It’s pretty much a fact of life that no matter what you do, there will always be people who hate you. If you’re a Trump, this is very much the case.
During Christmas time, the Trump family was spending the holiday together in Palm Beach, Florida. Aside from spending time together, they also enjoyed some activities that only places like Florida can offer during winter. One of which was a day fishing.
Ivanka’s young son, Joseph Frederick Kushner, managed to catch a fish. So, like any proud mother would do in the digital age, Ivanka took some pictures of it and shared it on her social media.
She took four pictures, one of which showed a confederate flag… on a different boat… several hundreds of feet from their own fishing boat. Yep, that’s what the Left is outraged about. And not only are they outraged, they also theorize that the flag was planted there on purpose to “show that the Trumps are racists”.
While none of the comments (at least the ones I’ve seen) are really nasty or offensive, some of them do show that the commenter believes she meant for the flag to be in the background of the picture.
“Hey, Ivanka Trump, what’s up with the confederate flag in the background up the upper picture?”, asks one Twitter user using rather incorrect grammar. “… you should probably delete the second photo, hun,” suggested another.
But it’s not just random liberals on Twitter commenting on the photo. Steve Silberman, writer for Wired magazine, commented: “It’s karma. They can’t escape it. From Ivanka Trump’s tweet this morning.”
And Amy DuBois Barnett said: “Nice confederate flag in the background… #complicit #resist”.
The Left just loves to look for things that offends them. For anything that will get them angry. They can’t be happy and must always look to be negative about something.
You can see the picture at the top. Does that look like Ivanka was looking to send a message to black people that she is in any way racist? Does it look like she’s trying to tell people that her entire family is racist? No sane person would believe so. Still, the insane Left tries to attack Ivanka for that little detail in the photo.
Meanwhile, none of them mention how prominent Democrat Robert Byrd was a member of the Klan and was photographed holding the Klan hood while wearing the Klan robes. Robes which, might I add, feature the confederate flag.
None of them mention how Bill and Hillary Clinton viewed Robert Byrd as their mentor.
None of them mention how it was the Democrat South that wanted to keep slaves and opposed Republican Party founder Abraham Lincoln to the point of civil war.
None of them mention how African-American unemployment rates have hit a 17-year-low under Trump.
But sure, the Trumps are the racists. Give me a break.
Most people would’ve looked at the pictures and not thought much of it other than “huh. Ok.”
And, as you know, I try to look at things from multiple perspectives sometimes. But even looking at it from a liberal’s point of view, I still wouldn’t have thought much of it, much less have made a comment. Maybe I would’ve thought something bad about it, but not really paid it too much attention.
But Leftists love to hate people when given the chance. Hate lives rent-free in their hearts. The Left’s entire history has been nothing but hatred. Hatred of Native Americans (looking at you, Andrew Jackson). Hatred of black people. Hatred of Jews. Hatred of Christians. Hatred of freedom. Hatred of the concept of family. Hatred of Jesus Christ Himself.
The Left requires nearly no reason to hate someone. In time, I wouldn’t be surprised if they come to hate Barron Trump or any of Trump’s grandchildren. Just being related to the current President will garner hatred unless you denounce him.
I have no doubt that, given the chance, the Left would harass Barron into politically betraying his father.
And in this particular case, they really have no half-way decent excuse for their behavior.
If you remember back during the summer, Hurricane Harvey hit Texas. Amid the storm, a terrified hawk sought refuge in a good Samaritan’s cab and was given care by said Samaritan. During one of the update videos, the Samaritan briefly showed a couple of confederate flags hung on his wall. Despite them not being anywhere near the topic of the video, YouTube commenters still attacked him for having that flag in his home.
And while I would still defend his decision to hang that flag in his own property, I know that he had it there on purpose. But the flag shown in Ivanka’s picture was shown by accident, with no malignant intentions behind it (frankly, the good Samaritan had no malignant intentions showing his own flags).
But this is Christmas time and I’m filled with the spirit of giving. And what I’m giving is a taste of the Left’s own medicine.
May I remind you that Kathy Griffin showed a grotesque and very mature picture of a beheaded Donald Trump being held by the “hair” by said “celebrity” in the style of an ISIS picture? How come there’s more Leftist outrage over Ivanka’s picture than there was over that clearly malignantly-intended photo?
Why are they ok with the brutalized and beheaded sculpture of the current POTUS? Why are they ok with Snoop Dogg releasing a music video showing a clown dressed as Trump being shot by a fake gun by the high-as-a-kite rapper?
Why are they ok with showing these ill-intended and grotesque things but flip the heck out whenever they see a confederate flag?
The answer to those questions is what I’ve been talking about in this article: hatred.
They hate Trump to the point where they have dreams of killing him. They hate Trump for a myriad of reasons and all wish to see him dealt with. Either by impeachment, resignation or assassination, they want Trump gone.
This is just how hateful they are. How insane they are. How evil they are.
An innocent picture of a toddler filled with pride over catching a fish is turned into rage fuel for the Left simply because there’s a confederate flag in the background far away from the focus of the photo.
Have I mentioned that the Left disgusts me?
“O you who love the Lord, hate evil! He preserves the lives of his saints; he delivers them from the hand of the wicked.”
Author: Freddie Drake Marinelli.
I’ve previously written an entire article dedicated to telling you just how much the Left truly hates science. Well, here’s one more reason the Left has made a joke of science:
Ben Shapiro recently wrote an article on his website: The Daily Wire. The title of the article is: “SO MUCH SCIENCE: World Health Organization Says Playing Video Games Too Much Is A Mental Disorder, Transgenderism Isn’t”.
Yep, playing video games too much is a mental disorder, but believing you’re a member of the opposite gender is completely sane.
Now, I’ll be the first to say that while video games can be addictive, they don’t cause mental disorders. Playing video games too much is certainly not a good thing, but it doesn’t mean you have a mental disorder. An addiction? Perhaps. But not a disorder.
How do I know this? When I was younger, I could have essentially considered myself to have been addicted to video games. While I didn’t necessarily play video games every day, I would always think about video games (if I wasn’t thinking about girls) and simply couldn’t wait for the weekend to come so that I could play hours and hours of Call of Duty, Grand Theft Auto and what have you.
I would always prefer playing video games over sports or spending time with friends… well, spending time in real life with friends.
Video games used to be nearly my whole existence. But then I grew up. I had to realize that video games, unless I was going to become a game developer or something like that, weren’t going to help me out in the real world.
And while I had considered different job avenues in gaming, even in the realm of sports, I decided that none of those things mattered as much as getting the Truth out to the people and exposing the Left as much as humanly possible.
I used to be addicted to video games, but not anymore. I had an addiction, not a disorder. If I had a disorder, I’d be wasting my time playing video games all day instead of sitting here at my computer desk and writing these articles.
So it’s important to correctly define things as they are, not make everything political. The Washington Post reported that the World Health Organization (WHO) is expected to declassify transgenderism as a mental disorder.
“The proposals to declassify transgender identity as a mental disorder have been approved by each committee that has considered it so far… Transgender activist groups have been working toward this for years, said Mauro Cabral, one of the program directors of the Global Action for Trans Equality.”
The Left has politicized everything, including science. What was once considered an objective search for the truth of the universe and everything within it has been corrupted and turned into the exact opposite of what it is by definition.
Despite no evidence for man-made climate change, the Left preaches that like it’s gospel and will try to shut anyone down who disagrees with it – even fellow (or should I say, real) scientists.
Despite the fact that even the theory of evolution suggests the likelihood of a Creator, at least in the very beginning of life, they still adamantly refuse to believe the existence of God and mock those who believe in Him.
Despite the fact that discoveries that our very genetic makeup define just about everything about us including one’s gender, the Left has corrupted that in favor of actual insanity.
The Left hasn’t only made a mockery of science. They’ve made science THE OPPOSITE of science.
Theories are more valued than actual facts. Narratives have trumped previous discoveries. Corruption has disguised itself as science to fool people into believing humanity is responsible for the eventual demise of the world.
The fact that the WHO considers an addiction to be an actual mental disorder but believing to be a member of the opposite gender despite scientific and genetic evidence is not a mental disorder shows you just how corrupt these people are.
An organization created to help people identify possible disorders has been turned into yet another Leftist puppet.
Do you see one of the many reasons I believe the Left is evil? Science tells transgenders that they are who they are, so the Left utterly butchers science. They push for baseless political narratives that will only serve to further destroy society.
That may sound crazy today, but if left unchecked, who knows what the world will be like in 100 years? No, it likely won’t be completely flooded, but people might be so confused that no one knows what people are anymore.
Could you imagine if half the population of the world (not that I think it will ever necessarily come to that) was transgender? Males will still have male reproductive systems even with female reproductive parts. And females will still have female reproductive systems even with male reproductive parts.
Women can’t impregnate their partner and men can’t have babies. And if anyone thinks this is homophobic in any way, or against transgenders, then they themselves might just have a mental disorder.
Because let me tell you: science is adamantly against the idea of transgenders. It’s not some conservative “bigot” telling you a man can only be a man and a woman can only be a woman. It’s science that tells you that. And not only does science tell you that, but so does logic. So does the law of non-contradiction, the law that tells you contradictory statements can’t both be true in the same sense at the same time.
You can’t be a man if you’re a woman. You can’t be a woman if you’re a man. Such a premise defies science, logic and the law of non-contradiction.
But if you believe to be a member of the opposite gender, there’s no other explanation to that train of thought other than that you have a mental disorder or disease.
And if you believe being a member of the opposite gender is not a mental disorder but you believe playing video games too much is, you’re entirely illogical.
“There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death.”
Author: Freddie Drake Marinelli.
I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that 2017 has been one of the best years of many Americans’ lives. Likewise, I also don’t think it’s a stretch to say this has been one of the worst, years in the Left’s recent history.
A writer in the Washington Post makes it known just how terrible a year this has been for the Left, but hilariously believes 2018 might be somewhat better, or at least hopes it will be.
He titles his article: “Voters Should Use Ballot Box to Control Trump In 2018”.
He begins his article by detailing just how badly he feels about how this year has turned out for them: “Grit your teeth. Persevere. Just a few more days and this awful, rotten, no-good, ridiculous, rancorous, sordid, disgraceful year in the civic life of our nation will be over. Here’s hoping that we all – particularly special counsel Robert Mueller – have a better 2018.”
I just love how he also hopes Mueller will somehow have a better time in 2018 to find evidence of collusion. If he hasn’t found anything worthwhile at this point in time, he’s not likely to find anything. I’ve heard rumors that he might even EXONERATE Trump of these charges. I won’t go with the rumors until it seems believable and it simply doesn’t at this point. Mueller hates Trump. That much we know. I don’t think he wants to do the POTUS any favors.
The article then continues: “Many of us began 2017 with the consoling thought that the Donald Trump presidency couldn’t possibly be as bad as we feared. It turned out to be worse.”
Ahh, music to my ears. See, the fact that this has been such a terrible year for the Left is something to celebrate. If the reality of Trump’s presidency is even worse than they feared, that only means that Trump has been MORE EFFECTIVE IN DESTROYING THE LEFT than we previously thought he’d be able to be.
I’ve even talked about this before with some people, saying that at this point in time, there’s really no reason for any conservative to still be a Never Trumper. That Trump has been such a conservative president as to rival Reagan that no true conservative has any excuse to no longer support him. They don’t necessarily have to like him personally or what he says on Twitter, but they certainly at this point should be supporting much of what he has been doing and what he wants to do.
And it’s precisely because he’s been a conservative to match Reagan that the Left has considered this year to be so bad for them and consider Trump’s presidency to be so bad.
It’s not bad for America, it’s bad FOR THE LEFT!
Regardless, the author of that article tries to make the case for why this was such a bad year for everyone and why 2018 offers even a glimmer of hope, which is laughable.
He continues the article by saying: “Did you ever think you would hear a president use the words ‘very fine people’ to describe participants in a torchlit rally organized by white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and the Ku Klux Klan?”
Did you ever think a future U.S. President wrote in his diary: “I have come to the conclusion that fascism is right for Germany and Italy”? That “The Nordic races appear to be definitely superior to the Romans”? That “The Germans really are too good – that’s why people conspire against them”? And that Hitler was “stuff of legends” and he will “emerge from the hate that now surrounds him and come to be regarded as one of the most significant figures to have lived”?
No, this isn’t from Trump’s diary. This is from John F. Kennedy’s.
The article continues: “Did you ever think you would hear a U.S. ambassador to the United Nations thuggishly threaten that she would be ‘taking names’ of countries that did not vote on a General Assembly resolution the way she wanted?”
Did you ever think the Left would protest the fulfillment of a campaign promise that has been made by multiple presidents but never came to fruition until Trump came about? Both Bushes, Clinton and Obama all promised to move the embassy to Jerusalem. None of them did it. Trump actually fulfills that promise and everyone is against him? Why am I not surprised?
I also find it funny how this guy describes that threat as “thuggish”. We are the largest provider of financial contributions to the U.N. They largely run on America’s money. Taking that away is not a “thuggish” threat. It’s a parental threat, if anything.
The children of the U.N. misbehaved and threw a tantrum and thus must be punished. We have already pulled $285 million from the U.N.’s 2018 budget. So they’re already getting a cut in their allowance.
Then the article continues with: “Did you ever think the government of the world’s biggest military and economic power would reject not just science but empiricism itself, preferring to use made-up ‘alternative facts’ as the basis for major decisions?”
I’ve said multiple times that the Left flat-out rejects science when talking about climate change, yet we’re the ones to reject not just science but empiricism as well? Empiricism is the theory that all knowledge is derived from sense-experience. Tell me again, Mr. Leftist, how you’re able to sense man-made climate change.
Tell me again how you’re able to sense whether or not a fetus is alive. Tell me again how you can sense that genetic makeup doesn’t determine one’s gender.
The Left’s "science" is nothing but science fiction.
Regardless, he continues to write about how bad Trump is at being president and even attacks Ivanka Trump and Jared Kuschner, claiming they are not qualified to handle their jobs. He attacks Republicans for “rolling over in passive submission”, likely due to the recently-passed tax cuts bill that the Left deems will mark the end of the world.
But he attempts to end things on a “positive” note, claiming that the “resistance” is stronger now than before.
“The day after Trump’s inauguration, a much larger crowd descended on Washington for the Women’s March, an immense show of resistance. That passion might eventually have faded away, but all evidence suggests it has not. If anything, it seems to have intensified.”
Then he begins to mention the two Democrat victories they had this year, which, I’ll remind you, HAPPENED OVER HALF A YEAR AFTER THE WOMEN’S MARCH!
He mentions Democrat victories in Virginia (which were honestly expected) and the Alabama Democrat victory (which considering how much the Left attacked the GOP candidate, they should be afraid it was as close as it was).
And that’s about it. Meanwhile, I can point you to Republican victories in Georgia (which the Left had some hope of winning, though not all that much) and in Montana (which the Left believed was a guaranteed victory for them).
I can point you to a heavily debilitated if not “on-the-verge-of-defeat” ISIS. An American economy that is seeing far faster growth than anyone expected. The passing of a major piece of legislation that will simultaneously help the middle-class a ton (and already has helped many people for specific companies giving out bonuses before even put into place), which will also go to helping to grow the economy.
I can point you to foreign travels in which Trump received far more respect from foreign leaders than his “savant” of a predecessor ever did.
I can point you to a lot of victories not just for Trump but for the whole of America. Believe me, even the Left in companies such as NBC (one of the companies giving out thousand-dollar bonuses to employees) receive a victory after a year with Trump in office.
Finally, he ends his article by saying: “So Godspeed to the Mueller investigation, but let him worry about that. The rest of us – Democrats, independents, patriotic Republicans – should work hard toward the November election. Our duty is to elect a Congress that will bring this runaway train under control.”
Right, may I just point you towards the previous arguments I made? Look at all of them and then tell me Trump needs to be restrained. That he’s out of control. That these things are not good for the country.
I don’t expect a rational person to tell me these things are bad, but I do expect the Left to be entirely irrational in this aspect.
They don’t want these nice things to happen to the country. They certainly don’t want them to happen under a Republican president. But even less so under someone of Trump’s character.
They despise Trump and foolishly believe most of the country does as well. I will concede the point that I believe the “resistance” has likely become more passionate, but so has the MAGA movement.
Many previous Never Trumpers have now jumped aboard the Trump Train after seeing all the great things Trump has been doing. While they may have had an excuse not to follow Trump before, they certainly don’t any more.
And what Trump is doing will only serve to truly Make America Great Again. Trust me, I don’t expect 2018 to be a much better year for the Left than 2017 was. Same will go for 2019, 2020, 2021 all the way to 2024.
1 Chronicles 16:34
“O give thanks to the Lord, for He is good; For His lovingkindness is everlasting.”
Author: Freddie Drake Marinelli.
Before we get started with this article, I would first like to say that I hope you had a very Merry Christmas yesterday full of blessings and joy with family and loved ones. Now, let’s begin with the article.
While most people tend to relax and enjoy the great holiday that is Christmas, the Left, being the massive Scrooges they typically are, decided against simply celebrating Christmas. They also wanted to continue to push their agenda and further brainwash kids with their propaganda.
The Daily Wire wrote a story titled: “Government of Canada Claims Santa Claus Has Fled The North Pole Because Of Global Warming.”
Yep, yet another political, brainwashing tactic to scare kids into “saving the planet” and “fighting climate change.”
The article cites a little story published on the Government of Canada website. The story is titled: “Santa is moving to the South Pole”.
Here’s what it says: “Thanks to rising global temperatures, rapidly melting Arctic ice and growing human operations in the North, Santa Claus has signed an agreement with the International community to relocate his village next year to operate in an exclusive zone in the South Pole. Santa’s relocation agreement marks the first time that the international community agrees on a common legal definition of climate change that includes refugees as corporations, as well as individuals. This deal is expected to lead to the deployment of a global climate change refugee visa system that in the near future could help to more easily relocate individuals and corporations facing the impacts of climate change.”
Someone really put an awful lot of thought into this pile of garbage.
But we can see the intention of this story. They’re scaring kids by telling them “Santa has to move to the South Pole because of you.” Which hardly even makes sense in and of itself. If Santa had to move because of climate change, wouldn’t the South Pole be in danger of facing the same fate as the North Pole, which, by the way, IS NOT CLOSE TO MELTING YET AT ALL?!
Why would he move to the South Pole if climate change will force him out of there too eventually? Did he just decide to move to the literal opposite side of the world instead of moving somewhere closer like, say, Canada?
Did he take one look at the socialism there and realize he’ll probably be overtaxed because of his mass production of toys for kids around the world? I mean, he’s a producer, and producers tend to not do so well with socialist governments.
I also find it funny how they try to rope in refugees as well. It’s not enough to push for the climate change agenda that actually takes more faith to believe in than Christianity, but they also have to make a push for helping out these “refugees” who are suffering due to the climate change humanity is causing.
These people simply couldn’t take one day to rest from their erroneous and often times, hateful (though not necessarily in this case), narratives.
While kids are enjoying themselves opening the presents Santa got for them, Canada decided to tell them “Well, while you’re enjoying opening up that new Lego set, Santa has to move himself, his wife and all of his elves somewhere else because people like you and your parents aren’t doing enough to save the Earth. Happy Holidays!”
Yes, there’s nothing quite as rewarding as making children worry over guilt and possibly cry during Christmas.
But we can all see what they’re trying to do here. The brainwashing process is never quite done.
Ignore the fact that it’s virtually impossible for humanity to have a major impact in the climate of the world. Ignore the fact that the world has historically gone through multiple phases of extreme cold and warmth. Ignore that there have been at least FIVE major ice ages in the history of the world. Ignore the fact that all the “data” the Left ever presents is man-made data. Ignore the fact that any data relating to sea-temperatures can also be explained by the fact that EARTH’S CORE IS HOT TOO!
Ignore all sorts of logic that tell you climate change, at least man-made climate change, is not possible.
This is precisely why I say that it takes more faith to believe in climate change than Christianity. At least Christianity offers INARGUABLE PROOF of the existence of God. The very universe around you should be enough to tell you God exists. But there’s nothing the Left has shown or could possibly show that can convince me of the existence of climate change, at least a man-made climate change.
I’m a reasonable person. I understand that Earth’s climate DOES change. But it’s not via anything you or I or the world’s population do as a whole. God is the only being in existence with the power to control the climate.
And to a degree, I think even the Left knows this. They know it’s a sham, but they can’t possibly admit that to anyone. They have to live in that constant lie. And they do it not to “save the Earth”. They do it to gain more power and money from people.
That’s the goal of that Santa story. Kids want to help Santa. The Canadian government (or really any government that pushes for this tactic) can offer “solutions” to this “problem” and kids will passionately support it. Why? Because kids are never rational. They are never logical. But that’s ok because they’re just kids.
So what’s the Left’s excuse for never being rational and logical?
“For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.”
Author: Freddie Drake Marinelli.
Looking through some conservative websites, I came across a story that both elated me and shocked me.
The Daily Wire writes a story titled: “Pro-Life Win: CA Nursing Board Tells Pro-Abortion Advocates To Stuff It”.
I think you can clearly see just why that title surprised me as it did. California is a state I would never dream setting foot on again. For all its natural beauty, it harbors some of the most disgusting political ideologies in the world. So for me to see that a nursing board based in California does something, ANYTHING, against pro-choice advocates is stunning.
Here’s the story: “On Tuesday, the pro-life movement got a lift and the pro-choice movement’s surreptitious attempt to blunt abortion reversal was defeated when the California Board of Registered Nursing said the pro-life group Heartbeat International could grant continuing education units (CEUs) to nurses who study Abortion Pill Reversal,” writes the Daily Wire.
Now, you might be asking: “What is an Abortion Pill Reversal?” Well, first, you need to know what an abortion pill is. Some of you might know already, but for those who don’t, an abortion pill is a pill that can end a pregnancy that is less than 7 weeks along. The Abortion Pill Reversal, according to Daily Wire, is: “the procedure in which mothers who ingest mifepristone (RU-486) or ‘the abortion pill’ regret the decision and use an emergency progesterone treatment to save their babies.”
According to Jay Hobbs of Heartbeat International: “In the past five years, more than 400 mothers have successfully rescued their babies through an emergency progesterone treatment that has been used for more than 50 years to prevent miscarriages. Backed by a network of more than 350 medical providers, the Abortion Pill Reversal hotline (1-877-558-0333) – staffed with licensed medical professionals – answers over 50 calls per month from women who want to keep their baby after having started the chemical abortion pill process.”
But like with many nice stories with (so far) happy endings, there always has to be a bad guy. Enter the pro-“choice” movement. And you’ll understand why I put the word “choice” in quotations in a minute.
According to the Daily Wire: “In 2012, the California Board of Registered Nursing gave approval for Heartbeat as a CEU provider. Heartbeat then began offering credit for education on Abortion Pill Reversal online and at its annual conference.”
“But in late 2015, an activist with Rewire.com, Nicole Knight, joined California State Sen. Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) to pressure the Board into auditing Heartbeat.”
Upon that action, Hobbs reports: “According to emails obtained through Heartbeat’s public records request, Knight and representatives from both NARAL (National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League) and avowedly pro-abortion UC San Francisco insisted that Board officials take action against Heartbeat and its fellow pro-life pregnancy help groups, Care Net and National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA).”
Then, according to the Daily Wire: “[Sen.] Hill concurrently created legislation to try and disqualify all courses on Abortion Pill Reversal from receiving course credit. Although the law went into effect in 2016, it ultimately failed to disqualify the training.”
On July 28th, 2017, the Board confirmed Heartbeat’s ability to offer credit for the course work.
Then, the Daily Wire writes: “Spencer Walker, an attorney with the state’s Department of Consumer Affairs, sent a memo to Dr. Joseph Morris, executive officer of the nursing board, on August 14, warning the Board not to target Heartbeat.”
Walker writes in the memo: “The concept of abortion pill reversal is clearly science-based (pro-choice advocates were arguing that it wasn’t science-based), and a registered nurse would likely be involved in the indirect care of a patient seeking abortion pill reversal assistance through education or other means. Therefore, the board could be exposed to litigation if it prohibits continuing education providers from offering courses in abortion pill reversal.”
Putting aside the details of this battle for the life of children, do you see what the Left was trying to do? It was trying to discredit the course and, therefore, kill nearly all incentive for learning how to save the baby’s life should the mother regret her decision after taking the abortion pill.
Unless you’re a hateful psychopath hell-bent on killing babies, there is no reason to oppose this procedure or the coursework. Which brings me to the topic of this article.
The people opposed to Heartbeat International and the abortion pill reversal procedure are inherently against the choice of the mother to save her own child. The Left calls their movement pro-“choice”. The “choice” of an expecting woman to get rid of her own baby as though it was a bad case of the flu. Well, choice is a street that goes both ways. A woman can, at first, choose to kill her baby and then choose against it, as in the case of the women seeking the abortion pill reversal procedure.
Anyone who is against that procedure is not pro-choice. They’re pro-death. Pro-abortion. Pro-killing the baby.
If the pro-choice movement really was pro-choice, they wouldn’t encourage women to get abortions. They wouldn’t demonize the idea of having kids. They wouldn’t glorify killing children. They would make it known that women have that option (physically, at least, not so much spiritually). They would let people know: “Hey. I know you didn’t plan this, so just so you know, there’s this option.”
They wouldn’t say: “Don’t want the kid? KILL IT! And no backsies either. You only get one choice.”
Now, personally, I don’t think killing your baby should ever be a choice. But looking at things from a Leftist’s perspective, it still makes no sense to encourage women to get abortions in this manner. Why would anyone be opposed to a woman’s choice to SAVE her baby? Why would they try to discredit a course that helps women who choose to SAVE their baby after regretting taking the pill?
That’s inherently against pro-choice. So that’s why I write this article. These people are not pro-choice. They’re pro-death. They don’t just have no regard for life – they HATE life.
I remember having read a story from a woman who used to work for Planned Parenthood. She always believed that women had a choice, but that it was entirely THEIR choice to make, not Planned Parenthood's. What made her stop working for Planned Parenthood, at least to the best of my recollection, is that one day in a meeting, she was discussing the number of abortions PP performs a year.
During this meeting, she was trying to think of ways for those numbers to go down. She didn’t want millions and millions of babies being killed. She just wanted to help the women who felt as though abortion was the only option. She believed abortion should be a last resort.
But during that meeting, bringing up the topic of trying to decrease those numbers, her fellow workers thought differently. They didn’t want the numbers to go down. They wanted them to go UP. They wanted to perform MORE abortions, not less.
She then, after some time, wound up quitting Planned Parenthood. You see, PP is not in the business of helping women. They’re in the business of killing babies.
This woman wanted to help women seek other options she believed Planned Parenthood offered. She didn’t want women to choose abortion immediately. Planned Parenthood does.
These people don’t want to help women. These people want to make money off of killing infants.
Make no mistake, Planned Parenthood is evil. It’s one thing to think abortion should be an option. It’s another to think it should be everyone’s FIRST option.
While I won’t excuse people who think it should be an option but don’t think it should be a first option, I can understand them. They are simply misinformed. They are what I would call “weak”. That’s not meant to insult them, but warn them. I’m not talking about physical strength, but rather spiritual strength.
These people might mean well but are simply wrong. That’s why they’re weak. But it’s the other people. The one’s I call “wicked” that are evil.
It’s those people in that meeting that want to jack up the number of abortions they perform. It’s the people that want to discredit a course that helps save the lives of babies. It’s the people that run Planned Parenthood and those within the government and media that support it that are evil.
It’s those people that inherently and unabashedly violate the most basic inalienable right given to us by God: the right to LIFE, that are evil.
Those people are not pro-choice. They are pro-evil.
1 John 3:8
“Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
If you remember, yesterday I shared with you something House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said about the tax bill. That it will be the actual end of the world if the bill passes. Meanwhile, I’m still waiting for everyone to die because of the Net Neutrality repeal.
But she’s not the only hysterical liberal to have said something outrageous or funny about the bill.
The Daily Wire published a story detailing 6 outrageous responses from the Left. The article is titled: “The Top 5 Most Absurd Responses To The GOP’s $1.5 Trillion Tax Cut”. It says top 5, but they include an honorable mention so it’s really 6 absurd responses.
One of them is the “Armageddon” quote I shared with you yesterday. But funny enough, that wasn’t the last dumb thing Pelosi said about the bill. Aside from marking the end of the world, the bill also “does violence to the vision of our Founders.”
In a speech on the House floor on Tuesday, Pelosi said the following statement: “This GOP tax scam is simply theft, monumental, brazen theft from the American middle class and from every person who aspires to reach it. The GOP tax scam is not a vote for an investment in growth or jobs. It is a vote to install a permanent plutocracy in our nation. They’ll be cheering that later. It does violence to the vision of our Founders. It disrespects the sacrifice of our men and women in uniform, who are a large part of our middle class and to whom we owe a future worthy of their sacrifice. And it betrays the future and betrays the aspirations of our children. It demands, it morally demands a no vote from every member of this house of the people.”
I just love it when the Left just hands me the ammo to tear them down. Let’s start with the beginning. Since when is a tax CUT a scam that will hurt the middle class? Since when is a benefit a liability? That’s rather illogical thinking.
Then, she says it’s “not a vote for an investment in growth or jobs.” And this is precisely why I call the Left serial liars. Those are some of the very things this bill is FOR. It will lower taxes on businesses which will create jobs and help grow the economy.
“A vote to install a permanent plutocracy.” Says the career-politician with a $30 million net worth.
“Violence to the vision of our Founders.” No, multiple calls for gun control is violence to the vision of our Founders. Funding an organization with the sole purpose of ending one of the basic, inalienable rights of unborn children is violence to the vision of our Founders. The unrelenting drive to increase the size and scope of the government is violence to the vision of our Founders. THE ENTIRE LEFT IS VIOLENCE TO THE VISION OF OUR FOUNDERS!
“Disrespects the sacrifice of our men and women in uniform, who are a large part of our middle class and to whom we owe a future worthy of their sacrifice.” And that’s why I think members of Congress should get a pay cut to give to the brave men and women in uniform who make around $20,000 a year provided they have the experience and appropriate rank. Like I said, this is a bill that will help the middle class. This is a bill that will help our soldiers too.
“Betrays the future and betrays the aspirations of our children.” No, an abortionist betrays the future and aspirations of our children. Pro-choice Democrats betray the future and aspirations of our children.
I think I’ve said enough about her brainless claims. Let’s move on.
Next: “Protesters chant ‘Don’t kill us!’”, according to the Daily Wire.
“The Daily Mail highlighted the moment: ‘A wave of protesters provided one of the biggest bursts of emotion. One small group yelled out ‘Kill the bill, don’t kill us!’ as the final vote was being taken.” To which Vice President Mike Pence was forced to call for order.
Again, I thought repealing Net Neutrality was going to kill us. I thought pushing back against North Korea’s threats was going to kill us. I thought electing Trump was going to kill us. Either we’re all cats and have 9 lives or they’re lying.
Then, and one of my personal favorites: “Rosie O’Donnell offers $2 million bribe to Senators, violates federal law.”
What was it that Pelosi said about establishing a plutocracy? You see, this is my favorite for a few reasons. First, it’s a clear violation of the law, specifically Title 18 Section 201 of the United States Code, which, according to USLegal.com, means: “Whoever directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official with intent to influence that person’s official act will be fined for the offence of the bribery. The punishment prescribed by the statute is a fine of an amount not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, or imprisonment for not more than fifteen years, or both.”
In other words, should the federal government choose to investigate O’Donnell, she just might be screwed.
But there’s another reason this one is my favorite. Aside from the obvious law violation and clear hypocrisy that defines a Leftist, she crudely responded to Ben Shapiro’s tweet about Trump being “carved into Mount Rushmore by Friday” if he investigates Rosie with: “suck my d**k ben.” To which Ben Shapiro answered with: “You’re already a felon, Rosie. Don’t be a homophobic sexual harasser too.”
So she’s in jeopardy of prison time AND is destroyed by a conservative on Twitter. And that, my friend, is why this was my favorite.
Alas, we move on: “Chuck Schumer prophesies dark, dark days ahead and Republicans plagued by regret.”
Schumer said: “Republicans will rue the day that they pass this tax bill because it’s so unfair to the middle class. It blows a hole in our deficit, it so threatens Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. They will rue the day.”
Yeah, just like they rued the day a similar bill was passed 30 years ago during the Reagan administration. I’m trembling.
Finally: “Democrats spread news so fake even The Washington Post calls foul.”
You really have to be Pinocchio himself to warrant a Left-leaning news organization to call out your lies. That’s precisely what happened to a rising star in the Democrat Party and potential 2020 presidential candidate hopeful Sen. Kamala Harris. Harris claimed on Twitter that: “On average, middle class families earning less than $86,000 would see a tax increase under the Republican ‘tax reform’ plan”.
However, the Post reports that: “Only a small percentage (6.5%) of the nearly 122 million households in the bottom three quintiles will actually face a tax increase. Meanwhile, more than 97 million (80%) will receive a tax cut.”
According to the Daily Wire, she was eventually forced to delete the tweet.
I’ve said this before, but the Left can be rather funny at times. Despite the fact that they lie through their teeth, their lies sometimes are comedy gold that you can’t help but to laugh out loud at.
One other thing to mention: I’ve seen multiple Leftists say that this tax bill will cost the GOP the 2018 midterm elections.
If that’s the case, how come Democrats aren’t supporting the bill? If passing it will ensure Republican defeat in a year, why in the world would Democrats try to stop it from passing? Believe me, it’s not out of “fairness” or “out of the kindness of their own hearts.”
They fear that passing this bill might be something that will SAVE the GOP in 2018. No, I’m not so naïve as to not realize what the GOP is doing here. Throughout 2017, Republicans have been rather uncooperative and very challenging to the MAGA agenda. Tax reform could’ve been something that was taken care of in the summer and Obamacare could’ve been repealed and replaced early in the year.
This sudden cooperation is not to help Trump get a legislative win. It’s so that they can keep their jobs next year. It’s pure survival instinct. If they are always challenging and fighting Trump, they won’t keep their jobs in 2018. And even though they’d be ok with seeing Democrats taking back control of Congress and either working to impeach Trump or altogether stop the MAGA movement, they’re not entirely dumb.
They want to keep their jobs not in order to help Trump but so that they can continue to make money in a position of power.
But even though I’m being rather cynical, truth is I’d rather have cowardly Establishment Republicans that won’t threaten Trump’s presidency over hateful, bigoted Establishment Democrats who hunger to get rid of Trump and destroy America.
But that’s all to be further discussed in later articles. For now, I’ll enjoy the victory over the Left and enjoy the coming tax cuts for the majority of Americans.
“Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, but those who act faithfully are His delight.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Before we begin, let me share some rather hysterical news with you about the Left’s push to defeat the tax bill.
Theamericanwarrior.com published a story titled: “Pelosi bails on tax cut protest after only handful of activists show up”.
It reads: “A handful of folks are really steamed that Republican lawmakers are planning to lower taxes, and they gathered in [a] tiny conference room on Capitol Hill where House Minority Speaker Nancy Pelosi was slated to speak Monday. But the demonstration was so weak, MSNBC reports, Pelosi didn’t even bother to show up.”
“’These protests have never been like what we saw with the healthcare law,’ an MSNBC reported said as a camera man panned the crowd of a couple dozen mulled about in self-scheduling conference room 2456.”
Looking at the video showing the pathetically small crowd, I can’t help but to think back to some of Hillary Clinton’s rallies where an embarrassingly small amount of people actually bothered to show up.
The MSNBC reporter may have said that these kind of protests are never quite like the healthcare law ones, but even he should admit that this is pathetic. This kind of protest may not be as passionate as the ones for healthcare law, but if Pelosi didn’t even bother to show up, it just tells you how pathetic that protest was.
And what makes it more hilarious is the apocalyptic tone Pelosi used last week when talking about the tax bill. At a Capitol Hill press conference, Pelosi was asked the following question by a reporter: “Minority leader, at this news conference and on the floor you, Democrats talk about this bill often in very apocalyptic terms, but isn’t really what’s going on that many people are getting a very modest tax cut, and some people are getting a tax increase, while a lot of this is also going to business but it’s not the end of the world?”
To which Pelosi responded with: “No, it is the end of the world. This, healthcare, the debate on healthcare is life-death. This is Armageddon. This is a very big deal. Because you know why? There’s really a very hard way to come back from this. They take us farther, more deeply into debt. What can you do but raise taxes?”
Boy, there’s a lot to cover here just from that quote. Let’s start from the beginning.
I just love whenever the Left makes apocalyptic claims about things Trump and/or Republicans do. It just goes to show just how scared they are of this bill passing and how necessary it is to pass it. They wouldn’t be saying that if they didn’t have much to lose. And what’s one of the bigger things they lose? That’s what brings us to the next part.
Pelosi mentions healthcare. That the debate on healthcare is life-death. Why does she mention it? Because part of the tax bill eliminates the Obamacare mandate that essentially forces people to buy healthcare or pay a fine.
Eliminating the mandate will almost certainly mark the beginning of the end of Obamacare unless the mandate is restored. And that’s precisely why the Left is so deathly afraid of the bill. It further destroys Obama’s legacy.
Moving on to the last part of her response, she mentions debt. That this bill will take us farther into debt. I find it rather funny that after 8 years of Obama, this is the moment that she chooses to have any sort of "concern" for the national debt.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated the tax bill would add $1.7 trillion to national debt over the next decade. But, according to Breitbart: “The CBO’s estimates, however, do not account for any additional economic growth that could arise from tax reform”. In that decade, the government could make more money with a stronger economy and that additional $1.7 trillion would be insignificant if not effectively cancelled out.
Now, I’ve been talking about how Pelosi was presumably so embarrassed by the small crowd of protesters that she decided against attending the event, but I haven’t quite talked about if people really like the bill. Well, that’s where the Fake News media comes in.
According to CNBC: “Nearly half of Americans oppose GOP tax bill ahead of final votes, poll says”.
Ah, yes. The holy polls have shown us the way the American people think once again and they have never been wrong in the past. According to a poll ran by Monmouth University, 47% of people surveyed said they disapprove of the bill, with 26% of them saying they approve, 19% having no opinion on it and 8% saying they want to wait to draw a conclusion until they saw a final bill.
Another poll run by, funny enough, CNBC’s All-American Economic Survey said that 70% of people “believe their taxes in the next couple of years will either stay the same or increase.” Well either 70% of the people surveyed are massive idiots or these people are lying about how many people believe this garbage.
I believe most people understand the Left’s efforts to undermine Trump and everything (good) Republicans do. Over the last couple of years, these news sources have made a name for themselves for being highly untrustworthy, so why would I take anything they say to heart?
And most people, I believe, agree with me on that – as well they should. The media and the whole of the Left make baseless claims that this tax plan will serve to help the rich get richer and will increase middle-income Americans’ taxes when that’s not at all the case.
I’ve said before that this tax bill will help middle-income Americans a good deal and that businesses will be helped out a ton. Helping businesses this way will help to strengthen the economy, create more jobs and benefit just about everyone regardless of class. But the Left doesn’t want you to know that.
The Left wants you to believe this tax cut will be the end of the world, as Pelosi described it, and that only they are able to be fair when it comes to taxes even though it’s been their plans and bills that put the country in the mess it was and still somewhat is.
Not once did Obama’s GDP grow by 3% in a single quarter. Trump’s did multiple times in CONSECUTIVE quarters. This tax bill will only help the economy get stronger and will lift the tyrannical Obamacare mandate off people’s shoulders.
Do I think most people like the tax bill? Given the information we have, there’s little reason not to. Now, I won’t claim to speak for the whole country, unlike the Left, when I say that. But I do also think that most people no longer trust the media. And that distrust goes a long way for helping Make America Great Again.
While I won’t claim that most people do like the tax bill, I will logically assume that most people don’t believe the garbage the MSM spews about it and will draw their own conclusions about the tax bill without the influence of serial liars.
“Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers; but his delight is in the law of the Lord, and on His law he meditates day and night.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Despite the fact that Mueller has overstepped his own authority and stepped outside the very boundaries of the law on multiple occasions during his investigation on Donald Trump and Russia, President Donald Trump has said that he has no plans to fire Mueller from the Special Counsel investigation.
And that’s a very good choice.
Even though it’s as clear as water that Robert Mueller and his Special Counsel is highly corrupt, no one on the Left will admit that. If Trump were to fire Mueller, it would give the Left ammunition to begin impeachment proceedings under the bogus claim that Trump is “obstructing justice”.
I’ve said this multiple times, but I’ll say it again: the Left doesn’t care about the facts. The fact is that Mueller has looked into Donald Trump’s past business dealings even though it makes no logical sense in an investigation into an election. He’s illegally, or at least improperly, procured tens of thousands of e-mails belonging to Trump Transition Team staffers and officials.
Mueller has been looking everywhere he could to find any sort of trace of collusion, but he’s found nothing. In 2017, we’ve found more evidence of Clinton-Russia collusion, Obama-Russia collusion, Clinton-Obama DOJ collusion and not a single negative mention of these things from the Left.
We’ve written multiple articles pointing towards the real collusion stories and government corruption stories, but Trump is the one under investigation? He’s the one treated as a criminal? EVERYONE ON THE LEFT HAS MORE OF A CRIMINAL RECORD THAN HE DOES AT THIS POINT!
But despite all of that, Trump won’t fire Mueller. And he certainly shouldn’t. Even though he, as head of the Executive Branch, has the power to hire and fire anyone working within that branch of the government, firing Mueller wouldn’t result in anything good.
Mueller is not the only person investigating Trump and Russian collusion. The FBI and the MSM are also on the case. Firing Mueller would serve no good purpose for Trump, and he knows this.
Firing Mueller would only serve to hurt Trump. I’ve already seen plenty of Leftist wackos on social media calling for people to “take to the streets” if Mueller is fired. They’re very much calling for riots to occur if Trump fires Mueller. And while that won’t really hurt Trump, it will drive Democrats in Congress to look to begin impeachment proceedings.
Granted, there are some like Sen. Al Green (D-TX) who have been calling for his impeachment pretty much since before he took office and have actually looked to begin impeachment proceedings in the past, but they haven’t amounted to anything.
Even House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said that they shouldn’t go down the path of impeachment without the facts (Although if they win Congress in 2018, I doubt facts will matter all that much in their efforts.)
And the fact that Trump has the right to fire Mueller for just about any reason doesn’t matter to the Left either. Democrats will see it as an effort to obstruct justice and will look to impeach him.
So that’s at least one reason Trump won’t fire Mueller. But here’s another: he doesn’t have to. Trump doesn’t have to fire Mueller at all. Why? Mueller’s Special Counsel is destroying their own reputation and integrity (of which they had little anyway).
It’s been well over a year since the Russian collusion story began and it’s almost been an entire year since Mueller was appointed head of the Special Counsel to investigate Trump and Russia. In that whole year, the evidence against Clinton and Obama has risen while evidence against Trump has remained a constant zero.
The Special Counsel hasn’t found anything of value on Trump. And I don’t believe these people are unintelligent in the least. I believe they have the intelligence to find the things they need to make a case. But they can’t find things that aren’t there.
They’ve searched high and low for any sign of collusion and not one thing has come up. They have detained Paul Manafort, but what was supposed to be the “beginning of the end for Trump” resulted in absolutely nothing since he was released not long after.
Trump won’t fire Mueller because he doesn’t have to. The longer Mueller keeps his position, the worse it will get for them. They’re self-destructing. And while the Left keeps claiming that Trump is undermining Mueller and claiming that Trump is destroying Mueller’s reputation and efforts, reality couldn’t be further from the truth.
The truth is that Mueller is doing all of that himself. Trump is merely pointing it out and commenting on it. And as long as Trump doesn’t fire Mueller, the Left can’t claim he’s obstructing justice. Even though he wouldn’t be obstructing justice and simply exercising his right as head of the Executive Branch, he doesn’t want to give the Left any more ammo than they already have… of which they have pathetically little amounts.
And Trump is not the idiot the Left claims he is. He’s actually proven to be far more intelligent and cunning than even them. If he were an idiot, he wouldn’t have been able to beat Hillary. If he were an idiot, the economy wouldn’t be improving nearly as well or as fast as it is. If he were an idiot, he wouldn’t get the respect of foreign leaders when he travels to other countries.
If he were an idiot, the Left wouldn’t be as hell-bent on destroying him as they have been over this past year. If he were an idiot, they wouldn’t take him as the threat he is to them.
Trump knows that firing Mueller would only get the Left shouting “obstruction” and “collusion” and other b.s.
And even though his supporters would back him up no matter what, there’s no point in beating a dead horse.
Mueller and his special counsel will take care of themselves.
“And He said to them, ‘I was watching Satan fall from heaven like lightning…”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Are you able to read this article? Have you been asked by your Internet service provider to pay an extra charge to be able to read the content of this article? OF COURSE YOU CAN READ THIS AND OF COURSE YOU WEREN’T ASKED TO PAY MORE FOR IT!
The biggest piece of news over this past week has been the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ruling to repeal Net Neutrality. This decision has been made to seem as though the literal end of the Internet and the world is now at hand.
Multiple low-information people make claims that without Net Neutrality, the Internet will no longer be free and open, that certain content will now cost more because of corporate greed and that certain content will be inaccessible.
People like Daily Show host Trevor Noah, who set up somewhat of a skit by saying that “there’s no evidence that this is going to break the Internet… so if you’re watching this show right now, online right now, I just want to remind you, that…” before simulating a disrupted stream.
Or Late Night host Seth Meyers saying: “If you’re not sure what [the ruling] means, better Google it while you still can.”
And more specifically, Jimmy Kimmel saying: “Thank you President Trump. Thanks to you and this jackhole (referring to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai) you appointed to run the FCC, big corporations are about to take full control of the internet, so Merry Christmas everybody.”
I truly fail to understand how these people’s minds work. They really think the only way for the internet to be open and free is for the government to control it. How insane is that?!
Let me tell you: the internet is not going to break. The internet was perfectly fine before 2015, when Net Neutrality was first put in place. It didn’t need to get regulated, but the government and the Left wanted it regulated. They wanted to have control over the internet. And for whatever insane reason, people wanted the government in charge of the internet as well.
I’ve seen plenty of people on Twitter saying that Net Neutrality was necessary to avoid corporate greed. That it was necessary to “protect the people”. That Net Neutrality was going to force companies to not overcharge people for internet service. And that’s a complete lie.
The government forcing companies what to charge kills competition. It kills capitalism. And if the government is in charge of the internet, they get to choose what to charge people and what content is available. The very thing these low-information people fear is what was going to happen if Net Neutrality WASN’T repealed.
Net Neutrality was not meant to protect people. It was meant to control the internet and heavily regulate it as well as its providers. It was meant to increase the size of the government. It was meant to give control of the content to the government. In other words, it was meant to give the government the power to censor the things they didn’t like.
No, it wasn’t going to be immediate. We’ve lived with Net Neutrality for 2, almost 3 years, and I doubt we’ve seen the government deny any website from existing because it had content they didn’t like. But things like these are never instantaneous. These things often times are about a progression of rules. Starting out simple and then placing more and more rules and regulations.
Like FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said in his statement regarding the ruling: “The free and open internet prior to 2015 is the one we are going to have going forward.”
It’s honestly ridiculous for people to believe Net Neutrality is necessary to keep a free and open internet. Net Neutrality does the exact opposite of it and it’s intended to do the exact opposite of it.
There’s nothing free and open about a heavily-regulated internet. That’d be like saying North Korea’s economy is a free market economy because the government controls it. It’s honestly that ridiculous.
One of the bigger claims the Left makes is that without Net Neutrality, wealthier people are able to afford better service while poorer people won’t get very good service. What they fail to realize is that that’s how every market works. If you can afford something better, you tend to get it. If you want to save money at the cost of better service, you can do that as well. That’s not a bad thing.
But perhaps the biggest claim the Left makes about it is that, as you heard from Kimmel, big corporations will have full control of the internet. Here's the thing: that's not at all the case. There's not a single case in the history of the internet of a big corporation having full control of the internet in a country. Without Net Neutrality, smaller ISPs have a better chance to compete than with it.
Do you think that in a capitalist and free market system corporations are going to charge people insane prices for their product and service? Do you not understand how capitalism works? IT’S ABOUT COMPETITION!
If an Internet service provider (ISP) like, say, Comcast, charges an unreasonable amount of money for internet in a certain area, other companies such as AT&T or Verizon can come in to that area and offer better deals.
Let’s take Boynton Beach, FL as an example. In Boynton Beach, according to highspeedinternet.com, there are three different ISPs: AT&T, Comcast Xfinity, and HughesNet.
AT&T offers internet speeds of up to 1000 Megabits per second (Mbps). That’s pretty great. But to get that incredible internet bandwidth, you have to live in certain areas where they provide it and it will, of course, cost more than slower speeds.
AT&T offers different bundles with different download speeds at different costs. For example, you can get the 75 Mbps internet plan starting at $60/mo. If you can’t afford that, you can choose a plan that will give you 50 Mbps starting at $40/mo.
These aren’t bad in the least, either. According to an article by Yahoo published 5 years ago, internet speeds of 10-15 Mbps were considered to be “the new normal”. Again, this was 5 years ago. You can only imagine how much faster internet speeds have gotten since then.
Now, let’s look at Xfinity. One of their bundles gives you 25 Mbps starting at $40/mo. Comparing this plan to AT&T’s, you can see it’s only half as fast for the same price. (I feel I’m obligated to say that I’m not sponsored by AT&T or any other internet service provider).
So that plan isn’t as good as AT&T’s. However, that’s not the only plan they offer. If it was, they wouldn’t be very successful. They also offer another plan that gives you 100 Mbps for $50/mo. That is quite the improvement from the previous plan and is also more competitive than AT&T’s.
So for AT&T to compete with that price and that speed, they have to offer even better deals. This is what competition looks like.
The government doesn’t need to come in and force companies to charge fair amounts of money. The market already does that.
Now, that’s the “big corporations” the Left deems evil. Let’s look at that last ISP in Boynton Beach: HughesNet. They offer different deals, but those deals don’t offer better internet speeds. Rather, they offer more Gigabytes of data.
For example, their cheapest plan is 10 GB of data, 25 Mbps starting at $50/mo. The difference between that plan and competitors’ plans is that plan is good for 24 months, while AT&T’s and Xfinity’s are for 12 months. HughesNet can’t quite compete as strongly against the big ISPs, so they have to look for other ways to stay competitive.
These three compete in Boynton Beach. While the small ISP can’t quite compete with the other two, that doesn’t mean everything is lost for them. Yes, the big corporations essentially monopolized the area, but Net Neutrality was making it more difficult for competitors to get into the area. The barriers of entry have been lifted and now more smaller companies such as HughesNet will be able to offer the same service and compete with the big boys.
The insane fear low-information people have is that big corporations are very greedy. That these corporations will take people’s money and keep it for themselves and that’s how they get rich. It’s the classic narrative of the rich get richer while the poor get poorer, but reality couldn’t be further from the truth.
Yes, the owners of these companies certainly are rich, but they didn’t steal or take money from the poor. Frankly, taking money from the poor is not a very realistic way to get rich. They own companies that provide good service for people. They may not be perfect but they’re not the devils the Left makes them out to be.
So Net Neutrality wasn’t going to protect the people from these companies. It was going to abuse these companies, kill competition and ultimately increase prices that hurt the people, much in the same way Obamacare premiums only rise and rise.
Obamacare was MEANT to do that. Net Neutrality ditto.
“An honest witness does not deceive, but a false witness pours out lies.”
Author: Freddie Drake
Yes. Yes they are.
But why specifically do I bring this up? Because a Politico reporter tweeted about something she claims Donald Trump Jr. did… when he was 3-years-old.
Now, the tweet has some profanity in it and I’ll do my best to censor it while also letting you know what it is she said. So, MATURE LANGUAGE WARNING.
Virginia Heffernan, the Politico reporter, tweeted: “My friend Anna taught Don Jr preschool in Manhattan. She asked him to move his mat one day and he said, ‘f--- you, b---ch.’ He was three. Today’s for you, Anna.”
Now, I don’t know exactly what was going through Virginia’s head while she tweeted that, but that’s easily one of the dumbest lies I’ve seen. Not to mention that it really serves next to no purpose. That’s just lying for lying’s sake. Perhaps a crude attempt at smearing his reputation, but who exactly is going to believe a THREE-YEAR-OLD would curse out his teacher?!
Clearly, many twitter users easily caught on to the obvious lie.
Among the replies are things like: “Because this is how pre-schoolers talk, totally not an attention-seeking lie.” As well as: “I read this to my 3 year old and he said ‘that’s a f---ing lie. Now get me chocolate milk.’” And: “File this under ‘no way in hell this happened.’”
And if by some crazy stretch of the imagination this actually happened, users were quick to point out that doing or saying something when you are that young shouldn’t be a reason for attacking someone’s character. One user said: “So now what people did when they were three years old, as reported on by other people nearly 40 years later, is fair game to make claims about their character? And you think that’s sane? And you whinge like a pathetic little child at having that pointed out? Bless your heart.”
And do you want to know what’s funny? CNBC’s John Harwood actually believes it’s true, saying: “for real? That’s amazing.”
Whenever the Left writes tweets like these, I try to get into their heads and search for any possible reason for tweeting these things. Sometimes, it’s easy. For example, Sandra Fluke (remember her?) tweeted: “Killing #NetNeutrality would kill access to abortion information…”
Here, I can see the reason for the tweet. Even though it’s ridiculously stupid, she tweeted that so that people demand that the FCC keeps Net Neutrality. Even though such information would be available with or without Net Neutrality, Sandra Fluke is deceiving her audience by making such a ridiculous claim for which she has no facts to back up.
So I know her reasoning behind the tweet: deception. Virginia’s tweet is flat-out a waste of the 4 seconds that it takes to read it. Never before has so little time mattered so much and she wastes everyone’s 4 seconds with that garbage.
That tweet has no clear reasoning. If I’m taking a stab at it, I’d say that it’s a flimsy attempt at character assassination or smearing. And that’s my best guess. Why she’s specifically targeting Trump Jr., I don’t know. Maybe she was just bored and decided to tweet out something utterly insane.
And it’s precisely because that’s my best guess for her reasoning that I ask the question: “is the Left just a bunch of serial liars?”
Because I can understand lying for the reason Sandra Fluke lied about Net Neutrality. The reason any Democrat lies about the tax bill. The reason the Left lies about how Trump is racist. The reason the Left lied about Roy Moore being a pedophile and sexual assaulter.
Those are all for advancing their political agenda and/or winning elections. Those are the kind of lies I tackle on a daily basis, so I understand the reason behind them. But this? Again, this is not even a good attempt at harming someone’s reputation. It’s just lying for lying’s sake.
That’s why I ask that question. Is there something within their brains that basically FORCES them to lie? Are they actually incapable of telling any sort of truth? Are they pathological liars?
I answered the question at the very beginning. Yes, they most certainly are serial liars. Pathological liars. They couldn’t tell the truth about someone they despised if their lives depended on it.
Because Trump Jr. is someone Virginia deems “despicable” (or deplorable, if you will), she feels the uncontrollable urge to lie about him. Big lie, small lie, it doesn’t matter. He’s someone she hates with a passion so she simply MUST do something that may cause harm to his reputation. It doesn’t even have to be believable. Just as long as enough of their brainwashed sheep believe it because of what they themselves think of the President’s son, it’s more than ok.
Something has to seriously be wrong with you to make such a baseless claim. Baseless much in the same way they make claims about Trump and conservatives, but differently at the same time. Again, there’s a difference between those kinds of lies and this particular kind of lie.
Those lies are lies with a clear objective in mind. Virginia’s lie hardly seems like it has a purpose for existing.
These kinds of lies are what make me curious about the state of mind of the Left. They claim Trump is demented and unfit for office, yet they hardly seem fit for eating a meal without a bib or changing clothes without the help of their parents.
I know I’ve made the joke that, as time goes on, the Left seems to be losing more and more of their sanity. But this time, it’s a bit less of a joke and more of a serious case.
Beyond asking if the Left is a bunch of serial liars, I wish to ask, is the Left mentally ill? And this is not a joke. You have to have something seriously wrong in your head to lie like that for seemingly no reason. You have to have something seriously wrong to believe that a man can be a woman and a woman can be a man and that they have the right to use the opposite gender’s restroom.
You have to have something seriously wrong in your head to believe killing an unborn child is a woman’s “right”. That, despite the fact that a human being is growing inside a woman, he or she is somehow not alive.
You have to have something seriously wrong in your head to deny that Man-made Climate Change is a hoax. Now, that’s a bit different because it’s more about information. Ignorance plays a big hand in believing Man-made Climate Change is real. But for someone to flat out accept Man-made Climate Change with no proof is actually worrying.
Denying facts such as no increase in Earth's temperature in years is to flat-out deny reality. And that can make people very dangerous. In my previous article, I said that Roy Moore failed to attack the Left, particularly failing to attack how hateful and dangerous they are.
What do I mean by that? Let’s use this example: Kate Steinle was killed by an Illegal Immigrant who shouldn’t have been in the country, who was wanted for deportation and who had been deported several times prior. The Left-run San Francisco declared itself a “sanctuary city”, a city that protects Illegal Immigrants from deportation to the best of their ability. San Francisco literally harbors criminals.
When the case came to a close and the Illegal Immigrant murderer got off scot-free, not a single Leftist was in uproar over the decision. It was clear involuntary manslaughter, but the jurors were not convinced. That case was a mockery of justice and not a single Leftist was outraged.
That case is merely one of the many cases of an Illegal Immigrant doing horrendous criminal activity, but the Left still wants open borders. They want these horrible people in the country for no reason other than so that they may vote Democrat.
The Left wants to pass gun law after gun law that makes it nearly impossible for good people who want to protect themselves to legally procure a gun. Such laws would, logically, increase crime rates. Yet, that doesn’t matter to them. They don’t care.
And that’s what makes them dangerous. They just don’t care about the safety and well-being of people. They don’t care about the lives of people. And you really have to have something seriously wrong in your head to have such little to no care for your fellow Man.
It’s a combination of an evil and sinful heart and such a psychologically unsound mind that drives people to do bad things. Take, for example, Ted Bundy and Adolf Hitler. Both were inarguably evil and messed up in the head. But one of them killed multiple women throughout the 70’s and the other killed millions and millions of people, mostly Jews.
Both were despicable human beings, but we don’t consider them to be on the same level. Taking aside the number of people they’ve killed, they were very different types of evil and insane.
One was what I would call a “chaotic evil” and the other was what I would call a “lawful evil.”
Don’t misunderstand, one is not better than the other. But they are different. Bundy was an all-out psychopath while Hitler was a bit more objective with his evil. Bundy didn’t seem to have an objective in mind. He just raped and killed his victims. That’s not to say he wasn’t tactical about it. He certainly was, that’s how he avoided law enforcement for such a long time. But what he didn’t have was an objective.
I won’t claim to know how Bundy’s mind worked, but I could say that he did those things mostly because he wanted to or wanted to see if he could do it.
Hitler’s evil was more objective. He didn’t just randomly want to kill tons of people. No, he killed the people that he deemed undesirable or unworthy of life. Starting out with 'imbeciles' (actual term of the time for describing people with special needs) and moving on to Jewish people, Gypsies and just about anyone who would be a retardation of Hitler’s desire for a superior and optimal race of human beings.
He rose through the ranks of politics and created his own National Socialist party that would rule Germany and much of Europe throughout WWII.
But why do I talk about them? Because in both cases, there was a link between an evil and sinful heart and an unsound mind. Bundy may have shown more psychopathic tendencies, but there’s no denying they were both severely evil and messed up in the head.
You have to be to believe murder is not just a welcomed option but also a primary and sought-after option.
It’s those evil and sinful hearts and unsound minds that we often see displayed by the Left. They may not quite be at the level of seeking murder and genocide, but the signs are there. The similarities are right there for people to see.
So, to answer my own questions: Yes, the Left is a bunch of serial liars and they are definitely mentally ill. Not necessarily to the level of Ted Bundy or other serial killers, but worryingly close to Hitler’s mental state.
“But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you…”
Author: Freddie Drake
Freddie Marinelli and Danielle Cross will bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...