A video from Project Veritas, a conservative non-profit organization dedicated to investigating corruption in the U.S., depicts a CNN Supervising Producer, John Bonifield, revealing that the “Russia collusion” story was “mostly bull****.”
According to Bonifield, the biggest reason they even run the story in the first place, despite a lack of evidence, is because of ratings. An undercover Project Veritas journalist met and talked with Bonifield, discussing the Russia story. “Then why is CNN constantly, like, Russia this, Russia that?”, the PV journalist asks. Bonifield responds with “Because it’s ratings… Our ratings are incredible right now.”
And he’s right. According to a Nielsen chart, CNN’s May ratings were significantly higher this year than the previous year. But this one line (there’s more that I’ll get to, don’t worry) is insanely telling of the mindset in the MSM. The biggest reason they run the “Russian collusion” story at all is not to destroy Trump and damage his reputation (though, they certainly hope to accomplish that), but to MAKE MONEY! CNN is a business, after all, as Bonifield says.
I just find it hilarious that, while they are largely socialist in nature, they prioritize making money and using capitalism to their advantage. They use capitalism to denounce capitalism. And it’s not like focusing on the Russia story was a decision by station managers or on-air “talent”. The decision to talk about Russia non-stop came from the head honcho of CNN, CEO Jeff Zucker. According to Bonifield, “The CEO of CNN said in our internal meeting, ‘good job everybody covering the climate accords (which they covered for a couple of days), but we’re done with it. Let’s get back to Russia.’ So even the climate accords, he was like, okay, a day or so but we’re moving back to Russia”.
Of course, that’s to be expected. Covering the farce that is the Russia story garners them a lot of views and a lot of money. But that’s not all that the undercover PV journalist managed to get out of Bonifield in this video. According to Bonifield, he thinks that “there are a lot of liberal CNN viewers who want to see Trump really get scrutinized. And I think if we would have behaved that way with President Obama and scrutinized everything that he was doing with as much scrutiny as we applied to Donald Trump, I think our viewers would’ve been turned off. I think they would’ve felt like we were attacking him (Obama).”
So even he admits that there’s massive Anti-Trump bias in the news business. Now, this is something we, conservatives and Trump supporters, have known for ages. But to see a CNN producer saying these very things is great. Even he has to admit they’ve been treating Trump unfairly because they believe most, if not all of their viewers want to see Trump be heavily scrutinized and destroyed by them.
Then, the video begins to talk more about the Russia story. The PV journalist begins: “But honestly, you think the whole Russia **** is just bull****?” To which Bonifield replies with: “Could be bull****. I mean, it’s mostly bull**** right now. Like, we don’t have any big giant proof. But then they say, ‘well, there’s still an investigation going on’… I don’t know, if you were finding something, we would know about it. The way these leaks happen, they’d leak it. It’d leak. If it was something really good, it would leak… I just refuse to believe that if they had something really good like that, that wouldn’t leak because we’ve been getting all these other leaks. So, I just feel like they don’t really have it but they want to keep digging.”
Mighty powerful stuff right there. And it looks like I was right all along, wasn’t I? I’ve said in multiple articles that, if there was any evidence, the MSM would know about it by now. That it’s been half a year since the election, half a year since the accusations began, and the FBI and MSM have yet to find anything real that ties Trump with Russia, or that shows Russia hacking our elections in some way. And now, we have an MSM spokesperson, if you will, ADMITTING TO THIS VERY FACT! From his own words, he says that the story is largely b.s. and that if there was something, anything, real and big out there, they would know it by now!
But you see? Like I said in the last article: this is about deception. They know they have no real proof and likely will NEVER have any real proof, but they will still run this story because 1) it’s garnering good ratings for CNN and 2) they want people to BELIEVE there was foul play in the 2016 election. The MSM KNOWS THEY’RE FULL OF IT, but they will never drop this ‘issue’ because it’s profitable for them.
2 Corinthians 11:13-14
“For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.”
CNN was forced to retract a story about a connection between one of Trump’s aides and a Russian-owned bank. Since it was retracted, I won't directly quote what that story said. But that doesn’t matter. The fact that CNN was actually CAUGHT DELIVERING FAKE NEWS is what really matters here. As a result of this retraction, three CNN employees have had to resign.
Thomas Frank, the author of the story, Eric Lichtblau, an editor in CNN’s “investigative” unit that ran the story, and Lex Haris, the man who oversaw the unit, all resigned due to the fact that their story had been revealed as fake.
Now, I’m glad that this happened. I’m happy to see the Left take another loss. They’ve been writing fake news stories for a very long time, as Trump himself has said in a tweet: “Wow, CNN had to retract big story on “Russia”, with 3 employees forced to resign. What about all the other phony stories they do? FAKE NEWS!” Of course, it’s difficult to oust every single story the Left writes as fake news (thought, we try our best to do so here).
But the fact remains: the Left only continues to receive losses. While this loss is of a different kind than an election loss, this is a loss on their credibility (of which, they have had very little in recent years). The MSM typically doesn’t get caught in delivering fake news to people. When they write b.s. stories such as all the stories on how Hillary Clinton was going to win in a landslide victory over Trump, or the multiple “Trump colluded with Russia” stories, they tend to stick. They’re usually not retracted.
With the “Trump colluded with Russia” stories example, they tend to write something along the lines of “As of yet, there seems to be no evidence of collusion.” That’s typically what saves those articles from having to be retracted. And I just find it hilarious that a “Trump colluded with Russia” story tried to “give evidence” that was seen as clearly fake.
Don’t misunderstand, now. This doesn't mean that they will simply give up on the story altogether. Their narrative will always be that Russia hacked the election in some way and that Trump colluded with Russia in order to win. Even without any sort of real evidence, they will never give up that narrative. Do you want to know why? Because the alternative would be accepting the fact that Trump beat the Democrat Party fair and square. That Trump BEAT THE LEFT without any help. That Trump WAS THE PREFERRED CANDIDATE OVER WHAT THE LEFT HAD TO OFFER!
The Left’s very pride is on the line with this narrative. They can’t accept the fact that someone like Trump, whom they view as nothing more than scum, actually beat them in a fair election and that he was seen as the better option by the majority of the country.
The Left isn’t simply trying to deceive you and me with the stories they write, as evidenced by the fact that CNN was caught writing fake news. They are trying to deceive themselves too. I’ve said multiple times, in multiple articles, that the MSM and the Left as a whole lives in their own bubble. That they believe they are in the majority. That they believe the large majority of people agree with them, like them, and wish to vote for them. And I’ve said multiple times that they are wrong about that. But that’s just what they do. They DECEIVE people, including themselves.
They can’t tolerate the fact that most people disagree with them and like Trump. And so, they write stories that say Trump’s approval rating is in the toilet and that the only possible way that Trump won is that he had to cheat. They write these stories aimed at everyone. They target Trump supporters in order to discourage them and make them think that Trump is a bad guy who is good friends with and works alongside of Russia (though, that never works out for them). They target Millennials to indoctrinate them into believing Trump is evil and should be defeated in 2018 and 2020. They target liberals in order to get them to believe the same thing as Millennials. And they target each other in the MSM so that they can try to convince each other that they are not the massive failures that they are.
It’s all about DECEIT. But the problem with deception is that, since we know that that’s what it is, we (conservatives) are able to tell the TRUTH and deliver the TRUTH to people. Like a previous article said: “Truth is absolute”.
“And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
On June 26th, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States voted to allow most of Trump’s travel ban executive order to go through. I’ll explain what I mean when I say “most” in a bit. For now, I just want to say that I’m very happy that the Supreme Court has finally gotten to this issue and recognized that Trump is acting within his power as POTUS to issue this travel ban order. I knew that it was only a matter of time before the Left was beaten on this one. But now, unto my explanation.
While the Supreme Court has allowed the travel ban to go through, there’s still a catch. “In a per curiam opinion (unanimous decision), the Court partially stayed the injunctions blocking enforcement of executive order 13,780”, according to Breitbart.
The opinion says: “We now turn to the preliminary injunctions barring enforcement of the §2(c) entry suspension. We grant the Government’s applications to stay the injunctions, to the extent the injunctions prevent enforcement of §2(c) with respect to foreign nationals who lack any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States. We leave the injunctions entered by the lower courts in place with respect to respondents and those similarly situated, as specified in this opinion.”
In other words, the government is granted full power to stop lower courts from impeding them from banning people that have no personal or business relationship with anyone or any company in the U.S. So basically, the travel ban goes through when it comes to people that don’t have any solid reason to be here. If a man from, say, Libya wants to visit family here in the next 90 or 120 days (the duration of the ban), he has to prove without a shadow of a doubt that he has family here and isn’t b.s.-ing anyone.
Now, here’s the biggest reason for having this ban: to improve our vetting procedures. While the Left will want you thinking that this ban is there just to be mean to a bunch of poor, harmless Muslim visitors, the reality of the whole situation is not nearly as overdramatic. The ban was ordered by the president as a temporary ban to keep people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from coming to the U.S. for 90 to 120 days, or 3 to 4 months. And the ban is put in place to allow for government agencies to add in or improve new vetting procedures in order to make sure we’re not letting a bunch of terrorists into our country so easily.
Yes, a few are likely to slip past those procedures, but with this, it’s a step towards one of the big promises Trump made during the campaign trail: Make America Safe Again. If we improve vetting procedures in order to keep bad guys from getting through, it means that there is less of a chance of foreign terrorism in the long-run. By no means, does this indicate that there will be no terrorism. As you saw a couple of weeks ago, A TERRORIST TRIED TO SHOOT AND KILL REPUBLICANS DURING A BASEBALL PRACTICE. While the shooter didn’t shout “Allahu Akbar” or declare allegiance to ISIS, he did try to eliminate and terrorize Republicans to keep them from doing their job in Congress. Granted, that counts as home-grown terrorism, but still.
The fact remains that Trump, now thanks to the Supreme Court, is managing to do something his predecessor couldn’t (arguably, didn’t want to) do. And that is keeping America safe by any means necessary and within the bounds of our constitutional law. This is no ban on Islam, as the Left wants you to believe. This is a ban on travelers from countries that are known for supporting terrorism. Granted, there are plenty of other countries left in the Middle East that harbor and create terrorists too, but this ban is a good first step towards making this country safe again.
Let’s not forget: this is only a TEMPORARY ban. Eventually, people from those areas will be able to travel to this country, but by then, we’ll have implemented far better security measures to ensure the safety of our country.
But right now, I’ll simply tally this one in the win column. While there is no flat-out, “you-shall-not-pass” travel ban on these countries, we’re at least making it far more difficult for terrorists to enter the U.S. from now on.
And I’ve known, thanks to God, that this travel ban was more than constitutional for a long time. And I just have to thank God that the Supreme Court finally got to it and arrived to the same logical conclusion.
“Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid or terrified because of them, for the Lord your God goes with you; He will never leave you nor forsake you.”
Leftist Deception: ‘Truth Is Relative’. No, Truth Is ABSOLUTE. Here's How Ignoring This Principle Can Cost You Your Life
We all have heard the leftist adage that truth is relative: ‘God may be real to you but He’s not real to me’; or ‘I don’t believe in the Bible, I think all religions are true’; or the most recent fallacy ‘Not my president’, as if they could choose to reject a democratically elected president.
This happens because the left wants to relativize everything, given the truth is so inconvenient to them. They think if you were born a girl, it’s OK if you identify yourself as male. You don’t have to accept the truth that biologically you’re a female – you can erase that because everything is relative, you see. Never mind that science says you’re a female.
Since everything is relative, it’s OK to kill a baby in his mother’s womb – if the mother doesn’t want her baby, then he’s not human, the left tells you. And on the topic of killing people, it’s OK for the left to want to kill Republican congressmen because in their mind killing in and of itself isn’t a bad thing when you’re killing Republicans. Let’s face it, they’ve been killing Republicans since the Democrats founded the KKK with the specific mission of KILLING BLACK REPUBLICANS.
It’s the same mindset that drives many relativist progressives to take trips to North Korea. In North Korea relativism also works – after all, relativism is a leftist invention. As you probably know, the regime in North Korea has massacred hundreds of people under the current leadership of Kim Jong Un. Communism has murdered more than 100 million people in all the countries it’s been implemented: from North Korea, to the former Soviet Union, to China to Cuba. In these countries KILLING PEOPLE isn’t against the law – only killing CERTAIN people, like communist government officials, is. The government reserves the right to kill you if they so desire. It’s relativism at its best…or worst, rather.
When you accept everything is relative, then murder may or may not be considered murder. It depends on who the victim is.
Now, relativism is a FALLACY. The TRUTH is ABSOLUTE. It’s not relative. It doesn’t depend on your feelings. It's the reason we call it 'the' truth and not 'a' truth.
In fact, it’s ILLOGICAL to think of truth as being relative. Things cannot, at the same time, BE and NOT BE. When you have two contradicting statements only one can be true. For example: Either there is a God or there is no God. If you don’t believe in God and I believe in God, only one of us can be right. Either there is a God or there isn’t, regardless of what each one of us believes. It’s called the law of non-contradiction. Contradictory statements cannot be simultaneously true, because contradictions are mutually exclusive.
I hear often times, when I have these discussions with leftists, that the Schrodinger’s cat paradox is a clear example of how the truth is relative. Except that leftists who use this paradox don’t fully understand its meaning. Paradox, by the way, is a statement that SEEMS like a contradiction, but it’s not.
The Schrodinger’s cat paradox involves a cat in a closed box supposedly poisoned by radiation. Until the box is opened, according to this paradox, you have to consider the cat simultaneously dead and alive. What the left misses about this paradox is the cat is, truthfully, either dead or alive, regardless of what we think. When we open the box, we’ll know. But the fact that we don’t know prior to us opening the box doesn’t cause the cat to be dead AND alive at the same time. There’s only ONE truth – the cat is either dead OR alive. It can’t be both.
Now, this is something a 2-year old will easily understand, apparently until they reach elementary school and are exposed to liberal indoctrination.
Nevertheless it’s this relativism that causes them to fly to North Korea ‘just to see it’. What would possess someone with a basic level of critical thinking to go to North Korea ‘just to see it’? Why would you risk your life to visit a country just to see what a murderous regime does to its people? And to you?
Anyone who knows anything about North Korea and who understands the law of non-contradiction will reject the idea of visiting that country – or Cuba or Afghanistan or Iran. I can understand missionaries. But regular folks with full understanding of the law of non-contradiction will never consider going.
As you know Otto Warmbier, the American who ‘just wanted to see North Korea’ and who was held hostage in a North Korean prison for about a year, died last week as a result of massive brain loss, possibly resulting from torture. The left actually mocked him multiple times, with Affinity magazine tweeting: ‘watch whiteness work. He wasn’t a “kid” or “innocent” you can’t go to another country and try to steal from them. Respect their laws’. Yes, Affinity Magazine doesn’t think Warmbier should have broken North Korean law, but they’re OK with illegal immigrants breaking our laws. Relativism, again…
North Korea is ruled by a MURDERER. There’s nothing relative to this fact.
North Korea is a TERRIBLE destination for ANYONE who loves life. None of these realities are RELATIVE. They’re ABSOLUTE. The cat is either dead or alive. Kim Jong Un is either a murderer or he isn’t.
I pray for Warmbier and his family. I wish his parents had stopped him before he boarded that plane. You can’t have your children buy into this ‘relativism’ the left pushes. It can cost them their lives.
There’s only one truth. Either God exists or He doesn’t. Either Hillary is a crook or she isn’t. Either killing babies is wrong or it isn’t. Either killing Republicans is wrong or it isn’t. Either the cat is dead or it’s alive.
The problem with the left is not that they’re too stupid to understand this basic principle – it’s that the truth is inconvenient. You see, if the law of non-contradiction is applicable to the cat or to North Korea being a murderous regime, then it also applies to GOD. God either exists or He doesn’t…but if He does, they’re TERRIFIED at the consequences – as they should be.
In case there's any doubt: God exists. Hillary is a crook. Kim Jong Un is a murderer. Killing babies is wrong and killing ANYONE is wrong.
Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."
On June 22nd, 2017, Senate Republicans revealed the Health Care bill they’ve been working on in order to repeal and replace the disastrous Obamacare mandate. However, Reuters pre-emptively wrote a story and ran a poll that says most Americans disapprove and dislike the Republican’s health care bill, with a supposed “Trump supporter” saying that “it’ll make people’s deductibles skyrocket.”
One of the key questions to ask here is: “How could anyone know what the bill was going to do before Republicans announced what it would do?” But that question is simply not the largest one here. No, the largest question here is this article’s title. Is the MSM getting lazy when it comes to trashing Trump (and, by extension, Republicans)? I mean, Reuters wrote this article THE DAY BEFORE THE DETAILS FOR THE BILL WERE ANNOUNCED! And to make matters worse (for the MSM), they ran their poll 9 DAYS BEFORE JUNE 22nd!
It’s truly incredible how lazy this story is. For anyone that actually pays attention to the world around them, they would know that no one would be able to say “deductibles will skyrocket” when the details for the plan had yet to be announced. And the thing is: the MSM is usually good at hiding their b.s. What I mean by that is that the MSM, if they write stories like these (which are still full of b.s.), they will publish them either the day the details are announced, or a day or two later. But when they write stories depicting that most Americans dislike the bill before they know what it is shows signs of laziness.
The MSM hasn’t been credible for the longest time. But they don’t exactly help themselves when they publish stories that are very obviously untrue. No one, before the 22nd, knew what was in the bill. So when they have a supposed “Trump supporter” saying that she knows deductibles will skyrocket, no one will believe them. Trump supporters won’t believe them. Even people on the Left (provided they have the necessary information) won’t believe them.
No liberal, if they know that the plans had yet to be announced, would believe that most Americans hate the plan before they know what is in it. So is the MSM (at least Reuters) being lazy here? I don’t know. All I know is that the MSM typically doesn’t make these kinds of mistakes. While they do publish b.s. stories on a daily basis, they usually time them right.
According to the Reuters poll that they ran: “a majority of the country thinks the [Senate] American Health Care Act would be harmful for low-income Americans, people with pre-existing health conditions and Medicaid recipients.' Then they go on to discuss the HOUSE plan, which will not be voted on at all this week, instead of the SENATE plan, which was unveiled last week. Either Reuters is incredibly CONFUSED or devilish DECEITFUL.
Back in 2010, when Obamacare was passed, Nancy Pelosi famously said “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.” Back then, I was opposed to it, not because of what was in it (how could I know, NO ONE TOLD US!) but largely because WE DIDN’T know what was in it. Also because it meant that the government would take control of healthcare in the country, but still. I didn’t like the bill because it was the equivalent to signing a deal to get mortgage for a house without reading the contract. People always say that you should read contracts before signing them so that you don’t get bamboozled. And bamboozled, we got.
Obamacare was a dumpster fire of a mandate from the start and it’s taken Republicans 7 years to come up with a substitute (whether or not it will work, we shall see if it is passed.) But the fact remains that we (conservatives) didn’t like Obamacare because of what it would mean, not for what it contained. No one can realistically say that they didn’t like this new bill before it was announced. It’s the equivalent of a child saying that they don’t like a certain food because they’ve never had it.
But beyond that, the fact that Reuters messed up so obviously is surprising. And that’s why this article’s title is what it is. Are they getting lazy? They must be, if they severely mistimed the publishing of that article and the running of that poll. But maybe, this is a sign of something larger: the Trump Effect. Maybe the Trump Effect has a hand in this. We know that the Left has suffered loss after loss in elections. And we know that their credibility has been going down the drain. Maybe the fact that the Left can’t defeat Trump is starting to affect their efficiency.
Maybe, they’ve been so affected by their constant losing against Trump and other Republicans that they’re starting to seriously lose it. That they’re growing desperate. They so desperately want most people to be on their side that they’re beginning to make obvious mistakes. I don’t know. That’s merely my theory. All I know is that I’m very glad and happy to see the Left in the state they are in, and hope to see them that way for the foreseeable future.
And while the Bible says that I should not rejoice when my enemy falls and to not let my heart be glad when he stumbles, I think God will forgive me for being happy that one of the largest evil organizations in the world (the Democrat Party and the Left as a whole) is finally suffering loss after loss, and that they don’t know what to do about it. Because this means that they are incapable of seriously damaging the country and implementing laws that go against the Bible like they were doing for the previous 8 years.
“Do not rejoice when your enemy falls, And do not let your heart be glad when he stumbles.”
That’s a bit of a loaded question. My answer would have to be “yes and no.” The Democrat Party is now 0-4 in special elections. They lost in Georgia, Montana, Kansas and South Carolina. They even tried different methods to win in each, but their overall message was to try and defeat Trump. And now, Representative Tim Ryan of Ohio believes the Democrat Party is in serious trouble. That’s the “yes” part of my answer.
Tim Ryan said that “our brand is worse than Trump… We can’t just run against Trump.” Do you have ANY IDEA HOW SIGNIFICANT THAT STATEMENT IS!? A Democrat is admitting that the Democrat Party’s brand is inferior to Trump! TRUMP! The man they believe to be the very scum of the Earth! This guy flat out said that the Democrat Party brand is worse than the Trump brand!
Now, I knew that fact all along, as did all of you who read these articles. Trump’s brand is infinitely superior to the Democrat Party brand. But to see an elected Democrat admitting that fact is altogether shocking! Do you have any idea how embarrassing it must be to admit that? How insignificant that guy must be feeling? He’s downright admitting that they can’t run on a “let’s defeat Trump” campaign, because he knows that a campaign like that simply won’t work.
I gotta give props to the guy for figuring this out. At least ONE OF THEM is realizing that more people like Trump than they would like to believe. All throughout the 2016 presidential campaign, every news media source ran polls depicting Hillary as the clear-cut winner of the election. With either a relatively small, or massive margin of victory over Trump. Regardless of by how much she would win, all of them thought she would. ALL OF THEM expected Ossoff to win. ALL OF THEM expected Quist to win in Montana. ALL OF THEM expected to defeat a Republican and make it a sign that Trump’s future is bleak.
ALL OF THEM were wrong.
I’ve said this multiple times in previous articles, but I feel I must say it again here: The Left believes they are in the majority and that the majority of people like, trust, and will vote for them. The media always runs stories depicting Trump as a bad guy. Depicting Trump’s decisions as unpopular. Depicting any Democrat loon winning highly-contested elections. And they’re wrong on every single front.
They are not in the majority. The majority of people don’t like or trust them, therefore, won’t vote for them. The majority of people don’t see Trump as a bad guy. The majority of people favor Trump’s decisions and hope he is able to do more (and hate the Democrat and Republican Parties for trying to stop him). And they don’t want Democrats winning more seats in Congress, knowing full-well that they will only keep America from being made great again.
And at least one person has figured this out. This Tim Ryan fellow put on his thinking cap and figured out that Trump is more trusted than the Democrat Party. As much as it undoubtedly hurt him to come to that realization and even admit it to the public, it’s the truth.
Don’t misunderstand, now. Just because ONE of these Leftists has figured out that flat out running against Trump in special election campaigns is a bad idea doesn’t mean the rest of the Left will think the same. That’s the “no” part of my answer. The large majority of the Left is simply too stubborn to admit that Trump is defeating them left and right. They (as a whole) will never admit that they can’t beat Trump. In fact, they still believe they have a clear shot at winning back Congress in 2018.
Representative Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico wrote that there was “no doubt that Democrats can take back the House next fall.” They will never admit defeat. Evil never does. Even when it knows it will fail and ultimately be defeated, it continues to fight for evil.
You know this, if you’ve read the Book of Revelations (or have read one of the many Scripture passages I write at the end of the articles relating to that Book.) The devil knows he will be defeated, but that doesn’t mean he won’t stop trying to destroy the world, destroy people’s lives and have them turn against God. Likewise, the Left will never stop trying to rise to power once again. They will never stop believing that they are the preferred party. They will never stop trying to stop a conservative, Christian agenda. And they will never stop trying to implement a communist, frankly satanic, agenda.
“Woe to those who scheme iniquity, who work out evil in their beds! When morning comes, they do it, for it is in the power of their hands.”
On Monday, June 19th, various technology company executives attended a meeting with the president to discuss technological advancements in the U.S., improving government technology and making the country more technologically powerful.
The president met with high-profile executives such as Apple CEO Tim Cook, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, and others. Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Alphabet (parent company of Google), said to the president after the meeting: “I’m absolutely convinced that during your administration there is going to be a huge explosion of new opportunities because of the platforms that are getting built in our industry.”
Tim Cook said he was pleased that Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner were bringing technology companies together in the Trump administration to help the government. He added “the U.S. should have the most modern government in the world, and today it doesn’t.”
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos offered advice to the president to use more commercial technologies in government in order to save tax payers money.
Each of these executives had something nice to say and offered good advice to the president. Each of them walked out of that meeting with optimism about the future of the country and the technology industry.
But they aren’t the first people to meet with Trump and come out of that meeting feeling happy and optimistic about the future.
Roughly a month before Trump was inaugurated, he met with Family Feud host Steve Harvey, in a meeting to try to “bring positive change to inner cities.” Harvey said: “… the transition teams on both sides asked me to meet (with the then-president-elect) and I’m glad I did. I found him in our meeting both congenial and sincere. Trump wants to help with the situations in the inner cities… I walked away feeling like I had just talked with a man who genuinely wants to make a difference in this area. I feel that something great could come out of this… I would sit with him anytime.”
NFL Legends Jim Brown and Ray Lewis have also met with the then-president-elect, and have both also praised Trump after their meeting.
Kanye West is another big celebrity that met with Trump and, during a concert in California, shocked the world by saying “I told y’all I didn’t vote, right? But if I would’ve voted, I would’ve voted for Trump.” That was before his meeting with the president, but still. He was happy to meet with the president and talked about the violent crimes occurring in his native city of Chicago (I blame Democrats ruling that city for nearly 90 years, personally).
Many people have met with Trump and have come out of meetings having nothing but praise to say about the president. Considering the fact that the Left wishes to make Trump seem like the biggest monster around, many mainstream celebrities seem to be supportive, or at least praiseful of him. When they meet with the president, they talk about precisely what they should talk about and come out of those meetings with a sense of optimism for the future.
Obviously when I say “people”, I largely mean celebrities or industry giants. It’s to be expected that, whenever the president meets with other politicians, particularly ones that don’t like him, those politicians won’t be happy after the meetings. No politician in Europe is happy with Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate agreement. No Democrat is happy (ever, really) whenever they have an audience with the president.
That’s because Trump doesn’t appeal to politicians. Trump himself ISN’T A POLITICIAN! In most politicians’ minds, they believe they belong to a group of elite people. And now, Trump has horned in on their group. POLITICIANS HATE THE PRESIDENT, WHILE MOST CITIZENS LOVE HIM!
Celebrities and industry giants meet with the president with open minds. And with the hope to help Make America Great Again. No politician (with the exception of conservatives) inside or outside the U.S. wishes to help Make America Great Again.
This just further proves that Trump is a man of the PEOPLE, and not WASHINGTON. And it only further proves that we made the right decision in electing him. God knows precisely what is in Trump’s heart. And He also knew precisely what was in Hillary’s heart. He knew that one of the two legitimately wanted to make this country great again and the other wished to sell it to the highest bidder.
“Would not God find this out? For He knows the secrets of the heart.”
A very short article written this past weekend in the Washington Times says that Rep. Adam Schiff claims there is evidence that Trump colluded with Russia. I think the best part about this article is that since it’s so insanely short (5 paragraphs), there is no actual piece of evidence to talk about.
Here’s the title of the article: “Rep. Adam Schiff says there is ‘evidence’ that Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” Now, if you’re a raging liberal, you’ll read this headline and think “Yes! Finally, there is someone out there with some evidence!” But no. The sad reality for liberals is that the article contains absolutely no evidence of collusion.
This is what the first three sentences say: “The ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee says he believes there is evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to interfere with the election. ‘Well, I think there is evidence,’ Rep. Adam Schiff said Sunday on ABC’s ‘This Week’. ‘I can’t go into the particulars of our closed investigation. But I also think there is evidence of obstruction. But in both cases, I would say, whether there is some evidence doesn’t mean there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt.’”
Do you see what they’re doing here? They wrote an article that’s about as significant today as it was 6 months ago. What I mean by that is this: THEY ARE SAYING THE SAME THING THEY SAID HALF A YEAR AGO! There is absolutely nothing new in this story. Everyone on the Left believes Trump colluded with Russia! It’s redundant to write an article saying this one other person believes it too!
All Rep. Schiff is saying is that “he thinks there is evidence.” You know what? So does every single Democrat politician, voter and news media person! This article literally brings nothing new to the table. It’s a nothing burger! And you know it’s nothing because EVEN SCHIFF HIMSELF SAID HE COULDN’T GO INTO THE DETAILS! That’s basically what every single person trying to come up with evidence of collusion has said! “We can’t go into the details, but we certainly believe, here at the Liberal Bureau of Insane People, that there is strong evidence of Trump collusion with Russia.” It’s the same thing over and over again.
But that’s simply a leftist deception tactic. What they’re trying to do here is keep people’s attention on this ‘collusion’ business so that they don’t forget the Left is looking into it. They simply want to remind people they’re looking for any way possible to impeach Trump. The reason why? It’s been 5 months since Trump’s inauguration. The Left promised that he’d be gone by now and are no closer to accomplishing that today as they were back then. It’s clear that Leftist voters are getting impatient.
Let’s not forget that only a week ago, an insane socialist nut tried to kill Republican members of Congress. He was a Leftist that got insanely, and I do mean INSANELY, impatient with trying to get rid of Trump that he decided to take matters into his own evil hands and try to eradicate the opposition. And upon the whole country learning of this act of terrorism, there have been plenty of Leftist voters on social media calling this criminal a ‘hero’ and wishing he had accomplished far more than he did.
So, in an effort to remind people that the Left is trying its hardest to impeach Trump, they publish stories like these that get Leftists energized and excited that they might be getting closer to accomplishing their goal, only to find out in the 5 paragraph article that there is nothing new to report. Only that this one other person that you may or may not have heard of believes the exact same thing as any other liberal believes and can offer no new information on the subject.
And do you know why they will never come up with anything? Aside from the fact that Trump DIDN’T collude with Russia? The Left is more than capable of digging up information they want and need to further their agenda. If there was anything to uncover, believe me, they would've already found it.
If you’ve been paying attention to the news recently, you know of the van attack in a London mosque. The driver of the van was a 47-year-old white male who injured 10 Muslims in that attack, according to Reuters. Usually, the media takes AGES to find out information about an attacker. But that’s only when the attacker is a Muslim Jihadist. And even then, the media is insanely careful not to call it a terrorist attack if they can avoid it.
And yet, Reuters found out quickly that the attacker was 47 years old and a white male THE SAME DAY AS THE ATTACK OCCURRED! So you see, the Left can find the information they need very quickly and efficiently. The fact that it’s been 5 months since Trump’s inauguration and roughly 7 months since the election (and the start of the allegations of collusion) and the Left has yet to come up with ANY piece of evidence against Trump means that they never will. And the reason they never will is because TRUMP DIDN’T COLLUDE WITH RUSSIA TO GET HIMSELF ELECTED!
Sadly, the fact that they will never come up with any evidence doesn’t mean that the Left will simply give up. They will never stop lying to people. They will never stop trying to deceive the masses and convince them that Trump cheated. Evil never stops trying to do evil. And Evil will never stop trying to eliminate Good.
“For everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come to the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.”
Ever since the Obama administration, many people often have heard the term “redistribution of wealth”. What Democrats want out of that is to take money from the rich to give to the poor. In reality, they’re stealing money from people that have worked hard and smart to earn it, give it to programs that help keep the poor poor, and keep the rest for themselves. I, however, have a proposition that will help many more people and without having to steal money from people that have worked hard to earn that money.
What I’m proposing is that we take some money congressmen make and redistribute it to the military to increase the wages of soldiers. Let’s look at some numbers, just to see what they each roughly make in a year.
According to nolabels.org, “The Average Joe of Congress gets paid $174,000 a year.” That number changes, of course, depending on what role a congressman has. The Speaker of the House is paid $223,500 a year, while majority and minority leaders are paid $193,400 a year. It’s very lucrative to have a career in politics, particularly in Congress.
According to work.chron.com, soldiers of varying rank are paid varying wages. That’s to be expected. But according to the website, “Enlisted soldiers in the Army have ranks from E-1 to E-9. In 2014, the initial monthly pay for the lowest rank (E-1), is $1,531.50 a month. Although, E-1s with less than 4 months of experience earn $1,416.30”. These are the newbies. The guys that don’t have much military experience. These ranks aren’t expected to earn much, but let’s look at the numbers per year. 1531.50 x 12 = 18,378. The soldiers in E-1 that have more than 4 moths of experience earn only $18,378 a year. Soldiers with less than 4 months of experience earn $16,995.60 a year.
Again, these are the lowest ranks, so it’s expected that they wouldn’t make as much as higher-ups, but those are just sad-looking numbers. Let’s go back to that website, shall we? It says that “The highest enlisted rank (E-9) earns $4,836.90 a month with over 10 years of experience, rising to $7,509.60 with more than 40 years of experience.” Going back to my calculator now. 4836.90 x 12 = 58,042.80. A solider with 10 years of experience earns only $58,042.80 a year! And 7509.60 x 12 = 90,115.2. A soldier with 40 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ONLY MAKES JUST NORTH OF $90,000 A YEAR!
These people are all fighting to protect our country from foreign enemies and the most these people can HOPE to make on average is $90,000 a year. Meanwhile, socialists that wish to fundamentally destroy the country make FAR MORE THAN DOUBLE THAT AMOUNT!
But I offer a simple and fair solution. I propose that these congressmen “pay their fair share” and give some of their money to the people who have the GUTS to protect this country. After all, we’re looking for income equality, are we not? We want fairness and equality for all people, right? After all, aren’t congressmen paid with tax payer’s dollars? And for what? To get in the way of Trump and keep this country from being made great again?
They are paid with tax payer dollars. They are basically taking tax payer’s money to be a nuisance. Police and firefighters are paid with tax payer dollars as well, but at least they are being productive. Police help communities stay safe, and firefighters fight blazing infernos in houses and apartment buildings and help rescue people that are trapped in those buildings. Congressmen (at least the ones that don’t support Trump) simply stand in the president’s way. In the American people’s way. And yet, they are paid nearly $200,000 a year to be thorns on patriot’s sides.
Of course, I’m completely aware of the fact that no one in Congress will go for this sort of thing. Whenever any sort of policy affects them, they aren’t very willing to support it. After all, they were all exempt from Obamacare. Why would they be if it was such a great bill? Oh yeah, it’s because it was nothing short of a dumpster fire. Democrat Congressmen would never willingly give their money to military soldiers if it meant that they get paid less.
After all, anyone can be tempted to succumb to greed. Not just Democrats, even Republicans can succumb to greed as well. Anyone who isn’t legitimately close to God can succumb to greed. Because greedy people don’t worship God, they worship money. They do everything in the name of money, and for the gain of money.
Don’t misunderstand. I’m not saying money is evil. I’m saying the worship of money is evil. If you spend your entire life chasing money and put money at the top of your priority (like Warren Buffet), that’s a waste of a life. Remember, you can’t take your money with you to heaven. If you prioritize making money, you’re prioritizing the wrong thing.
Again, making money isn’t bad. But making money your biggest priority is. Because then, you’re putting money ahead of God. THAT is where greed stems.
“’No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money'.”
YES!!! Absolutely yes! Let me be crystal clear here: THE LEFT HATES ITS OPPOSITION WITH EVERY FIBER OF THEIR BEING! The last article that I wrote lists a few cases in which the Left deals with its opposition using deadly methods. But today, I want to narrow down one of the roots for shootings such as the one in Virginia. I want to talk about the influence celebrities have on people.
Many people view celebrities as idols. They want to be just like them. Act and look just like them. And they will follow every little thing these celebrities say. Sadly, this also means that, when a celebrity HATES someone, that celebrity’s fans will also hate that person. And Donald Trump, while loved by a large majority of the country, is also hated by many people, including many celebrities.
Breitbart recently wrote a story listing the “15 Times Celebrities Envisioned Violence Against Trump And The GOP”. Many of these celebrities are big stars on the world stage. Celebrities such as Madonna, Kathy Griffin, Snoop Dogg, Robert De Niro, Marilyn Manson and others (article doesn’t include Jim Carrey dreaming of beating up the president with a golf club). These celebrities have ALL incited violence against Trump and Republicans in general.
Kathy Griffin showed a bloody and severed head of Trump, Snoop Dogg made a music video of him shooting the president (who looks like a clown) with a fake gun, and Marilyn Manson made a music video showing a ‘dead’ Trump with Manson ripping pages out of the Bible. The rest have either tweeted or said on national television that they would love to inflict harm upon the president or Republicans.
And since there are people that love these celebrities (for some reason), they will agree with the sentiment these celebrities have against Trump. They will hate Trump themselves. And this isn’t something new, either. Remember John Hinckley? The guy that tried to kill Reagan? He tried to kill him so that he would get the attention of a celebrity that was in a movie about a guy who wanted to kill a presidential candidate. Hinckley thought that if he could successfully assassinate a sitting president, he would get the attention of Jodie Foster, with whom he was obsessed.
Celebrities, sadly, tend to have some sort of influence on people. And when celebrities hate someone, their fans will as well. And because they are so distant from God (both the celebrities and their fans), they are ok with someone’s life being taken, as long as that someone is someone they truly hate.
Kathy Griffin showed a horrible picture to the world of what she wishes she could do to the president. All the celebrities listed in Breitbart’s article expressed either in words or pictures exactly what they wish to do to the president or other Republicans. THEY SPREAD HATE! It’s rich, really, that they claim they are doing it all for love. That what they are fighting for is love. Well, let me tell you, that’s some seriously messed up love right there.
Madonna, in the Women’s March speech, said that she has “thought a lot about blowing up the White House.” And in the same speech she said that the Women’s March signified a “… revolution of love…” I’m sorry, but you can’t say one minute that you have thought about blowing up the White House, hoping to kill the President and other people in it as a result, and the next minute say that you’re fighting for love.
That’s the same logic as saying ISIS fights for peace in the world. By inciting violence, killing people that think differently from you, or making them submit to your will, you don’t create peace. You create OPPRESSION! The very kind of oppression the Founding Fathers fought against!
I’m not afraid to say that these nut-job celebrities are almost on-par with members of ISIS. Both wish to destroy Christianity. Both wish to kill the president. Both wish to inflict harm upon people who think differently from them. The only difference is that ISIS often actually KILLS THE PEOPLE THEY SAY THEY WISH TO KILL!
THAT is the biggest difference between the two. But that difference makes no difference (no pun intended) when one of these celebrity’s fans goes out and tries to, or actually successfully kills people. Hodgkinson, the criminal who tried to kill Republicans in the Virginia shooting, was a HUGE Bernie supporter and life-long socialist. He’s someone who’s bought into every narrative the Left drives against Trump. And he’s no doubt seen all these celebrities say they wish to harm the president and/or other Republicans. So, in his mind, he thought it would be a terrific idea to actually go out and try to kill Republicans.
No doubt, he thought he would do far more damage than he achieved. No doubt he wanted to go after Trump too, but figured he’d find easier targets who are still the people he hates. And, in case you haven’t noticed, there is much silence coming from the Left on the shooting in Virginia.
I checked multiple celebrities’s twitter accounts. From Kathy Griffin’s, to Robert De Niro’s, to even the former President Barack Obama’s. NONE OF THEM EVEN TALKED ABOUT THE SHOOTING! The only person I saw talking about it was Hillary Clinton, if you can believe that. And all she said was the standard “My thoughts are with the victims” response. No condemnation of the shooter in the least. None of them care.
This is the result of being distant from God. Being distant from His righteousness. This is the result of being A LIBERAL. You grow up to not care about other people who think differently from you. And when someone tries to kill “the other people”, you either don’t care or flat out support the shooter for his actions. When you are raised to not want to follow God, and live your life hating those who do, these kinds of things tend to happen. Socialist sociopaths attempt mass murder against Republicans, Muslim Jihadists behead Christians and Jews, and the whole world becomes Hell for those who love God and Christ.
The Left fills people’s hearts with hatred. Hatred for Republicans. Hatred for Christians. And most of all, hatred for God. But do not be dismayed. You might be sad for this world. You might worry about the future of this country, of the President, and of your children. It’s natural to worry about those things. But there’s good news. None of this is permanent. This world as a whole is not permanent. The time will come when the Lord will take His children with Him to Paradise. And after that, He will destroy all that is Evil in this world, including the world itself.
If you’ve read the Book of Revelation, you know how the story of the world ends. The devil is ultimately defeated and those who follow Christ are saved from the evils of this world. There will be no pain, no sorrow, and certainly no evil in Heaven.
John 14:2-4, 6
“’My Father’s house has many rooms; if that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to prepare a place for you? And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am. You know the way to the place where I am going… I am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’”
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...