In the latter half of 2017, countless accusations against powerful people have come out, with some being utter b.s. *ahem* Moore *ahem* Trump *ahem*, while others are earth-shattering, such as Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey, George Takei and others.
Most recently, another accusation was made, this time about yet another Democrat: Sen. Al Franken. And not only is this just an accusation, there’s also tangible proof of the act.
As you can see from the picture above, Al Franken is seen groping a woman by the name of Leeann Tweeden, who is clearly asleep.
There’s more. Leeann also wrote a story on her local radio station’s website “790 KABC”, for which she works. The story is titled: “Senator Al Franken Kissed and Groped Me Without My Consent, And There’s Nothing Funny About It.”
Without seeing the picture, you might be confused as to why she mentions that last part, about it not being funny. Of course it’s not funny. Sexual assault isn’t funny… well, to the normal person.
As you can see, Al Franken is not only groping her breasts, but he’s also smiling at the camera, as though to say “Yeah, I know what I’m doing and I don’t really care.”
Leeann gives us the context to the situation. She begins with: “In December of 2006, I embarked on my ninth USO Tour to entertain our troops, my eighth to the Middle East since the 9/11 attacks… Also on the trip were country music artists Darryl Worley, Mark Wills, Keni Thomas, and some cheerleaders from the Dallas Cowboys. The headliner was comedian and now-senator, Al Franken. Franken had written some skits for the show… Like many USO shows before and since, the skits were full of sexual innuendo geared toward a young, male audience…”
“Franken said he had written a part for me that he thought would be funny… When I saw the script, Franken had written a moment when his character comes at me for a ‘kiss’. I suspected what he was after, but I figured I could turn my head at the last minute, or put my hand over his mouth, to get more laughs from the crowd.”
She then writes that Franken insisted that they rehearse the “kiss”. Not once, but multiple times. He continued to badger her to rehearse the scene and she began to feel uncomfortable. Eventually, she said “ok”.
According to Leeann: “We did the line leading up to the kiss and then he came at me, put his hand on the back of my head, mashed his lips against mine and aggressively stuck his tongue in my mouth… I felt disgusted and violated.”
Yeah, I bet. For someone of his caliber to force himself on anyone is a disgusting thought.
She then details that after the incident, she decided against telling the Sergeant Major of the Army, the person who sponsored the tour. She decided against telling anyone of importance. According to her, she did tell “a few others on the tour”, but it’s unlikely that they were anyone of importance. Just people who were there for her when she needed them.
Leeann then writes that after the incident, she avoided Franken as much as she could. No one can blame her… well, except Franken, I guess. According to Leeann, Franken “repaid me with petty insults, including drawing devil horns on at least one of the headshots I was autographing for the troops. But he didn’t stop there.”
When the tour was over and they were heading back to the U.S., “After 2 weeks of grueling travel and performing I was exhausted. When our C-17 cargo plane took off from Afghanistan I immediately fell asleep, even though I was still wearing my flak vest and Kevlar helmet. It wasn’t until I was back in the US and looking through the CD of the photos we were given by the photographer that I saw this one:…”
At this point, she shows the picture above.
“I couldn’t believe it. He groped me, without my consent, when I was asleep.”
She then writes that she wanted to scream out to the world what Franken had done to her, but that she was afraid at the time. Afraid of the potential backlash and damage done to her career as a broadcaster. But she also says that now, she’s no longer afraid. That she had debated in her mind whether or not to go public. Whether it’d be worth telling her story. That finally, she decided it WAS worth it.
Now, why did I title this article “Why Democrats Will Never Hold The Moral High Ground On Anything”? Because I believe that one of the reasons the Left is throwing Bill Clinton under the bus is because they want the moral high ground when it comes to accusing conservatives such as Roy Moore of sexual assault.
The Left believes that if they apologize for excusing Bill’s behavior, they will be rectified and be free to accuse conservatives of this stuff without the constant reminder that they were ok with Bill doing his intern.
But it’s stories like these the reason as to why they will never hold the moral high ground on anything. They have set up a new rule of “always believing the women accusing men of sexual assault.” The Left can’t go back on that after doubling down on it against Moore. They would have to either abandon Al Franken or be called hypocrites again for defending him.
I honestly don’t think they’d do the latter, because there’s clear photographic evidence of his misdeeds, not just an accusation.
But even if they do abandon Franken, their problem doesn’t end there. At the beginning of the article, I mentioned the likes of Weinstein, Takei, Spacey, and such. Of course, that’s a small percentage of Leftists who have been accused of sexual assault.
Do you wanna know why the Democrats will never hold the moral high ground on anything? BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO MORAL GROUND TO COVER! Morality is a total joke to them. Or at least something for them to mold to their liking.
The fact that they WANT full-grown men to have the right to enter women’s restrooms shows you what kind of morals they have. The fact that they WANT women to have the right to kill their own unborn children in the name of “healthcare” shows you what kind of morals they have. The fact that Hollywood makes movie after movie depicting a woman being a sex object and nothing else shows you what kind of morals they have. The fact that the Hollywood men such women work with are likely to ASSAULT THEM sexually and try to keep it a secret shows you what kind of morals they have.
They have no morals. That’s just what happens when you not only shut Christ out of your life, but you also make fun of Him and His followers. Morality, conscience, much like everything else in this world, comes from God.
Evil, sin, these things come from Satan. A fallen angel without morals. Without a sense of decency. Democrats are much like him.
Look at today’s society. It’s the direct result of Democrat brainwashing children in schools and people using t.v., or other entertainment media.
Look at any show on Netflix’s or Hulu’s lineup and I dare you to find one righteous show. One show where the characters don’t talk about sex half the time. One show where they show a family going to church, praying and worshipping the Lord.
The closest thing I can think of a “righteous” show is “Blue Bloods”, but even that show has been going less and less Christian. In a show about a family of Catholic police officers in New York City, you’d expect them to be shown praying (something which they have done a maximum number of once in the latest season) and thanking the Lord not just for the food they are about to eat, but for keeping them safe in one of the most dangerous cities in the country.
My point is that today’s society is not very morally sound. A good character is attacked while evil is appreciated to near levels of worship.
The Democrats will never hold the moral high ground on anything because they’re too evil and wicked to hold something like that over anyone else. And when I say “Democrats” I of course mean all of the Left. I include Establishment Republicans as well because they’re no better.
The only time Evil will hold the moral high ground will be during Armageddon. During the fulfilment of the prophecies in the Book of Revelation. And that’s only because by that point, Christians will no longer be on Earth. They will be in Heaven. Earth will be populated by these kinds of people.
Democrats will never hold the moral high ground because God and God alone occupies it. And no one can ever take that away from Him.
“’Listen to me, you who know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear not the reproach of man, nor be dismayed at their revilings. For the moth will eat them up like a garment, and the worm will eat them like wool; but my righteousness will be forever, and my salvation to all generations.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
One month before the Alabama Senatorial election, Judge Roy Moore has been bashed for the allegations that he pursued inappropriate relationships with minors, including a sexual assault case of a 16-year-old girl.
Not only has the Left bashed him (after creating the allegations), but even Republicans are bashing him. Senate Republicans such as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Sen. John McCain have called for Roy Moore to quit the race. Worst of all, Sen. Cory Gardner, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, said he would expel Moore from the Senate if elected. Basically, Alabama voters don’t matter to him and he’s going to expel a man that has yet to be proven to have done something wrong.
And what’s interesting is that the MSM has also been trying to separate Trump from Moore, essentially isolating the Alabama Judge. It’s obviously the Divide and Conquer strategy.
About a week ago, CNN wrote a story titled: “White House: If allegations against Moore are true, he should step aside.”
In the story, they quote things that Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Alyssa Farah, the VP’s press secretary, have said the leaders of the country’s opinions are on Moore. Huckabee Sanders said: “Like most Americans, the President believes we cannot allow a mere allegation, in this case one from many decades ago, to destroy a person’s life. The President also believes that if these allegations are true, Judge Moore will do the right thing and step aside.”
Farah has said that the Vice President “found the allegations in the story disturbing and believes, if true, this would disqualify anyone from serving in office.”
I agree with the POTUS and VPOTUS. If the allegations are true, he should step aside. The problem is EVERYONE ELSE IS THROWING HIM UNDER THE BUS WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE OF MISDEEDS!
Cory Gardner has already decided that he’ll ignore the will of the Alabama voters and will expel Moore if elected. No evidence. No actual case, unlike Bob Menendez, who is actually ON TRIAL for sexual misconduct. No, it doesn’t matter. The media says he’s a pedophile perv, so he must be a pedophile perv and simply can’t be allowed a Senate seat.
Meanwhile, there’s plenty of evidence about Bill Clinton’s sexual misconduct (and I say misconduct to put it lightly), and he was allowed to serve two full terms as President and is walking free. Why? Because he’s a Democrat. Granted, he’s been talked about negatively in recent time by the Left, but it’s mainly to further their own goals.
They’re throwing Bill under the bus NOW because they want to start focusing on Trump and the allegations made against him. Rush Limbaugh has said that it’s so that the Left can occupy the moral high ground while further accusing Trump of sexual misconduct. I don’t think that’s all of it.
They’re throwing Bill under the bus because he’s outlived his usefulness for the Democrat Party. Both Clintons have. So they’re trying to apologize for defending him so that when the time comes to further attack Trump on sexual assault, they’ll have the moral high ground. But beyond that, it’s also testing out a play in the Democrat Party playbook that, so far, appears to be working.
What do I mean? Look at the comments made by Republicans and Democrats. Democrats hate Moore and Republicans are abandoning him; questioning him. If Moore loses the election, the Left will credit the sexual assault allegations and use them on other conservatives because they’ve seen that it works.
They’ll also use it against Trump. The Washington Post is already looking to do that. A couple of days ago, they released an article titled: “If Republicans believe Roy Moore’s accusers, why not Trump’s?”
There it is! That’s the big story they want to get into! If the Left sees that they can defeat Moore with these allegations, they will allege that EVERY Republican who wants to run for any sort of office (and is conservative, not Establishment) is also a sex offender.
As a reminder, Trump also faced sexual assault allegations three weeks before the election. This isn’t a new play. But they’re doing something different here: they’re going even stronger at Moore with more and more allegations. Not only that, but they also see Moore as a big threat that’s easier to deal with.
He’s not running for President. He’s running for Senate. And while it’s a lower office, it still holds value. That one vote is one vote closer to passing the Trump agenda. The Make America Great Again agenda. The Left simply can’t allow it. So, they’re going even harder at Moore with these allegations than they did with Trump.
And it seems as though it might just work. Cory Gardner, a name that will now be associated with treason to the American people, couldn’t keep Trump from becoming President, but he CAN keep Moore from becoming Senator… at least as a Republican.
Gardner wants the election to be made null and void if Moore wins. Meaning that Alabama Governor Kay Ivey will have to hold a special election, starting the election process all over. But that doesn’t mean Moore will be defeated. He can still run as an Independent. And if he does that, he can run on “The Republican Party has betrayed you, Alabama. You wanted me, but they denied your will. Show them that you’re voting for America First, not Republican First!”, or something along those lines.
But that’s a bridge that we’ll cross when we get there. For now, I want to tell you why I think Roy Moore is innocent: because this is far too convenient for the Left.
I’ve said this before, but really think about it. These allegations are about events that happened DECADES AGO! And yet, we’re only NOW hearing about them? Five women have come forward, and the Left has made sure to capitalize on it, saying that people “knew” about Moore’s misdeeds for a long time. That’s eerily similar to the Harvey Weinstein case. Hollywood people knew about his misdeeds but the story didn’t come out until this year. And you’re telling me Moore is the same as Harvey?
And don’t give me that “he’s a powerful man so he thought he could get away with it” b.s. These accusations are about what happened 40 or so years ago. Back then, he wasn’t a judge. Not even close. He was an Assistant District Attorney for Etowah County, Alabama from 1977-1982. He was a nobody back then, so why not bring these accusations to light back then?
There’s no evidence of Moore’s misdeeds, only allegations. But no one is giving him the benefit of the doubt. Because he’s a Republican (and dangerous to the Left), the Left needs to destroy him. Because he’s a Republican, other Republicans have to pretend to hold the moral high ground and pretentiously declare that he should step aside, regardless of whether or not the allegations are true.
Let me tell you, if Gardner really goes through with deciding the election for the people of Alabama, the Republican Party is as good as dead. The Moore allegations have made national news. His expulsion from Senate, if he wins, will also make national news. Therefore, the Republican Party’s betrayal of the voters in Alabama will make national news as well.
The GOP has been on thin ice for a very long time. Ignoring the will of the voters will utterly shatter that ice and ultimately kill the Republican Party. It will show that they can’t be trusted. Other than Establishment socialists, who would run for the Republican Party after that? Conservatives would look to form their own political party and win with that. It would likely mean Democrat victories for some time, but it’s worth it to see the GOP be torn to shreds. Eventually, a new conservative candidate would be voted into office.
That would mean the absolute end of the GOP’s relevance in politics. Not that Gardner cares. He’s more than ok with Democrats winning for centuries if it means defeating a conservative such as Roy Moore.
Do you want to know why I think Roy Moore is innocent? Because he’s not the big target here. He’s just a test dummy. The Left is testing their “sexual assault” play to use against other conservatives. The allegations don’t have to be true, but enough people have to believe they are. That’s how they win.
Normally, one Senate seat wouldn’t matter so much. So why does this one matter so much? Because it will keep the Left from achieving their ultimate goal: completely defeat Donald Trump. One more vote for the Trump agenda means one less person sabotaging it.
Roy Moore is innocent because he’s being targeted by the Left and the RINOs too much for it to be believable. They are evil psychopaths. Why would I believe anything they say? Beyond that, why would I come around to thinking they’re right just because more women show up and say Moore did stuff to them? Telling a lie over and over again doesn’t make it true.
And yet, we’re supposed to believe these women NOW when Moore presents such a threat to the Left? When it’s NECESSARY for the Left to attack him? No, I, along with fellow Alabama voters, see right through that.
We will vote him into office as a Republican and as an Independent if need be. We won’t be denied our pick for Senate. We won’t be denied the America we want. We will drain the swamp the first chance we get.
When the time comes, Establishment candidates such as John McCain, Jeff Flake, Mitch McConnell, Lindsay Graham and Cory Gardner will be voted out of office.
Trump will drain the swamp from the inside, us voters will drain it from the outside.
“By your endurance you will gain your lives.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Keeping in the seemingly new trend of pointing the finger at Bill Clinton for his misdeeds, New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg writes that she believes at least one of the women accusing Clinton of rape: Juanita Broaddrick.
In an article surprisingly titled: “I Believe Juanita”, Goldberg says that out of all of the women accusing Clinton of rape, Juanita Broaddrick is the one who “haunts” her.
To give you some context for this article, Goldberg is a Leftist (you kinda have to be to work at the New York Times), so for her to write an article about believing one of the accusers of Bill Clinton is eye-widening. Even more so when you recall that she’s not the only person distancing herself from Bill now.
If you remember, yesterday I wrote an article about David Brooks placing the blame on Bill Clinton for today’s “sexual misconduct” environment. And now, yet another NYT columnist targets Bill Clinton as well? That’s very strange.
Of course, that’s not to say she is flat-out turning on the Left. Even though she’s writing about believing Juanita Broaddrick’s allegation, she also mentions that, during the 2016 Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton was the one who “had to pay the political price for Bill’s misdeeds, as they were trotted out to deflect attention from Trump’s well-documented transgressions.”
As you can see, she’s still as ignorant as any other Leftist out there. “Well-documented transgressions?” What well-documented transgressions? You mean the Access Hollywood tape? If I recall, the tape was about him TALKING about powerful people getting away with sexual misconduct. And while that’s not something I liked hearing Trump say, that’s still NOWHERE NEAR AS BAD AS WHAT LEFTISTS HAVE BEEN DOING FOR DECADES!
So as you can see, the Left still wants to pretend Trump is a sexual predator even though he’s done nothing to earn such a disgraceful title.
Regardless, that’s a point that will continue to be made over and over again in other articles. For now, I want to focus on the more “positive” side, if you will, of the article.
Perhaps the most important paragraph in the article is the following: “Of the Clinton accusers, the one who haunts me is Broaddrick. The story she tells about Clinton recalls those who’ve heard about Weinstein. She claimed they had plans to meet in a hotel coffee shop, but at the last minute he asked to come up to her hotel room instead, where he raped her. Five witnesses said she confided in them about the assault right after it happened. It’s true that she denied the rape in an affidavit to Paula Jones’s lawyers, before changing her story when talking to federal investigators. But her explanation, that she didn’t want to go public but couldn’t lie to the FBI, makes sense. Put simply, I believe her.”
That last sentence is the big shocker. For decades, Bill Clinton was excused for his sexual assaults on multiple women. His wife, Hillary, as well as other Democrats and members of the media would do all they could to at the very least bury the story. Of course, that didn’t work too much, but it worked enough.
It didn’t work too much in that the stories are still talked about today (even by Leftists who bring them up), but it worked enough that Bill was never really punished for it. He was somewhat put to shame (mostly on camera), but other than that, nothing else happened. He’s still walking free.
I also read a story about Ted Cruz pulling his support for Roy Moore, saying: “As it stands, I can’t urge the people of Alabama to support a campaign in the face of these charges without serious, persuasive demonstration that the charges are not true.”, adding: “Both last week and this week, there are serious charges of criminal conduct that if true, not only make him unfit to serve in the Senate but merit criminal prosecution.”
Not a single piece of evidence has surfaced other than multiple Democrat women accusing Moore and yet, he is closer to going to jail than Bill ever has been?
I had little respect for Ted Cruz before today, mainly because of the primaries, but whatever little amount of respect I had for the guy is utterly gone. He sounds like a Leftist now. Funny enough, he sounds more Leftist than the New York Times writer in her article. Funny, right?
Regardless, my point is that Moore is merely being accused of rape and sexual misconduct with minors and he’s closer to being put in jail, even though there’s no evidence, than Clinton.
Just think about everything the Clintons have done. It’s not just the rape allegations on Bill, it’s EVERYTHING! Uranium One, the Russian dossier, the private server holding highly sensitive information, the Clinton Foundation receiving large sums of money from foreign countries, the threats to women who accuse Bill of rape. Monica Lewinsky's blue dress stained with Bill's DNA. THE CLINTONS ARE WALKING CRIMINALS! And they’re walking free.
Worst of all, they’re not even close to facing jail-time. Jeff Sessions’s only accomplishment so far is his part in the undoing of DACA. That’s it. He’s recused himself from the Russia probe. Even HE has sided against Moore. And he’s just now CONSIDERING launching a special counsel to investigate the Clinton Foundation.
That’s something that should’ve been launched as soon as he was appointed Attorney General. I have no idea why he’s waited until NOW to at least consider investigating the Clintons.
Regardless, we’ve gone on quite the tangent and I’d like to return to the main topic. I can safely say that 2017 has been a strange year so far. What with Harvey Weinstein being exposed, as well as plenty of other Hollywood elites, as being sexual predators; the media being out on a witch hunt since before the year started, looking for Russian collusion and finding nothing. This year was one of the Left’s worst.
The election of Trump stunned them and they’re still recovering. And things simply don’t seem to be going well for the Left in any way. They’re losing significant election after significant election; significant Democrat after significant Democrat is being accused of sexual harassment in the least and assault at the most; and I’ve lost count now on how many Leftist media writers have turned on Democrats to an extent, or at least have told the truth, such as in the case of Trump still beating Hillary if the elections were held today.
And even though the media pretends things are horrible within the GOP (and they’re right to a certain extent), they can’t really ignore the fact that things are far worse for the Democrat Party. Yes, the Republican Establishment hates Trump with all their beings, but the Republican base is unified with Trump. I can’t say the same of the Democrats.
Regardless, I’ll end this article with this: the Clintons have been walking free for far too long. I just hope that Sessions pulls the trigger on the investigation on the Foundation and winds up sending them both to prison.
“But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Last week, in an interview with Charlie Rose, New York Times columnist David Brooks “argued that tolerating former President Bill Clinton’s behavior had a hand in creating an environment where sexual misconduct was given a pass.”, according to Breirbart.
There’s roughly two things I have to say about this: 1) No, duh! And 2) I’m surprised that he’s saying this.
As a reminder, David Brooks is the guy that said that Trump had three options: “… decide if he prefers to resign, be impeached, or get assassinated.”
So you can see why I’m somewhat perplexed at this MSM columnist’s decision to place some of the blame on Bill Clinton. For the longest time, Bill Clinton has been a sexual predator, and for just as long, he’s been given a pass from the Left and the Mainstream Media.
And yet, a member of the Mainstream Media put some of the blame on Bill Clinton for the sexual harassment environment we live in? That’s honestly shocking. What is not shocking, however, is when he also brings up the allegations made against Trump and Roy Moore.
“He then cited Republicans tolerating what President Trump and Alabama Republican Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore are accused of and argued partisanship is idolized,” according to Breitbart.
But here's the thing: We simply don’t believe the allegations. And wanna know why? Because they’re so obviously fake, they’re hilarious.
This is a point I made in my previous article about Roy Moore: Three weeks before the Presidential election, Trump was accused of sexually harassing and assaulting multiple women. Today, a month before the Alabama special election, Roy Moore is being accused of having an inappropriate relationship with a minor. In other words, they’re accusing him of being a pedophile.
And we know that the allegations made against both of these Republicans are entirely fake. So to compare these two to the likes of Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein is ridiculous.
At the worst, Trump has TALKED about the issue, as recorded on the Access Hollywood tape. But again, that’s at the worst. At HIS worst. At Weinstein and Clinton’s worst, they’ve FOREVER SCARRED MULTIPLE WOMEN!
Regardless, Brooks continues: “The uncomfortable thing for a lot of progressives, frankly, is how much did the Clinton thing create this whole environment? How much did tolerance of Bill Clinton create the environment in which the rest of this was given permission?”
He’s worried about what’s uncomfortable for progressives? THEY’RE THE ONES DOING THESE THINGS! The uncomfortable thing for a lot of progressives is not how much Clinton’s case created the environment. The uncomfortable thing for them is the worry of whether or not THEY’D GET AWAY WITH IT NOW!
Now, I’ll be somewhat fair and say that it’s not all Bill Clinton’s fault. IT’S A LOT OF DEMOCRATS’ FAULT!
Before Clinton was even talked about, there was another Democrat legacy in the news: the Kennedy’s. While I can’t quite recall any “sexual assault” cases, I know that the Kennedy’s had extramarital affair problems.
JFK and Bobby Kennedy had both been accused of sleeping with Marilyn Monroe. Ted Kennedy, JFK’s brother, was most likely also cheating on his wife at the time of the 1969 Chappaquiddick incident.
For those who don’t know, let me set the stage up for this case. According to Wikipedia: “… [Ted] Kennedy was at Chappaquiddick Island… hosting a party that he gave for the Boiler Room Girls, a group of young women who had worked on his brother Robert’s ill-fated presidential campaign the year before. Kennedy left the party with one of the women… he attempted to cross the Dike Bridge… Kennedy lost control of his vehicle and crashed in the... tidal channel on Chappaquiddick Island. Kennedy escaped the overturned vehicle… dove below the surface seven or eight times, vainly attempting to reach and rescue [the girl]… He swam to shore and left the scene… He contacted authorities the next morning, but [the girl’s] body had already been discovered.”
That’s a lot of information to take in, so I’ll summarize. Ted Kennedy threw a party for young single women on Chappaquiddick Island, which is on the eastern end of Martha’s Vineyard. Ted Kennedy owned a home in Martha’s Vineyard. If he wanted to throw a party, why not do it at his home? Is it because his wife was there? Not to mention the Boiler Room Girls consisted of 6 women. In total, 6 SINGLE women and 6 MARRIED Democrat men attended the 'party'. Not much of a party, right? And to top it off, Kennedy left the party with one of them.
Now, I ask you, does that not sound like he was looking to cheat? The Kennedy’s are notorious for their affairs and this doesn’t exactly sound like Ted Kennedy was looking to be a Good Samaritan.
Now, there’s a difference between sexual assault and cheating. But my point is that the Kennedy’s have a decent hand in the way our culture is today. Bill Clinton does as well.
When you see another person being accused of sexual harassment or assault, most of the time they’re either elected Democrats such as Anthony Weiner and Bill Clinton, or are Democrat Hollywood celebrities such as Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey, George Takei, Charlie Sheen and a myriad of other people.
And whenever a Republican is accused of it, it’s usually b.s. Look at Trump, for example. He was accused of assault THREE WEEKS before the election. And the claims turned out to be b.s. Look at Roy Moore. He was accused of pedophilia ONE MONTH before the state election. And it’s b.s. as well.
What I’m saying is that, looking at the Left, sexual harassment, assault and lust altogether seems to be all they’re about. For people who claim to be “fighting for women’s rights”, they sure don’t respect the fairer sex.
They claim to fight for a woman’s “right” to kill her own baby, and it’s not shocking. Of course they would fight for that. If abortion were illegal, they might be a bit more hesitant to assault a woman. They don’t want to have to pay for child support, or at least go to court over it.
They want to abuse women without repercussions, so they claim to be in favor of their “reproductive rights”.
David Brooks is right to place some of the blame on Bill Clinton. He’s shown Democrats that they can do whatever they want to women and the media will be on their side. But to say that Trump and Moore (or any other conservative) have a hand in this as well is utter nonsense.
The Democrat Party is the party of sexual assault. The party of lust. The party of sin. The party of evil.
I’ve made this point before, but I’ll say it again here: The Left is the second worst thing to happen to women, second only to the rise of Islam. And even then, it’s a rather close race.
“’There is no peace,’ says the Lord, ‘for the wicked.’”
Author: Freddie Drake.
One of the biggest news pieces this week (aside from the seemingly endless stream of Hollywood elites being exposed as predators) has been the hit pieces against Judge Roy Moore (R), who is running for a Senate seat for Alabama in December.
The hit pieces, of course, include the allegations made by the Left that Moore had an inappropriate relationship with a 14-year-old girl 40 years ago. Given just how Christian and conservative Roy Moore is, I can see why the Left feels the necessity to smear him. They are afraid of him.
Let me leave you with some food for thought: if Roy Moore did really do that 40 years ago, how come we’re only finding this out now when he’s running as a Republican for Senate? He was a Democrat before switching to the Republican Party, much akin to Reagan. In those 40 years, I imagine he’s had a share of political opponents. So why now? Why are people saying this now, a month before the Alabama elections?
Because he’s a threat to a Democrat Party that has been almost completely dismantled.
And do you want to know what’s funny? Check out this article published by the Washington Post: “Roy Moore is unfit to serve.”
Gee, where have I heard that before? You’d think that, after Trump’s crushing victory over Hillary Clinton, the Left would at least TRY to adopt different political strategies and attacks. Throughout the election, they called Trump “unfit to serve”. Calling him delusional, crazy and unstable. Yet, he won. So why do they think this would work on other Christian conservatives?
Granted, the Democrat Party is using the same playbook that’s often times won them elections. But with Trump’s victory, that playbook is quickly becoming outdated. It’s the equivalent to running the Triangle Offense in today’s NBA: it just doesn’t work anymore.
And now, a genius at the Washington Post decided to use the same words they used to describe Trump with? Brilliant.
But what exactly does the article say? Well, it begins with this: “Alabama voters will pick a new senator in December, and their choice is between one of the most divisive, counterproductive figures in U.S. politics and a well-qualified, even-tempered former prosecutor. In other words, there is no choice. Former Judge Roy Moore (R) is unfit to serve. Former prosecutor Doug Jones (D) would be a credit to the state.”
Ha! Good one. Notice the specific words the writer chooses to describe Moore. Do they sound familiar to you? “Divisive and counterproductive.” Doesn’t that sound like they’re describing Trump?
And it just keeps getting better. “… electing Mr. Moore would be a sure way to worsen Washington’s problems. His unapologetic extremism would pour gasoline on the already raging fire of partisanship and dysfunction.”
It’s like they’re ENDORSING Moore at this point. They call him an extremist, and you know what that means whenever a Leftist calls a conservative “extremist”. They say he’s unapologetic about it and that it would “worsen Washington’s problems.”
But you see, THAT’S ONE OF THE REASONS WE WANT HIM THERE! Ever since the election of Trump, the Establishment has been trying to essentially put out a fire in Washington. Electing Roy Moore would be like pouring gasoline on it. But that’s the thing: THAT’S WHAT WE WANT!
Now, to any Leftists reading this, don’t misconstrue what I’m saying. I’m not saying I want anarchy and chaos running around in Washington. I’m saying that I want the Washington Establishment to essentially burn to the ground. I want it destroyed. I want for it to cease to exist, or at least be rendered entirely powerless.
Electing Roy Moore would be a step towards Making America Great Again. It would mean that the Washington Establishment has one less vote to kill the Trump agenda. It would mean one more vote towards repealing Obamacare, passing tax reform (in the likelihood that it won’t happen this year), passing a better spending bill and BUILDING THE WALL!
And the WaPo article even dares bring the Founding Fathers into this conversation. The article reads: “[Moore] called for a de facto religious test when he argued that Muslims elected to represent their communities should not be seated in Congress. This would have appalled the Founding Fathers and should alarm believers of all stripes.”
Really? That would’ve alarmed the Founding Fathers? Arguing that members of a death cult should not be in Congress would alarm the Founding Fathers, but outrageous increases in the size of government, increases in government spending, government-funded abortion clinics, gay marriage, transgender “rights” debates and a call for sweeping gun control wouldn't alarm them? Give me a break. Must I remind this ignoramus that our Founding Fathers were CHRISTIANS?!
And the writer of this article thinks that these are reasons to not elect him? Does he even know who the target audience is? Hint: it’s not Leftist Virginia, New Jersey or New York. It’s ALABAMA! A state where, according to Wikipedia, 86% of people in Alabama (as of 2014) identify as CHRISTIAN! A state where Trump won 62% of the vote! A state that has voted solidly Republican since REAGAN!
That’s why I’m saying that the WaPo article is inadvertently making the best case for Roy Moore. He’s solidly Christian! Solidly conservative! And attacking those very things won’t get the Left anywhere.
Why else do you think they’re trying to pin him with allegations that supposedly took place 40 YEARS AGO! Because they can’t realistically try to beat him with anything else, and even this will end with failure.
This is roughly the same tactic they tried on Trump. Three weeks before the election, the Left had women accusing Trump of sexually assaulting them years prior. The details of the accusations are different but the overall message is the same: don’t vote for this guy because he’s a sexual predator.
If that tactic didn’t work on Trump, it surely won’t work on Moore. But I’m glad to see them try. Because it just goes to show all Alabama voters just how much of a threat Moore is to the Left. The more the Left attacks him, the more I like him.
“The good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth what is good; and the evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth what is evil; for his mouth speaks from that which fills his heart.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
You’ve read my previous article on this topic. I focused mostly on the Democrat winner of the election and how the Left thinks that this is a major push against the President and his policies and agenda.
I also explained how that is not the case, but I’ll explain that in greater detail in this article.
I usually answer a title question later in the article, but in this case, I shall begin the article with the answer and explain why my answer is correct as we go along, with the help of a Breitbart article I’ve recently read.
Now, who exactly lost on Election Day 2017? Well, the easiest answer would be “Republicans.” But that’s only half right. Yes, Democrats won in Virginia, New Jersey and New York. Even a Transgender “woman” defeated the Republican incumbent in Virginia, which goes to show just how Leftist they are turning.
But why do I say that the answer is only half right? Because the actual loser of the elections is the Republican Establishment, not Republicans as a whole.
Ed Gillespie ran a campaign that didn’t embrace Trump or his policies until it was too late. And by that point, embracing such policies seemed insincere and like he was only doing it for the votes – which he was.
And so, Breitbart published an article titled: “What GOP Must Learn From The 12 Reasons Virginia Went Democrat In 2017.”
According to Breitbart, the 12 reasons Virginia went Democrat are:
The article also covers three reasons why all is not lost for the GOP, saying that “The Left is already overreaching… Most Democrats’ 2018 and 2020 candidates will not resemble Northam” and that “Republicans might be turning the corner.”
But that’s where they’re wrong. All IS lost for the GOP. For a long time now (since long before Trump was even President), I had one concise thought in my mind about the Republican Party: They will never win another election again if their candidate is Establishment. And looking back, I know I was right then, just as much as I am now. After 8 years of Obama, and just one year of Trump, we can see the Establishment for who they are. They pretended to fight for what Americans want, “trying” to repeal Obamacare, knowing that Obama would veto it every time. And now, they have the votes and a President who will sign the same bills they wanted when Obama was President and they just don’t want to do it.
More than that, they’re not even pretending to be on Americans’ side anymore. They are proudly and unabashedly against Trump and his agenda. They will announce ahead of time their plans to kill any effort to repeal Obamacare in any way, any effort to bring about good tax reform and just about any effort that would Make America Great Again. Why? Because they HATE America just as much as the Left does. They don’t want to Make America Great Again. They want to Make America THEIRS Again.
They want America to belong to the Washington Establishment again. To the Elites in Washington again.
They. Want. To. Be. Kings.
Any effort to Make America Great Again will be halted and killed by the Establishment. Do you want to know why I wasn’t sad or annoyed that Democrats won November 7? Because they were going to win no matter what. Their opposition was nothing more than a charade. They had not true opposition.
Obama had no true opposition in 2008 or 2012. McCain is an Establishment lifer. An elite among elites. The head of the Republican effort to impede Trump. Romney is less talked about only because he isn’t in the spotlight as much as McCain. They were both more than ok with Obama winning. They were both HOPING that Hillary would win.
It’s not that they’re spineless. It’s not that they don’t have guts. It’s that they’re evil. They have hatred and evil in their hearts. They put on a show in front of people, pretending they’re opposing the Democrats and promising the American people that they will fight their hardest to repeal Obamacare, smiling as they say those things – not because they’re sincere, but because they’re devious. They smile because they know that they’re tricking people – deceiving them.
The Breitbart article ends with: “… it is possible that enough politicians are figuring out that the MAGA agenda… may be the key to their success in 2018 and 2020.” That’s certainly something to take away from the Republicans’ losses. That people running for office should embrace the MAGA agenda. But Establishment Republicans would rather lose to Democrats (other Establishment politicians) than allow Trump to win any more than he already has.
Come 2018, it’s entirely likely that we’ll begin to see the Republican Party being destroyed. Not because Democrats will defeat them, but because actual pro-Trump and pro-America people will defeat them.
As voters, we’ll do our best to Make America Great Again, and that includes voting for people who’ll strive to do that.
The draining of the swamp has only just begun.
“By your endurance you will gain your lives.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Over this past week or so, I’ve gone back and forth calling the Left either sick or amusing. That’s because, while most of the time they’re sick, there are times when they’re simply amusing. How they react to certain things such as shootings and terror attacks have been the main focus whenever I talk about them being amusing. Well, these Democrat victories in Virginia, New Jersey and New York are just as amusing.
“How is it amusing if Democrats win elections?”, you may be wondering. Well, consider what elections they’ve won. Democrats won in Virginia, New Jersey and New York in 2016. They won again this year... what a shocker.
And the amusing part is that they’re pretending this is a major victory. One writer in the New York Times titled his article: “Virginia Rejects Your Hateful Politics, Mr. Trump.”
The article begins: “Ralph Northam’s election as Virginia governor amid reportedly high turnout on Tuesday is a stinging and welcome rebuke to President Trump and white nationalism.”
Ok, what’s white nationalism got to do with anything here? This person is simply trying to use the typical Leftist tactic of tying a Republican with something they deem as “bad”. Regardless, this is honestly an intriguing and amusing article.
The article continues: “Having been nearly vanquished in the primary by Corey Stewart, an anti-immigrant conspiracy theorist who played on issues like preserving Confederate monuments, Mr. Gillespie (the loser of the gubernatorial election), at the advice of Republican leaders, took up race-baiting. His ads, featuring menacing tattooed men, accused Mr. Northam of being ‘weak on MS-13’ the gang formed by Central American immigrants in Los Angeles that now threatens Virginia suburbs…”
So they’re accusing Gillespie of race-baiting? Sure! It’s not like Democrats don’t play the race card whenever they deem it advantageous!
What? The Democrats ran an ad that featured a menacing-looking, black pick-up truck with a Confederate flag in the back and with a Gillespie bumper-sticker that appears to be hunting down and attempting to run over Hispanic children? Well… uhh… what does that have to do with race-baiting?
Honestly, it’s like the Left sometimes ANNOUNCES their hypocrisy.
But do you want to know what else is funny? Even the writer slams the Democrat victor to an extent. At one point, the article says: “Mr. Northam was a lackluster campaigner in his own right. Despite mountains of post-2016 evidence that Democrats need to present voters with an inclusive and compelling economic message, he didn’t hone his own until late in the race. Then, he lost support from the progressive wing of his party after he seemed to suggest he’d oppose sanctuary cities and, at the request of unions, omitted Justin Fairfax, his African-American running mate in the lieutenant governor’s race, from the campaign pamphlets.”
Right, three things stand out here: that “inclusive and compelling economic message” part, the part about Northam supposedly opposing sanctuary cities, and that racist act of omitting the African-American running-mate from the pamphlets. Let’s go over each one.
First, the “inclusive and compelling economic message”. Right, what exactly would that entail? An economy that works for everyone? That’s what a capitalist economy is for. That’s what we have. Everyone that has the drive to work and work very hard can become successful. Those who don’t want to do anything are the ones who are not successful. Not even in a socialist economy.
Next, the supposed “opposing sanctuary cities” part. This one is actually pretty interesting. You see, Gillespie ran “an ad that claimed Northam cast a deciding vote on Feb. 22 in favor of sanctuary cities”, according to the Daily Signal. However, Mark Krikorian said that Northam’s stance on immigration changed after that ad: “[Since] Gillespie’s ads criticizing MS-13 and sanctuary cities, Northam has now flipped and said that if some city did declare it a sanctuary, he would act to stop it if he were governor.”
Of course, this is just one guy talking. I mean, who even is this guy, anyway? Mark Krikorian, according to the Daily Signal, is an “executive director at the Center for Immigration Studies, a nonpartisan immigration research organization.”
Right, that’s fine and dandy, but just because this guy says something doesn’t make it true… unless Northam himself confirms it. You see, according to the Richmond-Times Dispatch: “In an interview… with the Norfolk TV station WAVY, Northam said for the first time that, under certain circumstances, he would sign a bill similar to the one he voted against this year, a vote that spawned a wave of ominous ads from the Gillespie campaign linking Northam to the Latino gang MS-13. ‘If that bill comes to my desk… I sure will. I’ve always been opposed to sanctuary cities. He knows that,’ Northam said of Gillespie…”
Well, that changes things. That makes me somewhat more ok with the Democrat’s victory… if he sticks to those beliefs, that is. And since what he said makes me somewhat happier, that can only make the Left somewhat less happy. I guess that’s equivalent exchange for you. My happiness about his victory rose after finding this out, and the Left’s happiness somewhat must’ve declined.
Don’t get me wrong, he’s still a Democrat and he’ll likely still vote according to what his Democrat overlords want done in Virginia. But still, this at least puts somewhat of a smile on my face after Democrat victories.
Lastly: omitting his African-American running mate from the pamphlets. Need I say more?
Now, you’ve seen the title of this article. Why is it sad for Democrats to have won in Virginia, New Jersey and New York? Because they’re pretending this is a major victory and an indicator to how 2018 will go.
They’re acting the exact same way they would’ve acted if they had won in Georgia and Montana. They would write articles that say “State X rejects your hateful politics, Mr. Trump.”
Even the NYT article I’m talking about touts this victory as something more than it really is.
The article ends with: “Mr. Gillespie’s choice to lay his principles on the altar of Trumpism made Mr. Northam’s win doubly important, as a triumph over the politics of racial division, and as a lesson for other Republicans tempted to adopt Mr. Trump’s vile tactics as their own.”
Right, of course this guy’s gonna say something like that. This Democrat win is a shocker to exactly no one. Virginia voted Democrat in 2016. They clearly didn’t learn their lesson and voted Democrat again this year. But it’s sad for them to pretend this expected victory is anything more than it really is.
A Democrat won in New Jersey - who didn’t see that coming? De Blassio was reelected as mayor of New York City - what a surprise. Virginia voted for a Democrat - I’m so shocked.
Let’s not forget that these states have been true-blue for ages. And let’s not forget REPUBLICANS WON IN GEORGIA AND MONTANA - two states where the Democrats expected landslide victories, but were absolutely destroyed in the results.
Let them believe this small victory will lead to anything more. And let them believe that this small victory should be a warning to other Republicans. The guy says this is a “lesson for other Republicans tempted to adopt Mr. Trump’s vile tactics as their own”. Vile tactics, you say? You mean how he partially funded a fake Russian dossier about his opponent… oh, wait, that was Hillary. Or maybe when he paid women to accuse his opponent of sexual harassment and assault… oh, wait, Hillary again. Oh! How about when he paid for the answers to debate questions? No, wait, that was also Hillary.
But I see what this person is writing about. He’s trying to get Republicans to not adopt Trump’s agenda and policies as their own. Hmmm, I wonder why that is. Maybe because HIS AGENDA AND POLICIES ARE VASTLY POPULAR WITH THE MAJORITY OF THE COUNTRY AND WOULD LEAD TO MOST REPUBLICANS WINNING IN MOST STATES?!
Regardless, the Democrats can have their small celebration. Their small victories. Meanwhile, the rest of the country will continue to vote for people who will passionately seek to Make America Great Again.
“But they who wait for the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings like eagles; they shall run and not be weary; they shall walk and not faint.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
It’s been a full year, 365 days since the last election. A day that will live in infamy for the Left and a day most Americans will remember as the day we began trying to Make America Great Again.
It’s been a full year since the Left has cried themselves to sleep every single night and now, even an MSM source admits that Trump would still beat Hillary Clinton if the elections were held tomorrow.
Interestingly enough, that’s less shocking than you would think it is. I’m not talking about what the MSM source says would be the results of the election. I’ve known for a long time now that Trump would always be more popular than Hillary.
No, what I’m talking about is the level of surprise I get from seeing an MSM source admit to something like this.
One thing I’ve noticed over the past month or so is that, slowly but surely, the MSM is beginning to get some sort of sense for reality. Just last week, I was talking about how the economy was doing so well that even the MSM (CNBC, in particular) had to take notice. I’ve also talked about how a writer for CNN admitted that Jeff Flake’s attempt to take out Trump was doomed from the start.
Sure, the MSM has been trying their hardest to continue to be the #1 seller of fake news for the public, but there come points in time that people, even news organizations, have to face reality.
A year ago, they had to face the reality that Trump had beaten Hillary Clinton in the election. For months after, they were shouting that Russia had interfered in the election, but realized they had no evidence to support their claim. They’re still trying to run with that story, but at this point, would the Washington Post (the specific MSM source I’ll be talking about) write a story titled: “12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election”?
If they honestly believed Russia had anything to do with the election, they wouldn’t be writing something like this – an admission that Trump would still do better in terms of numbers than Hillary (albeit with reportedly lower numbers).
The article begins: “It has been almost exactly one year since President Trump shocked the world by defeating Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election. And he might well do it again today.” Keep in mind, this story was written yesterday.
But it’s certainly interesting to see a Washington Post writer admit that, if the election were held today, Hillary Clinton would still lose to Donald Trump.
Even after the constant bashing, ridiculing, mocking and deceiving that they’ve been doing to Trump, Washington Post has to admit that Hillary would still be seen as the less favored candidate, showing that her numbers are even worse than the day of the election.
Now, I’m not exactly surprised by that. The MSM has been exposed as fake news, so not many people believe them. And I’m not exactly surprised to see Hillary’s numbers be even worse than last year’s. What with every single scandal that the Clintons and the Democrat Party have had this year, it’s obvious that people’s views on them have only worsened.
According to WaPo: “The Washington Post-ABC News poll asked respondents how they’d vote in a redo of the 2016 election, and, if anything, Clinton seems to have lost more ground than Trump. Among those who voted, 46 percent say they picked Clinton last year and 43 percent picked Trump – a slightly more favorable sample than the 2016 election, in which Clinton won the popular vote by two percentage points. But in a head-to-head rematch, Clinton’s support drops even more than Trump’s does, and they wind up in a 40-40 tie. Given that Trump overperformed in key, blue-leaning swing states, that means he’d probably have won again.”
That’s a lot to look over, so let’s break it down.
First, there’s the 46-43 difference. Knowing how the MSM tends to run their polls, oversampling Democrats, those numbers are terrible for Hillary and the Democrats. If, after a year of constant bashing and character-assassination attempts, the difference between the two candidates in an MSM poll is still that tight, reality might be worse for them than they realize. The reason Clinton won the popular vote is largely because of California (and voter fraud in Detroit and other Leftist cities, but we’ll ignore that for the time being). Take California out of the equation and Trump annihilates Hillary in popular vote as well. That’s why we have the Electoral College, so that one state doesn’t decide the election for the whole country.
Next, the 40-40 tie. Yet another sign as to why the Democrats are in major trouble. The previous numbers were about real voters. About how they had voted in the election. Those are previous numbers. The 40-40 tie makes things worse for the Left because it means that, out of those voters sampled, 40% of them would vote Clinton (meaning that 6% of them wouldn’t vote for her again) and 40% of them would vote Trump (meaning 3% of them wouldn’t vote for him again).
Typically, support for the loser of an election tends to slide, but this is simply devastating for the Clintons. Hillary was horrendously unpopular a year ago and her image has only worsened since then.
Of course, I won’t be so quick to believe the MSM when they say a decent amount of people would not vote for Trump again. I believe them when they say people wouldn’t vote for Clinton again, but not when they say people wouldn’t vote for Trump again. Why? Because they have no reason to lie about Hillary’s numbers dropping, but they have every reason in the world to say Trump’s numbers are dropping.
Other than covering the Russia story, the MSM has spent their time running b.s. polls that have Trump’s approval numbers trying to break the 40% mark. That’s just another part of the effort to smear Trump. Another part of the character-assassination effort. But it’s not working. If it were, THE WASHINGTON POST WOULDN’T WRITE A STORY DEPICTING TRUMP AS THE WINNER!
Of course, even the Washington Post writer has to try to take down Trump as well in a story saying he’d win again. According to WaPo: “… even as Trump’s disapproval rating has reached a new high of 59 percent, he has still got enough of a base to win reelection if there was a rematch today. Of course, that’s if he wound up facing the same historically unpopular Democratic nominee that he did in 2016… Trump certainly can’t count on facing another opponent who is so unpopular in 2020… he can still win under the right circumstances. The kind of circumstances he was in a year ago today, for example.”
I won’t argue that part of the reason Trump won is because Hillary was a disaster of a candidate. In fact, even I have said that that’s one of the reasons why Trump won. But here’s the thing: that’s not the only reason.
If the Democrats’ best hope is to get a candidate that doesn’t majorly suck, they are on the fast track to yet another election loss. How do I know this? Take a look at some of the recent special election results. It’s entirely arguable that nearly every Democrat candidate was better than Hillary Clinton, or at least more likable. And the Republican candidates they faced likely aren’t as popular as Trump is. And yet, the Democrats have lost every significant election this past year.
You can clearly see that Democrats have been largely unpopular, even in elections they should’ve easily won. Take Montana for example. Or Georgia.
What I’m saying is that a candidate that is more likable than Clinton would do very little for the Democrats. Let’s look at some of the potential prospects for the Democrat Party, shall we?
First, there’s Bernie Sanders. Provided he lives for another three years, Bernie would be a decent candidate for the Democrat Party. He’s an open socialist and knows nothing about the economy or much of anything. He’s the prototypical Democrat candidate. He would get the Millennial vote because my generation will likely go down in history as the worst to have ever lived. But I still don’t think he would win against Trump. Why? Because from a conservative’s point of view, he’s even worse than Hillary.
Next, there’s Kamala Harris. A rising star in the Democrat Party, but by 2020, it’s likely that Trump supporters will see her as just as unfavorable as Hillary Clinton. Being from a 21st Century California, it’s hard for anyone outside that state to like her. She certainly wouldn’t draw any Trump supporters, because she, too, is just another socialist.
I won’t discuss this much further, given my time constraints, but I’ll end things off with this: the Democrat Party is in total disarray. Trump’s support only continues to grow. The Democrat Party will likely lose in 2018 if people vote for conservative challengers to RINO seats, which is a great possibility.
Every Democrat effort to stop Trump has been a total failure. And I don’t think going full-on socialist is going to help them just yet. The country is still too conservative and Christian for that. Millennials may be the most ignorant generation to walk the Earth, but there’s still conservatives among them, as you can clearly see given just who is writing these articles.
I don’t see the Democrat Party winning again any time soon.
1 Corinthians 15:57
“But thanks be to God, who gives us victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
On Sunday, November 5th, 2017, a gunman by the name of Devin Patrick Kelley shot and killed 26 church-goers at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas. This is by far the biggest mass shooting in the state’s history. But even though Kelley did a lot of damage (more than there ever should be), he could’ve done even more.
While the Left is salivating over this opportunity to push for more gun control like the insensitive, sick and evil people they are, it’s been confirmed that the shooter was taken down, not by law enforcement, but by an armed citizen.
It’s your typical story of the “good guy with a gun”. While the damage had been done, it’s entirely possible that the shooter could’ve done more damage had he not been confronted by Stephen Willeford, the local hero of Sutherland Springs.
According to Breitbart: “The Daily Mail reports that a local resident claims Willeford managed to shoot the alleged gunman… between the plates of the body armor that he was wearing.”
Body armor, huh? This sick, evil man came prepared. I mean he really looked to do some serious damage. He probably figured that, this being Texas, there would be a decent amount of people with guns there and decided to add some protection for himself in case someone wanted to be a hero and take him head on. Thankfully, someone outside the church managed to be the hero Kelley feared and wound up wounding the shooter.
And, according to the Daily Wire, there’s two people to thank for taking down the shooter. One being Willeford and the other being a man named Johnnie Langendorff, who “works at a nearby auto parts store”.
According to the Daily Wire: “While Kelley was armed with a powerful AR-15 and was formerly a military member, Willeford (who claims to have no military experience or training) engaged Kelley, getting into a shootout. One witness said that when he came face to face with Kelley, Willeford ‘didn’t hesitate; he shot in between Kelley’s body armor, hitting him in his side’...”
“Wounded, Kelley dropped his Ruger assault rifle and jumped into an SUV to flee… [Willeford and Langendorff] jumped into [Langendorff’s truck] and sped after Kelley...”
And according to the original Daily Mail story: “As they approached a sharp curve in the road… Kelley appeared to lose control and his car swerved off the road.”
Kelley was then found dead, seemingly from blood loss due to the gunshot wound.
I commend the actions and bravery of those two men. The bravery of Willeford to risk his own life trying to protect others and stop a madman with a gun using his own rifle, and the bravery of Langendorff to pursue the gunman with a perfect stranger.
But returning to the culprit, according to another Daily Mail article: “Former classmates say Texas gunman was an ‘outcast’ who ‘preached his atheism’ online before killing 26 in the state’s worst ever mass shooting.”
Why am I not surprised that the guy was an atheist? How often do Christians kill other people? How often do NRA members kill people? OF COURSE THE GUY WAS AN ATHEIST! Well, maybe I shouldn’t say that. The only other option given his actions is that he could’ve been a MUSLIM.
Regardless of what he was, one thing is for sure: he’s burning in Hell right now. You don’t do that kind of thing unless you’re filled with evil in your heart.
Like I said, I’m not surprised he’s an atheist. According to his former classmates: “He was always talking about how people who believe in God were stupid and trying to preach his atheism.”
I wouldn’t even be surprised if he was a registered Democrat! It’s these kinds of people that always do these kinds of things! If they’re not atheist, they’re Muslim. If they’re not Muslim, they’re atheist. And whenever they use guns, the Left blames THE GUNS!
And they’re shameless about it too. Just last week, NYC suffered an Islamic terrorist attack and the media attacked Trump for saying something about the way the terrorist got into the country (not even about his “faith”) the day after the attack. The Left immediately went after gun owners THE DAY OF THE SHOOTING!
They bashed Trump for “politicizing” the terrorist attack the day after it happened but they themselves politicize this shooting THE VERY DAY 26 PEOPLE DIED!
Not to mention that they’re trying to discredit the heroes as well. According to Breitbart: “Critics on social media argue that the ‘good guy with a gun’ did not prevent the gunman from killing 26 and injuring dozens more.” As though the guy was supposed to know ahead of time that there was going to be a tragedy occurring near him.
If they’re really saying dumb things like that, it only means that their argument for gun control has been totally dismantled.
It’s the Leftist argument equivalent of a little kid saying “well, you’re a stupid head!” or “well… shut up!”
Every time there’s a shooting, the Left blames the gun. And we, conservatives, always make the case that there needs to be more guns in people’s hands, not less. That if more people have guns, this wouldn’t happen as often or to such a degree. They would still happen, such as in this case. The gunman was armed to the teeth and brought armor, expecting a shootout with someone, or at least preparing for one.
He was ready to kill people who couldn’t defend themselves and those who would try. But no gun law passed would’ve prevented this from happening. If anything, any gun law passed would’ve MADE THINGS WORSE!
Do you want to know why we make the argument of “good guys with guns vs. bad guys with guns”? Because we know that bad guys don’t care about the law. There’s laws against murder, and yet, people do it. Why? BECAUSE THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT THE LAW!
Gun control only makes things worse for law-abiding citizens. I’ve said this time and time again. Gun control only punishes those who actually obey the law, not criminals. If the Left got their way, it’s entirely possible that more people might’ve died this past Sunday. It’s entirely possible that more people would’ve died in Vegas. It’s entirely possible that more people would’ve died in Orlando.
Name any shooting in the history of the country and I will point out how things could’ve gone worse.
It’s the ridiculous combination of taking guns away from citizens and police officers that endangers people. If the Left got their way, they would be the only ones with guns. And that’s a terrifying thought.
I think James Woods put it best. In a reply from a Leftist twitter user who said: “The NRA is soaked and bathed in blood. How do its adherents sleep at night?”, James Woods replied with: “With a Beretta on the nightstand in case yet another Democrat decides to go on a rampage.”
It’s truly sickening to see how the Left acts some times. They defend a religion that was born of death and destruction, preaches death and destruction and has followers that constantly cause death and destruction, yet they claim that a pro-2nd amendment organization is soaked in blood for the death and destruction that was caused ONLY BY DEMOCRATS!
I said earlier that the gunman was burning in Hell. He is burning in Hell not because of what he did, but because of who he was. He was an unbeliever. He was entirely defiant of God. If he hadn’t been defiant of God, he never would’ve done something like this. No Christian would ever do something like this to anyone. Not even to Muslims, not even to atheists.
You’ll never see a Christian lighting up a mosque. You’ll never see a Christian lighting up a Planned Parenthood office. Christians know the meaning of life. They know just how much value each life has.
The Left hates life. They hate it that other people have good lives, and thus, they push for socialism, a killer of good lives (for other people, not for themselves). They think so little of life that they are more than happy to allow women to kill their unborn children, pretending that it’s part of “women’s healthcare”. I’m no doctor, but even I know that “healthcare” does not include the execution of people.
They think so little of life that they think people should be able to waste it by getting high with every drug imaginable, pretending it’s for people’s “freedom” and that it’s their “right”.
The Left is the very enemy of life. I know I’ve said that sometimes the Left is amusing, well, there’s a reason I say “sometimes”. Because most of the time, they’re not amusing. They’re sick.
“For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, slanders.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
I’ve mentioned before that it’s not a surprise how the Left reacts to certain things. Whenever there’s a shooting, they blame the gun, gun owners and Republicans. When there’s a terrorist attack, they blame Republicans for not being friendly to them, or something along those lines. Likewise, whenever a Democrat does something extremely shady (or flat out illegal), the media tends to stay away from that story like it’s the plague.
They’ve ignored the Harvey Weinstein story for years. They’ve ignored every account of unconstitutional actions undertaken by the Obama administration. They’ve ignored the Clinton e-mails, the fraudulent Russian dossier, the Uranium One deal, and now, the revelation that Hillary Clinton pretty much bought out the Democrat Party to ensure her nomination.
And I’m not surprised in the least that they choose to ignore such a groundbreaking story. Why? Newsbusters.org puts it best: “They [don’t] want to ruin their narrative that Clinton was a pure angel who was a victim of Donald Trump and Russian collusion.”
Narrative is the only thing that matters to them… well, as long as it brings results.
Harvey Weinstein has been raping and sexually assaulting women for 30 years? He’s a good Democrat donor. Our decree is that nothing happens to him! (Unless all the women he ever assaulted come forth).
Bill Clinton did the dirty deed with a WH intern as President of the United States? A slap in the wrist for him! No need to impeach him.
Barack Obama spied on political opponents using a government agency? Good! That’ll teach those no-good Republicans! Nothing but praise for the man while pretending he did nothing wrong!
The Clintons sold 20% of our uranium to a Russian company? I’m sure they had good reasons and that it was perfectly legal to do it. No need to discuss the matter any further!
An Islamic Terrorist killed 8 people with a truck in New York City? He does not represent the only religion in the world that has a constant terrorism problem! He wasn’t a true Muslim! Neither was the Orlando shooter. Neither was the shooter in Tampa, FL that killed two people for disrespecting Islam back in May 19th. Neither were the San Bernardino shooters. Neither were… my God, that’s a long list of Islamic terror attacks on American soil in the website religionofpeace.com/attacks/american-attacks. (Seriously, I suggest you check out that website).
On the other hand…
Trump literally ran on a positive campaign that should resonate with everyone with his slogan “Make America Great Again”? What a racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic pig!
It doesn’t matter what sins Democrats commit every single day. It doesn’t matter just how corrupt they are while they call others corrupt. It doesn’t matter just how much Hillary cheated while they all shout Trump cheated.
The media will ignore every groundbreaking story that places any Democrat in a bad position. Not only that, they will try to spin something like the Manafort case as something that will lead to Trump’s impeachment.
The Mainstream Media is truly despicable. And now, they continue with their Leftist tendencies and ignore the story that A TOP DEMOCRAT WROTE HERSELF! But this is about as surprising as the Patriots winning the Superbowl or the Warriors winning the NBA Championship. It was expected from the beginning.
Their decision to ignore the story comes as a shock to exactly no one. This is nothing more than another attempt at hiding the bodies created by the Democrats. The bad news for them is that people like us exist: conservatives. We dig up the skeletons in the Left’s closet for the world to see. And we do this nearly every day.
Like Ephesians 5:13 says: “But everything exposed by the light becomes visible…” It’s hard to ignore the reality that the Left is a bunch of despicable, deceiving, evil people. Their actions are more often than not seen by the masses, at least eventually.
The Uranium One deal happened 3 years ago, and yet, just NOW we’re beginning to talk about it more.
Harvey Weinstein has been a sexual reprobate for an entire generation, but just NOW he’s been exposed. And it’s not like it was a massive secret. Almost everyone in Hollywood knew about it, quite possibly including the nearly 58,000 homeless people in Los Angeles County.
And even beyond him, we’re seeing a ripple effect of exposing more and more sexual predators in Hollywood, including the likes of Kevin Spacey – a man that was so confident that the Left would forgive him for his actions that he came out as “gay” to excuse himself. (And that backfired on him miserably.)
There’s a very good reason Trump started calling the MSM “fake news”. It’s not just that they falsely report things about Trump. It’s that they also ignore every shady business deal, every shady action, every single sin Democrats commit because it doesn’t fit their narrative. Their narrative that the Democrats are the “good guys”. Their narrative that they “care about people”. The narrative that they actually have a soul. It’s all a sham.
Nothing could be further from the truth. They are not the “good guys” – good guys don’t sell 20% of our country’s uranium to an enemy state. Good guys don’t give $150 billion to a rogue enemy nation that literally calls for our deaths every single day.
Democrats don’t care about people. They work their hardest to keep people poor. To make sin look like the greatest thing since sliced bread and make Christ look like a worthless religious idol that only idiots and racists worship. They promise to “stick it to the rich guys” when they make shady business deals with said rich guys. They promise to unite the country when they’ve spent the past 8 years dividing it in terms of racial issues, gender issues, sexual preference issues, and so on.
They DON’T have a soul. But maybe that’s a good thing for them. Because if they did have souls, they would be on the fast track to eternal damnation.
And no, that’s not a “righteous condemnation” that the Left accuses us Christians of doing. I’m not the one judging them. If anything, I’m warning them. If they don’t course-correct, they will face infernal punishment.
I don’t have any right to judge them. God on the other hand…
2 Corinthians 5:10
“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Danielle Cross and Freddie Drake will bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...