Over the weekend, President Donald Trump visited Alabama to pay his respects and give support for the families and communities devastated by massive tornadoes that killed 23 people. During his visit, some young kids asked the President if he would sign their Bibles.
And because he did, the Left is freaking out about it (which can really be a slogan for Trump in 2020: “Because Trump did it, the Left is freaking out”. It could cover literally anything he ever does).
Joe Biden’s former chief of staff, Ron Klain, tweeted: “He signed bibles with the same hand he used – as President – to sign hush money checks to an adult film star.”
Peter Daou, former adviser to Hillary Clinton wrote: “Donald J. Trump is signing Bibles. The man whose vicious and inhumane border policy violates the fundamental teachings of Jesus is signing Bibles.”
Reverend Al Sharpton (and I honestly forgot he was a reverend before this, considering his outright constant anti-Christian behavior) tweeted: “Donald Trump traveled to AL this past Friday to comfort those who had been devastated by a recent tornado that killed 23 people. During the trip, Trump was asked to sign some Bibles… I suggest that he takes some time to READ the Bible…”
And others on Twitter shared the same sentiment: “Imagine being a Christian and having Trump of all people sign your bible. NOBODY should be signing the word of God… Is this the end times? Lol,” wrote one Twitter user.
“Why did Trump sign Bibles for Christians?! He is not the author of the Bible. Matter of fact, he is what the Bible tells you not to be. Notice how he signed them on the cover. Trump still has never opened one. Trump autographing bibles is like Hannibal Lecter signing cookbooks,” wrote another user who also shared a picture of the Bibles he signed with the caption: “When the man who embodies all 7 deadly sins – lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy and pride – is signing bibles it means that it is time to reevaluate your religion.”
I will get to absolutely obliterating all of these people’s arguments in a moment, but first, let me share with you some other tweets from actually sane and not hypocritical people:
“Note to all the people ridiculing evangelicals for asking Trump to sign their bibles: Martin Luther King’s family asked President Obama to sign MLK’s bible. And Obama did,” wrote one Matthew Schmitz.
A group called Students for Trump tweeted: “Truman signs a Bible: *crickets*. Carter signs a Bible: *crickets*. Clinton signs a Bible: *crickets*. Gore signs a Bible: *crickets*. Trump signs a Bible: *HYSTERIA*.”
It’s also worth mentioning that Bush, Reagan and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts have all also signed Bibles.
So to the person saying that Trump shouldn’t sign a bible because he’s not the author, what would he say to anyone else who signs Bibles? Or what would he say if someone famous signed something they really had nothing to do with, because that sort of thing happens pretty often?
Someone signing something does not symbolize that person therefore having been responsible for that something. If you had given Stan Lee a comic book about Superman and he signed it, that does not mean he is responsible for the creation of Superman.
Now, let’s address some of the tweets from the Left regarding this. Ron Klain is trying to point out the supposed hypocrisy of Trump signing a bible with the same hand he used to supposedly sign hush money payments for Stormy Daniels. Yeah, because we all know that once someone commits a sin, they are irredeemable.
We all know the story of Moses, who killed an Egyptian guard, was on the lam for 40 years, God appeared to him in the form of a burning bush, told him that he messed up and left him to cry over it.
We all know the story of Abraham, who was so impatient for God’s promise to come to pass that he slept with his wife’s servant, bearing a child with her and God decided he messed up and didn’t give him another child, leaving Abraham and his tribe to suffer in their sin.
We all know the story of David, who used his kingly power to sleep with one of his most loyal soldiers’ wife, got her pregnant, sent said soldier off to die in battle, was removed from power and made to suffer forevermore in his sin because God would not forgive him even after he acknowledged his sins and repented of them.
We all know the story of Saul of Tarsus, who so hated Christians that he would use the power of the Roman Empire to hunt down and kill said Christians until Jesus Himself appeared to him, asking him why he was persecuting Him, made him blind and left him to rot forever as a sinner.
Time and time again, story after story, we see a recurring theme: man is sinful. But that’s not the end of the story. God did not abandon Abraham even after he sinned. He did not abandon Moses after he sinned. He did not abandon David after he sinned. He did not abandon Saul after he repeatedly sinned. Their faith in the Lord is what ultimately saved them.
The point of the Bible is that, while we are yet sinners and by our own abilities can never hope to be anything other than sinners, we are saved by the Grace of the Lord through our faith in Him. That’s as true in the Old Testament as it is in the New Testament. Saving Grace is what saved those living under the Old Testament and it’s what saves those who live under the New Testament.
Regardless of what Trump has done (and the only reports seem to be from Leftist sources, so you know how reliable those are), there’s no doubt that he is, indeed, a sinner. At heart, he’s a sinner because he is as human as you and I. But if he has repented, bowed his head down in reverence of Christ and asked for forgiveness of his sins, he has been forgiven.
Now, let’s go over those tweets once more. I already covered Ron Klain and the Twitter user who said he shouldn’t sign bibles because he is not the author, etc.
Let’s cover Peter Daou’s tweet about Trump signing bibles in spite of his “vicious and inhumane border policies”. Well, there are a number of things I can say about this.
First, what vicious and inhumane border policies? You mean the ones that Obama enacted and the media conveniently ignored until Trump took power and those policies remained? You mean the ones where we separate children from traffickers who seek to use those children to enter the country? You mean the ones where we separate those children from drug mules? From sex traffickers? How exactly is it humane to leave them with those people? If that is your definition of humane, you need some serious help.
Second, Obama and Clinton have both signed bibles. Despite the fact that they are both pro-gay marriage, pro-abortion, pro- just about everything the Bible warns against, they both have signed bibles. Why is it not a problem when they do it? They both come far closer to being the anti-Christ than Trump does. And I would be very shocked if either of them, let alone both of them, have repented of their sins.
Now, let’s look at what Sharpton said. He suggested that Trump read the Bible. Does Sharpton read the Bible himself? What does Romans 16:17-18 say?
“I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them. For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naïve.”
Read that, then read what Sharpton has said in the past and tell me he’s not an egregious hypocrite.
Lastly, we return to the guy who said Trump’s not the author of the Bible, so he shouldn’t be signing it. Remember that he also shared a picture that showed two Bibles Trump signed with the caption: “When the man who embodies all 7 deadly sins… is signing bibles it means that it is time to reevaluate your religion.”
For which I would refer you back to what I said earlier about man being sinful by nature and being redeemed by Christ.
No, we will not reevaluate our religion because our religion teaches us the Saving Grace of Christ at the cross. Who among us hasn’t occasionally been tempted or even committed one of these deadly sins? I know what I’ve struggled with regarding these sins and I have begged for forgiveness from the only source that can give me that: Jesus.
And as far as the 7 deadly sins go, I can realistically count only one or two of those sins that I could think Trump would really do: lust and pride. When it comes to lust, this is assuming that he did actually sleep with Stormy Daniels, which may or may not have actually happened. When it comes to pride, I’d say it’s mostly his boasting about his business ventures, etc. on the campaign trail and elsewhere.
But here’s the thing about the 7 deadly sins: they are deadly when they get to the point where they violate the first commandment: thou shall have no other God before me.
When your lust is so massive that you prefer to sleep around than worship God, you are effectively worshipping the flesh. When your gluttony is so great that you prefer to eat as much as possible instead of worshipping God, you are effectively worshipping what is supposed to be beneath man in the Creation. When your greed is so great that you seek to make as much money as possible instead of praising God for allowing you to do this and instead of worshipping God, you are effectively worshipping money. When your laziness is so grand that it keeps you from worshipping God, you are effectively worshipping laziness. When your wrath is so overwhelming that it keeps you from worshipping God, you are effectively worshipping violence. When your envy is keeping you from worshipping God, you are effectively worshipping that which you wish to have. When your pride is so massive that it keeps you from worshipping God, you are effectively worshipping yourself.
Only worshipping God, and His Son Jesus Christ, is what saves us. Only having God, and His Son Jesus Christ, in our hearts is what saves us. Putting in place things which are not God is what dooms us. It’s precisely for that reason that that was God’s FIRST commandment.
If Trump has God, has Christ, in his heart, he has been forgiven of all of his sins. Even if that post was right – that he indeed was the embodiment of all 7 deadly sins (he’s not) – as long as he has repented of his sins and Christ is in his heart, he has been forgiven.
But I can tell you many of these people have not been forgiven. Christ does not reside in them.
This especially goes for Al Sharpton, who though he says is a Reverend and may actually be a Reverend, is far from a Christian, particularly when taking into consideration what Matthew 15:8 says: “These people honor Me with their lips, but their hearts are far from Me.”
Sharpton says he’s a Christian but I have not seen anything close to Christian behavior on his part.
Overall, I am not at all upset over Trump signing bibles. Particularly considering that he was asked by people, starting with some young kids, to do so. It’s not like he actively sought to put his name on them. What was he supposed to do? Decline a young kid who likes the President and loves Jesus?
Personally, I would not have asked him to sign my Bible because I’d rather keep my thoughts on the Lord whenever I see or read my Bible, but that’s just me. I don’t think it’s anywhere near this big of a deal for a CHRISTIAN President to be signing Bibles when he’s asked to. It certainly wasn’t to these people when atheist Presidents or supposedly Christian presidents signed them.
“There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.”
And please make sure to check out our free weekly newsletter. As the name suggests, it is a newsletter that comes completely free of charge. What you get is a compilation of the week’s articles sent right into your inbox. So make sure to check it out today!
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
I’m almost tempted to make a bingo card of Leftist men who have recently been exposed for sexually assaulting at least one woman. Seriously, firing after firing, allegation after allegation, ousting after ousting, the Left seems to be getting demolished as time goes on.
The most recent Leftist to have been exposed as a sexual assaulter is Matt Lauer, who has been fired from NBC for credible allegations of sexual assault made against him.
An article written on PageSix.com is titled: “Matt Lauer allegedly sexually assaulted staffer during Olympics.”
“Matt Lauer allegedly sexually assaulted a female NBC staffer during the Sochi Winter Olympics in 2014.”
And one of the more interesting parts of this story is the fact that Matt Lauer’s victim complained to NBC’s Human Resources department about the assault. Usually, women call out their attackers very publicly. In this intriguing new environment of women exposing sexual assaulters, this is the first time I’m hearing that the victim either hasn’t come forward publicly or refuses to do so.
Of course, I can understand her decision not to publicly do that. There’s personal repercussions that come with informing the public that you’ve been assaulted. But it’s interesting that in this particular case, the woman chose to remain anonymous, at least for the time being.
Regardless, the article continues: “An NBC insider said Lauer’s alleged victim complained to HR on Monday: ‘This happened so quickly. She didn’t go to the media, she made a complaint to NBC’s human resources, and her evidence was so compelling that Matt was fired on Tuesday night. The victim says she has evidence that this has also happened to other women, but so far we don’t have evidence of that.’”
Perhaps another rather interesting part of the article is that they write: “Lauer’s firing comes amid rumors that several news outlets were working on stories about his alleged sexual misconduct. Reporters for the New York Times had been investigating Lauer for several weeks, according to sources who had been contacted by the paper, CNN reported.”
What exactly does that tell you? It tells me that the reason Lauer was fired in the first place isn’t simply because of the evidence presented to NBC’s HR department by the victim. Another reason, seemingly, is that other news outlets were investigating him on his sexual misconduct and “working on stories” about it.
Does that mean that NBC would’ve kept Lauer on their staff if other news outlets hadn’t been working on stories about him? That if the woman had been the only person to even bring up what he did that NBC wouldn’t have fired him?
Maybe, or maybe not. Regardless, we move on to NBC News Chairman Andy Lack’s statement on Lauer’s firing: “On Monday night, we received a detailed complaint from a colleague about inappropriate sexual behavior in the workplace by Matt Lauer. It represented, after serious review, a clear violation of our company’s standards. As a result, we’ve decided to terminate his employment. While it is the first complaint about his behavior in the over twenty years he’s been at NBC News, we were also presented with reason to believe this may not have been an isolated incident…”
Wait, wait, wait. “We were also presented with reason to believe this may not have been an isolated incident?” But the aforementioned NBC insider said “the victim says she has evidence that this has also happened to other women, but so far we don’t have evidence of that.”
If Andy Lack has reason to believe more women were assaulted by Lauer, doesn’t that mean he has sufficient evidence for such reasoning? There’s a bit of a contradiction, don’t ya think? Either they have enough evidence to at least have reason to believe Lauer assaulted more than just that initial woman or they DON’T have enough evidence that he assaulted more than just one woman.
Which is the truth? I don’t know. But I’ll tell you, I wouldn’t be surprised if there are more women that have been victimized by Lauer. In every high-profile sexual assault case we’ve seen in recent time, there’s always been more than just one woman. Even in the Roy Moore case.
Of course, we know the Roy Moore case is entirely b.s., but you get the point. There’s usually more than just one woman.
Now, why do I say I wouldn’t be surprised if there are more women in this case? Two reasons. First, because of a little bit of information that the Page Six article divulges: “His wife, Annette, famously filed for divorce in 2006, accusing him of ‘cruel and inhumane’ behavior, but withdrew the filing a month later after they reached a private agreement. They ostensibly live separate lives – she lives full time in the Hamptons with their children, while Matt resides in the city during the week.”
Now, back in 2006, I wasn’t paying much attention to the world around me, so forgive me for learning this only now. But the claim his wife made is rather troubling. “Cruel and inhumane” behavior? If that’s true, I feel sorry for Annette and her children.
The second reason I wouldn’t be surprised if more women are victims of Lauer is simply because of what Lauer is: a Leftist.
I’ve said this time and time again, but the Left is among the biggest threat to women in the world. The very fact that the Left has no morals or values is what endangers women the most. The Left respects no one and treats everyone equally poorly.
According to Hillsdale College, Winston Churchill said: “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.” in 1948. And in 1945, he said: “The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.”
Under socialism, everyone is equally miserable. This misery extends past financial wealth. The Left is socialist. And they’re the ones doing these things to multiple women. They have no good values or morals. They see people not as people but as opportunities.
They saw Obama as an opportunity to elect the first black President. They see women as an opportunity to advance their feminist agenda, while simultaneously getting closer (a bit too close) to women who believe their b.s. They see gay people as an opportunity to further drive us to immorality and sin. They see transgenders as an opportunity to do very much the same thing now that gay marriage is the law of the land and the Left has to be angry about something.
They see black people as victims of a racist past they never lived through. As victims of a racist past that the Left themselves are responsible for yet claim no responsibility for it.
The Left is entirely devoid of morals. Of values. Their hearts are filled with sin. There’s a reason Lust is one of the 7 deadly sins. It’s one of the major ones that billions of people commit and too often don’t repent for.
I often say that evil fills the hearts of the Left. Lust is considered a part of said evil. That’s why I’m not surprised that all these Leftists have done horrible things to multiple women. What surprises me is the courage many of these women have to expose these Leftists.
I can tell you, I didn’t think something like this would happen. And certainly not at this magnitude. It’s truly incredible to see these Leftists be exposed. The Left usually protects their own people, but it seems that’s not entirely the case. While they still protect the likes of Al Franken, John Conyers, Bob Menendez and whoever else in Congress who’s a Democrat has been accused of sexual assault, they are seemingly leaving members of the media in the dust.
Just last week Charlie Rose was fired from his network for the very same thing. Kevin Spacey was fired from his Netflix show “House of Cards” and the original domino, Harvey Weinstein, was fired from the very company he co-founded.
I don’t know what the reason is for these Leftists’ careers being basically obliterated, but I will certainly thank God for these unrepentant sinners being punished for their sins.
America’s justice system may not be perfect, but God’s justice system certainly is.
“When justice is done, it brings joy to the righteous but terror to evildoers.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
Linda Bloodworth-Thomason, a T.V. writer, author and filmmaker wrote a story on Hollywood Reporter about the sexual harassment in Hollywood. In her story: “Lessons from Witnessing Four Decades of Harassment in Hollywood”, Linda details stories she’s heard from other women in Hollywood about the sexual harassment history of Hollywood, as well as recounting some of her own. And boy, does she tear into Hollywood.
She begins: “I always knew I wanted to be a writer… my first three mentors were Hollywood giants Norman Lear, James L. Brooks and Larry Gelbart… It wasn’t until a few years later that I began to experience sexual harassment – the producer’s hand rubbing my back inside my blouse during meetings; the studio exec who, on my first day, encouraged me to wear a bikini to work… I didn’t know then that this is a man’s town, based mostly on male friendships. Forget those iconic letters that make up the Hollywood sign. It would be much more fitting if there was a giant penis casting a shadow over all the women who tirelessly endeavor to rise above this unpoliced playground for men.”
Now, this article is insanely long, so I will forgo a good chunk of it. What’s important to know is that Linda herself has been victim to sexual harassment at the hands of Hollywood people. She also tells the stories of other women who have been victims of sexual harassment. “I remember the revered star of a classic TV crime drama telling me a story about the president of her network. During her show’s final season, this actress was invited to his executive dining room for lunch. When she began to pitch her next series, he told her she was now way too old for his network. She started to cry and got up to go. He stood up, too, took her by the shoulders and said, ‘I’m sorry. I can’t let you leave like this’. She softened, almost forgiving him. Then he shoved his tongue down her throat.”
And that’s just one horrifying story of sexual harassment (or abuse, given the ending). She then tells the story of the people in a sitcom demanding that the “youngest, best-looking women show up for work at the crack of dawn wearing tight, revealing shorts.” And that once they discovered that one of the young women was utterly afraid of guns, they “forced her to purchase one and shoot a raccoon that lived on the stage.” And that when Linda called ABC to file a complaint, she discovered that while the producer had lost his job, the star of the show was left “unscathed”.
She then goes on to talk about gender inequality and ageism in the entertainment business. That by the time a male Hollywood star retires, roughly 3 generations of female actresses would have played his wife. (It’s important to note she uses Michael Douglas (aged 74) as an example of a male Hollywood star and Blythe Danner, who’s 74, Gwyneth Paltrow, who’s 45, and Apple Martin, who’s… wait for it… 13, oh, and Paltrow’s daughter.)
She also mentions a point I also agree with. “The over-sexualization, humiliation and brutalization of women on television and in movies remains rampant.” I certainly agree that women have been disgustingly over-sexualized in nearly every adult movie, humiliating them and making them look as though they are nothing more than pieces of meat to use for sex.
She then goes on to mention that she’d think that with all the “rampant misogyny”, Hollywood would “take on the issue of social justice for women – the same way it has embraced the cause of the African-American, Jewish (yeah, ok), and LGBTQ communities. But so far... just the sad sound of crickets.”
Sadly, since it’s basically a rule that Leftists must rip on Trump if they’re talking about politics, she also goes out of her way to call HIM a sexual predator. When she attacks the excuses people (usually Leftists) give for people like Harvey Weinstein, such as “they’re really not bad people, just ill”, she says the following: “Truthfully, I would’ve preferred the simple and more honest explanation given by our president, Donald J. Trump. ‘Grab ‘em by the p***y… When you’re a star, you can do anything.’ Thank you, Donald. I believe you’re the only sexual predator, to date, who’s told the truth.”
Yep, she just couldn’t resist trying to attack an innocent man when talking about the very guilty people of Hollywood. She’s a Leftist, after all.
And perhaps the best part of the story is when she talks about a personal friend of hers: “… I will be the first to admit that clearly delineated moral choices can still be painfully complex where friendship is involved. One of the best friends I will ever have and a man I love dearly, former President Bill Clinton, has certainly taxed my feminist conscience, but always without diminishing my affection. I even helped write his apology to the nation for his own sexual misconduct… and believe to this day it was based on something that was none of our business.”
I honestly think that, with those lines alone, she killed the point of her own story. How can you claim to be against sexual harassment when you still think highly of an ADMITTED sexual predator? And how can she say she believes it was based on something that was none of their business while at the same time saying that women should speak out against those who harass them? Isn’t it Weinstein’s business who he rapes, by that logic?
She does say that some may find it hypocritical (because it is), but that that doesn’t matter because she warned people against “allowing Harvey Weinstein to host political fundraisers.” THAT is the excuse she gives. She’s not even denying that she’s being hypocritical, she just switches back to talking about how she tried to warn people about Weinstein.
Aside from the obvious hypocrisy of her article, there is one thing she forgot to mention: Hollywood is entirely LEFTIST! She knows very well that Hollywood is Leftist, and yet, she fails to see wherein the problem lies. It’s not the fact that Hollywood is owned by men. It’s the fact that Hollywood is owned by LEFTISTS! Leftists who, for THIRTY YEARS, knew about Weinstein’s behavior. And that includes Leftist women. Leftists who have no moral conscience, only a script for what to say when politics is involved. They know they have to side with political correctness, social justice, and the Left.
But by doing that, they ignore morality. I’ve said before, the Left is without morals. You can’t honestly expect Leftist men to be morally sound about anything. Weinstein isn’t the first, nor will he be the last, Leftist in Hollywood to rape and sexually assault and harass women. And Linda shouldn’t be one more of the people within Hollywood who fails to realize where the problem stems. It’s not an issue of gender, it’s an issue of MORALITY!
There’s a reason Lust is one of the 7 Deadly Sins. It’s one of the most disgusting things for God to witness in the world He’s created. And Hollywood is chockfull of it. From the over-sexualization of women (and men) that even LINDA points out, to all the corruption and sinfulness of studio execs and stars, to the Harvey Weinsteins of the industry, Hollywood is inundated in lust. But that problem doesn’t come from men. That problem comes from the HEART of those men.
Hollywood is a great example of what happens when God is not allowed in your city. I say great as opposed to “perfect” because it’s not the perfect example. Nazi Germany would be the perfect example. Soviet Russia would be the perfect example. Hollywood is not quite at those levels because, as rotten as California’s local politicians are, they don’t rule the country. If left on their own, they would descend into Communism. Its celebrities would want to flee the country and demand that the new country be like California.
But that’s beside the point. The point is that Hollywood is a terrible place for women not because of gender inequality, but because of the sinful hearts of those with power. Hollywood is horrible because it’s Leftist. And Hollywood is Leftist because it’s horrible.
“In their own eyes they flatter themselves too much to detect or hate their sin.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
Recently in an interview with CNN at a Women for Women International event in New York, former Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton blamed FBI Director James Comey for her loss of the election. “If the election had been on October 27, I would be your president… I take absolute personal responsibility… I am very aware of the challenges, the problems, the shortfalls we had.” She also said that she was “on the way to winning until a combination of James Comey’s letter on October 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me and got scared off.”
Oh boy, I got a lot to say just from that… Well, here we go…
First of all, for the first few months after Trump’s win and subsequent inauguration, all we heard was that Russia was the one who hacked the election. Obama, Hillary, and the Fake News media were like broken records on the subject, crying and whining over and over again that Russia stole the election from Hillary. And now that it’s been 3 months into Trump’s presidency, the fire and passion behind that load of b.s. has died down. It’s like a toddler throwing a tantrum and when she begins to tire out, she wearily complains about the same thing before taking a nap.
Secondly, she blames someone else immediately after she “takes responsibility” for her loss. She immediately blames Comey and Russian WikiLeaks for her losing the election. That’s not taking responsibility in the least! But this is the way the Left works. If things don’t go their way, they don’t blame themselves for their failure. They always blame others. If they lose elections, it’s because another country hacked the election, somehow, or someone else was plotting against them and sabotaged them. They refuse to accept the fact that they simply weren’t the preferred candidate during the election.
But she’s not the only one pointing fingers on this matter. Barbra Streisand, one of the washed-out attention-seekers in Hollywood, blamed the country’s misogyny for Clinton’s loss. In an interview with WNYC’s Leonard Lopate, Streisand said “power and woman have always been suspect. Strong women have always been suspect in this country.” She’s blaming everyone who didn’t vote for Hillary of being misogynistic. She blames the American people for the result of the election. At least she’s aware of who actually influences an election: the American people, rather than a government worker or a foreign nation.
This is the way the Left operates. Nothing is ever their fault. If they fail, it’s because someone else was out to get them. They never run out of excuses as to why they lost. Earlier, they blamed Russian hacking. Today, Hillary blames Comey and WikiLeaks and Streisand blames sexism on the part of the American people for Clinton’s loss. In their own eyes, they are the very definition of perfection, and if things don’t go their way, it’s not because they messed up at some point, it’s because someone else sabotaged them.
They see themselves in a far different light than God sees them. They see themselves as perfect in every way, while God sees them as evil, selfish sinners. They are so filled with evil and hatred in their hearts that the mere concept of anything being their fault is ludicrous. They (elected Democrats) often commit 4 of the 7 deadly sins.
It’s because of all of these things that they are incapable of taking responsibility for anything or even moving on from loss (of elections). Their hearts are filled with these deadly sins and due to that, they are far from the blessings of God. He wasn’t about to reward such evil with another election victory. He put a stop to it and anointed someone to lead the country just a bit closer to Him.
“The acts of the flesh are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies and the like. I warn you as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.”
Author: Freddie M.
Freddie Marinelli and Danielle Cross will bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...