Hopefully, he won’t be the last… Democrat Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Shultz’s IT staffer Imran Awan was arrested this week when he was trying to flee the country. Awan is Pakistani-born and is criminally charged with multiple counts of bank fraud and, just so you know, your tax dollars are still paying for his salary – he’s still on the House payroll…
The FBI is said to be investigating several smashed hard drives from Awan’s home – his brother is also under investigation.
‘Breitbart News previously reported that a federal employee with knowledge of the situation told the Daily Caller in May, “A laptop used by Imran was hidden in an unused crevice of the Rayburn House Office Building” and was found by Capitol Police and seized for use in the criminal investigation against him. The Daily Caller further noted, “Wasserman Schultz’s office is in Longworth House Office Building, a separate structure.”’
The laptop was hidden and, much to the surprise of many eyewitnesses, Democrat Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Shultz fought with Capitol Police to STOP them instead of cooperating with them.
Yes, Debbie fought with the police…isn’t that the very definition of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE? And if so, why wasn’t she arrested on the spot??
In any case, this is great news – particularly amid the twitter storm around the AG and whether or not Jeff Sessions is doing his job.
Donald Trump was elected president to carry out an agenda, and draining the swamp is one of the agenda items. With or without Sessions, Trump has a mandate. It’s good to know that the FBI is actually doing its job. As far as Sessions, let me just say this: Trump needs a wartime consigliere…
Do you recognize the phrase? It comes from the movie ‘The Godfather’, where Michael Corleone, who’s about to go to war against the other families, decides to replace his lawyer Tom Hagen (consegliere) with a ‘wartime consigliere', as the Don didn't think Hagen had the courage or the temper to counsel him appropriately during a war.
AG Jeff Sessions is doing a great job on illegal immigration – he’s the reason illegal border crossings are down by a whopping 78%. The question becomes: why is Trump complaining about him? Perhaps something’s cooking – perhaps, the fact that Sessions isn’t about to resign and Trump isn’t about to fire him, indicates that something is going on behind the scenes. Perhaps something big involving more democrats...
We can only hope…
Whether or not Sessions stays will depend upon what time of ‘consigliere’ he is. If he’s onboard fighting the swamp, investigating the crimes the Clintons and the Obamas have committed, then he should stay. And maybe that’s the reason why Trump is criticizing him – to make Sessions a victim so that the illiterate mainstream media begins praising him (which they have already) and by the time a big announcement comes, there’s no way the MSM can attack Sessions after all the praises. This is, of course, pure speculation.
But if, by any chance, Sessions doesn’t have the desire, or the courage to confront some of the most powerful people in this country, he should resign and let somebody else take his place.
But please understand: this is not about going after PEOPLE. We don’t want to use the power of the State to target PEOPLE, like this special counsel-Mueller-burger is doing. He’s TARGETING TRUMP in the hopes that he can find a crime.
We want to TARGET CRIMES which will lead to the criminals. Note that the FBI in this case seized the computer and investigated a crime…and only after this, it gets an order to arrest the Congresswoman's aide.
In a civil society, the police investigate CRIMES to then arrest criminals.
In a banana republic, the Muellers of the world target PEOPLE to try to find crimes…
Hopefully, this House staffer is the first of a number of democrats who we know need to be prosecuted. When you’re the Secretary of State and you sell Uranium to Russia for profit, there’s no way there isn’t enough evidence there to prosecute. In this country, nobody’s supposed to be above the law…
‘When justice is done, it brings joy to the righteous but terror to evildoers’
Author: Danielle Cross
I’ve already written about the “meeting” Trump and Putin had at the G20 Summit. I’ve already discussed how it was a nothing-burger and made to seem like a mountain when it’s merely a molehill. Well, part of the reason it’s made to seem like a mountain is because the MSM (particularly CNN) has called this talk that the two presidents had a “secret meeting.”
Trump even called out the fake news media by tweeting: “Fake News story of secret dinner with Putin is ‘sick’. All G20 leaders, and spouses, were invited by the Chancellor of Germany. Press knew!” And: “The Fake News is becoming more and more dishonest! Even a dinner arranged for top 20 leaders in Germany is made to look sinister!”
CNN’s Chris Cillizza wrote an analysis piece challenging the president’s “fake news” accusations, saying: “No media outlet reported anything about a ‘secret dinner’… No one is making the dinner look ‘sinister’. And, no one is suggesting the media was unaware that the dinner was taking place.” Later on Twitter, he said: “Again, NO ONE is saying the meeting was private or secret. NO ONE.”
However, I can attest to the contrary. I remember having gotten a Fox News alert on my iPhone saying that Trump and Putin had held a secret meeting. And even Cillizza’s own employer, CNN, had said multiple times that the dinner and meeting were “secret”.
Brooke Baldwin, host of CNN Newsroom, “twice referred to the meeting as a ‘secret sitdown’ between Trump and Putin – and even at one point asked, “Why didn’t we (the media) know about this?”, according to Breitbart.
She also said that “These two presidents, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, did not disclose a second meeting until now.” Yeah, you usually don’t have to disclose a random chat you have with a foreign leader, Brooke.
But she’s not the only person that contradicts Cillizza’s claim that no one called the meeting “secret”. Kate Bolduan, host of State of America, called it a “secret and second sitdown between the president and Russian president Vladimir Putin. Why wasn’t the meeting revealed? What was discussed? And who knows what was said?” And according to Breitbart, “Bolduan described the meeting a second time live on CNN as ‘secret’”.
It’s not just CNN anchors that contradict Cillizza’s claim that no one called it a “secret” meeting. Washington Post’s Aaron Blake tweeted: “Why did Trump meet secretly with Putin? Here are 3 theories.” And then proceeds to link the story he wrote.
Salon’s Matthew Rozsa also calls the meeting “secret” in his article titled: “Donald Trump defends his second, secret meeting with Vladimir Putin.”
And the Financial Times, in their “Daily Briefing”, referred to the meeting as “secret”.
Point is that EVERYONE WAS CALLING IT A SECRET MEETING! Everyone wanted this to be a story on how Trump and Putin are possibly plotting something behind the scenes and the media is left in the dark. They want people to read their headlines and think “wow, Trump and Putin had a secret meeting? That MUST mean there was collusion in the election and that Trump cheated to get elected.”
But just as I figured, this wound up being another nothing-burger. And I’ll make a prediction: EVERYTHING ON THIS MATTER WILL WIND UP AS BEING A NOTHING-BURGER! Granted, that’s an easy prediction to make, knowing what I know about the Left and their tactics and also knowing the very nature of the reason this matter even exists.
I’ve said multiple times that the only reason this matter even exists is because the Left can’t get over the fact that they were utterly REJECTED this last election, so they came up with an excuse that will lead them to nowhere.
But the focus of this article isn’t the “collusion” narrative the Left drives. Overall, it’s about the fake news that the MSM ALWAYS delivers. Every single news organization out there said that the meeting between the presidents was “secret” and that they were “unaware of it”. All it turned out to be is a one-hour chat between the two world leaders, likely to fraternize and strengthen the relationships between the countries. But the MSM treats it as though the meeting was held behind closed doors. And that the media is like Kay at the end of The Godfather, seeing “Don” Donald Trump about to do business with Putin behind closed doors.
The reality of the situation is that the two world leaders met in public and talked in public. Chris Cillizza says that no one said it was secret, but everyone around him in the media world was calling it that precisely.
I just love it when the Fake News media gets called out for what they are. Both when one particular person lies about what the media is saying and when whole networks are found to be lying to the people.
And the thing about constantly lying to your audience is that, eventually, there will be slip-ups. You’ll say something that horrendously and untimely contradicts either what you said previously, or what everyone else around you (who are also lying) is saying. And they constantly lie because they are wicked. They lie to get where they want to go and get what they want. They lie to gain power. They lie to destroy everyone who isn’t like them and doesn’t think like them.
They lie because, if they showed their true colors, no one would like them. That’s one of the reasons millennials love socialism. They’ve been told lies about it. That it’s wonderful and everyone is equal and no one has too much or too little and the government helps everyone. All of that is a LIE. Because if they told people what socialism is truly about, no one in their right mind (that isn’t in the government) would want it.
“The righteous hate what is false, but the wicked make themselves a stench and bring shame on themselves.”
Author: Freddie Drake
Charlie Gard, an 11-month old British baby, has been sentenced to die. His only crime? Being too sick. Charlie’s lawyer was APPOINTED – yes! appointed! – by the British government. And you know what? ‘His’ lawyer supports assisted dying. Legally speaking, the lawyer is the guardian of the baby – and he supports euthanasia and is ready to kill Charlie. With friends like these...
You probably have heard of this case: the little boy has a terminal disease and the doctors where he’s hospitalized have decided spending more of the Queen's resources on him is a waste of money, so they want to switch his ventilator off – the machine that keeps the baby alive.
Obviously, these doctors indicate that killing Charlie is in Charlie’s best interest – if you can believe that. But like all arrogant leftists, they don’t speak about killing the baby – they speak about just letting him die ‘with dignity’...
But whose baby is Charlie anyway?
Would you accept my decision as to what to do with your baby? Would you accept a lawyer’s decision or even a doctor’s decision? Opinions? Yes. But DECISIONS? NO WAY!
As you probably know, Charlie has been granted residence in the US should the royal supreme courts in the UK allow him to be transferred to a US hospital for experimental treatment. His parents also have the money to pay for that treatment. Now, the parents have given up and Charlie will be left to die. Why? Because the UK's government determination to KILL THIS BABY has resulted in now being too late to save the little boy. The irony is, should Charlie have been allowed to come to the US, the British hospital wouldn’t have had to spend any more money on Charlie – and he would have been given a chance to live.
But did Charlie’s doctors agree with this strategy?
Nooooo! They’re way too arrogant! They want this boy DEAD!
Can you imagine the INTERNATIONAL embarrassment they’d be put through should the treatment in the US have been successful? These doctors have reputations to protect! Although, in my book, that ship has sailed…
How about the UK Supreme courts? Do the Judges agree?
So far, judges have been eager to KILL this baby because, let’s face it, they’re arrogant too!
Big government tends to think they own you – you and your children. There is not one leftist out there who doesn’t think the government should be allowed to kill you – whether it’s the communist regime in North Korea, which kills the opposition, or a more ‘civil’ socialist government like in the UK, which is certain it’s their right to STOP your child from accessing healthcare in the US so that he might live.
Big government spits in your face: ‘so you want to live? You want to go to the US and save yourself or your child? NO WAY! You’ll die because I say so’.
What these doctors and judges should have said is this: ‘we’re sorry we can't help you, Charlie, but if your parents want to give you another chance, please go to the US, angel, and we’ll pray for you’. THAT is the attitude they should have – after all, Charlie is one of their own…
Why do these doctors and judges do these things? Where is all of this coming from?
Evil, that’s where it’s coming from.
Loving individuals HELP people, particularly INNOCENT CHILDREN.
Anyone who wants to KILL CHILDREN is EVIL, pure and simple. There is no other possible explanation.
Now, this is nothing new – and let’s not forget that in America alone more than 55 million babies have been killed since Roe v Wade. This is, of course, evil too. So let's not pretend we're awesome, because we're not.
But evil has targeted children for thousands of years – since Moses! In the Bible, Pharaoh instructed midwives to kill all male newborns, but Moses' mom put him in a basket on a river to save his life. And Herod, during Jesus’ time, ordered the killing of all male children in Bethlehem who were two years old or under, because he wanted to kill baby Jesus. So as you can see, children are a KEY TARGET of evil.
And Charlie’s a problem of big government, which is always evil. In my mind, only the parents have the right to decide what’s best for their child. Dying is in nobody’s best interest, no matter how badly the left attempts to sugarcoat it.
If Charlie had been allowed to come to the US for therapy, what’s the worst that could have happened? He could have died, but at least, the parents and doctors would have done EVERYTHING within their power to save him – which is every doctor’s and parent’s obligation. Right now, nobody with decision making power in the UK, aside from his parents, has had any interest in saving this boy.
Why do citizens allow governments to own their own children? At which point are citizens in the UK and everywhere in the world where these things happen going to STOP and THINK how much FREEDOM they’re allowing their big governments to take away? What will it take for the rest of us to realize there’s still right and wrong in this world and that the government should NOT be allowed to make YOUR DECISIONS, particularly LIFE AND DEATH decisions?
Obamacare was DESIGNED to do exactly this: put your life and death decisions in the hands of bureaucrats. Look at Charlie – this is your child under Obamacare. This is YOU when you get too old and the system needs to ration healthcare as the UK is doing in Charlie’s case. This is SOCIALIZED MEDICINE at work!
But it all starts by delegating TOO MUCH OF OUR POWER TO THE GOVERNMENT.
Charlie’s problem is socialized medicine.
Whose baby is it anyway?
The UK government’s…
God save the Queen…
Let's pray for Charlie and for people around the world to identify the evil around us...and FIGHT it.
‘Then Herod, when he saw that he had been tricked by the wise men, became furious, and he sent and killed all the male children in Bethlehem and in all that region who were two years old or under, according to the time that he had ascertained from the wise men.’
Author: Danielle Cross
The latest news coming from Robert Mueller’s special counsel into the Russia investigation is that said counsel will now be looking into all former transactions Trump and his affiliates had with any Russian person even over a decade before the 2016 election. Basically, anyone that is Russian and has spoken with Trump or one of his friends is now under investigation. And the best part is the fact that they’re not even ALLOWED to do that. Trump told the NY Times that “any digging into matters beyond Russia would be out of bounds.”, according to Bloomberg.
So now, the special counsel feels compelled to spy on people that have absolutely nothing to do with the election just because they’re Russian and have spoken with Trump. (Discrimination, anyone?) The counsel will look into any Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a SoHo (a neighborhood in Lower Manhattan) development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008.
I won’t discuss the mere fact that it’s ridiculous that the counsel will now be spying on anyone that is from Russia and is associated with a Trump. I’ll simply say that the counsel is clearly overstepping its boundaries in this investigation and something should be done about that.
What I will discuss, however, is the title question of this article: Should We Be Worried About The Mueller Special Counsel? Short answer: no.
The special counsel will do no better job than the FBI and MSM have in the last 6 months since Trump was officially made president and roughly 8 months since the election. Let’s not forget that the only reason this is even a topic is because the Left couldn’t accept the fact that they lost, so there must have been some cheating involved. But because that’s the basis of this whole narrative, any and all investigations will lead to nothing substantial.
Don’t get me wrong. Knowing what I know about the Left, they are bound to attempt to fool people with false evidence eventually. They’ve already fooled their own base by writing multiple articles and doing multiple interviews saying that they are close to uncovering the truth on the matter, only for them to write or say in the end that there is no new information relating to the matter.
Because of the very nature of the cause of the investigation (deception), nothing will ever be found about it. And Trump knows it. That’s why he’s letting Mueller do this investigation. Because there is nothing wrong that he did. THE LEFT THEMSELVES KNOW THIS! Remember the CNN scandal a few weeks ago? No, not the one about Trump beating up the CNN logo in a gif and CNN hunting down the kid who made that and silenced him. I’m talking about the video Project Veritas made about a person working at CNN saying of the investigation: “It’s mostly bulls**t.”
The people within the MSM know very well that the Russia narrative is just that, A NARRATIVE! There’s no truth to it. There’s no evidence to it. And there never will be any evidence or truth to it. But they want YOU to believe it. That’s the goal.
In respect to the counsel itself, it will find nothing, just as the FBI and MSM have also found nothing. Why? BECAUSE THERE’S NOTHING TO BE FOUND!
I just wonder for how long they can keep up this charade without presenting any evidence until even their own base stops believing their b.s. Am I giving the Leftist base too much credit in believing they will eventually stop believing the MSM? Maybe. But maybe there are at least SOME people in their base that will eventually wise up and think: “it’s been 3 years since this investigation started (I believe they will drive this narrative until Trump is out of the White House) and not a single piece of actual evidence has surfaced. Maybe there really was no collusion.” Again, maybe I’m giving too much credit to the liberal base. But there are bound to be a few people smart enough to stop believing the MSM, even if that number is small.
I recall having met a former Obama supporter at the ballot boxes a couple of weeks before Election Day, saying that she was planning on voting for Trump. I can’t recall exactly what reason she gave, but she must’ve figured something out for her to decide against voting for Hillary. So I can imagine there might be people that will figure out the MSM is lying to them and that there’s nothing to this story. I can only pray that that happens.
As for us, we shouldn’t worry about the special counsel, or any other investigation that arises to investigate this matter. We know the truth of what happened on election night. We know Trump won fair and square. And we know the Left is only driving this narrative to make it look as though the only way they could lose to Trump was through Trump cheating.
I just hope that there will eventually be people on the Left’s base that wise up and figure out what their leaders and media are doing. I don’t expect them to do a 180 and become super conservative, but I do hope at least some of them will figure out that this Russia narrative is nothing but b.s.
“And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
One common theme in a few of my latest articles is that anything a Trump ever does is considered a crime, suspicious or, in general, wrong, in the Left’s mind. Trump Jr. meeting with the Russian lawyer has been considered part of the “collusion” narrative, even though it was a complete nothing-burger. The president meeting with French president Macron and his wife and saying something nice to her is considered sexist. And now, Trump talking with Putin at a G20 Summit dinner means that there was collusion.
ANYTHING TRUMP EVER DOES OR SAYS IS WRONG IN THEIR EYES! He could literally tell someone “Nice weather we’re having”, and the Left would slam Trump for being a climate-denier.
Trump talking with Putin (through a translator, of course) at a dinner means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! But, of course, it means everything to the Left. On CNN, Sen. Chris Coons said that Trump’s reliance on Putin’s translator was “a basic failure in terms of national security protocol.” And that Trump “needed to know, from an American perspective, what was being said.”, according to CNS news.
Sure, if you’re discussing world politics or business deals, you need your own translator, in whom you can trust. But not if you’re discussing, say, the weather. There WAS a translator there, he was just Putin’s translator. Obviously, that translator knew English, otherwise he WOULDN’T BE A TRANSLATOR! So if Trump wanted to have a nice, friendly chat with Putin that had nothing to do with politics, he DIDN’T NEED HIS OWN TRANSLATOR! To say that it’s “a basic failure in terms of national security protocol” is going off of the assumption that they were discussing politics or business, or something along those lines.
So wouldn’t the fact that Trump didn’t have his own translator mean that what they were discussing wasn’t politics or business? Trump isn’t the moron the Left makes him out to be. HE BEAT THEM, AFTER ALL! He was smart enough to beat the Left at every turn during the election, and up to this point. So he knows that, if he was discussing politics or business with Putin, that he would need his own translator with him. And that whole, “Trump needed to know… what was said” statement is ridiculous. He knew what was said. THEY HAD A TRANSLATOR THERE!
Sen. Coons then noted that no one knows what the two men talked about. “That’s exactly the point”, he said. “He was publicly seen by our allies, by critical heads of state with whom they’re trying to sustain our alliances, to snub them and take the time to invest a great deal of individual one-on-one time with Putin, relying on his translator.” Is it wrong to try to make friends with a country that isn’t really a U.S. ally? To the Left, it is. Well, at least now. It used to be that Russia was the Left’s best friend. But now, they are stabbing them in the back by blaming them of collusion against Hillary.
During that summit, there was plenty of time for Trump to speak with America’s allies. He DID speak with them. But now he’s trying to at least act friendly with Putin and the Left thinks they’re planning their “next election heist”. He didn’t snub anyone at the summit by speaking with Russia. In fact, isn’t it considered being a good leader to TRY TO STRENGTHEN RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES? If Trump were to make the U.S.-Russia relationship stronger, why is that a bad thing? Because that’s not what the Left wants.
They don’t want the U.S. to be friends with Russia. They want the U.S. to not be the world’s leader and let Russia take over that role. That’s what Obama was trying to do during his 8 years! He didn’t want America to be the world’s leader. He wanted to weaken America and drop its standing in the world. He was successful, to an extent, in both. Now, Trump is doing everything he can to undo what Obama did and is doing his best to make the world’s second strongest nation our ally while letting the world know that America is always will be the world’s leader. (At least for as long as it is run by good people and not liberals.)
The Left thinks Trump is “too close and too friendly with Putin”. To them, that means that there is inarguable proof that there was collusion. To me, it means that Trump is being a good LEADER and doing one of the jobs he was elected to do.
Like I said: everything Trump does or says is either criminal, suspicious, or flat-out wrong in the eyes of the Left. But all of that is derived from the false narrative that Trump colluded with Russia during the election. Every single one of us logical people knows that there’s absolutely nothing there and it’s just one massive excuse for the Left as to why they were beaten.
They label Trump a cheater, but have zero evidence to support their claim. This will wind up as being a nothing-burger as much as everything else relating to this subject has been. EVERYTHING the Left brings up on this issue will wind up as being a nothing-burger. But like I’ve said in the past: that doesn’t matter. They’ll always run this narrative, no matter the fact that there will never be any actual evidence of collusion.
They’ll always run this story, not to prove that it’s true, but to tell future voters that Trump is a cheater, a bad guy and that future voters should vote for them because they’re not cheaters and bad guys (even though we offer plenty of evidence to the contrary on this website alone). It’s about destroying Trump’s character and reputation. It’s, much like nearly everything else relating to the Left, about DECEPTION.
2 Corinthians 11:13-14
“For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
I’ve literally titled a previous article as “Everything A Trump Does Is A Crime In The Left’s Eyes.” Well, apparently complimenting a foreign first lady on her appearance comes close to that, what with the MSM being insanely outraged at the comment Trump made directly to Brigitte Trogneux (French First Lady).
During a visit to France in honor of Bastille Day (the French version of the 4th of July), the president commented to Brigitte Trogneux that she is in “such good physical shape.”, before turning to the French president, saying that his wife is beautiful.
Now, to us living in the world of the sane, someone saying something like that to us or of our wives is typically taken as a compliment. If you’re the leader of a country and the leader of the most powerful nation on Earth mentions to you that your wife is beautiful, you usually would thank that leader for his kind words and offer kind words in return.
But to those living in the world of the Left and the MSM, that kind of comment (if made by a Republican) will be taken as a “sexist scandal”. Why am I putting those words under quote marks? Because that’s precisely the title of an article written by The UK Express: “Trump Embroiled In ANOTHER Sexism Scandal After Remarks To Macron’s Wife Brigitte Trogneux.”
According to them, “One twitter user said: ‘Gross. Notice how she (Brigitte) totally ducks behind his victim in matrimony. #MAGA – Making ALL Girls Afraid.’” I saw the video. For those of you who may not have, all that happened is that Trump made that comment to Brigitte, who was next to Melania, Trump then turned to Macron to tell him that she’s in good shape, and turned back to her to tell her she’s beautiful and to “go have a good time” with Melania. Then the two world leaders walked together one way, while the leaders’ wives walked another.
AT NO POINT DOES ANYONE EVEN REMOTELY LOOK AWKWARD, WEIRDED OUT OR OFFENDED AT HIS COMMENT! At one point, Macron even appears to be SMILING when Trump said that. Brigitte doesn’t “duck behind” Trump’s “victim in matrimony”. Which, THAT, is an offensive comment by that twitter user.
Trump literally was being a very nice person to the French leader and his wife, AND THE LEFT IS OUTRAGED THAT HE DID THAT! They are making a mountain out of a molehill from this.
Let me be perfectly clear: The Left only cares about this because it’s a REPUBLICAN who said this. If it had been Obama, or Hillary or any other Democrat, that comment would’ve gone largely unnoticed. Let’s not forget the fact that the Left has worked overtime to make sure to protect Bill Clinton’s reputation of being a sexual predator.
There’s even an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to “allegations” made against him. The article says that three people (aside from Monica Lewinsky) have accused Clinton of some form of sexual harassment. “Juanita Broaddrick accused Clinton of rape; Kathleen Willey accused Clinton of groping her without consent; and Paula Jones accused Clinton of exposing himself and sexually harassing her.”
If Clinton had been a Republican, the Left would remind you of those names EVERY SINGLE DAY! But because Clinton is a Democrat, his sexual predatory history is masked by the media and ignored by the Left in general. And this is SEXUAL HARASSMENT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT THAT CLINTON COMMITTED!
Trump made a nice comment to Brigitte and the Left treats it as worse than anything Bill could have ever done!
But you know what might be the best part about that story on The UK Express? Sometimes articles contain polls within them to see if the readers agree or disagree with what is being said. In that UK Express article, there was such a poll, that asked “Do you think Trump’s remarks were sexist?” The options were: “Yes – He’s clearly demeaning to her.” And: “No – It’s just a compliment”. I, of course, answered “no”. Funny enough, so did 57% of the people that read that article.
There were more people that disagreed with what the article was saying than there were people who thought Trump was being sexist. Isn’t it funny when the Left has an open poll where anyone can participate, as opposed to a poll that they run where they oversample liberals over conservatives? When just about anyone is free to answer a poll question, the Left seems to be in the minority. Isn’t that interesting?
So the MSM can say whatever they want about Trump’s comments to the French First Lady. It’s not like the majority of people agree with them, obviously. This is precisely why I love writing articles that expose Fake News and the evils of the Left. Sometimes, as in this case, they remind me that the Left is not the majority. They may be loud, but they are few.
I just have to thank God for that. That no matter what the Left attempts at undermining our democracy or trying to destroy Trump’s reputation, most people do not side with them.
“What then shall we say in response to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?”
Author: Freddie Drake
If you’re an intelligent person you just know that this Donald Trump Jr ‘collusion’ narrative is nothing but an attempt to destabilize President Trump. Even those pushing the story know it’s a ‘nothing burger’, as Democrat commentator Van Jones put it.
Last week Fox News personality Charles Krauthammer got on board this ‘Russia collusion’ nothing burger narrative. He is, as you well know, a never-Trumper. His feelings must have been hurt when then candidate Trump repeatedly criticized him for his elitist bias. You may recall Krauthammer said he wouldn’t vote for Trump – and I’m sure he didn’t.
According to a Breitbart story, Krauthammer finds Junior GUILTY not for what he DID, but for what he had in MIND. I wonder what Mr. K has in mind right now - certainly nothing good. What's on anybody's mind is critical...to God. He knows what you're thinking, but in an American court of law, what's on your mind, if you don't act upon it, isn't a crime...And this, assuming you have something wicked in mind, which in Junior's case, he didn't. Exposing Hillary is hardly wicked - in fact, it's a civil duty.
Krauthammer is a psychologist – he knows nothing about the law. He doesn’t know what collusion is or how the law defines it as antitrust. He doesn’t know that nothing illegal took place during the meeting between Junior and the Russian lawyer, who by now we know she has more ties to the democrats and the phony dossier (of which Trump was the target) than to Trump.
Greg Jarrett, another Fox News personality and a real lawyer, said that even if Putin had been in that meeting with Donald Trump Jr NO LAW was broken. There’s no treason. There’s no collusion. Nothing.
But the media continues to push the story…
We can all understand why Democrats want to fuel the story. We can certainly understand why the never-Trumpers like Krauthammer, McCain and Graham want to fuel the story as well – after all, it was McCain who sent an aide of his to get the Russian Dossier that TARGETED Trump (rather than ‘colluded’ with Trump), which was ultimately proven false. Trump, if anything, is the TARGET of democrat/MSM/never-Trumpers collusion.
The never-Trumpers were never on board with Trump to begin with, so it’s understandable, to a certain extent, why they would love to see Trump thrown out of office.
Let me clarify – ‘understandable’ in a context where the elites have a sense of entitlement to decide who runs our country. It’s ‘understandable’ if you see America as a banana republic where a handful of very rich people rule. If you’re McCain and a big part of the ruling class, you won’t ever support a President who ran on draining the swamp. If you’re McCain you see America as YOUR banana republic.
But how about the media?
How come the rest of the media – after CNN’s Van Jones comment or its hysterical reaction to the video showing Trump beating up CNN and the THREAT to the minor who produced it – doesn’t go straight to CNN’s JUGULAR to WIN their audience for themselves? How come NBC, ABC, CBS and all the rest jump on board DEFENDING CNN rather than trying to destroy them as competitors do in any other industry? Ever wonder about this?
The reason is simple: the media is part of the ruling class. How dare you elect President Trump when they wanted Hillary?
But what I think is important to understand is this: all these players (the never-Trumpers, the democrats and the media) are not in the business of simply destabilizing Trump. They’re in the business of self-preservation and self-promotion. Trump is only the clear leader of a movement formed by people like you and me who are tired of this ruling class. Trump is the biggest problem for them, but he’s not the ultimate enemy.
Who’s the ruling class’ ultimate enemy?
That’s right. This cold war against Trump is ultimately a war against you and all of us, including the democrat base.
If you ever thought of the dichotomy between the Left and the Right or democrats and republicans, let me tell you this: This division is FALSE. It’s just a distraction to get you to vote for establishment democrats or establishment republicans.
The real dichotomy that we must absolutely see here is not left versus right, but rather the DEEP STATE versus THE REST OF US.
The next four years are going to be exactly like this: the ruling class destabilizing Trump while he continues growing jobs, giving impressive speeches like the Warsaw speech, securing our borders with travel bans, and generally speaking, doing what he was elected to do.
The problem is, this is only going to get worse. If the ruling class wins this cold war between them, the deep state, and the rest of us, this country will definitely turn into a banana republic. All we can do is keep fighting and shrinking the government. We must shrink the government and stop watching the MSM. They must go bankrupt for lack of advertising and viewers. We know ratings are crashing – let’s make sure they continue to crash.
But we must stay on the alert, as well. What we’re going through is exactly what our Founding Fathers feared the most – a secular America ruled by a supersized government where politicians grow rich and powerful without ever producing anything of market value.
We must fight – we must fight by sharing Trump’s accomplishments, by pointing out the MSM’s lies, by exposing the left’s evil intentions and by PRAYING.
'Do not be anxious about anything, but in every situation, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus'.
Author: Danielle Cross
Ok, I won’t go so far as to actually say that he is the devil himself. But why do I ask that question? Most, if not all, of you readers probably believe in God. As such, you also probably believe in Satan. The Bible often speaks of Satan, calling him the great dragon and snake and deceiver of the world. But when you think of Satan, what do you picture? Probably a 6’ tall red guy with horns and legs like a goat, wielding a trident.
By that description, he seems rather silly. Who would believe that such a being could exist? That’s part of the reason why so many people today don’t believe that Satan exists. The Bible doesn’t describe him that way, though. In fact, aside from being described as a snake and a great dragon, he is never really described physically. All the Bible says of him in terms of physical attributes is that he was “perfect in beauty”, according to Ezekiel 28:12.
Satan was created as the perfect creation. Not the perfect BEING, mind you. That title belongs to God and only God. But Satan was God’s masterpiece. His perfect creation. He was given the most wisdom, talent and beauty out of all the angels. On top of that, he was given the highest honor and greatest job an angel could have: guarding and protecting God’s throne. His job was to protect the very holiness of God! That’s the best and most honorable job anyone could hope to have, but Satan wanted more.
He wanted to be ABOVE God. And so, he rebelled against Him. That’s how Satan became a fallen angel.
So you see, Satan was created not as the ruler of Hell and a disgusting creature in terms of physical looks. He was created to be God’s GREATEST ANGEL! He doesn’t look like a half-goat half-man mix with a fancy pitchfork and some serious skin problems. He was created to be PERFECT! But even the most perfect of creations is still just that, a CREATION. Satan wanted to be a CREATOR. To be ABOVE GOD.
So we know that Satan doesn’t look the way people usually picture him looking like. In fact, Satan started to be described this way during the Middle Ages. Back then, the Church was very aware of the presence of Satan. They were deathly afraid of him. So they decided to ease their worries by attacking Satan. How, you may ask? Well, it wasn’t going to be a battle with weapons. It was going to be a psychological battle. Knowing what they knew about Satan, they knew that he is a proud being. So, they decided to make fun of him. After all, someone who is prideful can’t stand public ridicule and humiliation.
And so, they had artists draw Satan as an ugly, inhuman-looking creature that represents the evils of the world. But that’s not what he looks like. That’s the thing about it.
And that’s why I ask the title question, is the pope the Anti-Christ? Well, first, I have to explain my reasoning as to why I’m picking on the pope as opposed to, say, Obama or Hitler or Stalin. All were evil in their own right. All wanted to, like Satan, be kings of this world. All thought they could be higher than God. But they were all too obviously evil. Their evil could easily be recognized. Yes, they all had followers that loved them and those followers didn’t think they were evil. But we, who follow Christ, all know that the three are evil (though, with varying résumé’s of evil actions).
Satan, however, will not be seen as evil by a large majority of the world. And he will appear as though he is God Himself. In fact, the Bible speaks of this. Revelation 13:4 “And they (the world) worshipped the dragon, for he had given his authority to the beast, saying ‘Who is like the beast? And who can fight against it?’”
He will perform miracles and signs and the world will worship him. The point I’m trying to make here is that Satan won’t one day emerge and kill millions upon millions of people. He won’t destroy anything in this world. He’s not like a comic book villain that appears out of nowhere, laughs evilly and makes buildings explode. He will appear to be the world’s SAVIOR. It’s one of the ways he intends to BECOME LIKE GOD!
So he won’t be someone that is clearly evil and will kill and destroy people and civilizations. He will appear like an angel of light, ready to lead his followers to greatness. He will say the right things at the right times. People will love him, all throughout the world. He’s basically a politician. But in all seriousness, his evil won’t be painfully obvious to the world. People will actually believe he is God. And so, I ask: is the pope the Anti-Christ?
The pope is the head of the Catholic Church. He is, in many people’s eyes, the representative of God and light and goodness. He is, after all, called “His Holiness”. And we all know he's just a man like you and me. The title "His Holiness" can only be attributed to GOD.
Pope Francis is a notorious climate change believer, so he doesn’t trust that God is in control, but rather believes Man is in control of the climate. He is also rather lenient when it comes to gay or lesbian Christians (which is rather oxymoronic) - the Bible is very clear on this. Practicing gays or lesbians by definition cannot be Christians, while former gays or lesbians can be if they repent.
And now, to answer the title question: no, he’s not the Anti-Christ. He doesn’t fit the physical description of the devil nor is he a clear God-like figure that the majority of the world follows. That doesn’t mean, however, that this pope is not a tool for the devil to use. This pope is as far from God as I’ve seen a pope be. He doesn’t trust God. He trusts Man. He may not be the Anti-Christ, but he certainly is no Christian.
Sorry to any Catholic readers on here, but that’s the truth.
2 Corinthians 11:3
“But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent’s cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ.”
Author: Freddie Drake
As time goes on, we learn more things about specific news pieces that grab the nation’s attention. The same principle applies here, since we now know for just how long Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was in the country before she met with Donald Trump Jr. in June 2016.
To give some context, Natalia was granted entry into the country via the Justice Department granting her “parole immigration”. In other words, she didn’t need a visa in order to be and stay in this country for some time. But the thing is: her “immigration parole” expired in January 2016. Yet, she was still in the country by June 2016, when the meeting between her and Trump Jr. (as well as others) took place. How? Well, we’ve yet to know. But it certainly seems shady.
Natalia was given entry to the country in a strange way. The “parole immigration” grant is a rare and new grant. According to U.S. Attorney Paul Monteleoni, “In October, the government bypassed the normal visa process and gave a type of extraordinary permission to enter the country called ‘immigration parole’… That’s a discretionary act that the statute allows the attorney general (then, Loretta Lynch) to do in extraordinary circumstances. In this case, we did that so that Mr. Katsyv could testify. (Mr. Katsyv is a Russian businessman in trial for an asset forfeiture case with the federal government) And we made the further accommodation of allowing his Russian lawyer into the country to assist.”
So AG Loretta Lynch bypassed standard operating procedure for allowing entry to the U.S. for this specific case. While that explains how the Russian lawyer got into the country, it doesn’t explain how she managed to STAY FOR HALF A YEAR AFTER IT EXPIRED! But it’s certainly intriguing to see the connection between this Russian lawyer and someone in the Obama administration. It’s important and interesting to note the fact that the Attorney General herself bypassed a normal process for allowing entry into the country for this particular person that the Left is now attempting to connect to a Trump.
While we don’t know how she managed to stay for so long in the country, we do know her intentions for being here. As has been explained by even Trump Jr. himself, her goal was to help repeal the Magnitsky act, a sanction imposed on Russia in 2012 for a human rights violation on Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, who allegedly uncovered a massive $230 million money laundering scheme involving Russian government officials that hurt U.S. companies. Magnitsky was killed in prison under mysterious circumstances.
The sanction put into place punished Russian officials by prohibiting them from entering the country and using the country’s banking system. In retaliation, the Russian government prohibited Americans from adopting Russian children. Natalia Veselnitskaya was lobbying in the U.S. to get the sanction repealed, even though her initial purpose for being in the country was to help a client of hers in a federal case.
And it’s because of this sanction that she sought an audience with Trump Jr., and potentially Trump himself, under the guise of having “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. But you have to ask yourself this question: why go to the Trumps? Remember, this was back in June 2016 when even some Never-Trumper Republicans didn't think Trump could ever be elected President. So why go to a Trump? Why not go to the Clintons? Sure, the sanction was put into place by Obama, but Hillary is not Obama. And everyone in the MSM said Hillary was going to win the election. So why go to Trump Jr. with “dirt on Hillary”?
If Trump wasn’t likely to win as every leftist thought before election night, why go to his family to try to repeal the sanction? It just doesn’t add up. The fact that she was here well past the expiration date of her “immigration parole” and that she hoped to speak with a Trump on this issue is certainly strange. Knowing what kind of connection she has with the Obama administration, what with Loretta Lynch making a massive exception for Natalia to enter the country, the fact that no one asked any questions as to why she was still in the country by late spring, and that she looked to talk with a Trump makes things look rather shady.
Could it be that she was some sort of agent for the Democrat Party to bring down Trump, or at least get some dirt on his family? Knowing what I know about the Left, it’s not exactly crazy to think that the Left hired this woman to get something on Trump Jr. and maybe even Trump. I don’t want to go too far into conspiracy territory, but it’s something to take note of and for you readers to be suspicious of the Left.
We know to what lengths the Left goes to get rid of their opposition. Hiring a Russian lawyer to get some sort of dirt on Trump Jr. by enticing him to find out something shady on Hillary is not beyond their means nor their ethics. If assassination is not beyond their ethics, neither is something like this. And it’s clear that this Russian lawyer is more closely tied to the Left than she is with Trump Jr. or the president.
We now know that Veselnitskaya worked for years with the founder of Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson. Fusion GPS, you may recall, is the firm that produced the now discredited "dossier" against Trump. So, if anything, this Russian lawyer was hardly trying to help Trump but rather trying to...destroy him...
She may be what I would call an "agent" of the Left. Perhaps she planted a "bug" in Junior's office. Or perhaps she was trying to get information to complete the "dossier". It's not beyond the Left's means and ethics to pull something like this.
But I can rest assured that this attempt at pinning Trump with Russia will fall flat just as the others have for the last 9 months.
The best part about it is the fact that, depending on the kind of information that surfaces from here on out, we are now able to spin this around on the Left and get them to stop talking about it. Because the minute a story backfires on the Left, the MSM immediately drops it and pretends like nothing ever happened. I just hope and pray that that will be the result of this latest attempt to undermine our democracy.
“For fools speak folly, their hearts are bent on evil: They practice ungodliness and spread error concerning the Lord; the hungry they leave empty and from the thirsty they withhold water.”
Author: Freddie Drake
The biggest piece of news circulating around this week is that Donald Trump Jr. had e-mail conversations 'with' a Russian lawyer who 'said to have info' to “’incriminate’ Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as ‘part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump”, according to Fox News. Well, the e-mails were really between Trump Jr. and Rob Goldstone, an acquaintance who arranged for Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya to meet with the president’s son, Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, and Jared Kushner.
But to the Left, the part that the Russian lawyer never exchanged an email with Junior is irrelevant. The Left sees this and immediately shouts at the top of their lungs that “Trump colluded with Russia” once again. The Left has become a broken record, at this point. But here’s the interesting thing about this story in particular: THERE’S ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO THESE E-MAILS! Trump Jr. released the entire e-mail chain via Twitter. All those e-mails showed was that Rob was trying to set up a meeting between Trump Jr. and the Russian lawyer. That’s it! That’s what the Left is salivating about! That’s what the Left is alleging Trump Jr. of treason for!
In the meantime, we see TENS OF THOUSANDS OF E-MAILS THAT GOT DESTROYED BY HILLARY AND THE LEFT DOESN’T EVEN BAT AN EYE! Hillary destroyed well over 30,000 e-mails and the server they were saved in, because she had something to hide. And the MSM sweeps that under the rug. Trump Jr. releases the information of a couple of e-mails and the MSM WANTS HIS AND HIS FATHER’S HEADS!
There’s no actual evidence of collusion, even in this e-mail chain. Trump Jr’s. biggest crime? Trying to be set up on a meeting. That’s it! He just wanted to talk! Meanwhile, Hillary accepted donations from foreign countries during the campaign trail via the Clinton Foundation and not a single Leftist cares at all.
This is simply nothing more than the Left’s latest attempt at destroying Trump by falsely claiming he colluded with Russia to get to the White House. This, along with everything else up to this point, leads to nowhere on the matter. The Left is no closer today to unseating and destroying Trump as they were when the election results came in.
And the interesting part? Not a single Trump supporter cares. I’ve heard multiple people call in on the Rush Limbaugh show to say that they don’t care about anything related to the whole “Trump colluded with Russia” narrative. And frankly, the only reason I care about it is because I want to expose the Left's evil intentions. Otherwise, I too, would not care about this whole thing.
And that’s where the Left loses their edge. I’ve said this in the past, but I’ll say it again: The Left targets Trump supporters as much as they target their own base. It’s not enough for them to get their own base to believe the b.s. they spew out. They also want YOU to believe it. They want YOU to abandon all hope for the Trump administration and abandon all support for him. They want YOU to believe there is no hope for the future Trump wants to make, or that Trump isn’t planning on Making America Great Again as he promised. They want YOU to be lost.
If you remember throughout the campaign, nearly every single poll out there had Hillary winning the election either by a few points or in a landslide. They ALWAYS do this. They ALWAYS show these kinds of polls to discourage YOU from voting or supporting your candidate. After all, who wants to support a clear loser, right? That’s their tactic. They failed with the polls, but they still believe they can discourage you, particularly throughout the next 4 years.
They still believe they can get you to feel panicked and scared that Trump is guilty of a massive lie the Left has told enough times that they now themselves believe. The thing is: no matter how many times you tell a lie, it will never become the truth.
For the past half-year, the Left has been reporting this lie nearly every single day. And for the past half-year, they said they would be dropping a bomb on Trump and prove he colluded with Russia. And for the past half-year, they've found NOTHING. But that doesn’t exactly matter, does it?
They’ve already convinced their base that Trump colluded with Russia. I’ve seen multiple people on social media shout at Trump supporters that Trump cheated and is BFF’s with Putin. They’ve been thoroughly brainwashed by the Left. Reason and logic don’t matter to them. The fact that there is no evidence doesn’t matter to a Leftist. They believe Trump cheated, so he must have.
The Left has been successful in getting their base to eat from the palm of their hands. But they will never be successful in convincing a single Trump supporter to abandon him. And yes, I’ve seen those phony “Trump supporters” on t.v. saying that they can no longer support the president. They don’t fool me or anyone else out there. They were never Trump supporters to begin with - or they've been paid by the media/democrats.
The Left may be able to deceive their own base with amazing results, but they will never be able to deceive Trump supporters. Many no longer care about this whole Russia business. The Left lost on this one. Not that they will stop trying. Not that they will believe they’ve lost in any way, either.
Look at the devil, for example. He knows what’s coming to him. He knows what God’s plans are for him. He can’t escape it or fight it. And yet, he will continue trying to deceive the world into following him. He knows he won’t win against God, but he is determined to bring down as many people as he possibly can. The more people he can get to not follow God, the better.
The Left is very much the same way. It doesn’t matter if they are constantly proven wrong. It doesn’t matter if they are swiftly defeated in elections. If they can get people to believe every word they say and eventually get to the point where they can be in power once again, who cares what the truth is? They HATE the truth.
1 John 3:8
“The one who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work.”
Author: Freddie Drake
Danielle Cross and Freddie Drake will bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...