A couple of weeks ago, the Occupier of the Oval Office threatened hundreds of millions of Americans with a federal vaccine mandate and was visibly and audibly frustrated, not because he actually believed there were people keeping us from being able to move forward, but because his faux-presidency has been crumbling around him for the past couple of months, particularly after the Afghan disaster. When he made that threat, I said that I didn’t fear that what he wanted done would actually be done. And I was right, in more ways than I thought.
 
Back when I wrote the article, I was under the impression that his administration would actually try to make such a mandate and that freedom-loving governors, AG’s and companies would have to fight it in courts and likely even take the entire matter to the Supreme Court. I didn’t doubt that such massive civil disobedience would be effective. But as it turns out, it won’t even be necessary.
 
Allow me to explain. In the White House’s COVID plan section, they have a number of action items of what they intend to do or are currently doing. Such items include enforcing a federal worker mandate, whereby federal workers have to get the vaccine (conveniently excluding anyone who works in Biden’s administration and in Congress – you know, the elites); a federal contractor mandate, whereby people who work with the federal government, though not necessarily in it, have to get the vaccine (likely excludes whatever elites would be part of this group); and the infamous national worker mandate for companies with over 100 employees.
 
This is what’s written in that third plan:
 
“The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is developing a rule that will require all employers with 100 or more employees to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any workers who remain unvaccinated to produce a negative test result on at least a weekly basis before coming to work. OSHA will issue an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) to implement this requirement. This requirement will impact over 80 million workers in private sector businesses with 100+ employees.”
 
And that is all we have heard of the White House regarding this intention ever since. That paragraph was posted the day after Biden’s threat, on September 10th. Three weeks later and absolute silence on this front from the WH, or any federal agency at all.
 
The DoL’s website is utterly absent of any and all information regarding a national vaccine mandate, even from the days that the Occupier made the threat and that the aforementioned paragraph was written on the White House website. Even OSHA’s COVID information site says nothing about a vaccine mandate either being worked on or looking to be enforced. The most they say is that people “should” get the vaccine, not that they “must” or are “obligated”, or that they are working towards creating a mandate.
 
This is important because, again, it’s been three weeks. Nearly a month after this threat from the Occupier himself, and not a single word from the agencies which would work towards such a mandate whatsoever. There is no date for when they even want to begin discussing this matter, let alone when they think they will begin writing or enforcing the rule.
 
And according to The Conservative Treehouse, “if there was a federal intent to actually force American workers to get forcibly vaccinated as a condition of employment, there would be daily updates from a massive inter-agency network of compliance offices, regulatory agencies and private sector business interests giving updates and briefings.” And this is just regarding the anticipated guidance part aka Step 1, let alone the enforcing of any such actual rule or mandate.
 
Even if the guy is completely wrong about that assessment, you would think that, following Biden’s threat, either the Department of Labor or its OSHA agency would at least MENTION the intended national vaccine mandate for companies with over 100 employees, even if they haven’t actually begun to work on the rule. And yet, there is absolute silence on that end.
 
The only thing we have heard of this mandate from the administration at all is in a recent press conference with Jen Psaki, where she was ASKED about it by a reporter and gave the typical vague answer of “they’re looking into it” or “they’re working on it at OSHA”, etc. Nothing concrete or definitive.
 
Other than that, she said that many companies are already doing their own vaccine mandates “on their own”, and that’s certainly true. Companies like Delta, Apple, Google, and many hospitals throughout the country have executed their own vaccine mandates, and for many of these companies, they are losing workers quickly and having to backtrack on those mandates.

Apple and Google are mostly liberal, so there is little in the way of resistance to the mandate, but airlines have had to undo the mandate, or at least restructure them to be far less strict because of a large loss in employees which they couldn’t easily replace (namely, pilots). The same is happening to many hospitals, particularly in New York, where its lunatic Leftist governor has claimed that they would just replace the unvaccinated workers with either illegal immigrants or NATIONAL GUARD servicemen, as if either of those options were viable in a high-skill job.
 
But apart from those things, there is absolutely no news about a national vaccine mandate for employers with 100+ employees. Nearly a month without any updates whatsoever in what would be the single biggest restructuring of employment rules in U.S. history. That is proof positive that the DoL and OSHA know perfectly well that they have no legal means by which they can write and particularly enforce such a rule.
 
Similarly to how it would be impossible to enforce a complete and total confiscation of guns in America, it would be impossible to enforce a vaccine mandate for all companies with 100+ employees. What tools could they even use? What would be the necessary manpower and how would one go about enforcing the rule? Even with gun confiscation, theoretically, all that would be needed would be the police manpower to go house-to-house and confiscate guns (which is easier said than done). What would they be able to do with a vaccine mandate even theoretically? Particularly one which focuses on employees, not people in general?
 
They haven’t said a word about the mandate because they KNOW they can’t actually work on making such a mandate. Even outside of the legality of the issue (given that this is an illegitimate administration in the first place and Democrats don’t care for the law at all), it’s outright unenforceable. So they aren’t even trying to write rules.
 
Like I said, I was never afraid that what Biden wanted done would actually be done, but this works out even better than what I had expected. I expected the lawless administration to at least TRY to make unconstitutional rules, even if they knew they were unenforceable, just to show people that they tried to do something. This is even better than what I hoped for.
 
James 4:7
“Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.”

Before I begin with this rather lengthy article, allow me to clearly express the fact that I AM NOT A DOCTOR, and thus what I say should not be considered medical advice whatsoever. All this is is a protocol which a woman used to save her husband who had gone to the hospital because of pneumonia which the doctors wanted to treat as a severe case of the Chinese coronavirus, and had they gotten their way, the woman’s husband likely would have been another of their victims.
 
With that out of the way, let’s begin. As I stated previously, this is a protocol which a woman used to save her husband as he was going through a case of pneumonia for which he had to be hospitalized. This is what the woman said on The Kate Dalley Show that she did to save her husband:
 
“Here is the actual protocol that we used to save my husband from the hospital protocol. He had pneumonia. They tried to claim it was ‘Covid-pneumonia.’ X-rays are the same as regular pneumonia, by the way. But here is our protocol that some wonderful America’s Frontline Doctors helped me with.”
 
“Keep in mind my husband is 56, not in the greatest shape (right? He’s supposed to [be] a HUGE risk, right?) and diabetic. He should not be a success story of epic proportion, right? But he was. Here’s the thing – pneumonia is pneumonia is pneumonia. Bacterial needs an antibiotic and viral – you get the oxygen up and TLC at home. They have made a three-ring circus out of the label Covid. They are over-treating it and we under-treated it. We treated it like regular good ole pneumonia.”
 
“The X-ray pics are exactly the same. No difference, I checked. What was pneumonia in 2015 is the same as today. Docs will even admit no one has regular pneumonia anymore. Why is that? What they are doing is the equivalent of you having a hangnail and their protocol is chopping off the hand while watching you bleed out and blaming the hangnail as being a new fierce kind of hangnail. Honestly – that’s what’s going on with the ‘Covid’ diagnosis.”
 
“What they label Covid is just respiratory illness. Some people have pneumonia, some bacterial, some viral, some a cold, some the flu – when I asked the docs if they could identify what Covid was or what it actually looked like – none of them could. And they were embarrassed when I asked. One said, ‘Well I’m sure it’s out there somewhere.’ I’m not kidding.”
 
Taking a brief moment to comment on just a couple of things, I will point out that the reason that they couldn’t identify the Chinese coronavirus nor say what it looked like is because no one has been able to isolate the virus, as I have stated in prior articles. Despite all the time, energy, and focus in dealing with the pandemic, not a single scientist, Western or Chinese, has been able to isolate the virus and thus prove its existence. And that whole “Covid-pneumonia” is ridiculous and pathetic all in one, an indication of how delusional or outright evil some of these doctors are.
 
In any case, let’s move on.
 
“When pressed, they had no idea how to identify it – other than the fraudulent test dialed up to 40 magnifications that really just says you have illness, not did [specify] Covid. Why do I say that? The ‘Covid’ test is like magnifying a typeset letter ‘A’ 40 times – until you just see black ink – and it could be any letter – that’s what the Covid test is. It’s magnified so many times that it could be any illness. People don’t know that. That is very telling. And something everyone should be aware of.”
 
“Labeling all illness Covid gives them the ability to do dangerous protocols for the elusive mystery thing that no one has seen or can describe. The CDC said they have no samples of Covid. China admitted the same. No sample after 19 months? Hmm.”
 
Now, for the ACTUAL PROTOCOL used to save the woman’s husband's life. Keep in mind that neither she nor I are doctors and that everyone’s case can vary because not everyone is going through the same. As the lady said earlier, the hubby is 56 with diabetes, so a comorbidity. For better information regarding other cases, it’s best to go to America’s Frontline Doctors’ treatment protocols, as they also have far more detail on what to do and how to treat the Chinese coronavirus (or whatever someone has).
 
The woman suggested that you tell the doctors that you want (demand it):
 
“10,000 mg – 20,000 mg of high-dose INTRAVENOUS Vitamin C daily. Not just oral. They will try to reduce to oral. They may try to give you the equivalent of a chewable. You need at least 10,000 a day. 20,000 is better.”
 
“Vitamin C has many properties to help in many, many ways that people don’t realize. It’s been known to fight inflammation in respiratory for decades. It strengthens your immune system. Pneumonia is inflammation. (Their protocol in most hospitals is only up to 6,000 max a day ONLY if they have severe sepsis so you have to demand use for this), so you have to push them. Don’t stop pushing. If you aren’t firm – if you don’t get a backbone (because their arrogance and control is off the charts) then ignore this entire post. They love pushovers. They cling to their protocol.”
 
“If you use the words ‘it won’t do any harm,’ that’s their buzz words to get them to act. They like those words.”
 
In essence, you have to be firm. In my opinion, the reason for “it won’t do any harm” being buzz words for them is that they shift the responsibility of something happening to the patient away from the doctors and onto you. Doctors have emergency protection from deaths or injury if they stick to their protocol, so they risk being sued if they do things outside protocol and they result in the death of the patient. They want the security that they won’t be sued for doing as you want them to do, so it’s important to make it clear, even sign anything that makes you responsible instead of them, that you will take responsibility and won’t sue them if they go outside protocol and the patient still dies.
 
“He also had 260mg Zinc a day oral but you can/should push for intravenous (IV). They said ‘they were out of it’ but I guess never use it? That was confusing. But at least get an oral dosage.”
 
“10,000 intravenous (IV) Vitamin D a day.”
 
“Slipped in 3 NAC (immune support) capsules a day. (N-Acetylcysteine).”
 
“They kept coming and telling my husband that any moment he could crash and have to go on a vent. Even when his oxygen was at 91 on the high flow. Their scare tactics were relentless. Within 30 hours my hubby was doing great.”
 
It’s important to do everything you can to keep yourself or loved ones OFF of ventilators, as roughly 80% of people who go on ventilators end up dying. With such a high mortality rate (surprised THAT isn’t considered an epidemic of sorts, but not entirely seeing as the elites want people to die), it’d practically be a death sentence to go on ventilators. Do not let yourself or your loved ones be scared into capitulating to the doctor’s demands to go on ventilators. The reason they still push for it, despite the high mortality rate, is because doctors and hospitals are paid nearly $40k per PATIENT who goes on a ventilator (they also get paid $13k per positive COVID diagnosis, which partly explains why they say everything from pneumonia to freaking gunshot wounds are COVID), according to State Sen. Scott Jensen, who is also a medical doctor.
 
It’s part greed and part ideological delusion that’s driving this crap.
 
In any case, back to the protocol:
 
“Forced them to cut back their DEX (steroid) to half to make way for Budesonide inhaled steroid. Instead of just regular dose, once a day, we upped to once every six hours.”

“’Early administration of inhaled budesonide reduced the likelihood of needing urgent medical care and reduced time to recovery after early COVID-19.’ (Lancet article).”
 
“That was key. (Their typical Dex steroid causes psych issues – read up on it. Makes them agitated and angry and all kinds of stuff, besides blood sugar going through the roof.)”
 
“Don’t let them do Remdesivir. It can cause organ failure. Try to ask for Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine but I’m letting you know that they will say they won’t work. Yes, there are plenty of studies [that show they do]. But they will shame you for bringing them up. You can fight for them. They will act like you are asking for voodoo remedies. This is how pathetic it is. What works is not part of the 341 pages given to the hospitals by the NIH/CDC.”
 
“Page 205 of their NIH handbook of their horrifying protocol, they even list all the benefits of Budesonide and claim it keeps them from even going to the hospital in the first place, but claimed there were not enough people in the trial – so whoops – can’t recommend. But results are a glowing recommendation? Yep. This is the silver bullet. Ask for it – demand it. Lancet medical journal just published on it a month ago, calling it the miracle in the UK three months ago. I found that most doctors do not read up or study what is going on. I found they don’t know much about what they are doing because they keep saying it’s a mystery? No mystery. They are OVER-treating it. Scary.”
 
“REFUSE THE VENT. Over and over and over and over. Be firm. Be nice. Be firm.”
 
“Go to the Frontline Doctor page on [the] internet. Do a televisit. They help anyone. They overnight certain drugs mentioned above. What they overnight is based on body weight dose. So make sure to take enough for first few days. In my husband’s case it should have been 30mg the first few days and then down to 6mg a day.”
 
“Go to an IV clinic – they are everywhere and no script or doctor needed for intravenous amounts – you can just get over there ASAP. They help anyone. That website I mentioned is key because no one else will give those drugs at the bought and sold hospitals.”
 
A piece of advice, look up “IV clinic (insert name of my city and state)” instead of “IV clinic near me” because the latter just showed me one in a state completely different from mine and I was momentarily under the impression that they aren’t actually everywhere, but upon looking up IV clinics specifically in my city and state, I was able to find a couple, so make sure to do diligent research.
 
Back to the protocol:
 
“Getting Budesonide was key. Had it in a nebulizer at the hospital.”
 
“[W]e walked out of that place no one hardly walks out of in 3 and a ½ days. Miracle? Or giving someone a chance to fight it, and so never needing things with extremely high death rates – like vent. Say you’ll claim hospice and remove them if they don’t listen to you. Pray for them to listen to you. Prayer works. Blessings work. Be firm but nice.”
 
“The entire key to our success was that Vitamin C high load when we got in there. My husband was at a 79 blood oxygen level.”
 
“Why did we give 3 capsules of NAC in the hospital a day to my husband? NAC – N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a precursor of the antioxidant glutathione, has been used to loosen thick mucus in the lungs and treat acetaminophen overdose for decades. However, NAC can also boost the immune system, suppress viral replication, and reduce inflammation. I would have this around in bulk!”
 
“And Dr. Mikovitz recommended Glutathione supplements. There are websites for televisits to good doctors like www.myfreedoctor.com. There are Mobile IV vitamin clinics also! They come to your house. The ‘Right to Try’ Act is hugely important to tell your doctors what you want your loved one to be given.”
 
So thank you, President Trump, for that resource.
 
One more thing I want to share real quick, which I guess wasn’t part of the protocol of this lady (don’t remember where else I got it, but it’s a good resource), is the Patient Bill of Rights.
 
I’m willing to bet most of you didn’t even know this existed, and even fewer of you know what those rights are. Which is fair, as I didn’t know this existed either until just recently.
 
Not all of the parts of the Patient Bill of Rights are entirely necessary for you to constantly know, so I will share some here (of course, you can check out the entire Patient Bill of Rights here).
 
As a patient, you have the right:
 

• To safe, considerate and respectful care, provided in a manner consistent with your beliefs;

 

• To expect that all communications and records pertaining to your care will be treated as confidential to the extent permitted by law;

 

• To know the physician responsible for coordinating your care at the Clinical Center;

 

• To receive complete information about diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis from the physician, in terms that are easily understood. If it is medically inadvisable to give such information to you, it will be given to a legally authorized representative;

 

• To receive information necessary for you to give informed consent prior to any procedure or treatment, including a description of the procedure or treatment, any potential risks or benefits, the probable duration of any incapacitation, and any alternatives. Exceptions will be made in case of emergency;

 

• To receive routine services when hospitalized at the Clinical Center in connection with your protocol. Complicating chronic conditions will be noted, reported to you, and treated as necessary without the assumption of long-term responsibility for their management;

 

• To receive appropriate assessment of, and treatment for, pain;

 

• To refuse to participate in research, to refuse treatment to the extent permitted by law, and to be informed of the medical consequences of these actions, including possible dismissal from the study and discharge from the Clinical Center. If discharge would jeopardize your health, you have the right to remain under Clinical Center care until discharge or transfer is medically advisable;

 

• To expect that a medical summary from the Clinical Center will be sent to your referring physician;

 

• To designate additional physicians or organizations at any time to receive medical updates.

 
 
As I said, these are only some (actually, most) of the rights under the Patient Bill of Rights. I highlighted these ones because I believe these would be most applicable to most people at most times, and are the most important ones to know, particularly the ones regarding safe care and not being forced to participate in research (as most people currently are).
 
Anyway, to make a very long article short, please ensure that you or your loved one are being taken care of properly. If you have the misfortune of having to go to the hospital, you have to be the one in charge of the health of yourself or your loved one, as most doctors in most hospitals only care about the money they are paid and the legal security of their protocol over the health and safety of their patients. I would advise (not medical advice) to try telemedicine and IV clinics before going to the hospital, as most cases should not even really lead to hospitalization at all.
 
But if you do end up having to go, for one reason or another, follow either this lady’s protocol or that of the Frontline Doctors. Supposedly, the average recovery time for people is 7 to 14 days, and a relatively old, diabetic man managed to recover in less than four days. That’s no fluke, and even Joe Rogan, when he had Covid, said he used Ivermectin and recovered in about as long. Also don’t forget that President Trump had the Chinese coronavirus and recovered in just three days because of HCQ.
 
These things work and work for the healthy and less healthy, the low-risk and high-risk patients. So you have to be the one in control of your or your loved one’s health, because most doctors won’t give a semblance of a damn about that.
 
Jeremiah 17:14
“Heal me, O Lord, and I shall be healed; save me, and I shall be saved, for you are my praise.”

The fake news media, as should be plenty clear for all to see, has been trying to spread the fake news narrative that the vaccines to the Chinese coronavirus are safe and effective and that those who refuse to get the vaccine are risking death.
 
Operating under the assumption that we’re all as stupid as they are, one ABC News affiliate station in Detroit asked people on Facebook about dead unvaxxed loved ones who died from the Chinese coronavirus. Reality showed them the exact opposite of what they were looking for.
 
ABC News affiliate WXYZ in Detroit, Michigan went to Facebook and posted the following:
 
“After the vaccines were available to everyone, did you lose an unvaccinated loved one to COVID-19? If you’re willing to share your family’s story, please DM us your contact information. We may reach out for a story we’re working on.”
 
The post received around 40,000 responses, with pretty much all of them sharing heartbreaking stories of vaccinated loved ones having suffered an adverse effect or two, or outright dying shortly after getting vaxxed.
 
Obviously, I can’t share all of them, but I will share a good few of them to really drive the point.
 
First, from a woman who lost her mom to the jab: “Lost my Mom 10 days after she got her 2nd Pfizer jab. She couldn’t swallow or talk correctly the very next day… was hospitalized and basically never ‘woke up’ again. Was sent home on hospice after 5 days in the hospital and died at home 2 days later…”
 
Well, I’m sure that the ABC affiliate will be thrilled to know that the CDC counts people who died within 14 days of getting vaccinated as UNVACCINATED, and thus could use that story as part of their “unvaccinated loved ones who died from COVID” even though it’s clear that the virus didn’t kill this woman’s mother. And I frankly wouldn’t put it past these bastards to actually do something so horrible.
 
Another post, this time from a parent:
 
“My daughter 33 years old died 10 days after getting the shot. She had an enlarged heart and she had a terminal lung disease pulmonary hypertension! She shouldn’t of (sic) gotten the shot! Pfizer only first shot Bath New York.”
 
Another story: “My son’s classmate lost her mother from heart complications due to the vaccine.”
 
And another: “No but I know a teenager hospitalized myocarditis the day after the second Pfizer shot.”
 
An even more heartbreaking story than others:
 
“My daughter got the first dose of Moderna then conceived a baby. My grandson was stillborn with heart and brain malformations that a Pfizer VP said could happen during the 20th and 22nd day of conception. But hey he is a crazy guy right. Hmm. Not. Also the FDA won’t have full test results in regards to teratology (the study of abnormalities of physiological development in organisms during a lifetime) until 2025.”
 
Another story:
 
“I have a friend that dies (sic) after receiving the Pfizer. Went to the Er with unexplained tremors the day after. They got the tremors to stop and released him. He died the next day.”
 
A post with two harrowing stories:
 
“My parent’s neighbor woke up the next morning after the shot suddenly completely deaf. His doctor told him it’s from the vaccine and if his hearing didn’t return within a few weeks he will be permanently deaf. He is now permanently deaf.
 
Our rabbi’s mentor (a very prestigious rabbi) was recovering from covid in a rehab facility. He was doing well, walking and about to be discharged home. The facility forced him to take the vaccine because it became their policy, even though he refused. He immediately developed paralysis in one arm. They then forced the second shot on him, he refused again, but the facility insisted. After the 2nd shot he developed complete, progressive paralysis and died.
 
Why do we not see these stories in the news? Why are journalists silent on the thousands of vaccine injuries leading to permanent disability and death? What happened to honest journalism? Please report these stories in the news!”
 
I have a feeling this person knows the answer to each of those questions. We don’t see these stories in the news because these stories undermine the narrative that the establishment wants to drive. They are silent on these stories because either they themselves want to drive the establishment narrative or, at best, they fear repercussions for reporting on such stories. I mean, Nikki Minaj is getting attacked by people from her own side simply for sharing a story about her cousin’s adverse effect to the vaccine and asking challenging questions about the vaccine.
 
So if she could borderline be cancelled for her “defiance” to the establishment narrative, so could any journalist. As to what happened to honest journalism, it’s frankly a wonder if there ever was such a thing in the first place.
 
In any case, a few more stories before a rather important and interesting one:
 
“My Dad started having problems after his first shot. But was bound and determined to get second shot. He died 5 days after second shot of a massive heart attack. He had no known heart problems before!”
 
“My father in law had the covid vax then had a stroke and died. They ruled out all the normal stroke causes. It was the vaccine and my husband will be reporting it to VAERS. Do a report on that!”
 
“No stories on that (dying unvaxxed). But a guy I knew got double shot and 2 days later dropped dead of a heart attack. Why don’t you report on THAT.”
 
“My fully vaccinated husband and I just recovered from covid and gave it to our unvaccinated children who we were trying to protect by getting the shots in the first place!!! How about covering that story instead of producing more propaganda. So much journalisming!!”
 
As I have said many times in the past, the vaccine doesn’t even do what it’s marketed as being capable of doing. It doesn’t protect the people getting the shot and it doesn’t protect other people. When they tell you “you have to get it to protect your loved ones” tell them two things: first, that makes no sense as no other vaccine works that way, and two, it doesn’t even manage to do that.
 
But now, let’s get to what I think is the most interesting story:
 
“The vaccine has become so politicized that even if it is useful for preventing serious illness or death from covid, they pretend that adverse effects don’t exist and so they don’t warn people and don’t actually monitor people for them. My mother had a hypertensive crisis from the moderna booster which could have caused a stroke, and now she has to be on blood pressure medication. I also developed high blood pressure after one dose of Pfizer (I had covid already in November and just thought a booster would be a good idea, but I monitored my BP because of what happened with my mom). We know a 22 year old woman who also developed hypertension and tachycardia after the second Pfizer dose in March, and she is now on medication but her tachycardia is still uncontrolled. They are endangering people’s lives by pretending the adverse effects don’t exist. They know they exist which is why they don’t want to give boosters yet. They think it will cause even more adverse effects.”
 
This is particularly important and significant because it’s not some random person sharing their account, but a REGISTERED NURSE. You know, someone with “expertise” in the subject matter who we should blindly trust, according to the Left.
 
So we have not only the accounts of numerous people (literally with tens of thousands more stories that I can’t cover due to time) who have either lost a loved one due to the vaccine or have had a loved one’s life utterly and irretrievably changed due to the vaccine, which monsters like the ABC News affiliate in Detroit continue to support unilaterally.
 
Now, one might make the assertion that these are merely anecdotes and not real data, and they could be lying. First, there is real data covering this, as I have written in the past. Second, consider that this is a local affiliate in deep-blue Detroit. While I doubt every single person commenting lives in Detroit, they are at least from that area if they follow that particular news affiliate, so by and large, many of these people are from deep-blue Detroit. Finally, even if they aren’t, are we really going to ignore the literal tens of thousands of stories from people and just assume that they are lying? Well, the Left will do what they can to ignore people’s plight, that’s for sure.
 
But would other, relatively honest people choose to ignore that? Would they comment on one of these people’s posts and charge “you’re lying” without any evidence? I doubt they would, and that’s why the Left would rather bury these kinds of stories.
 
The Nikki Minaj situation shows a lot of people, for the first time, what the establishment does to those who just ASK QUESTIONS regarding the vaccine: they get attacked, libeled, and have their character assassinated. And if that can happen to someone like Minaj, it can, and does, happen to a lot of other people who, in some cases, have had things happen to THEM.
 
Here's hoping that a lot more people’s eyes are opened to the reality of the toxic nature of the vaccine and that these stories come out more often in the mainstream.
 
Proverbs 12:22
“Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, but those who act faithfully are his delight.”

Protesting works. It might take time and making plenty of noise, but it gets results. And in England, following weeks of protests from common sensical people, the government has decided to shelve the fascistic Chinese coronavirus vaccine passport system which would have forced citizens to show proof of vaccination just to enter businesses and venues, much in a “mark of the beast” manner.
 
According to the U.K.’s Health Secretary Sajid Javid, “[W]e’ve looked at it properly and whilst we should keep it in reserve as a potential option, I’m pleased to say that we will not be going ahead with plans for vaccine passports.”
 
Frankly, they should scrap it altogether, since such a system will be utterly detrimental to the country and would only lead to further protests like the ones they had been seeing for a while now.
 
Regardless, Javid also said that Great Britain may also soon be looking to drop other Chinese coronavirus restrictions, including mandatory testing for returning travelers, which is more good news.
 
According to Javid, “I’ve never liked the idea of saying to people, ‘You must show your papers’ or something to do what is just an everyday activity.”
 
Then why keep the passports as a “potential option”, presumably in the case that the pandemic gets worse? I don’t know Javid’s political ideologies, and I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt on this and say that I think he’s sincere, but if you have some sort of moral distaste for such a system, then you should be against it from the moment it is conceived, without leaving it as a “potential option” for the future.
 
Javid also explained that England didn’t simply want to submit to international peer pressure regarding vaccine passports, as many Western “allies” like much of continental Europe, Japan, Israel, and some American states were implementing them to one extent or another. “So many countries, at the time they implemented it, was to try and boost their vaccination rates and you can understand why they might have done that.”
 
And certainly, no country ought to be bullied into doing something it doesn’t want to do (the same applies to people individually), but there are globalist fascists out there who care little for national or personal freedom, and will do what they can to ensure others will do as they want them to do.
 
That’s the whole point of the vaccine passports in the first place. Don’t wanna get vaccinated? Then you can’t enter these venues. Soon, it will be “Don’t wanna get vaccinated? You’re fired.” Matter of fact, forget the idea that it would be “soon.” It’s already happening, albeit at a smaller scale. For example, a Navy assistant coach was reportedly fired for refusing to take the vaccine. Whether this technically is because the military has a vaccine mandate is irrelevant. This is the result that commies want for those who refuse to do as they want: job termination.
 
It’s not merely a complete violation of the Nuremberg Code, it’s objectively morally evil. So it’s good that at least some sense has returned to England regarding the insanity of the Chinese coronavirus.
 
What’s rather interesting about this whole ordeal, at least in England, is that the vaccine passports were seemingly opposed by people on both sides of the aisle.
 
Liberal Democrat MP Alistair Carmichael said that vaccine passports would open “the door to a major change in the relationship between the citizen and the state. The introduction of vaccine passports will have enormous practical implications for the literally thousands of businesses across the country who will be required to gather and to hold our data.”
 
Labour Party’s top deputy Angela Rayner said that her party “cannot support any potential COVID pass scheme for access to everyday services.”
 
Conservative MP William Wragg called the vaccine passport plan “a load of rubbish,” and fellow Conservative MP Mark Harper said it was a “pointless policy with damaging effects.”
 
Naturally, I’m inclined to believe the only reason this is bipartisan is because politicians often say what they believe people want to hear. But even with that, it does still show bipartisan opposition to the vaccine passport system, which exemplifies just how unpopular such a policy proposal is.
 
The people don’t want it, political opponents to the PM lampoon it, and political allies criticize it just as harshly, if not more so. With so much pressure, it makes sense that the government would backtrack on such a fascistic idea.
 
Unfortunately, it’s not all good news, as not all of the U.K. will drop such tyrannical measures. Last week, Scotland’s Parliament voted 68-55 to implement a vaccine passport system for entry into nightclubs and other crowded venues and negative COVID tests will not be accepted. And Northern Ireland has created a vaccine passport, but thus far, it’s only with regards to international travel. No word on whether Wales intends to implement a vaccine passport system.
 
The good news is that I highly doubt the people of those countries in the U.K. will simply take it lying down. If even the people of IRAN and CUBA are protesting their corrupt and tyrannical governments, it would be easy to imagine that the people of Scotland, Northern Ireland, etc. would be willing to protest such authoritarian measures.
 
I just hope and pray that more of these tyrannical idiots recognize that they only have as much power as we allow them to have and that the real power belongs, as President Trump said in his first inauguration address, to the people.
 
Luke 10:19
“Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you.”

How you act under pressure can say a lot about you. If you can remain calm, cool and collected and deal with the situation in such a manner, it speaks well of your leadership skills. However, Biden, who largely has never faced much pressure at all because of a largely friendly fake news media, is lashing out as a result of waning popularity amongst even his supporters/voters and usually friendly media.
 
His approval ratings, following the disastrous Afghan crisis that he created, as well as his mishandling of the southern border and inflation, have gone down into the low 30s (as if they were ever actually higher, given that the country didn’t elect him), and are even noticeably low in fake news media polls which always show favoritism to Democrats.
 
Backed into a corner, and with his faux-presidency crumbling around him (I’m prophesying right now that he will be out in a few months, particularly if he keeps digging his own grave like this), Biden has chosen to lash out at dissenters regarding the toxic Chinese coronavirus vaccines in a speech which, had Trump given it, the media would have pointed out as “divisive” and “hateful.”
 
During this speech, the Occupier repeatedly demonized the tens (or hundreds, as I believe) of millions of Americans who have not taken the toxic vaccine, saying that “many” people in the country are “frustrated” with the unvaxxed, going so far as to claim that “this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.”
 
If he were right, which is no surprise that he isn’t, then Israel wouldn’t be seeing such massive influxes of COVID patients who have had the vaccine.
 
According to Vision Times, “The majority of [COVID-19] patients in an Israeli hospital are fully vaccinated, including those with severe disease… ‘95% of the severe patients are vaccinated’… ‘85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people.’”
 
There is also anecdotal evidence to suggest that the same is happening here, but reportedly, doctors aren’t allowed to disclose whether someone in the hospital suffering from the Chinese coronavirus is vaccinated.
 
Not to mention that, as I have written in a prior article, the fully vaccinated may be super spreaders of the Delta variant. And while I have questioned the existence of even the virus itself (and still do), the point is that if there is any pandemic at all, it’s a pandemic of the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated as the pressured pretend president claims.
 
Biden also claimed in his speech that “a distinct minority of Americans” are causing “a lot of damage” and are “keeping us from turning the corner.”
 
If it’s as distinct of a minority as you say, why is any of this necessary? More than that, if the vaccinated are as protected from the virus as YOU yourself claim in this very speech, Joe, then what does it matter whether someone else is protected? Couldn’t the vaccinated workers go back to work without any issues? And if so, why did the CDC backtrack on the vaccinated's need for wearing a mask?
 
You ask “What more is there to wait for? What more do you need to see?” First, and foremost, the answers to these questions that you keep avoiding. What we need to wait for is the results of the long-term effects of the vaccines, which are unknowable as of yet because not enough time has passed. What we’re waiting for is a RECENTLY LAUNCHED study into the effects of the vaccine on menstruating women. What more we need to see is that these things aren’t the toxic crap that they appear to be. What we need to wait for is the formula of what exactly is in these jabs.
 
“We’ve made vaccinations free, safe, and convenient.” Oh, you’ve made them free and “convenient” (as in, they are widely available, which is what I think he means here), but they are FAR from safe, as numerous articles on THIS VERY WEBSITE ALONE indicate, let alone the dozens or hundreds of other studies out there which I haven’t covered or haven’t even read yet.
 
“We’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. And your refusal has cost all of us.” Big talk coming from a guy who can barely string two sentences together. Your patience is wearing thin? Ours ran out a LONG time ago. Our refusal to be subjected to experimental vaccines has cost people? How many people has your administration killed, Joe?
 
Back during the campaign trail, when supposedly 230,000 Americans died under Trump, you said that “anyone responsible for that many deaths shouldn’t remain president.” According to mainstream figures (remember, only 6%, according to the CDC, have actually died from the virus, if it exists at all), 250,000 Americans have died since your administration took over.
 
If Trump killed 230,000 people by the time he left office, you’ve killed 250,000 since you’ve taken office. So I repeat, Joe, how many people have you killed? And we know that the vaccine itself has killed hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, if the VAERS system is any indication (and the fact that only 1% of all actual cases are reported), so how many people has this administration killed because of its insistence (now close to being illegal if he intends to enforce the b.s. he’s spewing in this speech) that people get vaccinated?
 
Your refusal to listen to real scientists and observe the data has cost this country infinitely more than you could possibly claim about the unvaccinated.
 
But it’s not just a medical or physical price you would have us pay, but also a social one. You insist that this mandate isn’t about people’s “freedom or personal choice.” In essence, you demand that we obey and that we have no choice on the matter.
 
To that, I say go f**k yourself. I have never said that word about anyone or to anyone in the past (at least on this site), but I believe it’s warranted here. You want us to ignore the data SCREAMING that the vaccines are dangerous and want to FORCE us, through our employers, to get a dangerous vaccine? This is the very tyranny the Left claimed Trump supported. Furthermore, this is a complete and utter violation of the Nuremberg Code, regarding the coercion of people to unwillingly undergo medical experimentation.
 
Keep in mind, Trump was impeached over a phone call. And here, we have the Occupier of the Oval Office violating INTERNATIONAL LAW through means of coercion, basically telling people that they won’t have a job anymore if they don’t get the vaccine.
 
Well and justly do I say to Biden to go f**k himself. Not because he can actually do any of this, but because he is OPEN about what he wants.
 
No, I don’t fear that what he says wants done will actually be done. Already, multiple Republican governors and companies have stated their purpose to not comply with such an illegitimate and unconstitutional order. And if he continues to press on with this crap, getting more tyrannical in his actions, I don’t see how his administration survives (politically). Push people far enough and they will eventually push back. And as we’ve seen in countries around the world trying their hand at full-on communism, the people push back.
 
Iran, the U.K., France, Italy and Australia, to name a few, have seen anti-lockdown and anti-vaccine passports/mandates protests. Australia being particularly significant, as there are a number of laws in that country which outright illegalize protesting and hundreds have been arrested for doing so in anti-lockdown protests.
 
Do not expect the American people, out of everyone, to simply take illegal, liberty-limiting actions from the government lying face down.
 
Biden’s faux-presidency is crumbling around him and I believe it will soon come undone, particularly as more evidence mounts and is shared of the rigged election.
 
Deuteronomy 28:7
“The Lord will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you. They shall come out against you one way and flee before you seven ways.” 

As we have known for a very long time now, Joe Biden isn’t exactly a master speaker nor does he command a strong knowledge of the English language when he speaks. This was very much demonstrated recently when talking about climate, as the Occupier of the Oval Office basically claimed that tornadoes don’t exist anymore, or at least, an unspecified “they” don’t call them that anymore.
 
“Uh, you know, the, looks like a tornado, they don’t call ‘em that anymore, that hit the crops and, and wetlands in the middle of the country, and, and Iowa, and Nevada, and, I mean it’s just across the board. And uh, you know um, uh, as I said we’re in this together.”
 
Hard to be “in this together” when most of us don’t know what the hell you’re talking about, Joe.
 
But, hey, this ought to be something to celebrate, right? Tornadoes don’t exist anymore, which is a success in the “fight” against climate change, right? Oh, wait, yeah, this is just because Old Man Biden is a senile coot unfit for the office he stole. Forgot.
 
Naturally, Pretend President Porky Pig had people attempt to defend his incoherence online, claiming that what Biden was talking about wasn’t tornadoes but derechos, a different kind of storm.
 
Of course, since this is a Leftist argument, there are a few holes in it.
 
First of all, Biden was referring, at least, to something that “looks like a tornado.”
 
Here’s a tornado:

And here’s a picture of a derecho:

The only people who could claim that a tornado and a derecho look similar are people who have never seen one or the other and people who are awfully dishonest like Leftists who still defend the ghost of the Democrat Party.
 
The only similarity between both storms is the color, and that’s just because they look LIKE DARK CLOUDS, as you would typically find in PRETTY MUCH ALL STORMS.
 
Furthermore, The National Weather Service defines a tornado as “a violently rotating column of air extending from the base of a thunderstorm down to the ground” which is “capable of completely destroying well-made structures, uprooting trees, and hurling objects through the air like deadly missiles.” Meanwhile, their definition of derecho is a “widespread, long-lived wind storm that is associated with a band of rapidly moving showers or thunderstorms.”
 
In essence, the two are nothing alike, again, apart from color and I already explained why that is the case.
 
Secondly, and lastly, it makes no sense for Biden to have been talking about derechos because people still call them that. Even if one were to argue that most people don’t know the term “derechos”, which is certainly possible, and would usually refer to a derecho as a weird storm, or a storm in general, that represents a lack of information on the particular storm, not a change in idiom regarding the name of the storm.
 
Whoever “they” is in Biden’s nonsensical speech, it’s definitely not meteorologists who can accurately recognize and name the particular storm. If “they” is the general public which might not know the name of the storm, again, that’s about a lack of information, not a conscious decision to start calling those storms something else.
 
So whether Biden actually meant to say tornadoes or was merely referring to derechos, what he said was both incoherent and inaccurate. Not that they had to be coherent or accurate for loyal Leftist dogs to defend Biden at the drop of a hat (even when no one would blame them if they stopped defending him considering his drop in ratings, even those which are rigged in his favor). Frankly, it’s pathetic that these people have to force themselves (even more pathetic if they don’t have to force themselves, to be honest) to defend the nonsense of a man who should be long retired by now and as far away as possible from the nuclear button.
 
And yet, we don’t really expect them to do anything else. This is the dog they chose in the primaries (even if the country at large didn’t choose him) and they have to stick by him, apparently. This, despite the increase in Biden voters regretting their decision in 2020.
 
But hey, at least tornadoes aren’t a thing anymore, right? Ah, wait, almost forgot again.
 
The Left really can’t have anything, huh?
 
Proverbs 18:2
“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”

In what is a seeming attempt at “owning” pro-lifers, commie actress Bette Midler suggested on Twitter that “all women refuse to have sex with men until they are guaranteed the right to choose by Congress.”
 
In other words, she is telling women, namely pro-abortion women, to NOT spread their legs as they often do and have sex, because this apparently would be detrimental to pro-life men.
 
Yeah, I don’t get it either, but you won’t hear me complaining about this instance of Leftist illogic.
 
Naturally, this comes following the Texas Heartbeat Act which protects the unborn beginning at six weeks gestation, when the heart usually begins to beat. Because women usually don’t find out that they are pregnant around this time as well, this bill pretty much effectively bans abortion.
 
And unlike similar pro-life, heartbeat laws which can easily be ignored by activist judges and pro-abortion law enforcement (including Leftist DA’s), the Texas heartbeat law allows individuals to report violations of that law and sue the abortionists as a result. This means that the power to enforce this law doesn’t have to rest on a state government which might be full of activists who will ignore the law for their ideologies, but rather, on We the People, particularly pro-life people to actually do something about abortion.
 
Basically, this bill is an important first step in overturning the criminal and disastrous Roe v. Wade decision of 1973 which has led to a holocaust of the unborn. Which is precisely why so many Leftists are so uppity about this law, including Bette Midler.
 
Still, that she would encourage women to abstain from sex as a “punishment” is utterly hilarious to me and quite the self-own.
 
For the most part, pro-life men aren’t going around sleeping with every woman they can find. If anything, men who sleep around so much would much rather abortion be widely available, since they wouldn’t want to be “burdened” with the responsibilities of fatherhood. Pro-life men tend to be Christians, and Christians tend to view sex in the way God does, which is that it’s something only a man and a woman ought to do when they are married, not before or outside of it.
 
The funny thing is that Bette Midler isn’t the only moron to suggest women don’t have sex with men in “protest” to a heartbeat bill. Back in 2019, when Georgia passed a similar heartbeat bill, equally-as-stupid actress Alyssa Milano called on women to go on a “sex strike” because “we just cannot risk pregnancy” “until women have legal control over our own bodies.”
 
Naturally, I’m inclined to argue that women have legal control over their OWN bodies, not the bodies of others including their own children, but I don’t care to argue with someone who said this back in 2019.
 
The reason for pointing this out is that this seems to be one of at least two arguments Leftists sometimes make regarding pro-life bills (yes, they make a slew of other ones, but I want to talk about these two specifically because both arguments are actually beneficial to society).
 
They make the self-defeating argument that women should abstain from sex, as we just talked about. But they also make another argument that, frankly, I can’t help but agreeing with 100% and believe would be a benefit to society: that men shouldn’t legally be allowed to get a woman pregnant and then abandon her. That “if she has to stick with the pregnancy and the consequences of it, then so should he,” as I hear liberals put it.
 
Every time I see this on social media (not that I frequent them all too much anymore) from a liberal who makes this argument, I tend to reply with something akin to “deal”. In essence, completely agreeing with the premise.
 
Though they obviously make these arguments for the wrong reasons (as they would still prefer both to have sex and not have to “stick” with the pregnancy), I definitely won’t stop liberals from inadvertently making arguments which help improve society.
 
Indeed, women should be practicing abstinence until they get married (same for men). This is the Christian view of sex and I won’t complain if liberals end up making this same argument or begin advocating for this, even if for the wrong reasons. And men definitely shouldn’t get to enjoy the pleasures of sexual intercourse and then bail the minute the consequences of such intercourse come up.
 
Both as a Christian and as a man, it disgusts me that a man would get a woman pregnant and then abandon her and the child. It’s utterly wrong and despicable to do such a thing to a woman. And while the Left might say that they also have a problem against that, it’s the natural consequence of the “sexual liberation” movement of the 1960’s, sponsored by the American Left both of then and now.
 
But if liberals inadvertently make arguments that would make society better (a man having to legally stay with the pregnant woman would do wonders for strengthening the nuclear family, not to mention it would accomplish much the same as the abstinence insofar as it keeps these men from humping anything that moves), who am I to complain?
 
I’ll certainly point out that they would make things better, hence this very article, but you won’t hear me making arguments against such things. At most, I would only highlight that they are only doing this for the entirely wrong reasons, which is something that definitely ought to be addressed, but otherwise, I’ll be as silent as a mouse.
 
After all, as Napoleon is attributed with saying, “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”
 
Romans 12:19
“Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.’”

Because liberalism is a mental illness, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that any solution to a problem brought up by a Leftist will be utterly moronic.
 
So when it comes to the problem of gun violence, instead of going with logical solutions like allowing people to defend themselves, the city of San Francisco will instead opt to pay “high risk criminals”, aka people who are highly likely to shoot someone, $300 a month to not shoot people and an extra $200 if they work on “improving their community”, which can mean anything from simply working and attending school to being a mediator in a situation that might lead to violence.
 
The kicker of that last one is that it’s unclear whether or not one needs to be successful in preventing violence through mediation in order to get paid. So it potentially could be that two people could be fighting, a person in the Dream Keeper Fellowship program (the program we’re talking about) comes in and says “stop, don’t hurt each other”, the two say “shut up” and the person in the program could just be like “well, I tried,” and be paid $200.
 
And there is a reason I think such a ridiculous situation could be plausible, which I will get to momentarily.
 
Now, where will San Francisco get the money to pay criminals not to specifically shoot people (another thing I will get to momentarily)? Well, by diverting $120 million in funding from law enforcement, of course. So it’s basically another “defund the police” attempt which will undoubtedly backfire on San Francisco.
 
According to The New American, the program “will start with engaging 10 participants in October, and will then expand to another 30 ‘high-risk individuals’ by the end of the year.”
 
And The San Francisco Examiner, which is critical of programs such as these, noted that this program is partly designed after the Operation Peacemaker Fellowship program in Richmond, California, which offers criminals up to $1,000 a month to not shoot other people.
 
At the outset, that program seems like a resounding success. A 2019 study published in the American Journal of Public Health showed that, following the installation of the program, there was a 55% decrease in gun homicides and a 43% decrease in shootings since the program began in 2010. However, there are a few problems with the program.
 
First, there is one massive, obvious loophole that criminals can take advantage of: They are paid not to SHOOT others, not to not harm or try to kill others in general. While it’s true that gun-related crime decreased by a lot since the program began, there was also a 16% increase in stabbings, beatings, all kinds of assaults and homicides which didn’t involve a firearm.
 
In essence, Richmond experienced what London has for a few years now: less gun-related crime, but a lot of other kinds of violent crime anyway.
 
They didn’t make their cities safer, just changed the way in which violence was perpetrated.
 
And the second problem of this program: it didn’t even work with one criminal. One of the participants of that Richmond program was later arrested and sentenced to 40 years to life in prison for SHOOTING and killing another man.
 
Basically, the guy was part of the program, likely was paid a decent amount of money (again, Richmond offered up to a thousand dollars a month), and then went on to violate the terms of the program anyway, rendering it utterly useless.
 
Those two real-life cases are the reason I think that aforementioned ridiculous scenario, where two people fight and a participant could be paid for “trying” to stop it, could happen, and why I specified that the program pays criminals to not shoot people.
 
The guy who shot and killed someone was paid by the program and then went on to violate the rules of the program anyway, so it’s easy to see someone doing that exact same thing in San Francisco and particularly easy to see someone “trying” to stop a violent act from happening and getting paid even if unsuccessful.
 
And the rise in other kinds of violent crime apart from gun violence is why I specified the program paying criminals not to shoot others. Such idiotic solutions may appear to work at the outset, like I said, but they don’t actually work to perform the stated purpose of reducing violence.
 
If San Francisco wants to see a decrease in violence, gun-related or otherwise, they need to make it easier for people to arm and defend themselves.
 
Like I have said in other articles talking about gun control, it doesn’t work. San Francisco has strict gun control measures and still sees a lot of gun violence. That’s no coincidence.
 
And for those who might argue that it makes no sense to make it easier for criminals to get a gun, consider that this makes it easier for law-abiding citizens to get a gun, and criminals often target people and places they strongly believe are unarmed.
 
Schools are gun-free zones and are often targeted by sickos. Police departments and prisons have tons of people who have guns and know how to use them, and you rarely, if ever, hear about shootings happening in those places.
 
Now, one might argue “but military bases have been sites for shootings, and they have the best weapons in the world.” Yes, but bases also have regulations that disarm their soldiers in most places. Allow soldiers to always be armed and you will be far less likely to hear of shootings at military bases, and if you do, the death toll will be minimal and will almost certainly largely include the shooter.
 
The general point is that by disarming the populace, you make it easier on the CRIMINALS to get their way. Not to mention that programs like these can, and often do, fund their criminal actions.
 
Criminals will procure their weapons most often through illegal means, so gun control law doesn’t prevent anyone from getting a gun except people who already INTEND to follow the law and would use it defensively.
 
Like I said, if San Francisco wants to really reduce violence in their city, they should allow their citizens to arm themselves more easily. But Democrats never actually care to solve the problems they create. After all, how else are they going to get their fundraising and donation money to “try to solve these problems”?
 
They will dine and live great lives off of the blood of their constituents.
 
Matthew 15:14
“Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.”

According to a recent study by the Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published in The Lancet, fully vaccinated people (that is, those who have taken the ridiculous two shots) carry 251 times the viral load of the Chinese coronavirus compared to those who are unvaccinated.
 
The study reads: “Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020.”
 
And in what is a particularly bad blow to the vaccine narrative, the study shows that the vaccinated can spread to both the vaxxed and unvaxxed. According to the Daily Veracity:
 
“The study focused on healthcare workers who were unable to leave the hospital for two weeks. The study showed that fully vaccinated workers, about two months after injection, carried and transmitted the virus to their vaccinated colleagues after infection. They also passed the virus to unvaccinated people, including their patients. The vaccine used in the study was the Oxford/AstraZeneca (AZD1222) vaccine.”
 
While this isn’t particularly new, it’s just more evidence against the vaccine and particularly the vax mandates.
 
One of the biggest reasons the Left claims for getting the vaccine is that one wouldn’t be able to transmit the virus onto other people. Even though a vaccine is meant to protect the person GETTING IT and this narrative goes completely against what is generally understood about vaccines, that is what the Left had been arguing for a long time. However, even that isn’t true (shocker), as the vaccinated, if they get the virus (or something, seeing as we’ve previously discussed the potential inexistence of COVID-19), can spread it onto other people, even those who are also vaccinated.
 
So what is the point of getting the vaccine? There is no medical or scientific reason for it, you’re just supposed to do as you’re told and if possible, they will force you to get it through social and financial coercion, violating the Nuremberg Code.
 
Every supposed “benefit” of getting the vaccine has utterly backfired after even some amount of review. It used to be that those who were vaccinated had the “privilege” to not wear a mask (as if that actually stopped the rest of us from doing the same), but recently, the CDC went back on that, urging vaccinated people to continue to wear masks because they were still catching and spreading the virus (or whatever else, but let’s, for the sake of the argument, say it’s really the Chinese coronavirus).
 
Even the vaccine passports will likely backfire on them, given that they already are in the UK.
 
According to Breitbart, “Britain’s socialized healthcare system reportedly falsified up to 700,000 vaccine passport records… resulting in many Britons being barred from leaving the country.”
 
In other words, the British healthcare system messed up the healthcare records of 700,000 Brits, keeping them from enjoying the “benefits” of the vaccine passport system, such as going to clubs or pubs, large public events like sports games, etc.
 
So not only is it a draconian system which divides and discriminates against people because they don’t want to be part of an experimental vaccine trial and fall victim to violations of the Nuremberg Code, but it’s a draconian system which doesn’t even work (again, shocker).
 
So the vaccinated still have to wear masks and social distance (according to the fascists, that is. They don’t actually have to do any such thing), they can still catch and spread the virus thereby negating any medical benefit to the vaccine, and the fascistic vax passport system, at least in the UK, is not only authoritarian but also incompetent and broken.
 
I repeat, what reason is there to get a vaccine? We’ve already seen that it doesn’t protect you from catching the virus, which at this point, with the Delta variant (assuming it exists) being the dominant one, isn’t much of a big deal since the variant is 20 times less lethal than the original strain (again, assuming these things exist).
 
The study from Oxford found the less lethal Delta strain in all of those vaccinated workers, which is probably the reason as to why they survived, but again, seeing as the Delta strain is less lethal than the already pretty mild 99.98% non-lethal Chinese coronavirus, what reason is there for someone without the vax to get jabbed?
 
Not to mention the VAERS system which shows tens of thousands of reported deaths from the vaccines (which, I will remind you, is a system which reports less than 1% of all actual cases in the U.S., so the real number is likely much, much higher) and other adverse effects from the vaccine, such as thrombosis (blood clots), anaphylaxis (allergic reactions), neurologic injury and, in pregnant women, particularly those in the first and second trimesters, spontaneous abortion.
 
All these risks just to get a vaccine which doesn’t work, to “protect” you from something you have a greater than 99.98% chance of surviving if you are relatively young and healthy, since, again, the Delta variant is the dominant one and it’s far less lethal.
 
Oh, and you may even become a super spreader due to the 251 times greater viral load, therefore putting your loved ones at risk (according to the Left’s argument).
 
This entire charade has been one massive pile of bullcrap after another. A virus which people were too afraid to accurately say came from China, which has a survival rate equal to or greater than the flu, which apparently only targets rallying Republicans and Trump supporters but not BLM and Antifa rioters and Democrat politicians.
 
We were repeatedly told we only had to wait 15 days to slow the spread. This was over 530 days ago. In the meantime, almost all states went into lockdown, causing a mini-recession, millions of jobs lost from which we are still recovering, and untold pain and deaths caused by said lockdowns which will go ignored because people were too damn afraid of the virus (in large part because the Establishment kept insisting this was practically the Plague).
 
We were told we could reopen once cases went down. They went down and many states didn’t reopen. We were told we could reopen once vaccines were available. Vaccines are available and many states have RE-ENTERED lockdown. The goalposts keep being moved and b.s. reason after b.s. reason keeps being thrown out.
 
And on top of all that, we are being driven insane by the illogic of the insistence of getting a vaccine which even a VENTRILOQUIST COMEDIAN IN JEFF DUNHAM can see is utter stupidity (in a video where he had one of his puppets asks questions to a puppet “Joe Biden” during a press conference, which included the vaccines among other topics).
 
And now, along with everything else, a study shows that those who were gullible enough to get a vaccine might be super spreaders due to the viral load? I repeat, for the final time (in this article), why would anyone ever get one of these vaccines?
 
Proverbs 18:7
“A fool’s mouth is his ruin, and his lips are a snare to his soul.”