Pandemic Of The Vaxxed: Majority Of Denmark Cases From Vaccinated, Jabbed More Likely To Test Positive
Before beginning with this article, I just want to say that I hope you had a very Merry Christmas. I know things have been messed up for quite some time now, but take heart in knowing that this madness will come to an end sooner than people believe.
So without further ado, let's begin.
This is far from the first time that I have talked about how this pandemic is one of the vaccinated, but it is the first time since the new variant has been discovered, and it’s worth knowing just what it is doing to those who swear that they are completely protected from any version of the Chinese coronavirus.
And for this, we have two different articles regarding the same subject: Omicron in the vaxxed.
First, let’s talk about the Nazism-infatuated Europeans, specifically the Danes. According to Blue State Conservative, “Most new Covid cases in Denmark occur in people who are vaccinated or boosted – and that is true for both Omicron and earlier variants. More than 76 percent of non-Omicron Covid infections in Denmark are in vaccinated people, along with about 90 percent of Omicron infections.”
So not only are more than three-fourths of non-Omicron Chinese coronavirus cases found in those who have taken the jab (in Denmark, at least, but I know it’s not much different elsewhere), but so are nine in ten when it comes to Omicron cases.
You have to ask just how exactly this is possible if the vaccines are supposed to be effective. Well, of course, one can’t discount the fact that hospitals are financially incentivized to report pretty much anything as Covid, so there is definitely some inflation there. However, I can’t imagine that’s the only thing that is driving these numbers. Those numbers are far too big for this to just be those incentives, particularly when considering who it is that they are claiming has the Chinese coronavirus.
I think this is a combination of both lying from the hospitals (much how they lie about them being “overwhelmed”, even as far back as early in the pandemic when they were shown dancing in videos and participating in BLM protests) and the vaccine being utter crap, because we KNOW that both these things are true.
We KNOW that the hospitals and doctors are financially incentivized to come up with “positive” Chinese coronavirus cases and we KNOW that the vaccines are useless at best and poisonous at worst.
But we also know, at least recently, that the vaxxed are more likely to test positive for Omicron than the non-vaxxed.
Specifically, 4.5 times as likely. And this is not just those who got two shots and are now both laughably and sadly considered “not vaccinated”, this is those who have gotten the two shots and the booster as well.
According to the UK government’s Office for National Statistics, those who are triple vaccinated are 4.5 times as likely to test positive for Omicron than the unvaccinated.
And to further show that this is likely not just overcounting for financial gain, they also found that those who are double-vaccinated (no booster) are 2.3 times more likely to get Omicron than the unvaccinated.
I shall ask again, how is this possible if the vaccines are supposed to be effective? Because from the numbers (the “science” the Left praises so much), the more doses of a vaccine that you get, the more likely you are to catch the Omicron variant of the virus. And with this being the dominant strain, apart from the Left’s efforts to promote the vaccines, one can easily see cases going further and further up as time goes on.
Now, I should reiterate that total number of cases shouldn’t really matter, only deaths ought to be looked at and we haven’t done this since even before the Delta strain was discovered, but if people really will be worried simply because of the total cases, then they should pay attention at WHO is getting infected and at what rate.
The sad thing is that they have so been brainwashed by the Left and fake news media (but I repeat myself) that they won’t care to look at the data to see who is getting infected. They likely have gotten the shot themselves and if they end up getting infected, they will most likely accept whatever narrative “explanation” the fake news media gives them.
The good news is that a good deal of them, even if not necessarily the majority, will have enough reason left within them to recognize that they got the jab, got the Chinese coronavirus, and have begun to rethink whether or not the people they trusted up to that point are actually trustworthy. Because they keep claiming that the vaccinated are completely protected from the virus (though somehow not from the unvaxxed), yet they are the ones getting the virus by large majorities, and with greater likelihoods than those whom they believed to be “unsafe”.
I believe this madness will end, their lies be exposed, and their corruption admonished and destroyed once and for all, never to be allowed back into power again.
Let us pray that this happens sooner rather than later.
“Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer.”
The infamously unpopular Brandon administration might be even more unpopular than we had previously thought. A myriad of (intentional) screw-ups have made the illegitimate and already unpopular fake president be even less popular as time has gone on.
And at this rate, barring any overt cheating from the Dems (which would be admittedly more difficult to pull off than in 2020), the midterm elections will likely see a red wave, particularly as more and more sitting Democrats announce they won’t be running for re-election next year (a mirror of 2018 for Republicans, and I have always said that it was at least one reason why they lost the House that year).
But allow me to give you the context of this article. See, a Rasmussen poll recently surveyed roughly 1,000 Americans, asking them if Brandon should be impeached for his failure in Afghanistan.
I think the results are particularly eye-opening, as this was an issue a few months ago and, while it is notoriously one of the worst foreign screw-ups for anyone sitting in the Oval Office, you’d think the negative views surrounding it would have at least somewhat subsided since then.
But I think that, because of everything else he’s messing up, in particular the economy, people are less willing to forgive and forget that international embarrassment which should have cost at least ONE person his or her job.
And so, we see results like these:
57% of Men said that Brandon should be impeached; 62% of Women said the same, which is rather interesting as women tend to lean more to the Left in these polls; 54% of people aged 18-34 said he should be impeached, and like with women, younger people tend to also lean Left; 63% of 40-64 agreed Brandon needs to be impeached; 61% of those 65 and older also agreed.
Amongst white people, 60% said Brandon deserves to be impeached for Afghanistan, with 56% of blacks and 61% of “Other non-white” people saying the same. And along party lines, 83% of Republicans think he should be impeached (a rather low number for this demographic), 58% of the politically unaffiliated said the same, and an astounding 40% of Democrats also believe he deserves to be impeached.
All in all, 60% of all voters say they believe Brandon ought to be impeached for his failure in Afghanistan.
And while Dems were the only demographic which didn’t have a majority agreeing with that statement, the fact that 1) all other demographics did have said majority and 2) it got as close as 40% of them agreeing on this shows you just how much of a failure this guy is, even in the eyes of those who (legitimately) voted for him.
Oh, and before you ask, they didn’t like the slave owner either, as 58% said that Kamala is unqualified to be President.
Like I said, Brandon is an infamously unpopular occupier of the Oval Office, but this poll shows things to be even worse than I imagined. And again, this is over the subject of Afghanistan. Were they to ask about the subject of inflation, or his inability to “end” the pandemic as he said he would do, how many more people would have said he should be impeached?
And if more people were to understand that Joe Biden and the Democrats did, indeed, steal the 2020 presidential election, just how much of the country would be in uproar demanding either his impeachment or resignation (alongside Kamala’s), or even that Trump be allowed to serve the term that he had actually won?
The only things keeping this regime afloat are the fake news media and the Deep State (which controls the fake news media, so really, just the Deep State). But even they are not invincible, not when enough of us fight against them in a peaceful manner.
It is said that it only takes 3.5% of a country’s population participating in peaceful protest to bring about great change. In 1986, according to The BBC, “millions of Filipinos took to the streets of Manila in peaceful protest and prayer in the People Power movement. The Marcos regime folded on the fourth day. In 2003, the people of Georgia ousted Eduard Shevardnadze through the bloodless Rose Revolution, in which protestors stormed the parliament building holding the flowers in their hands. While in 2019, the presidents of Sudan and Algeria both announced they would step aside after decades in office, thanks to peaceful campaigns of resistance.”
While the fake news media isn’t covering them, millions around the world are protesting the tyrannical vaccine mandates and lockdowns instituted in would-be communist countries, such as the UK, Australia, Austria, Germany, Italy, and even in actual communist countries like Cuba, there are protests which go uncovered by the media because they run against their narrative that most people approve of the mandates.
But they won’t be ignored forever, and they won’t be beaten at any point. Likewise, something similar could occur in this country. Not over the vaccine mandates, as it’s practically dead on arrival already and any further attempt to enforce it would be met by lawsuits and disobedience not only from companies but entire states as well. But Brandon keeps destroying the country as he is, and more people are made to suffer for it, they will arrive to the breaking point.
Of course, this is all hypothetical, but I do believe and declare that Biden will no longer occupy the Oval Office relatively soon (and won’t be replaced by the giggling prostitute). And all it takes is 3.5% of us in active protest. Surely, we have far more than that already.
Dismantling the Deep State is absolutely possible, and we will achieve that sooner than one might expect.
“Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.”
Exhibit #1519 of the vaccines doing absolutely jack at best and being utterly malignant at worst, we have a story about three BuzzFeed staffers having attended a Christmas party getting the “dreaded” Chinese coronavirus despite being triple vaxxed, wearing masks and showing proof of vaccination upon entering the party.
According to Business Insider, “The three positive employees told Insider they were vaccinated, had received their booster shots, and said they were experiencing mild symptoms.”
BuzzFeed, being a far-Left media company, requires its employees to be vaccinated, so not only does this mean that the people who got the virus were vaccinated themselves (as previously established) but so was the one who SPREAD the virus onto his or her colleagues.
As a reminder, the deceitful Left makes the following two claims regarding the vaccines: They help protect you from getting the virus and keep you from spreading the virus onto other people.
This story alone contradicts both those things, but as we have seen over this past year, it’s far from the only example.
Business Insider then said: “BuzzFeed requires vaccinations for staffers, and partygoers had to present their vaccination cards to get into the event. Two days before the party, BuzzFeed updated its rules to require masks ‘unless you are actively eating or drinking,’ according to the email, which was obtained by Insider.”
So, again, not only were the people who got infected vaccinated, and the person who infected them was vaccinated, but they all had to wear masks unless they were actively eating or drinking something.
That would be exhibit #3526 of the masks also being utterly garbage and not helping to either stop or slow down the spread of the virus, even amongst the “immunized”.
By-and-large, the tyrannical Left focused on four major policies for trying to “combat” the Chinese coronavirus: lockdowns, social distancing, mask-mandates, and vaccine-mandates. All four of them have failed or are in the process of being proven failures due to a lack of effectiveness in its main job of fighting the virus. At this point, it’s not an accident, neither is it sheer stupidity.
The lockdowns were a bad idea from the start, as anyone would be able to tell that you would basically be destroying people’s lives in the “hopes” of saving them. Of course, it wasn’t immediately apparent that the lockdowns weren’t helping, but even if they had, they still were a terrible idea because of all the OTHER negative side effects which never went reported by the fake news.
Things like drug overdoses, domestic abuse which went unreported to the police, child suicide rates skyrocketing, and this is without even talking about the almost irreparable financial damage done to individual families whose main sources of income were furloughed because they were considered “non-essential”.
They basically told people to their faces that their ability to provide for themselves and their families was “not essential.” That’s a moderately milder way of saying that their lives and the lives of their families don’t matter in the grand scheme of things and that they are entirely replaceable in the socialist cog.
How were more people not outraged by this?
And that’s just one of the mind-numbingly moronic proposals by the tyrants.
There were also the social distancing mandates and the mask mandates, both of which can be thrown together.
They forced not only healthy adults, but children who had long been PROVEN to have both low transmission and infection rates in comparison to older people, to social distance and wear masks.
We saw image after image and video after video of kids being forced to eat their lunch separately from their friends, having to study and work in very isolated manners, and generally being unnecessarily forced into social isolation and wearing uncomfortable, often suffocating masks for prolonged periods of time.
I mentioned this in a prior article, but I once saw a video of a mom telling her son that a group of parents who sued the school district over the mask mandates had won their case, and that the kids would no longer have to unnecessarily wear masks everyday to school. The kid, upon hearing the news, ran to hug his mother, who was recording his reaction, and began to bawl his eyes out in joy.
If this one kid, who, from what I remember, looked to be around the fourth or fifth grade, reacted like this at the news that he DIDN’T have to wear a mask in school anymore, how many other kids, particularly younger kids, are currently suffering because of the sheer depravity of school administrators who are unfit to run a computer program, let alone education?
They are actively, willingly and gleefully making kids suffer for either more money, the sick thrill of exercising power over others, or their evil agendas.
And neither the masks or social distancing did much of anything to protect them from a virus which they are THE MOST LIKELY to survive from out of all age ranges. And that’s without mentioning that more “vulnerable” adults still have a 99.97% chance of surviving.
Finally, there’s the vaccine mandates, and we are witnessing in real-time why they aren’t working. They, at best, don’t protect people from crap, and at worst literally acts like AIDS, with the added bonus of screwing people’s hearts up.
Remember in the previous article how I said that, with the Omicron variant, 80% of the cases found in the U.S. were from those who were “fully vaccinated”? And how I asked “How is it that, at any point in the new variant’s existence, those who got the shots are statistically more likely to be infected with this variant that those who didn’t get any shot whatsoever?”
In my mind, the only way that can actually happen is if the immune system of the vaccinated was weaker than that of the unvaccinated. And the only way that can happen is if the vaccine weakens the immune system of whoever takes it.
This isn’t just my random theory, it’s actually been shown that this is what happens.
So, then, no one ought to be surprised when a vaccine which basically acts like the AIDS virus ends up making people more likely to succumb to other illnesses.
And, of course, it’s making people suffer from increased heart risks and “sudden” deaths, among other health issues.
There is no reason whatsoever to trust the vaccines or the people coercing us into getting the vaccines. So the vaccine mandates will also end in failure, sooner rather than later.
Let the BuzzFeed staffers, as well as others, serve as examples of just why these tyrants are untrustworthy of anything they say or do.
“It is not good to be partial to the wicked or to deprive the righteous of justice.”
With the seeming existence of a new variant of the Chinese coronavirus having been discovered in November, the authoritarians of our world have sought to further increase their draconian practices and solidify their tyrannical power for as long as they possibly can, all while falsely claiming to be doing this “for the good of the people,” as all tyrants usually do.
However, as is often the case, the science just doesn’t support their audacious claims and actions, as has become clear recently.
So, there are three new things to know about this whole shamdemic, as it currently stands anyway.
Let’s begin with the first thing I mentioned: that being this new variant (assuming the Chinese coronavirus exists to begin with) being awfully mild and even the person who discovered it asserting that it could actually be good for achieving natural immunity, a concept which has “suspiciously” escaped the minds of every medical “expert”.
South African doctor Angelique Coetzee wrote an article for the UK Daily Mail in which she expressed puzzlement and disappointment in Britain (and, by extension, other countries) for its response to the discovery of the Omicron variant.
“[Y]ou only have to look at the picture in South Africa, where the world’s first known cases of Omicron were spotted, to realise this reaction is out of all proportion to the risks posed by this variant. And I should know – because I am the doctor who first raised the alarm about Omicron back in November.”
She also emphasized the point that this variant is “very very mild” in comparison to other strains of the virus, including Delta, which already was milder than the original strain.
“Don’t just take my word for it. I have seen quite a few Omicron patients who have previously had the Delta variant and they tell you that, while no one ever wants to get Covid, they feel almost lucky that it was only Omicron they had the second time around.”
And despite the best attempts by tyrants to claim that this variant is overwhelming hospitals in the UK, Doctor Coetzee explains that there “haven’t been many patients admitted to hospital with Omicron” and “deaths are not rising as dramatically and neither is the average length of time people stay in hospital.”
It’s worth noting that it’s been roughly three weeks since this new variant was discovered and only one person is said to have died WITH the virus, which as I have explained in prior articles, is a b.s. standard because it can apply to any other method of death. I have literally talked about how people who died AFTER GETTING SHOT were counted in the COVID death toll because they had the virus, even though it had no bearing towards their untimely death.
Returning to the doctor, again, she expressed disappointment at the reactions by governments over this very mild variant, “I am disappointed by such knee-jerk reactions. They bear no relation to what we’re seeing in surgeries in South Africa, where people rarely even discuss Omicron.”
She ultimately concludes that this “huge overreaction” from governments “is scaring people unnecessarily” and that governments should actually allow for this variant to be spread: “A hard lockdown would slow the process of Omicron making its way through the population and allowing people to develop the vital antibodies which will move your population towards herd immunity.”
Well, lockdowns have proven to not do jack with dealing with the virus at any capacity, including slowing the spread, but I understand the lady’s point here: Allow people to get a far milder version of the virus in order to receive the natural antibodies which would be FAR more beneficial and less detrimental to people than getting the vaccine.
Speaking of vaccines, let’s move on to the second new thing about this shamdemic: it’s a pandemic of the vaccinated.
At least, that’s the very appropriate title of this article from The National Pulse, which reports that, according to the CDC, “80 percent of COVID-19 ‘Omicron variant’ cases are found in so-called ‘fully vaccinated’ individuals… Only 19 percent of cases were identified in unvaccinated individuals.”
Now, as it stands, it’s a fairly small sample size of only 43 reported Omicron cases in the U.S., with no hospitalizations or deaths, like I mentioned earlier, having been reported. However, it’s rather peculiar (in a normal sense, anyway, not when you already know that the vaccines are useless at best) that the overwhelming majority of those 43 cases were those who, at least until recently, were considered “fully vaccinated” according to Fascist Fauci. And as a bit of a kicker, 33% of those people also had the booster, so even those who are “fully vaccinated” according to Fascist Fauci were infected.
Most importantly, less than 20% of the cases were from people who didn’t get the vaccine. How is it that, at any point in the new variant’s existence, those who got the shots are statistically MORE LIKELY to be infected with this variant than those who didn’t get any shot whatsoever?
Well, a rhetorical question, as we all know. I’ve already covered how the vaccines are useless towards protecting people from the virus, be it the individual getting the vaccines or other people around them (a ridiculous concept which has hardly been questioned, despite it being so exclusive to the COVID vaxx), and outright malignant and deadly at worst, so it’s no surprise to me, really, that those who didn’t get the vaccine are better off.
Now, perhaps unsurprisingly, despite reporting on these figures, the CDC has expressed no intention of discussing or investigating the link between the vaccines and the variant. It’s almost like they are just mouth-pieces in lab coats and not actual scientists in search of the truth, regardless of how little they might like it.
In any case, let’s move on to the final line item, that being the malicious effects of the Merck COVID pills.
According to The New York Times (yes, you read that right), the drug has the “potential to cause mutations in human DNA,” with this being a particularly concerning thing for pregnant women, as “the drug could affect a fetus’ dividing cells, theoretically causing birth defects,” with one researcher saying “there is no circumstance” in which he would advise a pregnant woman to take this drug.
The author of this article explains (though buried deep into the article, so let’s not give him more credit than he deserves) that the researchers were concerned that the drug could “cause errors” in a patient’s DNA or that of an unborn child, as those errors could cause mutations which may “contribute to the development of cancer, or cause birth defects either in a developing fetus or through incorporation into sperm precursor cells.”
So the drug that the Brandon administration recently ordered tens of millions of has the potential to alter human DNA and cause cancer, particularly for unborn children, though adults could also be affected?
Why am I not surprised?
At any rate, what I believed was the best course of action before the Omicron variant was a thing is still the best course of action: don’t get the poisonous vaxx, eat healthy foods which are high on anti-oxidants (things like broccoli, lentils, beets, spinach and dark chocolate, among others), take Ivermectin or HCQ if feeling a little under the weather, etc. (Potentially for legal reasons, I should remind you that I am not a doctor nor a qualified physician or anything of the sort, so don’t take any of that as advice, particularly as each individual person is different and has different circumstances).
Let’s continue to pray and fight against the tyranny of would-be Hitlers around the globe.
“A righteous man knows the rights of the poor; a wicked man does not understand such knowledge.”
"Never Again", They Said: German EU Parliament Member Fights For Australians Held In COVID Concentration Camps
I have said many times in the past, at least when talking about the Chinese concentration camps, that the excuse the world had for not being able to do anything about the Holocaust was ignorance. People, for the most part, didn't even know what was going on in various camps throughout Europe, and had little knowledge of their existence. However, ignorance is not a good enough excuse this time around. And ashamedly, I'm not even talking about Chinese concentration camps this time.
In Australia, a country which just two years ago would have considered itself free and democratic, the government has set up various camps to house the unvaccinated and those exposed to COVID.
Now, before getting to the meat and potatoes of it all, I just have to ask: If the Australian government believes the unvaccinated to be at risk of getting and dying from COVID, why would they put into these camps people who have been exposed to COVID? It sounds just as malicious as what Andrew Cuomo did in New York retirement and nursing homes. Are they hoping to kill these people? We know they harbor nothing but ill-will towards the unvaccinated because they refuse to comply with their tyrannical vaccination orders and dual-economy system, so are they actively trying to rid themselves of what they would consider as "political enemies"?
Whatever the case may be, it is undeniably evil to do something like this, knowing the facts surrounding not only the survivability of the Chinese coronavirus, but the lethality and adverse effects of the vaccines on otherwise healthy people.
A video (posted on Twitter, so it will likely be taken down at some point) of an Australian who was sent to one of these camps details roughly how their camp system works. In essence, the captives aren't allowed to leave their designated living quarters without a mask unless it is to do their laundry. They are not allowed to talk with other people outside their quarters or outside any nearby fences. Failure to comply will lead to a $5,000 AUS fine (no information surrounding repeated offenses, but given the Third Reich-ish nature of the Australian government as of late, it's not hard to imagine roughly what they might be willing to do).
And while I doubt they are actively performing experiments on their captives (apart from seeing roughly what will happen to them by mixing unvaccinated people with those exposed to the virus) or forcing them to work for them or outright killing them with gas chambers and furnaces, there is no doubt that they at least have the POTENTIAL to perform such atrocities.
After all, if they already see the unvaccinated as villains to society to the point where they must be separated not only from the economy but also from civilization at large, what's to stop them from going all the way and exterminating them through some irrational "justification" that they come up with? Their consciences? If they had that, they wouldn't be putting people in concentration camps. Of course, only God knows what will happen, and it's very possible that they won't go so far down Nazi Germany territory, but the fact that Australia is at this point to begin with gives reason for concern.
Perhaps rather ironically, a German EU member of parliament, named Christina Anderson, made a video, posted to Rumble, answering Australians' SOS call.
In the video, she said: "I will do whatever I can to make it known to the world that your once free and liberal democracy has been transformed into a totalitarian regime which tramples on human rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law. I am imploring all of you around the world who still think your governments are looking out for your best interests, at no point in history have the people forcing others into compliance been the good guys. The welfare of humanity has always been the alibi of tyrants. Do you not realize that this vaccine does not protect you from COVID? It does, however, protect you from governmental oppression. For now, that is. But don't think for even a second that this is not going to change tomorrow."
"I am a German, and we once asked our grandparents how they could have just stood by in silence, allowing a horrific totalitarian regime to come about. Anyone could have known; all they had to do was open their eyes and take a look. The vast majority chose not to. So what will you tell your grandchildren? Will you tell them you did not know? Will you tell them you were just following orders? You need to understand it is not about breaking the fourth wave. It is about breaking people. Australia does not need a no-COVID strategy. What Australia needs is a no-oppression strategy. So I stand in support with your fight for freedom and democracy. We need to stop our governments from transforming our free and democratic societies into totalitarian regimes. We need to do it now. We need to stand up now."
A powerful, short speech, I have to say. And she is 100% correct. Never, in the entire history of the world, have those who forced compliance of others into certain actions ever been the good guys. Nazis do that, fascists do that, socialists do that, communists do that. Tyrants do that. Always, their alibi is "the greater good", but it never actually is for the better of the people. The victim is always the people these tyrants claim are doing them a favor. For the Third Reich (given the actions of modern day Germany, I won't call Hitler's Germany "Nazi Germany" anymore, because now there is a second Nazi Germany, or an unofficial Fourth Reich), their targets were Jews, capitalists and non-Aryans. For the Soviet Union, it was the Cossacks, the Kulaks, the White Army, officers of the former Russian Empire, and generally anyone who disagreed with the regime. For the Chi-comms, it was anyone who even remotely liked the "old traditions" of China and didn't subscribe to the Color Revolution.
And it wasn't as if people were utterly ignorant of what was going on in Germany during Hitler's reign. The Holocaust was a big secret, sure, but their targeting of Jews wasn't, as they specifically made propaganda to demonize the Jews. The Holocaust wasn't well-known at the time, but the Nazis' oppression was. And so, like Christina said, they asked their grandparents how they could have stood by in silence as tyranny ran rampant on their country. Likewise, future generations will look at what is going on currently in more than one country and judge this time just as harshly as we judge the Third Reich.
And I love how Christina phrased it: "So what will you tell your grandchildren? Will you tell them you did not know? Will you tell them you were just following orders?" I love it because that last one calls back to the answer that Nazi guards and scientists would give during the Nuremberg Trial as to why they did what they did: "We were just following orders." It wasn't an acceptable answer then, and it's not an acceptable answer now.
To end things off, I want you to look back at the picture above. Look at what it shows. Look at the buildings, the sort of road, and the people in it. Now, look at the following pictures:
Does it look like there is a whole lot of difference between the picture of the Australian camp and the pictures of the concentration camps with Nazis in them?
So why would anyone be willing to, rightly, demonize the four pictures but not the one at the top? Why would anyone justify the one at the top and judge the ones right above?
Tell whoever it is who sides with this atrocity that if they ever wondered if they would have supported the Nazis in Germany during WWII, they need not wonder anymore, for the answer is quite clear.
"Whoever says to the wicked, 'You are in the right,' will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations, but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them."
Despite repeated demonstrations that the Brandon administration intends to enforce vaccine mandates (and they haven't actually managed to really do anything on this regard, at least officially), their already illegal activity is faced by a judge's decision to block the vaccine mandates on the grounds that "The COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission of the disease among the vaccinated or mixed vaccinated/unvaccinated populations."
Gotta say, that's the first time I've ever heard the term "mixed vaccinated." That concept just makes so little sense to me, I could hardly believe it exists. Of course, this is with the implication that one jab of the vaccine isn't enough to count one as "vaccinated", and in the near future, will likely also include anyone who has gotten two jabs but not the "booster" shot, because, as we know, Fascist Fauci gets to change the definition of things like "vaccine", "cases", "deaths", etc.
At any rate, Louisiana U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty blocked the federal vaccine mandate for health care workers last week, a stepping stone to what can easily lead to a broader ban on the mandate itself regardless of circumstance.
In his ruling, the judge made the obvious and logical assertion that the Left selectively either ignores or outright demonizes: "If boosters are needed six months after being 'fully vaccinated,' then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate them?"
This is a question that the Left hates being asked because it directly challenges, with sound logic, the reasoning behind getting not only one, but two or three or four jabs to "combat" a virus which is no worse than seasonal flu (and which conveniently and mysteriously has made seasonal flu all but disappear completely).
If you were to ask this question to a Leftist, they will either call you a conspiracy theorist, a racist, or a "science denier", or a combination of the three. All ad hominem attacks which are the very embodiment of a lost argument.
Yet, these are the kinds of questions people in important positions, such as federal judges, are asking and which the communists will have to answer, if they even can find a reasonable one.
The complainant in this case provided evidence based on Dr. Peter McCullough's declaration that the vaccines don't prevent transmission amongst any population, and that "Mandatory COVID-19 vaccines for hospitals do not increase safety for employees or hospital patients. McCullough declared that additional treatment with other drugs and supplements has resulted in an 85% reduction in hospitalizations and death of high-risk individuals presenting with COVID-19."
This declaration, particularly regarding the lack of prevention of transmission of the virus, is also backed up by other research from Europe, specifically regarding the efficacy of vaccine passports. An investigation by experts in Spain concluded that "vaccine passports have no significant impact on reducing COVID-19 infection rates," according to Summit News. The study found that ordering people to show proof of vaccination in order to enter venues "is not reducing levels of transmission." Even worse, the investigation found that vaccine passport systems "contribute to a false impression that vaccinated people do not get infected," when in actuality, "around 40 per cent of those vaccinated are susceptible to infection and transmitting the infection."
The vaccine doesn't prevent transmission of the virus, something which has been known for a while now, the mandates are entirely illogical as a result of that, and vaccine passport systems don't work in any significant way and only mislead people into believing that getting the vaccine means they are immune to the virus (a fact which, were this any other vaccine for any other disease, would lead to federal regulators to scrap the production of the vaccines because they are, at best, doing absolutely nothing). As the judge said in his ruling: "In other words, even if you are fully vaccinated, you still may become infected with the COVID-19 virus."
The ruling continued with: "Although CMS spent pages and pages attempting to explain the need for mandatory COVID-19 vaccines, when infection and hospitalizations rates are dropping, millions of people have already been infected, developing some form of natural immunity, and when people who have been fully vaccinated still become infected, mandatory vaccines as the only method of prevention make no sense."
Thank the Lord for sound, rational judges like Doughty. Seeing as the vaccines don't prevent transmission, it makes no sense whatsoever to assert that they are not only a means of prevention, but are the ONLY VALID source of prevention. This is like saying that mechanics don't fix houses and someone comes along and says that ONLY mechanics can fix houses.
Furthermore, a CDC study found that, when there was an outbreak of the "Delta" variant in a federal hospital between July and August of 2021, there was no significant difference in transmission potential between vaccinated and unvaccinated people who had the virus. The Left may claim that the independent studies by researchers which don't support the narrative are a bunch of conspiracy theory hoopla, but they absolutely cannot say the same if it comes from a CDC study or other "reputable" sources which are like churches to them, at least if they want to keep asserting the "credibility" of such sources.
The vaccines don't work, the passport system doesn't work, and the vaccine mandates are not only illogical but outright tyrannical. Even if the vaccines did everything they were advertised of doing, namely protecting you from the virus, and didn't cause any sort of harm whatsoever, it'd still be immoral to issue a vaccine mandate. Matter of fact, it wouldn't even be seen as necessary because just about everyone would at least be open to getting it. But because we have seen that it does nothing at best and can outright kill people in horrible ways at worst, most people don't want to get them (and no, I have no reason to believe Brandon when he says we're at somewhere like 70% vaccinated). It's in large part because this is toxic poison that people don't want to get them and why tyrants like Brandon feel compelled to try and FORCE people into taking poison.
Thankfully, there are still plenty of people out there willing to fight back against this insanity and having the ability to actually do something about it materially.
Let the mandate die, and the vaccines along with it.
"Blessed are they who observe justice, who do righteousness at all times!"
The fight for our Republic will always be a worthwhile one, and when it is in jeopardy, even if it appears as though the bad guys have won, it is imperative to fight until we are victorious. For if we give up the fight today, we will never get another chance in the future.
This is something that Mike Lindell understands perfectly well. He knows that if we don't fix 2020, there will be no 2022, 2024 or other future elections in which we could have a fair and free election, nevermind even the chance of winning whatsoever.
And so, roughly a year after the failed Texas lawsuit in which roughly 20 other states took part, Mike Lindell has sought to raise a complaint with the Supreme Court directly to challenge the election results on even better grounds than the Texas one, which already had a very solid ground to begin with.
The complaint is about 80 pages long (not counting the exhibits) and, naturally, is quite legally technical, bringing up a number of constitutional articles and clauses which can be very confusing for non-legal experts.
So to help with that regard, Attorney-at-Law Kurt Olsen appeared with Mike Lindell and Brannon Howse on Frank Speech to give as simple a summary as can realistically be given for such a subject matter.
Olsen begins by explaining that this complaint is largely a model for what state AGs ought to do to challenge the 2020 election results: "What we have presented is a model complaint for the state AGs that lays out the case as to why the November 2020 election should not stand. There are four significant differences in this complaint compared to the complaint that was filed by the State of Texas in December of last year. We have: New defendants and claims against those defendants. Those new defendants are the United States and then the officers of the United States: The President, the Vice President, Speaker of the House, the Attorney General and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate."
He continues: "We have brought claims under Article IV of the Constitution, the Guarantee clause, which provides that the United States shall provide for a Republican form of government, which as alleged in the complaint: a stolen election is not a Republican form of government. And we've also alleged violations of the Take Care clause, that's Article II, and that is simply that these officers have a duty to making sure that the laws of the United States are faithfully executed. And in this election, they were not."
"One point to talk about," Olsen adds, "the Article II claims, which is the same claim that was asserted last time. It's important to recognize that when you hear in the media that these are, you know, these complaints were baseless claims of election fraud, that's just simply ignoring the claims in the complaint and the actual facts. Because it is a fact that as of October of 2020, there were four Supreme Court Justices who wanted to take up a case involving Article II violations, in that particular situation was in Pennsylvania, when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, by fiat, ruled that ballots could be counted after the statutory deadline of November 3rd, 8 P.M. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said 'you can keep counting ballots even if they're not postmarked, they're not signed, you can do that through November 6th.'"
"At that time, Justice Ginsburg had passed away and the Court was at eight justices on it. There was a claim by the Republican Party of Pennsylvania to stay that decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Four Justices wanted to take that case up and for the Justices to rule on that, they had to believe that the plaintiffs... would likely succeed on the merit. So this is a long way of saying that the claims under Article II, there are four Supreme Court Justices who want to rule on whether these changes to election law by non-legislative actors, such as courts, such as officers, violate Article II of the constitution."
"In terms of the three remaining new issues, we have new arguments for standing. You may recall that in December of last year the Supreme Court dismissed the Texas case... saying that there was no standing on behalf of Texas. And we have two new arguments on that, which we think are very sound. One of which could not have been made before, and that is: Now that the Georgia runoff election resulted in the U.S. Senate being split 50/50, and Kamala Harris is the deciding vote, that all the states have standing to bring an action because of that. Because, as alleged in the complaint, now- Vice President Kamala Harris was not legitimately elected. And because she has the tie-breaking vote, all states now have an injury as a result of that."
Quickly commenting on that last bit, and to give a bit of a break between whole blocks of quotes, you really have to marvel at the way God works sometimes. God made it so that, following this sham election, the Left would try to do the same in Georgia's runoff election, and they got their wish there. And yet, that very result is part of the case as to why now EVERY state can claim injury to the fraudulent election results, due to Harris being the tie-breaking vote in a Senate which is split evenly. Last year, one argument made was that Texas could not have enough weight to sway an entire election based on injury (nevermind the fact it was stolen, I guess), because any state could therefore make a similar claim and we'd never have a sitting President.
Well, now, every single state can claim injury because of the result of the election in the form of whole federal laws being approved by an illegitimate tie-breaking vote. Of course, not every state is going to claim injury, but every state that could claim it now can, as opposed to simply joining Texas' case on the Lone Star State's behalf.
Their cheating in the Georgia runoff elections has seemingly come to bite them in the rear, and so will them cheating in 2020.
At any rate, getting back to Olsen:
"The other basis for standing that has been alleged is that the constitution is a compact amongst the peoples of the state. Everybody in each state agreed to play by the same rules. Because accepting the facts in the complaint [unintelligible] true, which the court must, the electoral count would be below 270. As a consequence, every state has a right under the 12th Amendment to demand an election pursuant to the 12th Amendment... for the President and the Vice President."
"The next distinction in this case is that we have a plethora of new evidence and facts since December. On September 24th, 2021, we had the results of the Maricopa audit. On October, you had the [unintelligible] county sheriff refer felony criminal charges against the Wisconsin election, saying that the election laws in Wisconsin were not just broken, they were, quote, 'shattered'. You have the Wisconsin legislative audit bureau issue a damning report, finding tens of thousands of ballots that were irregular or, I would argue, illegal. So, for example, there were over 50,000 new registered voters whose identification didn't even match what was on file at the Wisconsin election commission. Such things as 'the names weren't the same.' Obvious things that would raise questions of illegality. This is all new information."
"You have new court decisions. So, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled, after our Supreme Court dismissed the Texas case, that guidance given by the Wisconsin election commission [unintelligible], which involves potentially over 160,000 ineligible voters, that that guidance was unlawful. In Michigan, you have a Michigan court rule in March of 2021, that the Secretary of State guidance there, doing away with signature verification requirements, was unlawful. So you have a host of new facts, new developments, new findings, all that make this complaint materially different than the case that was filed in December 2020."
"The last thing that is materially different: The cover-up. There is evidence that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors destroyed election records, and they tried to block the audit every step of the way, and destroyed these election records, apparently, after the court in Arizona ruled that that audit must go forward... There is also evidence of destruction of election records in Georgia that Voter DA, a grassroots activist group, filed a Freedom of Information Act request, got emails when they requested ballot images that those ballots no longer existed. And Voter DA also produced emails which are cited in the complaint that the Director of Elections in Georgia gave guidance saying 'hey, it's okay to go destroy the ballot images that existed on the disks or the Dominion voting machines.'"
"We also have in Georgia recent developments were a renowned computer science professor has raised the warnings that he can hack into these machines and steal votes. And the judge in that case sealed his 25,000 word report despite him begging the judge release it to the cyber infrastructure and information security agency to fix these problems. And these problems go beyond just Georgia, [the professor] says that these vulnerabilities go to 16 states, including Georgia. Now, what he doesn't say in that report, which is quite interesting, he is saying that this situation so dire and so urgent that [unintelligible] need to be notified so they can fix these problems before the 2022 election. But what he glosses over is: those same problems apparently existed during the 2020 election."
He finishes with: "These are bombshell developments that are just proving out that the case that Texas brought originally was only meritorious. The idea that these were baseless allegations, it never was, the allegations were incredibly strong back then, but they've only gotten stronger."
The only people who still claim that 2020 was not stolen are those who were involved in the theft, those who benefited from the theft, and those who want to pretend as though it's impossible to steal elections or simply don't want to look at the facts and will consider anyone who brings them up to be crazy conspiracy theorists.
But the facts of the 2020 election were clear from the very beginning: Joe Biden and the Democrats were stealing the election right before our eyes. We hoped they wouldn't succeed, and we hope that they won't get away with it now.
And with how more people are more likely to believe Biden stole the election now than last year (in part, likely, to how awful he has been as Occupier), it's only a matter of time until justice is served.
"Therefore the Lord waits to be gracious to you, and therefore He exalts Himself to show mercy to you. For the Lord is a God of justice; blessed are all those who wait for Him."
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...