About a week ago, I wrote an article talking about how it’s ridiculous for Leftists to claim they are siding with God or that they are doing God’s work whenever they support or do the work of the devil. Though I did not put it quite that way, that’s basically the message of the article. Well, I guess we can consider this article a sort of sequel to that one.
 
Recently, Chelsea Clinton had an interview on SiriusXM with a panel of fellow feminazis. One of the hosts, Jess McIntosh, asked the former First Daughter: “How do you keep going in the hopes that your daughter doesn’t have to have this fight?” Referring to the fight to allow women to kill their unborn.
 
Chelsea replied: “Every day, I make the moral choice to be optimistic that my efforts and my energies, particularly when I’m fortunate enough to be in a partnership with fellow travelers, hopefully will make a difference.”
 
“And when I think about all of the statistics – that are painful – of what women are confronting today in our country, and what even more women confronted pre-Roe and how many women died and how many more women were maimed because of unsafe abortion practices, we just can’t go back to that.”

I will just say that I’m not surprised that Chelsea Clinton continues to use long-since debunked rhetoric and “statistics” to further her cause. As I mentioned in my article titled: “Feinstein Tried To Corner Kavanaugh On Roe Question And Failed”, according to a 1972 CDC report, the maternal death rate from abortions was only 39 in the United States. This means that, in the year before Roe v. Wade happened, only 39 women died due to having an abortion.
 
Going further, even two pro-choice people, Dr. Mary Calderone (former PP medical director) and Dr. Bernard Nathanson (former abortionist and co-founder of NARAL) admitted that the numbers they were using were fictitious.
 
Dr. Mary Calderone wrote in 1960: “About 90% of all illegal abortions are being done by physicians… whatever trouble arises usually arises from self-induced abortions which comprise approximately 8%...”
 
Dr. Bernard Nathanson admitted his organization (NARAL)’s numbers of between 5 and 10 thousand women dying every year from back-alley abortions “were totally false… but in the ‘morality’ of our revolution, it was a useful figure, widely accepted…”
 
So right off the bat, we can call out Chelsea on her b.s., knowing full-well that not too many women died due to abortions before 1973. It also reinforces that article’s point that it seems that abortion is to blame for women’s deaths or complications, not the legality of them.
 
Of course, that’s now where we’re ending this. I’ve yet to get to the most egregious part of the interview. Chelsea continued talking (and she seemingly gets her speaking skills from her mother), saying: “[outlawing abortion is] unconscionable to me, and also, I’m sure that this will unleash another wave of hate in my direction, but as a deeply religious person, it’s also unchristian to me.”
 
I have quite a few things to say about this, only a handful of which I allow myself to write in an article so as to not be vulgar.
 
First of all, I’m surprised she didn’t use this psychic power of precognition to let her mother know that she would lose the 2016 presidential election.
 
Second of all, what’s truly unchristian is supporting the cause of allowing women to end the life of their own children under the guise of “women’s healthcare”. Not only is this willful support of an evil practice that is literally meant to end a life, but it’s also deception in fooling people into supporting this. As egregious and disgusting as the Left is, they are conscious enough to recognize that only a handful of really messed up people would ever openly support the idea of killing children.
 
The Left always tried to dehumanize an unborn child, saying that “it’s not a kid, it’s a fetus.” Well, using all-knowing Google to do some basic research, fetus literally means: “an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.” Would you like to know the synonyms? They are: embryo (though technically that’s the gestation period that comes before being a fetus and after being a zygote) and UNBORN BABY/CHILD!
 
Fetus literally means child. So not a single heartless or ignorant Leftist can possibly tell me a fetus is not human or not a child. Even the Leftist overlords at Google disagree with such a point.
 
Not that it matters too much to the Left. Not many people would sign on to the idea of killing a child in the womb, so they have to disguise it to make it not look so horrible, so they say it’s “women’s healthcare”, even though healthcare is meant to do the opposite of killing someone. They say it’s “women’s liberation”, going by the insinuation that having a child is somehow comparable to being a slave.
 
There is nothing Christian about the killing of the innocent. For Chelsea to call herself “deeply religious”, it must mean something entirely different from what she thinks. No religion in the world, as far as I know, supports abortion. Even Islam does not support it and even forbids it unless the pregnancy puts the mother’s life in danger.
 
Which reminds me, how does pregnancy put someone’s life in danger? I could maybe understand if it made complications for someone who is extremely skinny or overall unhealthy, but most women, when they have children, tend to be relatively healthy. I don’t think I’ve seen any cases in which a woman HAD to terminate a pregnancy due to her life being at risk. I’ve only seen cases of women WILLINGLY ENDING THE PREGANCY BECAUSE IT’S INCONVENIENT!
 
Regardless, I’ll return to the main point. Willingly killing a child inside the womb is not something religious people tend to support. So either Chelsea belongs to a secret religious group that supports abortion (the Left religiously supports the idea that people affect the climate, so I guess that’s not too far-fetched) or she’s lying about being religious. She’s certainly lying about outlawing abortion being unchristian.
 
Now, the interview did not end there. Since Chelsea mentioned that she would get some flak over these comments, the interview went into attack mode, attacking the pro-life crowd.
 
First, Chelsea tried to make herself the victim by saying she has been “compared to slave owners and Nazis” over her positions on abortion. Well, considering Planned Parenthood is basically the legacy of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, a Nazi scientific institution focusing on anthropology, human heredity and eugenics, and that the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute was basically Nazi Germany’s version of Planned Parenthood, only with the pretense that they were making the human race “better”, I’d say the comparisons are fairly accurate.
 
One of the panelists also directly attacked pro-life people, calling us “anti-choice” instead of pro-life, and calling us “ugly” and that “we love guns”. I guess that last part is true, though I don’t know what that has to do with this current conversation.
 
But the reality of the situation is that we’re FOR THE PRESERVATION OF LIFE! And the reality is that the only people that are ugly here are the Left. I don’t usually attack someone based on their looks, and I won’t here now. What I’m talking about when in say they’re ugly is what’s in their hearts: evil.
 
What is truly ugly is trying to convince women that it’s okay to kill their unborn because “they are not alive yet” and that doing so is a kick to the “patriarchy” or some such nonsense. Abortion is nothing short of death. Abortionists are glorified killers. And those who support this effectively support the death of human life.
 
No matter what way anyone says, that it’s “humane” or some other bullcrap, nothing will ever convince me that abortion is right in any case.
 
Oh, and if it’s “humane”, wouldn’t that imply that whatever is in the womb is ALIVE?! Because you don’t humanely kill what is technically not alive. We humanely kill animals when they become too old or when they get run over on the streets and are still alive. To say that abortion is humane is 1) erroneous, considering the methods of abortion and that PP has sold the parts of fetuses and likely still do and 2) would be conceding the point that a fetus is alive. You don’t do anything humane to something that isn’t alive.
 
Psalm 127:3-5
“Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward. Like arrows in the hand of a warrior are the children of one’s youth. Blessed is the man who fills his quiver with them! He shall not be put to shame when he speaks with his enemies at the gate.”
 
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. Unlike Chelsea Clinton’s fake religion, the contents of this newsletter are 100% Christian, conservative and pro-American. It contains a compilation of the week’s articles and easy access to our online store. Check it out today!
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

It’s no secret that just about everything the Left touches becomes rotten. We only need to look at Hollywood, San Francisco, Detroit, Chicago, New York and other Democrat-owned cities to see the culmination of decades of Leftist policy ruling over people. Cities that were once great visions of the American Dream torn down to fit the style of a socialist dystopia.
 
But it’s not just cities that are negatively affected by the Left. It’s causes and organizations as well, including the NAACP, which once stood up for the cause of civil rights and is now nothing but a Democrat platform to send black people into electoral slavery.
 
This past weekend, Rev. Clenard Childress Jr. slammed the NAACP’s support for abortion and Planned Parenthood, which they once were firmly against.
 
Can’t say I blame him for these reasons:

• Abortion is the leading cause of death across the board in America, but particularly so for black and Hispanic communities.
• Nearly 1,800 black babies are aborted every single day  
  
• 52% of all African American pregnancies end in abortion
• Abortion is “the least regulated medical procedure” and is “completely ignored by health regulation enforcement,” according to Rev. Childress.  
• Since Roe v. Wade, the United States has seen “a holocaust where over 20 million African American children have been systematically annihilated by abortion and thus denied access to the American Dream,” according to the Reverend.
  
• According to a pro-life Nigerian scientist named Obianuju Ekeocha, Planned Parenthood “targets black and other minority communities, having up to 79% of their surgical abortion facilities located within walking distance of African American or Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods.”  

And perhaps most importantly: Margaret Sanger, Hillary Clinton’s idol, was one of the most notorious racists and white supremacists the country has ever seen. She literally spoke to the women’s chapter of the KKK in New Jersey and wrote a letter to her friend Clarence Gamble that “we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister (a black man working for Sanger) is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
 
The very founder of Planned Parenthood was a notorious racist who sought to eradicate the black population, saw them as a “weed” to be uprooted, and employed Nazi sympathizers (Gamble and Lothrop Stoddard) who wanted to bring the Nazis’ eugenics program to the U.S. so that they, too, could rid the country of “undesirables”.
 
In her words: “More children from the fit; less from the unfit – that is the chief issue of birth control.”
 
And as we can see, her ideals are rooted in Darwin’s Natural Selection theory, where the strong dominate the weak.
 
Knowing how horrendously racist and evil Sanger was (and this is without mentioning her proposed “parenthood” license), it’s frankly a wonder why anyone would support Planned Parenthood, especially an organization such as the NAACP, which is composed of the key demographic Sanger despised to the point of seeking ethnic cleansing that puts Hitler to shame.
 
Well, it WOULD be a wonder if we didn’t know that Planned Parenthood, the Left and even Sanger herself were trying to deceive people. In her very letter to Gamble, she mentioned that they don’t want word of their true motives getting out. She herself knew that openly embracing ethnic cleansing through eugenics and abortion would not be a good thing and would only lead to her failure, which she considered unacceptable.
 
This is why I blatantly attack the Left on the issue of abortion. They call it “healthcare” and “women’s liberation”. It’s nothing short of murder, having tallied up to 60.6 million deaths in the U.S. since 1973 (and this is only counting abortion after it became legal, not before) and up to 1.5 BILLION deaths worldwide since 1980 according to the website NumberOfAbortions.com, which takes its information from the Guttmacher Institute, a division of Planned Parenthood of America.
 
It’s egregious that anyone would be supportive of this mass genocide. It’s entirely selfish to demand abortion in any way just because a woman does not want to take responsibility for a child and just wants to have fun screwing dudes left and right. If a woman does not want children, then don’t have sex. Wait until marriage, when you are in a better position to have a child.
 
Now, I know the argument the Left will always fall back on: “What about rape?! If a woman is raped and gets pregnant from it, you really expect her to still have that child?!”
 
Yes. Pregnancy from rape does not change the fact that abortion is murder. It’s a horrible thing that happens, and I would not wish this upon my worst enemy. And I wish we lived in a world where this does not happen and there is no fear of this ever happening. But killing your own child because you were forcefully and horribly impregnated is never justified.
 
To women who are raped and subsequently impregnated when they did not want a child, I offer my sincerest apologies for what happened. But the child should not be the one to suffer as a consequence of the horrible act of sexual violence that occurred.
 
A child in a womb is not a consequence; it’s not a disease to be rid of. It’s a wonderful life that’s just begun. It’s tremendous potential. I wonder how many of the aborted babies could have been the first woman President, or the first openly-gay President. How many of them could have gone on to find the cure for the different types of cancer or the cure for HIV/AIDS. How many of them could have gone on to establish peace in war-torn nations. How many of them could have been the next Billy Graham, Rush Limbaugh, Ronald Reagan. The next Michael Jordan, LeBron James, Kobe Bryant. The next Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Tim Tebow.
 
Over 60 million deaths in the U.S. since Roe v Wade and 1.5 billion worldwide since 1980, that’s a lot of potential utterly wasted because of evil people who sought to eradicate certain populations of the world and intended for the government to control people’s lives to the point where they would need to have a license to have a child (and that’s for one child, too).
 
Potential wasted because of ignorant people within the NAACP who think the systemic eradication of their own race is excusable.
 
It’s not surprising for me to say that I want Roe v Wade overturned. Of course, that does not necessarily mean that abortion is made illegal. It means that individual states can decide what kind of abortion laws to have, either severely limiting them, eradicating them altogether or keeping them the same as they currently are.
 
While abortion would not necessarily be done away with entirely, it would at least present the opportunity for even more people to be spared from the death camps called abortion clinics. It would mean more lives saved.
 
But the fight would not just end there. To truly defeat abortion, it not only needs to be made entirely illegal, but the people also have to have a change of heart and mind. People who want abortion will always fight for it. Changing their hearts and minds is the only true way of defeating abortion.
 
Unfortunately, I am not such an optimist that I believe it can happen. I am a realist. As such, I understand that, for as long as Man walks the Earth, there will be evil. Man is naturally evil, after all. And considering the events that are prophesied in the Book of Revelation, I doubt we will ever get to the point where all hearts and minds on Earth are changed to despise abortion. After all, such a change of heart would require the recognition of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Not everyone alive will be saved, so we will never see a world where abortion is truly defeated… well, let me rephrase that.
 
We will never see our CURRENT world get to the point where abortion can and will be truly defeated. The new world described in the Book of Revelation made by the Lord, on the other hand…
 
Revelation 21:1-4
“Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more. And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, ‘Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be His people and God Himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.’”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

This week has truly been devastating for the Left. With regards to Supreme Court matters alone, they faced loss after loss with 5-4 decisions on pro-life pregnancy centers no longer being forced to promote abortion and public sector unions no longer being able to force non-union-members to pay fees.
 
But both of those news are tame in comparison to hearing that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy would be retiring at the end of the Court’s annual term (end of June). This opens the door to President Donald Trump nominating another possible Constitutionalist like Gorsuch to the Court, handing conservatives a reliable majority in the Supreme Court.
 
Despite the fact that Justice Kennedy was nominated by President Ronald Reagan, he has proven to be wildly unpredictable, a moderate and often a swing voter in the Court alongside Chief Justice John Roberts.
 
He upheld Obamacare as Constitutional, was the key vote that legalized same-sex marriage and upheld women’s “right” to abortion in 1992.
 
He was a liberal in all but name. And now, Trump has the prime opportunity to nominate yet another Gorsuch and deal a major blow to decades of Leftist Justices getting their way. Of course, that includes such things as Obamacare, DACA, illegal immigration, sanctuary cities and states, same-sex marriage, and perhaps the single biggest issue: abortion.
 
Now, the White House has narrowed a list of over 20 picks down to 5. This list includes people like Brett Kavanaugh, Amul Thapar, Amy Barrett, Thomas Hardiman and Raymond Kethledge.
 
From what we know about them, while they all have voted conservatively in many issues, people like Kavanaugh and Hardiman have shown to be relatively moderate in other areas, with Kavanaugh upholding Obamacare in a couple of cases, saying that Obamacare penalties were actually “taxes” in one of those cases, and with Hardiman seemingly buckling to typical Leftist hysteria of racism and discrimination when he struck down a fire department’s residency requirement, which he termed “racially motivated” and went on record saying: “minority workforce representation that low suggests discrimination”.
 
So, in my mind, both Kavanaugh and Hardiman are too unreliable. The other three seem to be the most conservative, as well as true Constitutionalists who will stick with the written text in the Constitution, as well as the intentions of the people who wrote the Constitutional amendments, in their decisions rather than go with what they like or don’t like.
 
But in any case, most of these picks are true conservatives who will surely and seriously challenge the horrendous 1973 Roe v. Wade case that has resulted in 60.5 million abortions since 1973 in the U.S.
 
Successfully criminalizing abortion will likely be Trump’s lasting achievement, particularly since Court justices can serve for an entire generation or even more depending on their age. Gorsuch’s selection has already solidified a relatively conservative Court for decades to come. This will further solidify a conservative Court, leaving Roberts as the last swing voter, who has occasionally shown to be conservative himself. Add that to the fact that the two oldest Justices in the Court are liberals (Ginsburg, 85, and Breyer, 79) and you could potentially replace those two at some point at the end of Trump’s second term or beginning of Pence’s first term. Almost certainly by the end of Pence’s second term and most definitely by the beginning of Ivanka’s first term.
 
Jokes aside, it cannot be overstated how massive this is for America. For life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. While a Presidential election will only guarantee a political side’s success for 4 years, and midterm elections for 2 years, whoever’s side gets to pick a new Supreme Court Justice could influence the country for decades.
 
Trump’s pick for the Supreme Court will almost certainly guarantee a very conservative Court for the next half century. This means that almost regardless of who wins elections in the next ten to twenty years, the Supreme Court will likely maintain the Constitution even in the case of a President Bernie Sanders (which will almost certainly never happen).
 
Now, with these news comes yet another reason for conservatives to vote in the November mid-term elections. Securing a Republican majority, or perhaps even a supermajority, as I think will occur, means that for the next two years, we will have one of the most conservative Presidents in history, a very solidly pro-Trump and conservative Congress and a very conservative Supreme Court for decades to come.
 
Man, if I were a liberal, I’d be panicking right now. I suppose the only thing that has kept them from completely running amok (yes, it can get worse) is the hope that Democrats might be able to take back the House at the very least. But if and perhaps when Republicans not only retain Congress but add more seats to amount to a supermajority, the Left might honestly panic and start another Civil War.
 
I don’t know, I wouldn’t put it past them to do it again. If the situation I describe becomes reality, the Left will be at its most powerless it has ever been. They might panic and do something stupid.
 
Not to compare this situation to a video game I know, but I will draw a fair comparison anyway. There’s this video game series titled Fallout, in which you play as a character in a post-nuclear war America set hundreds of years from now. In this series, America is utterly devastated by nukes after a war over resources with Communist China. According to the game’s lore, China invaded Anchorage, Alaska in search for oil and the U.S. counter-attacked, eventually invading main-land China. While it is unclear exactly what caused the Chinese to launch nukes at the U.S., it was most likely out of desperation to try to win an unwinnable war.
 
Now, what the heck does a game have to do with a real life situation? Like the Chinese Communists, the Left might feel cornered and trapped and feel as though they need to explore extreme situations to try and fight back. If they feel they don’t really have much to lose, the Left might go to any extreme necessary to try and reclaim the country they believe is theirs. Ironically, in the video game series, launching nukes wound up destroying China as well. This could also be the fate of the Democrat Party.
 
In resorting to desperate measures far worse than the incivility we’re already witnessing, the Democrat Party might well see itself destroyed.
 
Of course, the ideologies won’t die until God has destroyed the world, but the major political party of the Left might well cease to exist in the near future.
 
Regardless, that’s not what I want to take away from the retirement of Justice Kennedy. While it’s still something to be aware of, as of right now, I just want to delight in the fact that horrible Leftist cases decades-old will likely face their biggest and toughest challenge yet.
 
Romans 8:28
“And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to His purpose.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

With the growing evils of today’s Left, the term “pro-life Democrat” almost seems like an oxymoron at this point. But recently, southern Democrats have shown their respect for life inside the womb in a very unexpected way: with a 15-week abortion ban being signed into law.
 
Breitbart News explains that the bill, which was authored by Democrat state Senator John Milkovich, “was signed by [Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards] Wednesday afternoon.”
 
What is also interesting is that Edwards is the Democrat governor of Louisiana.
 
“The legislation creates criminal penalties for anyone performing an abortion beyond 15 weeks. Mothers of unborn babies would not be charged,” according to Breitbart News.
 
Milkovich spoke during hearings of the bill, saying: “The farther along the pregnancies the more risks to the mother and the more tortuous it is for the babies.”
 
May I remind you that this IS A DEMOCRAT REFERRING TO PEOPLE IN THE WOMB AS “BABIES”! It’s honestly a sad, sad world when something like that seems almost unbelievable.
 
The News-Star reported on this story, having Dr. Wayne Gravois testifying in favor of the bill, saying: “They can yawn, smile, grimace (at 15 weeks). It’s a baby.”
 
The measure wound up being overwhelmingly popular, passing in the state House by a vote of 70-9, and passing in the state Senate by a vote of 24-1.
 
Now, despite these good news, there also are some bad news regarding this. Babies can’t simply be allowed to remain safe, if Leftists have anything to say about it.
 
Back in March, Mississippi passed a similar law and became the first state to ban all abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy. According to Breitbart: “The state’s only abortion clinic immediately challenged the law in court, and a federal judge granted a temporary restraining order to keep it from going into effect. The Louisiana law will go into effect if the Mississippi law is upheld by the courts.”
 
And back in May, Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds signed a bill that bans most abortions once a fetal heartbeat can be detected. The biggest child-killing organization in the world simply couldn’t stand idly by and joined forces with ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) to file a lawsuit against the state over the law.
 
In case you are unfamiliar with ACLU, don’t let their official name mislead you. The acronym may as well mean “American Communist Liberal Union” with how Leftist they are.
 
Returning to Louisiana, a Leftist group called Lift Louisiana is “launching a social media campaign against the law, claiming it prevents women from accessing abortion.”
 
The director for the pro-abortion group stated: “It is painfully clear that anti-abortion state legislators will stop at nothing to push their radical agenda, despite growing evidence that these laws hurt women. It must stop. With this campaign, we’re aiming to raise awareness about our state’s dangerous abortion restrictions and how Louisianans can fight back.”
 
First, the only ones with a radical agenda is the Left. Killing children inside the womb in the name of healthcare and women’s liberation can’t be described as anything other than a radical agenda… well, except maybe “murder” but that’s beside the point. It’s not a radical agenda to want to save as many babies as possible from women who feel as though it is their only option and choose to make a horrible mistake. It’s a radical agenda to want to allow people to indiscriminately kill the unborn, which even they know is wrong, otherwise they would not hide behind “healthcare” and “women’s liberation”.
 
If they honestly didn’t think it was wrong, they wouldn’t try to convince people it was anything other than murder. (Whether they care if it is wrong or not is a different matter. Chances are they do know it’s wrong and still don’t care).
 
Second, what evidence suggesting these laws hurt women? She doesn’t offer any, of course. Why? Because there honestly isn’t any. To say that such a law hurts women is to defy logic. How could it possibly hurt women? Most women have a feeling that they are pregnant about a week after conception, when the embryo implants itself in the uterus. They can confirm their pregnancy to a pretty accurate degree soon after.
 
If they don’t want the baby or feel they can’t afford to have one and choose abortion for some reason, they still have roughly 14 weeks, or about 3 months to come to such an evil decision and perform it. So time restraints are not what supposedly “hurts” women.
 
So in what other regard could it possible “hurt” women? It doesn’t. It only hurts Planned Parenthood’s bottom line and the Left’s dream to see the African-American race go extinct (since African-Americans are the biggest victims to abortion and Margaret Sanger was a noted racist who founded what would eventually be Planned Parenthood to exterminate what she considered as “weeds” of the world).
 
Finally, given the overwhelming support for the bill, which was CREATED BY A DEMOCRAT AND SIGNED INTO LAW BY A DEMOCRAT, I don’t think very many Louisianans will look to “fight back” against what they consider to be “oppression”.
 
By stark contrast, Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser said that all the pro-life lawmakers of Louisiana, including the Democrat ones, ought to be applauded for this accomplishment.
 
“They followed through on their pro-life principles and united across party lines to protect unborn children. Louisiana is leading the way in their bipartisan effort to bring our nation’s laws into line with basic human decency.”
 
The key there is “basic human decency” of which the Left severely lacks. The Left only believes in basic human decency when it is to protect rapist illegal immigrant gang members.
 
Alas, that is a different conversation for another time. For now, I will simply commend Governor Edwards and Louisiana State Senator John Milkovich for their part in the creation and signing of the bill to protect the most innocent of us all.
 
I simply hope and pray that it will be allowed to take effect soon and that the evil organizations who are against this child-saving policy will fail in their efforts.
 
Psalm 139:13-14
“For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

If you needed any more proof than there already is that abortion is evil, I’ll share a story with you about some Twitter comments made by Dr. Leah Torres, an abortionist.
 
To give some context, Dr. Evil… – eh… – Torres was defending the position against pro-life advocates that she didn’t perform abortions for the money of it: “Your ignorance is showing. Look up what docs get paid for delivering babies vs performing abortions. I’ll take $3K for the delivery over $100 for the abortion. Why do anti-choice folks always think it’s for money?”
 
Maybe because the alternative would be that you do it for fun, which is even worse. Doing it for the money doesn’t redeem you at all, but doing it because you like it makes you look far worse. I’d like to think that most abortionists do it for the money, not because they hate babies and love to end their lives. Abortionists are legal murderers, after all. If you don’t go into it for the money, there’s something seriously wrong with you. Even as a child of around 8 years old, I understood that abortion was legal murder.
 
At one point, one Twitter user raised the very point I’m making here. They wrote: “So [if] it’s not for the money, is it because you just like infanticide? Do you hear their heartbeats when you lay down at night? Do you hear their screams?”
 
And to this particular comment is when Leah made the more horrendous comment: “No. You know fetuses can’t scream, right? I transect the cord 1st so there’s really no opportunity, if they’re even far enough along to have a larynx. I won’t apologize for performing medicine. I’m also a ‘uterus ripper outer,’ if that’s how you’d like to describe hysterectomy.”
 
In other words, she’s admitting that she doesn’t hear them scream because she slits their throats first. I hate the fact that that’s somehow normal and should be encouraged.
 
Let me repeat it in case it didn’t sink in entirely. SHE SLITS BABIES’ THROATS SO THEY DON’T HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SCREAM!
 
This is not medicine! THIS IS SERIAL KILLER MENTALITY! Since when is medicine a tool to KILL someone? But I’ll likely get to that later since there’s a clear bigger issue at hand.
 
And please excuse my language here, but WHAT THE HELL?! How is that a normal piece of conversation?! How is that an excuse whatsoever?! Those are the kind of words that would warrant someone to be INSTITUTIONALIZED!
 
But you see, for her, that’s not weird or crazy or evil at all. She even follows up what she said with “I won’t apologize for performing medicine”. She FUNDAMENTALLY BELIEVES this is normal! THIS IS NOT NORMAL! IT’S CRAZY! IT’S HEARTLESS! AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, EVIL!!
 
Sorry for yelling here, but I don’t know how else I should respond to such blatant evil. It’s only been a few days since I wrote ANOTHER article about a crazy Leftist who was defending abortion. I called her evil too. This makes that other woman look like Mr. Rogers by comparison!
 
Ok, let’s take a breather. Let’s regather our thoughts. Considering that I’ve long acknowledged this sort of work to be work worthy of Satan, I should not be so surprised at the calmness of this she-devil’s voice in detailing how she kills children. It’s sick, no doubt. But it shouldn’t be so surprising. This is evil. There’s not a darn person in the world who could possibly convince me otherwise.
 
This is NOT medicine. This is NOT women’s rights. This is NOT liberation of women. This is NOT normal. This is NOT something to brag about. This is NOT something to support. You can’t possibly say that “it’s your body, your choice” when it’s the BABY’S throat that is being cut. You can’t possibly say that horrible line to me when it’s the BABY’S body being manipulated, its life ended and its body parts desecrated.
 
It should never be ANYONE’S choice to end the life of another human being. Much less if that life is the life of a woman’s CHILD! Abortion is not merciful. Abortion is not out of love. Abortion is hatred. Hatred for life.
 
Of course, they can’t possibly admit that. No one would support the end of an innocent human being’s life. So they redefine what it means to be alive. They take away the humanity of a baby inside the womb. They declare it to not be alive just yet. That it needs to be outside the womb for it to be alive. And so, they justify taking away their lives. They treat babies in the womb in a very similar way as to how they treated slaves - by dehumanizing them.
 
No, babies in the uterus aren’t forced to pick cotton. But the life of a baby in the womb today equals that of a slave. It’s not alive. It’s not human. But in some ways, the way they treat babies in the womb is even worse than how they treated slaves.
 
Slaves at least were considered “property”. While they were dehumanized and stripped of their basic rights, they weren’t disposed of unless necessary and weren’t flat-out killed either. So a closer comparison for pre-born babies would have to be with Jews inside concentration camps. Or at the least, those inside death camps like Auschwitz.
 
Babies in the womb aren’t considered property. Property at least is something to take some care of. No, babies are treated as nothing more than Jell-O at best and a disease at worst. To the Left, the women who choose to keep their babies choose to keep the “random assortment of crap” growing inside them. And the women who choose to kill their babies choose to get rid of a disease.
 
The ironic thing is that they at least consider a disease to be alive, since it’s a virus and it’s a cell. They consider a single cell to be alive but not a baby inside the womb.
 
The life of a human baby inside the womb is less than property. Less than nothing. Much like Jewish lives were less than nothing for the Nazis, or at least something to rid the world of, babies inside the wombs are less than nothing for the modern-day Left.
 
It’s true when people say that whatever the Left touches becomes corrupted and broken. That extends further than what the government takes over. The Left has touched and shaped our culture. Life is meaningless. This is the corruption of society at the hands of the Left.
 
You can party, get drunk, get high, have sex and utterly shame yourself if you so desire. If your life means nothing outside the womb to the Left, how could we expect them to value life inside the womb? If people don’t value their own lives, they’ll certainly not value others’. And since a fetus is “not alive”, then it’s more than ok to get rid of it like a bad case of the flu.
 
This is the sort of darkness the Left envelopes themselves in. And the ludicrous thing is that they claim to be the light. They claim their cause is that of justice and freedom, not malice, hatred and evil. You can’t outright sell evil to people, so you have to call it good. As the prophet Isaiah said: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.” Isaiah 5:20.
 
And there’s no logical reason not to call abortion evil. Normalizing the mutilation of a child’s corpse is just as evil as the act itself.
 
Thankfully for people, even someone like Leah, they’re not irredeemable. Such an act and the defense of it rightfully belongs in Hell. For anyone to do this, that’s exactly where they belong. But even something like this can be redeemed. Even someone like any abortionist can be redeemed. Even the most evil figures in history could have been redeemed.
 
People like Stalin, Ted Bundy, Nikolas Cruz, Osama bin Laden, and even Adolf Hitler could all have been redeemed (in the case of Cruz, he still could be). There’s not a single action coming from their part that would redeem them. Nothing they could do in their own accord. Nothing other than repent; ask for forgiveness. Forgiveness, not from the world, as it would not forgive, but rather forgiveness from God.
 
He is the only One who could possibly redeem anyone’s soul. He sent His son Jesus Christ to the cross not so that the whole world would be saved, but so that whoever believeth in Him would be.
 
Now, do I expect Leah to turn to Christ in repentance? No. While I don’t know the woman personally and she’s already given me a horrible first impression, I don’t know if she will at any point in her life. But let’s not forget that Saul would hunt down and order the execution of Christians before he eventually came to Christ himself - and became the Apostle Paul.
 
If a man as vile as Saul could find salvation, surely anyone could as well. Again, I don’t expect Leah to repent and come to Christ. If she does, I’ll surely never know. But one can only hope and pray that she finds salvation.
 
Romans 10:9
“Because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
​

At this point in my career in talking about the Left and their evil ways, it really shouldn’t come as a surprise to see an MSM article defending a woman’s “right” to kill her own baby for any given reason, including Down syndrome in the yet-to-be-born human.
 
I’m not surprised; I’m not shocked, but I am appalled. I am outraged. The very defense of any murder such as this is horrible and I can’t fathom the reason anyone has to defend this.
 
Ruth Marcus wrote an article on the Washington Post titled: “I would’ve aborted a fetus with Down syndrome. Women need that right.”
 
I’ll likely restate this point later in the article, but I’ll present it here initially: how could you possibly say you’re a loving parent if you’d be willing to abort a baby with Down syndrome?
 
People say that you should love your child regardless of who they are, what they are and what they do. So how come that love is instantly taken away if the child has Down syndrome? If you’re a pregnant woman, excited at the life growing inside of you and you love the fact that you’ll soon be a mother (or mother of more than one child), how could you simply take away that love you have for the child if you were to find out it had Down syndrome?
 
Either you didn’t actually love that child or you wouldn’t choose to abort that child. The abortion of any child is never done out of love or mercy. Quite the opposite, in fact. It’s done out of evil, hatred and selfishness. By that title alone, Ruth admits she would’ve hated the idea of raising a child with Down syndrome and would’ve chosen to not love that child. A Down syndrome baby is "too inconvenient" for her selfish, self-centered life. For the fact that the Left says love isn’t a choice, she sure is choosing not to love any child she could have if they had Down syndrome.
 
But let’s dive in to the horrible article. The first paragraph is honestly rather insulting.
 
“There is a new push in antiabortion circles to pass state laws aimed at barring women from terminating their pregnancies after the fetus has been determined to have Down syndrome. These laws are unconstitutional, unenforceable – and wrong.”
 
First, who the hell is this evil woman to determine what is right and what is wrong? That’s not up to a single man, woman or child to define. It’s up to GOD to define. Do you see why I said this paragraph was insulting?
 
Second, I find it interesting how she would call us “antiabortion” people. Does that mean she is admitting that her position isn’t “pro-choice” but rather “pro-abortion”? Because if she considers herself to be outside of the “antiabortion circle”, naturally, one would expect her to be in the “pro-abortion circle”, in that case. So you see, it’s not about a person’s choice. It’s about sentencing any innocent child to DEATH upon a person’s whim.
 
Finally, I can understand that she’s essentially going by the Roe v. Wade case to legalize abortion when she says “barring women from terminating their pregnancies… [is] unconstitutional.”
 
But I would like to dispute the very Supreme Court case. How could one possibly say that aborting a baby is constitutional? Where in the Constitution of the United States of America does it say that a woman has the right to kill her own child while inside the womb? What Amendment, what section in that Amendment and under what clause does it say a woman has such a right? Murder is not a constitutional right!
 
Regardless, I’ll return to the stomach-churning article. Eventually, she mentions that she had performed tests for Down syndrome while she was pregnant with her two children. She then says: “I can say without hesitation that, tragic as it would have felt and ghastly as a second-trimester abortion would’ve been, I would have terminated those pregnancies had the testing come back positive. I would have grieved the loss and moved on.”
 
Could you imagine being her child and reading that you were this close to being unloved and thrown away like trash by your own mother just because of something you had absolutely no control over? I don’t know how old her children are, but I can imagine the shock they must’ve felt if they read the article and read how their mother would’ve killed them due to such imperfection.
 
Then she goes on to say: “And I am not alone. More than two-thirds of American women choose abortion in such circumstances. Isn’t that the point – or at least inherent in the point – of prenatal testing in the first place?”
 
NO! The point of prenatal testing is to check and see if there will be possible issues in the future of the child’s life and ACT ACCORDINGLY WITH THE RESULTS! You perform these tests to see if your child is ok. And if it’s not, you act accordingly for the BENEFIT of the child’s FUTURE! Not to justify your decision to END that child’s future.
 
I may not be a parent yet. Not even close. But I understand common sense, which is more than any Leftist can claim. When my future wife and I are expecting a baby, we’ll perform these tests. If they come back negative, we’ll praise the Lord and thank Him for giving us a perfectly healthy baby. But if they come back positive, we’ll pray to the Lord for strength and guidance in what would almost certainly be a very pressing and trying future for us.
 
But regardless of the results of the test, we’ll love that child more than we’ll love ourselves. Ruth here is admitting that she loves herself more than her children, in a sense. If she’s unwilling to raise a child with Down syndrome which would certainly be a life-long commitment and job to do, that’s indicative of the limited “love”, if there is any at all, within her heart.
 
It’s indicative of the sort of selfish “love” that is honestly very much expected from people who support abortion.
 
Indicative of the sort of selfish “love” that was present in noted-racist Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger, as well as just about anyone in the 30s and 40s that supported Nazi Germany’s eugenics program – a program that essentially championed the very thing Ruth is defending: the extermination of “undesirables”.
 
Those undesirables began with the lame, cripple and stupid (not Joe Biden stupid, but actual mental retardation). Then, they moved on with the “socially undesirable” i.e. the Jews, Gypsies, blacks and such.
 
Now, moving away from the article directly, people on Twitter made sure to utterly destroy the article and the arguments it presents.
 
“Monstrous evil unashamedly displayed. You would never say that women need the right to abort, say, a fetus predisposed to be gay, or a fetus predisposed to be alcoholic, or a fetus predisposed to be (*cough* China *cough*) female,” said one Twitter user, referencing the fact that sex-selective abortion takes commonplace in China, given that the government does not regulate it despite the fact that it’s illegal and that the Chinese culture tends to prefer males over females… for some reason.
 
Another Twitter user sought to use a study to defend children with Down syndrome: “A 2011 study found that nearly 99% of people with Down syndrome over the age of 12 said they were happy with their lives. 99% said they loved their families. 97% said they liked their brothers and sisters. 86% felt they could make friends easily.”
 
Ok, now I see why the Left hates children with Down syndrome. 99% say they were happy with their lives? I doubt a double digit percentage of Leftists can say they feel the same. They are always angry and hateful and poisonous towards everything, seemingly. “99% said they loved their families.” Well, the Left has been trying to utterly bugger up the very definition of a family, so it makes sense that the Left hates people with Down syndrome. They’re envious.
 
They’re envious that 99% of people with Down syndrome over the age of 12 live happy lives. The Left is never happy, even when Obama was President. They have always been angry and outraged at everything. If they got absolutely everything they wanted, they’d still be miserable. Not because they don’t have what they want, but because they do and there’s nothing left for them to campaign for and try to win elections. No new “issue” that would need to be addressed. We’d simply be left with a worse hell than the Soviet Union was.
 
You thought I was joking when I said that I see why the Left hates people with Down syndrome, didn’t you? I understand the mind of the Left, which is why I can so easily refute them and even mock them. I understand they are entirely hateful people. People who thrive on the anger and hatred of a group of people (i.e. the outraged Parkland students) to try and push their agenda.
 
While saying the Left hates people with Down syndrome may sound like an exaggeration, in reality, it’s no exaggeration at all. They hate just about everyone, so I would expect them to hate people with Down syndrome as well. You have to understand that these people are people who live without Christ in their hearts. As such, hatred and anger stirs up from within them without much deterrent.
 
I’ve mentioned before the different sorts of evil. The difference between chaotic evil and lawful evil. To simplify them, chaotic evil is evil without a conscience. Lawful evil is evil with a conscience that understands that what he or she is doing is evil and is ok with it.
 
An example of chaotic evil would be someone like Parkland shooter Nikolas Cruz. You can’t possibly convince me he has a conscience; a little voice inside his head that tells him when doing something is wrong. That little voice in his head is likely drowned out by all the other voices in his head that tell him he should kill people, and that, given recent news stories, he dreams of “killing people and [being] covered in blood,” according to a Miami Herald report about Cruz’s psychiatric file written 4 years ago… which honestly raises more red flags about the incompetence of the Broward County Sheriff’s office, the county school, and all involved investigative authorities.
 
An example of lawful evil would be someone like Ruth. She champions evil, likely knowing it’s evil, but convinces herself that it’s just and right. A better example would be Obama, who did evil things, knowing full well they were evil, and was happy to have done it.
 
But both are evil just the same. Evil that stems from their hearts. From Man’s very own nature. From not having Christ in their hearts. Only someone who doesn’t have Christ in their hearts would be willing to abort any baby for any given reason. Only someone who doesn’t have Christ in their hearts would be so selective in their “love” of their child to abort them for such an imperfection.
 
And if two-thirds of women in America choose to kill their own child based on the Down syndrome test coming back positive, I shall pray for their souls. Someone should.
 
Isaiah 32:6
“For fools speak folly, their hearts are bent on evil: They practice ungodliness and spread error concerning the Lord; the hungry they leave empty and from the thirsty they withhold water.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Over this past weekend, two separate and very different marches occurred. One was the March for Life and the other was the Women’s March. And these two events highlight the characters of the opposing sides.
 
According to the Daily Wire, at the March for Life event: “Families proudly pushed their babies with Down syndrome – an abnormality we, as a society, are urgently told to dispose of – in their strollers with smiles on their faces; former abortion clinic workers held signs proclaiming that life matters; teens chanted about their love for babies and held clever and playful signs; single mothers boasted of their children they chose to keep thanks to pro-life pregnancy centers and religious organizations; a Congresswoman told the masses of the miracle birth of her daughter who was supposed to die upon delivery; and the faithful said prayers aloud in unison and sang church hymns.”
 
Overall, love was the main message of the March for Life.
 
In stark contrast, we see the hatred of the “Women’s March”, which in all reality is the “Hatred March”. Because that’s exactly what that march showcased.
 
Info Wars released a video of one of their team members attending the event. The video is over 20 minutes long, so I won’t talk about absolutely everything in it, but that’s fine. Most of the video is simply the same thing: angry, hateful protesters calling for the impeachment of our duly elected president, calling for supposed “women’s rights” that they already have or that they shouldn’t have - aka the “right” to kill their own children as though they were some sort of disease - and lots and lots of swearing.
 
Throughout the video, you would see those captured by the camera either flipping off the camera or the reporter himself (or both), you would see the protesters calling Info Wars fake news (which is hilarious), you would see the protesters voicing the same liberal talking points that Trump is a racist and a sexist despite having no proof of those claims and even going so far as to deny the fact that Trump has appointed more women to significant positions than any previous President.
 
They would often call Trump a rapist but ignore the fact that Bill Clinton, Harvey Weinstein and multiple other Democrats are rapists themselves. One of them even berated the Info Wars guys and twice spat on them.
 
Many of them were constantly cursing despite the fact that children were present. One of them even called the Info Wars guys “a**holes” right in front of his son who looked to be no older than 13. I saw a lot of children marching with their insane parents and some even holding signs such as “Justice = Equality”, despite the fact that that’s entirely untruthful given that Bill and Hillary Clinton are just two of many Democrats who should be in jail at the moment.
 
But the overall message was clear: these people hate everyone and everything that isn't like them. I saw far more hateful signs attacking Trump than loving signs calling for unity and peace. In fact, I don’t remember having seen a single sign that didn’t either bash Trump or recite a liberal talking point such as “we’re all immigrants”, which funny enough, has nothing to do with women and thus proves the point that this was not a “women’s march” but a “hatred march”.
 
On the other hand, all I saw from the March for Life signs was love. That unborn children should be protected no matter what. One in particular makes the great point that “True feminists protect human life”. And that’s true. A true feminist would protect unborn girls. Someone who’s truly against racism would protect unborn minorities. Someone who’s for gay rights would protect the right of a potential future gay person.
 
And yet, all these people support abortion. They support the idea of euthanasia for minorities. Oh, did that come out of nowhere? Yeah, that’s what Margaret Sanger’s mission was. She founded Planned Parenthood for the benefit of eugenics. In other words, she founded Planned Parenthood so that “undesirables” wouldn’t get a chance at life.
 
In a 1934 article titled: “America Needs a Code for Babies”, Sanger said that the government should establish a code “for the better distribution of babies… to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit… No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for fatherhood… No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.”
 
I recall a liberal talking point being that the government should “stay out of women’s vaginas”. Well, the very founder of Planned Parenthood suggested that the government should control women’s vaginas through the same means they control someone’s right to drive. And funny enough, this is very similar to China’s “one child” policy, yet we don’t see these Leftists calling out China’s oppressive regime.
 
And this might even be a tough pill to swallow for liberals, but Sanger even accepted an invitation to speak to the women’s chapter of one of the biggest racist organizations in history: the Ku Klux Klan. In a letter to one of her associates, Clarence Gamble, she wrote: “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” This was a letter explaining why she hired black ministers to be her ambassadors to the black community.
 
And that’s not all. In 1938, she urged Americans to follow Nazi Germany’s path of eugenics. “In animal industry, the poor stock is not allowed to breed,” she wrote. “In gardens, the weeds are kept down.”
 
And that’s not her only affiliation with Nazis. Ernst Rudin, chief architect of the Nazi sterilization program, wrote an article on Sanger’s magazine “Birth Control Review” titled: “Eugenic Sterilization, an Urgent Need.”
 
Knowing this, I’m not really surprised that the protesters at the “Women’s March” were so hateful and angry. The very founder of Planned Parenthood was a hateful, angry Nazi-sympathizer who sought to eradicate the African-American population and allow the government to have control of people’s reproductive endeavors.
 
The evidence is clear: the Left is full of hateful bigots and the Right is full of loving and compassionate people who love life.
 
Proverbs 10:12
“Hatred stirs up strife, but love covers all offenses.”
 
Author: Freddie Drake Marinelli.

Looking through some conservative websites, I came across a story that both elated me and shocked me.
 
The Daily Wire writes a story titled: “Pro-Life Win: CA Nursing Board Tells Pro-Abortion Advocates To Stuff It”.
 
I think you can clearly see just why that title surprised me as it did. California is a state I would never dream setting foot on again. For all its natural beauty, it harbors some of the most disgusting political ideologies in the world. So for me to see that a nursing board based in California does something, ANYTHING, against pro-choice advocates is stunning.
 
Here’s the story: “On Tuesday, the pro-life movement got a lift and the pro-choice movement’s surreptitious attempt to blunt abortion reversal was defeated when the California Board of Registered Nursing said the pro-life group Heartbeat International could grant continuing education units (CEUs) to nurses who study Abortion Pill Reversal,” writes the Daily Wire.
 
Now, you might be asking: “What is an Abortion Pill Reversal?” Well, first, you need to know what an abortion pill is. Some of you might know already, but for those who don’t, an abortion pill is a pill that can end a pregnancy that is less than 7 weeks along. The Abortion Pill Reversal, according to Daily Wire, is: “the procedure in which mothers who ingest mifepristone (RU-486) or ‘the abortion pill’ regret the decision and use an emergency progesterone treatment to save their babies.”
 
According to Jay Hobbs of Heartbeat International: “In the past five years, more than 400 mothers have successfully rescued their babies through an emergency progesterone treatment that has been used for more than 50 years to prevent miscarriages. Backed by a network of more than 350 medical providers, the Abortion Pill Reversal hotline (1-877-558-0333) – staffed with licensed medical professionals – answers over 50 calls per month from women who want to keep their baby after having started the chemical abortion pill process.”
 
But like with many nice stories with (so far) happy endings, there always has to be a bad guy. Enter the pro-“choice” movement. And you’ll understand why I put the word “choice” in quotations in a minute.
 
According to the Daily Wire: “In 2012, the California Board of Registered Nursing gave approval for Heartbeat as a CEU provider. Heartbeat then began offering credit for education on Abortion Pill Reversal online and at its annual conference.”
 
“But in late 2015, an activist with Rewire.com, Nicole Knight, joined California State Sen. Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) to pressure the Board into auditing Heartbeat.”
 
Upon that action, Hobbs reports: “According to emails obtained through Heartbeat’s public records request, Knight and representatives from both NARAL (National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League) and avowedly pro-abortion UC San Francisco insisted that Board officials take action against Heartbeat and its fellow pro-life pregnancy help groups, Care Net and National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA).”
 
Then, according to the Daily Wire: “[Sen.] Hill concurrently created legislation to try and disqualify all courses on Abortion Pill Reversal from receiving course credit. Although the law went into effect in 2016, it ultimately failed to disqualify the training.”
 
On July 28th, 2017, the Board confirmed Heartbeat’s ability to offer credit for the course work.
 
Then, the Daily Wire writes: “Spencer Walker, an attorney with the state’s Department of Consumer Affairs, sent a memo to Dr. Joseph Morris, executive officer of the nursing board, on August 14, warning the Board not to target Heartbeat.”
 
Walker writes in the memo: “The concept of abortion pill reversal is clearly science-based (pro-choice advocates were arguing that it wasn’t science-based), and a registered nurse would likely be involved in the indirect care of a patient seeking abortion pill reversal assistance through education or other means. Therefore, the board could be exposed to litigation if it prohibits continuing education providers from offering courses in abortion pill reversal.”
 
Putting aside the details of this battle for the life of children, do you see what the Left was trying to do? It was trying to discredit the course and, therefore, kill nearly all incentive for learning how to save the baby’s life should the mother regret her decision after taking the abortion pill.
 
Unless you’re a hateful psychopath hell-bent on killing babies, there is no reason to oppose this procedure or the coursework. Which brings me to the topic of this article.
 
The people opposed to Heartbeat International and the abortion pill reversal procedure are inherently against the choice of the mother to save her own child. The Left calls their movement pro-“choice”. The “choice” of an expecting woman to get rid of her own baby as though it was a bad case of the flu. Well, choice is a street that goes both ways. A woman can, at first, choose to kill her baby and then choose against it, as in the case of the women seeking the abortion pill reversal procedure.
 
Anyone who is against that procedure is not pro-choice. They’re pro-death. Pro-abortion. Pro-killing the baby.
 
If the pro-choice movement really was pro-choice, they wouldn’t encourage women to get abortions. They wouldn’t demonize the idea of having kids. They wouldn’t glorify killing children. They would make it known that women have that option (physically, at least, not so much spiritually). They would let people know: “Hey. I know you didn’t plan this, so just so you know, there’s this option.”
 
They wouldn’t say: “Don’t want the kid? KILL IT! And no backsies either. You only get one choice.”
 
Now, personally, I don’t think killing your baby should ever be a choice. But looking at things from a Leftist’s perspective, it still makes no sense to encourage women to get abortions in this manner. Why would anyone be opposed to a woman’s choice to SAVE her baby? Why would they try to discredit a course that helps women who choose to SAVE their baby after regretting taking the pill?
 
That’s inherently against pro-choice. So that’s why I write this article. These people are not pro-choice. They’re pro-death. They don’t just have no regard for life – they HATE life.
 
I remember having read a story from a woman who used to work for Planned Parenthood. She always believed that women had a choice, but that it was entirely THEIR choice to make, not Planned Parenthood's. What made her stop working for Planned Parenthood, at least to the best of my recollection, is that one day in a meeting, she was discussing the number of abortions PP performs a year.
 
During this meeting, she was trying to think of ways for those numbers to go down. She didn’t want millions and millions of babies being killed. She just wanted to help the women who felt as though abortion was the only option. She believed abortion should be a last resort.
 
But during that meeting, bringing up the topic of trying to decrease those numbers, her fellow workers thought differently. They didn’t want the numbers to go down. They wanted them to go UP. They wanted to perform MORE abortions, not less.
 
She then, after some time, wound up quitting Planned Parenthood. You see, PP is not in the business of helping women. They’re in the business of killing babies.
 
This woman wanted to help women seek other options she believed Planned Parenthood offered. She didn’t want women to choose abortion immediately. Planned Parenthood does.
 
These people don’t want to help women. These people want to make money off of killing infants.
 
Make no mistake, Planned Parenthood is evil. It’s one thing to think abortion should be an option. It’s another to think it should be everyone’s FIRST option.
 
While I won’t excuse people who think it should be an option but don’t think it should be a first option, I can understand them. They are simply misinformed. They are what I would call “weak”. That’s not meant to insult them, but warn them. I’m not talking about physical strength, but rather spiritual strength.
 
These people might mean well but are simply wrong. That’s why they’re weak. But it’s the other people. The one’s I call “wicked” that are evil.
 
It’s those people in that meeting that want to jack up the number of abortions they perform. It’s the people that want to discredit a course that helps save the lives of babies. It’s the people that run Planned Parenthood and those within the government and media that support it that are evil.
 
It’s those people that inherently and unabashedly violate the most basic inalienable right given to us by God: the right to LIFE, that are evil.
 
Those people are not pro-choice. They are pro-evil.
 
1 John 3:8
“Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil.”
 
Author: Freddie Drake.

It’s a commonplace assumption that liberals absolutely love science and anything to do with it. In reality, however, they DETEST science. Well, real science, at least.
 
Let’s begin with one of the biggest news of the past week: Trump pulling the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Agreement. Here, the president made sure that the U.S. didn’t get screwed over once again by Globalists and small nations who would be more than happy to take America’s money for nothing in return. But in doing so, the Left has gone absolutely bananas (and I love it), claiming that Trump is trying to kill the Earth with everyone in it. Globalist leaders, as well as highly uninformed celebrities are all insanely angry with the president for doing this.
 
I even saw a tweet from someone (not anyone famous) that essentially acknowledged the fact that the Earth has gone through multiple ice ages and therefore a change in climate is a normal occurrence. However, it boggles me how they can acknowledge that fact and still believe that mankind is capable or even responsible for the change in climate. If climate change is a cycle, how can mankind be in any way responsible for it? Unless I’m remembering Pixar’s CG movie “Ice Age” wrong, I can’t remember any point in which the humans in that movie were driving Hummers and 18-wheelers and flying 747 commercial air planes every day.
 
If the change in climate is natural, how can mankind be in any way at all responsible for it? And how can mankind be in any way able to stop a natural occurrence? And perhaps a better question: how can we predict what the planet will be like and look like in 100+ years if we can’t even predict with complete certainty the pattern of a hurricane? We can predict that the Earth will be completely flooded but we can’t predict when and where the next big hurricane will make landfall on the U.S?
 
And that’s just lunacy from the ‘climate change’ narrative. Now, let’s focus on two other narratives that the Left drives that have absolutely no scientific basis: That there are more than 2 genders and a human fetus isn’t human.
 
Let’s begin with the former. We have all studied at one point during high school science that there are things called “chromosomes”. These chromosomes contain our genetic information. They tell us such things as how tall we’ll be, what our hair color will be and what gender we’ll be. That last part is determined by what combination of chromosomes one has. A male has the chromosome combination of “XY”, while a female has a chromosome combination of “XX”. SCIENCE ITSELF TELLS YOU IF YOU’RE A BOY OR A GIRL! You don’t get to decide that. Society doesn’t get to decide that. Only God gets to decide whether you’re a boy or a girl.
 
So the next time some Social Justice Warrior nut asks you the ever-so-annoying question of “Did you just assume my gender?”, tell them “Yes, because science tells you if you’re a boy or a girl. And you’re very clearly one of those two.” So there should be no further debate on this non-issue.
 
And now for the more important narrative the left drives: That a human fetus isn’t human. How can anyone think that you’re not human until you’re born? If you were to show a picture of, say, a dog fetus to a liberal, they would no doubt say that it’s a dog. If you showed them a picture of a cat fetus, they would say it’s a cat. But if you show them a picture of a human fetus, they would say that it’s nothing more than a random assortment of cells. Talk about a human rights violation. They don’t even acknowledge a human fetus for what it is!
 
When a woman goes to the doctor to verify if she’s pregnant, medical SCIENCE will tell her that she is. SCIENCE will tell her that there’s a living organism growing inside a woman. And SCIENCE will tell her that she’s pregnant with a HUMAN BEING. There’s no other way to describe it. Science tells you that a human fetus is a human being in its earliest stages of life. And when liberals say women have the right to get abortions, they’re advocating for the right of women to KILL THEIR OWN CHILDREN!
 
So here’s my overall point: The Left HATES science when science tells them they’re wrong. When science is against the narratives they’re trying to drive, they lie to people and say that THEIR narrative is science, when there’s no scientific validity to anything they say. Science is the Left’s friend only when it works in their favor, which it rarely does. Let’s not forget that the scientific community has been working to debunk a theory that they themselves created: the Big Bang Theory.
 
But why do I mention that theory? Because that theory supports the idea of Creation. And if there’s Creation, there’s a Creator. “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep… And God said, ‘Let there be light’, and there was light…” If there’s a beginning to the universe, there had to have been something or someone that created it. But now, scientists claim that the universe was always here. That there was no beginning, which, when you think about it, makes absolutely no sense. But hey, that’s just the Left insulting your intelligence.
 
So remember, the Left may claim that they love science, but what they truly love is their narratives. Narratives that hold no scientific validity and only help increase the size of the government and the power of those within it. It’s not about science or even being right. It’s about having POWER OVER YOU.
 
Isaiah 45:12
“’It is I who made the earth, and created man upon it. I stretched out the heavens with My hands and I ordained all their host.’”
 
Author: Freddie M.

While accepting an award presented by Planned Parenthood, former Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton cited a Hulu production to back up her views on abortion. No, I’m not kidding – she actually cited Hulu’s The Handmaid’s Tale…I suppose this is how democrats back up all their theories…on novels…

But apart from the infantilism demonstrated by the former presidential candidate – infantilism that permeates the hearts and souls of every democrat, I must add – the argument that abortion is morally higher than life is an outrage.

Hillary said:

‘[…] anyone who wants to lead should also understand that fundamentally, this [abortion] is an issue of morality. I wish it were common ground, but I know for sure it is higher ground’

You bet abortion is an issue of morality - one that the Church should go after with full force.

In any case it’s hard to say whether Hillary’s position on abortion is based on her own convictions or on Planned Parenthood’s $38 million donation to her 2016 campaign. I personally think she will say and do anything for money and has no convictions – let’s not forget why her nickname ‘crooked Hillary’ was so widely popular during the campaign.

The democrat party has now become the party of abortion. In fact, DNC chair Tom Perez recently announced that his party’s commitment to abortion is ‘not negotiable’ and the party would never again support pro-life democrat candidates for office.

Yes, my friend – it’s hard to be a pro-life democrat these days. But then again, if you’re pro-life, then you cannot be a democrat…

The problem with democrats and their ‘higher morality’ is that they want to impose their morality on the rest of us. Since nobody on this planet is 100% moral and ethical, when you have a group of people wanting to impose their morality on you, it inevitably leads to tyranny.

Man cannot create morality – only God can.

The Nuremberg trials after WWII are a great example of what I mean. As you probably know, the Nazi leaders were brought to trial and charged with genocide and war crimes. After all they had massacred 6 million Jews. But, you see, the Nazi laws had declared Jews as ‘non-persons’. In other words, much like abortionists have declared unborn children ‘non persons’, Nazis did the same in Nazi Germany with respect to Jewish people. Obviously the end result was the 6 million dead Jews – or the 58 million massacred unborn children here in America. Nazi leaders’ defense was:

'What are you talking about? We have done nothing wrong. We have acted according to our own culture, according to our own morals and in perfect compliance with our own laws. We were told that Jews could be killed, so we killed them!. Who are you to come here now, from another culture, another society and impose your morals on us?’

Interesting defense, don’t you think?

And that’s because nobody can impose their morals on other people, like democrats are trying to do.

Only God can impose morals on us.

The extermination of an entire human race is wrong based on Christian values - not, Nazi law. Hitler gave the green light, but God says 'YOU SHALL NOT KILL'.

Nazis didn’t have the right to kill Jews any more than jihadists have the right to behead you – or any more than abortionists have the right to kill babies.
​
Christianity and the Bible are the foundation of a free society. You cannot have the government create morals because people, including people in government, are fundamentally immoral. In fact…

The extreme case these days where government dictates your morals is North Korea – Kim Jong Un has killed nearly 500 people in his short term in office, including members of his own family. He’s the epitome of evil because he doesn’t believe in a superior power who one day will judge him. If he did, he’d be a lot nicer.

When you know God will one day judge you, all of a sudden killing people, including, of course, infants, is a no-no.

Hillary and the democrat party obviously don’t think they’ll be judged by God one day. Today, they’re the party of abortion. Tomorrow they’ll be the party of killing the sick, or the old, or the black – wait, they once were the party of killing black people. The KKK was FOUNDED by democrats…

Friend, don’t let the moral relativism of the democrat party fool you. There’s only one truth. There’s only one moral code – and that’s the Bible.

Moral relativism causes people to create their own ‘values’. But it’s dangerous because your own values lead to Hitler or Kim Jong Un.

You see, Hillary believes there is no God. I believe there is – and He’s going to judge us all one day. Hillary and I cannot BOTH be right – only one of us is. What side are YOU on?

2 Timothy 2:15
‘Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth’

Author: DR