Because the Left is as dumb as a bag of bricks and as corrupt and evil as can be, they have taken it upon themselves to keep parents away from children’s education, making outrageous claims like “parents have no place in the classroom”.
 
Naturally, that would tick off any parent who is moderately concerned with their kids, and would prompt looking into just what kind of education these kids are receiving that the “educators” don’t want parents to find out about. Which is why the Florida legislation infamously (and incorrectly) called “Don’t Say Gay” bill exist, in order to protect children as young as THREE OR FOUR from having their minds corrupted by the subject of sex, a subject they are far too young to understand.
 
And this idea of parents being able to oversee their children’s education, which has been turned into a political matter because everything is political in this day and age, is extremely popular and favorable by pretty much everyone, even Democrat voters (though, unsurprisingly, that demographic is closer than the others in terms of favorable vs. unfavorable).
 
You see, according to a poll conducted by the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School, 46% of Americans aged 18-29 agree with the statement that “parents should have more control over their children’s education than they do now,” while only 23% disagreed.
 
That is a 2-1 margin in favor of parental control in education, and this is coming from the youngest demographic, the type that would more often side with the Left on political issues.
 
Unsurprisingly, Republicans showed the most support for this, with 64% agreeing with that statement and only 14% disagreeing. And like I said, even Democrats saw more people supporting that statement than opposing it, with 35% agreeing and 31% disagreeing, though like I said, this is unsurprisingly close in this demographic.
 
I will give credit where it’s due, as a still majority of Democrats seem to be somewhat reasonable with this, but it’s clear that they are very quickly becoming a party of groomers and child abusers. If teachers don’t want the parents of the kids they are teaching to know what is being taught, that should be a massive red flag that something terrible is going on. Because what adult will tell a kid “don’t mention this to your parents” and have anything other than evil planned for that kid?
 
At any rate, as far as Independents go, they also showed a great deal of support for that statement, with 44% agreeing and 20% disagreeing.
 
And just to reiterate, this is ALL young Americans. Young Republicans, young Democrats, young Independents, all had a majority, in most cases a strong majority, agreeing that parents should have more control over kids’ education. One can only imagine how much more support older Americans have for parental rights in education. Actually, it’s not that hard to imagine, seeing as Gov. Youngkin pretty much ran on this one issue and won handily against someone who was vehemently opposed to parental rights in education.

The poll, of course, showed other matters, such as young Americans’ approval of Brandon dropping 18% over the last year, a similar number to what I mentioned in the previous article. The poll also showed 85% of young Americans supporting government measures to addressing student debt, though with varying solutions for it. For example, 38% said they approved of the government fully cancelling student loan debt, while 27% said they agreed with the government assisting with repaying the debt without fully cancelling, 21% said they preferred debt be cancelled only for those who are in most need, and 13% said they believed the government shouldn’t alter its policy aka no student loan debt cancellation.
 
But it’s not really much of a surprise that the demographic which is most burdened by student loan debt would want to see it be cancelled or at least be assisted with repayment. The matter of fact is that student debt is as much of a scam as college itself, rips people off substantially and leads them to financial misery. The idea that people go into debt so they can get an “education” and then get a crappy job (some people don't even accomplish that) just to try and repay that debt which is easily in the six figures is absolutely insane. And this is without even going into the fact that colleges, for the most part, are just Marxist indoctrination centers.
 
Getting back to parental rights, quite unsurprisingly, there are those who are opposed to parents having any say in their kids’ education.
 
For example, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten claimed that “Instead of everybody joining together in America to get us out of the effects of the pandemic, these right-wing ideologues are just trying to create fear and anxiety and anger exploiting the fear that parents already have in order to win elections and end public education as we know it.”
 
A few things to say about this. First, I’m not surprised she’s trying to get people to focus on the scamdemic instead of what evils they are doing in classrooms. These people are sick, and not with COVID.
 
Second, what do you mean “fear that parents already have”? If they are already fearful, then these “right-wing ideologues” aren’t creating fear, anxiety and anger. You yourself are admitting it’s already there.
 
Third, why is it already there? Why are parents already fearful? Is it because this indoctrination and corruption of minds isn’t anything new and parents have been growing more and more concerned with what their kids are being taught? Is it because one of the silver linings of the lockdowns was that parents got to basically sit in on classes and got to see what their kids were being taught in online classrooms and didn’t like it? Why does that fear already exist if we are to believe that what teachers are doing is merely educating kids and not doing other awful, immoral and illegal things? No parent who is confident his or her child is receiving a solid education will have any fears about it, so the fact that there IS fear in parents is a damning statement of this education system.
 
Fourth and finally, she isn’t entirely wrong, at least with that last bit. Us “right-wing ideologues” certainly are trying to end public education as we know it, because public education as we know it is teaching kids to be immoral, Marxist wokemobs as young as Kindergarten and they are being taught about sexuality at that young of an age. The fact that they include gay sex makes it a lot worse, but the teaching of sexuality at any level is what is abhorrent to those of us who have a heart and a conscience. That’s why there is such massive support in favor of the so-called “Don’t Say Gay” bill, because it protects young kids from teachers trying to corrupt their minds and groom them into being sexual objects.
 
It’s because of the current state of public education that homeschooling has grown between 5.4% and 11% from March 2020 to September 2020, and 5 million American children, by the summer of 2021, were being homeschooled. Government schools are so putrid that concerned parents (who have been wrongfully labeled as “terrorists” simply for inquiring about their children’s education at PTA meetings, which definitely doesn’t help the Left here) are looking everywhere, even within their own homes, to give their kids a better education.
 
So yes, we are definitely trying to end public education as we know it, because public education as we know it is resolutely evil and corrupt. And we will never apologize for trying to protect our kids.
 
Matthew 19:14
“But Jesus said, ‘Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.’”

The golden rule regarding Democrats is that the fake news media will always cover for them, particularly if they are a prominent figure within the party. Almost nothing short of blatant groping of women (at least getting caught for it) or outright murder will get Democrats into trouble with the fake news media (and this one is dubious, seeing as Ted Kennedy probably got away with it). So one would have to be a major screw-up of catastrophic proportions in order to be bashed by the Leftist fake news media.
 
And for the first time since the botched Afghanistan withdrawal, that’s what Brandon has had to face, at least from one source.
 
With inflation reaching 8.5%, the highest in 40 years (this comparison is often used to bash Reagan, but people forget that those levels were part of his RECOVERY from the double-digit inflation numbers seen during the Carter years) and wages effectively shrinking in comparison to inflation growth, more and more people are being open about their distaste for Biden (there are, of course, those who always lie in polls to protect themselves from Leftist persecution) and it’s being reflected in polling. So much so, in fact, that CNN is beginning to notice it.
 
In the latest CNN poll, the ghost hand-shaker is seeing approval of just 39%. This wouldn’t usually be too bad, but seeing as this is an extremely friendly poll, that 39% (which is a low in this poll) is terrible. Almost as friendly Quinnipiac University had him at an abysmal 33% approval.
 
These results have led to a CNN panel consisting of Bloomberg White House correspondent Jordan Fabian, CNN Capitol Hill reporter Melanie Zanona, and Time Magazine national political correspondent Molly Ball, with host Abby Phillip weighing in on such numbers.
 
Phillip said: “It’s an environment of overall discontent,” in relation to Republicans disapproving due to (among other things) poor economic policies, and environmentalist wackos disapproving due to Biden resuming the sale of oil and gas leases on federal land (ironically, the only thing I have ever approved of this illegitimate regime).
 
She continued: “People correctly perceive that he’s not in control of the situation. And I think ever since that Afghanistan last summer, people have had – voters overall – have not had a sense of leadership from the White House, have not had a sense that there’s a president in control, who is strong and consistent and knows what he’s doing and can project a consistent message from one day or the next.”
 
A few things to comment on here. First, notice that she added “correct” when talking about a perception that Biden isn’t in control of the situation. This indicates that even she is in agreement with the statement. Even a CNN panelist believes that Brandon is completely fumbling the bag here and cannot get a hold of any situation, from inflation to even messaging on Ukraine (which we’ll get to momentarily).
 
The second thing is that the American people haven’t had a sense of leadership from the White House not since the Afghanistan disaster, but since January 20th, 2021, namely in the hours before Biden successfully stole the presidency. We haven’t had a leader in the White House since Trump. The only difference between then and now is that even the Left is beginning to agree that Biden is not a leader.
 
Finally, it’s indicative of how big a failure Brandon is that even people on his own side, in a panel from one of the most Democrat-friendly fake news sources out there, are not only reporting how unpopular he is, but also don’t try to make excuses too much about it.
 
During the height of the Afghanistan botch, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, BBC News and others called it how it was: a disaster. By-and-large, they didn’t pull many punches against Biden. Matter of fact, I saw more CNN headlines lambasting Biden over that than from other sources. And this is awfully reminiscent of that time. The Afghanistan disaster was a spectacular botch, so much so that even fake news sources had little choice but to call him out on it.
 
This time, however, it’s not one particularly noteworthy botch or screw-up. It’s the culmination of them which have led to poor numbers even by CNN standards.
 
Molly Ball went on to talk about the inconsistent and botched messaging surrounding the war on Ukraine, saying that Biden continues to “step on his own messaging”, such as the time that Brandon heavily suggested that American troops would be sent to Ukraine, and that Putin “cannot remain in power”, suggesting forceful regime change in a world superpower which the Obama administration had been trying to be extremely friendly with.
 
Phillip then went on to share multiple clips of vulnerable Democrats in Congress distancing themselves from Brandon, to which Ball said that this should ring “alarm bells” for the occupier.
 
“It is a sign that they sense that there is nothing to be gained by continuing to be allies of the president,” Ball said. This is a sentiment which could not be found with Trump, even after the 2020 steal.
 
Of course, early on, many (though not all) RINOs made sure to distance themselves from Trump, but pretty much all conservatives in Congress or running for a Congressional seat sought his endorsement and wanted to be close to him. As time went on, with the obvious popularity of the MAGA movement, wolves dressed as sheep also sought to be endorsed by him (only to turn around and vote to impeach him for b.s. reasons) and even today, any Republican running, regardless of what they think or said about Trump in the past, is seeking his endorsement (which unfortunately, he is way too loose in giving).
 
Whereas Republicans seek Trump’s endorsement and close ties (even the ones who hate him), some Democrats seek to distance themselves from the man who supposedly won the most votes in American electoral history.
 
To conclude, the panel discussed his plummeting support from younger generations, which typically are the most Democrat-friendly demographic. Fabian argued that Brandon is losing support among millennials and Gen Z because he “hasn’t delivered” on campaign promises like canceling student loan debt, which could be an accurate assessment (alongside the Obama-like crappy economy). According to a recent Gallup poll, Biden is down 21% with Gen Z and 19% with millennials.
 
Fabian said: “Those numbers are a tremendous failure for a Democratic president to have numbers like that among young voters.”
 
Indeed, seeing as the youngest voters (aside from the literal infants) are those most recently indoctrinated by the Marxist centers for diseducation that we call colleges. When a Democrat president (or in this case occupier of the Oval Office) is seeing massive drops in support from young voters, that is another major indication of how poor a job he is doing.
 
Be it because of not canceling student loan debt or the crappy economy, young people are getting fed up with Brandon, as is the rest of the country.
 
Of course, we didn’t vote to elect him, and his approval was always low (given how, again, we didn’t elect him), but people, by-and-large tend to not be as honest as they would be in these polls if they didn’t have to fear Leftist persecution. Even the numbers we are seeing, regardless of source, I believe to be unnaturally high, and that his real approval numbers are far closer to the teens.
 
But let us not simply be content with these numbers now. The midterms are half a year away and they will certainly try to pull some shenanigans to avoid total disaster come November.
 
1 Peter 5:8
“Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.”

Pardon my French, but I believe France could nowadays be classified as a s**thole country, like the ones President Trump had talked about some years ago. The reason I say this is because of the following irrational, irritating and infuriating situation:
 
Last week, a farmer had to defend himself, his THREE-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER, and his home from FOUR burglars between the hours of 10 p.m. and 11 p.m., with the farmer taking his gun and killing one of the burglars. While any reasonable person would obviously classify this as a case of self-defense, and therefore a legal shooting and killing, it’s obvious that France is looneyville in this day and age, and the farmer was charged with MURDER for shooting one of the men who broke HIS rights by illegally entering his home and attempting to ransack it AT BEST.
 
But that’s not the worst part, because seemingly, the country’s PRESIDENT is siding with the court in charging the man with murder and, effectively, siding with criminals altogether.
 
More specifically, he said the following about the event: “Everyone must be safe, and the public authorities have to ensure it. But I am opposed to self-defense. It’s very clear and undisputable because otherwise the country becomes the Wild West. And I don’t want a country where weapons proliferate and where we consider that it’s up to the citizens to defend themselves.”
 
You know who else doesn’t believe in the right to self-defense? Those who wish to violate other people’s rights. And it’s not like you can only make the inference that that’s what he means. He’s telling you, straight up, that you don’t have a right to defend yourself, at least in France.
 
It’s maddening and I simply have no words to describe how enraging this is. He’s saying that the farmer, who is the VICTIM in this circumstance, should’ve just ALLOWED the burglars to ransack his home, frighten his daughter, and perhaps do even worse things to them. All because France “shouldn’t be the Wild West.”
 
France’s police force is already having to tangle with not only radical Islamic terrorists that Macron keeps allowing in and allowing to form insurgency zones, but also enforcing whatever illegal and inhumane COVID mandates he still has imposed on the French populace. Macron says that the farmer should’ve simply called the police, which I’ve previously discussed could be detrimental as response time, particularly in bad areas, can be pretty bad. Not to mention that, if the burglars had still been there by the time the cops showed up, you immediately have a hostage situation, making things even worse.
 
In such scenarios, there are a million possible outcomes. That there were FOUR of them means that it really could’ve gone unimaginably worse than it actually did, especially as they chose to do that at night, meaning they were prepared to meet opposition and having to subdue the residents (most burglaries happen in daylight, when people are away from their homes). Allowing four men free reign over your home, when you have a three-year-old child with you would be to fail as a parent and would invite the worst of situations imaginable. But going so far as to charging the man who defended his family and his home with murder and then claiming, with no uncertain words, that you’re opposed to the concept of people defending themselves and those they care about, is to fail as a civilized society, as a country, and as an officeholder.
 
I already really didn’t like Fascist Macron because of the mandates and everything else, but this makes me outright DESPISE the man. Yes, not simply as a Leftist politician, but as a man.
 
Just what could be going on in his head that he thinks that way of thinking is in any way okay, let alone that he would feel comfortable SAYING IT OUT LOUD (though with the first round of the French elections just days away, I’m certain someone in his camp will tell him to backtrack those comments, but we all know how putridly he feels about his fellow man, let alone Frenchmen)?
 
I guess he’s never had to contend with the traumatic experience and severe violation of one’s home that is burglary. But perhaps even worse, he himself could be considered a criminal, as he views people defending themselves as erroneous and morally deplorable. What plans does he have for his countrymen that he thinks they shouldn’t be able to defend themselves?
 
The bit about the Wild West was nothing but an excuse and an attempt at demonizing the time and to fearmonger based on that demonization. The Wild West is considered a “lawless” time, but people conflate that with is being “justiceless.” The federal government had a much tougher time imposing federal law in those days, to the point it was practically nonexistent in the “Wild West.” But the Wild West still had towns and designated lawmen. Not to mention people had guns to defend themselves against injustice that may fall upon them.
 
The concept of a Wild West is not the anarchic hellhole that the Left wishes to make of it. People were a lot freer and could trust, at least, in themselves and their weapons. Take away those weapons and all you’d be left with is Detroit, Chicago, or France in 2022.
 
Again, with the French police being held up doing other things, they likely wouldn’t have shown up to the scene until it was far too late. Is that a better outcome than the legal and justified killing of a BURGLAR READY TO SUBDUE THE FARMER? Is it better for crime to succeed so long as France doesn’t become “the Wild West”? Because guess what, whatever idea you have of the Wild West, Mr. Macron, it’s what your country has become. A lawless and, truly, justiceless land if the farmer was charged with murder at any capacity for DEFENDING HIS FAMILY AND HOME.
 
Thankfully, the farmer was released from jail, but is still under judicial supervision. Whether this means the murder charge was lifted or not, I don’t know, but that the French justice system would find it appropriate to “keep an eye” on the VICTIM of burglary is damning for Baguetteland.
 
Wanna know who else believed French people shouldn’t be able to defend themselves? Literally Hitler when he took over half the country and installed a Fascist puppet to run Vichy France.
 
Who would’ve thought France in 2022 would become Vichy France once more?
 
I hope these fascists and indisputably evil people in office are soundly defeated now and forevermore.
 
1 Timothy 5:8
“But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”

Watch out, Zorro, your iconic symbol is being attacked and cancelled by a virtue-signaling mob pretending they are doing anything at all effective against Russia.
 
I’d like to pretend we live in a remotely sane world, which is why I do my absolute best to stay off of Twitter, but on occasion I am pulled back in like Michael Corleone to see the collective idiocy of the Left.
 
Following the cancellation of Yuri Gagarin and Russia as a whole in a “World’s Prettiest Tree” competition, the Left around the world is seeking to cancel the letter “Z”, because, apparently, it’s being linked with support for Russia’s actions against Ukraine.
 
This makes about as much sense as the claim that the number “88” is a secret code for white supremacists that means “heil Hitler” or something like that. But it’s not as though logic is a requirement for Leftist actions. If anything, it’d be a deterrent.
 
The letter is apparently so egregious that Germany will outright make it a CRIME to use the letter, and Ukraine called for the global “criminalization” of the letter, at least in the context of it being used to voice support for Russia (those claims that Ukraine was Nazified don’t seem so ridiculous after this and the dismantling of 12 whole political parties, only half of which could be said to be pro-Russia).
 
However, even with this supposed context, the letter is being entirely dropped by companies like Zurich Insurance Group (henceforth known as “Urich” Insurance Group. I joke, they really just dropped it from their logo, but the name is the same) and Samsung, who dropped the “Z” from their Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Galaxy Z Flip 3 foldable smartphones.
 
And Lithuania would even go so far as to punish individuals and businesses with 500 euro fines ($554.35) just for DISPLAYING the letter “Z”, utterly ignoring the context and simply punishing the use of the letter as a whole, even if those displaying the letter are against Russia as well.
 
Which is not only extremely moronic, but outright ironic, seeing as the last name of the Ukrainian president starts with a “Z”.
 
But this is just how low IQ these individuals and businesses are. They are willing to outright cancel a whole LETTER IN THE ALPHABET, if it’s for the purposes of virtue signaling and appearing as woke as possible.
 
Never mind the fact that the letter itself has millions of different uses, and that someone could display the letter Z without being supportive of Russia (like how the Russian cosmonauts weren’t supporting Ukraine just because of the color of their space suits), apparently, any and all uses of the letter must be forbidden.
 
“The Suite Life of Zack & Cody”? More like “The Suite Life of Ack & Cody.” New York Jets QB Zach Wilson, you’re gonna have to change your name, bud. Actress Zendaya, might wanna permanently make yourself Mary Jane.
 
What, are they also gonna change the name of Mt. Zion back to Mt. Moriah? Actually, they very well might do that.
 
Regardless, anyone with half a functioning brain would recognize how stupid it is to cancel a whole letter of the alphabet just for the purposes of standing in “solidarity with the Ukrainian people.” In reality, they are, of course, standing in solidarity with their bank accounts, as I’ve noted in a prior article.
 
I have no idea how this concept of the letter “Z” being used by pro-Russia people was fabricated, but as I’ve previously mentioned, it doesn’t have to make a lick of sense. They will go forth with what they think is best (for them) regardless of logic and evidence at any capacity.
 
This much has been proven over the last couple of years in particular, given their insistence of mandating things like lockdowns, masks, social distancing and vaccination, despite the fact that none of those things work and could, in fact, be outright detrimental to people (and have proven to be so).
 
At this point, nothing the Left does should really be surprising to me, and nothing they cancel ought to stun me at all, but it somehow does. They continue to outdo themselves in their stupidity and attempts to virtue signal.
 
Lord, let this madness end sooner rather than later.
 
Proverbs 19:28
“A worthless witness mocks at justice, and the mouth of the wicked devours iniquity.”