The Left repeatedly has demanded that “we listen to doctors” and “experts” and that we “follow the science” surrounding the Chinese coronavirus. They, of course, are liars and hypocrites, as they utterly ignore any scientific data which shows this whole pandemic to be a farce and their supposedly “effective” measures to be nothing but pipe dreams at best and heavily damaging to society at worst.
They often try to cite Anthony Fauci as the be-all and end-all of scientific credentials, and that what he says is basically the Gospel. Well, here we have a doctor with even BETTER credentials than Fauci, Dr. Thomas T. Siler.
Dr. Siler is an internist with 37 years of experience, the same credentials as Fauci, and actually treats patients, so he gets to see the actual effects of the pandemic first-hand, making him a far more credible source than Fauci.
Dr. Siler wrote two articles, one in which he details the good news about the Chinese coronavirus and another which talks about “the bad and the ugly” surrounding the virus.
Let’s begin with the good news, shall we?
Siler details 10 points, or pieces of good news, for us to know:
1. “Globally, the survival rate for COVID-19 is 99.8%. Under the age of 70, the survival rate for COVID-19 is 99.97%. This is on par with many influenza seasons. Americans younger than 70 do not have to fear COVID-19 any more than influenza and we know how to protect the elderly.”
2. “Herd immunity for the alpha strain is here.” Dr. Siler says that antibody studies show that the percentage of those with natural immunity is 4-6 times higher than the number of cases in the U.S. And according to another doctor, from Johns Hopkins University, 80-85% of the population is immune. “Those who deny this,” Siler writes, “must explain how cases and deaths started to decline in January way before there was a significant vaccine effort. Instead, we are transitioning now from a pandemic to endemic status and, indeed, some eminent virologists say vaccinating in the middle of a pandemic is making herd immunity more difficult to obtain through the creation of variants.”
3. “The average age of death from COVID is 78. The average life expectancy in America is 78… Children and those under age 70 are at much lower risk.”
4. “Hydroxychloroquine works. Ivermectin works. It has been estimated 85% of COVID-19 deaths could have been prevented were these medicines used early.”
5. “Children are safe from COVID-19 and don’t spread the virus either. A study in the UK showed that the survival rate in children is 99.995%. In the U.S. 335 children have died since the start of the pandemic. A study done by Johns Hopkins and FAIR Health showed that all of the children that died from April 2020 to August 2020 had immune problems or were chronically ill. In that period, not one healthy child died. Children have more chance of dying in a car wreck, unintentional drug overdose, or influenza than from COVID-19. Vaccination for healthy children is not needed.”
6. “Sweden did not have a lockdown or mask mandate and did better with cases and deaths than many countries. Lockdown did not work and had serious cultural and economic side effects. There is ample literature now to show that masks, as we are using them, do not work.”
7. “Persons who have had COVID-19 infection have a robust and long-lasting immunity. This immunity also is likely to protect against variants. As evidence continues to accumulate that the new mRNA vaccines are neither as effective nor safe as advertised, I would advise not getting the vaccine on top of your natural immunity if you had the COVID-19 infection.”
8. “There is very little, if any, spread of COVID-19 from asymptomatic persons. This lie was spread early to maximize fear of this new virus. COVID-19 is like other respiratory viral infections – you catch it from being around someone who has symptoms.”
9. “The death rate nationally for COVID-19 has been going down since January.”
10. “The Delta variant is acting like a typical historical virus variant. Typically, variants happen all the time and are more contagious but less deadly… A UK report states the Delta variant is likely 20 times less deadly than the alpha strain, but that more data needs to be collected.”
Basically, Siler said, we needn’t be afraid of the Chinese coronavirus.
Unfortunately, there are entities who wish to only further increase the fear, rather than remain rational about it. For a variety of reasons, the lies and hysteria will only continue, and unfortunately, those who try and tell the truth will be de-platformed or generally censored, as Siler notes in his second article.
Now, we move on to the bad things about the pandemic:
1. The death count “has been artificially elevated to maximize fear.” “California’s fifth-most populous county revised its COVID-19 death count down by 22% after reviewing the cases for the last 18 months.” Washington and Minnesota also lowered their counts and it’s likely that “overcounting happened across our country.”
2. “The PCR test for COVID-19 is flawed in many ways and led to overcounting cases. Two weeks ago, the CDC and FDA quietly said they would abandon the PCR test for COVID-19 in December 2021, acknowledging it did not work. They also alluded to the fact that the PCR test could not distinguish between COVID and the flu. Did the flu go away last year? No, many cases were counted as COVID-19. The CDC and FDA also now admit that they did not have any physical samples of the COVID-19 virus (I’ll get to why in a moment) so they used common cold Coronaviruses and human cells to make a less accurate test.”
3. “The new mRNA vaccines are far from safe. While the VAERS reporting system now has over 10,000 deaths (EU 20,000 deaths) after the vaccine, a whistleblower with the CDC says the actual count is closer to 50,000 and not being reported. Adverse reactions, including… blood clots, neurologic injury, and spontaneous abortion have approached 650,000 patients in the USA.”
4. “The mRNA vaccine is not safe in pregnant women. An article in the New England Medical Journal showed a rate of spontaneous abortion of 12% which is close to what is normally expected and the conclusion was the vaccine was safe to give. However, the study was skewed to include mostly women in the third trimester (84%). The remaining women in the 1st and 2nd trimesters had a 75% spontaneous abortion rate (96 out of 127).”
5. Supposedly prestigious medical journals have spread disinformation. “The Lancet, the top medical journal in Europe, had to retract a study saying Hydroxychloroquine was not working on COVID-19 when it was proved that there was no data for the study… The Lancet also published a statement signed by several scientists saying the COVID-19 virus could not have possibly come from the Wuhan lab. With evidence mounting now that this is exactly what happened the Lancet cannot admit it was wrong. Faith in our medical leaders is waning.”
6. “Antibody Dependent Enhancement (“ADE”) may be happening. [R]eports are beginning to come in from countries that are heavily vaccinated, such as Israel, that vaccinated people are getting sick and may have more serious illnesses than those not vaccinated.”
7. “The mRNA vaccines are not 95% effective as touted. Efficacy is likely closer to 40-70% but more data is needed. Reports coming in from Israel and states like Massachusetts show high numbers of vaccinated people (over 50%) in the hospital with COVID-19.”
In that article, Siler also points to “the ugly” of the pandemic, such as the shady bullcrap that we have seen from “scientists” and the government. For example, Siler points to the faulty PCR testing being used to inflate case numbers and maximizing fear; or the fact that some protests and riots are ok and not superspreaders, such as BLM and Antifa riots, or things like a massive birthday bash for Obama, but other protests and gatherings, like any Trump rally or the Jan. 6th rally, being supposed superspreader events.
Read the article yourself for more such examples from Siler, because I want to get to the one thing the doc never got to which, as I mentioned previously, is related to why neither the CDC nor FDA don’t have samples of the Chinese coronavirus and had to use other coronaviruses: COVID-19 has yet to be proven to actually exist.
See, the way in which viruses are effectively proven to exist is through a process of isolation. You take a cell you believe is infected with the virus and attempt to isolate the virus from the rest of the cell. There is a pretty good article on Algora that goes into more technical detail about the process for finding new viruses, far too detailed for me to be able to simplify more than I already have. It also says that “none” of the steps necessary for isolating and discovering a new virus have “even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus.”
“But how can that be?” one might be compelled to ask. “We have seen the picture of the virus, with the cell and the things sticking out of it looking kind of like a crown, like the picture above.” Well, if that were evidence of the existence of the virus, the evolutionary “road-map” from ape to human would count as evidence of evolution. They likely made that graphic out of other coronaviruses and how they look. For example, the following:
MERS also looks rather similar to coronaviruses.
So just because we have all seen the graphic of what COVID-19 “looks like” that doesn’t necessarily mean that it exists. That it hasn’t been isolated means that it hasn’t been proven to exist.
Remember, also, that Siler mentioned that the death rate is on par with many influenza seasons and that the flu didn’t simply go away last year but many flu cases were counted as Chinese coronavirus cases. In a pandemic, it would be expected for MORE people than usual to die in a given year, yet we have seen that the number of people dying over the last few years has been about the same. Fewer were reported to die from things like the flu or influenza, etc., not because humanity somehow evolved into being capable of surviving those things within a year or two (any evolutionary biologist, even the most ardent and Leftist one, would tell you that’s not how evolution works) but because we have attributed non-COVD deaths to COVID, literally including gunshot wounds.
People have gotten sick, yes, but people always get sick with many things. The only difference is that, this time, those illnesses have been in the spotlight but been called COVID-19.
In Alberta, Canada, a man was fined $1,200 CAN for being in a “large gathering” of more than 10 people. In court, he demanded to see evidence of the virus isolated to justify a pandemic and the measures for which he was being fined. He specifically subpoenaed the Chief Medical Officer of Health for Alberta that she might isolate the virus and show proof of its existence. They tried dirty tricks like subpoenaing the man back within 24 hours of a court appearance, which was a “procedural violation” and which the man got the judge to agree was a violation. Eventually, the CMO’s lawyer said: “Well, your honor, [the defendant] is requesting evidence we cannot get.”
The health office of Alberta could not get evidence that the Chinese coronavirus was isolated and, therefore, real, something which, if anyone had isolated the virus, ought to be easy for them to have acquired such evidence.
Now, I have said previously that the CCP likely developed this virus in a lab and released it on accident but took advantage of the chaos to set the world on fire. It can’t be that both are true, since either it’s not real and therefore the CCP developed nothing or it’s real and the CCP developed something but there should be isolation and proof of the virus of which there isn’t any.
The CCP definitely is developing things in their virology institutes, since they are commie crap. We know for certain that, if the virus is real, that it’s artificial. But do we know that it definitely exists even artificially? The evidence points to the idea that no, it doesn’t exist. It would certainly make sense, since, again, you’d expect far more deaths in pandemic years than we would have in other years, even if the virus is artificial, yet the number of deaths has been about the same.
My gut instinct here is to go with the idea that it doesn’t exist (isolation is a key component) but that if it ever is isolated and proven to exist, we at least also know for sure that it is manufactured and not natural, as evidence shows.
At any rate, to close on this rather long article, what Dr. Siler wrote in his articles is great and certainly truthful. And all this from someone who has FAR more credibility than the Left’s St. Fauci.
“The heart of him who has understanding seeks knowledge, but the mouths of fools feed on folly.”
As I have explained many times in the past, Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a racist theory calling itself “anti-racist” because it supposedly “empowers” blacks while “destroying” white supremacy or whatever else. Basically, it makes white people out to be devils because of their race and black people to be victims for the same reason. Anyone with a positive IQ can tell that CRT fits the definition of racism to a T.
One black father from Colorado, named Derrick Wilburn, has such a positive IQ and in a school board meeting, demanded that the board ban the racist teaching from Colorado Springs School District 49’s classrooms.
Wilburn began by saying the following: “I am a direct descendant of the North American slave trade. Both my parents are black. All four of my grandparents are black, all eight of my great grandparents, all 16 of my great greats. On my mother’s side, my ancestors were enslaved in Alabama. On my father’s side, we were enslaved in Texas.”
The reason for mentioning this is that, by the Left’s own logic, if anyone can claim to be a victim of the legacy of slavery in this nation, it would be Wilburn and his family. Yet, he says the following: “I’m not oppressed, and I’m not a victim.”
The Left, mostly white knight liberals, make the claim that black people are oppressed and victimized because of crap that happened centuries ago. That a black person today is a victim of the slavery that was abolished over 150 years ago. By sharing the fact about his ancestry, and that his family used to be slaves, and proceeding to say that he is not oppressed or a victim is to shatter this delusional argument.
He then went on to explain that he travels the country extensively, and that no matter where he goes, he is “treated with kindness, dignity, and respect.”
“I have three children. They are not oppressed, either – although they are victims. I’ve taught my children they are victims of three things: their own ignorance, their own laziness, and their own poor decision-making.”
“Putting Critical Race Theory into our classrooms has taken our nation in the wrong direction. Racism in America would by and large be dead today if it were not for certain people and institutions keeping it on life support,” among which being the education system in this country.
“I can think of nothing more damaging to society,” he continued, “than to tell a baby today that she has grievances against another baby born today simply because of what their ancestors may have done two centuries ago.”
And he’s certainly correct. It is outright ghoulish to teach a child that he or she is naturally made enemies with another person simply because of what happened LONG before either of them were born or simply because of the immutable aspects of their skin color.
Critical Race Theory teaches white kids that they are, by nature, oppressors and black kids that they are, also by nature, oppressed. It gives rise to victimizing black people and, in some of those white kids, to make them think that they might be superior, thereby increasing, not diminishing, white supremacy. And if they teach that the white kids should feel inferior, that creates black supremacy instead, which is equally terrible.
CRT is simply the newest model of outright blatant racism that the Left wishes to create in this country.
And there are people like Wilburn who recognize this as well. He continued, “Putting Critical Race Theory into our classrooms is not combating racism. It’s fanning the flames of what little embers are left. Let racism die the death it deserves.”
Later on, the school board, thankfully, voted to pass the resolution to ban CRT from its schools, but by a narrow 3-2 vote.
The board provided their rationale for this vote, explaining that the school district “partners with parents to assist in their responsibility to educate their children in accordance with the principle that America is a nation founded on the principle that all men and women are created equal per the Declaration of Independence, Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”
They also argued that CRT “excludes individuals who merely advocate for neutral principles of the Constitution, or who deny or question the extent to which white supremacy shapes our institutions.” And that while schools ought to teach unvarnished American history, “such exposure should not purport to deliberately undermine student/family values, religious beliefs, or principles.”
The resolution also bans schools from being able to separate students by their race or assigning them work based on such criteria. It also further prohibits teaching the idea “that race is the most important identity,” “that group identity is more important than individual identity,” and that one is automatically an “oppressor or oppressed according to their race.”
While that is a good statement, it bothers me to no end that this wasn’t a 5-0 vote and even more so that it was as slim a margin as 3-2, which leads me to encourage parents, if they are able, to take their kids out of these crappy government schools.
That it was as slim a margin as that leaves it vulnerable to go the other direction some time in the future. While the people of that school district should take measures to ensure that that doesn’t happen, there is no guarantee that the district won’t ever go back on this decision and start teaching the racist CRT in their classrooms.
To save their children from such indoctrination (and, frankly, the indoctrination that is already allowed to occur in such classrooms), parents should take their kids out of these government schools and find alternatives, such as private school (a good one, as there can still be Leftist ones, if New York is anything to go by), schools tied with a church, or homeschooling which can be organized by parents in a neighborhood.
Whatever it takes to save these children from the toxic nonsense that the Left teaches and ruins any child that is subjected to it.
We have already seen, for the last few decades, what Leftist education does to children. It destroys them physically (obesity rates are sky-high because kids aren’t taught that sugar leads to obesity, not to mention the unhealthy crap they serve in cafeterias), spiritually (not having God in the classroom for 60 years will do that), mentally (an astounding coincidence that we have so many mental health issues when people who are mentally ill teach in schools) and emotionally (youth suicide, ages 10 to 24, jumped 57% between 2007 and 2018, and this was, as you can see, BEFORE the COVID-related suicides).
You wanna know how to Make America Great Again? Take Leftists and Leftism, not God, out of schools. Put God back in schools and His Teachings. Don’t tell kids that they are worthless crap descended from dumbass monkeys and fish who don’t know how to be fish (seriously, I’m to believe life on land happened because a fish somehow “evolved” to live somewhere it never lived on before? That’s not adaptation, that’s retardation) and are, therefore, here for no reason at all. Tell them that they were created in the image of the Almighty God who has a plan for their lives and that their lives matter (wanna ensure people believe that black lives matter? Teach them that lives matter, period).
That this decision was 3-2 when it should be clear as day that CRT is racist bullcrap tells me one of two things about the two people who voted to teach that crap: They are racist themselves, or they have a negative IQ. Either option is intolerable and inexcusable.
Parents shouldn’t wait for the district to, one day, reverse course on this, given how close of a vote this was. That it was this close ought to infuriate parents on the winning side and demand the resignation of the two dissenters.
Pull your kids out of government schools, for their sake.
“See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.”
Leftist Hypocrisy: Socialist Editor Reportedly Tried To Fire Staff For Trying To Organize Worker Co-Op
Evidence #481284 that socialists are utter hypocrites and only espouse beliefs they think others ought to follow but not themselves if said beliefs are in any way detrimental to those socialists.
For context, a group of employees of far-Left magazine Current Affairs have complained that Editor-in-Chief of the magazine, Nathan J. Robinson, has terminated their employment because they were attempting to organize a worker co-op at the company.
For those who don’t know, a worker co-op is basically the stated goal of communism, whereby companies are owned and controlled by the workers, not the people at the top.
What the workers were doing was practicing the very thing that Robinson espouses, and he tried to get them fired over it.
The employees who were reportedly fired wrote a statement giving out their grievances over the situation:
“Dear Comrades (yes, it does seriously start like that)
On August 8th, editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson (author of Why You Should Be A Socialist) unilaterally fired most of the workforce to avoid an organizational restructuring that would limit his personal power. Yes, we were fired by the editor-in-chief of a socialist magazine for trying to start a worker co-op.” (Emphasis original).
The statement then goes on to discuss a Zoom meeting during which Robinson was reportedly agitated over the workers’ desire to start a co-op. The statement also claims that Robinson wrote letters to five particular individuals where he expressed that he had “irreparably lost faith” in them and their ability to work together in the future.
Shortly after, Robinson reportedly retracted such statements, but claimed that “in his guts” he thought of the magazine as his and that, therefore, he ought to be the sole voice and leader atop any hierarchy in the organization.
“This organization has been heading slowly for some sort of reckoning where it was going to have to be made clear once and for all what kind of authority I wanted to have over it,” Robinson explained. “And I was in denial about the fact that the answer is I think I should be on top of the org chart, with everyone else selected by me and reporting to me. I let Current Affairs build up into a sort of egalitarian community of friends while knowing in my heart that I still thought of it as my project over which I should have control.”
Kind of sounds like a greedy capitalist pig! Or, more realistically, like a typical commie once he gets a taste of near absolute power.
Communism might sell itself as being about the benefit of workers and their control over corporations, but reality shows that to be the exact opposite. Corporations, if owned by anyone, are owned by either the government or people who are allied to the government by ideology or threat of death.
The Soviets routinely promised that the power belonged to “The People”, but by “The People” they meant themselves. They killed their people, arrested their people, kidnapped their people, starved their people, raped their people, robbed their people, abused their people and enslaved their people. Where they had originally promised the people the ability to own the companies and land they worked for, they instead forced them to own nothing at all, save for the clothes on their backs.
And this wasn’t a unique occurrence to the Soviets and the Russian people. This occurrence was the rule, not the exception, and I have yet to see the exception. In reality, everywhere there is communism, this is what happens: Promises of a better future where the people will own everything and the cold reality of a bitter future where the people will own nothing.
This, seemingly, is even the case in a socialist COMPANY. Their editor-in-chief is an avowed socialist and has written a book literally titled “Why you should be a socialist” and yet, acts seemingly in very anti-socialistic ways.
Supposedly, the socialist cause is what the workers are siding with: the workers being the owners of the company. That is the stated goal of communism, after all.
However, the real socialist cause is what the editor-in-chief is siding with: complete control over the entity and the people involved with it.
The reason it seems like such a juxtaposition is because the Left has long been capable of fooling people into believing that communism is for the little people and to the benefit of the little people, when it’s that precise demographic that most gets screwed.
Now, make no mistake, I am NOT siding with the socialist workers here. They deserve to see this crap happening to them because this is precisely what THEY HAVE BEEN ESPOUSING this whole time. They likely won’t realize it from this instance alone, if at all, but this is exactly the kind of result socialism brings.
Neither am I siding with the socialist editor-in-chief, as he also deserves the crap he is getting for seemingly acting “anti-socialistically” and in seeming opposition to his espoused beliefs.
I am merely pointing out that everyone involved with this mess is an idiot and a hypocrite. The editor-in-chief because he is acting seemingly contrary to his espoused beliefs and the workers because they are being treated exactly how all victims of socialism are treated, minus being unfairly sent to the gulags for complaining about their “Dear Leader”.
Not to mention that, were we to become a complete communist country, the editor-in-chief would quickly be victimized by the communist regime he would help establish. After all, it’s the useful idiots who are taken out first.
In any case, the magazine’s Board of Directors issued its own statement denying that anyone was “fired”, at least in a technical sense, but that seems to hardly matter, as the “fired” employees were left utterly disgruntled at the whole affair, claiming (with accuracy) that Robinson was unfit to run an organization. This is not merely an opinion from the employees, as Robinson himself reportedly wrote in one of those retracted statements that “I am not good at running an organization. I freely admit this.”
Not surprising, seeing as socialists hardly ever are, and if they seemingly are, it’s largely thanks to the financial help of far-Left billionaires like George Soros and the Rothschilds.
At any rate, whether the employees were ultimately fired or not is irrelevant. Robinson did TRY to fire them for attempting to organize a socialist workers’ co-op, showing how hypocritical he is and how much of an actual farse socialism and communism are in general.
Too bad there will be people who refuse to learn from this crap.
“No one who practices deceit shall dwell in my house; no one who utters lies shall continue before my eyes.”
Allow me to preface this by explaining roughly what I mean when I say that this is at all “surprising.” What I find surprising isn’t that the CCP has control over the WHO or that it uses pressuring tactics to force such organizations to lie on their behalf. What I find surprising is that anyone from the WHO, particularly a lead investigator into the origins of the Chinese coronavirus, would reverse course on the narrative and expose the CCP for its deceitful tactics.
What is also rather surprising is that the news organization to break this story is Jeff Bezos’ The Washington Post. They report that Peter Ben Embarek, a top scientist leading the WHO’s investigation into the origins of the Chinese coronavirus, “said Chinese researchers on the team had pushed back against linking the origins of the pandemic to a research laboratory in Wuhan in a report about the investigation.”
“In further comments during the interview that were not included in the documentary but were incorporated in an account by the Danish channel TV2 on its website, Ben Embarek suggested that there could have been ‘human error’ but that the Chinese political system does not allow authorities to acknowledge that,” continued the report.
What he’s saying is that the virus likely originated in the lab and was released as a result of some sort of accident, or “human error” as he puts it. Since the CCP is built on nothing but lies, it insists that anyone working in the government be seen as infallible and perfect, incapable of making mistakes such as these. They try to maintain an aura of perfection and effectiveness, so the idea that the virus came not only from a lab but was an accident goes against the narrative they wish to drive.
Embarek also said that the CCP pressed the investigating team to not look into the lab and only allowed them to report that it was “very unlikely” that the Chinese coronavirus escaped from a lab and demanded that the team “didn’t recommend any specific studies to further that hypothesis.”
In a TV interview, Embarek said that “it’s interesting that the lab relocated on the 2nd of December 2019: That’s the period where it all started. We know that when you move a lab, it disturbs everything… That entire procedure is always a disruptive element in the daily work routine of a lab.”
Embarek wasn’t completely betraying CCP narratives, however, and while he said that the virus likely came from the lab, he also said that it was likely a researcher at the lab could have become infected collecting bat samples, arguing that such a case would be one where “the virus jumps directly from a bat to a human.”
Essentially, he is revealing that it likely came from a lab, but not that it was necessarily altered or artificially created, just that it was originally in a bat and it was transmitted to a human, sort of like the original reported “origin” of the virus being from a Wuhan market.
However, New York magazine reported earlier this year that when six field workers got sick in a Chinese cave back in 2012 with a virus which is most closely related to the Chinese coronavirus, they were taken to a hospital and none of the hospital workers got sick, so the virus was not transmissible.
This is relevant because Dr. Steven Quay and UC Berkeley physics professor Richard Muller explained to The WSJ back in June that the genomic structure of the Chinese coronavirus was not found in any other virus in nature. That is the strongest evidence that the Chinese coronavirus was MANUFACTURED.
So no, it wasn’t transmitted from a bat to a human even in a lab. That the genomic sequence was unnatural indicates artificial creation through gain-of-function research.
In gain-of-function research, a spike protein is altered for the purposes of making a virus more transmissible and lethal. The specific genome sequence of CGG-CGG (known as “double CGG)” has “never been found naturally,” according to Quay and Muller, “in the entire class of coronaviruses that includes CoV-2.” They further explained that natural processes could not create a sequence combination if it “isn’t present in any other virus.”
“Although the double CGG is suppressed naturally, the opposite is true in laboratory work. The insertion sequence of choice is the double CGG. That’s because it is readily available and convenient, and scientists have a great deal of experience inserting it… Now the damning fact. It was this exact sequence that appears in CoV-2. Proponents of zoonotic origin must explain why the novel coronavirus, when it mutated or recombined, happened to pick its least favorite combination, the double CGG. Why did it replicate the choice the lab’s gain-of-function researchers would have made?”
The fact that there was no serious viral “improvement” which took place until a small variation was found many months after the pandemic began in England is also indicative that it was optimized in a lab. Compare it to SARS and MERS, both of which were confirmed to have had a natural origin – rapidly evolved as they spread through the population – until the most contagious forms of the viruses were dominant. The CCP virus, according to Quay and Muller, “didn’t work that way. It appeared in humans already adapted into an extremely contagious version… Such early optimization is unprecedented, and it suggests a long period of adaptation that predated its public spread. Science knows of only one way that could be achieved: simulated natural evolution, growing the virus on human cells until the optimum is achieved. That is precisely what is done in gain-of-function research.”
All evidence suggests to artificial creation of this virus. It makes no sense that Embarek would still be willing to share the nonsensical “bat-to-human transmission” theory when, by this point, he has angered the CCP by revealing what they do. It’s not at all unsurprising that the CCP does this crap, but they still don’t want their dirty laundry aired, and that is what Embarek did, to an extent.
Still, that someone this high up in the WHO would do this at all is a surprise anyway, and something for which I can be appreciative.
I just hope more of the corruption and deception of the CCP gets to be released and shown by even some of their closest allies.
“’The Lord will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you. They shall come out against you one way and flee before you seven ways.’”
In a recent video released by PragerU (below), psychoanalyst and author Erica Komisar made the argument that children should be exposed to God and religion, even if the parents aren’t believers themselves.
She explains that, as a therapist, she is often asked questions about anxiety and depression and why they are so prevalent in children and teenagers. She argues that one explanation for it, which is “almost surely the most neglected” is declining interest in God and religion in the U.S.
Komisar cited a Harvard study which shows that children who attended a religious service at least once a week “scored higher on psychological well-being measurements and had lower risks of mental illness.” This weekly attendance was also linked to “higher rates of volunteerism, lower probabilities of both drug use and early sexual initiation, and a sense of purpose.”
Regardless of the psychological benefits of weekly church attendance, there has been a 20% decrease in weekly religious attendance in the last 20 years. And in 2018, the American Family Survey showed that “nearly half of adults under 30 do not identify with any religion.”
Komisar commented on those surveys saying: “From a purely psychological point of view, this is not a good trend. Nihilism – the belief in nothing – is a rich fertilizer for anxiety and depression.”
As a result, Komisar argues that parents ought to expose their children to God and religion, even if those parents are themselves unbelievers.
Generally, I agree with Komisar and also believe that people ought to come to faith, in part, because of the moral and psychological benefits it would bring.
However, my one issue with JUST making this argument is that it’s no different from arguing that religion is a crutch for people to deal with their daily lives. This is an argument I often hear from unbelievers “Oh, you just believe in this pie-in-the-sky nonsense because you can’t properly deal with the daily stresses of life. It’s just a crutch for you and those who don’t believe in this unscientific nonsense have more mental/intellectual maturity.”
Obviously, such an argument is false and rooted in a misconception of religion, but it’s arguments like the one Komisar gives that sort of fuel that. Again, I am not disagreeing with Komisar on this, and I even understand why she’s making this argument. She’s a therapist, after all, and she wants to help people be better off psychologically and recognizes the mental benefits of religion, belief in God and regular church attendance.
I’m not taking away those benefits because they are, of course, very much there. If you’re going to teach your child something, better it be that God has them in the palm of His hands than that the world is on fire and they might not even get to see their adulthood.
However, to only argue in favor of religion and God in this manner is to lower them to crutches to deal with the truth of life. It ignores the very fact that there can BE no life in the first place without God.
I’m not saying that that’s the argument Komisar is making whatsoever, or that she believes that this is the only purpose of belief in God, but it does have the issue of giving those unbelievers credence they neither have nor deserve.
Parents should 100% expose their children to God and religion even if they don’t believe themselves. Komisar actually makes a fantastic point in the video that there are parents who say “I want to give my children the ability to choose what they believe themselves rather than force anything on them.” If that’s the case, then, Komisar argues, shouldn’t you be more willing to expose your children to God and religion? How else are they to make a free and informed decision about what to believe if they aren’t exposed to such options?
And that is a great argument. For parents to say that they don’t want to force a religion on their children, and so don’t expose their children to religion, because they want their children to choose for themselves is like parents saying they don’t want to force children to eat a particular type of food, so they don’t expose their children to that food, because they want them to choose for themselves.
Ultimately, they are accomplishing the exact OPPOSITE of what they claim to want. They are making that choice for their children to NOT be part of a religion by depriving them of the experience of it.
After all, who chooses to be part of something they have no idea what it is about? “I don’t want to tell my child what he should do when he grows up, so I’m not letting him do anything in any field so he can choose for himself what he wants to do.” That is a dumbass argument when put that way, and yet, it’s the standard operating procedure for some parents when it comes to their child’s beliefs?
If you expose children to nothing, they will know nothing and believe in nothing.
But at any rate, like I said, I generally agree with what Komisar is saying about God, religion and the psychological benefits of both. They definitely are true, and the benefits can be seen in anyone who is actually faithful to God.
God teaches us a myriad of things throughout the Bible, from that which He commands of us in the Ten Commandments to what Jesus said was the most important commandment “You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind,” as well as another commandment which He said was equally as important: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”
We are told by God, who is the author of morality (among all other things except for evil and sin), what is good, what is profitable, what must be done and how, all for His glory and His kingdom.
I am reminded of a guest speaker I once had for my Religion class in high school who was an atheist but argued in favor of the teachings of the Bible because they were, according to him, “good moral teachings.”
They certainly are, and had I known then what I know now, I would have made the same argument I had been making earlier in this article. God is, indeed, moral as He is the author of morality. We are taught that there is no sin in Him and He is not the author of sin and evil. So the speaker wasn’t technically wrong in that regard. However, the Bible is FAR more than just a guide on morality and God and religion are far more than just safe havens from the stresses and harshness of life.
The Bible is God’s very word to us. It depicts the history of not just the Jewish and Christian faiths, but of the entire world and its existence. It shows us who the author of the universe is, with the declaration of the very first words of the Bible being: “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth,” showing the reader that before everything was, He IS. He is eternal, He is omnipotent, He is omniscient, omnipresent, and the Creator and originator of all.
He created the heavens and the earth, all living things on it, above it and underneath it, including mankind. Mankind then was deceived by Satan into rebelling against God, and thusly was punished, along with Satan, for such rebellion, taking away their eternal life and their place in paradise.
Following that, mankind continued to rebel against God, sinning and sinning and being evil by nature, which was once not the case but the punishment by God for their original sin of disbelief in God’s word that if they eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil that they would surely die.
Despite this continual, natural sinfulness and rebellion, God sent His only begotten Son to, among other things, die on the cross for the sins of the people who believe in Him, that they should not perish but have eternal life. God had absolutely no obligation whatsoever to do that, and would be perfectly justified to have sent no savior at all and punish all mankind for its sins. And yet, He did send us a savior, because He is a kind and merciful God who loves His children.
When you understand this about God, one cannot possibly relegate Him to being a mere comforter (though He is a comforter) of the downtrodden, anxious and depressed. One cannot relegate His word as mere good guidance for how to live a moral life. One cannot relegate belief in Him and His word to just a crutch for dealing with life.
Again, I don’t think that’s what Komisar was saying, at all, and don’t think she believes this is all religion and God are good for. And again, I agree with almost everything she said in that PragerU video, with my biggest gripe being that at one point, she said “[B]etter for kids to use their imagination constructing something positive – such as a God who cares about us – than the dark, nihilistic idea that there’s no creator and protector…” which is problematic because it implies that God is someone we create ourselves, according to our desires. God cannot be created by people and a “god” created by evil people will permit evil deeds. I understand what she was trying to say here, but it’s rather problematic how she put it together.
God is a comforter and a protector, yes, but it’s far more beneficial and important to know that He is the Master of the Universe and not a single thing that happens happens without His permission. Even Satan, in all his evil deeds, is held back by God in his wickedness.
God created the world. God controls the world. God created you. God is in control of your life and has you in the palm of His hands. More than just a good psychological answer to the stresses of life, He is the Lord Almighty, in whom people can find comfort. And they can find said comfort precisely because of who He is, not because of who we want Him to be.
Yes, parents ought to expose their children to God and religion, even if they don’t themselves believe, and even if they only do it for the psychological benefits of it, because it can lead to a calling from the Lord to Him. But it is also very important to understand WHY God is even a good source of comfort to begin with and that begins with understanding WHO He is.
“No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day.”
Liberals are hypocritical. This much has consistently been observed for decades, as they will claim to be in support of one thing and then proceed to do the exact opposite to what they “believe.” One such example is of Obama’s birthday bash which I talked about last week, as well as the fact that Leftists will claim to care for the environment and proceed to own massive homes and private jets which leave massive carbon footprints.
Similarly, the Left will claim to be in support of the abolition of slavery, and of the people who fought slavery in the 19th century, but will take similar stances as pro-slavery people with regards to the modern-day evil of abortion.
This is the general point that Christian group Free The States recently tried to make at a rally.
The group distributed over 500,000 fake $20 bills with Harriet Tubman’s face on the front and a burning Pennsylvania Hall (the HQ of the Philadelphia slavery abolition movement which was torched by an angry mob just four days after its opening in May 1838) on the back. The tactic was to basically fool people into attending a “put Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill” rally, where they would be told certain truths about both Tubman and the fight against our modern culture’s evil: abortion.
Furthermore, the group set up a website called “Tubman20.com” and announced an in-person and livestreamed rally for August 1st at the former site of the Pennsylvania Hall.
At the rally, T. Russell Hunter, a 19th century historian and founder of Free The States, explained to the attendees “that though the abolitionists who opposed slavery are lauded in the modern era, they were loathed by the vast majority of Americans in the decades leading to the Civil War,” according to The Daily Wire.
Hunter explained: “Harriet Tubman is popular today. Her abolitionist friends are popular today. You can watch PBS documentaries about the abolitionists William Lloyd Garrison, Frederick Douglass… But when Harriet Tubman was living in this city, she was an outlaw. People tried to chase her down.”
“Harriet Tubman – and these men and women in the abolitionist movement – rejected all compromise with slavery. They demanded its total and immediate abolition. These abolitionists not only argued that slavery was evil, but they argued that gradual abolition was evil. They spent as much time arguing with moderate anti-slavery gradualists as they did arguing against slavery itself.”
“Here’s the point. Does our culture truly support Harriet Tubman? Do we appreciate people like Harriet Tubman, or do we treat abolitionists of today in the way we treated abolitionists of the past?”
“We find ourselves in a similar situation today among a similar people,” he continued to explain. “Chattel slavery is no longer legal; it has been abolished. The Supreme Court no longer prohibits individuals or states from helping those in bondage. However, the federal government, every state government, and the majority of the population totally, emphatically, and unquestionably protects the Supreme Court-sanctioned evil of our own age… I am talking about the evil of human abortion and the movement to abolish it.”
Unsurprisingly, as soon as Hunter revealed the true purpose of the rally, several attendees began to leave in anger. Hunter used those leaving as a good example of his point.
“Some of these folks that leave, that don’t want to hear us out – they don’t realize that they are treating us just the same way as they treated the abolitionists of an earlier age. They were willing to celebrate abolitionists like Harriet Tubman until someone said, ‘You agree with her then, but you would not agree with her now.’”
“We believe that these children ought to be rescued from being taken away to death. Like her, we believe that we should not live for ourselves, but we should live for others. Like her, we believe in and follow Christ. We believe that He leads the abolitionist cause, and that His gospel is the answer to abortion.”
In an interview with The Daily Wire, he noted that “it was very interesting to note who left and who stayed.”
“Almost all the white liberals stormed off in anger when the rally switched gears. But not a single black person left. Many of them stayed for more than thirty minutes after the rally was over to talk about abolitionism and have me sign their bills. Our message resonated strongly with them.”
“Our culture thinks they like Harriet Tubman, but that’s only because they have created a false, secularized version of her. She was a Bible-quoting, gun-toting, evangelical Christian abolitionist who trusted in God’s providence above all else. Tubman was the furthest thing from a modern leftist.”
“Tubman demanded slavery’s total and immediate abolition. She told Lincoln, ‘Never wound a snake. Kill it.’ She supported nullifying tyrannical fugitive slave laws. She supported immediatism, nullification, and many more of the principles pro-life leaders argue against when they oppose abolition bills.”
“Because of this, we set out to teach the culture about immediatism, nullification, and – most importantly – the gospel of Jesus Christ that animated Harriet Tubman.”
There isn’t a single thing here I could possibly, as a Christian, argue against, not that I would want to anyway.
I don’t know of any pro-life leaders who oppose abolition bills, and certainly, one could not consider themselves pro-life, let alone a leader, if they do. But if Hunter is going so far as to mention that, he probably has someone or some people in mind who fit the bill. Certainly, RINO Republicans who say what they need to say to gain support and then betray the principles they claim to espouse.
But what this rally demonstrated was the great point of the similarities of both abolitionist movements of the 19th century and of today.
While polls show that abortion is nowhere near as popular as the Left might have us believe, it is still more popular than I would want, and I’m willing to bet that many people would rather keep than overturn Roe v. Wade, as Hunter was trying to point out.
So with regards to the evil of abortion, abolitionists are much in the same position today as they were in the 19th century with regards to slavery.
Federal and state governments support abortion about as much as they supported slavery, and the reason laws changed was because more and more people recognized the evil of slavery, as I believe more and more people will recognize the evil of abortion. Those who argued against slavery were treated with contempt by many people, and attempts at changing the culture were met with violence (as evidenced by the burning of Pennsylvania Hall just four days after its opening).
Similarly, those who argue against abortion are treated with contempt, ironically even called “evil” and “anti-woman” and attempts at changing the culture are met with similar contempt (as evidenced by angry white liberals leaving the rally) and often times violence.
The same people, Democrats, who supported slavery in the past also support abortion today. Only abortion is even more ghoulish than slavery was, as abortion is the specific targeting of human babies for termination. Slaves at least got to live, for the most part. Not great lives, but lives nonetheless. Slaves were not sought out for destruction. Slavery was profitable mostly by the maintenance of the slaves and their numbers. Abortion is profitable exclusively by the elimination of human life.
It might be surprising for some to hear, but there is no doubt in my mind that abortion is a way worse evil than slavery ever was.
In 1860, five years before the abolition of slavery, the U.S. population was a little over 31 million. 3.9 million of them were slaves. So in 1860, 12% of the US population were slaves.
In 2020, the U.S. population was a little over 330 million. There have been over 63 million abortions in the U.S. since Roe v. Wade. Comparatively speaking, that’s nearly 20% of the current population. More people, numerically and statistically, have been killed by abortion than were slaves at the HEIGHT of slavery in 1860.
Abortion is a holocaust unlike any other. It supersedes Germany’s, Russia’s and China’s. It dwarfs slavery in the U.S., but one would be scorned for even thinking that, let alone saying it.
Even slavery’s purpose wasn’t outright genocide. Abortion is, even if there are those who argue against that.
They will say that babies “aren’t alive”, dehumanizing them like they did black people. They will say “it’s a woman’s choice”, also dehumanizing the babies as though they were property to be kept or tossed. When they inevitably run out of excuses to try and justify the unjustifiable, they switch to personal attacks of “you’re a sexist” or “you’re anti-woman” when abortion leaves many women emotionally scarred and regretting their decisions (not to mention we are at the point where they will argue that MEN can get an abortion, so how is that pro-woman?).
Any possible defense they have for abortion can be used for defending slavery. “What if a rape happens?” “What if it’s incest?” “What if it’s deformed or won’t have a normal life?” “It’s not a baby, it’s just a fetus!”
“What if the slave rapes someone in his freedom?” “What if they decide to have disgusting incestual relationships in their freedom?” “What if they are deformed and couldn’t have a normal life outside of slavery?” “It’s not a human, it’s property!”
The slavers of yesterday are the abortionists of today. They take up similar defensive strategies in opposing abolition in both centuries.
And like Hunter pointed out, it’s largely the white liberals who stormed off. The white liberals, who like to white knight for minorities, are the ones who got offended. The white liberals, who used to own slaves back in the day, are the ones who opposed abolition. Meanwhile, black people, the people most targeted by both institutions, decided to stay and hear the abolitionists out.
Funny how it works, that white liberals make ignorant, bigoted assumptions about what minorities think and want because those are the things the white liberals want them to think and want.
Like their incredulity at how a Latino could support Trump (after all, he was building a “racist wall” and wants to “deport people like me”), they are incredulous at the idea that there are black people who stand against the institution which seeks them out for termination.
They live in their own little bubble with their own little presuppositions about how the world works and how other people think and feel. And yet, they also have enough narcissism and self-righteousness to claim that black people who are conservatives “aren’t real black people” (and will make similar charges of conservatives of other minorities).
At any rate, what Free The States did here is spectacular and their points are well-made. Abortion ought to be immediately abolished and there can be no room for moderation or debate on that front. Slowly getting rid of abortion is as evil as not getting rid of it at all, so the solution ought to be quick and immediate.
“What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?”
There have been plenty of stories surrounding this year’s Olympics which either irritate or utterly disgust anyone who is of sane mind, from men competing against women to Olympians representing the U.S. protesting when the national anthem is played, etc.
And these stories have been circulated plenty, giving these undeserving bastards more recognition than they deserve. While such horrid situations ought to be discussed in the negative light they deserve, I would like to focus on the exact opposite today: an Olympian who represents her country well and who is not only happy to do so, but considers it a blessing and gives all the glory of her victory to God.
Sydney McLaughlin is an Olympic hurdler, who this past week managed to edge out her teammate Dalilah Muhammad and beat her own world record in the 400-meter hurdles to win the gold medal for her country, with Muhammad taking home the silver (and also breaking the previous world record but being a bit slower than McLaughlin).
The 21-year-old Olympian spoke to the press following the race, where she said “Just trusting the process, giving the glory to God… I’m just really grateful to represent my country and to have had this opportunity,” also mentioning the “hard work and dedication” which went into the season.
McLaughlin was also able to see footage of her Catholic high school celebrating her victory.
She also made sure to give thanks to God for her victory on Instagram as well:
“The face of a woman who is in awe of God. I could feel this meet was going to be something special… but MAN. Weeks like these are some of the hardest in a track athletes life. The mental strain of preparing for the rounds in order to solidify your spot is heavy enough. But the amount of weight the Lord took off my shoulders, is the reason I could run so freely yesterday. My faith was being tested all week. From bad practices, to 3 false start delays, to a meet delay. I just kept hearing God say, ‘Just focus on me.’ It was the best race plan I could have ever assembled. I no longer run for self-recognition, but to reflect His perfect will that is already set in stone. I don’t deserve anything. But by grace, through faith, Jesus has given me everything. Records come and go. The glory of God is eternal. Thank you, Father. Congrats to everyone who made the team, as well as my awesome competitors!! Let’s go represent the USA the best way we know how!”
It’s not often you get to hear competitors speaking like this. Usually, we focus on the stories like the ones I mentioned in the beginning, where people make asses of themselves and somehow take pride in it, or generally push for some Leftist, anti-God agenda. And while, again, it’s worthwhile to talk about those things in the negative manner which they deserve, it’s equally as important to talk about situations like these in the positive manner which they deserve.
Sydney is proud to represent her country and more importantly is proud to be a Christian. She gives the glory to God, not herself, for her ability to break her own world record and bring home the gold. She admits that she deserves nothing, that by grace, through faith, Jesus has given her everything, and that mortal things like records will come and go but God’s glory is eternal.
These are things which we should be celebrating and promoting, perhaps more so than the other stories. Yet, it will be talked about far less for a number of reasons. Namely, the fake news media loves to promote the filth that the other Olympians are pushing like anthem protests and men cheating by competing against women, so it’s only natural that these other stories get talked about more.
But it’s still true that stories like McLaughlin’s ought to be shared and talked about far more, giving her the recognition she deserves for being willing to stand up for what is right and righteous in a culture which has long hated what is right and righteous.
She expressly is grateful to represent her country, while other Olympians simply take the opportunity to bash it and embarrass it on the world stage. She thanks God and gives all the glory and credit to Him, while other Olympians will be self-absorbed and talk about “their” accomplishments as if they were solely theirs and might even hijack the stage to talk about the disgraceful filth the fake news media and elites would love to hear.
McLaughlin stands apart from these competitors, and I am certainly glad to see that. She is the type of competitor we ought to be talking about more and celebrating. She represents her country very well, as opposed to the other Olympians who only represent the minority of the elites who push their Leftist agenda.
Not only does she do a fantastic job as an Olympian, but also as a Christian, witnessing to the whole world of the wonder of God. Of course, she doesn’t have a whole lot of time to witness, but she takes whatever opportunity she can get to do so, and I am certain that this is utterly pleasing to the Lord.
God bless Sydney McLaughlin.
“Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among those with whom he is pleased!”
One thing has been made perfectly clear in the last year and a half of this pandemic: The people who claim that it’s a big deal never act as though it’s a big deal. It’s a similar phenomenon to what they do regarding climate change. They claim man-made climate change will destroy the planet one of these days and then go on to do things which run contrary to the message they generally give.
One such example is Obama having bought a house on Martha’s Vineyard, which the Left constantly claims will be underwater in a decade or so. So if it’s going to be underwater because of climate change, why buy the property which Obama’s OWN SIDE claims is doomed? It’s because they don’t actually believe the bullcrap they sell, neither when it comes to climate change nor the Chinese coronavirus.
This is once again exemplified with the planned 60th birthday party that the Obamas are planning to hold for the former criminal-in-chief; a birthday party which seeks to have over 700 people in it.
Even Axios kind of called them out on this, reporting: “Obama is hosting a 60th birthday bash for himself and hundreds of guests on Martha’s Vineyard this coming weekend amid heightened public health concerns – locally and nationally – about the COVID-19 Delta variant.”
If even Axios, of all sites, is calling them out on this even to this extent, you know these people are utter hypocrites.
And this news comes as the illegitimate Biden administration and other top Democrats are trying to fearmonger people about the “danger” of the Delta variant of the Chinese coronavirus, scaring people about the increased number of cases despite the fact that deaths have not gone up alongside that increase.
Still, Leftists are making the claim that the Delta variant is something to fear and for which we ought to re-implement the failed policies which did nothing to slow down the original Chinese coronavirus over the last year and a half, and that includes Barack Obama.
Fake news CNN tried to downplay this party, claiming that the attendees would be “fully vaccinated” so there would be no issues at all with holding such a super-spreader event (a term they would never use to describe their own parties). But if the Delta variant is as bad as they themselves claim, why do fully vaccinated people now have to wear masks indoors again?
If these people believe that the Delta variant and the Chinese coronavirus in general are so bad, why do they CONSTANTLY break the rules that they themselves either set up or have openly supported?
The Heritage Foundation has a neat little list of incidents where policymakers have supported restrictions and regulations for Americans and then went on to break those very rules, often the very day they were imposed.
The first example The Heritage Foundation shares was of Mayor Bill de Blasio going to the gym after advising New Yorkers not to go to the gym themselves (a case which we ourselves have noted multiple times). Another example they give is of Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot getting a haircut at a salon despite such places being shut down. And of course, they also include Nancy Pelosi’s similar little scandal.
Most recently, as in the last two days of July, there were five incidents of COVID hypocrisy to be noted.
The first one was of D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (she appears multiple times here, unsurprisingly) being seen maskless with Dave Chappelle hours before new mask mandate goes into effect.
Now, the liberal might argue “she’s technically not breaking the rules because the mandate hadn’t gone into effect yet.” Oh, yes, I’m sure the virus was well aware that it couldn’t begin trying to affect people again until after the mandate went into effect. Seriously, that’s just a technicality and she was no safer from the virus, either the original or Delta variant, hours after the mandate went into effect than she was before.
But even if the virus somehow, someway did act like that and Bowser was technically “safe” from it or at least was not being hypocritical about the mandate and being maskless, like I said earlier, she appears multiple times here.
Later that same day, she held her birthday party maskless despite the mandate, by that point, having gone into effect. And for those who might argue that maybe the party was outside, and she didn’t break the INDOOR mask mandate, here’s a picture of the event:
Not only is Bowser not wearing a mask indoors, but there isn’t a SINGLE person in that picture, whom I could tell, who was wearing a mask at all or properly. There is one dude on the right who has a mask but has it all the way down, and that’s the only one I can see with a mask at all.
So technicality or not regarding that first incident I mentioned, she is definitely a massive hypocrite with this second one.
The third one I will mention, the last one with Bowser, was an incident the following day, on July 31st, where she attended a wedding party, again indoors, and again without wearing a mask despite the indoors mask mandate she had implemented just the day before.
So three incidents in two days of sheer hypocrisy from just ONE of these deceivers.
The other two recent incidents were of Nancy Pelosi, where she swore in a new congressman without wearing a mask despite the new mask mandate in the House and New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell, who was seen maskless at an event on the same day that she implemented new mask mandates.
And this is FAR from the complete list of incidents of utter hypocrisy from these people. Check out the site for yourself to see the many times these politicians and policymakers were caught violating their own rules and mandates (and who knows how many other incidents there are where they weren’t caught?).
The point is that NONE of the people who are telling you to be wary of the virus are acting wary of the virus. None of the people who say that this is a big deal are acting like it’s a big deal. None of the people who claim that these mandates are safe and effective are acting like they do a damn thing. None of the people who ORDER you to do this and that are doing it themselves.
That’s because NONE of them believe the crap that they spew. They will say it over and over again, of course, because they want YOU to believe it and be afraid enough to be submissive to them, but they know better than to believe their own crap and sure as hell are acting like it.
There are people who condescendingly ask you why you refuse to follow these unconstitutional mandates, and while there are plenty of good answers, perhaps none is more effective than the fact that none of the people who demand we do these things do them themselves.
According to the CDC’s most recent guidance, even those fully vaccinated need to be wearing masks, so it’s not an issue of “oh, you conservatives are just unvaccinated while these liberals are vaccinated, so they get to enjoy these extra freedoms.” 1) That’s discrimination, as there shouldn’t be any reason one group of people ought to enjoy more rights and liberties based on this criterion and 2) again, the CDC recommends fully vaccinated people (that is, those who have gotten two shots, which I will continue to argue why it’s necessary to get two if they are as safe and effective as they claim they are) to wear masks.
I assume that Bowser, Obama, Pelosi and all these other people have been fully vaccinated and yet, they continue to disregard even the rules that THEY have established.
If they have no worries about the consequences of their rule-breaking, there should be no one else who ought to have such worries. Even ignoring the scientific data surrounding the mildness of the virus (both versions) and the inefficacy of the vaccines, masks and lockdowns, you can just look at the behavior of the elites to see how little worry anyone ought to have here.
Sure, they all SAY that these things are necessary and safe and effective, but none of them are acting like what they say has any sort of truth in it. None of them are acting the least bit worried about the pandemic, certainly, not like they generally act when they speak with the press on this matter.
So then, why would any of us have to worry about what they themselves are not worried? Why do any of us have to follow these mandates when they themselves refuse to do so?
Simply, they have law enforcement on their side. The corrupt bureaucrats get to make the rules others have to follow, but they don’t have to follow themselves if only because the cops will be on their side, at least for the most part. It’s a “do as I say, not as I do” kind of corrupt system.
But it’s not like it can’t be fought. I don’t go to businesses which require me to wear masks indoors, unless it’s absolutely necessary. And lawsuits can be filed because these mandates are illegal and unconstitutional.
But generally speaking, if anyone wants to argue with me about why I don’t follow these guidelines, I present them with these very hypocrites who are rule-breakers as well but who are utterly self-righteous and grandstanding about their positions. They urge others to do what they themselves refuse to do.
I have NO intention of following any such people or listening to what they tell me to do and any politician supposedly on our side ought to be primaried or generally challenged if they insist on these insane mandates.
Frankly speaking, there is no reason for ANYONE to believe the crap that these people spew.
2 Timothy 3:5
“Having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people.”
The Unintended Consequences Of Biden Mandating Vaccination For Federal Employees: Draining The Swamp
Last Thursday, Occupier Joe Biden announced a mandate for millions of federal workers to either receive a “lifesaving vaccine” (which is nothing of the sort) or follow strict and stringent “safety” protocols such as wearing masks “no matter where they are”, get tested once or twice a week, social distance and “generally not be allowed to travel for work.”
The same standard seemingly applies to all federal contractors. Biden also seemingly based this decision on the DOJ’s prior “ruling” that Chinese coronavirus vaccination mandates were “legal,” which as I said in the last article, means absolute squat since it just means that the DOJ won’t prosecute states and businesses which mandate vaccinations but state AGs and private citizens can still sue and nothing at all changes following that “ruling.”
Funny enough, Biden, in that Thursday announcement, also iterated the need for even the VACCINATED to wear masks, following the CDC’s updated “guidance” on mask-wearing (thereby giving even LESS of a reason to get vaccinated, since they had been trying to give special rights to the vaccinated, including not having to wear masks, though both mandates are utterly unconstitutional).
What’s more, Biden, in a bid to encourage people to get vaccinated, insisted time and time again that “99%” of people falling ill of the virus and dying are unvaccinated. Small tangent, but if the vaccines are safe and effective, why isn’t that number 100%? We’ve only had the vaccine for half a year, let’s say, so it stands to reason that most people who have died of the virus are those who were not vaccinated (which is extremely misleading, and would be like saying that Rome existed more than 70 years ago, which is technically true but again, misleading. Of course most people who have died of the Chinese coronavirus are unvaccinated, we’ve only had the vaccine until recently. And again, why is the number not 100%?).
In any case, I, for one, couldn’t care less about whether or not federal workers are mandated to get the vaccine or have to follow strict “safety” protocols. They are the swamp, after all. So why would I care about their suffering?
Furthermore, this vaccine mandate (threat, really) from the Biden administration brings with it unintended consequences which are actually pretty advantageous for Americans: it inadvertently drains the swamp.
Think of it like this: We all know of the effects of the vaccines. I have, for the last half a year, written many articles which highlight the ineffectiveness of the vaccines in fighting the Chinese coronavirus and downright show the active HARM which they pose to those who get the vaccine. I’ve even used data from the CDC itself, through its VAERS system, to showcase the, at this point, tens of thousands of people who have died of the vaccines (and as a reminder, the VAERS system only reports less than 1% of cases, so it’s possible, at this point, that over a million have died from the vaccines).
And undoubtedly, many federal workers have taken the vaccines as well. While it’s almost certain that not everyone who takes the vaccine will die from it, it can still cause other severe side-effects which can sideline people. Let’s pretend, then, that at least 50% of federal workers have taken the vaccine and another 10% intend to take the vaccine but haven’t quite yet come around to doing so for one reason or another. So 60%, to be conservative, since many labor unions working with or for the federal government have protested against the mandate, and many will refuse to take the vaccine for religious or health reasons.
Anthony Fauci had said that 40 to 50% of the CDC had yet to take the vaccine (arguably, he didn’t say they refused, but it’s the CDC and I highly doubt they would have trouble getting vaccinated), so a 60% estimate of federal workers getting the vaccine isn’t out of line.
That means that a LOT of those people could see severe side-effects as a result of getting the vaccine. They might get seriously sick and have to quit/retire or might outright die, depending on the circumstances. But the other 40% who might refuse to get the vaccine would likely face extreme pressure from their peers (the Left’s authoritarian tendencies will backfire here) to get the vaccine and might choose to quit or retire as well from the extreme pressure that the Left tends to put on people to act in the manner which they wish.
Either way, this kind of pressure from the Biden administration to either get the vaccine (which could seriously harm or kill them) or be subjected to stringent protocols (and face further pressure from others) would inadvertently lead to some amount of swamp draining.
Either the workers get the vaccine and die/be forced into retirement or they don’t get the vaccine but face enough pressure from the administration and their peers to want to quit/retire (or get the vaccine, which brings us back to that first option). Such a mandate on federal workers will likely lead to inadvertently draining the swamp, and from one of the biggest swamp rats of all.
Certainly, God works in mysterious ways. Even when we think there is no possibility for something to happen, such as draining the swamp in this case because a swamp lifer stole the election, God makes a way for it to be possible.
I am reminded of the story of the widow’s oil, where a woman comes to Elisha in dire need, as her husband recently died and a creditor was coming to take the woman’s two sons to be his slaves. Elisha asked the woman what she had in her house and she replied “Your maidservant has nothing in the house but a jar of oil,” 2 Kings 4:2. Elisha then told her to go to all her neighbors and gather empty vessels and pour that oil into all those vessels. And that’s exactly what she did, with just one jar of oil, she managed to fill all the vessels she had with her with that oil by the power of God. Thanks to that, she was able to pay off her debt.
The story is rather short and doesn’t go into a whole lot of detail, but I’m certain the woman at least thought to herself “how can this lone jar of oil be enough to pay off my debt? If I thought it would be enough, I wouldn’t have had to come to Elisha to begin with.” In essence, I think she doubted there would have been a way for her to use that oil to pay for her debt (seeing as she said she "has nothing... but a jar of oil"), but God made a way for exactly that to happen.
Similarly, I believe that’s what God is doing with this situation as well. He is using a swamp rat to drain the swamp, likely without the rat’s knowledge.
Even if I overestimate what this will do to the swamp in terms of draining it, that this will definitely lead to some people in federal government to be forced out is more than I was expecting going into this illegitimate administration.
With Biden successfully stealing the election, I fully expected the swamp to recover from the four years of Trump, but frankly, this could do more damage to them than even Trump did. All under the “leadership” of one of their own.
God certainly is poetic with irony.
“I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world.”
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...