Since we are young, we are taught to use violence as an absolute last resort. But when being harassed, using violence tends to become more of a viable and acceptable option. That’s what happened this past week in Montana.
Recorded audio depicts Ben Jacobs, a reporter for the UK Guardian, attempting to interview Greg Gianforte on the Republican health care plan. The audio begins with Gianforte telling Jacobs “We’ll talk to you about that later” To which Jacobs replied with “Yeah, but there’s not going to be time, I was just curious.” Gianforte replies with “Ok, Speak with Shane please.” However, afterwards you can hear that Jacobs kept pressing the issue on Gianforte, and Gianforte ‘body-slammed’ him to the ground due to that, according to the media. Gianforte then claims that a previous reporter from the very same ‘news’ organization did the same thing, harassing him about the issue.
Now, let’s keep in mind, the media LOVES to spin things in the Left’s favor. The audio clip depicted Gianforte seemingly snapping on Jacobs for no good reason within the first 3 seconds. We don’t know what happened in the moments prior. Gianforte himself says that other reporters from the Guardian were provoking him the exact same way, so it’s understandable that he would feel frustrated with them. I mean, we all feel frustrated with the media and have been frustrated with them for a long time. This frustration didn’t start in the 2016 presidential election, either. This has been going on for a very long time.
This frustration, however, has only grown in the last couple of years. With the media reporting fake news and lying about every little detail of Trump’s campaign and administration so far, people not only have stopped believing the MSM, they’ve become frustrated with them for what they report. Gianforte is no different. Particularly if he himself is being harassed by an anti-Trump liberal “reporter”.
The official campaign statement on the matter says that Jacobs “entered the office without permission, aggressively shoved a recorder in Greg’s face, and began asking badgering questions… Jacobs was asked to leave… After asking Jacobs to lower the recorder, Jacobs declined. Greg then attempted to grab the phone that was pushed to his face. Jacobs grabbed Greg’s wrist, and spun away from Greg, pushing them both to the ground… It’s unfortunate that this aggressive behavior from a liberal journalist created this scene at our campaign volunteer BBQ”.
And the audio depicts most of those things happening. It depicts Jacobs being asked to leave and talk to campaign spokesman Shane Scanlon. It also depicts Jacobs declining to do so. The only thing that’s up in the air is whether Gianforte ‘body-slammed’ Jacobs during the altercation. The only reason being is that all we have depicting the incident is the audio-recording and eye-witness accounts from other members of the media (fake news media, including a Fox News reporter) and people in Gianforte’s campaign. And while the MSM news sources will stick to their own stories, the one Fox News reporter, Alicia Acuna changed hers. Initially, she believed to have seen Gianforte grab Jacobs by the neck, but now she says that, while she did see Gianforte’s hands go up, they may have been directed at Jacobs’ clothes.
So, when you think about it, that account supports the official campaign story that Gianforte tried to grab the phone. If Ms. Acuna only remembers seeing Gianforte’s hands go up, they could’ve been directed at Jacobs’ hands which held the phone the campaign report mentions, not his neck or clothes.
Now, regardless of what happened, whether Gianforte body-slammed Jacobs to the ground or they both fell down, I think this is a sign of strength. This shows that Gianforte isn’t someone you can just mess with. If Gianforte and Jacobs both fell to the ground, it shows Gianforte being strong enough to not let an arrogant socialist ‘reporter’ get away with harassing him and being annoying.
And I’m not the only one who thinks that was a sign of strength either. I’ve heard multiple people call into the Rush Limbaugh show saying how Jacobs had it coming, and that Gianforte was simply standing up for himself. I’ll be honest, I thought much the same thing when I first heard the news of it and the audio soundbite. There’s only so much b.s. any person can take, especially from liberal news organizations and reporters harassing you if you’re conservative.
We must be able to stand up for ourselves when we are harassed by anyone. We can’t let them do whatever they want. Because we know that harassment comes from those who are and do evil. It comes from those who don’t believe other people have the same rights that they do. And so:
“Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of His might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil.”
In a previous article on the Manchester Terror Attack, I mentioned how I love it when the mainstream media publishes braindead stories. The reason being is that they are insanely funny to me when I read them. In this case, it’s a story written on FiveThirtyEight.com by Nate Silver on how Gianforte winning by 6 points is no reason for Republicans to celebrate.
A particular quote that simply brings a smile to my face, knowing just how ridiculously stupid it sounds: “… A night where Democrats are losing Montana by ‘only’ 6 or 7 points is consistent with the sort of map you might see if Democrats were either taking over the House (in 2018) or coming pretty close to it.” HAHAHA! Are you kidding me?! Their socialist cowboy loses by 6 points and they think this is ‘according to plan!?’ You simply can’t be serious! This is the equivalent of a basketball team being happy that they only lost by 10 points in a playoff game. “At least they didn’t get blown out.”, a fan would say.
Trust me, no basketball fan would be happy that their team lost by 10 points, even in a regular season game. And I have the feeling that, behind that fake wall of “we can still win in 2018”, there lies a scared soul that believes they simply won’t win in the midterm elections. I don’t even think this is desperation at this point. This simply might be genuine fear, masked by their smug character that thinks they still have a chance at retaking power in the government.
And why do I believe that? Because this further proves that they are wrong. They believe that Democrats are the preferred party. They believe Trump is hated and despised by anyone with a brain. They believe Russia hacked the election. They refuse to believe that their era of power is over. And this election is proof of it. Before the election, the Left was singing praise of the Democrat candidate Rob Quist. Much in the same way they did with Hillary. But now, Nate Silver writes “… Quist and Gianforte both have their issues as candidates…” He’s throwing their posterchild under the bus due to his loss!
The Left is absolutely terrified of believing that they might be wrong about everything. Trump isn’t hated. Montanans didn’t want a Democrat winning this special election. And Trump’s popularity isn’t down the drain.
Here’s yet another funny quote from Silver’s article that is bound to both make you laugh and think: “Quist winning by 1 or losing by 13 might’ve called for a recalibration of our assumptions (about how 2018 will go.); we don’t think this result (Gianforte’s 6 point victory) does.” In other words, had Quist won by 1 point or lost by 13, they might have to rethink their 2018 strategy. That is complete garbage. Had Quist won at all, it would’ve meant that everyone and their grandmother hated Donald Trump. The Democrats wouldn’t have rethought ANYTHING. If Quist had won by 1 point, it would’ve meant the beginning of a Democrat takeover of the House, followed by the Senate, followed by the White House, in their minds.
But this is yet another one of the Left’s endless stream of lies. If Quist had won, they would’ve celebrated as though their favorite team just won the Superbowl. But since he lost by a rather large margin, they have to pretend like this Republican victory means absolutely nothing, and that the Democrats are en route to a big victory in 2018.
In fact, this reminds me of one of the articles I wrote about the Georgia special election. On how the Democrat candidate didn’t quite clinch victory, but the Left pretended that he did. And the fact that he didn’t; the fact that he now only has one candidate to run against, and the fact that Quist lost in Montana terrifies the Left to the core. Georgia’s special election is less than a month from now, so we’ll have to wait ‘til then to see who wins. But I wouldn’t be surprised if the Left pretends it meant absolutely nothing if the Republican candidate wins.
They often hide themselves from the truth. And that’s because the truth hurts. Their entire lives revolve around one massive lie: that the vast majority of people love them. And when they are proven wrong, they have to pretend that they are still loved, even if it’s not quite as much as they previously thought. Or that the results were simply a fluke. Reality is far different, however. Most people no longer trust the media. Most people disliked Hillary as a candidate and by far preferred Trump over her. Most people in Montana didn’t want Quist as their congressman. And the most important point: Most people are not Leftists.
The Left must accept this truth if they ever hope to win again. (Which I hope they don’t)
“And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
The Washington Post wrote a story recently on how ISIS might’ve been targeting women in the Manchester terror attack. Shashank Joshi, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute said: ”It’s very well known that misogyny is deeply rooted in the radical Islamist worldview.” Gee, you think? You gotta love the media sometimes when they publish stories such as these that make you go “Oh, really??”. It seems they’ve finally gotten the idea that ISIS just might hate women. And it took an act of terrorism that seemingly targeted girls to realize that.
Joshi continued: “If you go back to early Islamist documents, misogyny and cultural hostility have often been two sides of the same coin… There’s a connection between the targeting of a concert like this (female target audience) and the enslavement of young girls in northern Iraq.” Praise be to the Lord! They’ve finally come on to something here! ISIS hates women! WHO KNEW!? But seriously, folks, how did it take this long and an attack at a concert largely targeting a female audience to figure out ISIS hates women, particularly Western women?
We (conservatives) have been saying all along that ISIS (and Muslim extremists in general) hate everyone that isn’t like them. Had this been a Snoop Dogg or Lil’ Wayne concert, one that targets a black audience, maybe the story would’ve been ISIS is racist and hates black people.
The funny thing is: ISIS is everything the Left claims to hate. The Left claims to hate sexist misogynists, but ISIS is sexist and misogynistic. They own women as sex slaves! It’s not difficult to find stories of women who have escaped from the grasp of ISIS and told their stories of what happened while they were there. The Left claims to hate racism, yet a large majority of the Muslim world still allows slavery. Even though most Muslim countries have banned slavery, they don’t enforce those laws. People are still allowed to own other people. In fact, the Muslim world has a worse history of slavery than the U.S. could’ve ever had!
The largest amount of slaves there ever were in the U.S. at one time was 4.5 million in 1861, and the only reason it got that high was through reproduction, not through import. By contrast, 14 million black slaves were imported into the Middle East starting from the time of the Arab conquest in the 7th century. And slaves were treated far worse in the Middle East than they were here. The mortality rate was insanely high for slaves. According to the Encyclopedia on Islam, “Of the Saharan salt mines, it is said that no slave lived for more than five years.” Not only that, but male slaves were castrated to prevent slave reproduction en masse. And 95% of female slaves’ children were murdered.
Islam has a history full of hatred for women, for black people, for Jews and for Christians. In fact, the Crusades STARTED BECAUSE OF THEM AND THEIR HATRED! And the Washington Post is just now starting to connect some dots? Only now they realize that ISIS doesn’t like women? Why did it take mass murder in a concert targeting a female audience for them to start thinking about it? And perhaps my largest question. Why has the Left refused to seriously go after ISIS knowing that they represent what they believe Trump to be: racist and misogynistic?
I said in my previous article that the Left and ISIS have one common enemy: Christianity. Perhaps there, we’ll find the solution. Christianity offers freedom from oppression. With that, we know that whatever form of authority may be oppressing us, it is nothing in comparison to the Lord. The Left hates the fact that people are afraid of God and not of the government. The Left wishes for people to submit to them and to follow and believe everything they say, no questions asked. ISIS is the exact same way. They want people to be afraid of them and Allah, but most people aren’t.
Let’s be honest here: ISIS (along with the Muslim world) and the Left are on the same side. They may do things differently. They may be trying to accomplish different things, but they are invaluable allies to each other. Actually, let me correct myself. ISIS isn’t an ally of the Left, they are merely a tool. ISIS does what I believe in my heart the Left wants to do: eradicate Christians and Christianity in this world. Much like the KKK was a military arm of the Left in the late 19th century and early 20th century, ISIS is yet another military arm of the Left. The only difference is that the Left can’t directly control ISIS’s actions.
So maybe that’s why the Left has hesitated to strongly fight ISIS. Why would they willingly destroy such a useful tool to them? You see, now? This is one of the reasons I believe the Left to be evil. The Left, as well as ISIS, Al Qaeda, the U.S.S.R., and Nazi Germany are all rooted in evil. But I’ll say this once again, likely not for the final time: in the end, the devil loses. In the end, evil loses. In the end, evil won’t be victorious against the Lord.
“And the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur, into which the beast and the false prophet had already been thrown. There, they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.”
Earlier this week, there was a terrorist attack at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England. The terror attack took the lives of 22 people (so far) and have injured 59 others. A day after the attack, ISIS claimed responsibility, saying that a “soldier of the caliphate”(Salman Abedi) placed explosive devices at a gathering of “crusaders”, aka Christians, at the Manchester Arena.
Now, I don’t know how many Christians actually are fans of Ariana Grande, considering her statements on how she feels about America and Americans (saying she hates them back in 2015), but the mere fact that ISIS wasn’t merely trying to kill anyone they could in the name of Allah tells you something. We already know that ISIS hates Christians as much as Hitler hated Jews. Actually, ISIS hates Jews too. It’s an odd choice to target a pop singer’s concert to kill Christians, but the terrorists are ok as long as they cause mass panic and terror. Hence why we call them terrorists.
Prime Minister Theresa May said of the attack that “We struggle to comprehend the warped and twisted mind that sees a room packed with young children not as a scene to cherish but as an opportunity for carnage.” Upon reading that statement, I immediately thought “The only way to not comprehend the ‘warped and twisted mind’ of these people is if you don’t understand one simple principle: Man is evil, and ISIS is a collection of evil people.”
ISIS is comprised of people who follow a religion that teaches its followers to lie to unbelievers and eventually either kill or force unbelievers to follow their religion. And thanks to Obama, they (ISIS) have grown in massive power in the Middle East and are a major threat to the world. Their aim is to submit the entire world to Islam. And they will achieve this goal in one of two ways: force every unbeliever into following this death cult of a religion, or kill everyone who doesn’t believe so that the only people left in the world are those who follow Islam to heart or are too afraid to leave it.
ISIS, like I said in the previous paragraph, are a threat to the whole world. That’s why I couldn’t understand why the Left didn’t want to fight them ardently. Now, I know that ISIS and the Left have a common enemy: Christians. ISIS hates America not because it’s powerful, but because it’s Christian. The Left hates America largely because of the same reason. We managed to get rid of the Left in the White House and a portion of the federal government in general (though, there are still establishment jerks that side with the Left in opposing Trump). Now it’s time that Trump makes good on one of his campaign promises: get rid of ISIS.
Trump voters voted for him for a variety of reasons. Be it because of the wall, or growing jobs, or what have you. But I’m rather certain that the ultimate annihilation of ISIS was a big factor in ensuring Trump would win the election. We all know the threat ISIS poses. Even the Left does, only they want to use it for their own agenda, letting these barbarians do whatever they want. But we sane people want ISIS to be eliminated forever, and we voted for a man who would make sure they were. He just needs to actually do it.
We already have done a number on ISIS from day 1. And we have dropped the Mother of all Bombs on them. But that won’t be nearly enough to ensure their ultimate destruction. These beasts continue to carry out successful acts of terrorism in multiple countries. From our own to Germany, England, France and others. The Left did nothing to try to actually stop or destroy them, but now, the Left is not in power. Now, ISIS faces potential backlash. I don’t know if Trump will order another, bigger strike on ISIS soon, but I know that this country no longer has a president that will simply let go of this. Gone are the days that ISIS is free to do as they please. It’s time to hunt these animals before they kill any more innocent people.
It’s clear that with Trump winning the election, God decided that ISIS’s time on this earth would be cut short. Thank God Almighty that he placed Trump in the White House.
“Many are the plans in the mind of a man, but it is the purpose of the Lord that will stand.”
This past weekend, the president met with Saudi King Salman. While there, the president and king managed to reach a deal that would help the U.S. economically, having sold $110B worth of weapons, and would help Saudi Arabia in their fight against terrorism and the threat of Iran. Due to that deal, King Salman awarded the president with the kingdom’s highest medal of honor award for his efforts to “strengthen the relationship between the two friendly countries” and continuing to “enhance security and peace.”
It’s clear here that the king of Saudi Arabia and the Saudis in general are showing far more respect to Trump than they ever did to Obama. Of course, I don’t blame them for showing less respect to Obama. The former president made sure to BOW to the king, a sign of weakness and submission. A sign that warrants no respect from anyone.
Even Trump said on Twitter back in 2012 “Barack Obama bowed to the Saudi King in public – yet the Dems are questioning Mitt Romney’s diplomatic skills.” While I’ll ignore the part about the 'never-trumper'/traitor’s questioned diplomatic skills, we have to acknowledge the fact that Obama’s bowing to the Saudi king is a sign of poor diplomatic skills. And the media hasn’t forgotten about that either (though, they largely tried to ignore it at the time).
The media, being the biggest source of fake news around, said that Trump is being hypocritical for bowing to King Salman upon receiving the aforementioned medal of honor. I gotta tell you, this is the easiest story to swat back at them. Largely due to the fact that Trump is significantly taller than King Salman, so in order to help the king give him the award, he had to bend over a bit to receive the honor. But the media wants a negative story on Trump so badly that they are scraping the bottom of the barrel and pretty much nitpicking at things the president does.
But here’s the thing: the media can't come up with any negative stories (at least, ones that stick). The media had been touting how Trump is a massive fool and would destroy relations with any country he meets with. The president has even taken action, having signed a deal that would be mutually beneficial, and yet, the media can’t spin anything against Trump? Why is that?
It’s because, while Trump is here at home, doing things to help this country, the media can spin them as disastrous. They can say that the vast majority of people want Trump impeached or never wanted him in the White House to begin with. But they can’t put words into another country’s mouths. They can’t claim that the Saudi king or people think anything badly of the president. Their own media get to decide what is said, and the Saudis largely LOVED having the president over. And it’s not just the president that accomplished things there, the First Lady and Ivanka Trump accompanied the president on this trip and made strides to help women in the kingdom. Granted, this being a Muslim country, I don’t know how far these efforts will get, but the two were certainly well received by the female population of the country.
The media in the U.S. wish to nitpick every little thing that occurs on this trip. And that’s all they’ve managed to do. The Washington Post wrote a story on how Trump’s trip to Saudi Arabia is “bizarre and un-American”. Here are some of the points they’ve nitpicked on:
Firstly, while it is true that previous presidents usually have their first trip abroad to either of America’s neighbors (Canada or Mexico), Trump doesn’t want to waste time. He wants to ensure that terrorism is dealt with altogether and relations between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia are strengthened.
Secondly, while Saudi Arabia is ok with some Islamist extremists (of course they are, they themselves are Muslim), they hate Iran and the terrorist organizations Iran funds..
Thirdly, the “sword dance” is, like I explained, a dance to commemorate the beginning of a notable occasion. The one in this case would be the strengthening of relations between our two countries. And while it is male only, it’s a part of their culture. A larger point being: since when does the Left have any complaints about Muslim tradition and culture?! Which leads me to my next point of emphasis:
Fourth, why would the media complain about Ivanka trying to help women in Saudi Arabia become entrepreneurs? Granted, this being a Muslim country, women hardly have any rights. Even the Washington Post points out that women can’t show their faces or “travel without the permission of male guardians.” But to repeat myself: Since when does the Left or the media altogether care about women in the Middle East? They didn’t complain when Obama went there. In fact, they made sure to avoid talking about that at all while Obama was there. So why care now?
Fifth, why is Tillerson talking about human rights in Iran considered a bad thing? All the media had to say about it is that it’s hypocritical. Even though it’s the Left that promotes gay rights here in the U.S. but flat out ignores the fact that gay people are horrendously tortured and killed simply for their sexual orientation. Talk about hypocrisy.
Lastly, of course Tillerson won’t allow the U.S. media in the press conference. The media is full of LIARS! They will attempt to make a mockery of Tillerson in such a conference and disrupt what the president is trying to accomplish in the region.
And finally, here’s my main point: Trump in a single trip has managed to accomplish more for this country than Obama did in 8 years. I’m not just talking about making the country $110B richer from one deal. I’m also talking about one of the things Trump promised during the campaign trail: that America would be respected again. He’s certainly making strides to accomplishing just that, and for that, we must truly be thankful to God that we don’t have Hillary as president and that we no longer have Obama as president either.
“Every good thing given and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shifting shadow.”
The media and much of the country has solely been focused on the whole ‘Russian hack’ or ‘Trump-Russia collusion’ stories. Let’s be honest, until Trump leaves the White House, the media will never stop talking about it because they will never be able to prove either of those things happened. And, unless there’s a clear need to talk about it, either due to a new development in the story (created by the media, of course), or another reason, I’d rather focus on a larger and more real issue today: Globalism.
Over the whole of the 20th century, the largest threat to liberty and freedom throughout the world was communism. Don’t get me wrong, it still is. We just have to be able to realize what people are calling it now: Globalism/progressivism. During the Democrat Party Primaries, Bernie Sanders called himself a socialist. He was the first openly socialist candidate to run for president. But here’s the thing: everyone that runs for president in the Democrat Party (and Republican Party, if they’re from the establishment) is a socialist. Hillary said that she wasn’t socialist, but rather ‘progressive’. In reality, they are both the same.
Both aspire to increase the size of the government and replace God with government. Socialists, communists, progressives, liberals, globalists - call them what you will, they all want the same thing: to have unrivaled power and have people under their control. That’s why the Democrat Party fought the North during the Civil War to keep black people as slaves. That’s why the Democrat Party today insists in creating more and more government programs that cripple those with low-income salaries and force those people to be entirely dependent on government ‘assistance’.
The Democrat Party, as ‘progressive’ as they claim to be, hope to repeat the cycle of world history. What I mean by that is, having a country become an empire run by its massive government in which the king, or pharaoh, or emperor, or Caesar is the supreme leader of everyone. That’s why this country is so special. This country was founded a Christian country. Christianity has not only survived, but thrived in this country. And this country has not only survived, but thrived thanks to Christianity. That’s why, even after over 200 years, this country is still capable of electing Reagans and Trumps into the White House.
We know the history of the world. It’s a history of rebellion (against God, mostly), invasion, and destruction. A history of mad kings and evil empires. This country offers its people something no other country in the world has offered before: true freedom. The freedom to be as successful as you can be, provided you put in the effort to accomplish it. Freedom guaranteed by the country’s most basic laws: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
But the Left wants that gone. They surely don’t care about life, demonstrated by their desire to encourage women to have as much ‘fun’ as possible without having to worry about a pesky kid. They don’t want anyone other than themselves to have liberty, demonstrated by the fact they fought, died and killed to keep black people as slaves. And they don’t care about people's pursuit of happiness. If someone is living in a nice house, drives a nice car and is genuinely happy (not that material possession means happiness), they think it’s because they stole from the poor or they got those things illegitimately. The Left wants communism, but they can’t flat out come out and say that. Instead, they will say they want ‘Globalism’ because that way, the world is ‘united’.
Don’t let yourself be deceived, Globalism isn’t world unity and world peace. It’s governmental unity. Globalism isn’t about uniting people, it’s about uniting governments, with a governing system above the people. That’s what the U.N. and E.U. are. Ironically enough, the U.N. was created in order to avoid another Hitler rising up and trying to wipe out a whole race of people (*ahem* The UN is cool with Iran *ahem*).
Globalism is the ultimate from of big government. It is based on the communist idea conceived by Soviet Leon Trotsky of global communism. That’s why I’ve said in a previous article that Globalism is about world domination. Though not done through war or bloodshed, Globalism is simply a diplomatic way for a council of people to rule the world.
You know how conspiracy theorists believe in the Illuminati? Well, this would be a real Illuminati, if the Leftists of the world get what they want.
Now, I wish I could tell you something along the lines of “thankfully, God won’t allow such a thing to happen in this world” but I can’t. The Book of Revelation talks about the fact that Satan will rule over the Earth (through a number of beasts) until he’s imprisoned for 1000 years, after which he will be thrown in the lake of fire and sulfur. Every Christian knows that there eventually will come a point in which the Earth is destroyed by God. That there will be a Rapture and a Judgement placed on the whole world. So I can’t tell you that God won’t allow there to be a One World government. The Bible does, after all, speak of an anti-Christ.
However, here’s the important part: It’s ok. Since it’s in the Bible, we know that it’s part of God’s master plan. Those who follow Christ won’t even be taking part in it anyway. Us Christians won’t be present for the Judgement of the world. This world is merely temporary. Heaven awaits those who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ.
“… I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their testimony of Jesus and for the word of God, and those who had not worshipped the beast or its image, and had not received its mark on their foreheads or hands. And they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.”
Short answer: NO. Like I’ve said in my previous article, Trump is simply too clean and innocent to be found guilty of anything the Left alleges. And that’s because that’s all the Left has: ALLEGATIONS. They have spent half a year investigating a Russian hack or Trump’s collusion with Russia and haven’t found any evidence of either. The Left is conducting investigations simply on what the media ‘reports’. None of what they say is legitimate. That’s the reason we often call them the “Fake News Media”. They report on fake news. They don’t report on facts, they report their own narratives. That’s not journalism, that’s PROPAGANDA!
Trump recently took to twitter to voice his opinion on the ‘Russian hack’ allegations. “This is the single greatest witch hunt of a politician in American history!”, followed by another tweet saying: “With all of the illegal acts that took place in the Clinton campaign & the Obama Administration, there was never a special counsel appointed!” On a side note, USA Today wrote an article on these tweets, saying “It was unclear what ‘illegal acts’ Trump was referring to…” Aw, c’mon! We all know what illegal acts he’s referring to. ALL OF THEM! From Benghazi to the e-mails to the IRS investigation of conservative organizations to Fast & Furious!
But back to my point, the president is clearly annoyed by the fact that a special counsel was appointed based on complete false accusations of hacking and colluding. But the Left will go to any extent necessary to get Trump out of the White House, with Pence following if they succeed. The problem for the Left is: it’s an IMPOSSIBLE task. Trump is innocent of everything the Left alleges he’s done. To repeat myself: IT’S BEEN HALF A YEAR since the investigation officially began (though, I’m certain Obama ordered an investigation on Trump since the race began) and not a single piece of evidence has surfaced. Not even close.
Now, just because the Left can’t come up with any solid evidence of anything doesn’t mean they will give up the pursuit to destroy themsel-… er, I mean, impeach the president. The Left are masters at character assassination. They’ve recently done it to Bill O’Reilly, whom they’ve been trying to get for decades. They even tried it with Sean Hannity with the exact same sexual harassment allegations, but that one fell flat. They’ve been trying forever to do that to Rush Limbaugh, and they’re certainly trying to do it to Trump now.
The Left didn’t care all too much about what Trump said or did before the race began. For decades, he’s simply been someone people should aspire to be: a successful business man. He was even friends with many Democrats, but that all changed when he announced his candidacy for president as a Republican. It all changed when he showed himself to be the Donald Trump that would end up running the country. Granted, at first, they thought he was a joke. That he would implode within the year, if not within the first few months. But once the Left came to the realization that he’s a legitimate threat to Obama’s legacy and their agenda, they went full-on ballistic.
Trump was only someone to destroy when he was clearly in the way of the Leftist agenda. But to their dismay, there was nothing they could do to stop him. Their candidate was extremely flawed, someone who had a better chance at winning in 2008 than now. They’ve had 8 years of utopia for the Washington establishment and its friends, but a growing concern of a coming dystopia for the rest of the country. And their opponent was someone everyone knew, and thus, many trusted. It wasn’t until the last three weeks of the election that the Left got truly desperate and paid women to make false sexual harassment charges against Trump, which ended up backfiring, expectedly, considering the many atrocities against women that Hillary’s husband had committed.
The Left not only had 6 months of FBI investigation into Trump to find evidence of foul play, or shady business transactions, or of a cheating character in Trump. They had about HALF A CENTURY of Trump being in the world’s eye to find some sort of lethal character flaw that would turn off his supporters. Business deals that may have looked shady, scandalous even. But the best thing they found was Trump having a ‘locker-room talk’ with someone during an interview.
Trump is one of the cleanest business executives and friend of politicians I’ve ever seen. There aren’t any question marks in Trump’s business life, only in his presidential life, and that’s only because the Left creates those question marks without solid, or even logical evidence.
I know for a fact that Trump won’t be impeached, because there’s nothing for anyone to find that would be impeachment-worthy. Not only that, I don’t believe God would allow the man he anointed to be in the White House to be kicked out. Like I said in the previous article: God set things up this way for a reason. He set Trump’s life as it has gone for a reason, and that reason may just be to save this country from falling into the hands of the devil, at least for as long as Trump is president.
Just remember this. It’s something that helped me cope with the 2012 election results: No matter who’s president, Jesus is King.
“And on His robe and on His thigh He has a name written, ‘King of kings, and Lord of lords.’”
Yesterday, I wrote an article talking about a recent storyline on Trump ‘leaking’ ‘classified’ information to Russian officials in a meeting this past week. In all honesty, I fully expected that story to be the most talked about thing for about 2 weeks before something else took the media’s attention from that. But another piece of news has done that in only a few days: Comey’s recent memo.
Now, I’ve covered the whole ‘Comey getting fired thing’ in two whole articles (here and here), so I won’t give that any more coverage than I need to. What’s done is done. But here’s my main point: the Left had so little to talk about when it comes to those ‘leaks’ that they’ve actually stopped talking about it. Instead, they’ve focused on Comey’s memo on what the president had told him much prior to the director’s firing.
While they are both within the same subject: Trump colluding with Russia, the ‘leaks’ story isn’t really about Russia interfering with the election, so it wasn’t going to have much of a lifespan in the media world. However, the fact that they only covered it for a few days is surprising. While this does indicate that the Left has little to absolutely no information on what was ‘leaked’, I’m astonished that they didn’t continue to try to make things up.
Just look at the whole ‘Russia intervened in the election’ narrative they’ve got going on. There’s absolutely no evidence of Russian hacking or Trump collusion with Russia even after half a year of ongoing investigation! The media simply makes up what excuses and evidence they want to attack and damage the president’s reputation, at which they are failing miserably, since no one outside of their immediate liberal viewers circle believe Russia cheated to help Trump get elected.
My point here is: I can’t think of a single time the media has decided to stop covering something that could ‘damage’ an opponent’s reputation simply for lack of evidence. If the Left hates someone, they will stop at nothing to make them resign, be impeached or be made ineffective. They will lie through their teeth about everything, as long as it helps them destroy their target.
There’s only one person I can think of that has been heavily attacked by the media but came out as beloved by nearly everyone: Ronald Reagan. Another reason I make the comparison between him and the current president.
But back to my point. The Left is not usually like this. They don’t know the meaning of ‘backing down’ unless it’s a Republican doing it. The media doesn’t let up on anything, so why do it this time? And I can only think of one simple answer: Trump is too clean and innocent to be made found guilty of anything the Left could allege.
Think about it. Trump has been in the world’s eye for decades before he decided to run for president. Even Obama said (in an essay back when he was studying at Harvard University) that the American Dream was to be Donald Trump. Before Trump ran for president, he was beloved and admired by anyone and everyone that wanted to be successful in life. But once he ran for president, the media started to not only make fun of him, but to flat out hate him when they discovered he was a legitimate threat to the Democrat Party.
But in all of that time in the spotlight, not a single time was Donald Trump seen as doing something insanely horrible that would characterize him as the horrible person the Left thinks he is. That’s because he’s not that kind of person. He is literally the opposite of Hillary Clinton. While Hillary was a cheat, a fraud and a flat out despicable person, Trump is clean, legitimate and trustworthy. He has a clean record in his nearly 70 years of life. He hasn’t made shady deals like Obama, or the Clintons or Warren Buffet. And that’s what ticks the Left off the most. They can’t prove he’s done many things wrong because he HASN’T done many things wrong.
Not to say he’s sinless. He certainly isn’t. But he’s doing far better than any person in the media or the Washington establishment. God knew exactly who needed to be in last year’s presidential race. Someone who everyone knows and hasn’t done wrong by them. Someone who, while still flawed, is not going to actively make things better for himself and worse for someone else. Someone who won’t sell out the country to a globalist cause that replaces God with government. The Lord knew precisely what was in Trump’s heart and set things up to make sure he would make his way to the White House.
“He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, He has put eternity into man’s heart, yet so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end.”
The latest piece of news circulating around has been of a meeting between the president and a Russian official, in which allegedly the president divulged sensitive information in relation to the fight with ISIS. Before I go on to my larger point, I’d like to say this: When it comes to fighting ISIS, sharing info with a foreign government isn’t a bad thing, considering it’s likely that the information given was about HOW TO FIGHT THEM AND WHAT TO DO! In this sense, the president didn’t do anything wrong, but the Left sure makes it sound as though he did.
Trump himself and even his national security adviser, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster have both said that what was said during that meeting wasn’t anything classified or anything the Russians didn’t already know. I don’t know the details to what was said in the meeting, beyond a city being under control of ISIS, but the details don’t matter to the Mainstream media, when they believe Trump to have done something wrong. They will find fault in anything he does short of breathing.
But now onto my larger point: if this was Hillary, nothing would’ve been said about it. In fact, nothing WAS said about anything relating to placing the nation under foreign danger! The Left would love nothing more than for the world to forget about the fact Hillary kept and deleted tens of thousands of emails that contained sensitive and even classified information in an unsecured server. In fact, it’s one of the reasons she lost the election. People didn’t trust her with the country’s national security. Beyond wanting open borders and bringing in hundreds of thousands of refugees, she was highly incompetent in keeping anything secure. And many people agreed.
But this is yet another example of Leftist hypocrisy. They go after Trump with claims of jeopardizing national security by revealing sensitive and classified information to Russian officials when his predecessor Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were more than free to divulge any kind of information they felt like giving to anyone in the world. And it’s all because they have a “D” next to their names. Had these two been in power during WWII, they would’ve told Japan that we had nukes (fun fact: Truman told Stalin the U.S. had nukes during WWII) and maybe even had given the plans to how to make one. Hey, they probably would’ve said that Hitler was just misunderstood, but that’s a theory for another time.
The point here is: any Democrat can get away with any crime under the sun as long as they are either donating to the Democrat party or are contributing to the Democrat party agenda. Something as small as this, which is yet another thing that the MSM is making a mountain of, wouldn’t even be a blip on the radar for them under Hillary or Obama. I can only imagine what kind of information Obama has given up that the Left has covered up or simply ignored.
Don’t be mistaken, this is nothing more than yet another smear campaign to damage Trump’s reputation. The evidence? The Washington Post published an article on May 16, 2017 titled “Trump is dangerously incompetent”. This article was written in response to the alleged leaking of information and is nothing more than an opinion piece on how Trump sucks and is the worst thing since unsliced bread (not quoting the article), an article written by a sad, insignificant nobody that likely cried all throughout the new year. This is certainly not the first nor the last of opinion-based, Trump-hating narrative that the Left will write during the president’s administration. But it presents nothing more than mere hatred for the president.
Like I previously stated, had this been under Obama or Hillary, people wouldn’t even know it ever happened. Or if they did, the Left would swiftly and quickly come to the president’s defense and bury the claim with other, nonsensical story lines and non-news stories about gluten being bad for you, or eggs being good for you. The point is: the Left doesn’t care about national security or protecting American’s lives. If they did, they would understand the danger of accepting hundreds of thousands of refugees from Muslim countries and the increased chances of successful terrorist attacks taking place.
But that’s the thing: Evil doesn’t see itself as evil. No one, unless majorly messed up in the head, would willingly do evil. They do evil because they are deceived into doing evil, or are taught that something evil is really good, and that something good is really evil.
“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.”
On May 25th, 2017, Montana will hold special elections for one of its congressional districts, due to the incumbent, Ryan Zinke resigning his post. This election will determine whether Republicans maintain a seat in Congress or whether Democrats gain one more. And make no mistake, the Left will make a mountain out of this molehill.
I’ve already talked about how they will make the Georgia special election to be a bigger deal than it really is. And they were really excited to see a Democrat win in that election, partly due to the state being largely Republican, but were disappointed when Jon Ossoff (said Democrat) failed to clinch the victory, leading to a run-off election occurring in July.
Much like in Georgia, the Left will make this election seem almost on par with the presidential election, saying that if the Democrats win, it’s a representation of what the country feels about Trump. (Though, it’s funny how when a Republican, or even Trump himself wins, it doesn’t mean anything, or it was just a fluke, or there was cheating involved.)
However, they fail to realize a very important point: TRUMP WON! And he wasn’t the only one who won in November of 2016. The Republican party managed to maintain control of Congress too! If one Democrat wins one election, it means next to nothing, at least in terms of what it will mean in the grand scheme of things Trump plans to do during his administration. But this is precisely why they want to make these elections seem like a bigger deal than they really are.
You may not remember this, but during the Obama administration there were well over 40 SPECIAL ELECTIONS taking place. And not a single one of those special elections would indicate whether Obama and his policies were the preferred option. The Mainstream media didn’t make anywhere as big a deal of those elections as they are of these. If a Democrat wins even one of these special elections, it means Trump is vastly hated throughout the nation and we all regret having voted for him.
But you see, this is the kind of deception the Left loves to employ on people. They wholeheartedly believe that the Democrat party is the more loved party and that leftist views are the more commonplace views in America. And whenever they are proved wrong; whenever their candidate loses and their views are rejected, it’s not because they weren’t the preferred option, it’s because someone cheated at some point. It’s because someone else sabotaged their candidate, such as Comey sabotaging Hillary, or Russia hacking the election, somehow.
I’ve said this before, largely because it’s true, but deception is one of the devil’s strongest weapons. Much like the serpent deceived Eve into eating from the forbidden tree so that she may be like God, the Left deceives people (or at least tries to) into believing that Trump’s approval rating is in the 30’s and that most Trump supporters regret ever having voted for him. In reality, the more the Left attacks Trump, the gladder we are to have voted for him. If he’s seen as this big of a threat to the Left, we must’ve elected the right guy. I can’t imagine them going at Jeb Bush or Mitt Romney with so much constant fervor. They wouldn’t want those two in the White House (neither would I), but I doubt either of them would cause so much trouble for the Left that they literally drive the Left insane (particularly knowing how much both of them wanted to work WITH AND FOR the Democrats, rather than work with them FOR US, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.)
But returning to my main point, the Left often uses one of Satan’s strongest weapons against their political enemies and on the people that voted for those enemies. It’s why I believe that the biggest reason to smear Trump isn’t to get rid of him (since doing that wouldn’t work), but rather to plant the seeds of corruption in anyone that may listen that either voted for Trump or wasn’t old enough to vote this last election, but will be for the rest. They aren’t trying to convince liberals that Trump is bad. They’d simply be preaching to the choir. They want to deceive YOU and convince YOU (the Trump voter, if applicable to you) that Trump is a dirtbag that will destroy the country. But like I said in the previous paragraph: the more they trash Trump, the more convinced we become that he is the right man for the job.
“The mouth of the righteous is a fountain of life, but the mouth of the wicked conceals violence.”
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...