This week has truly been devastating for the Left. With regards to Supreme Court matters alone, they faced loss after loss with 5-4 decisions on pro-life pregnancy centers no longer being forced to promote abortion and public sector unions no longer being able to force non-union-members to pay fees.
 
But both of those news are tame in comparison to hearing that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy would be retiring at the end of the Court’s annual term (end of June). This opens the door to President Donald Trump nominating another possible Constitutionalist like Gorsuch to the Court, handing conservatives a reliable majority in the Supreme Court.
 
Despite the fact that Justice Kennedy was nominated by President Ronald Reagan, he has proven to be wildly unpredictable, a moderate and often a swing voter in the Court alongside Chief Justice John Roberts.
 
He upheld Obamacare as Constitutional, was the key vote that legalized same-sex marriage and upheld women’s “right” to abortion in 1992.
 
He was a liberal in all but name. And now, Trump has the prime opportunity to nominate yet another Gorsuch and deal a major blow to decades of Leftist Justices getting their way. Of course, that includes such things as Obamacare, DACA, illegal immigration, sanctuary cities and states, same-sex marriage, and perhaps the single biggest issue: abortion.
 
Now, the White House has narrowed a list of over 20 picks down to 5. This list includes people like Brett Kavanaugh, Amul Thapar, Amy Barrett, Thomas Hardiman and Raymond Kethledge.
 
From what we know about them, while they all have voted conservatively in many issues, people like Kavanaugh and Hardiman have shown to be relatively moderate in other areas, with Kavanaugh upholding Obamacare in a couple of cases, saying that Obamacare penalties were actually “taxes” in one of those cases, and with Hardiman seemingly buckling to typical Leftist hysteria of racism and discrimination when he struck down a fire department’s residency requirement, which he termed “racially motivated” and went on record saying: “minority workforce representation that low suggests discrimination”.
 
So, in my mind, both Kavanaugh and Hardiman are too unreliable. The other three seem to be the most conservative, as well as true Constitutionalists who will stick with the written text in the Constitution, as well as the intentions of the people who wrote the Constitutional amendments, in their decisions rather than go with what they like or don’t like.
 
But in any case, most of these picks are true conservatives who will surely and seriously challenge the horrendous 1973 Roe v. Wade case that has resulted in 60.5 million abortions since 1973 in the U.S.
 
Successfully criminalizing abortion will likely be Trump’s lasting achievement, particularly since Court justices can serve for an entire generation or even more depending on their age. Gorsuch’s selection has already solidified a relatively conservative Court for decades to come. This will further solidify a conservative Court, leaving Roberts as the last swing voter, who has occasionally shown to be conservative himself. Add that to the fact that the two oldest Justices in the Court are liberals (Ginsburg, 85, and Breyer, 79) and you could potentially replace those two at some point at the end of Trump’s second term or beginning of Pence’s first term. Almost certainly by the end of Pence’s second term and most definitely by the beginning of Ivanka’s first term.
 
Jokes aside, it cannot be overstated how massive this is for America. For life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. While a Presidential election will only guarantee a political side’s success for 4 years, and midterm elections for 2 years, whoever’s side gets to pick a new Supreme Court Justice could influence the country for decades.
 
Trump’s pick for the Supreme Court will almost certainly guarantee a very conservative Court for the next half century. This means that almost regardless of who wins elections in the next ten to twenty years, the Supreme Court will likely maintain the Constitution even in the case of a President Bernie Sanders (which will almost certainly never happen).
 
Now, with these news comes yet another reason for conservatives to vote in the November mid-term elections. Securing a Republican majority, or perhaps even a supermajority, as I think will occur, means that for the next two years, we will have one of the most conservative Presidents in history, a very solidly pro-Trump and conservative Congress and a very conservative Supreme Court for decades to come.
 
Man, if I were a liberal, I’d be panicking right now. I suppose the only thing that has kept them from completely running amok (yes, it can get worse) is the hope that Democrats might be able to take back the House at the very least. But if and perhaps when Republicans not only retain Congress but add more seats to amount to a supermajority, the Left might honestly panic and start another Civil War.
 
I don’t know, I wouldn’t put it past them to do it again. If the situation I describe becomes reality, the Left will be at its most powerless it has ever been. They might panic and do something stupid.
 
Not to compare this situation to a video game I know, but I will draw a fair comparison anyway. There’s this video game series titled Fallout, in which you play as a character in a post-nuclear war America set hundreds of years from now. In this series, America is utterly devastated by nukes after a war over resources with Communist China. According to the game’s lore, China invaded Anchorage, Alaska in search for oil and the U.S. counter-attacked, eventually invading main-land China. While it is unclear exactly what caused the Chinese to launch nukes at the U.S., it was most likely out of desperation to try to win an unwinnable war.
 
Now, what the heck does a game have to do with a real life situation? Like the Chinese Communists, the Left might feel cornered and trapped and feel as though they need to explore extreme situations to try and fight back. If they feel they don’t really have much to lose, the Left might go to any extreme necessary to try and reclaim the country they believe is theirs. Ironically, in the video game series, launching nukes wound up destroying China as well. This could also be the fate of the Democrat Party.
 
In resorting to desperate measures far worse than the incivility we’re already witnessing, the Democrat Party might well see itself destroyed.
 
Of course, the ideologies won’t die until God has destroyed the world, but the major political party of the Left might well cease to exist in the near future.
 
Regardless, that’s not what I want to take away from the retirement of Justice Kennedy. While it’s still something to be aware of, as of right now, I just want to delight in the fact that horrible Leftist cases decades-old will likely face their biggest and toughest challenge yet.
 
Romans 8:28
“And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to His purpose.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

It is rare for me to share polls in back to back articles, but I honestly think this particular poll is noteworthy and even more important than the Obama poll.
 
In a recent poll released by Axios, 92% of Republicans and right-wing-leaning Independents say that “traditional news outlets knowingly report false or misleading stories at least sometimes”.
 
Now, that’s not really the most important part of the poll. While this is noteworthy as well, it’s expected for Republicans and conservative-leaning Independents to be distrustful of the media. But still, if the Left hopes to ever turn some Trump supporters into Democrats, they’re in for quite the uphill battle.
 
But perhaps more important than the Republicans’ views on MSM is the rest of the country, including other Independents and Democrats.
 
The results don’t look good for either one, surprisingly (or perhaps, unsurprisingly).
 
According to the poll, 79% of Independents (in general) believe the MSM deliberately makes up the news they’re reporting.
 
This could be potentially devastating for Democrats in the coming elections, if the highly-sought-after Independents largely distrust the news they see reported.
 
But while that could be devastating for Democrats, the numbers they pull from Democrat-leaning people could prove to be their Armageddon.
 
Asked the same question, 53% of Democrats believe the MSM is reporting fake news, compared to 46%. As expected, it’s far less than Republicans and Independents, but this is honestly huge.
 
Axios tells us that they polled nearly 4000 adults so if well over half of the Democrats said that they believe news sources deliberately report fake news, Democrats seeking election will be lucky to even see a blue drop of water in November.
 
In total, the Axios poll determines that 72% of the people surveyed are distrustful of the media. Now, one can legitimately say that this is just one poll and that the source may not be all that credible. I would agree with you if Axios weren’t one of the more popular news sources for Millennials.
 
While they don’t necessarily seem to be insanely anti-Trump, as many of their articles have to do with technology and other things Millennials go crazy about, they’re not exactly conservative by any stretch of the imagination. So if these relatively Left-wing people saw these kinds of results in their surveys, that’s eye-catching.
 
But the poll didn’t end there. It also asked people whether they think the MSM deliberately reports fake news, with 65% saying “they have an agenda”, 30% believing it’s just laziness or poor fact-checking and only 3% believe it’s accidental.
 
I, for one, believe it’s a combination of having an agenda and being lazy, at least in some occasions. For example, at some point last year, CNN was forced to retract a story regarding Trump Jr. and Russians. The reason for the retraction is that they got the dates wrong and thus, wouldn’t help the Mueller investigation prove any sort of collusion. This, I believe, was laziness on the part of CNN simply because they saw “Trump” and “Russia” and soiled themselves with excitement. But it’s also clearly part of the agenda-driven news we have been seeing for a while now. So that’s the reason I believe it’s a combination of both on occasion.
 
Although, most of the time, I believe they are deliberately lying (and have proven they are lying) in order to drive their agenda forward.
 
The Axios poll also asked people whether they believe they can spot fake news, with 78% of Republicans saying they believe they can spot fake news and 73% of Democrats saying the same.
 
And when it comes to checking facts and sources, Axios found that 57% of Democrats “say they use Google search to verify facts” compared to 48% of Republicans and 55% of Independents.
 
Looking at this, you might believe that’s actually bad for Republicans. Here’s why it’s not: Google is very Left-wing. They ensure their algorithms are favorable to Democrats and socialists and unfavorable to Republicans. If you remember, some time ago, Google deemed California’s Republican Party to have an ideology of Nazism. When it was brought to their attention, they removed it. Google is incredibly biased against conservatives, so why would Republicans trust what Google says?
 
Not to mention that the Axios poll also finds that 43% of Democrats use “fact-checking” websites such as FactCheck.org and Snopes.com. Neither is a fact-checking website, despite what they try to tell you. Want proof? Look up whether Hitler was a socialist in Snopes. They will deem that to be false, despite the fact that Hitler was the FOUNDER of the National Socialist German Worker’s Party. It’s literally in the NAME and they claim Nazis weren’t socialists. Give me a break.
 
Oh, and by the way, the first few search results on Google are pages that say Nazis and Hitler weren’t socialist. Wonder how that could be.
 
What that particular poll question showed is not that Republicans don’t do research or won’t fact-check the information we receive. We just don’t use websites that are just as likely to lie to us as the fake news media.
 
Regardless, what’s really the most important part of the survey is the number of people who are distrustful of the MSM. If even more than HALF of the Democrats surveyed were distrustful of the media, that doesn’t bode well for Democrats one bit.
 
This kind of coincides with a little movement I noticed over this past weekend on Twitter. It was called the “#WalkAway” movement, where long-time Democrat voters were walking away from the Democrat Party because the Party is going too far Left and they simply can’t recognize it.
 
And if more candidates such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who is a radical socialist, keep winning their primaries over other Democrats, more and more Democrat voters will begin leaving the Party as well.
 
It’s hardly surprising. Many Democrats were disenchanted with the way Obama handled the country and decided to support and vote Trump. Since his election, we’ve seen the Democrats in Congress and in the Media be nothing more than obstructionist children throwing hissy-fits and crying foul, doing what they can to destroy Trump’s reputation at the least and his entire administration at most. That hasn’t changed.
 
Last year, a socialist whacko decided to shoot up a baseball field full of elected Republicans. Why would anyone sane want to align themselves with someone of his caliber?
 
And more recently, Maxine Waters has been endorsing harassment and uncivil behavior against Trump staffers. This is highly dangerous behavior, as harassment can easily turn into violence and death. And harassment against Trump staffers can easily turn into harassment against Trump voters and supporters. Matter of fact, that’s already been happening, if you recall the time when Cheesecake Factory employees harassed a black Trump supporter and his family, making violent threats against him.
 
A few articles ago, I said that this is what the Left has been reduced to. Nothing but savages. Is it really any wonder so many long-time Democrats are eager to jump off of that sinking ship? And make no mistake, it’s a sinking ship. The farther Left they go, the less support they’ll have. The less support they have, the less power they can acquire.
 
I wouldn’t be surprised if the Democrat Party ceased to exist in 30 or 40 years, at most. They’ve turned into radical anti-Americans, anti-Christians, anti-Founding principles, anti-capitalists. They’ve long ceased to be the Democrat Party of Bill Clinton. For as flawed as that piece of crap is, he was not a radical. He was a decent capitalist. His economy, as agreed by both sides of the aisle, is the second best economy of the 20th century, only following Reagan’s. You can’t have a successful economy without capitalism and capitalist policies.
 
Obama has taken the Party too far to the Left and not many people want to follow. This isn’t even about hatred of Trump anymore. Trump has been doing marvels for the country, especially for the economy. By the end of this century, unless someone better comes along, people will remember Trump’s economy to be the best of the 21st century, perhaps even rivaling and besting Reagan’s. And the Democrats are adamantly against it. They still want to impeach Trump on b.s. grounds today as much as when he first won the election.
 
But while their desire to impeach the President is undying, more and more people, including Democrats, are seeing what the Democrat Party is doing and what Trump is doing. They see Trump as far better than the Democrats at this point. Let me share with you a tweet from someone (I don’t know this person) about their decision to “#WalkAway” from the Democrat Party.
 
“I was ride or die Bernie. My folks were seriously angry w/me because after the DNC BS I refused to vote for Her. When I stopped watching Bill Maher, they started not liking me much. Think I got tossed from the will when I defended our POTUS. Yeah, I did a #WalkAway and I am proud.”
 
And here’s another tweet from someone else regarding the movement: “Some of my Democrat friends are not happy and considering leaving the Democrat Party and going independent. They feel the Democrat Party has gone so radical left and now refer to themselves ‘Progressive Democrats’. They are leaving the true Democrats behind…”
 
The Democrat Party is entirely unrecognizable from the Democrat Party of even the early 2000s. Don’t get me wrong, they’ve always been evil and have vaunted socialism and communism, but at least they used to pretend not to like them and even had some members who were totally against communism. JFK was hugely anti-communist. He was a pro-lifer and a Catholic. If he were alive today, he would not find a home in the Democrat Party. This is what many people are coming to find. Long-time Democrat voters and supporters who no longer feel can belong to the Democrat Party.
 
We really must thank the Lord for Trump’s election. Aside from the obvious good things of Making America Great Again, his presidency and immunity to Leftist attacks has caused the Left to unmask themselves. Like I said, they’ve been reduced to savages, but what they were before were simply savages donning a civil outfit. One can hardly say that this Democrat Party is all that dissimilar to the Democrat Party that would conduct public lynchings and go to war over their supposed “right” to own another human.
 
With the way they are currently acting, as utter savages against those who disagree with them, I wonder how long it will be until they demand erecting separate drinking fountains and public restrooms for us.
 
Jokes (perhaps) aside, you honestly can’t blame anyone for wanting to jump off of the sinking Democrat ship. They need to seriously course-correct and become far more centrist, at least, in order to even survive at this point. I don’t see anyone willing to lead the Democrat Party back to the center, so I don’t see that happening any time soon. I might be wrong in the future, but this will most likely lead to the utter destruction and dissolution of the Democrat Party.
 
Isaiah 10:1
“Woe to those who enact evil statutes and to those who constantly record unjust decisions.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Whenever you watch the news, or at least whenever you would watch the news when Obama was President, you could swear that Obama was the greatest thing ever since sliced bread. The way he was portrayed made him look as though he was brilliant, sophisticated and hugely popular. Well, it turns out he was far less popular than we may have thought… even back when he was still Prez.
 
In a 2014 Quinnipiac poll ranking the best and worst Presidents since World War II, 33% of polltakers ranked Obama as the worst. That is the highest point number, with George W. Bush ranking second worst at 28%.
 
The third worst President according to the poll was Richard Nixon and the fourth was Jimmy Carter.
 
In ranking the best Presidents since World War II, Ronald Reagan destroyed all other competition with 35%, with second place being Bill Clinton coming in at 18% and third place being JFK at 15%. Barack Obama only received 8% in the poll.
 
Interestingly enough, the poll also reported that “45% believe the nation would be better off had Mitt Romney defeated Obama in the 2012 presidential election; 38% say the country would be worse off with a Romney presidency,” according to an article on USA Today talking about the poll.
 
There was a time, before I knew of the establishment and its wickedness, when I thought the country would have been better off with Romney as POTUS instead of Obama. Make no mistake, Obama was the far worse candidate, but Romney would have been only marginally better. He likely would have passed tax reform, but not much else would have been to the benefit of the country.
 
And this is without taking into consideration that, had Romney won, Trump would have likely not run for President and we might have Hillary in the Oval Office right now, so I would say that, considering our current situation, the country would be worse off with a President Romney.
 
Of course, I can’t exactly blame people back in 2014 for believing Romney would have been better. Heck, even I thought that back then. But knowing what I know now, as despicable and evil and putrid as Obama was, I’m ok with the 2012 election results. After all, they are partly what brought us the best President we’ve had since Reagan.
 
Now, the poll didn’t end there. It also handed out grades for Obama on key issues. According to the poll, Obama received negative grades in his handling of the economy (not topping 3% GDP growth in any quarter and rampant unemployment rates will do that), his handling of foreign policy (giving a terrorist nation billions of dollars to secretly forward their nuclear arsenal and bending over backwards to appease a rogue communist dictator will do that), his handling of health care (Obamacare… need I say more?), his handling of the environment (as it turns out, people can’t change the global climate), and his handling of terrorism (allowing a “JV” team to overrun much of the Middle East and have multiple successful acts of terror in our country will do that).
 
Now, USA Today tries to somewhat excuse these poor numbers for Obama by saying: “Of course, Obama and Bush are the most recent presidents; historians will tell you that it takes decades to truly measure an individual president’s performance.”
 
That may be true, but when you have a sitting president who is praised to the hills by the media pulling these kinds of numbers, there’s a problem. The article (and consequently, the poll) were released in July of 2014 – before the midterm elections in which Republicans won back Congress. These numbers are indicative of Republican success in the midterms and likely even success in 2016.
 
Now, I wouldn’t blame you if this is the first time you’re hearing about these numbers. No doubt, the MSM tried their best to hide these numbers since they go against their narrative that Obama is beloved by most, if not all of America and would (at the time) want a Democrat supermajority in Congress and for another Democrat to succeed Obama in 2016.
 
But these numbers highlight the truth. America hated the job Obama was doing. Granted, this much was evident in the results of the 2016 election, but it’s clear that even back then, people were tired of Obama’s crap. They wanted change and so, in 2014, voted Republican and gave the GOP control of Congress in the hopes that they would do something good. Alas, not much came of that, but the American people refused to roll over and allow Democrats control of the country. But they desperately needed a leader who would stand up for them, fight for them and return the country to its former glory.
 
They were tired of Obama saying our best days were behind us and that a regressing America was the new normal that we had to get used to. So when Trump came in with the perfect message: Make America Great Again, the people had their new Jupiter Conservator (Parson Weems reference to the exaltation of George Washington; Washington was a hero). In essence and effect, Trump is the anti-Obama that the country needed and voted for.
 
Of course, the part about Trump is not part of the poll, as it was taken in 2014. That was my current-day take on the results of the poll. The American people did not and do not like Obama or what he was doing to the country. They needed someone who would be entirely different and found that in Trump.
 
Looking at these results, it’s easy to tell that Obama’s legacy not only will be marred in darkness, but it will also be largely considered to be marred in darkness. He constantly did evil things, passed evil policy, laws and regulation, and secretly formed a shadow government to keep tabs and control of his successor. The American people noticed this (except the shadow government, of course) and hated it.
 
I just wonder if Quinnipiac will update this survey at some point in the future, perhaps in the middle of Trump’s second term, to see where Trump ranks among these other Presidents in the same questions.
 
No doubt, he might be remembered as the best President, even better than Reagan, if he does his job well. He’s on track to doing that only a year and a half in as is.
 
Proverbs 29:2
“When the righteous increase, the people rejoice; but when a wicked man rules, the people groan.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Yesterday, I shared with you an article about an MSNBC commentator encouraging Democrats to call Trump supporters “Nazis”. In that article, I also shared with you the fact that the Left is far closer to being actual Nazis than they could ever claim we are. This past week, as well as one Low IQ Waters insane rant, showed us their true Nazi colors.
 
Let’s begin with DHS secretary Kirstjen Nielsen being harassed and heckled at a D.C. restaurant last week. She was enjoying her evening when members of the group “Democratic Socialists of America” (DSA) began shouting at her and heckling her, chanting things like “No borders! No walls! Sanctuary for all!”, as well as “Shame! Shame! Shame!” and “Kirstjen Nielsen, you’re a villain! Lock her up!”
 
Now, let’s fast-forward to this past weekend, when Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave a restaurant in Virginia. Granted, they seemingly were polite about it and have the right to refuse service to anyone, so this is not the biggest deal out there, but their reasoning behind refusing service to her is because they don’t like her or who she works for. Again, the restaurant has the right to refuse service to anyone, even for that reason, but it speaks volumes that a restaurant would refuse someone service simply because of their employment or political leanings.
 
Last Friday, protesters heckled Florida AG Pam Bondi, ironically outside a showing of a Mr. Rogers documentary titled “Won’t You Be My Neighbor”, for her support of the Trump administration.
 
Finally, at some point over the weekend, Maxine Waters (D-CA) publicly endorsed this type of behavior against Trump administration officials.
 
Here’s her insane rant:
 
“History will record while he tried to step on all of us, we kicked him in his rear and stepped on him. If you think we’re rallying now, you ain’t seen nothing yet. Already, you have members of your cabinet that are being booed out of restaurants, who have protesters taking up at their house, who say, ‘No peace, no sleep. No peace, no sleep.’ And guess what? We’re going to win this battle because while you try and quote the Bible, Jeff Sessions and others, you really don’t know the Bible. God is on OUR side! On the side of children. On the side of what’s right. On the side of what’s honorable. And so, let’s stay the course. Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up and if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere. Mr. President, we will see you every day, every hour of the day, everywhere that we are to let you know you cannot get away with this!”
 
This is what the Left has been reduced to. Nothing but savages. They can’t win at the ballot box, so they try to intimidate, harass and threaten their opposition. Can you believe these are the people who claim to be the “tolerant” ones?
 
This is nothing short of Nazi and Fascist tactics utilized by the brown and black shirts of the early 20th century. Richard Evans wrote a book titled “The Coming Of The Third Reich”, noting the sort of tactics the Nazis used against their political opponents. In regard to Social Democrat Reichstag deputy Otto Buchwitz, here’s how Evans noted the Nazis treated him:
 
“Brownshirts occupied the seats at his meetings, shouted insults at him, and on one occasion fired a shot at him, causing mass panic amongst his listeners and leading to a brawl in which more shots were fired by both stormtroopers (Nazis) and Reichsbanner men. Several Nazis and Social Democrats had to be taken to hospital, and not a single table or chair in the hall was left intact. After this, gangs of eight to ten Nazi stormtroopers harassed Buchwitz outside his house when he left for work in the morning, twenty or more crowded round him when he came back to his office after lunch, and between one and two hundred hassled him on the way home, singing a specifically composed song with the words ‘When the revolvers are shot, Buchwitz’ll cop the lot!’ Nazi demonstrations always halted outside his house, chanting ‘Death to Buchwitz!’”
 
One can easily see the similarities between the Nazi Party and the Democrat Party. And the similarities don’t end there. While I’ve already mentioned countless ways in which the Democrat Party share commonalities with the Nazi Party, it’s important to mention that the Democrat Party also shares similarities with the Confederate Party. Not really a surprise there, since Confederates were Democrats, but most people aren’t taught the truth in history class and believe there was some sort of “switch” in ideologies in which the Democrats are no longer racists and Republicans are now the racist ones. No such switch ever happened.
 
Now, let’s note some similarities between the Confederates of the Civil War (prior to the war, at least) and the modern day Democrat Party. The Confederates openly defied the election of Lincoln, as well as openly defying federal law in regards to slavery. The Democrats openly defied the election of Trump, as well as (currently) openly defying federal law in regards to illegal immigration through their use of sanctuary cities and declaration of California as a sanctuary state.
 
The Confederates sought and managed to secede from the Union and form their own nation. The Democrats in California and other states are also seriously considering secession from the Union to form their own socialist nations.
 
The Confederates fought to keep black people in slave plantations from which they could not possibly escape. The Democrats put into place policy that makes it almost impossible for black people to get out of the ghetto.
 
We’ve known the Democrats were the modern-day Confederates and Nazis for a long time, but this really takes it a step further. Now, they are actively seeking to recreate the ascension of the Third Reich here in the United States under the false pretense that they are the good guys (because evil always thinks they are good) and that God is with them.
 
Let me tell you this now, Low IQ Waters, God is not on the side of illegal immigrant gangs who kill, torture, rape and destroy. He is not on the side of people who openly defy law that is not in defiance of His Law. And He is most definitely not on the side of the people who consider abortion “healthcare”, gay marriage a right, transgenderism a normal and acceptable lifestyle, and who have historically been the most racist, hateful, vindictive and destructive forces on Earth.
 
People like Maxine Waters are utterly sickening to say God in on her side. She will try to use some out-of-context passages to translate a millennia-old situation into a modern-day policy change, all the while utterly forgetting everything else within the Bible such as the sanctity of life, of marriage, of respecting and loving one’s neighbors, as well as the punishment that comes to those who twist the Word of God for their personal profit.
 
The Democrat Party isn’t just the modern-day Confederate Party. They’re not just the American version of the Nazi Party. They are utterly God-less and spineless individuals who throw temper tantrums like the children they are whenever they don’t get their way. They lose an election? Riot. They see a political opponent in a public place? Harass them and intimidate them into evacuating out of fear for their lives.
 
Some days, I feel it isn’t enough to merely call them evil. Calling them that means absolutely nothing to them. Most of them know they are evil and spreading evil and just don’t care.
 
They are utter garbage. Crap. Soulless and rotten to the core. And even despite their history, despite their calls for violence, despite their horrific and barbaric behavior, I still do not wish them ill. Not that it would ever happen, because we are not deranged and evil people, but I would never hope for my fellow Christians and conservatives to treat these people the way they treat us.
 
I would never wish this kind of literally insane harassment upon anyone, even my worst enemies. Why? Because I’m not a scumbag like they are. I’m not deranged. I’m not emotionally disturbed over the results of an election. I’m not fed daily bullcrap about supposed unfairness and inhumanity within the Trump administration. I’m not lied to and do not lie to others.
 
I do not need to resort to violent threats and barbaric actions to win an argument or get my way.
 
I am a child of the Most High God. I do unto others as I wish they would do unto me. I do not let my emotions and my anger drive my actions. And as hard as it is sometimes, I forgive those who have done wrong by me multiple times.
 
I cannot possibly claim to be perfect or some sort of angel, but in comparison to these devils, you’ll swear I am an angel.
 
Earlier I mentioned that Christians and conservatives don’t do this sort of thing. We don’t harass people for their political leanings or for their religion or any other issue. Because we know that such a thing would be unchristian. Such a thing is something that drives us farther from God and closer to Satan. Farther from Heaven and closer to Hell.
 
We do not rely on barbarism to get our way because Jesus Christ is our way. We know He is Lord and He is in control of the universe. Nothing happens in this world without His approval.
 
And perhaps most important of all, we understand that regardless of who is President, Jesus is King.
 
Romans 12:2
“Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

In the world of politics, the one thing that can absolutely destroy a political campaign is the attack of an opponent’s supporters or future voters. Hillary Clinton made the mistake of calling Trump supporters “deplorables”, prompting us to proudly wear merchandise that calls us that and further support Trump.
 
Even Hollywood has, at least in the past, understood the importance of not attacking another candidate’s supporters, but rather try to bring them in to your own camp and convince them that your candidate is the better choice, if the movie “Our Brand Is Crisis” starring Sandra Bullock is anything to go by.
 
Well, it seems nobody remembered to tell MSNBC commentator Donny Deutsch last week.
 
On MSNBC’s “Morning Joe”, co-host Mika Brzezinki prompted her guest by talking about the “family separation” hoax outrage and unapologetically attacking Trump (as per usual).
 
Deutsch had this to say: “What has to happen now is this can no longer be about who Trump is. It has to be about who we are, if we are working towards November. We can no longer say Trump’s the bad guy. If you vote for Trump, you’re the bad guy. If you vote for Trump, you are ripping children from parents’ arms. The mistake we’ve made in the past is ‘Look at that bad guy over there. Look at that bad guy’. What the Democrats have to do is make the next election a referendum on not who Trump is, but who you are. That’s the big difference. You can no longer as a voter – because it’s not about taxes, it’s not even about some abstract term of immigration or nationalism; if you vote for Trump then you, the voter, you, not Donald Trump, are standing at the border, like Nazis, going ‘You here, you here.’”
 
Boy am I gonna have fun with this one.
 
First, as I mentioned earlier and as is the whole topic of the article, attacking a candidate or a person’s supporters is perhaps the worst mistake you can make in politics. It’s not the voters who are on the ballot. And calling them “Nazis” unless they vote for you will not get you any votes. Wanna know what happens when someone says “If you don’t vote for me, you’re a Nazi”? The response is: “screw you, moron.” And that’s sugarcoating it, as I don’t write curse words unless I’m quoting someone. And even then, I make sure to censor the words.
 
I get that the Left is basically out of ideas on how to take down Trump, but the way you separate him from his supporters isn’t to attack the supporters. Calling someone who won’t vote Democrat an “idiot” or a “Nazi” will only get them angry at you, not at their favored candidate.
 
Second, Obama and Bush were enforcing the same law Trump (prior to the EO) was enforcing. Does that mean that Obama and Bush voters are also evil because they were voting for someone who was ripping children from their parents’ arms?
 
Third, what do you mean it’s not about “taxes… some abstract term of immigration or nationalism”? It’s PRECISELY ABOUT THOSE THINGS TOO! If Democrats get control of Congress, they will RAISE people’s taxes. We want to vote for MAGA candidates because they will KEEP TAXES LOW and even perhaps LOWER THEM AGAIN! And what do you mean by “some abstract term of immigration or nationalism”? It is not abstract in the least. If Democrats get control of Congress, they will do what they can to open our borders. They will do what they can to destroy this country as founded and reshape it into their own socialist utopia (though, a dystopia for everyone else).
 
Finally, with everything we know about the National Socialist German Worker’s Party that Hitler founded, we know very well that the only people who come close to accurately describing Nazis are the Democrats and the entire Left. Sure, they may not be calling for the deaths of the Jews (even though they effectively are if they support Palestine), but everything about the Nazis from the Nuremberg Laws shaping after the Democrat South’s slavery laws to the brown shirts’ confiscation of all civilian weapons, to even the calls for environmental awareness perfectly describes the modern-day Democrat Party.
 
That even includes the Antifa thugs who organize and destroy and attack similarly to the brown (and even Fascist black) shirts of the 20th century. Not to mention their harassment of conservatives in restaurants, as with the cases of Kristjen Nielsen, Sarah Sanders and Eugenior Joseph (the black Trump supporter who was harassed in a Cheesecake Factory in Florida back in May).
 
Replace Hitler’s hatred for Jews with hatred for Trump supporters and conservatives and you have these unhinged Leftists.
 
Make no mistake, the Left wants to silence us regardless of method. Whether through banning us on social media or flat out having us arrested and/or killed, this is what they want to do. Their behavior more closely resembles Nazi Germany’s than they could ever claim we do. Not to mention they’ve already held internment camps for the Japanese during World War II under the orders of FDR, one of the Democrats’ favorite Presidents (who was honestly the closest thing we ever had to a Mussolini, given what he did).
 
But returning to Deutsch, all of this is the reason such a tactic would never work. Not only does it not help to attack someone’s supporters, but given the nature of the Left as being far more Nazi-like than they could ever claim we are, not enough people will ever buy it… well, if people are educated, that is. The Left has done a good job at promulgating a big lie that the Nazis and Italian Fascists were right-wing.
 
I don’t know if I’ve shared this with you in the past, but I will do so here. I remember having taken a political leaning quiz in high school. The quiz asked me all sorts of questions about political topics and the results would show my own political standing on an X-Y chart, in which the farthest left in the X-line is communism (which makes sense), farthest down on the Y-line was anarchy, farthest up on the Y-line was authoritarianism and farthest right on the X-line was Fascism. And on this chart, there were other notable people in history/politics such as Adolf Hitler, Obama, Stalin, and interestingly enough, Rush Limbaugh.
 
The chart placed me, of course, pretty far-right and “anarchist”.
 
Anyway, the chart also placed Hitler relatively right-wing, albeit more to the authoritarian side. If it were entirely honest, it would have put Marxism at the very left (since Communism, Nazism, Fascism and Socialism all derive from Marxism), totalitarian at the very top, anarchy at the very bottom and conservative at the very right.
 
And if it were honest, it would’ve put Stalin, Obama, Hitler and Mussolini pretty close together on the left, with Rush Limbaugh, Ronald Reagan, Eisenhower and Lincoln on the right.
 
But due to this assignment, I was led to believe, and legitimately believed until I learned better, that Hitler and Mussolini were right-wingers. That Communism was big government on the Left and Fascism was big government on the Right. That’s, very clearly, a lie. But as a high school student, this is what I was taught. And this is what other students are taught as well.
 
And it’s all a huge lie. Nazism and Fascism are not right-wing ideologies, they are their own interpretations of Marxism, which is entirely Left-leaning and anti-capitalist.
 
Regardless, returning to Deutsch, I honestly do hope this is a method they employ. Calling us Nazis will yield them the same result as in 2016. Not only am I ready to destroy each of their arguments, but I’m also ready to more strongly support pro-Trump candidates this November and fully support Trump in 2020.
 
My only worry is that this will eventually lead to a sort of civil war, in which Antifa terrorists and unhinged radical Leftists will harass more and more conservatives and perhaps eventually actually start killing us. Of course, I’m ready to destroy anyone who wishes to harm me and my family thanks to my 2nd Amendment rights, but that could definitely make things ugly out there.
 
Still, seeing as most gun owners live in red counties and consider themselves conservative, I doubt any actual civil war with the Left would last longer than a week. While I hope and pray we never reach that point, red-blooded Americans will be ready to fight for our freedoms once again.
 
John 16:33
“I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

While I tend not to look at too many polls to gauge a candidate’s favorability or people’s views on a certain issue, one poll conducted by YouGov, a market research and data analytics firm, caught my eye with some of the results on the issue of illegal immigration.
 
The poll was conducted just a few days ago and it polled 1,500 U.S. adults. The poll found that only 19% of those polled favored “releasing the families and having them report back for an immigration hearing at a later date.”
 
In other words, only 19% of those polled favored the Obama-era policy of “catch and release”.
 
According to the Daily Wire: “Even among Democrats, only 30% liked the idea, while 33% of Hillary Clinton voters and 36% of self-described ‘liberals’ favored it. Among Independents, just 17% were in favor of catch and release, as were just 16% of moderates. Among Republicans, only 7% backed it, as did only 7% of conservatives and 4% of Trump supporters.”


This tells me something in particular: people didn’t actually like what Obama’s policies were, they just liked them because they were Obama’s. Similarly, I’ve noticed on occasion that when people are asked what they think of a policy enacted by Trump, but were not told it was Trump’s, people tended to favor said policy (of course, depending on what the policy was).
 
“Catch and Release” is entirely synonymous with Obama and is revered by the fake news media as the policy we should be using (that is until they start heavily demanding open borders, as they might in the coming days and weeks following the charade of “keeping families together”). But when you get down to it, most people, even Democrats, liberals and Clinton voters, do not like the idea of “catch and release”.
 
The poll provided four particular policies regarding illegal immigration: “catch and release”, “holding families together in detention centers until an immigration hearing at a later date” (which seems to be the one the Trump administration is leaning towards), “arresting the adults, sending them to jail to await a criminal trial and sending any minor children to shelters run by the Department of Health” (the administration’s previous approach), and “arresting both the adults and minor children, sending the adults to jail and the minor children to juvenile detention centers to await a criminal trial”.
 
I already mentioned “catch and release” and the results of that poll, but the other ones are quite interesting as well.
 
In regards to “holding families together in detention centers until an immigration hearing at a later date”, this method proved to be the most popular among polltakers, with a total of 44% backing the idea, 49% of Democrats, 39% of Independents, 47% of Republicans, as well as 53% of Clinton voters, 44% of Trump voters, 48% of liberals, 51% of moderates and 43% of conservatives.
 
Personally, I agree with this idea. The separation of families is a very bad thing, which is why I bash Obama, Bush and especially Clinton over this since this began in 1997 after the Flores case, as I mentioned in my previous article.
 
Of course, I can’t say I’m surprised at the amount of Democrat voters who support this idea. It’s a little more humane (though the media will certainly try to make it seem just as inhumane as separating families so they can push for open borders and amnesty) and Democrat voters tend to be fooled into thinking Democrats care about anyone other than themselves. But this idea overall seems better than the previous approach. Not to mention that Trump’s EO exposes the Left as frauds since they will say it’s not enough and will push for no prosecution and detainment at all, which exposes this as not being about the kids, but about open borders.
 
Stupidly enough, the Left believes they can win on the key issue that got Trump elected in the first place and it’s the reason I believe Trump’s EO is the best move to expose the fraudulent Left on this issue.
 
Regarding Trump’s previous approach of “arresting the adults, sending them to jail to await a criminal trial and sending any minor children to shelters run by the Department of Health”, that proved to be less popular than even “catch and release”. Of the people polled, only 12% supported the idea, with 5% of Democrats supporting it, 12% of Independents, 22% of Republicans, 3% of Clinton voters, 27% of Trump voters, 3% of liberals, 11% of moderates and 25% of conservatives.
 
Again, not very surprised at these results. It’s not a very popular policy, at least to me, because it was used and created by Democrats. Of course, the media and Democrats try to make it seem as though it’s strictly Trump policy, and many have bought into that b.s. In a perfect world, people would recognize that this policy was created and used by the Left (yes, I’m counting Bush as part of the Left) and bash those who created it and the ones who employed it but had the chance to end it.
 
Like I said, Obama had the best chance to do this in 2009 when the Democrats owned Congress and the White House. And don’t tell me that that is only 2 years of majority. That is not a good enough excuse. Trump has been in power for less than 2 years and look at what he’s accomplished so far. And that is with a Republican Party that has been UNCOOPERATIVE for much of it and a Democrat Party that has been OBSTRUCTING everything they possibly could. Obama, with total control of Congress, could’ve done far more damage than he actually did. We must thank the good Lord that he wasn’t as effective as Trump is.
 
Let’s finally move on to the final policy on the poll: “arresting both the adults and minor children, sending the adults to jail and the minor children to juvenile detention centers to await a criminal trial”. Unsurprisingly, only 8% supported this idea, with 2% of Democrats, 7% of Independents, 16% of Republicans, 2% of Clinton voters, 15% of Trump voters, 2% of liberals, 6% of moderates, and 15% of conservatives.
 
Personally, I also disagree with that idea. It simply seems like too much, particularly for minors. While there very well could be some minors who are close to 18 years old, most are younger children who are dragged to these places by their parents (for some reason) so sending them to juvie over something they really had no control over is a little harsh.
 
Now, I can also understand the reasoning behind some conservatives on issues like these. I agree with the idea that we should take care of our own children first, our own homeless people first, our own citizens first. That is part of the reason I voted for Trump, to put America, and thus, Americans, first. Any nation that prioritizes the citizens of another country over their own citizens is a nation that is doomed to be reshaped at best and utterly destroyed at worst.
 
But it makes sense that this last method is so unpopular.
 
Now, these were not the only things tracked by the poll. Among many other things such as Trump’s handling of North Korea, people’s view on certain countries as allies or enemies and their opinions on the FBI, the poll asked “Do you think the policy of separating parents arrested for crossing the border into the United States without proper documentation from their minor children will or will not discourage immigrants from crossing the border illegally?”
 
In other words, is family separation a deterrent of illegal border crossing? A total of 34% said that it is, with 38% saying no and 28% being unsure. Personally, I don’t think it’s a deterrent whatsoever. Think of it this way: families are attempting to illegally cross the border in at least 80 degree heat on a good day, risking capture and deportation, risking separating themselves in the trip alone, risking heatstroke and dehydration (and other things that threaten their lives). If they are willing to go through that, I can’t see how being separated by the government can seem like much of a deterrent.
 
The only effective deterrent of illegal immigration is a border wall and more security. We need to make it almost entirely impossible for anyone to cross the border illegally. People might be able to climb a fence, but unless they are Spider-Man, they can’t climb a 20 to 30 ft. wall.
 
Now, looking at these results overall, it tells me that people still tend to side with Trump on immigration issues. If even Hillary voters and registered Democrats heavily disapprove of “catch and release”, what honest-to-God hope do they have to winning in the midterms? Especially on the biggest issue that got Trump elected? Pushing for amnesty and open borders didn’t work in 2016, so what makes them think it will work now? The way they see Trump isn’t the way the majority of the country sees Trump.
 
Ephesians 5:13
“But when anything is exposed by the light, it becomes visible.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

Yesterday, I shared with you a nice story about Chris Pratt giving a good, wholesome, pro-God acceptance speech at the MTV Movie awards. Unfortunately, the Left is loud enough in their asinine outrage that they warrant some form of attention.
 
Amidst the controversy of children being separated from their “families” (unsure how many of them are simply using children to enter the country), actor Peter Fonda, Jane Fonda’s younger but equally as disturbed brother, sent out a series of disgusting tweets attacking DHS secretary Kristjen Nielsen and Donald Trump’s youngest son, Barron.
 
Why do they continually attack an 11-year-old? Because they’re bullies, that’s why.
 
The tweets he sent out are vile, so I will censor the disgusting excuse for a human being’s language.
 
Let’s begin with his attack on Barron, which has since been deleted (it’s all in caps, because he is insane and loud, but it’s annoying so I will write it out like a normal human being who hasn’t lost all his marbles): “We should rip Barron Trump from his mother’s arms and put him in a cage with pedophiles and see if mother will stand up against the giant a**hole she is married to. 90 million people in the streets on the same weekend in the country. F***.”
 
Boy, can I have a lot of fun with this tweet alone, but I don’t want to make this too long. First, this is hundreds of times worse than what Border Patrol is doing. They aren’t ripping kids from their “parents’” arms. The parents willingly leave them when seeking asylum, otherwise they get deported. Second, no one is putting these kids with Polanski- I mean pedophiles. They are taken by government workers. Third, you can’t even get 90 million people to vote for the disaster candidate that was Hillary, how can you get 90 million people to march on the streets? That would take more than the entire population of the three biggest states: California, Texas and Florida.
 
Not everyone in California is a mind-numbed Leftist. Even less people are in Texas and Florida. Getting 90 million people to march on something would be taking nearly a third of the entire country’s population. You’re not gonna get that.
 
Regardless, let’s continue with the insane actor’s tweets.
 
This one is directed at Nielsen: “Kristjen Nielsen is a lying gash that should be put in a cage and poked at by passerby. The gash should be pilloried in Lafayette Square naked and whipped by passerby while being filmed for posterity.”
 
A couple of things regarding this. First, eww. Second, Democrats don’t get to whip people anymore. They lost that right when they lost the Civil War. Third, this, among the other vile things, goes to show how twisted and demented this p.o.c. is. Lastly, this jerk made me look up the term “gash” in a vulgar sense. I won’t share it with you because I do not wish to taint your minds to the levels of this demented dude.
 
This next tweet attacks ICE agents and their families (again, in all caps to show how insane he is): “We should hack this system, get the addresses of the ICE agents, CBP agents and surround their homes in protest. We should find out what schools their children go to and surround the schools in protest. These agents are doing this cuz they want to do it. They like doing this. F***.”
 
Does he have Tourette’s or something? Why does he have to end these tweets with that profanity? He already shows his literally insane outrage, why end it with that word? Also, again, this is far worse than what ICE and Border Patrol are doing. This is stalking and harassment. And that’s best case scenario.
 
Why does the Left feel as though violence is the only solution? Why do they feel they have to shout at people to “win” their arguments? Oh, right, because they can’t fight in the realm of ideas and their collective IQ barely reaches the double digit mark. And no, I’m not talking about ALL Left-leaning people here. I don’t refer to liberals as stupid. I refer to these Leftists with some semblance of power as stupid.
 
Now, I won’t share all of his vile, disgusting tweets because I think this is enough to show how insane these people are. I’m actually running out of adjectives to describe these people and their behavior. It’s vile, disgusting, volatile, asinine, insane, ridiculous… you get the idea.
 
But do you want to know what makes this entire hysteria laughable? It’s so obvious it’s just to score political points that it hurts.
 
First, this policy is not Trump’s. He didn’t enact anything, as I’ve honestly seen someone on Twitter complain about. This isn’t Trump’s doing. This is the result of a 1997 federal government agreement on the Flores v. Sessions case and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that accompanied children could not be held in custody under the terms of the settlement. This follows the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. Who was the POTUS who signed this bill into law? Bill Clinton.

Second, Chuck Schumer and the Democrats rejected a bill proposed by the GOP to fix this issue. The reason? To “keep the focus on Trump”, according to Chuck Schumer in an interview with The Hill. When presented with a piece of legislation that would effectively end their cries and would mean a longer-term solution than an Executive Order (which Trump has signed), they reject it in order to continue this cockamamie fight.
 
The truth is that Democrats couldn’t care less about children. They are the ones who want to continue funding Planned Parenthood, the world’s biggest child-killing organization. They constantly separate children from their families, and that’s honestly the nicest thing that horrible organization does. Yet, we are to believe these evil people care about these children?
 
And let’s not forget, these are the “children” of ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS! Not the children of people who want to enter the country legally, but the children of people who want to enter the country so bad they would use children as anchors to seek asylum. It’s these parents that are WILLINGLY separating themselves from their children.
 
As an immigrant who came to this country as a child, I can assure you that there’s no way in Hell my mother would agree to being separated from me for more than 20 days just so she could enter the country. There’s no way in Hell any good parent would do that to their children. You’ve seen the pictures of Obama’s separation of children from their parents. You’ve seen them cry. What good parent would do that to their child? To enter the country? Sure, wherever they are coming from is most likely a “s**thole” country, but no good parent would willingly separate themselves from their children just for a shot at a better life. They would stay with their children and figure out another way.
 
Wanna know why this is such a big deal? A couple of reasons. More and more people are using this method of entering the country illegally. Why? Because Trump has taken away many other options for these people. Using a child to seek “asylum” is just a new, more popular way to have a decent shot at entering the country. Not to mention the hundreds of cases in which people have fraudulently used children to enter the country, according to the Washington Examiner. In fact, “301 children who arrived at the U.S.-Mexico border with an accompanying adult from October 2017 to April 2018 were found to have no relation to the adult who posed as their parent or guardian.”
 
So people are clearly using children as a scam to enter the country.
 
Another reason this is such a big deal is because the Left has absolutely no other arrows in their quiver. With the economy roaring, ISIS basically defeated and NK agreeing to denuclearize, among many other great things, the Democrats have had nothing to sell people on. This is purely an effort to revive the long-since-dead “Blue Wave”. Not to mention this is meant to take us to “Let’s not separate families and just open the borders”.
 
Elections and open borders are all the Democrats care about here. Not the children, nor their families. If they cared at all about the children, they wouldn’t have signed this into law back in 1996. They wouldn’t have enforced this law while Obama was still President. They wouldn’t have waited until they exhausted all other options to attack Trump for.
 
They would’ve taken care of this when they had ultimate power back in 2009, or even at any point during Obama’s presidency, given that the GOP wants to put an end to this policy as well.
 
The Democrats don’t want a fix to this, they want something to fight over. They can’t win anywhere else. They can’t win with Trump’s economy kicking butt. They can’t win with unemployment numbers hitting record-lows. They can’t win with Trump making the world a little bit safer. Ironically, they will try to win with arguably the biggest issue Trump won: immigration.
 
But with Trump’s decision to sign an EO and working with the GOP to make this a more long-term thing, the Democrats won’t have much to fight over by the time November rolls around. The majority of the country still wants Trump’s agenda dictating immigration reform.
 
Now, I fully expect Paul Ryan to use the momentum of this farce of a fight to push his amnesty bill, thus hurting Republicans in November, but we’ll see what happens. Trump won’t sign an amnesty bill, that’s for sure.
 
Returning to Peter Fonda, I don’t think I need to say anything more. His disgusting psyche speaks for itself.
 
Ephesians 6:11
“Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

It is rare to see Hollywood celebrities, particularly massive stars, showing their faith in God to the public, but Chris Pratt is not quite like other Hollywood celebrities.
 
Aside from the obvious fact that he’s not an Atheistic liberal, Chris Pratt is not afraid to be so outspoken about his faith in the Lord. We’ve seen him tweet prayers for close friends and being an overall good guy, but this speech might flat out make him my new favorite Hollywood actor.
 
At the MTV Movie awards earlier this week, Chris Pratt was honored with the “Generation Award”. In his acceptance speech (video below), he felt compelled to give a list of tips, or as he calls them, “9 Rules From Chris Pratt”.
 
Here’s some of the list, the ones I think are the best “rules”:
 
Number 1: “Breathe. If you don’t, you’ll suffocate.”
 
Number 2: “You have a soul. Be careful with it.”
 
Number 3: “Don’t be a turd. If you’re strong, be a protector and if you’re smart, be a humble influencer. Strength and intelligence can be weapons and do not wield them against the weak. That makes you a bully. Be bigger than that.”
 
Number 5: “Doesn’t matter what it is, earn it. A good deed, reach out to someone in pain, be of service, it feels good and it’s good for your soul.”
 
Number 6: “God is real. God loves you. God wants the best for you. Believe that. I do.”
 
Number 8: “Learn to pray. It’s easy and it’s so good for your soul.”
 
Number 9: “Nobody is perfect. People are going to tell you you’re perfect just the way you are; you’re not! You are imperfect. You always will be, but there’s a powerful force that designed you that way. And if you’re willing to accept that, you will have grace and grace is a gift. Like the freedom we enjoy in this country that grace was paid for with somebody else’s blood. Do not forget it. Don’t take it for granted.”
 
Finally, he ends his speech by saying: “God bless you. Please get home safely.”
 
Let me tell you, I far prefer Chris Pratt’s acceptance speech than I did Robert De Niro’s. Not only is Pratt’s not an unnecessary and dull tirade against Trump that shows signs of insanity, but it’s also a very good and positive message.
 
Frankly, I don’t know which rule is my favorite. I certainly appreciate number 6’s bold and truthful statement about God’s existence and His unconditional love for us. It’s basic, but it’s also very much appreciated. If this were a church sermon, this would be an unnecessary proclamation. Pretty much everyone in a church is already accepting of the fact that God is real. But since this is an award ceremony with other A- and B-list celebrities, such as Chadwick Boseman and Mila Kunis, I would say that Pratt’s bold statement is a welcome change of pace for what otherwise might’ve been yet another unnecessary and alienating tirade against Trump.
 
And before a Leftist reader (not certain that there even are any here) claims that God is “alienating”, I’ll say that it’s really not. First, his proclamation isn’t bashing the beliefs of half his audience; it’s boldly professing his own. Second, Pratt’s message is about the love God has for us. That is literally the opposite of alienating.
 
This proclamation is certainly a welcome change of pace from the usual Leftist insanity that they promulgate and shove down people’s throats.
 
The other two that are in contention would have to be 8 and 9. 8, much like 6, is simple but powerful. It’s also a fantastic tip to anyone who hears it. Prayer is a fundamental part of faith in God and will honestly help a lot of people.
 
For anyone who feels left out and as though they don’t matter, prayer can help them feel and believe that there is someone in this universe that is listening. And aside from feeling good, you can also build a good relationship with God in this manner. Though He already knows what is in your heart, He delights in your prayers.
 
But number 9 seems to be the best one out of all of them. Let’s read that one more time, shall we? “Nobody is perfect. People are going to tell you you’re perfect just the way you are; you’re not! You are imperfect. You always will be, but there’s a powerful force that designed you that way. And if you’re willing to accept that you will have grace and grace is a gift…”
 
This both takes the time to give fantastic advice for people who feel they should be perfect and continues sharing the greatness of God. You are not perfect. You never will be, neither should you try to be. You were not designed to be perfect. You were designed according to His purpose. According to His plan.
 
“… Like the freedom we enjoy in this country, that grace was paid for with somebody else’s blood. Do not forget it. Don’t take it for granted.”
 
That is perhaps the most powerful part of his entire speech. Not only does he show his patriotism for his country in acknowledging that this country enjoys freedoms next to no other country enjoys and those freedoms were fought for by brave men in the past who died for the vision of a free nation and a free people, he brings it back to God and the sacrifice Christ made at the cross.
 
He died so that we may be free from sin, forgiven for those sins and that we may be given grace to enter Heaven should we repent, ask for this forgiveness and accept Christ as our Lord and Savior.
 
And yes, I suppose you could say it’s a bit blasphemous to compare the sacrifice made by men to create this nation with the sacrifice made by the Son of God to give us salvation, but I think Pratt understands the unbelievable sacrifice Christ made at the cross and wanted to also add in a bit of patriotism with a parallel that works.
 
Of course, Christ’s sacrifice is incredibly more important to far many more people. This is something we can all agree on, including the superstar actor. But it’s worth taking note of the sacrifice other people made in making this a free nation. Let’s be honest, how many other actors winning awards will take the time to note the greatness of our nation and its fortuitous freedom which many take for granted?
 
Hollywood people usually either attack the POTUS, the policy he’s enacting or employing even if it’s good for the country or has been employed by previous Presidents or flat out attack our system of government and wish for some sort of communist revolution to occur (which would not happen in a capitalist country, as dictated by history).
 
But Pratt’s acknowledgment of the sacrifice made by our Founding Fathers and the revolutionaries, as well as the immense sacrifice made by Christ on the cross is noteworthy. Like the freedoms we enjoy in this country, we should not take for granted the sacrifice and the gift that Christ has given us.
 
If left entirely up to us, it is highly unlikely we would be able to reach the Kingdom of God. In fact, let me rephrase that. It’s IMPOSSIBLE to reach the Kingdom of God without Him. Verse after verse explains well how we cannot enter Heaven on our own. So taking Christ’s sacrifice for granted would lead us nowhere desirable.
 
When people in movies and t.v. talk about someone making the ultimate sacrifice aka laying down their lives to save their friends, no other being in the history of Earth ever made a sacrifice as powerful, successful and grand as the one Christ made on the cross. A character in a movie or show may be able to save his friend or group of friends, but Christ saved all who believeth in Him. I can’t possibly claim to know a precise number, but it should be around the BILLIONS range in the roughly 2000 years since His death.
 
But returning to Pratt’s speech, I find it endearing to see a Hollywood mega star such as himself being so outspoken about his faith in God and his appreciation for this country. I think this goes to show that Pratt is the Lot to Hollywood’s Sodom. A man of faith in a wicked environment. I pray that Pratt’s faith is strong enough to withstand the wicked environment he lives in. So far, he seems to be doing well.
 
Psalm 1:1-2
“Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers; but his delight is in the law of the Lord, and on his law he meditates day and night.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.

George Soros knows very well that, in order to OWN America, you have to OWN the DNC. And in order to OWN the DNC you must OWN the Clintons. Please don’t forget this premise as you read on…

The IG report that was made public last week reveals a huge number of interesting evidence about the swamp – it confirms Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were biased against Trump. It confirms that ‘we’ in the FBI ‘will stop Trump’ from becoming President – and ‘we’ has to be a group of people CONSPIRING at the FBI. It confirms that then FBI director James Comey broke protocol with one end in mind: to exonerate Hillary from any crime. In doing so, Comey himself may have broken the law by adding to the law something that it doesn’t require in the Hillary case: intent. I think we can all agree that Page, Strzok, Comey, Hillary and all the rest broke the law – and our trust. These were people in positions of power who used that power to benefit themselves and a particular presidential candidate. Hillary herself was way too senior in the Obama Administration not to know that she was breaking the law when she decided to keep an illegal, unprotected server for official business.

Let’s let lady Justice deal with these actors – I have a feeling that somebody will end up in jail over all of this.

But let’s focus on Obama for a moment. We know that Obama lied when he said he learnt about the illegal server when the media reported it and not before. We know it’s a lie because the IG report says that Obama himself was using an alias to write to Hillary when she was the Secretary of State on her numerous email addresses – he, too, was using unofficial Hillary email addresses to conduct official businesses and that’s a crime. So we know that a Hillary criminal investigation would have led to Obama himself and he could not afford it. 

Now, let’s talk about the premise of the headline: Was Obama trying to OWN Hillary?

We all know that NOBODY in the Obama Administration back in 2016 thought Trump was going to win. Obama never in a million years thought he could be the target of an investigation – it’s the reason he let Hillary keep that illegal server. Nobody in the Obama Administration thought any of this would come to light.

So, with this in mind, let’s go back to the Comey press conference in October 2016 when he announced the FBI had found 30,000 new emails on the ‘Hillary matter’ that they would investigate, only to announce a couple of days later that there was no intent on the part of Hillary and therefore no ‘reasonable prosecutor’ would indict. Why would he do this, knowing that in May of that year the FBI had decided not to pursue Hillary? They knew all along Hillary was not to be touched. Why would he open and close the investigation like this in October of 2016? And why wouldn’t he just do his job and present the evidence to the DOJ?  I’ve heard analysts say it was Comey’s ego that caused him to be on the spotlight, or Hillary may have threatened him and that’s why he closed the investigation and all sorts of reasons why he chose against prosecuting her, even when he didn’t have the power to do that as FBI director.

Well, I have another theory….let me explain.

Obama had already indicated in April 2016 that 'I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America's national security,' in an interview on 'Fox News Sunday.' He added 'What I've also said is that -- and she has acknowledged -- that there's a carelessness, in terms of managing emails, that she ... recognizes.' So Comey was just following orders: Hillary was just...'careless'.

Now, if you want to OWN America, you must OWN the DNC. And Obama doesn’t own the DNC…yet. He knows this perfectly well – if he’s going to put his own friends in office, he must NEUTRALIZE the Clintons sooner rather than later. Right now, the DNC is divided – and the Clintons have way too many friends for Obama’s liking. For a long time I thought Obama would throw Hillary under the bus on this email case just to get the Clintons out of the way and become the king of the DNC. But now I think he had a better plan…

I think Obama decided that neutralizing the Clintons doesn’t necessarily mean finishing them off politically – it means keeping their skeletons in the closet and owning them personally, like mobsters do. I think Comey was trying to convey the message that, once Hillary was inaugurated, she’d have to thank Obama for her freedom and presidency. And Obama holds the key to her future. She better continue with his legacy or else…

Let’s not forget that Obama is used to Chicago politics – these people are not like you and me. They’re mobsters. And speaking of mobsters, there’s one story in The Godfather Part II that explains what may have happened here (clip at the bottom).

You see, in The Godfather II, there’s this character, Senator Pat Geary, that opposes Michael Corleone, the head of the mobster family. The Senator knows Corleone is a criminal and he wants to find ways to bring him to justice. Corleone needs politicians, law enforcement agents and senior leaders on his payroll in order to conduct his illegal business freely. And this Senator is in his way. What was Corleone’s brilliant plan? To ambush the Senator: the Corleone gangsters find a prostitute for the Senator, who they then kill but making it look like the Senator did it. The Senator had been drugged somehow and he doesn’t even remember what happened to the girl – he thinks he must have killed her, given the evidence. But the Godfather’s saviors come to the rescue and protect the Senator from public shame and jail. The end objective was to OWN the Senator, which they managed to do by PROTECTING him from being INDICTED over a CRIME.

With Hillary it’s the same – except she did commit the crime. So Obama’s objective was to OWN the next President by sending Comey to close the email case to PROTECT Hillary from being INDICTED over a CRIME.

Perhaps that’s the reason the IG didn’t find documented evidence of political bias – Comey and Obama weren’t just rooting for Hillary out of love for her. This was about WHO was going to OWN the DNC…and the country.
 
Psalm 9:7-8
'But the LORD abides forever; He has established His throne for judgment, And He will judge the world in righteousness; He will execute judgment for the peoples with equity.'

​Author: Danielle Cross

Recently, the DOJ’s Office of Inspector General report on the FBI’s handling of the Clinton e-mails investigation revealed a text message conversation between two FBI employees the day after Trump won the 2016 election.
 
Here is the exchange:
 
FBI Employee: “I’m very upset.”
FBI Employee: “haha”.
FBI Attorney 2: “I am so stressed about what I could have done differently.”
FBI Employee: “Don’t stress. None of that mattered.”
FBI Employee: “The FBI’s influence.”
FBI Attorney 2: “I don’t know. We broke the momentum.”
FBI Employee: “That is not so.”
FBI Employee: “All the people who were initially voting for her would not, and were not, swayed by any decision the FBI put out. Trump’s supporters are all poor to middle class, uneducated, lazy POS that think he will magically grant them jobs for doing nothing. They probably didn’t watch the debates, aren’t fully educated on his policies, and are stupidly wrapped up in his unmerited enthusiasm.”
 
Love you too, bud.
 
But seriously, you might be thinking “this is just what the Left in general thinks of us, what’s the big deal? They’ve called us worse.” True, but those were all people on social media or in the MSM. These people are FBI AGENTS who are supposed to REMAIN UNBIASED!
 
Take a look back at these texts. I’ll also remind you that Peter Strzok also texted Lisa Page that “they” would stop Trump from becoming President. I don’t know who these two employees are, but clearly there was a larger conspiracy to rig the election.
 
Of course, this is nothing new to us. We knew that Hillary conspired to cheat and we also knew that Obama did as well, but this really puts things into perspective. This is evidence that the FBI was politically biased throughout the campaign. Meaning, there is reason to believe there was bias in the handling of the e-mail investigation as well.
 
The FBI attorney was wondering what they could have done differently. Regarding what? It’s unclear. The conversation seems to focus on the Hillary investigation. But the larger context is regarding the election. What could they, as FBI agents, have done to keep Trump from becoming President? Clearly, not very much. But what gives them license to believe they even could have done anything? Was their handling of the investigation meant to help out Hillary?
 
Of course, we know that it was. Comey usurped the authority of the Attorney General by exonerating Hillary and not seeking charges against her. He didn’t have the power to do that as FBI director. The FBI director can make recommendations to the AG, but he/she does not have the authority to decide the fate of the person being investigated.
 
But again, as we already knew all of this and the corruption within the FBI, this further puts things into perspective.
 
Now the conversation didn’t just end there. Of course, the attorney continued his or her upset tirade by saying: “I just can’t imagine the systematic disassembly of the progress we made over the last 8 years. ACA is gone.”
 
And the employee made further known just what he thinks of us: “Who knows if the rhetoric about deporting people, walls, and crap is true. I honestly feel like there is going to be a lot more gun issues, too, the crazies won finally. This is the tea party on steroids. And the GOP is going to be lost, they have to deal with an incumbent in 4 years…” And then he says something pretty interesting: “We have to fight this again.”
 
Who is “we”? Who is the “we” that Strzok talks about when saying they would stop Trump? Of course, I have no doubt that it’s the Deep State, the swamp, the Obama people who can’t stand to lose and must not allow people their right to vote for people they disagree with.
 
To this elitist jackhole, we are too stupid to know what is right. We are too uneducated and must be helped in choosing who to vote for. And if we vote for the wrong person, they will do whatever they can to destroy said person, undermine that person and rule his or her election null and void.
 
This is corruption at its finest. Thankfully, the American electorate system seems to have been solid enough that no matter what these holier-than-thou elitists tried to do, they wouldn’t get away with it.
 
And since it’s in my nature, I will obliterate this man’s claims here.
 
First, the only ones who are crazy here are the people who believe themselves big enough and bad enough that they could influence and alter the results of an election to benefit themselves every time out. The only ones crazy here are the ones who fight for a political side that would ultimately see the United States destroyed from within, that would see American citizens at the mercy of the government… or Sharia Law, honestly. The only ones who are crazy here are the ones who believe a fetus is nothing more than a random assortment of cells, Islamic terrorists can be appeased by giving them jobs, Antifa terrorists are peaceful angels sent from Heaven, a man can be a woman and vice versa, and that MS-13 are innocent souls.
 
Second, what gun violence? You mean the one that ravaged the nation during Obama’s 8 years when he did absolutely nothing about it, even with a Democrat majority in his first 2 years as POTUS? You mean the one where we saw record numbers of shootings perpetrated by Democrats or Muslims? I won’t deny there isn’t gun violence in Trump’s America, but Obama had the best opportunity to actually do something about it and did nothing. Not to mention that some of the most dangerous places in the country in terms of gun violence are places where Democrats have power, such as Chicago, Oakland and Detroit.
 
Third, I simply love how he blasts poor and middle class people. Aren’t the Democrats supposed to be the ones who cared about the low and middle class people? Aren’t they the ones who do great things for the downtrodden? How are Trump’s supporters the poor and middle class?
 
This is just another example of how the Left has utterly abandoned the low and middle class. Particularly, the white, blue collar class. They make fun of you, they attack you, and then, somehow expect you to vote for them? What a joke.
 
Finally, the FBI employee makes fun of Trump’s promise of bringing back jobs and of your expectations that jobs will “magically” come back. Well, abracadabra, jerk. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (from March 2018), Donald Trump has created nearly 2.5 million jobs since becoming President. This goes along with record-setting unemployment rates in the last few months as well.
 
Reading what these people think of us, I feel mixed emotions. For one, I feel indifferent, as this is something I would expect out of mind-numbed Leftists who believe Obama is God. The problem is that, as I mentioned earlier, these are FBI employees. They’re law enforcement. They’re SUPPOSED to remain unbiased in how they handle investigations and their overall work. THAT is what makes me angry. Although, it’s also something to be expected. This is the swamp, after all. The Deep State. These are corrupt, biased and evil people we are talking about.
 
People who have seemingly worked to alter the results of an election. People who have sought to undermine the people they are supposed to serve. People who have taken Democracy into their own hands and tried to taint it.
 
We really have to thank the Lord for Donald Trump’s election victory. It’s not just Hillary that he had to beat. It was also government corruption. And by some miracle, he managed to do it. All thanks to the Lord.
 
Because here’s the thing: it really doesn’t matter what these FBI employees tried to do or will try to do. It doesn’t matter the extent Hillary and Obama and his administration went to cheat. It doesn’t matter what they think they are capable of. Ultimately, it is God who decides what happens.
 
He gets to decide who wins an election. He gets to decide what policy an authority figure enacts. None of it is a surprise to Him. He gets to decide who goes where and what they end up doing. For as powerful as the FBI might think they are, or might actually be, they are absolutely nothing compared to the Lord.
 
Usually, I would use an analogy here to compare a situation, but no analogy could honestly be properly used. Because there is nothing that can compare to God’s power. Nothing that can compare to the power gap that exists between God and Man. Man, ultimately, has no power. We only have as much power as the Lord gives us.
 
These fools may think they can play God. Ultimately, they are nothing.
 
We must also be thankful that these things are coming to light. It might be scary to believe our government can be so corrupt as to try and steal an election away from the American people, but it’s worse to not be aware of the danger.
 
Make no mistake, this is war. A war that we cannot afford to lose and cannot afford to not participate in. This isn’t Democrat vs. Republican anymore. It’s not conservative vs. liberal. It’s the Left vs. We the People. It’s Evil vs. Good. It’s government corruption vs. the American people. The Deep State vs. the rest of us.
 
The swamp may be big, but it’s not unbeatable. As I said before, it is the Lord who gets to decide who wins and who loses. If He is with us, who in the world are they to be against us?
 
Proverbs 19:21
“Many are the plans in the mind of a man, but it is the purpose of the Lord that will stand.”
 
Author: Freddie Marinelli.