It’s sometimes difficult to discern whether someone is merely ignorant on a political issue or if they are generally stupid and no amount of information given to them will actually get them to learn. Those on the Left will usually be ignorant no matter what, but stupidity reigns supreme because they continue to believe what they do despite the information provided to them by conservatives.
And seemingly, Bill Maher is among those who were merely ignorant on the issue of abortion, as he explained in a recent segment of his show that he was unaware both that Europe was more restrictive on abortion than the U.S. is and that most people who call themselves pro-life are actually women, rather than men.
I say “seemingly” because he’s had his “Real Time” show for nearly 20 years and, as a 66-year-old man, has been involved in media since the early 1980s, when he appeared on Johnny Carson’s and David Letterman’s shows (not to mention he definitely had political opinions from before that time as well).
My point being that I really doubt he’s only come to learn this recently. You’re this involved in the political world (albeit through commentary) for this long and only now you are beginning to hear things from the other side? Either he always did and would always ignore them, or he really was living in a Leftist bubble all his life.
At any rate, Maher said “I learned things this week… that are pretty basic things that I did not know about abortion. Like in Europe, the modern countries of Europe are way more restrictive than we are or what they’re even proposing! If you are pro-choice, you would like it a lot less in Germany, and Italy, and France, and Spain, and Switzerland. Did you know that? I didn’t know that.”
What he’s referring to is that Germany, France and Spain all have abortion limits set at 14 weeks into the pregnancy, while Italy and Switzerland have their limits at 12 weeks. Here in the U.S., Democrats shriek about even the mildest of restrictions to abortion and argue that it would be “unfair” to have limits at 20 weeks of pregnancy.
Maher continued: “I learned most people who are pro-life are women. I did not know that. Most abortions are from… mothers, people who have a kid… And I thought this was interesting, most abortions now – even when you go to a clinic are done with the pill. The pill. And pills are easy to get in America. So, you know, for the people who say we’re going back to 1973, we’re not. That’s just factually inaccurate.”
A couple things to say here. First, don’t think I didn’t catch that “most abortions are from… mothers, people who have a kid” bit that was clearly trying to be woke and claim men can get pregnant too. It’s not “most” of the abortions being from mothers. It’s ALL of them. Only mothers can get pregnant because only women can get pregnant and mothers are all women.
Second, regarding the “going back to 1973” thing, that’s just fearmongering from the Left to scare dumb women into thinking they will be forced to get risky, unsafe, life-threatening (for the mother, not just the child) abortions and that Roe allows them to get “safe” abortions. It’s a load of crap, all of it. For starters, overturning Roe doesn’t even get rid of abortion nationwide. The matter goes back to the states. Red states, hopefully, would eliminate abortion altogether, but blue states will continue to have it. And if an evil woman from a red state wants to kill her baby because she’s a selfish whore, she can go to a blue state to kill the child.
Of course, overturning Roe would only be step 1 in eliminating abortion nationwide, as we should be a country (and world, but country comes first and is easier) which not only disallows abortion but outright shuns it as it should be. Girls should be taught to not wantonly have sex with whatever is drunk enough to screw them and subsequently getting pregnant. They should be taught that life begins at conception because that’s the moment where two different DNA codes merge to create a unique one. Boys (at the appropriate age) should be taught not to act on their sexual impulses and temptations. Boys should be taught to be men of honor who will abstain from sex until he marries a woman who is also willing to abstain from sex until marriage.
Notice that I didn’t mention that girls should be taught to love their children, because such a thing comes naturally. The women who are pro-abortion are unnatural. They were taught to hate children and see them as nothing but a burden in their lives, and for the unborn, as nothing more than parasites.
And beyond coming to hate their children, they come to hate themselves. Not sure if you’ve seen the following image, but it depicts a person who either deeply hates herself or is being extremely overdramatic:
That sign indicates a deep level of self-hatred. Of course, the message falls a bit flat given that she’s wearing a mask because she fears dying of the largely non-lethal Chinese coronavirus, but the point remains. Only someone who hates him or herself to a notable degree would be willing to have that kind of sign at a Roe protest.
If they hate themselves, how can we expect them to not hate their children? And the thing about hate is that it has to be taught. The Leftist has to be taught that white people are evil, black people are blameless and victims, men are oppressors, etc. That’s why they want crap like CRT in classrooms, which only creates more and more Leftists who hate other people and most importantly themselves.
In any case, there’s more to that segment, as he had guests, one who was seemingly more pro-life and the other who was staunchly pro-abortion and was fuming the entire time (not to mention spreading disinformation like “interracial marriage” is next to try and make as many of their favored demographics fearful and ticked off enough to incite violence against pro-lifers), but this article is long enough as it is.
Again, I’m not believing for one second that Maher only became privy to this information recently. People had to have been telling him, in some form or fashion, about stuff like that and he had to have either ignored them altogether or countered that it was just “right-wing talking points.”
The fact is that only SEVEN countries in the entire world allow for elective (no reason) abortion after 20 weeks: The U.S., Canada, Netherlands, Singapore, China, North Korea and Vietnam.
Not exactly the best crowd to surround yourself with.
That abortion exists altogether is a nightmarish thing. Make no mistake, Roe v. Wade is the single worst decision the Supreme Court ever made. Dredd Scott may have led to the Civil War and Plessy led to the need for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but neither led to the genocide of nearly 64 million babies in 49 years, neither led to the death of nearly 20 million black babies in 49 years, and neither led to over 1000 babies being aborted every day in the U.S.
And yes, just because Roe has been around for nearly 50 years doesn’t mean crap. Roe is not “settled law” like conservative justices were cowardly made to acknowledge in their confirmation hearings. First of all, it’s not law. Only the Legislature can write and pass laws. Supreme Court cases are merely decisions as to what the SCOTUS of that time believes to be constitutional. But the Constitution does not say abortion was fine or legal anywhere. Furthermore, Plessy v. Ferguson, the decision which led to the “separate but equal” doctrine, was around for 58 years before it was overturned.
If Dredd Scott and Plessy were overturned, as they should’ve been, so can and should Roe v. Wade, Casey v. Planned Parenthood, Obergefell v. Hodges (the gay marriage case), etc. Evil should not be the law of the land and no Supreme Court case is ever “settled.”
If America wishes to see God’s favor and be able to sincerely say “God bless America” it must destroy evil wherever it is found. One such evil is in Roe v. Wade.
“Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”
In yet another example of the utter destruction that people have allowed to befall them, a recent study from the Royal Society Open Science journal found that lockdowns in the United Kingdom drove roughly 60,000 children to clinical depression.
Researchers found that there was a 27.1% prevalence of depression in their sample, a number far higher than would have occurred without lockdowns. This percentage, according to the UK Telegraph, equates to roughly 60,000 extra children who suffered as a result of the Chinese coronavirus lockdowns than otherwise would have under normal circumstances.
The study says: “After controlling for baseline scores and several school and pupil-level characteristics, depressive symptoms were higher in the COVID-19 group. These findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 pandemic increased adolescent depressive symptoms beyond what would have likely occurred under non-pandemic circumstances.”
One could argue that the study is saying that the pandemic itself is what drove children to depression, but one would have to be awfully disingenuous to pretend as though being practically locked in your home without the ability to see your friends and/or extended family wouldn’t have any sort of negative psychological effects.
We saw images of children being forced to wear masks and sitting by themselves in cafeterias, and they were absolutely miserable. They were literally banned from being able to socialize with their friends, despite the fact that children are the safest demographic regarding the virus.
And this isn’t the only negative side-effect found in the study.
According to the research, 400,000 UK children were referred to mental health specialists for things such as eating disorders and self-harm. How do you see this and not think that the measures taken during the pandemic were not only not beneficial towards “slowing” the spread of the virus (it seems to be a seasonal thing, kind of like, oh, well, what do you know, THE FLU!) but were actively harmful towards society.
Even in China, we are currently seeing whole cities being forced to stay indoors, not being able to even leave to get food, just because ONE person in that entire city tests positive for the virus they created. The CCP is currently performing psychological terrorism on their own populace, not because the virus is just that terrible or even because they think it’s just that terrible, but because this is the best opportunity to screw their own people over since Mao’s “Great Leap Forward”.
And clinical depression is far from the only problem kids have had to face as a result of evil people’s mandates and cowardly people’s submission. According to Summit News, there has been a shocking outbreak of hepatitis in children as a result of lockdowns and social distancing weakening their immune systems, with most of the 169 cases discovered having occurred in children under the age of 5. 17 of those little kids have had to get liver transplants and one of them ended up dying.
Again, this comes as a result of a weakened immune system caused by lockdowns and social distancing. You know how sometimes, when a kid gets chicken pox, friends of that kid’s parents who are parents themselves will throw “chicken pox parties” so that their kids develop immunity towards it? Whatever you might think of such a ritual, its benefit is that it does precisely that: helps develop the kids’ immune systems. Lockdowns and social distancing accomplish the opposite of that,and weaken the immune system.
Another negative side-effect, which will likely be a generational one unless we can figure out a way to reverse it, is that many infants have struggled in cognitive development and developed speech disorders as a result of adults around them wearing masks. According to speech therapists, adults wearing masks has caused a 364% increase in patient referrals of toddlers and other very young children.
Little kids learn behavior from their parents, so not being able to see their faces has seemingly caused cognitive development issues in those kids. Which would be strange if not for the fact that I would 100% believe many of those parents were wearing masks inside their own homes like psychopaths.
The damage done to society is far greater than perhaps any of us realize. In an effort to protect ourselves from the biggest mountain-out-of-a-molehill virus with very little lethality, we have destroyed civil liberties, the idea of bodily autonomy, and skewed the very development of the future leaders of this country. And still, there are people out there who want to inject poison into LITTLE CHILDREN and cause even more, perhaps irreparable, damage to them. Oh, and in the meantime, teachers have sought for a way to have sex with those kids too, and call you bigot and terrorist for trying to stop them.
A country which does not protect its children is a country which does not deserve a future and most certainly will not have one.
“For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.”
Because the Left is as dumb as a bag of bricks and as corrupt and evil as can be, they have taken it upon themselves to keep parents away from children’s education, making outrageous claims like “parents have no place in the classroom”.
Naturally, that would tick off any parent who is moderately concerned with their kids, and would prompt looking into just what kind of education these kids are receiving that the “educators” don’t want parents to find out about. Which is why the Florida legislation infamously (and incorrectly) called “Don’t Say Gay” bill exist, in order to protect children as young as THREE OR FOUR from having their minds corrupted by the subject of sex, a subject they are far too young to understand.
And this idea of parents being able to oversee their children’s education, which has been turned into a political matter because everything is political in this day and age, is extremely popular and favorable by pretty much everyone, even Democrat voters (though, unsurprisingly, that demographic is closer than the others in terms of favorable vs. unfavorable).
You see, according to a poll conducted by the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School, 46% of Americans aged 18-29 agree with the statement that “parents should have more control over their children’s education than they do now,” while only 23% disagreed.
That is a 2-1 margin in favor of parental control in education, and this is coming from the youngest demographic, the type that would more often side with the Left on political issues.
Unsurprisingly, Republicans showed the most support for this, with 64% agreeing with that statement and only 14% disagreeing. And like I said, even Democrats saw more people supporting that statement than opposing it, with 35% agreeing and 31% disagreeing, though like I said, this is unsurprisingly close in this demographic.
I will give credit where it’s due, as a still majority of Democrats seem to be somewhat reasonable with this, but it’s clear that they are very quickly becoming a party of groomers and child abusers. If teachers don’t want the parents of the kids they are teaching to know what is being taught, that should be a massive red flag that something terrible is going on. Because what adult will tell a kid “don’t mention this to your parents” and have anything other than evil planned for that kid?
At any rate, as far as Independents go, they also showed a great deal of support for that statement, with 44% agreeing and 20% disagreeing.
And just to reiterate, this is ALL young Americans. Young Republicans, young Democrats, young Independents, all had a majority, in most cases a strong majority, agreeing that parents should have more control over kids’ education. One can only imagine how much more support older Americans have for parental rights in education. Actually, it’s not that hard to imagine, seeing as Gov. Youngkin pretty much ran on this one issue and won handily against someone who was vehemently opposed to parental rights in education.
The poll, of course, showed other matters, such as young Americans’ approval of Brandon dropping 18% over the last year, a similar number to what I mentioned in the previous article. The poll also showed 85% of young Americans supporting government measures to addressing student debt, though with varying solutions for it. For example, 38% said they approved of the government fully cancelling student loan debt, while 27% said they agreed with the government assisting with repaying the debt without fully cancelling, 21% said they preferred debt be cancelled only for those who are in most need, and 13% said they believed the government shouldn’t alter its policy aka no student loan debt cancellation.
But it’s not really much of a surprise that the demographic which is most burdened by student loan debt would want to see it be cancelled or at least be assisted with repayment. The matter of fact is that student debt is as much of a scam as college itself, rips people off substantially and leads them to financial misery. The idea that people go into debt so they can get an “education” and then get a crappy job (some people don't even accomplish that) just to try and repay that debt which is easily in the six figures is absolutely insane. And this is without even going into the fact that colleges, for the most part, are just Marxist indoctrination centers.
Getting back to parental rights, quite unsurprisingly, there are those who are opposed to parents having any say in their kids’ education.
For example, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten claimed that “Instead of everybody joining together in America to get us out of the effects of the pandemic, these right-wing ideologues are just trying to create fear and anxiety and anger exploiting the fear that parents already have in order to win elections and end public education as we know it.”
A few things to say about this. First, I’m not surprised she’s trying to get people to focus on the scamdemic instead of what evils they are doing in classrooms. These people are sick, and not with COVID.
Second, what do you mean “fear that parents already have”? If they are already fearful, then these “right-wing ideologues” aren’t creating fear, anxiety and anger. You yourself are admitting it’s already there.
Third, why is it already there? Why are parents already fearful? Is it because this indoctrination and corruption of minds isn’t anything new and parents have been growing more and more concerned with what their kids are being taught? Is it because one of the silver linings of the lockdowns was that parents got to basically sit in on classes and got to see what their kids were being taught in online classrooms and didn’t like it? Why does that fear already exist if we are to believe that what teachers are doing is merely educating kids and not doing other awful, immoral and illegal things? No parent who is confident his or her child is receiving a solid education will have any fears about it, so the fact that there IS fear in parents is a damning statement of this education system.
Fourth and finally, she isn’t entirely wrong, at least with that last bit. Us “right-wing ideologues” certainly are trying to end public education as we know it, because public education as we know it is teaching kids to be immoral, Marxist wokemobs as young as Kindergarten and they are being taught about sexuality at that young of an age. The fact that they include gay sex makes it a lot worse, but the teaching of sexuality at any level is what is abhorrent to those of us who have a heart and a conscience. That’s why there is such massive support in favor of the so-called “Don’t Say Gay” bill, because it protects young kids from teachers trying to corrupt their minds and groom them into being sexual objects.
It’s because of the current state of public education that homeschooling has grown between 5.4% and 11% from March 2020 to September 2020, and 5 million American children, by the summer of 2021, were being homeschooled. Government schools are so putrid that concerned parents (who have been wrongfully labeled as “terrorists” simply for inquiring about their children’s education at PTA meetings, which definitely doesn’t help the Left here) are looking everywhere, even within their own homes, to give their kids a better education.
So yes, we are definitely trying to end public education as we know it, because public education as we know it is resolutely evil and corrupt. And we will never apologize for trying to protect our kids.
“But Jesus said, ‘Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.’”
The golden rule regarding Democrats is that the fake news media will always cover for them, particularly if they are a prominent figure within the party. Almost nothing short of blatant groping of women (at least getting caught for it) or outright murder will get Democrats into trouble with the fake news media (and this one is dubious, seeing as Ted Kennedy probably got away with it). So one would have to be a major screw-up of catastrophic proportions in order to be bashed by the Leftist fake news media.
And for the first time since the botched Afghanistan withdrawal, that’s what Brandon has had to face, at least from one source.
With inflation reaching 8.5%, the highest in 40 years (this comparison is often used to bash Reagan, but people forget that those levels were part of his RECOVERY from the double-digit inflation numbers seen during the Carter years) and wages effectively shrinking in comparison to inflation growth, more and more people are being open about their distaste for Biden (there are, of course, those who always lie in polls to protect themselves from Leftist persecution) and it’s being reflected in polling. So much so, in fact, that CNN is beginning to notice it.
In the latest CNN poll, the ghost hand-shaker is seeing approval of just 39%. This wouldn’t usually be too bad, but seeing as this is an extremely friendly poll, that 39% (which is a low in this poll) is terrible. Almost as friendly Quinnipiac University had him at an abysmal 33% approval.
These results have led to a CNN panel consisting of Bloomberg White House correspondent Jordan Fabian, CNN Capitol Hill reporter Melanie Zanona, and Time Magazine national political correspondent Molly Ball, with host Abby Phillip weighing in on such numbers.
Phillip said: “It’s an environment of overall discontent,” in relation to Republicans disapproving due to (among other things) poor economic policies, and environmentalist wackos disapproving due to Biden resuming the sale of oil and gas leases on federal land (ironically, the only thing I have ever approved of this illegitimate regime).
She continued: “People correctly perceive that he’s not in control of the situation. And I think ever since that Afghanistan last summer, people have had – voters overall – have not had a sense of leadership from the White House, have not had a sense that there’s a president in control, who is strong and consistent and knows what he’s doing and can project a consistent message from one day or the next.”
A few things to comment on here. First, notice that she added “correct” when talking about a perception that Biden isn’t in control of the situation. This indicates that even she is in agreement with the statement. Even a CNN panelist believes that Brandon is completely fumbling the bag here and cannot get a hold of any situation, from inflation to even messaging on Ukraine (which we’ll get to momentarily).
The second thing is that the American people haven’t had a sense of leadership from the White House not since the Afghanistan disaster, but since January 20th, 2021, namely in the hours before Biden successfully stole the presidency. We haven’t had a leader in the White House since Trump. The only difference between then and now is that even the Left is beginning to agree that Biden is not a leader.
Finally, it’s indicative of how big a failure Brandon is that even people on his own side, in a panel from one of the most Democrat-friendly fake news sources out there, are not only reporting how unpopular he is, but also don’t try to make excuses too much about it.
During the height of the Afghanistan botch, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, BBC News and others called it how it was: a disaster. By-and-large, they didn’t pull many punches against Biden. Matter of fact, I saw more CNN headlines lambasting Biden over that than from other sources. And this is awfully reminiscent of that time. The Afghanistan disaster was a spectacular botch, so much so that even fake news sources had little choice but to call him out on it.
This time, however, it’s not one particularly noteworthy botch or screw-up. It’s the culmination of them which have led to poor numbers even by CNN standards.
Molly Ball went on to talk about the inconsistent and botched messaging surrounding the war on Ukraine, saying that Biden continues to “step on his own messaging”, such as the time that Brandon heavily suggested that American troops would be sent to Ukraine, and that Putin “cannot remain in power”, suggesting forceful regime change in a world superpower which the Obama administration had been trying to be extremely friendly with.
Phillip then went on to share multiple clips of vulnerable Democrats in Congress distancing themselves from Brandon, to which Ball said that this should ring “alarm bells” for the occupier.
“It is a sign that they sense that there is nothing to be gained by continuing to be allies of the president,” Ball said. This is a sentiment which could not be found with Trump, even after the 2020 steal.
Of course, early on, many (though not all) RINOs made sure to distance themselves from Trump, but pretty much all conservatives in Congress or running for a Congressional seat sought his endorsement and wanted to be close to him. As time went on, with the obvious popularity of the MAGA movement, wolves dressed as sheep also sought to be endorsed by him (only to turn around and vote to impeach him for b.s. reasons) and even today, any Republican running, regardless of what they think or said about Trump in the past, is seeking his endorsement (which unfortunately, he is way too loose in giving).
Whereas Republicans seek Trump’s endorsement and close ties (even the ones who hate him), some Democrats seek to distance themselves from the man who supposedly won the most votes in American electoral history.
To conclude, the panel discussed his plummeting support from younger generations, which typically are the most Democrat-friendly demographic. Fabian argued that Brandon is losing support among millennials and Gen Z because he “hasn’t delivered” on campaign promises like canceling student loan debt, which could be an accurate assessment (alongside the Obama-like crappy economy). According to a recent Gallup poll, Biden is down 21% with Gen Z and 19% with millennials.
Fabian said: “Those numbers are a tremendous failure for a Democratic president to have numbers like that among young voters.”
Indeed, seeing as the youngest voters (aside from the literal infants) are those most recently indoctrinated by the Marxist centers for diseducation that we call colleges. When a Democrat president (or in this case occupier of the Oval Office) is seeing massive drops in support from young voters, that is another major indication of how poor a job he is doing.
Be it because of not canceling student loan debt or the crappy economy, young people are getting fed up with Brandon, as is the rest of the country.
Of course, we didn’t vote to elect him, and his approval was always low (given how, again, we didn’t elect him), but people, by-and-large tend to not be as honest as they would be in these polls if they didn’t have to fear Leftist persecution. Even the numbers we are seeing, regardless of source, I believe to be unnaturally high, and that his real approval numbers are far closer to the teens.
But let us not simply be content with these numbers now. The midterms are half a year away and they will certainly try to pull some shenanigans to avoid total disaster come November.
1 Peter 5:8
“Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.”
Disgusting: Macron Says He Is “Opposed To Self-Defense” After Farmer Defends Himself Against Burglars
Pardon my French, but I believe France could nowadays be classified as a s**thole country, like the ones President Trump had talked about some years ago. The reason I say this is because of the following irrational, irritating and infuriating situation:
Last week, a farmer had to defend himself, his THREE-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER, and his home from FOUR burglars between the hours of 10 p.m. and 11 p.m., with the farmer taking his gun and killing one of the burglars. While any reasonable person would obviously classify this as a case of self-defense, and therefore a legal shooting and killing, it’s obvious that France is looneyville in this day and age, and the farmer was charged with MURDER for shooting one of the men who broke HIS rights by illegally entering his home and attempting to ransack it AT BEST.
But that’s not the worst part, because seemingly, the country’s PRESIDENT is siding with the court in charging the man with murder and, effectively, siding with criminals altogether.
More specifically, he said the following about the event: “Everyone must be safe, and the public authorities have to ensure it. But I am opposed to self-defense. It’s very clear and undisputable because otherwise the country becomes the Wild West. And I don’t want a country where weapons proliferate and where we consider that it’s up to the citizens to defend themselves.”
You know who else doesn’t believe in the right to self-defense? Those who wish to violate other people’s rights. And it’s not like you can only make the inference that that’s what he means. He’s telling you, straight up, that you don’t have a right to defend yourself, at least in France.
It’s maddening and I simply have no words to describe how enraging this is. He’s saying that the farmer, who is the VICTIM in this circumstance, should’ve just ALLOWED the burglars to ransack his home, frighten his daughter, and perhaps do even worse things to them. All because France “shouldn’t be the Wild West.”
France’s police force is already having to tangle with not only radical Islamic terrorists that Macron keeps allowing in and allowing to form insurgency zones, but also enforcing whatever illegal and inhumane COVID mandates he still has imposed on the French populace. Macron says that the farmer should’ve simply called the police, which I’ve previously discussed could be detrimental as response time, particularly in bad areas, can be pretty bad. Not to mention that, if the burglars had still been there by the time the cops showed up, you immediately have a hostage situation, making things even worse.
In such scenarios, there are a million possible outcomes. That there were FOUR of them means that it really could’ve gone unimaginably worse than it actually did, especially as they chose to do that at night, meaning they were prepared to meet opposition and having to subdue the residents (most burglaries happen in daylight, when people are away from their homes). Allowing four men free reign over your home, when you have a three-year-old child with you would be to fail as a parent and would invite the worst of situations imaginable. But going so far as to charging the man who defended his family and his home with murder and then claiming, with no uncertain words, that you’re opposed to the concept of people defending themselves and those they care about, is to fail as a civilized society, as a country, and as an officeholder.
I already really didn’t like Fascist Macron because of the mandates and everything else, but this makes me outright DESPISE the man. Yes, not simply as a Leftist politician, but as a man.
Just what could be going on in his head that he thinks that way of thinking is in any way okay, let alone that he would feel comfortable SAYING IT OUT LOUD (though with the first round of the French elections just days away, I’m certain someone in his camp will tell him to backtrack those comments, but we all know how putridly he feels about his fellow man, let alone Frenchmen)?
I guess he’s never had to contend with the traumatic experience and severe violation of one’s home that is burglary. But perhaps even worse, he himself could be considered a criminal, as he views people defending themselves as erroneous and morally deplorable. What plans does he have for his countrymen that he thinks they shouldn’t be able to defend themselves?
The bit about the Wild West was nothing but an excuse and an attempt at demonizing the time and to fearmonger based on that demonization. The Wild West is considered a “lawless” time, but people conflate that with is being “justiceless.” The federal government had a much tougher time imposing federal law in those days, to the point it was practically nonexistent in the “Wild West.” But the Wild West still had towns and designated lawmen. Not to mention people had guns to defend themselves against injustice that may fall upon them.
The concept of a Wild West is not the anarchic hellhole that the Left wishes to make of it. People were a lot freer and could trust, at least, in themselves and their weapons. Take away those weapons and all you’d be left with is Detroit, Chicago, or France in 2022.
Again, with the French police being held up doing other things, they likely wouldn’t have shown up to the scene until it was far too late. Is that a better outcome than the legal and justified killing of a BURGLAR READY TO SUBDUE THE FARMER? Is it better for crime to succeed so long as France doesn’t become “the Wild West”? Because guess what, whatever idea you have of the Wild West, Mr. Macron, it’s what your country has become. A lawless and, truly, justiceless land if the farmer was charged with murder at any capacity for DEFENDING HIS FAMILY AND HOME.
Thankfully, the farmer was released from jail, but is still under judicial supervision. Whether this means the murder charge was lifted or not, I don’t know, but that the French justice system would find it appropriate to “keep an eye” on the VICTIM of burglary is damning for Baguetteland.
Wanna know who else believed French people shouldn’t be able to defend themselves? Literally Hitler when he took over half the country and installed a Fascist puppet to run Vichy France.
Who would’ve thought France in 2022 would become Vichy France once more?
I hope these fascists and indisputably evil people in office are soundly defeated now and forevermore.
1 Timothy 5:8
“But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”
Watch out, Zorro, your iconic symbol is being attacked and cancelled by a virtue-signaling mob pretending they are doing anything at all effective against Russia.
I’d like to pretend we live in a remotely sane world, which is why I do my absolute best to stay off of Twitter, but on occasion I am pulled back in like Michael Corleone to see the collective idiocy of the Left.
Following the cancellation of Yuri Gagarin and Russia as a whole in a “World’s Prettiest Tree” competition, the Left around the world is seeking to cancel the letter “Z”, because, apparently, it’s being linked with support for Russia’s actions against Ukraine.
This makes about as much sense as the claim that the number “88” is a secret code for white supremacists that means “heil Hitler” or something like that. But it’s not as though logic is a requirement for Leftist actions. If anything, it’d be a deterrent.
The letter is apparently so egregious that Germany will outright make it a CRIME to use the letter, and Ukraine called for the global “criminalization” of the letter, at least in the context of it being used to voice support for Russia (those claims that Ukraine was Nazified don’t seem so ridiculous after this and the dismantling of 12 whole political parties, only half of which could be said to be pro-Russia).
However, even with this supposed context, the letter is being entirely dropped by companies like Zurich Insurance Group (henceforth known as “Urich” Insurance Group. I joke, they really just dropped it from their logo, but the name is the same) and Samsung, who dropped the “Z” from their Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Galaxy Z Flip 3 foldable smartphones.
And Lithuania would even go so far as to punish individuals and businesses with 500 euro fines ($554.35) just for DISPLAYING the letter “Z”, utterly ignoring the context and simply punishing the use of the letter as a whole, even if those displaying the letter are against Russia as well.
Which is not only extremely moronic, but outright ironic, seeing as the last name of the Ukrainian president starts with a “Z”.
But this is just how low IQ these individuals and businesses are. They are willing to outright cancel a whole LETTER IN THE ALPHABET, if it’s for the purposes of virtue signaling and appearing as woke as possible.
Never mind the fact that the letter itself has millions of different uses, and that someone could display the letter Z without being supportive of Russia (like how the Russian cosmonauts weren’t supporting Ukraine just because of the color of their space suits), apparently, any and all uses of the letter must be forbidden.
“The Suite Life of Zack & Cody”? More like “The Suite Life of Ack & Cody.” New York Jets QB Zach Wilson, you’re gonna have to change your name, bud. Actress Zendaya, might wanna permanently make yourself Mary Jane.
What, are they also gonna change the name of Mt. Zion back to Mt. Moriah? Actually, they very well might do that.
Regardless, anyone with half a functioning brain would recognize how stupid it is to cancel a whole letter of the alphabet just for the purposes of standing in “solidarity with the Ukrainian people.” In reality, they are, of course, standing in solidarity with their bank accounts, as I’ve noted in a prior article.
I have no idea how this concept of the letter “Z” being used by pro-Russia people was fabricated, but as I’ve previously mentioned, it doesn’t have to make a lick of sense. They will go forth with what they think is best (for them) regardless of logic and evidence at any capacity.
This much has been proven over the last couple of years in particular, given their insistence of mandating things like lockdowns, masks, social distancing and vaccination, despite the fact that none of those things work and could, in fact, be outright detrimental to people (and have proven to be so).
At this point, nothing the Left does should really be surprising to me, and nothing they cancel ought to stun me at all, but it somehow does. They continue to outdo themselves in their stupidity and attempts to virtue signal.
Lord, let this madness end sooner rather than later.
“A worthless witness mocks at justice, and the mouth of the wicked devours iniquity.”
In the toughest and most gut-wrenching strike from the international community against mean ol’ Putin, organizers of the International European Tree Contest have banned Russia from participating in their Tree of the Year contest.
Take that, Vlad!
To add on to this joke of an attempt at literally useless virtue signaling, the event officials awarded the “prestigious” award to Poland, because Poland is helping Ukrainians flee their country.
Furthermore, they released a statement saying: “This move is not directed against ordinary Russian women and men. We appreciate all active citizens of the Russian Federation who strive for a free civil society and the protection of nature. However, we cannot stand idly by and watch the unprecedented aggression of the Russian leadership against a neighboring country. The exclusion of Russia from the competition is a step that must be understood in the context of international efforts to isolate Russia in order to stop the war.”
Boy, do I have a lot to say about this hilarious cancelation.
First, note that they mentioned women ahead of men towards the beginning. It’s not at all surprising that an environmentalist, Leftist wacko organization that literally just awards countries with “Tree of the Year” (in all likelihood as a front for some money laundering or other bribery actions, kind of like how Ukraine is known for laundering money and being massive Clinton, Biden and other Democrat donors) would be so “woke” as to say “women and men” when “men and women” is the far more common phrase.
Second, I find it hilarious that they call whatever they don’t like “unprecedented.” Just what’s unprecedented about one country invading another? Russia invaded Georgia and Armenia, and took Crimea in 2014, albeit without having to fight.
Before that, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Croatia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Albania, Romania, Iran, Finland, the Baltic states, Ukraine (1919), the Ottoman Empire, Galicia, Germany, etc. in reverse order. And that’s JUST in the case of Russia. Of course, many other countries have conducted invasions. In the 2000s alone, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, Ethiopia invaded Somalia, Comoros invaded Anjouan, Kenya invaded Somalia, Turkey invaded Syria; Senegal, Nigeria and Ghana invaded Gambia and the UAE invaded Yemen.
After World War II, China invaded Tibet (twice), France invaded Vietnam, Pakistan invaded India; Egypt, Jordan, Iraq and Syria invaded Israel, North Korea invaded South Korea, North Vietnam invaded South Vietnam, Iraq invaded Iran, Argentina invaded the Falkland Islands, Iran invaded Iraq, etc.
Before then, over literal millennia, countries have invaded other countries and particularly neighboring ones. Countries invading other countries is the most precedented thing in world history.
Lastly, I find it the most hilarious that they actually take themselves so seriously as to believe this is an effort to isolate Russia from the international community and would do even the most miniscule of things to stop war in Ukraine.
Either they could take lessons in humility from Narcissus or they are massive morons.
Do you really think Putin received news of this and thought “Man, this is getting out of hand. We’ve now been cancelled by hippy tree people from competing to see who has the prettiest tree! Clearly, this is a sign that what I’m doing is not very well received by people I already didn’t like nor respect. I shall put an end to this now, before we miss out on the ‘World’s Fanciest Hat’ award”?
What, exactly, would something like this practically achieve? Nothing, of course, but it’s not meant to achieve anything practical. Like I said, this is just useless virtue signaling to express support for the “current thing” the Left supports: Ukraine.
Granted, the Left only supports Ukraine because it’s a cash cow for them and they may or may not have very incriminating evidence of crimes against humanity in some of the biolabs in that country, but they’re still generally pushing for Russia to not be inside Ukraine anyway.
And the only reason people like the organizers of the “world’s prettiest tree” event do this isn’t to actually show support for a country under siege. They don’t care one wit about the plight of the Ukrainian people. They only do this to show support for their Leftist buddies to keep events like these going. If they didn’t do something this worthless and idiotic, they themselves would be on the other end of the ban hammer. They themselves would be the ones being canceled.
So, they do stupid crap like this to “stop the war” as if anyone would believe this does anything to achieve that.
With the way things are going, the next major war America and the West participate in will be a massive defeat (particularly since the American military will now be accepting those who weigh the same as a Bradley into their ranks) and very deservedly so.
I’d feel no sadness over the loss of a West which long abandoned God and worships the self, kills babies in cold blood and parades around the sexually abominable, and sends out ridiculous and useless virtue signals in fake shows of “support” that amount to literally nothing, all for the sake of a paycheck.
What a worthless culture this one is.
“Turn away from evil and do good; so shall you dwell forever. For the Lord loves justice; he will not forsake his saints. They are preserved forever, but the children of the wicked shall be cut off. The righteous shall inherit the land and dwell upon it forever.”
On April 12, 1961, the Soviet Union made history by sending the first man into space, a cosmonaut named Yuri Gagarin. For a long time after that, particularly after the space race ended, the Left made the joke that the Soviets won the space race but the U.S. “moved the goal-posts” by claiming reaching the moon was the true end-goal of the space race. Well, now, it seems cancel culture might ironically and inadvertently make the U.S. the retroactive winners of the space race.
You see, a U.S. space industry conference, The Space Foundation, renamed a fundraising party from “Yuri’s Night” to “A Celebration of Space: Discover What’s Next,” citing recent events as the reasoning for it.
Essentially, these people are trying to cancel Yuri Gagarin for no other reason than that he was Russian as a sort of political statement against the actions of the Russian government.
Obviously, for anyone with a positive IQ, this is utterly ridiculous and achieves nothing but the very erasure of history that (ironically, in this case) the Soviet Union and the CCP were/are known for. So it’s no surprise to see Russian Cosmonaut Andrey Borisenko taking issue with this, warning that “A fight with history has started.”
Arguably, this fight started long ago, and this is merely another battle in that overall fight, but there is no doubt that he is generally right. This is definitely a fight with history for no other reason apart from worthless virtue-signaling.
Borisenko went on to explain, “Yuri Gagarin is not only our history, [he] is global history. They are trying to erase world history from the memory of everyone on Earth.” He added, “Such actions are indefensible… I suspect that in other events that will be held in the near future, related to the coverage of space exploration, space flights, the mention of our country will also be erased.”
His suspicions are not unfounded, given cancel culture’s track history and the Left’s clear stance in opposition to Russia, which has only served as a scapegoat for them over the last couple of decades, and in particular in the last few years (Russian collusion hoax, anyone?).
If other space conferences were to cancel Gagarin, again, they would ironically make the U.S. the retroactive winners of the space race, since they’d be completely erasing the history of our then-enemies in said race.
And I doubt it would simply end with Gagarin, just as Borisenko suspects.
This whole shebang is just another in a series of moronic moves by the Left with relation to Russia and Ukraine. For example, the fake news media made the false suggestion that Russia cosmonauts boarded the ISS “wearing Ukraine’s colors” of yellow and blue. The BBC, Bloomberg, The Times, and NPR all made the suggestion that these Russians were “taking a stand against Putin and his war”.
As with all other things, this was b.s. from the fake news media, as mission commander Oleg Artemyev explained that the suits had been made six months prior to the mission (so LONG before this invasion), and noted that “Color is just color… It has nothing to do with Ukraine.”
Furthermore, to outright push back against the narrative the fake news media was trying to present with this (the narrative being that Putin and his actions are extremely unpopular even amongst Russians), Artemyev went on to say: “In these days, even though we are in space, we are together with our president and people!”
Such sentiment was seemingly shared by many Russians, who attended a huge Trump-like rally last Friday to express their support both for their president and country altogether (though the fake news media tries to claim this was a Soviet-style rally where people were forced to attend and cheer, once again signaling their utter hypocrisy, as well as just spewing opinions without facts as they could not verify if that was the case).
In any case, I find it rather amusing, if still annoying, that cancel culture would target the first man in space just because of his nationality, thereby erasing his and his country’s history and making the U.S., the country they generally hate the most, the de facto winners of the space race retroactively.
Hopefully, this will be undone some time soon, cancel culture be put to bed, and globalism utterly defeated and destroyed.
“I said in my heart, God will judge the righteous and the wicked, for there is a time for every matter and for every work.”
The Chinese coronavirus pandemic is pretty much over, but since the communists don’t want to face the consequences of their actions, they are trying to distract the world they decimated with the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Evidence of that is the fact that Pfizer, despite being persistent on sealing away the data they got on their toxic vaccines for 75 whole years, were forced to release their data now, practically in the shadows, as everyone else will be far more focused on Ukraine-Russia and the possibility for a larger conflict.
But I don’t intend to let these bastards get away with it, and neither should you. So, I will dedicate the rest of this article strictly to focusing on the adverse effects of the vaccine that they released in their data. Brace yourself, this might be a long one.
The PDF they released basically begins with explaining the timeline of them shipping their vaccines, which is from December 1st of 2020 to February 28th 2021.
In roughly those first 3 months of shipping their vaccines worldwide, there was a total of 42,086 case reports which contained 158,893 adverse events. Searching for times when the FDA recalled something medical, I found that in September of 2018, all ReGen Series products had to be recalled, “due to reported adverse reactions,” read the FDA’s website. It’s not specified what adverse reactions there were or their severity, but if ReGen products (not necessarily a vaccine, but still within the realm of medicine, so it’s applicable) had to be recalled due to reported adverse effects, why wouldn’t the Pfizer (and presumably the other vaccines also have similar issues) shot also be recalled?
Well, we all know why.
In any case, let’s get to the actual effects.
According to Pfizer’s data, in events reported in 2% or more cases, they found the following adverse effects:
And for those who might accuse me of trying to scare people with medical terms for relatively mild things, these are the terms that Pfizer used in their data. I literally had to look up these terms to define them.
Now, one might look at this list and say that it doesn’t look so bad. Sure, you don’t want any of these things to happen, but they are not exactly life-altering or life-ending things, by-and-large.
And that may, indeed, be the case. But we’re, unfortunately, just getting started. Those were the adverse effects listed by Pfizer. Now, here are the Adverse Effects of Special Interest (AESIs) listed by Pfizer:
Obviously, not all of these have the same chance of occurring within a vaccine-taker, but this is an extremely long list of adverse effects. For crying out loud, Pfizer even had to specify AEs of special interest, there were so many. And the bastards knew of this, likely for a very long time, and not only continued to ship these products, but still do so now.
More than 40,000 cases with nearly 160,000 adverse effects, many of which can either utterly change someone’s entire life, or END their entire life.
And this is JUST from Pfizer AND just from the first three months of data-gathering. What’s Moderna’s data looking like? Or Johnson & Johnson’s? Or any other vaccine manufacturer’s?
Pfizer alone recorded over 40,000 cases and nearly 160,000 adverse effects, and it’s generally considered (by pro-vaccine morons, at least) to be the most “effective” vaccine, and thus, is perhaps the most popular one. Are Moderna’s numbers fairly similar? Are, in actuality, over 100,000 cases and roughly 400,000 adverse effects across all the vaccines? What do the numbers look like today?
What’s the death toll of these butchers? How many lives have they ruined or ended as a result of their evil?
And for those who might try to argue that this is “just” from 2% or more of the reported cases, keep in mind that the world completely shut down and DEMANDED that it adhere to tyrannical dictatorships out of fear of a virus with a 0.007% mortality rate. Hell, even the originally thought 3.4% is around the percentage of events from the reported cases in Pfizer’s data.
The figures for the virus’s mortality rate are important and noteworthy to the point of subjugating entire countries, but the figures for the vaccine’s adverse effects (which are bigger than the virus’s mortality rate) are unimportant and should be ignored?
At the very least, by-and-large, you can recover from the virus far better than you could from what the vaccine will give you. Soccer players have either been forced into retirement or outright collapsed and died on the soccer field as a result of the vaccine. Athletes whom you’d think would have a better chance of fighting against the effects of the vaccine.
Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, everyone who was/is involved in the destruction of people should and will face the consequences of their actions.
“Evil men do not understand justice, but those who seek the Lord understand it completely.”
If There’s Nuclear War, U.S. Government Advises Wearing Masks And Social Distancing In Bomb Shelters
I am NOT making this up. In the event that nuclear catastrophe occurs, billions die and the world is actually destroyed by the hands of man, those who are lucky enough to find themselves inside nuclear shelters must remember to wear a mask and social distance if sharing such shelter with non-family members.
This is the unsurprising-for-this-regime’s priority in the case that Brandon screws up so badly that world leaders arbitrarily decide to call it a day for the human race. COVID is always the priority.
Now, to be fair, this isn’t utterly new advice. This has actually been on the website Ready.gov since November 11th, 2020, three days after our election began to be openly stolen.
For context, the website has advice on getting inside shelters and staying inside of them:
“Get inside the nearest building to avoid radiation. Brick or concrete are best.”
This is, of course, assuming you’ve survived the initial detonation to begin with.
“Remove contaminated clothing and wipe off or wash unprotected skin if you were outside after the fallout arrived. Hand sanitizer does not protect against fall out. Avoid touching your eyes, nose, and mouth, if possible. Do not use disinfectant wipes on your skin.”
“Go to the basement or middle of the building. Stay away from the outer walls and roof.”
So far, relatively sound advice, I’d presume. Don’t know how applicable this would be to most people, and I don’t doubt that radiation could eventually make its way to people even inside brick or concrete buildings, but in such a devastating event, there is little that really matters anymore. Either you’re dead or you’re screwed in a post-apocalyptic wasteland with irradiated water, crops, and animals, as it applies. But as sound as advice that may be, here comes the sadly embarrassing part: “Try to maintain a distance of at least six feet between yourself and people who are not part of your household. If possible, wear a mask if you’re sheltering with people who are not a part of your household.”
Now, I don’t know for sure, and searching “can viruses survive nuclear fallout” didn’t yield me any results, but I’m not so sure that the Chinese coronavirus would be able to survive nuclear war any more than humanity would.
Even if it does, it’s far from a priority in such an event, for crying out loud. Aside from the already well-known facts of its non-lethality and the uselessness of masks, whoever manages to survive a nuclear explosion isn’t going to be worried about catching this or any virus.
Well, maybe idiots in the Left coast would, but not anyone remotely sane. The virus isn’t an end-of-the-world event, nuclear war is. There are about a million other things you’d have to worry about before the darned Chinese coronavirus.
Things pertaining to survival such as finding and staying inside a bomb shelter that could actually withstand modern nuclear arsenal and fallout. Things like having a large enough food supply and stable water supply that is separate from other water which could become contaminated. Things like having weaponry and ammo to protect yourself against those who will inevitably revert to raiding. Things like being able to adapt to the new state of the planet and trying to rebuild humanity.
Only a stable society has the luxury to worry about pandemics.
This advice, of course, was picked apart and mocked online for its sheer stupidity. One political commentator wrote: “’Wear a mask in the event of a nuclear fallout’… from the same government who told kids to hide under a desk in case of a nuclear bomb.”
Which does bring up something interesting. Even back in the day, when we thought America was America, the U.S. government was pushing bullcrap on people. Everyone and their grandmother likely knew that a wooden desk in a school classroom would do absolutely nothing to protect the students in case of a nuclear detonation.
“Oh, but it was probably done to keep the kids calm and not worry”. First, it was called the “Red Scare” for a reason; it was scary. Kids were undoubtedly scared either way. Second, do you know how you can achieve that without lying to kids and looking like utter morons? Telling the kids to pray.
Supposedly, this was a more Christian country back in the day, so why not make that the number one advice for children?
Why not be upfront with them and say that if there is a nuclear explosion outside of our school, the desks won’t do anything to protect you, but God certainly will. Not necessarily on Earth, but most definitely in Heaven.
What/who would you rather trust? A shoddy wooden desk that has “Billy rulez and Stevie droolz” written on it with a pencil, or the Almighty God, Master of the Universe, Creator of Heaven and Earth?
If kids see a nuclear explosion outside their schools, they’re going to be deathly afraid anyway, so that advice is less than worthless. At that point, they might as well trust in the safety and warmth of God than in the insecure confines of their cold desks.
God should have always been the number one priority for this country, and the state it finds itself in is the result of failure to do so. Now, we have morons in elected and unelected offices who dictate that people should wear masks and MAINTAIN SIX FEET APART INSIDE NUCLEAR SHELTERS in the event of nuclear war.
Let us turn to Him once again that we may undo the societal damage that has been created by the unbelievers.
“He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will abide in the shadow of the Almighty. I will say to the Lord, ‘My refuge and my fortress, my God, in whom I trust.’”
We bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...