The Never Trumper and liberal would look at that headline and believe that I have given up on Trump or the fight to ensure Biden and the Democrats do not steal this election. They will think I am a pro-Trumper who is looking at the situation and thinks it is so bleak that I have no other choice but to pray to God for a miracle. Make no mistake: praying to God is our FIRST choice, not our last.
It is not rare for soldiers to pray to God before they set off to battle. They do so, not because they are at their wits end and can only pray for a miracle. They do so because they believe God will deliver them from the present darkness of war. They do so because they believe God will protect them from the enemy. They do so because they are believers first and soldiers second. They do so because they know the awesome power of the Lord.
Read the following written prayer from a Russian soldier during World War II:
“O God, hear me! Not once in my life have I ever spoken to you, but today I feel the urge to make you an act of worship. You know that even from my infancy they always told me that you didn’t exist… I, stupid, believed them. I had never marveled at your great works. But tonight I looked up from out of a shell hole at the heaven of stars above me! And fascinated by their brilliant magnificence. All at once I understood how terrible the deception…”
“I don’t know, O God, if you will give me your hand. But I say this to you, and you understand. Isn’t it strange, that in the midst of a terrible inferno, the light should appear to me and I should have discovered you? Beyond this I have nothing to say to you. I am happy just because I have known you. At midnight we must attack, but I have no fear, you are looking out for us.”
“It is the signal. I have to go. It was wonderful to be with you. I want also to tell you, and you know it, that the battle will be hard: it could be that, in this very night, I’ll come to knock at your door. And even though up to now I haven’t been your friend, when I come, will you let me come in? But what’s this? Am I crying? My Lord God, you see what has happened: only now I’ve begun to see clearly… Farewell, my God, I am going. It’s scarcely possible that I’ll return. Strange; Death now has no fear for me.”
Realize the magnitude of such a prayer. Children in the Soviet Union were taught not to believe in God. Teachers would often, under order of the Soviet school systems, organize an exercise where children would be given two potted plants: one which they would water themselves and take care of themselves, and another which “would be left up to God to take care of”. The point of the exercise was to “prove” that God didn’t exist because the plant that would not get watered or put under the sun or overall taken care of would die, and the one that the children took care of would live.
So, it is not surprising that a Russian soldier in the midst of the Second World War would have spent much of his young life not having known God at all. And even still, it is clear to me, through reading that prayer, that the Holy Spirit came down upon him and his eyes were opened to the Lord. That soldier, as he had predicted, would die in that battle. But he did not despair at the thought. He felt tranquil, as he expressed in the end of the prayer.
Prayer to God may have been among his last actions, but it was not out of desperation for hope of making it out of there. Again, he demonstrated he was not afraid of meeting his end there. Similarly, those who support and have voted for Trump, whether twice now or for the first time this election, we do not hope in God because He is our last hope or choice; He is our ONLY hope and choice.
Shall we have hope in an imperfect system (which is still pretty good, all things considered) created by imperfect men? Shall we have hope in even Trump himself or his legal team? I’m not saying that because I think they will fail; I say that because I believe God will let them succeed and has the power to do so. I say that because, at the end of the day, whether we are talking about war, a rigged election, or whatever else, we can truly do nothing more than to put all our trust, faith and hope in the One who is Master of All.
We see what we have to face. Many of us saw much of that during the recent State Senate hearing in Philadelphia.
The State of Pennsylvania sent out 1.8 million mail-in ballots and received 2.5 million. A clear sign of a rigged election. Republican poll watchers were not allowed to watch the polls, and even Philadelphia sheriffs didn’t allow them to go in, despite them having a judge’s order to be allowed to watch the polls. Another clear sign of a rigged election. At one point, the vote count received 570k votes going to Biden and only 3,200 going to Trump. Yet another sign of a rigged election.
There is plenty more, but also keep in mind that this was JUST in the State of Pennsylvania. There are other states like Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia and Michigan to consider, and even then, I doubt those are the only states where massive irregularities occurred.
Did you know that Biden severely underperformed Hillary Clinton everywhere in the country, with just about every demographic, except in four key cities? The only places where Biden did “better” were Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia, all of which are in states where some of the worst irregularities occurred and which are being challenged (Arizona is another state where such irregularities occurred, but no particular city “carried the day” for Biden there).
So we know what we are faced with. On the natural level, there are plenty of reasons to be worried. However, we do not serve a natural god, we serve a supernatural God. Absolutely none of this is a surprise to Him. He knows the exact number of votes stolen, illegally thrown away, illegally counted, etc.
We likely will never know the extent to which Democrats have been trying to steal this election (and I suspect this is far from the only election they have tried to steal, given Biden’s comments about his “voter fraud operation” and how “you guys did it for President Obama’s administration before this”, pointing to the possibility of Obama having stolen at least one of his elections, most likely 2012). However, what is important is to keep them from stealing this one, because if we are successful in doing that, I believe it will serve as a wake-up call to many Republicans (not the establishment ones) about election security.
I’ve said this before but I will repeat it here: it’s possible that this is all a blessing in disguise. Had Trump won in a massive landslide like I originally hoped he would, the topic of election security and fraud would not have been a priority. Sure, a Trump landslide would have been evidence that it clearly didn’t work, but consider that Trump is very much unlike other Republicans in many regards. He has the kind of pull many other Republicans do not. He is the most popular Republican president and candidate since Ronald Reagan. Had he won in a massive landslide and nothing was done about election security and defeating the Democrat fraud operations, they would have taken over in 2024 very easily, and the fears and worries we have today would become guaranteed realities four years from now.
If Trump succeeds, as I believe God will lead him to do, this close brush with fraud victimization will lead him to do something about the election. Keep in mind, also, that he sought to secure this election from foreign influence JUST because of the allegations made against him that he colluded with Russia.
If he is willing to implement policies which secure the elections from foreign influences just because of what people say about him, don’t you think he will be more willing to implement policies which secure the elections from domestic influences because of how close he was to being cheated out of re-election?
Election security and fighting fraud are now unmistakably a part of the Make America Great Again agenda, because without it, Democrats will have a much easier time stealing all future elections wherever they need them, with varying degrees of success in some places, at least.
There will be no Red Wave in 2022 if we don’t keep this election from being stolen by the Democrats. But again, despite all our earthly trials and tribulations, we must place our faith and trust, first and only, in the Lord.
Just as He hardened Pharaoh’s heart, He can also soften the hearts of our enemies. He can guide even wicked people to righteousness. Consider that before the Apostle Paul was an apostle or a Christian, he was the biggest helper of the Roman Empire in persecuting and hunting down those who walked with Christ.
If Christ can cause Saul of Tarsus to have a change of heart and become His follower, and further to writing about half of the New Testament and being one of the most influential apostles of the 12, God can make even people like Justice Roberts to do the right thing (and yes, I am aware of how he voted in a recent SCOTUS case regarding Cuomo’s unconstitutional shuttering of religious services, but that case does not go against the truth that God can guide Roberts’ steps away from wickedness and evil).
So do not put your hope in Trump, or his legal team, or the justice system of the United States. Rather, put your hope in the One who is above all things, who created all things, and who is Master over all things. Put your faith and trust and hope in the One who cannot be cheated, who cannot be victimized, and who knows the plans of the wicked and laughs at them.
Put your hope in God first and only.
“Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer.”
Author: President-elect Freddie Marinelli.
I would like to thank all of my voters, friends and family for getting me to where I am today. As President-elect, I will ensure we have a peaceful transition of power and once inaugurated, I will lead this nation away from the communist hellhole the Democrats and the Left wish to take us to and towards a future where God is back in our schools, the Constitution is actually taught, our history is taught, and where no Marxist shall ever find refuge.
Why am I saying all of this? Because I currently have about as much claim as Joe Biden does to call myself President-elect. Despite the fake news media calling state after state for Joe Biden and even pretending as though he has passed the 270 electoral vote threshold, he, in fact, has not won jack. The following are states which are heavily contested (due to rampant voter fraud) and have not officially been called or certified in anyone’s favor:
Both Alaska and North Carolina have recently been called for Trump, giving him 232 electoral votes so far in comparison to Joe Biden’s 226. As it currently stands, President Trump is ahead in the electoral college vote and has multiple paths for victory against Biden.
Matter of fact, The Gateway Pundit pointed this very thing out.
In Nevada, as well as in pretty much every other state they mention, they point out the blatant voter fraud that threatens to steal the election away from Trump. “Signatures were not verified on hundreds of thousands of votes. It is likely that President Trump will win this state if any of the ineligible votes are eliminated here…”
In Arizona, TGP points to delays in counting. In Wisconsin, TGP points to Biden’s 20,000 vote lead over Trump but notes that “in the morning after the election more than 100,000 votes magically appeared in Milwaukee… If these votes or the exception in the numbers in Rock County are addressed, Trump will likely win this state by a large margin.”
In Michigan, 100,000 ballots were dropped overnight in Detroit, and if eliminated from the total vote tally (there are lawsuits taking place here and other states), it will likely go to Trump. If all of these aforementioned states go Trump’s way (as they should), that would give Trump 278 electoral votes.
There is also Pennsylvania, where some of the most blatant and obvious rigging and fraud is happening. Biden currently leads the vote count here, but it is very obviously through fraud, given that Trump was ahead by 700,000 votes on election night before the Leftist jackals stopped counting to harvest ballots for Biden. This, I think, is one of the biggest focuses for Trump’s legal team, since I think it is where the easiest case can be made for widespread massive voter fraud.
Finally, there is Georgia, which unfortunately, despite it being largely a red state, is seeing a lot of election fraud (and hardly any fight in the state GOP, it seems). Like in other states, Trump was winning this one handily on election night, with a 100,000 vote lead, but ballot harvesting operations have allowed for Biden to take the lead here as well, though they are beginning a hand recount there, so it could end up going for Trump.
If the Trump legal team can get those illegal votes thrown out, as they should, Trump will win here as well, for a total of 311 electoral votes. Of course, this is all assuming that the courts rule in Trump’s favor (which, given the rampant voter fraud, they should).
Jon Miller wrote a great Twitter thread about the two ways in which the Supreme Court could go here:
One way is roughly what I just talked about: SCOTUS orders the states in dispute to remove all illegal ballots and do recount (likely by hand), which would lead to the situation I described above where Trump wins 311 electoral votes.
The other way is the SCOTUS rules the entire election as invalid due to the mass voter fraud, which, as Miller writes: “At that point it will be sent to Congress and Senate for a vote.”
Now, I know what you might be thinking: “So it’s sent to Congress? Meaning it has to go through the Democrat-led House? Doesn’t that mean that we already lost?” And, no, it doesn’t, as Miller points out: “Congress votes but it has nothing to do with what party has power. Every state gets one vote and 30 states are held by Republicans. 19 by Dems. They have to vote down party lines,” because of the 12th amendment.
The Constitution provides for a situation in which an election is either too close for any winner to be declared or where the Supreme Court has to intervene because of rampant and proven fraud. Trump’s legal team doesn’t even have to prove that every single illegal ballot is illegal, just that there is enough that those illegal ballots could intervene in the election and change the results. If that is proven, the SCOTUS can go down different roads, and many of those roads lead to Trump’s second term.
This is why the Democrats are rushing with “President-elect Joe Biden.” It’s nothing but posturing. They are well aware of the fact that they could and likely will lose this election through a number of ways, so for the purposes of fighting Trump’s legitimacy, they have to pretend as though HE is the one that “stole” the election as opposed to them.
This is why even I (and many others) have begun to call myself “President-elect”, because I have as much legal claim to be that as Joe Biden does. Neither of us have gotten the sufficient amount of legal votes in the electoral college to be President-elect. My “office” of the President-elect includes a desk that’s been battered through a couple of moves, a two-year-old computer, a nearly-decade old monitor, another computer which is years old and never use but always keep on my desk just in case, some books, a couch/bed behind my desk, a white board and a flat-screen television. All of this is just an official part of my office of President-elect as whatever is on Biden’s desk at home or in his basement.
I have half a mind to try and contact President Trump about my transition of power for my administration, seeing as I have as much legal claim to it as Biden does.
So don’t let any fake news source make the claim that Joe Biden is “President-elect” because he flat-out isn’t. The fake news media doesn’t get to decide the elections, else Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Michael Dukakis, Walter Mondale, Jimmy Carter, and every other Democrat who came before would have won (and out of all of these, only Carter actually was POTUS at some point).
What gets to decide the election is the United States Constitution, and it says that the electoral college decides the election. When it cannot or when it’s this heavily contested, the Supreme Court makes a decision as to the avenue for deciding the president.
And by the way, every single news outlet that today is lambasting Trump for “refusing to accept the results of the election” is also every single news outlet which for four years refused to accept the results of the 2016 election, and perhaps even more importantly, PRAISED Al Gore for doing pretty much the same thing that Trump is now doing back in the 2000 election.
Gore put this country through 30+ days of litigation, and every step of the way, he was praised by the fake news media as “fighting for democracy.” Now, Trump is doing pretty much the same thing only because of rampant voter fraud which anyone halfway paying attention can notice, and they call him a “sore loser” or other crap.
Not that it’s in any way surprising, of course. I would have to be insane to be at all surprised at this kind of reaction from the media. But it’s worth it to point out the great hypocrisy of these people and their outright subjectivity throughout it.
Now, something that is fairly ironic about this situation is that it could be a blessing in disguise. One silver lining of the current election fiasco we are witnessing is that it paves the way for Trump to prioritize election security once he enters his second term. Had he won in a landslide like I was originally hoping he would, election security would not have been much of a priority because the fraud, despite its size, would not have been effective enough to sway the election.
Trump has so far won more than 72 million votes, which is nearly 10 million more votes than he got four years ago. That is MASSIVE and if it weren’t for the election fraud and its relative success (thus far), it’s what a lot of people would be talking about for a long while. This is more than what Obama got in 2008, and this is WITH THE TOSSED-OUT TRUMP VOTES. In reality, he has even more votes than the official count.
But as great as that is for Trump, do you really think that any other Republican could get these kinds of numbers? If the fraud scheme had not been exposed as it had been because it was clearly not effective enough to sway the election, the Democrats would have come back in two years and in four years and every future election cycle with some of the same schemes that would, in the future, actually help them steal the elections.
Even despite the annoyance of this current process, and the anger at the Democrats trying to steal an election away from the American people, if Trump is ultimately successful, he can (and should) prioritize election integrity for the future, because I can just about guarantee no Republican in the future will ever win the presidency again if these kind of shenanigans are allowed to continue.
At any rate, no one should be calling Joe Biden “President-elect”, seeing as he has not actually won the election. But for as long as Democrats and Leftists do actually call him that, might as well start calling myself that too.
This isn’t over folks, not by a long-shot.
“But let justice flow down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.”
Author: President-elect Freddie Marinelli.
During this election limbo, communists Evan McMullin, who ran for president in 2016 (apparently), and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (I have made the decision not to officially recognize any Democrat by their title, given the high likelihood of fraud throughout many elections which have always gone the Democrats’ way) flirted with the communist idea of making lists of people who have supported President Donald Trump, particularly in his efforts to call out the blatant fraud that threatens to steal this election away from its rightful winner.
McMullin tweeted (in a tweet which is still up and does not have any Twitter tags saying that it might “incite violence” or anything which would make the guy look bad): “We should keep and publish a list of everyone who assists Trump’s frivolous and dangerous attacks on the election. Name and shame forever.”
Side note, why is Trump calling out the blatant election fraud that anyone with even one objective news source can tell is happening a “frivolous and dangerous” attack on the election, but Hillary and the Dems/MSM accusing Russia of stealing the 2016 election, without evidence, not considered a “frivolous and dangerous” attack on the election?
Why, after four years of lunatics screaming about how the elections are rigged, are these very same people now claiming that it is impossible to rig an election?
A rhetorical question, of course. We all know why they do what they do. When they lose an election, it’s because of cheating from the Republicans. When they win an election, legitimately or not (and I call into question how often they legitimately win), it is absolutely ludicrous to conceive of the idea that elections could be interfered with by anyone.
These people are evil and so is anyone who supports them while knowing this sort of hypocrisy.
At any rate, returning to McMullin’s tweet, AOC replied: “Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted tweets, writings, photos in the future.”
Do you see how these psychos work? They call people who have legitimate concerns about the integrity of the election “sycophants” because they support Trump and even imply that it is a CRIME in which people can be ACCOMPLICES to do so. All the while other Democrats “insist” in “unifying” the nation, now that Biden has been declared the winner by the fake news media (a claim which effectively does nothing but put Biden in the same posture as Gore in 2000, allowing for Trump’s eventual victory to be seen as just as illegitimate as Bush’s victory).
Those Democrats are not asking for unification, by the way. They are asking for submission; that despite the blatant rigging of the election, you have to obey them. Just weeks after Biden called Trump supporters “ugly” and after FOUR YEARS of these people calling us Nazis and white supremacists, they are asking us to be “united” with them? Screw that. That’s not unification, it’s submission and anyone with half a brain cell can tell.
At any rate, even despite these patronizing and insincere calls for “unity”, there are those, particularly on the far-Left, who are a bit more honest with the way they currently feel. They believe they have won and that the future is theirs, and all they have to do is get rid of the “undesirables.”
This is the way ALL communists operate, regardless of country. All that hinges on whether or not they go public with this crap is whether or not they believe they have won and have the power to enact this stuff.
They always hide their true intentions until they believe they have the power to expose them with impunity, because what they want is just about always going to be unpopular with people. In a speech in April of 1959, Fidel Castro declared (translated from Spanish, obviously): “I have said in a clear and definitive fashion that we are not Communists. The doors are open to private investments that contribute to the industrial development of Cuba.”
Earlier in January 1959, following Batista’s defeat, Castro told journalists that “the new government will decline any relations with dictatorial states… first of all the Soviet Union.”
A communist apologist might argue: “See, Freddie? Castro didn’t switch to communist upon getting victory over Batista. He still made that promise even after victory was assured.”
Eh, no. Sure, he made that promise, but he soon practically went against everything that they had been promising to the Cuban people (such as democratic elections) once he made himself Prime Minister in February, only a month after he made that statement. Castro made that “we are not Communists” speech just months before relations with the U.S. broke down and they began to partner with the Soviet Union, which they promised would not be a thing that would happen.
The only difference between the communists of Cuba in the past and the communists of the U.S. in the present is that the American Communists are certain of their victory that has yet to come and have no real shame in exposing themselves for who they are.
Prominent Democrats like James Clyburn were worried, for a while, that “defund the police” would hurt Democrat candidates and it definitely did, seeing as Republicans made a lot of gains in House races (and that’s with the blatant rigging of the election, as some races have now been overturned to elect the Republican because of “discovered glitches” that “accidentally” gave Republican votes to the Democrat candidates).
Exposing who they are hurts them, but not everyone is cognizant enough to realize this. Matter of fact, even despite how these down-ballot elections have gone the Republicans’ way, AOC still insists that going to the far-Left is the only way Democrats will win in the future.
Such idiotic commies like AOC have no real issue discussing out loud any ideas of making lists of enemies in preparation for disappearing people and sending them to concentration camps. And don’t think that that couldn’t possibly happen here. If Biden actually becomes the occupier of the oval office (like I said, I won’t recognize their official titles), all that he would need to do is write an executive order (or orders) which would immediately pack the Supreme Court with three or four “justices” and gets them to go to work immediately.
“What? That’s nonsense, Freddie. SCOTUS justices have to be confirmed by the Senate, which the GOP is just about certain to hold.” Right, because people who are willing to break the rules and laws to gain power would not be willing to break the rules and laws to use their power. If Biden could somehow get three or four justices into the Supreme Court immediately, no legal actions would work because anything that reaches the Supreme Court would be met by new justices which support this illegal and unconstitutional court packing scheme.
Trust me when I say, if Biden does actually get to occupy the White House, this country will be at his mercy (and he will be Xi’s puppet, so you can imagine how much mercy they would have). Not even the Democrats keeping the House would be at all relevant, since Biden could then write any laws he wants (though he would probably still leave that up to the Democrat-controlled House and they could send their bills straight to the oval office as opposed to the Senate because, again, these people don’t care about rules which limit their power).
This is why communists like McMullin and AOC have no real issue whatsoever with publicly discussing revenge plans and making lists of enemies: they think they have won and there is nothing that can stop them.
A foolish thought, but these are not necessarily the smartest of people.
At any rate, pray that the courts will rule in favor of Trump or at the very least rule the election as null and void (due to the mountains of evidence which show rampant fraud) and leave it up to one representative from each state to decide the election (which will go to Trump because Republicans rule in 30 states and the 12th Amendment obligates them to vote for their party’s nominee).
Pray that God will deliver a great defeat to the evil Leftists who openly discuss their vile plans for us.
“When the righteous increase, the people rejoice, but when the wicked rule, the people groan.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
Prepare for a whole slew of narratives to be thrown out the window, particularly if Biden “wins” the election. COVID will suddenly not be a problem and the “militant, authoritarian, racist” National Guard will all of a sudden not be any of those things in order to maintain some semblance of order in far-Left cities and states where these riots have been happening.
Following the election, once it was clear the riots would not help Trump much more than they already have, Oregon Governor Kate Brown finally ordered the National Guard to step in and quell the riots going on in Portland.
Why are there still riots going on if there is a decent chance that Biden will “win”? Well, the riots were not all about Trump. Sure, the Left opportunistically used them to try and hurt Trump (somehow, I mean, I don’t know that that’s what actually happened. If anything, I anecdotally know that the riots being allowed to happen turned people towards Trump, not against him) and cause as much chaos as possible, but one has to take into consideration that the people involved in the riots are the useful idiots.
Yes, they will be opportunistically used by the higher-ups, but they also do actually believe in the communist garbage they are spewing. Many of these socialists don’t even like the Democrats, nor Joe Biden (they might have voted for him anyway to get rid of Trump, but did so begrudgingly) because they consider them to not be “Leftist enough” or “too moderate” and would be perfectly happy to get rid of them as well, given the chance.
Kate Brown is not well-liked by these Leftists, and neither is Ted Wheeler, who won his race by 7 percentage points to a pro-Antifa far-Leftist in Sarah Iannorone (and 13% of the vote went to write-in candidates like far-Leftist community activist Teressa Raiford, so it could also have gone to the pro-Antifa candidate if not for that).
For these people to still be rioting as they are is not really a surprise. They’ve been rioting for years, though only in recent months have they gotten a good amount of attention.
It is also not surprising that Kate Brown would finally order the National Guard to step in to attempt to bring in peace. Prior to the election, she repeatedly refused to bring in the National Guard, likely believing that letting them go in and be effective against riots would help Trump appear to be competent and a harbinger for peace. He is those things, don’t misunderstand, but Brown didn’t want to help give him credit for something, so she allowed the violence to go on, with countless businesses being ruined and even more people being hurt as a result.
Two months ago, when asked why she had not called in the National Guard despite Wheeler also repeatedly asking her to do so, Brown responded with:
“So just to be very, very clear, the mayor asked for assistance from the National Guard several weeks, perhaps months ago, and there were multiple reasons at the time why I rejected that request… In terms of Oregon, I’m relying on our trained law enforcement, the Superintendent of the State Police, Travis Hampton, the Portland Police Chief, Chuck Lavelle. Travis, Superintendent Hampton would say that, A, we don’t need the national guard at this time and, B, that they are not trained for this work. What we need on the ground is trained law enforcement.”
What a load of crap. Here, Brown gave two reasons as to why she did not call in the National Guard at the time: 1) she determined “they were not needed” at the time and 2) that they are not trained to do this kind of work.
Both of those reasons are utter lies.
Let’s begin with the first one. Since she has called them in now, she obviously must have determined that they were needed (yes, I know she mentioned the Superintendent, but she is the one who ultimately makes the decision to bring them in and makes this determination). But what about these riots is any more dangerous or destructive than the MONTHS of non-stop rioting and multiple declarations of “state of emergency” that they were doing before?
Were they not needed when the rioters showed up to the street where Wheeler lived (until he moved precisely because of these riots)? Were they not needed when they were trying to set ablaze government buildings? Were they not needed when police officers were being assaulted?
Were they only going to be needed if they presented a threat to the governor herself? If the rioters had decided to go to her residence in Salem, which is not that far from Portland, would they have been needed at that point?
And again, what makes the riots happening during/after the election so different from the ones that were happening before the election?
So that is a total b.s. lie. How about the second “reason”, the one about not being trained for this?
This one is an even more contemptible lie because it is far more easily proven. A determination of “need” is subjective to the governor’s line of thinking. There is no reason to call them in now as opposed to months ago, since there doesn’t seem to be much different about these riots than the ones before which would prompt such a response, but it is still a subjective determination. However, the second “reason” is an outright lie. The National Guard IS MOST DEFINITELY TRAINED FOR THESE SITUATIONS.
According to Vocal Media, the National Guard serves a number of purposes:
They are in “reserve” in case of major conflict breaking out and the country needing a large influx of active soldiers who are ready for combat, both domestically and abroad. They help during national disasters to rescue people, set up shelters and enforce curfews. And most relevant to this topic of discussion: THEY HELP ENFORCE THE PEACE IN AMERICAN CITIES WHEN THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT CANNOT.
Following the 1992 LA riots, the California National Guard was sent in to quell them because it became too much for the LAPD alone to handle. They are MOST DEFINITELY trained for these kinds of situations.
But for the briefest of moments, let’s assume that a Leftist is not utterly full of crap and say she was telling the truth. If she was telling the truth, then she just sent in a bunch of people with guns to an incredibly hostile environment for law enforcement who are not trained to handle the kinds of situations going on in that city.
So which is it, Gov. Brown? Are they actually trained to handle these situations, in which case you actively prevented Portland from having a chance of peace before the election therefore calling into question your intentions and your very character, or are they not trained to handle these situations, in which case you stand to have made things worse by sending in untrained people with guns into a highly stressful situation?
This is the kind of illogical bullcrap that I HATE about the Left, but they never get called out for it and they never suffer the consequences of it. Oregon is deep blue and it’s never coming back if THIS did not turn it red. I was kinda hoping that it would turn it red because there is no way that the Democrats spent much time worrying about getting fake ballots in that state, because just about no one would expect it to go for Trump (not that they weren’t still doing it because they probably were, just that the focus of this kind of operation was elsewhere, which probably meant less attention to this state’s elections). I was hoping this confidence that it would not be a swing state would actually swing the state over to Trump and the Democrats would have to suddenly shift to worrying about that state too and try to cheat there too, but nope.
Not even strict lockdowns and extremely violent riots going on for MONTHS was enough to get the state to even remotely be considered for Trump. A lot of liberals simply refuse to learn and will have to suffer even more for them to learn, if even that. Who knows, either they go the way of Venezuelans actively opposing Maduro (but obviously not being able to do anything about it) or they get sent to the gulags with smiles on their faces believing they are doing something good for “the community” or whatever else.
I was hoping plenty of people would learn from these terrible leaders, and while a lot did learn (Trump got the most votes of any Republican ever and gained more than 5M from 2016, so plenty of people did learn, and in a free and fair election, Trump would have long ago won the EC and even the popular vote), it’s clear some people simply won’t.
And no Never Trumper better tell me “well, if Trump had just been more appealing for people to vote for him and not be repulsed by the thought of doing so, he would have won,” because no. One of the biggest reasons the Left hates him as much as they do is because he fights back against them. They were calling George W. Bush, John McCain and Mitt Romney some of the same things that they presently call Trump.
They have compared Bush to Hitler and have gone with the idea that McCain and Romney are/were insidious racists and Nazis – some of the biggest scum in the world. They wouldn’t have done anywhere near as well as Trump has done and would have conceded long ago if they were currently in Trump’s shoes.
This isn’t a “Trump is unlikable” issue (because that is clearly not true because, again, he’s garnered more votes than any Republican in history and gained over 5 million votes from last time), it’s a “Democrats are trying to steal this election” issue and a “some people, mainly Leftists, never learn” issue.
I was hoping that there were more sensible, reasonable people in Oregon and even in Portland than there actually are, but they seem to be pretty cozy with far-Leftists being in charge. Granted, only Leftists were running in local and state elections, so I can’t blame them for that, but they could have tried to swing the state over to Trump in a place where the Democrat election-stealing efforts were fairly minimal because they didn’t believe it would be necessary, and didn’t.
Am I mad? No. They can vote for whatever crap they want and they are the ones who will suffer the consequences; I have long since left that hellhole. I am, however, disappointed because I did believe they could, if they voted for Trump, have swung things a bit in that regard. A long-shot chance, to be sure, but I expected some chance and it didn’t happen. If the current events happening in that place are not enough to get them to learn, hardly anything, if at all, will.
But at any rate, getting off of that tangent, it really should not be surprising to see Brown suddenly calling in the National Guard to quell these things. Even regardless of who wins, the time for people to *legally* cast their votes has passed and any actions taken by her won’t really affect the results of the election.
The narrative of “it’s authoritarian/racist to bring in the National Guard to stop these peaceful protests” is gone now that such a narrative is unnecessary. For appearances, they might still push something akin to this, but it doesn’t really matter.
As far as bringing peace to Portland goes, while I’m not affected either way, plenty of people are, and I am glad that at least something is being done, even if it was extremely delayed/politically motivated. There are still decent people in Portland so I pray for their safety and their ability to sustain themselves in that communist hellscape.
Regarding anyone else, never forget what the Left has been trying to do for these last four years and what they will continue to try to do not only for the next four but for the foreseeable future. These people must be fought at every turn in every which way. It is the only way to preserve our freedoms, even if we have to separate ourselves nationally from them.
“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
So far, the election does not seem to indicate a Trump landslide. There is still the possibility that it could win big, to an extent, if some states like Arizona only got around to begin counting election day votes the day after the election, but in this time period, the country is basically in limbo.
It has been clear for a very long time now that the Democrats would try to cheat as much as they could during the election, from counting fake ballots for Biden to not counting real ballots for Trump, and even delaying counting the votes until they can “find” enough votes to ensure Biden would win in any given place, such as Pennsylvania (which is run by Democrats, so this would be rather easy, except for the massive margins which Trump is winning this state by).
The fake news media also did its part, what with Fox News (literally no reason to watch any of their crap except for Tucker and I straight up deleted their app on my phone following election night) calling states like Virginia and Arizona for Biden when hardly any votes had been counted and refusing to call states like Florida and Texas for Trump when there was no way whatsoever for Biden to make up the difference there.
And as we all expected, big tech is censoring anyone who is calling into question the irrationality of certain voting patterns and other claims which at all make the Democrats look bad.
So we knew that the fix was in.
I was hoping for such a massive election day landslide in Trump’s favor that it would basically be an exercise in futility for the Democrats to try and come up with the tens of millions of ballots that they would need to make up the difference and seal it for Biden. Granted, if Arizona and other states are only recently coming around to counting election day ballots and that is how the vast majority of Trump voters can be found, then it still could be that Trump wins bigly, depending on how things go with that. However, as things currently stand, this looks to be a close one in either direction.
Do I believe that for even a second? Of course not. Trump was pulling in record crowds, and enthusiasm for him was off the charts. Biden can’t even get a parking lot full of people to show the least bit of enthusiasm for him, but you’re telling me he is pulling in all of these votes from all the right places he needs to win?
You’re telling me that Michigan stopped counting votes for like an hour and after an hour, they magically “found” 130,000 ballots which ALL went to Biden? You’re telling me Wisconsin is seeing just about 100% of registered voters turned out to vote for Biden specifically? You’re telling me he won the most votes out of any presidential candidate in American history?
There never was any enthusiasm for Biden, how is he legitimately pulling in all these votes? The answer is that he isn’t. There are plenty of examples of voter fraud happening all around the country, and I have even pointed out Ilhan Omar’s fraud schemes in Minnesota (and speaking of her, there is no reason for me or anyone else to consider her a legitimate Congresswoman, so she will not receive the title of “Representative”, and if Biden wins, I won’t consider him legitimate either. Give him the same treatment the Left gave Trump).
In a free and fair election, we likely would have known that Trump won fairly early into the night on election night, most likely even winning the popular vote as well. Hell, in a free and fair election where there are no fraudulent votes, I don’t see Democrats winning any state apart from Hawaii and maybe, to some extent, California. I particularly would not see them winning anything close to 270 in this particular election.
However, the Left cheats and they are not very intent on hiding it either. Instead, they attempt to project that cheating onto Republicans, claiming that they are the ones who do it and claiming that that’s what they did in 2016. Trust me, even if it’s 100% proven and nationally reported that the Democrats cheated in this election, they will try to justify it by saying that “Trump and the GOP cheated in 2016 through collusion, so it’s okay for us to do it here.” We all know it’s utter bullcrap, but they will say that if they have to. These are not just and fair people. These are evil people thirsty for revenge for 2016 and will destroy the entire country if given the chance.
But at any rate, let me get to the point of this entire article. While I have no idea whatsoever how the election will ultimately go (still hoping Trump wins in a big way and even flips some of the states which were already “called” for Biden), everyone, even liberals, can agree that the polls were utter garbage.
Every single poll had Biden winning in a landslide, with double digit leads in states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and many other places. They had Florida, Georgia and Texas going to Biden, for crying out loud! Even if Biden wins, it will not be anything like what the polls predicted. They predicted a massive blue wave, Democrats flipping the Senate, etc., etc., and none of those things happened whatsoever.
All throughout the night, Left-wing news organizations like The Young Turks were getting 2016 flashbacks. Many on the Left were seeing Trump winning by a lot in Pennsylvania and Virginia (even while Fox had prematurely called it for Biden when Trump was winning it by 17 points) and were convinced that Trump would be re-elected.
They all had put their hopes in their own polls being right, and none of them were. Nothing even close to what they were predicting ended up happening, regardless of how this election will ultimately look like.
While this is a lesson that a lot of people should have learned in 2016 (since literally that exact same thing happened back then), people should learn this time around that the polls are never to be trusted, given how blatantly biased they always seem to be. When you oversample Democrats and undersample Republicans, you are naturally going to see the Democrats being up and by a lot.
In some instances, like shy Republican voters, there isn’t much the polls can do to offset that to show a more realistic outcome because some of the surveyors are outright not telling the pollsters who they intend to vote for. However, even despite that factor, there is still blatant rigging of the polls to make the Democrats appear to be ahead by massive margins when they are not whatsoever.
I haven’t trusted any Left-wing polls since 2016 when they do this crap and have even more reasons to not trust them now on just about anything. And while I have, in the past, pointed to polls from sources like the Washington Post, CNN, etc., it is because they tended to show favorable things for Trump/Republicans, which was significant considering how these pollsters tend to run their polls.
I hope Fox News pays dearly for their election night shenanigans. I also wish people, particularly in the mainstream media, would stop showing polls which are so blatantly rigged, but we know that they won’t. They have to push the narrative that Democrat Candidate X is winning by big margins to try and suppress Republican turnout (and to rake in the donation money to the doomed candidates). They also can’t outright look at poll results from their own organizations and declare “yeah, I don’t believe this poll and neither should you,” so for employment reasons alone, they wouldn’t change their attitudes on polling, but I just hope the OVERWHELMING majority of people have a complete lack of trust for polls from here on out, at least for as long as the polls keep being rigged as they are.
And while I wish I could have made this article about how Trump won massively AND still made the point that the polls were utter garbage, this is still far from over. We do not have a Romney/McCain type Republican in charge here. Trump is a fighter and he will go to whatever extent is necessary to secure this victory.
I just hope the election day votes get counted and they show Trump winning by so much that the Left cannot overcome the deficit even through cheating.
Pray to the Lord, my friends. This will be a battle.
“Though they plan evil against you, though they devise mischief, they will not succeed.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
Among the many egregious running lies from the fake news media and the Democrats is the idea that Donald Trump has never denounced or condemned white supremacy and that he actually refuses to condemn white supremacists because he supposedly is one of them. This is, of course, a contemptible lie that has multiple times been debunked and Trump himself has recently debunked by sharing a video (below) of nearly 40 times that he has denounced white supremacy and racism.
Now, I could share each and every time he has done it, but I would like the focus of conversation to be on something else entirely. Of course Trump has condemned white supremacy time and time again! He’s not a racist! In a recent NBC News townhall, he repeatedly denounced white supremacy.
During the first presidential debate, he denounced white supremacy. Back in 2016, he said he “totally disavow[s] the Ku Klux Klan. I totally disavow David Duke.”
Time and time again, when the fake news media asked him to denounce white supremacy, he has done it without fail and without question. They have done this multiple times despite the fact that, for a long time, he has denounced white supremacy. They KNOW that he does not support it, but they have to keep up the lie that he has never denounced white supremacy and they do this by asking him again and again, as though it’s necessary.
I think Trump needs to change things up a little bit whenever he is asked that question. Of course, he should still denounce white supremacy, but he should push back against the fake news media for asking them over and over again (admittedly, he has done a bit of this particularly in recent time) and he should ask the fake news media if they will disavow the left-wing, Antifa and BLM violence that we have seen over the last few months and years.
There will not be any more debates, so he can’t ask Joe Biden directly if he will do this (which he won’t since these animals are his supporters) so he should ask the fake news media if they will do this, because they so far have not.
Following the death of George Floyd and the response to it from BLM and Antifa terrorists, the fake news media happily shared the riots that were occurring, though reframing them as “mostly peaceful protests” or “demonstrations”. They never went so far as to support the riots outwardly, but they sure as hell did all they could to make them look legitimate in the eyes of the people.
They literally had burning buildings in the background as they reported “slightly fiery but mostly peaceful protests.”
This was not reported by the fake news media, but as of August 19th, according to The Federalist, 30 people have died since the “mostly peaceful protests” erupted, and according to the Associated Press (so not exactly a right-wing source), “many of the people killed were African Americans, compounding the tragedy for black families.”
Many black people were killed during the “mostly peaceful protests”. And while the fake news media no longer covers them, that doesn’t mean they aren’t still happening. Philadelphia has been subject to further rioting following the police-involved shooting of an armed black man (who was charging at officers) and the only thing the MSM is reporting about it is the shooting of the black man, not the rioting that ensued.
And the ONLY reason they have stopped showing all of this is because they saw in numerous polls that people, quite unsurprisingly, were not exactly fans of all of the violence that the fake news media was assuring them was not happening as they were showing it.
With the Democrats either condemning violence in general or outright siding with the “protesters” in wanting to destroy law enforcement in this nation, the fake news media could not continue covering them because this would only have led to an easy victory for Trump. They switched back to the Chinese coronavirus because they believe Trump was far more vulnerable on that subject (and it’s also why each debate began with that discussion).
They have never outright denounced this Left-wing violence, and in some instances, have even tried to gaslight people into believing that it was TRUMP SUPPORTERS who were doing this.
While I think continuing to disavow white supremacy is a smart political decision, the truth of the matter is that he should not still be doing it because he should not still be asked to do so.
Again, the fake news media KNOWS that he has done this many times. Trump was asked by Chris Wallace during the 2016 REPUBLICAN PRIMARY DEBATES if he would denounce white supremacy, and yet, Wallace acted as though the first 2020 debate was the first time he asked that question. He unequivocally understands that Trump is against white supremacy and still acts as though no one has ever asked him to denounce it or as though he has always refused to do it.
Remember the Charlottesville “fine people” hoax? Immediately after he said the “fine people” part, he also said: “And you had people – and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.”
He said this in the same interview which the fake news media and the Democrats claim that he called white supremacists “fine people.” For the last three years, they ran with that lie – with that HOAX – as though he didn’t say what he actually said about not including the white supremacists as “fine people.”
Time and time again, he has denounced white supremacy whenever he was asked to do it. He should still do that (because God knows these people will not relent on this idiotic idea) but he should also go on the offensive on this.
At no point throughout these riots has the Left ever denounced the left-wing violence that we have witnessed. At no point did they denounce Antifa and BLM. In fact, they’ve done the opposite. Regarding Antifa, they maintain that it’s not a terrorist organization, or even an organization at all, and that it’s just “an idea.” An idea which has now killed multiple people, including Trump supporters.
Regarding BLM, because of its name alone, they claim it is a good thing. After all, you’re a bigot if you don’t support Black Lives Matter. If you don’t support them, that means you don’t think that the lives of black people matter. Despite the fact that they, too, have blood on their hands and have had people commit multiple crimes including arson, theft, assault (both on civilians and police officers), etc., etc.
We all know that these two Marxist organizations are terrorist organizations, now not too dissimilar from al-Qaeda and ISIS. The fake news media has refused to condemn these Left-wing terrorists, and will maintain that they are not actually violent or EVEN REAL in some cases, but that’s not a good thing for the Left.
Like I said, the only reason they stopped showing the riots is because the poll numbers showed that people didn’t like the violence and the violent people behind those acts. The fake news media is already pretty hated because they don’t even try to hide their partisan support for the Democrats. That they had to stop showing those riots is an indication that the people are not with them on this, and it further hurts them to not disavow the people committing these crimes.
The Democrats are pretty good at making emotional connections, like when Biden repeatedly talked directly to the camera during the debates to talk with people about how “because of Trump and his handling of the virus, you don’t have someone at your dinner table”, but the truth is that (apart from the fact that Democrat governors have directly been responsible for thousands of deaths) these riots have also led families to be broken up.
At least 30 people have died so far, meaning that 30 families have been broken. 30 families no longer have that someone at their dinner table or no longer can contact that person through their phones because they can’t pick up any more. What about these families, Leftists? Must these families be forsaken because “people are hurting” over the deaths of criminals and thugs who happen to be black?
Like the AP pointed out, many of the victims were black people. Must innocent black families suffer because these “mostly peaceful protesters” need “a way to vent their frustration and anger at systemic racism”?
Real people, real businesses, real families are being negatively impacted, in major ways, because of these riots. Businesses were already on the brink of collapse due to the unconstitutional lockdowns, and the riots are the final nail in the coffin for many of those businesses.
Why are Leftists ignoring the pain and suffering of these innocent people, many of whom are black? Why do Leftists refuse to disavow the violence that has befallen at least 30 families and hundreds if not thousands of businesses? Why do Leftists make excuses for these violent acts and outright gaslight people into believing that what is very clearly happening is not actually happening?
These are the kinds of questions I wish Trump would ask these heartless Leftist bastards because you and I both know they cannot give a good answer. Whatever answer they give will just be a parroted talking point that only further hurts them and at best, all they can do is sit in silence (which is something the Left never does anyway).
Trump should not have to be posting videos pushing back on the Leftist narrative that he hasn’t denounced white supremacists. But since the fake news media will continue to do so, it’s in his best interest to denounce white supremacy at every given opportunity. However, whenever it happens, he also needs to turn it back around on them and ask them if they will denounce the Left-wing violence which has so far led to 30 deaths, 30 families broken, and hundreds or thousands of businesses ruined.
Someone needs to hold these people accountable for their egregious actions and Trump should be the one leading that charge.
“A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will perish.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
The fake news media will lie about anything and everything if they think it would even slightly help the Democrats out, no matter how utterly ludicrous and divorced from reality that lie may be. This is seemingly what they have chosen to do recently regarding yet another Joe Biden gaffe.
During a campaign “rally”, Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden once again showed his senility and his early stages of possible dementia when talking about the election. This is what Joe said at one point in that “rally”:
“This is the most [consequential election], not because I’m running, but because [of] who I’m running against, this is the most consequential election in a long, long, long time. And the character of the country, in my view, is literally on the ballot, what kind of country we’re going to be.”
“Four more years of George, uh, George, uh, he, uh… gonna find ourselves in a position where if Trump gets elected we’re gonna be, we’re gonna be in a different world.”
It is clear where the guy made the mistake. Joe Biden mistakenly believed that George W. Bush was still president, not Donald Trump. At least, he did this for a brief moment but caught himself quickly enough and remembered that he was running against Trump, not Bush.
However, that is far too logical for the fake news media, who are seemingly willing to die on the hill that Biden was not talking about Bush, but about actor and “comedian” George Lopez, who has never even run for president.
Dave Weigel from The Washington Post said: “1.1 million views and a Fox story based on the premise that Biden was confusing Trump with George Bush. He was talking to George Lopez.”
While George Lopez was a part of the livestream, the context does not make any sort of sense for Biden to have been referencing George Lopez.
“Four more years of George…” Lopez? How is that better than Biden confusing Trump with Bush? At least if he was confusing Trump with Bush, he was confusing presidents, not a guy who never even has run!
And yet, this is what the idiots on the fake news media are running with. CNN’s Brian Stelter tweeted: “NBC has added an editor’s note to this morning’s ‘Today’ show segment that played a clip of Biden saying ‘four more years of George, uh…’ without noting that he was talking to George Lopez.”
Jake Tapper tweeted: “Lie after lie after lie,” siding with Weigel and attacking conservatives on this.
“No, you silly conservatives, Joe Biden wasn’t confusing Trump with George Bush, he was confusing Trump with George Lopez!”
Ah, ok, much better, then.
But seriously, how is that a better argument than just admitting the guy briefly confused Trump with Bush? It’s not like this is the first time Biden has confused people or gotten their names wrong.
During an Illinois campaign rally in 2008, after having been tapped to be Obama’s running mate, Biden said: “A man who will be the next president of the United States – Barack America!”
During an interview with CBS Evening News, Biden criticized Bush’s handling of the financial crisis, saying: “When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed.”
Herbert Hoover was president during the stock market crash of 1929, not FDR, and there was no television back then.
Earlier this month, Joe Biden forgot he was running for president, not the Senate, and forgot Mitt Romney’s name, calling him “the senator who was a Mormon, the governor, ok?”
Following his Super Tuesday victories, Biden confused his wife for his sister and vice versa.
He has, repeatedly, forgotten where he is and outright confused states. He claimed to have gone to an exclusively black college in Delaware. And he has, repeatedly, forgotten who was president at any given time.
This is a pattern for Joe Biden and it’s all public, even though the fake news media never covers it. This close to an election, given how utterly biased the fake news media is, I expected them to try and cover for Biden’s gaffes to try and minimize them, but this is an utterly strange hill to die on.
How does it make more sense to claim that Biden meant George LOPEZ when talking about getting “four more years” of a person named George?
If the media is wrong (which of course they are), that just makes Biden look senile. If the media is right and Biden meant George Lopez, it makes him look like a moron. How is that a better alternative?
It’s not like Joe didn’t recognize his momentary gaffe. He immediately tried correcting himself and rather promptly got it right. This gaffe, had it been left alone, would have largely been swept under the rug. He has confused people many times before, as I have just shared. Yeah, it still makes him look senile, but claiming he was talking about George Lopez in the context of getting four more years, a context of presidential terms, would actually make the guy look even worse if true.
How is it better for Biden to have meant that George LOPEZ was president than for him to have meant that George Bush was president?
Not that I want these idiots to correct themselves, this kind of gaslighting and obvious attempt at protecting one candidate over another further proves to everyone how much of a partisan hack these people are, particularly this close to the election.
Instead, I shall relentlessly mock these fools for their horrid miscalculation which they will be far too proud and stubborn to correct.
“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
With a little over a week to go before the election, the last presidential debate certainly did no favors for Joe Biden, even as the debate topics and liberal moderators were favorable to the corrupt Democrat (admittedly, the moderator still did far better than Chris Wallace did, by a mile, even if she interrupted Trump far more than Biden and began to debate Trump later on in the night a bit).
There are a number of things that I could point to which likely could lead to Joe Biden’s landslide defeat being even grander, such as his slip up in noting that he would move away from fossil fuels (a remark which will cost him dearly in Pennsylvania), or his outright lie (of which there were plenty) regarding how “not one single person” lost their private health insurance once Obamacare was enacted, but his overall debate performance was outright awful and has led to some eye-opening post-election poll numbers, which I will get to in a moment.
Despite the fact that the Democrats have basically owned the black vote for the last 50 years (pun intended), that little safety net of theirs is beginning to not be so safe anymore.
For 50 years, the Democrats have promised black people economic prosperity, safety, justice reform, healthcare reform, and generally have promised black people that their lives would improve if only they would consistently vote for Democrats everywhere they could. They have been promising this for half a century and things have only gotten worse in places run by Democrats.
Let’s not forget that Joe Biden himself was the author of the 1994 Crime Bill, and his running mate is responsible for the incarceration of over 44,000 black people and almost 2,000 incarcerations were for marijuana-related offenses when she was California’s AG.
Now, if people commit crimes, they have to do the time. That is not my issue here, even with the marijuana stuff since I do not believe for a second that it should be made legal. However, the Democrats go around pretending like they’re doing this massive favor for black people and that they are making reforms and new laws that help black people when that has not shown to be the case whatsoever.
They claim that this country’s laws overincarcerate people and that the system is rigged against blacks and other minorities, when they are the ones writing and enforcing those laws. California has been a deep-blue state for a long time now and Harris was its Attorney General from 2011-2016. Democrats own California and yet, it’s not the socialist paradise that they claim we would have as a nation if we were to consistently elect them.
California is quickly becoming (if it isn’t one already) a socialist dystopia because that is all socialism can bring to anybody. So even if a Leftist were to make the excuse that “the reason things aren’t great for black people is because Republicans still get elected to the presidency and Congress,” it is nothing more than that: an excuse. This is because California has been very solid blue for decades now, their last Republican governor was not truly a Republican, and we can see what the Leftist ideology brings to all people, let alone black people: misery.
In Minneapolis, where George Floyd died during a police-involved event, Democrats have been in total control for ages. Same in Baltimore, where Freddie Gray died in police custody.
Wherever Democrats rule, people suffer, particularly black people. Perhaps that’s why it really shouldn’t be so surprising that Trump has such high likely voter approval numbers from black people. You see, according to Rasmussen Reports, National Daily Black Likely Voter Job Approval for Trump from October 19 to 23 has seen a fantastic rise.
On the 19th (a Monday), Trump’s black LV approval was at 25%, which is still pretty good, but could be better. It went down by one point the following day, but on Wednesday the 21st, it ticked up a good bit to 31%. The day of the debate, it went up to 37% and on Friday, following Thursday night’s debate, it was at 46%.
A good reason for this, in my opinion, is Trump’s Platinum Plan to economically assist black people who were heavily affected during the pandemic (a plan which was brought forth by Ice Cube who is not likely to vote for Biden after Sleepy Joe refused to work with Mr. Cube on this plan). That was fairly big news throughout the week last week, so the tick up to 31 and 37% made sense, as well as the 46% following the debate in which Biden began to slowly fall apart once he began to be pressed on Hunter’s emails.
These numbers ought to terrify Democrats, who have, like I said, enjoyed a safety net with black voters for half a century. LBJ himself once said that he’ll “have those n*****s voting Democratic for the next 200 years,” in discussions with fellow Democrat governors talking about the Great Society plan. As it turns out, he might have been right for the first 50 or so years, but the Democrats are beginning to lose this demographic.
Will a majority of black people be voting for Trump? Doubtful. But considering these are likely voters, if these numbers remain steady for the next week and a half (or at least they don’t drop well below 30%), that will give Trump a huge advantage over Biden and the Democrats.
And while I cannot possibly claim to be able to predict the future, I can say that this trend is not a good one whatsoever for the Democrats. It’s unlikely the GOP will ever see another Trump-like candidate, but if they can embrace Trumpism following Trump’s tenure as POTUS, this sort of trend will continue their way, maybe even to the point where a majority of black people will begin to vote for Republicans again like they did following the passages of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution.
You know, when the KKK began to form and was terrorizing black people because they largely were targeting Republicans and black people were largely Republican back then?
I have long believed that Joe Biden was headed towards an embarrassing landslide defeat (again, no one get complacent here, there is still a job to be done) but if these numbers continue, Joe will lose by an even bigger margin than even I thought he would.
He easily sealed his defeat in Pennsylvania following his fossil fuel comments, but he might lose even worse in many other places.
Here’s hoping Trump will utterly CRUSH the communist Trojan horse and deliver a defeat that will bring Democrats flashbacks of 1984.
“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
Back in late September, I talked about the bombshell Senate report that spared no detail about the business dealings of the Bidens and the overall corruption of the Obama/Biden administration with regard to Ukraine and Burisma Holdings.
Well, a recent New York Post article drops another bombshell in the form of recovered emails between Hunter Biden and a top Burisma executive named Vadym Pozharskyi.
The details of this one are pretty juicy and Twitter thought them so damaging that they outright have been banning people that simply TALK about it, which only serves to bring more attention to a story which otherwise might not have led very many people to care about it (particularly as some people will vote for Biden no matter what).
According to the NY Post: “Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company, according to emails obtained by The Post.”
This goes against something that Joe Biden had been claiming for a long time now, that he has “never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” We all knew for a long time now that that was an utter lie, but this only goes to further prove it, particularly as according to Politico, “Biden’s campaign would not rule out the possibility that the former VP had some kind of informal interaction with Pozharskyi, which wouldn’t appear on Biden’s official schedule.”
For context, the Biden campaign had responded to the NY Post’s piece, obviously lambasting it, but only claiming that the former VP never officially met with the Burisma executive, meaning that the two had met in secret in an informal setting. This, suffice to say, does not look good for Biden at all, and I think this can somewhat be considered an October Surprise, but aimed at the Democrats as opposed to the Republicans.
At any rate, returning to the uncovered emails (which were not hacked, as some on the Left might claim. They were in a computer taken to a repair shop which was never claimed and the shop owner tried contacting the owner multiple times before looking through the contents of the hard drive, as the computer could now be claimed as his own, and found these emails. He then made a copy of the hard drive and set it to various places such as the FBI and Rudy Giuliani’s lawyers), we find some truly juicy stuff.
An April 17, 2015 email from the Burisma executive reads: “Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together. It’s realty [sic] an honor and pleasure. As we spoke yesterday evening, would be great to meet today for a quick coffee. What do you think? I could come to you [sic] office somewhere around noon or so, before or on my way to airport. Best, V.”
Like I said, that email points to Joe Biden having met with an executive from Burisma, which Joe had been lying to people about for years.
Less than a year after that particular email, Joe Biden coerced the Ukrainian president and Prime Minister into firing the country’s top prosecutor who had been investigating Burisma Holdings’ executives, which naturally included Hunter Biden. This is something else that Joe is now lying about, despite the fact that there is video proof that he has outright BRAGGED about what he did, saying to the Council on Foreign Relations in 2018: “I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’”
“Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.”
Another email from Pozharskyi, which is a lengthy one so I will share the most important details, reads as follows: “Dear Hunter and Devon,… As previously pointed out on a number of occasions, the representatives of new authorities in power tend to quite aggressively approach N. Z. unofficially with the aim to obtain cash from him… After unsuccessful attempts to receive funds from our side, they proceeded with concrete actions… We urgently need your advice on how you could use your influence to convey a message/signal etc. to stop what we consider to be politically motivated actions…”
A few things need to be made clear about this. First of all, this was an email sent to Hunter and his business partner Devon Archer (whom I’ve talked about at length in that other article) on May 12th, 2014… the same day that Hunter Biden, at least officially, joined the Burisma board.
I see Burisma didn’t take too much time to use their newly acquired influence.
Secondly, this was a bit of a murky period in Ukraine. The Revolution was still ongoing and President Viktor Yanukovych had fairly recently been removed from office in February. The country wouldn’t have elections until May 25th, in which Poroshenko succeeded the former president. So it’s a bit of a strange period and I do not know exactly who was in charge of the country in between the time Yanukovych was removed and Poroshenko was installed (which was in June). However, someone obviously was in charge and their short-lived administration clearly wanted some money from this “N. Z.” fellow, who is most likely Burisma’s owner Mykola Zlochevsky, as he is an oligarch with plenty of money and his name “Mykola” is a Ukrainian version of “Nicholas.”
It is a bit strange that Pozharskyi would refer to Zlochevsky as “N. Z.” instead of “M. Z.” since they are both Ukrainians, but given the context of those initials in Pozharskyi’s email, I can’t think of whom else he could possibly be referring to, as he talks about “the gaz [sic] production business of N. Z. …”
At any rate, the New York Post also noted that this email was sent on the same day that Burisma announced (and has since redacted) Hunter Biden’s addition to the board of directors, though they also say that “Hunter Biden actually joined the board in April 2014, according to multiple reports.”
So that is another possible lie from the Bidens in general, as Hunter was reportedly a part of the board of directors of the gas company a good bit before his official announcement. I wonder what else happened in between the time that he actually joined the board and the time that the announcement was made official.
There is more to this story in the New York Post, though I do not think many other details are all that relevant for me to share here, other than an email written by Pozharskyi and forwarded to Hunter by Archer about a proposed tax law which would have been detrimental to Burisma, but I did not get too much out of that exchange.
Like I said in my previous article regarding the dealings of Hunter Biden and his father, I want you to imagine the outrage from the Left if any person on the Right, such as Don Jr. or Eric Trump, or anyone from the Pence family, had been caught doing the things that Hunter was doing.
Hunter has taken millions of dollars from Burisma simply in exchange for his family name and the position of his father, has taken millions of dollars from other foreign sources such as the wife of the former mayor of Moscow, and has a detailed record of corruption. If a right-winger had done even one of the things Hunter has done, that would be all we’d be talking about for weeks, and all the way to the election.
But because it’s a story which damages the Democrat nominee, it has to be pushed back against and censored on social media, which like I said, only serves to draw more attention to the story. Some people might not care about the actual story involving Hunter Biden and the implications of Joe’s lying butt, but they will care about social media censorship and will want to look into exactly why it is that big tech giants are trying to suppress this story so badly.
Despite the fact that I imagine a decent number of Biden voters have already voted for the guy, I hope some people who were considering voting for Biden but have yet to do so change their minds about it after this. Stories which display the Bidens’ corruption would be shut down every single time if Biden were to win. Even now, we see that happening in large part because big tech bribes Republican congresspeople so that they can get away with this crap.
Here’s hoping this story will help a good amount of people recognize how utterly awful Joe Biden is and how important it is to keep him as far away from the Oval Office as possible.
2 Peter 2:15
“Forsaking the right way, they have gone astray. They have followed the way of Balaam, the son of Beor, who loved gain from wrongdoing…”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
In 1980, then-candidate Ronald Reagan asked the American people during one of his debates against Jimmy Carter: “Are you better off today than you were four years ago?” Ever since, polls have begun to ask this question, particularly when an incumbent president was up for re-election. And the numbers we see today are nothing but good news for President Trump.
According to Gallup, 56% of registered voters say that they are better off today than they were four years ago, while 32% said they were worse off.
This is simply astounding for a couple of reasons.
First, consider the climate we are in. This year has taken a toll on a lot of people, with some early worries of a potential global conflict with Iran after the killing of Soleimani (which led to nothing because Iran is all bark and no bite when Trump is in charge) to fires raging in Australia and, most recently, in the west coast (though that’s not an exclusive event for 2020), to dealing with a global pandemic willingly started by the CCP and dealing with the economic ramifications of idiots deciding to shut down the economy for a virus that is only marginally deadlier than the flu for most people.
2020, to put it simply, can go to hell. This is a sentiment many people around the world can agree with, I believe. So to see this many people saying that they are better off TODAY (technically between September 14-28, when the poll was taken) than they were four years ago after eight years of Obama is simply astounding and hilarious to me.
Obama’s tenure as president is seen as a worse event in people’s lives than what has happened this year.
Which actually sort of brings me to the second reason this is so astounding: that 56% is considerably HIGHER than in previous elections.
In 2012, Gallup surveyed this question too (though in December, for some reason), and found that 45% said that they were better off back then than four years prior. In 2004, 47% said the same thing. In 1992 (not sure why Gallup doesn’t include 1996. Guess they just didn’t ask the question that election cycle), only 38% said they were better off, and finally, in 1984, 44% said they were better off than four years earlier.
With the exception of 1992, which was surprisingly low, each of the incumbent presidents in those elections ended up getting re-elected. And, again, look at how massive of a gap there is between 2020’s response and 2012’s. An 11-point difference in Trump’s favor is nothing to scoff at and something that is simply not indicative that the president is headed towards defeat.
Poll after poll claims that Trump is eight to 14 points behind Biden, depending on who you ask. Demographic splits and shy voters can often influence the results of these polls, but such matters are of little importance to the pollsters because the results show things they want to see: Trump losing and badly.
It doesn’t matter that they tried this same song and dance in 2016 and ended up with egg on their faces because of it; they want to see Biden winning, even if they have to delude themselves into believing their reporting is reality.
Well, despite what polls say, this number should absolutely terrify the Democrats. When things are going well (or, at least, people believe things are going well), voters won’t try to rock the boat. Why get rid of the guy that is making so many people believe they are better off today than four years ago? Why mess with what is working so well?
This is particularly the case considering just how many people are saying the same thing. Again, there is an 11-point difference between Trump and Obama in Trump’s favor. Obama was a horrible president – one of the worst – and still, enough people believed he was doing a fine enough job that he should get four more years in the Oval Office. 11% more people than even that believe we are in a better position today than at any point during Obama’s tenure. And yet, we’re supposed to believe Biden is running away with it?
We’re supposed to believe that it’s already over for Trump and there is nothing he could possibly do to turn things around? That Biden is a shoo-in to win the election? I’m sorry, I just don’t believe it.
What’s interesting as well is that another question Gallup asked is whether Trump or Biden has more presidential qualities and whether the surveyor agrees more with Trump or Biden on the issues that are most important to them.
It was fairly close for both candidates in both questions. 44% of people believe Trump has presidential qualities while 49% said the same of Biden. But when it comes to the issues, Trump has a slight advantage with 49% saying they agree with him on the issues compared to 46% who agreed with Biden.
That indicates a base and ideological advantage to Trump, which is one of the biggest reasons Trump always plays to his base. This, as I have stated in the past, is a base election. It’s communists versus sane people, with sane people being largely in Trump’s camp, even if they don’t necessarily like him on a personal level. And as it stands, there are far more sane people than there are communists.
Trump’s base, as a result, gets bigger and bigger. Why wouldn’t he play to his base at every opportunity, then?
At any rate, one cannot tell me that this is not good news for Trump. They can cite whatever heavily biased source they want, but this is a pretty good indicator as to who is more likely to win the election. If people think things are going well enough (particularly this many people) then they won’t get rid of the guy that made this situation in the first place. Even despite what this year has brought, many are of the belief that we are better off today, under Trump’s administration, than we were following eight years of the Obama regime. What does that say about Biden’s chances at winning (particularly considering he was Obama’s VP)?
Of course, as I believe I must remind people, this is not to say that Trump supporters can simply coast this election. We have to go out and vote, yes with the belief that Trump will win but with the mindset that he is as far behind as the polls say he is. We have to come out in droves to get Trump re-elected, or else, we’ll get a Biden presidency and, in all certainty, the installation of a socialist regime which undoes the electoral process as we know it in order to get Leftists into every place of power imaginable.
Trump is winning but we have to ensure that he ultimately gets that victory.
“I can do all things through him who strengthens me.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
Freddie Marinelli and Danielle Cross will bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...