2020, as I have said in the past, has been a very rough year for everyone. For a time, tens of millions of people lost their jobs or they were furloughed and many small businesses went under, with few being likely to recover, while mega corporations have only grown as a result. However, the economy is making a comeback, and perhaps the biggest indicator of this, at least for the foreseeable future, is the stock market.
The markets usually work as a foretelling of the future, based on what people in the markets think will happen soon. It’s not an exact science, of course, but the big dips in the market in the earliest months of the year foretold the economic trouble we would face soon after, but now, the markets are back, with some hitting new record highs and mostly or completely wiping out the losses throughout the pandemic.
An economic recovery certainly helps Trump, much to the dismay of the Left who were salivating at the idea of a ruined economy for a chance to get Biden (or Harris) elected and finally bring America down. We are seeing an economic recovery right now, even as things still aren’t quite to how good they were pre-Chinese coronavirus, and this sort of recovery spells good news for a Trump re-election.
According to The Socioeconomics Institute, Trump has an 87% chance to win re-election if the market is above 28,052 on Election Day (Nov. 3rd). For the record, before the pandemic hit, the Dow Jones was at 29,500 and bottomed out at 18,591 on March 23rd.
Now, while a lot can happen in between now and November 3rd, as I have been saying all along, the current economic future looks bright, provided there are no major surprises that blindside us. Even the momentarily terrifying reality of two hurricanes hitting the states at the Gulf of Mexico has sort of dwindled as the two super storms have weakened over time.
But provided that nothing majorly bad occurs, Trump is in good position to win, according to the model. As it stands, the Dow Jones is hovering around 28,600, roughly a thousand points shy of the prior record which is fairly reachable at this point.
More specifically, the Institute notes that if the Dow Jones is anywhere over 23,377, Trump has at the very least a mild chance of winning re-election, while if the Dow is between 22,208 and 23,377, Biden has a mild chance of winning. Obviously, anything below 22,208 and Biden as a strong chance of winning.
The reasoning behind the Institute’s model is due to them studying all presidential races where an incumbent was running for re-election and in their research, they found that “the strongest correlation with incumbents’ margins of victory or defeat” was the net change in the market for the three years leading up to the election.
The last three years have been fairly strange, at least with this year in comparison to the last two. Ever since Trump became President, this country saw nothing but economic success. Following Trump’s election, the Dow Jones went up 2,000 points from election day to inauguration day. The market was excited for a Trump presidency. Time and time again, I noted how the economy was absolutely booming, with the unemployment rate hitting record low after record low, in general and for minorities.
We had such a roaring economy that during the Democrat primaries, NO ONE was talking about the economy. Despite it usually being at the top of people’s concerns heading into an election, not one Democrat dared to talk much about the economy because they KNEW they couldn’t fool everyone into believing it wasn’t real. Often times, their only, and flimsy, argument was that it was somehow “Obama’s” economy, even after three years of a Trump presidency.
It really speaks to their poor, phony character that the Left would blame Obama’s predecessor for all of his economic failures and steal the credit that rightfully belongs to his successor for a booming economy. The Obama economy was flat and stagnant, which is rather impressive for the fact that he inherited a recession and did NOTHING to make it better. And ever since Trump came along and made things better, they somehow got it into their minds that the credit belongs to the guy who had EIGHT YEARS to make it better and didn’t. That the guy who spent less than a year rebuilding the economy had nothing to do with it, even as it was happening under his watch, even as they had a guy in his same position for eight years who accomplished absolutely nothing.
Then, once the pandemic hit and local and state governments decided to completely shut things down, which naturally led to an economic downturn, only THEN did Democrats, specifically Joe Biden, start to talk about the economy and lie about how Obama and Biden rebuilt the economy after their 2008 win and Trump destroyed it.
Now that the economy is back strong, the Democrats are once again without a message, other than “Orange Man Bad”.
Now, all they have is “Trump is a racist” while citing no evidence and while having the most racist ticket in I don’t know how long. Seriously, for the first time in roughly a century, the Democrats are running a segregationist and a slave owner as their presidential and vice presidential candidates.
Now, all they have is “Trump is a sexist” while citing no evidence and while having a guy who is well-documented in sexually harassing women and who picked his VP largely because she is a woman.
Now, all they have is “Trump is evil” while citing no evidence and while running the most pro-death ticket in political history. And I’m not just talking about abortion here, though they are extreme proponents of it. I’m also talking about being anti-police (rather ironic, considering Harris’ former professional position) and supporting the violent riots (calling out the violence in general does not tell me Biden is against this. It’d be like watching a terrorist attack and denouncing the violence itself as opposed to those who perpetrated it, though they have done this plenty in the past, so I suppose there is precedence for this disgusting behavior).
The economy is making a great comeback following the closures, which is why the Left has turned back to reporting largely about the virus in an effort to scare people into locking things down again. They report “new cases” as though they are equal to “new deaths”, which isn’t at all the case (pun intended).
If nothing else, the economy would carry Trump into 2020. A damaged economy means a damaged Trump heading into the election while a strong economy means a strong Trump. We are still not quite where we were pre-pandemic in terms of economic strength, but we are getting there. This is a nightmare for Democrats and it showed throughout the DNC and the RNC.
I only pray to God that the economy will continue getting better and exceed where it was pre-pandemic and that Trump utterly trounces Joe Biden and the Democrats, giving them a defeat they haven’t seen since 1984.
“And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.”
While there are plenty of things that I could talk about, such as how Jacob Blake’s shooting has only become more justifiable in light of recent evidence or how Kyle Rittenhouse’s case for self-defense becomes more and more clear (and the NYT, of all sources, is reporting this), something that has largely been forgotten in recent time is the nonsense that is climate change and the bogus warnings given by those who peddle the theory that we are killing our planet.
And while I have written about the nonsense of anthropogenic climate change and related topics throughout the past couple of months, one aspect of this subject I haven’t talked about in well over a year and a half is the nonsense of the “last chance to save the planet” the Left peddles occasionally to scare people into giving up their rights and liberties supposedly to “fight” climate change.
The Guardian recently published an article giving us a warning and a “last chance” to fight climate change.
“Thirty years ago we were warned. Now is our last chance to listen,” read their subhead.
“Thirty years ago this week, the population of Earth was given official notification that it faced a threat of unprecedented magnitude. Emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, spewed into the atmosphere from factories and vehicles burning fossil fuels, were pinpointed, definitively, as triggers of future climate change. Melting ice caps, rising sea levels and increasing numbers of extreme weather events would be the norm for the 21st century unless action[s] were taken, warned the authors of the first assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).”
“… Three decades later, it is clear that we have recklessly ignored that warning…. The world could easily heat by 3C by the end of the century at this rate, warn scientists. The impact on the world will, by then, be catastrophic…”
Oh, no! We only have one last chance to save the Earth?! Quick, everyone, listen to these scientists who definitely do not have an agenda nor do they stand to lose anything by going against this political idea that pretty exclusively benefits the Left! Everyone, give up your cars, air travel, A/C units, and for good measure, give up your guns and civil liberties as well. We are fighting climate change, after all!
Yeah, that kind of warning doesn’t exactly lead people to be afraid if it is repeated ad nauseam for decades on end. I literally wrote an article back in December 2018 titled: “How Much Longer Can The Left Say ‘It’s Our Last Chance To Save The Earth’?”
The Left keeps returning to this well, and at some point, the jig has to be up, right?
For example, the United Nations gave us 10 years to save the world. “A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed…”
Well, clearly, we must listen to these scientific experts and global leaders at the U.N.! ENTIRE NATIONS ARE AT STAKE! Sound the alarm, everyone! We only have ten years to save the world!
Get ready, my fellow Americans, for if we do not reverse course, the world will end by the year 2000!
Yeah, the U.N. gave this apocalyptic warning in 1989, claiming “coastal flooding” and “crop failures” would lead to “eco-refugees” if we don’t cease using fossil fuels by the turn of the millennium.
And while the Left claims that there are climate refugees in this day and age, that couldn’t be further from the truth. There are radical Islamic terrorists claiming to be refugees (Ilhan Omar basically being one of them) and there are illegal immigrants claiming to be refugees, but none of the warnings the Left has given over the past CENTURY have come to fruition.
Remember George Perkins Marsh? The guy basically heralded as the grandfather of American ecology? Remember how he gave a warning that the planet was “fast becoming an unfit home for its ‘noblest inhabitant,’” and that if mankind didn’t change the way it lived, that the planet would be reduced “to such a condition of impoverished productiveness, of shattered surface, of climatic excess, as to threaten the depravation, barbarism, and perhaps even extinction of the species”?
Need I remind all of us that he gave this apocalyptic warning in 1864, roughly one year before Lincoln would be assassinated?
This is a warning given to us 156 years ago now. Suffice to say, we are further from depravation and barbarism and extinction today than we were back then (well, not counting the barbaric riots going on, at least).
We have far more food today than we did during the Civil War. There are far more people today than there were during the Civil War. And while we, as a country, are nearly as divided politically today as we were during the Civil War, we are still not quite to that level yet. By the end of the war, an estimated 700,000 people died or were killed, which was roughly 2% of the U.S. population at the time. To put that number into perspective, if we were at war today and 2% of our population died, that would equal roughly 6,000,000 casualties. Thankfully, we are nowhere near quite close to that, I don’t believe, even with the animosity that exists today.
So the warning that if mankind didn’t change its ways or there would be savagery, depravity (of food and resources) and possibly extinction pretty obviously did not come to fruition and we are in a far better state today than back then.
Worth mentioning, by the way, that Marsh gave this warning before the invention of the automobile, A/C units and the other things that the Left usually blames for climate change, and still, Marsh felt as though there was sufficient anthropogenic climate change at the time for it to be noticeable and worrisome.
What we have to remember is that anthropogenic climate change is a hoax, but the climate is dynamic and changing and the planet has gone through periods of warmth and cold. That, however, does not signify mankind having anything to do with it, and certainly, having the ability to put at stop to it (which would actually be pretty dangerous, all things considered).
That the Left would continue pushing for the idea that we have a set time period to “do something” about climate change is not at all surprising to me, knowing that their only objective is to use fear to control the masses and to obtain as much power as possible, but it is still extremely asinine in the context of how the climate actually works.
Not that I expect them to know how it actually works, at any rate. I’ve pointed this out in the past, but not one single prediction the Left has made regarding climate change has ever come true. Not once have we seen climate-related flooding, droughts, excessive ice, lack of ice, or any of the other multiple and ridiculous assertions made by the Left.
This is because they are propagandists, not climate scientists or experts or anything of the sort. They only claim we have one “last chance” not because it’s true but because fear is a tool used to control people and the Left are notorious fearmongers.
Still, I do enjoy it every time they issue yet another “last chance” warning. If only it weren’t driving little children to literally have nightmares about something that will never happen. For THAT, the Left is utterly unforgivable (among many other reasons).
“’There is no peace,’ says the Lord, ‘for the wicked.’”
A few days ago, I noted that President Trump’s job approval jumped up as the DNC went on last week, in large part due to the fact that the DNC was extremely boring at best and filled with deranged lunatics hellbent on destroying this nation and making little effort to hide that at worst. Now that the lunatic Leftists have had their convention of horror, it’s time for Republicans to have their convention and there are noticeable differences between the two conventions.
While the DNC focused on how Trump was a “threat” to Democracy and how everything is awful and it’s white capitalist men’s fault, the RNC is focusing on hope, redemption and American exceptionalism to carry us through a pandemic and any economic problems it has caused (and that we are likely past the worst of it).
The RNC featured a number of guest speakers, all of whom talked about overwhelmingly positive things, such as the historic pardoning of Jon Ponder, and the powerful speeches given by pro-life advocates speaking the truth about the horrors of abortion (FYI: I, personally, did not know that abortion has a smell. I just feel sorry for Abby Johnson, who gave us that fact, because the sense most connected to our memory is our sense of smell, so she likely remembers very well what an abortion smells like).
Overall, the RNC stands in stark contrast to the DNC, which even some in the fake news media had to acknowledge the fact that (at least the first night) was very good and effective. This has shown in the polls, as a recent Zogby poll shows Trump’s approval standing at 52%, the highest in the poll’s record.
What’s more, Trump enjoys pretty decent support from African Americans (36%), Hispanics (37%) and Asians (35%), all of whom usually vote for Democrats. Trump also enjoys pretty decent numbers with Independent voters, with 44%.
Perhaps what is most surprising, however, is that 23% of DEMOCRATS also approve of Donald Trump in the recent survey.
The Washington Examiner reports: “Pollsters have been somewhat at a loss to explain the rise of Trump’s approval ratings, considering that there has been little positive news to help his standings other than the peace deal he helped negotiate between Israel and the United Arab Emirates.”
Well, then, allow me to explain to the pollsters roughly what is likely driving Trump’s approval up: THE RIOTS, NUMBNUTS!
Even the dumbest man on cable news, Don Lemon, recently said: “The rioting has to stop… it’s showing up in the polling, it’s showing up in focus groups.”
To which I have a couple of things to say.
First, how interesting that Lemon decided to actually call them “riots” here when for the past few months, as they were happening, the media was insistent on calling them “peaceful protests”. Of course, there never was anything peaceful about them, as they all lead to violence, arson, vandalism, assault and a slew of murders, but the media ignored all of them, even as they were showing BURNING BUILDINGS and were simply calling them “peaceful protests”. Why? Because they somehow thought that the riots would HELP them beat Trump.
Their line of thinking probably went something like this: The people rioting shows Trump and Republicans to be weak leaders, so people will want to vote them out. The problem here is that the riots were EXCLUSIVELY happening in DEMOCRAT-RUN cities, counties and states. The Democrats in charge, because in their infinite wisdom they thought the riots were helping them against Trump, were doing nothing to quell the riots until they got a little too close to home, literally.
The Democrats that were not in charge of those places (namely, congresspeople) were either fully supporting and endorsing the violence or merely tolerating it at best. This included Joe Biden, who supports defunding the police (no, there is no difference between defunding and “redirecting” if the lack of funds render the police inoperable).
The media, like I pointed out, were running cover for the riots because they also thought they were helping the Democrats. They covered the riots as “peaceful protests” and omitted certain stories or facts which would undermine their agenda.
And Leftist celebrities, the people who are least qualified to talk about how Americans think, believe that America thinks like them, worships them, and believe that whatever they say is gospel, so they also support the riots, believing them to be for a good cause, even if they are violent. They will defend the actions of Jacob Blake, who did everything wrong in the video shown (not caring about being tased is an indication of being high on drugs and going to your car, opening the door and reaching in for something when you were not asked to do anything of the sort is BOUND to get you shot, so there is ZERO that the Left can say that makes Jacob Blake any sort of victim here).
The Left supports the riots, until they come to the oh, so shocking realization that it’s not exactly helping them. It’d perhaps be one thing if the riots were happening and they secretly supported (or even funded) them, but openly disagreed and called for law and order, but they are letting Trump be the law and order guy here and that’s what people want.
Now that the riots are not politically expedient, Lemon has no qualms about calling them riots and wants them to stop because they’re helping Trump.
Which brings me to the second thing I want to say about this: notice that the ONLY reason they want the riots to stop is because of politics.
The Left doesn’t care that businesses are being destroyed, that families are being brought to financial ruin, that people are being assaulted and, in many cases, killed. No, none of that ever mattered to the Left, else they would’ve demanded the riots stop the minute the first one occurred.
The ONLY reason they want the riots to end is because they are helping Trump in the polls. Remember this the next time a Democrat insists that they are the party of “love” and “tolerance” and that they are, in any way, the good guys.
I’ve made this point in the past, but it bears repeating: the Left is the physical manifestation of the kind of people described in Isaiah 5:20: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who turn darkness to light and light to darkness, who replace bitter with sweet and sweet with bitter.”
They call themselves good when they are, in fact, evil. Only evil people could look at the horrors of riots and think they are good if they help them and bad if they don’t. Only evil people could look at the genocide that is abortion, the holocaust that it is, and consider it a “woman’s right” and “freedom.” Only evil people could look at children being dragged to drag queen story hour and think that it’s a good thing. Only evil people could think that forcing children to take life-altering puberty blockers because the children momentarily feel like they are a different gender (or because one of their parents wants them to be a different gender) is a good thing.
This was all very much demonstrated in how they covered the death of George Floyd in contrast to the death of Secoriea Turner and Cannon Hinnant. The death of George Floyd was politically expedient to the Left, so it’s covered as a national tragedy. The deaths of Turner and Hinnant undermined their agenda, so they were largely ignored or restructured as an argument against gun ownership.
The American people see all of this bullcrap coming from the Left and, understandably, come to see Trump in a better light. Trump’s supporters aren’t the ones burning down businesses. Trump’s supporters aren’t the ones assaulting cops. Trump’s supporters aren’t the ones murdering people. Trump’s supporters aren’t the ones terrorizing those who do not raise their fists to show “solidarity” with the radical Left (btw, I’m beginning to see that raised fist as no different to the Nazi salute, and that’s how it should be treated).
It’s radical Leftists who are doing all of these things and the vast majority of people do not want this. Many who are life-long Democrat liberals are reportedly planning to vote for Trump because of all of this. They are pushing normal people to the right and making their camp smaller and smaller.
The only reason the Democrat base is as rabid and insane as it is is not because radical Leftist communism is now mainstream for many people, but because more moderate people have left the Democrat party because they felt the Democrat party has left them.
If you have a room of a hundred people and ten of them are communists, if the 90 other people leave that room, that doesn’t make communism the mainstream thought (at least, outside of that room).
Trump is enjoying bumps in approval because the Left is unwittingly handing him the election by making themselves far too crazy and dangerous to be allowed anywhere near the levels of power that they desire.
While there is still a good amount of time left before the election takes place, and plenty can happen in that time interval, if the economy recovers and the Left continues to show how insane they are, provided their mail-in voting scheme doesn’t work to the extent they want it to, I don’t see how Biden beats Trump at any capacity.
I wouldn’t even be surprised if states like Wisconsin, Minnesota and maybe even New York end up going to Trump.
“The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”
I have previously made mention that I like basketball and there are times when that world meets the world of politics, whether it’s a stupid comment uttered by a player or the overall business dealings that the NBA at large has with the CCP (which has a little something to do with this article). But I don’t think I’ve ever talked about the two worlds of gaming and politics coming together, so this will be a fairly new experience for me.
At any rate, allow me to give you the important context of this article. According to Gaming news website Kotaku (which is Leftist, so it’s largely garbage, but useful here), the people at Activision, which is the publisher of the annual video game giant “Call of Duty”, decided to edit the trailer for their newest installment in the franchise: “Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War” because the trailer featured footage from the Tiananmen Square massacre.
But they didn’t just edit it for Chinese audiences. They edited the trailer for ALL audiences and only IGN and Gamespot still carry the original trailer (video below).
So not only are they censoring a massacre perpetrated by the CCP to Chinese audiences, they are also doing it for all audiences so that they might not know about it unless they specifically set out to research it. Perhaps I shouldn’t be so surprised at this, considering that Activision is partly owned by Tencent, a Chinese gaming corporation. I suppose Tencent doesn’t want anyone to know about the massacre perpetrated by the CCP, which makes sense considering they are a Chinese company.
However, it is still extremely shameful for Activision to go down this path of Chinese appeasement, especially considering the theme of the trailer.
For a little background context, the Call of Duty series has always been about simulating war. The first few iterations of the franchise focused on World War II and numerous sequels have either gone to a more modern setting, returned to World War II, delved into the Vietnam War and some have even gone to futuristic wars like World War III and other things. The Black Ops series in particular started out with a Vietnam War setting and seemingly, the producers are returning to that setting.
One important aspect of the setting was, of course, the conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union in their arms and space races, with plenty of stories of foreign interference such as Soviet spies infiltrating United States intelligentsia and other places, as well as the attempts to radicalize Americans towards accepting and embracing communism (which has been rather successful as of late).
And seemingly, the newest iteration in the franchise will explore this aspect a bit more. The trailer itself focused on an interview by a KGB defector named Yuri Bezmenov, who detailed in four stages how a free society collapses. The first stage is demoralization, specifically in indoctrinating students into believing foreign values and beliefs that stand apart from American tradition, which would be taught by radical students from the 1960s and 70s once they controlled educational institutions. This is currently happening.
The second step is destabilization of the structure of society – the economy, the military and international relations. This is currently happening as well, with the Left insistent on bringing down the American economy and destroy its superpower status so that a global government can be established and dominate completely. They are also destroying the military not simply by cutting its funding but also by having soldiers indoctrinated, forced to read pseudo-scientific garbage like “White Fragility”, and overall making it so that the U.S. military has no real desire to protect the U.S. As far as the international relations go, I chuck that up mostly to other countries which are more secular and socialistic and do not like people like Donald Trump, instead preferring people like Obama and Biden.
The third stage is crisis, an event which builds upon the first two stages to bring about a revolution. This is also happening with the Chinese coronavirus panic and the Left attempting to drive us towards a constitutional crisis following the 2020 election in their mail-in voting scheme, as well as the race riots going on bringing about a racial crisis to this country.
The fourth stage is normalization, as in establishing a “new normal”. Sound familiar?
At any rate, the actions by Activision are extremely ironic given all of this. One theme they outright display in the game’s trailer is “know your history or be doomed to repeat it.” And yet, they are destroying history by censoring the Tiananmen Square massacre in order to appease their Chinese owners.
You couldn’t write better satire than that, but unfortunately and sadly, this is reality. I don’t know how many recognize the irony in the trailer showing “know your history or be doomed to repeat it” and editing the trailer so it gets rid of an important part in world history which perfectly encapsulates the evil that is the CCP and communism as a whole in order to appease the people who perpetrated that crime against humanity.
The Chinese government killed hundreds, if not thousands of student protesters. This is a fact not known by most of the people in China, at least those not involved in the government, and at the behest of a Chinese company which partially owns them (5%), Activision is trying to ensure that this fact is also not known to other people outside of China.
Now, one might think “but it is very well known outside of China. How does one game trailer editing that part out make it so that people outside of China not know about it?” To this, I say: “wait a couple of decades.”
Communism used to be abhorred by the overwhelming majority of the country just 40 years ago. The memories of the Cold War are fading from this country and many are forgetting just what communism is and how horrible it is.
Just 30 years ago, West German band “The Scorpions” released the worldwide hit “Winds of Change” which celebrated the toppling of the Berlin Wall and freedom from communism, optimistic towards a future “where the children of tomorrow dream away in the wind of change.”
The tragedy is that the following verses say: “Distant memories are buried in the past forever.” THIS is the problem, because the children of tomorrow dream dreams of communist revolutions, and the memories are being buried too deep into the past, that they do not know how horrible communism is.
In time, the memory of the Tiananmen Square massacre will fade in the minds of the countries which know about it if not regularly taught. That Activision would edit out footage from its trailer in appeasement of the Chinese is an indication of this looming threat.
Of course, the massacre is but one aspect of communism which many will forget in the future. Matter of fact, even as many know about it today, how many even connect it with the horrors and injustices of communism? In America, we know very well about Tiananmen Square, and yet, plenty seem to want communism anyway.
That warning in the trailer that if we fail to learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it, may be cliched, but it’s definitely true. For crying out loud, New York University is now trying to implement RACIAL SEGREGATION in student dorms and this is being celebrated as an achievement by Leftists (not that that should be much of a surprise, considering they were fighting for segregation in the 60s, but still).
The memories of the Civil Rights movement, and the teachings that came about it, are being hijacked by the Left so that they might be forgotten forever, to the point where they rewrite history and say that MLK would support the anti-white, racist domestic terrorists in BLM.
Again, it’s disgustingly ironic that Activision would focus this year’s installment of Call of Duty on “remembering your history” while also attempting to rewrite it and lead people to forget it because actually remembering your history and reminding people of it would hurt their bottom line.
Shame on Activision for doing this and shame on all U.S. companies which work for or with the 21st century version of Nazi Germany.
Remember your history.
“Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.”
Jemele Hill is not exactly what people would call “smart.” This was very much clear when on Sunday, the former ESPN host suggested that the United States was just “as bad” as Nazi Germany, and that the Nazis “learned” from “watching America”.
Her initial tweet read as follows: “Been reading Isabel Wilkerson’s new book, ‘Caste,’ and if you were of the opinion that the United States wasn’t nearly as bad as Nazi Germany, how wrong you are. Can’t encourage you enough to read this masterpiece.”
Naturally, for comparing the U.S. to Nazi Germany, she was destroyed online for her sheer ignorance. Former Acting Director of National Intelligence and Ambassador to Germany Ric Grenell replied: “Read a book. The Nazis murdered 6.5 million Jews.”
Daily Wire writer Matt Walsh replied: “Been reading Jemele Hill’s tweets, and if you were of the opinion that she’s smarter than a cactus, how wrong you are.”
Tim Young replied: “Just the basic fact that you have a huge platform/make a solid living s****ing on the President and haven’t been locked in a labor camp says this is the complete opposite of nazi Germany. Grow up.”
To that particular tweet, Hill replied with the following: “Nowhere in my tweet did I say the current state of America is like Nazi Germany. I was referring to our racial history. The parallels have been pointed out by plenty of historians, not just Isabel Wilkerson. You tell me to grow up. I say, you need to read more.”
To be fair, the initial tweet did not specify that she was referring to Civil War-era America and not contemporary America. The wording was just ambiguous enough for people to reasonably believe she was referring to the current state of the country and not its history.
At any rate, she also replied to Arc Digital Editor-in-Chief Berny Belvedere, who originally told her: “This is breathtakingly irresponsible. How is anyone supposed to trust your judgment after this horror show of an opinion?”
To go on a bit of a tangent before quoting Hill’s reply to Belvedere, THIS particular opinion was only the latest one in a series of them which ought to demonstrate to people that her judgment is not to be trusted. She has REPEATEDLY compared Trump to some of the worst dictators in history and suggested he was on track to doing the same things that they did. This particular opinion was not particularly exceptional in comparison to the other atrocious takes she has uttered.
In any case, Hill’s reply to Belvedere was as follows: “What would you call it when a country that murdered millions of Jews learned their systems of genocide by watching America, and studying our history of racialized slavery, and great knack for racial terrorism?”
This is where I have to give up a point, but not a point she would want me to take note of: The Nazis DID learn from Americans – just not the country as a whole nor the kinds of Americans she would want them to have learned from.
What I mean is that Nazi Germany didn’t learn its practices from watching America. They learned their practices from watching THE DEMOCRAT SOUTH.
Hill, in her original tweet, was promoting a book that compared Nazi Germany with America, at least in its history as a country. Allow me, then, to promote a book that dispels the Leftist notions that America as a whole is to blame for the atrocities of the Nazis: Dinesh D’Souza’s “The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of The American Left.”
The subhead is, admittedly, a tad misleading. The modern American Left certainly has roots in the Nazis, but the Nazis also have roots in the old American Left – the one which fought for slavery, enacted Jim Crow laws and made it nearly impossible for former slaves to succeed and prosper, enacting laws and regulations that basically forced the freed slaves to return to the plantations while being paid peanuts and not living much differently free as they did when slaves.
Simply, to answer her question regarding what I would call it when a country that committed egregious crimes against humanity learned from watching politicians in America basically doing the same would be “learning from Democrats.”
Democrats were the ones who founded the domestic terrorist group known as the KKK. They were the ones who fought to keep their slaves. They were the ones who fought a war which led to the genocide of Native Americans.
Here’s an excerpt from D’Souza’s book, in a section aptly titled: “Learning from Hitler.”
“In this book I will show what the Left learned from the Nazis, and also what the Left taught the Nazis… Hitler… specifically said he intended to displace and exterminate the Russians, the Poles, and the Slavs in precisely the same way Americans in the Jacksonian era had displaced and exterminated the native Indians. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were directly modeled on the segregation and anti-miscegenation laws that had been implemented decades earlier in the Democratic South. Forced sterilization and euthanasia aimed at eliminating racial ‘defectives’ and producing a ‘superior’ Nordic race were two additional schemes the Nazis got from American progressives…
… Franklin D. Roosevelt was an avid admirer of Mussolini who sought to import Italian fascist schemes to America. FDR also collaborated with the worst racist elements in America, working with them to block anti-lynching laws and exclude blacks from New Deal programs and name a former Klansman to the Supreme Court. Mussolini, for his part, praised FDR’s book ‘Looking Forward’ and basically declared FDR to be a fellow fascist. Hitler too saw FDR as a kindred spirit and the New Deal was widely praised as an American form of fascism in the Nazi Party’s official newspaper ‘Volkischer Beobachter’ and other Nazi publications.”
“JFK toured Nazi Germany in the 1930s and came back effusive with praise of Hitler and his theory of Nordic superiority. ‘I have come to the conclusion, ‘JFK wrote in his diary, ‘that fascism is right for Germany and Italy.’… [JFK] described [Hitler] as ‘the stuff of legends… Hitler will emerge from the hate that now surrounds him and come to be regarded as one of the most significant figures to have lived.’”
D’Souza notes that the American Left learned from Nazi Germany, following World War II, as much as Nazi Germany learned from the American Left which was directly responsible for the darkest parts of America’s history.
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a massive advocate for eugenics (as evidenced by her founding of PLANNED PARENTHOOD) long before Hitler rose to power. She sought to eliminate black people, whom she considered “weeds” of society, and had black people fooled by a black eugenicist who would parrot Sanger’s eugenics propaganda as being beneficial to black people.
In a way, Hill is right in saying that Nazi Germany learned by watching America. However, they didn’t learn by watching Republicans or right-wingers. They didn’t learn by watching the people the Left now associates with them. They learned from THE LEFT and the things they had done. Like I pointed out, the Nuremberg Laws were modeled after the Left’s racist segregation laws.
The Nazis learned from the Left and the Left learns from Nazis. Take the following quote, as an example: “We are socialists. We are the enemies of today’s capitalist system of exploitation… and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.”
This sounds exactly like something someone would’ve said (or basically, someone did say) at last week’s Democratic National Convention. This quote, in fact, came from a 1927 speech made by Adolf Hitler.
D’Souza writes: “The Nazi Party at the outset offered a twenty-five point program that included the nationalization of large corporations and trusts, government control of banking and credit, the seizure of land without compensation for public use, the splitting of large landholdings into smaller units, confiscation of war profits, prosecution of bankers and other lenders on grounds of usury, abolition of incomes unearned by work, profit sharing for workers in all large companies, a broader pension system paying higher benefits, and universal free healthcare and education.”
With some slight alterations, this sounds exactly like the Leftist plan of today. Modern Leftists want, to some extent or another, each of these propositions, with some slight alterations to account for our modern era.
The American Left and the Nazis are inseparable, much as they might try to deny it. The American Left at least partly inspired Hitler and the Nazis in their quest to eradicate “inferior” races (I say partly because I believe Nietzsche’s theory of the “ubermench” or “superman” was also partly to blame). The American Left, past and present, has clear ties to Nazi Germany.
So, no, it’s not that Nazi Germany learned from watching America, because different states had different policies, as did different presidents in different times.
No, Nazi Germany specifically learned from watching American Leftists in how they enacted their racist and egregiously inhuman laws.
“For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed.”
A political party’s convention is supposed to be this big fest, essentially, in order to drum up support for the newly-nominated candidate, particularly if they really need it. It’s meant to get people excited and hyped to vote for them come November. This election’s DNC, however, seemed to have the opposite intended effect: Trump’s job approval went up AS THE CONVENTIONS WERE HAPPENING.
Matt Palumbo from Bongino.com points this out: “In the Rasmussen Poll, President Trump’s approval stood at 47% [before the convention] – but made an incredible four percentage point leap this morning to 51%. When I reached out to Rasmussen to confirm that the sampling for today’s poll wasn’t taken before the DNC began to air, they said the polling data was being accumulated as the DNC speeches were ongoing. In other words, it is likely that some people were being directly influenced by the DNC – albeit not in favor of any Democrats.”
Democrats, I’ll give you some good news and some bad news. First, the good news: hardly anyone was watching your commie-fest over the four days it was airing.
Yes, THAT is the good news. According to Joe Concha from The Hill, ABC, CBS and NBC’s combined viewership of the second night of the DNC was just 6.13 million viewers, a 48% drop from night 2 of the 2016 DNC. By comparison, CBS’s “Big Brother” received more than half of that alone, at nearly 4 million viewers, on the same night.
The first night didn’t fare much better either, with a 28% drop in viewership compared to the previous electoral season.
The reason this is good news is because plenty of people didn’t see the actual commie-fest that was going on, with all of the asinine and dangerous demands that people deeply involved in this party usually make.
The bad news is that all of this – Trump gaining in approval AS THE CONVENTION WAS GOING ON and viewership dropping like someone who had information that would lead to Hillary Clinton’s arrest – is a huge indicator that virtually no one is excited to vote for Biden.
This, of course, is nothing new to us who see things for how they are. We KNOW that Biden is a bore and hardly anyone is willing to vote for him for his own sake. The people that intend to vote for Biden aren’t voting for Biden, just against Trump. And in terms of likely voters, Trump is very much winning.
And, honestly, who can blame people who willingly sit through the snooze-fest that was the DNC for not exactly feeling excited to vote for Biden? What was shown in those four nights are boring, woke scold communists threatening to uproot this country’s very foundation.
It might not have helped the Democrats for them to have featured Elizabeth Warren on their Native American Caucus Meeting, either. It was already established LONG ago that Elizabeth Warren is less Native American than the average white person in this country, so to have her on that panel, particularly since everyone KNOWS she’s not Native American, even to her own admission, probably ruffled a few people’s feathers.
The Democrats also hilariously had a panel of Democrat Governors which included STACEY ABRAMS, which came off as more funny and pathetic than whatever point they were trying to prove with this stunt.
Other than that, though, apart from the usual morons demanding to defund the police (which doesn’t exactly help sell the idea that Biden is a moderate who doesn’t want to defund the police), abolishing ICE and prisons, defending and promoting the rioters in Portland, and other communist crap, hardly any part of the DNC was very memorable or interesting.
Obama gave a dark and depressing speech in which he focused far more on attacking Trump than propping up Biden, and Biden himself, upon giving his acceptance speech, gave a faux-hope and faith speech that REEKED with insincerity, considering Biden is a proponent of abortion, which does not demonstrate any kind of faith in Christ (the fact that they omitted “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance doesn’t exactly point to this being a campaign about faith and hope for the future).
The DNC not only didn’t accomplish its intended goal of getting people excited to vote for Biden (assuming that was the goal in the first place, considering how little time they actually spent promoting their very nominee), but the convention seemed to have the exact opposite intended effect, as people began to approve of Trump more as the convention was taking place!
Just about every aspect of the DNC Convention was a disaster for Democrats, particularly as they allowed for people to contribute in their chats with impunity. By which I mean that they had no real security system or method of authentication, so anyone who wanted to log into their streams and troll the crap out of them could easily do so by creating any random e-mail address on the spot, creating a random password and a random username. That was literally all that was necessary to interact with the chats, which were often bombarded by trolls with people going by usernames like “Creepy Uncle Joe”, “1/1024 Native American”, “Biden has Dementia”, “Hunter”, and “Kamala Invented the School to Prison Pipeline”, with all leaving funny messages to troll the DNC.
The issue was so bad, they often had to disable the chat in each of the individual panels that they were hosting.
So yeah, this season’s DNC Convention was not exactly what the Democrats were hoping to get out of it. Sure, they got to attack Trump with whatever b.s. lie they wanted, including perpetuating the “fine people” hoax, and got to display their communist and insane demands to defund the police, abolish ICE and destroying Capitalism, but it very clearly cost them, to some extent or another.
Not only was their viewership in the tank compared to even 2016’s convention, but the people who were brave or crazy enough to sit through it were getting turned off by the Democrats and began to support Trump just a little bit more, as evidenced by the fact that not only did he have 51% total approval, but he also had 38% strong approval and had a +3 net rating, with 48% disapproval, the first time he’s flipped it in a while.
People aren’t excited to vote for Biden and the people that made the decision to watch the convention were quickly turning towards Trump.
As I’ve said in the past, Trump isn’t running against Biden, but against voter fraud, but little enthusiasm for Biden won’t exactly help the Democrat either.
“But you, O God, will cast them down into the pit of destruction; men of blood and treachery shall not live out half their days. But I will trust in you.”
Coming from the political side of the aisle which for three and a half years has perpetuated the conspiracy theory that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election, for any Leftist to accuse someone else of being a kook conspiracy nut is absolutely rich (though projection is a popular Leftist tactic).
Still, Leftist reporters have tried to attack Trump for the section of his supporters who follow QAnon, which began with a supposed high-level anonymous government worker, referred to as “Q”, who supposedly has “access to classified information about what truly is going on behind the scenes in the nation’s capital,” according to Breitbart.
The Left, because they definitely are not guilty of doing the same thing, charge this group as being a bunch of conspiracy theorist wackos. One reporter in particular during a recent Trump presser asked the President repeatedly about them.
Trump initially responded with: “Well, I don’t know much about the movement, other than I understand they like me very much, which I appreciate.”
The reporter asked him again about Q, saying: “The crux of the theory is this belief that you are secretly saving the world from this satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibals. Does that sound like something you are behind?”
I will return to this question in a moment. First, let me share the fantastic answer that the President gave to this fake news reporter:
“I haven’t heard that, is that supposed to be a bad thing or a good thing? If I can help save the world from problems, I’m willing to do it. I’m willing to put myself out there… I don’t know really anything about it other than they do supposedly like me and they also would like to see problems in these [Democrat-run] areas go away. We’re saving the world from a radical left philosophy that will destroy this country and when this country is gone the rest of the world will follow.”
More specifically, the beginning part of the answer, I feel, was the best part of it. By asking whether that’s supposed to be a good or bad thing, he is basically asking: “what, are you supporting the Satanic, pedophilic cannibals? Are you siding with them? What’s so bad about wanting to save the world from such people?”
Which brings me back to the original question, as I said I would return.
While I do not associate myself with QAnon, in large part because the so-called high-level agent got it completely wrong about the impending arrests of Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and Huma Abedin following Trump’s electoral victory in 2016 and because the group still believes that indictments are coming for such people (I have zero faith that any such thing will happen, at this point, knowing how corrupt the Department of Injustice is), I believe they have a point about the Satanic, pedophilic cannibals.
Don’t laugh, I’m being serious. We all know precisely how satanic and evil the Left is.
The Left advocates and CELEBRATES the holocaust that is abortion. Planned Parenthood makes the crux of their income from abortions and SELLING BODY PARTS OF THE BABIES! They are so enamored with this sick and depraved practice that they are beginning to push for POST-birth abortion. Remember Gov. Northam, before the whole blackface scandal? He went on a radio show to push for such abortion and people blew a gasket over it.
They are calling for the defunding of the police while simultaneously demanding you give up your guns, which would only naturally lead to chaos and death on the streets. For crying out loud, THEY ARE DEFENDING THE CURRENT VIOLENCE THAT IS GOING ON WHILE BLAMING TRUMP FOR IT!
They defend the burning down of a church while attacking those who want to pray in it and listen to sermons in them. They talk at length about the supposed injustice of George Floyd’s death, while ignoring the factors that actually contributed to his death, and simultaneously can hardly pretend to give a damn about the execution of a five-year-old white boy!
They espouse the beliefs that have killed over 100 million people while claiming conservatives are Nazis and Trump is Hitler. They attack a 16-year-old kid who supports Trump, claim he has a “punchable face”, and then have to settle with the kid for hundreds of millions of dollars because they SLANDERED HIM JUST BECAUSE HE SUPPORTS TRUMP!
The Left also famously associated itself with Jeffrey Epstein, with Bill Clinton being among Epstein’s most notorious and frequent clients, if the flight logs and multiple photographs are any indication. According to multiple victims, Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell would traffic young girls for Leftists to rape and abuse, and in some cases, kill and possibly eat.
Considering this involves high-level political figures on the Left, there is no concrete evidence to show that this was happening, but I wouldn’t exactly put it past them to go that far. We KNOW these people are evil. We KNOW they are pedophiles. Cannibalism is not a massive leap in logic here.
Whether or not Trump is saving the world from it, I don’t know. I know he stands firmly against it, disassociated himself from Epstein likely as soon as he found out what was going on, and recognizes the evil that the Left is, considering they have FANTASIZED about his assassination on multiple occasions.
What I do know, ultimately, is that the Left is FILLED with Satanists, because no Christian can be a true Christian and a Leftist at the same time. It takes a purely evil heart and mind to be a Leftist in this day and age. And one does not exactly have to worship Satan in order to be a Satanist – they just have to do his bidding, and not follow God. Satan doesn’t care if people worship him or not or believe in him or not. He’s perfectly content with people who are not Christians, because those are the people he gets in Hell.
I know that Epstein, Maxwell, the Clintons, the Obamas, the Soros, and everyone who is a hardcore communist Leftist is EVIL for the things that they adamantly support.
Most people will hear about Leftists being “Satanic, pedophilic cannibals” and laugh it off, believing it to be utter nonsense, but I wouldn’t put it past them to be exactly that.
We KNOW they are Satanic. We KNOW they are pedophiles (that Netflix show about “twerking” pre-teens, which promotes pedophilia, is a massive indicator that they are, indeed, pedophiles, not to mention Hollywood has long been a cesspool of pedophilia, with the likes of Roman Polanski and Kevin Spacey being some of the most notorious ones). And there are reports from Epstein’s victims regarding cannibalism.
But even assuming they aren’t the last thing, they definitely are the former two things. The Left stands in direct opposition to God and everything they say and do reflects that.
Trump may not be secretly leading a group of loyal FBI investigators to spy on and arrest and indict multitudes of Satanic, pedophilic and cannibalistic Leftists, but the Left IS FULL of Satanists and pedophiles, at the very least.
They are sick, depraved, evil people. They laugh it off and call it a “conspiracy theory” (a term created by the CIA to undermine claims by people who might know just a little too much about what the government is doing) and attempt to hide what they are doing, not because they are ashamed of it, but because they know almost everyone would be repulsed and horrified about discovering their dirty little secrets.
Child sacrifice, murder and cannibalism all used to be pretty standard millennia ago and the only people in history who were explicitly appalled by it were the Israelites (when they were righteous and not doing it themselves in sick and depraved attempts to “please” God).
Christianity has made it so that evil has to hide itself in the darkness, lest their works should be exposed in the light. They have to hide what evils they do and laugh off the idea that they are doing it, calling those who would expose them “conspiracy theorists”, all-the-while grooming the rest of the world to substantially get used to the evils that they do.
Do you think the idea to “shout your abortion” would’ve been well-received in the 1970s? Only in a gradually secular society that is abandoning God would such a horrifying and disgusting phrase be seen as tame or even as EMPOWERING.
You may laugh off the idea that Leftists are Satanists, pedophiles and cannibals, but they routinely have shown their outright evil desires and have repeatedly been exposed as pedophiles, even if they don’t necessarily get legally punished for it.
The Left is full of evil people – an evil which knows no bounds. Do not put it past them to be totally depraved in a number of different ways which we can hardly conceive.
“Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desires, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.”
Plenty has been going on this past week. Perhaps the biggest story, of course, is the ongoing DNC, featuring liars, cheaters, deceivers, rapists, a young socialist who hilariously endorsed the guy who was not made the nominee that same night, and, of course, the Democrat nominee and Joe Biden’s husband: Joe Biden.
However, a story that has not really been reported on a whole lot, largely because it completely craps all over the Green New Deal and heavily exposes its many flaws, is the story of the California blackouts happening as a result of the state’s insistence on using “renewable energy” to power itself up but with those sources failing to meet the demand of Californian residents.
Over the last week, California had been experiencing a series of blackouts that make the state look like Venezuela, likely because socialists run both places, as a result of renewable energy sources failing to meet demand. Officials said that the blackouts came due to the “unexpected loss of a 470-megawatt power plant Saturday evening, as well as the loss of nearly 1,000 megawatts of wind power.”
The state’s overreliance on wind and solar has led to these blackouts, because there is little wind currently blowing and solar panels have a hard time collecting power from the sun when there are clouds in the sky or when it’s nighttime.
According to Breitbart: “On Friday, Newsom said, the state had fallen about 1,000 megawatts short; on Saturday, it fell 450 megawatts short. Sunday saw only ‘modest or minor’ interruptions. But on Monday, he said, the state would be 4,400 megawatts short of ‘where we believe we needed to be.’”
It doesn’t help California’s residents either that they are currently experiencing a massive heat wave, record-breaking temperatures, and wildfires in their forests.
Now, even despite this, Newsom still insists on continuing the “transition” to “100% renewable” energy, clearly not having learned the lesson that these other energy sources cannot, as currently constructed, meet the demand of the entire state. If they could, we wouldn’t even be talking about blackouts NOW.
Still, he did admit that “we cannot sacrifice reliability as we move forward in this transition” and that they need to be “more sober” about renewable energy, which is extremely rare for any Leftist to do.
I don’t imagine the Left would be all too happy to hear this (provided anyone does hear it, considering this story exposes the flaws of green energy as being insufficient and leading to a series of blackouts and no proponent of these communist policies would dare share a story which would expose these things).
The reason I say this is because any semblance of a thought that green energy is in any way flawed or with drawbacks must be shut down. Michael Moore was lambasted for releasing a film which EXPOSED the inefficiencies of “green” energy, being extremely dependent on the very fossil-fuels they claim to be trying to replace.
I’ve already written a little about this movie, more specifically, in a rebuke by another Leftist environmentalist wacko who was among the people who lambasted Moore for the movie, so there is not much point in me going too far into it. But the point remains that even MICHAEL MOORE, who was, for a long time, a Leftist sweetheart who was always reliable for attacking and “exposing” Republicans with documentaries, was attacked for straying from the hive mind surrounding green energy.
Moore was essentially tried as a traitor to the Left for that documentary, even as in that very movie, he still espoused the same Leftist beliefs about climate change he always did and ultimately argued in favor of population control to keep the amount of people who are “able” to “affect” the climate to a minimum.
So for Gavin Newsom to even slightly suggest that there are flaws the Left has overlooked in terms of the reliability of green energy, I can’t imagine many people would be too happy with him over this. Though, I have hardly heard anything about it, once again, because the entire story hurts the Leftist narrative surrounding green energy, so I doubt Newsom will experience much falling out with other Leftists over this admission.
Not that he’s wrong, of course. There definitely are PLENTY of flaws regarding so-called green energy, not only in terms of economic price but also in terms of practicality. It is IMPOSSIBLE for green energy to produce the amount of energy required to power up the entire state of California. And California is among the best-suited to try this sort of green energy tactic anyway!
They have a lot of natural advantages for using renewable energy. They get plenty of sun and nice weather, they get good wind flow, which is why they even have those wind farms in the first place, they are next to the biggest ocean in the world to try hydro and the state is very rich in natural resources.
California has all the advantages it could possibly need to try using so-called green energy sources, but the fact remains that the technology is not available for these sources to completely replace fossil fuels. Not only can they not produce the same output of energy as fossil fuels, but as Michael Moore’s documentary pointed out, they REQUIRE fossil fuels to even be used at all.
Solar panels require the mining of quartz and coal and fusing them together. This process requires the use of fossil fuels. Wind turbines have to be constructed with tools that require the use of fossil fuels. The two also require the mining of rare earth metals, again, a process which requires fossil fuels. Even ethanol requires fossil-fuel-based agricultural systems to produce corn, which fuels ethanol.
This is without even mentioning that wind and solar power plants take up a lot of arable land and often require terraforming, which also requires machinery which uses fossil fuels.
Green energy cannot output the same amount of power as fossil fuel can, and it requires fossil fuels to even be constructed and functional. There is ZERO logical reason to use solar, wind or whatever else in the stead of fossil fuels. The ONLY environmentally-friendly alternative to fossil fuels which can produce a good amount of power is nuclear, but the Left sees it as just as evil as coal and gas.
For Gavin Newsom to admit that there are shortcomings to green energy sources is quite surprising, all things considered. Even when faced with blackouts, I wouldn’t put it past Leftists to pretend nothing is wrong, or at least, ignore the actual reason for the blackouts. I mean, he’s even routinely blamed the California wildfires on CLIMATE CHANGE despite the many other actual reasons such wildfires start, such as lightning striking a tree and catching it on fire, or the heatwaves drying the leaves, making them easily-flammable, etc.
For him to make this admission is honestly surprising, though, again, as few people are talking about it, I doubt he would be tried as a heretic by the cult of climate change for saying what he said.
Still, to try and continue the transition to “100% renewable”, which is an outright myth as renewable energy requires fossil fuels to be created and operated, will only lead California to face more blackouts and power problems.
I just hope the people of California come to the realization, at some point or another, that Leftist policies lead not to prosperity but struggle, and will begin voting these communists out of office forever.
“The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”
With the Democrat National Convention underway, the Left is trying its best to hype up Biden and prop him up as the clear answer to Republican President Donald Trump. However, despite this, former President Barack Obama is less than enthused about Biden’s run against Trump.
Now, while I have already talked about how Trump’s real opposition isn’t Biden but mail-in voter fraud, the fact remains that Biden still needs to campaign, to one extent or another, even if the farthest he goes is his front porch. He still has to give interviews and talk to people and do the things most regular presidential nominees have to do, even in this unique election.
In this campaigning, Obama points out that one shouldn’t “underestimate Joe’s ability to f**k things up,” reported a recent Politico article which was surprisingly harsh towards Joe Biden at points.
Throughout this Politico article, the general theme seems to be that Joe Biden felt he didn’t get much, if any, respect from Obama or those around him, not too dissimilar to Fredo Corleone, the aloof and clearly mentally-challenged older brother of Michael Corleone, the smart and tactful son of Vito who ended up succeeding him as the titular Godfather of his mafia family.
I imagine the following scene from The Godfather Part II is something Joe can relate to:
Fredo: “I’m your older brother, Mike, and I was stepped over!”
Michael: “That’s the way Pop wanted it.”
Fredo: “It ain’t the way I wanted it! I can handle things! I’m smart! Not like everybody says… like dumb… I’m smart and I want respect!”
Apart from the sentiment that Joe is not a very intelligent fellow, I think he can relate to Fredo in that he, too, was basically “stepped over.” Fredo was passed over as Don of the family, following the death of Sonny and Vito, making Michael the head of the Corleone family, despite being younger than Fredo. Similarly, Joe was passed over as the “heir” of the Obama administration’s legacy, with the Democrats choosing Hillary Clinton, who was at least relatively smarter and had the same Ivy League education and background that many Leftist elitists favor.
In fact, that sentiment of being passed over as Obama’s heir was a major topic in the Politico article as well:
“… behind all the BFF bonhomie is a much more complicated story – one fueled by the misgivings the 44th president had about the would-be 46th, the deep hurt still felt among Biden’s allies over how Obama embraced Hillary Clinton as his successor, and a powerful sense of pride that is driving Biden to prove that the former president and many of his aides underestimated the very real strengths of his partner,” according to Politico.
If this doesn’t scream “Fredo Corleone” to you, I don’t know what does.
Leon Panetta, Obama’s secretary of Defense, recalled: “[Biden] was loyal, I think, to Obama in every way in terms of defending and standing by him, even probably when he disagreed with what Obama was doing. To some extent, [Biden] oftentimes felt that that loyalty was not being rewarded.”
The Politico article then went on to point out the way in which “Young White House aides frequently mocked Biden’s gaffes and lack of discipline in comparison to the almost clerical Obama. They would chortle at how Biden, like an elderly uncle at Thanksgiving, would launch into extended monologues that everyone had heard before.”
Even the infamous Ben Rhodes, a key part of the Iran nuclear deal, wrote in his memoir that “in the Situation Room, Biden could be something of an unguided missile.”
A particularly bad quote came from Obama himself, apart from his “don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f**k things up” quote, where he reportedly told one 2020 Democrat candidate, speaking of the then-current Democrat electorate in Iowa, “And you know who really doesn’t have it? Joe Biden.”
Whether he meant the ability to win or to run things smoothly or what, I don’t know, but that hardly matters. He clearly doesn’t have much, if any, confidence in Joe Biden and has unenthusiastically supported Biden because he just kinda has to.
This was pointed out in the Politico article:
“But even in victory, Biden and his aides often act like they have something to prove to the Obama team that doubted them. Some Biden allies noted that Obama’s endorsement of Biden, when it finally arrived, lacked the effusiveness of his endorsement of Clinton. ‘I don’t think there’s ever been someone so qualified to hold this office,’ he said of Clinton in his video message in 2016. Four years later, in his endorsement video for Biden, he said: ‘I believe Joe has all of the qualities we need in a president right now… and I know he will surround himself with good people.’”
Obama and the Left have run with the narrative that Trump is dividing the country (completely ignoring that THEY are the ones who have been dividing the country with identity politics since HE was president), so it’s not surprising that he would say that Biden has “the qualities we need in a president right now.” Biden is known in the Swamp as being a bit more willing to cooperate with other people, even Republicans, which contrasted with Obama’s egotistical and narcissistic approach to things, believing he knew more than everyone else in whatever room he occupied combined.
That’s not to say Biden would make for a good president at all, of course – he’d be a train wreck and would not actually be in charge, which is why Obama mentioned that second part of Biden surrounding himself with “good people.”
Obama has no trust in Biden’s ability to do much of anything, especially doing things right, and knows perfectly well that if Joe were to “win” (if you read my previous article talking about cheat-by-mail, you know why I put that word in quotation marks), Joe would, at best, be the puppet with the official title of POTUS but someone else, like Kamala, would be the one actually running things and at worst, he would be forced to resign almost immediately to let Kamala be POTUS.
These are things we all knew, and even suspected that Obama saw it the same way, but it’s particularly interesting to see this from POLITICO of all sources. This, suffice to say, does not exactly hype people up to the idea of a Biden presidency. For Politico’s readers, this does not get them excited to vote for Biden, either by mail or by showing up to the polls.
While at some points the article tries to be more positive towards Biden, things like pointing out that Biden repeated the third grade, got all Cs and Ds in his first three semesters in college except for As in P.E., a course in which you would have to royally screw up to get anything less than a C, a B in “Great English Writers”, where he plagiarized in his paper, and an F in ROTC, as well as having graduated 76th out of 85 students at Syracuse Law School definitely do not help paint a pretty or excitable picture of Joe Biden, something he desperately needs.
I find it rather surprising that Politico would publish something like this, knowing full well that these people are largely Democrats. You would think they’d do whatever they could to help Biden win, especially as he is a candidate who NEEDS to be helped by those around him and those who support him.
Maybe they don’t exactly expect Biden to win, after all. Either that or they are so in bed with the Obama camp of the Democrat Party that they would rather try and avoid a disastrous campaign and Biden “presidency” which could tarnish whatever is left of the Obama legacy (which, granted, Biden or whomever controls his strings would get us back into the Paris climate deal and the Iran nuke deal and try to restore basically everything about Obama’s legacy, while trying to destroy Trump’s expansive legacy).
I don’t know the precise reason as to why the people at Politico chose to publish this, though I suppose we are still far enough away from the election that it would not really matter if this was published at all, and the sentiments expressed in the Politico article are sentiments found just about throughout the entirety of the Democrat Party anyway, and they aren’t doing a great job in hiding those sentiments.
At any rate, whatever the reason, I will enjoy the fact that they did and will call back to this whenever the opportunity strikes. Thanks for the ammo, Politico.
“Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you.”
The 2020 presidential election easily stands to be the most unique one in modern election history, if not history altogether, for a variety of reasons.
It’s very possible that the Left might outright steal the election through their cheat-by-mail system, focusing on swing states that Trump won in 2016 to ensure he does not get to 270 (assuming he wins all the other states he did in 2016 but does not pick up other swing or blue-purple states) and make it so that they either have Joe Biden “win” or make it contested enough to the point there is no clear winner until January 20th, when the new Congress would have to select the President of the United States and his/her Vice President.
This very easily could lead to a Constitutional crisis, as the Democrats (provided they at least retain the House) could pressure the Republicans (provided the GOP keeps the Senate) into either voting for Joe Biden to win (the likelier option, in my opinion) or have the Speaker of the House (Pelosi) be voted President of the United States.
Of course, Trump could try and counter this by suing in states where no clear winner is announced (ala 2000 election) and have it make it to the Supreme Court, but considering John Roberts HATES Trump, I wouldn’t expect things to go Trump’s way here.
No matter what ends up happening – whether the Democrats successfully cheat by mail to have a bunch of illegitimate ballots be counted towards Biden and allowing him to win, or successfully sabotaging the process enough that some states simply do not have an announced winner by January 20th at noon (when the current President’s term ends), leading to Congress to have to sort it out and either making Biden or Pelosi (or someone else) POTUS, or having the Supreme Court deciding this election (and almost certainly having Biden win) – this election, if the Democrats get their way, could mark the end of our Constitutional Republic and mark the beginning of a Banana Republic, not too dissimilar to Russia or Venezuela.
This is why I say that Trump isn’t running against Biden or Harris, but against corruption and election interference through an easily-rigged system (that the Democrats ironically claim Trump is trying to rig and yet do nothing to try and ensure the safety of the election, not that projecting what communists do onto their political opponents is anything new).
To answer the first question posited in the title, the reason the Democrats are pushing for mail-in voting is simple: it is their easiest shot to win and forever remain in power. If they are successful in this election, they can easily replicate it in future elections, pandemic or not, with the media reporting on something like: “since the 2020 election, more and more Americans are opting to simply vote by mail, as opposed to spending hours at crowded polling stations” or some other b.s. like that.
The Left wants power and as much of it as they can get, for as long as they can possibly have it, and the cheat-by-mail system gives them the best opportunity they possibly could have to do exactly that.
But that’s just the first question. What about the second? Why are they pushing conspiracy theories that Trump is trying to rig the election through things like taking away mail boxes or locking them up?
There are a number of reasons for this. For one, they want to push back on the idea that THEY are the ones trying to cheat, so they make the entire conversation about how their opposition is actually the one that is trying to cheat.
The Left tried to cheat in the 2016 election with foreign interference and Obama’s DOJ screwing over Trump, but when they failed, they switched to claiming Trump was the one who cheated and launched an “investigation” into it which wouldn’t turn up anything (since Trump didn’t cheat) but steered the conversation away from their own cheating and towards the claims that Trump cheated.
The Mueller investigation’s only purpose was to cover up for the Left’s cheating in 2016. The Left’s accusations today are to cover up for the Left’s cheating in 2020.
If all the media reports is that Trump was trying to cheat, there is little room in the discussion about how the Left actually cheated, so they get away with it.
But these conspiracy theories also give the Left insurance in their worst-case scenario: a Trump re-election.
If the Left once again is unsuccessful in their cheating (and plenty does still have to go right for them, such as these riots not being bad enough to get even long-time Democrat voters to vote for Trump) and Trump wins again, they can claim that he only did it by voter suppression regarding mail-in ballots.
The simple fact is that the USPS absolutely CANNOT handle the amount of electoral ballots the Democrats want to send out to make sure Biden wins (assuming this is their Plan A). CBS News, roughly a month ago, ran an experiment by sending out 100 fake ballots in Philadelphia one day, and a few days later, sending out 100 more.
According to CBS News: “A week after initial ballots were sent, most ballots appeared to be missing from the P.O. box,” which they had set up for the experiment.
The investigative journalist CBS News used in this experiment had gone to the post office and asked for the ballots, which the post office had misplaced, and he only got them back once he got a manager and explained the situation.
Another problem arose in the form of missorted mail, as alongside the ballots, the CBS journalist also mistakenly received a birthday card meant for someone else.
Regarding the actual “votes”, CBS News reported: “Out of the initial batch mailed a week earlier, 97 out of 100 votes had arrived. Three simulated persons, or 3% of voters, were effectively disenfranchised by mail by giving their ballots a week to arrive. In a close election, 3% could be pivotal.”
So the Philadelphia post office mismanaged three “votes” out of just 100 for a meaningless primary election. Do you think they’d do much better with millions of votes for the presidential election?
This mismanagement of ballots is what the Democrats would count on if they lose in 2020.
I imagine their goal is to have as many fake ballots go out to count for Biden, enough to counter the people who will vote for Trump (including the, likely, many people who are disgusted with the modern Democrat Party in allowing and encouraging violence in our streets), but in the worst-case scenario, they have “insurance” ready to try and get Trump out of office.
Of course, if Trump wins, this would just be Russia 2.0 with the same results: Trump remains in office (assuming the Democrats don’t control Congress with enough votes to remove Trump or coerce enough spineless Republicans to vote to remove him). However, it would further divide this nation and possibly incite even more violence. After all, “Trump just stole ANOTHER election!” is what the media and Democrats will screech to the ends of the Earth.
The Left will do whatever they can to get into and stay in power. They will lie, cheat, and steal, delegitimizing our entire electoral process and plunging us into chaos. Your life doesn’t matter. My life doesn’t matter. No one’s life matters other than the ones who are at the top, and even then, only the useful ones.
The idea of destroying elections altogether is extremely appealing to the Left and the only way to do it is by delegitimizing them and making them appear like they can be easily compromised by “fascists”.
Democracy is dangerous to Democrats’ ability to be in power, so if they can get rid of it, or at least control who gets to win (again, like Russia or Venezuela, having something that, on the surface, appears to be democracy but in reality, it is not), they don’t have to worry about anything ever again, justice and freedom be damned.
Truly, the way to counter this blatant cheating is for enough people in swing states that went to Trump in 2016 and those which did not go to Trump in 2016 (and maybe a few others, like Minnesota), to vote for Trump and make the electoral vote clearly go to Trump, that he gets to 270 decisively.
2020 has been a year of darkness so far, but light shines brightest in the dark. Democrats’ draconian, economy-killing policies, as well as their encouragement of the violent riots which have claimed the lives of many and cost cities and states billions in damages, has opened a lot of people’s eyes. People who previously had no real desire to vote for Trump, or anyone for that matter, coming to the realization that the current Democrat Party is crazy and dangerous, so they have to vote for Trump to ensure those crazy people do not get to rule over us.
People who look at what’s going on, recognizing this is awful, and seeing just who is either tolerating it at best and encouraging it at worst, and knowing that such apathetic-at-best and evil-at-worst people cannot be allowed to have power in this country and are turning towards a guy whom they may not necessarily like or even agree with at all, but know that he is the infinitely better option.
It definitely doesn’t help the Democrats that 62% of voters say that the growing level of violence is important to their vote in this election, according to a recent Rasmussen survey.
The Left absolutely cannot be allowed to win this election, which they will do their darndest to try and steal. I only pray that they will fail in this endeavor as they failed in 2016.
“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.”
Author: Freddie Marinelli.
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...