It is quite ironic that Hollywood Leftists would rail people for wanting to own firearms and yet will gleefully feature said firearms in their own movies, getting to play around with them as much as they want. It is this irony that brings the sad truth that, were Hollywood Leftists like Alec Baldwin at all knowledgeable of standard gun safety, two people would not have been shot on the set of the Western “Rust” last week, with one of them being fatally wounded.
 
Given the fake news media is full of fake news, there are many contradicting accounts and stories about it, usually to try and clear Baldwin of any blame whatsoever. But here is (roughly) what we know about the event so far:
 

1. Alec Baldwin was the lead producer of the film and was the most veteran person there. This gives him the most amount of responsibility for the safety of the production. He is the most knowledgeable person on set, is the main boss in the set, and he is the one who makes personnel decisions i.e. who gets hired to what position.                                                                                                                                               
2. There were prior discharge of gun incidents even BEFORE the one that claimed a life and threatened to take another. This led to many members of the crew resigning, citing safety concerns. That the production was allowed to continue as if nothing had happened is extremely negligent, at absolute best. And the one who makes the decision to continue is the producer.                                                                    
3. In order to save money, the producers (i.e. Baldwin) combined the job of the armorer with that of the props. Usually, those are separate jobs, as the primary job of the armorer is to ensure safety on the set whenever guns are involved, real or fake. In this case, the armorer failed to clear the gun, as is required of the job, to ensure that the only thing that was in it were blanks, if anything at all.                          
4. Baldwin, upon being handed a live firearm, failed to clear the gun himself after the armorer failed to clear it. Being a) the person being handed the gun, b) the producer and c) the most experienced person there, Baldwin should have cleared the gun himself and chewed out the armorer for having failed to do so herself.                                                                                                                                                
5. The incident happened during a rehearsal, not during filming. This is particularly egregious because there is absolutely NO reason to be handed even a prop gun, let alone a real gun, in such a scenario. A rubber gun, a stick or just making a finger gun would be sufficient for a rehearsal. I know that they likely assumed the real gun was just a prop anyway, but there is no need to take your chances regardless, low to nil as you would think the chances were that it’s a live firearm.                                                                                                                                                
6. The damn idiot POINTED THE GUN AT PEOPLE. This is basic standard gun safety and pretty much the golden rule of firearms: don’t point the gun at anyone you don’t intend to shoot. You treat every gun, real or fake, loaded or unloaded, as though it is capable of killing another person upon firing. Even if you take an actual gun, clear it yourself and make sure it’s absolutely unloaded, you still treat it as though it’s loaded. This is something the anti-gun moron should have known even while being anti-gun.

 
 
There is also a report that Baldwin went on an anti-Trump rant while waving the gun, but that hasn’t been confirmed and is largely irrelevant to the story, even if true.
 
Two people were responsible for what happened last week: The armorer, for failing to do her most basic job and assuming she was just handing a cold gun (movie jargon for “safe”) to Baldwin, and Baldwin himself for the numerous reasons I just gave. But the most responsible one here is Baldwin, of course.
 
Again, he was not only the lead producer, but also the most experienced person there. The safety of himself and the crew rested on his shoulders and he routinely failed them, given there were multiple firing incidents prior to the one that took a young woman’s life.
 
He cut costs and combined two jobs which should not be combined, he failed to be responsible for clearing the gun after the person HE HIRED to ensure gun safety failed to do so as well, he failed to follow proper procedure to use either a rubber gun or something that is guaranteed to NOT kill anyone during rehearsal, and he failed to follow the most basic gun safety rule by aiming a gun at someone even if he thought it wasn’t loaded.
 
Absolute best case scenario for Baldwin here is that he is found to have been criminally negligent and slapped with such a charge, but more realistically, he might be charged with involuntary manslaughter, given the prior gun discharges on set and New Mexico’s laws regarding such a crime.
 
There are those who think we should feel bad for Baldwin here. I don’t. I feel bad for the woman he killed, seeing as she was in her early 40s and was a wife and a mother. I feel bad for the director who was also wounded by Baldwin because he had to go through that. But I don’t feel bad for Baldwin.
 
Obviously, I don’t think he meant to hurt, let alone kill, anyone here. But I have no obligation to feel bad for a guy who would make fun of a political opponent if they had done what he did. How do I know that he would make fun of such a person? Because he did.
 
Back in 2006, then-Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot his friend during a hunting trip (nonfatally). Baldwin wrote an entire HuffPost article in which he called Cheney a terrorist, who “terrorizes our enemies abroad and innocent citizens here at home indiscriminately. Who ever thought Harry Whittington (Cheney’s friend) would be the answers to America’s prayers? Finally, someone who might get that lying, thieving Cheney into a courtroom to answer some direct questions.”
 
He also made a joke about Cheney shooting Scooter Libby: “Cheney’s the guy who told Libby to out Valerie Plame. The rumor I heard is that someone yelled, ‘Look out! Shooter!’ and Cheney thought he said Scooter and fired in that general direction.”
 
Following that, he offered a non-apology to Cheney: “How about something more measured, then? How about… a lying, thieving oil whore. Or, a murderer of the U.S. Constitution?”
 
Now, I don’t like Cheney at all either. But Baldwin consider(ed) Cheney to be a political opponent and had no mercy or decency when Cheney accidentally shot his friend. So why should he receive any mercy or decency for accidentally shooting two people and killing one of them? Why should we be at all sympathetic to him and consider him a VICTIM in this circumstance when it was his own ignorant negligence regarding any semblance of gun safety that claimed the life of one and could have claimed the life of another?
 
I feel bad for the woman he killed and the man he almost killed. But I feel nothing for Baldwin at all. He deserves to face the criminal consequences of his actions. He’s a killer, even if he didn’t want to be one. And I have no intention of being nice to him when he had no mercy for his own political opponent of the time.
 
Of course, I do hope he comes to learn from all of this and the possible consequences of his ignorance and negligence and thus comes to understand the importance of gun safety. I will always root for my enemies learning from their evil ways and coming to the light. I hate God’s enemies, but my enemies might not necessarily be God’s enemies. If Baldwin comes to the Lord following this, I will be very happy and shout God’s praise, and I do hope Baldwin does come to the Lord. But he is not owed mercy or grace, either for this or anything else.
 
I will particularly not be merciful if he refuses to come to God. Let him receive the punishment that is due him.
 
Isaiah 30:18
“Therefore the Lord waits to be gracious to you, and therefore he exalts himself to show mercy to you. For the Lord is a God of justice; blessed are all those who wait for him.” 

We all know that, at bare minimum, Anthony Fauci has been a flip-flopper and a serial liar, willingly misinforming the public regarding the Chinese coronavirus, its origins, and the effectiveness/safety of the vaccines. This is the best-case scenario regarding Fauci, but information recently coming to light paint a far grimmer picture of the guy.
 
Back in August, The Gateway Pundit broke the story that Fauci funded a study in Tunisia “where beagle dogs were eaten alive by parasite-infested flies.” Oh, and this was TAXPAYER FUNDED, so YOUR money went to the torture and cruel experimentation on dogs (not that that’s the worst use of taxpayer money I have seen, considering it’s used to fund abortion as well).
 
However, there are new developments surrounding just what other experiments Fauci and his NIH have funded.
 
Before I tell you what they are, let’s do an exercise I call “Nazis or NIH?” I will tell you of an experiment that was either conducted by the Nazis or the NIH and you will guess which organization performed them.
 
The purpose of this should be rather obvious: there is little moral difference between the two.
 
Without further ado, let’s begin.
 
First: This organization was involved with an experiment where the study’s researchers would cripple monkeys with toxic brain injections through devices implanted into the apes’ skulls. The research included (WARNING, IF YOU ARE UNCOMFORTABLE READING THE DETAILS, SKIP THIS PART):
 
Locking the monkeys alone in small cages, drilling holes into their skulls, implanting head restraining devices, implanting electrodes into the monkey’s brains, and finally, injecting toxins that destroy their brains, causing them to lose control of their limbs, mouths and other body parts.
 
(YOU CAN CONTINUE READING FROM THIS POINT)
 
So which is it? Nazi or NIH? There are some clues to tell you, but it’s the NIH. To the NIH’s credit, had this been the Nazis, they would have used humans as opposed to monkeys, but the experimentation is still messed up and I don’t see the purpose whatsoever to this study. Was it to test whatever was injected into the monkeys’ skulls to see what would happen? What a surprise, something bad happened to them.
 
Second: This organization tested immunization compounds and serums for the prevention and treatment of various contagious diseases, such as malaria, typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, yellow fever, hepatitis and epidemic jaundice.
 
I will give you some time to think about this one because, scarily enough, one could picture both organizations doing this kind of thing, particularly with me leaving out key information which would tell you immediately which one did this.
 
Okay, the answer is that this was the Nazis. They did this at various concentration camps.
 
Last one: This organization experimented on orphans with terminal diseases in order to perform drug trials on them, with a total of 201 children dying out of 532.
 
There is one thing here which ought to tell you the answer, and I bet you really wish this had been the Nazis.
 
According to TGP, Fauci’s NIH was caught funding experiments on hundreds of children with AIDS in a New York City hospital back in 2004.
 
“In 2005, the city of New York hired the VERA Institute to form a final report on the drug trials. VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008. They reported that twenty-five children died during the drug studies, that an additional fifty-five children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29% of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used).”
 
You know, I was originally going to compare Fauci to Joseph Mengele, the Nazi’s “Angel of Death” who would perform experiments on people, mainly twins, at Auschwitz, but then I realized that that would be a bit too mean to Mengele. At least he only did experiments at one concentration camp and they were largely focused on a single subject matter. A more fitting comparison for Fauci would be if Hitler had had a medical degree and was entirely focused on his egregious experiments as opposed to running Germany and trying to dominate the world.
 
Fauci is Hitler with a medical degree. That is perhaps the most accurate thing I can say about the guy right now. And this is WITHOUT counting the gain-of-function research at Wuhan and everything he has done regarding the Chinese coronavirus and the vaccines.
 
Counting those things makes him even worse and brings him closer to the comparison to Hitler with an MD. But even discounting all that, what the NIH has done (THAT WE KNOW OF) in these experiments can only be compared to the inhumane experimentation of the Nazis throughout their 12-year Thousand Year Reich.
 
The Nazis performed multiple other experiments, including: Experiments on twins (like I mentioned), experiments on bone, muscle and nerve transplantation and regeneration, experiments on head injuries, experiments on hypothermia and freezing temperatures, experiments with mustard gas, experiments with Sulfonamide drugs, experiments on the potability of sea water, experiments with sterilization and fertility, experiments with outright poison, experiments with incendiary bombs, experiments regarding high altitudes, experiments on blood coagulation, and electroshock experiments.
 
What is perhaps most frightening is that I could see the NIH performing most of these experiments themselves. Perhaps not the mustard gas ones, the Sulfonamide drug, the potability of sea water, incendiary bombs and high altitudes, but the others are plausible, at least with varying degrees.
 
We KNOW that they are experimenting with sterilization, for example, given that is one of the effects of the vaccine.
 
But given what we already know the NIH has done, I think a comparison to the Nazis’ inhumane experiments is warranted. They might not be quite that depraved (as far as we know), but excusing or forgiving these relatively mild experiments (mild compared to the Nazis) would invite pushing the boundaries more and more.
 
They want to know just what they can get away with before being subjected to a second Nuremberg Trial, which we all know will come sooner or later.
 
I often talk about the evil of the Left or the Washington Establishment or the elite ruling class (but I repeat myself), however, it’s not often that I talk about the evil of the medical industry. And there is PLENTY to talk about regarding that subject.
 
This shows just how evil they are willing to be now, and the history of the Nazi experiments shows us just how evil they could potentially be in the future.
 
There are those who call for Fauci’s firing. I call for his execution. His and everyone who was involved with these inhumane experiments, either physically or financially. And before you say anything, yes, I know these were taxpayer funded, sadly. But it’s the NIH which was responsible for how that money was used. THEY are the ones who ought to pay the price for their evil. So make no mistake about that.
 
Fire Fauci, try him, prosecute him and execute him. Preferably with either parasitic flies, whatever was injected into those monkeys, or injecting him with the vaccine the number of times he thinks other people ought to receive it.
 
Maybe then we would begin to approach justice.
 
Exodus 21:23-25:
“But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.”

You know the Left is egregiously tyrannical when even Vladimir Putin thinks it proper to compare the woke “progress” they are attempting to do with what the Soviets did during the 1917 revolution and after.
 
For context, on Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin (whom I’ll remind all of you used to be in THE USSR’S KGB!) gave a speech during a plenary session of the 18th annual meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club in Sochi, where the topic of discussion was “Global Shake-up in the 21st Century.”
 
In this speech, Putin said the following (keep in mind this was translated from Russian, so it might sound grammatically off at times): “We see with bemusement the paralysis unfolding in countries that have grown accustomed to viewing themselves as the flagships of progress. Of course, it’s none of our business or what is happening, the social and cultural shocks that are happening in some countries in the Western countries, some believe that aggressive blotting out of whole pages of your own history, the affirmative action in the interest of minorities, and the requirement to renounce the traditional interpretation of such basic values as mother, father, family, and the distinction between sexes are a milestone… a renewal of society.”
 
He alluded to the fact that while Western nations have a right to do whatever they wanted to do, “the overwhelming majority of Russian society” rejected this wokeness altogether.
 
“The preparedness of the so called social progress believe that the bringing a new conscience, a new consciousness to humanity, something that is more correct. But there is one thing I would like to say: The recipes they come up with are nothing new. Paradoxical as it may seem, but this is something we saw in Russia. It happened in our country before after the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks followed the dogmas of Marx and Engels. And they also declared that they would go in to change the traditional lifestyle, the political, the economic lifestyle, as well as the very notion of morality, the basic principles for a healthy society. They were trying to destroy age and century long values, revisiting the relationship between the people, they were encouraging informing on one’s own beloved and families. It was hailed as the march of progress. And it was very popular across the world and it was supported by many, as we see, it is happening right now.”

“Incidentally,” he continued, “the Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of other opinions, different from their own. I think this should remind you of something that is happening. And we see what is happening in the Western countries, it is with puzzlement that we see the practices Russia used to have and that we left behind in distant path, the fight for equality and against discrimination turns into an aggressive dogmatism on the brink of absurdity, when great authors of the past as Shakespeare are no longer taught in schools and universities because they announced as backwards classics that did not understand the importance of gender or race.”
 
“In Hollywood there are leaflets reminding what you should do in the cinema, in the films, how many personalities and actors you’ve got, what kind of color, what sex, and sometimes it’s even tighter and stricter than what the Department of Propaganda of the Soviet Communist Party Central Committee did,” continued the surprisingly based Russian president. “And the fight against racism, which is a lofty goal, turns into a new culture, cancel culture, and into reverse discrimination, racism on the obverse. And it brings people apart, whereas the true fighters for civic rights, they were trying to eliminate those differences. I asked my colleagues to find this quote from Martin Luther King, and he said, ‘I have a dream, that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.’ That is a true value.”
 
“You know, the Bolsheviks were speaking about nationalizing not just the property, but also women. The proponents of new approaches go so far as they want to eliminate the whole notions of men and women, and those who dare say that men and women exist and this is a biological fact, they are all but banished. Parent number one, parent number two, or the parent that has given birth, or instead of breastmilk, you say human milk. And you say all of that, so the people who are not sure of their sexual agenda are not unhappy.”
 
“And I would like to say that this is not something new, and the 20s and the 1920s, the Soviet couture Tagore came up with the so called ‘Newspeak,’ and they thought that thereby they were building a new consciousness and coming up with new values, and they went so far that we feel the consequences up until now,” concluded Putin. “There are some monstrous things when from a very young age, you teach to children that the boy can easily become a girl and you impose on them this selection, this choice. You push the parents aside and make the child take this decisions that can destroy their lives. And if we call the spade a spade this is nigh to crime against humanity and all of that under the banner of progress, while some people just want to do that.”
 
I will remind you once again that this man used to WORK for the Soviet Union’s KGB, and in many ways runs Russia as though it was still the USSR. And yet, he understands just what the American Left is bringing to the table by trying to be “woke” and “progressive.”
 
Now, I’m not so naïve as to think he was saying all this to warn the West that what is happening is extremely reminiscent of the Soviet Revolutionary tactics of the early 20th century. He even started that speech by noting the bemusement they had in seeing what is happening. He made this speech not to warn the West, but to warn Russia against following the West’s woke direction of regressive “progress.”
 
The Russian people reject, as well they should, this idiotic “woke” thinking which is nothing new whatsoever, but Putin understands that positive sentiment for it is popular in the West and it could infect the Russian Federation. While, again, Putin runs Russia as it was the Soviet Union, both he and the Russian people at large have at least SOME amount of basic and traditional human values. They reject the militant gay agenda, the idea that the white race is naturally oppressive (probably because over 90% of the Russian population is white), and the idea that a man can be a woman or vice versa.
 
These are all tropes of the modern day Left in the Western world (even the Chinese communists aren’t fond of homosexuality, given that the CCP banned “sissy” men from being seen on television) but whose Godless values could spread to other countries with relative ease.
 
Putin wants to protect Russia from such heinous values because, as he said, such values destroy society. But despite the fact that he was clearly just trying to warn Russia, it does inadvertently serve as a warning to the West, which is currently undergoing such an asinine cultural revolution.
 
What the Left is doing and is trying to do is destroy not only the United States, but also the Western world in general. The foot-soldiers have a misguided idea that the West is responsible for the world’s woes such as slavery (as though this wasn’t a thing in Egypt thousands of years ago), racism (again, as though it wasn’t a thing elsewhere), genocide and imperialism (redundant to say it again), etc. Those at the top, to one extent or another, know it’s all bullcrap but gain tremendously from Western culture being battered and divided in such a way.
 
Take, for example, the Black Lives Matter (not the organization, but the belief/slogan) vs. All Lives Matter debate. This is a debate which, for the most part, I do not care to take part in any longer because I’ve come to the realization that most people, certainly the reasonable ones, are arguing over something that they agree on.
 
This is what I mean: Those who chant “Black Lives Matter”, at least the reasonable ones, don’t generally exclude other lives. While the slogan and chant seem exclusionary, no reasonable person who says that chant will also go on to say “I mean ONLY Black Lives Matter.” They believe that other people’s lives matter apart from black people’s, again, at least the reasonable ones. There are unreasonable people who say “no lives matter until Black Lives Matter”, which is preposterous and outright evil, and THAT is most certainly exclusionary and emphasizes that only black lives matter. But for the most part, I think that the foot-soldiers who side with “Black Lives Matter” don’t exclude other races.
 
As a result, they inadvertently admit that all lives matter. On the flipside, those who say “All Lives Matter” believe that, naturally, black lives are included. No reasonable person who says “All Lives Matter” will say “but not the black ones.” Frankly, I haven’t heard anyone on that side of the debate make such an assertion.
 
So what you have is one side, Black Lives Matter, believing that black lives matter and so do other people’s, and you have another side, All Lives Matter, believing that black lives matter and so do other people’s. THEY ARE ARGUING OVER SOMETHING THEY AGREE ON!
 
And this is what the elites and the establishment are gunning for: the division of the people so that we focus our efforts on each other as opposed to them. Somehow, the elite class has managed to make people argue over something that both “sides” agree on. Sure, like I said, there are those who are lunatics and exclusionary, but those are few and far between; the exception. Most people believe that all lives matter, even if they chant “Black Lives Matter.” So all we’re doing by engaging in this debate is wasting time and energy going at each other’s throats, when it’s the elite class which is pulling the strings in all this and causing such division and chaos.
 
This is what they do with pretty much everything. They do it with climate change, they do it with sexuality and the sexes in general, they do it with shootings, with terrorist attacks, and do it with homosexuality, all in the name of “progress”. They sow discord and chaos and division. This is what the Soviets did in the early 20th century, as Putin full-well understands, ironically.
 
The reason I say all this isn’t to try and back away from a debate, but to try and redirect it. It’s because I try to differentiate between the weak (those who say “BLM” but believe ALM) and the wicked (those who either say “no lives matter until BLM” or who attempt to further sow discord), knowing that at least the weak can be convinced to join our side. It’s hard to convince the weak that they are wrong when we treat them as wicked and just as culpable of the division and chaos as the elite ruling class.
 
The modern Left, the establishment elites, must not only be defeated but utterly DESTROYED AND CRUSHED everywhere, in basically every manner. Else, only the dissolution of society, Western and Eastern, will await us. Take heart, then, that God is with us and not with them.
 
Isaiah 54:17
“No weapon that is fashioned against you shall succeed, and you shall confute every tongue that rises against you in judgment. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord and their vindication from me, declares the Lord.”

There are many truths in this world that the Left simply refuses to accept and will often make propaganda claiming the exact opposite to be the case. One such truth is that men, on average, are physically superior to women and thus, when engaged in some sort of athletic event, the men will always have some sort of advantage and will almost always win. This is not always the case, of course, but more often than not, men will win in athletic competitions against women.
 
And this is what happened on Monday, when for the third straight time, Canada’s women’s hockey team, while preparing for the 2022 Winter Olympics, lost to a men’s junior A hockey team.
 
And it wasn’t particularly close. The team, the Drumheller Dragons, beat the women’s team in a shut-out, with the final score being 8-0.
 
Now, it’s really hard to score goals in hockey, so I won’t be too harsh on the women’s team for not being able to score a goal. On the flip-side, I will be harsh for the fact that they allowed eight scores against them as, again, it’s really hard to score goals in hockey.
 
According to CBC, “Adam Raesler scored a hat trick for the Alberta Junior Hockey League side, while Luke Fennig added a pair of goals. Ty Daneault, Grayson Dietrich and Ty Whitford all scored singles for the men’s junior A club.”
 
For those who might not know hockey terminology, a hat trick is when a single player scores three times in a single game. This is important because, like I said, it’s really hard to score goals in hockey, so to do so three times in a single game as an individual is relatively rare. A lot of games go unscored and many others will have relatively low scores.
 
CBC continued: “Canada’s Kristen Campbell stopped 19 of 22 shots in two periods of work and Emerance Maschmeyer six saves in relief. Eric Ward saved all five shots he faced in 29 minutes of play for the Dragons and Garrett Fuller finished out the game, making six stops.”
 
While stopping 19 of 22 shots might sound impressive, it shows just how many attempts at the goal the women’s team allowed the men to have. Combined, the two female goalies stopped 25 shots, allowing 8 goals, and the men stopped 11 shots and kept the women from scoring at all. This demonstrates how much more dominant the men’s team was than the women’s team.
 
And this is far from the first time that a woman or a women’s team have lost to a man/men’s team. For example, the U.S. women’s soccer team lost to FC Dallas back in 2017 5-2. FC Dallas is a soccer team for boys under 15-years-old. Now, sure, one can make the argument that the women’s team wasn’t really trying, which would be a fair argument. But we’re not done with the examples.
 
This is one which I have used many times in the past: the time when Serena and Venus Williams lost to a man outside the top-200.
 
To recount the story for those who might not remember the details, back in 1998, when the two women were at the top of the women’s tennis world, they boasted to the men’s ATP office that they could beat any player around the top 200. It’s likely that they understood, at least back then, that they stood no chance against the very best male tennis players, but believed they could beat those who were good but not particularly great.
 
German player Karsten Braasch, who was ranked 203rd at the time, seemingly overheard the sisters making such a claim and stepped up to challenge both competitors back-to-back.
 
According to USA Today, “Braasch would smoke cigarettes and sip beer during the changeovers, and to be honest no longer looked the part of a fit professional athlete.” Despite this, however, he went on to beat Serena 6-1 and Venus 6-2 in a single-set match.
 
In other articles, I have mentioned that Braasch boasted that he played like someone outside the top 500, and while it’s difficult to assert the accuracy of such a statement, the fact that he smoked cigarettes, sipped beer and no longer looked like a fit professional athlete lends credence to such a statement. The guy was very, very clearly not trying against the top female tennis players of the time, when both Serena and Venus were at their physical PRIMES.
 
Not to mention that, since Serena and Venus were the ones who were boasting about who they could beat in the first place, it’s entirely likely that the two of them WERE trying to win, so the excuse that “they weren’t trying, it was just for fun” is far less believable here.
 
It’s probably because of those particular matches against the Williams sisters that notable rage monster John McEnroe made the statement in an interview that while Serena was the best female tennis player in the world, “if she played the men’s circuit, she’d be like 700 in the world.”
 
He made this statement back in 2017, and of course, hysterical Leftists criticized McEnroe for such a statement, and even Serena Williams tweeted: “Please please keep me out of your statements that are not factually based… Respect me and my privacy.”
 
While we can’t know for sure that Serena Williams would be only 700 in the men’s circuit, what is a fact is that she would not be considered the best tennis player in the world (like the woman interviewing McEnroe was asserting) because she lost to a man outside the top 200 who likely actually did play like someone outside the top 500, back when she was in her physical prime and was likely really trying to win the match. So people got mad at McEnroe, not because he said something untrue, but because he said something which was likely certain and people didn’t like it.
 
People get ticked off when you remind them of the reality that men, on average, are physically superior to women, and when a man and a woman (or men and women) are competing physically, the men will usually come out victorious.
 
Does this mean I, an unathletic man who hasn’t played tennis in years, could beat Serena Williams in a single-set match? Almost certainly no. But I do have a physical advantage anyway (in part because I am much younger), so there is some amount of chance I could win, slim as it might be.
 
But all things being equal, having a male athlete compete against a female athlete in the same sport, almost all the time, the man will win. It’s why having transgender “women” compete against actual women is unfair and disgusting. Those men calling themselves women have a physical advantage over the actual women they are competing against. This is such an obvious reality that even South Park parodied it, when they had a man who looked and sounded a lot like “Macho Man” Randy Savage (for obvious reasons) compete against women in a “Strong Woman” competition and beat all of them with extreme ease.
 
When even the writers of South Park have more logical sense than Leftists, you know Leftists are particular lunatics.
 
Men are stronger than women. That is a fact that has been known since the dawn of time. Whining about it and making false claims to counter it does not make it untrue.
 
Ephesians 6:14
“Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness.”

The single biggest debate over this past year has been about the Chinese coronavirus vaccine and whether or not it is safe and effective. Over the course of multiple articles, I have shown that it is neither of those things (and this article will only further show that), and the recent death of Colin Powell (using his title as “General” would give him respect that he doesn’t deserve) ought to prove just how ineffective these vaccines are, at the very least.
 
On Monday, the family of the Deep State rat announced that Powell had died “due to complications from Covid 19.” The family stated on Facebook, “General Colin L. Powell, former U.S. Secretary of State and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff passed away this morning due to complications from Covid 19. He was fully vaccinated. We want to thank the medical staff at Walter Reed National Medical Center for their caring treatment. We have lost a remarkable and loving husband, father, grandfather, and a great American.”
 
I don’t know about the first three things, but he definitely wasn’t the last one.
 
At any rate, the fact that the guy was fully vaccinated and still died of the Chinese coronavirus (according to the family, at least, who knows if that actually was the cause?) ought to be a huge indication of how the vaccines aren’t nearly as efficacious as fraudsters like Fauci claim that it is.
 
Speaking of whom, there is a great video (unfortunately on Twitter, but what can you do?) going viral showing Anthony Fauci repeatedly talking about the “efficacy” of the vaccine, with a number of articles which show studies surrounding the efficacy of the vaccine.
 
Article after article claiming that the vaccines are “highly effective” alongside claims of “low chance of adverse reactions” or some other claim. Well, that’s what the articles say at first. One article’s headline, in the beginning, reads: “AstraZeneca COVID vaccine is 100% Effective at Preventing Severe Disease.”
 
Another: “Novavax Vaccine 100% Effective Against Both Moderate and Severe COVID-19.”
 
Another one: “Moderna says its Covid vaccine is 100% effective in teens, plans to seek FDA OK in early June.”
 
And another one: “The Pfizer Vaccine Is 100 Percent Effective for People This Age, Study Says.” And above that article there is a little tag that says it’s “fact-checked.” Not sure by whom, but most likely by liars.
 
At any rate, the video shows article after article claiming the vaccine’s effectiveness being 100%. Interestingly, that being the case for all of the vaccines. But then, a slight decline.
 
“Real-world vaccine study shows 99% effective rate.”
 
“Israeli Health Minister: Pfizer vaccine close to 99 percent effective.”
 
Ok, not necessarily great, but a decline of 1% is nothing. 99% is great!
 
“Pfizer coronavirus vaccine is 98% effective – expert.”
 
Alright, 2%. So what?
 
“Pfizer vaccine 97% effective against symptomatic COVID-19, study shows.”
 
3%? Call me when it’s something real.
 
“Pfizer vaccine 96.7% effective at preventing COVID deaths, Israeli data shows.”
 
Ha! This time, it only dropped by 0.3%! I told you it was nothing to worry about.
 
“Moderna vaccine is more effective against COVID-19 infection at 96% compared to Pfizer shot at 89%, another study finds.”
 
Okay, a bit more troubling regarding Pfizer, but Moderna’s is still very high at 96%. Worrying, but not a big deal.
 
“One Covid vaccine jab 96.6% effective in averting deaths, to 97.5%.”
 
Ah, you see? It’s starting to go back up, slightly. No real need to worry whatsoever.
 
“Updated Pfizer Data Shows Vaccine Is 95% Effective.”
 
Might be lower than usual, but it’s higher than that 89% the other article claimed. Still going up! To the moon!
 
“The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are 94 percent effective at preventing hospitalization in older adults, a study finds.”
 
A slight set-back, it will go back up in no time.
 
“Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine Still 93% Effective After 6 Months, Company Says.”
 
“Vaccine 92% effective against Delta variant: AstraZeneca.”
 
“CDC Reports Two Vaccines 91% Effective.”
 
Okay, what?
 
“CDC: Pfizer, Moderna vaccines are 90% effective in real-world conditions.”
 
Wait.
 
“Novavax Covid vaccine is 89% effective and could be approved in UK in weeks.”
 
Hold on.
 
“Study: Pfizer vaccine 88 percent effective against delta variant.”
 
“Getting both COVID-19 vaccine shots has 87% efficacy: Japanese university study.”
 
“Pfizer COVID vaccine 86% effective after third shot – Maccabi.”
 
STOP!
 
For the sake of this article’s brevity and not running a joke into the ground, I will stop quoting every single article which shows a slight drop in efficacy for the vaccine. But more and more articles came out showing smaller and smaller numbers for the efficacy of the vaccine. In the 80’s, 70’s, 60’s, on and on it went. I will only quote one more article’s headline just to show what the lowest number seems to be so far.
 
The vaccine went from being “100% effective” to this: “Pfizer Covid vaccine efficacy against infection plunges to just 20% after six months – but protection against severe illness barely dips, study concludes.”
 
From 100% efficacy to a pathetic 20%. After that, the articles all talk about people “needing booster shots” because, though they would never admit it, the vaccines ARE NOT EFFECTIVE ON THEIR OWN!
 
And after the articles on the booster shots, there are articles about countries outright halting or banning certain vaccines, such as the U.S. halting Johnson & Johnson vaccine shipments, Hong Kong halting the Pfizer vaccine, India halting AstraZeneca, Sweden halting Moderna, Japan also halting Moderna, UK halting AstraZeneca, Sweden and Denmark halting Moderna particularly for young people, South Africa halting what seems to be all vaccines, etc.
 
And at the very end, the video shows article after article depicting just for who the vaccines are highly-effective: the CEO’s and founders of the Big Pharma industries which created the vaccines. One article even claimed that Moderna posted profits for the first time, likely since it was founded. The vaccines made billionaires out of Big Pharma CEO’s and other executives.
 
The very last article’s headline is quite the stunner: “Stunning Study Reveals How Ineffective Pfizer Vaccine Actually Is,” with the following even more stunning sub-head: “Biden official: ‘If that’s not a wakeup call, I don’t know what is.’”
 
And as a last good measure, there is, of course, my own headline: “Colin Powell Dies Of China Virus, Despite Being ‘Fully Vaccinated’”.
 
Colin Powell was a Leftist, a Deep Stater and a rat. As a result, he fully believed the bullcrap the “scientists” and the fake news media were selling regarding the vaccine, apparently. Frankly, I was under the impression that these people knew better than to use the drugs they were selling, but I guess some of them did anyway.
 
Powell was fully vaccinated and died of the Chinese coronavirus. Whether that’s actually the case, I don’t know, but that’s the official story. So how does one who believes that the vaccine is effective and protects you from the virus reconcile the fact that Powell was “fully vaccinated” and still died of the virus?
 
The typical Leftist hardly has to do that, since doing mental gymnastics is second nature to them, but what about other people who aren’t necessarily uber-Leftist? How about people who were simply deceived by the fake news? And it’s not like Powell is the only person who was “fully vaccinated” and still died of the China virus. He’s just the most well-known so far. Many, many families have gone through something similar, having lost a loved one due to the virus, despite them having been fully vaccinated. Or, alternatively, losing a loved one to the vaccine because the adverse effects aren’t reported by the agenda-driven fake news media.
 
Now, Powell’s family is one such family. I don’t feel sorry for them, to be frank. Guy was garbage. But this and all the other cases ought to drive more and more people to stand against the vaccine, because at the very least, it’s not nearly as effective as people have been led to believe. Whether they come to believe the vaccines are outright killing people (they are) or not is another matter entirely. But the efficacy of the vaccines is being heavily questioned and this should further that along. At the very least, if the vaccine isn’t outright killing people (again, it is), it’s not protecting people as advertised.
 
If nothing else, that ought to be what drives more people to reject and oppose the vaccine, whether or not they have already taken it and whether or not they previously had misplaced faith in it.
 
2 Corinthians 2:11
“So that we would not be outwitted by Satan; for we are not ignorant of his designs.”

Before I begin with explaining the idiotic reason that Leftists believe Halloween to be racist, allow me to preface this entire article by claiming that, out of all of the things that the Left generally cancels, I actually don’t mind this one too much.
 
Again, it’s still an idiotic reason, but ironically goes into a direction which I sort of approve of or like, at least in some ways.
 
I will further explain my reasoning after I give you the context for this article.
 
You see, a Seattle school has chosen to cancel a Halloween themed parade because it, according to school administrators, “marginalizes people of color.”
 
It’s not a reason any of us didn’t expect, given how utterly moronic many of these people are, and given how white savior-ish these white liberals think they have to be, supposedly for the benefit of minorities like myself. However, regardless of our expectations for such a “reason”, it’s still a darn stupid one. Further detail about just WHY it “marginalizes people of color” is hardly even present later on.
 
A spokesperson for the school told Jason Rantz, Seattle-based conservative radio host, that “historically, the Pumpkin Parade marginalizes students of color who do not celebrate the holiday. Specifically, these students have requested to be isolated on campus while the event took place.”
 
The spokesperson added: “In alliance with SPS’s unwavering commitment to students of color, specifically African American males, the staff is committed to supplanting the Pumpkin Parade with more inclusive and educational opportunities during the school day.”
 
Well, first of all, I seriously doubt that a vast majority of the students are in any way bothered by the parade, which I will talk about more later. So in essence, the school is canceling a parade for the whole school because a few (if even that many) students felt “marginalized.” Right, because people knowing that you canceled a fun school activity definitely isn’t something that would make you even more marginalized. Kids love snitches and buzz-kills, after all!
 
I should also probably explain that this was in an elementary school, and kids can be quite mean, even at this point.
 
The second thing I want to talk about is why the spokesperson felt the need to say “specifically African American males.” What, are African American females not as important? Are kids of other races apart from African American not as important? It seems particularly odd how one race and one gender is specified when talking about “commitment to students of color.”
 
At any rate, in lieu of the Pumpkin Parade, students at the school can opt to participate in what the school described as “autumnal work” (whatever that means), “thematic units of study about the fall,” (because kids surely want to study the season above having fun) and might also look at “sharing all the cozy feelings of the season.” All definitely seem like fun alternatives to dressing up in costumes at school, a once-a-year event. Congrats, kids who complained, I’m sure you won’t be given swirlies for this.
 
The school also further explained their ridiculous reasoning behind canceling this parade in a newsletter to the parents, which was obtained by Rantz. The newsletter read: “Halloween events create a situation where some students must be excluded for their beliefs, financial status, or life experience. Costume parties often become an uncomfortable event for many children, and they distract students and staff from learning.”
 
It continues, but allow me to pause here for a moment.
 
With regards to the first item, that being that some students feel like they are excluded because of their beliefs, I can actually understand that one, but it does bring up a problem which I will get to momentarily. As I alluded to earlier in the article, I am not a particular fan of Halloween and don’t really mind its cancelation outright. I believe it’s not a “holiday” because a holiday, by strict definition, means a “holy day.” In this day and age, it’s come to mean just a special day in general that basically everyone in the country either celebrates (like Christmas, an actual holiday) or take time off of school/work for (like Columbus day, which is a special occasion because of its significance, sure, but not a holy day), etc.
 
Halloween is a celebration of evil, darkness, and of the macabre (I mean, just look at the picture above, for crying out loud). It’s celebrating literally everything that is opposed to God. And while I know that All Hallow’s Eve and Day began as Christian holidays for the remembrance of the dead, namely saints, martyrs and faithful departed (and I have my concerns regarding even this, as it may have originated from pagan traditions), it has since utterly excluded the idea of remembering the dead, at least the ones who died in Christ or were martyred for Him, and is largely about evil and darkness now. The complete antithesis of Christ.
 
Sure, for kids, it’s mostly about candy and dressing up in costumes, which are fun, but the “holiday” is utterly commercialized (candy companies definitely love this day) and taken away from the Christian roots of it and towards more sinister ones.
 
So I can understand people’s objections to the celebration based on beliefs. The second item, about financial status, makes little sense to me, as one can make costumes basically out of anything. As a kid (long before I became a Christian), when Halloween came around, I would go to school in my regular clothes (in itself rather neat for me at the time, since that school required uniforms most days) and a simple cape on my back, and I would say that I was “Dracula” or a vampire in general. This happened for multiple years because I largely didn’t have other costumes.
 
And yet, I had no real issues with that at all and to the best of my memory, I wasn’t really teased for coming every year with just a cape. Even if your family didn’t have enough money to even buy a cape (granted, the cheapest I saw on Walmart’s online store was $5, and it wasn't even a good-looking cape), you can make a costume out of literally anything. You can make a cape out of a large towel. You can make costumes out of simple clothes. And I can ASSURE YOU that kids have shirts with stuff like the Superman or Batman logos.
 
So the “financial status” excuse doesn’t hold up. As far as “life experience” goes, it’s so vague that almost anything could seemingly justify it, and this article is already long enough as it is without getting to the main point, so I’ll leave it there.
 
In any case, the letter then read: “Large events create changes in schedules with loud noise levels and crowds. Some students experience over stimulation, while others must deal with complex feelings of exclusion. It’s uncomfortable and upsetting for kids.”
 
Yeah, that first sentence makes me think that the cancelation of the event has less to do with “marginalized people of color” and more with the fact that it can be annoying for staff to organize certain things and have to schedule certain things outside of the usual, and that it can be annoying to hear loud noises. This idea is supported by the fact that earlier in the letter, it talked about costume parties distracting students and staff from learning. It’s not about the minority kids at the school, it’s about the teachers having to give a damn about doing more than usual for the fun of the kids.
 
Of course, they couldn’t outright come out and say “the staff is tired of this parade, so we’re not doing it anymore” so they just use the excuse of some kids “feeling marginalized” and basically blaming them for the cancelation.
 
Like one parent told Rantz: this is an “exercise in affluent white vanity that is wokeism.”
 
But again, it’s a cancelation that I don’t mind too much. However, it does present a problem, like I mentioned earlier. That, of course, is the idea that if a Halloween themed parade (or Halloween in general) can be canceled for the reasons stated either by the spokesperson or the newsletter, other (actual) holidays could also be canceled for the same reasons, namely Christmas.
 
After all, not everyone celebrates Christmas, so based on that, schools feel as though it would be okay to cancel all school Christmas events. However, despite that, I’m not particularly incensed by the cancelation of that Halloween parade because miserable Leftists (both in and out of schools) have been trying to cancel Christmas for a long time now. Protecting Halloween in this particular school isn’t going to keep this school or others from trying to cancel Christmas, and they are currently setting their sights on what can easily be considered a Satanic “holiday,” at least as it currently is celebrated.
 
So, again, I don’t mind the cancelation of this particular event. The school presents moronic reasons, probably to try and hide the staff’s laziness and annoyance with the activities of the day, but it accomplishes a job I don’t mind them accomplishing.
 
So you won’t hear me complaining too much about this at all. After all, as Napoleon is attributed with saying: “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”
 
Ephesians 6:11
“Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil.”

It’s not very often that we see blue-on-blue attacks (I’m willing to believe they happen far more often than being reported, and this is without counting Manchin’s resistance to Schumer and Sinema being harassed by Leftists), so it’s always quite a joyous sight to see when they do happen.
 
This time, it’s for a far less significant matter: the race for the next governor of New York in 2022. In all certainty, whoever ends up being the Democrat candidate will end up stealing the election, and NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio wants to be the Democrat’s thief (insert New York crime rate joke here).
 
However, it looks as though he will have trouble getting that spot, as people in his own Democrat Party are not only unconvinced that he would be in any way a good option, but even go so far as to mock the prospect.
 
Rich Schaffer, chairman of Suffolk County’s Democrat committee told the NYT that “Osama bin Laden is probably more popular in Suffolk County than Bill de Blasio. De Blasio, I would say, would have zero support if not negative out here.”
 
Would be a bit more impactful had it been from a committee chairman from New York county, the county that Manhattan is from, but still quite the scolding comment to make that the guy officially responsible for the deaths of 3,000 people and destruction of what used to be the city’s most iconic structures would be more popular anywhere in New York than the mayor of NYC. Hyperbole, of course, but it's quite the statement to make. Perhaps a rather offensive one, all things considered, but still.
 
However, he’s not the only Democrat to be opposed to de Blasio. Most notably, former representative and tax-evader Charles Rangel told the NYT that he didn’t want to “get involved in anything that would be negative” but admitted that he couldn’t think of “anything positive” to say about a potential de Blasio gubernatorial bid.
 
When even the guy found guilty of 11 ethics charges doesn’t think you’d be a good governor, that says something.
 
The Times also reported that de Blasio is privately telling people that he plans to run for NY governor, likely to try and see how much such a prospect would garner support:
 
“Mr. de Blasio, who has been a polarizing figure during his two terms in office, has also sounded our trusted former aides about their interests in working on a potential campaign, according to two people who are familiar with those contacts, and has made other overtures to labor leaders about a possible bid. His longtime pollster conducted a private survey to assess Mr. de Blasio’s appeal beyond New York City.”
 
And back in September, Politico reported that de Blasio had “phoned several labor leaders in recent days to gauge support.”
 
But, again, he isn’t exactly getting a whole lot of support from New York Democrats. Even NYC’s DOI recently released a report accusing the mayor of using NYPD security detail like personal servants for himself and his family.
 
The DOI commissioner Margaret Garnett said in a statement following the report: “Protecting the mayor and his family is a serious and significant job that should be guided by best practices, formalized procedures, and an understanding that security details are not personal assistants in a dignitary’s daily life but provide essential protection.”
 
De Blasio responded to this, claiming that there were “inconsistencies and inaccuracies” throughout the report, and just made the excuse that his “first responsibility was as a father and as a husband.” Is that what the guy was thinking when his own daughter participated in the George Floyd riots in NYC and got arrested for it?
 
In any case, it’s really quite telling when even members of his own Democrat Party in NEW YORK are at best not saying anything about it, like Rangel, and at worst are making jokes at his expense, like claiming that Osama bin Laden would be a more popular figure in New York politics than the mayor.
 
Whether he ends up running and winning the nomination is a different matter entirely (though I’d be willing to bet the NY Democrat Party would Bernie him out of the nomination). But his prospects so far do not appear good, suffice to say.
 
Either way, I just hope that the corruption, theft and lies in New York will be utterly uncovered and made known to every American so that the Democrats can’t steal further elections.
 
Ephesians 6:11
“Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil.”

For the past few weeks or months (forget when it started), we have jubilantly heard chants of “F*** Joe Biden” at a number of places, ranging from sports events to rallies to even places where the illegitimate president makes speeches, as was recently the case.
 
Before I get to the downside to it, allow me to express just why I love the chants: it depicts the reality that the fake news media would rather ignore.
 
Joe Biden is not only an illegitimate president, he is a failed one as well. Everything he has done or has advocated for has been to the massive detriment to the American people. We see this at the gas stations, at grocery stores, and elsewhere. He wants to be Stalin so badly that he wishes to mandate vaccinations on almost every American, certainly any American who wishes to work for a company with more than 100 employees, which is most companies at this point.
 
He has screwed up Afghanistan so badly that even the traitorous General Milley threw him under the bus at a recent Congressional hearing. He is screwing up the southern border so badly that even college students, who are usually Leftists, take notice of how poorly he has handled that situation.
 
Everything he is and everything he does is a massive failure, and as much as the fake news media would want to sweep all of that under the rug, there is only so much they can actually do, particularly the more he messes things up.
 
Afghanistan was such a massive blunder that even the fake news media couldn’t outright defend him. For example, here are some headlines I read from the fake news media at the time of the Afghan screw-up:
 

• CNN: “Biden isn’t adequately explaining why he failed to predict Afghanistan’s fast fall.” With the subhead: “He no longer gets credit simply for not being Trump.”

 

• CNN: “Europe left exposed as Biden walks America away from the world stage.”

 

• NBC opinion piece: “Biden is delusional if he thinks the Afghanistan withdrawal doesn’t endanger Americans.”

 

• CNN: “Biden’s presidency of crises pushes White House to its limits.”

 

• CNN: “The worst of times for Democrats. The White House is at its lowest moment yet as the harsh reality of power puts Biden’s leadership under extreme examination.”

 

• MSNBC: “Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal is a masterclass in bad management.”

 
 
And there were others as well, but in many cases, they did still try to be soft with Biden. Still, that these headlines and others did appear, and surprisingly CNN was seemingly the harshest on him, was telling of how badly he messed up with Afghanistan.
 
There are, of course, far more crises thanks to Biden, as CNN noted in one of its headlines, which has dragged his approval numbers down significantly even in far-Left fake news polls (they were never that high to begin with as, again, he was NOT ELECTED).
 
Which is why we so often hear “F*** Joe Biden” chants, which the White House has hilariously tried to gaslight people into believing that they are actually “Let’s Go Brandon” chants, which is outright bizarre. Who the hell is Brandon and why would people be cheering him? Not that this matters, as again, this is just the WH trying to lie and say that’s what was being chanted one of the most recent times, when we all know Biden was being dragged.
 
And for the most part, I ADORE the fact that we are hearing these chants. Again, it shows that reality is far different from what the fake news media wants to report it. Joe Biden is extremely unpopular. No amount of spinning or gaslighting is going to change that fact. If anything, that’s just going to make things worse for the Occupier.
 
However, there is one discernible downside to these chants. You see, Biden traveled to Howell, Michigan recently to try and sell people on the socialist power-grab of an infrastructure bill which would add another $3.5 trillion to our already overly inflated debt. Expectedly, there were protesters at such an event, and said protesters were chanting “F*** Joe Biden.”
 
And that’s perfectly fine, and I love the fact that they were doing this. However, it wasn’t simply the adults who were chanting “F*** Joe Biden.”
 
A Gateway Pundit reader sent this video to the site, which depicts kids in a school bus also chanting “F*** Joe Biden” alongside the protesters.
 
Now, this might not necessarily seem like much of a big deal, and in the grand scheme of things, it might not be, but I do think it’s at least somewhat relevant and concerning that kids are going along with the chant.
 
Personally, I began to get a bit of a potty mouth when I was in middle school, around 12 or 13 years of age, in large part because I heard my peers so often and casually cursing. This cursing behavior has stuck with me ever since, not that you would be able to tell, as I often either avoid cursing on this site or censor the words, like I’m doing with the chant in this case. Of course, I’m an adult and can largely say whatever I want to say, but there is no denying that such behavior is present because of my experience in middle school, being around casual cursing, which became part of my own vocabulary in no time.
 
And in many cases, when a child is heard cursing, they get some amount of reprimand from their parent or teacher (depending on the setting) and are discouraged from such continued cursing. But here, because of the behavior of adults, the kids feel as though they have free reign over the use of the strongest curse word in the world, at least if used in the context of cursing out Joe Biden.
 
While I would like to believe that this is helping to create a generation which is rebellious towards the Washington establishment and the deep state, it’s far more likely that the kids are just using the occasion as an excuse to freely use the word. And as things tend to go, they will then go on to find other justified uses of the word. For example, they might figure that since it’s okay to chant “F*** Joe Biden”, it’s also okay to chant “F*** Kamala Harris” or “F*** Nancy Pelosi”. More realistically, since kids usually aren’t very privy to politics, they will use that word to chant similar things about authority figures.
 
For example: “F*** my dad” or “F*** my teacher” or “F*** the principal.” That last one I could particularly envision happening, for example, during a school assembly where the principal is trying to speak and the chant all of a sudden breaks out.
 
Whatever may be the case, the chant has the unfortunate downside of teaching children that it’s okay to curse people out so brazenly. And such a thing can help in the deterioration of civilized society. Not that there aren’t other things which are doing that already, such as the attempt by lunatics to get children to go to “Drag Queen Story Hour” or selling them on the idea that a man can be a woman and vice versa, or that a white person is a devil because of their skin color and a black person is a victim and oppressed for the same reason.
 
However, if we have concerns regarding those other things which deteriorate civilized society, we should have some amount of concern regarding the chant as well.
 
I’m not discouraging people from doing it, and in all likelihood, those kids, exposed to it or not in this context, will likely go on to curse anyway as they get older because that’s just how contemporary society acts. But it’s important to at least be mindful of the fact that what adults say and do will have an effect on kids. Often times, kids want to imitate the behavior of adults, so if they see adults act in a certain manner, they will imitate that behavior.
 
Granted, that’s usually for the younger kids, and the kids in that video looked to be at least in the 4th or 5th grade, or about 10 to 11 years old, but the point remains that they were seeing and hearing adults nearby using that curse word at their leisure, and thus felt that they had license to also use the word, particularly if they were simply going along with the chant.
 
This is rather conflicting for me as, again, I love the chants and want to continue hearing them since they show just how unpopular this faux-president is, but I’m also rather bothered by the fact that this gives kids the impression that it’s okay to curse so casually and so much.
 
Numerous verses in the Bible speak against cursing. For example: James 3:8-10: “But no human being can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison. With it we bless our Lord and Father, and with it we curse people who are made in the likeness of God. From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers, these things ought not be so.”
 
Colossians 3:8: “But now you must put them all away: anger, wrath, malice, slander, and obscene talk from your mouth.”
 
Matthew 15:11: “It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person.” Obviously, the context of that one is that it’s okay to eat food which isn’t kosher, or what Jews typically eat, but the point was that what defiles a person is that which comes out of the mouth. What comes out of the mouth are words, which can be destructive to the self or to others.
 
Now, forgive my French, but I don’t give a damn about Joe Biden and if he is destroyed by such cursing. Frankly, I would rather see him be destroyed, even if by cursing, because he is evil and of the devil.
 
But there is no denying, either way, that God does not want us cursing, even those who are evil. After all, both Luke 6:28 and Colossians 4:6 speak of blessing those who curse and persecute us, and praying for those who abuse us (this part specifically belonging to the Luke verse).
 
Does this mean that I pray that Biden will succeed in his evil acts and intentions? Of course not, since that would be praying for evil. I want to see Biden destroyed because of his evil, but would be ecstatic to see him rebuilt in righteousness. Joe Biden, the person, is not my enemy. Joe Biden, the piece of crap pedophile, baby-killer, tyrant, election thief and demon, is my enemy. Take those things away, make him a brother in Christ (as in an actual brother, not one who claims is Catholic but isn’t regenerate in any way), and he ought to be welcomed by Christians with open arms.
 
This, I think, is what those verses mean when talking about blessing these people and not cursing them. We bless them that they would turn away from their evil, not that their evil ways will succeed. After all, those who are unrepentant and unregenerate are punished by God and cursed to eternal damnation.
 
So while I do love the chants insofar as they depict Biden’s rising unpopularity which even the fake news media can’t bury, let’s keep in mind that it can lead to children joining in with the cursing, believing themselves to be free of liability for it, and that God doesn’t want us cursing either.
 
I can’t claim to be better than those who do the chants, as even I have gone along with it many times, and I do relatively often curse (at least when talking about Biden, the Left, the establishment, etc.) but that doesn’t mean that I should.
 
Again, I love the chants for what they signify, but we should be mindful of what effect they can have on children.
 
2 Timothy 2:16:
“But avoid irreverent babble, for it will lead people into more and more ungodliness.”

Those who have experienced communism/socialism have, obviously, first-hand accounts as to what happens under such systems. And unless they belong to the establishment, or are outright mentally retarded, those who have experienced communism will tell you just how awful of a system it is and how much better capitalism (actual capitalism, not this crony crap we have currently) is by comparison.
 
Rapper Pitbull, whose real name is Armando Christian Perez, is one such person, as he is a first-generation Cuban-American and his family has suffered at the hands of communism and the Castro regime. So, in a recent performance, he seemingly felt compelled to express his pro-American and anti-communist beliefs.
 
“To whoever the f*** doesn’t like the United States of America, may God bless you, but f*** you at the same time. If you don’t like the United States of America, go back to the countries that we the f*** [are] from, and you’ll see how much you appreciate the United States of America.”
 
While this might be the first time I have talked about Pitbull, this is not the first time he has spoken out either in favor of this country or against the communist system that infects his home nation of Cuba.
 
During a recent interview, he expressed more anti-communist beliefs and his appreciation for this country, and even his disbelief that we have destroyed liberty over a virus:
 
“The reason I can have this conversation is because my family comes from communism, they fled communism, they had everything taken away from them, everybody got murdered, everybody got killed. That’s the reason me, being a first-generation Cuban-American… I look at freedom and I appreciate that s***. I appreciate opportunity. I appreciate anything that you give me… And, that comes from the fact that when Castro took over everything, and I’m looking at what’s going on right now – the only person here that’s hot… it’s Castro. He’s going, ‘Y’all did it with a virus? S***. Y’all took over the world with a virus? Y’all gotta be kidding me.’”
 
“In this day and age, I’m hoping that people see: as quick as you get it… come quick, leave quick,” the rapper continued. “When it comes to this technology, that’s exactly what it is. You got instant gratification and think you can touch many people, as quick as they [are] gonna pull it from you.”
 
Pitbull then went on to encourage politicians and people of great influence and wealth to get involved with the crisis in Cuba, where mass protests have been going on (not that it’s all that talked about, particularly after the regime cut the internet following the protests) for the past couple of months:
 
“This is a message to the world. We need to stand up, step up. But if you don’t understand what’s going on, then you need to wake the f*** up. Not only is this a Cuba event, a Cuba thing, this is a world event. This isn’t about politics. This is about saving lives. This is about unity, not division. And bottom line, it’s about taking action. Let me tell you something, why I’m frustrated and when I see everybody out there and doing what they’re doing, which I love what they’re doing. Okay, because not only do we live for freedom, we ride for freedom, we die for freedom but we mother***ing appreciate freedom.”
 
“And it gets me hot, it bothers me, and it frustrates me to a certain extent, being a Cuban American, and having a platform to speak to the world and not being able to help my own people, not being able to get them food, not being able to get them water, not being able to get them medicine,” Pitbull continued. “But most of all, not being able to help and really get them what they deserve, which is freedom. And this is my way of talking to the world. All world allies get together to help. Global businesses get together to help. People that we’re so proud of, people such as Jeff Bezos, a Cuban American, graduated from high school in Miami, built one of the biggest companies in the world, the richest man in the world. He’s somebody that can get involved and really help us and what we got. All we can do is create awareness, but politics are gonna be polititricks.”
 
“And while they figure out what they figure out, we need to figure out how to really help,” added the rapper. “We need to get creative, we need to figure out solutions while they’re losing their lives over there literally for something that we wake up every day and appreciate, which is freedom. So to everybody out there, stand up, step up. And if you don’t understand, get with the mother***ing program and wake up because this is about freedom and it’s about human rights. And to everybody in Cuba, keep the fight up.”
 
This is generally what a lot of people feel and understand, even if it’s a bit more expletive-filled. Hell, even I dropped an expletive when the illegitimate president expressed his desire to screw liberty and force a vaccine on people who neither want one nor need one. So the general feeling of “screw you if you want to take away my freedoms”, in a more expletive sense, is certainly there.
 
Like Pitbull suggested, people who don’t understand what communism is really about ought to spend some time in communist countries and then they would begin to appreciate the founding principles of this country. And I mean the ACTUAL founding principles, not the bullcrap Leftist woke dumbassery of “this country was founded on slavery.”
 
Anyone who is even relatively familiar with our founding principles understands what a load of crap that is, as every founding document makes the assertion that we are created free and equal, equal in the sense that no entity can force itself upon us and dominate and enslave us. It’s these founding documents and principles which served as the basis for the abolition of slavery, which would have naturally been phased out of our country were it not for the invention of the cotton gin, which made slave plantations extremely lucrative.
 
As I have said in prior articles, the U.S. government stopped the influx of slaves shortly after the founding of our country and believed slavery would eventually become too impractical to survive as an institution, and until the invention of the cotton gin, that’s the direction it was going.
 
This is part of our history and it’s what anyone with an internet connection can find, but which a Leftist indoctrination leads people to deny. The reality of our country is that it was founded based on the principles of liberty. Unfortunately, as time has gone on, that liberty became gradually more eroded, until today, we have people who actually and literally believe you shouldn’t have a say as to what you put into your body.
 
While Pitbull didn’t explicitly mention vaccine mandates, he did allude to the idea that the establishment “took over the world with a virus.” Despite everything we know about how mild the virus is, to the point where fewer people died in 2020 than did in years prior, we act as though it’s a practical death sentence to get the Chinese coronavirus and that we need to destroy all institutions of liberty to “protect” us from said virus.
 
And it’s typically those who hate this country who have gone along with the idea of destroying personal liberty, which is why Pitbull is as frustrated as he is and why he said what he said. While I have my problems with the way the country is run now and with how things currently are, there is no shortage of love for this country from me. In fact, it’s because of that love for this country that I wish to see the problems that we see resolved and the way things are to change.
 
I love capitalism, but hate this crony socialist-lite crap that we currently have and which has been exposed to be around in the last couple of years. I love the U.S. but hate the establishment that thinks is in charge of it.
 
When coming to this country, I was sold on the idea that this was the land of the free and the home of the brave. That this was the land of opportunity and that if you wanted to make something of yourself, you could. None of it was true, or at least, as true as I was led to believe. What country can claim to be the land of the free when your political, and now medical, beliefs can get you fired or generally castigated? What country can claim to be the home of the brave when you have soldiers being indoctrinated into Marxism and believing that it’s more important to accurately sexually identify people than defeating your enemies? What country can claim to be the land of opportunity when your beliefs can get you cancelled and stripped of all opportunities to live a better life?
 
I don’t know if this country ever achieved the aspirations of the founding principles (in large part because people are naturally evil), but those aspirations must still be there and definitely still are there in many people.
 
We wouldn’t be seeing the pushback that we are if we weren’t of the belief that, if this country isn’t as free and as great as it could be or has claimed to be, we can make it so. We just need to be able to defeat, politically, practically and ideologically, those who hate this country and want to see it come to ruin.
 
And I’m glad that someone like Pitbull is conscious enough to stand on the right side.
 
Exodus 14:14
“The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”

For anyone who doesn’t pay attention to the fake news media, or at least doesn’t think they are in any way truthful, objective journalists, it was immediately clear that the allegation that President Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election was a load of crap, fabricated by an embittered loser Hillary Clinton and her Leftist associates in and outside the media.
 
However, if you’re like Russell Brand and you watch the fake news media because you think they are at least somewhat truthful in their “reporting”, you’re bound to believe the crap that they spew until, surprise, surprise, you begin to question certain things and discover the lies they have been telling.
 
This is precisely what Brand has apparently been going through recently, as in a recent video which he posted to Rumble (something I will talk about in a moment, as it’s relevant to my overall argument), he expressed his epiphany that Trump was actually correct about Russian collusion being a hoax and that the Clintons and Democrats in general are corrupt and liars.
 
Brand said: “Well, now there’s serious evidence that it was the Clinton campaign and Hillary Clinton acolytes that were directly involved in the generation of what has proven to be conspiracy – untrue! Think about how much media you watched. Me, a person who I think, broadly speaking, is from the left – a liberal, certainly not a Trump-supporting Republican, with respect to those of you who are – I find myself in awe, gobsmacked, flabbergasted and startled by these revelations.”
 
This might be the first time I’ve heard a Leftist say “with respect to those of you who are” Trump supporters.
 
He continued: “What my concern is becoming is that these are totemic issues pushed to the forefront to mask ordinary, regular corruption like the Russiagate thing, the Hunter Biden laptop, all of that stuff. And it was like, being sort of in a way discussed as if it was just an absolute fact. To discover that this was propaganda, a construct, a confection by the Democratic Party – who, of course, are now in government – is kind of beyond disappointing, because you begin to question and query what other things may not be true. Once you recognize that people create certain truths in order to meet certain ends and aims, the idea you might be able to trust their integrity obviously dissolves.”
 
That is kind of major, all things considered, but perhaps not quite as much as one might originally think. You see, at least ever since the Chinese coronavirus pandemic began, Russell Brand has been surprisingly based and not following the narrative other Leftists follow. It seems his Rumble account (which it’s telling that he has one as well, as that indicates his separation from mainstream outlets, to an extent) is relatively new, with his first video having been published only on September 15th. However, I have seen at least snippets of him on some sort of podcast in which he stands against the COVID tyranny that we have been seeing.
 
Not to mention he is also rather based on other matters as well. For example, that aforementioned first video was titled: “Did Liberals Use Feminism to Justify Afghan Cluster F*ck?”, basically pointing at liberals and feminism and saying that it was they who messed things up in Afghanistan.
 
Other video titles include: “Are You DISGUSTED By This?! Marine’s Viral Video Gets Him Sacked,” obviously referring to Lt. Col. Stuart Scheller, who posted a video critical of the military leadership messing up Afghanistan and being basically imprisoned for it; “Facebook Are MANIPULATING Our Stupid Governments & LYING TO US”, which is pretty self-explanatory, and could frankly include all of big tech; “How Everyday People Were SCREWED By Liberal Politics,” which is also pretty self-explanatory and rather telling, seeing as he tends to hold liberal beliefs; “The Mainstream Media Are Trying To Start A CIVIL WAR!!,” “Vaccine Mandates: An ASSAULT On Your Bodily Freedom?”, “SHOCKING Wuhan Evidence. Did Fauci LIE?”, “Is This HYPOCRISY?!,” referring to, among other things, AOC wearing a very expensive dress which had the words “Tax the rich” on it to the highly-exclusive Met Gala, which to answer the question: Yes, it’s very hypocritical; “Thought Biden Couldn’t Sink Any Lower?? THINK AGAIN!!”, and others relating to not trusting Big Pharma, and bashing the establishment.
 
To summarize, Brand, as liberal as he was and in some ways still is, has been rather critical and questioning of the crap that those he considered/s to be on his side have been pushing for, at least as of late.
 
Which is certainly a rather hopeful sight to see, regardless of context. The guy who has been a raging liberal all this time and he would still classify himself as such has begun to see things in a more clear light, as they are, rather than as the Left claims they are. Inundating yourself in fake news means you can’t see reality as well as those who wisely avoid it, which is why it’s taken Brand only until NOW to come to the realization that Trump DIDN’T collude with Russia and that Hillary and Democrats in general are massively corrupt and evil, which has been general knowledge to most of us since this whole nonsense began.
 
Brand even said that he wanted to believe that the Democrat Party is the party of “inclusivity, and diversity and truth and social justice and all great, positive ideas,” but he is seemingly not too sure about that anymore, and with good reason. The only inclusivity the Democrat Party approves of is of Leftists and Leftist thinking. If you’re a conservative, you are less than human and don’t belong even in the job you might hold. The only diversity the Democrat Party approves of is diversity of outward appearance, but only as far as those people are Leftists, as conservative blacks, Hispanics, Asians, women, etc. are considered traitors to their race and gender, as though the Left still owns people.
 
The only “truth” the Democrat Party approves of is the relative truth crap that they pass off, while any evidence which contradicts them must be eliminated, as well as those who bring up such evidence. The only social justice the Democrat Party approves of is of disabling police officers from being able to take care of criminals, while people are being illegally held in prison for January 6th, just for being in the Capitol building doing nothing in particular because the FBI agents did their job in setting them up.
 
And anyone who doesn't inject fake news poison into their streams on the regular recognizes that the Democrat Party has no great, positive ideas, certainly none which are of any benefit to anyone other than themselves (this includes Republicans in the establishment, by the way, not just Democrats).
 
In any case, that Russell Brand has been discovering all these things about the side he once supported, or to some extent still supports, is hopeful in that if he, of all people, is figuring this stuff out, so can anyone who does even a bit of research which doesn’t include going back to the fake news well. It certainly means that the Left is nowhere near as popular, particularly with their most recent actions, as they believe themselves to be or even claim to be, even with some of their most recognized celebrities like Brand and, surprisingly, Nikki Minaj, who has done more to fight for freedom in a couple of weeks than the GOP has in decades.
 
Their downfall is a matter of when, not if.
 
Ephesians 6:12
“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.”