In the latter half of 2017, countless accusations against powerful people have come out, with some being utter b.s. *ahem* Moore *ahem* Trump *ahem*, while others are earth-shattering, such as Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey, George Takei and others.
Most recently, another accusation was made, this time about yet another Democrat: Sen. Al Franken. And not only is this just an accusation, there’s also tangible proof of the act.
As you can see from the picture above, Al Franken is seen groping a woman by the name of Leeann Tweeden, who is clearly asleep.
There’s more. Leeann also wrote a story on her local radio station’s website “790 KABC”, for which she works. The story is titled: “Senator Al Franken Kissed and Groped Me Without My Consent, And There’s Nothing Funny About It.”
Without seeing the picture, you might be confused as to why she mentions that last part, about it not being funny. Of course it’s not funny. Sexual assault isn’t funny… well, to the normal person.
As you can see, Al Franken is not only groping her breasts, but he’s also smiling at the camera, as though to say “Yeah, I know what I’m doing and I don’t really care.”
Leeann gives us the context to the situation. She begins with: “In December of 2006, I embarked on my ninth USO Tour to entertain our troops, my eighth to the Middle East since the 9/11 attacks… Also on the trip were country music artists Darryl Worley, Mark Wills, Keni Thomas, and some cheerleaders from the Dallas Cowboys. The headliner was comedian and now-senator, Al Franken. Franken had written some skits for the show… Like many USO shows before and since, the skits were full of sexual innuendo geared toward a young, male audience…”
“Franken said he had written a part for me that he thought would be funny… When I saw the script, Franken had written a moment when his character comes at me for a ‘kiss’. I suspected what he was after, but I figured I could turn my head at the last minute, or put my hand over his mouth, to get more laughs from the crowd.”
She then writes that Franken insisted that they rehearse the “kiss”. Not once, but multiple times. He continued to badger her to rehearse the scene and she began to feel uncomfortable. Eventually, she said “ok”.
According to Leeann: “We did the line leading up to the kiss and then he came at me, put his hand on the back of my head, mashed his lips against mine and aggressively stuck his tongue in my mouth… I felt disgusted and violated.”
Yeah, I bet. For someone of his caliber to force himself on anyone is a disgusting thought.
She then details that after the incident, she decided against telling the Sergeant Major of the Army, the person who sponsored the tour. She decided against telling anyone of importance. According to her, she did tell “a few others on the tour”, but it’s unlikely that they were anyone of importance. Just people who were there for her when she needed them.
Leeann then writes that after the incident, she avoided Franken as much as she could. No one can blame her… well, except Franken, I guess. According to Leeann, Franken “repaid me with petty insults, including drawing devil horns on at least one of the headshots I was autographing for the troops. But he didn’t stop there.”
When the tour was over and they were heading back to the U.S., “After 2 weeks of grueling travel and performing I was exhausted. When our C-17 cargo plane took off from Afghanistan I immediately fell asleep, even though I was still wearing my flak vest and Kevlar helmet. It wasn’t until I was back in the US and looking through the CD of the photos we were given by the photographer that I saw this one:…”
At this point, she shows the picture above.
“I couldn’t believe it. He groped me, without my consent, when I was asleep.”
She then writes that she wanted to scream out to the world what Franken had done to her, but that she was afraid at the time. Afraid of the potential backlash and damage done to her career as a broadcaster. But she also says that now, she’s no longer afraid. That she had debated in her mind whether or not to go public. Whether it’d be worth telling her story. That finally, she decided it WAS worth it.
Now, why did I title this article “Why Democrats Will Never Hold The Moral High Ground On Anything”? Because I believe that one of the reasons the Left is throwing Bill Clinton under the bus is because they want the moral high ground when it comes to accusing conservatives such as Roy Moore of sexual assault.
The Left believes that if they apologize for excusing Bill’s behavior, they will be rectified and be free to accuse conservatives of this stuff without the constant reminder that they were ok with Bill doing his intern.
But it’s stories like these the reason as to why they will never hold the moral high ground on anything. They have set up a new rule of “always believing the women accusing men of sexual assault.” The Left can’t go back on that after doubling down on it against Moore. They would have to either abandon Al Franken or be called hypocrites again for defending him.
I honestly don’t think they’d do the latter, because there’s clear photographic evidence of his misdeeds, not just an accusation.
But even if they do abandon Franken, their problem doesn’t end there. At the beginning of the article, I mentioned the likes of Weinstein, Takei, Spacey, and such. Of course, that’s a small percentage of Leftists who have been accused of sexual assault.
Do you wanna know why the Democrats will never hold the moral high ground on anything? BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO MORAL GROUND TO COVER! Morality is a total joke to them. Or at least something for them to mold to their liking.
The fact that they WANT full-grown men to have the right to enter women’s restrooms shows you what kind of morals they have. The fact that they WANT women to have the right to kill their own unborn children in the name of “healthcare” shows you what kind of morals they have. The fact that Hollywood makes movie after movie depicting a woman being a sex object and nothing else shows you what kind of morals they have. The fact that the Hollywood men such women work with are likely to ASSAULT THEM sexually and try to keep it a secret shows you what kind of morals they have.
They have no morals. That’s just what happens when you not only shut Christ out of your life, but you also make fun of Him and His followers. Morality, conscience, much like everything else in this world, comes from God.
Evil, sin, these things come from Satan. A fallen angel without morals. Without a sense of decency. Democrats are much like him.
Look at today’s society. It’s the direct result of Democrat brainwashing children in schools and people using t.v., or other entertainment media.
Look at any show on Netflix’s or Hulu’s lineup and I dare you to find one righteous show. One show where the characters don’t talk about sex half the time. One show where they show a family going to church, praying and worshipping the Lord.
The closest thing I can think of a “righteous” show is “Blue Bloods”, but even that show has been going less and less Christian. In a show about a family of Catholic police officers in New York City, you’d expect them to be shown praying (something which they have done a maximum number of once in the latest season) and thanking the Lord not just for the food they are about to eat, but for keeping them safe in one of the most dangerous cities in the country.
My point is that today’s society is not very morally sound. A good character is attacked while evil is appreciated to near levels of worship.
The Democrats will never hold the moral high ground on anything because they’re too evil and wicked to hold something like that over anyone else. And when I say “Democrats” I of course mean all of the Left. I include Establishment Republicans as well because they’re no better.
The only time Evil will hold the moral high ground will be during Armageddon. During the fulfilment of the prophecies in the Book of Revelation. And that’s only because by that point, Christians will no longer be on Earth. They will be in Heaven. Earth will be populated by these kinds of people.
Democrats will never hold the moral high ground because God and God alone occupies it. And no one can ever take that away from Him.
“’Listen to me, you who know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear not the reproach of man, nor be dismayed at their revilings. For the moth will eat them up like a garment, and the worm will eat them like wool; but my righteousness will be forever, and my salvation to all generations.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Over this past week or so, I’ve gone back and forth calling the Left either sick or amusing. That’s because, while most of the time they’re sick, there are times when they’re simply amusing. How they react to certain things such as shootings and terror attacks have been the main focus whenever I talk about them being amusing. Well, these Democrat victories in Virginia, New Jersey and New York are just as amusing.
“How is it amusing if Democrats win elections?”, you may be wondering. Well, consider what elections they’ve won. Democrats won in Virginia, New Jersey and New York in 2016. They won again this year... what a shocker.
And the amusing part is that they’re pretending this is a major victory. One writer in the New York Times titled his article: “Virginia Rejects Your Hateful Politics, Mr. Trump.”
The article begins: “Ralph Northam’s election as Virginia governor amid reportedly high turnout on Tuesday is a stinging and welcome rebuke to President Trump and white nationalism.”
Ok, what’s white nationalism got to do with anything here? This person is simply trying to use the typical Leftist tactic of tying a Republican with something they deem as “bad”. Regardless, this is honestly an intriguing and amusing article.
The article continues: “Having been nearly vanquished in the primary by Corey Stewart, an anti-immigrant conspiracy theorist who played on issues like preserving Confederate monuments, Mr. Gillespie (the loser of the gubernatorial election), at the advice of Republican leaders, took up race-baiting. His ads, featuring menacing tattooed men, accused Mr. Northam of being ‘weak on MS-13’ the gang formed by Central American immigrants in Los Angeles that now threatens Virginia suburbs…”
So they’re accusing Gillespie of race-baiting? Sure! It’s not like Democrats don’t play the race card whenever they deem it advantageous!
What? The Democrats ran an ad that featured a menacing-looking, black pick-up truck with a Confederate flag in the back and with a Gillespie bumper-sticker that appears to be hunting down and attempting to run over Hispanic children? Well… uhh… what does that have to do with race-baiting?
Honestly, it’s like the Left sometimes ANNOUNCES their hypocrisy.
But do you want to know what else is funny? Even the writer slams the Democrat victor to an extent. At one point, the article says: “Mr. Northam was a lackluster campaigner in his own right. Despite mountains of post-2016 evidence that Democrats need to present voters with an inclusive and compelling economic message, he didn’t hone his own until late in the race. Then, he lost support from the progressive wing of his party after he seemed to suggest he’d oppose sanctuary cities and, at the request of unions, omitted Justin Fairfax, his African-American running mate in the lieutenant governor’s race, from the campaign pamphlets.”
Right, three things stand out here: that “inclusive and compelling economic message” part, the part about Northam supposedly opposing sanctuary cities, and that racist act of omitting the African-American running-mate from the pamphlets. Let’s go over each one.
First, the “inclusive and compelling economic message”. Right, what exactly would that entail? An economy that works for everyone? That’s what a capitalist economy is for. That’s what we have. Everyone that has the drive to work and work very hard can become successful. Those who don’t want to do anything are the ones who are not successful. Not even in a socialist economy.
Next, the supposed “opposing sanctuary cities” part. This one is actually pretty interesting. You see, Gillespie ran “an ad that claimed Northam cast a deciding vote on Feb. 22 in favor of sanctuary cities”, according to the Daily Signal. However, Mark Krikorian said that Northam’s stance on immigration changed after that ad: “[Since] Gillespie’s ads criticizing MS-13 and sanctuary cities, Northam has now flipped and said that if some city did declare it a sanctuary, he would act to stop it if he were governor.”
Of course, this is just one guy talking. I mean, who even is this guy, anyway? Mark Krikorian, according to the Daily Signal, is an “executive director at the Center for Immigration Studies, a nonpartisan immigration research organization.”
Right, that’s fine and dandy, but just because this guy says something doesn’t make it true… unless Northam himself confirms it. You see, according to the Richmond-Times Dispatch: “In an interview… with the Norfolk TV station WAVY, Northam said for the first time that, under certain circumstances, he would sign a bill similar to the one he voted against this year, a vote that spawned a wave of ominous ads from the Gillespie campaign linking Northam to the Latino gang MS-13. ‘If that bill comes to my desk… I sure will. I’ve always been opposed to sanctuary cities. He knows that,’ Northam said of Gillespie…”
Well, that changes things. That makes me somewhat more ok with the Democrat’s victory… if he sticks to those beliefs, that is. And since what he said makes me somewhat happier, that can only make the Left somewhat less happy. I guess that’s equivalent exchange for you. My happiness about his victory rose after finding this out, and the Left’s happiness somewhat must’ve declined.
Don’t get me wrong, he’s still a Democrat and he’ll likely still vote according to what his Democrat overlords want done in Virginia. But still, this at least puts somewhat of a smile on my face after Democrat victories.
Lastly: omitting his African-American running mate from the pamphlets. Need I say more?
Now, you’ve seen the title of this article. Why is it sad for Democrats to have won in Virginia, New Jersey and New York? Because they’re pretending this is a major victory and an indicator to how 2018 will go.
They’re acting the exact same way they would’ve acted if they had won in Georgia and Montana. They would write articles that say “State X rejects your hateful politics, Mr. Trump.”
Even the NYT article I’m talking about touts this victory as something more than it really is.
The article ends with: “Mr. Gillespie’s choice to lay his principles on the altar of Trumpism made Mr. Northam’s win doubly important, as a triumph over the politics of racial division, and as a lesson for other Republicans tempted to adopt Mr. Trump’s vile tactics as their own.”
Right, of course this guy’s gonna say something like that. This Democrat win is a shocker to exactly no one. Virginia voted Democrat in 2016. They clearly didn’t learn their lesson and voted Democrat again this year. But it’s sad for them to pretend this expected victory is anything more than it really is.
A Democrat won in New Jersey - who didn’t see that coming? De Blassio was reelected as mayor of New York City - what a surprise. Virginia voted for a Democrat - I’m so shocked.
Let’s not forget that these states have been true-blue for ages. And let’s not forget REPUBLICANS WON IN GEORGIA AND MONTANA - two states where the Democrats expected landslide victories, but were absolutely destroyed in the results.
Let them believe this small victory will lead to anything more. And let them believe that this small victory should be a warning to other Republicans. The guy says this is a “lesson for other Republicans tempted to adopt Mr. Trump’s vile tactics as their own”. Vile tactics, you say? You mean how he partially funded a fake Russian dossier about his opponent… oh, wait, that was Hillary. Or maybe when he paid women to accuse his opponent of sexual harassment and assault… oh, wait, Hillary again. Oh! How about when he paid for the answers to debate questions? No, wait, that was also Hillary.
But I see what this person is writing about. He’s trying to get Republicans to not adopt Trump’s agenda and policies as their own. Hmmm, I wonder why that is. Maybe because HIS AGENDA AND POLICIES ARE VASTLY POPULAR WITH THE MAJORITY OF THE COUNTRY AND WOULD LEAD TO MOST REPUBLICANS WINNING IN MOST STATES?!
Regardless, the Democrats can have their small celebration. Their small victories. Meanwhile, the rest of the country will continue to vote for people who will passionately seek to Make America Great Again.
“But they who wait for the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings like eagles; they shall run and not be weary; they shall walk and not faint.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Whenever a shooting occurs, people tend to focus on being sympathetic towards the victims and their families… unless they’re Republicans, I guess.
Now, I don’t know whether the victims of the shooting were Republicans and Trump supporters, but that really doesn’t matter. However, to one particular Leftist woman, the fact that they may have been Republicans means that she has no sympathy over their deaths whatsoever.
According to the Daily Caller: “A top legal executive at CBS, Hayley Geftman-Gold said she ‘is not even sympathetic’ for the victims of the shooting at a country music festival…” Hayley had said: “If they wouldn’t do anything when children were murdered, I have no hope that Repugs will ever do the right thing. I’m actually not even sympathetic because country music fans often are Republican gun toters.”
Wow, what a special lady, huh? Now, she clearly references Sandy Hook here... or maybe she references the 58 million dead babies since Roe v. Wade. Ah, wait. Nope, hold on. She's a Leftist. Right. They don't show remorse about THOSE dead children, do they? Forgot.
And she says that taking guns away from people is “the right thing”. There’s not a single law that could’ve prevented what happened in Vegas. There’s not a single law that would’ve prevented Paddock from killing 59 and injuring over 500 others. Know why? BECAUSE IT’S ALREADY ILLEGAL TO DO EVERYTHING HE DID!
You can’t own an automatic weapon in this country. According to reports, the weapon he used was converted to fully auto, but guess what? THAT’S ILLEGAL TOO! Purchasing/owning a fully automatic weapon is entirely ILLEGAL for civilians. There already are gun control laws about the weapons he used, and yet, he massacred 59 people and wounded 500 more.
But that’s not the topic of this particular article. I’ve already written an article explaining why it doesn’t make sense to attack the 2nd amendment, and I’ve already explained my points thoroughly in that article. The topic of this article is the insensitivity, bigotry and hatred of the Left. This woman feels absolutely nothing for the victims of the shooting, but only as long as they are assumed Trump supporters.
No doubt she’d be crying if the victims were Democrats. But since there is a chance that there was a mixed political crowd, no doubt she would only cry for the Democrats slaughtered there, and not shed a single tear over the Republican deaths.
This is simply more identity politics, only in a twisted way. This particular Leftist’s message is: don’t cry for the deaths of Trump supporters, for they are your enemy. No doubt she was sad about the terror attack in an Orlando night club, since the victims were gay people. But if the victims are her political enemies? Forget about it. Not a single tear shed for them.
Leftists don’t feel sympathy for Right-wingers. I even saw one Twitter user (whose identity will remain private for their safety) tweeting: “I honestly want every single Trump supporter dead. This isn’t a tweet for attention. If you support Trump, I want you 6 feet in the ground.” Gee, love you too, friend.
But this is what I’m talking about. Could you imagine if any conservative person said that of Leftists? The FBI would storm into their home in a heartbeat! This person clearly has no sympathy for the victims of the Vegas shooting either, since they just so happened to have tweeted that the day after the shooting.
The Left is inherently evil and sick. They want evil things to happen to people they disagree with and pretend as though they are in the right. They pretend they are sympathetic and open-minded about everyone, when they’re not. They are close-minded bigots. If you disagree with them in any way, you become less than a person to them immediately.
If it’s confirmed that Trump supporters were, indeed, targeted at the Vegas shooting, one of two things will happen: 1) either the media will immediately stop talking about it, or simply slow down the talks about it, or 2) they will blame it all on Trump and supporters for “getting themselves killed”.
I’ve already seen Jimmy Kimmel blame Trump and Republicans for this. In his show, Kimmel said: “they should be praying for God to forgive them for letting the gun lobby run this country.” So he’s already blaming Trump, and he definitely won’t be the last one to do so. They don’t blame Islamic terrorism when a terrorist attack happens, but they blame the NRA and Republicans when a shooter (who is almost always a Democrat) kills people.
They want to take guns away from law-abiding citizens when someone that will not obey the law breaks it. They miss the common sense point that if a bad guy wants to get a gun HE WILL GET ONE NO MATTER HOW DIFFICULT! There is such a thing as the black market. There is such a thing as BREAKING THE LAW TO GET THINGS THAT ARE ILLEGAL! It’s the same principle as a drug addict: if a drug addict wants to get a drug, he will get one, no matter what.
They pretend to have compassion when they wholly lack it. Kimmel actually cried when he gave the message that he wanted people’s guns taken away. He pretended he had any sort of compassion within him, but the message he gave out would cause only more deaths and heart-break in this country.
AEI (American Enterprise Institute), a “conservative think tank” as described by Google, published an article about the number of homicides occurred by guns from 1993 to 2013 and the number of gun ownership in that same timespan.
The article shows that Gun Homicide Rate has gone down 49% in that 20 year timespan, and that gun ownership has gone up by 56% in that same timespan. They explain that an increase in gun ownership seems to be correlated to the decrease in homicide rate using a firearm. They also explain the fact that “the number of privately owned firearms in U.S. increased from about 185 million in 1993 to 357 million in 2013.”
This means that if more people have guns, the less likely people will try to kill someone else with a gun. That won’t stop them completely, but it’s clear that if there are more people with guns out there, bad people will be more hesitant to try and kill people. Because it doesn’t make sense to try to mass murder people who are likely armed themselves.
So it’s safer for people to own guns than for them to be taken away, and yet, Jimmy Kimmel and the Left want guns to be taken away from people? That’s, factually and realistically speaking, very insensitive and devoid of any sort of compassion for your fellow man.
But alas, the Left doesn’t run on facts. They run solely on emotion. “One bad person killed people with an illegal gun, so guns should be illegal!” “The world is on fire, so we have to pass laws and regulations that screw businesses to keep the world from getting too hot or too cold, we haven’t decided yet.”
For all the emotion the Left uses to drive its agenda, they sure are devoid of any of it when it comes to the deaths of their opposition.
“’But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you’”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Gee, you think? The Mainstream Media paints a false portrait of Trump’s image for America. They think that nearly everyone and their grandmothers hate Trump and are progressive. In reality, however, many people love Trump (over 60 million people, I might add) and are not progressive socialists. They may not all be super conservative, but they have all seen what “progressivism” has done to the country in the 8 years of Obama and they don’t like it.
The Hill published an article on September 29th, talking about how all the negative attacks on Trump might not be a good strategy, particularly for the 2018 mid-term elections. “Dem addiction to Trump attacks gives party cause for concern” is the title for the article. The article begins: “Democrats are linking Republican gubernatorial candidates to President Trump in New Jersey and Virginia, two states won by Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in last year’s presidential election where the attacks could drive base voters to the polls.”
“But some Democrats are concerned about their party’s strategy. Even if Democrats win the two contests, they say it could give the party a false sense of confidence that attacking Trump is the best way to win the House and Senate in 2018”. Right, and here’s the thing: linking Republican candidates to Trump can only work in a certain few places. Yes, this could work in New Jersey and maybe even Virginia, but this certainly won’t work everywhere else, and it seems as though people are beginning to notice.
And what are they noticing? That Trump is popular and well-liked by many, many people. I know, that’s completely crazy if you’re a Leftist. That very thought is insane, but it’s the truth. It’s as true today as it was throughout 2016, before and after the election.
So when I see the Left linking candidates to Trump, to me, that’s a good thing. Now, not everyone they’re linking to Trump is legitimately going to be a conservative or pro-Trump guy. But when I see them using that particular strategy, it gets me to want to look into those people to see if they truly would want to Make America Great Again and if they could work alongside the President to reach that end.
But the article is entirely right in the concept that, even if the Democrat candidates win in those states, it would give them a false sense of confidence for the mid-term elections. Every single time this past year that there’s been a special election, the MSM’s narrative would be “If the Republican guy loses, it means that Trump has lost support and the Democrats are on a fast track to winning back Congress in 2018.” And when Democrats end up losing, their narrative “switches” to “this election meant nothing, but since the difference was barely double digits, it means that Trump is losing support and Democrats are on a fast track to winning back Congress in 2018.”
They refuse to believe that Trump is well-liked. Now, Virginia is technically part of the South, which is very much pro-Trump, so I’m not entirely sure that the Democrat candidate is THAT likely to win there. But New Jersey is largely liberal, and their outgoing governor (who endorsed Trump) was wildly unpopular in his state. So I wouldn’t be too surprised if the Democrat candidate wins in New Jersey.
But the fact remains that the media will make that potential victory a far bigger deal than it really would be. And if the Republican guy wins, they would make HIS victory a far lesser deal than it really would be. But still, the Left, if the Democrats win, would falsely believe that Trump is losing support at an ugly pace and that Congress is theirs in 2018. Reality, however, is very different.
We The People voted for and elected Donald Trump to the White House in 2016. Since then, Congress has been nothing but useless to help Make America Great Again, because they DON’T want to Make America Great Again. They want to make America THEIRS again. They want to Make America THE GOVERNMENT’S Again. And We The People completely abhor that idea. We The People will be looking to elect anti-establishment, conservative, pro-America and pro-Trump people to Congress.
We The People want Congress to help Trump Make America Great Again by passing legislation that would immediately begin construction for the Wall, repeal Obamacare and generally do things we wanted them to do for Trump’s first 2 years in office.
So when I see the MSM writing articles that say “Democrats attacking Trump all the time might be a bad idea”, I just have to roll my eyes and say: “Duh!”
Among the reasons they state that Clinton lost to Trump was because her campaign focused too much on being negative against him. Well, can you blame them? CLINTON WAS AN INSANELY FLAWED CANDIDATE! She was (and still is) viewed as a crook. SHE STILL IS ONE! She was viewed as someone you wouldn’t trust to take care of your PENCIL, let alone the country. Her campaign focused on being negative towards Trump because THEY SIMPLY HAD NOTHING TO WORK WITH TO BE POSITIVE ABOUT HER!
The only thing she had going for herself (and was basically her only selling point to people) is that she’s a woman. And if elected, she would be the first woman president. But that alone isn’t enough to win elections, and she was good for nothing else, so she had to continuously attack her opponent because there was nothing good about her to sell to people.
But that’s merely ONE of the MANY reasons she lost. She also lost because people were getting frustrated and tired of seeing their country be reduced to an ever-apologizing joke of a country in front of the world. Because they were tired of seeing their country be less than it possibly could be. They wanted to see America prosper, but no Democrat wants to do that.
Trump is working his butt off to Make America Great Again and people love that about him. So when Democrats try to attack him, his support grows, rather than diminish. When they say that he’s a failure because he couldn’t pass significant legislation in his first year so far, we come to his aide to point out that it’s CONGRESS’ fault for not helping HIM!
And wanna know what? His support has only INCREASED since he took office. I remember Mark Levin being an anti-Trump person during the campaign, but he’s since realized his mistake and realized that Trump is entirely dedicated to Making America Great Again. So Trump has gained the support of former “Never Trumpers” like Mark Levin, who also happens to be a patriot. There are many more patriots that have since began to support Trump after seeing the great things he’s done for this country without the help or support of Congress.
And I’m sure they will look to vote for people that will help the President to improve the country at a far faster rate. So of course attacking Trump unceasingly would harm the Democrat party. They aren’t attacking an unpopular president. On contraire, they are attacking a VERY POPULAR President. That being said, I do hope they continue attacking Trump. If it harms them to no end, I say let them do as they please.
The Left continues to lose support and Trump continues to gain it. If Democrats think they can win by simply being against Trump, then fine. Let them think that. The results will only prove them wrong.
“The fruit of that righteousness will be peace; its effect will be quietness and confidence forever.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Comedy titan Mel Brooks said in an interview with BBC 4 recently that political correctness is leading to the ‘dead of comedy’. Mel Brooks, best known for comedies such as “Blazing Saddles” and “The Producers” has profited from political incorrectness for more than 50 years. This is a man who has taken risks, and succeeded, in satirizing racism.
Brooks said ‘We have become stupidly politically correct, which is the death of comedy […] It’s not good for comedy’. He added. ‘Comedy has to walk a thin line, take risks. Comedy is the lecherous little elf whispering in the king’s ear, always telling the truth about human behavior.’
Brooks is not the only comedian to speak up against political correctness. Not long ago Jerry Seinfeld complained about how political correctness is hurting humor too.
In a world where snowflakes cannot conceive the idea of sharing a college campus with students who don’t agree with their liberal viewpoints, the fact that a Hollywood legend like Brooks – hardly a conservative – is speaking out against political correctness is certainly refreshing.
We’re becoming a country where you can’t tell a joke of why the chicken crossed the road without a group of snowflakes complaining about your insensitivity towards chickens and how hard it is for them to cross a road! Next thing you know, college authorities form ‘Chicken Rights’ offices, create ‘Sensitivity Towards Chickens’ lectures and fire any college professor who dares tell a joke about the oppressed bird…
It’s ridiculous, I know. But that’s who we’re becoming.
We are raising an entire generation of people who have no idea how to deal with opposing views, debate in a civil manner and live in a world where Kim Jong Un massacres his own people and threatens the rest of us. They complain about WORDS when they should start figuring out how to STOP GENOCIDE.
These snowflakes will be eaten alive by the few millennials who were not raised this way. Sink or swim, as they say – they will sink.
Obviously, it’s all by design – there’s nothing the Left wants more than having more people dependent on government. Slaves who will vote them into office without the need of violence. Like Hugo Chavez was voted into office so many times by the very people he and his Leftist friends indoctrinated.
Comedy, much like any other talent, is a GOD GIVEN talent. People like Mel Brooks have made a fortune by doing what they were created to do. In fact, the JOY that comes from using your talents and making a living from them is a privilege that only a few people are able to realize. Most people live OK lives with jobs they dread. But when you do what God has created you to do, life becomes more joyful.
And yet, the Left is determined to destroy that. The Left is on a mission to make YOU miserable. Not only are you not able to tell jokes or say ‘Merry Christmas’, but you’re also to watch every word you say, exercise self-censorship and scream whenever somebody says something you can claim offended you. The Left is on a mission to ENSLAVE you to whatever THEY say you should FEEL and THINK.
You have a talent for jokes? You better use it against Trump!
You have a talent for music? You better use it against Trump!
You have a talent for writing? You better use it against Trump!
The truth is political correctness is not just killing comedy – it’s killing free speech. Again, it’s all by design. To the extent you fit in the liberal box the Left wants to put you in, you are fine. But you step outside of it, and they crush you. It’s, obviously, about control.
But don’t be afraid, my friend. The reality is that, whether you believe it or not, only God is in control. God either ordains or allows everything that happens – and He has a reason for everything. If you don’t believe in God, I’m afraid it doesn’t make this statement any less true. God is still in control whether you believe in Him or not.
And God has given these artists gifts. We all have gifts that we should use.
'Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows.'
Author: Danielle Cross
An article on TheHill.com caught my interest recently. You can see why with the title alone: “Liberal unrest threatens Dem immigration strategy.”
You don’t typically see Democrats opposing Democrats, or at least being divided on an issue. Even when they run for their Party’s nomination, they tend to agree on nearly everything, with the only disagreement being on how intensely they should pursue something. So to see an article that says there are people on the Left that don’t agree with Democrats is quite strange and interesting.
You might remember that, recently, Nancy Pelosi was heckled by “immigrants’ rights activists” who want Democrats to pass a “clean” Dream Act while also protecting the other 10 million illegals living in the country.
They heckled her and called her a liar when she said she was on their side (which she is) and believed she was betraying them by cutting a deal with Trump, chanting “all of us or none of us!” Gee, you’re really making this a tough decision, huh?
Those hecklers truly didn’t know that Nancy Pelosi is on their side and wants what they want. Trust me, she wishes Democrats didn’t have to try to negotiate with Trump. But here's the interesting part...
According to The Hill: “Some activists have been brought into the Democratic Party umbrella and agree with the need for negotiation… Others fear a deal between Trump and top Democrats would spare Dreamers while ‘kicking ICE into overdrive’ in persecution of other undocumented immigrants. Among that second group are activists who would rather accept new border-wall construction – a non-starter for the Democrats – than funding that could be used to hire more (ICE) agents.”
So it’s clear that there are two groups of immigrant activists: those who want Democrats to make a deal with Trump that would protect Dreamers and those who would rather ACCEPT BUILDING THE WALL than risk ICE hunting them down and deporting them.
“’A wall isn’t ICE, a wall doesn’t walk into your home and drag you out by your *expletive* hair’”, according the The Hill.
Man, I never thought I’d see immigrants be willing to give Trump the wall if it means that THEY get to stay here and not worry much about ICE. But here’s the strange part: while a Wall definitely takes a lot of money to fund, it likely won’t take away funding for ICE. Yes, ICE wouldn’t be heavily funded if a Wall is built, but it’s still a threat to illegals.
But I guess they have to deal with the cards they’ve been dealt. It’s either allow Trump to build a Wall and not have ICE super funded and super powerful to deport a whole lot of them or make a deal that just protects DACA recipients, doesn’t protect the rest and ICE gets funding that otherwise would’ve gone to the Wall.
I would feel sorry for them if they weren’t criminals. I would feel sorry for them if they weren’t looking to pay for their crimes one way or another.
But these kinds of things typically go ignored or unnoticed by the MSM. As did the overwhelming majority of support for Trump over Hillary, the media chooses to ignore the fact that there’s internal struggles within their own party and even their BASE!
However, that really shouldn’t come as such a big surprise. We all saw just how truly divided the Democrat base was in the primaries. Bernie Sanders was clearly better liked than Clinton, but the DNC never gave him or anyone else the chance to be the Democrat candidate for the 2016 election. And it’s clear that there were plenty of (registered) Democrats who wound up not voting at all because Hillary was so unlikable or simply because they were pissed that the DNC screwed Bernie over.
So there has been evidence of Democrats being divided, but they are not typically divided on ISSUES. While you see every single day that Republicans are worthless and are heavily divided on issues such as Obamacare and tax reform, Democrats tend to stick together. But, then again, all Democrats are Establishment (and the Establishment is communist), so they all know what way to vote.
But it’s entirely different to see people outside the Establishment divided on an issue, as opposed to a candidate. Sure, they will prefer one candidate over another, but they typically all agree on issues. They are typically either communists or dangerously misinformed. But here, you can see at least two sides within Democrats.
One side would rather try to strong-arm Trump (a tactic that simply won’t work) into protecting Dreamers and giving up on the Wall, and the other side would rather allow Trump to build the Wall, knowing that ICE won’t then be heavily funded to “mass deport” millions of illegals.
And it’s truly interesting to see this. Mostly because we’ve mostly been talking about Trump and HIS base and supporters and how THEY feel about a deal with the Democrats. But we have not payed attention to the Democrat base, largely because we thought they were all on the same page. I certainly didn’t expect Pelosi to get heckled by people that she agrees with and is on the same side with.
Heck, I even remember the time when Bernie Sanders was heckled at a campaign stop by Black Lives Matter people, even though he is on their side as well. So it’s clear that there is at least SOME division within the Democrat base.
And do you want to know what else is interesting? We (conservatives and Trump supporters) aren’t divided. The media will tell you that Trump’s base is leaving him and that we are divided amongst ourselves, but none of that is true. What they think is Trump’s base is the REPUBLICAN base. And, to an extent, they are right! Trump’s base is, largely, the Republican base… it’s just that Republicans no longer HAVE a base.
I wouldn’t call myself a Republican any more. I would call myself a Trumper. I don’t support the Republican Party, because they don’t support me. Trump, on the other hand, does support me and other Americans, and so, I support him. The Republicans no longer have a base. That base is now Trump’s base. But why do I say “to an extent”? Because I know and have seen plenty of former Democrats be in support of Trump.
Democrats who have formerly voted for Obama at least once and have decided to instead support Trump. Trump’s base is the Republican base + disillusioned Obama voters. Trump’s base is an AMERICAN base. Pro-America. While the Democrat base is largely anti-America and the Republican base is virtually non-existent.
And to see the Democrat base be divided at least to this current level is great. That’s merely one of the many reasons Trump won the election. And thankfully, we continue to see at least SOME level of division within the Democrat base.
We don’t tend to see evil and ignorance be divided, but when it happens, it’s great to see.
“But He, knowing their thoughts, said to them: “Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and a divided household falls.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
On Thursday, September 14th, the social media world exploded when reports came in (through the MSM) that Trump, Schumer and Pelosi reached a deal that would protect “Dreamers” and exclude the building of a wall.
Schumer and Pelosi, after their dinner with the president, released the following statement: “[We] agreed to enshrine the protections of DACA into law quickly, and to work out a package of border security, excluding the wall, that’s acceptable to both sides.”
If you read this alone, you’d think Trump caved on the Wall. But you have to remember exactly who is giving this statement. The Left will always lie when it benefits them. They’ve been trying to separate Trump from his supporters, and saying that Trump caved on the Wall is an attempt at doing just that.
And it worked for a bit. I saw plenty of conservatives be enraged at Trump on social media, when only one side (the b.s. liberal side) was given. On Thursday morning, Trump tweeted out: “No deal was made last night on DACA”. Trump also said, later in the day, that the three came “fairly close” to reaching a deal that would require “massive border security”.
Then, while traveling to Florida to assess the damage of Hurricane Irma and helping the victims, the President said: “Ultimately, we have to have the wall. If we don’t have the wall, we’re doing nothing.” He said that having the wall was “vital” and even called out Republicans who would “become the obstructionists” if the wall weren’t to be funded.
Now, I don’t know about you, but if the last couple of years is anything to go by, I’d trust what Trump says over what the MSM or Schumer and Pelosi said happened. If we don’t trust them when they say that Russia hacked the election or that Climate Change is happening and it’s our fault, why would we trust them when they say they’ve made a deal with the president? Particularly when he says that no deal was made in the end?
I’ve seen plenty of people on social media explode, saying they want the Wall and that we NEED the Wall. And I agree, but you have to realize that Trump never took the Wall off the table. He said no deal was made, so why trust the Left over him on this particular issue?
And Trump isn’t the only one to push back on what the Democrat leaders said. Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders tweeted: “While DACA and border security were both discussed, excluding the wall was certainly not agreed to.”
Like Trump, I’d trust HER more than any other news source on things the President does.
Now, Trump HAS softened his views on the Dreamer issue. Tweeting: “Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!” Another tweet read: “They have been in our country for many years through no fault of their own – brought in by parents at young age.”
This garnered one particular “Trump supporter” to attack the president. Ann Coulter tweeted: “’Put a fork in Trump, he’s dead’” and “At this point, who DOESN’T want Trump impeached?” Really? He softens his position on this one issue and you’re ready to put him in the guillotine? Ready to impeach him? Now, I won’t react too much towards Coulter’s tweets, since this isn’t the first time she’s thrown a tantrum over Trump doing something she didn’t like. She’s not a supporter, she’s simply trying to get attention and clicks to her page. That’s it.
The problem with that is that you come across as not being able to choose a side. You’re either FOR the President, therefore with conservatives, or AGAINST him and therefore with the Left. Megyn Kelly was against Trump and alienated her conservative audience. The Left never liked her. Conservatives no longer like her, so now her only audience is Never Trump traitors over at NBC, where her ratings are about what you’d expect when not a lot of people like you.
So it makes no sense to want to throw out Trump over THIS. He’s not saying he’s giving the Dreamers citizenship so they can vote for Democrats. He’s not giving up the Wall. In fact, he’s literally said he’s STILL going for the Wall. And he’s not going to sell out the country.
He will, however, try to get things to happen. Republicans are among the worst kind of scum on the Earth and won’t help Trump with anything. Democrats are willing to work with Trump if they get a little something in return. They’ve already done this with the debt ceiling, which wound up not meaning too much while also helping those affected by Hurricane Harvey with the “Hurricane Harvey Relief” part of the deal.
With the DACA issue, he’s willing to soften his position, but these people are somewhat different from other illegals. These DACA people were brought into the country through illegal means. But that’s at least a little bit more understandable than someone crossing the border on his own. It’s easy to know what we want with illegals that cross the border and exploit the country’s system. It’s a little bit more difficult knowing what you want when this involves people who were BROUGHT into our country and don’t know anything else outside of it. And it’s not exactly fair or even humane to flat out kick them out when they are not the ones at fault.
Now, there are different kinds of DACA children. Some of them were shipped by their parents from a foreign country. And some simply came here with their parents.
So, you have to take different measures with the different circumstances. Here’s what I propose:
First, the children shipped by their parents. I can understand parents wanting what’s best for their children, but a 6 or 7 year old is simply not going to do much better in this country without his/her parents. Could you imagine being that young, being in a foreign land where you don’t know the language, don’t know where to go and don’t know what to do, forced to live with a relative you barely know? It’s a horrible nightmare. So those children should be shipped back to their parents, because it’s better to be with people who love you somewhere not as good as the U.S. than being on your own, scared out of your mind in the best country in the world. At least at that age.
Children aren’t like adults. Adults will be better able to get by in a foreign country than a child would. So, they go back to their parents.
Finally, those who came here with their parents illegally. Well, this one’s the easiest. Send them all back. Each of them is breaking the law, and the child’s parents are teaching him/her that it’s OK to break the law on occasion. No child should be taught to break the law unless it’s a law that goes against God or the Bible. But border laws don’t go against God or the Bible. It’s not good for children to be taught that they can break the law if they will benefit from doing so.
But to return to the whole “Trump caved” issue, let’s not overreact. And let’s certainly not pay attention to what the Left says when Trump himself hasn’t given his side of the argument. We’ve never trusted the Left on anything else, why would we do it this time?
“For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
For the past nearly 2 years, the MSM has been attacking Trump with absolutely everything they possibly can. And one Politico article is realizing that… IT’S NOT WORKING FOR THE DEMOCRATS.
According to the Politico article: “Democrats tried attacking Donald Trump as unfit for the presidency. They’ve made the case that he’s ineffective, pointing to his failure to sign a single major piece of legislation into law after eight months on the job. They’ve argued that Trump is using the presidency to enrich himself and that his campaign was in cahoots with Russia. None of it is working.”
Well, at least SOMEONE on the Left-wing media has the intelligence to realize this fact. And why do you think it’s not working? Because people know none of what the MSM says or what the Democrats say about him is the truth.
They say he’s unfit to be President, when he’s quite possibly the sanest man in Washington D.C. at the moment. They say that he’s ineffective because he can’t get anything of significance signed. Well, we know that it’s not HIS fault. It’s the traitorous Republican Party that has failed to get anything done. They’ve been promising to repeal Obamacare for 7 years, often making excuses that they don’t have the required seats or the majority or that the President won’t sign it. And now that they DO have the majority AND a president who will be happy to sign it, they don’t want to do it.
So, of course, THAT particular tactic won’t work because everyone knows where the fault lies: in the Republicans.
The Left says that he uses the presidency to enrich himself, even though he DOESN’T EVEN NEED TO DO THAT! He’s already one of the wealthiest people in the world! Not to mention that he would’ve made FAR more money in one year by not being President than he will in 8! Furthermore, HE USED HIS OWN MONEY TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT! HE ACTUALLY LOST MONEY IN ORDER TO BECOME PRESIDENT!
So that tactic obviously doesn’t work for anyone that uses a little bit of logic.
And about Russia, of course that’s not working either. Eight months with ZERO evidence, in an investigation being run by the FBI, as well as former FBI Director Robert Mueller and all of the Mainstream Media? Either the FBI, Mueller and the MSM are all incredibly inept to find any concrete evidence, or the Russia story is just that - a story.
The Politico article then goes on to talk about the big points Democrats tend to work on to get votes: free college tuition, raising the minimum wage to $15 and universal health care. And, surprise, surprise: they don’t test well with people outside of their base.
According to the article: “The people in these polls and focus groups tend to see those proposals as empty promises, at best.”
The article then goes on to talk about how voters view Trump’s success with the economy, saying: “In focus groups, most participants say they’re still impressed with Trump’s business background and tend to give him credit for improving the economy. The window is closing, but they’re still inclined to give him a chance to succeed.”
Now that is an interesting and puzzling statement. “The window is closing, but they’re still inclined to give him a chance to succeed”? What do you mean the window is closing? He’s been president for 8 months, not 7 years. The window is wide open for the economy to improve. And, as it is, it’s improving at a far faster rate than Obama’s economy was (which is not surprising).
The Dow Jones Industrial Average has hit multiple all-time highs since his very ELECTION as president. He’s managed to create over 1 million jobs in his first 6 or so months as president. He’s convinced multiple businesses to continue operating in the U.S. and not leave for Mexico. And the overall economic atmosphere looks far more promising than when Obama was president.
But of course, all of those things go largely ignored by the Left. But they are not being ignored by We the People.
The article then goes on to talk about Trump’s handling of the Charlottesville riots. “The president’s equivocation on neo-Nazis was not as much of a political problem as his opponents want to believe, Democratic operatives say, and shifting the debate to whether or not to remove Confederate monuments largely worked for him.”
Well, would you look at that? People actually liked seeing the President blame EVERYONE involved in the violence in Charlottesville. As it turns out, people don’t want the terrorists at Antifa to get away with what they’re doing and want to place the blame on them as well. Not to mention the fact that most people are intelligent enough to realize that the president had nothing to do with the violence in Charlottesville and that the hatred and racism present there all came from the Left.
Next, the article returns to the polling points on free college tuition, saying: “The call for free college tuition fosters both resentment at ivory tower elitism and regret from people who have degrees but are now buried under debt. Many voters see ‘free’ as a lie – either they’ll end up paying for tuition some other way, or worse, they’ll be paying the tuition of someone else who’ll be getting a degree for free.”
Which is similar to how people feel about universal health care. “The challenge is that most voters in focus groups believe it’s a pipe dream – they ask who will pay for it and suspect it will lead to a government takeover of health care – and therefore wonder whether the politicians talking to them are being less than forthright, too.”
Oh, you mean people are worried about single-payer health care? What a shock. Even if they don’t know that what they’re afraid of is, indeed, single-payer, they ARE afraid of it… as they should be. Single-payer health care is one of the reasons Nazi Germany was so dangerous. The government there decided who would get taken care of and under what plan AKA who would be too expensive to take care of and whether euthanasia would be the best choice (a choice that only the government would make).
And it’s very much the same with college tuition. People KNOW that nothing is truly free. If something’s “free”, they will end up paying for it in some other way. And then, it’s not actually free.
People don’t want to have to pay for other people’s college tuition. They don’t want to pay for other people’s health care and they don’t want the government to be the only source of health care. You’ve seen the lines at the DMV. Trust me, you don’t want that to be the case at the hospital.
But it’s truly interesting to see someone at Politico writing a story like this. At least this particular writer was smart enough to realize that their tactics aren’t working on Trump. Of course, that won’t deter them from trying. If they can continue with this Russia investigation, even if it produces zero evidence, they will continue with it. If they can continue to call Trump unfit to be president, even if it produces zero results, they will continue.
They think that if you tell a lie enough times, it will become the truth. Well, no matter how many times you tell me the sky is purple, the sky won’t eventually turn purple. No matter how many times you tell me there are 36 genders, there won’t ever be more than 2. No matter how many times you tell me the world is getting hotter/colder, it won’t get hotter/colder. And no matter how many times you tell me this president is unfit for office, that won’t make him unfit for office.
The accumulation of all of those lies won’t result in one massive truth. Or rather, won’t result in them becoming the truth. The truth is that you’re wrong at every turn if you tell me any of those things is the truth.
“And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
Author: Freddie Drake
The term “white supremacy” seems to be the Left’s favorite term to throw around (along with Nazi). Anything involving a white person and a minority is considered white supremacy. And everything any conservative ever says is white supremacy, even if the topic has nothing to do with race.
And the Left simply CAN’T get past the topic of race. To them, a black person is nothing more than a minority to exploit. A Hispanic is nothing more than someone whose mind can easily be molded. The Left doesn’t care about these people, only that they eventually vote for Democrats.
But what exactly is the reason for me to be talking about this specific subject? Well, aside from the obvious answer that it’s a hot topic of discussion, it’s also the fact that it’s clear that the Left is insanely hysterical about race-baiting and calling white people “white supremacists” if they support Donald Trump or simply don’t share a liberal view.
For example, Hurricane Irma recently swept through the west coast of Florida. As a hurricane, it caused deaths and damage, not to mention people either decided to evacuate early, or were ordered to evacuate by Gov. Rick Scott.
And during times of evacuation, you occasionally see people looting stores or homes in order to 'salvage' things for themselves. It’s simply stealing, and there’s no getting around that. And the Miami police are very much aware of that.
On Sunday, the Miami Police Department twitter account tweeted: “Thinking about looting? Ask these guys how that turned out. #stayindoors.”, before sharing a picture of incarcerated criminals, likely being charged with looting.
Of course, there’s nothing wrong with that. Criminals should be punished for committing crimes… unless they’re black, according to author Sarah Jaffe.
In response to the Miami PD’s tweet, she wrote: “good morning, the carceral state exists to protect private property and is inseparable from white supremacy.”
It boggles my mind how people like that don’t realize that they themselves are being racist if they think black people that commit crimes should be allowed to walk just because they are black. Or that these people are being incarcerated just because they are black and not because they committed actual crimes.
It’s the same argument as saying that “if you don’t vote for Obama, you’re racist.” So I should vote for Obama because he’s black then? Isn’t that just as racist? I didn’t like Obama because he’s a socialist jerk. Same reason I don’t like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and any other liberal. Race isn’t an issue to me, but it’s a massive issue to them.
Now, obviously, Sarah’s tweet received a fair share of negative comments. Among these are comments like: “They have prisons, crime, and private property in Nigeria too. And Egypt. And India. Nothing to do with white supremacy. Poverty/inequality.” Or “So you’d be ok with someone breaking into your house and stealing all your stuff to avoid a ‘carceral state’?” And my personal favorite: “You’re saying non-whites can’t help but steal, so they shouldn’t be punished? Seriously? Keep your racist opinions to yourself. #ShameOnYou.”
I’m thankful that someone specifically called her out for being racist. You see, in her mind, since she’s a liberal, she can’t possibly be racist. So anything she says can’t possibly be considered racist if it’s directed towards white people.
Another example of liberal hysteria (and quite possibly, a bigger example) is the massive twitter rant an ESPN anchor went on against the President.
Jemele Hill, a co-host on SportsCenter at 6pm, wrote roughly a dozen tweets against the President and his supporters. Now, she gets repetitive, so I won’t quote all of them, but here are a few:
She begins with: “Donald Trump is a white supremacist who has largely surrounded himself w/ other white supremacists”. Ok, that’s b.s., but this is the exact same thing we hear on the news nearly every single day. Got anything else?
“The height of white privilege is being able to ignore his white supremacy, because it’s of no threat to you. Well, it’s a threat to me.” (Jemele is an African-American woman).
I’m sorry, but which of the two parties fought and killed to keep YOUR race as slaves, Jemele? Which recent former president said of the then president that he should be serving HIM coffee? To answer both: it was the Democrats and Bill Clinton, who said that of Barack Obama.
And let’s not forget one more crucial point: Jemele Hill is not the representative of every minority in the country. It might come as a shock to liberals reading these articles, but these articles are being written by HISPANIC PEOPLE! The author section might say “Freddie Drake”, but that’s not because I felt as though I should change my name to sound less “Hispanic”. I use that pen-name because I like the name “Drake”.
And the overwhelming amount of support for the President, love of this country and love of the All-Mighty Lord in this website doesn’t come from white people. It comes from Hispanics that love this country and would hate to see it turned into the very nation we so passionately wanted to get out of.
And who is trying to turn this country into the very nation I would hate to go back to? The Democrats. The Left. That’s one of the biggest reasons I voted for Trump in the first place. Because of his very slogan: “Make America Great Again.” I know what Obama was doing in his 8 years. I know what the Left wants to do to this country. And the ignorant people that call Trump a “fascist” have no idea what fascism truly is.
No, I can’t say that I’ve personally experienced socialism and fascism, since I’m very young. But I KNOW how terrible those things are. I don’t need to know how a car is built in order to know when one doesn’t work. Likewise, I don’t need to live under socialism to know it’s absolutely terrible and has failed everywhere it’s been tried.
Look at the Soviet Union, a nation that wasn’t stable enough to see its centennial anniversary of death and destruction. Look at Cuba, the nation most famous for selling their brand new ’57 Ford Taunus. Look at Venezuela, where the 1% are the people who can find brand-name bread at the supermarket. Look at North Korea, where they have massive paved streets where no cars other than government vehicles can drive.
So I don’t think Trump is a white supremacist. I think the white supremacists are the socialists whose very HISTORY is that of racism and slavery.
But now, to answer the title question. I think that the election of Donald Trump was so unprecedented that it’s almost literally blown a fuse in liberals’ minds. Seriously, they’ve gone insane. Or maybe they were always this insane, but they’ve managed to control it, knowing one of them was president.
Either way, it’s truly concerning to see so many people harbor and spout so much hatred for a man they’ve truly only seen on the Left-wing media. They hate the man, not knowing who he is. Having never held a conversation with him or having never heard him speak himself without liberal bias thrown in to make things look bad.
The Left truly is insane. But beyond that, the Left truly is evil. Hysteria creates hate. And hate creates evil. Evil deeds and evil thoughts. The Left hates this president and gleefully and openly speaks of tearing him down by force. Their evil hearts drive them to the point of near (or actual) insanity.
And the sad reality is that they are more than happy where they are: at the hands of the devil. They not only reject Christ, but also hate and mock Him. But I guess some of these people just weren’t meant to be saved.
“And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to His purpose. For those whom He foreknew He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, in order that He might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom He predestined He also called, and those whom He called He also justified, and those whom He justified He also glorified.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
An article on HotAir.com highlighted some comments made by former Clinton supporters and aides about Hillary’s new book titled: “What Happened.”
According to the article: “Even some of Clinton’s allies have grown weary of her insistence on re-litigating the 2016 campaign at a time when the Democratic Party is looking to forge a new identity in the age of Trump.”
One former Clinton fundraiser and surrogate said: “The best thing she could do is disappear. She’s doing harm to all of us because of her own selfishness. Honestly, I wish she’d just shut the **** up and go away.”
Now those are some harsh words! She used to be revered as the smartest woman in America and the greatest thing to happen to the country since the election and inauguration of Obama. And now, this person is saying that they wish she’d shut up and go away? Unbelievable.
But I can understand this person’s sentiments. Hillary (and the entire Left, really) is a very poor loser. And she’s actually spent the time to write a book blaming everyone else around her for her failure to become president, when just about everyone else has already moved on. But she continues to bring it back up. At this point, it’s clearly little more than a poor excuse to be in the spotlight for a few days… and making a bit more money on the election.
But hey, it’s working. I’m writing about her, aren’t I? So are other people in the media.
But let’s get back to the Hot Air article. “’None of this is good for the party’, said one former Obama aide. ‘It’s the Hillary show, 100%. A lot of us are scratching our heads and wondering what she’s trying to do. It’s certainly not helpful.’”
What she’s trying to do is be in the spotlight for a little bit and make money, as I said before. The Clintons want to make money. But that’s not what I want to focus on with that particular quote. Read back to the first thing this Obama aide said: “None of this is good for the party.”
Well, of course it isn’t. Hillary being unable to let go of the past definitely can’t be good for the party. But she’s not the biggest reason the Democrat Party is where it is today. No, that title belongs to the former POTUS.
It wasn’t just Hillary that sunk the Democrat Party in 2016, it was Obama (arguably, Trump had something to do with that as well). Obama is the reason the country is where it was last year. Obama made a mess of the country, on purpose. And the American people were sick of not being placed first. Of seeing their country be torn apart by the very people who should be making it a top priority. So, they voted for Trump. But some people didn’t vote for Trump just to vote for him. They voted for him to vote AGAINST Hillary. AGAINST Obama.
I’ve already mentioned multiple times in previous articles about the time that I met a former Obama voter at the line for the voting booths. I won’t retell it, but I will point to that person as an example of people that were enchanted by Obama’s promises of “hope” and “change” and were disenchanted to find that that “hope” wasn’t for America, but for those in government, and that that “change” was to change the country fundamentally (which he was thankfully unable to do).
So if that Obama aide wants to look for reasons as to why Hillary lost in 2016, he need not look any further than Obama’s actions as President and Trump’s ideas and ideologies for when he would become President.
To an extent, Hillary is right in that Obama was partly to blame for her loss in 2016. But she fails to see herself as part of the reason she failed as well. And even her former supporters are getting tired of her trying to analyze and reanalyze what happened in 2016.
Here’s what happened: Obama was the worst President the country has ever had. Hillary was the first crook to run for office. And Trump was the best candidate the country has seen since Ronald Reagan.
THAT is what happened. It’s a combination of those things that led to Trump being elected President. But at this point, just about everyone has already moved on. The media is more focused on trying to impeach Trump (under bogus circumstances), the Democrats are looking ahead to 2018 in hopes of regaining control of Congress (under the same policies and ideologies that cost them the 2016 election) and Republicans are wasting time and their power in Congress, looking ahead to 2018 to receive more money to do the exact same thing they’ve been doing until now - nothing.
The point is: everyone has already moved on from 2016. Everyone except Hillary. She CAN’T let go of it. Partly because it means that she gets to write worthless books in which she says the same things she’s been saying on interviews since the election in order to both be in the spotlight for a little bit and to make a little bit more money. She’s really milking her election loss here.
But the fact that even her own supporters and aides are saying that they’re tired of her is incredible. A year ago, if anyone of them were to say that they wish she’d “shut the **** up and go away”, they’d immediately get fired from their position as aide to her campaign and be shamed by their peers for attacking the “smartest” woman in America.
It’s obvious that she’s outlived her usefulness to the Democrat Party.
Now, I’m not trying to defend Hillary here. I’ve never liked her. Like other Democrats, she is evil and deceitful. But unlike other Democrats, she’s not much for ideology. She prefers making money. Her greed drives her. It drove her to run for President twice. It’s driven her to remain married to a rapist. It’s driven her to where she is today.
But it’s certainly interesting to see how evil treats evil. Hillary had her use to the Democrats for decades. But that’s no longer the case. She’s no longer an asset to the Democrat Party, but rather a liability. And, like one of her former aides said, they wish she’d “shut up and go away”.
She’s a failure, and everyone knows it.
“For the righteous falls seven times and rises again, but the wicked stumbles in times of calamity.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Danielle Cross and Freddie Drake will bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...