What is one of the campaign promises/slogans Trump made during the campaign trail? One was to Make America Great Again, and he’s working on that (sadly, without his OWN Party). Another was to Make America Safe Again, and he’s also working on that, with the travel ban, tougher military and the mere PROMISE of a Wall delivering results. And the one to talk about here: Make America Proud Again.
And he did just that on Tuesday, September 19th, 2017 at the U.N. General Assembly. In what one Fox News contributor called “the best speech of the Trump presidency”, the POTUS did something the U.N. has never seen before: the President of the United States of America prioritized America, pointed out the unacceptable behavior of rogue nations such as Iran and North Korea, and bashed socialist countries like Venezuela, making an example of them of what happens when socialism is the ruler of a country.
But he didn’t stop there. No, he also went after the disastrous Iran Nuke deal his predecessor made with the Islamic nation, saying: “The Iran deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into. Frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to the United States and I don’t think you’ve heard the last of it, believe me.”
Now, this is the sort of thing we’ve heard often during the campaign trail. He would often call the deal a terrible deal and an embarrassment. But this is another thing entirely. His audience isn’t ticked off Americans wanting their country back. His audience were members of a globalist cause that frankly couldn’t care less about the benefit and well-being of the U.S. They only care for as long as they can steal our money in terrible Climate Change deals.
His audience were people that never would’ve expected someone to be so bold with them. Someone who had the GUTS to tell them that this one particular nation is screwing the U.S. over and looking to build weapons of mass destruction. But do you know what happened? Cheers and applause.
According to the U.K. Daily Mail: “’We cannot let a murderous regime continue these destabilizing activities while building dangerous missiles. And we cannot abide by an agreement if it provides cover for the eventual construction of a nuclear program,’ Trump said, drawing applause from the leaders of more than 180 nations in the room.”
Would you look at that? Trump bashes and attacks the nuke deal, calling it for what it is, and the people in that room representing their own countries actually liked what he said and sided with him on that. Does that sound like something Obama did? Or something Clinton would’ve done?
Obama just ignored our allies’ cries to not side with the radical Iran and Hillary would’ve done more of the same. Trump, on the other hand, acknowledges, points out and bashes how terrible that deal is and decides to back up America’s allies instead of ignoring them and wants to scrap the whole deal. And this, he said IN A ROOM FULL OF PEOPLE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES! It’s one thing to say this to Americans who support the President and want their country back. But it’s an entirely different thing to say this to people that are either neutral with Iran or somewhat allied with Iran.
Most countries are not in direct danger from a Nuclear Iran. Israel is. America is. But most countries don’t have much to worry about with Iran, since they’re not in Iran’s sights. So to say this to this kind of crowd really tells you Trump has the guts to point out the evils of this world and not be a part of the evils of this world.
And perhaps the BIGGEST AND GUTSIEST thing he said during the assembly: “The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea. Rocket Man is on a suicide mission for himself and for his regime.”
HOLY GOD ALL-MIGHTY! He just doubled-down on his plans for North Korea! Now, he didn’t flat-out declare war on North Korea, as Leftists will likely misconstrue what he said. But he is certainly willing to completely destroy that nation if the United States feels as though it needs to defend itself or its allies from the Norks. Later on, he said: “The United States is ready, willing and able, but hopefully, this will not be necessary.”
He hopes things don’t come down to the United States taking action, but he assures THE WHOLE WORLD that we are ready, willing and able to do just that.
Now, why do I say that this is the biggest and gutsiest thing he said? Well, have you ever heard another United States President strictly warn another country that they will be destroyed if they continue with their shenanigans in front of the U.N. General Assembly? No other President has had either the guts or necessity to do that. Obama certainly didn’t have the guts, and Bush didn’t really have the necessity. So for this POTUS to warn another country that they will be destroyed if the need arises is HUGE!
Yet another reason why I know Trump was the right man for the job. And yet another promise fulfilled from his campaign trail. I certainly know that I’m proud of what Trump said. I certainly know that Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu is proud of what Trump said. And I certainly know that millions of Trump’s supporters are proud of what Trump said.
“’For I know the plans I have for you’, declares the Lord. ‘Plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.’”
Author: Freddie Drake
On Thursday, MSNBC Host Nicole Wallace defended Antifa for their actions in Charlottesville and referred to them as “good people” who are on “the side of angels”
Now THAT is a whole lot of b.s. right there. You mean to tell me the people who have incited violence in Charlottesville, Boston, Portland and a lot of other cities in the country are “the good guys”? Give me a break. Since when do the good guys attack police? Since when do they attack free speech? Since when do they assault people that have a different view from them?
I don’t remember Superman attacking police in Metropolis just because The Daily Planet said that cops are racist. I don’t remember Batman attacking Police Commissioner Jim Gordon because Batman thinks he’s the leader of the racist cops in Gotham City.
Antifa is the modern-day incarnation of the KKK! They are racist when they claim to be against racism. They are fascists when they claim to be anti-fascists. They are HATEFUL when they claim to be against hate.
I’ve already written another article on Antifa: “Is Antifa Evil Or Just Ignorant?” Notice how neither of the options is “are they the good guys?” OF COURSE THEY’RE NOT THE GOOD GUYS! They attack ANYONE who has a different opinion from them.
Ben Shapiro recently gave a speech at U.C. Berkeley. Knowing Antifa would want to shut down his speech, the college spent $600,000 to hire law enforcement to protect Shapiro and those attending the event. Thankfully, with police allowed to do their job, Antifa was unable to do anything there and the speech went on smoothly. Yes, there were protesters there, but they didn’t get violent. They may have been against Shapiro and what he was saying, but they are ALLOWED to do that. THAT is the free speech that is allowed and welcomed in the country. SHAPIRO’S right to freely speak his mind is the kind Antifa (and the whole Left) doesn’t want.
According to a Daily Wire article written by Ben Shapiro himself: “The students were engaged; the police were finally allowed to do their jobs. Antifa stayed away…” Do you see what happens when police are allowed to do their job to PROTECT FREE SPEECH?! Free speech is allowed and encouraged. What happens when police are not allowed to do their job is what happened in Charlottesville. That one woman didn’t need to die. But police were ordered to stand down and chaos ensued.
Chaos initiated by Antifa. That’s all they are: chaotic, liberal, rage-induced monkeys. For anyone to believe they are any different to the KKK or are on the “side of angels” is horrendously erroneous/ignorant.
Antifa are not the good guys. Not even close. Like I said in the previous article talking about Antifa, “They deceive people into believing evil is good and good is evil.” In that article, “They” were George Soros, Barack Obama and the Democrats of the world. And this certainly includes people on the MSM. By saying that Antifa are good people after seeing all the horrible things they have done is almost the equivalent to saying ISIS are good and just want the world to be a better place.
Ah, but what am I saying? Look who I’m talking about! The MSM DEFEND Muslims every time a terrorist attack happens, separating them from ISIS, when in reality, they simply are ones to not have done anything YET or simply misunderstand what Islam is about.
Reminder: Islam is about IMPOSING SHARIA LAW ON THE WHOLE WORLD BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
Likewise, to Antifa, it’s about imposing their leftist views on the whole world BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. If they have to punch you in the face, they will. If they have to break your legs, they will. If they have to KILL you, they will.
Antifa is almost as bad as ISIS. The only reason they aren’t JUST as bad is because they don’t go around the world setting up bombs and killing people at random. But don’t misunderstand, Antifa isn’t much better. They want to take away conservatives’ freedom of speech just because they don’t agree with us. They are more than willing to harm us while hiding themselves behind masks (not unlike the KKK and ISIS).
To respond to the insanely misinformed and wrong MSNBC host: no, Antifa are not the “good guys” who are on the “side of angels”. They are the bad guys (just as bad as the KKK) who are on the side of the Left and the Devil. They want chaos and disorder. They want rights to exist only for themselves and everyone else can screw off. They want to be in power and in charge of people. In charge of what people can say and do.
I asked whether Antifa is evil or just ignorant. And I answered that the protesters are simply ignorant while those at the top are the evil ones. Well, maybe not quite. While the ones at the top are, indeed, evil, I fully believe that the protesters themselves are evil too. And I fully believe that they truly think WE are the evil ones. And I fully believe that the protesters are more than capable of evil. It’s a fact, actually. Everything we’ve seen them do is evil!
But what I’m trying to say is that, while there’s clear ignorance coming from those protesters, I don’t believe for a second that any of them is “good”. And I fully believe that all of them are evil. Those who do the things they do to police and people who disagree with them can’t possibly be called “the good guys”. There isn’t a shred of goodness coming from them. Only hatred for everything that isn’t like them.
In essence, Antifa is not just the modern-day KKK, it’s fundamentally the modern-day Nazi Party. Hitler wanted to get rid of everything that wasn’t like “his perfect species” and those who would disagree with him. Antifa wants to get rid of everyone that doesn’t agree with them and isn’t like them.
And this person claims they are good? That’s sickening.
2 Corinthians 11:14
“And no wonder, for Satan himself disguises himself as an angel of light.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
On Thursday, September 14th, the social media world exploded when reports came in (through the MSM) that Trump, Schumer and Pelosi reached a deal that would protect “Dreamers” and exclude the building of a wall.
Schumer and Pelosi, after their dinner with the president, released the following statement: “[We] agreed to enshrine the protections of DACA into law quickly, and to work out a package of border security, excluding the wall, that’s acceptable to both sides.”
If you read this alone, you’d think Trump caved on the Wall. But you have to remember exactly who is giving this statement. The Left will always lie when it benefits them. They’ve been trying to separate Trump from his supporters, and saying that Trump caved on the Wall is an attempt at doing just that.
And it worked for a bit. I saw plenty of conservatives be enraged at Trump on social media, when only one side (the b.s. liberal side) was given. On Thursday morning, Trump tweeted out: “No deal was made last night on DACA”. Trump also said, later in the day, that the three came “fairly close” to reaching a deal that would require “massive border security”.
Then, while traveling to Florida to assess the damage of Hurricane Irma and helping the victims, the President said: “Ultimately, we have to have the wall. If we don’t have the wall, we’re doing nothing.” He said that having the wall was “vital” and even called out Republicans who would “become the obstructionists” if the wall weren’t to be funded.
Now, I don’t know about you, but if the last couple of years is anything to go by, I’d trust what Trump says over what the MSM or Schumer and Pelosi said happened. If we don’t trust them when they say that Russia hacked the election or that Climate Change is happening and it’s our fault, why would we trust them when they say they’ve made a deal with the president? Particularly when he says that no deal was made in the end?
I’ve seen plenty of people on social media explode, saying they want the Wall and that we NEED the Wall. And I agree, but you have to realize that Trump never took the Wall off the table. He said no deal was made, so why trust the Left over him on this particular issue?
And Trump isn’t the only one to push back on what the Democrat leaders said. Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders tweeted: “While DACA and border security were both discussed, excluding the wall was certainly not agreed to.”
Like Trump, I’d trust HER more than any other news source on things the President does.
Now, Trump HAS softened his views on the Dreamer issue. Tweeting: “Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!” Another tweet read: “They have been in our country for many years through no fault of their own – brought in by parents at young age.”
This garnered one particular “Trump supporter” to attack the president. Ann Coulter tweeted: “’Put a fork in Trump, he’s dead’” and “At this point, who DOESN’T want Trump impeached?” Really? He softens his position on this one issue and you’re ready to put him in the guillotine? Ready to impeach him? Now, I won’t react too much towards Coulter’s tweets, since this isn’t the first time she’s thrown a tantrum over Trump doing something she didn’t like. She’s not a supporter, she’s simply trying to get attention and clicks to her page. That’s it.
The problem with that is that you come across as not being able to choose a side. You’re either FOR the President, therefore with conservatives, or AGAINST him and therefore with the Left. Megyn Kelly was against Trump and alienated her conservative audience. The Left never liked her. Conservatives no longer like her, so now her only audience is Never Trump traitors over at NBC, where her ratings are about what you’d expect when not a lot of people like you.
So it makes no sense to want to throw out Trump over THIS. He’s not saying he’s giving the Dreamers citizenship so they can vote for Democrats. He’s not giving up the Wall. In fact, he’s literally said he’s STILL going for the Wall. And he’s not going to sell out the country.
He will, however, try to get things to happen. Republicans are among the worst kind of scum on the Earth and won’t help Trump with anything. Democrats are willing to work with Trump if they get a little something in return. They’ve already done this with the debt ceiling, which wound up not meaning too much while also helping those affected by Hurricane Harvey with the “Hurricane Harvey Relief” part of the deal.
With the DACA issue, he’s willing to soften his position, but these people are somewhat different from other illegals. These DACA people were brought into the country through illegal means. But that’s at least a little bit more understandable than someone crossing the border on his own. It’s easy to know what we want with illegals that cross the border and exploit the country’s system. It’s a little bit more difficult knowing what you want when this involves people who were BROUGHT into our country and don’t know anything else outside of it. And it’s not exactly fair or even humane to flat out kick them out when they are not the ones at fault.
Now, there are different kinds of DACA children. Some of them were shipped by their parents from a foreign country. And some simply came here with their parents.
So, you have to take different measures with the different circumstances. Here’s what I propose:
First, the children shipped by their parents. I can understand parents wanting what’s best for their children, but a 6 or 7 year old is simply not going to do much better in this country without his/her parents. Could you imagine being that young, being in a foreign land where you don’t know the language, don’t know where to go and don’t know what to do, forced to live with a relative you barely know? It’s a horrible nightmare. So those children should be shipped back to their parents, because it’s better to be with people who love you somewhere not as good as the U.S. than being on your own, scared out of your mind in the best country in the world. At least at that age.
Children aren’t like adults. Adults will be better able to get by in a foreign country than a child would. So, they go back to their parents.
Finally, those who came here with their parents illegally. Well, this one’s the easiest. Send them all back. Each of them is breaking the law, and the child’s parents are teaching him/her that it’s OK to break the law on occasion. No child should be taught to break the law unless it’s a law that goes against God or the Bible. But border laws don’t go against God or the Bible. It’s not good for children to be taught that they can break the law if they will benefit from doing so.
But to return to the whole “Trump caved” issue, let’s not overreact. And let’s certainly not pay attention to what the Left says when Trump himself hasn’t given his side of the argument. We’ve never trusted the Left on anything else, why would we do it this time?
“For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
For the past nearly 2 years, the MSM has been attacking Trump with absolutely everything they possibly can. And one Politico article is realizing that… IT’S NOT WORKING FOR THE DEMOCRATS.
According to the Politico article: “Democrats tried attacking Donald Trump as unfit for the presidency. They’ve made the case that he’s ineffective, pointing to his failure to sign a single major piece of legislation into law after eight months on the job. They’ve argued that Trump is using the presidency to enrich himself and that his campaign was in cahoots with Russia. None of it is working.”
Well, at least SOMEONE on the Left-wing media has the intelligence to realize this fact. And why do you think it’s not working? Because people know none of what the MSM says or what the Democrats say about him is the truth.
They say he’s unfit to be President, when he’s quite possibly the sanest man in Washington D.C. at the moment. They say that he’s ineffective because he can’t get anything of significance signed. Well, we know that it’s not HIS fault. It’s the traitorous Republican Party that has failed to get anything done. They’ve been promising to repeal Obamacare for 7 years, often making excuses that they don’t have the required seats or the majority or that the President won’t sign it. And now that they DO have the majority AND a president who will be happy to sign it, they don’t want to do it.
So, of course, THAT particular tactic won’t work because everyone knows where the fault lies: in the Republicans.
The Left says that he uses the presidency to enrich himself, even though he DOESN’T EVEN NEED TO DO THAT! He’s already one of the wealthiest people in the world! Not to mention that he would’ve made FAR more money in one year by not being President than he will in 8! Furthermore, HE USED HIS OWN MONEY TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT! HE ACTUALLY LOST MONEY IN ORDER TO BECOME PRESIDENT!
So that tactic obviously doesn’t work for anyone that uses a little bit of logic.
And about Russia, of course that’s not working either. Eight months with ZERO evidence, in an investigation being run by the FBI, as well as former FBI Director Robert Mueller and all of the Mainstream Media? Either the FBI, Mueller and the MSM are all incredibly inept to find any concrete evidence, or the Russia story is just that - a story.
The Politico article then goes on to talk about the big points Democrats tend to work on to get votes: free college tuition, raising the minimum wage to $15 and universal health care. And, surprise, surprise: they don’t test well with people outside of their base.
According to the article: “The people in these polls and focus groups tend to see those proposals as empty promises, at best.”
The article then goes on to talk about how voters view Trump’s success with the economy, saying: “In focus groups, most participants say they’re still impressed with Trump’s business background and tend to give him credit for improving the economy. The window is closing, but they’re still inclined to give him a chance to succeed.”
Now that is an interesting and puzzling statement. “The window is closing, but they’re still inclined to give him a chance to succeed”? What do you mean the window is closing? He’s been president for 8 months, not 7 years. The window is wide open for the economy to improve. And, as it is, it’s improving at a far faster rate than Obama’s economy was (which is not surprising).
The Dow Jones Industrial Average has hit multiple all-time highs since his very ELECTION as president. He’s managed to create over 1 million jobs in his first 6 or so months as president. He’s convinced multiple businesses to continue operating in the U.S. and not leave for Mexico. And the overall economic atmosphere looks far more promising than when Obama was president.
But of course, all of those things go largely ignored by the Left. But they are not being ignored by We the People.
The article then goes on to talk about Trump’s handling of the Charlottesville riots. “The president’s equivocation on neo-Nazis was not as much of a political problem as his opponents want to believe, Democratic operatives say, and shifting the debate to whether or not to remove Confederate monuments largely worked for him.”
Well, would you look at that? People actually liked seeing the President blame EVERYONE involved in the violence in Charlottesville. As it turns out, people don’t want the terrorists at Antifa to get away with what they’re doing and want to place the blame on them as well. Not to mention the fact that most people are intelligent enough to realize that the president had nothing to do with the violence in Charlottesville and that the hatred and racism present there all came from the Left.
Next, the article returns to the polling points on free college tuition, saying: “The call for free college tuition fosters both resentment at ivory tower elitism and regret from people who have degrees but are now buried under debt. Many voters see ‘free’ as a lie – either they’ll end up paying for tuition some other way, or worse, they’ll be paying the tuition of someone else who’ll be getting a degree for free.”
Which is similar to how people feel about universal health care. “The challenge is that most voters in focus groups believe it’s a pipe dream – they ask who will pay for it and suspect it will lead to a government takeover of health care – and therefore wonder whether the politicians talking to them are being less than forthright, too.”
Oh, you mean people are worried about single-payer health care? What a shock. Even if they don’t know that what they’re afraid of is, indeed, single-payer, they ARE afraid of it… as they should be. Single-payer health care is one of the reasons Nazi Germany was so dangerous. The government there decided who would get taken care of and under what plan AKA who would be too expensive to take care of and whether euthanasia would be the best choice (a choice that only the government would make).
And it’s very much the same with college tuition. People KNOW that nothing is truly free. If something’s “free”, they will end up paying for it in some other way. And then, it’s not actually free.
People don’t want to have to pay for other people’s college tuition. They don’t want to pay for other people’s health care and they don’t want the government to be the only source of health care. You’ve seen the lines at the DMV. Trust me, you don’t want that to be the case at the hospital.
But it’s truly interesting to see someone at Politico writing a story like this. At least this particular writer was smart enough to realize that their tactics aren’t working on Trump. Of course, that won’t deter them from trying. If they can continue with this Russia investigation, even if it produces zero evidence, they will continue with it. If they can continue to call Trump unfit to be president, even if it produces zero results, they will continue.
They think that if you tell a lie enough times, it will become the truth. Well, no matter how many times you tell me the sky is purple, the sky won’t eventually turn purple. No matter how many times you tell me there are 36 genders, there won’t ever be more than 2. No matter how many times you tell me the world is getting hotter/colder, it won’t get hotter/colder. And no matter how many times you tell me this president is unfit for office, that won’t make him unfit for office.
The accumulation of all of those lies won’t result in one massive truth. Or rather, won’t result in them becoming the truth. The truth is that you’re wrong at every turn if you tell me any of those things is the truth.
“And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
Author: Freddie Drake
The term “white supremacy” seems to be the Left’s favorite term to throw around (along with Nazi). Anything involving a white person and a minority is considered white supremacy. And everything any conservative ever says is white supremacy, even if the topic has nothing to do with race.
And the Left simply CAN’T get past the topic of race. To them, a black person is nothing more than a minority to exploit. A Hispanic is nothing more than someone whose mind can easily be molded. The Left doesn’t care about these people, only that they eventually vote for Democrats.
But what exactly is the reason for me to be talking about this specific subject? Well, aside from the obvious answer that it’s a hot topic of discussion, it’s also the fact that it’s clear that the Left is insanely hysterical about race-baiting and calling white people “white supremacists” if they support Donald Trump or simply don’t share a liberal view.
For example, Hurricane Irma recently swept through the west coast of Florida. As a hurricane, it caused deaths and damage, not to mention people either decided to evacuate early, or were ordered to evacuate by Gov. Rick Scott.
And during times of evacuation, you occasionally see people looting stores or homes in order to 'salvage' things for themselves. It’s simply stealing, and there’s no getting around that. And the Miami police are very much aware of that.
On Sunday, the Miami Police Department twitter account tweeted: “Thinking about looting? Ask these guys how that turned out. #stayindoors.”, before sharing a picture of incarcerated criminals, likely being charged with looting.
Of course, there’s nothing wrong with that. Criminals should be punished for committing crimes… unless they’re black, according to author Sarah Jaffe.
In response to the Miami PD’s tweet, she wrote: “good morning, the carceral state exists to protect private property and is inseparable from white supremacy.”
It boggles my mind how people like that don’t realize that they themselves are being racist if they think black people that commit crimes should be allowed to walk just because they are black. Or that these people are being incarcerated just because they are black and not because they committed actual crimes.
It’s the same argument as saying that “if you don’t vote for Obama, you’re racist.” So I should vote for Obama because he’s black then? Isn’t that just as racist? I didn’t like Obama because he’s a socialist jerk. Same reason I don’t like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and any other liberal. Race isn’t an issue to me, but it’s a massive issue to them.
Now, obviously, Sarah’s tweet received a fair share of negative comments. Among these are comments like: “They have prisons, crime, and private property in Nigeria too. And Egypt. And India. Nothing to do with white supremacy. Poverty/inequality.” Or “So you’d be ok with someone breaking into your house and stealing all your stuff to avoid a ‘carceral state’?” And my personal favorite: “You’re saying non-whites can’t help but steal, so they shouldn’t be punished? Seriously? Keep your racist opinions to yourself. #ShameOnYou.”
I’m thankful that someone specifically called her out for being racist. You see, in her mind, since she’s a liberal, she can’t possibly be racist. So anything she says can’t possibly be considered racist if it’s directed towards white people.
Another example of liberal hysteria (and quite possibly, a bigger example) is the massive twitter rant an ESPN anchor went on against the President.
Jemele Hill, a co-host on SportsCenter at 6pm, wrote roughly a dozen tweets against the President and his supporters. Now, she gets repetitive, so I won’t quote all of them, but here are a few:
She begins with: “Donald Trump is a white supremacist who has largely surrounded himself w/ other white supremacists”. Ok, that’s b.s., but this is the exact same thing we hear on the news nearly every single day. Got anything else?
“The height of white privilege is being able to ignore his white supremacy, because it’s of no threat to you. Well, it’s a threat to me.” (Jemele is an African-American woman).
I’m sorry, but which of the two parties fought and killed to keep YOUR race as slaves, Jemele? Which recent former president said of the then president that he should be serving HIM coffee? To answer both: it was the Democrats and Bill Clinton, who said that of Barack Obama.
And let’s not forget one more crucial point: Jemele Hill is not the representative of every minority in the country. It might come as a shock to liberals reading these articles, but these articles are being written by HISPANIC PEOPLE! The author section might say “Freddie Drake”, but that’s not because I felt as though I should change my name to sound less “Hispanic”. I use that pen-name because I like the name “Drake”.
And the overwhelming amount of support for the President, love of this country and love of the All-Mighty Lord in this website doesn’t come from white people. It comes from Hispanics that love this country and would hate to see it turned into the very nation we so passionately wanted to get out of.
And who is trying to turn this country into the very nation I would hate to go back to? The Democrats. The Left. That’s one of the biggest reasons I voted for Trump in the first place. Because of his very slogan: “Make America Great Again.” I know what Obama was doing in his 8 years. I know what the Left wants to do to this country. And the ignorant people that call Trump a “fascist” have no idea what fascism truly is.
No, I can’t say that I’ve personally experienced socialism and fascism, since I’m very young. But I KNOW how terrible those things are. I don’t need to know how a car is built in order to know when one doesn’t work. Likewise, I don’t need to live under socialism to know it’s absolutely terrible and has failed everywhere it’s been tried.
Look at the Soviet Union, a nation that wasn’t stable enough to see its centennial anniversary of death and destruction. Look at Cuba, the nation most famous for selling their brand new ’57 Ford Taunus. Look at Venezuela, where the 1% are the people who can find brand-name bread at the supermarket. Look at North Korea, where they have massive paved streets where no cars other than government vehicles can drive.
So I don’t think Trump is a white supremacist. I think the white supremacists are the socialists whose very HISTORY is that of racism and slavery.
But now, to answer the title question. I think that the election of Donald Trump was so unprecedented that it’s almost literally blown a fuse in liberals’ minds. Seriously, they’ve gone insane. Or maybe they were always this insane, but they’ve managed to control it, knowing one of them was president.
Either way, it’s truly concerning to see so many people harbor and spout so much hatred for a man they’ve truly only seen on the Left-wing media. They hate the man, not knowing who he is. Having never held a conversation with him or having never heard him speak himself without liberal bias thrown in to make things look bad.
The Left truly is insane. But beyond that, the Left truly is evil. Hysteria creates hate. And hate creates evil. Evil deeds and evil thoughts. The Left hates this president and gleefully and openly speaks of tearing him down by force. Their evil hearts drive them to the point of near (or actual) insanity.
And the sad reality is that they are more than happy where they are: at the hands of the devil. They not only reject Christ, but also hate and mock Him. But I guess some of these people just weren’t meant to be saved.
“And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to His purpose. For those whom He foreknew He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, in order that He might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom He predestined He also called, and those whom He called He also justified, and those whom He justified He also glorified.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
As you know, last week President Trump rolled back Obama's 2012 Executive Order that granted special treatment to illegal immigrants who came to America as children. Those 'children' are now in their 20s and 30s, therefore old enough to know right from wrong.
I myself am an immigrant. I too had dreams - dreams of my home country, Argentina, to one day do something different, better and highly unusual for any country in Latin America: RESPECT THE LAW. Argentina has had all sorts of issues - political and economic - for the simple fact that they refuse to respect the law they themselves enact. In some ways they operate like the Deep State in the US - there's a set of rules for the common people, and then there's another set of rules for people like Hillary Clinton.
But when I was young, I didn't see America's Deep State. Argentina has a deep state of its own, and it's what's ruined the country. When I was young, I dreamed about coming to America, because of its RULE OF LAW. I was tired of the special privileges that the ruling class had in Argentina and I wanted a fair shot at life and prosperity. You can't have that when taxation eats up most of your income and rules change overnight, putting you always at risk of being out-of-compliance in some aspect of what you do. It's by design, in case you're wondering. The deep state everywhere in the world wants to keep you on your toes and have the ability to arrest you or fine you as they wish.
Now, since my desire was to take a break from the disaster that is Latin America, I wanted to come to a place where rules didn't change overnight, and I could have some certainty that any legal action I would take or could be taken against me would be dealt with by the magistrates according to the law.
Sure, this was all long before that baker in Colorado was condemned for denying a wedding cake to a gay couple...
But in any case, at the time in the early 2000s, long before you could be condemned for not wanting to violate your faith, America was a decent country. America was a country where you could do whatever you wanted, as long as it was legal. In Argentina you could also do whatever you wanted, as long as you didn't get caught.
Never in a million years did I consider coming to America ILLEGALLY. NEVER!
And I had a child when I came here, who was 13 at the time. We waited, we planned and we did everything in a legal manner, because what I wanted more than anything was RULE OF LAW. And I wasn't going to expose my OWN CHILD to breaking the law. No way!
These 'dreamers' are not kids. And I would like to ask them what their dreams are, because clearly the rule of law isn't one of them.
There are many reasons why people come to America - GREED is one of them. When you're willing to break the law - or keep breaking it if your parents were the ones putting you in this position - then, where does it end? Where do you draw the line? Are you willing to STEAL? To KILL? You're already breaking the law, so what truly brings you here? The answer is...money, of course.
Prosperity is a top priority in these "dreamers'" minds. Not that there's anything wrong with prosperity. But when you're willing to break the law for money, then you're greedy. And there's no telling how far you're willing to go for money.
Dreamers have a CHOICE. They could continue breaking the law or they could just do the right thing: go back home and start a new, legal, process to come to America.
Dreamers remind me of Michael Corleone in 'The Godfather'. Michael (played by Al Pacino) was a member of a family of mobsters, with the Godfather, Don Vito Corleone (Marlon Brando) at the helm. With no fault of his own Michael was BORN into a family of criminals. And he kept telling his girlfriend Kay (Diane Keaton) that he wanted nothing to do with the family business. This went on until Vito was the target of a murder attempt.
What happened next?
Michael had a CHOICE.
What did he choose?
To finally join the family and continue ... breaking the law.
Obviously the movie, which was produced in leftist Hollywood, tries to justify Michael's decision as the 'natural thing to do' when your father's life is at stake. It tries to tell you that you would do the same thing as Michael did - assassinate the Chief of Police who had attempted to kill his father. The movie really doesn't leave the viewer an option - but the truth is we ALL have options. If you want to learn right from wrong, you don't watch The Godfather - you read the Bible.
The Godfather is an interesting movie that not only shows the choices human beings face - it also shows the DEEP STATE at work. After all, the Godfather owned Senators, Chiefs of Police, journalists, etc. etc. The godfathers of the world used to be called mobsters. We now call them LOBBYISTS. But this is a topic for another article.
Dreamers face the same types of decisions. They have a CHOICE. Either they join their families in continuing breaking the law, or they do the right thing.
They've CHOSEN to break the law.
As an immigrant myself, now a proud US Citizen, I find it disgusting that the Left would play down the importance of respecting the law.
But then again, the Left hardly ever respects the law. Look at ANTIFA, or Hillary, or Bill Clinton. The Left and the Constitution can never be reconciled.
Dreamers should do the right thing. Like Jim Carrey's character, lawyer Fletcher Reed, yells at one of his clients over the phone in the movie 'Liar Liar', after his client got arrested again: STOP BREAKING THE LAW!
'You must obey all my decrees and regulations. You must not commit any of these detestable sins. This applies both to native-born Israelites and to the foreigners living among you'
Author: Danielle Cross
An article on HotAir.com highlighted some comments made by former Clinton supporters and aides about Hillary’s new book titled: “What Happened.”
According to the article: “Even some of Clinton’s allies have grown weary of her insistence on re-litigating the 2016 campaign at a time when the Democratic Party is looking to forge a new identity in the age of Trump.”
One former Clinton fundraiser and surrogate said: “The best thing she could do is disappear. She’s doing harm to all of us because of her own selfishness. Honestly, I wish she’d just shut the **** up and go away.”
Now those are some harsh words! She used to be revered as the smartest woman in America and the greatest thing to happen to the country since the election and inauguration of Obama. And now, this person is saying that they wish she’d shut up and go away? Unbelievable.
But I can understand this person’s sentiments. Hillary (and the entire Left, really) is a very poor loser. And she’s actually spent the time to write a book blaming everyone else around her for her failure to become president, when just about everyone else has already moved on. But she continues to bring it back up. At this point, it’s clearly little more than a poor excuse to be in the spotlight for a few days… and making a bit more money on the election.
But hey, it’s working. I’m writing about her, aren’t I? So are other people in the media.
But let’s get back to the Hot Air article. “’None of this is good for the party’, said one former Obama aide. ‘It’s the Hillary show, 100%. A lot of us are scratching our heads and wondering what she’s trying to do. It’s certainly not helpful.’”
What she’s trying to do is be in the spotlight for a little bit and make money, as I said before. The Clintons want to make money. But that’s not what I want to focus on with that particular quote. Read back to the first thing this Obama aide said: “None of this is good for the party.”
Well, of course it isn’t. Hillary being unable to let go of the past definitely can’t be good for the party. But she’s not the biggest reason the Democrat Party is where it is today. No, that title belongs to the former POTUS.
It wasn’t just Hillary that sunk the Democrat Party in 2016, it was Obama (arguably, Trump had something to do with that as well). Obama is the reason the country is where it was last year. Obama made a mess of the country, on purpose. And the American people were sick of not being placed first. Of seeing their country be torn apart by the very people who should be making it a top priority. So, they voted for Trump. But some people didn’t vote for Trump just to vote for him. They voted for him to vote AGAINST Hillary. AGAINST Obama.
I’ve already mentioned multiple times in previous articles about the time that I met a former Obama voter at the line for the voting booths. I won’t retell it, but I will point to that person as an example of people that were enchanted by Obama’s promises of “hope” and “change” and were disenchanted to find that that “hope” wasn’t for America, but for those in government, and that that “change” was to change the country fundamentally (which he was thankfully unable to do).
So if that Obama aide wants to look for reasons as to why Hillary lost in 2016, he need not look any further than Obama’s actions as President and Trump’s ideas and ideologies for when he would become President.
To an extent, Hillary is right in that Obama was partly to blame for her loss in 2016. But she fails to see herself as part of the reason she failed as well. And even her former supporters are getting tired of her trying to analyze and reanalyze what happened in 2016.
Here’s what happened: Obama was the worst President the country has ever had. Hillary was the first crook to run for office. And Trump was the best candidate the country has seen since Ronald Reagan.
THAT is what happened. It’s a combination of those things that led to Trump being elected President. But at this point, just about everyone has already moved on. The media is more focused on trying to impeach Trump (under bogus circumstances), the Democrats are looking ahead to 2018 in hopes of regaining control of Congress (under the same policies and ideologies that cost them the 2016 election) and Republicans are wasting time and their power in Congress, looking ahead to 2018 to receive more money to do the exact same thing they’ve been doing until now - nothing.
The point is: everyone has already moved on from 2016. Everyone except Hillary. She CAN’T let go of it. Partly because it means that she gets to write worthless books in which she says the same things she’s been saying on interviews since the election in order to both be in the spotlight for a little bit and to make a little bit more money. She’s really milking her election loss here.
But the fact that even her own supporters and aides are saying that they’re tired of her is incredible. A year ago, if anyone of them were to say that they wish she’d “shut the **** up and go away”, they’d immediately get fired from their position as aide to her campaign and be shamed by their peers for attacking the “smartest” woman in America.
It’s obvious that she’s outlived her usefulness to the Democrat Party.
Now, I’m not trying to defend Hillary here. I’ve never liked her. Like other Democrats, she is evil and deceitful. But unlike other Democrats, she’s not much for ideology. She prefers making money. Her greed drives her. It drove her to run for President twice. It’s driven her to remain married to a rapist. It’s driven her to where she is today.
But it’s certainly interesting to see how evil treats evil. Hillary had her use to the Democrats for decades. But that’s no longer the case. She’s no longer an asset to the Democrat Party, but rather a liability. And, like one of her former aides said, they wish she’d “shut up and go away”.
She’s a failure, and everyone knows it.
“For the righteous falls seven times and rises again, but the wicked stumbles in times of calamity.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
The President stunned Republicans and conservatives in the country when he announced that he had made a deal with the Democrats to raise the debt ceiling and fund Hurricane Harvey relief.
Personally, I hate the fact that he agreed to raise the debt ceiling, but it’s a small price to pay for the future. Trump has, for a long time, said that he’d be willing to work with Democrats if Republicans don’t cooperate with him. On Wednesday, he proved he’d be willing to do just that.
Obviously, this annoyed just about any Republican and conservative in the country. No doubt, people will believe that Trump is shifting towards the Left… which is a horrible misconception. Trump is not an ideologue. He's a DOER. He doesn’t see Chuck Schumer the same way we conservatives do: as a socialist whack-job.
However, with Trump, there is always more than meets the eye with everything he does. Trump working with Democrats on this is of no big issue to me. So we have to raise the debt ceiling again. Big deal! Obama was doing it at every turn he could! And Republicans in Congress supported HIM. Now, it’s not a good thing to do that, since piling on debt like we were with Obama will ultimately bankrupt the country (as was Obama’s plan, undoubtedly). But this compromise didn’t give up too much - Republicans would have raised the debt ceiling anyway. Or do you have any doubts about that?
This compromise shows the Republican establishment that Trump is willing to work with the Democrats, provided that the deals he makes with them put America first. In this case, Trump is putting the VICTIMS of hurricanes Harvey and Irma FIRST. He wanted to SECURE FUNDING for the victims - something that Trump, obviously, didn't trust Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan would do. At this point, would you TRUST Republicans in Congress to get ANYTHING done?
Now, we KNOW the Democrats want to harm the country and destroy it. But Trump is not dumb. He won’t agree to anything that will damage the country just to spite the Republican establishment.
But by doing this, he tells the Republicans that they aren’t the only show in town. Huckabee put it best. In an interview on Fox News, Gov. Mike Huckabee utterly slammed Republicans for not doing anything with the power that We the People have given them. “Eight months, Republicans have had both houses. They’ve been able to get nothing done.” In reality, they are more than capable of getting things done, they just don’t want to. But I get what he’s saying here. “Look, no Obamacare repeal, no tax reform, nothing of great consequence. They passed a few insignificant bills but nothing significant.”
“So the president yesterday basically said I’m going to send a message to you the Republicans which is: if you won’t work with me and give me the most fundamental things that you the Republicans promised the American people, I’ll see what the Democrats are willing to do.”
Trump is telling the Republicans that he doesn’t need them to get things done. And that he’s willing to compromise on certain things to ultimately help the American people. The problem with that is HE’S DEALING WITH DEMOCRATS!
No Democrat will ever vote in favor of repealing DACA (which was an illegal executive order by Obama, which Trump has full power to roll back, but he chooses to let Congress deal with it). No Democrat will ever vote in favor of building a wall across the southern border without cutting a deal with Trump. No Democrat will ever likely vote in favor of tax reform without cutting a deal with Trump. No Democrat wants to Make America Great Again...but Republicans apparently don't want this either...
And Trump knows this (or at least SHOULD know this, by now, with all the hate he receives from the Left). Democrats HATE America. So Trump isn’t dealing with them just to spite the Republicans or because he is shifting towards a liberal view. He’s doing this to warn Republicans that they are not the only ones that Trump can work with.
Trump has gone against both Democrats and Republicans that don’t want to work with him to Make America Great Again. John McCain and Lindsey Graham are two prominent Republican traitors that don’t want to Make America Great Again. Jeff Flake is another, more recent example of a Republican who is really a Democrat in disguise.
Trump doesn’t care about either political party (frankly, neither do I). He couldn’t care less if Republicans or Democrats run Congress. It’s just that he’d rather see Republicans run Congress because he’s more likely to find people he can work with for the same goals in the Republican Party. He should be able to find more conservatives (true conservatives, that is) in the Republican Party than in the Democrat Party.
And he knows his base is largely conservative, with all of them wanting to Make America Great Again. But Trump won’t focus on what letter is next to someone’s name in Congress. He will focus on a person’s intentions and goals and whether they are willing to Make America Great Again.
Don’t misunderstand, Trump is entirely aware that Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer don’t want what he wants. After all, THEY ARE BOTH WITH OBAMA! But Trump is also a businessman. He knows that you have to compromise on certain things to get what you want. This time, he decided to compromise on the debt ceiling. This didn't need to happen, but Republicans in Congress have put Trump in this position.
Make no mistake, he will NEVER compromise on something that will Make America Great Again. If he’s making a deal with the Democrats and they tell him that Trump has to give up amnesty or the Wall, he will walk out of the deal immediately. He won’t compromise on things that will make it impossible to fulfill his campaign promises and slogan.
Do I think he did the right thing by working a deal with the Democrats? Only this time. I don’t trust Democrats. They are hateful, dishonest, and deceitful and will stop at nothing to destroy Trump and destroy this country. But with this deal, Trump didn’t give up anything Republicans in Congress wouldn't have given up anyway, and the Republicans are aware that Trump is willing to go around them to get his way.
Republicans need to wake up to the fact that they really don't have a base - Trump is the one who has a base. Pelosi, Bernie, Hillary, Obama and the rest of the Democrats have a base. But Republicans in Congress don't - they're on the path of extinction. They're self destructing.
But you have to ask: what does this mean for 2018? Does this mean that Democrats will regain either of the houses? Does this mean that Republicans will likely lose power that they never wanted in the first place? I don’t know for sure, since it’s too early to tell. What I do know is that the American people are sick and tired of Republicans who don’t do anything and Democrats acting as though they still own Congress, when they technically don’t.
That’s certainly how I feel. One year from now, I will look at who is running for Congress in my state and evaluate whether they seem as though they will work with the President to Make America Great Again, or if they will simply whine and moan that they can’t do things WHEN THEY VERY CLEARLY CAN! I certainly won’t vote for a Democrat, unless that Democrat is willing to Make America Great Again.
I have seen social media pages titled “Democrats 4 Trump” or something along those lines. And I know FOR A FACT that people were disenfranchised by Hillary Clinton. She is the most rejected woman in America, after all. And I certainly wouldn’t be surprised to find registered Democrats who, after 8 years of Obama, realized that he did nothing good for the country and that Trump offered FAR better solutions than Hillary did.
Do I know whether Republicans will retain power in Congress? No. What I do know is that, if they are unwilling to work with the President, and therefore unwilling to work FOR US, then they won’t get my vote.
If Trump had a political party of his own (say, the Trump Party), then I would register in a heartbeat and only vote for “Trumpers”. Now, I’m not so naïve as to assume that if they say they will work with the President, I would immediately believe them. But a “Trumper” would likely be more willing to actually WORK with the President than either of the current political parties.
Too bad the Trump Party is not an actual thing.
1 Peter 2:15
“For it is God’s will that by doing good, you should silence the ignorant talk of foolish people.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Hurricane Irma is, as of the time of this article, likely heading for Florida and is projected to downgrade to a Category 4 hurricane (which is still pretty bad). Due to this, the Left is trying to make an even stronger case for climate change than they were with Harvey, given the intensity of this storm.
And recently, Rush Limbaugh has made his own comments about the storm and the reaction the media, the government and the people who are projected to be influenced have been having. The media points to climate change as quick as they can blink. The government tells people to be prepared for the worst (as they should), and the people tend to panic by filling up with more gas than they need and buying more water than might be needed, since we can’t accurately predict where Irma will hit.
Now, I’m not saying that people shouldn’t prepare themselves for the worst. But it’s pretty clear that the media and government don’t exactly help people not to panic when a storm is heading our way. Yes, we should be prepared for the storm, but we don’t have to panic over it. And, as Rush says: “These storms, once they actually hit, are never as strong as they’re reported.”
We don’t know for sure what path Irma will take. And paths are simply estimations as to what MIGHT happen if everything about the storm remains the same. But these things never stay the same. The path was different yesterday, as was the day before, and will be tomorrow. The intensity of the storm can also change as well, since a few days ago, it wasn’t as strong. Last year, Hurricane Matthew lost some of its strength when it hit a part of Florida. Not to mention the fact that the path was also different a few days prior to Matthew’s landfall.
But what do I mean by “fake news says we think Irma is fake”? I mean the media often takes things we conservatives say out of context and simply gets things wrong.
As I mentioned, Rush had made his own comments about the storm and the response people have had up to this point. So the Washington Post felt compelled to take his words to mean something entirely different. Let’s begin with the title: “Rush Limbaugh’s dangerous suggestion that Hurricane Irma is fake news.”
Now that is an eye-catching title. But titles shouldn’t be deceitful. Rush Limbaugh never suggested that the hurricane is “fake news”. It makes no sense to say that a storm which is very obviously there is fake news. It’s what the media makes of the storm that is fake news.
The media takes every single hurricane that ever happens as a sign of climate change. And that climate change is our direct responsibility and so we must elect people that will combat climate change AKA Democrats.
They politicize potential devastation for a fake cause, and that is the “fake news” part of the ordeal. So, when we expose the Left for what they are doing, they will often lie about what we say and make it sound as though we are dangerous lunatics, which explains the Washington Post’s decision to add the words “dangerous suggestion”. Even though Rush never said Irma is fake news, they make it sound as though he did.
In the story, the writer says: “How did we get from Trump’s claim that he has ‘never seen more dishonest media than, frankly, the political media’ to the idea that weather reports are phony, too?” Observing history is how we got there. Weather reports are never perfectly accurate. No one can say they are. And we are not saying that the storm is fake, as this writer claims we are in his article. We are saying that, since we can’t know for sure what will happen until it actually happens, we can’t take these weather reports to be what WILL happen.
Not to mention the fact that it’s not just the inaccuracy of the reports that we’re talking about here. We’re talking about what the media and the Left makes of storms like these. They project potential chaos and devastation and blame climate change, and then when it doesn’t happen, they still blame climate change because a storm happened in the first place.
The media and the Left SALIVATE when a hurricane forms and looks to head our way. And they are always disappointed when they don’t make landfall or there isn’t as much devastation as they predicted. The media claims that we are directly responsible for these hurricanes, even though that claim makes absolutely no sense.
Weather reports are included in fake news. But funny enough, they’re the most truthful things they report. A hurricane is making its way to the U.S. and looks like it might hit. That holds more truth than anything else the media has said in a long time. But at least they can’t claim that weather reports are 100% accurate. They KNOW they aren’t completely right when it comes to the path of a hurricane.
But the fake news part of it is when they say that it’s most likely to sweep Florida directly, when they don’t know that for sure. Due to a storm’s very nature, things are bound to change. Like I said, Matthew was projected to make landfall a lot sooner and a lot farther south than it did. The path had changed WITHIN A DAY! Not to mention that Matthew’s strength had also decreased before it made landfall.
It’s entirely possible that Irma will also lose some strength (in fact, it’s PROJECTED to lose some strength before it reaches Florida), and it’s also possible that it will change paths. It could continue heading a bit more westbound into the Gulf of Mexico (where it will hopefully die and avoid hitting Texas and Mexico) or head north earlier than predicted and miss the coast of Florida altogether (and hopefully die in the Atlantic). It could also go where the paths say it might go. Only God knows for sure.
But NO ONE can be entirely sure of the path the hurricane will take until it actually goes through. So the weather reports, while they are something to keep an eye on, they are not to be taken to be the complete truth of what will happen, particularly half a week prior to when the storm is predicted to hit.
And it doesn’t help anyone to take Rush’s comments out of context and twist them into being “bad advice”, when he is the one that makes the most sense out of these things. Not that that actually matters to the media or the Left.
They WANT people to be in panic. They WANT people to ask questions as to what to do and who is available to help. And they WANT people to think that climate change is the cause for people losing their homes in Houston after Harvey and possibly having the same thing happen with Irma. They WANT people to think that these storms could be prevented, even though logic declares that they really can’t be prevented. They WANT people to think that Republicans don’t care about what will happen to people and they WANT people to think that Democrats offer a solution to all of their problems, including how to prevent more hurricanes from forming by “fighting” climate change.
Panic is what the Left WANTS. They want people to be solely dependent on THEM. On the GOVERNMENT and on the MSM. So they don’t like it when conservatives like Rush offer people peace of mind and some logic. People like him present a threat to their dominion on public information.
Deceit is the Left’s trade. But when their deceit is exposed, they have to fight back against it and try to continue to deceive people.
“Whoever walks in integrity walks securely, but he who makes his ways crooked will be found out.”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Hillary has written a book titled “What Happened”, in recollection of the events that occurred (with biased views) during the 2016 Presidential Election. Some excerpts of the book are available, and CNN has gotten to see a bit of it.
According to CNN: “(Hillary) said that (Bernie’s) attacks against her during the primary caused ‘lasting damage’ and paved the way for ‘Trump’s ‘Crooked Hillary’ campaign’”. In the book, Hillary says that Sanders “had to resort to innuendo and impugning my character” because the two candidates “agreed on so much”.
Well, first of all, Hillary was viewed as crooked WAY before the primaries. The reason Trump started calling her “Crooked Hillary” wasn’t because of what Sanders said, it was because of what Hillary DID. Wiping a server containing well over 30,000 e-mails about her time as Secretary of State for the Obama Administration is simply ONE of the reasons she is crooked. Accepting funds from foreign nations, such as Saudi Arabia, that went straight to the Clinton Foundation is yet another reason she is crooked.
Sanders may have brought up the topics (rarely), but he didn’t create them. SHE DID!
Next, I want to quote an excerpt from the book. She says that the two of them “agreed on so much”. Sure, they’re both SOCIALISTS! Only one of them is an open socialist, while the other prefers the term “progressive”, which means the exact same thing as socialist or communist.
In her book, Hillary says: “Throughout the primaries, every time I wanted to hit back against Bernie’s attacks, I was told to restrain myself. Noting that his plans didn’t add up, that they would inevitably mean raising taxes on middle-class families, or that they were little more than a pipe dream – all of this could be used to reinforce his argument that I wasn’t a true progressive.”
So she knows very well that Bernie’s socialist ideas would be at the expense of middle-class families (and pretty much all of the country, except for Democrats and their donors) and that his ideas were nothing more than “a pipe dream”. SHE KNEW THEY WERE BAD IDEAS, BUT SHE DID NOTHING AGAINST IT! As she says, it would’ve been used to reinforce his argument that she wasn’t a true progressive.
Oh no, I believe wholeheartedly she’s progressive. I also know that she’d rather be popular and well-liked (which didn’t work out anyway) than bring Bernie back to reality, as well as his supporters. She'd rather stay quiet and be liked than reveal that his plans will ultimately cost the American people far too much.
She didn’t want to push back against his plans, for the sake of being viewed as progressive, even though she KNOWS that Bernie’s plans would hurt the American people.
Much of the Democrat base runs on emotion. What FEELS right. How people will FEEL about something. You promise people free stuff, and they will react positively to that. You tell people they can’t have free stuff, they will be angry at you and say you are being mean. She didn’t want to appear as the bad guy, even though she KNEW that no one would benefit from Bernie’s ideas, other than people in the government and donors.
I’ve mentioned this story before, but I will retell it here: I remember looking through Facebook, looking at friends’ posts. This was during the height of the primaries for both parties. Bernie had all the momentum in the world against Hillary, but still would never overcome the rigged system the Democrat party had set up to give the nomination to Hillary. One of my Facebook friends was a Bernie supporter and had shared a post that showed some of Bernie’s objectives once he would become president. I don’t remember all of them, but I certainly remember one of them. One of Bernie’s “objectives” was to “end racism”.
I looked at that and thought: “How is he going to do that as president? What law could he possibly pass to get rid of racism (which lives at the heart of the Democrat Party)?” Furthermore, “How could anyone believe that any president could achieve such a thing? Do they actually believe Bernie will do that?” I guess that was part of the “pipe dream” Hillary was talking about.
Bernie’s supporters didn’t want to hear the cost of Bernie’s ideas. If you told them that his ideas would actually be detrimental to the country and its people, they would become enraged with you. They don’t want to accept reality: socialism doesn’t work.
Bernie promised all these things, with no true idea of how to make them happen, other than have it be at the expense of the American people. His plans were essentially to instruct and deceive people into digging their own graves with gusto. It didn’t matter that his plans wouldn’t work out or that they would be at the heavy expense of the middle-class. It was what his supporters wanted to hear. They wanted to hear that the government would take care of everyone, end racism, end climate change, make Muslims not kill us and bring world peace. In reality, they would all mean the demise of the United States of America.
The government can’t take care of everyone. That’s just not a stable system.
You can’t end racism, since it’s a matter of the heart. Racism is part of Man’s sinful nature. Of Man’s evil nature. And the end of racism certainly won’t be found in any Democrat.
You can’t end climate change. People don’t have the ability to affect the climate so severely. If we did, California would never get droughts and hurricanes would never happen. We can’t control the climate, only God can.
The only way for Muslims to not kill us is to make sure there are no Muslims. If you truly understand the nature of Islam, you know it’s nothing but a death cult. It’s not “the religion of peace”, as the Left would say. It’s not a religion. EVEN MUSLIMS WOULD TELL YOU IT’S NOT A RELIGION! It’s a way of life, in which women are less than dirt, children lesser still, gay people should be killed in horrendous ways, and anyone that doesn’t follow Islam must be either killed or forced to become Muslim.
You want to make sure Muslims don’t kill us? Convert them to Christianity!
And lastly, bringing world peace. Let’s be honest here, there will never be world peace. Because of Man’s sinful and evil nature, there will never be peace in this world. Peace is simply a break from war. Due to man’s very nature, there will always be conflict. There will always be war.
But Bernie’s supporters don’t want to hear that. They refuse to accept reality.
But now to return to the original topic of conversation of this article. Is it really a surprise that Hillary blames yet another person for her loss? Just after the election, it was the Russians. Then it was Comey. Now, it’s Bernie. I wonder who she’ll blame next. Trump? She likely already has. Her donors? No, she won’t risk upsetting the hand that pays her. Millennials? They’re the future of this country, so she likely wouldn’t do that. Debbie Wasserman Schultz? She helped Hillary become the nominee and likely has dirt on Hillary.
Regardless, it’s important to note that she will never point the finger at herself. She will never blame herself for her loss. She’s been touted as “the smartest woman in America”, so there’s no way she could find blame in herself.
That goes along with Man’s sinful and evil nature. They place blame and judgment on others, ignoring their own blame and flaws in the process.
“’Do not judge others, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?’”
Author: Freddie Drake.
Danielle Cross and Freddie Drake will bring you the TRUTH that the Left denies you. You'll live a more joyful and victorious life, because the Truth will set you free...