point in the pregnancy was evil, you’ve seen nothing yet. Democrat Virginia Governor Ralph Northam recently went on a radio show and he was asked whether or not he supported a Virginia bill that would do much of the same thing the New York bill did: allowing a woman to abort her baby even within seconds of birth.
 
The Governor said the following:
 
“This is why decisions such as this should be made by providers, physicians, and the mothers and fathers that are involved. When we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of the mother, with the consent of physicians, more than one physician by the way, and it’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus which is non-viable. So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen, the infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if this is what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physician and the mother.”
 
This goes WAY beyond anything else the Left has argued regarding this issue.
 
This is more than just “it’s just a clump of cells”. More than just “yeah, it has a heartbeat, but it’s not really alive.” This is “literally everyone considers this child to be alive but you can kill it anyway.”
 
I CANNOT EXPRESS JUST HOW PISSED OFF I AM AT THAT STATEMENT!
 
But I shall try and calm down and break down just what it is he said here.
 
First, he talked about this as being a decision. It should NEVER be considered a decision, but that will likely fall on deaf ears were I to debate a Leftist on this.
 
Second, notice how he mentioned deformities as a viable reason for murdering the child. I have often brought this up because it’s a very accurate argument, but this is EXACTLY what the Nazi eugenics program sought to do.
 
The first people that were rounded up and killed by the Nazis were those who were crippled or otherwise were simply not of any use. They could not fight in the war, they could not support the War Machine in any way, so they were disposed of.
 
Third, and easily the most important thing, the Governor CASUALLY talked about the parents choosing to RESUSCITATE a child that is STRUGGLING TO BREATHE in the outside world. If it struggles but the parents choose not to help it, that’s all hunky-dory for this guy.
 
And even if the parents mercifully choose to resuscitate the child, the Governor says they can STILL choose to kill it ANYWAY if they so desire.
 
I often say that there is not an argument anyone can make that will make me think abortion is not murder. By the same token, there is not an argument ANYONE can make that will make me think this is not UNDENIABLE INFANTICIDE!
 
Again, this is more than just the flimsy and dangerous excuse of “it’s just a clump of cells.” Pretty much everyone, Left or Right, agrees that a baby that is outside the womb is alive. That is why pro-choice/pro-abortion people argue that life begins at birth and not at conception. We can argue all we want about whether or not it’s alive inside the womb (it is), but pretty much everyone I’ve ever seen talk about this issue would agree that a child is ALIVE outside the womb.
 
Is this where we’re headed now? Arguing and debating the fact that a baby is alive ONCE IT’S BORN!?
 
Again, this goes beyond every other argument ever made regarding abortion. This is not even an abortion at this point. This is flat-out, unadulterated infanticide that this MONSTER is promoting.
 
WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD SUPPORT KILLING A CHILD ONCE IT’S BORN?!
 
Just when I think the Left could not get any more visceral, any more disgusting, they pull crap like this. Just when I thought the New York bill allowing abortion up to any point was evil and madness, the Left manages to show the very DEVIL that lives inside their hearts.
 
You know, I’m reminded of what Sen. Diane Feinstein said to Amy Coney Barrett. That Catholic dogma “lives loudly within you.”
 
I’ll take Catholic dogma living loudly within someone over the work of Satan living loudly within someone and that’s what I see from the Left.
 
No wonder their candidates support Medicare-for-all and eliminating everyone’s existing health insurance. These people HAVE NO SOUL! While most may have no brain, NOT ONE OF THEM HAS A SOUL.
 
Actually, let me rephrase. Not one of them has a soul that is still alive. They’ve killed or sold theirs. Their soul belongs to the devil, who is smiling at the Governor’s words.
 
And do you want to know what may just be the worst part? He was saying these things as though he were saying “interesting weather we’re having.” It was that casual as though he often talks about this and everyone around him agrees.
 
As though it makes complete sense for parents to have the ability to kill their NEW BORN CHILD.
 
It’s complete and total apathy for children. FOR HUMAN LIFE!
 
I remember Nancy Pelosi having a lot of children on the House floor when she was sworn into office as House Speaker. Many conservatives made the half-joking argument that Pelosi thinks those kids would all be considered available for slaughter while in the womb. Now, they’re seemingly moving in a worse direction. Now, those kids are available for slaughter within seconds, minutes, or however long AFTER birth.
 
And their slaughter wouldn’t even cause the Left to bat an eye. Killing children is as natural to them as breathing.
 
Believe me when I tell you I am really trying to hold back my anger here. I have so many things to say to the Governor that I simply cannot permit myself to say on this website. Just know that they are not exactly kind words.
 
This is the full-embrace of the Devil. And it’s only going to get worse.
 
There is not much else I can say that will be original. I’ve already called them degenerates, evil, etc. multiple times. The fact they keep embracing evil and keep going further down that path enrages me and saddens me. Not because I care for the state of their souls. They’re screwed. But because these people are elected into power. Gov. Northam has power to shape policy in his state.
 
And also because they have the power to influence others. It used to be the Left would at least PRETEND to be decent and reasonable people. That’s no longer the case. But instead of being punished for their indecency and their hatred, they get the House of Representatives. Now, you can call into question the legitimacy of many elections last November, considering how much voter fraud happened throughout, but that doesn’t change the fact that MANY people still support and fully embrace the Left PRECISELY BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE NOW.
 
Millennials, being the uninformed sad-sacks that they are, tend to support socialism more than capitalism according to many polls. Well, this kind of insane and inhuman rhetoric regarding born children is what accompanies socialism. People are not people under socialism, so how could we expect socialists to think that a baby that is BORN is an alive human being?
 
Remember Obama’s 2012 Democratic Convention slogan? “We belong to the government.” I’ve often talked about this being similar to what fascists, socialists, communists and everyone who wants big government all think.
 
Well, part of “people belonging to the government” means the government gets to decide just who qualifies as “people”. For the Nazis, the lame, the Jews, and anyone not of the Aryan race were considered less than people. For the Old Southern Democrats, black people were property, not people. For the Soviets, those who would oppose the regime were less than people. For much of the Middle East, the Jews, Christians, women and children are less than people.
 
For Governor Northam, a new born baby is less than a person. It does not have the right to live and the parents get to decide its fate.
 
It’s the same evil dogma we’ve seen from some of history’s most evil empires. And it seems to be festering as mainstream ideology on the Left if the Governor is talking about this so casually (and the radio host did not even question what the Governor said).
 
It’s truly sickening what evil the Left is capable of concocting. This is not human. This is Satanic.
 
Genesis 6:5
“The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

​May God have mercy on the State of New York, because I won’t.
 
On the anniversary of the biggest mistake in the Supreme Court’s history – Roe v. Wade – the State of New York voted 38-24 to legalize abortion through the third trimester, remove abortion from the definition of homicide, and overall made it a New York Constitutional right for people to get an abortion, with Gov. Andrew Cuomo signing it into law.
 
The bill is bullcraply (not an actual word but I don’t know how else to describe it) titled “Reproductive Health Act” and, like previously stated, removes a whole lot of limitations on abortion.
 
As I said, it allows for abortion in the third trimester, when an unborn baby has developed a nervous system and is more than capable of living in the outside world with little to no outside help.
 
The bill says that an abortion is perfectly fine if an abortion “is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.”
 
Yeah, don’t give me that crap. First, the term “health” is not defined, so it can really mean anything. The mother’s physical health doesn’t have to be at risk. Her mental health, emotional health, or even financial health can be legitimately pointed at for a legitimate reason for an abortion.
 
Second, there is never a case when an abortion is “necessary” for the life or health of a woman in the third trimester. As I said, an unborn baby can survive outside the womb during that stage with little help. If the pregnancy, for whatever reason, is causing the mother’s health to deteriorate and her life to be at risk, at that point in the pregnancy, labor would be induced.
 
In other words, no baby needs to die in such a circumstance.
 
Third, even in such a circumstance where the mother chooses to abort in the third trimester, she will still have to deliver a baby. Abortion during the third trimester is done differently from other periods of pregnancy. During a second trimester abortion, the baby’s torso and/or limbs are crushed, cut off, etc. It’s utterly gruesome. But during the third trimester, a lethal injection is given to the baby.
 
According to the Daily Wire, during a third trimester abortion, “the baby is injected with a poison directly into his skull or torso. He then suffers a hideously painful death, which he will certainly feel because of his developed nervous system. The mother carries the corpse around in her womb for a day. The next day, there is an ultrasound to check if the baby is dead. If he isn’t – if he has been writhing and suffering in agony for the past 24 hours, clinging onto life – then he will be injected again. The following day, the mother delivers her dead child. Sometimes she delivers him at the clinic, but if she can’t make it on time, the clinic is perfectly happy to recommend that she give birth into her toilet.”
 
So a delivery must happen either way, whether or not a woman delivers a living baby or a dead one. So the question must be asked: why go through with an abortion in this circumstance? For all the b.s. reasons for a woman to have an abortion that the Left will spew out of their mouths, there seems to be no even remotely legitimately-sounding reason for an abortion to be a viable option in this circumstance. (For the record, I don’t think there is any legitimate or legitimate-sounding reason for an abortion at any point, but there are arguments made by pro-abortion people that try to legitimize them.)
 
If the mother does not want the baby or does not think she can afford to have the baby, why not give it up for adoption? The baby will still have to be delivered, so how is delivering a dead baby a better option than delivering a live one?
 
Overall, in case you couldn’t tell, I am really pissed off right now. I usually would not write that word, and usually would say “ticked” off, but I think this situation at least justifies some swearing.
 
This is not okay.
 
And do you want to know what is perhaps the most messed up part? Never mind that the New York Senate voted on it, passed it and Cuomo signed it into law. The people that were there to witness this were CELEBRATING this and Cuomo ordered the One World Trade Center, a symbol of freedom and American prosperity, be lit pink in “honor” of this shameful event.
 
They were THRILLED at the fact that this bill will only cause more and more death.
 
I am so ticked off I can hardly think straight. There are a lot of things I want to say about this and to the people who both passed this death bill and celebrated it as some sort of achievement, but I have to restrain myself.
 
Let me be 100% honest with you here. I would FAR rather live in Sodom or Gomorrah than even set FOOT on New York.
 
New York has now become the new Sodom on steroids.

In Luke chapter 10, Jesus sends out 72 people to go to different towns and proclaim the Word of God, living off of what good people will give them in their homes in those towns. But as for the ones who do not receive the ones sent by Jesus, in verses 10-12, Jesus says to them: “But whenever you enter a town and they do not receive you, go into its streets and say, ‘Even the dust of your town that clings to our feet we wipe off against you. Nevertheless know this, that the kingdom of God has come near.’ I tell you, it will be more bearable on that day for Sodom than for that town.”
 
And later on in verse 16, Jesus says: “The one who hears you hears me, and the one who rejects you rejects me, and the one who rejects me rejects him who sent me.”
 
Now, how does this relate to the subject at hand?
 
New York is a state that outright rejects Christ. This bill proves as much. Not only the allowing, but the cheering, of passing a piece of legislation that legalizes the death of children in the womb who can absolutely live outside it with little help is an outright full embrace of evil.
 
Now, this is not something new by any means. New York has been a cesspool of liberalism and anti-Christianity for a while now, but this is only a step farther away from God and closer towards Satan.
 
The towns that rejected those sent by Christ were doomed and outright cursed by Jesus in verses 13 through 15: “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. But it will be more bearable in the judgment for Tyre and Sidon than for you. And you, Capernaum, will you be exalted in heaven? You shall be brought down to Hades.”
 
Cities, towns, even nations that reject Christ are utterly doomed. New York is quickly going down the path of eternal damnation and they continue voting into power those who would doom the people.
 
Never mind high taxes that straight up rob you more often than any mugger in a dark alley. This piece of legislation marks New York as the leading state in “reproductive rights”, which is simply another word for legal, and celebrated, murder.
 
This is infanticide and no one can convince me otherwise.
 
May God have mercy on everyone who celebrated death on that day, because I am just about out of it.
 
1 John 5:4
“For everyone who has been born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world – our faith.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

For as much as the Left wants to “shout” their abortions and Hollywood and other media want to portray abortion not simply as a choice, but a great one that leads to women being happier after getting one, the vast majority of the American people do not entirely agree with their positions.
 
According to a Marist/Knights of Columbus poll, 75% of Americans want substantial restrictions on abortion. This number includes 92% of Republicans, 78% of Independents, 60% of Democrats and 61% of people who identify as “pro-choice”.
 
All of those numbers, perhaps with the exception of the number of Republicans, are fantastic and very endearing numbers to see in an age where the Left rules the vast majority of the media, from the news, to Hollywood and television. We are constantly inundated with Leftist messages ranging from abortion to gay rights and everything in between. Regarding abortion, I am glad to see the vast majority of people are opposed to unrestricted abortion.
 
Knights of Columbus CEO Carl Anderson said regarding the poll: “As in past years, this poll shows that the pro-choice label on the abortion issue is simply insufficient. The majority of Americans – in both parties – support legal restrictions on abortion. Two-thirds of Americans want Roe revisited to allow for state regulation of abortion or to ban it altogether. The majority of the American people deserve to have their opinions heard.”


Regarding Roe, the poll found that 65% of Americans want the Supreme Court to do one of two things in revisiting it, either give the states the right to choose the legality of abortion (49%) or ban abortion altogether (16%). Unfortunately, that latter option is my preferred one and I would like to see that go up, but I will take these poll numbers as I get them. It is fantastic to see that people are not so Left-leaning that they want abortion and Planned Parenthood to go completely unrestricted in what they do and how they operate.
 
As far as taxpayer funding of abortion goes, 54% oppose taxpayer funding altogether of any abortion, while only 39% support it.
 
Regarding taxpayer funding of overseas procedures as provided by organizations like International Planned Parenthood (yes, We the People pay for people outside the U.S. to get abortions as well), 75% opposed it, with only 19% being in favor of it. Specifically, 94% of Republicans, 80% of Independents and 56% of Democrats opposed taxpayer funding of abortions abroad.
 
Regarding the ability of medical professionals to opt out of performing abortions due to moral objections, 55% agreed they should be able to opt out, while 35% disagreed.
 
62% of Americans oppose aborting unborn children with Down Syndrome and 59% support banning abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy, unless it is necessary to save the mother (which I don’t even know how it can get to that point at all).
 
Now, while I do appreciate that so many people want restrictions on abortion, I still think 20 weeks is still too far into the pregnancy. A heartbeat is usually detected around 6 weeks into the pregnancy, though sometimes it can be detected earlier or later than 6 weeks. Of course, I believe life begins at conception and abortion should be banned and outlawed altogether, but at the very latest, I would argue that abortion should not be allowed to occur after 6 weeks either.
 
If you end the heartbeat of any other living thing, you are effectively killing it. I see no reason for anyone to argue that a heartbeat does not constitute a living being in the womb. By the same token, I see no reason to argue aborting a baby after 6 weeks in the womb does not constitute murder.
 
But again, I’ll take these numbers as I get them. Frankly, with how much the Left raves about abortion, it’s an outright miracle that these many people disagree to some extents with the Left.
 
Moving on, 56% of Americans say that “scientifically”, a fetus is “a unique life”, while 35% argue that it’s “part of a woman’s body”. Also, 42% say life begins at conception while only 13% say it begins at birth.
 
A different poll by Students for Life of America found that people ages 18-34 (also known as Millennials) largely agreed that there should be limits on abortion (70%), with 42% opposing abortion altogether.
 
Altogether, these numbers simply bring a smile to my face. The overwhelming majority of Americans are not anywhere near as sick and depraved as the Left is, who wish to run entire campaigns around “shouting” their abortion, whatever that means.
 
I’ve written multiple stories regarding abortion. Some, like the one about an abortionist’s comments on what she does, are insanely depraved and stomach-churning. However, it is good to see such fantastic numbers to represent over 1,000 Americans (the sample size for the first poll was 1,066).
 
And what is so incredibly surprising is the amount of Democrats and pro-choice people who agree that there should be restrictions on abortions. Obviously, the Democrats polled were not elected officials, who are pretty much obsessed with allowing abortion to go unrestricted (largely because they take money from Planned Parenthood). So people within the Democrat Party, at least in the base, want at least some restrictions on it.
 
Like the Knights of Columbus CEO said, the label of “pro-choice” is insufficient. Being pro-choice, while I still think is not great, does not necessarily mean pro-unrestricted-abortion.
 
And often times, the reason I refer to people as being pro-abortion is because that’s what many in the Left are. They don’t care about people’s choices as long as they make the supposedly “right” one. To the Left, the more abortions there are, the better. That’s essentially dropping any pretense on supporting a choice.
 
If they supported a choice, they would be okay with clinics offering adoption as an option for a woman who does not want a child but is pregnant. The Left opposes that because they want the woman to get an abortion, not give up the child for adoption. Where’s the choice in that?
 
However, that is largely with regard to Democrat politicians or Hollywood Leftists. As shown in that poll, 60% of Democrats, aka voters who are registered Democrats, want some restrictions on abortion.
 
That is considerably different from the former two Leftists. So good job, Democrat voters. And for once, I am not being sarcastic.
 
These numbers show that the vast majority of America does not fall in line with the Democrat’s official position of unrestricted abortion. While many still are okay with abortion, it is at least a step in the right direction and in the Right direction, if you get what I mean.
 
Again, I am still opposed to any and all abortion, regardless of the circumstances (and I’ve yet to hear of a specific instance in which a pregnancy can cause a mother to be in lethal danger), but I will absolutely take getting just a little bit closer to God.
 
All things considered, I had honestly thought most people, at least most definitely in the Democrat Party, agreed with the Democrat platform of unrestricted abortion. The media certainly makes it seem like that’s the case (and I’m not surprised that this poll won’t make it to any fake news media outlet), but as always, they are full of fake news.
 
We must truly thank God that we are not quite as far gone as we may have previously thought.
 
Psalm 127:3
“Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

With a new year upon us, let’s take a look at the leading cause of death throughout the entire world in the year 2018.
 
In stark contrast with my article in which I outright said you would never guess who was the preferred candidate for the Democrat Party for the 2020 elections (which was literally anyone else apart from the known candidates), I don’t think it will be difficult at all for you to guess what the leading cause of death was in 2018 throughout the world. Particularly due to the image at the top.
 
According to a report from Worldomoters, which runs tallies regarding populations, births, deaths, CO2 emissions and other things, some 41.9 million children were aborted in the year 2018 as of December 31st.
 
In 2018, 23% of all pregnancies ended in abortion. Abortion has caused more deaths than cancer (8.2 mill), smoking (5 mill), HIV/AIDS (1.7 mill), malaria (less than 1 mill), alcohol (2.5 mill) and traffic accidents (1.3 mill) COMBINED. And it’s not even close. All those deaths amount to less than 20 million. So abortions DOUBLE the amount of deaths of other things put together.
 
What’s more, Worldometers also reports that there have been roughly 60 million deaths this year. So more than TWO-THIRDS of the world’s deaths are a result of abortion.
 
It’s so bad that the head of March for Life said that abortion is the “social justice cause of our time”, likening it to the Civil Rights era of Martin Luther King Jr.
 
And I would have to say that that’s definitely an accurate statement. The most innocent among us are being targeted and it’s only getting worse, without even having to mention the fact that the lunatic Left is moving towards normalizing and advocating for pedophilia.
 
The fact that more than two-thirds of the world’s deaths in 2018 were abortions should be quite eye-opening.
 
It also doesn’t help that supposed Republican challenger to Donald Trump, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, once again vetoed a heartbeat bill that would have allowed for infants in the womb to escape abortion if a heartbeat is detected.
 
I’ve said multiple times in the past that there’s not a thing anyone can say to me that would convince me that abortion is in any way okay or that a child inside the womb is anything but a human being. It’s an atrocity that humanity would be so adamant about eliminating itself in this way for any reason.
 
Now, some people could stupidly come to me talking about how we’re overpopulated and abortion is necessary. First of all, no, we’re not overpopulated. Places like New York City have a huge population, but elsewhere, there’s still a whole lot of land for humans.
 
Second of all, the whole overpopulation argument comes from the heavily flawed Malthusian theorem. For those who don’t know, let me explain what it is. Basically, Malthus argued that although populations grow exponentially (2 to 4 to 8 and so forth), our food supply grows arithmetically (1 to 2 to 3 and so forth).
 
There are a lot of things wrong with this theory. First of all, Malthus lived in the 18th and early 19th century (1766-1834). Back then, manual labor was necessary for crop-planting, which is the biggest reason countries had slaves. Since then, technology has advanced and made it so that far less manual labor had to be used for crop-planting, and the food supplies would actually go up. Technology allows for more crops to be planted than a human would be able to.
 
But even if technology is entirely taken out of the equation, Malthus is still wrong. He thinks that if there are more people on the planet, there is less food to go around. And that would be the case if those people were unable to work and grow more food themselves.
 
So even if technology is out of the picture, more people means more food planted and other foods like animals can be gathered, bred, hunted, etc. Malthus thought that population growth far outpaced food supplies, when that’s not how it works in the least bit.
 
There’s more food than there is people, and one person can grow a lot of food (even without technology), so through planting and replanting, gathering of animals for breeding etc., food supplies can go up alongside people.
 
Again, that’s taking technology out of the equation. Technology gives us the ability to grow far more crops than ever before. I live in areas close to farmlands and have driven in highways that are close to farmlands. Those farmlands stretch out insanely far and the technology that you see on those farms is largely why.
 
So the overpopulation argument is based off of a flawed theorem by someone who didn’t take into account the advancement of technology (can’t really fault him for that too much, though, considering the time that he lived in).
 
In other words, overpopulation is not even an argument for abortion in the least.
 
There’s not much else I think I need to say, if I’m honest. At least, things that I haven’t said before. There is no legitimate argument in favor of abortion.
 
Anything else from “what if the pregnancy is a danger to the woman?”, which I’ve never seen be the case in the modern world with modern medicine that is getting better and better, to “my body, my choice”, which I would argue that it’s not your body that you’re affecting, it’s the baby’s that you’re destroying, is simply not a solid argument whatsoever. There is no legitimately good argument in favor of abortion.
 
It’s a sickening thing and dangerous to humanity itself, considering it’s responsible for two-thirds of the world’s deaths last year, and really you cannot convince me that it’s anything but murder.
 
I pray that we will eventually be able to kick back against this human tragedy and never allow for it to resurface. And there is not much else that can be used to accurately describe abortion than a modern day tragedy.
 
Psalm 139:13-14
“For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Wonderful are your works; my soul knows it very well.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

This past week, a Mississippi Obama-appointed judge, U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves of Mississippi’s Southern District, struck down Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban claiming it was unconstitutional.
 
The judge wrote, upon reviewing the decision for documentation, that “there is no legitimate state interest strong enough, prior to viability (which he says begins at 23 weeks after conception), to justify a ban on abortions… The state chose to pass a law it knew was unconstitutional to endorse a decades-long campaign, fueled by national interest groups, to ask the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade. This court follows the commands of the Supreme Court and the dictates of the United States Constitution, rather than the disingenuous calculations of the Mississippi Legislature.”
 
He went on to rip the state legislature, saying the efforts to ban abortion are “pure gaslighting”: “Its leaders are proud to challenge Roe but choose not to lift a finger to address the tragedies lurking on the other side of the delivery room, such as high infant and maternal mortality rates. No, legislation like H.B. 1510 (the law he struck down) is closer to the old Mississippi – the Mississippi bent on controlling women and minorities.”
 
Beyond that, he even argues that he finds it “sadly ironic” that men, himself included, “are determining how women may choose to manage their reproductive health…”
 
Boy am I gonna have fun ripping this guy to shreds.
 
First of all, and what really should be the driving point of any abortion debate: abortion is unconstitutional. Interestingly enough, both sides of the argument could try to make a case for their side using the 14th Amendment.
 
Here’s what the 14th Amendment says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
 
What pro-abortion people will point to is the beginning: “All persons born…”. However, that alone does not mean that abortion is constitutional. To argue this means that if you kill a child inside a woman’s womb outside of abortion, then using this argument, one could argue that they did nothing wrong. And yet, when a person kills a pregnant woman, laws dictate that that counts as a double-homicide. But why if the 14th Amendment says that such a person is not a citizen of the United States or within its jurisdiction? Because it’s still a human being. And that’s what pro-life people point to as the problem with the Left’s argument: it’s still a human being.
 
The part of the 14th Amendment that pro-life people point to is: “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…”
 
It doesn’t say “any person born”, or “any citizen” as defined earlier in the amendment. It just says “person”. Personhood is only attributed to human beings. And a person within the womb is a human being. Therefore, the 14th Amendment says that the State shall not deprive any human being of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. And that is where we argue that abortion is unconstitutional. Because it very clearly is. The beginning part only applies to citizenship. It says persons born in the U.S. are citizens of the U.S. (except for obvious exceptions such as a foreign government employee’s wife having a child in the U.S. doesn’t make that child a citizen of the country, and such an exception could arguably be extended to illegal immigrants who are under the jurisdiction of their home countries). But when it comes to abortion, that’s not a solid argument at all. Particularly since the amendment makes it clear that all PERSONS shall not be deprived of LIFE.
 
So that’s the first thing I wanted to point out. The second thing I want to point out is the irony in the judge saying it’s sadly ironic that men, including himself, were determining abortion laws. Why is it ironic from my point of view? Because in 1973, the Supreme Court was composed entirely of men. So the same gender that this judge says should probably not be doing anything to decide abortion cases is the same gender that decided Roe v. Wade.
 
But finally, and perhaps one of the biggest points I wanted to make here, apart from settling the unconstitutionality of abortion itself, is the ludicrous comments from the judge that more readily characterize Margaret Sanger and the abortion industry than it does “old Mississippi” (which depending on what period of time you’re talking about, has also been ruled by Democrats in the past).
 
The judge says such legislation, and thus anyone that supports it, is “bent on controlling women and minorities.”
 
Margaret Sanger once wrote in Birth Control Review: “More children from the fit; less from the unfit – that is the chief issue of birth control.” She also wrote an article titled: “America Needs a Code for Babies,” in which she wrote: “no woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for fatherhood… No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.” And she also wrote a letter to one of her associates named Clarence Gamble, where she explained her reason for hiring black ministers to be her ambassadors to the black community. This is what she wrote: “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
 
That, combined with the fact that many (roughly 79%) of Planned Parenthood’s surgical abortion facilities are within walking distance of black and Hispanic neighborhoods, and you can’t help but think Sanger was a horrible human being, even by this judge’s standards.
 
It’s not us pro-lifers who wish to “control women and minorities”. It was Sanger that literally suggested that women not be allowed to have children without a permit, limiting them to only one child, and said to her cohorts that their goal was the extermination of black people. It’s Planned Parenthood, the organization that Sanger founded, that prioritizes abortions for minorities.
 
So for this judge to be making these arguments is entirely asinine and wrong. He is wrong about the constitutionality of abortion, wrong about what the Constitution says regarding abortion (which is nothing, by the way), wrong about his idea that men shouldn’t be influencing such abortion laws, and wrong about just which side of the argument intends on controlling people.
 
Considering all of these things, I cannot say I’m surprised that this is an Obama-appointed judge. Much like the others, this one has zero knowledge of the law of the United States, and only seeks to write it in favor of his Leftist agenda.
 
Jeremiah 1:5
“’Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to the nations.’”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles delivered right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

With the debacle between the White House and CNN White House Correspondent Jim Acosta taking the limelight in recent time, one piece of news that may have been largely ignored or hardly talked about was the great pro-life win that occurred last week when the Ohio House of Representatives voted in favor of banning abortions once a heartbeat has been detected in the fetus.
 
State House Bill 258 passed 58-35, moving on to the State Senate for consideration. Now, I don’t know each person within the State Senate, but Republicans have 23 votes to Democrats’ 9, so logic would dictate that the Senate Republicans will vote in favor of the bill, effectively passing the bill and sending it to the Governor’s desk.
 
And that’s really where the problem lies, considering Ohio’s current Governor John Kasich (DeWine will be inaugurated next year) vetoed a similar bill back in 2016, supposedly out of fear that “a legal challenge would overturn it”, according to the Daily Wire.
 
Such a fear is reasonable (though I would argue that it’s best to fight it in court than simply give up and veto it) since similar bills have been passed in North Dakota and Arkansas, but overturned by the courts, often citing the precedent set by the Supreme Court in the Roe v. Wade case of 1973.
 
According to LifeNews: “The controversial legislation would ban most abortions in Ohio if it becomes law. An unborn baby’s heart begins beating around six weeks, though new research suggests it may begin as early as 18 days after conception.”
 
Some of the comments from the House Republicans who supported and/or sponsored the bill are extremely endearing. State Rep. Christina Hagan said: “The point is: it’s time. It doesn’t matter if the governor is with us or against us,” referring to the possibility that Kasich may also veto this bill. “Motherhood isn’t easy but it’s necessary.”
 
State Rep. Candice Keller said: “(Abortion) is not a constitutional right. If you don’t know that, you need to read the Constitution.”
 
And my favorite comment comes from state Rep. Kristina Roegner, who said: “Today, let us stand up for the most innocent among us: the unborn.”
 
Now, predictably, House Democrats opposed the bill, suggesting that “abortion providers will be unjustly penalized”, according to the Daily Wire. This is in reference to the fact that the bill would also punish abortion providers, charging them with a felony for breaking the law by aborting a baby with a detected heartbeat.
 
However, I really must ask: what about the human beings inside the womb that are unjustly penalized for just existing? Why don’t they matter? Why is it Democrats care more about what happens to the abortionists that perform these heinous crimes of nature than they care about what happens to the unborn children that are mercilessly slaughtered for no other reason than the fact that they are there? But I’ll get back to this momentarily.
 
Now, back in 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal for the case. But since now Justice Kavanaugh is on the court, should such an appeal come up, they might be more willing to hear it, perhaps even leading to the grander case of reviewing and perhaps even overturning Roe v. Wade. But that’s getting ahead of ourselves, and it depends on an awful lot of things, such as if the Ohio Senate passes the bill (which I expect), if Kasich decides not to veto it this time (which I don’t expect, knowing him), if it receives a challenge in the court (which I would expect if Kasich doesn’t veto) and if Kavanaugh would be willing to hear an appeal for it (which I would expect, but you really never know).
 
So an awful lot of variables are to be taken into consideration before we even get to the possibility of overturning Roe v. Wade.
 
But as it stands, this is a great victory for the unborn, at least in the state of Ohio.
 
Now, let’s once again touch upon the desire to protect the practice of abortion over protecting the life that is growing inside the womb.
 
To me, and likely to many other people, defending those who perform abortions is no different than defending a serial killer. Imagine living in a world where someone is on trial for murder, and you have a number of people there defending the guy’s supposed right to do that. Because at the end of the day, that’s what these people are supporting.
 
It’s not about choice, because God knows the Left hates it when you make the “wrong” choice. It’s about legal murder and, depending who you ask, population control based on the ludicrous idea that we are somehow running out of room on our vast planet and we have too many people alive today that will eat up all our food and resources, when the exact opposite actually happens.
 
It’s about committing unspeakable evil in the guise of justice. It’s about committing horrible sin in the guise of doing what’s right. It’s sickening.
 
The fact that these particular Ohio Democrats would vote against such a bill that most sensibly argues in favor of the FACT that it’s a human life that’s growing inside a woman is really all I need to know about the Democrat Party. Of course, I already knew many of these things, and I am not surprised in the least that the Democrats would oppose such a bill, but it does highlight the evil and hatred they harbor in their hearts to be willing to sacrifice a human life inside the uterus in the name of “justice” and “women’s liberation”, which would be laughable arguments if the overall topic weren’t so serious and dire.
 
Not a single Democrat can dare lecture me about justice when they turn around and support such evil. Regarding the migrant caravan, not one of them can convince me that it’s the right thing to do to let them in, knowing that these Democrats also support the death of humans inside the womb. Regarding transgenders, there isn’t a Democrat that can convince me it’s right to let them think they are the opposite gender of what they truly are, knowing that such people would not be considered people inside the womb.
 
Regarding anything the Democrat Party says is right and just, I cannot possibly believe any of them or their arguments. Beyond disagreeing on transgenderism, illegal immigration, gay rights, climate change, etc., what truly matters to me, at the end of the day, that tells me whether someone is conservative or a Leftist is whether or not they support abortion at any capacity.
 
The day I heard Mitt Romney defend abortion in cases of rape and incest, wrong as both things are, made me recognize he wasn’t conservative. Heck, it made me recognize he was one of them. A Democrat in disguise (it doesn’t help that the now-Senator-elect is calling for climate action as being a priority).
 
Hearing these Republican women made me smile, recognizing that these women are conservative, and that the Republicans who voted in favor of the bill are conservative. They are fighting for those who truly have no voice, and who abortionists make sure will never have a voice. Fighting for those who cannot fight back, and who abortionists dismember, so that they can never fight back.
 
If me mentioning that abortionists dismember these babies made you cringe, or made your heart ache, good for you. It’s what happens and you recognize that it’s evil. I wonder just how many people who say they are pro-choice even know that such horrors are taking place. And I wonder how many of them even care.
 
I hope, for the sake of our nation’s soul, that most of them are simply ignorant to the evil, and not aware and in favor of such evil.
 
Philippians 3:2
“Look out for the dogs, look out for the evildoers, look out for those who mutilate the flesh.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.